UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One) |
|
x |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 |
|
OR |
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period
from to
Commission file number 1-12557
CASCADE
CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Oregon |
|
93-0136592 |
(State or other
jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2201 N.E. 201st Ave. Fairview,
Oregon 97024-9718
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 503-669-6300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.50 per share
Name of exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer x |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 31, 2006 was $466,182,462, based on the closing sale price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of March 15, 2007 was 11,984,653.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days after the registrants fiscal year end of January 31, 2007, to be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held June 5, 2007 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
14 |
|
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
15 |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
64 |
|
64 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
65 |
|
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
|
65 |
|
66 |
|
|
66 |
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
|
66 |
|
66 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
70 |
NOTE: All references to fiscal years are defined as year ended January 31, 2007 (fiscal 2007), year ended January 31, 2006 (fiscal 2006) and year ended January 31, 2005 (fiscal 2005).
i
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 7) contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including any projections of revenue, gross profit, expenses, earnings or losses from operations, synergies or other financial items; any statements of plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operations; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. The risks, uncertainties, and assumptions referred to above include, but are not limited to:
· Competitive factors in, and the cyclical nature of, the materials handling industry;
· Fluctuations in lift truck orders or deliveries;
· Availability and cost of raw materials;
· General business and economic conditions in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and China;
· Actions by foreign governments;
· Assumptions relating to pension and other postretirement costs;
· Foreign currency fluctuations;
· Pending litigation;
· Environmental matters;
· Levels of public and non-residential construction;
· Effectiveness of our capital expenditures and cost reduction initiatives.
We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report.
ii
Cascade Corporation (Cascade) was organized in 1943 under the laws of the state of Oregon. The terms Cascade, we, and our include Cascade Corporation and its subsidiaries. Our headquarters are located in Fairview, Oregon, a suburb of Portland, Oregon. We are one of the worlds leading manufacturers of materials handling load engagement devices and related replacement parts, primarily for the lift truck industry and to a lesser extent the construction industry. We also recently began manufacturing construction attachments following our purchase of the assets of Pacific Services & Manufacturing, Inc. (PSM). See Construction Attachments in Item 1 for a description of this business.
We manufacture an extensive range of materials handling load engagement products that are widely used on lift trucks and, to a lesser extent, on construction and agricultural vehicles.
Our products are primarily manufactured with the Cascade name and symbol, for which we have secured trademark protection. The primary function of these products is to provide the lift truck with the capability of engaging, lifting, repositioning, carrying and depositing various types of loads and products. We offer a wide variety of functionally different products, each of which has numerous sizes, models, capacities and optional combinations. Products are designed to handle loads with pallets and for specialized application loads without pallets. Examples of specialized products include devices specifically designed to handle loads such as appliances, carpet and paper rolls, baled materials, textiles, beverage containers, drums, canned goods, bricks, masonry blocks, lumber, plywood, and boxed, packaged and containerized products.
Our products are subject to strict design, construction and safety requirements established by industry associations and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Our major manufacturing facilities are ISO certified. Product specifications and characteristics are determined by the expected capacity to be lifted, the characteristics of the load, the ambient environment in which employed, the terrain over which the load will be moved and the operational life cycle of the vehicle. Accordingly, while there are some standard products, the market demands a wide range of products in custom configurations and capacities.
The manufacturing of our products includes the purchase of raw materials and components: principally rolled bar, plate and extruded steel products; unfinished castings and forgings; hydraulic cylinders and motors; and hardware items such as fasteners, rollers, hydraulic seals and hose assemblies. Certain purchased parts are provided worldwide by a limited number of suppliers. Difficulties in obtaining alternative sources of rolled bar, plate and extruded steel products and other materials from a limited number of suppliers could affect operating results. We are not currently experiencing any shortages in obtaining raw materials, purchased parts, or other steel products.
We market our products throughout the world. Our primary customers are companies and industries that use lift trucks for materials handling. Examples of these industries include pulp and paper, grocery products, textiles, recycling and general consumer goods. Our products are sold to the end-user customer through the retail lift truck dealer distribution channel and to lift truck manufacturers as original equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment.
1
In the major industrialized countries, lift trucks are a widely utilized method of materials handling. In these markets lift trucks are generally considered maintenance capital investment. This tends to subject the industry in general, to the cyclical patterns similar to the broader capital goods economic sector.
However, many of our products measurably improve overall materials handling and lift truck productivity. Further, we are continually developing products to serve new types of materials handling applications to meet specific customer and industry requirements. In this sense, our products may also be generally considered as a productivity enhancing investment. Historically, this has somewhat cushioned the negative impact of downward trends in the lift truck market on our net sales.
In the emerging industrialized countries, China in particular, lift trucks are replacing manual labor and other less productive methods of materials handling. As such, lift trucks are generally considered productivity enhancing investments in these markets. We believe this makes the lift truck markets in these countries generally less susceptible to downward trends in overall capital goods spending.
We are one of the leading domestic and foreign independent suppliers of load engagement products for industrial lift trucks. We compete with a number of companies in different parts of the world. The majority of these competitors are privately-owned companies with a strong presence in local and regional markets. A smaller number of these competitors compete with us globally.
In addition, several lift truck manufacturers, who are customers of ours, are also competitors in varying degrees to the extent that they manufacture a portion of their load engagement product requirements. Since we offer a broad line of products capable of supplying a significant part of the total requirements for the entire lift truck industry, our experience has shown that lower costs resulting from our relatively high unit volume would be difficult for any individual lift truck manufacturer to achieve for most products. We design and position our products to be the performance and service leaders in their respective product categories and geographic markets.
Our market share and gross profit throughout the world vary by geographic region due to the different competitive environments we face in each of these regions. Fluctuations in gross profit within a geographic region over time are generally due to a change in the competitive environment such as new competitors entering a market or existing entities merging or otherwise leaving the market. Additionally, cyclical variations in product demand directly affect margins as higher manufacturing volumes generally result in greater fixed cost absorption and increased gross profit.
A further discussion of the competition in each geographic region follows:
North AmericaWe are the leading manufacturer in North America and the preferred supplier of many OEMs as well as OEDs (original equipment dealers) and distributors. We compete in this region primarily with smaller regionally-based companies and a limited number of smaller foreign competitors. Our leading position has been achieved within the last ten years primarily as the result of an acquisition which complemented our existing product lines, as well as through our continued focus on providing high quality products and outstanding customer service.
EuropeWhile we are also a leading manufacturer in Europe, we compete with one Italian public company and several privately-owned companies with a strong presence in local and regional markets. Competition in this region is based principally on price, resulting in lower gross profit.
Asia PacificThis region includes operations in Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Korea and South Africa. The competitive environment varies somewhat from country to country, and competitors vary in size from smaller regionally-based private companies to some larger lift truck manufacturers. In general, we have established a strong presence throughout the region.
2
ChinaWe have operated in China for over 20 years and have established a strong presence in the lift truck market. Our competition consists primarily of smaller China-based companies. As a result of the continued growth in Chinas economy and the expanded use of lift trucks for various industrial purposes, we have seen in recent years an increase in the number of competitors in the Chinese market, including foreign manufacturers from Europe.
Our products are marketed and sold primarily to lift truck OEDs, OEMs and distributors globally. Our primary markets are North America, Europe, China and Asia Pacific. In addition to sales to the lift truck market, we sell products to OEMs who manufacture construction, mining, agricultural and industrial vehicles other than lift trucks.
No single customer accounts for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales. Our sales to OEM customers account for approximately 40-45% of our consolidated net sales.
Our products are manufactured with short lead times of generally less than one month. Accordingly, we do not believe the level of backlog orders is a significant factor in evaluating our overall level of business activity.
Most of our research and development activities are performed at our corporate headquarters in Fairview, Oregon and at our manufacturing facility in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Our engineering staff develops and designs substantially all of the products we sell and is continually involved in developing products for new applications. We generally do not consider patents to be important to our business.
From time to time, we are the subject of investigations, conferences, discussions and negotiations with various federal, state, local and foreign agencies with respect to cleanup of hazardous waste and compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Risk Factors (Item 1A), Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8), Legal Proceedings (Item 3) and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations (Item 7) contain additional information concerning our environmental matters.
At January 31, 2007, we had approximately 2,100 full-time employees throughout the world. The majority of these employees are not subject to collective bargaining agreements. We believe our relations with our employees are excellent.
In December 2006, we acquired the assets of PSM, a manufacturer of construction attachments in Woodinville, Washington. The construction attachments are used on medium and heavy duty construction vehicles used in the infrastructure, demolition, recycling, forestry, utility and general construction markets. The prevailing levels of commercial, infrastructure and general construction activity influence sales of these products. Housing construction has less of an overall influence. These products are sold through construction equipment dealers and major equipment manufacturers throughout the Western United States. We have approximately 100 employees working to design, manufacture and market these products.
3
We have substantial operations outside the United States. There are additional business risks attendant to our foreign operations such as the risk that the relative value of the underlying local currencies may weaken when compared to the U.S. dollar. For further information about foreign operations, see Risk Factors (Item 1A), Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 7) and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8).
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on or through our website at www.cascorp.com when such reports are available on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) websitewww.sec.gov. Once filed with the SEC, such documents may be read and/or copied at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, the following are certain risks that we believe should be considered carefully in evaluating Cascades business. Our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The risks summarized below do not represent an exclusive list, and additional risks not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems immaterial may also impair its business and operations.
Economic or industry downturns
Our business has historically experienced periodic cyclical downturns generally consistent with economic cycles in the markets in which we operate. The level of sales of our products reflects to a significant extent the capital investment decisions of the customers who buy our products and the lift trucks and other vehicles, on which our products are used. These customers have had a tendency to delay capital projects, including the purchase of new equipment or expensive upgrades, during industry or general economic downturns. Past downturns have been characterized by diminished product demand, excess manufacturing capacity and erosion of gross profit. Therefore, a significant downturn in the markets of our customers, including lift truck manufacturers and to a lesser extent construction equipment manufacturers, or in general economic conditions is likely to result in a reduction in demand for our products and could harm our business.
Our products do not depend upon proprietary technology to any significant degree, and therefore can be subject to intense competition. The principal methods of competition in our markets are product performance and ease of use, product quality, safety, customer service and support, product lead times, global reach, brand reputation, breadth of product line and price. Our customers increasingly demand more technologically advanced and integrated products in certain cases and we must continue to develop our expertise and technical capabilities in order to manufacture and market these products successfully. To retain our competitive position, we will need to invest continuously in research and development, manufacturing, marketing, customer service and support and our distribution networks.
4
We have at times expanded our business through acquisitions and expect that we will do so in the future if appropriate opportunities arise. If we are not successful in integrating acquisitions, we may not realize the operating results that we anticipate at the time of acquisition. Future acquisitions may require us to incur additional debt and contingent liabilities, which may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. The acquisition and integration of businesses involve a number of risks, including:
· Difficulties in matching the business culture of the acquired business with our culture;
· Assumption of unexpected liabilities;
· Demands on management related to the increase in our size after an acquisition;
· Diversion of managements attention from existing operations due to the integration of acquired businesses;
· Difficulties in integrating operations and systems;
· Difficulties in the assimilation and retention of employees; and
· Difficulties in retaining customers and integrating customer bases.
Economic, political and other risks associated with international operations
Foreign operations represent a significant portion of our business. We expect revenue from foreign markets to continue to represent a significant portion of our total sales. As noted in Properties (Item 2), we own or lease facilities in many foreign countries throughout the world. Since we manufacture and sell our products worldwide, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:
· Imposition of foreign exchange controls;
· Changes in a specific countrys or regions political or economic conditions, particularly in emerging markets such as China;
· Foreign currency exchange risks;
· Seizure of our property or assets by a foreign government without our consent;
· Civil unrest or war in any of the countries in which we operate;
· Tariffs, quotas, other trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;
· Potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;
· Difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations;
· Differing labor regulations;
· Requirements relating to withholding taxes on remittances and other payments by subsidiaries;
· Restrictions on our ability to own or operate or repatriate profits from our subsidiaries, make investments or acquire new businesses in foreign jurisdictions;
· Difficulty in enforcement of contractual obligations governed by non-U.S. law;
· Unexpected transportation delays or interruptions;
· Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; and
· The burden of complying with multiple and potentially conflicting laws.
5
Changes in economic or political conditions in any of the countries in which we operate could result in exchange rate movements, new currency or exchange controls or other restrictions being imposed on our operations.
Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our results of operations. Because our combined financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, translation of sales or earnings generated in other currencies into U.S. dollars can result in a significant increase or decrease in the amount of those sales or earnings. In addition, our debt service requirements are primarily in U.S. dollars, even though a portion of our cash flow is generated in foreign currencies. Significant changes in the value of these foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to meet interest and principal payments on U.S. dollar-denominated debt.
In addition, fluctuations in currencies relative to currencies in which our earnings are generated may make it more difficult to perform period-to-period comparisons of our reported results of operations. For purposes of accounting, the assets and liabilities of our foreign operations, where the local currency is the functional currency, are translated using period-end exchange rates, and the revenues, expenses and cash flows of our foreign operations are translated using average exchange rates during each period.
In addition to currency translation risks, we incur currency transaction risk whenever we enter into either a purchase or a sales transaction using a currency other than the local currency of the transacting entity. Given the volatility of exchange rates, we cannot be assured that we will be able to effectively manage our currency transaction and/or translation risks. Volatility in currency exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. We have purchased and may continue to purchase foreign currency hedging instruments protecting or offsetting positions in certain currencies to reduce the risk of adverse currency fluctuations. We have in the past experienced and expect to experience at times in the future a negative impact on earnings as a result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
The success of our business is largely dependent on our senior managers, as well as on our ability to attract and retain other qualified personnel. Seven members of our senior management team have been with us for over 20 years, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who have each been with us for over 34 years. Our current Chief Operating Officer, Terry Cathey, will be retiring in June 2007. The loss of the services of key management personnel or the failure to attract additional personnel as required could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Environmental compliance costs and liabilities
Our operations and properties are subject to stringent U.S. and foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection. These laws and regulations govern the investigation and clean up of contaminated properties as well as air emissions, water discharges, waste management and disposal and workplace health and safety. We can be held responsible under these laws and regulations no matter if the original actions were legal or illegal and no matter if we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. We could be responsible for payment of the full amount of any liability, whether or not any other responsible party also is liable.
These laws and regulations affect a significant percentage of our operations, are different in every jurisdiction and can impose substantial fines and sanctions for violations. Further, they may require substantial clean-up costs for our properties, many of which are sites of long-standing manufacturing
6
operations, and the installation of costly pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit pollution emissions and/or decrease the likelihood of accidental hazardous substance releases. We must conform our operations and properties to these laws and adapt to regulatory requirements in all jurisdictions as these requirements change.
We routinely deal with natural gas, oil and other petroleum products. As a result of our operations, we generate, manage and dispose of or recycle hazardous wastes and substances such as solvents, thinner, waste paint, waste oil, wash-down wastes and sandblast material. Hydrocarbons or other hazardous substances or wastes may have been disposed or released on, under or from properties owned, leased or operated by us or on, under or from other locations where such substances or wastes have been taken for disposal. These properties may be subject to investigatory, clean-up and monitoring requirements under U.S. and foreign, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations.
Fluctuations in raw material costs and availability
Significant cost increases in raw materials and components or shortages in these items could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
To manufacture our products we purchase raw materials and components, principally rolled bar, plate and extruded steel products, unfinished castings and forgings, hydraulic cylinders and motors and hardware items such as fasteners, rollers, hydraulic seals and hose assemblies. The price of steel is particularly significant to our manufacturing costs since most of our products are manufactured using specialty steel as a primary raw material and specialty steel based components as purchased parts. As a result, we are exposed to increases in the market prices of raw materials and components that we may not be able to mitigate by changing the selling prices of our products or other means.
We may also experience shortages of raw materials and purchased parts, which in certain cases are provided by a limited number of suppliers. Shortages may require us to curtail production or to devote additional financial resources to maintaining inventories of raw materials and purchased parts in excess of our normal requirements.
Our obligations under our postretirement benefit plan and certain foreign subsidiaries defined benefit pension plans are currently underfunded. At some time in the future we may have to make significant cash payments to fund these plans, which would reduce the cash available for our business.
As of January 31, 2007, our projected benefit obligations under our defined benefit pension plans exceed the fair value of assets by $2.2 million. As of January 31, 2007 our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation under our postretirement benefit plan, which is not funded, was $7.5 million. The underfunding in our defined benefit pension plans is due in part to fluctuations in the financial markets that have caused the valuation of the assets to decrease. We expect that any required cash payments to our plans that are not fully funded will be made from future cash flows from operations. If our cash contributions are insufficient to adequately fund the plans to cover our future obligations, the performance of the assets in our plans does not meet our expectations or assumptions are modified, our contributions could be materially higher than we expect. This would reduce the cash available for our business. Changes in U.S. or foreign laws governing these plans could require us to make additional contributions. During the year ended January 31, 2007, a change to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States required the recording of the full postretirement benefit plan liability on our consolidated balance sheet. In the future, additional changes could require the recording of additional costs related to these plans.
7
Reliance on lift truck dealers
Approximately 55-60% of our products are sold to the end-user customer through retail dealers. Therefore, a significant portion of our sales is dependent on the quality and effectiveness of these dealers, who are not subject to our control. As a result, poor performance by retail lift truck dealers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Original equipment manufacturers sourcing practices
We sell 40-45% of our products directly to OEMs, who carry inventories of finished products as part of ongoing operations and adjust those inventories based on their assessments of future needs. Such adjustments can have an impact on our quarterly results.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
8
We own and lease various types of properties located throughout the world. Our executive offices are located in Fairview, Oregon. We generally consider the productive capacity of our manufacturing facilities to be adequate and suitable to meet our requirements. Our primary locations are presented below:
Location |
|
|
|
Primary |
|
Approximate Footage |
|
Status |
|
NORTH AMERICA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Springfield, Ohio |
|
Manufacturing |
|
200,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Fairview, Oregon |
|
Manufacturing/Headquarters |
|
155,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Guelph, Ontario Canada |
|
Manufacturing |
|
125,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Toronto, Ontario Canada |
|
Manufacturing |
|
73,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Woodinville, Washington |
|
Manufacturing |
|
68,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Warner Robins, Georgia |
|
Manufacturing |
|
65,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Findlay, Ohio |
|
Manufacturing |
|
52,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
EUROPE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Almere, The Netherlands |
|
Manufacturing/European Headquarters |
|
162,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Schalksmuhle, Germany |
|
Manufacturing |
|
81,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Verona, Italy |
|
Manufacturing |
|
74,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Manchester, England |
|
Manufacturing |
|
44,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
La Machine, France |
|
Manufacturing |
|
37,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Brescia, Italy |
|
Manufacturing |
|
19,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Sheffield, England |
|
Sales |
|
10,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Vaggeryd, Sweden |
|
Sales |
|
2,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Epignay, France |
|
Sales |
|
2,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Barcelona, Spain |
|
Sales |
|
1,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Vantaa, Finland |
|
Sales |
|
500 |
|
Leased |
|
||
ASIA PACIFIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Brisbane, Australia |
|
Manufacturing |
|
46,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Osaka, Japan |
|
Sales/Distribution |
|
16,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Inchon, Korea |
|
Manufacturing |
|
12,000 |
|
Owned |
|
||
Auckland, New Zealand |
|
Sales/Distribution |
|
9,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Johannesburg, South Africa |
|
Sales/Distribution |
|
9,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
CHINA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Xiamen, China |
|
Manufacturing |
|
72,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Hebei, China |
|
Manufacturing |
|
65,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Xiamen, China |
|
Manufacturing |
(1) |
78,000 |
|
Leased |
|
||
Hebei, China |
|
Manufacturing |
(1) |
88,000 |
|
Leased |
|
(1) Facility is under construction and should be operational in fiscal 2008.
9
Neither Cascade nor any of our subsidiaries are involved in any material pending legal proceedings other than litigation related to environmental matters discussed below. We are insured against product liability, personal injury and property damage claims, which may occasionally arise.
On April 9, 2007, we entered into a settlement agreement with Employers Reinsurance Corporation with respect to litigation to recover various expenses incurred in connection with environmental and related proceedings. The recovery from the settlement, which is expected to approximate $15.5 million, net of expenses, will be recorded in our consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. This concludes all litigation against our insurance companies with regards to environmental matters.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Robert C. Warren, Jr.Chief Executive Officer and President(1)Mr. Warren, 58, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cascade since 1996. He was President and Chief Operating Officer from 1993 until 1996 and was formerly Vice PresidentMarketing. Mr. Warren joined Cascade in 1972.
Gregory S. AndersonSenior Vice PresidentHuman Resources(1)Mr. Anderson, 58, has served in his current position since 2002. He joined Cascade in 1984, and has served as Vice PresidentHuman Resources since 1991.
Richard S. AndersonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(1)Mr. Anderson, 59, has served as Chief Financial Officer since 2001. Mr. Anderson has been employed by Cascade since 1972 and held several positions including his appointments as Vice PresidentMaterial Handling Product Group in 1996 and Senior Vice PresidentInternational in 1999.
Terry H. CatheySenior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer(1)Mr. Cathey, 59, has served as Chief Operating Officer since 2000. He has been employed by Cascade since 1973 and has held several positions, including his appointments as Vice PresidentMaterial Handling Operations in 1996 and Vice PresidentManufacturing in 1993.
Herre Y. Hoekstra, Vice President and Managing Director, Europe(1)Mr. Hoekstra, 45, joined Cascade in 2005. Prior to joining Cascade, Mr. Hoekstra held various management positions with Royal Ten Cate, REMU and Royal Dutch Shell, in The Netherlands.
Michael E. Kern, Vice PresidentSales and Marketing(1)Mr. Kern, 60, has served as Vice PresidentSales and Marketing since 2003. He has been employed by Cascade since 1966 and has held several positions, including his appointments as Director of Dealer Marketing and Sales in 2001 and Aftermarket Sales Manager in 1999.
Kevin B. Kreiter, Vice PresidentEngineering(1)Mr. Kreiter, 53, has served in his current position since 2006. He has been employed by Cascade since 1979 and has held several positions within the engineering group.
Jeffrey K. Nickoloff, Vice PresidentCorporate Manufacturing(1)Mr. Nickoloff, 51, has served in his current position since 2002. He has held several positions with Cascade, including his appointments as Director of North American Manufacturing in 2000 and Plant Manager in 1993. Mr. Nickoloff joined Cascade in 1979.
10
Joseph G. Pointer, Vice PresidentFinance(1)Mr. Pointer, 46, has served as Vice PresidentFinance since 2000. Prior to joining Cascade in 2000, Mr. Pointer was a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in Portland, Oregon.
John A. CushingTreasurerMr. Cushing, 46, has served as Treasurer since 2001. He previously was Assistant Treasurer from 1999 until 2001. Prior to joining Cascade in 1999, Mr. Cushing was Assistant Treasurer for Fred Meyer, Inc., a retail company in Portland, Oregon.
(1) These individuals are considered executive officers of Cascade Corporation.
11
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
As of March 15, 2007, there were 181 shareholders of record of Cascades common stock including blocks of shares held by various depositories. It is our belief that when the shares held by the depositories are attributed to the beneficial owners, the total exceeds 2,000.
The following graph compares the annual percentage change in the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index and an industry group of peer companies, in each case assuming investment of $100 on January 31, 2002, and reinvestment of dividends. The stock price performance shown in the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the stock performance graph shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among
Cascade Corporation, The Russell 2000 Index
And A Peer Group
* $100 invested on 1/31/02 in stock or indexincluding reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending January 31.
The peer group comprises the following companies: Actuant Corporation., Alamo Group Inc., Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, Astec Industries, Inc., Columbus-McKinnon Corporation, Gehl Company, Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc., IDEX Corporation, Lindsay Manufacturing Company, Nordson Corporation.
12
The high and low sales prices of Cascades common stock based on intra-day prices on the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter during the last two fiscal years were as follows:
|
|
Year ended January 31 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||||
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
||||
First quarter |
|
$ |
53.96 |
|
$ |
37.85 |
|
$ |
37.95 |
|
$ |
30.61 |
|
Second quarter |
|
42.17 |
|
35.20 |
|
45.90 |
|
31.00 |
|
||||
Third quarter |
|
52.63 |
|
35.75 |
|
50.58 |
|
39.80 |
|
||||
Fourth quarter |
|
55.54 |
|
47.15 |
|
53.80 |
|
46.03 |
|
||||
On September 7, 2006 we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a share repurchase program of up to $80 million over a two-year period. The table below summarizes information about our purchases of our common shares during the three months and year ended January 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
be Purchased Under the |
|
||||||||||||
Period |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
||||||||||
November 1 - 30, 2006 |
|
|
136,956 |
|
|
|
$ |
52.23 |
|
|
|
136,956 |
|
|
|
$ |
58,934,000 |
|
|
||
December 1 - 31, 2006 |
|
|
138,488 |
|
|
|
53.53 |
|
|
|
138,488 |
|
|
|
51,521,000 |
|
|
||||
January 1 - 31, 2007 |
|
|
192,997 |
|
|
|
53.57 |
|
|
|
192,997 |
|
|
|
41,182,000 |
|
|
||||
Quarter ended January 31, 2007 |
|
|
468,441 |
|
|
|
$ |
53.17 |
|
|
|
468,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Quarter ended October 31, 2006 |
|
|
288,678 |
|
|
|
$ |
48.20 |
|
|
|
288,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Year ended January 31, 2007 |
|
|
757,119 |
|
|
|
$ |
51.27 |
|
|
|
757,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The common stock dividends declared during each quarter of the last two fiscal years were as follows:
|
|
Year ended |
|
||||
|
|
January 31 |
|
||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
First quarter |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Second quarter |
|
0.15 |
|
0.12 |
|
||
Third quarter |
|
0.15 |
|
0.15 |
|
||
Fourth quarter |
|
0.16 |
|
0.15 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Stock Exchange Listing and Transfer Agent
Cascades stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CAE.
Cascades registrar and transfer agent is Mellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., Shareholder Relations, P.O. Box 3315, South Hackensack, N.J., 07606, (800) 522-6645.
13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Cascades consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
|
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts and employees) |
|
|||||||||||||
Income statement data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
478,850 |
|
$ |
450,503 |
|
$ |
385,719 |
|
$ |
297,756 |
|
$ |
258,829 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
68,351 |
|
$ |
63,894 |
|
$ |
47,777 |
|
$ |
32,025 |
|
$ |
32,744 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
45,481 |
|
$ |
42,051 |
|
$ |
28,490 |
|
$ |
18,506 |
|
$ |
17,707 |
|
Cash flow data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
57,109 |
|
$ |
50,425 |
|
$ |
37,808 |
|
$ |
26,241 |
|
$ |
23,941 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
$ |
(33,582 |
) |
$ |
(31,723 |
) |
$ |
(14,857 |
) |
$ |
(19,612 |
) |
$ |
(7,718 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
$ |
(22,153 |
) |
$ |
(13,191 |
) |
$ |
(16,892 |
) |
$ |
(14,715 |
) |
$ |
(18,056 |
) |
Stock information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.64 |
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
Book value per common share(1) |
|
$ |
22.51 |
|
$ |
20.69 |
|
$ |
17.82 |
|
$ |
15.18 |
|
$ |
12.70 |
|
Dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Balance sheet information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and marketable securities |
|
$ |
36,593 |
|
$ |
58,497 |
|
$ |
31,985 |
|
$ |
31,586 |
|
$ |
29,501 |
|
Working capital(2) |
|
$ |
113,130 |
|
$ |
124,962 |
|
$ |
94,154 |
|
$ |
81,720 |
|
$ |
71,201 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
84,151 |
|
$ |
75,374 |
|
$ |
82,027 |
|
$ |
75,244 |
|
$ |
65,863 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
397,432 |
|
$ |
361,283 |
|
$ |
328,092 |
|
$ |
292,819 |
|
$ |
262,317 |
|
Total debt(3) |
|
$ |
51,119 |
|
$ |
29,922 |
|
$ |
40,564 |
|
$ |
53,934 |
|
$ |
63,851 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
$ |
271,636 |
|
$ |
259,406 |
|
$ |
217,883 |
|
$ |
183,688 |
|
$ |
144,748 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
18,078 |
|
$ |
10,580 |
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
$ |
11,403 |
|
$ |
10,665 |
|
Depreciation |
|
$ |
13,753 |
|
$ |
14,562 |
|
$ |
13,912 |
|
$ |
12,152 |
|
$ |
10,532 |
|
Amortization |
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
$ |
1,443 |
|
$ |
658 |
|
$ |
512 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
4,033 |
|
$ |
2,278 |
|
$ |
2,492 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
$ |
400 |
|
$ |
1,762 |
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
$ |
3,554 |
|
$ |
4,228 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
13,071 |
|
12,850 |
|
12,726 |
|
12,409 |
|
12,194 |
|
|||||
Number of employees |
|
2,100 |
|
1,900 |
|
1,800 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,500 |
|
(1) Defined as equity divided by number of common shares outstanding at year end.
(2) Defined as current assets less current liabilities.
(3) Includes notes payable to banks and current and long-term portion of debt.
14
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is a discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial condition as of January 31, 2007, and the results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report.
Our businesses globally manufacture and distribute material handling load engagement products primarily for the lift truck industry and to a lesser extent the construction industry. We operate our business in four geographic segments: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and China. A further discussion of the nature of our business is contained in Item 1, Business of this report.
RECENT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS AFFECTING OUR RESULTS
We have moved forward with a major expansion of our operations in China. The objectives of this expansion are to keep pace with the rapidly expanding Chinese lift truck market, expand our business in the Asia Pacific region and provide production capacity to begin exporting Chinese-made products to other parts of the world. During fiscal 2007 we invested $9 million and plan to invest another $5 million by the end of fiscal 2008. Our expansion to date has included the following:
· Equipment and production process upgrades at our existing facility in XiamenThis will allow us to produce a wider selection of products for sale both within China and to the Asia Pacific region. Along with these upgrades we are also increasing our efforts to source more materials and components from within China.
· Construction of a fork manufacturing facility in XiamenFork products manufactured at this facility will be exported to Europe to supplement our existing manufacturing capabilities in that region. We expect to begin production of forks at this location by the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
· Construction of a fork manufacturing facility in HebeiFork products manufactured at this facility and the existing fork facility in Hebei will be sold within China and the Asia Pacific region. The new facility is expected to begin production by the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
In addition to the capital investment in China, we are taking other steps to build the infrastructure to support the expanded operations. This includes administrative and engineering staff and information systems.
Use of Available Cash and Liquidity Position
During fiscal 2007 we initiated several steps which impact the utilization of available cash and our current liquidity situation:
· During the third quarter of fiscal 2007 we began a share repurchase program of up to $80 million. Through March 19, 2007 we have purchased 1,063,000 shares of common stock for $56 million. Total shares purchased through January 31, 2007 are disclosed in Item 5, Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
· The acquisition of the assets of PSM for approximately $40 million was the first step in our expansion into the construction attachment industry.
15
· As previously discussed, our China expansion has required an investment of $9 million in fiscal 2007 and is expected to require an additional $5 million in fiscal 2008.
These steps have reduced our overall net cash (cash/investments less long-term debt) in the short-term. However, if cash generated from operations continues at its present level, we will consider other ways to utilize available cash over the long-term.
The first step in our strategy to expand our North American business into attachments for construction vehicles was the acquisition of the assets of PSM in December 2006. We are also currently investigating opportunities to expand the business through additional acquisitions. Given the regional nature of these businesses, we would anticipate these acquisitions would be in areas of the United States outside of the Pacific Northwest. Our long-term plans are to develop this business in China as well.
After several years of marginal or no growth, the overall lift truck industry in Europe was strong in fiscal 2007, with shipments increasing 15% over fiscal 2006. Although industry growth was strong, our overall financial results in Europe for the year were disappointing in terms of sales growth and overall profitability. We continue to believe that improving our operational performance and increasing our market share in Europe, the worlds largest lift truck market, is our highest priority. We are planning and continuing to evaluate additional changes to our European business. These include efforts to realign our European sales force and expand resources available to focus on the growing Eastern European market, import fork products from China and efforts to focus on purchasing improvements and streamlining manufacturing operations and administrative functions.
Recent changes in the lift truck industry in Europe, including the sale of a lift truck division by one of Europes largest lift truck manufacturers and the continued globalization of business, are affecting the dynamics and business model previously used by global lift truck manufacturers. Whereas the previous practice was to source products locally or regionally, the current trend is to look more towards global sourcing. As previously noted a portion of our expansion in China is to produce forks for export into the European market. We believe this is the first step to address what will be a growing trend in the coming years. We believe we are well positioned to take advantage of this trend.
COMPARISON OF FISCAL 2007 AND FISCAL 2006
|
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands except |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
478,850 |
|
$ |
450,503 |
|
$ |
28,347 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
68,351 |
|
$ |
63,894 |
|
$ |
4,457 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
45,481 |
|
$ |
42,051 |
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
During fiscal 2007 we posted record levels of consolidated net sales, operating income and net income. This reflects the strength of lift truck markets throughout the world, where shipments were up 12%. Financial results in both North America and China were very strong. Asia Pacifics operating income fell short of the prior year. Europe had record net sales but incurred an operating loss.
16
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
263,312 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
250,576 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
12,736 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
160,502 |
|
61 |
% |
152,707 |
|
61 |
% |
7,795 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
102,810 |
|
39 |
% |
97,869 |
|
39 |
% |
4,941 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
46,015 |
|
18 |
% |
44,672 |
|
18 |
% |
1,343 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|||
Loss on disposition of assets |
|
16 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
598 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
56,181 |
|
21 |
% |
$ |
53,042 |
|
21 |
% |
$ |
3,139 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
The following are financial highlights for North America in fiscal 2007 as compared to the prior year:
· Higher sales are the result of increased volumes of shipments. Foreign currency changes accounted for less than 1% of the increase.
· North America lift truck industry shipments from 2006 to 2007 increased 4%. We have found that lift truck industry statistics provide an indication of the direction of our business activity. However, changes in our net sales do not correspond directly to the percentage changes in lift truck industry shipments. We believe we have maintained our overall existing market share in North America during fiscal 2007.
· Gross profit percentages remained consistent during fiscal 2007 and 2006. We have been able to offset the effect of general and material cost increases through either cost reduction activities or sales price increases.
· Selling and administrative costs increased primarily due to additional share-based compensation costs.
· Higher amortization costs in fiscal 2007 relate to amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisition of assets of PSM in December 2006.
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
137,755 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
132,213 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
115,114 |
|
84 |
% |
108,467 |
|
82 |
% |
6,647 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
22,641 |
|
16 |
% |
23,746 |
|
18 |
% |
(1,105 |
) |
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
23,371 |
|
17 |
% |
22,033 |
|
17 |
% |
1,338 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|||
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets |
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
851 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
1 |
% |
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(993 |
) |
(1 |
%) |
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The following are financial highlights for Europe in fiscal 2007 as compared to the prior year:
· Sales increased 2% due to increased shipment volumes, excluding currency changes. European lift truck industry shipments increased 15% in fiscal 2007. In comparing our sales growth to the current industry statistics, we believe we lost market share in Europe in fiscal 2007.
17
· Our gross profit percentage in fiscal 2006 included restructuring costs of $2.0 million related to the closure of a manufacturing facility in The Netherlands. Excluding these costs our fiscal 2006 gross profit percentage was 19%. The decrease in our fiscal 2007 gross profit is due to additional costs, including production inefficiencies at multiple manufacturing facilities and general cost increases.
· Excluding currency changes, selling and administrative costs increased 2% primarily due to additional sales and marketing costs. Fiscal 2006 costs also included $415,000 of restructuring costs.
· Gain on the disposition of assets in fiscal 2007 relates to the sale of a manufacturing facility in The Netherlands.
· Amortization costs decreased due to additional amortization of intangible assets in Italy during fiscal 2006.
Our performance in Europe continues to fall below our expectations, especially in light of a strong European lift truck market. This being said we still feel our initiatives, which were commenced in the prior year, will over the long-term allow us to achieve improved financial results. We have provided below an overview of these initiatives, our progress to date and additional changes planned in the upcoming year:
· The developing focus by lift truck manufacturers on global low cost sourcing and our expanded manufacturing capabilities in China will allow us to begin importing Chinese-made products into Europe in fiscal 2008. This will require additional rationalization of our existing European fork production facilities and expansion of our distribution capabilities. We believe we are well positioned in comparison with other European competitors to meet the demands of the currently changing market.
· We are continuing with efforts to realign the European sales force and modifying our marketing strategy. This includes expanding resources into the Eastern European market, which includes Poland, Czech Republic and Turkey. In addition, we are expanding the management team to strengthen our capabilities in our European production operations.
· We are continuing our efforts to focus on operational excellence, which includes product quality, on-time deliveries, review of procurement policies and practices and development of products specific to the European market. This includes the utilization of external consultants as needed.
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
48,256 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
45,471 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
2,785 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
36,163 |
|
75 |
% |
33,077 |
|
73 |
% |
3,086 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
12,093 |
|
25 |
% |
12,394 |
|
27 |
% |
(301 |
) |
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
8,225 |
|
17 |
% |
7,803 |
|
17 |
% |
422 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|||
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
3,866 |
|
8 |
% |
$ |
4,656 |
|
10 |
% |
$ |
(790 |
) |
|
(17 |
%) |
|
18
The following are financial highlights for Asia Pacific in fiscal 2007 as compared to the prior year:
· Strong lift truck markets in Korea and Japan supported our higher sales levels in fiscal 2007. Excluding currency changes, net sales increased 7%. Lift truck industry shipments in Asia Pacific increased 7% in fiscal 2007.
· Gross profits were down 2% over the prior year due primarily to higher material costs.
· Selling and administrative costs increased, excluding currency changes. This increase is due to additional personnel, marketing and employee benefit expenses.
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
29,527 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
22,243 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
7,284 |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
17,091 |
|
58 |
% |
13,523 |
|
61 |
% |
3,568 |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
12,436 |
|
42 |
% |
8,720 |
|
39 |
% |
3,716 |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
3,098 |
|
11 |
% |
2,499 |
|
11 |
% |
599 |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|||
Loss on disposition of assets |
|
37 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
4 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
9,297 |
|
31 |
% |
$ |
6,188 |
|
28 |
% |
$ |
3,109 |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
The following are financial highlights for China in fiscal 2007 as compared to the prior year:
· Net sales increased consistent with the continued growth of the Chinese economy. Lift truck shipments in China increased 33% in fiscal 2007.
· Gross profit percentages increased 3% in fiscal 2007. These increasing margins reflect the benefits from certain production process improvements implemented in Xiamen in fiscal 2007 and the additional sourcing of certain raw materials and components from within China.
· Selling and administrative costs have increased due to additional costs, primarily professional fees and other general costs, to support our expanding operations in China. As a percentage of net sales these costs are consistent with the prior year.
Our interest expense in fiscal 2007 decreased 16% in comparison with fiscal 2006. The reduction reflects our scheduled paydown of long-term debt in November 2006. See Financial Condition and Liquidity for additional discussion of Company debt levels and payments. We anticipate an increase in interest expense as we borrow against our credit facility for various initiatives.
Consolidated interest income increased $915,000 through increased investing activity and higher interest rates in fiscal 2007.
Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 increased to 34% in comparison to 32% in fiscal 2006. This increase is due to the reduced tax benefits from international financing and the discontinued special deduction for U.S. export sales, combined with the utilization of previously recorded foreign tax credits.
19
Based on our review of industry statistics and data we believe the general lift truck market outlook for fiscal 2008 is as follows:
· The North American market in fiscal 2008 will be at the business levels experienced in fiscal 2007.
· Europes lift truck industry is expected to grow at a modest rate for fiscal 2008.
· The market in Asia Pacific is expected to remain at the current levels through the remainder of fiscal 2008.
· The market in China is expected to continue to experience strong growth through the remainder of fiscal 2008.
Fourth Quarter Results (2007/2006)
|
Three Months Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
118,891 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
108,423 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
10,468 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
83,406 |
|
70 |
% |
76,577 |
|
71 |
% |
6,829 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
35,485 |
|
30 |
% |
31,846 |
|
29 |
% |
3,639 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|||
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
21,130 |
|
18 |
% |
20,674 |
|
19 |
% |
456 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|||
Loss on disposition of assets |
|
20 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
497 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|||
Operating income |
|
13,838 |
|
12 |
% |
10,632 |
|
10 |
% |
3,206 |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|||
Interest expense, net |
|
338 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|||
Other income, net |
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Income before taxes |
|
14,364 |
|
12 |
% |
10,497 |
|
10 |
% |
3,867 |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|||
Provision for taxes |
|
4,123 |
|
3 |
% |
2,232 |
|
2 |
% |
1,891 |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
10,241 |
|
9 |
% |
$ |
8,265 |
|
8 |
% |
$ |
1,976 |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
North America |
|
$ |
11,235 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
(1 |
%) |
|
Europe |
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(2,144 |
) |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|||
Asia Pacific |
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
177 |
% |
|
|||
China |
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
152 |
% |
|
|||
|
|
$ |
13,838 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
The following are financial highlights from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007:
· Sales growth, excluding currency changes, was 10% in Europe, 13% in Asia Pacific and 44% in China. North Americas net sales, excluding $2 million of sales related to the PSM acquisition, decreased 2%. Prior year fourth quarter sales in North America were very strong. We do not believe the decrease in sales in North America is an indication of any loss of market share in the region.
· Our overall gross profit in Europe was consistent with the prior year after excluding the restructuring costs from the closure of a facility in The Netherlands incurred in the prior year.
20
· Selling and administrative costs decreased 2% after excluding currency changes. This decrease is due to lower consulting and general costs in Europe and lower personnel and warranty costs in North America.
· The decrease in Europes operating loss is primarily due to $781,000 of additional restructuring costs incurred in fiscal 2006.
· Increases in operating income in the Asia Pacific and China regions are a result of strong lift truck markets and higher gross profits. The improved results reflect the benefits of our China expansion, both in terms of lower production costs and the distribution of Chinese-made products to the Asia Pacific region.
· The effective tax rate in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 was 29% as compared to 21% in the prior year. The current quarter rate reflects the benefit of an income tax refund received in China related to the recapitalization of our Chinese subsidiary. The prior quarter rate reflected the release of certain valuation allowances.
COMPARISON OF FISCAL 2006 AND FISCAL 2005
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands except |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
450,503 |
|
$ |
385,719 |
|
$ |
64,784 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
63,894 |
|
$ |
47,777 |
|
$ |
16,117 |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
42,051 |
|
$ |
28,490 |
|
$ |
13,561 |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
We experienced strong sales growth in all regions in fiscal 2006. Globally forklift truck shipments were up 10%. The net sales increase is due to higher sales volumes and the full years effect of price increases made throughout fiscal 2005. The increase in operating income is primarily due to higher sales levels as gross profit remained consistent with the prior year. A lower effective tax rate in fiscal 2006 contributed to a higher level of net income.
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
250,576 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
208,553 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
42,023 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
152,707 |
|
61 |
% |
128,175 |
|
61 |
% |
24,532 |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
97,869 |
|
39 |
% |
80,378 |
|
39 |
% |
17,491 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
44,672 |
|
18 |
% |
43,661 |
|
21 |
% |
1,011 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|||
Loss on disposition of assets |
|
4 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
151 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Insurance litigation recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental expense |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
53,042 |
|
21 |
% |
$ |
37,647 |
|
18 |
% |
$ |
15,395 |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
We experienced a net sales increase of $42 million or 20% in North America for fiscal 2006. The increase is due to higher volumes of shipments and the full years benefit of price increases made in fiscal
21
2005. Foreign currency fluctuations between the U.S. and Canadian dollar accounted for 1% of the increase in net sales. North American lift truck industry shipments from 2005 to 2006 increased 11%. We believe we maintained or increased our market share in North America during fiscal 2006.
Gross profit percentages in North America were 39% for both fiscal 2006 and 2005. We were essentially able to offset any general cost or material price increases with either cost reductions or sales price increases. We were affected by higher raw material costs and the sale in the United States of certain products manufactured in Canada. Sales of these products are in U.S. dollars but a significant portion of the costs are in Canadian dollars. The value of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar decreased 9% in fiscal 2006.
Selling and administrative costs for fiscal 2006 increased 2% or $1.0 million over fiscal 2005. Excluding the effects of currency changes, these costs increased 1% or $491,000, due to miscellaneous general cost increases.
Fiscal 2005 results include income of $1.3 million related to the settlement of insurance litigation.
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
132,213 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
118,723 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
13,490 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
108,467 |
|
82 |
% |
95,094 |
|
80 |
% |
13,373 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
23,746 |
|
18 |
% |
23,629 |
|
20 |
% |
117 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
22,033 |
|
17 |
% |
23,574 |
|
20 |
% |
(1,541 |
) |
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|||
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets |
|
441 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
1,264 |
|
1 |
% |
485 |
|
0 |
% |
779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
$ |
(359 |
) |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales in Europe for fiscal 2006 increased 11% to $132.2 million. Absent changes in foreign currency rates our net sales increased 13% in fiscal 2006. This increase was primarily the result of increased shipments and to a lesser extent sales price increases. Our sales in Europe for fiscal 2006 benefited from consistent demand in the lift truck market and additional production capacity from acquisitions, in particular from the purchase of a major German competitor in late fiscal 2005. European lift truck shipments in fiscal 2006 increased 3% over fiscal 2005.
The gross profit percentage in Europe fell from 20% in fiscal 2005 to 18% in fiscal 2006. The decrease is due primarily to $2.0 million of costs related to the closure of a manufacturing facility in The Netherlands as discussed below. The remainder of the decrease is due to additional maintenance and temporary labor costs in Germany.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we closed our manufacturing facility in Hoorn, The Netherlands. At January 31, 2006 all production operations in Hoorn were integrated into other manufacturing facilities in Almere, The Netherlands and Verona, Italy. This closure allowed us to eliminate excess capacity for attachment products. The total direct costs for the plant closure of $2.0 million consisted of $1.0 million of employee termination costs and $1.0 million of costs to move production equipment. These costs are recorded in cost of goods sold. The liability recorded on the January 31, 2006 consolidated balance sheet related to the plant closure is not material. The consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2006 includes current assets of $730,000 which represent property and equipment held for sale from the closure of the Hoorn facility.
22
European selling and administrative costs decreased 7% in fiscal 2006. Foreign currency fluctuations made up 1% of the decrease. The decrease is due to several factors, including lower warranty costs, reduced spending on information technology consulting and other general cost reductions. Fiscal 2006 costs also include $415,000 of costs related to employee terminations and closure of a German sales office.
Amortization costs increased in fiscal 2006 due to additional amortization of intangible assets in Italy.
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
45,471 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
39,095 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
6,376 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
33,077 |
|
73 |
% |
27,900 |
|
71 |
% |
5,177 |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
12,394 |
|
27 |
% |
11,195 |
|
29 |
% |
1,199 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
7,803 |
|
17 |
% |
6,813 |
|
18 |
% |
990 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|||
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
10 |
% |
$ |
4,384 |
|
11 |
% |
$ |
272 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
Asia Pacific net sales grew 16% to $45.5 million in fiscal 2006. Excluding currency changes, net sales increased 14%. The increase is due primarily to higher sales in Japan and Australia. Lift truck shipments in Asia Pacific increased 10% in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005.
The gross profit percentage dropped from 29% in fiscal 2005 to 27% in fiscal 2006. The decrease is due primarily to lower margins in Japan resulting from higher material costs and a change in product mix.
Selling and administrative costs in Asia Pacific for fiscal 2006 increased 15% over fiscal 2005. Excluding the effect of foreign currency changes, the increase was 13% from fiscal 2005. The increase is due to additional bad debt expenses, employee benefit costs and other general cost increases.
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
Change |
|
Change % |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
22,243 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
19,348 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
2,895 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
13,523 |
|
61 |
% |
11,368 |
|
59 |
% |
2,155 |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
8,720 |
|
39 |
% |
7,980 |
|
41 |
% |
740 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|||
Selling and administrative |
|
2,499 |
|
11 |
% |
1,841 |
|
10 |
% |
658 |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|||
Loss on disposition of assets |
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization |
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
6,188 |
|
28 |
% |
$ |
6,105 |
|
31 |
% |
$ |
83 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Net sales in China increased 15% to $22.2 million in fiscal 2006. Our net sales growth is consistent with the expansion of the Chinese economy. Lift truck shipments in China increased 11% in fiscal 2006.
Our gross profit percentage in China decreased to 39% in fiscal 2006. We are seeing more competition in our efforts to maintain and expand our market share in China. We also had a higher percentage of OEM product sales in fiscal 2006, which have lower gross profits.
As a part of our overall capital expansion plan in China, we are currently taking steps to upgrade equipment and further develop our manufacturing processes at our facility in Xiamen, China.
23
Selling and administrative costs in China have increased 36% in fiscal 2006. These increases are due to additional employee benefit costs, professional fees and bad debt expenses.
Our interest expense in fiscal 2006 decreased 23% in comparison with fiscal 2005. The reduction reflects lower debt levels due to our scheduled paydown of long-term debt.
Consolidated interest income increased $417,000 through increased investing activity in fiscal 2006.
Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 decreased to 32% in comparison to 37% in fiscal 2005. This decrease was due to the release of valuation allowances against certain foreign subsidiary capital losses and accruals, as well as higher levels of pre-tax income in lower tax jurisdictions of foreign entities. These benefits were reduced by the recording of additional valuation allowances against certain foreign subsidiary net operating losses.
The statements of cash flows reflect the changes in cash and cash equivalents for the three years ended January 31, 2007 by classifying transactions into three major categories of activities: operating, investing and financing.
Our main source of liquidity is cash generated from operating activities. This consists of net income adjusted for noncash operating items such as depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, gains and losses on disposition of assets and deferred income taxes, as well as changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $57.1 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $50.4 million in fiscal 2006. The increase in fiscal 2007 was due to higher levels of net income and share-based compensation and a decrease in inventory, excluding the impact of foreign currency. These changes were offset by an increase in accounts receivable and prepaid expenses and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Our net cash provided by operating activities increased to $50.4 million in fiscal 2006 from $37.8 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in fiscal 2006 was due to higher levels of net income and depreciation and amortization.
The principal recurring investing activities are capital expenditures. These expenditures are primarily for equipment and tooling related to product improvements, more efficient production methods and replacement for normal wear and tear. Capital expenditures by geographic segment were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year ended January 31 |
|
|||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
North America |
|
$ |
6,174 |
|
$ |
5,923 |
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
Europe |
|
2,469 |
|
3,189 |
|
4,640 |
|
|||
Asia Pacific |
|
481 |
|
336 |
|
301 |
|
|||
China |
|
8,954 |
|
1,132 |
|
539 |
|
|||
|
|
$ |
18,078 |
|
$ |
10,580 |
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
24
Chinas capital expenditures for fiscal 2007 include costs related to the construction of two new manufacturing facilities. These facilities are expected to be operational by the second quarter of fiscal 2008. We expect to make additional investments in China of up to $5 million related to the expanded operations.
We believe the level of capital expenditures is sufficient to meet operational requirements. We expect capital expenditures in fiscal 2008, including capital expenditures in China, to be approximately $20 million.
We held marketable securities of $23 million at January 31, 2006. We held no marketable securities at January 31, 2007. These securities consisted of auction rate and variable rate demand notes issued by various state agencies throughout the United States. We classified these securities as available-for-sale securities. These securities were insured either through third party agencies, reinsured through the U.S. federal government or secured by a letter of credit from a bank. There were no realized or unrealized gains or losses related to our marketable securities during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The securities held at January 31, 2006 were long-term instruments maturing through 2039; however, the interest rates and maturities were reset approximately every month, at which time we could sell the securities. Accordingly, we classified the securities as short-term in the consolidated balance sheet. Interest rates on the securities ranged from 3.0% to 4.3% per annum.
During fiscal 2007, we purchased the assets of PSM, a manufacturer of construction attachments located in Woodinville, Washington. The total purchase price for the assets was approximately $40.3 million, net of assumed liabilities.
During fiscal 2005, we completed the acquisition of the assets of Falkenroth Foerdertechnik, GmbH in Schalksmuhle, Germany. The aggregate purchase price paid in cash for Falkenroth, net of assumed liabilities, was $6.2 million.
Proceeds from the sale of securities received as a reversion from a pension plan terminated in 1997 were $1.0 million during fiscal 2005.
We continue to make our annual $12.5 million senior notes payment, with the final payment to be made during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. To fund various initiatives, we entered into a $125 million credit agreement during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. Net borrowings against this line of credit was $34 million as of January 31, 2007.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we started a program to repurchase common stock of up to $80 million over a two-year period. As of January 31, 2007 we repurchased 757,000 shares for $36.5 million, net of $2.3 million recorded as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet.
We declared dividends of $0.61, $0.54 and $0.45 per share in fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Cash paid for dividends was $7.6 million, $6.7 million, and $5.5 million in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The issuance of common stock related to the exercise of share-based awards generated $3.4 million, $2.8 million and $1.6 million of cash in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities at January 31, 2007 was $113.1 million as compared to $125.0 million of working capital at January 31, 2006. Our current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, at January 31, 2007 was 2.6 to 1 in comparison to 2.9 to 1 at January 31, 2006.
25
Total outstanding debt, including notes payable to banks, at January 31, 2007 was $51.1 million in comparison with $29.9 million at January 31, 2006. Our debt agreements contain covenants relating to net worth and leverage ratios. We are in compliance with debt covenants at January 31, 2007. Borrowing arrangements currently in place with commercial banks provide available lines of credit totaling $125 million. As of January 31, 2007, we had outstanding borrowings of $34 million, with an additional $3.2 million committed through the issuance of letters of credit. Average interest rates on notes payable to banks were 4.9% at January 31, 2007 and 3.0% at January 31, 2006.
We believe our cash and cash equivalents, existing credit facilities and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our expected working capital, capital expenditure and debt retirement requirements for fiscal 2008.
As of January 31, 2007, we maintain defined benefit pension plans in England and France covering certain employees. We calculate the net periodic pension costs related to our defined benefit plans on an annual basis. We have recorded a minimum pension liability, net of tax, of $1.5 million at January 31, 2007 to reflect the extent our pension liability exceeds the fair value of plan assets. The unrecognized loss for all defined benefit plans of $2.2 million at January 31, 2007 will continue to be recognized over the remaining service period of the employees. The combined accumulated pension obligation and unfunded benefit obligation for our defined benefit plans at January 31, 2007 is $9.8 million and $2.2 million, respectively. We have recorded the unfunded benefit obligation, the minimum pension liability, as a liability and reduction in shareholders equity on the consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2007.
We maintain a postretirement health care benefit plan in the United States consisting of health care coverage for approximately 180 eligible retirees and qualifying dependents. Another 117 current employees, all over 52 years of age, will be eligible to participate upon retirement. No additional employees will be eligible to participate in the plan. The postretirement plan is currently unfunded with an accumulated postretirement benefit obligation of $7.5 million at January 31, 2007. During fiscal 2007 we adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132 (R) that required us to record a minimum postretirement liability, net of tax, of $657,000 at January 31, 2007. See Recent Accounting Pronouncements for additional information. We have recorded the unfunded benefit obligation as a liability and the minimum postretirement liability as a reduction in shareholders equity on the consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2007. During fiscal 2007 our cost for the plan increased due to increasing health care costs, however the January 31, 2007 benefit obligation decreased compared to January 31, 2006 due to an increase to the discount rate and a reduction in the number of participants covered under the plan. The actual increases in health care costs in recent years have been in excess of our assumed trend rates. We have implemented significant increases in the level of contributions required from eligible retirees and qualifying dependents to mitigate the overall cost of the plan. In addition, recent changes in Medicare laws have reduced overall plan costs. Due to the continued trend of increasing health care costs the overall cost of the plan may continue to rise in future years. We will continue to investigate various options with this plan and our defined benefit plans to mitigate future cost increases. We currently have no plans to fund our postretirement plan.
We are currently engaged in ongoing environmental remediation efforts at both of our Fairview, Oregon and Springfield, Ohio manufacturing facilities. Current estimates provide for some level of remediation activities in Fairview through 2019 and Springfield through 2013. Costs of certain remediation activities at the Fairview facility are shared with The Boeing Company, with Cascade paying 70% of actual remediation costs. During fiscal 2007, the environmental liability decreased due to ongoing payments at both the Fairview and Springfield sites. No other adjustments to the liability were deemed necessary. The liability for all ongoing remediation efforts is $6.9 million and $7.9 million at January 31, 2007 and 2006,
26
respectively. The accrued environmental expenses recorded as a current liability of $1.0 million on the consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2007 represent our estimated cash expenditure for ongoing remediation activities for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2008.
The following summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of January 31, 2007:
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
2-3 |
|
4-5 |
|
Greater than |
|
|||||||
|
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
5 years |
|
|||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes payable to banks |
|
$ |
4,546 |
|
|
$ |
4,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
46,573 |
|
|
12,573 |
|
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
|||||
Estimated interest payments |
|
11,137 |
|
|
2,897 |
|
|
4,120 |
|
4,120 |
|
|
|
|||||
Operating leases |
|
9,030 |
|
|
2,887 |
|
|
4,289 |
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
|||||
Defined benefit pension obligations(1) |
|
9,899 |
|
|
629 |
|
|
1,247 |
|
952 |
|
7,071 |
|
|||||
Postretirement benefit obligation(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
81,185 |
|
|
$ |
23,532 |
|
|
$ |
9,656 |
|
$ |
40,926 |
|
$ |
7,071 |
|
(1) Represents committed and current minimum funding requirements for all plans. The total payments due in the future may vary from these estimates based on actual returns on plan assets, changes in assumptions, plan modifications and actuarial gains and losses. See additional discussion of these key assumptions and estimates in Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates below and Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8).
(2) Our postretirement benefit obligation related to healthcare coverage for certain retired employees is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. Payments under the plan are not included herein. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates below and Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8).
27
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an on-going basis, including those related to uncollectible receivables, inventories, impairment of goodwill, warranty obligations, environmental liabilities, benefit plans, share-based compensation and deferred taxes. We base our estimates on our historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses on accounts receivable resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. Such allowances are based on an ongoing review of customer payments against terms and a review of customer financial statements and financial information. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Inventory Reserves
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We maintain reserves to write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value, less costs to sell, based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required, which would result in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of income being greater than expected in the period in which more information becomes available.
Impairment of Goodwill
We review goodwill for impairment either annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the assets might exceed their current fair values. The review is performed for reporting units including North America, Europe, PSM and Australia. Certain factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review, at an interim date outside of the annual review, include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or our overall business and significant industry or economic trends. The impairment review is based on a discounted projected cash flow model that uses estimates of future sales, sales growth rates, gross profits, expense and capital expenditure levels, a discount rate and estimated terminal values to determine the fair value of the operating entities should an impairment exist. We use our weighted average cost of capital (WACC) to discount future cash flows for goodwill impairment tests. The WACC is the expected rate of return based on our existing debt and equity capital structure. Changes in these and other factors could result in impairments in the carrying value of goodwill, which would require a writedown to the assets fair value. If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we could be exposed to a material impairment charge.
28
We are continuing to pursue a number of initiatives in Europe to improve our financial performance of our European business. Our goodwill impairment test for Europe assumes the future operating results will reflect the benefits of our efforts. While these results are not inconsistent with our past operating results, they do reflect improvements over our recent financial results. If we do not realize these improvements it could result in an impairment of our goodwill in Europe in the future.
Warranty Obligations
We offer certain warranties with the sale of our products, which generally range from six months to one year. The warranty obligation is recorded as a liability on the balance sheet and is estimated through historical customer claims, product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Changes in these factors and statutory requirements for product warranties in markets in which we sell our products may require an adjustment to the recorded warranty obligations.
Environmental Liabilities
We accrue environmental remediation and litigation costs if it is probable a liability has been incurred at the financial statement date and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Our liability for environmental costs, other than for costs of assessments themselves, are generally determined after the completion of investigations and studies and are based on the estimated cost of remediation activities we are then required to undertake. The gross liability is based on our best estimate of undiscounted future costs using currently available technology and applying current regulations, as well as our own historical experience regarding environmental cleanup costs. The reliability and precision of the estimates are affected by numerous factors, such as site evaluation and reevaluation of the degree of remediation required, claims by third parties and changes to environmental laws and regulations. We adjust our liabilities as new remediation requirements are defined, as information becomes available permitting reasonable estimates to be made and to reflect new facts.
Benefit Plans
We make a number of assumptions with regard to both future financial conditions and future actions by plan participants to calculate on an actuarial basis the amount of income or expense and assets and liabilities recognized in association with our defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans. These assumptions include the expected return on plan assets, discount rates, expected increases in compensation levels, health care cost trend rates and expected rates of retirement and life expectancy for plan participants. We review the assumptions on an annual basis and make changes to reflect market conditions and the administration of the plans. While we believe the current assumptions are appropriate in the circumstances, actual results and changes in these assumptions in the future will result in adjustments which could impact the income or expense recognized in future years in relation to these plans.
The assumed rate of return on plan assets for our defined benefit plans is evaluated on an annual basis. We select the assumed rate of return based on information considering historical returns, our current and target asset allocation and the expected returns by asset class. We believe this assumption is reasonable given the asset composition and long-term historic trends. Our discount rate reflects the rate at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled. We increased our discount rate assumption to determine the January 31, 2007 liability to 5.2% from 4.7% at January 31, 2006 due to the market increases in interest rates during the year. Our most significant defined benefit plan is in England so interest rates on high-quality corporate bonds in that market have more influence on the overall discount rate.
Our discount rate, used to determine the liability for our postretirement plan, increased to 5.75% at January 31, 2007 from the discount rate of 5.5% at January 31, 2006. We determine our discount rate using a yield curve expected benefit payment methodology. This methodology uses individual curve rates to
29
discount each future years expected plan benefit payments. We select our health care cost trend rates based on recent plan experience and expectations about future increases in plan costs. We assume health care costs in fiscal 2008 will increase by 10% and future increases will decline by 1% per year until 4.5% is reached in 2013. The following presents the sensitivity of the key postretirement plan assumptions (in thousands):
|
|
Increase |
|
|||
The following presents the sensitivity of a 1% decrease in the discount rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
The following presents the sensitivity of a 1% increase in the health care cost trend: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
$ |
905 |
|
|
Share-based Compensation
Effective May 1, 2005, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (123R). SFAS 123R addresses the accounting for stock-based compensation in which we receive employee services in exchange for our equity instruments. Stock-based compensation is calculated using a fair value method. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the service period the award is expected to vest. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of stock options, the expected volatility of our common stock and expected dividends. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. We consider many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, award recipient class and historical experience. Significant changes in the assumptions for future awards and actual forfeiture rates could materially impact share-based compensation expense and our results of operations. Subsequent changes in forfeiture rates will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. See Notes 2 and 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8) for further discussion of our share-based awards and the related accounting treatment.
Deferred Taxes
Our provision for income taxes and the determination of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities involves a significant amount of management judgment. We are subject to taxation from federal, state and international jurisdictions. The taxes paid to these jurisdictions are subject to audit, although to date the results of any tax audits have been minor.
Judgment is also applied in determining whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of specific deferred tax assets, such as foreign tax credit carryovers or net operating loss carryforwards, will not be realized. We have recorded on our consolidated balance sheets a valuation allowance against various deferred tax assets. We consider future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged against income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination was made. We continually evaluate strategies that could allow for the future utilization of our deferred tax assets.
30
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At January 31, 2007 and 2006, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
SFAS 151In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151 (SFAS 151), Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that .under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges SFAS 151 requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of so abnormal. In addition, this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of SFAS 151 were effective for us on February 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 151 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
SFAS 154In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154 (SFAS 154), Accounting Changes and Error Correctionsa replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS 154 requires the application of a change in accounting principle be applied to prior accounting periods presented as if that principle had always been used. When a pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should be followed. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 154 at the beginning of fiscal 2007 did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.
FIN 48In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FASB Interpretation No. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We are currently evaluating the impact of FASB Interpretation No. 48 on our financial statements. Application of this interpretation is required for our financial statements at the beginning of fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.
SFAS 157In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 provides a common definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on our financial statements. Application of SFAS 157 is required for our financial statements for the fiscal year beginning February 1, 2008.
SFAS 158In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 (SFAS 158), Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
31
88, 106, and 132(R). This statement requires balance sheet recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of pension and postretirement benefit plans. Under SFAS 158, actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs or credits, and any remaining transition assets or obligations that have not been recognized under previous accounting standards must be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. In addition, the measurement date, the date at which plan assets and the benefit obligation are measured, is required to be the companys fiscal year end. Presently, we use a December 31 measurement date for the postretirement benefit plan, which will have to change to coincide with our January 31 fiscal year-end date. We adopted SFAS 158 for our financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, except for the measurement date provision, which is effective for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009. The impact of adopting SFAS 158 increased the employee benefit liability on our consolidated balance sheet by $1.0 million and decreased shareholders equity by $657,000, net of tax.
SAB 108In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108) Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors considered, is material. Application of SAB 108 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2007.
SFAS 159In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (SFAS 159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS 159 allows companies the choice to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Application of SFAS 159 is required for our financial statements beginning February 1, 2008. We are currently reviewing the impact of this pronouncement on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations. A significant portion of our net sales are denominated in currencies from international markets outside the United States. As a result, our operating results could become subject to significant fluctuations based upon changes in the exchange rates of the foreign currencies in relation to the United States dollar.
The table below illustrates the hypothetical increase or decrease in fiscal 2007 net sales of a 10% change in the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies which impact our operations (in millions):
Euro |
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
Chinese yuan |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
British pound |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
Canadian dollar |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
Other currencies (representing 11% of consolidated net sales) |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to offset the impact of currency fluctuations on certain nonfunctional currency assets and liabilities. The principal currencies hedged are denominated in Japanese yen, Canadian dollars, Euros and British pounds. Our foreign currency forward exchange contracts have terms lasting up to six months, but generally less than one month. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8).
32
A majority of our products are manufactured using steel as a primary raw material and steel based components as purchased parts. As such, our cost of goods sold is sensitive to fluctuations in steel prices, either directly through the purchase of steel as raw material or indirectly through the purchase of steel based components.
Presuming that the full impact of commodity steel price increases is reflected in all steel and steel based component purchases, we estimate our gross profit percentage would decrease by approximately 0.3% for each 1.0% increase in commodity steel prices. Based on our statement of income for the year ended January 31, 2007, a 1.0% increase in commodity steel prices would have decreased consolidated gross profit by approximately $1.3 million.
During fiscal 2007, we experienced some increases in prices for steel and steel components. We have continued to move aggressively to offset these increases through a variety of means, including sales price increases, cost reduction activities and alternative sourcing arrangements. In general we were more successful in North America, China and Asia Pacific in realizing the full benefits of these mitigating measures. In Europe the measures have not been as successful, resulting in some erosion of gross profit for certain products. During fiscal 2008 we are expecting some additional material price increases and will continue to implement mitigating measures where needed.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Cascade Corporation
We have completed integrated audits of Cascade Corporations consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cascade Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) at January 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 2, to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for share-based compensation in fiscal 2006 and the manner in which it accounts for defined benefit pension and other post retirement plans effective January 31, 2007.
33
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007 based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on managements assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Pacific Services & Manufacturing, Inc. (PSM) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during fiscal 2007. We have also excluded PSM from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. PSM is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 12% and less than 1%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended January 31, 2007.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Portland, Oregon
April 13, 2007
34
Cascade Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|||||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
478,850 |
|
$ |
450,503 |
|
$ |
385,719 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
328,870 |
|
307,774 |
|
262,537 |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
149,980 |
|
142,729 |
|
123,182 |
|
|||
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
80,709 |
|
77,007 |
|
75,889 |
|
|||
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets |
|
(552 |
) |
385 |
|
3 |
|
|||
Amortization |
|
1,472 |
|
1,443 |
|
658 |
|
|||
Insurance litigation recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|||
Environmental expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|||
Operating income |
|
68,351 |
|
63,894 |
|
47,777 |
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
2,294 |
|
2,741 |
|
3,570 |
|
|||
Interest income |
|
(1,894 |
) |
(979 |
) |
(562 |
) |
|||
Other income, net |
|
(1,304 |
) |
(95 |
) |
(218 |
) |
|||
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
69,255 |
|
62,227 |
|
44,987 |
|
|||
Provision for income taxes |
|
23,774 |
|
20,176 |
|
16,497 |
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
45,481 |
|
$ |
42,051 |
|
$ |
28,490 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.64 |
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
$ |