Edgar Filing: TF FINANCIAL CORP

form10q.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended March 31, 2012

- or -

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 0-24168

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Pennsylvania		74-2705050
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
or Organization)

3 Penns Trail, Newtown, Pennsylvania		18940
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 579-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES xNO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 Exchange Act). YES o NO x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: May 14, 2012

Class	Outstanding
$.10 par value common stock	2,835,058 shares

CONTENTS

PART I-CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28

Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	34

Item 4.		Controls and Procedures	35

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	36

Item 1A.		Risk Factors	36

Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	36

Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	36

Item 4.		Mine Safety Disclosures	36

Item 5.		Other Information	36

Item 6.		Exhibits	36

Signatures			37

Exhibits

31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.	Certification pursuant of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The following Exhibits are being furnished as part of this report:

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I-CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	At
	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,340		$	14,928
Investment securities
Available for sale		123,830			114,503
Held to maturity (fair value of $2,780 and $2,928 as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)		2,440			2,588
Loans receivable, net		490,492			494,125
Loans receivable, held for sale		884			488
Federal Home Loan Bank stock-at cost		7,274			7,657
Accrued interest receivable		2,502			2,610
Premises and equipment, net		6,527			6,559
Goodwill		4,324			4,324
Bank owned life insurance		18,658			18,506
Other assets		14,150			15,641
TOTAL ASSETS	$	693,421		$	681,929

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits	$	562,201		$	551,288
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB")		46,685			46,908
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		1,905			2,322
Accrued interest payable		1,629			1,375
Other liabilities		2,473			2,628
Total liabilities		614,893			604,521

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, none issued		-			-
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 5,290,000 shares issued, 2,833,521 and 2,831,874 shares outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, net of shares in treasury of 2,456,479 and 2,458,126, respectively.		529			529
Additional paid-in capital		54,173			54,118
Unearned ESOP shares		(1,066	)		(1,097	)
Treasury stock-at cost		(50,997	)		(51,032	)
Retained earnings		75,164			74,144
Accumulated other comprehensive income		725			746
Total stockholders’ equity		78,528			77,408
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	693,421		$	681,929

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	(in thousands, except per share data)

Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	6,197	$	6,584
Investment securities
Fully taxable		629		896
Exempt from federal taxes		435		355
Interest-bearing deposits and other		2		-
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME		7,263		7,835
Interest expense
Deposits		1,066		1,460
Borrowings		405		559
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE		1,471		2,019
NET INTEREST INCOME		5,792		5,816
Provision for loan losses		500		900
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		5,292		4,916
Non-interest income
Service fees, charges and other operating income		484		465
Bank owned life insurance		152		157
Gain on sale of loans		324		117
Gain on disposition of premises and equipment		277		-
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME		1,237		739
Non-interest expense
Compensation and benefits		2,874		2,746
Occupancy and equipment		710		818
Federal deposit insurance premiums		151		233
Professional fees		351		478
Marketing and advertising		85		67
Foreclosed real estate expense		287		61
Other operating		598		562
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE		5,056		4,965
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		1,473		690
Income tax expense		318		72
NET INCOME	$	1,155	$	618

Earnings per share—basic	$	0.42	$	0.23
Earnings per share—diluted	$	0.42	$	0.23
Dividends paid per share	$	0.05	$	0.05
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		2,718,839		2,695,700
Diluted		2,722,405		2,695,909

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)

Net income	$	1,155		$	618
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gains (losses)		(103	)		404
Tax effect		35			(137	)
Net of tax amount		(68	)		267
Pension plan benefit adjustment:
Related to actuarial losses		72			29
Tax effect		(25	)		(9	)
Net of tax amount		47			20
Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(21	)		287
Comprehensive income	$	1,134		$	905

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,155		$	618
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and impairment adjustment of mortgage loan servicing rights		54			50
Premiums and discounts on investment securities, net		57			27
Premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities, net		97			74
Deferred loan origination costs, net		54			69
Provision for loan losses		500			900
Depreciation of premises and equipment		203			219
Increase in value of bank owned life insurance		(152	)		(157	)
Stock based compensation		121			79
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale		15,694			5,767
Origination of loans held for sale		(15,926	)		(5,785	)
Loss (gain) on foreclosed real estate		179			(11	)
Gain on sale of:
Loans held for sale		(324	)		(117	)
Disposition of premises and equipment		(277	)		-
Decrease in:
Accrued interest receivable		108			154
Other assets		81			324
Increase (decrease) in:
Accrued interest payable		254			430
Other liabilities		(167	)		408
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		1,711			3,049

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Loan originations		(19,210	)		(22,525	)
Loan principal payments		20,441			23,578
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate		3,278			322
Proceeds from disposition of premises and equipment		356			-
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity		149			182
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities available for sale		8,195			7,700
Purchase of investment securities available for sale		(4,260	)		-
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available for sale		(13,520	)		-
Purchase of premises and equipment		(249	)		(91	)
Redemption of FHLB stock		383			470
NET CASH (USED)/PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(4,437	)		9,636

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		10,913			(2,382	)
Proceeds of long-term FHLB borrowings		4,500			-
Repayment of long-term FHLB borrowings		(4,723	)		(6,600	)
Net decrease in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		(417	)		(342	)
Common stock dividends paid		(135	)		(130	)
NET CASH PROVIDED/(USED) BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		10,138			(9,454	)
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		7,412			3,231
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		14,928			7,437
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	22,340		$	10,668
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	1,217		$	1,589
Income taxes	$	-		$	300
Non-cash transactions:
Capitalization of mortgage servicing rights	$	160		$	-
Transfers from loans to foreclosed real estate	$	1,848		$	843

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited) include the accounts of TF Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: 3rd Fed Bank (the “Bank”), Penns Trail Development Corporation, and TF Investments Corporation, which was merged into the Company during 2011. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet but does not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The Company’s business is conducted principally through the Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

NOTE 2—BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all of the disclosures or footnotes required by US GAAP. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

NOTE 3—CONTINGENCIES

The Company, from time to time, is a party to routine litigation that arises in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of this litigation, if any, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

NOTE 4—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following tables illustrate the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):

	For the three months ended March 31, 2012
			Weighted
			average
	Income		shares		Per share
	(numerator)		(denominator)		Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	1,155		2,718,839	$	0.42
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants		-		3,566		-

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	1,155		2,722,405	$	0.42

There were 61,526 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price range of $24.12 to $32.51 per share which were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2012 that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

	For the three months ended March 31, 2011
			Weighted
			average
	Income		shares		Per share
	(numerator)		(denominator)		Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	618		2,695,700	$	0.23
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants		-		209		-

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	618		2,695,909	$	0.23

There were 71,010 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price range of $24.12 to $32.51 per share which were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2011 that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Table of Contents

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of the Company’s investment securities are summarized as follows:

	At March 31, 2012
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized			Fair
	cost		gains		losses			value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	2,998	$	14	$	-		$	3,012
State and political subdivisions		55,487		3,895		(112	)		59,270
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		55,037		1,464		(48	)		56,453
Residential mortgage-backed securities privately issued		4,881		217		(3	)		5,095
Total investment securities available for sale		118,403		5,590		(163	)		123,830

Held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		2,440		340		-			2,780
Total investment securities	$	120,843	$	5,930	$	(163	)	$	126,610

	At December 31, 2011
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized			Fair
	cost		gains		losses			value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	2,995	$	35	$	-		$	3,030
State and political subdivisions		51,287		3,804		-			55,091
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		45,969		1,525		-			47,494
Residential mortgage-backed securities privately issued		8,723		195		(30	)		8,888
Total investment securities available for sale		108,974		5,559		(30	)		114,503

Held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		2,588		340		-			2,928
Total investment securities	$	111,562	$	5,899	$	(30	)	$	117,431

There was no sale of investment securities during the three months ended March 31, 2012 or 2011.

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities, by contractual maturity, are shown below.

	At March 31, 2012
	Available for sale				Held to maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	cost		value		cost		value
	(in thousands)
Investment securities
Due in one year or less	$	887	$	898	$	-	$	-
Due after one year through five years		8,922		9,379		-		-
Due after five years through ten years		27,431		29,065		-		-
Due after ten years		21,245		22,940		-		-
		58,485		62,282		-		-

Mortgage-backed securities		59,918		61,548		2,440		2,780
Total investment and mortgage-backed securities	$	118,403	$	123,830	$	2,440	$	2,780

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012:

			Less than					12 months
	Number		12 months					or longer				Total
	of		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Securities		Value		Loss			Value		Loss		Value		Loss
	(in thousands)
State and political subdivisions		4	$	4,147	$	(112	)	$	-	$	-	$	4,147	$	(112	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		4		10,619		(48	)		-		-		10,619		(48	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities privately issued		1		113		(3	)		-		-		113		(3	)
Total temporarily impaired securities		9	$	14,879	$	(163	)	$	-	$	-	$	14,879	$	(163	)

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2011:

			Less than					12 months
	Number		12 months					or longer				Total
	of		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Securities		Value		Loss			Value		Loss		Value		Loss
	(in thousands)
Residential mortgage-backed securities privately issued		2		3,442		(30	)		-		-		3,442		(30	)
Total temporarily impaired securities		2	$	3,442	$	(30	)	$	-	$	-	$	3,442	$	(30	)

On a quarterly basis, temporarily impaired securities are evaluated to determine whether such impairment is an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). The Company has performed this evaluation and has determined that the unrealized losses at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, are not considered other-than-temporary but are the result of changes in interest rates, and are therefore reflected in other comprehensive income.

Table of Contents

NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE

Loans receivable are summarized as follows:

	At
	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Held for investment:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	273,250		$	277,824

Commercial
Real estate-commercial		109,155			110,743
Real estate-residential		26,398			25,801
Real estate-multi-family		19,824			19,906
Construction loans		16,154			16,336
Commercial and industrial loans		4,685			4,414
Total commercial loans		176,216			177,200

Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		44,983			44,165
Other consumer		2,071			1,971
Total consumer loans		47,054			46,136

Total loans		496,520			501,160
Net deferred loan origination costs and unamortized premiums		953			1,065
Less allowance for loan losses		(6,981	)		(8,100	)
Total loans receivable	$	490,492		$	494,125

Held for sale:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	884		$	488

Table of Contents

The following table presents the composition of the commercial loan portfolio by credit quality indicators:

Commercial credit exposure-credit risk profile by internally assigned grade

	At March 31, 2012
			Special
	Pass		mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(in thousands)
Real estate-commercial	$	94,442	$	5,081	$	9,632	$	-	$	109,155
Real estate-residential		21,253		162		4,983		-		26,398
Real estate-multi-family		12,691		3,748		3,385		-		19,824
Construction loans		4,578		4,660		6,916		-		16,154
Commercial and industrial loans		4,424		92		169		-		4,685
Total	$	137,388	$	13,743	$	25,085	$	-	$	176,216


	At December 31, 2011
			Special
	Pass		mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(in thousands)
Real estate-commercial	$	95,719	$	6,189	$	8,835	$	-	$	110,743
Real estate-residential		21,447		2,891		1,463		-		25,801
Real estate-multi-family		12,753		3,768		3,385		-		19,906
Construction loans		4,452		4,312		7,572				16,336
Commercial and industrial loans		4,140		99		175		-		4,414
Total	$	138,511	$	17,259	$	21,430	$	-	$	177,200

In order to assess and monitor the credit risk associated with commercial loans, the Company employs a risk rating methodology whereby each commercial loan is initially assigned a risk grade. At least annually, all risk ratings are reviewed in light of information received such as tax returns, rent rolls, cash flow statements, appraisals, and any other information which may affect the then current risk rating, which is adjusted upward or downward as needed. At the end of each quarter the risk ratings are summarized and become a component of the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses. The Company’s risk rating definitions mirror those promulgated by banking regulators and are as follows:

Pass: Good quality loan characterized by satisfactory liquidity; reasonable debt capacity and coverage; acceptable management in all critical positions and normal operating results for its peer group. The Company has grades 1 through 6 within the Pass category which reflect the increasing amount of attention paid to the individual loan because of, among other things, trends in debt service coverage, management weaknesses, or collateral values.

Special mention: A loan that has potential weaknesses that deserves management’s close attention. Although the loan is currently protected, if left uncorrected, potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the loan’s repayment prospects or in the borrower’s future credit position. Potential weaknesses include: weakening financial condition; an unrealistic repayment program; inadequate sources of funds; lack of adequate collateral; credit information; or documentation. There is currently the capacity to meet interest and principal payments, but further adverse business, financial, or economic conditions may impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and repay principal.

Substandard: A loan that is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged. Although no loss of principal or interest is presently apparent, there is the distinct possibility that a partial loss of interest and/or principal will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected. There is a current identifiable vulnerability to default and the dependence upon favorable business, financial, or economic conditions to meet timely payment of interest and repayment of principal.

Table of Contents

Doubtful: A loan which has all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard asset with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors which may work to strengthen the asset, classification as an estimated loss is deferred until a more exact status is determined. Pending factors include: proposed merger, acquisition, liquidation, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans.

Loss: Loans which are considered uncollectible and have been charged off. The Company has charged-off all loans classified as loss.

Loans classified as special mention, substandard or doubtful are evaluated for potential impairment. All impaired loans are placed on non-accrual status and are classified as substandard or doubtful.

The following table presents the composition of the residential mortgage and consumer loan portfolios by credit quality indicators:

Mortgage and consumer credit exposure-credit risk profile by payment activity

	At March 31, 2012
	Performing		Non-performing		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential mortgages	$	269,210	$	4,040	$	273,250
Home equity and second mortgage		44,573		410		44,983
Other consumer		2,062		9		2,071
Total	$	315,845	$	4,459	$	320,304


	At December 31, 2011
	Performing		Non-performing		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential mortgages	$	272,322	$	5,502	$	277,824
Home equity and second mortgage		43,888		277		44,165
Other consumer		1,970		1		1,971
Total	$	318,180	$	5,780	$	323,960

In order to assess and monitor the credit risk associated with residential mortgage loans and consumer loans which include second mortgage loans and home equity secured lines of credit, the Company relies upon the payment status of the loan. Residential mortgage and other consumer loans 90 days or more past due are placed on non-accrual status and evaluated for impairment on a pooled basis with the exception of loans with balances in excess of $1 million and loans identified as Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”). An individual impairment analysis is performed using a recent appraisal or current sales contract for TDRs as well as non-performing mortgage and consumer loans with balances in excess of $1 million.

Table of Contents

The following table presents non-performing loans including impaired loans and loan balances 90 days or more past due for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued by class:

	At
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	4,040	$	5,502
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		2,039		2,711
Real estate-residential		838		-
Construction loans		6,580		4,044
Commercial and industrial loans		6		6
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		377		277
Other consumer		9		1
Total non-performing loans	$	13,889	$	12,541
Total loans past due 90 days as to interest or principal and accruing interest	$	-	$	-

Table of Contents

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by class:

	At March 31, 2012
	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
	(in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	2,140	$	2,442	$	143	$	1,696	$	-
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		874		1,497		254		1,186		-
Construction loans		3,208		3,816		443		3,512		-
Commercial and industrial loans		6		6		3		6		-
		6,228		7,761		843		6,400		-
With no allowance recorded:
Residential
Residential mortgages		-		-		-		1,361		-
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		1,165		1,165		-		1,189		-
Real estate-residential		838		838		-		419
Construction loans		3,372		3,372		-		1,799		-
		5,375		5,375		-		4,768		-
Total	$	11,603	$	13,136	$	843	$	11,168	$	-

	At December 31, 2011
	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
	(in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,252	$	1,252	$	388	$	751	$	-
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		1,497		1,497		877		3,581		-
Real estate-residential		-		-		-		497
Construction loans		3,816		3,816		1,035		4,143		-
Commercial and industrial loans		6		6		3		72		-
		6,571		6,571		2,303		9,044		-
With no allowance recorded:
Residential
Residential mortgages		2,381		2,381		-		1,497		-
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		1,214		1,214		-		1,270		-
Real estate-residential		-		-		-		459
Construction loans		228		228		-		1,642		-
Commercial and industrial loans		-		-		-		-		-
		3,823		3,823		-		4,868		-
Total	$	10,394	$	10,394	$	2,303	$	13,912	$	-

Table of Contents

The following tables present the contractual aging of delinquent loans by class:

	At March 31, 2012
	Current		30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		Loans past due 90 days or more		Total past due		Total loans		Recorded investment over 90 days and accruing interest
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	271,140	$	78	$	-	$	2,032	$	2,110	$	273,250	$	-
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		106,928		488		-		1,739		2,227		109,155		-
Real estate-residential		25,560		-		-		838		838		26,398		-
Real estate-multi-family		19,824		-		-		-		-		19,824		-
Construction loans		9,574		-		-		6,580		6,580		16,154		-
Commercial and industrial loans		4,679		-				6		6		4,685		-
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		44,448		158				377		535		44,983
Other consumer		2,044		18		-		9		27		2,071		-
Total	$	484,197	$	742	$	-	$	11,581	$	12,323	$	496,520	$	-


	At December 31, 2011
	Current		30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		Loans past due 90 days or more		Total past due		Total loans		Recorded investment over 90 days and accruing interest
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	273,231	$	98	$	153	$	4,342	$	4,593	$	277,824	$	-
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		108,382		-		-		2,361		2,361		110,743		-
Real estate-residential		25,489		312		-		-		312		25,801		-
Real estate-multi-family		19,906		-		-		-		-		19,906		-
Construction loans		9,151		-		3,141		4,044		7,185		16,336		-
Commercial and industrial loans		4,408		-		-		6		6		4,414		-
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		43,712		165		11		277		453		44,165		-
Other consumer		1,956		6		8		1		15		1,971		-
Total	$	486,235	$	581	$	3,313	$	11,031	$	14,925	$	501,160	$	-

Table of Contents

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is summarized as follows:

	Balance January 1, 2012		Provision			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Balance March 31, 2012
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	2,194	$	151		$	(399	)	$	7	$	1,953
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		2,819		(362	)		(623	)		-		1,834
Real estate-residential		464		190			-			-		654
Real estate-multi-family		358		(8	)		-			-		350
Construction loans		1,260		519			(608	)		-		1,171
Commercial and industrial loans		138		(97	)		-			5		46
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		448		(139	)		-			-		309
Other consumer		22		(13	)		(2	)		1		8
Unallocated		397		259			-			-		656
Total	$	8,100	$	500		$	(1,632	)	$	13	$	6,981

	Balance January 1, 2011		Provision			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Balance March 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,839	$	268		$	(57	)	$	-	$	2,050
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		3,281		429			-			-		3,710
Real estate-residential		534		(55	)		-			-		479
Real estate-multi-family		399		(49	)		-			-		350
Construction loans		1,363		252			-			-		1,615
Commercial and industrial loans		77		67			(44	)		3		103
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		607		189			(221	)		4		579
Other consumer		16		11			(7	)		-		20
Unallocated		212		(212	)		-			-		-
Total	$	8,328	$	900		$	(329	)	$	7	$	8,906

Despite the above allocation, the allowance for credit losses is general in nature and is available to absorb losses from any portfolio segment.

Loans receivable includes certain loans that have been modified as TDRs, where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. The objective for granting the concessions is to maximize the recovery of the investment in the loan and may include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of interest or principal, forbearance or other actions. TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructuring and typically return to performing status after considering the borrower’s repayment performance for a reasonable period of time, usually six months.

Table of Contents

Loans modified in a TDR are evaluated individually for impairment based on the present value of expected cash flows or the fair value of the underlying collateral less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized through an increase to the allowance for loan losses. In periods subsequent to modification, TDRs are evaluated for possible additional impairment.

The following table presents loans classified as TDRs segregated by class for the period indicated:

	For the three months ended March 31, 2012
	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgage		1	$	852	$	825
Total		1	$	852	$	825

For the Bank, restructuring of loans is usually either an extension of the maturity date or a temporary reduction or moratorium on the payment terms. No modifications involved any reduction in principal balance.

During the first quarter of 2012, a TDR totaling $167,000 that had been previously identified as in default of its modified terms was repaid and a $40,000 loss was charged to the allowance for loan losses.

Table of Contents

The following tables present the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and ending loan balance by portfolio by class based on impairment method as of March 31, 2012:

	Evaluated for impairment
Allowance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	143	$	1,810	$	1,953
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		254		1,580		1,834
Real estate-residential		-		654		654
Real estate-multi-family		-		350		350
Construction loans		443		728		1,171
Commercial and industrial loans		3		43		46
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		-		309		309
Other consumer		-		8		8
Unallocated		-		656		656
Total	$	843	$	6,138	$	6,981


	Evaluated for impairment
Loan balance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	2,140	$	271,110	$	273,250
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		2,039		107,116		109,155
Real estate-residential		838		25,560		26,398
Real estate-multi-family		-		19,824		19,824
Construction loans		6,580		9,574		16,154
Commercial and industrial loans		6		4,679		4,685
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		-		44,983		44,983
Other consumer		-		2,071		2,071
Total	$	11,603	$	484,917	$	496,520

Table of Contents

The following tables present the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and ending loan balance by portfolio by class based on impairment method as of December 31, 2011:

	Evaluated for impairment
Allowance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	388	$	1,806	$	2,194
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		877		1,475		2,352
Real estate-residential		-		369		369
Real estate-multi-family		-		350		350
Construction loans		1,035		795		1,830
Commercial and industrial loans		3		135		138
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		-		448		448
Other consumer		-		22		22
Unallocated		-		397		397
Total	$	2,303	$	5,797	$	8,100


	Evaluated for impairment
Loan balance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	3,633	$	274,191	$	277,824
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		2,711		108,032		110,743
Real estate-residential		-		25,801		25,801
Real estate-multi-family		-		19,906		19,906
Construction loans		4,044		12,292		16,336
Commercial and industrial loans		6		4,408		4,414
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		-		44,165		44,165
Other consumer		-		1,971		1,971
Total	$	10,394	$	490,766	$	501,160

Table of Contents

NOTE 7—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following tables present information about the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement hierarchy has been established for inputs in valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Determination of the appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for the instrument or security.

The fair value hierarchy levels are summarized below:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 inputs are inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable and contain assumptions of the party assessing the fair value of the asset or liability.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level are summarized below:

							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						March 31,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2012
	(in thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	-	$	3,012	$	-	$	3,012
State and political subdivisions		-		59,270		-		59,270
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		-		56,453		-		56,453
Residential real estate mortgage - backed securities privately issued		-		5,095		-		5,095
Total investment securities available for sale	$	-	$	123,830	$	-	$	123,830


							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						December 31,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2011
	(in thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	-	$	3,030	$	-	$	3,030
State and political subdivisions		-		55,091		-		55,091
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		-		47,494		-		47,494
Residential real estate mortgage - backed securities privately issued		-		8,888		-		8,888
Total investment securities available for sale	$	-	$	114,503	$	-	$	114,503

Table of Contents

Investment securities available for sale and mortgage-backed securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing agent. U.S. Government and federal agency and corporate debt securities are primarily priced through a multi-dimensional relational model, a Level 2 hierarchy, which incorporates dealer quotes and other market information including, defined sector breakdown, benchmark yields, base spread, yield to maturity, and corporate actions. State and political subdivision securities are also valued within the Level 2 hierarchy using inputs with a series of matrices that reflect benchmark yields, ratings updates, and spread adjustments. Mortgage-backed securities include FHLMC, GNMA, and FNMA certificates and privately issued real estate mortgage investment conduits which are valued under a Level 2 hierarchy using a matrix correlation to benchmark yields, spread analysis, and prepayment speeds.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level at March 31, 2012 are summarized below:

							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						March 31,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2012
	(in thousands)
Assets
Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	10,760	$	10,760
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		-		-		10,247		10,247
Mortgage servicing rights		-		870		-		870

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Bank has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value at March 31, 2012:

		Fair value		Valuation	Unobservable	Range of
Description		estimate		technique	Input	inputs
	(in thousands)

Impaired loans		$	10,760	Appraisal of collateral	Discount rate to reflect current market conditions and ultimate recoverability		5%-15	%
Real estate acquired through foreclosure			10,247	Appraisal of collateral	Discount rate to reflect current market conditions and liquidation expenses		5%-20	%

The fair value of impaired loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses are presented as a percent of the appraised value.

Table of Contents

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level at December 31, 2011 are summarized below:

							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						December 31,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2011
	(in thousands)
Assets
Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	8,091	$	8,091
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		-		-		11,731		11,731
Mortgage servicing rights		-		763		-		763

Impaired loans are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired, at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or fair value. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially valued at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or fair value at foreclosure less costs to sell and subsequently adjusted for further decreases in market value, if necessary. Fair value is determined by using the value of the collateral securing the loans and is therefore classified as a Level 3 hierarchy. The value of the real estate securing impaired loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure is based on appraisals prepared by qualified independent licensed appraisers contracted by the Company to perform the assessment.

The Company initially recognizes and measures servicing assets based on the fair value of the servicing right at the time the loan is sold. The Company uses the amortized cost method for subsequent measurement of its servicing assets and evaluates the recorded value for impairment quarterly. The Company retains a qualified valuation service to calculate the amortized cost and to determine the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. The valuation service utilizes discounted cash flow analyses adjusted for prepayment speeds, market discount rates and conditions existing in the secondary servicing market. Hence, the fair value of mortgage servicing rights is deemed a Level 2 hierarchy. The amortized cost basis of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights was $1.1 million and $1.0 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The fair value of the mortgage servicing rights was $870,000 and $763,000 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and was included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

In addition to financial instruments recorded at fair value in the Company’s financial statements, disclosure of the estimated fair value of all of an entity’s assets and liabilities considered to be financial instruments is also required. For the Bank, as for most financial institutions, the majority of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. However, many such instruments lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intent to hold its financial instruments to maturity or available for sale and to not engage in trading or significant sales activities. For fair value disclosure purposes, the Company substantially utilized the established fair value measurement hierarchy.

Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. In addition, there may not be reasonable comparability between institutions due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.

Table of Contents

Fair values have been estimated using data which management considered the best available, as generally provided by estimation methodologies deemed suitable for the pertinent category of financial instrument. The recorded carrying amounts and fair values segregated by fair value hierarchy level at March 31, 2012 are summarized below:

	Carrying		Fair		Fair value hierarchy levels
	value		value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,340	$	22,340	$	22,340	$	-	$	-
Investment securities		62,282		62,282		-		62,282		-
Mortgage-backed securities		63,988		64,328		-		64,328		-
Loans receivable, net		491,376		516,157		-		-		516,157

Liabilities
Deposits with stated maturities	$	180,962	$	183,013	$	-	$	-	$	183,013
Borrowings with stated maturities		46,685		47,680		-		47,680		-
Deposits with no stated maturities		381,239		381,239		381,239		-		-

The recorded carrying amounts and fair values at December 31, 2011 are summarized below:

	At December 31, 2011
	Carrying value		Fair value
	(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,928	$	14,928
Investment securities		58,121		58,121
Mortgage-backed securities		58,970		59,310
Loans receivable, net		494,613		516,359

Liabilities
Deposits with stated maturities	$	181,074	$	183,306
Borrowings with stated maturities		46,908		48,092
Deposits with no stated maturities		370,214		370,214

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents equals historical book value. The fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities is described and presented under fair value measurement guidelines as discussed earlier.

The fair value of loans receivable, net has been estimated using the present value of cash flows, discounted at the approximate current market rates, and giving consideration to estimated prepayment risk but not adjusted for credit risk. Loans receivable, net also includes loans receivable held for sale.

The fair value of deposits and borrowings with stated maturities has been estimated using the present value of cash flows, discounted at rates approximating current market rates for similar liabilities. Fair value of deposits and borrowings with floating interest rates is generally presumed to approximate the recorded carrying amounts.

The fair value of deposits and borrowings with no stated maturities is generally presumed to approximate the carrying amount (the amount payable on demand). Fair value deposits and borrowings with floating interest rates are generally presumed to approximate the recorded carrying amounts.

Table of Contents

The Bank’s remaining assets and liabilities are not considered financial instruments. No disclosure of the relationship value of the Bank’s depositors or customers is required.

NOTE 8—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has stock benefit plans that allow the Company to grant options and restricted stock to employees and directors. The awards, which have a term of up to 10 years when issued, vest over a three to five year period. The exercise price of each award equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. At March 31, 2012, there was $42,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested awards under the Company’s stock option plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 12.7 months. Option activity under the Company’s stock option plan as of March 31, 2012 was as follows:

	At March 31, 2012
	Number of shares			Weighted average exercise price per share		Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)		Aggregate intrinsic value ($000)
Outstanding at January 1, 2012		109,765		$	24.41
Options granted		-			-
Options exercised		-			-
Options forfeited		-			-
Options expired		(257	)		28.25
Outstanding at March 31, 2012		109,508		$	24.40		2.36	$	270
Options exercisable at March 31, 2012		92,071		$	25.30		2.13	$	191

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the first quarter and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options).

No options were exercised during the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

In July 2011, the Company issued stock of the Company as payment for director fees as permitted by the 2011 Director Stock Compensation Plan, the cost associated with these grants is included it as a component of stock-based compensation.

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation expense:

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense
Director fees	$	37	$	-
Stock grant expense		-		3
Stock option expense		7		8
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense		69		59
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	113	$	70

The Bank reports ESOP expense in an amount equal to the fair value of shares released from the ESOP to employees less dividends received on the allocated shares in the plan used for debt service. Dividends on allocated shares used to reduce ESOP expense totaled $8,000 and $9,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options resulted in a tax benefit of $2,000 and $3,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Table of Contents

NOTE 9—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Net periodic defined benefit pension cost included the following:

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	184		$	141
Interest cost		90			82
Expected return on plan assets		(162	)		(154	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		72			29

Net periodic benefit cost	$	184		$	98

There was no employer contribution for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The Company may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements”, including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits thereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company’s plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions that are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control). The following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Company and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors’ products and services; the willingness of users to substitute competitors’ products and services for the Company’s products and services; the success of the Company in gaining regulatory approval of its products and services, when required; the impact of changes in financial services’ laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes, acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Company at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

Financial Condition

The Company’s total assets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $693.4 million and $681.9 million, respectively, representing an increase of $11.5 million during the three-month period. Investment securities increased by $9.2 million due to security purchases of $17.8 million that were offset by principal repayments received of $8.3 million and net premium amortization of $154,000. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $7.4 million during the first three months of 2012 largely as a result of an increase in customer deposits discussed below. Loans receivable, net decreased by $3.6 million during the first three months of 2012. Principal repayments of $20.4 million were offset by originations of consumer and single-family residential mortgage loans totaling $16.4 million and commercial loans totaling $2.8 million. The Company increased the allowance for loan losses by $500,000 and transferred $1.9 million from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure. Loans receivable held for sale increased $396,000 primarily because originations of loans for sale in the secondary market of $15.9 million exceeded proceeds of $15.7 million from loan sales. The decrease in other assets was mainly the net effect of the sale of foreclosed real estate totaling $3.2 million and a foreclosure action which resulted in the acquisition of a property totaling $1.8 million. At March 31, 2012, real estate acquired through foreclosure totaled $10.2 million and included one parcel of unimproved raw land, two commercial properties and 36 residential properties.

Total liabilities increased by $10.4 million during the first three months of 2012. Deposit balances increased $10.9 million during the period with checking and savings accounts increasing by $11.6 million while money market accounts decreased $593,000. Retail certificates of deposit remained relatively unchanged. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased by $223,000, the result of scheduled amortization and maturities of $4.7 million offset by the proceeds of long term advances of $4.5 million.

Total consolidated stockholders’ equity of the Company was $78.5 million or 11.3% of total assets at March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2012, there were approximately 102,000 shares available for repurchase under the previously announced share repurchase plan.

Table of Contents

Asset Quality

Non-performing assets include real estate owned which is carried at estimated fair value less costs to sell and non-performing loans. Non-performing loans include loan balances 90 days past due and impaired loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued. The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s non-performing assets:

	At
Non-Performing Assets	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans receivable, net:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	4,040		$	5,502		$	4,951
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		2,039			2,711			5,949
Real estate-residential		838			-			2,389
Real estate-multi-family		-			-			7,145
Construction loans		6,580			4,044			-
Commercial and industrial loans		6			6			-
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		377			277			630
Other consumer		9			1			-
Total non-performing loans		13,889			12,541			21,064
Real estate owned		10,247			11,730			8,002
Total non-performing assets	$	24,136		$	24,271		$	29,066
Total loans 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal and accruing interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Ratio of non-performing loans to gross loans		2.79	%		2.49	%		4.15	%
Ratio of non-performing loans to total assets		2.00	%		1.84	%		3.08	%
Ratio of total non-performing assets to total assets		3.48	%		3.56	%		4.25	%

Non-performing residential mortgages include a loan with an unpaid principal balance of $1.3 million for which the Bank has recorded a partial charge-off of $302,000. The partial charge-off represents a collateral deficiency based on fair value of the property with respect to the outstanding balance. In addition, $96,000 of the allowance for loan losses has been allocated to this loan for potential selling costs related to the property.

Non-performing residential mortgages also includes a loan with an unpaid principal balance of $852,000 which the Bank has reported as a troubled debt restructuring. The terms of the loan have been modified to temporarily reduce the interest rate on the loan and as a result $25,000 of the allowance for loan losses has been allocated to this loan for the shortfall created by the modified interest rate.

Non-performing commercial real estate loans include a loan with an unpaid principal balance of $1.5 million secured by two contiguous parcels of commercial real estate and a lien on the guarantor’s personal residence. The Bank has recorded a partial charge-off of $623,000 of the allowance for loan losses, equal to the difference between the loan balance and the fair value based upon a recent appraisal. In addition, $254,000 of the allowance for loan losses has been allocated to this loan for potential costs related to selling the property. The Bank has initiated foreclosure proceedings and the borrower has filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Non-performing construction loans include a loan with an unpaid principal balance of $1.8 million secured by five contiguous lots approved for construction of commercial and residential buildings. The Bank recorded a partial charge-off of $425,000 of the allowance for loan losses equal to the difference between the loan balance and a recent appraisal. In addition, $203,000 of the allowance for loan losses has been allocated to this loan for potential selling costs related to the property. The borrower is attempting to sell the properties and apply the proceeds toward the outstanding loan balance.

Table of Contents

Non-performing construction loans also include two loans, with a combined balance of $2.0 million secured by a parcel of land. The Bank has recorded a partial charge-off of $183,000 of the allowance for loan losses equal to the difference between the recorded investment and a recent appraisal. The borrower is attempting to sell the property and intends to apply the sale proceeds to the outstanding loan balance. In addition, $240,000 of the allowance for loan losses has been allocated to this loan for potential costs related to selling the property.

At March 31, 2012, non-performing loans included a participation in a commercial construction project with a principal balance due to the Bank of $3.1 million and 6 commercial loans secured by residential property totaling $838,000. The loans were placed on non-accrual status and based on the most recent appraisals obtained by the Bank, management anticipates that the fair value of the underlying collateral is in excess of the outstanding loan balance. New appraisals have been ordered for the real estate securing the loans. With respect to each of the remaining non-performing loans, the Bank is taking appropriate steps to resolve the individual situations.

Foreclosed property at March 31, 2012 consisted of 39 parcels of real estate with a combined carrying value of $10.2 million. During 2012, the Bank sold three properties acquired through foreclosure with a recorded value of $3.2 million which approximated the carrying value of the assets and the Bank foreclosed on a mortgage secured by a single family dwelling valued at $2.0 million which resulted in a charge to the allowance of $40,000. All foreclosed properties are listed or are in the process of being listed with real estate agents for sale in a timely manner. Foreclosed real estate is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Bank provides valuation allowances for estimated losses from uncollectible loans. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and reduced by net charge-offs. On a quarterly basis, the Company prepares an allowance for loan losses (ALLL) analysis. In the analysis, the loan portfolio is segmented into groups of homogeneous loans that share similar risk characteristics: commercial loans secured by non-residential or non-owner occupied residential real estate, construction, commercial and industrial loans, single family residential, and consumer which is predominately real estate secured junior liens and home equity lines of credit. Each segment is assigned reserve factors based on quantitative and qualitative measurements. In addition, the Bank reviews its internally classified loans, its loans classified for regulatory purposes, delinquent loans, and other relevant information in order to isolate loans for further scrutiny as potentially impaired loans.

Quantitative factors include an actual expected loss factor based on historical loss experience over a relevant look-back period. Quantitative factors also include the Bank’s actual risk ratings for the commercial loan segments as determined in accordance with loan review and loan grading policies and procedures, and additional factors as determined by management to be representative of additional risk due to the loan’s geographic location, type, and other attributes. These quantitative factors are adjusted if necessary, up or down, based on actual experience and an evaluation of the qualitative factors.

Qualitative factors are based upon: (1) changes in lending policies and procedures, including but not limited to changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses; (2) changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments; (3) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans; (4) changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; (5) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans; (6) changes in the quality of the loan review system; (7) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (8) the existence and effect of any concentration of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; and (9) the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the existing loan portfolio.

Potentially impaired loans selected for individual evaluation are reviewed in accordance with US GAAP which governs the accounting for impaired assets, as well as regulatory guidance regarding treatment of troubled, collateral dependent loans. Each potentially impaired loan is evaluated using all available information such as recent appraisals, whether the loan is currently on accrual or non-accrual status, discounted cash flow analyses, guarantor financial strength, the value of additional collateral, and the loan’s and borrower’s past performance to determine whether in management’s best judgment it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal in accordance with the loan’s terms. Loans deemed not to be impaired are assigned a reserve factor based upon the group from which they were selected.

Table of Contents

Loans deemed impaired are evaluated to determine the estimated fair value of the collateral, and a portion of the ALLL will be allocated to the deficiency. Troubled collateral dependant real estate secured loans are valued using the appraisal value of the collateral, and a portion of the ALLL will be allocated to these loans based on the difference between the loan amount and the appraisal value. If such amounts, judged by management to be permanent, it will be charged-off. In addition, if foreclosure is probable, a portion of the ALLL will be allocated to the estimated additional costs to acquire and the estimated costs to sell. Upon completion of the foreclosure process, these amounts will be charged-off.

The ALLL needed as a result of the foregoing evaluations is compared with the unadjusted amount, and an adjustment is made by means of a provision to the allowance for loan losses. Recognizing the inherently imprecise nature of the loss estimates and the large number of assumptions needed in order to perform the analysis, the required reserve may be less than the actual level of reserves at the end of any evaluation period, and thus there may be an unallocated portion of the ALLL. Management adjusts the unallocated portion to an amount which management considers reasonable under the circumstances.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

Net Income. The Company recorded net income of $1.2 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to net income of $618,000, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Average Balance Sheet

The following table sets forth information (dollars in thousands) relating to the Company’s average balance sheet and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the periods indicated. Yields and costs are computed by dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the three-month periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012								2011
	Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost			Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable(1)	$	493,396	$	6,197			5.05	%	$	501,543	$	6,584			5.32	%
Mortgage-backed securities		61,971		539			3.50	%		66,401		695			4.24	%
Investment securities(2)		67,035		712			4.27	%		67,035		719			4.35	%
Other interest-earning assets(3)		13,619		2			0.06	%		3,237		-	*		-	%
Total interest-earning assets		636,021		7,450			4.71	%		638,216		7,998			5.08	%
Non interest-earning assets		50,557								48,984
Total assets	$	686,578							$	687,200
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	554,523		1,066			0.77	%	$	546,055		1,460			1.08	%
Borrowings from the FHLB		47,387		405			3.44	%		60,446		559			3.75	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		601,910		1,471			0.98	%		606,501		2,019			1.35	%
Non interest-bearing liabilities		6,523								6,482
Total liabilities		608,433								612,983
Stockholders’ equity		78,145								74,217
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	686,578							$	687,200
Net interest income-tax equivalent basis				5,979								5,979
Interest rate spread(4)-tax equivalent basis							3.73	%							3.73	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)-tax equivalent basis							3.78	%							3.80	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities							105.67	%							105.23	%
Less: tax-equivalent interest adjustments				(187	)							(163	)
Net interest income			$	5,792							$	5,816
Interest rate spread(4)							3.61	%							3.63	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)							3.66	%							3.70	%

(1	)	Non-performing loans have been included in the appropriate average loan balance category, but interest on non-performing loans has not been included for purposes of determining interest income.
(2	)	Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $187,000 and $163,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.
(3	)	Includes interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(4	)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5	)	Net yield on interest-earning assets represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
*		Is less than $500 for period indicated.

Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the change in interest income and interest expense (in thousands) attributed to (i) changes in volume (changes in the weighted average balance of the total interest earning asset and interest bearing liability portfolios multiplied by the prior year rate), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior year volume). Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately based on the absolute value of changes due to volume and changes due to rate.

	For the three months ended March 31
	2012 vs 2011 Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans receivable, net	$	(93	)	$	(294	)	$	(387	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(43	)		(113	)		(156	)
Investment securities (1)		-			(7	)		(7	)
Other interest-earning assets		-			2			2
Total interest-earning assets		(136	)		(412	)		(548	)
Interest expense:
Deposits		154			(548	)		(394	)
Borrowings from the FHLB		(111	)		(43	)		(154	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		43			(591	)		(548	)
Net change in net interest income	$	(179	)	$	179		$	-

)

Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $187,000 and $163,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.

Total Interest Income. Total interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, decreased by $548,000 or 6.9% to $7.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011. Interest income from loans receivable decreased by $387,000, the result of an $8.1 million decrease in the average balance of loans outstanding plus a decrease in the average yield on loans of 27 basis points. The decrease in the yield was caused by the effect of new loans added to the portfolio with a lower yield than the existing portfolio loans that matured or refinanced. Interest income from mortgage-backed securities was lower in 2012 in comparison to the same period of 2011 mainly because the yield associated with repayments was higher than the yield on newly purchased mortgage-backed securities.

Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $548,000 to $1.5 million during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 as compared with the same period in 2011. The average interest rates paid on the Bank’s deposits were 31 basis points lower in 2012 due to the maturity of certificates of deposit with higher interest rates than current market rates offered on the products into which the maturing CDs were renewed or reinvested, and a favorable change in the deposit mix and pricing. Interest expense associated with borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased $154,000 between the first quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2011. During the intervening period, the Bank reduced its average outstanding borrowings by $13.1 million, including the maturity of higher rate advances, thus the cost of funds of the remaining outstanding advances was 31 basis points lower.

Non-interest income. Total non-interest income was $1.2 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $739,000 for the same period in 2011. During the first quarter of 2012, gains on sale of loans increased $207,000 as a result of a higher level of residential loan sales activity in the quarter. The disposition of a branch property to a local municipality resulted in a gain of $264,000 in the first quarter of 2012.

Non-interest expense. Total non-interest expense increased by $91,000 to $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Foreclosed real estate expense increased $226,000 in 2012 mainly due to a valuation adjustment of $250,000 to the book value of real estate acquired through foreclosure less gains from sale of such assets totaling $71,000. Gain

Table of Contents

from the sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure was $11,000 in the first quarter of 2011. Employee compensation increased by $128,000, the combined result of annual salary increases and the increased costs associated with the defined benefit plans which rose $64,000 between the two quarters. In contrast, professional fees decreased $127,000 between the two periods as legal and professional costs were incurred during 2011 in connection with the Company’s reincorporation in Pennsylvania and the cost of distributing a 5% stock dividend in the first quarter of 2011. Occupancy and equipment costs decreased $108,000, which was mainly the result of a substantial reduction of costs associated with facility snow removal during 2012. FDIC insurance premiums decreased by $82,000 between the two quarters due to a change in the method of premium assessment. During the first quarter of 2011, premium assessment was based solely on deposit balances whereas under the new rules, the deposit insurance assessment base is the Bank's average total assets less its average tangible equity.

Income tax expense. The Company’s effective tax rate was 21.6% for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to 10.4% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. These effective tax rates are lower than the Company’s marginal tax rate of 34% largely due to the tax-exempt income associated with the Company’s investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and bank-owned life insurance.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

The Bank’s liquidity is a measure of its ability to fund loans, pay withdrawals of deposits, and other cash outflows in an efficient, cost-effective manner. The Bank’s short-term sources of liquidity include maturities, repayment and sales of assets, excess cash and cash equivalents, new deposits, broker deposits, other borrowings, and new borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank. There has been no material adverse change during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 in the ability of the Bank and its subsidiaries to fund their operations.

At March 31, 2012, the Bank had commitments outstanding under letters of credit of $700,000, commitments to originate loans of $34.1 million, and commitments to fund undisbursed balances of closed loans and unused lines of credit of $49.4 million. At March 31, 2012, the Bank had $8.2 million in outstanding commitments to sell loans. There has been no material change during the three months ended March 31, 2012 in any of the Bank’s other contractual obligations or commitments to make future payments.

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are dividends from the Bank, principal and interest payments received from a loan made to the Bank’s ESOP, and tax benefits arising from the use of the Company’s tax deductions by other members of its consolidated group pursuant to a tax sharing agreement. The Company is dependent upon these sources and cash on hand which totaled approximately $1.5 million at March 31, 2012 in order to fund its operations and pay the dividend to its shareholders. There has been no material adverse change in the ability of the Company to fund its operations during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012.

Capital Requirements

The Bank was in compliance with all of its capital requirements as of March 31, 2012.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Certain critical accounting policies of the Company require the use of significant judgment and accounting estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related data of the Company. These accounting estimates require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made. Management believes that the most critical accounting policy requiring the use of accounting estimates and judgment is the determination of the allowance for loan losses. If the financial position of a significant number of debtors or the value of the collateral securing the loans should deteriorate more than the Company has estimated, the present allowance for loan losses may be insufficient and additional provisions for loan losses may be required. The allowance for loan losses was approximately $7.0 million at March 31, 2012.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide the information required by this item.

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files and submits pursuant to the rules and forms of the SEC is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

During the quarter under report, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

	Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are involved in any pending legal proceedings, other than routine legal matters occurring in the ordinary course of business that in the aggregate involve amounts which are believed by management to be immaterial to the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

	As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

	None.

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

	Not applicable.

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

	None.

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

	(a)	Exhibits
		31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
		31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
		32.	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

		101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
		101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
		101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
		101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
		101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:	May 14, 2012	/s/ Kent C. Lufkin
		Kent C. Lufkin
		President and CEO
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	May 14, 2012	/s/ Dennis R. Stewart
		Dennis R. Stewart
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)