United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-KSB (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 ------------------ [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _________ Commission file number 000-22991 --------- Onspan Networking, Inc. ----------------------- (Name of small business issuer in its charter) Nevada ------ (State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 87-0460247 ---------- (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1000 Clint Moore Road, Suite 102, Boca Raton, Florida 33487 ----------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Issuer's telephone number 561-988-2334 ------------ Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None ---- (Title of each class) Name of each exchange on which registered Not applicable -------------- Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock ------------ Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed By Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]. Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB [ ] State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year were None. As of December 31, 2004, the registrant had outstanding 1,090,677 shares of its Common Stock, par value $.012 its only class of voting securities. The aggregate market value of the shares of Common Stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates on January 11, 2005, was approximately $630,273 based on its closing price on the OTC: Bulletin Board on that date. (See Item 5). DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE No documents are incorporated by reference into this Report except those Exhibits so incorporated as set forth in the Exhibit index. Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ]; No [X]. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PART I Item 1. Business..............................................................4 Item 2. Properties............................................................9 Item 3. Legal Proceedings.....................................................9 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a vote of security holders..................11 PART II Item 1. Market for common equity and related stockholder matters.............11 Item 2. Management's discussion and analysis or plan or operation............12 Item 3. Other Information....................................................15 Item 4. Consolidated Financial Statements....................................16 PART III Item 8. Changes & Disagreements with Accountants.............................36 Item 8A. Controls & Procedures................................................36 Item 9. Directors, Executive officers, Promoters and Control persons Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act....................36 Item 10. Executive Compensation...............................................39 Item 11. Security Ownership of certain beneficial owners and Management...........................................................42 Item 12. Certain relationships and related transactions.......................43 Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.....................................43 Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services ..............................45 3 PART I ITEM 1. HISTORY OF BUSINESS Originally incorporated in 1985, as Network Information Services, Inc., Network Systems International, Inc. ("NESI"), a Nevada corporation, was the surviving corporation of a reverse merger completed in April 1996. The Company became a publicly traded entity in connection with the re-organization. On July 10, 1998, the Company's stock was officially approved for listing on the NASDAQ Small Cap market and the Company's common stock began trading on NASDAQ Small Cap under the symbol NESI. As of April 2, 2002, the securities were de-listed from the NASDAQ Small Cap market and now trade on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol ONSP. Effective February 10, 2001, the Company changed its name from Network Systems International, Inc., to Onspan Networking, Inc. (the "Company" or "Onspan"). On October 9, 2001, the Company effected a 1 for 12 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock. Prior to August 5, 2002, the Company, a Nevada corporation, was a holding company, that through its wholly owned subsidiary, InterLAN Communications, Inc. ("InterLAN"), developed data communications and networking infrastructure solutions for business, government and education. On August 5, 2002, the Company completed the sale of its operating division InterLAN and announced a change in its strategy of business as discussed under Discontinued Operations below. April 22, 2003 the Company created a new subsidiary, Coventry 1 Inc. that is a Nevada Corporation. The Company's other subsidiary Onspan SmartHouse, Inc., is a Florida Corporation. Currently the Company has 3 full time employees. DISCONTINUED DIVISION On May 27, 2004, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Herbert Tabin, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gary Schultheis, an employee of the Company, pursuant to which the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Coventry 1, Inc., to Messrs. Tabin and Schultheis. The sole asset of the subsidiary was a single family home and lot located in Woodfield Country Club, Boca Raton, Florida and related country club golf membership. The purchase price for the shares of the subsidiary was $1,509,972, The purchase price for the subsidiary was based on a comprehensive certified appraisal as defined by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and the report conforms to applicable FIRREA guidelines and or requirements. Messrs Tabin and Schultheis bore the cost of the appraisal. The purchase includes the country club golf membership, and the purchaser is responsible for all costs and fees associated with the membership. In addition, the Purchaser shall be responsible for all expenses associated with the property comprising the Subsidiary whether accrued or outstanding or subsequently to be outstanding, including outstanding tax balance of $21,188, due to Palm Beach County, Florida for the year 2003, outstanding fees including electric, security etc. totaling $12,768, as well as an outstanding insurance payable of $17,043. Messrs. Tabin and Schultheis also 4 agreed to pay the Company 0.75% of the gross sales amount of the property upon any subsequent sale provided the gross sales price exceeds $2,000,001 The Company, which had received engineering plans, had intended to renovate and expand the existing home on the property. The Company sold the real estate project in order to service mounting legal expenses associated with litigation. The Company used the proceeds from the sale of this division to pay off its debt, which included a note payable to Evolve One , Inc and notes to related parties. RISK FACTORS SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS; NEED FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL. The Company's capital requirements have been and will continue to be significant. The Company has been dependent primarily on existing capital and a credit line. Future capital needs may be satisfied by either the private placement of equity securities and/or debt financings. The Company based on its cash requirements and exposure to liability from shareholder lawsuits is unsure if existing capital will be sufficient for the next twelve months. In the event that the Company's plans (due to unanticipated expenses, delays, problems, or otherwise), the Company would be required to seek additional funding. Any such additional funding could be in the form of additional equity capital. The Company is currently, contemplating, pursuing potential funding opportunities. However, there can be no assurance that any of such opportunities will result in actual funding or that additional financing will be available to the Company when needed, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing if needed, it will likely be required to curtail its plans and may possibly cease its operations. Any additional equity financings may involve substantial dilution to the Company's then-existing shareholders. MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH AND ATTRACTION AND RETENTION OF KEY PERSONNEL. Management of the Company's growth may place a considerable strain on the Company's management, operations and systems. The Company's ability to execute any future business strategy will depend in part upon its ability to manage the demands of a growing business. Any failure of the Company's management team to effectively manage growth could have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company's future success depends in large part on the continued service of its key management personnel. The Company believes that its future success also depends on its ability to attract and retain skilled technical, managerial and marketing personnel. Competition for qualified personnel is intense. The Company has from time to time experienced difficulties in recruiting qualified personnel. Failure by the Company to attract and retain the personnel it requires could have a material adverse affect on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 5 VOLATILITY OF MARKET PRICE; ISSUANCE OF SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF SHARES; AUTHORIZED SHARES; PROXY RULES. The Company's Common Stock has been traded since 1994. The Company believes that factors such as (but not limited to) the sale of common stock issued on conversion of the Company's debentures, announcements of developments related to the Company's business, fluctuations in the Company's quarterly or annual operating results, failure to meet expectations, general economic conditions, interest rate changes or money supply fluctuations and developments in the Company's relationships with clients and suppliers will cause the price of the Company's Common Stock to fluctuate substantially. In recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. Such fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of the Company's Common Stock. PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW PRICED STOCK. The Commission adopted regulations which generally define a "penny stock" to be any non-Nasdaq equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Based upon the price of the Company's Common Stock as currently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, the Company's stock is subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers which sell securities to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors." For transactions covered by this Rule, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received a purchasers' written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, the Rule may have a negative effect on the ability of shareholders to sell common shares of the Company in the secondary market. MANAGEMENT CONTROLS THE COMPANY'S FUNDS. Management has broad discretion over how to spend the funds held by the Company. Although management will endeavor to act in the best interests of the shareholders, there can be no assurance that the decision to utilize proceeds will prove profitable to the Company. THE COMPANY RELIES ON ITS MANAGEMENT. The Company is dependent upon the members of management set forth herein. If the current management is no longer able to provide services to the Company, its business will be negatively affected. 6 ADDITIONAL DEBT, OR EQUITY FINANCING MAY AFFECT INVESTOR'S ABILITY TO SELL COMMON STOCK. The Company's common stock currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol ONSP. Stocks trading on the OTC Bulletin Board generally attract a smaller number of market makers and a less active public market and may be subject to significant volatility. If the Company raises additional money from the sale of its Common Stock, the market price could drop and investor's ability to sell stock could be diminished. Further, even if the Company is able to increase its authorized shares, there can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain sufficient shareholder votes in the future for any such increase, which votes are required by Nevada law. THE COMPANY'S STRATEGY INCLUDES PURSUING STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS THAT MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL The Company will consider acquiring businesses that are intended to add products and or services. Acquisitions involve a number of operational risks that the acquired business may not be successfully integrated, may distract management attention, may involve unforeseen costs and liabilities, and possible regulatory costs, some or all of which could have a materially adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, the Company may make acquisitions with cash or with stock, or a combination thereof. If the Company does make any such acquisitions, various associated risks may be encountered, including potential dilution to the Company's then current shareholders, as a result of additional shares of common stock being issued in connection with the acquisitions. THE COMPANY'S STOCK PRICE WILL FLUCTUATE AND MAY FALL BELOW EXPECTATIONS OF SECURITIES ANALYSTS AND INVESTORS, WHICH COULD SUBJECT THE COMPANY TO LITIGATION The market price of the Company's common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyond its control. These factors include: - quarterly variations in operating results; - changes in accounting treatments or principles; - existing litigation; - announcements by the Company or its competitors of new products and services offerings, significant contracts, acquisitions or strategic relationships; - additions or departures of key personnel; 7 - any future sales of the Company's common stock or other securities; - stock market price and volume fluctuations of publicly-traded companies in general and Internet-related companies in particular; and - general political, economic and market conditions. It is likely that in some future quarter the Company's operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which could result in a decrease in the trading price of the Company's common stock. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. The Company may be the target of similar litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources, which could seriously harm the Company's business and operating results. THERE IS A LIMITED PUBLIC MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK AND THERE ARE NO ASSURANCES OF A CONTINUED TRADING MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK The Company's common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (R) Market (OTCBB) under the symbol "ONSP". The Company's common stock is thinly traded. There are no assurances the Company will maintain its OTC Bulletin Board (R) listing. If the Company's common stock should be delisted from the OTC Bulletin Board(R) Market, it is likely that the stock would then be quoted on the Pink Sheets Market, which could materially and / or adversely effect any future liquidity in the Company's common stock. INABILITY TO SECURE AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBER Due to the potential exposure to litigation and small compensation, it may be difficult to secure and Independent Audit Committee Member. If the Company is unable to secure an Independent Audit Committee Member, it may be in violation of current standards and may be subject to possible de-listing of which could have a materially adverse affect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. 8 ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The Company's principal executive offices were located in approximately 2,108 square feet of commercial office space sub-leased from Millennium Holdings Group, Inc., under a three-year lease signed on July 1, 2003 at a rate of $34,907 per annum plus 5% per annum. As of November 1, 2004, the company relocated its offices to approximately 1,545 square feet of commercial office space sub-leased from Evolve One, Inc a company related through common ownership under a five year sublease signed November 1, 2004 at a rate of $2,000 per month plus 5% per annum. The Company believes its current facilities are adequate for its current needs. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 1. Network Systems International of North Carolina, Inc. v Network Systems International, Inc. and OnSpan Networking, Inc. (02-CvS-10154) (Complaint filed September 13, 2002). This action asserts a claim for breach of contract against the Company, seeking certain tax refunds obtained by the Company. The plaintiff, a former subsidiary of the Company, claims that these tax refunds belong to the plaintiff. The Company filed counterclaims for refund of monies paid by the Company and owed by the Plaintiff, as well as for a declaratory judgment that any tax liability of the Company owed to the North Carolina Department of Revenue must be reimbursed by the Plaintiff. The parties agreed to settle all claims, and the action was dismissed on October 26, 2004. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Company paid the Plaintiff $39,800, and the Company and the Plaintiff each released all claims. Additionally, several shareholders affiliated with the Plaintiff agreed to transfer their shares to the Company. Those shares will be cancelled upon surrender. The number of shares to be cancelled is currently undetermined. 2. Securities Actions: a. D. Mark White v OnSpan Networking, Inc. and Herbert Tabin, Case No. 352198686 03 (District Court, Tarrant County Texas) (Complaint filed May 2, 2003). This action had asserted claims for violation of Texas securities law, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duties. The action was seeking unspecified damages, restitution in the amount of $300,000, treble damages, pre-judgment interest, the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and costs, and certain other relief. On August 31, 2004, the action was settled for $62,500. b.Richard T. Clark and Joel C. Holt v. Herbert Tabin and Gary Schultheis, United States District Court Northern District of Oklahoma, Case No. 03-CV-289K(J). On March 28, 2003, Plaintiffs Richard Clark and Joel Holt ("Plaintiffs") filed a petition in the Tulsa County District Court alleging claims against the Company and its President, CEO and Director, Herbert Tabin ("Tabin"), for, among other things, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. On May 1, 2003, the Company, along with Tabin, removed this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma and filed a Motion to Dismiss all claims. On October 15, 2003, Plaintiffs withdrew their 9 claims and filed an Amended Complaint asserting claims against Tabin, both individually and derivatively, on behalf of the Company. Plaintiffs also asserted claims against the Company. Plaintiffs sought damages in the amount of $300,000.00 each, as well as punitive damages. The Company retained independent counsel to conduct an investigation into the allegations by Plaintiffs made derivatively on behalf of the Company and, based on that investigation, determined that no action on behalf of the Company was warranted. Defendants also filed a Motion to Dismiss all of the allegations in the Amended Complaint. On October 19, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint in which they dropped the Company as a defendant and dropped the derivative shareholder claims. Plaintiffs added Gary Schultheis as an individual defendant. The Second Amended Complaint alleges claims against Tabin and Schultheis individually. Because the Second Amended Complaint was a different version than that which was approved for filing by the Court, Tabin filed a motion to strike and dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. A hearing was held on Tabin's motion to strike and dismiss and on December 3, 2004, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation to the Court recommending that the Court not strike or dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. On December 20, 2004, an Order allowed Plaintiffs to proceed under their Second Amended Complaint. This Order confirms that the Company is no longer a party. The Court also ordered the amount of $4,000, to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Company by January 19, 2004. The Company is currently exploring all methods of recovering attorneys' fees, including a malicious prosecution action on behalf of the Company against Clark and Holt as well as a Rule 11 motion for attorneys' fees with respect to, at a minimum, the derivative action. 3. Potential Tax Liability: The North Carolina Department of Revenue has contacted the Company with regard to state income taxes for the tax year ended September 30, 1999. Upon investigation, the Company has determined that former management did not file a state income tax return in North Carolina for that year, although a return was filed in Florida for that year and returns were filed in North Carolina for two then subsidiaries of the company. The Company is in the process of investigating the situation and of evaluating what action should be taken as a result of the inquiry by the North Carolina Department of Revenue. The Company has been unable to estimate with any reasonable certainty what liability it may have to the State of North Carolina. 10 ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. PART II ITEM 1. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS From July 1998, until February 9, 2001, the Company's common stock was traded under the symbol NESI, on the NASDAQ Small Cap market. Beginning February 10, 2001, it began trading under the symbol ONSP. As of April 2, 2002, the securities were de-listed from the NASDAQ Small Cap market. The Company's common stock is now traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol ONSP. On October 9, 2001, the Company effected a 1 for 12 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock. The total number of authorized Shares of its common stock before the stock split was 100,000,000; the total number of authorized shared of common stock after the stock split was 8,333,333. The total number of issued and outstanding shares of its common stock on the record date were 11,574,619; giving effect to the stock split, there were 964,552 shares of common stock issued and outstanding after the split. All information contained in this annual report gives proforma effect to this stock split. The following table sets forth, for the periods from October 1, 2002, through September 30, 2004, the quarterly high and low closing bid sale prices for the Company's Common Stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin. The prices represent quotations by dealers without adjustment for retail mark ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not represent actual transactions. HIGH LOW FISCAL YEAR 2004 ---- --- First Quarter $5.00 $.40 Second Quarter $3.80 $.40 Third Quarter $3.80 $.85 Fourth Quarter $ .85 $.45 HIGH LOW FISCAL YEAR 2003 ---- --- First Quarter $ .85 $.10 Second Quarter $1.07 $.51 Third Quarter $ .55 $.30 Fourth Quarter $2.75 $.30 11 As of September 30, 2004, there were approximately 318 holders of record of the Company's common stock, an undetermined number of which represent more than one individual participant in securities positions with the Company. RECENT ISSUANCES OF SECURITIES The Company has reserved 500,000 shares of common stock for the grant of qualified incentive options or non-qualified options to employees and directors of the Company or its parents or subsidiaries, and to non-employee directors, consultants and advisors and other persons who may perform significant services for or on behalf of the Company under the Plan. Prices for incentive stock options must provide for an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date the options are granted unless the eligible employee owns more than 10% of the Company's common stock for which the exercise price must be at least 110% of such fair market value. Non-statutory options must provide for an exercise price of not less than 85% of the fair market value. Pursuant to the Plan on September 2, 2003, the Company granted 122,000 non-qualified stock options and 366,000 incentive stock options to certain directors and employees. The stock options are immediately exercisable. On January 26, 2004, Gary Schultheis exercised 122,000 employee stock options. These options had an exercisable price of .30 a share, DIVIDENDS The Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock, and intends to utilize current resources to expand its operations. Therefore, it is not anticipated that cash dividends will be paid on the Company's common stock in the foreseeable future. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION The following discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition and results of operations should be read with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this annual report on Form 10-KSB ("Form 10-KSB"). All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-KSB are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different than any expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," 12 "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "continue," or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements include: 1. General economic factors including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates and trends in disposable income; 2. Information and technological advances; 3. Cost of products sold; 4. Competition; and 5. Success of marketing, advertising and promotional campaigns. The Company is subject to specific risks and uncertainties related to its business model, strategies, markets and legal and regulatory environment You should carefully review the risks described in this Form 10-KSB and in other documents the Company files from time to time with the SEC. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-KSB. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to the forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document. Effective May 27, 2004, the Company completed the sale of its operating line of business as discussed under Discontinued Division in Item 1, accordingly, the following discussion will deal with the Company's Plan of Operation. The operations of Coventry 1, for the nine months June 30, 2004, have been reclassified as loss from discontinued division. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company has identified the policies outlined below as critical to its business operations and an understanding of its results of operations. The listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Company's accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with no need for management's judgment in their application. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on the Company's business operations is discussed throughout Management's Discussion and Analysis or plan of operations where such policies affect the Company's reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company's preparation of the financial statements requires it to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Company's financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. PLAN OF OPERATION Prior to August 5, 2002, the Company, a Nevada corporation, was a holding Company, that through its wholly owned subsidiary, InterLAN Communications, Inc. ("InterLAN"), developed data communications and networking infrastructure solutions for business, government and education. Following August 5, 2002, the Company, announced a change in its strategy and subsequently sold its operating division InterLAN. In April of 2003, the Company changed its focus to investing in and revitalizing single family homes in established residential neighborhoods in suburban areas. The Company had acquired its first property on June 19, 2003. 13 The Company, which had received engineering plans for the real estate project, had intended to renovate and expand the existing single-family home on this site. However on May 27, 2004 the Company completed the sale of Coventry 1, Inc. and utilized the cash received for legal expenses. The Company is currently a party to several legal proceedings and although the Company will vigorously defend all of these actions, the Company is unable to estimate with any reasonable certainty what liability it may have to these litigants. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in defending these legal proceedings, or if successful the cost of defending these legal proceedings may significantly deplete the capital of the Company impairing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to the Company's business model or changes in the Company's capital strategy could result in the actual useful lives differing from the Company's estimates. In those cases where the Company determines that the useful life of property, plant and equipment should be shortened, the Company will depreciate the net book value in excess of the estimated salvage value over its revised remaining useful life. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of its deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While the Company has considered future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the carrying value of the deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period in which such determination was made. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE - The Company's selling, general and administrative expenses, including salaries and wages amounted to $611,322 during the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, as compared to $363,166 for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003. The increase is a result of higher compensation costs of $22,500, increased legal fees due to lawsuits of $197,203, increased rent of $21,939, increased travel due to persuing potential ventures of $14,340. 14 INCOME TAXES The Company recorded $193,111 in deferred income tax benefit for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2004, a 100% valuation allowance was taken against this amount as of September 30, 2004. The Company recorded $54,036 in deferred income tax benefit for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2003, a 100% valuation allowance was taken against this amount as of September 30, 2003 The North Carolina Department of Revenue has contacted the Company with regard to state income taxes for the tax year ended September 30, 1999. Upon investigation, the Company has determined that former management did not file a state income tax return in North Carolina for that year, although a return was filed in Florida for that year and returns were filed in North Carolina for two then subsidiaries of the company. The Company is in the process of investigating the situation and of evaluating what action should be taken as a result of the inquiry by the North Carolina Department of Revenue. The Company has been unable to estimate with any reasonable certainty what liability it may have to the State of North Carolina. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES During the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, working capital decreased $618,222 to $64,210 from $682,432. The primary reasons for the decrease is the decrease of ($675,000) in loan payable off set by an decrease in inventory - home of $1,464,344, and increase in accrued wages of $145,000 off set by increase in cash of $201,887. During this same period, stockholders' equity decreased $618,222 to $64,210 from $682,432. The decrease in stockholders' equity is primarily due to the net loss for the year of ($657,961), and increases in paid in capital of $36,600 primary due to the exercise of stock options There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving the above plans, or that such plans, if consummated, will enable the Company to obtain profitable operations or continue as a going concern. ITEM 3. OTHER INFORMATION None. 15 ITEM 4. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX Page # Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .....................17 Consolidated balance sheet....................................................18 Consolidated statements of operations.........................................19 Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity....................20 Consolidated statements of cash flows.........................................21 Notes to consolidated financial statements....................................23 16 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors Onspan Networking, Inc. and Subsidiary (f/k/a Network Systems International, Inc.) We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Onspan Networking, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2004, and 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Onspan Networking, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. However, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and had negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 15. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ Daszkal Bolton LLP Boca Raton, Florida December 2, 2004 17 ONSPAN NETWORKING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents ................................... $ 241,961 Property and equipment, net ................................... 3,158 Website ....................................................... 20,000 ----------- 23,158 ----------- $ 265,119 =========== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable ............................................ $ 24,963 Accrued dividend ............................................ 30,946 Accrued wages ............................................... 145,000 ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities ..................................... 200,909 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock; $.001 par value; authorized 12,500 shares; issued and outstanding 2,713 shares; liquidation preference $271,300 ........................... 2 Common stock, $.012 par value. Authorized 8,333,333 shares; issued and outstanding 1,090,677 shares ............ 13,088 Paid-in capital ............................................. 7,908,845 Accumulated deficit ......................................... (7,857,725) ----------- Total stockholders' equity .................................... 64,210 ----------- $ 265,119 =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 18 ONSPAN NETWORKING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003 2004 2003 COSTS AND EXPENSES: Salaries and wages ............................. 179,500 157,000 Other selling, general and administrative expenses ...................... 431,822 236,166 ----------- ----------- 611,322 393,166 ----------- ----------- Loss from operations ............................. (611,322) (393,166) OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): Interest income ................................ 825 9,580 Loss on sale of marketable equity securities ............................ - (28,866) Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable equity securities ................. - - Interest expense ............................... (4,632) (110,008) Other expense .................................. (42,832) - ----------- ----------- Total other income (expense) ................. (46,639) (129,294) ----------- ----------- LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES ......................... (657,961) (522,460) INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE ..................... - - ----------- ----------- LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS .................. (657,961) (522,460) LOSS FROM EARNINGS OF A DISCONTINUED DIVISION .... - (3,139) ----------- ----------- NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES .................................. $ (657,961) $ (525,599) =========== =========== BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE CONTINUED OPERATIONS ........................... $ (0.63) $ (0.54) =========== =========== DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS ........................ $ - $ (0.00) =========== =========== TOTAL ......................................... $ (0.63) $ (0.54) =========== =========== WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING BASIC AND DILUTED .............................. 1,051,570 968,677 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 19 ONSPAN NETWORKING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003 (UNAUDITED) Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Shares Par Value Shares Par Value Capital Deficit Total ------ --------- --------- --------- ----------- ------------ ----------- BALANCE, September 30, 2002 ........ 2,713 $ 2 968,677 $ 11,624 $ 7,773,134 $ (6,677,304) $ 1,107,456 Issuance of options for loan payable - - - - 100,575 - 100,575 Net (loss) ......................... - - - - - (525,599) (525,599) ----- --- --------- --------- ----------- ------------ ----------- BALANCE, September 30, 2003 ........ 2,713 2 968,677 $ 11,624 $ 7,873,709 $ (7,202,903) $ 682,432 Exercise of Stock Options .......... - - 122,000 1,464 35,136 - 36,600 Sale of Coventry 1 ................. - - - - - 3,139 3,139 Net (loss) ......................... - - - - - (657,961) (657,961) ----- --- --------- --------- ----------- ------------ ----------- BALANCE, September 30, 2004 ........ 2,713 $ 2 1,090,677 $ 13,088 $ 7,908,845 $ (7,857,725) $ 64,210 ===== === ========= ========= =========== ============ =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 20 ONSPAN NETWORKING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003 2004 2003 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss .............................................$ (657,961) $ (525,599) Less: (Loss) from discontinued operations, net .......$ - $ (3,139) ----------- ----------- (Loss) from continuing opertions .....................$ (657,961) $ (522,460) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation ....................................... 1,131 912 Stock options granted in loan agreement ............ - 100,575 Unrealized loss from marketable securities ......... - - Gain on sale of marketable securities .............. - 28,866 Change in assets and liabilities Income tax receivable ............................ - 45,147 Inventory ........................................ 1,509,972 - Prepaid expenses ................................. - 11,833 Accounts payable ................................. (32,173) 51,598 Accrued interest ................................. (9,433) 9,433 Accrued wages payable ............................ 145,000 - Amounts due to purchasers of discontinued operations ...................................... (55,929) 30,000 ----------- ----------- Net cash used in operating activities ................ 900,607 (244,096) ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from sale of marketable securities ........ - 51,134 Capital expenditures ............................... (22,922) - ----------- ----------- Net cash used in investing activities ................ (22,922) 51,134 ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Loan from EONE ..................................... (675,000) - Loan Payable, Related Party ........................ 250,000 - Proceeds from payments on loan payable-related party (250,000) - Exercise of Stock Option ........................... 36,600 - Payment to settle litigation ....................... (102,500) - ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by financing activities ............ (740,900) - ----------- ----------- NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS .............................. 136,785 (192,962) NET CASH USED IN (PROVIDED BY) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 101,027 (833,500) NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 237,812 (1,026,462) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period from continuing operations ......................... 4,149 1,030,611 ----------- ----------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period .............$ 241,961 $ 4,149 =========== =========== Continued See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 21 ONSPAN NETWORKING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003 (CONTINUED) 2004 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash paid for interest and income taxes are as follows: Interest ........................................... $28,856 $ - Income taxes .......................................$ - $ - See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 22 ONSPAN NETWORKING , INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Originally incorporated in 1985, as Network Information Services, Inc., Network Systems International, Inc. ("NESI"), a Nevada corporation, was the surviving corporation of a reverse merger completed in April 1996. The Company became a publicly traded entity in connection with the re-organization. On July 10, 1998, the Company's stock was officially approved for listing on the NASDAQ Small Cap market and the Company's common stock began trading on NASDAQ Small Cap under the symbol NESI. As of April 2, 2002, the securities were de-listed from the NASDAQ Small Cap market and now trade on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol ONSP. Effective February 10, 2001, the Company changed its name from Network Systems International, Inc., to Onspan Networking, Inc. (the "Company" or "Onspan"). On October 9, 2001, the Company effected a 1 for 12 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock. Prior to August 5, 2002, the Company, a Nevada corporation, was a holding company, that through its wholly owned subsidiary, InterLAN Communications, Inc. ("InterLAN"), developed data communications and networking infrastructure solutions for business, government and education. On August 5, 2002, the Company completed the sale of its operating division InterLAN and a changed its strategy of business. On April 22, 2003 the Company created a new subsidiary, Coventry 1 Inc. that is a Nevada Corporation. The Company's other subsidiary Onspan SmartHouse, Inc., is a Florida Corporation. On May 27, 2004, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Herbert Tabin, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gary Schultheis, an employee of the Company, pursuant to which the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Coventry One, Inc., to Messrs. Tabin and Schultheis. The sole asset of the subsidiary was a single family home and lot located in Woodfield Country Club, Boca Raton, Florida and related country club golf membership. The purchase price for the shares of the subsidiary was $1,509,972, The purchase price for the subsidiary was based on a comprehensive certified appraisal as defined by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and the report conforms to applicable FIRREA guidelines and / or requirements. Messrs Tabin and Schultheis bore the cost of the appraisal. The purchase includes the country club golf membership, and the purchaser is responsible for all costs and fees associated with the membership. In addition, the Purchaser shall be responsible for all expenses associated with the property comprising the Subsidiary whether accrued or outstanding or subsequently to be outstanding, including outstanding tax balance of $21,188, due to Palm Beach County, Florida for the year 2003, outstanding fees including electric, security etc. totaling $12,768, as well as an outstanding insurance payable of $17,043. Messrs. Tabin and Schultheis also agreed to pay the Company 0.75% of the gross sales amount of the property upon any subsequent sale provided the gross sales price exceeds $2,000,001. The Company, which had received engineering plans, 23 had intended to renovate and expand the existing home on the property. The Company sold the real estate project in order to service mounting legal expenses associated with litigation. The Company used the proceeds from the sale of this division to pay off its debt, which included a note payable to Evolve One , Inc and notes to related parties. 2. SUMMARIES OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES BASIS OF PRESENTATION - The financial statements at September 30, 2004 and 2003, include the accounts of the Company and the discontinued operations of Coventry 1, Inc. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2004 include the accounts of Onspan Networking, Inc. and its subsidiary, Onspan Smarthouse Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued wages approximate fair value as of September 30, 2004, because of the short maturity of these instruments. INVENTORY HOME The carrying value of the Inventory - home is reflected at cost. PREFERRED STOCK At September 30, 2004, the Company had 2,713 shares outstanding of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A"). Series A has a stated liquidation preference value of $100 per share redeemable at the Company's option, has no voting rights, and each preferred share is convertible to 4 shares of the Company's common stock as adjusted for the 1 for 12 reverse stock split. Dividends on the Series A were to be paid monthly in cash at a rate of 12% of the original issue. The Company's Board of Directors, elected to suspend the payment of Series A dividends. This decision was made in light of the general economic conditions. In particular, the Board took such actions as necessary to preserve the Company's working capital in order to ensure the continued viability of the Company. The Board of Directors is unable at this time to 24 predict if the Company will resume the payment of cash dividends on its Series A 12% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. However, the Company has accrued dividends on these shares in the amount of $30,946 at September 30, 2004. STOCK OPTION PLAN The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations, in accounting for its stock option plan. As such, compensation expense would be recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), requires the Company to disclose pro forma information regarding option grants made to its employees. SFAS 123 specifies certain valuation techniques that produce estimated compensation charges that are included in the pro forma results below. These amounts have not been reflected in the Company's Statement of Operations, because Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," specifies that no compensation charge arises when the price of the employees' stock options equal the market value of the underlying stock at the grant date, as in the case of options granted to the Company's employees. SFAS No. 123 pro forma numbers are as follows for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003: 2004 2003 Actual net income (loss) .......... $(657,961) $(525,599) ========= ========= Pro forma net income (loss) ....... $(657,961) $(667,119) ========= ========= Pro forma basic and diluted net Income (loss) per share ......... $ (.63) $ (.69) ========= ========= EARNINGS PER SHARE The financial statements are presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 ("SFAS 128"), "Earnings Per Share". Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution from the exercise or conversion of securities into common stock. 25 USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for significant renewals and improvements are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed using an accelerated method for both financial and income tax purposes based upon the useful lives of the assets. WEBSITE Monies paid for acquisition of www.VOIS.com of $20,000, were capitalized on the Company's balance sheet as of September 30, 2004. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", the Company follows the policy of evaluating all qualifying assets as of the end of each reporting quarter. For the year ended September 30, 2004, no charges to operations were made for impairments in the future benefit of this asset. The Company will amortize the asset over three years when operations using the domain site commense. RECLASSIFICATION Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIE)," (revised December 2003 by FIN No. 46R), which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. For variable interests in VIEs created before January 1, 2004, the Interpretation will be applied beginning on January 1, 2005. For any VIEs that must be consolidated under FIN No. 46R that were created before January 1, 2004, the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests of the VIE initially would be measured at their carrying amounts with any difference between the net amount added to the balance sheet and any previously recognized interest being recognized as the cumulative effect of an accounting change. If determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, fair value at the date FIN No. 46R first applies may be used to measure the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest of the VIE. The adoption of FIN No. 46R did not have a material impact 26 on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows as the Company does not have any VIEs. In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-01, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments." EITF 03-01 provides guidance on other-than-temporary impairment models for marketable debt and equity securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," and SFAS No. 124, "Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations," and non-marketable equity securities accounted for under the cost method. The EITF developed a basic three-step model to evaluate whether an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. In September 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-01-1, which delays the effective date until additional guidance is issued for the application of the recognition and measurement provisions of EITF 03-01 to investments in securities that are impaired; however, the disclosure requirements are effective for annual periods ending after June 15, 2004. The adoption of the disclosure provisions of EITF 03-01 did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition. In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151, Inventory Costs--an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 . The Statement amends the guidance of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing , by clarifying that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and by requiring the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. It does not appear that this Statement will have a material effect on the financial position, operations or cash flows of the Company when it becomes effective in 2006. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123R"), a revision to SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), and superseding APB Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, including obtaining employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R applies to all awards granted after the required effective date and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date. Adoption of the provisions of SFAS 123R is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations. 27 3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment, which are reflected at cost, consist of the following at September 30, 2004 and 2003: 2004 2003 ---- ---- Computer equipment ..................... $ 6,612 $ 3,689 ------- ------- Total property and equipment ........... $ 6,612 $ 3,689 Less: accumulated depreciation ......... (3,454) (2,322) ------- ------- Property and equipment, net ............ $ 3,158 $ 1,367 ======= ======= Depreciation expense for the year ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 is $1,131 and $912, respectively. 4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 2004 2003 ---- ---- Net loss from discontinued division - Coventry 1 ........ $ - $(3,139) Net (loss) from discontinued operations ................. $ - $(3,139) ===== ======= Net (loss) per common share Basic ............................................... (.00) (.00) Diluted ............................................. (.00) (.00) 5. REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE The Company had a demand line of credit with a related party (Evolve One Inc), totaling $1,000,000, under which the Company could borrow on an unsecured basis at 5% annually. On April 1, 2004 The Company repaid to Evolve One, Inc $22,000 in accrued interest. On May 27, 2004 the Company repaid the remaining outstanding balance of $684,602 including accrued interest. This note has been paid in full and cancelled as of September 30, 2004. The terms of the demand line of credit stated that the Company must issue options to purchase common stock equal to 10% of the dollar amount of the loan advance at an exercise price of $0.10 per share, and options to purchase common stock equal to 90% of the dollar amount of the loan advance at the ten trading day average at the time of the draw ($0.30 at June 30, 2003). Under these terms, the Company issued 675,000 stock options resulting in a charge to interest expense of $110,008 in 2003. 28 6. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash deposits. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $100,000. At September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company had approximately $140,000 and $0 in excess of FDIC insured limits, respectively. 7. NOTE PAYABLE - SHAREHOLDER The Note Purchase agreement, a Convertible Promissory Note for $100,000 was issued by the Company on October 24, 2003 to Mr. Tabin. This note was due on July 31, 2004, and accrued interest at a rate of 5.25% per annum payable at maturity. On February 27, 2004 the Company entered into a Secured Promissory Note with our President, Herbert Tabin. The Note Agreement, was a Secured Promissory Note for $50,000 that was issued by the Company on February 27, 2004 to Mr. Tabin. This note was due on August 1, 2004, and accrued interest at a rate of 5.25% per annum payable at maturity. The note was secured by a security interest in property located at 3764 Coventry Lane, Boca Raton On March 31, 2004 the Company entered into a Secured Promissory Note with our President, Herbert Tabin. The Note Agreement, was a Secured Promissory Note for $25,000 that was issued by the Company on March 31, 2004 to Mr. Tabin. This note was due on August 1, 2004, and accrued interest at a rate of 5.25% per annum payable at maturity The note was secured by a security interest in property located at 3764 Coventry Lane, Boca Raton . On May 31, 2004 the Company repaid our President, Herbert Tabin $179,060. In satisfaction of repayment on the three outstanding Promissory Notes including accrued interest. On April 8, 2004 the Company entered into a Secured Promissory Note with an employee, Gary Schultheis. The Note Agreement, was a Secured Promissory Note for $75,000 that was issued by the Company on April 8, 2004 to Mr. Schultheis this note accrued interest at a rate of 5.25% per annum payable at maturity. On May 31, 2004 the Company repaid Gary Schultheis $75,572 in satisfaction of the Promissory Note including accrued interest. As of September 30, 2004 there are no outstanding notes and all accrued interest has been paid . 8. RELATED PARTY In 2004 the Company accrued $72,000 in salaries with its President Herbert Tabin. On October 15, 2004 The Company purchased 150,000 shares for $.18 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $27,000. (1,200,000 shares post split ) of Evolve One, Inc, a related party where certain officers and directors of the Company are also officers and directors of Evolve One Inc. in a private transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. 29 9. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY On June 19, 2003, the Company granted 675,000 stock options to Evolve One Inc in a revolving note agreement (See Footnote 5). The options have an exercise price of $.10 per share. These options have an exercise price of $.10 and $.30 per share. The Company recognized a non-cash interest expense of $100,575, during the twelve month period ended September 30, 2003. On January 26, 2004 , Gary Schultheis exercised employee stock options to obtain 122,000 shares of common stock. These options had an exercisable price of .30 a share. The company received $36,600 in proceeds. 10. EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS During 1999, the Company adopted the Onspan Networking, Inc. f/k/a Network Systems International, Inc. "1999 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan." The maximum number of shares authorized and available under the plan was amended to be increased from 41,667 to 500,000 shares, this amendment was approved at the annual shareholder meeting held December 31, 2001. Under the terms of the plan, the options expire after 10 years, as long as the employees remain employed with the Company. The Company has reserved 500,000 shares of common stock for the grant of qualified incentive options or non-qualified options to employees and directors of the Company or its parents or subsidiaries, and to non-employee directors, consultants and advisors and other persons who may perform significant services for or on behalf of the Company under the Plan. Prices for incentive stock options must provide for an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date the options are granted unless the eligible employee owns more than 10% of the Company's common stock for which the exercise price must be at least 110% of such fair market value. Non-statutory options must provide for an exercise price of not less than 85% of the fair market value. Pursuant to the Plan on September 2, 2003, the Company granted 122,000 non-qualified stock options and 366,000 incentive stock options to certain directors and employees. The stock options are immediately exercisable. The following is a summary of option activity for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. 30 OPTIONS OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AVAILABLE WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR GRANT OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE --------- ------- -------------- Balance; September 30, 2002 485,666 14,334 $13.08 Granted ................... (488,000) 488,000 .30 Exercised ................. - - - Cancelled ................. 2,667 (2,667) - Balance; September 30, 2003 333 499,667 .67 -------- -------- ------ Granted ................... - - - Exercised ................. (122,000) (122,000) .30 Cancelled ................. - - - Balance; September 30, 2004 122,333 377,667 .67 -------- -------- ------ 11. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes for the years ended September 30, consists of the following components: 2004 2003 ---- ---- Continuing operations Federal: Deferred ................... $ - $ - ---- ---- $ - $ - ==== ==== Discontinued Operations Federal Deferred ................... - - ==== ==== Total income tax expense (benefit) $ - $ - ==== ==== 31 Reconciliation of the Federal Statutory Income Tax rate to the Company's effective income tax rate is as follows: 2004 2003 ---- ---- Computed at the Statutary rates (34%) .............. $(223,707) $(178,704) Non deductible expenses ............................ 401 625 State income taxes net of federal tax benefit ...... (23,841) (19,704) Unrealized loss on marketable securities ........... - 143,747 --------- --------- Reinstatement /Change in valuation Allowance ....... 247,147 54,036 --------- --------- Tax provision (benefit) ............................ $ - $ - ========= ========= The significant temporary differences that give rise to a deferred tax asset as of September 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows: 2004 2003 ---- ---- Deferred tax asset: Unrealized loss on marketable securities ........... $ - $ - Capital loss Carryforward .......................... 41,798 41,798 NOL Carryforward ................................... 610,907 417,796 --------- --------- Total deferred tax asset ...................... 652,705 459,594 Less valuation allowance ..................... (652,705) (459,594) --------- --------- Net deferred tax asset ........................ $ - $ - ========= ========= The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended September 30, 2004 was an increase of $193,111. In assessing the reliability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carry forward originated September 30, 2002; the amount is $1,735,828 and expires in 2024. During the year ended September 30, 2003 a refund of $45,147 was received from the Internal Revenue Service for prior year overpaid income taxes for former subsidiary InterLAN Communications as per the sale agreement. 32 12. LEASE COMMITMENT OPERATING LEASES The Company had entered into a sub-lease agreement with Millennium Holdings Group, Inc for a three-year term commencing July 1, 2003, for office space in Boca Raton, Florida. The lease provided for base monthly rentals of $2,908 plus the Company's proportionate share of certain expenses with 5% annual increases through June 30, 2006. As of November 1, 2004 the company relocated its offices to approximately 1,545 square feet of commercial office space sub-leased from Evolve One, Inc a company related through common ownership under a five year sublease signed November 1, 2004 at a rate of $2,000 per month plus 5% per annum Minimum future obligations over the term of the lease are as follows: Year ended September 30, ------------------------ 2005 $ 22,000 2006 25,100 2007 26,355 2008 27,670 2009 29,056 2010 2,413 -------- $132,612 ======== Rent expense for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 aggregated $35,165 and $13,226 respectively. 13. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 1. Network Systems International of North Carolina, Inc. v Network Systems International, Inc. and OnSpan Networking, Inc. (02-CvS-10154) (Complaint filed September 13, 2002). This action asserts a claim for breach of contract against the Company, seeking certain tax refunds obtained by the Company. The plaintiff, a former subsidiary of the Company, claims that these tax refunds belong to the plaintiff. The Company filed counterclaims for refund of monies paid by the Company and owed by the Plaintiff, as well as for a declaratory judgment that any tax liability of the Company owed to the North Carolina Department of Revenue must be reimbursed by the Plaintiff. The parties agreed to settle all claims, and the action was dismissed on October 26, 2004. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Company paid the Plaintiff $39,800, and the Company and the Plaintiff each released all claims. Additionally, several shareholders affiliated with the Plaintiff agreed to transfer their shares to the Company. Those shares will be cancelled upon surrender. The number of shares to be cancelled is currently undetermined. 33 2. Securities Actions: a. D. Mark White v OnSpan Networking, Inc. and Herbert Tabin, Case No. 352198686 03 (District Court, Tarrant County Texas) (Complaint filed May 2, 2003). This action had asserted claims for violation of Texas securities law, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duties. The action had was seeking unspecified damages, restitution in the amount of $300,000, treble damages, pre-judgment interest, the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and costs, and certain other relief. In August 31, 2004, the action was settled for $62,500. b.Richard T. Clark and Joel C. Holt v. Herbert Tabin and Gary Schultheis, United States District Court Northern District of Oklahoma, Case No. 03-CV-289K(J). On March 28, 2003, Plaintiffs Richard Clark and Joel Holt ("Plaintiffs") filed a petition in the Tulsa County District Court alleging claims against the Company and its President, CEO and Director, Herbert Tabin ("Tabin"), for, among other things, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. On May 1, 2003, the Company, along with Tabin, removed this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma and filed a Motion to Dismiss all claims. On October 15, 2003, Plaintiffs withdrew their claims and filed an Amended Complaint asserting claims against Tabin, both individually and derivatively, on behalf of the Company. Plaintiffs also asserted claims against the Company. Plaintiffs sought damages in the amount of $300,000.00 each, as well as punitive damages. The Company retained independent counsel to conduct an investigation into the allegations by Plaintiffs made derivatively on behalf of the Company and, based on that investigation, determined that no action on behalf of the Company was warranted. Defendants also filed a Motion to Dismiss all of the allegations in the Amended Complaint. On October 19, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint in which they dropped the Company as a defendant and dropped the derivative shareholder claims. Plaintiffs added Gary Schultheis as an individual defendant. The Second Amended Complaint alleges claims against Tabin and Schultheis individually. Because the Second Amended Complaint was a different version than that which was approved for filing by the Court, Tabin filed a motion to strike and dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. A hearing was held on Tabin's motion to strike and dismiss and on December 3, 2004, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation to the Court recommending that the Court not strike or dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. On December 20, 2004, an Order allowed Plaintiffs to proceed under their Second Amended Complaint. This Order confirms that the Company is no longer a party. The Court also ordered the amount of $4,000, to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Company by January 19, 2004. The Company is currently exploring all methods of recovering attorneys' fees, including a malicious prosecution action on behalf of the Company against Clark and Holt as well as a Rule 11 motion for attorneys' fees with respect to, at a minimum, the derivative action. 34 3. Potential Tax Liability: The North Carolina Department of Revenue has contacted the Company with regard to state income taxes for the tax year ended September 30, 1999. Upon investigation, the Company has determined that former management did not file a state income tax return in North Carolina for that year, although a return was filed in Florida for that year and returns were filed in North Carolina for two then subsidiaries of the company. The Company is in the process of investigating the situation and of evaluating what action should be taken as a result of the inquiry by the North Carolina Department of Revenue. The Company has been unable to estimate with any reasonable certainty what liability it may have to the State of North Carolina. 14. EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earning (loss) per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect per share amounts that would have resulted if dilutive potential common stock had been converted to common stock. The following reconciles amounts reported in the financial statements: 2004 2003 ---- ---- (Loss) from continuing operations ...................... $ (657,961) $(522,460) (Loss) from discontinued operations .................... - (3,139) ---------- --------- Net (loss) ............................................. $ (657,961) $(525,599) ========== ========= Denominator for basic earnings per share - Weighted average shares ................................ 1,051,570 968,677 Effect of dilutive securities - stock options .......... - - ---------- --------- Denominator for diluted earnings per share - Weighted average shares adjusted for dilutive securities 1,051,570 968,677 ========== ========= Basic and diluted (loss) per common share: (Loss) from continuing operations ...................... $ (.63) $ (.54) (Loss) from discontinued operations .................... - - ---------- --------- Net (loss) ............................................. $ (.63) $ (.54) ========== ========= 35 15. GOING CONCERN The accompanying condensed financials were prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving the above plans, or that such plans, if consummated, will enable the Company to obtain profitable operations or continue as a going concern. 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On October 15, 2004 The Company purchased 150,000 shares for $.18 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $27,000. (1,200,000 shares post split) of Evolve One, Inc, a related party where certain officers and directors of the Company are also officers and directors of Evolve One Inc. in a private transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. PART III ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES The Company's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -14(c) and 15d-14(c)) were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the previously mentioned evaluation. ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS, COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS: The following table sets forth the names, ages and current positions with the Company held by the Directors and Executive Officers, together with the date such positions were assumed. The Company is not aware of any arrangement or understanding between any Director or Executive Officer and any other person pursuant to which he was elected to his current position. 36 Position or Office Date Name Age ------------------ ---- ---- --- President/CEO/Director Jul/2000 Herbert Tabin 37 Treasurer/CFO/Director Sep/2000 Marissa Dermer 36 Director 2001 Elizabeth Capra 42 HERBERT TABIN is currently the President, CEO and a Director of the Company. He is also a Director and founder of Evolve One, Inc., a related party, and currently serves as its Director of Marketing. Mr. Tabin has been a Director of Evolve One, Inc. since February 1998, a publicly traded company. Mr. Tabin is also currently Vice President of Millennium Holdings Group, Inc. a private Florida-based venture capital firm. Mr. Tabin has been Vice President with Millennium Holdings since 1996. In February 1999, Mr. Tabin became President of Interactive Golf Marketing a publicly traded company that became WowStores.com. In August 1999, Mr. Tabin resigned as President of WowStores.com following its acquisition by StockFirst.com. Previously, Mr. Tabin was a Vice President of Marketing with LBI Group, Inc., a merchant banking and venture capital group from April 1995 to December 1996. From September 1993 to March 1995 Mr. Tabin was a vice president with HBL Associates a financial relations firm in New York City. From 1989 to August 1993 Mr. Tabin was employed with the American Stock Exchange and New York-based Stock Brokerage firms Stratton Securities, Continental Broker-Dealer and Kensington Wells, Inc. Mr. Tabin received a Bachelor of Science in Business Economics from the State University of New York At Oneonta in 1989. In March 2000, the State University of New York At Oneonta named their campus' largest computer lab, the Tabin Computer Lab. MARISSA DERMER is a Director of the Company and is currently the Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Dermer is also currently controller of publicly traded Evolve One, Inc. From September 1997 to April 2000, Ms. Dermer was an assistant controller with Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management, Inc., the mutual fund advisory group of Paine Webber Inc. Prior to her employment with Paine Webber, Ms. Dermer was a manager of David Berdon and Company LLP, a prominent public accounting firm headquartered in New York City from 1990 to 1997. Ms. Dermer graduated in 1990 from the State University of New York at Albany with a degree in Business/Accounting. ELIZABETH CAPRA is a Director of the Company. Mrs. Capra is also currently an Executive Assistant with Publicly Traded Evolve One, Inc. From October 1992 to July 1999, Mrs. Capra was simultaneously a Property Manager for upscale properties, Reflections of Boca, Inc. and Sanctuary of Boca Raton, Inc., both located in Boca Raton, Florida. From 1984 to 1991 Mrs. Capra was the Assistant to the Vice President of The International Department of Marsh & McLennan - insurance and reinsurance broking, investment management and consulting businesses worldwide. Mrs. Capra graduated in 1983 from Roberts Walsh Business School with a degree in Business Administration. 37 CODE OF ETHICS Effective November 1, 2003, our board of directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, our company's President (being our principal executive officer) as well as all employees. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote: - honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; - full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us; - compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; - the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and - accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our company's personnel shall be accorded full access to our President with respect to any matter that may arise relating to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Further, all of our company's personnel are to be accorded full access to our company's board of directors if any such matter involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by our President . In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly managers and/or supervisors, have a responsibility for maintaining financial integrity within our company, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal, provincial and state securities laws. Any employee who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to his or her immediate supervisor or to our company's President. If the incident involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the President, the incident must be reported to any member of our board of directors. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our company policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is filed herewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 14 to this annual report. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any person without charge, upon request. Requests can be sent to: OnSpan Networking, Inc., 1000 Clint Moore Road, Suite 101, Boca Raton, FL 33487 38 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT None. ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table shows the cash compensation of the Company's chief executive officer and each officer whose total cash compensation exceeded $100,000, for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE - ANNUAL COMPENSATION Other Annual Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation --------------------------- ---- ------ ----- ------------ Herbert Tabin 2004 N/A N/A N/A Chairman of the Board 2003 N/A N/A N/A And Chief Executive Officer 2002 N/A N/A N/A Since July 25, 2000 Marissa Dermer 2004 N/A N/A N/A Chief Financial Officer 2003 N/A N/A N/A Since September 2000 2002 N/A N/A N/A SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE - LONG-TERM COMPENSATION Securities Underlying Options Name and principal position Year SAR's --------------------------- ---- ---------- Herbert Tabin 2004 N/A Chairman of the Board 2003 122,000(1) And Chief Executive Officer 2002 N/A Since July 25, 2000 Marissa Dermer 2004 N/A Chief Financial Officer 2003 122,000(1) Since September 2000 2002 N/A ________ (1) The Company issued Mr. Tabin, and Ms Dermer options to purchase 122,000 shares each of its common stock, exercisable at $.33 and $.30 per share respectively, as compensation for their services to the Company in fiscal 2003. 39 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan In April 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the Company's Stock Incentive Plan (the "Stock Incentive Plan"). The purposes of the Stock Incentive Plan are to closely associate the interests of the key associates (management and certain other employees) of the Company and its adopting subsidiaries with the stockholders by reinforcing the relationship between participants' rewards and stockholder gains, to provide key associates with an equity ownership in the Company commensurate with Company performance, as reflected in increased stockholder value, to maintain competitive compensation levels, and to provide an incentive to key associates for continuous employment with the Company. Under the Stock Incentive Plan, the Company may grant (i) incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and (ii) options that are not qualified as incentive stock options ("nonqualified stock options"). Executive officers, management and other employees of the Company capable of making a substantial contribution to the success of the Company are eligible to participate in the Stock Incentive Plan. The Stock Incentive Plan is administered by a Committee consisting of three members appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Committee"). The Committee is currently comprised of Messr. Tabin and Ms. Dermer. and Ms Capra The Committee, in its sole discretion, has the authority to: (i) designate the key associates or classes of key associates eligible to participate in the Stock Incentive Plan; (ii) to grant awards provided in the Stock Incentive Plan in the form and amount determined by the Committee; (iii) to impose such limitations, restrictions and conditions upon any such award as the Committee shall deem appropriate; and (iv) to interpret the Stock Incentive Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan is 500,000 shares. At September 30, 2004, there were options to purchase 377,667 shares of the Company's common stock outstanding under the Stock Incentive Plan. The shares of common stock available for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan are subject to adjustment for any stock dividend or distribution, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, split-up, combination, exchange of shares or the like. Shares issued may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. Shares tendered by a participant as payment for shares issued upon exercise of an option shall be available for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan. Any shares of common stock subject to an option, which for any reason is terminated unexercised or expires shall again be available for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan. Subject to the provisions of the Stock Incentive Plan, the Committee may award incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options and determine the number of shares to be covered by each option, the option price therefore and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercises of the option. Each option shall be exercisable at 40 such times and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may specify in the applicable award or thereafter. Incentive stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan are intended to qualify as such under section 422 of the Code. No incentive stock option granted under the Stock Incentive Plan may be exercisable more than 10 years from the date of grant. The option price per share for nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options must at least equal the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. For a 10% shareholder must equal at least 110%. Each option shall be evidenced by a written stock option agreement, in such form as the Committee may from time to time determine, executed by the Company and the grantee, stating the number of shares of common stock subject to the option. The Committee may at any time and from time to time terminate or modify or amend the Stock Incentive Plan in any respect, except that without stockholder approval the Committee may not (i) increase the maximum number of shares of common stock which may be issued under the Stock Incentive Plan, (ii) extend the period during which any award may be granted or exercised, (iii) extend the term of the Stock Incentive Plan, or (iv) change the associates/employees or group of associates/employees eligible to receive incentive stock options. OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR Percent of total Number of options/SARs Securities grated to Exercise or Underlying Options/ employees in Base Expiration Name SARs granted (#) fiscal year Price ($/Sh) Date ---- ------------------- ----------------- ------------ ---------- None AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FY-END OPTION/SAR VALUES Number of securities VALUE OF underlying UNEXERCISED unexercised IN-THE-MONEY Shares options/SARs at OPTIONS/SARs Acquired FY-end (#) At FY-end ($) On Value Exercisable/ Exercisable/ Name Exercise (#) Realized ($) Unexercisable Unexercisable ---- ------------ ------------ --------------- ------------- NONE $0 41 ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table indicates all persons who, as of September 30, 2004, the most recent practicable date, are known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of any class of the Company's voting securities and all Directors of the Company and all Officers who are not Directors of the Company, as a group. The Company's common stock is the only class of its voting securities. As of September 30, 2004, there were 1,090,677 shares of the Company's common stock outstanding. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and includes any securities which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the conversion or exercise of any security or other right. Unless otherwise noted, the Company believes that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of its common stock beneficially owned by them. The information as to the number of shares of the Company's common stock owned by each named person or group is based upon the information contained in a record list of the Company's shareholders at September 30, 2004. Title of Amount & Nature of % of Class Name & Address of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Owner Class -------- ---------------------------------- ------------------ ----- Common Herbert Tabin 369,902(1) 30.29% 1000 Clint Moore Rd, Suite 101 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Common Marissa Dermer 124,500(2) 10.24% 1000 Clint Moore Rd, Suite 101 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Common Elizabeth Capra 122,000(3) 10.06% 1000 Clint Moore Rd, Suite 101 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Common Gary Schultheis 158,500 14.53% 1000 Clint Moore Rd, Suite 101 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Common All directors and executive 774,902 52.80% officers as a group (four persons) _________ (1) Includes an option granted to Mr. Tabin on October 23, 2000 for 8,333 shares with an exercise price of $13.56 per share, and an option granted on September 2, 2003 for 122,000 shares with an exercise price of $.33 per share, the closing price for the stock on that date as reported on the NASDAQ Small Cap Market. The options were granted by the Board of Directors in lieu of current compensation agreements. 42 (2) Includes an option granted to Ms. Dermer on October 23, 2000 for 2,500 shares with an exercise price of $13.56 per share, and an option granted on September 2, 2003 for 122,000 shares with an exercise price of $.30 per share, the closing price for the stock on that date as reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. The options were granted by the Board of Directors in lieu of current compensation agreements. (3) Includes an option granted to Ms. Capra on September 2, 2003 for 122,000 shares with an exercise price of $.30 per share, the closing price for the stock on that date as reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. The options were granted by the Board of Directors in lieu of current compensation agreements. ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS "There is no immediate family relationship between or among any of the Directors and Executive Officers, except Ms. Dermer who is the sister-in-law of Mr. Tabin. Related transactions include 1) Mr. Tabin is also a director of EvolveOne, Inc. who Onspan sub leases its office space from. ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K The following documents are filed as a part of this report or are incorporated by reference to previous filings, if so indicated: (a) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 4.0 Long Term Incentive Stock Options Plan (1) 10.1 Stock Purchase Agreement Dated May 27, 2004 (2) 14 Onspan Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Adopted by the Board of Directors On November 1, 2003 31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 31.2 Certification of Principal Accounting and Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32.2 Certification of Principal Accounting and Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 _________ (1) Incorporated by reference to the Company's report on Form S-8 dated July 27, 2001, filed on July 27, 2001. (2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's report on Form 8-K dated May 27 2004, filed on June 7, 2004. 43 (b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K 1. 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2004 announcing on May 27, 2004 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Herbert Tabin, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gary Schultheis, an employee of the Company, pursuant to which the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Coventry One, Inc., to Messrs. Tabin and Schultheis. The sole asset of the subsidiary was a single family home and lot located in Woodfield Country Club, Boca Raton, Florida and related country club golf membership. The purchase price for the shares of the subsidiary was $1,509,972, and Messrs. Tabin and Schultheis also assumed responsibility for all expenses associated with the property comprising the subsidiary, including an existing tax balance of $21,188 due to Palm Beach County, Florida, outstanding fees totaling $21,768 and an insurance payable of $17,043. Messrs. Tabin and Schultheis also agreed to pay the Company 0.75% of the gross sales amount of the property upon any subsequent sale provided the gross sales price exceeds $2,000,001. The purchase price for the subsidiary was based on a comprehensive certified appraisal. Messrs Tabin and Schultheis bore the cost of the appraisal. The Company, which had received engineering plans, had intended to renovate and expand the existing home on the property 2. Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission August 8, 2002 announcing on August 5, 2002, the Company sold and transferred the stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary, InterLAN Communications, Inc. to G. Anthony Munno, Martin Sainsbury Carter and Brian Ianniello, who were executives and employees of InterLAN. In exchange for the assignment of the InterLAN stock, Messrs. Munno, Carter and Ianniello transferred 20,833 shares of Onspan common shares, and Onspan was relieved of substantially all obligations and guarantees provided to third parties. Onspan also retained the right to a certain tax refund owing to InterLAN. These individuals also resigned in all capacities as directors, officers and/or employees of Onspan. InterLAN provides data communications and network solutions and consulting services. 3. Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission October 16, 2001 announcing the Onspan Networking, Inc. (the "Company"), filed a Certificate pursuant to Section 78.207 of the Nevada Statutes whereby the Company decreasing the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $.012, at a rate of one for twelve (1:12), and proportionately decreasing the number of authorized shares of common stock at a rate of one for twelve (1:12). As a result, the Company's authorized common stock has been reduced from 100,000,000 shares to 8,333,333 shares, and the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock were reduced from 11,574,619 to approximately 964,552 shares. 44 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. AUDIT FEES The aggregate audit fees billed by Daszkal Bolton LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 and for the review of quarterly financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ending December 31, March 31, and June 30, 2004 were $14,000. The aggregate audit fees billed by Daszkal Bolton LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 and for the review of quarterly financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ending December 31, March 31, and June 30, 2003 were $17,100. AUDIT RELATED FEES For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by Daszkal Bolton LLP relating to the performance of the audit of our financial statements which are not reported under the caption "Audit Fees" above was $0 and $0, respectively. TAX FEES For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 the aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, include the preparation of federal and state corporate income tax returns. The aggregate tax fees billed to Onspan by Daszkal Bolton LLP for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $768 and $925, respectively. ALL OTHER FEES Other than fees relating to the services described above under "Audit Fees," "Audit-Related Fees" and "Tax Fees," there were no additional fees billed by Daszkal Bolton LLP for services rendered to Onspan for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. 45 AUDIT COMMITTEE POLICIES Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our independent auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be: * approved by our audit committee; or * entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management. The audit committee pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors, including those set forth above. The audit committee has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by Daszkal Bolton LLP and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining Daszkal Bolton LLP's independence. 46 SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ONSPAN NETWORKING, INC. By: /s/ Herbert Tabin --------------------- Herbert Tabin, Principal Executive Officer January 12, 2005 In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. SIGNATURES By: /s/ Herbert Tabin --------------------- Herbert Tabin, Principal Executive Officer January 12, 2005 By: /s/ Marissa Dermer ---------------------- Marissa Dermer, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer January 12, 2005 47