Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-156719
 
PROSPECTUS
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
 
30,151,149 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
 
We are registering an aggregate 30,151,149 shares of our Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), for resale by the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus, consisting of 5,300,003 shares of Common Stock, an aggregate 21,489,801 shares of Common Stock which are issuable to upon exercise of certain Common Stock purchase warrants (the “Warrants”), and an aggregate 3,361,345 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of a certain Convertible Term Note dated December 21, 2007.

The selling stockholders will receive all of the net proceeds from this offering, although we may receive proceeds of up to approximately $15,054,718 if all the Warrants are exercised for cash.  We have agreed to bear all of the expenses incurred in connection with this offering.  The selling stockholders will pay any brokerage commissions and/or similar charges incurred for the sale of the shares of our Common Stock.  The selling stockholders may sell the shares in public or private transactions, at prevailing market prices, or at privately negotiated prices, directly to purchasers or through brokers or dealers. Brokers or dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders.

Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “ASFG.OB”. On March 27, 2009, the bid and ask prices of our Common Stock were $0.035 and $0.045 per share, respectively, as reported by the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk.

We urge you to read carefully this prospectus, and the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 6, where we describe specific risks associated with an investment in Aftersoft Group, Inc., before you invest in our securities.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

No underwriter or other person has been engaged to facilitate the sale of shares of Common Stock in this offering. You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and the information we have referred you to. We have not authorized any person to provide you with any information about this offering, Aftersoft Group, Inc. or the shares of our Common Stock offered hereby that is different from the information included in this prospectus. If anyone provides you with different information, you should not rely on it.
 
The date of this prospectus is May 1, 2009

 
 

 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
The following table of contents has been designed to help you find information contained in this prospectus. We encourage you to read the entire prospectus.
 
 
Page
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
1
RISK FACTORS
6
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
13
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
13
USE OF PROCEEDS
14
DILUTION
14
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
14
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
18
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
20
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
22
EXPERTS
23
LEGAL REPRESENTATION
24
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
24
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
35
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
36
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
37
CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
55
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
55
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS
66
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
69
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
72
DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
79
WHERE YOU CAN GET MORE INFORMATION
79
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
80
 
 
i 

 
 
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
 
You should read the following summary together with the more detailed information elsewhere in this Prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements and the section titled “Risks Factors,” regarding us and the Common Stock being offered for sale by means of this Prospectus.
 
Unless the context indicates or requires otherwise, (i) the term “Aftersoft” refers to Aftersoft Group, Inc. and its principal operating subsidiaries; (ii) the term “MAM Software” refers to MAM Software Limited and its operating subsidiaries; (iii) the term “ASNA” refers to Aftersoft Network N.A., Inc. and its operating subsidiaries;(iv) the term “EXP Dealer Software” refers to EXP Dealer Software Limited and its operating subsidiaries; and (v) the terms “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” and the “Company” refer collectively to Aftersoft Group, Inc.
 
CORPORATE BACKGROUND
 
The Company’s principal executive office is located at Regus House, Heronsway, Chester Business Park, Chester, UK, CH4 9QR and its phone number is 011-44-124-489-3138.
 
In December 2005, W3 Group, Inc. (“W3”) consummated a reverse acquisition and changed its corporate name to Aftersoft Group, Inc. W3, which was initially incorporated in February 1988 in Colorado, changed its state of incorporation to Delaware in May 2003. On December 21, 2005, an Acquisition Agreement (the “Agreement”) was consummated among W3, a separate Delaware corporation named Aftersoft Group, Inc. (“Oldco”) and Auto Data Network, Inc. (“ADNW”) in which W3 acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Oldco in exchange for issuing 32,500,000 shares of Common Stock of W3, par value $0.0001 per share, to ADNW, which was then the sole shareholder of the Company. At the time of the acquisition, W3 had no business operations. Concurrent with the acquisition, W3 changed its name to Aftersoft Group, Inc. and its corporate officers were replaced. The Board of Directors of the Company appointed three additional directors designated by ADNW to serve until the next annual election of directors. As a result of the acquisition, former W3 shareholders owned 1,601,167, or 4.7% of the 34,101,167 total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock and ADNW owned 32,500,000 or 95.3% of the Company’s Common Stock. On December 22, 2005, Oldco changed its name to Aftersoft Software, Inc. and is currently inactive.
 
On August 26, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of EXP from ADNW in exchange for issuing 28,000,000 shares of Common Stock to ADNW with a market value of $30,800,000. On February 1, 2007, the Company consummated an agreement to acquire Dealer Software and Services Limited (“DSS”), a subsidiary of ADNW, in exchange for issuing 16,750,000 shares of Common Stock to ADNW with a market value of $15,075,000.
 
During 2007, the Company conducted a strategic assessment of its businesses and determined that neither EXP nor DSS fit within its long-term business model. The Company identified a buyer for the two businesses in First London PLC (formerly, First London Securities PLC) (“First London”). First London is a UK-based holding company for a group of businesses engaged in asset management, investment banking, and merchant banking. First London’s shares are traded on the London Plus market. First London’s areas of specialization include technology, healthcare, and resources, and its merchant banking operations take strategic, principal positions in businesses that fall within its areas of specialization.

 
1

 
 
On June 17, 2007, DSS sold all of the shares of Consolidated Software Capital Limited (“CSC”), its wholly owned subsidiary, to RLI Limited, a company affiliated with First London (“RLI”). The consideration for this sale consisted of a note from RLI with a face value of $865,000. On November 12, 2007, as part of the sale of EXP (see below), the $865,000 note was exchanged for 578,672 shares of First London common stock having a fair value of $682,000. The transaction resulted in a loss of $183,000 to the Company.
 
The Company sold its interest in EXP and DSS, EXP’s wholly owned subsidiary, on November 12, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of a Share Sale Agreement (the “EXP Agreement”), EU Web Services Limited (“EU Web Services”) a subsidiary of First London, agreed to acquire, and the Company agreed to sell, the entire issued share capital of EXP it then owned, which amounted to 100% of EXP’s outstanding stock.
 
As consideration for the sale of EXP, including DSS, EU Web Services agreed to issue to the Company, within 28 days of the closing, 1,980,198 Ordinary shares (the UK equivalent of common stock), £0.01 par value, in its parent company, First London. The Ordinary shares received by the Company had an agreed upon fair market value of $3,000,000 at the date of issuance of such shares. The Company recorded the shares received at $2,334,000, which represents the bid price of the restricted securities received, and discounted the carrying value by 11% (or $280,000) as, pursuant to the EXP Agreement, the shares could not be sold by the Company for at least 12 months. Further, the EXP Agreement provided that the Company receive on May 12, 2008 additional consideration in the form of: (i) Ordinary shares in EU Web Services having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of the date of issuance, provided that EU Web Services is listed and becomes quoted on a recognized trading market within six (6) months from the date of the Agreement; or (ii) if EU Web Services does not become listed within the time period specified, Ordinary shares in First London having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of May 12, 2008. As EU Web Services did not become listed within the six-month timeframe, the Company received on August 14, 2008 1,874,414 shares in First London, which had a fair market value of $2,000,000 on May 12, 2008.

Aftersoft is a former subsidiary of ADNW, a publicly traded company, the stock of which is currently traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol ADNW.PK, although it is not current in its reporting obligations with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). ADNW transferred its software aftermarket services operating businesses to Aftersoft and retained its database technology, Orbit. Orbit is a system for supply and collection of data throughout the automotive industry. To date, Orbit is still in its development phase, and ADNW will require substantial external funding to bring the technology to its first phase of testing and deployment. On November 24, 2008, ADNW distributed a dividend of the 71,250,000 shares of Aftersoft common stock that ADNW owned at such time in order to complete the previously announced spin-off of Aftersoft’s businesses. The dividend shares were distributed in the form of a pro rata dividend to the holders of record as of November 17, 2008 (the “Record Date”) of ADNW’s common and convertible preferred stock. Each holder of record of shares of ADNW common and preferred stock as of the close of business on the Record Date was entitled to receive 0.6864782 shares of Aftersoft's common stock for each share of common stock of ADNW held at such time, and/or for each share of ADNW common stock that such holder would own, assuming the convertible preferred stock owned on the Record Date was converted in full.  Prior to the spin-off, ADNW owned approximately 77% of Aftersoft’s issued and outstanding common stock. Subsequent to and as a result of the spin-off, Aftersoft is no longer a subsidiary of ADNW.

DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND BUSINESS
 
Aftersoft Group, Inc. provides software, information and related services to businesses engaged in the automotive aftermarket in the US, UK and Canada and to the automotive dealership market in the UK. The automotive aftermarket consists of businesses associated with the life cycle of a motor vehicle from when the original manufacturer’s warranty expires to when the vehicle is scrapped. Products sold by businesses engaged in this market include the parts, tires and auto services required to maintain and improve the performance or appeal of a vehicle throughout its useful life. The Company aims to meet the business needs of customers who are involved in the maintenance and repair of automobiles and light trucks in three key segments of the automotive aftermarket, namely parts, tires and auto service.

 
2

 
 
The Company’s business management systems, information products and online services permit our customers to manage their critical day-to-day business operations through automated point-of-sale, inventory management, purchasing, general accounting and customer relationship management.
 
The Company’s customer base consists of wholesale parts and tire distributors, retailers, franchisees, cooperatives, auto service chains and single location auto service businesses with high customer service expectations and complex commercial relationships.
 
The Company’s revenues are derived from the following:
 
 
·
The sale of business management systems comprised of proprietary software applications, implementation and training; and
 
·
Providing subscription-based services, including software support and maintenance, information (content) products and online services for a fee.
 
The Company currently has the following wholly owned direct operating subsidiaries: MAM Software in the UK, and ASNA in the US.
 
MAM Software Ltd.
 
MAM Software is a provider of software to the automotive aftermarket in the UK. MAM Software specializes in providing reliable and competitive business management solutions to the motor factoring (also known as jobber), retailing, and wholesale distribution sectors. It also develops applications for vehicle repair management and provides solutions to the retail and wholesale tire industry. All MAM Software programs are based on the Microsoft Windows family of operating systems. Each program is fully compatible with the other applications in their range, enabling them to be combined to create a fully integrated package. MAM Software is based in Sheffield, UK.
 
Aftersoft Network N.A., Inc. (ASNA)
 
ASNA develops open business automation and distribution channel e-commerce systems for the automotive aftermarket supply chain. These systems are used by leading aftermarket outlets, including tier one manufacturers, program groups, warehouse distributors, tire and service chains and independent installers. ASNA products and services enable companies to generate new sales, operate more cost efficiently, accelerate inventory turns and maintain stronger relationships with suppliers and customers. ASNA has three wholly owned subsidiaries operating separate businesses: (i) AFS Warehouse Distribution Management, Inc. and (ii) AFS Tire Management, Inc. which are both based in Dana Point, California, and (iii) MAM Software, Inc., which is based in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
 
 
3

 
 
Summary of the Offering
 
Shares of Common Stock being offered by the selling stockholders:
 
30,151,149 shares of our Common Stock.
     
Selling stockholders
 
Holders of the shares of Common Stock, Common Stock purchase warrants, and Convertible Term Note dated December 21, 2007 .  See “Selling Stockholders” at page 14.
     
Number of shares outstanding before the offering:
 
103,977,099 (1)
     
Number of shares outstanding after the offering, if all the shares are sold:
 
103,977,099 (1)
     
Use of Proceeds:
 
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of Common Stock by the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus. The selling stockholders will receive all net proceeds from the sale of the shares offered by this prospectus.
     
Risk Factors:
 
See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 6 and the other information in this prospectus for a discussion of the factors you should consider before deciding to invest in shares of our Common Stock.
     
Dividend Policy:
 
We intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and growth of our business and retire liabilities. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that we will declare any cash or stock dividends on our Common Stock for the foreseeable future. See “Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters” on page 18.
     
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board Symbol:
 
ASFG.OB
 
 
(1)
Based on 79,125,953 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2009, and assumes that (a) all Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 21,489,801 shares of our Common Stock, which shares are covered by this prospectus, have been exercised in full, and (2) the Convertible Term Note dated December 21, 2007, which is convertible into an aggregate 3,361,345 shares of our Common Stock, which shares are covered by this prospectus, is converted in full.

 
4

 
 
Summary Financial Data
 
The summary consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the information presented in this prospectus under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and with our audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
The summary consolidated financial data set forth below is derived from our consolidated financial statements. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.  The consolidated statement of operations data for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 is derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.  The consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007 is derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus.
 
Statement of Operations Data
 
( In thousands, except per share data)
 
Six Months Ended
   
Years Ended
 
   
December 31, 2008
   
December 31, 2007
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007
 
Total revenue
  $ 10,850     $ 11,000     $ 22,463     $ 20,217  
Costs and operating expenses
  $ 16,199     $ 11,143     $ 34,269     $ 24,211  
Income (loss) continuing operations
  $ (5,349 )   $ (143 )   $ (11,806 )   $ (3,994 )
Income (loss) discontinued operations
  $ -     $ (12 )   $ (13 )   $ 506  
Net loss
  $ (5,349 )   $ (155 )   $ (11,819 )   $ (3,488 )
Income (loss) per share attributed to common stockholders basic and diluted
                               
Continuing operations
  $ (0.06 )   $ -     $ (0.15 )   $ (0.05 )
Discontinued operations
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 0.01  
Net Loss per share
  $ (0.06 )   $ -     $ (0.15 )   $ (0.04 )
Weighted average number of shares - basic and diluted
    92,773,620       85,787,724       87,057,391       79,828,912  
 
Balance Sheet Data
 
(In thousands) 
 
December 31, 2008
   
December 31, 2007
   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007
 
Total assets
  $ 21,610     $ 43,260     $ 29,802     $ 38,882  
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,315     $ 4,606     $ 1,964     $ 583  
Total liabilities
  $ 13,867     $ 14,085     $ 14,747     $ 14,108  
Working capital (deficiency)
  $ (1,829 )   $ 586     $ (1,895 )   $ (3,665 )
Shareholders’ equity
  $ 7,743     $ 29,175     $ 15,055     $ 24,774  
 
 
 
5

 
 
RISK FACTORS
 
Our business, financial condition and operating results are subject to a number of risk factors, both those that are known to us and identified below and others that may arise from time to time. These risk factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those suggested by forward-looking statements in this document and elsewhere, and may adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. If any of those risk factors should occur, moreover, the trading price of our securities could decline, and investors in our securities could lose all or part of their investment in our securities. These risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our prospects.
 
WE HAVE A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO EVALUATE OUR BUSINESS AND TO PREDICT OUR FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS.
 
We were known as W3 Group, Inc. and had no operations in December 2005, at which time we engaged in a reverse acquisition; therefore, we have limited historical operations. Two of our subsidiaries, MAM Software and AFS Tire Management, Inc. (f/k/a CarParts Technologies, Inc.) have operated since 1984 and 1997, respectively, as independent companies under different management until our former parent, ADNW, acquired MAM Software in April 2003 and CarParts Technologies, Inc. in August 2004. Since the reverse merger in December 2005, we have been primarily engaged in organizational activities, including developing a strategic operating plan and developing, marketing and selling our products. In particular, we had integrated a third subsidiary as a result of the acquisition of EXP from ADNW in August 2006, its MMI Automotive subsidiary. In February 2007, we acquired DSS from ADNW, which owned a minority interest of DCS Automotive Limited. On November 12, 2007, we sold EXP and DSS, which was EXP’s wholly owned subsidiary. As a result of our limited operating history, it will be difficult to evaluate our business and predict our future operating results.
 
WE MAY FAIL TO ADDRESS RISKS WE FACE AS A DEVELOPING BUSINESS WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
 
We are prone to all of the risks inherent in the establishment of any new business venture. You should consider the likelihood of our future success to be highly speculative in light of our limited operating history, as well as the limited resources, problems, expenses, risks and complications frequently encountered by entities at our current stage of development.
 
To address these risks, we must, among other things,
 
 
·
implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy;
 
 
·
continue to develop new products and upgrade our existing products;
 
 
·
respond to industry and competitive developments;
 
 
·
attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel; and
 
 
·
obtain equity and debt financing on satisfactory terms and in timely fashion in amounts adequate to implement our business plan and meet our obligations.
 
We may not be successful in addressing these risks. If we are unable to do so, our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
 
 
6

 
 
OUR FORMER PARENT IS NOT CURRENT IN ITS REPORTING OBLIGATIONS WITH THE SEC AND DUE TO LACK OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION ABOUT OUR FORMER PARENT, SHARES OF OUR FORMER PARENT MAY BECOME WORTHLESS.
 
Our former parent, ADNW, is not current in its reporting obligations with the SEC and may never become compliant in its obligations to file such reports. As a result there is a limited amount of current and meaningful information about ADNW. The only meaningful information reported in respect of ADNW is information that we report as a result of our own independent filing obligations. Now that the spin-off of our Company from ADNW is complete, even less information will be available with respect to our former parent. As a result, the price of ADNW’s shares may fall and the market for shares of ADNW’s common stock may become non-existent. As a result, any of our shareholders who received shares of our Common Stock as a result of the distribution of the our shares in the spin-off, who will remain holders of ADNW’s common stock may be unable to sell their ADNW stock privately or on the Pink Sheets and their shares in ADNW may become worthless. Further, the fact that ADNW is non-compliant in its obligations to file may reflect negatively on us, as a former subsidiary, and the potential decrease in the price of ADNW’s shares may negatively impact the price of our shares.
 
COMMON EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT BETWEEN OUR COMPANY AND OUR FORMER PARENT COMPANY MAY RESULT IN OUR BECOMING NON-COMPLIANT WITH OUR REPORTING OBLIGATIONS AS OUR FORMER PARENT IS.
 
As discussed above, our former parent is not current in its reporting obligations with the SEC and may never become compliant in its obligations to file such reports. Mr. Ian Warwick, our President and CEO, also served as President and CEO of our former parent until immediately following the spin-off.  There is a possibility that, because Mr. Warwick continues to serve as our President and CEO, we may similarly become non-compliant with our reporting obligations as our former parent is. If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations with the SEC, our shareholders will not have adequate information about us. Further, any trading market currently existing for our securities may decrease and our shareholders may find it difficult to sell their shares.
 
WE MAY FAIL TO SUCCESSFULLY DEVELOP, MARKET AND SELL OUR PRODUCTS.
 
To achieve profitable operations, we, along with our subsidiaries, must continue successfully to improve, market and sell existing products and develop, market and sell new products. Our product development efforts may not be successful. The development of new software products is highly uncertain and subject to a number of significant risks. The development cycle - from inception to installing the software for customers - can be lengthy and uncertain. The ability to market the product is unpredictable and may cause delays. Potential products may appear promising at early stages of development, and yet may not reach the market for a number of reasons.
 
ADDITIONAL ISSUANCES OF SECURITIES WILL DILUTE YOUR STOCK OWNERSHIP AND COULD AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE.
 
As of March 31, 2009, there were 79,125,953 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding and no Preferred Stock issued. Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of an aggregate of 150,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, on such terms and at such prices as our Board of Directors may determine. These shares are intended to provide us with the necessary flexibility to undertake and complete plans to raise funds if and when needed. In addition, we may pursue acquisitions that could include issuing equity, although we have no current arrangements to do so. Any such issuances of securities would have a dilutive effect on current ownership of Aftersoft stock. The market price of our Common Stock could fall in response to the sale or issuance of a large number of shares, or the perception that sales of a large number of shares could occur.
 
 
7

 
 
WE MAY ENCOUNTER SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RISKS IF WE GROW OUR BUSINESS THROUGH ACQUISITIONS.
 
As part of our growth strategy, we may seek to acquire or invest in complementary or competitive businesses, products or technologies. The process of integrating acquired assets into our operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and may absorb significant management attention that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development of our business. We may allocate a significant portion of our available working capital to finance all or a portion of the purchase price relating to possible acquisitions although we have no immediate plans to do so. Any future acquisition or investment opportunity may require us to obtain additional financing to complete the transaction. The anticipated benefits of any acquisitions may not be realized. In addition, future acquisitions by us could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could materially adversely affect our operating results and financial position. Acquisitions also involve other risks, including entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience.
 
AN INCREASE IN COMPETITION FROM OTHER SOFTWARE MANUFACTURERS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUE AND CASH FLOW.
 
Competition in our industry is intense. Potential competitors in the U.S. and Europe are numerous. Most competitors have substantially greater capital resources, marketing experience, research and development staffs and facilities than we have. Our competitors may be able to develop products before us or develop more effective products or market them more effectively which would limit our ability to generate revenue and cash flow.
 
THE PRICES WE CHARGE FOR OUR PRODUCTS MAY DECREASE AS A RESULT OF COMPETITION AND OUR REVENUES COULD DECREASE AS A RESULT.
 
We face potential competition from very large software companies, including Oracle, Microsoft and SAP that could offer Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) and Supply Chain Management (“SCM”) products to our target market of small- to medium-sized businesses servicing the automotive aftermarket. To date we have directly competed with one of these larger software and service companies. There can be no assurance that these companies will not develop or acquire a competitive product or service in the future. Our business would be dramatically affected by price pressure if these larger software companies attempted to gain market share through the use of highly discounted sales and extensive marketing campaigns.
 
IF WE FAIL TO KEEP UP WITH RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, OUR TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTS COULD BECOME LESS COMPETITIVE OR OBSOLETE.
 
The software industry is characterized by rapid and significant technological change. We expect that the software needs associated with the automotive technology will continue to develop rapidly, and our future success will depend on our ability to develop and maintain a competitive position through technological development.

 
8

 
 
WE DEPEND ON PATENT AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS TO DEVELOP AND PROTECT OUR TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTS, WHICH RIGHTS MAY NOT OFFER US SUFFICIENT PROTECTION.
 
The software industry places considerable importance on obtaining patent and trade secret protection for new technologies, products and processes. Our success will depend on our ability to obtain and enforce protection for products that we develop under US and foreign patent laws and other intellectual property laws, preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties.
 
We also rely upon trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. Others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology. We may not be able to meaningfully protect our trade secrets which could limit our ability to exclusively produce products.
 
We require our employees, consultants, and parties to collaborative agreements to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships or collaboration with us. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection of our trade secrets or adequate remedies in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential and proprietary information.
 
IF WE BECOME SUBJECT TO ADVERSE CLAIMS ALLEGING INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD-PARTY PROPRIETARY RIGHTS, WE MAY INCUR UNANTICIPATED COSTS AND OUR COMPETITIVE POSITION MAY SUFFER.
 
We are subject to the risk that we are infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. Although we are not aware of any infringement by our technology on the proprietary rights of others and are not currently subject to any legal proceedings involving claimed infringements, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to such third-party claims, litigation or indemnity demands and that these claims will not be successful. If a claim or indemnity demand were to be brought against us, it could result in costly litigation or product shipment delays or force us to stop selling such product or providing such services or to enter into royalty or license agreements.
 
OUR SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION SERVICES COULD CONTAIN DESIGN DEFECTS OR ERRORS WHICH COULD AFFECT OUR REPUTATION, RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT COSTS TO US AND IMPAIR OUR ABILITY TO SELL OUR PRODUCTS.
 
Our software and information services are highly complex and sophisticated and could, from time to time, contain design defects or errors. We cannot assure you that these defects or errors will not delay the release or shipment of our products or, if the defect or error is discovered only after customers have received the products, that these defects or errors will not result in increased costs, litigation, customer attrition, reduced market acceptance of our systems and services or damage to our reputation.
 
IF WE LOSE KEY MANAGEMENT OR OTHER PERSONNEL OUR BUSINESS WILL SUFFER.
 
We are highly dependent on the principal members of our management staff. We also rely on consultants and advisors to assist us in formulating our development strategy. Our success also depends upon retaining key management and technical personnel, as well as our ability to continue to attract and retain additional highly qualified personnel. We may not be successful in retaining our current personnel or hiring and retaining qualified personnel in the future. If we lose the services of any of our management staff or key technical personnel, or if we fail to continue to attract qualified personnel, our ability to acquire, develop or sell products would be adversely affected.

 
9

 
 
IT MAY BE DIFFICULT FOR SHAREHOLDERS TO RECOVER AGAINST THOSE OF OUR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS THAT ARE NOT RESIDENTS OF THE U.S.
 
Three of our directors, of whom two are also executive officers, are residents of the United Kingdom. In addition, our significant operating subsidiary, MAM Software is located in the United Kingdom. Were one or more shareholders to bring an action against us in the United States and succeed, either through default or on the merits, and obtain a financial award against an officer or director of the Company, that shareholder may be required to enforce and collect on his or her judgment in the United Kingdom, unless the officer or director owned assets which were located in the United States. Further, shareholder efforts to bring an action in the United Kingdom against its citizens for any alleged breach of a duty in a foreign jurisdiction may be difficult, as prosecution of a claim in a foreign jurisdiction, and in particular a foreign nation, is fraught with difficulty and may be effectively, if not financially, unfeasible.
 
OUR MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL SYSTEMS MIGHT BE INADEQUATE TO HANDLE OUR POTENTIAL GROWTH.
 
Our success will depend in significant part on the expansion of our operations and the effective management of growth. This growth will place a significant strain on our management and information systems and resources and operational and financial systems and resources. To manage future growth, our management must continue to improve our operational and financial systems and expand, train, retain and manage our employee base. Our management may not be able to manage our growth effectively. If our systems, procedures, controls, and resources are inadequate to support our operations, our expansion would be halted and we could lose our opportunity to gain significant market share. Any inability to manage growth effectively may harm our ability to institute our business plan.
 
BECAUSE WE HAVE INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS, WE WILL BE SUBJECT TO RISKS OF CONDUCTING BUSINESS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.
 
International operations constitute a significant part of our business, and we are subject to the risks of conducting business in foreign countries, including:
 
 
·
difficulty in establishing or managing distribution relationships;
 
·
different standards for the development, use, packaging and marketing of our products and technologies;
 
·
our ability to locate qualified local employees, partners, distributors and suppliers;
 
·
the potential burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws and trade standards; and
 
·
general geopolitical risks, such as political and economic instability, changes in diplomatic and trade relations, and foreign currency risks and fluctuations.

 
10

 
 
THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK IS LIMITED AND YOU MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SELL YOUR COMMON STOCK.

Our Common Stock is currently quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, and is not traded on a national securities exchange. The market for purchases and sales of the Company’s Common Stock is limited and therefore the sale of a relatively small number of shares could cause the price to fall sharply. Accordingly, it may be difficult to sell shares quickly without significantly depressing the value of the stock. Unless we are successful in developing continued investor interest in our stock, sales of our stock could continue to result in major fluctuations in the price of the stock.

THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK IS LIKELY TO BE VOLATILE AND SUBJECT TO WIDE FLUCTUATIONS.
 
The market price of the securities of software companies has been especially volatile. Thus, the market price of our Common Stock is likely to be subject to wide fluctuations. If our revenues do not grow or grow more slowly than we anticipate, or, if operating or capital expenditures exceed our expectations and cannot be adjusted accordingly, or if some other event adversely affects us, the market price of our Common Stock could decline. If the stock market in general experiences a loss in investor confidence or otherwise fails, the market price of our Common Stock could fall for reasons unrelated to our business, results of operations and financial condition. The market price of our stock also might decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us.
 
SINCE OUR STOCK IS CLASSIFIED AS A “PENNY STOCK,” THE RESTRICTIONS OF THE SEC’S PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS MAY RESULT IN LESS LIQUIDITY FOR OUR STOCK.
 
The SEC has adopted regulations which define a “Penny Stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as therein defined) of less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transactions involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock by a retail customer, of a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. Disclosure is also required to be made about commissions payable to both the Broker/Dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements are required to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Because the market price for our shares of Common Stock is less than $5.00, our securities are classified as penny stock. As a result of the penny stock restrictions, brokers or potential investors may be reluctant to trade in our securities, which may result in less liquidity for our stock.
 
WE HAVE INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR THE SERVICES WE OFFER. HOWEVER, A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES MAY BE MADE AGAINST US REGARDLESS OF OUR RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE, WHICH COULD EXPOSE US TO LIABILITY.
 
We provide business management solutions that we believe are critical to the operations of our customers’ businesses and provide benefits that may be difficult to quantify. Any failure of a customer’s system installed or of the services offered by us could result in a claim for substantial damages against us, regardless of our responsibility for the failure. Although we attempt to limit our contractual liability for damages resulting from negligent acts, errors, mistakes or omissions in rendering our services, we cannot assure you that the limitations on liability we include in our agreements will be enforceable in all cases, or that those limitations on liability will otherwise protect us from liability for damages. In the event that the terms and conditions of our contracts which limit our liability are not sufficient, we have insurance coverage. This coverage of approximately $2,000,000 in the aggregate in the UK and in the US insures the business for negligent acts, error or omission, failure of the technology services to perform as intended, and breach of warranties or representations. It also insures the services that we supply including, web services, consulting, analysis, design, installation, training, support, system integration, the manufacture, sale, licensing, distribution or marketing of software, the design and development of code, software and programming and the provision of software applications as a service, rental or lease. However, there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage will be adequate or that coverage will remain available at acceptable costs. Successful claims brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage could seriously harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Even if not successful, large claims against us could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to our senior management.
 
 
11

 
 
WE WERE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN COVENANTS UNDER OUR SENIOR SECURED NOTE. WE HAVE RECEIVED WAIVERS ON THREE OCCASIONS OF THESE EVENTS OF DEFAULT FROM THE HOLDER OF THE NOTE, HOWEVER THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT WE WILL NOT VIOLATE ANY ADDITIONAL COVENANTS IN THE FUTURE.

During the fiscal periods ended March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, we violated certain covenants related to cash flow ratios under our senior secured note with ComVest Capital LLC, dated December 21, 2007. ComVest has provided us a waiver of these events of default on each occasion. There can be no assurance that we will be able to meet all of the revised financial covenants and other conditions required by our loan agreement in the future. If there are future violations, our lender may not grant additional waivers of future covenant violations and it also could require full repayment of the loan, which would negatively impact our liquidity and our ability to operate.
 
WE DO NOT INTEND TO DECLARE DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON STOCK.
 
We will not distribute dividends to our stockholders until and unless we can develop sufficient funds from operations to meet our ongoing needs and implement our business plan. The time frame for that is inherently unpredictable, and you should not plan on it occurring in the near future, if at all.

 
12

 
 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements and information relating to our business that are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by us or based upon information currently available to us. These statements reflect our current views and assumptions with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties.  No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed, and actual results may vary materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “project” and similar expressions or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. In some cases, you can also identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “plans,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 6, that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In addition, you are directed to factors discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation section beginning on page 37, and the section entitled “Description of Business” beginning on page 24, and as well as those discussed elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
The aforementioned factors do not represent an all-inclusive list. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. In particular, this prospectus sets forth important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. These and other factors, including general economic factors, business strategies, the state of capital markets, regulatory conditions, and other factors not currently known to us, may be significant, now or in the future, and the factors set forth in this prospectus may affect us to a greater extent than indicated. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth in this prospectus and in other documents that we may file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Current Reports on Form 8-K.
 
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this prospectus. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any update or revisions of any of the forward-looking statements to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or to conform these statements to actual results.
 
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
 
We are not providing any tax advice as to the acquisition, holding or disposition of the securities offered herein. In making an investment decision, investors are strongly encouraged to consult their own tax advisor to determine the U.S. federal, state and any applicable foreign tax consequences relating to their investment in our securities.

 
13

 

USE OF PROCEEDS
 
The shares of Common Stock offered hereby will be offered for the account of the selling stockholders named in this prospectus. As a result, all proceeds from the sales of the Common Stock will go to the selling stockholders and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of our Common Stock in this offering.  Please see “Selling Stockholders” below for a list of the selling stockholders.

We have agreed to bear all of the expenses incurred in connection with this offering.

We will receive proceeds of up to approximately $15,054,718 from the exercise of the Warrants if and to the extent that such Warrants are exercised by the selling stockholder (assuming all Warrants are exercised at their current respective exercise prices prior to their expiration).  Since we cannot predict when the warrants will be exercised, if ever, we have not earmarked these proceeds for any particular purpose, and we anticipate that any proceeds that we do receive will be added to our general working capital for application to our ongoing operations.

Of the shares covered by this prospectus, an aggregate 300,000 shares of Common Stock and an aggregate 3,337,500 shares issuable upon exercise of Warrants were initially issued by the Company as partial consideration for the settlement of claims against the Company by Mr. Blumenthal and Mr. McKenna, two of the selling stockholders, respectively. We have not received, and will not receive, any cash proceeds as part of such settlement agreements.
 
DILUTION
 
As of March 31, 2009, we had 79,125,953 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding, and 103,977,099 shares of Common Stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis. In addition to the shares of common stock held by the selling stockholders, the latter figure includes the shares that are issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and conversion of the Term Note they hold. Assuming all of the shares will have been issued and outstanding at the time the selling stockholders sell such shares pursuant to this prospectus, including the shares issued upon the exercise of the Warrants and the conversion of the Term Note, there will be no dilution to our existing stockholders as a result of the offering by the selling stockholders.
 
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
 
The selling stockholders, and their pledgees, donees, transferees and/or successors in interest, named in this prospectus are offering all of the 30,151,149 shares of Common Stock offered through this prospectus.
 
The following table provides information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock held by each of the selling stockholders, including:
 
 
1.
The number of shares beneficially owned prior to this offering;
 
 
2.
The total number of shares to be offered hereby; and
 
 
3.
The total number and percentage of shares that will be beneficially owned upon completion of this offering.
 
All expenses incurred with respect to the registration of the offering by the selling stockholders of these shares of Common Stock (other than transfer taxes) will be borne by us, but we will not be obligated to pay any underwriting fees, discounts, commissions or other expenses incurred by the selling stockholders in connection with the sale of such shares.

 
14

 
 
For purposes of the table below, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. The information in the table below is current as of the date of this prospectus. The information contained in the table below is based upon information provided by the selling stockholders and we have not independently verified this information. The selling stockholders are not making any representation that any shares covered by this prospectus will be offered for sale. The selling stockholders may from time to time offer and sell pursuant to this prospectus any or all of the Common Stock covered hereby.
 
Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, we believe that each of the selling stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power over the shares of our Common Stock indicated. In determining the number of shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage of beneficial ownership, we include any shares as to which that person has sole or shared voting power or investment power, as well as any shares that are subject to outstanding warrants or options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2009. Applicable percentages are based on 79,125,953 shares of our Common Stock outstanding on March 31, 2009.
 
Except as indicated below, no selling stockholder is the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Common Stock or other equity securities issued by us or any securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, our equity securities.
 
For purposes of this table we have assumed that all Warrants are fully exercised, the Term Note is converted in full, and that all shares of Common Stock offered by the selling stockholders are sold. However, the selling stockholders may sell some, all or none of their shares of our Common Stock offered by this prospectus and we are unable to determine the exact number of shares that actually will be sold. We do not know how long the selling stockholders will hold the shares of our Common Stock before selling them, and we currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any of the selling stockholders regarding the sale of any of the shares of our Common Stock.

We may require the selling stockholders to suspend the sales of the securities offered by this prospectus upon the occurrence of any event that makes any statement in this prospectus or the related registration statement untrue in any material respect or that requires the changing of statements in these documents in order to make statements in those documents not misleading.
 
 
15

 
 
Name and Address of Selling Stockholder
 
Number of 
Shares 
Beneficially 
Owned Prior 
to the Offering
   
Number of 
Shares Being 
Offered Hereby
   
Number of 
Shares 
to be 
Beneficially 
Owned After 
the Offering
   
Percentage 
of Shares to be 
Beneficially 
Owned  After 
the Offering
 
Arthur Blumenthal (1)
1801 Swedesford Rd.
Malvern, PA 19355
   
650,365
     
300,000
(2)
   
350,365
     
0.44
%
Aidan J. McKenna
619 East Drive
Sewickly, PA 15143
   
3,337,500
     
3,337,500
(3)
   
0
     
 
Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, LP (4)(5)
450 7 th Avenue, Suite 509
New York, NY  10123
   
3,038,196
     
1,666,668
(6)
   
1,371,528
     
1.72
%
Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, LP I (4)(5)
450 7 th Avenue, Suite 509
New York, NY  10123
   
3,565,919
     
1,666,668
(6)
   
1,899,251
     
2.38
%
Wynnefield Small Cap Value Offshore Fund Ltd.  (5)(7)
450 7 th Avenue, Suite 509
New York, NY  10123
   
5,094,965
     
1,666,668
(6)
   
3,428,297
     
4.29
%
Channel Partnership II, LP (5) (8)
450 7 th Avenue, Suite 509
New York, NY  10123
   
1,250,000
     
1,250,000
(9)
   
0
     
 
Lewis Opportunity Fund, LP (10)
c/o Lewis Asset Management Corp.
45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2570
New York, NY  10111
   
10,434,974
     
5,112,328
(11)
   
5,322,646
     
6.32
%
LAM Opportunity Fund, LTD (10)
c/o Lewis Asset Management Corp.
45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2570
New York, NY  10111
   
2,639,390
     
1,290,671
(12)
   
1,348,719
     
1.68
%
Little Wing LP (13)
145 East 57 th Street, 10 th Floor
New York, NY  10022
   
6,333,800
     
714,584
(14)
   
5,619,216
     
7.07
%
Tradewinds Fund Ltd. (13)
145 East 57 th Street, 10 th Floor
New York, NY  10022
   
600,254
     
118,750
(15)
   
481,504
     
0.61
%
W. Quillen Securities (16)
145 East 57 th Street, 8 th Floor
New York, NY  10022
   
665,966
     
665,966
(17)
   
0
     
 
ComVest Capital, LLC (18)
One North Clematis, Suite 300
West Palm Beach, FL  33401
   
8,444,678
     
8,444,678
(19)
   
0
     
 
Christopher Vulliez
c/o Amphor Capital
529 Fifth Avenue, 8 th Floor
New York, NY  10017
   
416,668
     
416,668
(20)
   
0
     
 
The Hummingbird Value Fund L.P. (21)
145 East 57 th Street, 8 th Floor
New York, NY  10022
   
2,500,000
     
2,500,000
(22)
   
0
     
 
Commonwealth Associates LP (23)
830 Third Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10022
   
1,000,000
     
1,000,000
(24)
   
0
     
 
TOTAL:
   
49,972,675
     
30,151,149
     
19,821,526
     
19.06
%

 
(1)
Mr. Blumenthal is Vice President of Sales and Marketing of ASNA, a position he has held since 2001.
 
 
(2)
Represents shares issued by the Company to Mr. Blumenthal as partial consideration for the settlement of claims he brought against the Company (see “Legal Proceedings” at page 36 and Note 9 on page F-28 below).
 
 
16

 
 
 
(3)
Represents 3,337,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of Warrants which were issued to Mr. McKenna as partial consideration for the settlement of claims he brought against the Company and its subsidiaries (see “Legal Proceedings” at page 36 and Note 9 on page F-27 below).  The Warrants are exercisable at $0.48 per share, and expire on January 31, 2012.
 
 
(4)
The Company has been informed that Wynnefield Capital Management, LLC (“Wynnefield LLC”) is the general partner and managing entity of this selling stockholder, and that each of Nelson Obus and Joshua H. Landes, principals and co-managing members of Wynnefield LLC, exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder.
 
 
(5)
Dwight Mamanteo, one of the Company’s directors, is an investment analyst with Wynnefield Capital, Inc., which is an entity affiliated with Wynnefield LLC.  Mr. Mamanteo exercises neither voting nor dispositive control over the shares beneficially owned by Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, LP, Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, LP I, Wynnefield Small Cap Value Offshore Fund Ltd. or Channel Partnership II, LP.
 
 
(6)
Represents 833,334 shares of common stock, and 833,334 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at an exercise price of $1.00 per share and expire on July 2, 2013.
 
 
(7)
The Company has been informed that Wynnefield Capital, Inc. is the investment manager of this selling stockholder, and that each of Nelson Obus and Joshua H. Landes, principal executive officers of Wynnefield Capital, Inc., exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder.
 
 
(8)
The Company has been informed that Nelson Obus, general partner, exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially by this selling stockholder.
 
 
(9)
Represents 625,000 shares of common stock, and 625,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at an exercise price of $1.00 per share and expire on July 2, 2013.
 
 
(10)
The Company has been informed that Lewis Asset Management Corp. is the managing entity of this selling stockholder, and that W. Austin Lewis IV, portfolio manager and general partner, exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder.
 
 
(11)
Represents 5,112,328 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire April 24, 2014.
 
 
(12)
Represents 1,290,671 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire April 24, 2014.
 
 
(13)
The Company has been informed that Quilcap Management, LLC is the investment manager of this selling stockholder, and that Parker Quillen, president of Quilcap Management, LLC, exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder.  Mr. Quillen’s brother, Whitney S. Quillen, is a broker-dealer registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”). See footnote 16 below.
 
 
(14)
Includes 357,292 shares of common stock and 357,292 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire July 2, 2013.
 
 
(15)
Represents 59,375 shares of common stock and 59,375 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire July 2, 2013.
 
 
(16)
Each of W. Quillen Securities, and its president, Whitney S. Quillen, are broker-dealers registered with FINRA. W. Quillen Securities, received the securities as placement agent compensation in the ordinary course of business, and at the time had no understandings or agreements, directly or indirectly, with any party, to distribute such securities.  The Company has been informed that Whitney S. Quillen exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder.
 
 
(17)
Represents shares of common stock underlying warrants to purchase an aggregate 665,966 shares of the Company’s common stock issued to W. Quillen Securities as placement agent compensation in connection with the Company’s private placement of units of common stock and warrants on July 2, 2007, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and will expire on July 2, 2013.
 
 
17

 
 
 
(18)
The Company has been informed that ComVest Capital Advisors, LLC is the managing entity of this selling stockholder, and that Gary Jaggard, managing director of ComVest Capital, LLC ("ComVest") exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder. This amount does not include 1,000,000 shares of common stock owned by Commonwealth Associates, LP, an entity affiliated with ComVest.
 
 
(19)
On December 21, 2007, the Company entered into a certain Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with ComVest, as lender, pursuant to which ComVest agreed to extend to the Company a $1,000,000 secured revolving credit facility and a $5,000,000 term loan (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Description of Securities – Convertible Note” for additional information). The shares shown in the table include: (i) an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to ComVest in connection with the Loan Agreement, which are currently exercisable at $0.11 per share and expire December 31, 2013; (ii) 2,083,333 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to ComVest in connection with the Loan Agreement, which are currently exercisable at $0.3618 and expire December 31, 2013; and (iii) 3,361,345 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the $5,000,000 principal amount of the certain Convertible Term Note dated December 21, 2007 issued to ComVest at a current conversion rate of $1.4875 per share.

The warrants also contain a cashless exercise feature.  The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices may be adjusted, at any time while the warrants are outstanding, in the event of certain issuances of shares of our common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of our common stock, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective exercise prices of the warrants.

This offering does not include any shares of common stock which may be issued in the event that ComVest elects in the future to require payment of interest in shares of common stock rather than in cash, of approximately 31,933 shares per interest month. The Company may register any such shares in a future registration statement, when and if necessary.
 
 
(20)
Represents 208,334 shares of common stock and 208,334 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire July 2, 2013.
 
 
(21)
The Company has been informed that Hummingbird Management LLC is the managing entity of this selling stockholder, and that Paul D. Sonkin exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder.
 
 
(22)
Represents 1,250,000 shares of common stock, and 1,250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at an exercise price of $1.00 per share and expire on July 2, 2013.
 
 
(23)
The Company has been informed that Commonwealth Management LLC is the general partner of this selling stockholder, and that Robert A. O’Sullivan, managing member of Commonwealth Management LLC, exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by this selling stockholder. Commonwealth Associates LP is a broker-dealer registered with FINRA and Robert O’Sullivan is a registered representative of Commonwealth Associates LP. This amount does not include an aggregate of 8,444,678 shares of common stock beneficially owned by ComVest Capital, LLC, an entity affiliated with Commonwealth Associates LP.
 
 
(24)
Represents an aggregate 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to Commonwealth Associates LP on July 3, 2008 as compensation for work performed during its banking and advisory engagement with the Company. Commonwealth Associates LP received the securities as compensation in the ordinary course of business, and at the time had no understandings or agreements, directly or indirectly, with any party, to distribute such securities.  The warrants are currently exercisable at an exercise price of $0.30 per share and expire on July 3, 2013.
 
Except as disclosed above, none of the selling stockholders:
 
 
(i)
has had a material relationship with us or any of our affiliates other than as a stockholder at any time within the past three years;
 
 
(ii)
served as one of our officers or directors; nor
 
 
(iii)
is a registered broker-dealer or an affiliate of a broker-dealer.
 
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
Our Common Stock is traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “ASFG.OB.” As of March 31, 2009, there were approximately 772 shareholders of and 79,125,953 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

On March 27, 2009, the bid and ask prices of our Common Stock were $0.035 and $0.045 per share, respectively, as reported by the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. The following table shows the range of high and low bids per share of our Common Stock as reported by the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board for the fiscal year periods indicated. Such over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 
18

 
 
   
2007
 
   
High
   
Low
 
1st Quarter ended September 30
 
$
1.20
   
$
1.10
 
2nd Quarter ended December 31
 
$
1.40
   
$
0.51
 
3rd Quarter ended March 31
 
$
0.90
   
$
0.48
 
4th Quarter ended June 30
 
$
0.65
   
$
0.43
 
 
   
2008
 
   
High
   
Low
 
1st Quarter ended September 30
 
$
0.47
   
$
0.20
 
2nd Quarter ended December 31
 
$
0.30
   
$
0.16
 
3rd Quarter ended March 31
 
$
0.45
   
$
0.23
 
4th Quarter ended June 30
 
$
0.25
   
$
0.10
 
 
   
2009
 
   
High
   
Low
 
1st Quarter ended September 30
 
$
0.51
   
$
0.10
 
2nd Quarter ended December 31
 
$
0.34
   
$
0.07
 
3rd Quarter ended March 31  
$
0.10    
$
0.03  

DIVIDENDS

We have never declared or paid dividends on our Common Stock, and our board of directors does not intend to declare or pay any dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Our earnings are expected to be retained for use in expanding our business. The declaration and payment in the future of any cash or stock dividends on the Common Stock will be at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend upon a variety of factors, including our future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors may consider to be relevant from time to time.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
 
Plan Category
 
Number of
Securities to Be
Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
under the Plan (2)
 
   
(a)
 
(b)
 
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
 
0
 
N/A
   
13,909,983
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
  0
 
0
   
0
 
Total
 
  0
 
0
   
13,909,983
 

 
19

 

(1)
Represents the shares authorized for issuance under the Aftersoft Group Inc. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the Annual Meeting held on June 12, 2008. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan, including Stock Options, Stock Awards, and Stock Appreciation Rights is limited to 15% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the first trading day of any fiscal year, or 13,909,983 for fiscal 2009.
   
(2)
As of June 30, 2008.
 
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
 
This prospectus relates to the registration of the resale of 30,151,149 shares of our Common Stock on behalf of the selling stockholders named herein.
 
The selling stockholders may sell some or all of their shares at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, at negotiated prices or at fixed prices.  The shares may be sold or distributed from time to time by the selling stockholders or by pledgees, donees or transferees of, or successors in interest to, the selling stockholders, directly to one or more purchasers (including pledgees) or through brokers or dealers who act solely as agents. The distribution of the shares may be effected in one or more of the following methods:
 
 
·
ordinary broker transactions, which may include long or short sales;
 
 
·
transactions involving cross or block trades on any securities or market where our Common Stock is trading;
 
 
·
purchases by brokers or dealers as principal and resale by such purchasers for their own accounts pursuant to this prospectus;
 
 
·
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
 
 
·
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker solicits purchasers;
 
 
·
privately negotiated transactions;
 
 
·
at the market to or through market makers or into an existing market for the shares;
 
 
·
through transactions in options, swaps or other derivatives (whether exchange listed or otherwise);
 
 
·
in other ways not involving market makers or established trading markets, including direct sales to purchasers or sales effected through agents; or
 
 
·
any combination of the foregoing.
 
The selling security holders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.
 
In addition, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers who may engage in shares in the course of hedging the positions they assume with the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers that require the delivery by such broker-dealers of the shares, which shares may be resold thereafter pursuant to this prospectus.
 
 
20

 
 
Brokers, dealers, or agents participating in the distribution of the shares may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders and/or the purchasers of shares for whom such broker-dealers may act as agent (which compensation as to a particular broker-dealer may be in excess of customary commissions). Neither the selling stockholders nor we can presently estimate the amount of such compensation. We know of no existing arrangements between the selling stockholders and any other stockholder, broker, dealer or agent relating to the sale or distribution of the shares. We do not anticipate that either our stockholders or we will engage an underwriter in the selling or distribution of our shares.
 
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus. We have agreed to bear the expenses of the registration of the shares, including legal and accounting fees.
 
The selling stockholders named in this prospectus must comply with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act in the offer and sale of the Common Stock being offered by them. The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers who execute sales for the selling stockholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In particular, during such times as the selling stockholders may be deemed to be engaged in a distribution of the Common Stock, and therefore be considered to be underwriters, they must comply with applicable laws and may among other things:
 
 
1.
Not engage in any stabilization activities in connection with our Common Stock;
 
 
2.
Furnish each broker or dealer through which Common Stock may be offered, such copies of this prospectus from time to time, as may be required by such broker or dealer, and
 
 
3.
Not bid for or purchase any of our securities or attempt to induce any person to purchase any of our securities permitted under the Exchange Act.
 
Any commissions received by broker-dealers and any profit on the resale of shares sold by them while acting as principals might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act.
 
State Securities - Blue Sky Laws
 
Transfer of our Common Stock may be restricted under the securities regulations or laws promulgated by various states and foreign jurisdictions, commonly referred to as “Blue Sky” laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our Common Stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the Blue Sky laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that there may be significant state Blue-Sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. Accordingly, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments and should be prepared to hold the shares of our Common Stock for an indefinite period of time.
 
 
21

 
 
Regulation M
 
We have informed the selling stockholders that Regulation M promulgated under the Exchange Act may be applicable to them with respect to any purchase or sale of our Common Stock. In general, Rule 102 under Regulation M prohibits any person connected with a distribution of our Common Stock from directly or indirectly bidding for, or purchasing for any account in which it has a beneficial interest, any of the shares or any right to purchase the shares, for a period of one business day before and after completion of its participation in the distribution.
 
During any distribution period, Regulation M prohibits the selling stockholders and any other persons engaged in the distribution from engaging in any stabilizing bid or purchasing our Common Stock except for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the open market price of the Common Stock. None of these persons may effect any stabilizing transaction to facilitate any offering at the market. As the selling stockholders will be offering and selling our Common Stock at the market, Regulation M will prohibit them from effecting any stabilizing transaction in contravention of Regulation M with respect to the shares.
 
We also have advised the selling stockholders that they should be aware that the anti-manipulation provisions of Regulation M under the Exchange Act will apply to purchases and sales of shares of Common Stock by the selling stockholders, and that there are restrictions on market-making activities by persons engaged in the distribution of the shares. Under Regulation M, the selling stockholders or their agents may not bid for, purchase, or attempt to induce any person to bid for or purchase, shares of our Common Stock while such selling stockholders are distributing shares covered by this prospectus. Regulation M may prohibit the selling stockholders from covering short sales by purchasing shares while the distribution is taking place, despite any contractual rights to do so. We have advised the selling stockholders that they should consult with their own legal counsel to ensure compliance with Regulation M.
 
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
 
Number of Authorized and Outstanding Shares. Our Articles of Incorporation authorized the issuance of an aggregate of 150,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, with the Preferred Stock to be issued on such terms and at such prices as the Board of Directors of the Company may determine.
 
As of  March 31, 2009, the Company had 79,125,953 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding and no Preferred Shares issued.
 
Warrants. As of March 31, 2009, there were 21,798,135 warrants to purchase shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding. The terms of these warrants are shown in the following table:
 
   
Amount
   
Exercise Price
 
Expiration Date
     
3,437,500
   
$
0.48
 
1/31/2012
     
12,277,302
   
$
1.00
 
7/2/2013
     
1,000,000
   
$
0.11
 
12/31/2013
     
2,083,333
   
$
0.3618
 
12/31/2013
     
2,000,000
   
$
0.11
 
12/31/2013
     
1,000,000
   
$
0.30
 
7/3/2013
Total:
   
21,798,135
           
 
 
22

 
 
Convertible Note.   On December 21, 2007, in connection with a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement with ComVest Capital LLC (“ComVest”), the Company issued a Term Note to ComVest.  The Term Note is payable to ComVest in the principal amount of $5,000,000. The Term Note currently bears interest at a rate of eleven percent (11%) per annum, except that during the continuance of any event of default, the interest rate will be increased to sixteen percent (16%). The Term Note is repayable in 11 equal monthly installments of $208,333.33 each, payable on first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2010, through November 1, 2010, with the balance due on November 30, 2010.  As of December 31, 2008, the principal balance due on the Term Note was $5,000,000.00.

The principal and interest payable on the Term Note is currently convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the option of ComVest, at a conversion price of $1.4875 per share. In addition, the Company may require conversion of the principal and interest under certain circumstances. The number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Term Note (the “Conversion Shares”), and/or the conversion price, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of Conversion Shares, and/or the conversion price may be adjusted in the event of certain sales or issuances of shares of our Common Stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of our Common Stock, at any time while the Term Note is outstanding, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective conversion price of the Term Note.
 
We have no other current plans, arrangements, commitments or agreement regarding issuances of our Common Stock.
 
Voting Rights. Holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders. Holders of Common Stock have no cumulative voting rights. Accordingly, the holders of in excess of 50% of the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding will be able to elect all of our directors and to approve or disapprove any other matter submitted to a vote of all stockholders.
 
Other. Holders of Common Stock have no preemptive rights to purchase our Common Stock.
 
Dividend. We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our Common Stock, and our board of directors does not intend to declare or pay any dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future.
 
Transfer Agent. Shares of Common Stock are registered at the transfer agent and are transferable at such office by the registered holder (or duly authorized attorney) upon surrender of the Common Stock certificate, properly endorsed. No transfer shall be registered unless we are satisfied that such transfer will not result in a violation of any applicable federal or state securities laws. The transfer agent for our Common Stock is Corporate Stock Transfer, 3200 Cherry Creek Drive South Suite 430 Denver, Colorado 80209. Their phone number is (303) 282-4800.
 
EXPERTS
 
The consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus of Aftersoft Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended, have been audited by KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion), and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

 
23

 
 
KMJ Corbin & Company LLP was not employed on a contingency basis or had, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, a substantial interest, directly or indirectly, in the Company, nor was it with the Company as a promoter, managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer or employee.
 
LEGAL REPRESENTATION
 
Gersten Savage LLP, at 600 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022, has passed upon the validity of the securities being offered hereby. Gersten Savage LLP was not hired on a contingent basis. Gersten Savage LLP has received 800,000 shares of ADNW’s common stock, in consideration for work previously undertaken on behalf of ADNW for which it was not compensated. Further, it is not nor will be a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, or employee of the issuer.
 
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
Our Company
 
Aftersoft Group, Inc. provides software, information and related services to businesses engaged in the automotive aftermarket in the US, UK and Canada and to the automotive dealership market in the UK. The automotive aftermarket consists of businesses associated with the life cycle of a motor vehicle from when the original manufacturer’s warranty expires to when the vehicle is scrapped. Products sold by businesses engaged in this market include the parts, tires and auto services required to maintain and improve the performance or appeal of a vehicle throughout its useful life. The Company aims to meet the business needs of customers who are involved in the maintenance and repair of automobiles and light trucks in three key segments of the automotive aftermarket, namely parts, tires and auto service.
 
The Company’s business management systems, information products and online services permit our customers to manage their critical day-to-day business operations through automated point-of-sale, inventory management, purchasing, general accounting and customer relationship management.
 
The Company’s customer base consists of wholesale parts and tire distributors, retailers, franchisees, cooperatives, auto service chains and single location auto service businesses with high customer service expectations and complex commercial relationships.
 
The Company’s revenues are derived from the following:
 
 
·
The sale of business management systems comprised of proprietary software applications, implementation and training; and
 
 
·
Providing subscription-based services, including software support and maintenance, information (content) products and online services for a fee.
 
The Company’s principal executive office is located at Regus House, Heronsway, Chester Business Park, Chester, UK, CH4 9QR and its phone number is 011-44-124-489-3138.
 
 
24

 
 
CORPORATE BACKGROUND
 
In December 2005, W3 Group, Inc. (“W3”) consummated a reverse acquisition and changed its corporate name to Aftersoft Group, Inc. W3, which was initially incorporated in February 1988 in Colorado, changed its state of incorporation to Delaware in May 2003. On December 21, 2005, an Acquisition Agreement (the “Agreement”) was consummated among W3, a separate Delaware corporation named Aftersoft Group, Inc. (“Oldco”) and Auto Data Network, Inc. (“ADNW”) in which W3 acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Oldco in exchange for issuing 32,500,000 shares of Common Stock of W3, par value $0.0001 per share, to ADNW, which was then the sole shareholder of the Company. At the time of the acquisition, W3 had no business operations. Concurrent with the acquisition, W3 changed its name to Aftersoft Group, Inc. and its corporate officers were replaced. The Board of Directors of the Company appointed three additional directors designated by ADNW to serve until the next annual election of directors. As a result of the acquisition, former W3 shareholders owned 1,601,167, or 4.7% of the 34,101,167 total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock and ADNW owned 32,500,000 or 95.3% of the Company’s Common Stock. On December 22, 2005, Oldco changed its name to Aftersoft Software, Inc. and is currently inactive.
 
On August 26, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of EXP from ADNW in exchange for issuing 28,000,000 shares of Common Stock to ADNW with a market value of $30,800,000. On February 1, 2007, the Company consummated an agreement to acquire Dealer Software and Services Limited (“DSS”), a subsidiary of ADNW, in exchange for issuing 16,750,000 shares of Common Stock to ADNW with a market value of $15,075,000.
 
During 2007, the Company conducted a strategic assessment of its businesses and determined that neither EXP nor DSS fit within its long-term business model. The Company identified a buyer for the two businesses in First London PLC (formerly, First London Securities PLC) (“First London”). First London is a UK-based holding company for a group of businesses engaged in asset management, investment banking, and merchant banking. First London’s shares are traded on the London Plus market. First London’s areas of specialization include technology, healthcare, and resources, and its merchant banking operations take strategic, principal positions in businesses that fall within its areas of specialization.
 
On June 17, 2007, DSS sold all of the shares of Consolidated Software Capital Limited (“CSC”), its wholly owned subsidiary, to RLI Limited, a company affiliated with First London (“RLI”). The consideration for this sale consisted of a note from RLI with a face value of $865,000. On November 12, 2007, as part of the sale of EXP (see below), the $865,000 note was exchanged for 578,672 shares of First London common stock having a fair value of $682,000. The transaction resulted in a loss of $183,000 to the Company.
 
The Company sold its interest in EXP and DSS, EXP’s wholly owned subsidiary, on November 12, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of a Share Sale Agreement (the “EXP Agreement”), EU Web Services Limited (“EU Web Services”) a subsidiary of First London, agreed to acquire, and the Company agreed to sell, the entire issued share capital of EXP it then owned, which amounted to 100% of EXP’s outstanding stock.
 
As consideration for the sale of EXP, including DSS, EU Web Services agreed to issue to the Company, within 28 days of the closing, 1,980,198 ordinary shares (the UK equivalent of common stock), £0.01 par value, in its parent company, First London. The Ordinary shares received by the Company had an agreed upon fair market value of $3,000,000 at the date of issuance of such shares. The Company recorded the shares received at $2,334,000, which represents the bid price of the restricted securities received, and discounted the carrying value by 11% (or $280,000) as, pursuant to the EXP Agreement, the shares could not be sold by the Company for at least 12 months. Further, the EXP Agreement provided that the Company receive on May 12, 2008 additional consideration in the form of: (i) Ordinary shares in EU Web Services having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of the date of issuance, provided that EU Web Services is listed and becomes quoted on a recognized trading market within six (6) months from the date of the Agreement; or (ii) if EU Web Services does not become listed within the time period specified, Ordinary shares in First London having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of May 12, 2008. As EU Web Services did not become listed within the six-month timeframe, the Company received on August 14, 2008 1,874,414 shares in First London, which had a fair market value of $2,000,000 on May 12, 2008.
 
 
25

 
 
Aftersoft is a former subsidiary of ADNW, a publicly traded company, the stock of which is currently traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol ADNW.PK, although it is not current in its reporting obligations with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). ADNW transferred its software aftermarket services operating businesses to Aftersoft and retained its database technology, Orbit. Orbit is a system for supply and collection of data throughout the automotive industry. To date, Orbit is still in its development phase, and ADNW will require substantial external funding to bring the technology to its first phase of testing and deployment. On November 24, 2008, ADNW distributed a dividend of the 71,250,000 shares of Aftersoft common stock that ADNW owned at such time in order to complete the previously announced spin-off of Aftersoft’s businesses. The dividend shares were distributed in the form of a pro rata dividend to the holders of record as of November 17, 2008 (the “Record Date”) of ADNW’s common and convertible preferred stock. Each holder of record of shares of ADNW common and preferred stock as of the close of business on the Record Date was entitled to receive 0.6864782 shares of Aftersoft's common stock for each share of common stock of ADNW held at such time, and/or for each share of ADNW common stock that such holder would own, assuming the convertible preferred stock owned on the Record Date was converted in full. Prior to the spin-off, ADNW owned approximately 77% of Aftersoft’s issued and outstanding common stock. Subsequent to and as a result of the spin-off, Aftersoft is no longer a subsidiary of ADNW.
 
The Company currently has the following wholly owned direct operating subsidiaries: MAM Software in the UK, and ASNA in the US.
 
Aftersoft Group, Inc. Organization Chart
 
  
 
 
26

 
 
MAM Software Ltd.
 
MAM Software is a provider of software to the automotive aftermarket in the UK. MAM Software specializes in providing reliable and competitive business management solutions to the motor factoring (also known as jobber), retailing, and wholesale distribution sectors. It also develops applications for vehicle repair management and provides solutions to the retail and wholesale tire industry. All MAM Software programs are based on the Microsoft Windows family of operating systems. Each program is fully compatible with the other applications in their range, enabling them to be combined to create a fully integrated package. MAM Software is based in Sheffield, UK.
 
Aftersoft Network N.A., Inc. (ASNA)
 
ASNA develops open business automation and distribution channel e-commerce systems for the automotive aftermarket supply chain. These systems are used by leading aftermarket outlets, including tier one manufacturers, program groups, warehouse distributors, tire and service chains and independent installers. ASNA products and services enable companies to generate new sales, operate more cost efficiently, accelerate inventory turns and maintain stronger relationships with suppliers and customers. ASNA has three wholly owned subsidiaries operating separate businesses: (i) AFS Warehouse Distribution Management, Inc. and (ii) AFS Tire Management, Inc. which are both based in Dana Point, California, and (iii) MAM Software, Inc., which is based in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
 
Industry Overview
 
The Company serves the business needs of customers involved in the supply of parts, maintenance and repair of automobiles and light trucks in three key segments of the automotive aftermarket, namely parts, tires and auto service.
 
The industry is presently experiencing a level of consolidation in the lines that are being sold. The previous distinction of having parts and tires provided by two distinct suppliers is coming to an end, as our customer’s businesses need to offer their clients the widest range of products and services under one roof. As a result, what were previously parts-only stores, jobbers and warehouses, are now taking in tire inventory as well in order to satisfy their clients’ demands, and vice-versa. This in turn is causing owners of these businesses to evaluate their business systems to ensure they can compete over the short, medium and long term. An increase in the “do-it-yourself” market due to “credit crunch” is requiring these systems, but at the same time a need to compete strongly with other parts stores is cutting margins as businesses attempt to attract new and return business. Longer warranties are still deferring the length of time until newer vehicles are entering the aftermarket, except for running spares and service parts, accident damage, and optional add-ons such as security, entertainment, performance and customization.
 
The Company believes that growth in the automotive aftermarket will continue to be driven by the following factors:
 
 
·
gradual growth in the aggregate number of vehicles in use;

 
·
an increase in the average age of vehicles in operation;

 
·
fewer new vehicles being purchased due to uncertainty in the economy, especially available credit;

 
·
growth in the total number of miles driven per vehicle per year; and
 
 
27

 
 
 
·
increased vehicle complexity.
 
Products and Services
 
Meeting the needs of the automotive aftermarket requires a combination of business management systems, information products and online services that combine to deliver benefits for all parties involved in the timely repair of a vehicle. The Company provides systems and services that meet these needs and help its customers to meet their customers’ expectations. These products and services include:
 
 
1.
Business Management Systems comprised of the Company’s proprietary software applications, implementation and training and third-party hardware and peripherals;
 
 
2.
Information Products such as an accessible catalog database related to parts, tires, labor estimates, scheduled maintenance, repair information, technical service bulletins, pricing and product features and benefits that are used by the different participants in the automotive aftermarket;
 
 
3.
Online Services and products that provide online connectivity between manufacturers, warehouse distributors, retailers and automotive service providers. These products enable electronic data interchange throughout the automotive aftermarket supply chain between the different trading partners. They also enable procurement and business services to be projected over the Web to an expanded business audience; and
 
 
4.
Customer Support, Consulting and Training that provide phone and online support, implementation and training.
 
Business Management Systems
 
ASNA’s business management systems meet the needs of warehouse distributors, part stores and automotive service providers as follows:
 
Warehouse Distributors
 
DirectStep. This product is designed for and targeted at warehouse distributors that seek to manage multiple locations and inventories on a single system. ASNA through its subsidiary, MAM Software Inc., provides distributors a complete business management system for inventory management, customer maintenance, accounting, purchasing and business analytics. The products enable online trading and services (through ASNA’s OpenWebs product) including price and product information updating integrated with Autopart and VAST products, which are used by parts stores and automotive service providers.
 
Parts Stores
 
Autopart. This is a UK-developed product that is sold and promoted in the US by MAM Software Inc. This product is designed for and targeted at parts store chains that seek to manage multiple locations and inventories on a single system for a regional area and are also suited to managing single location franchisees or buying group members. The product provides point of sale, inventory management, electronic purchasing capabilities and a fully integrated accounting module. It also allows the parts stores to connect with automotive service providers through our Openwebs online services product.
 
 
28

 
 
Automotive Service Providers
 
VAST. This product is designed for and targeted at large- to medium- sized automotive service chains that seek to manage multiple locations and inventories for a regional area is also suited to managing single location stores that are part of a franchise or a buying group. VAST provides point-of-sale, inventory management, electronic purchasing and customer relationship management capabilities. It also allows the automotive service providers to connect with parts and tires warehouse distributors and parts stores through ASNA’s online services and products.
 
Autowork. This is a UK-developed product that is sold by MAM Software Ltd. This product is designed for and targeted at small single store automotive installers. The Autowork product provides estimate, job card, parts procurement and invoice capabilities. It also allows the automotive installer to connect with parts distributors through the Company’s online services and products. This product has recently been made available over the internet as a Software as a Service product (SaaS), allowing customers to purchase the solution on a monthly basis but without the need to manage the system. It has been launched under the name of Autowork+.
 
Autopart. This is a UK-developed product that is sold in both the US and UK. In the US it is sold by MAM Software Inc. and in the UK by MAM Software Ltd. This product is designed for and targeted at parts store chains that seek to manage multiple locations and inventories on a single system for a regional area. It is also suited to managing single location franchisees or buying group members. The product provides point of sale, inventory management, electronic purchasing capabilities and a fully integrated accounting module. An Autopart PDA module is also available to allow field sales personnel to record sales activity in real time on handheld devices while on the road. The PDA module also allows the sales representative to maintain their stock and synchronize in real time while traveling or later locally with Autopart directly. It also allows parts stores to connect with automotive service providers through the ASNA online services, OpenWebs.
 
Information Products
 
The Company provides product catalog and vehicle repair information required to enable point-of-sale transactions. These proprietary database products and services generate recurring revenues through monthly or annual subscription fees.
 
MAM Software Ltd. develops and maintains proprietary information products that differentiate its products from those of the majority of its competitors in the UK. In the US and Canada, ASNA develops and maintains a proprietary workflow capability that integrates information products sourced from its suppliers such as Activant, WHI and NAPA to its automotive parts and tire customers, including warehouse distributors, parts stores and automotive service providers.
 
MAM Software Ltd.’s principal information service is AutoCat, which provides access to a database of over 9 million unique automobile vehicle applications for approximately 500,000 automotive parts product lines in the UK market. Business systems software used by the warehouse distributor, parts store and auto service provider enable the user to access information about parts quickly and accurately. MAM Software Ltd. charges a monthly or annual subscription fee for its information products and provides customers with periodic updates via compact discs. In the UK, there are approximately 1,300 end-users who use our information products.
 
 
29

 
 
In addition, information products developed or resold by ASNA include Interchange Catalog, a database that provides cross references of original equipment manufacturer part numbers to aftermarket manufacturer part numbers; Price Updating, a service that provides electronic price updates following a price change by the part manufacturer; Labor Guide, a database used by automotive service providers to estimate labor hours for purposes of providing written estimates of repair costs to customers; Scheduled Service Intervals, a database of maintenance intervals; and Tire Sizing, a database that cross-references various tire products and applications.
 
Online Services
 
Both ASNA and MAM Software Ltd. offer online e-commerce services in the form of system-to-system and web browser implementations. These online services connect the automotive aftermarket from manufacturers through warehouse distributors and parts stores to automotive service providers for the purpose of purchasing parts and tires, fleet and national account transaction processing and online product price information.
 
OpenWebs(TM) e-Commerce Gateway Services
 
In the US and Canada, ASNA’s e-commerce gateway services use automotive industry standard messaging specifications to deliver online services that connect the automotive aftermarket supply chain for the purpose of purchasing parts and tires, fleet and national account transaction processing, online product and price updating for parts and tires.
 
OpenWebs(TM) e-Commerce Browser Services
 
In the US and Canada, ASNA’s e-commerce browser services enable warehouse distributors and parts stores to provide an online service to automotive service providers for the purpose of purchasing of parts and tires, accessing account information and other browser-based channel management services.
 
Autonet
 
In the UK, MAM Software Ltd.’s Autonet online services connect manufacturers, warehouse distributors, parts stores and automotive service providers for the purpose of purchasing of parts and tires, fleet and national account transaction processing and product information and price distribution.
 
AutoCat+
 
MAM Software Ltd.’s UK product information database is available for access and distribution as a Web-driven service called AutoCat+ in which the database and access software have been enhanced to enable service professionals to look up automotive products for themselves, view diagrams and select the parts for their vehicle. This enhanced version of the AutoCat product is used by parts stores and the professional installer segments of the automotive parts aftermarket in the UK. ASNA resells a similar online service in the US and Canada called VAST.
 
Customer Support and Consulting and Training
 
The Company provides support, consulting and training to its customers to ensure the successful use of its products and services. The Company believes this extra level of commitment and service builds customer relationships, enhances customer satisfaction and maximizes customer retention. These services consist of the following:
 
 
30

 
 
 
·
Phone and online support. Customers can call dedicated support lines to speak with knowledgeable personnel who provide support and perform on-line problem solving as required.
 
 
·
Implementation, education and training consulting. Our consulting and training teams work together to minimize the disruption to a customer’s business during the implementation process of a new system and to maximize the customer’s benefit from the use of the system through training.
 
ASNA and MAM Software Ltd. also provide a customer-only section on their intranet sites that allows customers direct access to newsgroups, on-line documentation and information related to products and services. New customers enter into support agreements, and most retain such service agreements for as long as they own the system. Monthly fees vary with the number of locations and the software modules, information products and online services subscribed to. The agreements are generally month-to-month agreements. The Company offers training at both ASNA and MAM Software Ltd.’s facilities, the customer’s facilities and online for product updates or introduce specific new capabilities.
 
MAM Software Ltd.’s UK catalog information product and other information services are delivered by its AutoCat team. The AutoCat product team sources, standardizes and formats data collected in an electronic format from over 130 automotive parts manufacturers. MAM Software Ltd. provides this data to its customers in a variety of formats. MAM Software Ltd. previously produced catalog updates on compact discs approximately four times a year from its facilities in Wareham, England, but has recently updated the system to AutoCat+, which allows customers to subscribe to receive online updates via the Internet.
 
Distribution
 
There are two primary vertical distribution channels for aftermarket parts and tire distribution: the traditional wholesale channel and the retail channel.
 
Automotive Aftermarket Distribution Channels
 
 
·
Traditional Wholesale Channel . The wholesale channel is the predominant distribution channel in the automotive aftermarket. It is characterized by the distribution of parts from the manufacturer to a warehouse distributor, to parts stores and then to automotive service providers. Warehouse distributors sell to automotive service providers through parts stores, which are positioned geographically near the automotive service providers they serve. This distribution method provides for the rapid distribution of parts. The Company has products and services that meet the needs of the warehouse distributors, parts stores and the automotive service providers.
 
 
31

 
 
 
·
Retail Channel . The retail channel is comprised of large specialty retailers, small independent parts stores and regional chains that sell to “do-it-yourself” customers. Larger specialty retailers, such as Advance Discount Auto Parts, AutoZone, Inc., O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. and CSK Auto Corporation carry a greater number of parts and accessories at more attractive prices than smaller retail outlets and are gaining market share. The business management systems used in this channel are either custom developed by the large specialty retailers or purchased from business systems providers by small to medium-sized businesses. The Company has products and services that support the retail channel.
 
In addition to these two primary channels, some aftermarket parts and tires end up being distributed to new car dealers. The business management systems used in this channel have unique functionality specific to new car dealerships. The Company sells a small number of products into the auto service provider side of car dealerships. Aftermarket wholesalers of parts and tires provide online purchasing capabilities to some new car dealerships.
 
Product Development
 
The Company’s goal is to add value to its customer’s businesses through products and services designed to create optimal efficiency. To accomplish this goal, the Company’s product development strategy consists of the following three key components:
 
 
·
Integrating all of the Company’s products so that its software solutions work together seamlessly, thereby eliminating the need to switch between applications;
     
 
·
Enhancing the Company’s current products and services to support its changing customers needs; and
     
 
·
Providing a migration path to the Company’s business management systems, reducing a fear that many customers have that changing systems will disrupt business.
 
Sales and Marketing
 
The Company’s sales and marketing strategy is to acquire customers and retain them by cross-selling and up-selling a range of commercially compelling business management systems, information products and online services.
 
Within the parts, tire and auto service provider segments, each division sells and markets through a combination of field sales, inside sales, and independent representatives. The Company seeks to partner with large customers or buying groups and leverage their relationships with their customers or members. Incentive pay is a significant portion of the total compensation package for all sales representatives and sales managers. Outside sales representatives focus primarily on identifying and selling to new customers complemented by an inside sales focus on selling upgrades and new software applications to its installed customer base.
 
The Company’s marketing approach aims to leverage its reputation for customer satisfaction and for delivering systems, information and services that improve a customer’s commercial results. The goal of these initiatives is to maximize customer retention and recurring revenues, to enhance the productivity of the field sales team, and to create the cross-selling and up-selling opportunities for its systems, information products and online services.
 
 
32

 
 
ASNA also has agreements with three software distributors in North America to sell its products. We pay distributors a percentage for each software package they sell. The client pays the distributor directly for any professional services rendered to deploy the software. This is becoming a less important part of ASNA’s sales strategy as our in-house sales representatives generate most of our sales.
 
Research and Development
 
The Company spent approximately $3.2 million in fiscal 2008 on research and development, with approximately $1.8 million spent by ASNA, and $1.4 million by MAM Software. In fiscal 2007, the Company spent approximately $2.9 million on research and development, with $1.7 million by ASNA, $1.2 million by MAM Software.
 
The Company spent approximately $ .71 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008, on research and development, with approximately $ .39 million spent by ASNA  and the $ .32 million spent by MAM Software Ltd.

The Company spent approximately $ .77 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007 on research and development with approximately $ .42 million spent by ASNA and $ .35 million spent by MAM Software Ltd.

The Company spent approximately $ 1.49 million for the six months ended December 31, 2008 on research and development with approximately $ .79 million spent by ASNA and   $ .70 million spent by MAM Software Ltd.

The Company spent approximately $ 1.46 million for the six months ended December 31, 2007 on research and development with approximately $ .82 million pent by ASNA and $ .64 million spent by MAM Software.
 
Patent and Trademark
 
MAM Software holds a UK trademark for its Autonet product. The trademark is a graphical device that is made up of text saying “Autonet Tailored Internet Solutions for the Automotive Industry.” It was filed for registration December 8, 2001 and registration was granted August 9, 2002 under ADP number 0812875001 and is due for renewal December 8, 2011.
 
Customers
 
For its fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, no single customer accounted for more than 10 % of the Company’s total revenues. The Company’s top ten customers collectively accounted for 20% of total revenues. Some of ASNA’s top customers in North America include Autopart International, AutoZone, Monro Muffler Brake, Fountain Tire and US Tire and Exhaust. In the UK market, MAM Software’s top customers include Unipart Automotive, Motoserv, Sutton Autofactors, and Auto Battery Service.
 
No customer accounted for more than 10 % the Company’s revenue during the three and six month period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
 
Competition
 
In the US and Canada, ASNA competes primarily with Activant, Inc. and several smaller software companies, including Autologue, Maddenco, Janco, ASA and WHI, Inc. (formerly known as Wrenchead Inc.) that provide similar products and services to the US automotive aftermarket. Additionally, an ongoing competitive threat to the Company is custom developed in-house systems, information products and online services. For example, AutoZone, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company’s NAPA Parts Group both developed their own business management systems and electronic automotive parts catalogs for their stores and members, although the Company currently has a partnership agreement with each of these companies to supply their information products the Company’s solutions.
 
In the US and Canada, the Company expects to compete successfully against its competitors using two separate and complimentary strategies. First, the Company will continue to focus on selling and promoting our complete supply chain solutions that provide businesses with easy integration of its business management information systems into their existing supply chain structures. Second, the Company will continue its strategy of working with those businesses that already manage their own supply chains and information products (catalogs), such as buying groups like NAPA, helping to improve and compliment their systems with the Company’s products.
 
ASNA, in the US and Canada, competes with multiple products across different market segments, so its competitors vary by segment.
 
 
33

 
 
Within the warehouse distribution segment, the Company will continue to support its legacy system, Direct Step, which is a product which the Company developed many years ago that enables large warehouses with millions of parts to locate, manage, pack and deliver the parts with ease and efficiency. Direct Step is not a Microsoft Windows-based technology. The Company’s existing and prospective customers are moving towards modern solutions which integrate easily with Internet-based transactions and interactions, and the Company believes that its AutoPart product provides that solution. The Company has been selling AutoPart successfully in the UK for the past six years, and feels that the success this product in the UK and the successful installation of this product within the US will enable the Company to promote and benefit quickly from this product.
 
The tire segment is comprised of three distinct elements: retail, wholesale and commercial. Within the tire segment and the auto service segment, the Company focuses on client and market requirements, which the Company believes will enable it to offer its clients the best solution, regardless of the size of a client’s business. By continually integrating and extending the functionality of its solutions across the entire supply chain, the Company believes that it will be able to offer existing and potential clients products that suit their present and future needs. Management believes that its products will present existing and potential clients the opportunity to move away from their older existing systems, which may restrict their market opportunities, and will permit integration into additional sales channels and reduce the costly maintenance of older systems.
 
The auto parts segment within the auto service space has many competitors who have developed applications for single location auto service shops. Many of these have been developed by parts distributors like NAPA and AutoZone. While these applications do well in a small single location store, they are not widely distributed in the multi-store location segment of the auto parts business. The Company’s goal is not to pursue single store locations. Rather, it will focus on the multi-store for which its product VAST is highly suited. The Company believes that this multi-store ability offers strong opportunities to beat the competition in this area and quickly increase the Company’s customer base.
 
The last area that the Company plans to compete in is the e-commerce space, providing new tools and solutions for this expanding Internet marketplace. The goal of the Company’s OpenWebs product is to connect both parts and tire partners together in a real-time environment so they can perform electronic ordering as well as disseminate information. Within the Tire segment, the Company feels that it has a competitive advantage. The Company’s observation has led it to believe that most tire distributors either do not have a business-to-business solution or have developed solutions from independent sources. While the parts segment of this market is largely tied to Activant, Inc at this time, the Company believes that customers are looking for solutions that simply integrate their supply chain, completely and without further restrictions. The Company’s OpenWebs solution will allow them to achieve these goals.
 
In the UK, MAM Software continues to compete primarily with Activant, Inc. and several other smaller software companies including EGO and RAMDATA. The Company feels that it provides a range of solutions that combine proven concepts with cutting-edge technology that are functional, effective and reliable. The Company’s feels that its focus towards continuing to provide solutions that enable business to find new efficiencies and increase existing efficiencies, as the Company develops its own products, will provide it an advantage over the competition. These efforts, together with strong post sales support and ongoing in depth product and market support, will assist the Company in generating and maintaining its position within the market.
 
Several large enterprise resource planning and software companies, including Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation and SAP AG continue to make public announcements regarding the attractiveness of various small and medium enterprise vertical markets and have established new accounts in non-automotive markets. The Company to date has only competed with one of these larger software and service companies, in the UK, which has lead to a partnership on a project with MAM Software Ltd taking the lead. However there can be no assurance that those companies will not develop or acquire a competitive product or service in the future.
 
 
34

 
 
Employees
 
The Company has 174 full-time employees: three at Aftersoft Group Inc., 52 at ASNA and 119 at MAM Software Ltd. The three employees in Aftersoft Group Inc are our senior executives. ASNA has 52 employees in the US comprised of 4 in management, 8 in sales and marketing, 10 in research and development, 25 in professional services and support and 5 in general and administration. MAM Software has 119 employees in the UK comprised of 6 in management, 13 in sales and marketing, 22 in research and development, 70 in professional services and support and 8 in general and administration.
 
All of the Company’s employees have executed customary confidentiality and restrictive covenant agreements.
 
The Company believes it has a good relationship with its employees and is currently unaware of any key management or other personnel looking to either retire or leave the employment of the Company. During 2008, the Company adopted a 2007 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders.
 
Additional Information
 
We are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and in accordance therewith, we file periodic reports, documents and other information with the SEC relating to our business, financial statements and other matters. Such reports and other information may be inspected and are available for copying at the offices of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 on official business days during the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. or may be accessed at www.sec.gov. Information regarding the operation of the public reference rooms may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
 
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
 
Our corporate offices are Regus House, Herons Way, Chester Business Park, Chester, CH4 9QR UK. The main telephone number is 0-11-44-1244-893138. Aftersoft leases approximately 600 square feet at its corporate offices and pays rent of $3,227 per month. Aftersoft Group (UK) Ltd has offices at Regus House, Herons Way, Chester Business Park, Chester, CH4 9QR UK. The main telephone number is 44-1244-893138.

ASNA has offices at 34052 La Plaza Drive, Suite 201, Dana Point, California 92629. The main telephone number is 949-488-8860. ASNA has an office at 3435 Winchester Rd, Ste 100, Allentown, PA 18104 and the phone number at that office is 610-336-9045, and an office at 125 Fernwood Rd, Ste 202, Wintersville, OH 43953, with a phone number of 740-264-6853. The California offices total approximately 3,400 square feet and are leased at an aggregate a monthly cost of $7,672. The Allentown, Pennsylvania office is approximately 7,105 square feet in size and is leased for a monthly cost of $14,663 and the Wintersville, Ohio office is approximately 617 square feet in size and is leased monthly for a cost of $436.

MAM Software has three offices. It has headquarters at 1 Station Road, Deepcar, Sheffield, S36 2SQ, UK. The phone number is 44-114-283-7135. It also has a regional office at 15 Duncan Close, Red House Square, Moulton Park, Northampton, NN3 6WL, UK. The phone number is 44-160-449-4001. It has second regional office at Leanne Business Centre, Sandford Lane, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 4DY, UK. The phone number is 44-192-955-0922. MAM Software leases approximately 17,970 square feet at its company headquarters at a monthly cost of $15,294. It leases approximately 1,223 square feet at its Northampton office at a monthly cost of $2,105 and approximately 717 square feet at its Wareham office at a monthly cost of $1,277.
 
 
35

 
 
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
As previously reported, the Company was informed of a verdict against CarParts Technologies, Inc. (“CarParts”) in favor of Aidan McKenna, one of the selling stockholders named herein, in litigation in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The judgment was for the principal amount of $3,555,000 and stems from a complaint filed by Mr. McKenna on November 13, 2002 regarding an asset purchase transaction. That judgment also terminated the Company’s counter-claim against Mr. McKenna alleging breach of contract. CarParts is now known as AFS Tire Management, Inc. (“AFS Tire”). AFS Tire is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aftersoft Network N.A, Inc., which, in turn, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
 
In a companion case to the aforementioned action, Mr. McKenna filed a Request for Entry of Sister State Judgment in the Superior Court of California for Orange County seeking the enforcement of his Pennsylvania judgment against CarParts in Orange County, California. In response, CarParts filed a Motion to Vacate Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment or to Stay Enforcement of Judgment. The hearing on that motion was set for and heard on September 7, 2006. At the hearing, CarParts’ motion was denied.
 
In September 2006, Mr. McKenna filed another action in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. This new action seeks to enforce Mr. McKenna’s previously described judgment against CarParts against several new entities, including AFS Tire Management, Inc., AFS Warehouse Distribution Management, Inc., AFS Autoservice, Inc., Auto Data Network, Inc. and the Company. This new action alleges that all of these entities are liable for payment of Mr. McKenna’s judgment against CarParts.
 
On August 1, 2007, the Company and Mr. McKenna entered into an agreement that settled this outstanding matter. Pursuant to the settlement, we paid Mr. McKenna $2,000,000 in cash, issued him an 8% promissory note in the principal amount of $825,000, which is payable over 24 months, and issued Mr. McKenna 1,718,750 shares of our Common Stock, which represented $825,000 at a value of $0.48 per share (the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of settlement). Mr. McKenna was also entitled to warrants to purchase an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock at the same price. Upon entering this agreement all parties agreed to withdraw all existing litigation and claims. The Company finalized its agreement with McKenna on September 6, 2007 and revised its litigation accrual to $3,650,000 to reflect the settlement. The shares were issued in August 2007 (see Notes 7, 9 and 10 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Registration Statement). In November 2007, the Company amended the settlement agreement and issued 1,718,750 warrants to purchase Common Stock for $0.48 per share. The warrants were issued to replace the Common Stock included in the settlement agreement.  The common stock underlying 3,337,500 of these Warrants form part of the shares being registered herein.
 
 
36

 
 
Additionally, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Arthur Blumenthal, one of the selling stockholders named herein. Mr. Blumenthal’s lawsuit, “Arthur Blumenthal, et al. v. Auto Data Network, Inc., et al.,” emanated from an agreement Mr. Blumenthal had with a subsidiary of the company, AFS Tire Management, Inc. which was previously called CarParts Technologies, for the purchase of Anderson BDG, which had not been settled. The lawsuit was filed on September 11, 2006 in the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, West Chester, Pennsylvania, File No. 06-07960. The Company renegotiated the agreement with Mr. Blumenthal, the terms of which required the Company to make a payment of $50,000 cash and the issuance to Mr. Blumenthal and registration of 300,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, which were issued in fiscal 2007 and valued at $0.48 per share, (the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of settlement) or $144,000. The Company subsequently completely settled the lawsuit with Mr. Blumenthal and repaid his notes, plus interest, totaling $957,329 in fiscal 2008.  The 300,000 shares form a part of the shares being registered herein.
 
The Company funded these settlements from part of the proceeds raised during a private placement of units of Common Stock and warrants, which was completed on July 2, 2007, and the sale of its holding in DCS Automotive Holdings Limited.
 
Homann Tire LTD (“Homann”) filed a complaint against the Company’s subsidiary AFS Tire Management, Inc. (f/k/a CarParts Technologies, Inc.) in California District Court on August 11, 2005 regarding the Company’s obligations pursuant to a software license agreement that it had entered into with Homann on October 18, 2002. The Company believed that complaint was “without merit” as it had received a signed system acceptance on the software and as per standard contracts, this removes any possibility of a refund, unfortunately, the Company was not in a financial position to pursue this case so it was felt prudent to settle the case. The Company started to implement the system but full installation was never completed and Homann moved to another system 6 months later. During depositions pursuant to this case, the Company successfully negotiated a settlement agreement with Homann on March 29, 2007. Although the maximum sum payable under the original contract was $271,408, the Company was able to negotiate more favorable terms. The terms of the agreement call for a settlement payment to Homann for $150,000 as evidenced by a note payable. The note payable bears interest at 8% per annum. Payment of $25,000 cash was made in April 2007. The remaining balance of $125,000 is payable in April 2009, the Company expects to be able to pay for this from free cash flow at that time. Interest on the note payable is payable in monthly installments of $833. The Company reclassified the settlement liability from accrued legal expenses to $25,000 of current portion of notes payable and $125,000 of notes payable, net of current portion.
 
The Company is also involved in certain legal proceedings and is subject to certain lawsuits, claims and regulations in the ordinary course of its business. Although the ultimate effect of these matters is often difficult to predict, management believes that their resolution will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
 
Some of the statements contained in this Form S-1, which are not purely historical, may contain forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s objectives, expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, our actual results could differ materially from those disclosed in these statements due to various risk factors and uncertainties affecting our business, including those detailed in the “Risk Factors” section. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform them to actual results. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
 
 
37

 
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
 
Available-for-Sale Investments
 
We account for our investments in equity securities with readily determinable fair values that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”). Management determines the appropriate classification of such securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. Restricted securities are valued at the quoted market bid price and discounted for the required holding period until the securities can be liquidated. We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale under SFAS 115. Marketable securities consist of equity securities. The specific identification method is used to determine the cost basis of securities disposed of. Available-for-sale securities with quoted market prices are adjusted to their fair value. Any change in fair value during the period is excluded from earnings and recorded, net of tax, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Any decline in value of available-for-sale securities below cost that is considered to be “other than temporary” is recorded as a reduction of the cost basis of the security and is included in the statement of operations as an impairment loss.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on specific identification of customer accounts and our best estimate of the likelihood of potential loss, taking into account such factors as the financial condition and payment history of major customers. We evaluate the collectibility of our receivables at least quarterly. The allowance for doubtful accounts is subject to estimates based on the historical actual costs of bad debt experienced, total accounts receivable amounts, age of accounts receivable and any knowledge of the customers’ ability or inability to pay outstanding balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The differences could be material and could significantly impact cash flows from operating activities.
 
 
38

 
 
Software Development Costs
 
Costs incurred to develop computer software products to be sold or otherwise marketed are charged to expense until technological feasibility of the product has been established. Once technological feasibility has been established, computer software development costs (consisting primarily of internal labor costs) are capitalized and reported at the lower of amortized cost or estimated realizable value. Purchased software development is recorded at its estimated fair market value. When a product is ready for general release, its capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of three years. If the future market viability of a software product is less than anticipated, impairment of the related unamortized development costs could occur, which could significantly impact our recorded net income/loss.
 
Goodwill
 
SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” addresses how intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets should be accounted for in the financial statements upon their acquisition and after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized but rather be tested at least annually for impairment, and intangible assets that have finite useful lives be amortized over their useful lives. In addition, SFAS 142 expands the disclosure requirements about goodwill and other intangible assets in the years subsequent to their acquisition. SFAS 142 provides specific guidance for testing goodwill and intangible assets that will not be amortized for impairment. Goodwill will be subject to impairment reviews by applying a fair-value-based test at the reporting unit level, which generally represents operations one level below the segments we report. An impairment loss will be recorded for any goodwill that is determined to be impaired. We perform impairment testing on all existing goodwill at least annually. If the actual fair value of the reporting unit is less than estimated, impairment of the related goodwill could occur, which could significantly impact our recorded net income/loss.
 
Long-Lived Assets
 
Our management assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. If the actual fair value of the long-lived assets are less than estimated, impairment of the related asset could occur, which could significantly impact the recorded net income/loss of the Company.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions.” Accordingly, software license revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product component has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is probable. If any of these criteria are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the criteria are met. In accordance with SOP 98-9, the Company accounts for delivered elements in accordance with the residual method when arrangements include multiple product components or other elements and vendor-specific objective evidence exists for the value of all undelivered elements. Revenues on undelivered elements are recognized once delivery is complete.
 
In those instances where arrangements include significant customization, contractual milestones, acceptance criteria or other contingencies (which represents the majority of the Company’s arrangements), the Company accounts for the arrangements using contract accounting, as follows:
 
 
39

 
 
 
1.
When customer acceptance can be estimated, expenditures are capitalized as work in process and deferred until completion of the contract at which time the costs and revenues are recognized.
     
 
2.
When customer acceptance cannot be estimated based on historical evidence, costs are expensed as incurred and revenue is recognized at the completion of the contract when customer acceptance is obtained.
 
The Company records amounts billed to customers in excess of recognizable revenue as customer advances and deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
Revenues for maintenance agreements, software support, on-line services and information products are recognized ratably over the terms of the related service agreements.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. Deferred taxation is provided in full in respect of taxation deferred by timing differences between the treatment of certain items for taxation and accounting purposes.
 
Overview
 
Aftersoft Group Inc. is a company that operates through two wholly owned subsidiaries based in the US (ASNA) and the UK (MAM), which operate independently of one another. We market and develop business management software solutions that manage both the business and supply chain for small and medium-sized firms in the automotive aftermarket. The automotive aftermarket includes those businesses that supply servicing, parts, oil, tires, and performance extras to the retail market.
 
Management believes that the largest single issue facing the automotive aftermarket at this time is the downturn of the global economy, especially the economics in which we operate. The constraint of credit within the U.S. and U.K. markets is forcing automobile owners to retain their existing automobiles far longer than they may have previously planned. This is forcing owners to seek out more economic ways of maintaining their vehicles, and management believes this presents an opportunity to the Company. The need for consumers to maintain their vehicles longer requires service suppliers to offer a wide range of services at highly competitive prices. Management believes that this can be achieved only by those businesses that are able to efficiently manage their businesses and find methods to reduce costs without affecting service levels, which may best be done through investments in ‘up to date’ management information systems, specifically those designed for the automotive market. However, management also has recently noticed that some businesses wishing to invest in new management systems are also finding their access to credit reduced. This may have a detrimental effect on our revenues if customers are unable to fund purchases. Management still believes that the aftermarket landscape will continue to change over the next 18 months, with the convergence of the aftermarket and tire markets, but this rate of change maybe slower than first expected. Management still believes that the desire of parts manufacturers to produce and control their own product catalogues, rather than allowing this information to be made available by third-party catalog suppliers, will present opportunities to the Company.
 
 
40

 
 
Our revenue and income is derived primarily from the sale of software, services and support, although in the UK we also earn a percentage of our revenue and income from the sale of hardware systems to clients. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, we generated revenues of $22,463,000 with an operating loss of $11,504,000, and during the six months ended December 31, 2008, we generated revenues of $10,850,000 with an operating loss of $305,000. During our 2008 fiscal year and the first half of fiscal 2009, 77% and 76%, respectively, of our revenues come from the UK market. During our 2008 fiscal year, we raised capital through equity and debt financing (netting proceeds of approximately $6.4 million) and the sale of our DCS investment, which we have used in part to settle outstanding legal judgments and repay outstanding notes. The remainder of the capital is being used to fund the growth of our business.
 
We are headquartered in Chester, U.K. and maintain additional offices for our U.S. operating subsidiary in Dana Point, California, Allentown, Pennsylvania and Wintersville, Ohio, and, for our U.K. operating subsidiary, in Sheffield, Northampton and Wareham in the U.K.

The software that we sell is mainly based on a Microsoft Windows-based technology although we do still have an older ‘Green Screen’ terminal-based product. The four main products that we sell in the US each relate to a specific component of the automotive aftermarket supply chain, including warehouse distributing, the jobber, the installing and the “open web.” We sell our Direct Step product into the warehouse segment, which enables large warehouses with millions of parts to locate, manage, pack and deliver the parts with ease and efficiency. We sell our Autopart product into the jobber segment, which manages a jobber’s entire business (i.e., financial, stock control and order management) but more important, enables the jobber quickly to identify the parts that his client needs, either via the internet or telephone, so that the correct product for the vehicle on the ramp can be supplied. We sell our VAST product into the installer, segment, which repairs and maintains automobiles. The installer needs systems that enable it to efficiently and simply manage its businesses, whether as a single entity or national multi-site franchise. The fourth and final segment is the “open webs.” This technology allows these three separate business solutions to connect to each other and/or other third party systems to allow, among other processes, ordering, invoicing and stock checking to take place in real-time both up and down the supply chain. The UK market differs from that of the US in that it does not have the same number of large warehouse distribution centers, so we do not sell the Direct Step product in the UK We continue to sell the Autopart product to the jobber market, but sell Autowork and Autocat+ to the installer market.
 
To date, management has identified four areas that it believes we need to focus on.
 
The first area is the release of one of our U.K. products developed by MAM, our U.K. subsidiary, under a Software as a Service (SaaS) model. This is where software solutions are made available to end-users via the internet and does not require them to purchase the software directly but ‘rent’ it over a fixed period of time. Management believes that this will be a rapidly growing market for the U.K. as businesses continue to look for ways of reducing capital expenditures while maintaining levels of service. Once this has been successfully deployed in the U.K. the Company will look to use a similar model in the U.S.

The second area of focus is the sales and marketing strategy within the U.S. market. To date, although increased resources have been made available for sales and marketing, they have not brought the levels of return that management had expected. Management has reviewed the U.S. business’ sales processes and marketing efforts and made what it feels are significant improvements that will bear fruit over the next six months. In addition to this, a Head of Communications and Marketing has recently been appointed and the Company expects this appointment to further increase the profile of the U.S. business and its product offering. However, management still recognizes that if it is unable to recruit, train and deploy suitably capable personnel within the market, the businesses products will be undervalued and its market potential will not be reached.
 
 
41

 
 
The third area of focus relates to the continued sales and market initiatives tied to the Autopart product within the U.S. market. A senior member of the U.K. management team has been appointed to join the U.S. business to head the efforts relating to this product along with a complementary DirectStep product. To date this move has proved successful, as we have increased levels of service and knowledge of our U.S. staff members, and management believes that this will lead to significant revenue increases within the next 6 months .While management believes that this is the correct route to follow, it is aware that this effort and the move of personnel may affect the U.K. business following the transfer of a key member of former U.K. management.
 
The fourth area is other English-speaking markets in auto industry aftermarkets as opposed to f ocusing on additional vertical markets that share common characteristics to that of the automotive market. Management intends to carefully monitor this expansion as a result of the current state of the global economy.

Former Subsidiaries

On November 12, 2007, the Company divested all of its shares in EXP. Pursuant to the terms of a Share Sale EXP Agreement (the “EXP Agreement”), EU Web Services Limited (“EU Web Services”) agreed to acquire, and the Company agreed to sell, the entire issued share capital of EXP it then owned.
 
As consideration for the sale of EXP, EU Web Services agreed to issue to the Company, within 28 days of the closing, ordinary shares, 0.01 GBP par value, in its parent company, having a fair market value of $3,000,000 at the date of issuance of such shares. The Company recorded the shares received at $2,334,000, which represents the bid price of the restricted securities received, and discounted the carrying value by 11% (or $280,000) as the shares cannot be liquidated for at least 12 months. Further, the EXP Agreement provided that the Company receive additional consideration in the form of: (i) Ordinary shares in EU Web Services having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of the date of issuance, provided that EU Web Services is listed and becomes quoted on a recognized trading market within six (6) months from the date of the EXP Agreement; or (ii) if EU Web Services does not become listed within the time period specified, Ordinary shares in EU Web Services’ parent company having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of the date of issuance.
 
On June 17, 2007, DSS sold all of the shares of Consolidated Software Capital Limited (“CSC”), its wholly owned subsidiary, for a note receivable of $865,000. On November 12, 2007, as part of the sale of EXP, the $865,000 note receivable was exchanged for EU Web Services’ parent company common stock having a fair value of $682,000. The transaction resulted in a loss of $183,000 to the Company.
 
Impact of Currency Exchange Rate

Our net revenue derived from sales in currencies other than the U.S. dollar was 75% and 76% for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008, respectively, as compared to 75% and 75% for the corresponding periods in 2007. As the US dollar strengthens in relation to the Great Britain Pound (“GBP”), as it has recently done, our revenue and income, which is reported in US dollars, is negatively impacted. Changes in the currency values occur regularly and in some instances may have a significant effect on our results of operations. For the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, revenue from sales in currencies other than US dollar was 76% and 74%, respectively.

Income and expenses of our MAM subsidiary are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. During the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008, the exchange rate for MAM’s operating results was US$1.7364 per GBP1, compared with US$2.0331 per GBP1 for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2007. The average exchange rate for MAM’s operating results was US$2.0044 per GBP1 and US$1.9323 per GBP1 for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Assets and liabilities of our MAM subsidiary are translated into US dollars at the quarter-end exchange rates. The exchange rate used for translating our MAM subsidiary was US$1.4479 per GBP1 at December 31, 2008 and US$1.9954 per GBP1 at June 30, 2008. Assets and liabilities of our MAM subsidiary were translated into US dollars at June 30, 2007 at an exchange rate of US$2.0039 per GBP1.

Currency translation (loss) and gain adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, which totaled ($2,595,000) and $238,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and ($3,643,000) and $618,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Currency translation gain for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $278,000 and $1,899,000, respectively.
 
Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2008
 
The Company’s results of continuing operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 compared with the year ended June 30, 2007 were as follows:
 
 
42

 
 
Revenues . Revenues increased $2,246,000 or 11.1% to $22,463,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $20,217,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. Revenue increased from organic sales growth in data services and support in our UK operations and increased sales of software from the US operation. We believe that the increase in revenues, coupled with extensive cost-reduction initiatives, will enable us to sustain ongoing operations through the course of the next 12 months. In an effort to conserve cash, we have and continue to reduce cost within the US operations and have implemented reporting systems and controls to better manage the US business. Should our cost-cutting efforts not be successful or in the event that our revenue decreases in the future, we may need to seek additional debt or equity financing. Any inability to obtain additional financing, if required, or an inability to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, would have a material adverse effect on our ability to implement our business plan.
 
Cost of Revenues . Total cost of revenues increased $1,072,000 or 11.4% to $10,429,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $9,357,000 for the same period of June 30, 2007. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues marginally increased from 46.3% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007 to 46.4% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008. As a result of ongoing cost-cutting initiatives, we have been able to minimize any increase in the cost of sales after a thorough review of operations throughout the Company, but focused primarily on the US operations, which revealed discretionary items that were capable of being reduced or eliminated without sacrificing revenue. Included in such items was the elimination or reduction of cost and expenses such as travel for sales personnel that was not directly related to new business development or closing a sale; reduction of non-performing sales staff from the US payroll; and outsourcing of software development work where feasible.
 
Operating Expenses . The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, our operating expenses and the variance thereof:
 
   
For the Twelve Months Ended June 30,
             
   
2008
   
2007
   
$ Variance
   
% Variance
 
Research and development
 
$
3,176,000
   
$
2,874,000
   
$
302,000
     
10.5
%
Sales and marketing
   
2,467,000
     
1,985,000
     
482,000
     
24.3
%
General and administrative
   
8,438,000
     
2,675,000
     
5,763,000
     
215.4
%
Depreciation and amortization
   
1,287,000
     
1,462,000
     
(175,000
)
   
(12.0
)%
Impairment of Goodwill
   
8,170,000
     
3,100,000
     
5,070,000
     
163.5
%
Total Operating Expenses
 
$
23,538,000
   
$
12,096,000
   
$
11,442,000
     
94.6
%

Operating expenses increased by $11,442,000 or 94.6% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 compared with the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. This is due to the following:
 
Research and Development Expenses. Research and Development expenses increased by $302,000 or 10.5% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, when compared with the same period in the previous fiscal year. This increase was due to the introduction of additional staff and cost of living pay increases offset by a reduction in capitalized projects within the UK business.
 
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and Marketing expenses increased by $482,000 or 24.3% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 compared with the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. This increase is due to the appointment of additional sales personnel within the US operation and additional costs associated with increased attendance at industry shows compared to the previous year. The UK operation also appointed additional resources within its marketing department and experienced an increase in its advertising costs, compared with the previous fiscal year.
 
 
43

 
 
General and Administrative Expenses. General and Administrative expenses increased by $5,763,000 or 215.4% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 as compared with the same period in 2007. Of the increase, $800,000 was related to a write down of receivables from ADNW. An additional $544,000 of the increase was attributable to an increase in costs within the US and UK operating companies, including costs associated with our new UK premises, the write off of bad debt by the US business and payroll taxes. $166,000 of this increase was due to liabilities that became payable upon completion of the ComVest debt funding and $275,000 of this increase was due to our recognition of head office and corporate costs that ADNW had expensed in the same fiscal period of 2007. Also contributing to the increase in General and Administrative expenses was an increase in corporate salaries of $999,000, which included the hiring of a full-time corporate CFO, and the payment of a full year’s salary for the CEO and COO (in early 2007, these officers were paid their salaries by ADNW). Other increases included $138,000 related to public relations, $150,000 related to financial consulting, payment of retainers and related fees to our independent directors of $54,000, and the premium associated with our D&O policy of $75,000 and an increase of $99,000 for stock grants to employees and directors. Finally, $291,000 of the increase was due to our assumption of the liability for the settlement of Mr. Blumenthal’s claim against ADNW, and $532,000 of increased expense was due to increased legal fees related to filings and other corporate matters that we incurred during the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the previous fiscal period.
 
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $175,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 as compared with the same period in 2007. This decrease is almost entirely due to the UK operation having fully amortized capital development projects when compared to the same period of the previous fiscal year.

Goodwill Impairment. Following operating losses at ASNA during fiscal period 2008 and after an analysis of goodwill at ASNA, management has recognized an impairment of $8,170,000 in 2008 and $3,100,000 in 2007 that is not expected to recur as the Company executes on its growth plans and invests capital raised within the US operation.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $745,000 to $874,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008. This increase in interest expense is related to our interest associated with our loan from ComVest Capital LLC. We accrued interest under the ComVest loan of $305,000. The remaining ComVest interest of $435,000 was accounted for in amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs, which are included in interest expense.

Other Income. Other income for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 amounted to $571,000 as compared to other expenses of $1,976,000 for the same period ended June 30, 2007. The increase in income for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2008 is related to the reduction in litigation settlements of $76,000 and the one-time gain on sale of non-marketable securities of $1,312,000. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2007, other expenses primarily relates to a one-time litigation settlement of $2,350,000, offset by a onetime gain on extinguishment of a liability of $487,000.

Income Taxes. Income taxes increased $91,000 to $873,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $782,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was due to increased earnings at our UK subsidiary for period ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the prior twelve-month period.

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations. As a result of the above, we realized a net loss of $11,806,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, compared with a net loss of $3,994,000 for the for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007.
 
 
44

 
 
Discontinued Operations. The income from discontinued operations was $13,000 and $884,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Loss on the sale of discontinued operations was $26,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 and $378,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007.

Net Income (Loss). As a result of the above, we realized a net loss of $11,819,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 compared with a net loss of $3,488,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007.

Results of Operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008
 
Our results of operations for the three months and six months ended December 31, 2008 compared with the three months and six months ended December 31, 2007 were as follows:
 
Revenues. Revenues were $5,005,000 and $10,850,000 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively, compared with revenues of $5,645,000 and $11,000,000 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2007, respectively.   Our U.S. operation experienced slightly higher revenues for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2007 than it did during the 2008 periods, due to a contract which we completed during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, and did not also have in 2008, for which we billed the customer approximately $121,000. Additionally, our UK revenues were negatively impacted by the strength of the US dollar vs. the British Pound, as discussed above.
 
Cost of Revenues. Total cost of revenues for the three months and six months ended December 31, 2008, were $2,235,000 and $4,990,000, respectively, compared with $2,508,000 and $5,167, 000 for the same periods of December 31, 2007, respectively.  This was consistent with the decrease in revenues during the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008.
 
Operating Expenses. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, our operating expenses and the variance thereof:

   
For the Three Months
             
(In thousands)
 
Ended December 31,
             
   
2008
   
2007
   
Variance $
   
Variance %
 
                         
Research and development  
  $ 709,000     $ 766,000     $ (57,000 )     -7.4 %
Sales and marketing  
    561,000       661,000       (100,000 )     -15.2 %
General and administrative  
    1,478,000       2,254,000       (776,000 )     -34.4 %
Depreciation and amortization  
    260,000       327,000       (67,000 )     -20.5 %
Total Operating Expenses  
  $ 3,008,000     $ 4,008,000     $ (1,000,000 )     -25.0 %

(In thousands)
 
For the Six Months
Ended December 31,
             
   
2008
   
2007
   
Variance $
   
Variance %
 
                         
Research and development
  $ 1,494,000     $ 1,458,000     $ 36,000       2.5 %
Sales and marketing
    1,160,000       1,189,000       (29,000 )     -2.4 %
General and administrative
    2,983,000       3,564,000       (581,000 )     -16.3 %
Depreciation and amortization
    528,000       682,000       (154,000 )     -22.6 %
Total Operating Expenses
  $ 6,165,000     $ 6,893,000     $ (728,000 )     -10.6 %
 
 
45

 
 
Operating expenses decreased by $1,000,000, or 25% for the three months ended December 31, 2008, compared with the three months ended December 31, 2007, and decreased by $728,000 or 10.6% for the six months ended December 31, 2008, compared with the six months ended December 31, 2007. This is due to the following:

Research and Development Expenses.  Research and Development expenses decreased by 7.4% for the three month period ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, and increased by 2.5% for the six month period ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year.  The decrease for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 is primarily a result of a reduction in the number of personnel working on development projects during the quarter.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and Marketing expenses decreased by $100,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared with the same period in 2007, and decreased by $29,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 compared with the six months ended December 31, 2007. This decrease is due to a reduction in sales personnel within the U.S. operation during the three months ended December 31, 2008 when compared with the same period in the prior fiscal year.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and Administrative expenses decreased by $776,000 or 34.4% for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, and decreased $581,000 or 16.3% for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared with the same period in 2007.  The decrease is effectively due to our spin-off from our former parent, ADNW, in November 2008, as a result of which we were not burdened with extra costs associated with ADNW as of the end of our three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008. This decrease during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was offset in part by $75,000 of increased financial consulting costs and $76,000 of legal, accounting and printing costs associated with the registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC relating to our spin-off from ADNW.  Similarly, the decrease of expenses during the six month period ended December 31, 2008 was offset in part by $150,000 of increased financial consulting costs and $124,000 of legal, accounting and printing costs associated with the registration statement.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $67,000, or 20.5%, and $154,000, or 22.6%, for the three month and six month periods ended December 31, 2008, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2007, which is primarily due to the U.K. operation having fully amortized capital development projects during the 2008 fiscal periods, when compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal year.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $364,000 or 568% to $428,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2007, and increased $718,000 or 875% to $800,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the six months ended December 31, 2007.  The increase in interest expense is related to our interest payments associated with our loan from ComVest Capital LLC.  For the three months ended December 31, 2008 we paid ComVest $224,000 in cash, and $204,000 was accounted for in amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs.  For the six months ending December 31, 2008, we paid $396,000 in cash, and $404,000 was accounted for in amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs.

Other Income (Loss). The three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008 include a write down of $3,957,000 available-for-sale securities because of an other-than-temporary decline in the market value of the securities.  Other income includes $76,000 from the net settlement of litigation for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2007.   The six months ended December 31, 2007 includes $1,312,000 from the sale of non-marketable securities.
 
Income Taxes. Income taxes decreased by $18,000, or 8.2%, and $75,000, or 19.3%, for the three and six month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007, due to a reduced effective tax rate for our U.K. subsidiaries for the respective periods.
 
Net Income (Loss). As a result of the above, we recorded a net loss of $4,797,000 for the three month period ended December 31, 2008, compared with a net loss of $1,123,000 for the three month period ended December 31, 2007, and realized a net loss of $5,349,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008, compared with a net loss of $155,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2007.
 
Discontinued Operations. The (loss) from discontinued operations was ($23,000) for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and earnings of $14,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2007.  Loss on the sale of discontinued operations was $26,000 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2007.  There were no discontinued operations during the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, most of our profits have been generated in Europe, but with the introduction of new products and efforts to streamline U.S. operations, we expect to see an increase in overall revenues with a contribution from U.S. operations in fiscal 2009.
 
 
46

 
 
We completed an equity offering and realized net proceeds of $2,036,000 in the first quarter of 2008 and completed a convertible debt offering that realized net proceeds of $4,359,000 in the second quarter of 2008. We also sold non-marketable securities for $2,000,000 and realized a profit of $1,312,000. These funds were used to settle and pay down litigation of approximately $3,000,000. The funds were also used to reduce accounts payable and settle liabilities of ADNW.
 
We sold EXP during the second quarter of 2008 and received a note and 4,433,284 ordinary shares of First London, PLC (formerly, First London Securities PLC) valued at approximately $4,100,000. The securities are registered public company shares and are carried on the balance sheet dated December 31, 2008 at $957,000.  First London is listed on the London Plus Stock Exchange, but the stock has not developed a liquid trading market.  Currently the stock is thinly traded and if an active market develops for the shares, this investment could be an additional source of working capital.
 
We also used cash to settle approximately $2,100,000 of liabilities of ADNW and in consideration of our assuming such liabilities we received 20,400,000 shares of ADNW common stock. The carrying value of the ADNW stock we hold is approximately $2.9 million at June 30, 2008. We sold approximately 5.23 million shares of ADNW common stock on July 3, 2008, for which we received approximately $889,000 before fees and expenses .
 
If internal revenues prove insufficient to support our growth plans, we may consider raising additional funds through debt or equity financing. There can be no assurance that such funding will be available on acceptable terms, in a timely fashion or even available at all. Should new funds be delayed, we plan to the burden on our current funding to a sustainable level and to tailor our development programs accordingly.
 
We believe that our liquidity will improve throughout our fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. We believe that this improvement will be a result of our ongoing cost-cutting initiatives in the US coupled with a continued improved sales picture in our US operation. Notwithstanding the improved outlook as a result of our internal initiatives, we remain guarded in our optimism given the weakness in the US economy, which, should it affect buying decisions of our target market, will impact our liquidity through reduced sales in the US.

During the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2008, we had material commitments for capital expenditures of $1,064,000. The purposes of these capital expenditures were for the purchase of property and equipment for $383,000 and the development of software products of $681,000. During the course of the next 12 months, we expect that our capital needs will remain constant. We do not anticipate any off balance sheet financing arrangements and expect to maintain our current ratio of debt to equity.

We believe that we have addressed all liabilities of ADNW that we are required to assume and see no prospects that we will need to be responsible for any further liabilities of ADNW. We believe that the combination of streamlined operations in the US coupled with no further responsibility for liabilities of ADNW will enable us to generate cash flow from operations for the next 12 months.
 
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement with ComVest Capital LLC

On December 21, 2007, we entered into a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with ComVest Capital LLC (“ComVest”), as lender, pursuant to which ComVest agreed to extend to us a $1,000,000 secured revolving Credit Facility and a $5,000,000 Term Loan.
 
Credit Facility and Revolving Credit Note.   Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Credit Facility is available to us through November 30, 2009, unless the maturity date is extended, or we prepay the Term Loan (described below) in full, in each case in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement. The Credit Facility provides for borrowing capacity of an amount up to (at any time outstanding) the lesser of the Borrowing Base at the time of each advance under the Credit Facility, or $1,000,000. The borrowing base at any time will be an amount determined in accordance with a borrowing base report we are required to provide to the lender, based upon our Eligible Accounts and Eligible Inventory, as such terms are defined in the Loan Agreement.  The Loan Agreement provides for advances to be limited to (i) 80% of Eligible Accounts plus, in ComVest’s sole discretion, (ii) 40% of Eligible Inventory, minus (iii) such reserves as ComVest may establish from time to time in its discretion.  As of December 31, 2008, the borrowing base was $1,228,000.

In connection with the Credit Facility, we issued a Revolving Credit Note (the “Credit Note”) on December 21, 2007 payable to ComVest in the principal amount of $1,000,000, initially bearing interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (a) the prime rate, as announced by Citibank, N.A. from time to time, plus two percent (2%), or (b) nine and one-half percent (9.5%). The applicable interest rate will be increased by four hundred (400) basis points during the continuance of any event of default under the Loan Agreement. Interest is computed on the daily unpaid principal balance and is payable monthly in arrears on the first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2008. Interest is also payable upon maturity or acceleration of the Credit Note.  On February 10, 2009, the interest rate was increased from 9.5% to 11% in connection with a waiver we received for violating one of our debt covenants at December 31, 2008 (discussed below).

We have the right to prepay all or a portion of the principal balance on the Credit Note at any time, upon written notice, with no penalty. The Credit Note is secured pursuant to the provisions of certain Security Documents which we entered into on the same date.
 
 
47

 
 
We have the right, at our option, and provided that the maturity date of the Credit Facility has not been accelerated due to our prepayment in full of the Term Loan, to elect to extend the Credit Facility for one additional year, through November 30, 2010, upon written notice to ComVest, provided that no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing at that time. We also have the option to terminate the Credit Facility at any time upon five business days’ prior written notice, and upon payment to ComVest of all outstanding principal and accrued interest of the advances on the Credit Facility, and prorated accrued commitment fees. The Credit Facility commitment also terminates, and all obligations become immediately due and payable, upon the consummation of a Sale, which is defined in the Loan Agreement as certain changes of control or sale or transfers of a material portion of our assets.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we drew down $500,000 of the Credit Facility.  We drew down the remaining $500,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. 
 
 
Term Loan and Convertible Term Note.  In addition to the Credit Facility, ComVest extended us a Term Loan, evidenced by a Convertible Term Note (the “Term Note”) we issued on December 21, 2007 in the principal amount of $5,000,000. The Term Loan was a one-time loan, and unlike the Credit Facility, the principal amount is not available for re-borrowing.  The Term Note bears interest at a rate of eleven percent (11%) per annum, except that during the continuance of any event of default, the interest rate will be increased to sixteen percent (16%).

Initially, the Term Note was payable in 23 equal monthly installments of $208,333.33 each, payable on first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2009, through November 1, 2010, with the balance due on November 30, 2010.  The amortization schedule was subsequently modified, and was delayed for one year so that payments will commence on January 1, 2010, pursuant to an amendment of the Loan Agreement during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (see below).

We have the option to prepay the principal balance of the Term Note in whole or in part, at any time, upon 15 days’ prior written notice. We will be required to prepay the Term Loan in whole or part under certain circumstances. In the event that we prepay all or a portion of the Term Loan, we will ordinarily pay a prepayment premium in an amount equal to (i) three percent (3%) of the principal amount being prepaid if such prepayment is made or is required to be made on or prior to the second anniversary of the Closing Date, and (ii) one percent (1%) of the principal amount being prepaid if such prepayment is made or is required to be made after December 21, 2009.

The number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Term Note and the conversion price may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction.  In addition, the number of conversion shares, and/or the conversion price may be adjusted in the event of certain sales or issuances of shares of our common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of common stock, at any time while the Term Note is outstanding, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective conversion price of the Term Note.  The principal and interest payable on the Term Note was initially convertible into shares of our common stock at the option of ComVest, at an initial conversion price of $1.50 per share. On July 3, 2008, the conversion price was reduced to approximately $1.49 per share following our subsequent issuance of shares of common stock and warrants at an effectively lower price.  Consequently, the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amount of the Term Note was increased to 3,361,345 shares from 3,333,333 shares. We also may require conversion of the principal and interest under certain circumstances.

As of December 31, 2008 and the date hereof, the principal balance due on the Term Note was and is $5,000,000.00.
 
Warrants.  In connection with the Loan Agreement, we issued warrants to ComVest to purchase the following amounts of shares of our common stock, exercisable after December 21, 2007 and expiring December 31, 2013: a) warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.3125 per share;  b) warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.39 per share; and c) warrants to purchase 2,083,333 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.3625 per share.  The warrants also contain a cashless exercise feature.  The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices may be adjusted, at any time while the warrants are outstanding, in the event of certain issuances of shares of our common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of our common stock, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective exercise prices of the warrants.

 
48

 

The exercise prices for 3,000,000 of these warrants were subsequently modified in connection with waivers we received for violations of one of our debt covenants, as discussed further below.

Debt Covenants ..  The Loan Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including:

(a)           Maximum limits for capital expenditures of $600,000 per fiscal year;
 
(b)           Limitation on future borrowings, other than in certain circumstances, including to finance capital expenditures;
 
(c)           Limitation on guaranteeing any obligation, except for obligations in the ordinary course of business and obligations of our wholly owned subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course of business;
 
(d)           Limitation on entering Sales-Leaseback Transactions with respect to the sale or transfer of property used or useful in our business operations;
 
(e)           Limitation on acquiring securities or making loans;
 
(f)            Limitation on acquiring real property;
 
(g)           Limitation on selling assets of the Company or permitting any reduction in our ultimate ownership position of any subsidiary;
 
(h)           Limitation on paying dividends;
 
(i)            Limitation on selling any accounts receivable; and
 
(j)            Requiring that, at the end of any quarter of any fiscal year, the ratio of (a) Earnings Before Interest, Depreciation, and Amortization (“EBIDA”) minus capital expenditures incurred to maintain or replace capital assets, to (b) debt service (all interest and principal payments), for the four (4) consecutive quarters then ended, to be not less than 1.25 to 1.00 (the “EBIDA Ratio Covenant”).
 
The Loan Agreement is collateralized by a pledge of all of our assets and the stock of our subsidiaries. Certain of the loan covenants described above prohibit us from paying dividends or borrowing additional funds for working capital requirements. The prohibition on paying dividends may restrict our ability to raise capital through the sale of shares of preferred stock that we may designate in the future, because such shares are typically more marketable with dividend rights.  If we were to raise capital through the sale of shares of our common stock and those shares were sold for less than the applicable exercise price(s) of the warrants issued to ComVest, or were issued for less than the applicable conversion price of the Term Note, then automatically and without further consideration, the exercise price of the warrant(s) and the conversion price of the Term Note will be reduced based on a formula based upon the selling price of the shares and the number of shares sold.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell any shares of our common stock.  Even if we were able to sell such shares, we cannot currently predict the selling price.  The sale of any such shares would result in immediate dilution to our existing shareholders’ interests.

Amendments to Loan Agreement and Waivers for Violations of Certain Covenants .  Subsequent to March 31, 2008, we notified ComVest that we had incurred a loss of $1,897,000 for the three-month period ending March 31, 2008, and as a result, we had a ratio of EBIDA to debt service of (4.41):1.00, therefore violating the EBIDA Ratio Covenant described above.  ComVest agreed to grant us a waiver for this violation.  On May 15, 2008, we entered into a Waiver and Amendment, pursuant to which ComVest granted us the waiver, and  in consideration therefor, we reduced the exercise price for 1,000,000 warrants issued to ComVest in connection with the Loan Agreement from $0.3125 per share to $0.11 per share, and recognized the incremental fair value of the modified warrants of $24,000 as additional interest expense.   As a result of ComVest granting us this waiver, we were not in violation of any loan covenants at March 31, 2008.

 
49

 

Subsequent to June 30, 2008, we advised ComVest that we had incurred a loss of $11,664,000 for the six-month period ending June 30, 2008, and that as a result had again violated the EBIDA Ratio Covenant with an EBIDA to debt service ratio of (2.26):1.00.  ComVest agreed to provide us with another waiver.  In connection therewith, we entered into a letter agreement amending the Loan Agreement (the “September 23, 2008 Waiver and Amendment”) and modifying the EBIDA Ratio C ovenant.  Pursuant to the September 23, 2008 Waiver and Amendment, t he EBIDA Ratio Covenant was waived for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 and was reduced to 0.62:100 from 1.25:1.00 for the quarter ended December 31, 2008.   Additionally, the EBIDA Ratio Covenant was reset for future quarters to 0.71:1.00 for the four quarters ended March 31, 2009; 0.50:1.00 for the four quarters ended June 30, 2009; and 1.25:1.00 for the four quarters ended September 30, 2009 and thereafter.  Additionally, ComVest agreed to delay the commencement of the loan amortization related to the Term Note for one year, from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2010.  In consideration for these modifications, we reduced the exercise price related to 2,000,000 warrants issued to ComVest in connection with the Loan Agreement from $0.39 to $0.11.  The incremental fair value of the modified warrants is $15,000, which was recorded as an additional debt discount and is being amortized over the remaining life of the term loan pursuant to EITF 96-19, “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments.”  As a result of these amendments, we were not in violation of any loan covenants at June 30, 2008.

As described herein, we incurred a net loss of $5,349,000 for the six month period ended December 31, 2008.  Subsequent to the end of the quarter, we advised ComVest of the loss, and that as a result, our ratio of EBIDA to debt service was (1.41):1.00 in violation of the amended EBIDA Ratio Covenant. ComVest agreed to extend an additional waiver of this covenant, which was granted on February 10, 2009, under a Waiver and Amendment #2 letter agreement (the “February 10, 2009 Waiver and Amendment”).  In consideration for the waiver, we agreed to increase the interest rate on the $1,000,000 Credit Facility from 9.5% to 11%.  As a result of ComVest granting us this waiver, we were not in violation of any loan covenants at December 31, 2008. If we restore compliance with the EBIDA Ratio Covenant as of the close of any quarter ending on or after March 31, 2009, then the annual interest rate will be restored to 9.5%, effective as of the first day of the calendar month next succeeding our demonstrated quarter-end compliance with such covenant.

Our violations of the EBIDA Ratio Covenant described above did not and will not have any impact on any other loan agreements to which we are a party.  However, pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, if we default on any other indebtedness in excess of $100,000 and such default creates an acceleration of the maturity of such indebtedness, then we would be in default of our ComVest Loan Agreement.
 
50

 
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company’s only off balance sheet arrangements are its operating leases. The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment pursuant to month-to-month and non-cancelable operating lease agreements that expire on various dates through October 2028. Terms of the leases provide for monthly payments ranging from $500 to $15,300. For the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred rent expense totaling approximately $573,000 and $515,000, respectively.

Future annual minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Years Ending
    June 30,
     
2009
 
$
641,000
 
2010
   
523,000
 
2011
   
497,000
 
2012
   
410,000
 
2013
   
397,000
 
Thereafter
   
4,462,000
 
   
$
6,930,000
 

Current Products and Services

Meeting the needs of the automotive aftermarket requires a combination of business management systems, information products and online services that combine to deliver benefits for all parties involved in the timely repair of a vehicle. Our products and services include:

 
·
Business management systems comprised of our proprietary software applications, implementation and training and third-party hardware and peripherals;
     
 
·
Information products such as an accessible catalog database related to parts, tires, labor estimates, scheduled maintenance, repair information, technical service bulletins, pricing and product features and benefits, which are used by the different participants in the automotive aftermarket;
     
 
·
Online services and products that connect manufacturers, warehouse distributors, retailers and automotive service providers via the internet. These products enable electronic data interchange throughout the automotive aftermarket supply chain among the different trading partners. They also enable procurement and business services to be projected over the internet to an expanded business audience. Some UK clients use our information products on their own websites and intranets; some clients in North America and the UK use our systems and branded software to obtain relevant and up-to-date information via the internet; and
     
 
·
Customer support and consulting services that provide phone and online support, implementation and training.

Need for Technology Solutions

A variety of factors drive the automotive market’s need for sophisticated technology solutions, including the following:
 
 
51

 
 
Inventory Management

Industry sources suggest that approximately 35% of parts produced are never sold and 30% of parts stocked are never sold. Approximately 25% of parts sold are eventually returned due to insufficient knowledge or capability by either the parts supplier counterman or the auto service provider installer. Clearly, there is substantial inefficiency in the automotive aftermarket supply chain. This inefficiency results in excess inventory carrying costs, logistical costs and the over-production of parts and tires at the manufacturer level. Overcoming these challenges requires the combination of business systems software, information products, and connectivity services we offer.

Competition

In the US, the need for technology solutions has been accelerated by the expansion of large specialty parts retailers such as Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and large auto service chains like Monro Muffler and Brake, Inc. This expansion has driven smaller competitors to computerize or upgrade their existing systems with more modern business management solutions enabled for information products and online services. Many of the systems used by smaller competitors today are older, character-based or systems developed in-house that have a limited ability to integrate current information products and online services.

Volume and Complexity of Information

Businesses in the automotive aftermarket manage large volumes of information from numerous sources with complex inter-relationships. There are over 4.5 million different stock-keeping units (“SKUs”) available to parts sellers in the product catalogs used by the US automotive aftermarket. The numbers of SKUs increase in the order of some 5% each year. Moreover, manufacturers update product information and product prices with increasing frequency as they improve their internal processing and try to keep pace with consumer trends. As a result, most automotive aftermarket businesses require sophisticated inventory management systems, accurate and timely information on parts, tires, and repair delivered through online services to communicate, manage and present this volume of data effectively.

Customer Service Requirements

Consumer demand for same-day repair service and the need to maintain efficient use of repair bays, forces automotive service providers to demand prompt and accurate delivery of specific parts and tires from their suppliers. Getting the required product promptly depends on all the parties having access to timely information about product price and availability. To meet these demanding customer service requirements successfully, automotive aftermarket participants need business management systems, product information and online services that enable workers to reliably and accurately transact their business between warehouse distributors, parts stores and automotive service providers.

Regional Efficiencies

The use and availability of a combination of business management systems, information products and online services has resulted in the development of regional trading networks among auto service provider chains, stores and warehouse distributors of parts and tires. This enables participants to achieve the efficiencies and customer service levels that are critical to being competitive and successful against the larger retail and service chains in the automotive aftermarket.

Areas of Growth

We believe that there is a clear need for our services and products in the aftermarket segment, which in 2006 grew at an annualized rate of 5% over 2005.

We expect growth in the automotive aftermarket will continue to be driven by:
 
 
52

 
 
 
·
gradual growth in the aggregate number of vehicles in use;

 
·
an increase in the average age of vehicles in operation;

 
·
fewer new vehicles being purchased due to a slowdown in the economy;
 
 
·
growth in the total number of miles driven per vehicle per year; and
 
 
·
increased vehicle complexity.
 
Plans for Growth

We see opportunities to expand the breadth of our client base within the automotive industry and diversify into new industries with similarly complex needs. We plan to offer tailored business management and distribution software to the wholesale distributor market of the automotive industry. We have also started to expand and diversify our client and product mix in the UK to serve the lumber and hardware industries, which we believe have an unmet need for the efficiency offered by our suite of business software solutions and services. Our growth plans include adapting and updating our software products to serve other vertical markets as well as through potential acquisitions.

Additional Vertical Markets: the Lumber, Hardware and Wholesale Distributor Markets and Additional Territories

We have identified that the lumber, hardware and wholesale distribution industries would benefit from the business management and distribution systems developed by MAM Software Ltd for its customers in the automotive aftermarket. We already have 40 UK clients operating in the hardlines and lumber market and electrical wholesale distribution market who are using a derivative of MAM Software Ltd’s Autopart product, known as “Trader.” We originally moved the Autopart product into these additional vertical markets a number of years ago after being approached by companies operating within these vertical markets who could not find a management solution that satisfied their requirements. To date, these additional vertical markets have made only a limited contribution to the revenues of MAM Software Ltd.

These new market opportunities are made up of the following: The lumber and hardware market consists of independent lumber and building materials yards, independent hardware retailers, home improvement centers, retail nurseries and garden centers. Wholesale distributors of products, include electrical suppliers, medical suppliers, plumbing, heating and air conditioning, brick, stone and related materials, and industrial suppliers, services, machinery and equipment, among others.

We have been increasing our promotion of the “Trader” product to these markets, specifically targeting medium sized businesses with revenues of between $2 million and $10 million. We are, and intend to continue, doing this through a number of channels, internet, direct marketing, advertorials and trade shows. The Internet channel initially focused on raising awareness of the website and the Trader product through a new website specifically for the Trader product. This in turn has been tied to advertising via the internet, by placing banner ads on industry websites such as Building.co.uk, a UK website aimed at the building trade and EDA.com, which is the UK Electrical Distributors Association website. These banner ads have been directing customers to straight through to the Trader website where the benefits of this system are explained. We have also looked to raise awareness of the Trader product by placing advertisements in trade journals and will continue to look to have articles and editorial reviews written about the product and its advantages for those operating within these markets. We have also been targeting medium sized businesses within these vertical markets with direct mail pieces such as product fliers, product demo CDs and case studies from the small client base we have in this market. These have then been followed by MAM’s existing internal sales team to generate qualified leads for the external sales representatives. We recognize that we will need increased industry experience to sell effectively within these markets and intend to recruit a suitably experienced and qualified sales manager to lead this development. In addition to direct marketing we have attended trade shows and exhibitions that have given us the opportunity to invite businesses that we have targeted previously while giving us exposure to those businesses that as yet we haven’t connected with.  Given the costs associated with such expansion coupled with the softening global economy, we have elected not to focus on such new vertical markets in the short term but instead to focus on expansion in the other English-speaking automotive aftermarket opportunities. 
 
 
53

 
 
We believe that there are many opportunities in other parts of the world where we could sell our technologies and services. We are considering expanding into markets such as South Africa, Australia and India as well as Spanish speaking nations, and may wish to establish operations in partnership with regional businesses to assist us in both the sales and administrative aspects of building a global business.

Strategic Goals

We hope to increase our share of the US and Canadian markets by (i) increasing the sales and marketing presence of our Autopart product, (ii), focusing on the service station element of the market (iii) and establishing OpenWebs™ as the e-commerce standard within the automotive market. In Europe we expect to continue to grow our market share through (i) moving our supply chain management software into additional auto industry aftermarkets that are English-speaking , (ii) alliances with major manufacturers and national retail chains within the automotive aftermarket, and (iii) an increased marketing presence. We believe that our successful experience within the automotive market will translate well into other vertical markets that have similarly complex supply chains. By developing specific sales teams with relevant market experience and supporting with them suitable marketing collateral, we believe that within two years these teams will generate significant revenue and earnings. The Company plans, at this stage, to focus only on the UK for these additional vertical market opportunities.

Development Cost

Our plan of operation in the next twelve months continues a strategy for growth within our existing subsidiaries with an on-going focus on growing our US operation. We estimate that the operational and strategic development plans we have identified will require approximately $11,800,000 of funding. We expect to spend approximately $3,000,000 on research and development, $6,000,000 in general and administrative expenses and $2,800,000 on sales and marketing in our growth plan.

We plan to finance the required $11,800,000 with a combination of cash flow from operations as well as cash raised through equity and ComVest debt financing completed in December 2007. In July 2007, we raised approximately $2.5 million in equity (before expenses) and in December 2007 we completed a debt financing for gross proceeds of $6 million (before expenses), which is comprised of a $5 million term loan and a $1 million revolving line of credit. We anticipate that with this combination of cash flow and funding we will not require any additional funding for the foreseeable future.

We have used a portion of the aforementioned funds raised to (a) settle the judgment that Mr. McKenna had against one of our subsidiaries; (b) pay Mr. Blumenthal $997,000 to settle an outstanding loan and related dispute; and (c) pay down approximately $1,000,000 of ASNA’s current accounts payable to bring the level down to an acceptable industry norm.
 
 
54

 
 
We expect to use the remaining funds raised and generated from operations to expand sales and marketing in the US operation, in addition to allow investment into capital items, specifically computer hardware.
 
Future Plans
 
We expect to see continued growth from both the US and UK operations during the remainder of fiscal 2009, with strong growth in revenues and operating income from the US operation. We have identified a number of opportunities to widen our client base within the automotive industry and are actively pursuing those at this time. We also expect to see increases in revenue over the next two quarters, specifically due to additional products that have been developed by the US operation which are currently being released to customers, and the reintroduction of our Autopart line of products in the US market.
 
We intend to continue to work at maximizing customer retention by supplying and developing products that streamline and simplify customer operations, thereby increasing their profit margin. By supporting our customers’ recurring revenues, we expect to continue to build our own revenue stream. We believe that we can continue to grow our customer base through additional sales personnel, targeted media and marketing campaigns and products that completely fit clients’ requirements. We also intend to service existing clients at higher levels and increasingly partner with them so that together we both will achieve our goals.
 
Revenues in the UK are continuing to generate positive cash flow and free cash but the loss in the US operations and corporate expenses resulted in a negative cash flow for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Our current plans still require us to hire additional sales and marketing staff and to support expanded operations overall.  We believe our plan will strengthen our relationships with our existing customers and provide new income streams by targeting additional English-speaking auto industry aftermarkets for our Autopart product.  If we continue to experience negative cash flow we will be required to limit our growth plan.
 
CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.
 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

The Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee” or the “Committee”) of the Board administers our executive compensation program. Each member of the Committee is a non-employee and an independent director. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing salaries, administering our incentive programs, and determining the total compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. The Compensation Committees seeks to achieve the following goals with our executive compensation programs: to attract, motivate, and retain key executives and to reward executives for value creation. The Compensation Committee seeks to foster a performance-oriented environment by tying a significant portion of each executive’s cash and equity compensation to the achievement of performance targets that are important to the Company and its stockholders. Our executive compensation program has three principal elements: base salary, cash bonuses, and equity incentives under a recently established 2007 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”).
 
 
55

 
 
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis speaks as of the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.

Compensation Principles

We believe the top growing companies design their compensation program to attract, motivate, and retain highly talented individuals to drive business success. We further believe that the ideal programs tend to be principle-based rather than rules-based with such best practices compensation programs providing for the opportunity for executives and other key employees to achieve significant compensation upon the realization of objectives that clearly benefit a company and its shareholders. The Committee believes that best-practices plan will reflect the following principles:
 
(1)
Compensation should be related to performance
 
A proper compensation program should reinforce our Company’s business and financial objectives. Employee compensation will vary based on Company versus individual performance. When the Company performs well against the objectives that the Compensation Committee and Board will set, employees will receive greater incentive compensation. To the extent the business does not achieve or meet these objectives, incentive awards will be reduced or eliminated. An employee’s individual compensation will also vary based on his or her performance, contribution, and overall value to the business. Employees with sustained high performance should be rewarded more than those in similar positions with lesser performance. 
 
(2)
Our employees should think like stockholders
 
The second critical principle of our compensation programs should be to foster an environment where our employees should act in the interests of the Company’s stockholders. We believe that the best way to encourage them to do that is through an equity interest in their company. Equity interest in a company can be achieved in several respects: the establishment of equity incentive plans that provide for the granting of equity-based awards, such as stock options and/or restricted stock or performance share units to employees. This requires the establishment of an omnibus long-term stock-based incentive plan, which LTIP was approved and adopted by our Board and shareholders. While this plan also provides for traditional stock options, we believe that options should not form the dominant focus of a proper incentive plan and that performance share units or performance vesting restricted stock grants represent a preferred form of equity incentive. The philosophy behind such a structure is that as employees earn more stock (as opposed to options) they will think more like stockholders. Put another way, when all employees become owners, they think and behave like owners.
 
 
56

 
 
(3)
Incentive compensation should be a greater part of total compensation for more senior positions
 
The proportion of an individual’s total compensation that varies with individual and Company performance objectives should increase as the individual’s business responsibilities increase. Thus, cash bonuses and LTIP-based compensation should form the overwhelmingly dominant portion of overall compensation for the Company’s senior employees and the milestones for payouts on those plans for our senior employees are based entirely on corporate results.

Compensation Targets

Historically, we have not set targets for our offices and employees. Presently the Compensation Committee with the assistance of outside advisors and input of the officers of the Company is setting competitive targets that properly reflect the challenges of the business and create an equity-focused culture throughout the entire Company.

We believe that in allocating compensation among these elements, the compensation of a company’s senior-most levels of management - those persons having the greatest ability to influence a company’s performance - should be predominantly performance-based, while more junior employees should receive a greater portion of their compensation based on their base salary.

Base Salary and Cash Incentive

We will divide total cash compensation into a base salary portion and a cash incentive bonus portion. The Compensation Committee establishes the Chief Executive Officer’s targeted cash compensation first and then sets the cash compensation for other officers accordingly, based on the function served by that officer, that officer’s experience, and expected individual performance. Generally, we believe that the higher the level of responsibility of the executive within our Company, the greater the portion of that executive’s target total cash compensation that consists of the cash incentive component. The higher the executive’s level of responsibility within the Company, the greater the percentage of the executive’s compensation that should be tied to the Company’s performance.

Equity Incentive

Long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture that encourages such performance by our executive officers through the use of stock and stock-based awards. The Committee believes that the use of stock and stock-based awards offers the best approach to properly achieving our goals. We believe that stock-based compensation provide the principal method for executive officers to acquire equity or equity-linked interests in the Company. We have implemented the LTIP which we will utilize for such a purpose, which has received shareholder approval.

Rationale for Paying each Element

Base compensation and participation in benefit plans are established to provide employees with appropriate industry competitive terms. Director retainers are paid partially to compensate directors for their considerable time investment and to assist directors in covering their indirect operating expenses as independent contractors. Annual incentive cash bonuses are paid to reward employees for performance and stockholder value enhancement in the current year, based upon targets set by the Board for the CEO and his direct reports, with the CEO establishing the individual targets for all other employees.

LTIP awards will be designed to reward the building of long-term stockholder value, while providing modest, interim rewards in the pursuit of such longer-term objectives.
 
 
57

 
 
Determination of Amounts to Pay

Base salaries, benefits and potential cash bonuses are established based upon current market conditions. Where needed, outside consultants may be retained to assist in this process. Benefit plan structures may be evaluated periodically to determine market competitiveness with similar companies.

Stock-based awards to be granted will be evaluated based upon projected total compensation levels for participants assuming certain objectives are achieved. Since the majority of the total potential compensation is based upon performance, our expectation is that the total projected compensation level be well above average, because the “at risk” compensation levels generally exceed 2/3 of anticipated compensation under the assumption that bonus targets are met. The Committee, taking into consideration management’s recommendations and with sign-off from all independent Directors, will set each year’s goals and milestones, their weightings, and the formulas for award calculation. For accounting purposes, cash elements are expensed as earned. LTIP awards are expensed as provided for under FAS 123R, and are further described in the footnotes to the audited financial statements included in this Prospectus.

How the Elements Interact

While each element is set with certain needs in mind, the Committee also looks at the total compensation package for each individual to determine that the total payout is appropriate to the level of responsibility attributable to each participant. The total compensation package will also include any bonus amounts and awards to be based on performance targets, when such targets are ultimately set by the Committee.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

The Compensation Committee uses the same factors in determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer as it does for other senior officers. Our Chief Executive Officer’s base salary for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 was US $349,195. Our Chief Executive Officer’s salary is established in British pounds, which is the currency of his residence. When translated into U.S. dollars, which is our currency, the amount of his compensation will fluctuate based upon exchanges rates. Our Chief Executive’s salary is set at a specific level in British Pounds Sterling. During the past 18 months the weakness in the U.S. Dollar relative to the British Pound has effectively increased his salary on a Dollar-denominated basis, even though his base salary in Pounds Sterling has not changed. Additionally, the deterioration of the exchange rate has weakened the Compensation Committee’s ability to compare the CEO’s salary to a peer group. Also, since his salary is set pursuant to his employment agreement that was entered into with our parent, ADNW, we have used the peer group described below for comparison purposes only. We are reviewing his compensation and the compensation of our other senior officers with the expectation of putting agreements in place with our officers to be effective after the spinoff from ADNW. His salary will be evaluated based on a comparison with a peer group as determined by our independent directors. Our independent directors are surveying companies whose revenue base and organizational size were consistent with ours as well as several companies within our industry, which we defined as business and supply chain management software solutions. The peer group is thus being created from a group of companies that are both similar in size as well as companies within our industry segment. Finally, we will compare the peer group to compensation for similar companies that are in the midst of a turnaround.

Employment Agreements

We expect to enter into employment agreements with our executive officers, but as of the date of this discussion, have yet to do so.
 
 
58

 
 
Severance Benefits

We anticipate that each Executive Officer’s contract will contain a severance benefit for that officer if he or she is terminated other than for cause or the officer leaves the Company after a change in control, provided they leave for “good reason.” The severance benefit will range from six (6) months’ benefit to two (2) years’ benefit in the case of our Chief Executive Officer. We plan to provide this benefit because we want executives to focus on the Company’s business and enhancing stockholder value without undue concern about any possible loss of their job.

Retirement Plans

We do not offer retirement plans for our officers.

Change in Control

We anticipate that each officer’s contract will contain standard provisions that protect that officer in the event there is a change in control that has not been approved by our Board of Directors. In addition, our LTIP provides for acceleration of vesting in the event of a change in control.

The precise terms and conditions of each executive contract and of each plan will be contained in each such contract or plan, and will be filed with the SEC.

Perquisites

We offer limited perquisites for our executives. We may offer life insurance policies for our Named Executive Officers, but as of the date of this report, have yet to establish those policies.

Board Process

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves all compensation and awards to executive officers, which include the Chief Executive, the Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer, and any other Named Executive Officers. Generally, on its own initiative the Compensation Committee reviews the performance and compensation of the Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer and, following discussions with those individuals, establishes their compensation levels where it deems appropriate. For the remaining officers, the Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee that generally, with such adjustments and modifications that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee, are approved. With respect to equity-based compensation awarded to others, the Compensation Committee grants restricted stock, generally based upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer.

The Compensation Committee believes that objectives cannot be established in a vacuum and thus invites management’s input into the establishment of milestones. Although Committee meetings are held in executive session, without management’s presence, the Committee (and from time to time individual members of the Committee) routinely meets with senior officers of the Company to discuss objectives, to explain the rationale for certain objectives or milestones, and to assure that it has management’s input in assessing the consequences of decisions made in Committee, for instance, the impact that its decisions may have on our financial statements. The Committee’s interactions with management seek to achieve a balance between receiving management’s buy-in for objectives and assuring that management is not actually or effectively establishing the terms and parameters for its own compensation.

Forward-Looking Statements

Disclosures in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis may contain certain forward-looking. Statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts are forward-looking and usually identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “approximate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial matters.
 
 
59

 
 
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this report include the matters discussed regarding the expectation of compensation plans, strategies, objectives, and growth and anticipated financial and operational performance of the Company and its subsidiaries. A variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance and results of the Company’s business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to those set forth herein.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and the Company does not intend to correct or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2008 and 2007

The following table sets forth information for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 concerning the compensation paid and awarded to all individuals serving as (a) our Chief Executive Officer, Ian Warwick, (b) the two most highly compensated Executive Officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer) of ours and our subsidiaries at the end of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for these periods, Simon Chadwick and Charles F. Trapp, and (c) two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to (b) except that they were not serving as executive officers at the end of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. These individuals may be collectively referred to in this report as our “Named Executive Officers.”
 
Name and
Principal Position
Fiscal
Year
 
Salary
($)
   
Bonus
($)
   
Stock
Awards
($)
   
Option
Awards
($)
   
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
   
Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
   
All
Other
Compensation
($)
   
Total
($)
 
Ian Warwick (1)
  2008
   
349,195
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
349,195
 
                                                                   
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
  2007
   
350,682
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
350,682
 
 
   
                                                               
Simon Chadwick (2)
  2008
   
259,402
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
259,402
 
                                                                   
Chief Operating Officer and
Director
  2007
   
260,507
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
260,507
 
 
   
                                                               
Charles F. Trapp (3)
  2008
   
214,583
     
     
25,500
(3) 
   
     
     
     
     
240,083
 
                                                                   
Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer
  2007
   
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
 
 
   
                                                               
Michael O’Driscoll   (4)
  2008
   
93,593
     
     
     
     
     
     
46,992
(4) 
   
140,585
 
                                                                   
Former Chief Financial Officer and Director
  2007
   
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
 
 
   
                                                               
Michael Jamieson (5)
  2008
   
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
     
N/A
 
                                                                   
Former Chief Operating Officer
  2007
   
196,384
(5)
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
196,384
 
 
 
60

 
 
(1)
Reflects salary paid to Mr. Warwick for services rendered to us and our subsidiaries during fiscal 2008 and 2007 as Aftersoft’s Chief Executive Officer and President. Salary was paid in British pounds at an annual salary of 175,000 GBP. The amounts shown was translated to U.S. dollars based on a June 30, 2008 currency conversion rate of 1 GBP = $1.9954 and the June 30, 2007 currency conversion rate of 1 GBP = $2.0039. Mr. Warwick did not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director on our Board of Directors.

(2)
Reflects annual salary paid to Mr. Chadwick for services rendered to us and our subsidiaries during fiscal 2008 and 2007 as Aftersoft’s Chief Operating Officer. Salary was paid in British pounds at an annual salary of 130,000 GBP. The amounts shown was translated to U.S. dollars based on a June 30, 2008 currency conversion rate of 1 GBP = $1.9954 and the June 30, 2007 currency conversion rate of 1 GBP = $2.0039. Mr. Chadwick did not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director on Board of Directors.

(3)
Mr. Trapp was appointed Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer effective as of December 1, 2007. The amount shown in the table reflects salary in the amount of $134,167 earned for services in these capacities between December 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008, as well as salary in the amount of $80,416 earned for services as an accountant prior to his appointment as an officer. The salary for fiscal 2008 also includes $20,500 that was deferred and contributed by Mr. Trapp to the Company’s plan established under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The amount shown in the “Stock Awards” column reflects the dollar amount recognized for fiscal 2008 financial statement reporting purposes of the outstanding stock awards held by Mr. Trapp in accordance with FAS 123R. Stock award represent an award on May 13, 2008 of 750,000 shares of Common Stock with a grant date closing price of $0.10 per share, of which 34% or 255,000 shares vested immediately on the date of grant. The remaining 66% of the shares or 495,000 shares will vest in three equal installments of 165,000 shares on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The shares were not issued pursuant to any existing compensation plan. Refer to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Note 1 “Stock Based Compensation” and Note 10 “Stockholders Equity” included elsewhere in this prospectus, with respect to valuation assumptions for this stock grant. Mr. Trapp held no other stock or option awards at June 30, 2008.

(4)
The 2008 salary reflected in the table was earned by Mr. O’Driscoll for services rendered as our Chief Financial Officer between July 1, 2007 and November 30, 2007 in the amount of $93,593. The amount shown under “All Other Compensation” reflects amounts paid to Mr. O’Driscoll in connection with the termination of his employment with the Company. The salary and termination payments were made in British pounds and were translated to U.S. dollars based on the November 30, 2007 currency conversion rate of 1 GBP = $2.0705.
 
 
61

 
 
(5)
Mr. Jamieson previously served as our Chief Operating Officer and a Director on our Board of Directors, but resigned these positions on March 6, 2007. The amount shown in the table reflects compensation paid to him for his services during 2007 as Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, MAM Software Ltd. The amount shown reflects annual salary paid to Mr. Jamieson in British pounds at an annual salary of 98,000 GPB, and was translated to U.S. dollars based on June 30, 2007 currency conversion rate of 1 GBP = $2.0039.

Other Compensation

Other than as described above, there were no post-employment compensation, pension or nonqualified deferred compensation benefits earned by the executive officers during the year ended June 30, 2008. We do not have any retirement, pension, or profit-sharing programs for the benefit of our directors, officers or other employees. The Board of Directors may recommend adoption of one or more such programs in the future.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2008 Fiscal Year End

The following table provides information relating to the vested and unvested option and stock awards held by the named executives as of June 30, 2008. Each award to each named executive is shown separately, with a footnote describing the award’s vesting schedule.

   
Option Awards
   
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of 
Securities 
Underlying
Unexercised 
Options
(# Exercisable)
   
Number of 
Securities 
Underlying 
Unexercised 
Option
(# Unexercisable)
   
Equity 
Incentive 
Plan 
Awards: 
Number of 
Securities 
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned 
Options (#)
   
Option 
Exercise 
Price 
($)
   
Option 
Expiration 
Date
   
Number of 
Shares or 
Units of 
Stock That 
Have Not 
Vested 
(#)
   
Market 
Value of 
Shares or 
Units of 
Stock That 
Have Not 
Vested
($)
   
Equity 
Incentive 
Plan 
Awards: 
Number 
of 
Unearned
Shares, 
Units 
or 
Other 
Rights 
That 
Have Not 
Vested 
(#)
   
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 
Ian Warwick
                                                     
Simon Chadwick
                                                     
Charles F. Trapp
   
     
     
     
     
     
495,000
(1)
 
$
123,750
(2)
   
     
 
Michael O’Driscoll
                                                                       

(1)
Stock awards represent an award on May 13, 2008 to Mr. Trapp of 750,000 shares of Common Stock with a grant date fair value of $0.10 per share, of which 34%, or 255,000 shares, vested immediately on the date of grant. The remaining 66% of the shares, the 495,000 shares reflected in the table, will vest in three equal installments of 165,000 shares, on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The shares were not issued pursuant to any existing compensation plan.
 
(2)
Based on the closing price of $0.25 of the Company’s Common Stock on June 30, 2008.
 
Employment Agreements with Executive Officers Subsequent to Fiscal 2008

Effective as of December 1, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), upon the approval of our Board of Directors, We entered into employment agreements with each of Ian Warwick, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Charles F. Trapp, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Simon Chadwick, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
 
 
62

 
 
Ian Warwick Employment Agreement

The Employment Agreement with Mr. Warwick (the “Warwick Agreement”) is for an initial term of two and one-half years from the Effective Date, and is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods unless terminated by Mr. Warwick or us. Mr. Warwick will receive an annual base salary of $300,000, payable in U.S. dollars. The annual salary is increased to $350,000 upon our achievement of a market capitalization goal of $50 million for at least 25 consecutive trading days. The terms of the Warwick Agreement also entitles Mr. Warwick, a United Kingdom resident, to a make-whole payment that will restore him to the British Pound Sterling equivalent that existed on the Effective Date in the event that the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to the British Pound Sterling increases such that his base salary is reduced, as a result of such currency translation, by 10% or more (the “Make-Whole Payment”).

The Warwick Agreement also provides for an appointment to our Board of Directors, on which Mr. Warwick already serves.

Mr. Warwick is eligible for a performance-based annual cash incentive bonus of up to 150% of his base salary in any fiscal year depending on the extent to which the applicable performance goal(s) of the Company, which are to be established by our Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (“Compensation Committee”) or pursuant to a formal bonus plan, are achieved, subject to any operating covenants in place with respect to outstanding bank debt. The Compensation Committee established an EBITDA-related target for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, with respect to Mr. Warwick’s potential incentive bonus for fiscal 2009.

In addition, Mr. Warwick is entitled to participate in all of our benefit plans and our equity-based compensation plans, which currently consists of our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”). Pursuant to the Warwick Agreement, Mr. Warwick is to be awarded two grants of 3-year performance share unit awards under the LTIP, each for 500,000 performance share units as a base objective, with 30% of the award vesting in the first year of the grant provided that the base target for that year is met, 30% of the award vesting in the second year of the grant provided that the base target for the second year is met, and 40% of the award vesting in the third and final year of the grant provided that the base target for the third year is met (“Performance Share Units”). The performance measures for these awards, which have been set by the Compensation Committee, are based on increases in our earnings per share (“EPS”) and return on invested capital (“ROIC”). Further, with respect to both awards in each grant year, (i) if the Company’s results amount to less than 80% of the established target(s), none of the awards will vest; (ii) if the Company’s results are equal to 80% of the established target(s), 50% of the award will vest; (iii) if the Company’s results are equal to 100% of the established target(s), 100% of the award will vest; and (iv) if the Company’s results are equal to or better than 120% of the established target(s), 150% of the award will vest. Results between these established parameters will be interpolated.

The Warwick Agreement also entitles Mr. Warwick to be granted options to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock under the LTIP. These options will vest as to one-third of the award on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, at a strike price of $0.75, $1.00 and $1.25, respectively. The options expire ten years from the grant date.

The Warwick Agreement provides that in the event Mr. Warwick’s employment is terminated for Good Reason, for any reason other than for Cause, Death or Disability or for Good Reason during the 30-day period immediately following the first anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Window Period”), he is entitled to, among other things, a severance payment equal to his 12 months base salary. In addition, under such circumstances, all of Mr. Warwick’s stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock will immediately vest and be payable in shares of our common stock and all of his performance share units that would vest in the course of any fiscal year shall vest on a pro rata basis.
 
 
63

 
 
Charles F. Trapp Employment Agreement

The Employment Agreement with Mr. Trapp (the “Trapp Agreement”) is for an initial term of one year from the Effective Date, and is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods unless terminated by Mr. Trapp or us. Mr. Trapp will receive an annual base salary of $220,000, payable in U.S. dollars. Mr. Trapp is eligible for a performance-based annual cash incentive bonus of up to 150% of his base salary in any fiscal year depending on the extent to which the applicable performance goal(s) of the Company, which are to be established by the Compensation Committee or pursuant to a formal bonus plan, are achieved, subject to any operating covenants in place with respect to outstanding bank debt. The Compensation Committee established an EBITDA-related target for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, with respect to Mr. Trapp’s potential incentive bonus for fiscal 2009.

In addition, Mr. Trapp is entitled to participate in all of our benefit plans and equity-based compensation plans, which currently consists of the LTIP. Mr. Trapp will be awarded two grants of 3-year Performance Share Unit awards under the LTIP, each for 300,000 performance share units as a base objective, with the same terms, performance targets and metrics as Mr. Warwick’s Performance Share Unit awards described above. Mr. Trapp also will be granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock under the LTIP. These options will vest as to one-third of the award on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, at a strike price of $0.75, $1.00 and $1.25, respectively. The options expire ten years from the grant date.

The Trapp Agreement provides that in the event Mr. Trapp’s employment is terminated for Good Reason, for any reason other than for Cause, Death or Disability or for Good Reason during the Window Period, Mr. Trapp is entitled to, among other things, a severance payment equal to his 12 months base salary, all of Mr. Trapp’s stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock shall immediately vest and be payable in shares of our common stock and all of his performance share units that would vest in the course of any fiscal year shall vest on a pro rata basis.

Simon Chadwick Employment Agreement

The Employment Agreement with Mr. Chadwick (the “Chadwick Agreement”) is for an initial term of two years from the Effective Date, and is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods unless terminated by Mr. Chadwick or us. Mr. Chadwick will receive an annual base salary of $225,000, payable in U.S. dollars. The terms of the Chadwick Agreement also entitles Mr. Chadwick, a United Kingdom resident, to a Make-Whole Payment consistent with the one awarded to Mr. Warwick.

The Chadwick Agreement also provides for an appointment to our Board of Directors, on which he already serves.

Mr. Chadwick is eligible for a performance-based annual cash incentive bonus of up to 150% of his base salary in any fiscal year depending on the extent to which the applicable performance goal(s) of the Company, which are to be established by the Compensation Committee or pursuant to a formal bonus plan, are achieved, subject to any operating covenants in place with respect to outstanding bank debt. The Compensation Committee established an EBITDA-related target for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, with respect to Mr. Chadwick’s potential incentive bonus for fiscal 2009.
 
 
64

 
 
In addition, Mr. Chadwick is entitled to participate in all of our benefit plans and our equity-based compensation plans, which currently consists of the LTIP. Mr. Chadwick will be awarded two grants of 3-year Performance Share Unit awards under the LTIP, each for 400,000 performance share units as a base objective, with the same terms, performance targets and metrics as Mr. Warwick’s and Mr. Trapp’s Performance Share Unit awards described above. The Chadwick Agreement also grants Mr. Chadwick options to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock under the LTIP. These options will vest as to one-third of the award on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, at a strike price of $0.75, $1.00 and $1.25, respectively. The options expire ten years from the grant date.
 
In the event Mr. Chadwick’s employment is terminated for Good Reason, for any reason other than for Cause, Death or Disability or for Good Reason during the Window Period, Mr. Chadwick is entitled to, among other things, a severance payment equal to his 12 months base salary, all of Mr. Chadwick’s stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock shall immediately vest and be payable in shares of our common stock and all of his performance share units that would vest in the course of any fiscal year shall vest on a pro rata basis.

Director Compensation for Fiscal 2008

During fiscal 2008, directors who were not officers of the Company received $2,500 for each Board meeting attended in person and $750 for each Board Committee meeting attended in person, or 75% of the applicable rate if attended such Board or Committee meeting by teleconference. Directors who are also executive officers of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for their service on the Board.

The following table reflects all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the Company’s directors for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
 
Name
 
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
   
Stock Awards
($)  (1)
   
Options
Awards
($)
   
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
   
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
   
All Other
Compensation
($)
   
Total
($)
 
Ian Warwick
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Simon Chadwick
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Dwight B. Mamanteo
   
29,000
     
850
     
     
     
     
     
29,850
 
Marcus Wohlrab
   
29,000
     
850
     
     
     
     
     
29,850
 
Frederick Wasserman
   
28,600
     
850
     
     
     
     
     
29,450
 
 
(1)
The amount shown in the table reflects the dollar amount recognized for fiscal 2008 financial statement reporting purposes of the outstanding stock awards held by the directors in accordance with FAS 123R. Stock awards represent an award on May 13, 2008 to each of Mr. Mamanteo, Wohlrab and Wasserman of 25,000 shares of Common Stock with a grant date closing price of $0.10 per share, of which 34% or 8,500 shares, vested immediately on the date of grant. The remaining 66% of the shares, or 16,500 shares, will vest in three equal installments of 5,500 shares, on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The shares were not issued pursuant to any existing compensation plan. Refer to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Note 1 “Stock Based Compensation” and Note 10 “Stockholders Equity” included elsewhere in this prospectus, with respect to valuation assumptions for this stock grant. The directors held no other stock or option awards at June 30, 2008.
 
 
65

 
 
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS
 
Our executive officers, directors and other significant employees and their ages and positions are as follows:
 
Name
 
Age
 
Position
Ian Warwick
 
48
 
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company
Charles F. Trapp
 
59
 
Chief Financial Officer of the Company
Simon Chadwick
 
40
 
Chief Operating Officer and Director
Dwight B. Mamanteo
 
39
 
Director
Marcus Wohlrab
 
45
 
Director
Frederick Wasserman
 
54
 
Director
Gerald M. Czarnecki
 
 68
 
Director
W. Austin Lewis IV
 
 33
  Director

Ian Warwick has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors since December 2005. He served as CEO, President and Chairman of Auto Data Network, Inc, Aftersoft Group’s former parent, from October 2005 until immediately following the spin-off of Aftersoft from ADNW on November 24, 2008. From September 2004 until December 2005 he served as CEO of Broaden Software, Inc., a software company aggregator. From January 2004 to July 2004, he served as CEO of Bioaccelerate Holdings, Inc. where he established the structure of the business to enable it raise capital and acquire pharmaceutical products and licenses. From March 2001 to September 2003 he established and listed on the OTCBB, Corpsan, Inc. a supply chain and enterprise resource planning company for the design and print industry.
 
Charles F. Trapp was appointed Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer on November 30, 2007, following the resignation of the company’s former CFO, Michael O’Driscoll. Mr. Trapp was the co-founder and President of Somerset Kensington Capital Co., a Bridgewater, New Jersey-based investment firm that provided capital and expertise to help public companies restructure and reorganize from 1997 until November 2007. Earlier in his career, he served as CFO and/or a board member for a number of public companies, including AW Computer Systems, Vertex Electronics Corp., Worldwide Computer Services and Keystone Cement Co. His responsibilities have included accounting and financial controls, federal regulatory filings, investor relations, mergers and acquisitions, loan and labor negotiations, and litigation management. Mr. Trapp is a Certified Public Accountant and received his Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from St. Peter’s College in Jersey City, New Jersey.
 
Simon Chadwick has served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company since May 2007 and as a director since July 2007. Mr. Chadwick has served as the Company’s vice-president of Corporate Development since January 2006. From September 2004 to March 2006, Mr. Chadwick served as the chief technical officer of Broaden Software, Inc., a software company aggregator, for which he structured several acquisitions and provided business and technology appraisals and negotiations in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and South Africa. From November 2003 to September 2004, he served as the chief executive officer of BrainBox Consulting Ltd., a technology consulting company. From July 2000 to November 2003, he served as the chief technology officer of Corspan Inc., a private equity funded company focused on e-business initiatives, including the acquisition of leading-edge knowledge, content, and management systems. Mr. Chadwick received his Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry and computer science from the University of Hull (Hull, England).
 
 
66

 
 
Dwight B. Mamanteo became a Director of the Company on March 1, 2007. Mr. Mamanteo serves as the Chairman of the Company’s Compensation Committee and as a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and as a member of the Company’s Governance Nomination Committee. From November 2004 to the present, he has served as an investment analyst and portfolio manager at Wynnefield Capital Inc., a private investment firm headquartered in New York City. From September 1999 to June 2004, he served as manager of Global Alliances Technical Services for BEA Systems in the US and France. He has also provided technical consulting services to Delta Technologies, VISA International, Liberty Mutual, Ameritec Communications and Ericcson Communications. Mr. Mamanteo also serves on the Board of Directors of PetWatch Animal Hospitals, Inc and served on the Board of Directors of Sevis Sherpa Corporation, where he chaired the Compensation Committee. He received his MBA from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business and his Bachelor of Electrical Engineering from Concordia University (Montreal).
 
Marcus Wohlrab became a Director of the Company on March 1, 2007. Mr. Wohlrab is the Chairman of the Governance and Nomination Committee and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. In April 2001, Mr. Wohlrab founded Easting Capital Limited, a company that serves as a placing agent for credit and interest rate securities as well as negotiating public finance deals for large infrastructure projects as well as private companies. Easting Capital has recently been re launched beginning 2008 with new shareholders and is now known as M2group AG registered in Switzerland. From October 2000 to April 2001, Mr. Wohlrab was Executive Vice President Market Development for Easdaq, the pan-European Stock Market for growth companies (later acquired by NASDAQ). From January 1998 to September 2000, he served as Director Europe and Middle East for NASDAQ International. He also founded, built and helped finance WinWatch/WinVista, a software programming entity focused on Internet and Windows security products. He was also Director of Corporate Finance for Modatech Systems, Assistant Director for the Union Bank of Switzerland, Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Paine Webber International, and Vice President for Wood Gundy/CIBC/Oppenheimer. Mr. Wohlrab received a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics and Geology from Devon University and is fluent in Italian, French, German and English.
 
Frederick Wasserman became a Director of the Company on July 17, 2007. Mr. Wasserman is the Chairman of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Governance and Nomination Committee and Compensation Committee. Mr. Wasserman is President of FGW Partners, LLC, a financial management consulting firm he started, effective as of May 1, 2008. From August 2005 to December 2006, he served as Chief Operating and Chief Financial Officer of Mitchell & Ness Nostalgia Company, a manufacturer of licensed sportswear. From January 2001 to February 2005, he served as President and Chief Financial Officer of Goebel of North America, a subsidiary of the manufacturer of M.I. Hummel products, W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik Company. From December 1995 to January 2001 he served as Vice-President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Papel Giftware, serving as the company’s interim president from May 2000 to January 2001. He also brings 13 years of public accounting experience, most notably work with each of Coopers & Lybrand and Eisner & Company. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, and has been a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Wasserman also serves as a Director for the following companies: Acme Communications, Inc. (chairman- Nominating Committee, member- Audit Committee), Breeze-Eastern Corporation (Chairman- Audit Committee), Allied Defense Group (Member-Audit Committee, Ethics and Governance Committee), TeamStaff, Inc.(Chairman- Audit Committee), Crown Crafts, Inc. and Gilman + Ciocia, Inc. (Chairman- Compensation Committee, Member- Audit Committee).
 
 
67

 
 
Mr. Czarnecki became a Director of the Company on August 13, 2008. Mr. Czarnecki is the Chairman and CEO of The Deltennium Group, Inc., a privately held consulting and direct investment firm, since its founding in 1995. Since August 2007, Mr. Czarnecki has served as President and CEO of 02Media, Inc., a private organization providing direct response marketing campaign management and infomercial production, educational and branded entertainment TV programming and Internet marketing campaign management. From April 1, 2007 to January 15, 2008, Mr. Czarnecki served as interim President & CEO of Junior Achievement Worldwide, Inc., where he also serves on the board of directors, and as member of the Executive Committee, and Chairman of its Human Resources, Compensation and Pension Committees. Mr. Czarnecki is a member of the Board of Directors of State Farm Insurance Company and is Chairman of the Audit Committee; a member of the Board of Directors of Del Global Technology, Inc. since June 2003, and Chairman of the Audit Committee; and a member of the Board of Directors of State Farm Bank and State Farm Fire & Casualty. He is also a member of the advisory board for Private Capital, Inc. and serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of National University. In addition he is Chairman of the Board of National Leadership Institute, a nonprofit organization dedication to facilitating quality leadership and governance in nonprofit organizations; Chairman of the National Association of Corporate Directors - Florida Chapter, and faculty member; and member of the Board of Directors of Junior Achievement of South Florida, Inc. Mr. Czarnecki holds a B.S. in Economics from Temple University, and M.A. in Economics from Michigan State University, a Doctor of Humane Letters from National University and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Czarnecki serves as our lead director.
 
Mr. Lewis was appointed to the Board on January 27, 2009.  He currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Lewis Asset Management Corp., an investment management company headquartered in New York City which he founded in 2004.  From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Lewis was employed at Puglisi & Company, a New York based broker-dealer registered with FINRA, where he served as a registered representative and managed individual client accounts, conducted due diligence for investment banking activities and managed his own personal account.  In 2002, Mr. Lewis co-founded Thompson Davis, & Company, Inc., a registered broker-dealer headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Lewis was employed by Branch Cabell and Company, Inc. in Richmond, Virginia (“Branch Cabell”) where he was a registered representative. Following the November 2000 acquisition of Branch Cabell by Tucker Anthony Incorporated (“Tucker Anthony”), Mr. Lewis served as a Vice-President for Tucker Anthony and subsequently RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. which acquired Tucker Anthony in August of 2001.  Mr. Lewis received his Bachelor of Science degree in Finance and Financial Economics from James Madison University in 1998.
 
Board Committees
 
The Company’s Board of Directors has three standing committees of the Board: a Compensation Committee, an Audit Committee and Governance and Nomination Committee. The directors named above serve on the following Board committees:
 
 
Compensation Committee:
 
Audit Committee
 
Governance and
Nomination Committee
         
Dwight B. Mamanteo – Chair
 
Dwight B. Mamanteo
 
Dwight B. Mamanteo
         
Marcus Wohlrab
 
Marcus Wohlrab
 
Marcus Wohlrab – Chair
         
Frederick Wasserman
 
Frederick Wasserman** – Chair
 
Frederick Wasserman
         
Gerald M. Czarnecki -ex officio member
 
Gerald M. Czarnecki -ex officio member
 
Gerald M. Czarnecki -ex officio member
         
W. Austin Lewis IV
 
W. Austin Lewis IV
 
W. Austin Lewis IV
 
**
The Board of Directors has determined that Frederick Wasserman is a financial expert as defined in Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act.
 
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
Under the securities laws of the United States, our directors, executive (and certain other) officers, and any persons holding ten percent or more of our Common Stock must report on their ownership of the Common Stock and any changes in that ownership to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Specific due dates for these reports have been established. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, we believe that all reports required to be filed by such persons pursuant to Section 16(a) were filed on a timely basis.
 
 
68

 
 
 
 
Code of Ethics
 
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to our CEO and CFO, principal accounting officer, controller, and persons performing similar functions, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as of March 31, 2009 by (a) each stockholder who is known by the Company to own beneficially 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock; (b) all directors; (c) the Company’s chief executive officer, and other executive officers, and (d) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all persons listed below have (i) sole voting power and investment power with respect to their shares of Common Stock, except to the extent that authority is shared by spouses under applicable law, and (ii) record and beneficial ownership with respect to their shares of Common Stock. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based upon 79,125,953 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2009. Unless otherwise identified, the address of the directors and officers of the Company listed above is c/o Aftersoft Group, Inc., Herons Way, Chester Business Park, Chester, UK CH49QR.
 
Name and address of beneficial owner
 
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
   
Percent of class of
Common Stock (1)
 
Wynnefield Persons (2)
c/o Wynnefield Capital Inc.
450 Seventh Ave., Suite 509
New York, NY 10123
   
12,949,080
(3)
   
15.74
%
                 
Quillen Persons (4)
145 East 57th Street, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10022
   
6,960,112
(5)
   
8.75
%
                 
ComVest Capital LLC
105 S. Narcissus Ave.
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
   
9,444,678
(6)
   
10.66
%
                 
Directors and Officers:
               
                 
Ian Warwick 
Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman
   
4,132,881
(7)
   
5.22
%
                 
Simon Chadwick
Chief Operating Officer
   
1,853,941
     
2.34
%
                 
Charles F. Trapp
Chief Financial Officer
   
255,000
(8)
   
0.32
%
                 
Frederick Wasserman,
Director
   
56,001
(9)
   
0.07
%
                 
Dwight B. Mamanteo,
Director
   
152,116
(10)
   
0.19
%
                 
Marcus Wohlrab,
Director
   
34,504
(11)
   
0.04
%
                 
Gerald M. Czarnecki,
Director
   
515,600
(12)
   
0.65
%
                 
W. Austin Lewis IV (13)
c/o Lewis Asset Management Corp.
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
    16,177,888
(14)
   
18.92
%
                 
Executive Officers and Directors
as a group (8 persons)
   
23,177,931
     
27.76
%
                 
Former Officers:
               
                 
Michael Jamieson
   
340,000
     
0.43
%
                 
Michael O’Driscoll
   
0
     
0.00
%
 
 
69

 
 
(1)
Based on a total of 79,125,953 shares of Common Stock outstanding. In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, each person’s percentage interest is calculated by dividing the number of shares that person owns by the sum of (a) the total number of shares outstanding as of March 31, 2009 plus (b) the number of shares such person has the right to acquire within sixty (60) days of March 31, 2009.

(2)
Comprised of Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, LP (“Wynnefield Partners”) and Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value LP I (“Wynnefield Partners I”), and the general partner of each of these entities, Wynnefield Capital Management, LLC (“Wynnefield LLC”); Wynnefield Small Cap Value Offshore Fund Ltd. (“Wynnefield Offshore”) and its investment manager, Wynnefield Capital, Inc. (“Wynnefield Capital”); Channel Partnership II, LP (“Channel”); Nelson Obus, who serves as principal and co-managing member of Wynnefield Capital Management, LLC, principal executive officer of Wynnefield Capital, Inc. and general partner of Channel Partnership II, LP; and Joshua H. Landes, who serves as principal and co-managing member of Wynnefield Capital Management, LLC and executive officer of Wynnefield Capital, Inc. (collectively, the “Wynnefield Persons”). Dwight Mamanteo, one of the Company’s directors, is an investment analyst with Wynnefield Capital. He exercises neither voting nor dispositive control over the shares beneficially owned by Wynnefield Capital. The Company has been informed that Nelson Obus and Joshua H. Landes share voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by Wynnefield Partners, Wynnefield Partners I, Wynnefield Offshore, Wynnefield LLC and Wynnefield Capital, and that Nelson Obus exercises sole voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by Channel.
 
(3)
Represents an aggregate 9,824,078 shares of common stock and 3,125,002 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire July 2, 2013, which are beneficially owned as follows: (i) 2,204,862 shares of common stock and 833,334 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants are beneficially owned by Wynnefield Partners; (ii) 2,732,585 shares of common stock and 833,334 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants are beneficially owned by Wynnefield Partners I; (iii) 4,261,631 shares of common stock and 833,334 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants are beneficially owned by Wynnefield Offshore; and (iv) 625,000 shares of common stock and 625,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants are beneficially owned by Channel.
 
(4)
Comprised of Little Wing, L.P. (“Little Wing”); Quilcap Corp., the general partner of Little Wing (“Quilcap Corp.”); Tradewinds Fund, Ltd. (“Tradewinds”); Quilcap Management, LLC, the investment manager of Little Wing and Tradewinds (“Quilcap Management”); and Parker Quillen, the President of Quilcap Corp. and the Sole Managing Member of Quilcap Management (collectively, the “Quillen Persons”).  Based upon information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009.

(5)
Represents (i) 5,976,508 shares of common stock and 357,292 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire July 2, 2013, owned by Little Wing, with respect to which Little Wing has the power to vote and dispose, which power may be exercised by Mr. Quillen, as President of Quilcap Corp and as Sole Managing Member of Quilcap Management; and (ii) 540,879 shares of common stock and 59,375 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire July 2, 2013, owned by Tradewinds, with respect to which Tradewinds has the power to vote and dispose, which power may be exercised by Mr. Quillen, as the Sole Managing Member of Quilcap Management; and (iii) 26,058 shares of common stock with respect to which Mr. Quillen has sole voting and dispositive power.  Based upon information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009.
 
 
 
70

 
(6)
Includes the following shares owned by ComVest Capital LLC: (i) 1,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock, which are currently exercisable at $0.11 per share and expire December 31, 2013; (ii) 2,083,333 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock, which are currently exercisable at $0.3618 per share and expire December 31, 2013; (iii) 2,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock, which are currently exercisable at $0.11 per share and expire December 31, 2013, and (iv) 3,361,345 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the $5,000,000 principal amount of that certain Convertible Term Note dated December 21, 2007 issued to Comvest Capital LLC, at a current conversion rate of $1.4875 per share (see “Description of Securities – Convertible Note” for details regarding this Term Note). The Company has been informed that Comvest Capital Advisors, LLC is the managing entity of ComVest Capital, LLC, and that Gary Jaggard, managing director of Comvest Capital, LLC, exercises voting and investment control over the shares beneficially owned by ComVest Capital, LLC. Also includes 1,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants owned by Commonwealth Associates, LP, an entity affiliated with Comvest Capital, LLC. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence” for additional detail.

(7)
Includes 425,000 shares that Mr. Warwick owns directly, and 3,707,881 shares which are held indirectly through a corporation that Mr. Warwick controls.

(8)
Represents the vested portion, or 34%, of an award of an aggregate 750,000 restricted shares of Common Stock granted by the Company on May 13, 2008 for services previously rendered, which vested immediately. The remaining 66% of the shares will vest in three equal installments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

(9)
Includes (i) 8,500 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, which represents 34% of an award for an aggregate 25,000 shares of restricted Common Stock granted on May 13, 2008 by the Company for services previously rendered, with respect to which the remaining 66% of the shares will vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date; and (ii) 18,334 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, and 9,167 shares which will vest within 60 days, o ut of an award of an aggregate 110,000 shares of restricted Common Stock which vest quarterly over three years from the grant date of October 6, 2008.

(10)
Includes (i) 8,500 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, which represents 34% of an award for an aggregate 25,000 shares of restricted Common Stock granted on May 13, 2008 by the Company for services previously rendered, with respect to which the remaining 66% of the shares will vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date; and (ii) 14,301 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, and 8,667 shares which will vest within 60 days, out of an award of an aggregate 104,000 shares of restricted Common Stock which vest quarterly over three years from the grant date of October 6, 2008.

(11)
Includes (i) 8,500 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, which represents 34% of an award for an aggregate 25,000 shares of restricted Common Stock granted on May 13, 2008 by the Company for services previously rendered, with respect to which the remaining 66% of the shares will vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date; and (ii) 17,334 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, and 8,667 shares which will vest within 60 days, out of an award of an aggregate 104,000 shares of restricted Common Stock which vest quarterly over three years from the grant date of October 6, 2008.

(12)
Includes (i) 10,625 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, and 1,389 shares which will vest within 60 days, out of an award for an aggregate 25,000 shares of restricted Common Stock granted by the Company for joining the Board of Directors on October 6, 2008, with respect to which 8,333 shares vested immediately and the remaining 16,667 shares vest quarterly over three years; (ii) 19,251 vested shares of restricted Common Stock, and 11,667 shares which will vest within 60 days, out of an award of an aggregate 140,000 shares of restricted Common Stock which vest quarterly over three years from the grant date of October 6, 2008; and (iii) 35,000 shares of Common Stock received in lieu of cash compensation.
 
(13)
W. Austin Lewis IV is the portfolio manager and general partner of Lewis Asset Management Corp., the investment manager of Lewis Opportunity Fund, LP and LAM Opportunity Fund, LTD., which are selling stockholders named in this prospectus.  Accordingly, Mr. Lewis is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by Lewis Opportunity Fund, LP and LAM Opportunity Fund, LTD. and beneficially owned by Lewis Asset Management Corp.

(14)
Represents (i) 3,103,524 shares owned directly by W. Austin Lewis IV, (ii) 5,322,646 shares of common stock and 5,112,328 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire April 24, 2014, owned by Lewis Opportunity Fund, LP, and (iii) 1,348,719 shares of common stock and 1,290,671 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, which are currently exercisable at $1.00 per share and expire April 24, 2014, owned by LAM Opportunity Fund, LTD.
 
 
71

 
 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
Transactions with Auto Data Network, Inc.
 
Prior to the spin-off of Aftersoft from Auto Data Network, Inc. (“ADNW”) on November 24, 2008, Mr. Warwick served as Chairman and CEO of both companies. Effective immediately following the spinoff, Mr. Warwick resigned from all positions with ADNW.  None of the Company’s other officers and directors serve as officers or directors of ADNW.

During the 2008, 2007 and 2006 fiscal years, the Company had the following transactions with ADNW:

 
·
From time to time ADNW advanced funds to the Company. As of June 30, 2008, the balance of such advances was zero. During the 2008 fiscal year, payments totaling $2,108,000 were advanced to Aftersoft with repayments of $219,000. In fiscal 2006, the Company transferred its note receivable with a related party known as MAM North America, Inc. (“MAM North America”) in the amount of $510,000 to ADNW. ADNW had agreed to accept the assignment for all the issued shares of MAM North America from the Company and repaid the $510,000 note receivable on October 1, 2005 by allowing the Company to reduce its balance of loans due to ADNW. The Company sold its 43% shareholder interests in MAM Software North America, Inc. in October 2005. As a consequence of the sale ADNW agreed that MAM Software Limited could offset the $510,000 note receivable from MAM Software North America, Inc. against the outstanding debt due ADNW. The net book value of the Company’s investment in MAM Software North America, Inc. prior to the transfer to ADNW was zero. The transactions allowed the Company to improve its balance sheet by reducing loans due to the ADNW. Furthermore MAM North America has indemnified MAM UK against all past or current liabilities. In December 2005, the Company sold property and equipment to a third party for $308,000, who paid the $308,000 directly to ADNW. On June 10, 2006, the Company sold 100% of the outstanding Common Stock of Euro Soft (which by then had its own operations) to a different third party for $1,400,000. The proceeds from the sale of Euro Soft were paid by this third party purchaser directly to ADNW. No prior or subsequent relationship existed between ADNW or Aftersoft with either of these purchasers.
 
 
·
The Company issued the following shares of Common Stock to ADNW as full consideration of three acquisitions:
 
 
(1)
On December 21, 2005, the Company issued 32,500,000 shares of its Common Stock to ADNW for the acquisition of MAM Software Limited and CarParts Technologies Inc. Prior to this transaction, ADNW owned 100% of MAM Software Limited and CarParts Technologies, Inc. The approximate dollar value of the 32,500,000 shares that were issued at the time was $54,925,000, which is based on the closing price of our stock of $1.69 per share on that date. The transaction was undertaken as part of the spin-off of businesses that were formerly owned by ADNW into what ultimately became Aftersoft Group, Inc.
 
 
72

 
 
 
(2)
On August 25, 2006, the Company issued 28,000,000 shares of its Common Stock to ADNW for the acquisition of EXP. EXP is a former subsidiary of the Company, which was sold on November 12, 2007. Prior to this transaction, ADNW owned 100% of EXP. The transaction was undertaken with ADNW because the Company believed at the time that EXP would prove to be a strategic component of the Company’s business in the United States. The approximate dollar value of the 28,000,000 shares that were issued at the time was $30,800,000, which is based on the closing price of the Company’s stock of $1.10 per share on that date.

 
(3)
On February 1, 2007, the Company issued 16,750,000 shares of its Common Stock to ADNW for the acquisition of DSS. DSS is a former subsidiary of the Company, which was sold on November 12, 2007. Prior to this transaction, ADNW owned 100% of DSS. The transaction was undertaken with ADNW because the Company believed at the time that DSS would prove to be a strategic component of the Company’s business in the United States. The approximate dollar value of the 16,750,000 shares that were issued at the time was $15,075,000, which is based on the closing price of the Company’s stock of $0.90 per share on that date.

Transactions with Auto Data Network, Inc.

Balance due to ADNW as of June 30, 2005
 
$
(884,418
)
Transfer of advances made to MAM Software USA to ADNW
   
510,000
 
Advances received from ADNW
   
(633,875
)
Payments made on behalf of ADNW
   
236,183
 
Payment made from Note Receivable by a third party direct to ADNW
   
450,000
 
Proceeds from sale of Aftersoft Fixed Assets paid by a third party direct to ADNW
   
308,000
 
Balance due to ADNW as of June 30, 2006
   
(14,110
)
Payments made by ADNW to third parties for earn-outs on behalf of Aftersoft
   
(2,200,000
)
Payments made from note receivable by third party direct to ADNW
   
950,000
 
Payments made on behalf of ADNW
   
1,528,110
 
Balance due from ADNW as of June 30, 2007
   
264,000
 
Payments made on behalf of ADNW
   
2,108,000
 
Write down of advance to net realizable value
   
(800,000
)
16,000,000 shares of ADNW common stock issued in April 2008 by ADNW to the Company as payment for advances
   
(1,572,000
)
Balance at June 30, 2008
 
$
0
 

From time to time various payments were made by ADNW and Aftersoft companies on behalf of other companies within the ADNW group of companies. The advances do not attract interest and there is no set dates for repayment.
 
 
73

 
 
On June 29, 2007, the Company granted to a holder of 2,124,098 shares of ADNW preferred stock, which is convertible into 7,231,622 shares of common stock of ADNW, certain exchange rights. The preferred shareholder agreed to waive anti-dilution rights it held in ADNW for the right to exchange the preferred shares for 6,402,999 units of the Company, which units were issued as part of the private placement that closed in July 2007, and contained the same terms as the securities issued in that offering (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report) - one share of the Company’s Common Stock, and a five-year warrant to purchase one share of Company’s Common Stock exercisable at $1.00. On April 24, 2008, the Company completed the exchange transaction and issued the shares and warrants.

In April 2008, the Company received an aggregate of 27,631,622 shares, or 26.6% of ADNW’s common stock, for assuming certain liabilities of ADNW, including with respect to a lawsuit involving Arthur Blumenthal. This matter is described under “Legal Proceedings” and a share exchange with a former ADNW shareholder, described below. On July 3, 2008, the Company sold 5,231,622 of such shares to unaffiliated third parties for $0.17 per share, and aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $889,000. An additional 2,000,000 shares were used at the request of the Company to pay certain service providers in respect of services previously rendered to ADNW, and to settle certain outstanding minor obligations of ADNW.

On November 24, 2008 (the “Dividend Distribution Date”), ADNW distributed a dividend of the 71,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that ADNW owned at such time in order to complete the previously announced spin-off of Aftersoft’s businesses. The dividend shares were distributed in the form of a pro rata dividend to the holders of record as of November 17, 2008 (the “Record Date”) of ADNW’s common and convertible preferred stock. Each holder of record of shares of ADNW common and preferred stock as of the close of business on the Record Date was entitled to receive 0.6864782 shares of Aftersoft's common stock for each share of common stock of ADNW held at such time, and/or for each share of ADNW common stock that such holder would own, assuming the convertible preferred stock owned on the Record Date was converted in full.

Due to the nature of the dividend distribution, the ex-dividend date was set by NASDAQ as Tuesday, November 25, 2008, one day following the Dividend Distribution Date. No consideration was paid by any ADNW shareholder to receive the distribution of the dividend shares. Only whole shares were delivered to ADNW shareholders, so any resulting fractional shares in calculating the dividend were rounded up to the nearest whole number.

As a result of Aftersoft’s ownership of certain ADNW securities, Aftersoft received approximately 13,965,295 shares of its own common stock in connection with the dividend distribution. On December 31, 2008, Aftersoft retired 13,730,413 of the shares. The remaining 234,882 shares were used by Aftersoft for rounding of fractional shares issued in respect of the spin-off dividend, to make adjustments for the benefit of the holders of ADNW’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which received fewer shares in connection with the spin-off than the number to which they were entitled as a result of a calculation error relating to the Series B conversion rate, and for other minor adjustments.

Prior to the spin-off, ADNW owned approximately 77% of Aftersoft’s issued and outstanding common stock. Subsequent to and as a result of the spin-off, Aftersoft is no longer a subsidiary of ADNW.
 
 
74

 
 
Transactions with ComVest Capital LLC and its affiliate, Commonwealth Associates LP

ComVest Capital LLC

ComVest Capital LLC (“ComVest’) is the Company’s senior secured lender.  During fiscal 2008, ComVest extended to the Company a $1,000,000 secured revolving credit facility and a $5,000,000 term loan pursuant to the terms of a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), a Revolving Credit Note and a Convertible Term Note, each dated December 21, 2007.  The material terms of these loans are described further below. In connection with this transaction, the Company issued to ComVest warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,083,333 shares of the Company’s common stock. The material terms of these warrants are described further below.

At the time the loans were made, ComVest was not a party related to the Company. Each of these loans were made in the ordinary course of business, were made on the substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the lender and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.  As a result of the issuance of the Convertible Term Note and the warrants, ComVest became a shareholder of the Company, and currently may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of approximately 10.66% of the Company’s common stock (including certain warrants held by Commonwealth Associates LP, see below).

Credit Facility and Revolving Credit Note . Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Credit Facility is available to the Company through November 30, 2009, unless the maturity date is extended, or the Company prepays the Term Loan (described below) in full, in each case in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement. The Credit Facility provides for borrowing capacity of an amount up to (at any time outstanding) the lesser of the Borrowing Base at the time of each advance under the Credit Facility, or $1,000,000. The borrowing base at any time will be an amount determined in accordance with a borrowing base report that the Company is required to provide to the lender, based upon the Company’s Eligible Accounts and Eligible Inventory, as such terms are defined in the Loan Agreement.  The Loan Agreement provides for advances to be limited to (i) 80% of Eligible Accounts plus, in ComVest’s sole discretion, (ii) 40% of Eligible Inventory, minus (iii) such reserves as ComVest may establish from time to time in its discretion.  As of December 31, 2008, the borrowing base was $1,228,000.

In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company issued a Revolving Credit Note (the “Credit Note”) on December 21, 2007 payable to ComVest in the principal amount of $1,000,000, initially bearing interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (a) the prime rate, as announced by Citibank, N.A. from time to time, plus two percent (2%), or (b) nine and one-half percent (9.5%). The applicable interest rate will be increased by four hundred (400) basis points during the continuance of any event of default under the Loan Agreement. Interest is computed on the daily unpaid principal balance and is payable monthly in arrears on the first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2008. Interest is also payable upon maturity or acceleration of the Credit Note.  On February 10, 2009, the interest rate was increased from 9.5% to 11% in connection with a waiver the Company received for violating one of the debt covenants at December 31, 2008 (discussed below).

During the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter of 2008, the Company drew down $500,000 of the Credit Facility, and drew down the remaining $500,000 during the first and second fiscal quarter of 2009.  As a result, as of June 30, 2008, the outstanding principal due on the credit facility was $500,000, and as of March 31, 2009, the entire credit facility had been extended, and has an outstanding principal amount due of $1,000,000.  As of March 31, 2009, the Company has not yet repaid any principal.  As described above, this loan currently bears interest at a rate of 11%.  During fiscal 2008, the Company paid $2,045 in interest payments, and during the first two quarters of fiscal 2009, the Company paid $35,559 in interest payments.
 
75

 
Term Loan and Convertible Term Note.   In addition to the Credit Facility, ComVest extended a Term Loan, evidenced by a Convertible Term Note (the “Term Note”) issued on December 21, 2007, in the principal amount of $5,000,000. The Term Loan was a one-time loan, and unlike the Credit Facility, the principal amount is not available for re-borrowing.  The Term Note bears interest at a rate of eleven percent (11%) per annum, except that during the continuance of any event of default, the interest rate will be increased to sixteen percent (16%).

Initially, the Term Note was payable in 23 equal monthly installments of $208,333.33 each, payable on first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2009, through November 1, 2010, with the balance due on November 30, 2010.  The amortization schedule was subsequently modified, and was delayed for one year so that payments will commence on January 1, 2010, pursuant to an amendment of the Loan Agreement during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (see below).

The number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Term Note and the conversion price may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction.  In addition, the number of conversion shares, and/or the conversion price may be adjusted in the event of certain sales or issuances of shares of the Company’s common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of common stock, at any time while the Term Note is outstanding, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective conversion price of the Term Note.  The principal and interest payable on the Term Note was initially convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of ComVest, at an initial conversion price of $1.50 per share. On July 3, 2008, the conversion price was reduced to approximately $1.49 per share following the Company’s subsequent issuance of shares of common stock and warrants at an effectively lower price.  Consequently, the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amount of the Term Note was increased to 3,361,345 shares from 3,333,333 shares. The Company also may require conversion of the principal and interest under certain circumstances.

Since December 21, 2007, the principal amount due on the Term Note has been $5,000,000. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has not yet repaid any principal. As described above, this loan currently bears interest at a rate of 11%. During fiscal 2008, the Company paid $290,278 in interest payments, and during the first two quarters of fiscal 2009, the Company paid $281,112 in interest payments.

Warrants.  In connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company issued warrants to ComVest to purchase the following amounts of shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable after December 21, 2007 and expiring December 31, 2013: a) warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.3125 per share;  b) warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.39 per share; and c) warrants to purchase 2,083,333 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.3625 per share.  The warrants also contain a cashless exercise feature.  The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices may be adjusted, at any time while the warrants are outstanding, in the event of certain issuances of shares of the Company’s common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective exercise prices of the warrants.
 
76

 
The exercise prices for 3,000,000 of these warrants were subsequently modified in connection with waivers the Company received for violations of one of the debt covenants, as discussed further below.

Debt Covenants ..  The Loan Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including:

(a)           Maximum limits for capital expenditures of $600,000 per fiscal year;
(b)           Limitation on future borrowings, other than in certain circumstances, including to finance capital expenditures;
(c)           Limitation on guaranteeing any obligation, except for obligations in the ordinary course of business and obligations of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course of business;
(d)           Limitation on entering Sales-Leaseback Transactions with respect to the sale or transfer of property used or useful in the Company’s business operations;
(e)           Limitation on acquiring securities or making loans;
(f)            Limitation on acquiring real property;
(g)           Limitation on selling assets of the Company or permitting any reduction in the Company’s ultimate ownership position of any subsidiary;
(h)           Limitation on paying dividends;
(i)            Limitation on selling any accounts receivable; and
(j)            Requiring that, at the end of any quarter of any fiscal year, the ratio of (a) Earnings Before Interest, Depreciation, and Amortization (“EBIDA”) minus capital expenditures incurred to maintain or replace capital assets, to (b) debt service (all interest and principal payments), for the four (4) consecutive quarters then ended, to be not less than 1.25 to 1.00 (the “EBIDA Ratio Covenant”).
 
The Loan Agreement is collateralized by a pledge of all of the Company’s assets and the stock of the Company’s subsidiaries. 

Amendments to Loan Agreement and Waivers for Violations of Certain Covenants .  Subsequent to March 31, 2008, the Company notified ComVest that the Company had incurred a loss of $1,897,000 for the three-month period ending March 31, 2008, and as a result, the Company had a ratio of EBIDA to debt service of (4.41):1.00, therefore violating the EBIDA Ratio Covenant described above.  ComVest agreed to grant the Company a waiver for the violation of this loan covenant.  On May 15, 2008, the Company and ComVest entered into a Waiver and Amendment pursuant to which ComVest granted the waiver, and, in consideration therefor, the Company reduced the exercise price for 1,000,000 warrants issued to ComVest in connection with the Loan Agreement from $0.3125 per share to $0.11 per share, and recognized the incremental fair value of the modified warrants of $24,000 as additional interest expense.   As a result of ComVest granting this waiver, the Company was not in violation of any loan covenants at March 31, 2008.

Subsequent to June 30, 2008, the Company advised ComVest that the Company had incurred a loss of $11,664,000 for the six-month period ending June 30, 2008, and that as a result had again violated the EBIDA Ratio Covenant with an EBIDA to debt service ratio of (2.26):1.00.  ComVest agreed to provide the Company with another waiver.  In connection therewith, the Company and ComVest entered into a letter agreement amending the Loan Agreement (the “September 23, 2008 Waiver and Amendment”) and modifying the EBIDA Ratio Covenant.  Pursuant to the September 23, 2008 Waiver and Amendment, the EBIDA Ratio Covenant was waived for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 and was reduced to 0.62:100 from 1.25:1.00 for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Additionally, the EBIDA Ratio Covenant was reset for future quarters to 0.71:1.00 for the four quarters ended March 31, 2009; 0.50:1.00 for the four quarters ended June 30, 2009; and 1.25:1.00 for the four quarters ended September 30, 2009 and thereafter.  Additionally, ComVest agreed to delay the commencement of the loan amortization related to the Term Note for one year, from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2010.  In consideration for these modifications, the Company reduced the exercise price related to 2,000,000 warrants issued to ComVest in connection with the Loan Agreement from $0.39 to $0.11.  The incremental fair value of the modified warrants is $15,000, which was recorded as an additional debt discount and is being amortized over the remaining life of the term loan pursuant to EITF 96-19, “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments.”  As a result of these amendments, the Company was not in violation of any loan covenants at June 30, 2008.
 
77

 
As described in the financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, the Company incurred a net loss of $5,349,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2008.  Subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Company advised ComVest of the loss, and that as a result, the Company’s ratio of EBIDA to debt service was (1.41):1.00 in violation of the amended EBIDA Ratio Covenant.  ComVest agreed to extend an additional waiver of this covenant, which was granted on February 10, 2009, under a Waiver and Amendment #2 letter agreement (the “February 10, 2009 Waiver and Amendment”).  In consideration for the waiver, the Company agreed to increase the interest rate on the $1,000,000 Credit Facility from 9.5% to 11%.  As a result of ComVest granting this waiver, the Company was not in violation of any loan covenants at December 31, 2008. If the Company restores compliance with the EBIDA Ratio Covenant as of the close of any quarter ending on or after March 31, 2009, then the annual interest rate will be restored to 9.5%, effective as of the first day of the calendar month next succeeding the Company’s demonstrated quarter-end compliance with such covenant.
 
Commonwealth Associates LP
 
The Company has engaged Commonwealth Associates LP (“Commonwealth”) as its consultant and exclusive merger and acquisitions advisor pursuant to a Consulting Agreement dated June 3, 2008 (the “Consulting Agreement”). Commonwealth and ComVest are entities that are under common control. The Consulting Agreement is for an initial term of 24 months, and provides that Commonwealth will (i) be issued warrants to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which will be exercisable for 5 years at a price of $0.30 per share, or the effective price for the Company’s shares resulting from the sale of approximately 28,631,622 shares of ADNW’s common stock with respect to which Commonwealth may act as placement agent, whichever is lower, and will contain anti-dilution protection and a cashless exercise feature with respect to one-half of the warrants; (ii) receive $15,000 per month for 18 months for its advisory services beginning June 3, 2008 and (iii) receive a fee in connection with an M&A transaction equal to 5% of the aggregate consideration paid or received by the Company.

On July 3, 2008, the Company issued to Commonwealth warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as compensation for work performed in connection with the Company’s sale on July 3, 2008 of the 5,231,622 shares of ADNW common stock that it owned, which is further described in footnote 12 on page F-33. The warrants are currently exercisable at an exercise price of $0.30 per share and expire on July 3, 2013. Additionally, during the six months ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid $45,000 to Commonwealth, and recorded a liability for unpaid fees of $45,000.
78

 
Director Independence

Our determination of independence of directors is made using the definition of “independent director” contained in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) , even though such definitions do not currently apply to us because we are not listed on NASDAQ. We have determined that Dwight B. Mamanteo, Marcus Wohlrab, Frederick Wasserman and Gerald Czarnecki are “independent” within the meaning of such rules. Ian Warwick and Simon Chadwick are not “independent” under these rules, due to their respective positions as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer.
 
DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES
ACT LIABILITIES
 
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes us to indemnify any director or officer under prescribed circumstances and subject to certain limitations against certain costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, to which such person is a party by reason of being one of our directors or officers if it is determined that the person acted in accordance with the applicable standard of conduct set forth in such statutory provisions.
 
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of Aftersoft pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in such Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
 
WHERE YOU CAN GET MORE INFORMATION
 
In accordance with the Securities Act of 1933, we are filing with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1, of which this prospectus is a part, covering the securities being offered in this offering. As permitted by rules and regulations of the SEC, this prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement. For further information regarding both our Company and the securities in this offering, we refer you to the registration statement, including all exhibits and schedules, which you may inspect without charge at the public reference facilities of the SEC’s Washington, D.C. office, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10am and 3pm, and on the SEC Internet site at http:\\www.sec.gov. Information regarding the operation of the public reference rooms may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
 
 
79

 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007
 
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F–1
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 and 2007
F–2
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
F–3
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
F–4
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
F–5
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F–7
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Unaudited)
 
Index to Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets
F-34
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)
F-35
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
F-36
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
F-40
 
 
80

 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Aftersoft Group, Inc.
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aftersoft Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aftersoft Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
/s/ KMJ Corbin & Company LLP
KMJ CORBIN & COMPANY LLP
 
Irvine, California
 
September 29, 2008
 
 
F-1

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share data)
 
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
ASSETS
           
Current Assets
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,964     $ 583  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $202 and $227
    3,233       2,851  
Investment in non-marketable securities
          688  
Inventories
    615       319  
Current assets of discontinued operations
          2,587  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    690       278  
Total Current Assets
    6,502       7,306  
                 
Property and Equipment, Net
    592       209  
                 
Other Assets
               
Goodwill
    11,878       20,030  
Amortizable intangible assets, net
    4,584       5,265  
Software development costs, net
    1,718       1,301  
Investments in available-for-sale securities
    4,102        
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
          4,742  
Other long-term assets
    426       29  
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 29,802     $ 38,882  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 2,372     $ 2,196  
Accrued expenses and other
    3,508       1,811  
Current portion of accrued litigation costs
          2,000  
Payroll and other taxes
    933       866  
Current portion of long-term debt
    598       1,020  
Current portion of deferred revenue
    607       643  
Taxes payable
    379       391  
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
          2,044  
Total Current Liabilities
    8,397       10,971  
                 
Long-Term Liabilities
               
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
    545       753  
Deferred income taxes
    880       880  
Accrued litigation costs, net of current portion
          825  
Long-term debt, net of current portion and debt discount
    4,783       679  
Other
    142        
Total Liabilities
    14,747       14,108  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Stockholders' Equity
               
Preferred stock: Par value $0.0001 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
           
Common stock: Par value $0.0001 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized, 92,733,220 and 80,127,384 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    9       8  
Additional paid-in capital
    31,732       26,123  
Due from parent company
    (2,850 )     (264 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    1,617       1,523  
Accumulated deficit
    (15,453 )     (2,616 )
Total Stockholders' Equity
    15,055       24,774  
  $ 29,802     $ 38,882  
 
The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-2

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
 
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
For the Year Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Revenues
  $ 22,463     $ 20,217  
Cost of revenues
    10,429       9,357  
Gross Profit
    12,034       10,860  
                 
Operating Expenses
               
Research and development
    3,176       2,874  
Sales and marketing
    2,467       1,985  
General and administrative
    8,438       2,675  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,287       1,462  
Impairment of goodwill
    8,170       3,100  
Total Operating Expenses
    23,538       12,096  
                 
Operating Loss
    (11,504 )     (1,236 )
                 
Other Income (Expense)
               
Gain on extinguishment of liability
          487  
Interest expense
    (874 )     (129 )
                 
Gain on sale of investments
    1,312        
Litigation settlement , net
    76       (2,350 )
Other, net
    57       16  
Total other income (expense), net
    571       (1,976 )
                 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    (10,933 )     (3,212 )
                 
Provision for income taxes
    873       782  
                 
Loss from continuing operations
    (11,806 )     (3,994 )
                 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    13       884  
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
    (26 )     (378 )
                 
Net Loss
    (11,819 )     (3,488 )
                 
Unrealized loss on investments in available-for-sale securities
    (184 )      
Foreign currency translation gain
    278       1,899  
Total Comprehensive Loss
  $ (11,725 )   $ (1,589 )
                 
Loss per share attributed to common stockholders - basic and diluted
               
Net loss from continuing operations
  $ (0.15 )     (0.05 )
Discontinued operations
          0.01  
Net Loss
  $ (0.15       (0.04  
                 
Loss per share attributed to common stockholders - basic and diluted
               
      87,057,391       79,828,912  
 
The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-3 

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

   
Common Stock
   
Additional
Paid-in-
   
Due To
(From)
   
Other Comprehensive
   
Retained Earnings (Accumulated
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Parent
   
Income (Loss)
   
Deficit)
   
Total
 
Balance as of June 30, 2006
    79,821,167     $ 8     $ 25,564     $ 14     $ (376 )   $ 872     $ 26,082  
Common stock issued to consultants for services performed
    6,217             3                         3  
Common stock issued to convert long-term debt
    300,000             144                         144  
Fair value of warrants issued for litigation costs
                412                         412  
Advances to parent company, net
                      (278 )                 (278 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                            1,899             1,899  
Net loss
                                  (3,488 )     (3,488 )
Balance as of June 30, 2007
    80,127,384       8       26,123       (264 )     1,523       (2,616 )     24,774  
Common stock issued for cash
    5,208,337       1       2,035                         2,036  
Common stock issued to settle litigation
    1,718,750             825                         825  
Litigation settlement shares returned
    (1,718,750 )           (275 )                       (275 )
Fair value of warrants issued to settle litigation
                152                           152  
Fair value of warrants issued to consultant
                27                         27  
Fair value of warrants issued with long-term debt
                910                         910  
Common stock and warrants issued for parent company common stock
    6,402,999             1,812                   (1,018 )     794  
Common stock issued as compensation
    994,500             99                           99  
Fair value of warrants issued to lender
                24                         24  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                            278             278  
Unrealized loss on investment in available-for-sale securities
                            (184 )           (184 )
Advances to parent company, net
                      (2,586 )                 (2,586 )
Net loss
                                  (11,819 )     (11,819 )
Balance June 30, 2008
    92,733,220     $ 9     $ 31,732     $ (2,850 )   $ 1,617     $ (15,453 )   $ 15,055  
 
The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-4

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
(In thousands)
 
For the Years Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES :
           
Net loss
  $ (11,819 )   $ (3,488 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
               
Non-cash revenues
          (360 )
Depreciation and amortization
    1,286       1,947  
Debt discount amortization
    412        
Gain on extinguishment of liability
          (487 )
Loss on disposition of property and equipment
    16       4  
Gain on sale of investment in non-marketable securities
    (1,312 )      
Loss on settlements of amount due from parent company
    1,091        
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
    26       378  
Gain on modification of debt settlement
    (123 )      
Fair value of stock and warrants issued for services and compensation
    126       3  
Fair value of warrants issued for debt waiver
    24        
Fair value of warrants issued for litigation costs
          412  
Impairment of goodwill
    8,170       3,100  
                 
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of the effect of acquisitions and divestitures):
               
Accounts receivable
    (382 )     (233 )
Inventories
    (37 )     (75 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (671 )     (59 )
Net advances to parent company relating to operating activities
    (2,060 )     (278 )
Accounts payable
    176       884  
Taxes payable
    151       (224 )
Deferred revenue
    172       (1,235 )
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    1,884       300  
Accrued litigation costs
    (2,000 )     1,805  
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
    (4,870 )     2,394  
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Cash sold in divestitures
    (157 )      
Purchase of property and equipment
    (383 )     (228 )
Proceeds from the sale of investment in non-marketable securities
    2,000        
Net advances to parent company relating to investing activities
          (1,250 )
Capitalized software development costs
    (681 )     (585 )
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
    779       (2,063 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of cash issuance costs
    2,036        
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of cash issuance costs
    4,359        
Payments on long-term debt
    (1,062 )     (84 )
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
    5,333       (84 )
                 
Effect of exchange rate changes
    57       (40 )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    1,299       207  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    665       458  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 1,964     $ 665  
 
The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
F-5

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

(In thousands)
 
For the Years Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
           
Cash paid during the year for :
           
Interest
  $ 438     $ 149  
Income taxes
  $ 873     $ 1,300  
                 
Non-cash investing and financing transactions during the year for :
               
Settlement of note receivable by offsetting against amounts due to Parent
  $     $ 950  
Shares issued for accrued litigation costs
  $ 825     $  
Value of shares returned in revised litigation settlement
  $ 275     $  
                 
Value of warrants issued in revised litigation settlement
  $ 152     $  
                 
Earn-out payments to third parties related to EXP paid by Parent
  $     $ 2,200  
Shares issued for conversion of long-term debt
  $     $ 144  
Value of warrants issued related to debt issuance
  $ 910     $  
                 
Shares exchanged for parent company common stock:
               
Value of parent company shares received
  $ 794     $  
Deemed dividend to parent company
    1,018        
Value of Company shares exchanged
  $ 1,812     $  
Shares of parent company common stock received in exchange for legal obligation
  $ 484     $  
Shares of parent company common stock received in exchange for receivable from parent company
  $ 2,372     $  
                 
               
Accounts receivable
  $     $ 933  
Goodwill
    -       700  
Accounts payable
    -       (68 )
Deferred revenue
    -       (322 )
Loss on sale
    -       (378 )
Note receivable
  $ -     $ 865  
                 
Divestiture of MMI (see Note s 2 and11):
               
Cash
  $ 157          
Accounts receivable
    439          
Inventory
    6          
Other
    27          
Current Assets
    629          
Property and equipment
    156          
Other long term assets
    219          
Goodwill
    723          
Intangible assets
    2,242          
Total Assets
    3,969          
Liabilities assumed
    (1,739 )        
Net assets divested
    2,230          
Proceeds received
    0          
Loss on disposal
  $ 2,230          
                 
Divestiture of EXP (see Notes 2 and 11):
               
Accounts receivable
  $ 1,050          
Investments in available for sale securities
    369          
Current Assets
    1,419          
Goodwill
    1,640          
Total Assets
    3,059          
Liabilities assumed
    (1,405 )        
Net assets divested
    1,654          
Proceeds received:
               
Investments in available for sale securities
    2,334          
Receivable from buyer
    1,707          
Gain on disposal
  $ 2,387          
                 
 
Divestiture of note receivable of $865,000 for an investment in available for sale securities of $682,000 as part of the divestitures of EXP and MMI (see Note 3).

The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-6

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2008 and 2007

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Basis of Presentation
 
Aftersoft Group, Inc. is a subsidiary of Auto Data Network, Inc. (“ADNW”), which owns approximately seventy-seven percent (77%) of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock as of September 28, 2008. The Company is in the process of spinning out from ADNW through distribution by ADNW all of the shares of Aftersoft’s common stock it owns to its shareholders (representing approximately 0.686 shares of Company’s common stock for every share of ADNW common stock held by ADNW shareholders).
 
Aftersoft Group is a leading provider of business and supply chain management solutions primarily to automotive parts manufacturers, retailers, tire and service chains, independent installers and wholesale distributors in the automotive aftermarket. The Company conducts its businesses through wholly owned subsidiaries with operations in Europe and North America. MAM Software Limited (“MAM”) is based in Sheffield, United Kingdom (“UK”) and Aftersoft Network, NA, Inc., (“ASNA”) has offices in the United States (“US”) in Dana Point, California, Allentown, Pennsylvania and Wintersville, Ohio.
 
EXP Dealer Software Services Limited (“EXP”) is comprised of MMI Automotive Limited (“MMI”), based in Wiltshire, UK, Anka Design Limited, (“Anka”) based in Chester, UK, and Dealer Software Services Limited (“DSS”), an inactive company, which were all sold during fiscal 2008, and are included as Discontinued Operations in the Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods presented (see Notes 2 and 11).
 
The Company operates on a June 30 fiscal year end.
 
Combination of Entities under Common Control
 
On August 26, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of EXP from ADNW in exchange for issuing 28,000,000 shares of Common Stock to ADNW, with a market value of $30,800,000. In addition, on February 1, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of DSS from ADNW in exchange for issuing 16,750,000 shares of Common Stock to ADNW with a market value of $15,075,000. Since these acquisitions were with the Company’s majority shareholder, the net assets acquired are recorded at the amounts reflected in ADNW’s consolidated financial statements as of July 1, 2005, and all historical financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2007 have been retroactively restated as though the transactions had occurred on July 1, 2005.
 
 
F-7

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
The net assets of EXP at July 1, 2005 consisted of the following:
 
Cash
 
$
64,000
 
Other current assets
   
773,000
 
Property and equipment
   
177,000
 
Goodwill
   
635,000
 
Amortizable intangibles
   
2,784,000
 
Current liabilities
   
(708,000
)
Other long-term liabilities
   
(807,000
)
Net assets recorded to stockholders’ equity
 
$
2,918,000
 
         
The net assets of DSS at July 1, 2005 consisted of the following:
       
         
Investment in non-marketable securities
 
$
688,000
 
Net assets recorded to stockholders’ equity
 
$
688,000
 
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $100,000. At June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $0 and $88,000, respectively, of balances in these accounts in excess of the FDIC insurance limits. For banks outside of the United States, the Company maintains its cash accounts at financial institutions which it believes to be credit worthy.
 
For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.
 
Customers
 
The Company performs periodic evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses as deemed necessary. The Company generally does not require collateral to secure its accounts receivable. Credit risk is managed by discontinuing sales to customers who are delinquent. The Company estimates credit losses and returns based on management’s evaluation of historical experience and current industry trends. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts.

 
F-8

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
No customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
 
Segment Reporting
 
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” SFAS No. 131 requires public companies to report selected segment information in their quarterly reports issued to stockholders. It also requires entity-wide disclosures about the product, services an entity provides, the material countries in which it holds assets and reports revenues, and its major customers. As a result of the divestitures that occurred during fiscal 2008, the Company operates in only one segment.
 
Geographic Concentrations
 
The Company conducts business in the US, Canada and the UK. From customers headquartered in their respective countries, the Company derived 24% of its revenues from the US, and 76% from its UK operations during the year ended June 30, 2008 compared to 26% from the US and 74% from the UK for the year ended June 30, 2007. At June 30, 2008, the Company maintained 21% of its net property and equipment in the UK with the remaining 79 % in the US.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by the Company’s management include, but are not limited to, the collectibility of accounts receivable, the fair value of investments in available-for-sale securities, the recoverability of goodwill and other long-lived assets, valuation of deferred tax assets, and the estimated value of warrants and shares issued for non-cash consideration. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, investments in securities, long-term debt, accounts payable and accrued expenses. The carrying values of such instruments classified as current approximate their fair values as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 due to their short-term maturities. The difference between the fair value and recorded values of long-term debt are not significant due to the lack of significant differential between current prevailing rates of similar instruments and the rates of the Company’s non-current instruments.
 
 
F-9

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Available-for-Sale Investments
 
The Company accounts for its investments in equity securities with readily determinable fair values that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Management determines the appropriate classification of such securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. The specific identification method is used to determine the cost basis of securities disposed of. Unrealized gains and losses on the marketable securities are included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. At June 30, 2008, investments consist of corporate stock with an unrealized loss of $184,000 (see Note 4). At June 30, 2007, investments consist of corporate stock with no unrealized gain or loss.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or current estimated market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventories consist primarily of hardware that will be sold to customers. The Company periodically reviews its inventories and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Once established, write-downs of inventories are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or excess inventories.
 
Investment in Non-Marketable Securities
 
Non-marketable securities consist of equity securities for which there were no quoted market prices. Such investments were initially recorded at their cost, subject to an impairment analysis. Such investments will be reduced if the Company receives indications that a permanent decline in value has occurred. Any decline in value of non-marketable securities below cost that is considered to be “other than temporary” will be recorded as a reduction on the cost basis of the security and will be included in the consolidated statement of operations as an impairment loss.
 
The Company owned an 18.18% ownership interest in DCS Automotive Ltd, a non-public company in the UK, which it acquired for $688,000. During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold its non-marketable investment to a third party for $2,000,000, generating a gain of $1,312,000.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost, and are being depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms. Equipment under capital lease obligations is depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the related assets or the term of the lease. Maintenance and routine repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time of retirement or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the statement of operations.

 
F-10

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Software Development Costs
 
Costs incurred to develop computer software products to be sold or otherwise marketed are charged to expense until technological feasibility of the product has been established. Once technological feasibility has been established, computer software development costs (consisting primarily of internal labor costs) are capitalized and reported at the lower of amortized cost or estimated realizable value. Purchased software development cost is recorded at its estimated fair market value. When a product is ready for general release, its capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of three years. If the future market viability of a software product is less than anticipated, impairment of the related unamortized development costs could occur, which could significantly impact the recorded net income (loss) of the Company.
 
Amortizable Intangible Assets
 
Amortizable intangible assets consist of completed software technology, customer relationships and automotive data services and are recorded at cost. Completed software technology and customer relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 8 to 10 years, and automotive data services are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 20 years.
 
Goodwill
 
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” addresses how intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets should be accounted for in the financial statements upon their acquisition and after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized but rather be tested at least annually for impairment, and intangible assets that have finite useful lives be amortized over their useful lives. In addition, SFAS No. 142 expands the disclosure requirements about goodwill and other intangible assets in the years subsequent to their acquisition.
 
SFAS No. 142 provides specific guidance for testing goodwill and intangible assets that will not be amortized for impairment. Goodwill will be subject to impairment reviews by applying a fair-value-based test at the reporting unit level, which generally represents operations one level below the segments reported by the Company. An impairment loss is recorded for any goodwill that is determined to be impaired, which resulted in an $8,170,000 impairment charge in fiscal 2008 and a $3,100,000 impairment charge in fiscal 2007. The impairment loss relates to ASNA as a result of continuing operating losses and less optimistic operating forecasts. The estimated fair value of ASNA was determined using present value techniques. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products and services will continue which could result in additional impairment of goodwill in the future.
 

 
F-11

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Balance, July 1, 2006
 
$
22,700,000
 
Earn out payback to third parties related to EXP.
   
2,200,000
 
Effect of exchange rate changes
   
1,293,000
 
Impairment charges
   
(3,100,000
)
Elimination of goodwill related to divesting of EXP
   
(700,000
)
Reclassification of goodwill relating to discontinued operations
   
(2,363,000
)
Balance June 30, 2007
   
20,030,000
 
Effect of exchange rate changes
   
18,000
 
Impairment charges
   
(8,170,000
)
Balance June 30, 2008
 
$
11,878,000
 
 
Long-Lived Assets
 
The Company’s management assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets (other than goodwill discussed above) upon the occurrence of a triggering event by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. At June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s management believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets (other than goodwill discussed above). There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products and services will continue, which could result in impairment of long-lived assets in the future.
 
Issuance of Non-Employee Stock for Non-Cash Consideration
 
All issuances of the Company’s stock to non-employees for non-cash consideration have been assigned a per share amount equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the value of consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of the non-cash consideration received pertains to services rendered by consultants and others and has been valued at the market value of the shares on the dates issued.
 
The Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” and EITF 00-18, “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees.” The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. In accordance with EITF 00-18, an asset acquired in exchange for the issuance of fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments should not be presented or classified as an offset to equity on the grantor’s balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes.
 
 
F-12

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment” requiring it to recognize expense related to the fair value of its share-based compensation awards over the applicable vesting period, subject to estimated forfeitures.
 
For valuing stock options awards under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes valuation model, using the guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 for determining its expected term and volatility assumptions. For the expected term, the Company uses a simple average of the vesting period and the contractual term of the option. Volatility is a measure of the amount by which the Company’s stock price is expected to fluctuate during the expected term of the option. For volatility the Company considers its own volatility as applicable for valuing its options and warrants. SFAS 123(R) requires that forfeitures be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The risk-free interest rate is based on the relevant US Treasury Bill Rate at the time each grant. The dividend yield represents the dividend rate expected to be paid over the option’s expected term; the Company currently has no plans to pay dividends.
 
On June 12, 2008, the Company’s shareholders approved the Aftersoft Group Inc. 2007 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the plan, including stock options, stock awards, and stock appreciation rights is limited to 15% of the shares of common stock outstanding on the first trading day of any fiscal year. The Company issued restricted shares to management and board members in fiscal 2008 under this plan (see Note 10).
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions.” Accordingly, software license revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product component has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is probable.
 
If any of these criteria are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the criteria are met. In accordance with SOP 98-9, the Company accounts for delivered elements in accordance with the residual method when arrangements include multiple product components or other elements and vendor-specific objective evidence exists for the value of all undelivered elements. Revenues on undelivered elements are recognized once delivery is complete.
 
In those instances where arrangements include significant customization, contractual milestones, acceptance criteria or other contingencies (which represents the majority of the Company’s arrangements), the Company accounts for the arrangements using contract accounting, as follows :
 
 
1)
When customer acceptance can be estimated, expenditures are capitalized as work in process and deferred until completion of the contract at which time the costs and revenues are recognized.

 
F-13

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
 
2)
When customer acceptance cannot be estimated based on historical evidence, costs are expensed as incurred and revenue is recognized at the completion of the contract when customer acceptance is obtained.
 
The Company records amounts collected from customers in excess of recognizable revenue as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
 
Revenues for maintenance agreements, software support, on-line services and information products are recognized ratably over the term of the service agreement.
 
Advertising Expense
 
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. For the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, advertising expense totaled $126,000 and $199,000, respectively.
 
Gain on Extinguishment of Liability
 
The Company realized $487,000 of income from the extinguishment of sales tax liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2007, due to the expiration of the statute of limitations related to such liabilities. During June 2001, CarParts Technologies, Inc., now known as AFS Tire Management, Inc., adopted a formal plan to abandon its internet retailing business and a provision was set up to cover any potential sales tax liabilities. This balance represents the portion of the potential liabilities that was never paid.
 
Foreign Currency
 
Management has determined that the functional currency of its subsidiaries is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of the UK subsidiaries are translated into US dollars at the year-end exchange rates. Income and expenses are translated at an average exchange rate for the year and the resulting translation gain (loss) adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, which totaled $278,000 and $1,899,000 for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
Foreign currency gains and losses from transactions denominated in other than respective local currencies are included in income. The Company had no foreign currency transaction gains (losses) for all periods presented.
 
Comprehensive Income
 
Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. For the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the components of comprehensive income (loss) consist of foreign currency translation gains (losses) and unrealized gains and on investments in available-for-sale securities.
 
 
F-14

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company accounts for domestic and foreign income taxes under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”
 
Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. Deferred taxation is provided in full in respect of taxation deferred by timing differences between the treatment of certain items for taxation and accounting purposes. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
 
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” which defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions as well as guidance regarding the measurement of the resulting tax benefits. FIN 48 requires a company to recognize for financial statement purposes the impact of a tax position if that position is “more likely than not” to prevail (defined as a likelihood of more than fifty percent of being sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the tax position). The Company adopted FIN 48 in its consolidated financial statements (See Note 8).
 
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 
Basic earnings (loss) per common share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding assuming all potential dilutive common shares were issued. During periods in which the Company incurs losses, common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The Company has no dilutive securities for the year ended June 30, 2007. For the year ended June 30, 2008, a total of 20,798,135 common stock purchase warrants and debt convertible into 3,333,333 shares were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
 
 
F-15

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computation for the years ended June 30:
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share:
           
Net loss
  $ (11,819,000 )   $ (3,488,000 )
Deemed distribution to parent company
    (1,018,000 )     -  
Net loss available to common shareholders
  $ (12,837,000 )   $ (3,488,000 )
Denominator for basic and diluted Loss per common share:
               
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
    87,057,391       79,828,912  
                 
Net loss per common share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted
  $ (0.15 )   $ (0.04 )
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain amounts in the 2007 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation, with no effect on the previously reported net loss.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” to define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value and expand disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement provides guidance related to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value and disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 157 on July 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements.
 
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS. No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 would create a fair value option of accounting for qualifying financial assets and liabilities under which an irrevocable election could be made at inception to measure such assets and liabilities initially and subsequently at fair value, with all changes in fair value reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) requires acquiring entities in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) on July 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
 
F-16

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 160 requires entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 160 on July 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
NOTE 2. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
 
EXP Dealer Software Limited
 
The acquisition of EXP was recorded as a combination of an entity under common control (see Note 1).
 
During the year ended June 30, 2007, ADNW made earn-out payments on behalf of the Company to the previous owners of Anka totaling $1,500,000 pursuant to the original acquisition agreement between ADNW and the previous owners. Such payments were recorded as goodwill and a reduction in the amount due from parent company. There are no additional potential earn-out payments under the acquisition agreement.
 
On October 30, 2007, the Company divested MMI. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, EXP agreed to sell shares of Distal Enterprises (“Distal”), which owned the shares of MMI, to the original sellers of MMI, in full and final satisfaction of any and all amounts owed to the original sellers of MMI. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company, EXP, and ADNW were released from any and all of its liabilities under the original purchase agreement and any other agreements between the parties executed prior thereto, upon the completion and transfer of the entire issued share capital of Distal to the original sellers. The Company received no further consideration on the sale, and incurred a loss of $2,230,000 which is included in sale of discontinued operations (see Note 11).
 
On November 12, 2007, the Company divested EXP. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”), EU Web Services Limited (“EU Web Services”) agreed to acquire, and the Company agreed to sell, the entire issued share capital of EXP it then owned. In consideration of the sale, EU Web Services agreed to issue to the Company, within twenty-eight days from the Agreement’s execution, Ordinary 0.01 GBP shares in its parent company, First London Securities, PLC (“First London Securities”) having a fair market value of $3,000,000 at the date of issuance of such shares. The Company received 1,980,198 shares and recorded the investment at $2,334,000, which represented the bid price of the restricted securities received, and discounted the carrying value by 11%, as the shares cannot be liquidated for at least twelve months. The shares are included as investment in available for sale securities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (see Note 4). Further, the Agreement provided that the Company receive additional consideration in the form of: (i) Ordinary shares in EU Web Services having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of the date issuance of, provided that EU Web Services is listed and becomes quoted on a recognized trading market within six (6) months from the date of the Agreement; or (ii) If EU Web services does not become listed within the time period specified, Ordinary shares in EU Web Services’ parent company having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of the date of issuance. The Company originally recorded the receivable at $1,707,000. The Company recorded a gain of $2,387,000 on the sale of EXP which is included in sale of discontinued operations (see Note 11). The Company received 1,874,414 shares of First London Securities as payment for the $2,000,000 receivable.
 
 
F-17

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
The operations of EXP (including MMI, Anka and DSS) for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the net assets of EXP at June 30, 2007 have been reclassified and presented separately in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (see Note 11).
 
Dealer Software and Services Limited
 
The acquisition of DSS was recorded as a combination of an entity under common control (see Note 1). DSS had a wholly owned subsidiary, Consolidated Software Capital Limited (“CSC”).
 
During the year ended June 30, 2007, ADNW made earn-out payments on behalf of the Company to the previous owners of CSC totaling $700,000 related to the original CSC acquisition by ADNW under the acquisition agreement. Such payments were recorded as goodwill and a reduction in the amount due from parent company. There are no additional potential earn-out payments under the acquisition agreement.
 
On June 17, 2007, DSS sold all of its CSC shares for a note receivable of $865,000. The operations of CSC for the year ended June 30, 2007 are considered discontinued operations and have been reclassified and presented separately in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (see Note 11)
 
On November 12, 2007 as part of the sale of EXP, the $865,000 note receivable was exchanged for 578,672 shares of First London Securities common stock having a fair value of $682,000. The transaction resulted in a loss of $183,000 and is included in sale of discontinued operations (see Note 11).
 
NOTE 3. TRANSACTIONS WITH PARENT COMPANY
 
From time to time payments were made by the Company to settle certain obligations of ADNW and recorded as advances to Parent Company. The advances were non-interest bearing and due on demand. ADNW had minimal operations, and as of December 31, 2007, agreed to exchange the balance due for 16,000,000 common shares of ADNW. The Company recorded the net receivable at $2,372,000, which represented the bid price of the restricted securities to be received as of December 31, 2007, discounted the carrying value by 11% or $188,000 because the shares cannot be liquidated until the Company’s spinoff is approved by the SEC which was estimated to be completed in approximately six months.
 
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company reduced the carrying value of amount due from parent company by $800,000, which represents the reduction of the bid price of the restricted shares from December 31, 2007 and was recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 
ADNW attempted to settle an old outstanding obligation of $775,000 with Mr. Blumenthal (see Note 9) for 4,400,000 shares of ADNW common stock. The value of the shares declined and Mr. Blumenthal elected not to accept the shares as full compensation and demanded that the Company settle the liability with additional or different consideration. In April 2008, the Company accepted the 4,400,000 shares from ADNW valued at $484,000 in exchange for attempting to settle this liability. The difference between the value of the ADNW shares and the amount of the obligation of $291,000 was recorded as general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The Company is in the process of negotiating a settlement of this obligation.
 
 
F-18

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
On June 29, 2007, the Company granted to a holder of 2,124,098 shares of ADNW preferred stock, which is convertible into 7,231,622 shares of common stock of ADNW, certain exchange rights. The preferred shareholder agreed to waive anti-dilution rights it held in ADNW for the right to exchange the preferred shares for 6,402,999 units of the Company, which units were issued as part of the private placement that closed in July 2007, and contained the same terms as the securities issued in that offering (see Note 10) - one share of the Company’s common stock, and a five-year warrant to purchase one share of Company’s common stock exercisable at $1.00. On April 24, 2008, the Company completed the exchange transaction and issued the shares and warrants. The difference of $1,018,000 between the value of the Company units issued ($1,812,000) and the ADNW shares received ($794,000) was recorded as a distribution in the form of an increase to accumulated deficit.
 
As a result of the above transactions, the Company owns approximately 27.6 million shares of ADNW’s common stock on a fully converted basis in the aggregate, representing 26.6% of ADNW’s common stock on a fully diluted basis. Subsequent to June 30, 2008, the Company liquidated 5,231,622 common shares of ADNW for net proceeds of $889,000, and intends to issue 2,000,000 common shares of ADNW in exchange for settling $208,000 of ADNW obligations. It is the Company’s intention to exchange the remaining 20,400,000 shares of ADNW common stock it owns for 14,002,560 shares of its own common stock once the spin-off is declared effective by the SEC and retire such shares immediately upon receipt. As a result, the Company has classified this investment as a reduction to stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
NOTE 4. INVESTMENT IN AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
 
The Company received a total of 4,433,284 shares of First London Securities from the sale of EXP (see Note 2). The shares are listed for trading on the London Plus Exchange but currently they are thinly traded.
 
The Company values the investment at the bid price and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company owns approximately 3% of First London Securities and carries the investment at $4,102,000, net of unrealized loss of $184,000.
 
 
NOTE 5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
Property and equipment consist of the following:

   
June 30, 2008
   
June 30, 2007
 
Leasehold improvements
  $ 574,000     $ 160,000  
Computer and office equipment
    163,000       68,000  
Equipment under capital leases
    10,000       10,000  
Furniture and equipment
    357,000       418,000  
      1,104,000       656,000  
Less : Accumulated depreciation
    512,000       (447,000 )
    $ 592,000     $ 209,000  
 
 
F-19

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Depreciation expense on property and equipment assets for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $118,000 and $66,000, respectively.
 
NOTE 6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
Intangible assets consist of the following:
 
   
June 30,
2008
   
June 30,
2007
 
Assets not subject to amortization:
           
Goodwill
  $ 11,878,000     $ 20,030,000  
Assets subject to amortization:
               
Completed software technology (9-10 years useful life)
  $ 3,389,000     $ 3,389,000  
Customer contracts / relationships (10 years useful life)
    3,909,000       3,909,000  
Automotive data services (20 years useful life)
    391,000       391,000  
      7,689,000       7,689,000  
Less : Accumulated amortization
    (3,105,000 )     (2,424,000 )
Amortizable intangible assets, net
  $ 4,584,000     $ 5,265,000  
                 
Software development costs
  $ 3,263,000     $ 2,458,000  
Less : Accumulated amortization
    (1,545,000 )     (1,157,000 )
Software development costs, net
  $ 1,718,000     $ 1,301,000  

For the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized amortization expense on its software development costs and other amortizable intangible assets of $1,168,000 and $1,396,000 (restated), respectively.
 
Estimated future amortization of software development costs and intangibles is as follows:
 
Years Ending June 30,
       
 
$
1,130,000
 
2010
   
1,130,000
 
2011
   
760,000
 
2012
   
760,000
 
2013
   
760,000
 
Thereafter
   
1,762,000
 
Total
 
$
6,302,000
 
 
 
F-20

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
NOTE 7. LONG-TERM DEBT
 
Long-term debt consists of the following as of June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007:

   
June 30,
2008
   
June 30,
2007
 
ComVest term loan, net of debt discount of $756,000
  $ 4,244,000     $ -  
ComVest revolver
    500,000       -  
McKenna note
    497,000       825,000  
Homann note
    125,000       125,000  
Other notes
    15,000       749,000  
      5,381,000       1,699,000  
Less current portion
    (598,000 )     (1,020,000 )
Long term portion
  $ 4,783,000     $ 679,000  
 
During fiscal 2008, $734,000 of the July 30, 2007 Other notes payable were repaid from the proceeds of the July 2007 equity offering (see Note 10).
 
Future maturities of long-term debt (excluding debt discount) at June 30, 2008 are as follows:
 
Years Ending June 30,
       
 
$
598,000
 
2010
   
1,287,000
 
2011
   
4,252,000
 
Total
 
$
6,137,000
 
 
ComVest Loan Agreement
 
On December 21, 2007, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with ComVest Capital LLC (“ComVest”), as lender, pursuant to which ComVest agreed to extend a $1,000,000 secured revolving Credit Facility and a $5,000,000 Term Loan. The Loan Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including maximum limits for capital expenditures per fiscal year, and ratios for liquidity. In connection with obtaining a waiver for a violation of loan covenants at March 31, 2008, the Company reduced the exercise price from $0.03125 per share to $0.11 per share for one million warrants held by Comvest (see below), recognizing the incremental fair value of the modified warrants of $24,000 as additional interest expense.
 
As of June 30, 2008, in connection with obtaining a waiver for a violation of loan covenants, the Company and ComVest amended the loan agreement and modified certain covenants. The cash flow ratio coverage was reduced and the lender agreed to extend from January 1, 2009 until January 1, 2010 the start of the loan amortization. As part of the amendment, ComVest required the Company to reduce the exercise price from $0.39 to $0.11 for 2,000,000 warrants held by ComVest (see below). The incremental fair value of the modified warrants is $15,000, which will be recorded as an additional debt discount and amortized over the remaining life of the term loan pursuant to EITF 96-19, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments.” After obtaining the above waivers, the Company is not in violation of any loan covenants at June 30, 2008.
 
 
F-21

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Credit Facility and Revolving Credit Note. Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Credit Facility is available from December 21, 2007 (the “Closing Date”), through November 30, 2009, unless the maturity date is extended, or the Company prepays the Term Loan (described below) in full, in each case in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement. The Credit Facility provides for borrowing capacity of an amount up to (at any time outstanding) the lesser of the borrowing base at the time of each advance under the Credit Facility, or $1,000,000. The borrowing base at any time will be an amount determined in accordance with a borrowing base report the Company is required to provide to ComVest, based upon the Company’s Eligible Accounts and Eligible Inventory, as such terms are defined in the Loan Agreement.
 
In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company issued a Revolving Credit Note (the “Credit Note”) payable to ComVest in the principal amount of $1,000,000, bearing interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (a) the prime rate, as announced by Citibank, N.A. from time to time, plus two percent (2%), or (b) nine and one-half percent (9.5%). The applicable interest rate will be increased by four hundred (400) basis points during the continuance of any event of default under the Loan Agreement. Interest will be computed on the daily unpaid principal balance and is payable monthly in arrears on the first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2008. Interest is also payable upon maturity or acceleration of the Credit Note.
 
The Company has the right to prepay all or a portion of the principal balance on the Credit Note at any time, upon written notice, with no penalty. The Credit Note is secured pursuant to the provisions of certain Security Documents.
 
The Company may, at its option, and provided that the maturity date of the Credit Facility has not been accelerated due to prepayment in full of the Term Loan, elect to extend the Credit Facility for one additional year, through November 30, 2010, upon written notice to ComVest, provided that no default or event of default have occurred and are continuing at that time. The Company also has the option to terminate the Credit Facility at any time upon five business days’ prior written notice, and upon payment to ComVest of all outstanding principal and accrued interest of the advances on the Credit Facility, and prorated accrued commitment fees. The Credit Facility commitment also terminates, and all obligations become immediately due and payable, upon the consummation of a Sale, which is defined in the Loan Agreement as certain changes of control or sale or transfers of a material portion of the Company’s assets.
 
At June 30, 2008 the Company had sufficient collateral to draw down the $1,000,000 Credit Facility, and has borrowed $500,000 under this facility. The interest rate at June 30, 2008 was 9.5%.
 
Term Loan and Convertible Term Note. Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, ComVest extended to the Company a Term Loan in the principal amount of $5,000,000, on the Closing Date. The Term Loan is a one-time loan, and unlike the Credit Facility, the principal amount is not available for re-borrowing.
 
The Term Loan is evidenced by a Convertible Term Note (the “Term Note”) issued by the Company on the Closing Date, and payable to ComVest in the principal amount of $5,000,000. The Term Note bears interest at a rate of eleven percent (11%) per annum, except that during the continuance of any event of default, the interest rate will be increased to sixteen percent (16%).
 
 
F-22

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
As amended (see above), the Term Note is repayable in 11 equal monthly installments of approximately $208,333, payable on first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2010, through November 1, 2010, with the balance of $2,708,333 due on November 30, 2010.
 
The Company has the option to prepay the principal balance of the Term Note in whole or in part, at any time, upon 15 days’ prior written notice. The Company will be required to prepay the Term Loan in whole or part under certain circumstances. In the event that the Company prepays all or a portion of the Term Loan, the Company will ordinarily pay a prepayment premium in an amount equal to (i) three percent (3%) of the principal amount being prepaid if such prepayment is made or is required to be made on or prior to the second anniversary of the Closing Date, and (ii) one percent (1%) of the principal amount being prepaid if such prepayment is made or is required to be made subsequent to the second anniversary of the Closing Date.
 
The principal and interest payable on the Term Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of ComVest, at an initial conversion price of $1.50 per share. In addition, the Company may require conversion of the principal and interest under certain circumstances.
 
The number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Term Note (the “Conversion Shares”), and/or the conversion price, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of Conversion Shares, and/or the conversion price may be adjusted in the event of certain sales or issuances of shares of the Company’s common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of common stock, at any time while the Term Note is outstanding, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective conversion price of the Term Note. The Company issued a warrant exercisable below the conversion price of the Convertible Note which caused a reduction in the Convertible Note conversion price from $1.50 per share to $1.49 per share.
 
The Company incurred a closing fee of $100,000 in connection with the Term Loan. In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company has agreed to pay an annual commitment fee of $15,000, on December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2008, and on any termination date (pro-rated, if applicable), that the Credit Facility is in effect, as well as a collateral monitoring and administrative fee of $1,500 per month.
 
The expenses of this financing were approximately $641,000, which included a finder’s fee of $300,000, lender fees of $190,000 and professional and due diligence fees of approximately $151,000. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $4,359,000. The fees were allocated between debt issuance costs and debt discount. The debt issuance costs of $478,000 are recorded in Other Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are being amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the loan using the effective interest method. Debt discount of $163,000 is recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in the carrying value of the debt, and is being amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.
 
 
F-23

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Warrants. In connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company issued warrants to ComVest to purchase the following amounts of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, exercisable after the Closing Date and expiring December 31, 2013: a) Warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.3125 per share; b) Warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.39 per share; and c) Warrant to purchase 2,083,333 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.3625 per share; (each, a “Warrant”) (the 5,083,333 shares collectively issuable upon exercise of the Warrants are referred to herein as the “Warrant Shares”). The relative fair value of the Warrants is $868,000 using a Black Scholes valuation model and also contains a cashless exercise feature. The warrant valuation was computed using a 3.5% risk-free interest rate, a 99% volatility and a six-year life. The value of the warrants is included in debt discount, is recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in the carrying value of the debt, and is being amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.
 
The number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices may be adjusted in the event of certain issuances of shares of the Company’s common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of common stock, at any time while the Warrants are outstanding, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective exercise prices of the Warrants.
 
The Company has also granted certain registration rights and piggyback registration rights to the holder(s) of the securities underlying the Term Note and Warrants.
 
The Company issued warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock as compensation for assistance in securing the $5,000,000 Term Loan. The warrants were valued at $42,000 using a Black Sholes valuation model and are included in debt issuance cost. The warrant valuation was computed using a 3.5% risk free interest rate, a 99% volatility and a six-year life.
 
Amortization of debt discount was $275,000 and amortization of debt issuance costs was $137,000 for the year ended June 30, 2008.
 
Homann Note
 
The Company has an unsecured note payable to Homann Tire LTD (“Homann”) in the amount of $125,000, bearing interest at 8% per annum and due April 29, 2009 (see Note 9). The terms of the note include interest only payments of $833 per month. A principal payment of $25,000 was made in April 2007. The remaining balance of $125,000 is payable in April 2009, and the Company expects to be able to repay this from free cash flow at that time.
 
McKenna Note
 
The Company issued an unsecured note payable to Mr. A. McKenna in the amount of $825,000, due July 2009, with interest at 8% per annum, in 24 monthly installments of $37,313 including interest (see Note 9). The Company expects to satisfy this obligation from free cash flow.
 
 
F-24

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
 
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on July 1, 2007. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company did not recognize an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. There is no unrecognized tax benefits included in the consolidated balance sheets that would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rate.
 
The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had no accrual for interest or penalties on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2008 and 2007, and has not recognized interest and/or penalties in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
 
The Company is subject to taxation in the US, UK and various state jurisdictions. The Company’s tax years for 1993 and forward are subject to examination by the US and state tax authorities due to the carry forward of unutilized net operating losses.
 
The adoption of FIN 48 did not impact the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. At June 30, 2008, the Company had net US deferred tax assets of $1.7 million. Due to uncertainties surrounding the Company’s ability to generate future US taxable income to realize these assets, a full valuation has been established to offset the net US deferred tax asset. Additionally, the future utilization of the Company’s Federal and California net operating loss credit carry forwards (“NOLs”) to offset future taxable income maybe subject to an annual limitation, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383, as a result of ownership changes that may have occurred previously or that could occur in the future. The Company has not analyzed any NOLs from the acquired subsidiaries to determine the maximum potential future tax benefit that might be available, nor has it performed a Section 382 analysis to determine the limitation of the NOLs. Until these analyses have been performed, the Company has reduced its deferred tax assets by approximately $5.4 million to only account for NOLs generated in the US since the dates of ADNW’s acquisitions of the subsidiaries (totaling approximately $5.5 million) in its deferred tax asset schedule (see below) and has recorded a corresponding decrease to its valuation allowance. When these analyses are finalized, the Company plans to update its unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48. Due to the existence of the valuation allowance, future changes in the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits will not impact the Company’s effective tax rate.
 
At June 30, 2008, the Company had Federal and California income tax NOLs of approximately $5.5 million since the date ADNW acquired the subsidiaries. The Federal and California NOLs expire at various dates through 2028 and 2018, respectively, unless previously utilized.
 
The change in the valuation allowance is primarily attributable to the removal of the deferred tax assets related to the NOLs, offset by the change in the current year deferred tax assets.
 
The provision for income taxes consists of the following for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
 
 
F-25

 


 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007

   
US
Federal
   
US
State
   
UK
Corporate
   
Total
 
2008
                       
Current
  $ -     $ -     $ 873,000     $ 873,000  
Deferred
    -       -       -       -  
Total
  $ -     $ -     $ 873,000     $ 873,000  
                                 
2007
                               
Current
  $ 50,000     $ 63,000     $ 669,000     $ 782,000  
Deferred
    -       -       -       -  
Total
  $ 50,000     $ 63,000     $ 669,000     $ 782,000  
 
The tax effects of temporary differences and carry-forwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets consist of the following at June 30, 2008 and 2007:
 
   
June 30,
2008
   
June 30,
2007
 
Deferred tax assets:
           
             
Net operating loss carry-forwards
  $ 2,200,000     $ 6,730,000  
Deferred revenue
    392,000       731,000  
Reserves and accruals
    580,000       410,000  
Total deferred tax assets
    3,172,000       7,871,000  
                 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Other acquired amortizable intangibles
    (1,558,000 )     (2,573,000 )
Software development costs
    (584,000 )     (455,000 )
Depreciation and amortization
    (100,000 )     (319,000 )
State taxes
    (56,000 )     (271,000 )
Total deferred tax liabilities
    (2,298,000 )     (3,618,000 )
                 
Valuation allowance
    (1,754,000 )     (5,133,000 )
Net deferred tax liabilities
  $ (880,000 )   $ (880,000 )

The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 differs from the amount computed by applying the US federal income tax rates to net loss from continuing operations before taxes as a result of the following:
 
 
F-26

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Taxes at statutory rates applied to loss from continuing operations before taxes
  $ (3,717,000 )   $ (1,092,000 )
State taxes, net of federal effect
    (180,000 )     (193,000 )
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
    3,268,000       1,240,000  
Other non-deductible expenses
    2,000       40,000  
Differential in UK corporate tax rate
    (100,000 )     (209,000 )
Income generated in tax-free location
    (446,000 )     (294,000 )
Change in valuation allowance
    2,046,000       1,290,000  
Total adjustments
    4,590,000       1,874,000  
Provision for income taxes
  $ 873,000       782,000  
 
The Company does not intend to repatriate any earnings from the UK subsidiaries to the U.S.
 
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Legal Matters
 
From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The ultimate disposition of these proceedings could have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
 
 
(1)
On August 1, 2007 the Company and Mr. McKenna entered into an agreement resolving all outstanding actions by Mr. McKenna against the Company and its subsidiaries related to the initial action against CarParts Technologies, Inc., which is now known as ASNA. The agreement provided that the Company would pay Mr. McKenna $2,000,000 in cash, $825,000 on a promissory note with an interest rate of 8% amortized in equal payments over a 24-month period (see Note 7) and in addition would issue Mr. McKenna 1,718,750 shares of Common Stock of the Company, which represented an aggregate number of shares of common stock of the Company that the parties determined fairly represented $825,000 (assuming a price of $0.48 per share of common stock, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of settlement). Mr. McKenna was also entitled to warrants to purchase an equivalent number of shares of common stock at the same price, which was valued at $412,000 (using the Black-Scholes valuation model) and recorded as an additional litigation cost for the year ended June 30, 2007. Upon entering this agreement all parties agreed to withdraw all existing litigation and claims. The Company recorded the settlement with McKenna as of June 30, 2007. The shares were issued in fiscal 2008 (see Note 10). This settlement was amended during fiscal 2008 (see Note 10).
 
 
F-27

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Additionally, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Arthur Blumenthal, a former shareholder of Anderson BDG, Inc. Mr. Blumenthal’s lawsuit against the Company’s parent ADNW emanated from an agreement Mr. Blumenthal had with a subsidiary of the Company, ASNA (f/k/a CarParts Technologies, Inc.) for the purchase of Anderson BDG, that had not been settled although it was past due. The Company assumed the liability as part of a plan of spinning off certain businesses into the Company and renegotiated the agreement with Mr. Blumenthal, the terms of which required the Company to make a payment of $50,000 cash and the issuance to Mr. Blumenthal and registration of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which were issued in fiscal 2007 and valued at $0.48 per share, (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of settlement) or $144,000. The Company subsequently completely settled the lawsuit with Mr. Blumenthal and repaid his notes in fiscal 2008. In fiscal 2008, the Company is in the process of negotiating a settlement with Mr. Blumenthal in another matter on behalf of ADNW (see Note 3).
 
 
(2)
Homann Tire LTD (“Homann”) filed a complaint against the Company’s subsidiary ASNA (f/k/a CarParts Technologies, Inc.) in California District Court on August 11, 2005 regarding the Company’s obligations pursuant to a software license agreement that it entered into with Homann on October 18, 2002.
 
The Company started to implement the system but full installation was never completed and Homann moved to another system six months later. During depositions pursuant to this case, the Company negotiated an agreement with Homann on March 29, 2007. The terms of the agreement provide for a settlement payment to Homann of $150,000 bearing interest at 8% per annum. Payment of $25,000 cash was made in April 2007. The remaining balance of $125,000 is payable in April 2009, and the Company expects to be able to repay this from free cash flow at that time. Interest on the note payable is payable in equal monthly installments of $833 (see Note 7).
 
 
(3)
The Company was sued by a former officer of W3 Group, Inc. for $37,000 for an unpaid note and expenses. The Company settled the litigation by paying $17,500 in fiscal 2008, which was recorded as part of reduction in litigation settlement in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 
Indemnities and Guarantees
 
The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with its facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessors for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. In connection with its customers’ contracts the Company indemnifies the customer that the software provided does not violate any US patent. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
 
The Company has agreed to indemnify ComVest and its directors, officers, employees, attorneys and agents against, and to hold ComVest and such persons harmless from, any and all losses, claims, damages and liabilities and related expenses, including reasonable counsel fees and expenses, they may incur, arising out of, related to, or as a result of, certain transactions or events in connection with the Credit Facility and Term Loan.
 
 
F-28

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Operating Leases
 
The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment pursuant to month-to-month and non-cancelable operating lease agreements that expire on various dates through October 2028. Terms of the leases provide for monthly payments ranging from $500 to $15,300. For the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred rent expense totaling approximately $573,000 and $515,000, respectively. Future annual minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
 
Years Ending June 30,
       
 
$
641,000
 
2010
   
523,000
 
2011
   
497,000
 
2012
   
410,000
 
2013
   
397,000
 
Thereafter
   
4,462,000
 
   
$
6,930,000
 
 
NOTE 10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
On July 5, 2007, the Company issued 5,208,337 shares of common stock and an equivalent number of warrants with strike price of $1.00 to investors in connection with a private placement of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock. The net proceeds from this transaction amounted to $2,036,000.
 
On August 1, 2007 the Company issued 1,718,750 shares of common stock and 1,718,750 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $0.48 per share to Mr. McKenna in partial settlement of the outstanding litigation costs (see Note 9). These shares were valued at the issue price of the private placement on the date of the transaction of $0.48 per share, totaling $825,000, and the warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model, totaling $412,000. In November 2007, the parties amended the settlement agreement by having Mr. McKanna return the 1,718,750 shares and the Company issuing an additional 1,718,750 warrants to purchase common stock at $0.48 per share. The fair value of the shares received back was $275,000 and the new warrants were valued at $152,000 using a Black Scholes valuation model. The warrant valuation was computed using a 3.5% risk free interest rate, a 99% volatility and a 4.5 year life. The Company realized a net reduction in litigation settlement expenses of $123,000 for the year ended June 30, 2008.
 
On May 13, 2008 the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved restricted stock awards of an aggregate of 2,985,000 shares of its common stock to certain employees, a corporate officer and three outside directors in respect of services previously rendered. The shares vest as follows: 34% of the shares vest immediately on the date of grant, and the remaining 66% of the shares will vest in three equal installments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The Company issued 994,500 shares of common stock that were fully vested on the date of grant. The Company did not receive any consideration and recorded an expense of $99,450 based on the market price on the date of grant. The additional shares will be valued based on the dates the shares are issued in the future.

 
F-29

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 28,000,000 shares for the acquisition of EXP and 16,750,000 shares for the acquisition of DSS (see Note 1).
 
In fiscal 2007 the Company also issued 300,000 shares to debt providers to reduce the note payable by $144,000. These shares were issued at the market price of $0.48 per share. The Company also issued 6,217 shares to consultants for services provided. These shares were issued at the market price of $0.50 per share.
 
Warrants:
 
At June 30, 2008, the Company has the following warrants outstanding:
 
Issuance of warrants in connection with the ComVest Loan Agreement (see Note 7):
       
ComVest
   
5,083,333
 
Other
   
250,000
 
     
5,333,333
 
Issuance of warrants to a service provider (valued at $27,000)
   
155,549
 
Issuance of warrants in McKenna settlement (see Note 9 and above)
   
3,437,500
 
Issuance of warrants to investors in private placement (see above)
   
5,208,337
 
Issuance of warrants to placement agent in private placement
   
260,417
 
Issuance of warrants to Lewis Global Funds (see Note 3)
   
6,402,999
 
Total issued
   
20,798,135
 

The outstanding warrants have an exercise price ranging from $0.11 to $1.00 and remaining life of 3.6 years to 5.8 years. The weighted average exercise price is $0.72 per share and the weighted remaining life is 5.15 years.
 
NOTE 11. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
 
The net assets of EXP (including MMI, Anka and DSS) at June 30, 2007 consist of the following which have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (in thousands):
 
 
F-30

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
82
 
Accounts receivable
   
914
 
Note receivable
   
865
 
Investment in available-for-sale securities
   
360
 
Inventories
   
20
 
Other
   
346
 
Current assets of discontinued operations
 
$
2,587
 
         
Property and equipment
 
$
150
 
Goodwill
   
2,363
 
Amortizable intangible assets, net
   
2,229
 
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
 
$
4,742
 
         
Accounts payable
 
$
492
 
Accrued expenses
   
239
 
Payroll and other taxes
   
179
 
Current portion of deferred revenue
   
754
 
Taxes payable
   
373
 
Other current liabilities
   
7
 
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
 
$
2,044
 

The sale of MMI resulted in a loss of sale of discontinued operations (in fiscal 2008) as follows (in thousands):
 
Cash
 
$
157
 
Accounts receivable
   
439
 
Inventories
   
6
 
Other
   
27
 
Current Assets
   
629
 
Property and equipment
   
156
 
Other long term assets
   
219
 
Goodwill
   
723
 
Amortizable intangible assets, net
   
2,242
 
Total Assets
   
3,969
 
Liabilities assumed
   
(1,739
)
Net assets divested
   
2,230
 
Proceeds
   
0
 
Loss on disposal
 
$
(2,230
)
 
 
F-31

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
The sale of EXP resulted in a gain on the sale of discontinued operations (in fiscal 2008) as follows (in thousands):
 
Accounts receivable
 
$
1,050
 
Investments in available-for-sale securities
   
369
 
Current Assets
   
1,419
 
Goodwill
   
1,640
 
Total Assets
   
3,059
 
Liabilities assumed
   
(1,405
)
Net assets divested
   
1,654
 
Proceeds - value of shares and receivable (see Note 3)
   
4,041
 
Gain on disposal
 
$
2,387
 
 
The sale of CSC resulted in a loss on the sale of discontinued operations (in fiscal 2007) as follows (in thousands):
 
Accounts receivable sold
 
$
933
 
Goodwill written off
   
700
 
Accounts payable assumed
   
(68
)
Deferred revenue assumed
   
(322
)
Net assets sold
   
1,243
 
Consideration received
   
865
 
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
 
$
378
 

Included in discontinued operations of the Company are the following results of EXP, including MMI (in thousands):
 
   
For the
Period
July 1, 2007
until the
Date of Sale
   
For the
Year Ended
June 30, 2007
 
Revenue
  $ 1,670     $ 6,561  
Cost of sales and operating expenses
    1,657       5,949  
Income from operations
    13       612  
Other expense
    -       (13 )
Income taxes
    -       258  
Net income, net of taxes
  $ 13     $ 341  
 

 
F-32

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
June 30, 2008 and 2007
 
Included in discontinued operations of the Company are the following results of CSC in fiscal 2007 (in thousands):
 
Revenues
 
$
611
 
Cost of sales
   
68
 
Income from operations
   
543
 
Income taxes
   
-
 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
$
543
 
 
NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
On July 3, 2008, the Company sold to an investor group 5,231,622 shares of ADNW common stock for $889,000 before fees and expenses. The Company incurred cash expenses and fees of approximately $31,500 and agreed to issue to the selling agent five-year warrants to purchase for $0.30 per share 1,000,000 shares of common stock. The warrants were valued at $137,978 using a Black-Scholes valuation model, with a risk free interest rate of 1.84 %, a volatility of 117% and a five-year life. This transaction resulted in a net gain of $214,915 that will be recorded in fiscal 2009 to accumulated deficit as the investment is recorded as an offset to stockholders’ equity (see Note 3).
 
 
F-33

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)

   
December 31,
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2008
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
ASSETS
           
Current Assets
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,315     $ 1,964  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $44 and $202
    2,491       3,233  
Inventories
    248       615  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    454       690  
Total Current Assets
    4,508       6,502  
                 
Property and Equipment, Net
    1,006       592  
                 
Other Assets
               
Goodwill
    9,518       11,878  
Amortizable intangible assets, net
    3,770       4,584  
Software development costs, net
    1,557       1,718  
Investments in available-for-sale securities
    957       4,102  
Other long-term assets
    294       426  
Total Assets
  $ 21,610     $ 29,802  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 1,340     $ 2,372  
Accrued expenses and other
    2,843       3,508  
Payroll and other taxes
    779       933  
Current portion of long-term debt
    536       598  
Current portion of deferred revenue
    354       607  
Other current liabilities
    485       379  
Total Current Liabilities
    6,337       8,397  
                 
Long-Term Liabilities
               
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
    569       545  
Deferred income taxes
    880       880  
Long-term debt, net of current portion and debt discount
    5,752       4,783  
Other
    329       142  
Total Liabilities
    13,867       14,747  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
Preferred stock:
               
Par value $0.0001 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
    -       -  
Common stock:
               
Par value $0.0001 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized, 79,093,944 and 92,733,220 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    8       9  
Additional paid-in capital
    29,924       31,732  
Parent company common stock
    -       (2,850 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (1,218 )     1,617  
Accumulated deficit
    (20,971 )     (15,453 )
Total Stockholders' Equity
    7,743       15,055  
                 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
  $ 21,610     $ 29,802  

The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-34

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)

(In Thousands except for share and per
 
For the Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
 
share data)
 
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
Revenues
  $ 5,005     $ 5,645     $ 10,850     $ 11,000  
Cost of revenues
    2,235       2,508       4,990       5,167  
Gross profit
    2,770       3,137       5,860       5,833  
                                 
Operating expenses
                               
Research and development
    709       766       1,494       1,458  
Sales and marketing
    561       661       1,160       1,189  
General and administrative
    1,478       2,254       2,983       3,564  
Depreciation and amortization
    260       327       528       682  
Total operating expenses
    3,008       4,008       6,165       6,893  
                                 
Operating loss
    (238 )     (871 )     (305 )     (1,060 )
                                 
Other income (expense)
                               
Interest expense
    (428 )     (64 )     (800 )     (82 )
Write down of investment available-for-sale securities
    (3,957 )     -       (3,957 )     -  
Interest income
    13       -       13       -  
Reduction in litigation settlement
    -       76       -       76  
Gain on sale of investment in non-marketable securities
    -       -       -       1,312  
Other, net
    11       1       13       (1 )
Total other income (loss), net
    (4,361 )     13       (4,731 )     1,305  
                                 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
    (4,599 )     (858 )     (5,036 )     245  
                                 
Provision for income taxes
    198       216       313       388  
Loss from continuing operations
    (4,797 )     (1,074 )     (5,349 )     (143 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
    -       (23 )     -       14  
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
    -       (26 )     -       (26 )
Net loss
    (4,797 )     (1,123 )     (5,349 )     (155 )
                                 
Reversal of unrealized loss on investments in available-for-sale securities
       1,556       -       808       -  
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
    (2,595 )     238       (3,643 )     618  
Total comprehensive income (loss)
  $ (5,836 )   $ (885 )   $ (8,184 )   $ 463  
                                 
Earnings (loss) per share attributed to common stockholders - basic and diluted
                               
Continuing Operations
  $ (0.05 )   $ (0.01 )   $ (0.06 )   $ -  
Discontinued Operations
    -       -       -       -  
    $ (0.05 )   $ (0.01 )   $ (0.06 )   $ -  
Earnings per share attributed to common stockholders - basic and diluted
    92,814,017       85,787,724       92,773,620       85,787,724  

The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-35

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In Thousands)

   
For the Six Months Ended
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
             
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
             
Net loss
  $ (5,349 )   $ (155 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    528       869  
Writedown of investments in available-for-sale securities
    3,957       -  
Debt discount and debt issuance cost amortization
    409       -  
Stock compensation expense
    17       -  
Gain on sale of investments in nonmarketable securities
    -       (1,312 )
Payment of litigation costs
    -       (2,000 )
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
    -       26  
Gain on modification of debt settlement
    -       (123 )
Warrants issued for services
    -       27  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of effect of acquisitions and divestitures):
               
Accounts receivable
    742       (895 )
Inventories
    367       (217 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    236       160  
Accounts payable
    (1,032 )     (509 )
Net advances to parent company relating to operating Activities
    -       (2,108 )
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    (233 )     2,758  
Deferred revenue
    (229 )     401  
Taxes payable
    (154 )     200  

 
F-36

 

Net cash used in operating activities
    (741 )     (2,878 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchase of property and equipment
    (95 )     (113 )
Proceeds from the sale of investments in non-marketable securities
    -       2,000  
Capitalized software development costs
    (119 )     (396 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (214 )     1,491  
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of cash issuance Costs
    -       2,037  
Proceeds from sale of Parent company common stock, net of cash issuance costs
    841       -  
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of cash issuance costs
    500       4,359  
Payments on long-term debt
    (258 )     (875 )
Net cash provided by financing activities
    1,083       5,521  
                 
Effect of exchange rate changes
    (777 )     (236 )
Cash divested in discontinued operations
    -       (157 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (649 )     3,741  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    1,964       665  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 1,315     $ 4,406  
                 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest
  $ 373     $ 66  
Income taxes
  $ 104     $ 270  

 
F-37

 

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
           
Value of distributed shares
  $ 29     $ -  
Value of retired shares
  $ 2,126     $ -  
Shares issued for accrued litigation costs
  $ -     $ 825  
Value of shares returned in revised litigation settlement
  $ -     $ 275  
Value of warrants issued in revised litigation settlement
  $ -     $ 152  
Value of warrants issued for debt discount/debt issuance costs
  $ -     $ 910  
Value of warrants issued for amended debt covenants
  $ 15     $ -  
Issuance of debt for property, plant and equipment
  $ 403     $ -  
Gain on sale of Parent company common stock
  $ 337     $ -  
                 
Shares of Parent company common stock remitted in exchange for Parent company obligations
  $ 193          
Parent company obligations assumed by Company
    (140 )   $ -  
                 
Loss on settlement of Parent company obligations
  $ 53     $ -  
                 
Divestiture of MMI (see Note 9):
               
Cash
          $ 157  
Accounts receivable
            439  
Inventory
            6  
Other
            27  
Current Assets
            629  
Property and equipment
            156  
Other long term assets
            219  
Goodwill
            723  
Intangible assets
            2,242  
Total Assets
            3,969  
Liabilities Assumed
            (1,739 )
Net assets divested
            2,230  
Proceeds received
            -  
Loss on Disposal
          $ (2,230 )
                 
Divestiture of EXP (see Note 9):
               
Accounts receivable
          $ 1,050  
Investments in available-for-sale securities
            369  
Current Assets
            1,419  

 
F-38

 

Goodwill
   
1,640
 
Total Assets
   
3,059
 
Liabilities assumed
   
(1,405)
 
Net assets divested
   
1,654
 
Proceeds - value of shares and receivable (see Note 3)
   
4,041
 
Gain on disposal
 
$
2,387
 

The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-39

 

 AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1.    MANAGEMENT’S REPRESENTATIONS

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Aftersoft Group, Inc. (“Aftersoft” or the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America has been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Operating results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2009. It is suggested that the consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, which was filed with the SEC on September 30, 2008.

NOTE 2.    BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
On November 24, 2008, Auto Data Network, Inc. (“ADNW”), the former parent of Aftersoft, distributed a dividend of the 71,250,000 shares of Aftersoft common shares that ADNW owned at such time in order to complete the previously announced spin-off of Aftersoft’s business.  The dividend shares were distributed in the form of a pro rata dividend to the holders of record as of November 17, 2008 (the “Record Date”) of ADNW’s common and convertible preferred stock. Each holder of record of shares of ADNW common and preferred stock as of the close of business on the Record Date was entitled to receive 0.6864782 shares of Aftersoft's common stock for each share of common stock of ADNW held at such time, and/or for each share of ADNW common stock that such holder would own, assuming the convertible preferred stock owned on the Record Date was converted in full.  Prior to the spin-off, ADNW owned approximately 77% of Aftersoft’s issued and outstanding common stock. Subsequent to and as a result of the spin-off, Aftersoft is no longer a subsidiary of ADNW (see Notes 4 and 8).
 
Aftersoft is a leading provider of business and supply chain management solutions primarily to automotive parts manufacturers, retailers, tire and service chains, independent installers and wholesale distributors in the automotive aftermarket. The Company conducts its businesses through wholly owned subsidiaries with operations in Europe and North America. MAM Software Limited (“MAM”) is based in Sheffield, United Kingdom (“UK”) and Aftersoft Network, NA, Inc. (“ASNA”) has offices in the United States (“US”) in Dana Point, California, Allentown, Pennsylvania and Wintersville, Ohio.
 
EXP Dealer Software Services Limited (“EXP”) is comprised of MMI Automotive Limited (“MMI”), based in Wiltshire, UK, Anka Design Limited, (“Anka”) based in Chester, UK, and Dealer Software Services Limited (“DSS”), an inactive company, which were all sold during fiscal 2008, and are included as Discontinued Operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented (see Notes 3 and 9).

Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.

 
F-40

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. At December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, the Company did not have balances in these accounts in excess of the FDIC insurance limits. For banks outside of the United States, the Company maintains its cash accounts at financial institutions which it believes to be credit worthy.

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.
 
Customers
 
The Company performs periodic evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses as deemed necessary. The Company generally does not require collateral to secure its accounts receivable. Credit risk is managed by discontinuing sales to customers who are delinquent. The Company estimates credit losses and returns based on management’s evaluation of historical experience and current industry trends. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts.
 
No customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues during the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
 
Segment Reporting
 
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” SFAS No. 131 requires public companies to report selected segment information in their quarterly reports issued to stockholders. It also requires entity-wide disclosures about the products and services an entity provides, the material countries in which it holds assets and reports revenues, and its major customers. As a result of the divestitures that occurred during fiscal 2008, the Company operates in only one segment.

Geographic Concentrations
 
The Company conducts business in the US, Canada and the UK. For customers headquartered in their respective countries, the Company derived 23% of its revenues from the US, 2% from Canada and 75% from its UK operations during the three months ended December 31, 2008, compared to 25% from the US and 75% from the UK for the three months ended December 31, 2007.

The Company derived 22% of its revenues from the US, 2% from Canada and 76% from its UK operations during the six months ended December 31, 2008 compared to 25% from the US and 75% from the UK for the six months ended December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2008, the Company maintained 55% of its net property and equipment in the UK and the remaining 45% in the US.
  
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by the Company’s management include, but are not limited to, the collectibility of accounts receivable, the fair value of investments in available-for-sale securities, the recoverability of goodwill and other long-lived assets, valuation of deferred tax assets, and the estimated value of warrants and shares issued for non-cash consideration. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

 
F-41

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and debt instruments. Effective July 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and expands required disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

 
·
Level 1 – Fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
·
Level 2 – Fair value based on significant directly observable data (other than Level 1 quoted prices) or significant indirectly observable data through corroboration with observable market data. Inputs would normally be (i) quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, (ii) quoted prices in inactive markets for identical or similar assets or liabilities or (iii) information derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
 
·
Level 3 – Fair value based on prices or valuation techniques that require significant unobservable data inputs. Inputs would normally be a reporting entity’s own data and judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Pursuant to SFAS No. 157, other than for certain  investments in available for sale securities (see Note 5), the fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents is determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (“Level 1 Inputs”). The Company believes that the carrying values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values due to their nature and respective durations.

Available-for-Sale Investments
 
The Company accounts for its investments in equity securities with readily determinable fair values that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Management determines the appropriate classification of such securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. The specific identification method is used to determine the cost basis of securities disposed of. Unrealized gains and losses on the marketable securities are included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.   During the three months ended December 31, 2008, the Company wrote down its investment in available for sale securities and recognized a loss of $3,957,000 because of an other-than-temporary impairment. The recognition of this impairment loss in the statement of operations resulted in the reversal in other comprehensive income (loss) of previously recognized unrealized loss of $1,556,000 and $808,000 for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2008, investments consist of corporate stock with an unrealized loss of $3,957,000. At June 30, 2008, investments consist of corporate stock with an unrealized loss of $184,000.

Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or current estimated market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventories consist primarily of hardware that will be sold to customers. The Company periodically reviews its inventories and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Once established, write-downs of inventories are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or excess inventories.

 
F-42

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
Investment in Non-Marketable Securities
 
Non-marketable securities consisted of equity securities for which there were no quoted market prices. Such investments were initially recorded at their cost, subject to an impairment analysis. Such investments will be reduced if the Company receives indications that a permanent decline in value has occurred. Any decline in value of non-marketable securities below cost that is considered to be “other than temporary” will be recorded as a reduction on the cost basis of the security and will be included in the consolidated statement of operations as an impairment loss.
 
The Company owned an 18.18% interest in DCS Automotive Ltd, a non-public company in the UK, recorded at its cost of $688,000. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company sold its non-marketable investment to a third party for $2,000,000, generating a gain of $1,312,000.

Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost, and are being depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms. Equipment under capital lease obligations is depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the related assets or the term of the lease. Maintenance and routine repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time of retirement or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of operations. Depreciation expense from continuing operations was $46,000 and $30,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $84,000 and $59,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Software Development Costs
 
Costs incurred to develop computer software products to be sold or otherwise marketed are charged to expense until technological feasibility of the product has been established. Once technological feasibility has been established, computer software development costs (consisting primarily of internal labor costs) are capitalized and reported at the lower of amortized cost or estimated realizable value. Purchased software development cost is recorded at its estimated fair market value. When a product is ready for general release, its capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of three years. If the future market viability of a software product is less than anticipated, impairment of the related unamortized development costs could occur, which could significantly impact the recorded loss of the Company. Amortization expense from continuing operations was $27,000 and $92,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $85,000 and $224,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Amortizable Intangible Assets
 
Amortizable intangible assets consist of completed software technology, customer relationships and automotive data services and are recorded at cost. Completed software technology and customer relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 8 to 10 years, and automotive data services are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 20 years. Amortization expense from continuing operations on amortizable intangible assets was $187,000 and $205,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $359,000 and $399,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Goodwill
 
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”), addresses how intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets should be accounted for in the financial statements upon their acquisition and after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized but rather be tested at least annually for impairment, and intangible assets that have finite useful lives be amortized over their useful lives. In addition, SFAS No. 142 expands the disclosure requirements about goodwill and other intangible assets in the years subsequent to their acquisition.

 
F-43

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
SFAS No. 142 provides specific guidance for testing goodwill and intangible assets that will not be amortized for impairment. Goodwill will be subject to impairment reviews by applying a fair-value-based test at the reporting unit level, which generally represents operations one level below the segments reported by the Company. An impairment loss is recorded for any goodwill that is determined to be impaired, which resulted in an $8,170,000 impairment charge in fiscal 2008 and a $3,100,000 impairment charge in fiscal 2007. The impairment relates to ASNA as a result of continuing operating losses and less optimistic operating forecasts. The estimated fair value of ASNA was determined using present value techniques. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products and services will continue which could result in additional impairment of goodwill in the future. The Company performs impairment testing on all existing goodwill at least annually.
 
For the six months ended December 31, 2008, goodwill activity was as follows:

Balance, July 1, 2008
 
$
11,878,000
 
Effect of exchange rate changes
   
(2,360,000
)
Balance, December 31, 2008
 
$
9,518,000
 

Long-Lived Assets
 
The Company’s management assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets (other than goodwill discussed above) upon the occurrence of a triggering event by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. At December 31, 2008, management believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products and services will continue, which could result in impairment of long-lived assets in the future.
 
Issuance of Stock to Non-Employees for Non-Cash Consideration
 
All issuances of the Company’s stock to non-employees for non-cash consideration have been assigned a per share amount equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the value of consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of the non-cash consideration received pertains to services rendered by consultants and others and has been valued at the market value of the shares on the dates issued.
 
The Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” and EITF 00-18, “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees.” The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. In accordance with EITF 00-18, an asset acquired in exchange for the issuance of fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments should not be presented or classified as an offset to equity on the grantor’s balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes.

 
F-44

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) requiring it to recognize expense related to the fair value of its share-based compensation awards over the applicable vesting period, subject to estimated forfeitures.

For valuing stock options awards under SFAS No.123(R), the Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes valuation model, using the guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 for determining its expected term and volatility assumptions. For the expected term, the Company uses a simple average of the vesting period and the contractual term of the option. Volatility is a measure of the amount by which the Company’s stock price is expected to fluctuate during the expected term of the option. For volatility the Company considers its own volatility as applicable for valuing its options and warrants. SFAS 123(R) requires that forfeitures be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The risk-free interest rate is based on the relevant US Treasury Bill Rate at the time each grant. The dividend yield represents the dividend rate expected to be paid over the option’s expected term; the Company currently has no plans to pay dividends.

On June 12, 2008, the Company’s shareholders approved the Aftersoft Group Inc. 2007 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the plan, including stock awards, and stock appreciation rights is limited to 15% of the shares of common stock outstanding on the first trading day of any fiscal year. The Company issued restricted shares to management and board members in fiscal 2008 outside this plan and in fiscal 2009 under this plan (see Note 8).
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions.” Accordingly, software license revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product component has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is probable.
 
If any of these criteria are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the criteria are met. In accordance with SOP 98-9, the Company accounts for delivered elements in accordance with the residual method when arrangements include multiple product components or other elements and vendor-specific objective evidence exists for the value of all undelivered elements. Revenues on undelivered elements are recognized once delivery is complete.
 
In those instances where arrangements include significant customization, contractual milestones, acceptance criteria or other contingencies (which represents the majority of the Company’s arrangements), the Company accounts for the arrangements using contract accounting, as follows:
 
 
1)
When customer acceptance can be estimated, expenditures are capitalized as work in process and deferred until completion of the contract at which time the costs and revenues are recognized.

 
2)
When customer acceptance cannot be estimated based on historical evidence, costs are expensed as incurred and revenue is recognized at the completion of the contract when customer acceptance is obtained.
  
The Company records amounts collected from customers in excess of recognizable revenue as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
 
Revenues for maintenance agreements, software support, on-line services and information products are recognized ratably over the term of the service agreement.

 
F-45

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
Advertising Expense
 
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. For the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, advertising expense totaled $18,000 and $20,000, respectively, and totaled $28,000 and $42,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Foreign Currency
 
Management has determined that the functional currency of its subsidiaries is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of the UK subsidiaries are translated into US dollars at the quarter-end exchange rates. Income and expenses are translated at an average exchange rate for the period and the resulting translation (loss) gain adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, which totaled ($2,595,000) and $238,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and ($3,643,000) and $618,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Foreign currency gains and losses from transactions denominated in other than respective local currencies are included in income. The Company had no foreign currency transaction gains (losses) for all periods presented.
 
Comprehensive Income
 
Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. For the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the components of comprehensive income (loss) consist of changes in foreign currency translation gains (losses) and changes in unrealized loss on investments in available-for-sale securities.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company accounts for domestic and foreign income taxes under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”).
 
Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. Deferred taxation is provided in full in respect of taxation deferred by timing differences between the treatment of certain items for taxation and accounting purposes. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
 
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” which defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions as well as guidance regarding the measurement of the resulting tax benefits. FIN 48 requires a company to recognize for financial statement purposes the impact of a tax position if that position is “more likely than not” to prevail (defined as a likelihood of more than fifty percent of being sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the tax position). The Company adopted FIN 48 in its consolidated financial statements in fiscal 2008.
 
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 
Basic earnings (loss) per common share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding assuming all potential dilutive common shares were issued. During periods in which the Company incurs losses, common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The Company has no dilutive securities for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, a total of 21,798,135 common stock purchase warrants and debt convertible into 3,361,345 shares were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

 
F-46

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted loss per share computation for the three months ended December 31:
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share:
           
Net loss
  $ (4,797,000 )   $ (1,123,000 )
Deemed distribution to parent company
    (29,000 )     -  
Net loss available to common shareholders
  $ (4,826,000 )   $ (1,123,000 )
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per common share:
               
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
    92,814,017       85,787,724  
                 
Net loss per common share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted
  $ (0.05 )   $ (0.01 )

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted loss per share computation for the six months ended December 31:
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share:
           
Net loss
  $ (5,349,000 )   $ (155,000 )
Deemed distribution to parent company
    (169,000 )     -  
Net loss available to common shareholders
  $ (5,518,000 )   $ (155,000 )
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per common share:
               
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
    92,773,620       85,787,724  
                 
Net loss per common share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted
  $ (0.06 )   $ -  

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2007 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation (see Note 9), with no effect on the previously reported net loss.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active, and provides an illustrative example intended to address certain key application issues. FSP 157-3 is effective immediately, and applies to the Company’s December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements. The Company has concluded that the application of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2008.

 
F-47

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS. No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 would create a fair value option of accounting for qualifying financial assets and liabilities under which an irrevocable election could be made at inception to measure such assets and liabilities initially and subsequently at fair value, with all changes in fair value reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 and it has had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires acquiring entities in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) on July 1, 2009.  The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS No. 160 requires entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 160 on July 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
  
In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock, (“EITF 07-5”). EITF 07-5 provides guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to an entity’s own stock. EITF 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and will be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of EITF 07-5 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
 
EXP Dealer Software Limited
  
On October 30, 2007, the Company divested MMI. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, EXP agreed to sell shares of Distal Enterprises (“Distal”), which owned the shares of MMI, to the original sellers of MMI, in full and final satisfaction of any and all amounts owed to the original sellers of MMI. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company, EXP, and ADNW were released from any and all of its liabilities under the original purchase agreement and any other agreements between the parties executed prior thereto, upon the completion and transfer of the entire issued share capital of Distal to the original sellers. The Company received no further consideration on the sale, and incurred a loss of $2,230,000 which is included in sale of discontinued operations (see Note 9).
 
On November 12, 2007, the Company divested EXP. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”), EU Web Services Limited (“EU Web Services”) agreed to acquire, and the Company agreed to sell, the entire issued share capital of EXP it then owned. In consideration of the sale, EU Web Services agreed to issue to the Company, within twenty-eight days from the Agreement’s execution, Ordinary 0.01 GBP shares in its parent company, First London Securities, PLC (“First London Securities”) having a fair market value of $3,000,000 at the date of issuance of such shares. The Company received 1,980,198 shares and recorded the investment at $2,334,000, which represented the bid price of the restricted securities received, and discounted the carrying value by 11% as the shares cannot be liquidated for at least twelve months. The shares are included as investment in available for sale securities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (see Note 5). Further, the Agreement provided that the Company receive on May 12, 2008, additional consideration in the form of: (i) Ordinary shares in EU Web Services having a fair market value of $2,000,000 as of the date issuance of, provided that EU Web Services is listed and becomes quoted on a recognized trading market within six (6) months from the date of the Agreement; or (ii) If EU Web services does not become listed within the time period specified, Ordinary shares in EU Web Services’ parent company having a fair market value of $2,000,000 on May 12, 2008. The Company originally recorded the receivable at $1,707,000. The Company recorded a gain of $2,387,000 on the sale of EXP which is included in sale of discontinued operations (see Note 9). As EU Web Services did not become listed within the six-month timeframe, the Company received on August 14, 2008, 1,874,414 shares of First London Securities as payment for the $2,000,000 receivable.

 
F-48

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
The operations of EXP (including MMI, Anka and DSS) for the three months ended September 30, 2007 have been reclassified and presented separately in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations (see Note 9).

Dealer Software and Services Limited

DSS had a wholly owned subsidiary, Consolidated Software Capital Limited (“CSC”). On June 17, 2007, DSS sold all of its CSC shares for a note receivable of $865,000. On November 12, 2007 as part of the sale of EXP, the $865,000 note receivable was exchanged for 578,672 shares of First London Securities common stock having a fair value of $682,000. The transaction resulted in a loss of $183,000 and is included in sale of discontinued operations (see Note 9).

NOTE 4. TRANSACTIONS WITH PARENT COMPANY
 
From time to time payments were made by the Company to settle certain obligations of ADNW and recorded as advances to Parent Company. The advances were non-interest bearing and due on demand. ADNW had minimal operations, and as of December 31, 2007, agreed to exchange the balance due for 16,000,000 common shares of ADNW. The Company recorded the net receivable at $2,372,000, which represented the bid price of the restricted securities to be received as of December 31, 2007, and discounted the carrying value by 11% or $188,000 because the shares could not be liquidated until the spinoff of the Company from ADNW was completed pursuant to the distribution by ADNW of all of the Company’s shares it owned to its stockholders under a registration statement declared effective by the SEC which, as of December 31, 2007, was expected to take approximately six months. The spin-off registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on November 5, 2008.  On November 24, 2008 (the “Dividend Distribution Date”), ADNW distributed the dividend of the 71,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that ADNW owned at such time in order to complete the spin-off of Aftersoft’s businesses. The dividend shares were distributed in the form of a pro rata dividend to the holders of record as of November 17, 2008 (the “Record Date”) of ADNW’s common and convertible preferred stock. Each holder of record of shares of ADNW common and preferred stock as of the close of business on the Record Date was entitled to receive 0.6864782 shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of common stock of ADNW held at such time, and/or for each share of ADNW common stock that such holder would own, assuming the convertible preferred stock owned on the Record Date was converted in full.  Prior to the spin-off, ADNW owned approximately 77% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. Subsequent to and as a result of the spin-off, the Company is no longer a subsidiary of ADNW (see Note 8).

For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company reduced the carrying value of amount due from parent company by $800,000, which represents the reduction of the bid price of the restricted shares from December 31, 2007 and was recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations during such period.
 
ADNW attempted to settle an old outstanding obligation of ADNW of $775,000 with Mr. Blumenthal (see Note 7) for 4,400,000 shares of ADNW common stock. The value of the shares declined and Mr. Blumenthal elected not to accept the ADNW shares as full compensation, and has now demanded that the Company settle ADNW’s liability with additional or different consideration. In April 2008, the Company accepted the 4,400,000 shares from ADNW valued at $484,000 in exchange for attempting to settle ADNW’s liability. The difference between the value of the ADNW shares and the amount of ADNW’s initial obligation of $291,000 was recorded as general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations during such period. Upon further diligence and review of the matter during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company determined that no contractual or transactional basis exists which would have resulted in the assumption of any liability in this regard.  Thus, the Company does not believe it has an enforceable legal obligation to further compensate Mr. Blumenthal. The Company is in the process of negotiating a settlement of this matter, and during this time has elected to continue to treat this item as a liability on its financial statements while it attempts to negotiate a resolution.

 
F-49

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
On June 29, 2007, the Company granted to a holder of 2,124,098 shares of ADNW preferred stock, which is convertible into 7,231,622 shares of common stock of ADNW, certain exchange rights. The preferred shareholder agreed to waive anti-dilution rights it held in ADNW for the right to exchange the preferred shares for 6,402,999 units of the Company, which units were issued as part of the private placement that closed in July 2007, and contained the same terms as the securities issued in that offering (see Note 8) - one share of the Company’s common stock, and a five-year warrant to purchase one share of Company’s common stock exercisable at $1.00. On April 24, 2008, the Company completed the exchange transaction and issued the shares and warrants. The difference of $1,018,000 between the value of the Company units issued ($1,812,000) and the ADNW shares received ($794,000) was recorded as a distribution in the form of an increase to accumulated deficit.
 
As a result of the above transactions, at June 30, 2008, the Company owned approximately 27.6 million shares of ADNW’s common stock on a fully converted basis in the aggregate, representing 26.6% of ADNW’s common stock on a fully diluted basis as of that date.

During the six months ended December 31, 2008, the Company liquidated 5,231,622 common shares of ADNW for net proceeds of $889,000, and issued 2,000,000 common shares of ADNW in settlement of ADNW obligations (see Note 8). As a result of the Company’s ownership of certain ADNW securities, the Company received approximately 13,965,295 shares of its own common stock in connection with the spin-off dividend distribution.  On December 31, 2008, the Company retired 13,730,413 of the shares. The remaining 234,882 shares were used by the Company for rounding of fractional shares issued in respect of the spin-off dividend, to make adjustments for the benefit of the holders of ADNW’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which received fewer shares in connection with the spin-off than the number to which they were entitled as a result of a calculation error relating to the Series B conversion rate, and for other minor adjustments.

NOTE 5. INVESTMENT IN AVAILABLE -FOR-SALE SECURITIES
 
The Company received a total of 4,433,284 shares of First London Securities from the sale of EXP (see Note 3). The shares are listed for trading on the London Plus Exchange but currently they are thinly traded.

The Company values the investment at the bid price and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company owns approximately 3% of First London Securities and carries the investment at $957,000, net of an other-than-temporary loss of $3,957,000 as of December 31, 2008, and at $4,102,000, net of unrealized loss of $184,000 as of June 30, 2008.

In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s investments in available-for-sale securities (in thousands):
 
     
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
 
     
Quoted Prices in
 
Significant Other
 
Significant
 
 
Fair Value at
 
Active Markets for
 
Observable
 
Unobservable
 
 
December 31,
 
Identical Assets
 
Inputs
 
Inputs
 
 
2008
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Investments in available-for-sale securities
  957  
$
   
$
  957  
$
   
 
Fair value measurements using Level 2 inputs in the table above relate to the Company’s investments in available for sale securities, which are based on the current bid price of the Company’s stock in a thinly traded market.
 
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the Company’s assets measured at fair value using Level 2 inputs (in thousands):

 
F-50

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
   
Six Months
Ended
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
 
Beginning balance
 
$
 
Transfers into Level 2
 
4,106
 
Reversal of unrealized loss previously recorded included in accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
808
 
Other-than-temporary loss included in operations
 
(3,957)
 
Ending balance
 
$
957
 
 
The Company has determined that $3,957,000 of unrealized losses on these investments as of December 31, 2008 are other-than-temporary in nature. Factors considered in determining whether impairments are other than temporary include (i) the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee and (iii) the Company’s intent and ability to hold an investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. The fair value of the Company’s investments in available for sale securities could change significantly in the future and the Company may be required to record other-than-temporary impairment charges or additional unrealized losses in future periods.  The recording of the other-than-temporary impairment of $3,957,000 for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008 resulted in the reversal of previously recognized unrealized loss in other comprehensive loss of $1,556,000 and $808,000 for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
 
NOTE 6. LONG -TERM DEBT
 
Long-term debt consists of the following as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008:
 
   
December 31,
2008
   
June 30,
2008
 
ComVest term loan, net of debt discount of $543,000 and $756,000
  $ 4,457,000     $ 4,244,000  
ComVest revolver
    1,000,000       500,000  
McKenna note
    290,000       497,000  
Homann note
    125,000       125,000  
Secured notes
    403,000       -  
Other notes
    13,000       15,000  
      6,288,000       5,381,000  
Less current portion
    (536,000 )     (598,000 )
Long term portion
  $ 5,752,000     $ 4,783,000  
  
ComVest Loan Agreement
 
On December 21, 2007, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with ComVest Capital LLC (“ComVest”), as lender, pursuant to which ComVest agreed to extend a $1,000,000 secured revolving Credit Facility and a $5,000,000 Term Loan. The Loan Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including maximum limits for capital expenditures per fiscal year, and ratios for liquidity. In connection with obtaining a waiver for a violation of loan covenants at March 31, 2008, the Company reduced the exercise price from $0.3125 per share to $0.11 per share for one million warrants held by ComVest (see below), recognizing the incremental fair value of the modified warrants of $24,000 as additional interest expense.

 
F-51

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
As of June 30, 2008, in connection with obtaining a waiver for a violation of loan covenants, the Company and ComVest amended the Loan Agreement and modified certain covenants. The cash flow ratio coverage was reduced and the lender agreed to extend from January 1, 2009 until January 1, 2010 the start of the loan amortization. As part of the amendment, ComVest required the Company to reduce the exercise price from $0.39 to $0.11 for 2,000,000 warrants held by ComVest (see below). The incremental fair value of the modified warrants is $15,000, which was recorded as an additional debt discount and is being amortized over the remaining life of the term loan pursuant to EITF 96-19, “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments.”

As of December 31, 2008, in connection with obtaining a waiver for violation of certain loan covenant, the Company and ComVest agreed to increase the interest on the $1,000,000 Credit Facility (described below) from 9.5% to 11%.

After obtaining the above waivers, the Company is not in violation of any loan covenants at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008.

Credit Facility and Revolving Credit Note. Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Credit Facility is available from December 21, 2007 (the “Closing Date”), through November 30, 2009, unless the maturity date is extended, or the Company prepays the Term Loan (described below) in full, in each case in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement. The Credit Facility provides for borrowing capacity of an amount up to (at any time outstanding) the lesser of the borrowing base at the time of each advance under the Credit Facility, or $1,000,000. The borrowing base at any time will be an amount determined in accordance with a borrowing base report the Company is required to provide to ComVest, based upon the Company’s Eligible Accounts and Eligible Inventory, as such terms are defined in the Loan Agreement.
 
In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company issued a Revolving Credit Note (the “Credit Note”) payable to ComVest in the principal amount of $1,000,000, bearing interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (a) the prime rate, as announced by Citibank, N.A. from time to time, plus two percent (2%), or (b) nine and one-half percent (9.5%) (which was subsequently changed to 11%; see above). The applicable interest rate will be increased by four hundred (400) basis points during the continuance of any event of default under the Loan Agreement. Interest will be computed on the daily unpaid principal balance and is payable monthly in arrears on the first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2008. Interest is also payable upon maturity or acceleration of the Credit Note.
 
The Company has the right to prepay all or a portion of the principal balance on the Credit Note at any time, upon written notice, with no penalty. The Credit Note is secured pursuant to the provisions of certain Security Documents.
 
The Company may, at its option, and provided that the maturity date of the Credit Facility has not been accelerated due to prepayment in full of the Term Loan, elect to extend the Credit Facility for one additional year, through November 30, 2010, upon written notice to ComVest, provided that no default or event of default have occurred and are continuing at that time. The Company also has the option to terminate the Credit Facility at any time upon five business days’ prior written notice, and upon payment to ComVest of all outstanding principal and accrued interest of the advances on the Credit Facility, and prorated accrued commitment fees. The Credit Facility commitment also terminates, and all obligations become immediately due and payable, upon the consummation of a Sale, which is defined in the Loan Agreement as certain changes of control or sale or transfers of a material portion of the Company’s assets.
 
At December 31, 2008, the Company had drawn down the $1,000,000 Credit Facility in full.  The interest rate as of December 31, 2008 was increased from 9.5% to 11.0% in connection with obtaining a waiver from ComVest for violation of certain loan covenants (described above).

Term Loan and Convertible Term Note. Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, ComVest extended to the Company a Term Loan in the principal amount of $5,000,000, on the Closing Date. The Term Loan is a one-time loan, and unlike the Credit Facility, the principal amount is not available for re-borrowing.

 
F-52

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
The Term Loan is evidenced by a Convertible Term Note (the “Term Note”) issued by the Company on the Closing Date, and payable to ComVest in the principal amount of $5,000,000. The Term Note bears interest at a rate of eleven percent (11%) per annum, except that during the continuance of any event of default, the interest rate will be increased to sixteen percent (16%).
 
As amended (see ”ComVest Loan Agreement” above), the Term Note is repayable in 11 equal monthly installments of approximately $208,333, payable on first day of each calendar month commencing January 1, 2010 through November 1, 2010, with the balance of $2,708,333 due on November 30, 2010.

The Company has the option to prepay the principal balance of the Term Note in whole or in part, at any time, upon 15 days’ prior written notice. The Company will be required to prepay the Term Loan in whole or part under certain circumstances. In the event that the Company prepays all or a portion of the Term Loan, the Company will ordinarily pay a prepayment premium in an amount equal to (i) three percent (3%) of the principal amount being prepaid if such prepayment is made or is required to be made on or prior to the second anniversary of the Closing Date, and (ii) one percent (1%) of the principal amount being prepaid if such prepayment is made or is required to be made subsequent to the second anniversary of the Closing Date.

The principal and interest payable on the Term Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of ComVest.  In addition, the Company may require conversion of the principal and interest under certain circumstances.   The initial conversion price was $1.50 per share.   The number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Term Note (the “Conversion Shares”), and/or the conversion price, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of Conversion Shares, and/or the conversion price may be adjusted in the event of certain sales or issuances of shares of the Company’s common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of common stock, at any time while the Term Note is outstanding, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective conversion price of the Term Note. 

On July 3, 2008, the conversion price for the Term Note was reduced from $1.50 to $1.49 as a result of certain anti-dilution protection contained therein following the issuance by the Company of additional shares of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock. Consequently, the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amount of the Tern Note was increased to 3,361,345 shares from 3,333,333 shares.
 
The Company incurred a closing fee of $100,000 in connection with the Term Loan. In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company has agreed to pay an annual commitment fee of $15,000, on December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2008, and on any termination date (pro-rated, if applicable), that the Credit Facility is in effect, as well as a collateral monitoring and administrative fee of $1,500 per month.
 
The expenses of this financing were approximately $641,000, which included a finder’s fee of $300,000, lender fees of $190,000 and professional and due diligence fees of approximately $151,000. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $4,359,000. The fees were allocated between debt issuance costs and debt discount. The debt issuance costs of $478,000 are recorded in Other Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are being amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the loan using the effective interest method. Debt discount of $163,000 is recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in the carrying value of the debt, and is being amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.
 
Warrants. In connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company issued warrants to ComVest to purchase the following amounts of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, exercisable after the Closing Date and expiring December 31, 2013: a) Warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.3125 per share; b) Warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.39 per share; and c) Warrant to purchase 2,083,333 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.3625 per share; (each, a “Warrant”) (the 5,083,333 shares collectively issuable upon exercise of the Warrants are referred to herein as the “Warrant Shares”).  The exercise prices of certain of these warrants were amended, as described under “ComVest Loan Agreement” above. The relative fair value of the Warrants is $868,000 using a Black Scholes valuation model and also contains a cashless exercise feature.

 
F-53

 
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

The warrant valuation was computed using a 3.5% risk-free interest rate, a 99% volatility and a six-year life. The value of the warrants is included in debt discount, is recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in the carrying value of the debt, and is being amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.
 
The number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices, may be proportionately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, distribution, stock split, stock combination, stock consolidation, recapitalization or reclassification or similar transaction. In addition, the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, and/or the applicable exercise prices may be adjusted in the event of certain issuances of shares of the Company’s common stock, or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of common stock, at any time while the Warrants are outstanding, at an effective price per share which is less than the then-effective exercise prices of the Warrants.
 
The Company also granted certain registration rights and piggyback registration rights to the holder(s) of the securities underlying the Term Note and Warrants.

The Company issued warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock as compensation for assistance in securing the $5,000,000 Term Loan. The warrants were valued at $42,000 using a Black Sholes valuation model and are included in debt issuance cost. The warrant valuation was computed using a 3.5% risk free interest rate, a 99% volatility and a six-year life.

Amortization of debt discount was $277,000 and amortization of debt issuance costs was $132,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and was $139,000 and $66,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
 
Homann Note
 
The Company has an unsecured note payable to Homann Tire LTD (“Homann”) in the amount of $125,000, bearing interest at 8% per annum and due April 29, 2009 (see Note 7). The terms of the note include interest only payments of $833 per month. A principal payment of $25,000 was made in April 2007. The remaining balance of $125,000 is payable in April 2009, and the Company expects to be able to repay this from free cash flow at that time.
 
McKenna Note
 
The Company issued an unsecured note payable to Mr. A. McKenna in the amount of $825,000, due July 2009, with interest at 8% per annum, in 24 monthly installments of $37,313 including interest (see Note 7). The Company expects to satisfy this obligation from free cash flow.

Secured Notes

The Company has secured notes totaling $403,000 payable over 24 to 60 with monthly payments of $4,137 and quarterly payments of $6,278.  The notes bear interest rates of 5.49% to 9.54% and are secured by leasehold improvements and equipment with a carrying value of $431,400.

NOTE 7. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The ultimate disposition of these proceedings could have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

 
F-54

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

Aidan J. McKenna

On August 1, 2007, the Company and Mr. McKenna entered into an agreement resolving all outstanding actions by Mr. McKenna against the Company and its subsidiaries related to the initial action against CarParts Technologies, Inc., which is now known as ASNA. The agreement provided that the Company would pay Mr. McKenna $2,000,000 in cash, $825,000 on a promissory note with an interest rate of 8% amortized in equal payments over a 24-month period (see Note 6) and in addition would issue Mr. McKenna 1,718,750 shares of Common Stock of the Company, which represented an aggregate number of shares of common stock of the Company that the parties determined fairly represented $825,000 (assuming a price of $0.48 per share of common stock, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of settlement). Mr. McKenna was also entitled to warrants to purchase an equivalent number of shares of common stock at the same price, which was valued at $412,000 (using the Black-Scholes valuation model) and recorded as an additional litigation cost for the year ended June 30, 2007. Upon entering this agreement all parties agreed to withdraw all existing litigation and claims. The Company recorded the settlement with McKenna as of June 30, 2007. The shares were issued in fiscal 2008 (see Note 8). This settlement was amended during fiscal 2008 (see Note 8).

Arthur Blumenthal

Additionally, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Arthur Blumenthal, a former shareholder of Anderson BDG, Inc. Mr. Blumenthal’s lawsuit against the Company’s parent ADNW emanated from an agreement Mr. Blumenthal had with a subsidiary of the Company, ASNA (f/k/a CarParts Technologies, Inc.) for the purchase of Anderson BDG, that had not been settled although it was past due. The Company assumed the liability as part of a plan of spinning off certain businesses into the Company and renegotiated the agreement with Mr. Blumenthal, the terms of which required the Company to make a payment of $50,000 cash and the issuance to Mr. Blumenthal and registration of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which were issued in fiscal 2007 and valued at $0.48 per share, (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of settlement) or $144,000. The Company subsequently completely settled the lawsuit with Mr. Blumenthal and repaid his notes in fiscal 2008. In fiscal 2009, the Company is in the process of negotiating a settlement with Mr. Blumenthal in another matter on behalf of ADNW (see Note 4).

Homann Tire LTD

Homann Tire LTD (“Homann”) filed a complaint against the Company’s subsidiary ASNA (f/k/a CarParts Technologies, Inc.) in California District Court on August 11, 2005 regarding the Company’s obligations pursuant to a software license agreement that it entered into with Homann on October 18, 2002.

The Company started to implement the system but full installation was never completed and Homann moved to another system six months later. During depositions pursuant to this case, the Company negotiated an agreement with Homann on March 29, 2007. The terms of the agreement provide for a settlement payment to Homann of $150,000 bearing interest at 8% per annum. Payment of $25,000 cash was made in April 2007. The remaining balance of $125,000 is payable in April 2009, and the Company expects to be able to repay this from free cash flow at that time. Interest on the note payable is payable in equal monthly installments of $833 (see Note 6).
 
Indemnities and Guarantees
 
The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with its facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessors for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. In connection with its customers’ contracts the Company indemnifies the customer that the software provided does not violate any US patent. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

 
F-55

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

The Company has agreed to indemnify ComVest and its directors, officers, employees, attorneys and agents against, and to hold ComVest and such persons harmless from, any and all losses, claims, damages and liabilities and related expenses, including reasonable counsel fees and expenses, they may incur, arising out of, related to, or as a result of, certain transactions or events in connection with the Credit Facility and Term Loan (see Note 6).
 
NOTE 8. Stockholders' Equity
 
On July 5, 2007, the Company issued 5,208,333 shares of common stock and an equivalent number of warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 to investors in connection with a private placement of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock. The net proceeds from this transaction amounted to $2,036,000.
 
On August 1, 2007, the Company issued 1,718,750 shares of common stock and 1,718,750 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $0.48 per share to Mr. McKenna in partial settlement of the outstanding litigation costs (see Note 7). These shares were valued at the issue price of the private placement on the date of the transaction of $0.48 per share, totaling $825,000, and the warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model, totaling $412,000. In November 2007, the parties amended the settlement agreement pursuant to which Mr. McKenna returned the 1,718,750 shares and the Company issued to him an additional 1,718,750 warrants to purchase common stock at $0.48 per share. The fair value of the shares received back was $275,000 and the new warrants were valued at $152,000 using a Black Scholes valuation model. The warrant valuation was computed using a 3.5% risk free interest rate, a 99% volatility and a 4.5 year life. The Company realized a net reduction in litigation settlement expenses of $123,000 for the year ended June 30, 2008.
  
On May 13, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved restricted stock awards of an aggregate of 2,985,000 shares of its common stock to certain employees, a corporate officer and three outside directors in respect of services previously rendered. The shares vest as follows: 34% of the shares vested immediately on the date of issuance, and the remaining 66% of the shares will be issued in three equal installments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The Company issued 994,500 shares of common stock that were fully vested on the date of grant. The Company did not receive any consideration and recorded an expense of $99,450 based on the market price on the date of issuance. The additional shares will be valued based on the dates the shares are issued in the future.

On July 3, 2008, the Company sold to an investor group, 5,231,622 shares of ADNW common stock for $889,000 before fees and expenses. The Company incurred cash expenses and fees of approximately $48,000 and agreed to issue to the selling agent five-year warrants to purchase for $0.30 per share 1,000,000 shares of common stock. The warrants were valued at $137,978 using a Black-Scholes valuation model, with a risk free interest rate of 1.84 %, a volatility of 117% and a five-year life. This transaction resulted in a gain of $337,000, which is recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital (see Note 4).

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company reached an agreement with three creditors of ADNW, and issued them 2,000,000 shares of ADNW common stock owned by the Company in satisfaction of certain obligations of ADNW totaling $140,000. At the time of settlement, the ADNW shares were trading at less than the carrying value of the shares held by the Company, and the Company incurred a loss of $53,000 on the settlement, which is recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in-capital (see Note 4).
 
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company approved the issuance of 483,000 shares to the non-management members of the Board of Directors under the Company’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The shares will be issued over a three-year period. On October 6, 2008, the Company issued 47,890 shares of these awards, which were valued at $7,184.

On October 6, 2008, the Company issued a director of the Company 35,000 shares of common stock in lieu of $8,750 of cash compensation.

 
F-56

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

On November 24, 2008 (the “Dividend Distribution Date”), ADNW distributed the dividend of the 71,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that ADNW owned at such time in order to complete the spin-off of the Company’s businesses. The dividend shares were distributed in the form of a pro rata dividend to the holders of record as of November 17, 2008 (the “Record Date”) of ADNW’s common and convertible preferred stock. Each holder of record of shares of ADNW common and preferred stock as of the close of business on the Record Date was entitled to receive 0.6864782 shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of common stock of ADNW held at such time, and/or for each share of ADNW common stock that such holder would own, assuming the convertible preferred stock owned on the Record Date was converted in full.  Prior to the spin-off, ADNW owned approximately 77% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. Subsequent to and as a result of the spin-off, the Company is no longer a subsidiary of ADNW.

As a result of the Company’s ownership of certain ADNW securities, the Company received approximately 13,965,295 shares of its own common stock in connection with the spin-off dividend distribution.  On December 31, 2008, the Company retired 13,730,413 of the shares. The remaining 234,882 shares were used by the Company for rounding of fractional shares issued in respect of the spin-off dividend, to make adjustments for the benefit of the holders of ADNW’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which received fewer shares in connection with the spin-off than the number to which they were entitled as a result of a calculation error relating to the Series B conversion rate, and for other minor adjustments.  The value of these shares of approximately $29,000 was recorded as a distribution.

Warrants:
 
At December 31, 2008, the Company has the following warrants outstanding:
 
Issuance of warrants in connection with the ComVest Loan Agreement (see Note 6):
     
ComVest
    5,083,333  
Other
    250,000  
      5,333,333  
Issuance of warrants to a service provider (valued at $27,000)
    155,549  
Issuance of warrants in McKenna settlement (see Note 7 and above)
    3,437,500  
Issuance of warrants to investors in private placement (see above)
    5,208,337  
Issuance of warrants to placement agent in private placement
    260,417  
Issuance of warrants to Lewis Asset Management Corp. funds (see Note 4)
    6,402,999  
Issuance of warrants to placement agent (see above )
    1,000,000  
Total issued
    21,798,135  

The outstanding warrants have an exercise price range of $0.11 to $1.00 and a remaining life ranging from 3.10 years to 5.30 years. The weighted average exercise price is $0.70 per share and the weighted average remaining life is 4.65 years.

NOTE 9. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The sale of MMI resulted in a loss of sale of discontinued operations (in the second quarter of fiscal 2008) as follows (in thousands):
 
Cash
  $ 157  
Accounts receivable
    439  
Inventories
    6  
Other
    27  
Current Assets
    629  
Property and equipment
    156  
Other long term assets
    219  
Goodwill
    723  
Amortizable intangible assets, net
    2,242  
Total Assets
    3,969  
Liabilities assumed
    (1,739 )
Net assets divested
    2,230  
Proceeds
    0  
Loss on disposal
  $ (2,230 )

 
F-57

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)

The sale of EXP resulted in a gain on the sale of discontinued operations (in the second quarter of fiscal 2008) as follows (in thousands):
 
Accounts receivable
  $ 1,050  
Investments in available-for-sale securities
    369  
Current Assets
    1,419  
Goodwill
    1,640  
Total Assets
    3,059  
Liabilities assumed
    (1,405 )
Net assets divested
    1,654  
Proceeds - value of shares and receivable (see Note 3)
    4,041  
Gain on disposal
  $ 2,387  
 
Included in discontinued operations of the Company are the following results of EXP, including MMI (in thousands):

   
For the
Period October 1, 2007
until the Date of sale
 
Revenue
  $ 410  
Cost of sales and operating expenses
    433  
Loss from operations
    (23 )
         
Income taxes
    0  
Net loss, net of taxes
  $ (23 )

 
F-58

 

AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (cont’d)
December 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
 
   
For the
Period July 1, 2007
Until the Date of sale
 
Revenue
  $ 1,670  
Cost of sales and operating expenses
    1,656  
Income from operations
    14  
         
Income taxes
    0  
Net income, net of taxes
  $ 14  

NOTE 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company approved the issuance of 483,000 shares to the non-management members of the Board of Directors under the Company’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The shares vest over a three-year period.  On January 6, 2009, the Company issued 31,955 shares of these awards, which were valued at $2,876, and remitted income tax deposits in the amount of $684 for certain directors.

 
F-59

 
 
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to give you different information. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell nor are they seeking an offer to buy the securities referred to in this prospectus in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information contained in this prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference are correct only as of the date shown on the cover page of these documents, regardless of the time of the delivery of these documents or any sale of the securities referred to in this prospectus.
 
AFTERSOFT GROUP, INC.
 
30,151,149
 Shares
 of
 Common Stock
 

 

 
 
PROSPECTUS
 

 

 
 
May 1, 2009