sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 14, 2010
Registration
No. 333-150760
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 3
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING
CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3334
|
|
20-8908550
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
|
|
(Primary Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
801 Crescent Centre Drive, Suite 600
Franklin, TN 37067
(615) 771-5700
(Address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices)
Robert B. Mahoney
Chief Financial Officer
801 Crescent Centre Drive, Suite 600
Franklin, TN 37067
(615) 771-5700
(Name, address including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copy to:
|
|
|
Andrew J. Nussbaum
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
(212) 403-1000
|
|
Valerie Ford Jacob
Daniel J. Bursky
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
One New York Plaza
New York, NY 10004
(212) 859-8000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As promptly as practicable after the
effective date of this registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Registration
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Price(1)(2)
|
|
|
Fee(1)
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
$250,000,000
|
|
|
$9,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o)
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 at a rate equal to
$39.30 per $1,000,000 of the proposed maximum aggregate offering
price. Previously paid.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes shares of common stock
which may be purchased by the underwriters to cover
over-allotments, if any.
|
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this registration
statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject to Completion
Preliminary Prospectus dated
January 14, 2010
PROSPECTUS
Shares
Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation
Common Stock
This is Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations initial
public offering. Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation is selling
all of the shares offered hereby.
We expect the public offering price to be between
$ and
$ per share. Currently, no public
market exists for the shares. We intend to apply to list the
shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
NOR.
Investing in our common stock involves risks that are
described in the Risk Factors section beginning on
page 22 of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Initial public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The underwriters may also purchase up to an
additional shares
from us, at the public offering price, less the underwriting
discount, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus
to cover over-allotments.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The shares will be ready for delivery on or
about ,
2010.
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2010.
New Madrid Aluminum Smelting Facility
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus and any free writing prospectus prepared by us or on
our behalf that we have referred you to. We and the underwriters
have not authorized anyone to provide you with additional or
different information. If anyone provides you with additional,
different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on
it. We are not making an offer of these securities in any state
or other jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. You
should not assume that the information in this prospectus and
any free writing prospectus is accurate as of any date other
than the date of the applicable document regardless of its time
of delivery or the time of any sales of our common stock. Our
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows may have changed since the date of the applicable
document.
Industry
and Market Data
This prospectus includes industry and trade association data,
forecasts and information that we have prepared based, in part,
upon data, forecasts and information obtained from independent
trade associations, industry publications and surveys and other
information available to us. Some data is also based on our good
faith estimates, which are derived from managements
knowledge of the industry and independent sources. Industry
publications and surveys and forecasts generally state that the
information contained therein has been obtained from sources
believed to be reliable. Although we believe these sources are
reliable, we have not independently verified the information.
Statements as to our market position are based on market data
currently available to us. While we are not aware of any
misstatements regarding our industry data presented herein, our
estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to
change based on various factors, including those discussed under
the heading Risk Factors in this prospectus.
Similarly, we believe our internal research is reliable, even
though such research has not been verified by any independent
sources.
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights certain information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus. Please read the entire prospectus,
including the consolidated financial statements and the related
notes and the section entitled Risk Factors, before
you decide to invest. In addition, this prospectus includes
forward-looking information that involves risks and
uncertainties. See Cautionary Statement Concerning
Forward-Looking Statements.
Except as otherwise indicated herein or as the context
otherwise requires, references in this prospectus to
(a) Noranda HoldCo refer only to Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation, excluding its subsidiaries,
(b) Noranda AcquisitionCo refer only to Noranda
Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of Noranda HoldCo, excluding its subsidiaries, and
(c) Noranda, the company,
we, our, and us refer
collectively to (1) Noranda Aluminum, Inc. and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis prior to the consummation
on May 18, 2007 of the acquisition (as described below) by
Apollo (as defined below), which we refer to as the Apollo
Acquisition, and (2) Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis
(including Noranda Aluminum, Inc.) after the completion of the
Apollo Acquisition.
The
Company
Overview
We are a leading North American integrated producer of
value-added primary aluminum products and high quality rolled
aluminum coils. We have two businesses: our primary metals, or
upstream business, and our rolled products, or downstream
business. Our upstream business consists of our aluminum smelter
near New Madrid, Missouri, which we refer to as New
Madrid, and supporting operations at our vertically
integrated bauxite mine and alumina refinery. New Madrid has
annual production capacity of approximately 580 million
pounds (263,000 metric tonnes), which represents more than 15%
of total U.S. primary aluminum production as estimated by
CRU, an independent consultancy group focused in part on the
mining and metals sectors. Our downstream business is one of the
largest aluminum foil producers in North America and consists of
four rolling mill facilities with a combined maximum annual
production capacity of 410 to 495 million pounds, depending
on our production mix.
Upstream
Overview
Our upstream business is one of the largest U.S. producers
of primary aluminum. We believe our combination of captive
alumina and bauxite, secure electric power and strategically
located assets gives us meaningful operating flexibility. Our
bauxite mining operation in Jamaica, which we refer to as
St. Ann, provides a secure source of bauxite to our
wholly owned alumina refinery in Gramercy, Louisiana, which we
refer to as Gramercy. Our alumina refinery provides
a strategic supply of alumina to our New Madrid smelter at costs
below recent spot market prices for alumina. Because our captive
alumina and bauxite production capacity exceeds our internal
requirements, we also sell these raw materials to third parties.
The margin from these sales effectively lowers the cost of our
alumina supply. In addition, we have a long-term, secure power
contract at New Madrid that extends through 2020. This contract
gives Noranda an advantage over aluminum smelters facing
frequent power shortages or disruptions. In addition, our power
costs are not linked to LME aluminum prices, unlike the power
costs of some of our competitors, particularly in North America.
Primary aluminum is a global commodity and its price is set on
the LME. Due to a long-term domestic supply deficit in the
U.S. and transportation costs, our primary aluminum
products typically earn a Midwest premium on top of the LME
price, the sum of which is known as the Midwest
Transaction Price or MWTP. In addition, we
typically sell a majority of our primary aluminum shipments in
the form of value-added products, such as billet, rod and
foundry, which include a fabrication premium over the MWTP. We
also have the flexibility to direct primary aluminum volumes to
our downstream rolling mills, on an arms-length basis,
when demand is weak for our value-added end-products. This helps
to ensure a steady demand for all of our upstream production.
1
The upstream business is vertically integrated with operations
in bauxite mining, alumina refining and aluminum smelting.
Downstream
Overview
Our downstream business is a low-cost domestic producer of
aluminum rolled products. We own and operate four rolling mills,
including the West plant in Huntingdon, Tennessee, which is
recognized by CRU, an independent consultancy group focused in
part on the mining and metals sectors, as one of the most
advanced rolled aluminum production facilities in North America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Capacity
|
|
|
Plant
|
|
Location
|
|
(in Pounds)
|
|
Products
|
|
Huntingdon West
|
|
Huntingdon, TN
|
|
|
235 million
|
|
|
Finstock, container stock, intercompany reroll and miscellaneous
heavy gauge products
|
Huntingdon East
|
|
Huntingdon, TN
|
|
|
130 million
|
|
|
Finstock, transformer windings, household foil and miscellaneous
heavy gauge products
|
Salisbury
|
|
Salisbury, NC
|
|
|
95 million
|
|
|
Light gauge products including flexible packaging, finstock,
lithographic sheet, intercompany reroll and miscellaneous
leveled products
|
Newport
|
|
Newport, AR
|
|
|
35 million
|
|
|
Light gauge products including flexible packaging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
495
million(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Capacity includes intra-company
reroll. Based on production mix at December 31, 2009
effective annual capacity of our rolling mills is
410 million pounds.
|
2
Versatile manufacturing capabilities and advantageous geographic
locations provide our rolling mills with the flexibility to
serve a diverse range of end-users. We believe that this
flexibility, when combined with our strong customer service,
product quality and strategic sales support, has allowed our
downstream business to gain market share during a period of
weakness in end-market demand. The downstream business prices
its products at the MWTP plus a fabrication premium.
Notwithstanding periodic metal margin gains or losses during
times of volatility in aluminum prices, our downstream earnings
are substantially insulated from fluctuations in primary
aluminum prices. As a result, the downstream businesss
performance is predominantly driven by fluctuations in volumes
and the fabrication premium we are able to achieve. The
geographic proximity of our upstream and downstream businesses
creates a further degree of vertical integration, providing for
additional operational flexibility.
Recent
Developments
In January 2009, an ice storm disrupted the power grid
throughout Southeastern Missouri. The resulting power outage
disabled two of New Madrids three production lines,
initially reducing our daily production to 25% of pre-outage
levels. This event had a substantial negative impact on our 2009
operating results. By December 31, 2009, we had restored
New Madrids production to 80% of pre-outage volumes and we
are currently scheduled to return daily production to 100% of
capacity during the first quarter of 2010. We reached a
settlement of approximately $68 million with our insurance
providers, all of which has been received. As of
September 30, 2009, we had spent approximately
$11.5 million and $24.0 million on capital
expenditures and costs related to the restoration program,
respectively, with $32.0 million of settlement funds
remaining and earmarked to fund the completion of the
restoration program by early 2010.
From time to time, we enter into fixed-price aluminum swap
agreements for specified time periods to reduce the risk profile
of our business or enhance the value of our equity. When prices
are high relative to our cost of production, we may enter into
aluminum sale swaps that allow us to substantially lock in the
prices at which we sell our primary aluminum even though the LME
price may vary considerably. Conversely, when our estimate of
the fair-value LME price is significantly higher than the market
LME price, we may enter into fixed-price aluminum purchase swaps
to lock in some or all of the value of our aluminum sale swaps.
In March and April 2009, as the LME price fell to a level where
over 50% of the worlds aluminum suppliers were producing
negative cash margins, we entered into fixed-price aluminum
purchase swaps to lock in the majority of the value in our
existing aluminum sale swaps. Our sale swaps, which, at the
time, covered approximately 50% of our expected upstream
shipments through 2012, currently have a net open hedge position
of approximately 8% and 7% of shipments in 2010 and 2011,
respectively. Soon after we locked-in the majority of our
aluminum sale swap gains, we executed a hedge settlement
agreement with our primary hedging counterparty that allows us
to monetize a portion of the locked-in gains, provided that the
proceeds are used to fund debt repurchases.
Through the year ended December 31, 2009, we purchased a
total of $379 million aggregate principal amount of
indebtedness subject to reimbursement under the hedge settlement
agreement. In reimbursement for these purchases, we realized
cash proceeds from our primary hedging counterparty totaling
$120.8 million during the year ended December 31,
2009 and $58.7 million on January 4, 2010. At
December 31, 2009, we had approximately $191 million
remaining in locked-in hedge gains and as of January 4,
2009, this value had been reduced to approximately
$126 million. In addition to our purchases of indebtedness
during 2009 that were subject to reimbursement pursuant to the
hedge settlement agreement, we used available cash balances to
complete purchases of an additional $25.1 million aggregate
principal amount of indebtedness that were not subject to
reimbursement.
On August 31, 2009, we completed a transaction, which we
refer to as the Joint Venture Transaction, whereby
we became the sole owner of the alumina and bauxite production
joint ventures, Gramercy and St. Ann, respectively, that we had
operated since 2004 with Century Aluminum Company, whom we refer
to as Century. In consideration for its ownership
share, Century was forgiven certain liabilities to the alumina
joint venture and was released from all agreements and
obligations of the joint ventures. In addition, as part of the
Joint Venture Transaction, we agreed to sell to Century
approximately 190,500 metric tonnes of alumina through 2010,
with the first 125,000 metric tonnes sold at a fixed price and
the reminder sold at prices indexed to the LME price.
3
Competitive
Strengths
Vertically Integrated Assets and Long-term Electricity
Supply. Our vertical integration and long-term
electricity supply result in a high correlation between changes
in the MWTP and our operating earnings. Our upstream business is
integrated from bauxite to alumina to primary aluminum metal. In
strengthening LME environments, the net cost of our alumina
generally becomes increasingly attractive relative to contracted
and spot market alumina prices. We believe that this cost
advantage in rising markets and the security of our bauxite and
alumina supply provide us with a competitive advantage versus
aluminum producers that are dependent on LME price indexed
alumina supplies. At New Madrid, we seek to maximize value-added
product sales, but in weak markets, our downstream business
provides a reliable source of commodity grade ingot demand.
Power is the most significant component of our upstream cash
cost to produce primary aluminum. Our New Madrid smelter has
entered into a long-term power supply contract through May 2020,
ensuring the secure supply of power. This contract gives Noranda
an advantage over aluminum smelters facing frequent power
shortages or disruptions. In addition, our power costs are not
linked to LME aluminum prices, unlike the power costs of some of
our competitors, particularly in North America.
Strong Liquidity Position. As of
January 12, 2010, we had $227.8 million of cash and
revolving credit facility available borrowings. As of
December 31, 2009, we had cash and revolving credit
facility borrowings available totaling $167.9 million. As
of the date of this prospectus, we had $127.3 million of
locked in hedge gains that we will receive during the course of
2010 and 2011 or which we have the option to monetize early to
retire debt under our hedge settlement agreement. In 2010,
through the date of this prospectus, we have used available cash
balances to repay $150.0 million of our revolving credit
facility borrowings. In the year ended December 31, 2009,
our cash interest payments totaled $17.3 million, following
our elections to pay interest in-kind on our notes beginning in
the third quarter of 2008. We also have no debt maturities prior
to 2013 and no maintenance covenants in our debt facilities. The
combination of significant sources of liquidity, a low cash
interest burden relative to our debt and no near-term maturities
provides for our favorable liquidity position and the ability to
invest in and grow our business.
Strategically Located Assets. The ease of
access and proximity of Gramercy to St. Ann and New Madrid to
Gramercy provide us with an attractive freight cost advantage.
New Madrid is the closest Midwest smelter to the Gulf Coast, the
location of our alumina refinery and the entry point for
approximately 75% of the alumina shipped to the U.S. We
believe this proximity allows our New Madrid smelter to source
its alumina from Gramercy at an advantageous freight cost
compared to other U.S. based smelters. In addition, our New
Madrid smelter is located in close proximity to its customers,
with more than 80% of shipments to customers located within a
one-day
truck delivery distance.
High Quality Downstream Assets. Our downstream
businesss largest rolling mill, the Huntingdon
West facility, is recognized by CRU as one of the most advanced
rolled aluminum production facilities in North America. This
mill began production in 2000 at a capital cost of
$238 million and has the lowest conversion cost (excluding
metal) for foil stock production in North America, according to
CRU. We have the ability to shift production and produce a
variety of products based on customer demand and forecasted
volume, pricing and profitability trends. Our rolling mills are
designed and configured to produce a broad suite of products,
which permits rapid reaction to changing customer and market
demand. In turn, the ready supply of commodity primary aluminum
production provides security of supply to our downstream
facilities, thereby allowing us to take advantage of short-term
surges in downstream demand.
Experienced Management Team. We have a
seasoned management team, whose members average more than
21 years of experience in cyclical and commodity
industries. Our senior management team, led by CEO and President
Layle K. Kip Smith, has achieved substantial
cost-cutting and commercial goals since the onset of the global
economic slowdown, allowing us to operate in the midst of a
severe downturn in aluminum pricing and demand, while
positioning us for better performance as markets return.
Financial discipline has been a priority, including the strict
control of operating expenses and cash flow.
4
Business
Strategy
Expand Our Production and Sales. Over the five
years ending in 2008, we increased our upstream production by
37 million pounds and we believe we will have similar
opportunities to increase production through major capital
investments and debottlenecking projects in the future. We are
also undertaking a capital project to expand capacity at our rod
mill at New Madrid, given strong trends in the market for rod
used in conductor applications. In addition to the significant
sales opportunities for smelter grade alumina and bauxite, which
we now have by virtue of our sole ownership of our alumina
refinery and bauxite mining operation, we believe there is an
opportunity to increase our sales of hydrate, or chemical grade
alumina, an attractive specialty product.
Pursue Opportunistic External Growth. We
regularly review potential opportunities to acquire additional
upstream and downstream businesses. We recently completed the
Joint Venture Transaction, which offers us the opportunity to
increase our sales and subsidize our smelter operating costs.
Our focused commercial activities since the closing of the Joint
Venture Transaction have yielded sufficient contracted demand to
support full production levels at our alumina refinery through
2012. Operating at full production volumes will allow us to
better leverage the fixed costs at our refinery. In addition, we
believe that there are meaningful cost-cutting opportunities at
Gramercy and St. Ann. The Joint Venture Transaction and
subsequent increase in our alumina sales to third parties serve
to increase the impact of changes in the LME price on our
operating cash flow.
Focus on Productivity Improvements. Our
management team is committed to reducing costs at our production
facilities by investing in high-return capital improvements,
optimizing labor productivity and implementing projects that
improve the operating and energy efficiencies of our production
processes. In late 2008, we initiated a comprehensive
productivity program called Cost-Out Reliability and
Effectiveness, or CORE. Through September 30,
2009, CORE generated approximately $35 million in cost
savings from headcount reductions and operating improvements. We
believe that opportunities exist to drive additional cost
savings and efficiencies, particularly at Gramercy and St. Ann.
Our upstream cash cost of primary aluminum has declined from
$0.81 per pound for the full year ended 2008 to $0.76 per pound
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This
significant improvement, which occurred notwithstanding the
inefficiencies from low capacity utilization rates at New Madrid
in 2009, has been driven by CORE as well as favorable price
trends in some of our major cost inputs, including natural gas
and caustic soda. In the downstream business, we have identified
and implemented the early stages of various capital projects
that will increase our ability to use scrap metal to reduce
costs. In addition, we maintain lean manufacturing and Six Sigma
programs to rationalize our cost base in the upstream and
downstream operations.
Maximize Cash Flow. Senior management has
implemented a focused strategy to maximize profitability and
cash flow. Our ability to maintain positive cash flows from
operations during the recent economic downturn and concurrent
smelter production outage is a testament to our strong focus on
cash conservation and productivity. In addition, we have been
able to generate significant cash flow through the prudent
management of working capital, capital expenditures and
operating expenses. We intend to continue this keen focus on
cash flow, even as market conditions improve. From the date of
the Apollo Acquisition through September 30, 2009, working
capital reductions contributed $145 million to cash flow
from operating activities, and we will continue to target
working capital efficiencies throughout our businesses without
sacrificing our product availability or lead times.
Improve Capital Structure and Financial
Profile. Since the Apollo Acquisition through
September 30, 2009, we have retired or repurchased
453 million principal amount of our indebtedness. These
debt reductions, which were funded with cash flow generated from
our operations and gains realized from aluminum hedges, have led
to significant equity value creation while allowing us to
maintain a strong liquidity position. In addition to reducing
leverage, we seek to improve our financial profile by mitigating
our exposure to rising input costs and falling product prices.
We believe that prudent and opportunistic hedging of the
commodities that impact our business, including aluminum,
natural gas and crude oil, allows us to protect the value of our
enterprise from large and sometimes rapid commodity price
fluctuations. In October and November of 2009, we entered into
natural gas purchase swaps that raised our hedge profile to
approximately 45% of our forecasted natural gas needs in each of
2010, 2011 and 2012. In addition, approximately 8% of our 2010
and
5
2011 aluminum sales are hedged at fixed prices. We continue to
evaluate our hedging strategy based on our financial leverage
and our view of actual and forecasted commodity prices.
Enhance Safety Performance and Continue Stable Employee
Relations. We believe that maintaining employee
safety and a positive working relationship with our employees
are key drivers of a well performing business. We have
consistently improved our company-wide safety performance
through focused procedures and training programs. In 2009, our
company-wide annual number of recordable safety incidents per
man hour had decreased by over 45% from 2005 levels. There have
been no significant labor disruptions at any facility under our
management since 1996 and we have recently successfully
renegotiated agreements with our labor unions, including at St.
Ann in 2008 and at our downstream rolling mill in Salisbury,
North Carolina in 2009.
Industry
Overview
The aluminum industry consists broadly of upstream primary
aluminum production and downstream rolled product manufacturing.
Upstream production involves the power intensive process of
producing primary aluminum from alumina, which is derived from
the raw material bauxite. Downstream manufacturing involves the
value-added process of converting primary aluminum into aluminum
products, such as finstock, light gauge sheet, foil and other
products.
Upstream
Primary aluminum is a highly functional metal because of its
metallurgical properties and environmentally friendly
attributes, such as its light weight and recyclability.
Significant amounts of aluminum are required for basic
infrastructure and transportation needs and, as growth trends in
developing economies such as China, India and Russia continue,
aluminum usage is expected to enjoy significant growth. Global
trends by consumers and governments suggest a rising preference
to use environmentally responsible materials which may drive
increased intensity of use for aluminum versus other heavier
materials that are not as frequently recycled. For example, in
the automotive industry, the amount of aluminum per vehicle has
increased in recent years, helping to drive increased fuel
efficiency and higher post-consumer recycling of automotive
parts. In the field of electricity conductors, new power cable
designs employ significantly more aluminum per cable foot in an
effort to increase efficiency and conductivity. As energy and
resource conservation and post-consumer recycling efforts
continue to intensify, aluminum demand is expected to benefit.
Following significant weakness related to the global recession
and credit crisis which began in late 2007 and continued through
2009, aluminum prices have begun to recover, rising just over
75% through December 31, 2009 from their record lows
reached in February 2009. Prices would need to rise by almost
50% from December 31, 2009 levels to equal peak prices
reached in July 2008. Pressure remains on global producers to
cut operating costs.
According to CRU, the global business operating production cost
curve for aluminum has fallen significantly from year-end 2008
to September 30, 2009. This decrease is related to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
lower costs for alumina, which is indexed to the LME price of
aluminum for many global producers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
decreased power costs, due to changes in power tariffs by
regulatory authorities around the world and, in some cases,
indexing of power prices to the LME price of aluminum;
|
|
|
|
|
|
emergence of approximately one million metric tonnes per year of
new low-cost capacity outside of China;
|
|
|
|
|
|
shut-down of approximately three and a half million metric
tonnes per year of high-cost global capacity (after accounting
for recent restarts), including nearly one-third of
U.S. smelter capacity; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
large regional LME hub premiums (such as the Midwest premium
Noranda earns), which analysts measure as a credit against
producers cash costs.
|
While primary aluminum demand has improved since the trough in
prices in early 2009, global inventories remain high, and
end-market demand, particularly in North America, has been slow
to recover.
6
Weakness in the supply and demand balance has been offset, in
part, by curtailment of global production capacity as well as
strong recent growth and stimulus measures in emerging
economies, particularly China. Metal premiums in South East
Asia, Europe and the U.S. have risen in relation to the LME
price, aided by improving demand, metal financing contracts and
net imports into China tightening the spot market. Higher
premiums in Asia and a recovery from the trough in the
U.S. economy has aided U.S. producers and lifted MWTP.
In 2010, global demand is expected to grow by approximately 13%
over 2009 levels according to CRU. In addition, there is a
shortage of domestically produced primary aluminum in the
U.S. United States aluminum production is approximately 52%
of the total of U.S. aluminum demand per 2008 CRU
production and demand statistics.
The following chart illustrates the expected growth in aluminum
global consumption, according to CRU. Demand is expected to
increase by 22% from 2008 to 2012, and by nearly 81% between
2008 and 2020.
Source: CRU
Notwithstanding weakness in the current and recent supply and
demand trends for aluminum, we believe the medium and long-term
supply and demand outlook for aluminum supports sustainable,
higher LME prices due to the following trends:
|
|
|
|
|
global demand driven by long-term and sustained economic growth,
higher standards of living and increased demand from emerging
markets, especially China and India;
|
|
|
|
|
|
long-term world-wide increases in the cost of power, which is a
significant input cost in the production of primary aluminum;
|
|
|
|
|
|
barriers to entry for greenfield smelters due to high capital
costs, long lead time to market, required regulatory approvals
and increasing scarcity of power;
|
|
|
|
|
|
substitution away from other metals (e.g., steel and copper) to
aluminum due to aluminums
strength-to-weight
and
value-to-weight
ratios and relative price compared to other metals; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a weaker U.S. dollar relative to historical periods.
|
We are a North American producer with a majority of our primary
aluminum sales in the form of value-added products delivered
within a
one-day
delivery radius of New Madrid. Therefore, while global market
trends determine the LME price and impact our margins, domestic
supply and demand for our value-added products also directly
impact our margins.
Similar to the trend in the cost to produce aluminum, the global
business operating production cost curve for alumina has fallen
significantly from an average of $259 per tonne in calendar year
2008 to $211 per
7
tonne in the first three quarters of 2009. The decrease in
alumina refining costs has been driven by lower input costs and
capacity rationalization.
The bulk of smelter grade alumina is generally sold on a
contract basis with prices typically ranging from
12-15% of
the LME price depending on the contract term and alumina market
dynamics. The spot alumina market has improved following
rationalization of high-cost alumina refinery capacity and
postponement of large greenfield projects in response to record
low alumina prices earlier this year. CRU estimates that around
a fifth of global alumina capacity was idle in the early part of
2009. More recently, there have been restarts in refining
capacity accompanying restarts in smelting capacity within
China. In the second half of 2009, the Atlantic region, where we
sell our alumina, has seen particularly strong support for
alumina prices due to the closure of a greater portion of
alumina production capacity versus other regions according to
CRU. Transaction prices for smelter grade alumina in the
Atlantic region are strong relative to historic ranges due, we
believe, to a supply/demand balance that is relatively tight.
Downstream
Our downstream business is a leading producer of foil and
certain light gauge sheet products. Industry-wide, these two
product groups accounted for approximately 1.5 billion
pounds of demand in North America in 2008.
Profit margins in the downstream business are generally
unaffected by short-term volatility in the underlying LME price.
The price of any given end-product is equal to the cost of the
metal, or MWTP, plus a negotiated fabrication premium. These
fabrication premiums are determined in large part by industry
capacity utilization, which in turn is driven by supply-demand
fundamentals for our product. Since 2007, the downturn in the
U.S. economy generally and the housing market in particular
have resulted in lower industry volumes and, in addition,
reduced fabrication premiums in certain key product areas.
Risk
Factors
Participating in this offering involves substantial risk. Our
ability to execute our strategy also is subject to certain
risks. The risks described under the heading Risk
Factors immediately following this summary may cause us
not to realize the full benefits of our strengths or may cause
us to be unable to successfully execute all or part of our
strategy. Some of the more significant challenges and risks
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our susceptibility to cyclical fluctuations in the primary
aluminum industry and changes in general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
the cost of energy and raw materials;
|
|
|
|
the risk of natural disaster that could damage our facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to pass through increases in our costs to our
customers;
|
|
|
|
our substantial indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of the industry in which we
operate.
|
Before you participate in this offering, you should carefully
consider all the information in this prospectus, including
matters set forth under the heading Risk Factors.
Principal
Stockholders
Our principal stockholders are investment funds affiliated with
or managed by Apollo Management VI, L.P., including Apollo
Investment Fund VI, L.P. and its parallel co-investment
funds. Apollo Investment Fund VI, L.P. is an investment
vehicle with committed capital, along with its parallel
investment funds, of over $10 billion. Apollo Management
VI, L.P., Apollo Investment Fund VI, L.P. and its parallel
investment funds are affiliates of Apollo Global Management,
LLC, a leading global alternative asset manager with offices in
New York, Los Angeles, London, Frankfurt, Singapore and Mumbai.
Apollo Global Management, LLC had assets under management of
$51.8 billion as of September 30, 2009, in private
equity, credit-oriented
8
capital markets funds and real estate invested across a core
group of industries where Apollo Global Management, LLC has
considerable knowledge and resources. Companies in which
affiliates of Apollo Global Management, LLC have a significant
equity investment include, among others, Berry Plastics
Corporation, CEVA Logistics, Momentive Performance Materials
Inc., Metals USA Holdings Corp., and Parallel Petroleum
Corporation. Except as otherwise indicated herein or as the
context otherwise requires, Apollo refers to
investment funds affiliated with, or co-investment vehicles
managed indirectly by, Apollo Management L.P., including Apollo
Investment Fund VI, L.P., along with its parallel
investment funds.
Additional
Information
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation was incorporated in
Delaware on March 27, 2007. The principal executive offices
of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation are at 801 Crescent
Centre Drive, Suite 600, Franklin, TN 37067, and the
telephone number there is
(615) 771-5700.
We also maintain an internet site at www.norandaaluminum.com.
Our website and the information contained therein or
connected thereto shall not be deemed to be incorporated into
this prospectus or the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, and you should not rely on any such
information in making your decision whether to purchase our
securities.
9
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares |
|
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
|
|
|
Listing |
|
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the trading symbol NOR. |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering
of approximately $ million
after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and expenses, assuming the shares are offered at
$ per share, which represents the
midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus. As described in Use of Proceeds, we
intend to use the proceeds from this offering to pay for the
costs associated with the offering and for general corporate
purposes. |
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
We intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock at
an annual rate of $ per share. We
intend to pay our first quarterly dividend payment
on .
The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of
our common stock may be limited by restrictive covenants of our
debt agreements, and will be at the sole discretion of our Board
of Directors and will depend on many factors, including our
financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, level of
indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to
the payment of dividends and other considerations that our Board
of Directors deems relevant. See Dividend Policy,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Contractual
Obligations and Contingencies, Description of
Certain Indebtedness and Description of Capital
Stock Common Stock. |
Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this
prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option;
|
|
|
|
does not give effect
to shares
of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding
options as
of ,
2010, shares
of which we expect will likely vest upon consummation of this
offering, at a weighted-average exercise price of
$ per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
does not give effect
to shares
of common stock reserved for future issuance under our Amended
and Restated Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan and does not give effect
to shares
of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010
Incentive Award Plan.
|
10
SUMMARY
CONDENSED HISTORICAL AND
UNAUDITED SUPPLEMENTAL PRO FORMA FINANCIAL AND OTHER
DATA
The following tables present the summary condensed historical
and unaudited supplemental pro forma consolidated financial and
other data of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. and the summary condensed
historical and unaudited supplemental pro forma consolidated
financial and other data of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation. This information is only a summary and should be
read in conjunction with the sections entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Unaudited
Supplemental Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and with the audited consolidated financial
statements of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. and Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation and their notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus, as well as the other financial information included
in this prospectus.
Noranda HoldCo, Noranda AcquisitionCo and Noranda Intermediate
Holding Corporation did not engage in any business or other
activities prior to the Apollo Acquisition except in connection
with their formation and the Apollo Transactions, as described
in Business The Transactions.
Accordingly, for the purposes of this prospectus, all financial
and other information herein relating to periods prior to the
completion of the Apollo Transactions is that of Noranda
Aluminum, Inc.
The financial information for the period from January 1,
2006 to August 15, 2006, which we refer to as
Pre-predecessor, includes the results of operations,
cash flows and financial condition for Noranda Aluminum, Inc. on
a basis reflecting the historical carrying values of Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. prior to the Xstrata Acquisition, as described in
Business The Transactions. The financial
information for the periods from August 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and from January 1, 2007 to
May 17, 2007 and as of December 31, 2006 includes the
results of operations, cash flows and financial condition for
Noranda Aluminum, Inc. on a basis reflecting the
stepped-up
values of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. prior to the Apollo
Acquisition, but subsequent to the Xstrata Acquisition, and is
referred to as Predecessor. The financial
information for the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 and as of December 31, 2007, as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as of and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 includes
the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition
for Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation on a basis reflecting
the impact of the purchase allocation of the Apollo Acquisition,
and is referred to as Successor.
The consolidated statements of operations and cash flows data
for the periods from January 1, 2006 to August 15,
2006, from August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006, from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007, from May 18,
2007 to December 31, 2007 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the summary consolidated balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 have been
derived from the audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated
statement of operations data, cash flow data and balance sheet
data for the nine months ended and as of September 30, 2008
and 2009, have been derived from our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Management also has presented unaudited supplemental pro forma
condensed consolidated statements of operations to reflect the
consolidated results of operations of the company as if the
Apollo Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2006. The
unaudited supplemental pro forma condensed consolidated
statements of operations include pro forma adjustments that we
believe are (i) directly attributable to the Apollo
Transactions and the Special Dividend, as described in
Dividend Policy, (ii) factually supportable and
(iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the
consolidated results.
The unaudited supplemental pro forma condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2007 are based on the historical
consolidated statements of operations for the Pre-predecessor
period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006 and the
Predecessor period from August 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and the historical consolidated
statements of operations for the Predecessor period from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007 and the Successor
period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007,
respectively, and give effect to the Apollo Transactions and the
Special Dividend as if they had occurred on January 1, 2006.
The unaudited supplemental pro forma condensed consolidated
statement of operations data is for informational purposes only
and does not purport to present what our results of operations
would have been if the Apollo Transactions and the Special
Dividend had occurred as of the date indicated, nor does it
project our results of operations for any future period.
Furthermore, this data does not reflect any additional costs
necessary to operate as a stand-alone company. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
Forma(1)
|
|
|
|
Pro
Forma(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
As of and
|
|
|
|
As of and
|
|
|
|
As of and
|
|
|
As of and
|
|
|
As of and
|
|
|
|
for the Year
|
|
|
|
for the Year
|
|
|
|
for the Year
|
|
|
for the Nine
|
|
|
for the Nine
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions, except per share data and where noted)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009(2)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
1,312.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,395.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,266.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,004.9
|
|
|
$
|
540.6
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,133.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,205.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,122.7
|
|
|
|
846.8
|
|
|
|
566.5
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
73.8
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
Insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43.5
|
)
|
Other (recoveries) charges, net
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,261.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,222.0
|
|
|
|
895.9
|
|
|
|
617.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
139.4
|
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
(77.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
(104.1
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(193.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(107.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21.42
|
|
|
|
|
21.53
|
|
|
|
|
21.72
|
|
|
|
21.71
|
|
|
|
21.77
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21.42
|
|
|
|
|
21.53
|
|
|
|
|
21.72
|
|
|
|
21.71
|
|
|
|
21.77
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Data(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
184.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
256.5
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
672.8
|
|
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
|
|
|
599.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760.0
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,616.7
|
|
|
|
|
1,650.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,936.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875.1
|
|
Long-term debt (including current
portion)(5)
|
|
|
160.0
|
|
|
|
|
1,151.7
|
|
|
|
|
1,346.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021.0
|
|
Common stock subject to redemption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficiency)
|
|
|
1,008.5
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
Working
capital(6)
|
|
|
201.7
|
|
|
|
|
211.5
|
|
|
|
|
336.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473.6
|
|
Cash Flow
Data(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
|
|
111.7
|
|
|
|
230.4
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.1
|
)
|
|
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
(149.1
|
)
|
Financial and Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79.2
|
|
|
$
|
135.1
|
|
|
$
|
200.8
|
|
Average realized Midwest Transaction
Price(8)
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
Net cash cost for primary aluminum (per pound
shipped)(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External aluminum (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
496.5
|
|
|
|
|
523.4
|
|
|
|
|
509.5
|
|
|
|
374.5
|
|
|
|
221.9
|
|
Intersegment aluminum (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total aluminum shipments (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
555.0
|
|
|
|
|
554.6
|
|
|
|
|
589.9
|
|
|
|
435.7
|
|
|
|
256.3
|
|
External alumina
(kMts)(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.5
|
|
External bauxite
(kMts)(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145.0
|
|
Downstream (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
409.3
|
|
|
|
|
371.6
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
346.1
|
|
|
|
273.3
|
|
|
|
235.3
|
|
See accompanying notes
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
and as of
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
and as of
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in millions, except per share data and where noted)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
816.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
496.7
|
|
|
$
|
527.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
867.4
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
660.6
|
|
|
|
|
409.0
|
|
|
|
424.5
|
|
|
|
|
768.0
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
Other (recoveries) charges, net
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684.4
|
|
|
|
|
422.5
|
|
|
|
441.3
|
|
|
|
|
806.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
131.6
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
Other expenses (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
110.6
|
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period
|
|
$
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.67
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
Balance sheet
data(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75.6
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,616.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,650.5
|
|
Long-term debt (including current
portion)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151.7
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficiency)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Working
capital(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211.5
|
|
Cash flow
data(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
107.8
|
|
|
$
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
160.8
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31.8
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1,197.7
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
(83.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,112.5
|
|
Financial and other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(7)
|
|
$
|
147.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.0
|
|
|
$
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
150.2
|
|
Average realized Midwest Transaction
Price(8)
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
Net cash cost for primary aluminum (per pound
shipped)(11)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Shipments (pounds in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External aluminum (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
308.8
|
|
|
|
|
187.7
|
|
|
|
202.3
|
|
|
|
|
321.1
|
|
Intersegment aluminum (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
36.3
|
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total aluminum shipments (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
345.1
|
|
|
|
|
209.9
|
|
|
|
214.4
|
|
|
|
|
340.2
|
|
Downstream (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
259.1
|
|
|
|
|
150.2
|
|
|
|
135.6
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
236.0
|
(10)
|
See accompanying notes
13
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Figures may not add due to rounding. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Net income (loss) per share is not presented for the
Pre-predecessor and Predecessor periods because Noranda was a
wholly owned subsidiary during those periods. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Historical balance sheet and cash flow data are presented. Cash
flow data are not presented for the pro forma periods. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Long-term debt includes long-term debt due to related parties
and to third parties, including current installments of
long-term debt. For the Successor period long-term debt does not
include issued and undrawn letters of credit under the existing
$242.7 million revolving credit facility. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Working capital is defined as current assets net of current
liabilities. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
EBITDA represents net income (loss) before income taxes, net
interest expense and depreciation and amortization. We have
provided EBITDA herein because we believe it provides investors
with additional information to measure our performance. We use
EBITDA as one criterion for evaluating our performance relative
to our peers. We believe that EBITDA is an operating performance
measure, and not a liquidity measure, that provides investors
and analysts with a measure of operating results unaffected by
differences in capital structures, capital investment cycles and
ages of related assets among otherwise comparable companies. |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (U.S.
GAAP), and may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures used by other companies in our industry. EBITDA should
not be considered in isolation from or as an alternative to net
income, operating income (loss) or any other performance
measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
For example, EBITDA excludes certain tax payments that may
represent a reduction in cash available to us; does not reflect
any cash requirements for the assets being depreciated and
amortized that may have to be replaced in the future; does not
reflect capital cash expenditures, future requirements for
capital expenditures or contractual commitments; does not
reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital needs; and does not reflect the significant interest
expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest
or principal payments, on our indebtedness. |
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to EBITDA for
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
$
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
36.5
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
98.2
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
147.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.0
|
|
|
$
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
150.2
|
|
|
$
|
79.2
|
|
|
$
|
135.1
|
|
|
$
|
200.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
The price for primary aluminum consists of two components: the
price quoted for primary aluminum ingot on the LME and the
Midwest transaction premium, a premium to LME price reflecting
domestic market dynamics as well as the cost of shipping and
warehousing, the sum of which is known as the Midwest
Transaction Price. As a majority of our value-added products are
sold at the prior months MWTP, we calculate a
realized MWTP which reflects the specific pricing of
sale transactions in each period. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
External alumina and bauxite shipments (in kilometric tonnes, or
kMts) are recorded subsequent to the August 31,
2009 Joint Venture Transaction. Additionally, from
time-to-time,
the New Madrid smelter sells excess alumina. |
14
|
|
|
(10) |
|
For purposes of comparability to other periods, brokered metal
sales are excluded from downstream pounds because the related
metal was sold without fabrication premiums. Brokered metal
sales excluded were $8.2 million for the period from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007, and
$43.2 million for the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Unit net cash cost for primary aluminum per pound represents our
costs of producing commodity grade aluminum net of value-added
and Midwest premiums on primary aluminum sales, and alumina and
bauxite sales to external customers. We have provided unit net
cash cost per pound of aluminum shipped because we believe it
provides investors with additional information to measure our
operating performance. Using this metric, investors are able to
assess the prevailing LME price plus Midwest premium per pound
versus our unit net costs per pound shipped. Unit net cash cost
per pound is positively or negatively impacted by changes in
primary aluminum, alumina and bauxite production and sales
volumes, natural gas and oil related costs, seasonality in our
electrical contract rates, and increases or decreases in other
production related costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Unit net cash costs is not a measure of financial performance
under U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures used by other companies in our industry. Unit net cash
costs per pound shipped should not be considered in isolation
from or as an alternative to any performance measures derived in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Unit net cash costs per pound shipped
has limitations as an analytical tool and you should not
consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our
results under U.S. GAAP. |
The following table summarizes the unit net cash costs for
primary aluminum for the upstream segment for the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total upstream cash cost (in millions)
|
|
|
244.5
|
|
|
|
|
155.1
|
|
|
|
158.8
|
|
|
|
|
259.3
|
|
|
|
478.2
|
|
|
|
347.2
|
|
|
|
194.8
|
|
Total shipments (pounds in millions)
|
|
|
345.1
|
|
|
|
|
209.9
|
|
|
|
214.4
|
|
|
|
|
340.2
|
|
|
|
589.9
|
|
|
|
435.6
|
|
|
|
256.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net upstream cash cost per pound for primary
aluminum(a)
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The following table reconciles the upstream segments cost
of sales to the total upstream cash cost for primary aluminum
for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Upstream cost of sales
|
|
|
306.0
|
|
|
|
|
194.1
|
|
|
|
203.5
|
|
|
|
|
356.8
|
|
|
|
623.0
|
|
|
|
454.9
|
|
|
|
317.3
|
|
Downstream cost of sales
|
|
|
399.0
|
|
|
|
|
240.5
|
|
|
|
237.9
|
|
|
|
|
432.7
|
|
|
|
597.5
|
|
|
|
472.8
|
|
|
|
273.8
|
|
Intersegment cost of sales
|
|
|
(44.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)
|
|
|
(97.8
|
)
|
|
|
(80.9
|
)
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
660.6
|
|
|
|
|
409.0
|
|
|
|
424.5
|
|
|
|
|
768.0
|
|
|
|
1,122.7
|
|
|
|
846.8
|
|
|
|
566.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream cost of sales
|
|
|
306.0
|
|
|
|
|
194.1
|
|
|
|
203.5
|
|
|
|
|
356.8
|
|
|
|
623.0
|
|
|
|
454.9
|
|
|
|
317.3
|
|
LIFO and lower of cost or market
adjustments(b)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
(30.5
|
)
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Fabrication
premium(c)
|
|
|
(30.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
|
(40.5
|
)
|
|
|
(33.2
|
)
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
Depreciation expense upstream
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(51.2
|
)
|
|
|
(70.3
|
)
|
|
|
(52.5
|
)
|
|
|
(40.9
|
)
|
Joint ventures
impact(d)
|
|
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses(e)
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
Insurance
proceeds(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
External alumina and
bauxite(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
Other(h)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total upstream cash cost of primary aluminum
|
|
|
244.5
|
|
|
|
|
155.1
|
|
|
|
158.8
|
|
|
|
|
259.3
|
|
|
|
478.2
|
|
|
|
347.2
|
|
|
|
194.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During 2009, we refined our cash cost calculation methodologies
to reflect an adjusted EBITDA based calculation (see the
Covenant Compliance section for a full description
and reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA). As a result, 2008
figures may not tie to cash costs as presented in 2008 filings.
We did not revise the calculation of cash cost for periods prior
to 2008 as the effect is immaterial. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Reflects the conversion from last-in, first-out
(LIFO) to first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method of inventory costing, including removing the effects of
adjustments to reflect the lower of cost or market value. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Our value-added products, such as billet, rod and foundry, earn
a fabrication premium over the MWTP. To allow comparison of our
upstream per unit costs to the MWTP, we net the fabrication
premium in determining upstream cash costs for primary aluminum. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Our upstream business is fully integrated from bauxite mined by
St. Ann to alumina produced by Gramercy to primary aluminum
metal manufactured by our aluminum smelter in New Madrid,
Missouri. To reflect the underlying economics of the vertically
integrated upstream business, this adjustment reflects the
favorable impact that third-party joint venture sales have on
our upstream cash cost for primary aluminum and comprises
primarily depreciation and amortization expense. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Represents certain selling, general and administrative expenses
which management believes are a component of upstream cash costs
for primary aluminum, but which are not included in cost of
goods. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Excess insurance proceeds reduce our cash costs to the extent we
determine those proceeds will offset future costs, rather than
be spent on capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents the impact of external bauxite and alumina sales to
external customers as the cash costs presented are for primary
aluminum only. |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Reflects various other cost adjustments, such as cash
settlements on derivative transactions, the elimination of the
effects of any intercompany profit in inventory, as well as any
purchase accounting adjustments. |
16
Covenant
Compliance
Upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a change of
control, we could be required to repay or refinance our
indebtedness. In addition, certain covenants contained in our
debt agreements restrict our ability to take certain actions
(including incurring additional secured or unsecured debt,
expanding borrowings under existing term loan facilities, paying
dividends and engaging in mergers, acquisitions and certain
other investments) unless we meet certain standards in respect
of the ratio of our Adjusted EBITDA, calculated on a trailing
four-quarter basis, to our fixed charges (the fixed-charge
coverage ratio) or the ratio of our senior secured net
debt to our Adjusted EBITDA, calculated on a trailing
four-quarter basis (the net senior secured leverage
ratio). Furthermore, our ability to take certain actions,
including paying dividends and making acquisitions and certain
other investments, depends on the amounts available for such
actions under the applicable covenants, which amounts accumulate
with reference to our Adjusted EBITDA on a quarterly basis.
The minimum or maximum ratio levels set forth in our covenants
as conditions to our undertaking certain actions and our actual
performance are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Ratio Relevant to
|
|
Covenant
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Covenants
|
|
Threshold
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Noranda HoldCo:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due
2014(1)
|
|
Fixed Charge
Coverage
Ratio
|
|
Minimum
1.75 to 1.0
|
|
|
2.5 to 1
|
|
|
|
1.3 to 1
|
|
Noranda AcquisitionCo:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due
2015(1)
|
|
Fixed Charge
Coverage
Ratio
|
|
Minimum
2.0 to 1.0
|
|
|
3.2 to 1
|
|
|
|
1.7 to 1
|
|
Senior Secured Credit
Facilities(1)(2)
|
|
Net Senior
Secured
Leverage Ratio
|
|
Maximum
3.0 to
1.0(3)
|
|
|
1.9 to 1
|
|
|
|
3.2 to 1
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of measuring Adjusted EBITDA in order to compute
the ratios, pro forma effect is given to the Joint Venture
Transaction as if it had occurred at the beginning of the
trailing four-quarter period. Fixed charges are the sum of
consolidated interest expenses and all cash dividend payments in
respect of preferred stock. In measuring interest expense for
the ratio, pro forma effect is given to any repayment or
issuance of debt as if such transaction occurred at the
beginning of the trailing four-quarter period. |
|
|
|
|
|
For Noranda HoldCo and Noranda AcquisitionCo, the pro forma
impact of the Joint Venture Transaction on Adjusted EBITDA for
the four quarters ended September 30, 2009 was
$23.2 million. For Noranda HoldCo, fixed charges on a pro
forma basis (giving effect to debt repayments) for the four
quarters ended December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2009 were $94.7 million and $80.6 million,
respectively. For Noranda AcquisitionCo, fixed charges on a pro
forma basis (giving effect to debt repayments) for the four
quarters ended December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2009 were $73.4 million and $61.8 million,
respectively. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As used in calculating this ratio, senior secured net
debt means the amount outstanding under our term B loan
and the revolving credit facility, plus other first-lien secured
debt (of which we have none presently), less unrestricted
cash and permitted investments (as defined
under our senior secured credit facilities). At
December 31, 2008, senior secured debt was
$618.5 million and unrestricted cash and permitted
investments amounted to $160.6 million, resulting in senior
secured net debt of $457.9 million. At September 30,
2009, senior secured debt was $565.9 million and
unrestricted cash and permitted investments aggregated
$235.0 million, resulting in senior secured net debt of
$330.9 million. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The maximum ratio was 2.75 to 1 until December 31, 2008 and
changed to 3.0 to 1 on January 1, 2009. |
Because we currently do not satisfy these ratio levels, we
currently are limited in our ability to incur additional debt,
make acquisitions or certain other investments and pay
dividends. These restrictions do not
17
interfere with the
day-to-day-conduct
of our business. Moreover, our debt agreements do not require us
to maintain any financial performance metric or ratio in order
to avoid a default.
As used herein, Adjusted EBITDA (which is defined as
EBITDA in our debt agreements) means net income
before income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and
amortization, adjusted to eliminate related party management
fees, business optimization expenses and restructuring changes,
certain charges resulting from the use of purchase accounting
and other specified items of income or expense.
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under
U.S. GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures used by other companies in our industry. Adjusted
EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from or as an
alternative to net income, income from continuing operations,
operating income or any other performance measures derived in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an
analytical tool and you should not consider it in isolation or
as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under
U.S. GAAP. For example, Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain tax
payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;
does not reflect any cash requirements for the assets being
depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the
future; does not reflect capital cash expenditures, future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual
commitments; does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements
for, our working capital needs; and does not reflect the
significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary
to service interest or principal payments, on our indebtedness.
Adjusted EBITDA also includes incremental stand-alone costs and
adds back non-cash hedging gains and losses, and certain other
non-cash charges that are deducted in calculating net income.
However, these are expenses that may recur, vary greatly and are
difficult to predict. In addition, certain of these expenses can
represent the reduction of cash that could be used for other
corporate purposes. You should not consider our Adjusted EBITDA
as an alternative to operating or net income, determined in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of our operating
performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating
activities, determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an
indicator of our cash flows or as a measure of liquidity.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to Adjusted
EBITDA for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
|
113.9
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
73.4
|
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
|
|
98.2
|
|
|
|
83.8
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
Joint venture
EBITDA(a)
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
LIFO
adjustment(b)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
LCM
adjustment(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(193.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(193.2
|
)
|
New Madrid power
outage(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
Charges related to termination of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
Non-cash hedging gains and
losses(e)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
(69.6
|
)
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
(80.2
|
)
|
Non-recurring natural gas
losses(f)
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
68.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
Joint Venture impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.3
|
|
Purchase
accounting(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Incremental stand-alone
costs(h)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items,
net(i)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
296.3
|
|
|
|
309.3
|
|
|
|
234.9
|
|
|
|
79.2
|
|
|
|
225.6
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The following table reconciles cash flow from operating
activities to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities
|
|
|
189.7
|
|
|
|
202.0
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
|
|
184.2
|
|
|
|
111.7
|
|
|
|
230.4
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on hedging activities
|
|
|
(22.1
|
)
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)
|
|
|
(47.0
|
)
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
(36.4
|
)
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
Settlements from hedge terminations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119.7
|
)
|
Insurance proceeds applied to capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Changes in deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Changes in pension and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(41.8
|
)
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
(32.0
|
)
|
Changes in asset and liabilities, net
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
(61.9
|
)
|
|
|
(28.3
|
)
|
|
|
(33.0
|
)
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
Joint venture
EBITDA(a)
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
LIFO
adjustment(b)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
LCM
adjustment(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
New Madrid power
outage(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
Non-cash hedging gains and
losses(e)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
(69.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.2
|
)
|
Charges related to termination of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
Non-recurring natural gas
losses(f)
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
accounting(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Incremental stand-alone
costs(h)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance proceeds applied to depreciation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
Other items,
net(i)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
296.3
|
|
|
|
309.3
|
|
|
|
234.9
|
|
|
|
79.2
|
|
|
|
225.6
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Prior to the consummation of the Joint Venture Transaction on
August 31, 2009, our reported Adjusted EBITDA includes 50%
of the net income of Gramercy and St. Ann, based on transfer
prices that are generally in excess of the actual costs incurred
by the joint venture operations. To reflect the underlying
economics of the vertically integrated upstream business, this
adjustment eliminates the following components of equity income
to reflect 50% of the EBITDA of the joint ventures, for the
following aggregated periods (in millions): |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Net tax expense
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total joint venture EBITDA adjustments
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Our New Madrid smelter and downstream facilities use the LIFO
method of inventory accounting for financial reporting and tax
purposes. This adjustment restates net income to the FIFO method
by eliminating LIFO expenses related to inventory held at the
New Madrid smelter and downstream facilities. Inventories at
Gramercy and St. Ann are stated at lower of weighted average
cost or market, and are not subject to the LIFO adjustment. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Reflects adjustments to reduce inventory to the lower of cost
(adjusted for purchase accounting) or market value. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents the portion of the insurance settlement used for
claim-related capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
We use derivative financial instruments to mitigate effects of
fluctuations in aluminum and natural gas prices. This adjustment
eliminates the non-cash gains and losses resulting from fair
market value changes of aluminum swaps, but does not affect the
following cash settlements (received)/ paid (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminum swaps fixed-price
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(88.6
|
)
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)
|
Aluminum swaps variable-price
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
(23.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The previous table presents cash settlement amounts net of early
terminations of fixed-price aluminum swaps and bond buybacks. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
During 2006, as mandated by Falconbridge Limited, our former
parent entity, we entered into natural gas swaps for the period
between April and December 2006 in response to rising natural
gas costs at the end of 2005. Natural gas prices, however,
decreased in 2006, and as a result, we generated losses on the
natural gas swaps. Our credit agreements provide for the
exclusion of losses incurred from those natural gas swaps. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents impact from inventory
step-up and
other adjustments arising from adjusting assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the Joint Venture Transaction to their
fair values. |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Reflects (i) the incremental insurance, audit and other
administrative costs on a stand-alone basis, net of certain
corporate overheads allocated by the former parent that we no
longer expect to incur on a go-forward basis and (ii) the
elimination of income from administrative and treasury services
provided by Noranda Aluminum, Inc.s former parent and its
affiliates that are no longer provided. |
20
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Other items, net, consist of the following (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sponsor fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Pension expense non-cash portion
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Employee compensation items
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Consulting and non-recurring fees
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Restructuring-project renewal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below
as well as the other information contained in this prospectus
before investing in our common stock, or deciding whether you
will or will not participate in this offering. The risks
described below are not the only risks facing us. Additional
risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we
currently view to be immaterial may also materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. Any of the following risks could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. In such a case,
you may lose part or all of your original investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We have
substantial indebtedness, which could adversely affect our
ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations,
limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our
industry and prevent us from servicing our debt.
We have substantial indebtedness. As of December 31, 2009,
our total indebtedness was $952.2 million. Based on the
amount of indebtedness outstanding and interest rates at
December 31, 2009, our annualized cash interest expense is
approximately $34.5 million, all of which represents
interest expense on floating-rate obligations (and thus is
subject to increase in the event interest rates were to rise),
prior to any consideration of the impact of interest rate swaps.
Of this amount, we have the right under the applicable
indebtedness to pay approximately $22.3 million by issuing
additional indebtedness rather than in cash. We issued
additional indebtedness as payment for our interest due
May 15, 2009 and November 15, 2009 under our bond
indentures. Further, we have notified the trustee for Noranda
HoldCo and Noranda AcquisitionCo bondholders of our election to
pay the May 15, 2010 interest payments by issuing
additional indebtedness. In the event we continue to exercise
such right, our debt will increase further. Our
subsidiaries ability to generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to make scheduled payments on their and our debt
depends on a range of economic, competitive and business
factors, many of which are outside their and our control. Our
subsidiaries inability to generate cash flow sufficient to
satisfy their and our debt obligations, or to refinance their
and our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows and could require
us and our subsidiaries to do one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
raise additional capital through debt or equity issuances or
both;
|
|
|
|
cancel or scale back current and future business
initiatives; or
|
|
|
|
sell businesses or properties.
|
Our and our subsidiaries substantial indebtedness could
have important consequences, including:
|
|
|
|
|
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under
our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to borrow money for our working capital,
capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other
corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
requiring our subsidiaries to dedicate a substantial portion of
their cash flow to payments on their and our indebtedness, which
will reduce the amount of cash flow available for working
capital, capital expenditures, product development and other
corporate requirements;
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry
conditions;
|
|
|
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to our less leveraged
competitors;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to respond to business
opportunities; and
|
|
|
|
subjecting us and our subsidiaries to restrictive covenants,
which, if we and our subsidiaries fail to comply with these
covenants, could result in an event of default under their and
our debt which, if not
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
cured or waived, could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
|
Restrictive
covenants under the indentures governing our Notes and our
existing senior secured credit facilities may adversely affect
our operational flexibility.
The indentures governing our senior floating rate notes due 2015
issued by Noranda AcquisitionCo, which we refer to as the
AcquisitionCo Notes, and our senior floating
rate notes due 2014 issued by Noranda HoldCo, which we refer to
as the HoldCo Notes and collectively with the
AcquisitionCo Notes as the Notes, and
our existing senior secured credit facilities contain, and any
future indebtedness we incur may contain, a number of
restrictive covenants that will impose significant operating and
financial restrictions on us and our subsidiaries, including
restrictions on our and our subsidiaries ability to, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur or guarantee additional debt;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make distributions to our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
repurchase or redeem capital stock;
|
|
|
|
make loans, capital expenditures, acquisitions or investments;
|
|
|
|
sell assets including stock of subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
create or incur liens;
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with other companies or transfer all or
substantially all of our assets;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
engage in certain business activities.
|
As a result of these covenants, we are limited in the manner in
which we conduct our business, and we may be unable to engage in
favorable business activities or finance future operations or
capital needs.
A failure to comply with the covenants contained in the existing
senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing
the Notes or any future indebtedness could result in an event of
default under the existing senior secured credit facilities, the
indentures governing the Notes or such future indebtedness,
which, if not cured or waived, could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows. In the event of any default under the existing
senior secured credit facilities, the indentures governing the
Notes or any future indebtedness, our and our subsidiaries
debt holders and lenders:
|
|
|
|
|
will not be required to lend any additional amounts to us and
our subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, together with
accrued and unpaid interest and fees, to be due and payable;
|
|
|
|
may have the ability to require us to apply all of our available
cash to repay these borrowings; or
|
|
|
|
may prevent us and our subsidiaries from making debt service
payments under our and our subsidiaries other agreements,
any of which could result in an event of default under such
agreements.
|
If the indebtedness under the existing senior secured credit
facilities or our other indebtedness, including the Notes, were
to be accelerated, there can be no assurance that our and our
subsidiaries assets would be sufficient to repay such
indebtedness in full. See Description of Certain
Indebtedness.
Despite
our substantial indebtedness, we and our subsidiaries may still
be able to incur significantly more debt. This could increase
the risks associated with our substantial leverage, including
our ability to service our indebtedness.
The indentures governing the Notes and our existing senior
secured credit facilities contain restrictions on our
and/or our
subsidiaries ability to incur additional indebtedness.
These restrictions are subject to a number of important
qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in
compliance with these restrictions
23
could be substantial. Accordingly, we and our subsidiaries
could incur significant additional indebtedness in the future,
much of which could constitute secured or senior indebtedness.
As of January 12, 2010, we had $227.8 million of cash and
revolving credit facility available borrowings. The more
leveraged we and our subsidiaries become, the more we and our
subsidiaries, and in turn our security holders, become exposed
to the risks described above under We have
substantial indebtedness, which could adversely affect our
ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations,
limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our
industry and prevent us from servicing our debt.
Our
variable-rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk,
which could cause our annual debt service obligations to
increase significantly.
Substantially all of our and our subsidiaries
indebtedness, including the Notes and borrowings under the
existing senior secured credit facilities, are subject to
variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk.
See Description of Certain Indebtedness. If interest
rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable
rate indebtedness would increase, resulting in a reduction of
our net income, even though the amount borrowed remained the
same. As of December 31, 2009, outstanding indebtedness was
$952.2 million. Our annualized cash interest expense based
on indebtedness and interest rates at that date was
approximately $34.5 million. A 1% increase in the interest
rate would increase our annual interest expense by
$9.5 million, prior to any consideration of the impact of
interest rate swaps.
Cyclical
fluctuations in the primary aluminum industry cause variability
in our earnings and cash flows.
Our operating results depend on the market for primary aluminum,
a cyclical commodity with prices subject to global market forces
of supply and demand and other related factors. Such factors
include speculative activities by market participants,
production activities by competitors, political and economic
conditions, and production costs in major production regions. A
substantial increase in primary aluminum production capacity
could further affect prices. Prices have been historically
volatile. Over the past ten years, the average daily LME
settlement price has ranged from a low of $0.52 per pound in
1999 to a high of $1.49 per pound in July 2008.
In the second half of 2008, global economic contraction severely
impacted the aluminum industry. Driven by significant weakness
in end-use markets such as housing and transportation, aluminum
prices experienced a profound decline. During that contraction,
the monthly average LME price dropped from a peak of $1.49 in
July 2008, to a low of $0.57 in February 2009. The decline in
LME price to levels at which our production cash costs were
higher than our primary metal selling prices had a significant
negative impact on our financial results. Since then, LME prices
have risen to $1.00 as of December 31, 2009. If LME prices drop
significantly, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely
affected.
We have hedged our exposure to the volatility of LME-based
prices for only approximately 8% of our expected cumulative
primary aluminum shipments for 2010 and 2011. If we do not
undertake further hedging activities, we will continue to have
price risk with respect to the unhedged portion of our primary
aluminum shipments. A prolonged downturn in prices for primary
aluminum could significantly reduce the amount of cash available
to us to meet our current obligations and fund our long-term
business strategies. In addition, we may terminate or
restructure our current hedges or enter into new hedging
arrangements in the future, which may not be beneficial,
depending on subsequent LME price changes, and could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
Our significant cost components, specifically our supply of
alumina, which we own, and our New Madrid power contract are not
tied to the LME price of aluminum. As a result, as the LME
prices decrease, our profit margins are reduced which could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
24
A
downturn in general economic conditions, as well as a downturn
in the end-use markets for certain of our products, could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A global recession and credit crisis began in late 2007 and
continued through 2009. This crisis substantially impacted our
upstream and downstream markets in 2008 and 2009. A continued or
renewed decline would have a corresponding negative impact on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
Historically, global supply and demand for primary aluminum have
fluctuated in part due to general economic and market conditions
in the United States and other major global economies, including
China. In addition, certain end-use markets for our rolled
products, such as the housing, construction and transportation
industries, experience demand cycles that are correlated to the
general economic environment. Economic downturns in regional and
global economies or a decrease in manufacturing activity in
industries such as construction, packaging and consumer goods,
all of which are sensitive to a number of factors outside our
control, could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Losses
caused by disruptions in the supply of electrical power could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to losses associated with equipment shutdowns,
which may be caused by the loss or interruption of electrical
power to our facilities due to unusually high demand, blackouts,
equipment failure, natural disasters or other catastrophic
events. We use large amounts of electricity to produce primary
aluminum, and any loss of power that causes an equipment
shutdown can result in the hardening or freezing of
molten aluminum in the pots where it is produced. If this
occurs, we may experience significant losses if the pots are
damaged and require repair or replacement, a process that could
limit or shut down our production operations for a prolonged
period of time. During the week of January 26, 2009, power
supply to our New Madrid smelter was interrupted numerous times
because of a severe ice storm in Southeastern Missouri, causing
a loss of approximately 75% of the smelter capacity.
Although we maintain property and business interruption
insurance to mitigate losses resulting from catastrophic events,
we may be required to pay significant amounts under the
deductible provisions of those insurance policies. In addition,
our coverage may not be sufficient to cover all losses, or may
not respond to all causes of loss or cover certain events.
Certain of our insurance policies do not cover any losses we may
incur if our suppliers are unable to provide us with power
during periods of unusually high demand.
Delays
in restoring our New Madrid smelter to its full production
capacity could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
During the week of January 26, 2009, power supply to our
New Madrid smelter, which supplies all of the upstream
business aluminum production, was interrupted several
times because of a severe ice storm in Southeastern Missouri. As
a result of the damage caused by the outage, we lost
approximately 75% of the smelters capacity. The smelter
has returned to operating above 80% of capacity as of
December 31, 2009.
We expect the smelter to return to full production during the
first quarter of 2010. Restoration of capacity could take longer
if unforeseen issues arise with the restart including but not
limited to equipment damage and large-scale pot failure and
rebuild. Further, compared to normal operations, production in
the initial phases of a restart is inherently less efficient,
consumes more energy, and produces lower purity metal. Delays
and inefficiencies in restoring capacity could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
25
Our
operations consume substantial amounts of energy and our
profitability may decline if energy costs rise.
Electricity and natural gas are essential to our businesses,
which are energy intensive. The costs of these resources can
vary widely and unpredictably. The factors that affect our
energy costs tend to be specific to each of our facilities.
Electricity is a key cost component at our New Madrid smelter.
We have a power purchase agreement with AmerenUE
(Ameren), Missouris largest electric utility,
pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase substantially all
of New Madrids electricity through May 2020. Ameren may
increase the rates it charges its customers, including Noranda,
with the approval of the Missouri Public Service Commission
(MoPSC). On July 24, 2009, Ameren petitioned
the MoPSC for a general rate increase of approximately 18%
across all customer categories, including Noranda. Ameren also
requested that our contract be modified to include a
take-or-pay
arrangement. We expect the case to be decided by the MoPSC in
June 2010, if not settled prior to that time. The outcome of the
rate case or any future rate cases Ameren may initiate could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Electricity is also a key cost component at our rolling mill
facilities. Electricity is purchased through medium-term
contracts at competitive industrial rates from regional
utilities supplied through local distributors. If we are unable
to obtain power at affordable rates upon expiration of these
contracts, we may be forced to curtail or idle a portion of our
production capacity, which would lower our revenues and
adversely affect the profitability of our operations.
Natural gas is the largest cost component at our Gramercy
refinery and a key cost component at our rolling mill
facilities. Our Gramercy refinery has contracts to guarantee
secure supply from two suppliers at an index-based price. Our
downstream business purchases natural gas on the open market.
The price of natural gas can be particularly volatile. As a
result, our natural gas costs may fluctuate dramatically, and we
may not be able to mitigate the effect of higher natural gas
costs on our cost of sales. Any substantial increases in energy
costs could cause our operating costs to increase and could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. We enter into
financial swaps to offset changes in natural gas prices.
Fuel is a substantial component of the cost structure at our St.
Ann bauxite mining operation. Our fuel is provided under an
indexed-based contract linked to the price of oil. Our fuel
costs at St. Ann may fluctuate, and we may not be able to
mitigate the effect of higher fuel costs. Changes in the index
will have an impact on our cost structure. Any increases in fuel
costs could cause our operating costs to increase and could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
On June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives
approved adoption of the American Clean Energy and Security Act
of 2009 (ACESA). ACESA would establish an
economy-wide cap on emissions of green house gasses
(GHG) in the United States and would require
entities to obtain GHG emission allowances corresponding to
their annual emissions. The U.S. Senate has also begun work
on its own legislation for controlling and reducing emissions of
GHGs in the United States. Any laws or regulations that may be
adopted to restrict or reduce emissions of GHGs would lead to
higher energy costs at our New Madrid smelter and our Gramercy
refinery and could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Whether or not new congressional legislation is passed governing
GHG emissions, there is a risk that the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency could regulate such GHGs, which could also
result in similar energy cost increases and related impacts on
our business.
We may
encounter increases in the cost of raw materials, which could
cause our cost of goods sold to increase, thereby materially and
adversely affecting our business, financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows and limiting our operating
flexibility.
We require substantial amounts of raw materials in our business,
consisting principally of bauxite, alumina, primary aluminum,
recycled aluminum and aluminum scrap. If raw material prices
increase we may not be able to pass on the entire cost of the
increases to our customers or offset fully the effects of high
raw
26
materials costs through productivity improvements, which could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We may be forced to sell excess alumina at market prices that
could be substantially lower than our cash cost of production
which could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We generally sell
35-40% of
St. Anns bauxite production to a third party pursuant to a
sales contract expiring in 2010. Revenues from these sales
reduce the net cost of bauxite to Gramercy. In the event the
third-party purchaser is unable to honor that contract, or renew
the contract after 2010, the cost of our bauxite could increase,
which could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Prices for the raw materials used by our downstream business,
including primary aluminum, recycled aluminum and alloying
elements, are subject to continuous volatility and may increase
from time to time. Our sales are generally made on the basis of
a margin over metal price, but if raw material costs
other than metal increase we may not be able to pass on the
entire cost of the increases to our customers or offset fully
the effects of high raw materials costs through productivity
improvements, which could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. In addition, a sustained material increase in raw
materials prices may cause some of our customers to substitute
other materials for our products.
Our
hedging activities may not be effective in reducing the
variability of our revenues.
We have entered into derivative transactions related to only
approximately 8% of our expected cumulative primary aluminum
shipments for 2010 and 2011. If we do not undertake further
hedging activities, we will continue to have price risk with
respect to the unhedged portion of our primary aluminum
shipments. In addition, our actual future shipment volumes may
be higher or lower than we estimated. Further, the derivative
instruments we utilize for our hedging activities are based on
posted market prices for primary aluminum, the timing of which
may differ from the prices that we realize in our operations. As
a result of these factors, our hedging activities may be less
effective than expected in reducing the economic variability of
our future revenues.
We are under no obligation under our existing senior secured
credit facilities, our outstanding Notes or otherwise to
maintain our existing hedging arrangements or to enter into
further hedging arrangements. Future market prices for aluminum
could decline materially, reducing our revenues and cash flows.
For additional information regarding our hedging activities, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We may
be unable to continue to compete successfully in the highly
competitive markets in which we operate.
We are engaged in a highly competitive industry. We compete with
a number of large, well-established companies in each of the
markets in which we operate. Our upstream business competes with
a large number of other value-added metals producers on an
international, national, regional and local basis. We also
compete, to a much lesser extent, with primary metals producers,
who typically sell to very large customers requiring regular
shipments of large volumes of metals. Our downstream business
competes in the production and sale of rolled aluminum products
with a number of other aluminum rolling mills, including large,
single-purpose sheet mills, continuous casters and other
multi-purpose mills. Aluminum also competes with other
materials, such as steel, copper, plastics, composite materials
and glass, among others, for various applications. In the past,
for certain applications customers have demonstrated a
willingness to substitute other materials for aluminum. In both
businesses, some of our competitors are larger than us and have
greater financial and technical resources than we do. These
larger competitors may be better able to withstand reductions in
price or other adverse industry or economic conditions. A
current or new competitor may also add or build new capacity,
which could diminish our profitability by decreasing price. New
competitors could emerge from
27
within North America or globally, including China. If we do not
compete successfully, our business, financial condition, results
from operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely
affected.
In addition, our downstream business competes with other rolled
products suppliers, principally multi-purpose mills, on the
basis of quality, price, timeliness of delivery, technological
innovation and customer service. One primary competitive factor,
particularly in the flat rolled business, is price. We may be
required in the future to reduce fabrication prices or shift our
production to products that generally yield lower fabrication
prices in order to remain at full capacity, which could impact
our level of profitability. In addition, technological
innovation is important to our customers and if we are unable to
lead or effectively meet new innovations to meet our
customers needs, our financial performance could be
materially and adversely impacted. Increased competition in any
of our businesses could have a material and adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
Aluminum
may become less competitive with alternative materials, which
could reduce our share of industry sales, lower our selling
prices and reduce our sales volumes.
Aluminum competes with other materials such as steel, copper,
plastics, composite materials and glass for various
applications. Higher aluminum prices relative to substitute
materials tend to make aluminum products less competitive with
these alternative materials. Environmental or other regulations
may increase our costs and be passed on to our customers, making
our products less competitive. The willingness of customers to
accept aluminum substitutions, or the ability of large customers
to exert leverage in the marketplace to affect pricing for
fabricated aluminum products, could result in a reduced share of
industry sales or reduced prices for our products and services,
which could decrease revenues or reduce volumes, either of which
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
If we
were to lose order volumes from any of our largest customers,
our revenues and cash flows could be materially
reduced.
Our business is exposed to risks related to customer
concentration. In 2008 and for the first nine months of 2009,
our ten largest customers were responsible for 31% and 35%,
respectively, of our consolidated revenues. In 2008 and through
September 30, 2009, no one customer accounted for more than
5% of our consolidated revenues. A loss of order volumes from,
or a loss of industry share by, any major customer could
materially and adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations by lowering sales volumes, increasing
costs and lowering profitability. In addition, our customers may
become involved in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings or
default on their obligations to us. Our balance sheet reflected
an allowance for doubtful accounts totaling $0.2 million at
December 31, 2007, $1.6 million at December 31,
2008 and $0.2 million at September 30, 2009.
We do
not have long-term contractual arrangements with a significant
majority of our customers, and our revenues and cash flows could
be reduced if our customers switch their
suppliers.
A significant majority of our customer contracts have a term of
one year or less, although we have long-term relationships with
many of our customers. Many of these customers purchase products
and services from us on a purchase order basis and may choose
not to continue to purchase our products and services. The loss
of these customers or a significant reduction in their purchase
orders could have a material and adverse impact on our sales
volume and business, or cause us to reduce our prices, which
could have a material and adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our
business requires substantial capital investments that we may be
unable to fulfill.
Our operations are capital intensive. Including Gramercys
and St. Anns capital expenditures, capital expenditures
were $64.4 million, $62.7 million and
$81.5 million for 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
We may not generate sufficient operating cash flows and our
external financing sources may not be available in an amount
sufficient to enable us to make anticipated capital
expenditures, service or refinance our indebtedness or fund
other liquidity needs. If we are unable to make upgrades or
purchase new plant and
28
equipment, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely
affected by higher maintenance costs, lower sales volumes due to
the impact of reduced product quality and other competitive
influences.
We may
be materially and adversely affected by environmental, safety,
production and product regulations or concerns.
Our operations are subject to a wide variety of
U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. environmental
laws and regulations, including those governing emissions to
air, discharges to waters, the generation, use, storage,
transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials
and wastes, land reclamation and employee health and safety
matters. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations can
be costly, and we have incurred and will continue to incur
costs, including capital expenditures, to comply with these
requirements. As these regulatory costs increase and are passed
through to our customers, our products may become less
competitive than other materials, which could reduce our sales.
If we are unable to comply with environmental laws and
regulations, we could incur substantial costs, including fines
and civil or criminal sanctions, or costs associated with
upgrades to our facilities or changes in our manufacturing
processes in order to achieve and maintain compliance. In
addition, environmental requirements change frequently and have
tended to become more stringent over time. We cannot predict
what environmental laws or regulations will be enacted or
amended in the future, how existing or future laws or
regulations will be interpreted or enforced, or the amount of
future expenditures that may be required to comply with such
laws or regulations. Our costs of compliance with current and
future environmental requirements could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
In addition, as an owner and operator of real property and a
generator of hazardous waste, we may be subject to environmental
cleanup liability, regardless of fault, pursuant to Superfund or
analogous state or
non-U.S. laws.
Thus, we could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs
and costs arising from third-party property damage or personal
injury claims, relating to environmental contamination at
properties currently or formerly operated by us or at
third-party sites at which wastes from our operations have been
disposed. Contaminants have been discovered in the soil
and/or
groundwater at some of our facilities. The discovery of
additional contaminants or the imposition of additional cleanup
obligations at these or other sites could result in significant
liability. In addition, because we use or process hazardous
substances in our operations, we may be liable for personal
injury claims or workers compensation claims relating to
exposure to hazardous substances.
Xstrata has agreed to indemnify us through May 2010 from certain
environmental liabilities relating to Xstratas operation
of the business. If Xstrata becomes unable to, or otherwise does
not, comply with its indemnity obligations, or if certain
environmental conditions or other liabilities for which we are
obligated are not subject to indemnification, we could be
subject to significant unforeseen liabilities.
We have identified certain environmental matters at both
Gramercy and St. Ann, which are disclosed in our financial
statements to the extent they represent liabilities as defined
by U.S. GAAP. There could be other significant
environmental issues of which we are not aware. The occurrence
of new environmental issues could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Some
of our facilities are located in areas that have been subject to
natural disasters. Future natural disasters in these areas could
damage our facilities and disrupt our operations.
Our aluminum smelter is located in New Madrid, Missouri on the
banks of the Mississippi River and near the New Madrid fault
line, in an area that may be subject to natural disasters such
as floods, tornados, ice storms and earthquakes. As experienced
during the January 2009 ice storm and subsequent power outages
at our New Madrid facility, when such a disaster occurs, it can
damage the facility in question and disrupt our production of
aluminum. Our bauxite mine is located in St. Ann, Jamaica and
our refinery is located in Gramercy, Louisiana, areas that may
be exposed to hurricanes. In addition, our other facilities may
be subject to natural disasters. We maintain insurance to
protect us from events that may be caused by floods,
earthquakes, tornados and hurricanes in amounts that we believe
are commercially reasonable. There can be
29
no assurance, however, that such insurance would be available
on a timely basis or adequate to completely reimburse us for the
losses that might be sustained or to provide funds for the
reconstruction of our facilities, and in any event such
insurance would not enable us to immediately reconstruct our
facilities to avoid a suspension or disruption of our business
while reconstruction proceeded to completion or alternative
sourcing was located. In addition, our hedging arrangements
could require us to deliver aluminum even if we are unable to
produce such aluminum, which could cause us to incur unexpected
costs in purchasing aluminum on the open market.
Our
business is subject to unplanned business interruptions that may
adversely affect our performance.
The production of aluminum is subject to unplanned events such
as accidents, supply interruptions, transportation
interruptions, human error, mechanical failure and other
contingencies. Operational malfunctions or interruptions at one
or more of our facilities could cause substantial losses in our
production capacity. For example, during January 2009, an ice
storm caused a power outage at our New Madrid smelter, causing a
loss of approximately 75% of the smelters capacity. As
such events occur, we may experience substantial business loss
and the need to purchase one of our integrated raw materials at
prices substantially higher than our normal cost of production,
which could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Furthermore, our vertical integration may cause operational
malfunctions or interruptions at an upstream facility to
materially and adversely affect the performance or operation of
our downstream facilities. Such interruptions may harm our
reputation among actual and potential customers, potentially
resulting in a loss of business. Although we maintain property
and business interruption insurance to mitigate losses resulting
from catastrophic events, we may be required to pay significant
amounts under the deductible provisions of those insurance
policies. In addition, our coverage may not be sufficient to
cover all losses, or may not cover certain events. To the extent
these losses are not covered by insurance, our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be
materially and adversely affected.
We
could experience labor disputes that disrupt our
business.
As of December 31, 2009, approximately 70% of our employees
are represented by unions or equivalent bodies. We are a party
to nine collective bargaining agreements that expire at various
times. Agreements with two unions at St. Ann expire in May and
December 2010, respectively. Our agreement with the union at
Gramercy expires in September 2010. All other collective
bargaining agreements expire within the next five years.
As we renew bargaining agreements, labor negotiations may not
conclude successfully and, in that case, may result in a
significant increase in the cost of labor or may break down and
result in work stoppages or labor disturbances, disrupting our
operations. Any such cost increases, stoppages or disturbances
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows by limiting plant
production, sales volumes and profitability.
Our
operations have been and will continue to be exposed to various
business and other risks, changes in conditions and events
beyond our control in foreign countries.
We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial,
political, economic and business risks in connection with our
non-U.S. operations.
We have production activities outside the United States via our
bauxite mining operations in St. Ann, Jamaica. In addition to
the business risks inherent in operating outside the
United States, economic conditions may be more volatile,
legal and regulatory systems less developed and predictable and
the possibility of various types of adverse governmental action
more pronounced.
In addition, our revenues, expenses, cash flows and results of
operations could be affected by actions in foreign countries
that more generally affect the global market for primary
aluminum, including inflation, fluctuations in currency and
interest rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor
problems. Our operations and the commercial markets for our
products could also be materially and adversely affected by acts
of war, terrorism or the threat of any of these events as well
as government actions such as controls on imports, exports and
prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation or changes in fiscal
regimes and increased government
30
regulation in countries engaged in the manufacture or
consumption of aluminum products. Unexpected or uncontrollable
events or circumstances in any of these markets could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows.
Noranda Bauxite Limited, which we refer to as NBL,
pays the Government of Jamaica, which we refer to as the
GOJ, according to a negotiated fiscal structure with
multiple components. NBL recently reached an understanding with
the GOJ regarding revisions to this fiscal structure. If NBL and
the GOJ are unable to finalize definitive documentation
consistent with that understanding, possible revisions could
result in a net increase in our per pound net cash cost to
produce primary aluminum. If this increase is substantial, it
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The
loss of certain members of our management may have an adverse
effect on our operating results.
Our success will depend, in part, on the efforts of our senior
management and other key employees. These individuals possess
sales, marketing, engineering, manufacturing, financial and
administrative skills that are critical to the operation of our
business. If we lose or suffer an extended interruption in the
services of one or more of our senior officers, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be
materially and adversely affected. Moreover, the market for
qualified individuals may be highly competitive and we may not
be able to attract and retain qualified personnel to replace or
succeed members of our senior management or other key employees,
should the need arise.
Past
and future acquisitions or divestitures may adversely affect our
financial condition.
We have grown partly through the acquisition of other
businesses, including the transaction whereby we became sole
owner of Gramercy and St. Ann during 2009. As part of our
strategy, we may continue to pursue acquisitions, divestitures
or strategic alliances, which may not be completed or, if
completed, may not be ultimately beneficial to us. There are
numerous risks commonly encountered in business combinations,
including the risk that we may not be able to complete a
transaction that has been announced, effectively integrate
businesses acquired or generate the cost savings and synergies
anticipated. Failure to do so could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
On August 31, 2009 we became the sole owner of Gramercy and
St. Ann. Such transactions entail numerous risks, including:
difficulties in the integration of production processes and
products; failure to achieve expected synergies; diversion of
managements attention from other business concerns;
assumption of unknown material liabilities; adverse impact on
future reported earnings due to recording acquired assets and
assumed liabilities at their fair values, including higher costs
of goods sold, amortization of acquired intangible assets, and
additional depreciation expense; and potential loss of clients
or key employees of acquired companies.
The
insurance that we maintain may not fully cover all potential
exposures.
We maintain property, casualty and workers compensation
insurance, but such insurance does not cover all risks
associated with the hazards of our business and is subject to
limitations, including deductibles and maximum liabilities
covered. We may incur losses beyond the limits, or outside the
coverage, of our insurance policies, including liabilities for
environmental compliance or remediation. In addition, from time
to time, various types of insurance for companies in our
industries have not been available on commercially acceptable
terms or, in some cases, have not been available at all. In the
future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels,
and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we
maintain. In addition, the outage at our New Madrid smelter
could have an impact on our ability in the future to obtain
insurance at similar levels and costs, which could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial conditions, results
of operations and cash flows.
31
If we
fail to maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business in the future.
If we are unable to maintain an effective internal control
environment or to remediate any deficiencies or weaknesses that
may arise in the future, it could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations as well as
the time and cost involved in complying with Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 404).
In addition, beginning with our annual report for the fiscal
year ending 2010, our independent public registered accounting
firm will be required to provide an attestation of our
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting
pursuant to Section 404.
Risks
Related to an Investment in our Common Stock and this
Offering
There
is no existing market for our common stock and we do not know if
one will develop, which could impede your ability to sell your
shares and depress the market price of our common
stock.
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor
interest in Noranda will lead to the development of an active
trading market on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise or
how liquid that market might become. If an active trading market
does not develop, you may have difficulty selling any of our
common stock that you buy. The initial public offering price for
the common stock will be determined by negotiations between us
and the representatives of the underwriters and may not be
indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market
following this offering. See Underwriting.
Consequently, you may not be able to sell our common stock at
prices equal to or greater than the price you paid in this
offering.
The
price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and you
could lose all or part of your investment.
Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent
you from being able to sell your common stock at or above the
price you paid for your common stock. The market price for our
common stock could fluctuate significantly for various reasons,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
our operating and financial performance and prospects;
|
|
|
|
the price outlook for aluminum;
|
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in
our industry;
|
|
|
|
conditions that impact demand for our products and services;
|
|
|
|
future announcements concerning our business or our
competitors businesses;
|
|
|
|
the publics reaction to our press releases, other public
announcements and filings with the SEC;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities
analysts who track our common stock;
|
|
|
|
market and industry perception of our success, or lack thereof,
in pursuing our growth strategy;
|
|
|
|
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions
or restructurings;
|
|
|
|
changes in government and environmental regulation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
general market, economic and political conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
|
arrival and departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
the number of shares to be publicly traded after this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales of common stock by us, Apollo or members of our management
team;
|
|
|
|
|
|
adverse resolution of new or pending litigation against us;
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
changes in general market, economic and political conditions in
the United States and global economies or financial markets,
including those resulting from natural disasters, terrorist
attacks, acts of war and responses to such events; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
material weakness in our internal costs over financial reporting.
|
In addition, in recent years, the stock market has experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has
had a significant impact on the market price of securities
issued by many companies, including companies in our industry.
The changes frequently appear to occur without regard to the
operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the
price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors
that have little or nothing to do with Noranda, and these
fluctuations could materially reduce our share price.
Apollo
controls us and its interests may conflict with or differ from
your interests as a stockholder.
After the consummation of this offering, our equity sponsor,
Apollo, will beneficially own
approximately % of our common
stock, assuming the underwriters do not exercise their
over-allotment option. If the underwriters exercise in full
their over-allotment option, Apollo will beneficially own
approximately % of our common
stock. As a result, Apollo has the power to elect all of our
directors. Therefore, Apollo will have the ability to prevent
any transaction that requires the approval of our Board of
Directors or our stockholders, including the approval of
significant corporate transactions such as mergers and the sale
of substantially all of our assets. In addition, following a
reduction of the equity owned by Apollo to below 50% of our
outstanding common stock, Apollo will retain the right to cause
the Board of Directors to nominate a number of Apollo designees
for the Board of Directors. Thus, Apollo will continue to be
able to significantly influence or effectively control our
decisions. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Amended and Restated Securityholders
Agreement and Description of Capital
Stock Composition of Board of Directors; Election
and Removal of Directors.
The interests of Apollo could conflict with or differ from your
interests as a holder of our common stock. For example, the
concentration of ownership held by Apollo could delay, defer or
prevent a change of control of Noranda or impede a merger,
takeover or other business combination that you as a stockholder
may otherwise view favorably. Additionally, Apollo is in the
business of making or advising on investments in companies and
holds, and may from time to time in the future acquire,
interests in or provide advice to businesses that directly or
indirectly compete with certain portions of our business or are
suppliers or customers of ours. Apollo may also pursue
acquisitions that may be complementary to our business, and, as
a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available
to us. Further, Apollo will realize substantial benefits from
the sale of their shares in this offering. A sale of a
substantial number of shares of stock in the future by funds
affiliated with Apollo could cause our stock price to decline.
We are
a controlled company within the meaning of the New
York Stock Exchange rules and, as a result, will qualify for,
and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate
governance requirements.
Upon the closing of this offering, Apollo will continue to
control a majority of our voting common stock. As a result, we
are a controlled company within the meaning of the
New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. Under
the New York Stock Exchange rules, a company of which more than
50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or
another company is a controlled company and may
elect not to comply with certain New York Stock Exchange
corporate governance requirements, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement that a majority of the Board of Directors
consists of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that we have a nominating/corporate governance
committee that is composed entirely of independent directors
with a written charter addressing the committees purpose
and responsibilities;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that we have a Compensation Committee that is
composed entirely of independent directors with a written
charter addressing the committees purpose and
responsibilities; and
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the
nominating/corporate governance and Compensation Committees.
|
Following this offering, we intend to utilize these exemptions.
As a result, we will not have a majority of independent
directors nor will our nominating/corporate governance and
Compensation Committees consist entirely of independent
directors and we will not be required to have an annual
performance evaluation of the nominating/corporate governance
and Compensation Committees. See Management.
Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to
stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the New
York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements.
You
may not receive the intended level of dividends on our common
stock or any dividends at all.
We currently intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our
common stock at an annual rate of
$ per share. However, dividend
payments are not mandatory or guaranteed, and our Board of
Directors may never declare a dividend, decrease the level of
dividends or entirely discontinue the payment of dividends. Your
decision whether to purchase shares of our common stock should
allow for the possibility that no dividends will be paid. You
may not receive any dividends as a result of the following
factors, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
we are not legally or contractually required to pay dividends;
|
|
|
|
our dividend policy could be modified or revoked at any time;
|
|
|
|
even if we do not modify or revoke our dividend policy, the
actual amount of dividends distributed and the decision to make
any distribution is entirely at the discretion of our Board of
Directors and future dividends with respect to shares of our
capital stock, if any, will depend on, among other things, our
results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition,
business opportunities, provisions of applicable law and other
factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant;
|
|
|
|
the amount of dividends distributed is and will be subject to
contractual restrictions under:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the indentures governing the Notes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the terms of the existing senior secured credit facilities;
|
|
|
|
the terms of any other outstanding indebtedness incurred by us
or any of our subsidiaries after the completion of this
offering; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of dividends distributed is subject to state law
restrictions.
|
The terms of our existing senior secured credit facilities and
the indentures governing our Notes may restrict our ability to
pay cash dividends on our common stock. We are prohibited from
paying any cash dividend on our common stock unless we satisfy
certain conditions. See Description of Capital
Stock Common Stock and Description of
Certain Indebtedness. The existing senior secured credit
facilities and the indentures governing the Notes also include
limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends
to us. Furthermore, we will be permitted under the terms of our
debt agreements to incur additional indebtedness that may
severely restrict or prohibit the payment of dividends. The
agreements governing our current and future indebtedness may not
permit us to pay dividends on our common stock.
Future
sales or the possibility of future sales of a substantial amount
of our common stock may depress the price of shares of our
common stock.
Future sales or the availability for sale of substantial amounts
of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect
the prevailing market price of our common stock and could impair
our ability to raise capital through future sales of equity
securities.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
authorize us to
issue shares
of common stock, of
which shares
will be outstanding upon consummation of this offering. This
number
includes shares
that we are selling in this offering, which will be freely
transferable without restriction or further registration under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to
throughout
34
this prospectus as the Securities Act. The
remaining shares
of our common stock outstanding, including the shares of common
stock owned by Apollo and certain members of our management,
will be restricted from immediate resale under the federal
securities laws and the
lock-up
agreements between our current stockholders and the
underwriters, but may be sold in the near future. See
Underwriting. Following the expiration of the
applicable
lock-up
period, all these shares of our common stock will be eligible
for resale under Rule 144 or Rule 701 of the
Securities Act, subject to volume limitations and applicable
holding period requirements. In addition, Apollo will have the
ability to cause us to register the resale of their shares, and
our management members who hold shares will have the ability to
include their shares in the registration. See
Shares Eligible for Future Sale for a
discussion of the shares of our common stock that may be sold
into the public market in the future.
We may issue shares of our common stock or other securities from
time to time as consideration for future acquisitions and
investments. If any such acquisition or investment is
significant, the number of shares of our common stock, or the
number or aggregate principal amount, as the case may be, of
other securities that we may issue may in turn be substantial.
We may also grant registration rights covering those shares of
our common stock or other securities in connection with any such
acquisitions and investments.
Upon consummation of this offering, options to
purchase shares
of our common stock will be outstanding under our Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan. In addition, immediately following
this offering, we intend to file a registration statement
registering shares
of our common stock reserved for issuance under the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2010 Incentive Award Plan under
the Securities Act.
We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common
stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of
our common stock will have on the market price of our common
stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock
(including shares of our common stock issued in connection with
an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur,
may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common
stock.
Delaware
law and our organizational documents may impede or discourage a
takeover, which could deprive our investors of the opportunity
to receive a premium for their shares.
We are a Delaware corporation, and the anti-takeover provisions
of the Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of
a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change of
control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In
addition, provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws may make it more difficult for, or
prevent a third party from, acquiring control of us without the
approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of our Board of Directors to designate one or more
series of preferred stock and issue shares of preferred stock
without stockholder approval;
|
|
|
|
a classified Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
the sole power of a majority of the Board of Directors to fix
the number of directors;
|
|
|
|
limitations on the removal of directors;
|
|
|
|
the sole power of our Board of Directors to fill any vacancy on
our board, whether such vacancy occurs as a result of an
increase in the number of directors or otherwise; and
|
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for nominating directors or
introducing other business to be conducted at stockholder
meetings.
|
The foregoing factors, as well as the significant common stock
ownership by our equity sponsor, could impede a merger, takeover
or other business combination or discourage a potential investor
from making a tender offer for our common stock, which, under
certain circumstances, could reduce the market value of our
common stock. See Description of Capital Stock.
35
We may
issue shares of preferred stock in the future, which could make
it difficult for another company to acquire us or could
otherwise adversely affect holders of our common stock, which
could depress the price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
authorize us to issue up
to shares
of one or more series of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors
will have the authority to determine the preferences,
limitations and relative rights of shares of preferred stock and
to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the
designation of such series, without any further vote or action
by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with
voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the
rights of our common stock. The potential issuance of preferred
stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us,
discouraging bids for our common stock at a premium over the
market price, and materially and adversely affect the market
price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our
common stock.
You
will suffer immediate and substantial dilution in the net
tangible book value of the common stock you
purchase.
Prior investors have paid substantially less per share than the
price in this offering. The initial offering price is
substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share
of the outstanding common stock immediately after this offering.
Accordingly, based on an assumed initial public offering price
of $ per share (the midpoint of
the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus),
purchasers of common stock in this offering will experience
immediate and substantial dilution of approximately
$ per share in net tangible book
value of the common stock. See Dilution.
Noranda
HoldCo is a holding company and relies on dividends and other
payments, advances and transfers of funds from its subsidiaries
to meet its dividend and other obligations.
Noranda HoldCo has no direct operations and no significant
assets other than ownership of 100% of the stock of Noranda
AcquisitionCo and its indirect ownership of 100% of Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. Because Noranda HoldCo conducts its operations
through its subsidiaries, Noranda HoldCo depends on those
entities for dividends and other payments to generate the funds
necessary to meet its financial obligations, and to pay any
dividends with respect to our common stock. Legal and
contractual restrictions in the existing senior secured credit
facilities, the indentures governing the Notes and other
agreements governing current and future indebtedness of Noranda
HoldCos subsidiaries, as well as the financial condition
and operating requirements of Noranda HoldCos
subsidiaries, may limit Noranda HoldCos ability to obtain
cash from its subsidiaries. The earnings from, or other
available assets of, Noranda HoldCos subsidiaries may not
be sufficient to pay dividends or make distributions or loans to
enable Noranda HoldCo to pay any dividends on our common stock.
36
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements
which involve risks and uncertainties. You can identify
forward-looking statements because they contain words such as
believes, expects, may,
should, seeks,
approximately, intends,
plans, estimates, or
anticipates or similar expressions that relate to
our strategy, plans or intentions. All statements we make
relating to our estimated and projected earnings, margins,
costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and financial
results or to our expectations regarding future industry trends
are forward-looking statements. In addition, we, through our
senior management, from time to time make forward-looking public
statements concerning our expected future operations and
performance and other developments. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may
change at any time, and, therefore, our actual results may
differ materially from those that we expected. We derive many of
our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and
forecasts, which are based upon many detailed assumptions. While
we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that
it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and
it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could
affect our actual results. All forward-looking statements are
based upon information available to us on the date of this
prospectus.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our expectations, which we refer to as
cautionary statements, are disclosed under Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus, including,
without limitation, in conjunction with the forward-looking
statements included in this prospectus. All forward-looking
information in this prospectus and subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting
on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
cautionary statements. Some of the factors that we believe could
affect our results include:
|
|
|
|
|
our substantial indebtedness described in this prospectus, and
the possibility that we may incur more indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
restrictive covenants in our indebtedness that may adversely
affect our operational flexibility;
|
|
|
|
repayment of our debt is dependent on cash flow generated by our
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the cyclical nature of the aluminum industry and fluctuating
commodity prices, which cause variability in our earnings and
cash flows;
|
|
|
|
a downturn in general economic conditions, including changes in
interest rates, as well as a downturn in the end-use markets for
certain of our products;
|
|
|
|
losses caused by disruptions in the supply of electrical power;
|
|
|
|
|
|
delays in restoring our New Madrid smelter to full capacity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the relative cost of certain raw materials and
energy compared to the price of primary aluminum and aluminum
rolled products;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our hedging strategies in reducing the
variability of our cash flows;
|
|
|
|
the effects of competition in our business lines;
|
|
|
|
the relative appeal of aluminum compared with alternative
materials;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain customers, a substantial number of which
do not have long-term contractual arrangements with us;
|
|
|
|
our ability to fulfill our businesss substantial capital
investment needs;
|
|
|
|
the cost of compliance with and liabilities under environmental,
safety, production and product regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural disasters and other unplanned business interruptions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
labor relations (i.e., disruptions, strikes or work stoppages)
and labor costs, including at St. Ann where we are currently
negotiating new labor contracts;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
unexpected issues arising in connection with our operations
outside of the United States;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain key management personnel;
|
|
|
|
our expectations with respect to our acquisition activity, or
difficulties encountered in connection with acquisitions,
dispositions or similar transactions; and
|
|
|
|
the ability of our insurance to cover fully our potential
exposures.
|
We caution you that the foregoing list of important factors may
not contain all of the material factors that are important to
you. In addition, in light of these risks and uncertainties, the
matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained
in this prospectus may not in fact occur. Accordingly, investors
should not place undue reliance on those statements. We
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.
38
USE OF
PROCEEDS
Assuming an initial public offering price of
$ per share, which represents the
midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus,
our net proceeds from this offering are estimated to be
approximately $ million after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and offering expenses that will be paid out of the proceeds of
this offering. We currently intend to use the net proceeds from
the shares being sold by us in this offering, including any net
proceeds from any sales of our common stock sold pursuant to the
underwriters over-allotment, for general corporate
purposes.
General corporate purposes include working capital, the
expansion of our production capabilities, research and
development, purchases of capital equipment and potential
acquisitions of businesses that we believe are complementary to
our business. We have not determined the specific portion of any
net proceeds to be used for these purposes, and the net proceeds
from this offering have not been accounted for in our normal
budgeting process. Although from time to time we evaluate
possible acquisitions of companies and assets, we currently have
no definitive commitments or agreements to make any
acquisitions, and cannot assure you that we will make any
acquisitions in the future. The amounts actually expended for
these purposes may vary significantly and will depend on a
number of factors, including the amount of cash we generate from
future operations, the actual expenses of operating our
business, opportunities that may be or become available to us
and the other factors described under Risk Factors.
39
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock at
an annual rate of $ per share. We
intend to pay the first quarterly dividend
on .
However, there can be no assurance that we will declare or pay
cash dividends in the anticipated amounts and frequency set
forth in this prospectus, if at all. The declaration and payment
of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at
the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many
factors, including our financial condition, earnings, capital
requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual
restrictions applying to the payment of dividends and other
considerations that our Board of Directors deems relevant. Under
Delaware law, dividends may be payable only out of surplus,
which is our net assets minus our liabilities and our capital,
or, if we have no surplus, out of our net profits for the fiscal
year in which the dividend is declared
and/or the
preceding fiscal year. In addition, the covenants of our
existing senior secured credit facilities and the indentures
governing the Notes limit our ability to pay dividends on our
common stock and limit the ability of our subsidiaries to pay
dividends to us. As of September 30, 2009, because we did
not meet required performance ratios contained in the credit
agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities and the
indentures governing our Notes, our ability to pay dividends was
restricted. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies,
Description of Certain Indebtedness, and
Description of Capital Stock Common
Stock.
On June 11, 2007, we declared a cash dividend of
$216.1 million to our stockholders of record as of that
date, which we paid on June 12, 2007. In connection with
the payment of the Special Dividend, the options granted to
Norandas employees were adjusted to reflect the dividend
by reducing the exercise price thereof from $10 per share to $6
per share, and by paying each optionholder $6 per share in cash
per option, an aggregate cash payment of $4.1 million. As
used in this prospectus, the term Special Dividend
means the payments to stockholders and optionholders, along with
the related financing. See Business The
Transactions.
On June 13, 2008, we declared and paid a cash dividend of
$102.2 million or $4.70 per share to our stockholders of
record as of that date, which we refer to in this prospectus as
the 2008 Dividend. In connection with the payment of
the 2008 Dividend, outstanding options for shares of Noranda
common stock were adjusted to reflect the dividend by reducing
the exercise price thereof by $2.00 per share and by paying each
optionholder $2.70 per share in cash per option, an aggregate
cash payment of $2.8 million.
40
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization as of September 30, 2009, on a historical
basis, and as adjusted for this offering. This table should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements, unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements, and the related notes, included elsewhere in this
prospectus and Use of Proceeds, Summary
Condensed Historical and Unaudited Supplemental Pro Forma
Financial and Other Data, Selected Historical
Consolidated Financial Data and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
this Offering
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
256.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility due 2013
|
|
$
|
216.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term B Loan due 2014
|
|
|
349.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015 issued by Noranda
AcquisitionCo
|
|
|
387.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2014 issued by Noranda HoldCo
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,020.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 21,766,789 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(139.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
149.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noranda shareholders equity
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
30.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
990.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Ownership
and Organizational Structure
The following diagram sets forth our ownership and
organizational structure as of immediately following the
completion of this offering (ownership percentages are given
assuming the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment
option).
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All entities formed in Delaware unless otherwise noted. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Amounts shown are outstanding as of December 31, 2009.
Senior secured credit facility originally consisted of a
$500.0 million senior secured term credit facility and a
$250.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Guarantors of AcquisitionCo Notes include each of the
subsidiaries of Noranda AcquisitionCo that are guarantors of the
senior secured credit facilities. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
51% owned by the Government of Jamaica. |
42
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the initial public
offering price per share of our common stock and the net
tangible book value per share of our common stock upon
completion of this offering. Dilution results from the fact that
the per share offering price of our common stock is
substantially in excess of the book value per share attributable
to our existing equityholders.
Our net tangible book value (deficit) as of September 30,
2009 was $ million, or
$ per share of common stock. Net
tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total
tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the number of
shares of common stock outstanding as of that date.
After giving effect to the sale by us of shares of common stock
in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share (the midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), and after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, our as adjusted net
tangible book value as of September 30, 2009 would have
been $ million, or
$ per share. This amount
represents an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors. The
following table illustrates this dilution per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net tangible book deficit per share of common stock as of
September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
this offering(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net tangible book deficit per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net tangible book deficit is calculated by subtracting goodwill,
identifiable intangibles, deferred tax assets and deferred
financing costs from total net assets. |
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, our as adjusted net tangible book value will increase to
$ per share, representing an
increase to existing holders of $
per share, and there will be an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors.
Assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting
the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us in connection with the
offering, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) the net tangible book value
attributable to this offering by $
per share and the dilution to new investors by
$ per share and decrease
(increase) the as adjusted net tangible book deficit after this
offering by $ per share.
The following table summarizes, as of September 30, 2009,
as adjusted to give effect to this offering, the difference
between the number of shares of our common stock purchased from
us, the total consideration paid to us, and the average price
per share paid by existing stockholders and by new investors, at
the initial public offering price of
$ per share, before deducting the
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering
expenses payable by us in connection with this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Initial Public Offering
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
Average Price
|
Price per Share of Common Stock
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting
the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us in connection with the
offering, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public
43
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) the total consideration paid by new
investors by $ million, the
total consideration paid by all stockholders by
$ million and the average
price per share by $ per share.
The number of shares purchased is based on shares of common
stock outstanding as of September 30, 2009. The discussion
and table above exclude shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of outstanding options issued under our Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan and additional shares of common stock
reserved under our Noranda 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan and our
2010 Incentive Award Plan. To the extent outstanding options are
exercised, new investors will experience further dilution.
The adjusted information disclosed in this section is for
illustrative purposes only. Our net tangible book value
(deficit) following the completion of this offering is subject
to adjustment based on the actual offering price of our common
stock and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.
44
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables present our selected historical
consolidated financial data. This information should be read in
conjunction with the sections entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and with the audited consolidated financial
statements of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. and Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation and their notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus, as well as the other financial information included
in this prospectus.
Noranda HoldCo, Noranda AcquisitionCo and Noranda Intermediate
Holding Corporation did not engage in any business or other
activities prior to the Apollo Acquisition except in connection
with their formation, the Apollo Transactions and the Special
Dividend described elsewhere in this prospectus. Accordingly,
for the purposes of this prospectus, all financial and other
information herein relating to periods prior to the completion
of the Apollo Transactions and the Special Dividend is that of
Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
The financial information as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the period from
January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006 includes the
results of operations, cash flows and financial condition for
Noranda Aluminum, Inc. on a basis reflecting the historical
carrying values of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. prior to the Xstrata
Acquisition and is referred to as Pre-predecessor.
The financial information for the periods from August 16,
2006 to December 31, 2006 and from January 1, 2007 to
May 17, 2007, and as of December 31, 2006 includes the
results of operations, cash flows and financial condition for
Noranda Aluminum, Inc. on a basis reflecting the
stepped-up
values of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. prior to the Apollo
Acquisition, but subsequent to the Xstrata Acquisition, and is
referred to as Predecessor. The financial
information for the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, and as of December 31, 2007, as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as of and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, includes
the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition
for Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation on a basis reflecting
the impact of the purchase allocation of the Apollo Acquisition,
and is referred to as Successor.
The consolidated statements of operations data for the periods
from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006, from
August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006, from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007 and from May 18,
2007 to December 31, 2007 and the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the consolidated balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The consolidated statements of operations data
and cash flows data for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2005 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements which are not included
in this prospectus. To be consistent with current presentation,
we reclassified certain amounts previously reported as cost of
sales during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 to
selling, general and administrative expenses. The reclassified
items principally included salary and benefits of division
corporate, accounting, marketing and information technology
personnel, as well as other division administrative costs such
as professional fees and rent costs. The reclassifications did
not impact any subtotals, such as operating income, income
before income tax, or net income.
The consolidated statements of operations data, cash flow data
and balance sheet data for the nine months ended and as of
September 30, 2008 and 2009 have been derived from our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Management also has presented unaudited supplemental pro forma
condensed consolidated statements of operations data to reflect
the consolidated results of operations of the company as if the
Apollo Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2006. The
unaudited supplemental pro forma consolidated statements of
operations data include pro forma adjustments that we believe
are (i) directly attributable to the Apollo Transactions
and the Special Dividend, (ii) factually supportable and
(iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the
consolidated results.
The unaudited supplemental pro forma condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2007 are based on the historical
consolidated statements of operations for the Pre-predecessor
period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006 and the
Predecessor period from August 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and the Predecessor period from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007 and the Successor for
the period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007,
respectively, and give effect to the Apollo Transactions and
Special Dividend as if they had occurred on January 1,
2006. These pro forma financial statements are presented and
discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following information should be read in conjunction with,
and is qualified by reference to, our Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, our audited consolidated financial statements
and the notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as
the other financial information included in this prospectus.
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-predecessor
|
|
|
|
and Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
$
|
919.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,026.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,312.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,395.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,266.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,004.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
540.6
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
829.5
|
|
|
|
|
929.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,133.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,205.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,122.7
|
|
|
|
|
846.8
|
|
|
|
|
566.5
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
73.8
|
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
Insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43.5
|
)
|
Other (recoveries) charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862.8
|
|
|
|
|
954.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,173.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,261.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,222.0
|
|
|
|
|
895.9
|
|
|
|
|
617.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
|
139.4
|
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
|
(77.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
|
(104.1
|
)
|
Gain on settlement of contract
|
|
|
|
(129.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
(193.2
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
145.5
|
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(107.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
88.5
|
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax effects
|
|
|
|
(65.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
|
$
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.42
|
|
|
|
|
21.53
|
|
|
|
|
21.72
|
|
|
|
|
21.71
|
|
|
|
|
21.77
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.42
|
|
|
|
|
21.53
|
|
|
|
|
21.72
|
|
|
|
|
21.71
|
|
|
|
|
21.77
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes on following page
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-predecessor
|
|
|
|
and Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions, except ratios)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
184.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
256.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
520.8
|
|
|
|
|
528.7
|
|
|
|
|
672.8
|
|
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
|
|
|
599.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
1,024.6
|
|
|
|
|
988.1
|
|
|
|
|
1,616.7
|
|
|
|
|
1,650.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,936.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current
portion)(3)
|
|
|
|
329.5
|
|
|
|
|
252.0
|
|
|
|
|
160.0
|
|
|
|
|
1,151.7
|
|
|
|
|
1,346.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock subject to redemption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
472.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,008.5
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital(4)
|
|
|
|
173.2
|
|
|
|
|
127.5
|
|
|
|
|
201.7
|
|
|
|
|
211.5
|
|
|
|
|
336.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
57.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
230.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
(52.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
|
(149.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External aluminum (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
|
492.5
|
|
|
|
|
502.7
|
|
|
|
|
496.5
|
|
|
|
|
523.4
|
|
|
|
|
509.5
|
|
|
|
|
374.5
|
|
|
|
|
221.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment aluminum (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total aluminum shipments (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
|
548.9
|
|
|
|
|
546.2
|
|
|
|
|
555.0
|
|
|
|
|
554.6
|
|
|
|
|
589.9
|
|
|
|
|
435.7
|
|
|
|
|
256.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External alumina
(kMts)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External bauxite
(kMts)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
|
383.3
|
|
|
|
|
392.2
|
|
|
|
|
409.3
|
|
|
|
|
371.6
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
346.1
|
|
|
|
|
273.3
|
|
|
|
|
235.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Net income (loss) per share is not presented for the
Pre-predecessor and Predecessor periods because Noranda was a
wholly owned subsidiary during those periods. |
|
(3) |
|
Long-term debt includes long-term debt due to related parties
and to third parties, including current installments of
long-term debt. For the Successor period long-term debt does not
include issued and undrawn letters of credit under the existing
revolving credit facility. |
|
(4) |
|
Working capital is defined as current assets net of current
liabilities. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
External alumina and bauxite shipments are recorded subsequent
to the August 31, 2009 Joint Venture Transaction.
Additionally, from
time-to-time,
the New Madrid smelter sells excess alumina. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
For purposes of comparability to other periods, brokered metal
sales are excluded from downstream pounds because the related
metal was sold without fabrication premiums. Brokered metal
sales excluded were $8.2 million for the period from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007, and
$43.2 million for the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007. |
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 and as of
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 and as of
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
$
|
816.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
496.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
527.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
867.4
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
660.6
|
|
|
|
|
409.0
|
|
|
|
|
424.5
|
|
|
|
|
768.0
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
Other (recoveries) charges, net
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684.4
|
|
|
|
|
422.5
|
|
|
|
|
441.3
|
|
|
|
|
806.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
131.6
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
Other (income) expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
110.6
|
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
$
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per
share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.67
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75.6
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657.8
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,616.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,650.5
|
|
Long-term debt (including current
portion)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151.7
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficiency)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Working
capital(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211.5
|
|
Cash flow data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
107.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
160.8
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1,197.7
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(83.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,112.5
|
|
Shipments (pounds in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
|
308.8
|
|
|
|
|
187.7
|
|
|
|
|
202.3
|
|
|
|
|
321.1
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
345.1
|
|
|
|
|
209.9
|
|
|
|
|
214.4
|
|
|
|
|
340.2
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
|
259.1
|
|
|
|
|
150.2
|
|
|
|
|
135.6
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
236.0
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income per share is not presented for the Pre-predecessor
and Predecessor periods because Noranda was a wholly owned
subsidiary during those periods. |
|
(2) |
|
Long-term debt includes long-term debt due to related parties
and to third parties, including current installments of
long-term debt. For the successor period, long-term debt does
not include issued undrawn letters of credit under our existing
revolving credit facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Working capital is defined as current assets net of current
liabilities. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
For purposes of comparability to other periods, brokered metal
sales are excluded from downstream pounds because the related
metal was sold without fabrication premiums. Brokered metal
sales excluded were $8.1 million for the period from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007, $8.0 million for
the period from May 18, 2007 to June 30, 2007, and
$43.2 million for the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007. |
48
UNAUDITED
SUPPLEMENTAL PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
(in millions, except per share data)
This supplemental pro forma condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007, reflects
the pro forma assumptions and adjustments as if the Apollo
Transactions occurred on January 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2007 to May 17,
|
|
|
|
2007 to December 31,
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
$
|
527.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
867.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,395.1
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
424.5
|
|
|
|
|
768.0
|
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
1,205.3
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
Other (recoveries) charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441.3
|
|
|
|
|
806.7
|
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,261.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent and related party
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
|
|
42.8
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)(7)
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.53
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.53
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the historical consolidated results of operations. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects an increase of $12.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 of depreciation resulting from fair value
adjustments to property, plant and equipment as a result of the
Apollo Acquisition. The adjustment also reflects an increase of
$0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
resulting from the fair value adjustment to inventory as a
result of the Apollo Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes (i) an increase of $0.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 of amortization resulting from fair
value adjustments to amortizable intangible assets as a result
of the Apollo Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Reflects the elimination of historical intercompany interest
income and expenses, related to intercompany balances which were
not acquired as part of the Apollo Acquisition. |
49
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Reflects the net effect of the increase in interest expense
related to the additional indebtedness, incurred in the Apollo
Transactions and the Special Dividend in the aggregate principal
amount of $1,227.8 million, bearing interest at a
weighted-average interest rate of 8.3%. The interest rates used
for pro forma purposes are based on assumptions of the rates at
the time of the acquisition. The adjustment assumes
straight-line amortization of related deferred financing costs.
A 0.125% change in the interest rates on our pro forma
indebtedness would change our annual pro forma interest expense
by $1.5 million. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Reflects an increase of amortization of excess of carrying value
of investment over Norandas share of the investments
underlying net assets resulting from the fair value adjustments
to Norandas joint ventures as a result of the Apollo
Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Reflects the estimated tax effect of the pro forma adjustments
at Norandas statutory tax rate. |
The above unaudited supplemental pro forma condensed
consolidated statement of operations does not adjust the
write-off of deferred financing costs, which are included in the
historical consolidated results of operations included elsewhere
in this prospectus.
50
UNAUDITED
SUPPLEMENTAL PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
(in millions, except per share data)
This supplemental pro forma condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, reflects
the pro forma assumptions and adjustments as if the Apollo
Transactions occurred on January 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
$
|
816.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
496.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,312.7
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
660.6
|
|
|
|
|
409.0
|
|
|
|
|
64.2
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
1,133.8
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
Other (recoveries) charges, net
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684.4
|
|
|
|
|
422.5
|
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
|
1,173.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
131.6
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
|
(66.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
139.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, (income) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent and related party
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
(19.7
|
)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
113.3
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
112.7
|
|
Loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
|
125.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
110.6
|
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
|
(162.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
|
(61.5
|
)(7)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(100.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.42
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.42
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the historical consolidated results of operations. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects an increase of $49.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 of depreciation resulting from fair value
adjustments to property, plant and equipment as a result of the
Apollo Acquisition. The adjustment also reflects an increase of
$14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
resulting from the fair value adjustment to inventory as a
result of the Apollo Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes (i) the elimination of administrative expenses in
GCA Lease Holdings, Inc. of $0.7 million, which was not
acquired as part of the Apollo Acquisition; (ii) the
elimination of certain pension expenses of $1.7 million
primarily related to amortization of actuarial losses,
transition obligations and prior service costs; (iii) an
increase of $2.6 million of amortization resulting from
fair value adjustments to amortizable intangible assets as a
result of the Apollo Acquisition; and (iv) the addition of
a management fee of $2.0 million that we are permitted to
pay to Apollo for certain financial, strategic, advisory and
consulting services under the terms of the indentures governing
the notes (see Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Apollo Management Agreement and
Transaction Fee). |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Reflects the elimination of historical intercompany interest
income and expenses, related to intercompany balances which were
not acquired as part of the Apollo Acquisition. |
51
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Reflects the net effect of the increase in interest expense
related to the additional indebtedness, incurred in the Apollo
Transactions and the Special Dividend in the aggregate principal
amount of $1,227.8 million, bearing interest at a
weighted-average interest rate of 8.3%. The interest rates used
for pro forma purposes are based on assumptions of the rates at
the time of the acquisition. The adjustment assumes
straight-line amortization of related deferred financing costs.
A 0.125% change in the interest rates on our pro forma
indebtedness would change our annual pro forma interest expense
by $1.5 million. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Reflects an increase of amortization of excess of carrying value
of investment over Norandas share of the investments
underlying net assets resulting from the fair value adjustments
to Norandas joint ventures as a result of the Apollo
Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Reflects the estimated tax effect of the pro forma adjustments
at Norandas statutory tax rate. |
The above unaudited supplemental pro forma condensed
consolidated statement of operations does not adjust the
write-off of deferred financing costs, which are included in the
historical consolidated results of operations included elsewhere
in this prospectus.
52
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our results of
operations and financial condition with the Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data and the audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
beliefs, and that involve numerous risks and uncertainties,
including, but not limited to, those described in the Risk
Factors section of this prospectus. Actual results may
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements. See Cautionary Statement Concerning
Forward-Looking Statements.
The following discussion and analysis of our results of
operations and financial condition covers certain historical
periods prior to the consummation of the Apollo Transactions.
The discussion and analysis of historical periods prior to the
Apollo Acquisition do not reflect the significant impact that
the Apollo Transactions have had on us, including significantly
increased leverage and liquidity requirements. We have presented
a discussion of our results for the periods prior to the Apollo
Acquisition (the Pre-predecessor and Predecessor periods) on
both a historical and pro forma basis.
Introduction
Noranda HoldCo is a holding company created for the purpose of
the Apollo Acquisition. Prior to the Apollo Acquisition, on
May 17, 2007, Noranda HoldCo did not engage in any business
or other activities except in connection with its formation.
Therefore, the following Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or
MD&A, focuses on the historical and pro forma
results of operations of our operating company, Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. and its subsidiaries, for periods prior to the
Apollo Acquisition.
This MD&A is provided as a supplement to the audited
consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in the prospectus to help provide an understanding of
our financial condition, changes in financial condition and
results of our operations. The MD&A is organized as follows:
Company Overview. This section provides a
general description of our business as well as recent
developments that we believe are necessary to understand our
financial condition and results of operations and to anticipate
future trends in our business.
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates. This section discusses the accounting
policies and estimates that we consider to be important to our
financial condition and results of operations and that require
significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in
their application.
Results of Operations. This section provides a
discussion of the results of operations on a historical basis
for each of our fiscal periods in the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, and during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009. The section also
provides a supplemental discussion of operating results on a pro
forma basis to aid the reader in understanding the results of
operations of periods before and after the Apollo Acquisition.
Liquidity and Capital Resources. This section
provides an analysis of our cash flows for each of the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009.
Contractual Obligations and
Contingencies. This section provides a discussion
of our commitments as of December 31, 2008.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk. This section discusses our exposure to
potential losses arising from adverse changes in interest rates
and commodity prices.
53
Company
Overview
We are a leading North American integrated producer of
value-added primary aluminum products and high-quality rolled
aluminum coils. We have two businesses: our primary metals, or
upstream business, and our rolled products, or downstream
business. Our upstream business consists of our aluminum smelter
near New Madrid, Missouri, and supporting operations at our
vertically integrated bauxite mine and alumina refinery. New
Madrid has annual production capacity of approximately
580 million pounds (263,000 metric tonnes), which
represents more than 15% of total U.S. primary aluminum
production as estimated by CRU. Our downstream business is one
of the largest aluminum foil producers in North America and
consists of four rolling mill facilities with a combined maximum
annual production capacity of 410 to 495 million pounds,
depending on our production mix.
The
Joint Venture Transaction
On August 3, 2009, we entered into an agreement with
Century whereby we would become the sole owner of both Gramercy
and St. Ann. The transaction closed on August 31, 2009. In
the transaction, Noranda and Gramercy released Century from
certain obligations. These obligations included
(i) approximately $23.0 million Century owed Gramercy
for pre-transaction alumina purchases, and
(ii) Centurys guarantee to fund future payments of
environmental and asset retirement obligations. In addition, as
part of the transaction, we agreed to sell to Century
approximately 190,500 metric tonnes of alumina through
2010. The first 125,000 metric tonnes will be sold at a
fixed price, with the reminder sold at a price indexed to the
LME price.
Stand-alone
public company
Prior to the Apollo Acquisition, we did not operate as a
stand-alone public company, but instead as a subsidiary of
Xstrata and prior to our acquisition by Xstrata, as a subsidiary
of Falconbridge Limited. This financial information does not,
however, reflect what our results of operations, financial
position, cash flows or costs and expenses would have been if we
had been a separate, stand-alone public entity during the
Pre-predecessor and Predecessor periods presented.
Key
factors affecting our results of operations
Prices and markets. The global recession and
credit crisis which began in late 2007 and continued through
2009 has severely impacted the aluminum industry. Primary
aluminum is a global commodity, and its price is set on the LME.
Our primary aluminum products typically earn the LME price plus
a Midwest premium, the sum of which is known as the MWTP. As a
result of the 2008 global economic contraction, the monthly
average LME price dropped from a peak of $1.49 in July 2008 to a
low of $0.57 in February 2009. This decline in price has had a
significant negative impact on our 2008 and 2009 financial
results. LME prices have since risen to $1.00 as of
December 31, 2009.
Pricing in the downstream business is generally unaffected by
short-term volatility in the underlying LME price. The price of
any given end-product is equal to the cost of the metal, or
MWTP, plus a negotiated fabrication premium. These fabrication
premiums are determined in large part by industry capacity
utilization, which in turn is driven by supply-demand
fundamentals for our products. Since 2007, the downturn in the
U.S. economy generally and the housing market in particular
have resulted in lower industry volumes and, in addition,
reduced fabrication premiums in certain key product groups.
Because primary aluminum is a global commodity, we have
experienced and expect to continue to be subject to volatile
primary aluminum prices. This price volatility is influenced
primarily by the world supply-demand balance for those
commodities and related processing services, and other related
factors such as speculative activities by market participants,
production activities by competitors and political and economic
conditions, as well as production costs in major production
regions. Increases or decreases in primary aluminum prices
result in increases and decreases in our revenues (assuming all
other factors are unchanged). Since the Apollo Acquisition, we
have hedged this volatility through the use of derivative
financial instruments. See Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for further
discussion of
54
fixed price aluminum swaps. See Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates for further discussion
of our accounting for these hedges.
Demand. We are a North American producer with
a majority of our primary aluminum sales in the form of
value-added products delivered within a
one-day
delivery radius of New Madrid. Therefore, while global market
trends determine the LME price and impact our margins, domestic
supply and demand for our value-added products also directly
impact our margins. As a result of the global recession and
credit crisis which began in late 2007 and continued through
2009, we experienced a decline in demand for value-added
products utilized in the housing and construction industry.
Prior to the global recession and credit crisis, primary
aluminum experienced strong price trends supported to a large
extent by improved market fundamentals for aluminum, including
global demand growth from developing regions, higher global
power costs, new supply constraints and a weaker
U.S. dollar, among several other factors. For the year
ended December 31, 2008, external value-added shipments
were 404.8 million pounds, or 15.2% lower than in 2007.
These trends continued into 2009, as external value-added
shipments through the first nine months of 2009 were
214.6 million pounds, or 35.2% lower than in the comparable
2008 period. In third quarter 2009, we saw that rod sales held
steady with third quarter 2008. Billet shipments continue to be
lower than 2008 levels, but the rate of
quarter-over-quarter
decline has slowed. Despite some positive signs in both demand
and price, there is substantial uncertainty in the marketplace.
In addition to extraordinary declines in volume in the upstream
segment, the downstream business has also been impacted by weak
end markets beginning with the housing decline in 2007. Weak
market conditions have had a direct negative impact on our
downstream business volume and subsequently our financial
results. In 2009, we saw a slowing in the overall rate of volume
decline because of targeted growth programs in less cyclical
market segments.
While we are beginning to see a few favorable economic signs in
late 2009, our results continue to reflect the global economic
contraction and the resulting decline in end-market demand and
LME prices. Uncertainty remains about the timing and pace of the
industrys recovery. Global inventories, however, remain
high at over 6 million metric tonnes as of the end of
October 2009, raising concern about near term supply/demand
balances. Although certain global markets have seen increased
demand for aluminum, end-market demand in North America has been
slow to recover. Overall aluminum demand is still down
significantly versus 2008. Through September 2009, North
American industry foil shipments are down 20%, industry rod
shipments are down 30% and industry billet shipments are off 42%.
Our integrated operations provide us the flexibility to shift a
portion of our upstream production to our downstream business,
reducing our overall external purchase commitments, and allowing
us to retain the economic differential between LME pricing and
our production costs. In 2008, we responded to the decrease in
demand for value-added products by increasing the production of
commodity sow used in our downstream business. In 2008, the
decrease in value-added shipments to external customers was more
than offset by a 49.2 million pound increase in shipments
to our downstream operation and a 55.9 million increase in
external sow shipments.
Production. In 2008, our upstream business
produced approximately 575 million pounds (261,000 metric
tonnes) of primary aluminum. Due to a severe ice storm the week
of January 26, 2009, our New Madrid smelter lost
approximately 75% of its capacity because of damage from power
interruptions. At December 31, 2009 we were at 80% of
capacity and expect to return to full capacity during first
quarter 2010. See Business Primary
Metal Upstream Business for further discussion.
Our rolling mills have a combined maximum annual production
capacity of 410 to 495 million pounds, depending on our
production mix. Due to the downturn in the housing industry, our
downstream business produced 388 million pounds of rolled
products in 2008, compared to 406 million pounds in 2007
and 476 million pounds in 2006. During 2008, the downturn
in the housing market resulted in lower demand, which reduced
sales volumes and had a negative impact on our 2008 financial
results.
Production costs. The key cost components at
our smelter are power and alumina. Power is supplied by Ameren
under a
15-year
contract that commenced on June 1, 2005 and includes an
evergreen renewal option.
55
The contract has all-in rates, with seasonal adjustments that
result in rates from June to September being approximately 45%
higher than the rates from October to May. Rate changes to this
contract are subject to regulatory review and approval.
Our vertical integration arrangements with Gramercy provides us
with a secure supply of alumina at a cost effectively equal to
Gramercy and St. Anns combined cost of production net of
bauxite and alumina sales to third parties. Gramercy in turn
obtains bauxite from St. Ann. In addition, St. Ann sells bauxite
to third parties and Gramercy sells chemical grade alumina to
third parties. These third-party sales effectively reduce the
cost for producing smelter grade alumina for our smelter in New
Madrid.
Historically, natural gas prices have shown a high level of
volatility. Average natural gas prices were $7.22 per million
BTU in 2007, $9.43 per million BTU in 2008, and $3.94 in 2009.
At December 31, 2009, we were entered into forward swaps
for natural gas, effectively fixing our cost for approximately
45% of our natural gas exposure through 2012 at average prices
at an average price of $7.35 per million BTU.
In our downstream business, aluminum metal units, which
represent a pass-through cost to our customers, typically
account for approximately 70% of production costs with
value-added conversion costs account for the remaining 30%.
Conversion costs include labor, energy and operating supplies,
including maintenance materials. Energy includes natural gas and
electricity, which make up about 17% of conversion costs.
Effect
of inflation
While inflationary increases in certain input costs, such as
wages, have an impact on our operating results, inflation has
had minimal net impact on our operating results during the last
three years, as overall inflation has been offset by increased
selling prices and cost reduction actions. We cannot assure you,
however, that we will not be affected by general inflation in
the future.
Off
balance sheet arrangements
We do not have any significant off balance sheet arrangements.
Reconciliation
of Net Income between Noranda AcquisitionCo and Noranda
HoldCo
Noranda HoldCo was formed on March 27, 2007, and its
principal asset is its wholly owned subsidiary, Noranda
AcquisitionCo, which was also formed on March 27, 2007, for
the purpose of acquiring Noranda Intermediate Holding
Corporation. The following table reconciles the results of
operations of Noranda HoldCo and Noranda AcquisitionCo:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Consolidated net income of Noranda AcquisitionCo
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
(59.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Noranda HoldCo interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
Noranda HoldCo director and other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
Noranda HoldCo gains on debt repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
Noranda HoldCo tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
(58.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income of Noranda HoldCo.
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
74.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our principal accounting policies are described in Note 1
of the audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The preparation of financial
statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management
to make significant judgments and estimates. Some accounting
policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these
financial statements. Our financial position and results of
operations may be materially different when reported under
different conditions or when using different assumptions in the
application of such policies. In the event estimates or
assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts,
adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more
current information. The preparation of interim financial
statements involves the use of certain estimates that are
consistent with those used in the preparation of our annual
financial statements. Significant accounting policies, including
areas of critical management judgments and estimates, include
the following financial statement areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
Revenue
recognition
Revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss pass to
customers in accordance with contract terms. We periodically
enter into supply contracts with customers and receive advance
payments for product to be delivered in future periods. These
advance payments are recorded as deferred revenue, and revenue
is recognized as shipments are made and title, ownership, and
risk of loss pass to the customer during the term of the
contracts.
Impairment
of long-lived assets
Our long-lived assets, primarily property, plant and equipment,
comprise a significant amount of our total assets. We evaluate
our long-lived assets and make judgments and estimates
concerning the carrying value of these assets, including amounts
to be capitalized, depreciation and useful lives. The carrying
values of these assets are reviewed for impairment periodically
or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recorded in the period in which it is determined that the
carrying amount is not recoverable. This evaluation requires us
to make long-term forecasts of future revenues and costs related
to the assets subject to review. These forecasts require
assumptions about demand for our products and future market
conditions. Significant and unanticipated changes to these
assumptions could require a provision for impairment in a future
period. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we
have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate,
different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our
reported financial results.
Goodwill
and other intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition consideration paid
over the fair value of identifiable net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are
reviewed for impairment at least annually, in the fourth
quarter, or upon the occurrence
57
of certain triggering events. We evaluate goodwill for
impairment using a two-step process. The first step is to
compare the fair value of each of our reporting units to their
respective book values, including goodwill. If the fair value of
a reporting unit exceeds its book value, reporting unit goodwill
is not considered impaired and the second step of the impairment
test is not required. If the book value of a reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test
is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the impairment test compares the implied fair
value of the reporting units goodwill with the book value
of that goodwill. If the book value of the reporting units
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same
manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business
combination. During fourth quarter 2008, we recorded a
$25.5 million goodwill impairment write down in the
downstream business, reflecting continued weakness in end
markets and the view that the acute decline in foil demand
continues to put pressure on pricing as industry capacity
utilization is operating well below historic levels. Our fourth
quarter impairment testing indicated no goodwill impairment for
the upstream business.
Our analyses included a combination of discounted cash flow and
market-based valuations. Discounted cash flow valuations require
that we make assumptions about future profitability and cash
flows of our reporting units, which the company believes reflect
its best estimates at the date the valuations were performed
(October 1 and December 31.) Key assumptions used to
determine reporting units discounted cash flow valuations
at December 31, 2008 included: (a) cash flow periods
of seven years; (b) terminal values based upon long-term
growth rates ranging from 1.5% to 2.0%; and (c) discount
rates ranging from 11.8% to 12.7% based on a risk-adjusted
weighted average cost of capital for each reporting unit. In the
downstream business, a 1 percent increase in the discount
rate would have decreased the reporting unit fair value, and
consequently increased the goodwill impairment write-down, by
approximately $40 million. In the downstream business, a
10% decrease in the cash flow forecast for each year would have
decreased the reporting unit fair value, and consequently
increased the goodwill impairment write-down, by approximately
$50 million. In the upstream business, a 1 percent
increase in the discount rate would have decreased the reporting
unit fair value by approximately $50 million and a 10%
decrease in the cash flow forecast for each year would have
decreased the reporting unit fair value by approximately
$80 million, neither of which would have resulted in
upstream impairment at December 31, 2008.
Intangible assets with a definite life (primarily customer
relationships) are amortized over their expected lives and are
tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate
that a carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Insurance
accounting
Due to the power outage that damaged our New Madrid smelter on
January 26, 2009, which is discussed further in the
footnotes notes of our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 included elsewhere in this prospectus,
management has determined that accounting for insurance
represents a significant accounting policy.
In recording costs and losses associated with the power outage,
we follow applicable U.S. GAAP to determine asset
write-downs, changes in estimated lives, and accruing for
out-of-pocket
costs. To the extent the realization of the claims for costs and
losses are probable, we record expected proceeds only to the
extent that costs and losses have been reflected in the
financial statements in accordance with applicable
U.S. GAAP. For claim amounts resulting in gains or in
excess of costs and losses that have been reflected in the
financial statements, we record such amounts only when those
portions of the claims, including all contingencies, are settled.
Business
combinations
On August 3, 2009, we entered into an agreement with
Century pursuant to which we became the sole owner of both
Gramercy and St. Ann. The Joint Venture Transaction closed on
August 31, 2009. In the transaction Noranda and Gramercy
released Century from certain obligations. These obligations
included
58
(i) approximately $23 million Century owed Gramercy
for pre-transaction alumina purchases, and
(ii) Centurys guarantee to fund future payments of
environmental and asset retirement obligations.
As discussed further in the footnotes to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 included elsewhere in this prospectus,
we accounted for the Joint Venture Transaction under FASB ASC
Topic 805, Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805).
|
|
|
|
|
The Joint Venture Transaction may be a business combination
achieved in stages, since we owned 50% of both Gramercy and St.
Ann prior to August 31, 2009. Applying the provisions of
ASC Topic 805, we re-measured our previous 50% investment to
fair value as of the acquisition date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Joint Venture Transaction was a bargain purchase. We assumed
the remaining portion of Gramercy and St. Ann in exchange for
releasing Century from guarantees to fund future environmental
and asset retirement obligations. To the extent permitted by
U.S. GAAP, we have assigned a fair value to the liabilities
related to the guarantee from which we released Century. We are
in the process of reassessing the recognition and measurement of
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
|
Our preliminary determination of the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed is summarized in Note 2 to
our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Our estimates and assumptions are
subject to change, depending on the final evaluation of the fair
value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the closing date of the transaction.
Pending the final determination of the fair value of
consideration transferred and the fair value of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed we may record a gain on the Joint
Venture Transaction resulting from any remaining unallocated
purchase price remaining after the final determination of fair
values. See the footnotes to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, included elsewhere in this prospectus,
for the calculation of the unallocated purchase price.
Inventories
The majority of our inventories, including alumina and aluminum
inventories, are stated at the lower of cost, using the
last-in,
first-out method, or market. Inventories at Gramercy and St. Ann
are stated at the lower of cost, using the weighted-average cost
method, or market. The remaining inventories (principally
supplies) are stated at cost using the
first-in,
first-out method. In our downstream segment, we use a standard
costing system, which gives rise to cost variances. Variances
are capitalized to inventory in proportion to the quantity of
inventory remaining at period end to quantities produced during
the period. Variances are recorded such that ending inventory
reflects actual costs on a
year-to-date
basis.
As of the date of the Apollo Acquisition a new base layer of
LIFO inventories was established at fair value, such that FIFO
basis and LIFO basis were equal. For layers added between the
acquisition date and period end, we use a dollar-value LIFO
approach where a single pool for each segment represents a
composite of similar inventory items. Increases and decreases in
inventory are measured on a pool basis rather than item by item.
In periods following the Acquisition, LIFO cost of sales reflect
sales at current production costs, which are substantially lower
than the fair value cost recorded at the date of acquisition, to
the extent that quantities produced exceed quantities sold. In
periods when quantities sold exceed quantities produced, cost of
goods sold reflect the higher fair value cost per unit.
As LME prices fluctuate, our inventory will be subject to market
valuation reserves. The principal factors that gave rise to our
market valuation reserve at December 31, 2007 and 2008
were: (i) a substantial portion of the quantities in
inventory were priced at base level prices and (ii) the LME
price at December 31, 2007 and 2008 was significantly lower
than the LME price used in determining the fair value of
inventory at the date of the Apollo Acquisition. In periods when
the LME price at a given balance sheet date is higher than the
LME price at the time of the Apollo Acquisition, no reserves
will be necessary. In December 2008, our expected selling prices
were lower than our production cost on a FIFO basis.
59
Asset
retirement obligations
We record our environmental costs for legal obligations
associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset
that results from its acquisition, construction, development or
normal operation as asset retirement obligations. We recognize
liabilities, at fair value, for our existing legal asset
retirement obligations and adjust these liabilities for
accretion costs and revision in estimated cash flows. The
related asset retirement costs are capitalized as increases to
the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and
depreciation on these capitalized costs is recognized.
Derivative
instruments and hedging activities
During 2008, we designated fixed price aluminum swaps as cash
flow hedges, thus the effective portion of such derivatives was
adjusted to fair value through other comprehensive (loss)
income, with the ineffective portion reported through earnings.
Derivatives that have not been designated for hedge accounting
are adjusted to fair value through earnings in loss (gain) on
derivative instruments and hedging activities in the
consolidated statements of operations. For derivative
instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges,
the effective portion of any gain or loss on the derivative is
reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss
and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods
during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and
losses on the derivatives representing either hedge
ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment
of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
Forecasted sales represent a sensitive estimate in our
designation of derivatives as cash flow hedges. As a result of
the New Madrid power outage in January 2009, management
concluded that certain hedged sale transactions were no longer
probable of occurring, and we discontinued hedge accounting for
all our aluminum fixed-price sale swaps on January 29,
2009. At that date, the accounting for amounts in accumulated
other comprehensive income did not change. We entered into
certain natural gas contracts during the fourth quarter of 2009
that qualified for and were designated as cash flow hedges based
on a fraction of estimated consumption of natural gas. Amounts
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income are
reclassified into earnings in the periods during which the
hedged transaction affects earnings, unless it is determined
that it is probable that the original forecasted transactions
will not occur, at which point a corresponding amount of
accumulated other comprehensive is immediately reclassified into
earnings. Forecasted sales represent a sensitive estimate in our
accounting for derivatives because they impact the determination
whether any amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income
should be reclassified into earnings in the current period.
We determine the fair values of our derivative instruments using
industry standard models that incorporate inputs which are
observable throughout the full term of the instrument. Key
inputs include quoted forward prices for commodities (aluminum
and natural gas) and interest rates, and credit default swap
spread rates for non-performance risk. Our derivative assets are
adjusted for the non-performance risk of our counterparties
using their credit default swap spread rates, which are updated
quarterly. Likewise, in the case of our liabilities, our
nonperformance risk is considered in the valuation, and are also
adjusted quarterly based on current default swap spread rates on
entities we consider comparable to us. We present the fair value
of our derivative contracts net of cash paid pursuant to
collateral agreements on a
net-by-counterparty
basis in our consolidated statements of financial position when
we believe a legal right of setoff exists under an enforceable
master netting agreement.
Investments
in affiliates
Through August 31, 2009 we held a 50% interest in each of
Gramercy and St. Ann, which we accounted for using the equity
method. On August 31, 2009, we became sole owner of
Gramercy and St. Ann. Therefore we no longer have any equity
method investees. See Note 2 to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 for further information regarding the
Joint Venture Transaction.
Prior to the Joint Venture Transaction, we evaluated an equity
method investment for impairment when adverse events or changes
in circumstances indicated, in managements judgment, that
the investments may
60
have experienced a decline in value. When evidence of loss in
value occurred, we compared the investments estimated fair
value to its carrying value in order to determine whether
impairment had occurred. If the estimated fair value was less
than the carrying value and management considered, based on
various factors, such as historical financial results, expected
production activities and the overall health of the
investments industry, the decline in value to be
other-than-temporary,
the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value
was recognized in the financial statements as an impairment.
During first quarter 2009, because of the reduced need for
alumina caused by the smelter power outage and depressed market
conditions, Gramercy reduced its annual production rate of
smelter grade alumina from approximately 1.0 million metric
tonnes to approximately 0.5 million metric tonnes. At
March 31, 2009, these production changes led us to evaluate
our investment in these joint ventures for impairment, which
resulted in a $45.3 million write-down ($39.3 million
for St. Ann and $6.0 million for Gramercy) during first
quarter 2009. In second quarter 2009, we recorded a
$35.0 million impairment charge related to our
equity-method investment in St. Ann. This impairment reflects
second quarter 2009 revisions to our assumptions about
St. Anns future profitability and cash flows.
Our impairment analyses were based on discounted cash flows
valuations that require us to make assumptions about future
profitability and cash flows of each joint venture. The
assumptions used reflect our best estimates at the date the
valuations were performed. Key assumptions used to determine
reporting units discounted cash flow valuations for
March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 include:
(a) cash flow projections for five years; (b) terminal
values based upon long-term growth rates ranging from 1% to 2%;
and (c) discount rates ranging 17% to 19% based on a
risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital for each
investment.
For Gramercy, a 1% increase in the discount rate would have
decreased our investments fair value by approximately
$7.7 million and $15.0 million during first quarter
and third quarter 2009, respectively. A 10% decrease in the cash
flow forecast for each year would have decreased our
investments fair value by approximately $4.8 million
and $19.8 million during first quarter and second quarter
2009, respectively. Neither a 1% increase in the discount rate
or a 10% decrease in the cash flow forecast would have resulted
in an impairment charge for Gramercy for second quarter 2009.
For St. Ann, a 1% increase in the discount rate would have
decreased our investments fair value, and consequently
increased the total impairment write-down, by approximately
$2.7 million and $3.6 million during first quarter and
second quarter 2009, respectively. A 10% decrease in the cash
flow forecast for each year would have decreased our
investments fair value, and consequently increased the
impairment write-down, by approximately $7.1 million and
$5.6 million during first quarter and second quarter 2009,
respectively.
Share-based
Payments
As described in more detail in the Shareholders
equity and share-based payments footnote to our audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, we account for stock option grants in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)). Under SFAS 123(R), the fair
value of each award is separately estimated and amortized into
compensation expense over the service period. The fair value of
our stock option grants are estimated on the grant date using
the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The application of
this valuation model involves assumptions that require judgment
and are highly sensitive in the determination of compensation
expense.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we have granted
the following stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Grant date
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Common
Stock(1)
|
|
|
Option
Grant(2)
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
June 10, 2009
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
December 3, 2009
|
|
|
112,426
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All fair valuations were determined by our board of directors in
consultation with management at the date of each stock option
grant. These fair values were determined using a combination of
discounted cash flow and market-based valuations. Discounted
cash flow valuations require that we make assumptions about
future profitability and cash flows of our business units. We
believe these assumptions reflect the |
61
|
|
|
|
|
best estimates at the date the valuations were performed. Key
assumptions used to determine reporting units discounted
cash flow valuations at each grant date included: (a) cash
flow periods of seven years; (b) terminal values based upon
a 1.5% long-term growth rate; and (c) a 14% discount rates
based on a risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model at
the date of each stock option grant. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The grant date fair value of the underlying shares for each
grant equaled the stock option exercise price of the awarded
options, so there were no grant date intrinsic values for these
awards. |
At December 31, 2009, we had approximately 1.1 million
stock options outstanding, approximately 0.5 million of
which were vested with an intrinsic value of
$ million, and approximately
0.6 million of which were unvested with an intrinsic value
of
$ .
Intrinsic value reflects the amount by which
$
(the midpoint of the offering range for this offering) exceeds
the exercise price of the outstanding stock options.
Results
of Operations
The results of operations, cash flows and financial condition
for the Pre-predecessor, Predecessor, and Successor periods
reflect different bases of accounting due to the impact on the
financial statements of the Xstrata and Apollo acquisitions, and
the resulting purchase price allocations. The comparability of
these periods is also limited by other changes inherent from one
acquisition to another, such as operating as a stand-alone
company in the Successor period versus operating as a subsidiary
of a larger company in the Pre-predecessor and Predecessor
periods.
To aid the reader in understanding the results of operations of
each of these distinctive periods, we have provided the
following discussion for the Pre-predecessor period from
January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006, for the
Predecessor periods from August 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2007 to May 17,
2007, and for the Successor periods from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, for the successor year ended
December 31, 2008 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009.
You should read the following discussion of the results of
operations and financial condition with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
herein.
Pre-predecessor
period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006;
Predecessor periods from August 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2007 to May 17,
2007; and Successor periods from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31,
2008
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Upstream sales
|
|
|
|
400.3
|
|
|
|
|
243.6
|
|
|
|
|
275.2
|
|
|
|
|
423.8
|
|
|
|
|
660.7
|
|
Sales, excluding alumina sales
|
|
|
|
400.3
|
|
|
|
|
243.6
|
|
|
|
|
275.2
|
|
|
|
|
421.7
|
|
|
|
|
660.7
|
|
External shipments (in millions of pounds)
|
|
|
|
308.8
|
|
|
|
|
187.7
|
|
|
|
|
202.3
|
|
|
|
|
321.1
|
|
|
|
|
509.5
|
|
Average price per pound
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Downstream sales
|
|
|
|
415.7
|
|
|
|
|
253.1
|
|
|
|
|
252.5
|
|
|
|
|
443.6
|
|
|
|
|
605.7
|
|
Downstream sales, excluding brokered metal
|
|
|
|
415.7
|
|
|
|
|
253.1
|
|
|
|
|
244.3
|
|
|
|
|
400.4
|
|
|
|
|
605.7
|
|
External shipments (in millions of pounds)
|
|
|
|
259.1
|
|
|
|
|
150.2
|
|
|
|
|
135.6
|
|
|
|
|
236.0
|
|
|
|
|
346.1
|
|
Average price per pound
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
Upstream and downstream sales per pound shipped fluctuated
within a narrow range during the Predecessor period of 2007,
reflecting the movement in the LME price and the Midwest
Transfer Premium during the periods, which were at relative
peaks during the first six months of both 2007 and 2008.
In planning for 2007, management anticipated a significant
increase in demand for downstream products, and entered into
take-or-pay
contracts to purchase fixed quantities of commodity-grade sow
and other metals from external sources. With the softening of
the housing market in
mid-to-late
2007, the downstream businesss commodity grade sow
requirements were less than originally anticipated. In certain
cases the downstream business made arrangements to sell these
contracted metal quantities to others. These sales are referred
to as brokered metal sales, and were priced at or
near our cost of purchasing the quantities. There were no
brokered metal sales in 2008.
In 2008, the upstream business increased its intersegment
shipments to the downstream segment, primarily due to a decrease
in demand for value-added products related to the softening of
the U.S. economy and its impact on the housing and
construction industry.
Cost of
sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Upstream cost of sales
|
|
|
|
306.0
|
|
|
|
|
194.2
|
|
|
|
|
203.5
|
|
|
|
|
356.8
|
|
|
|
|
623.0
|
|
Total shipments (in millions of pounds)
|
|
|
|
345.1
|
|
|
|
|
209.9
|
|
|
|
|
214.4
|
|
|
|
|
340.2
|
|
|
|
|
589.9
|
|
Average cost per pound
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Downstream cost of sales
|
|
|
|
399.0
|
|
|
|
|
240.5
|
|
|
|
|
237.9
|
|
|
|
|
432.7
|
|
|
|
|
597.5
|
|
Downstream cost of sales, excluding brokered metal
|
|
|
|
399.0
|
|
|
|
|
240.5
|
|
|
|
|
229.7
|
|
|
|
|
389.3
|
|
|
|
|
597.5
|
|
External shipments (in millions of pounds)
|
|
|
|
259.1
|
|
|
|
|
150.2
|
|
|
|
|
135.6
|
|
|
|
|
236.0
|
|
|
|
|
346.1
|
|
Average cost per pound
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
Upstream and downstream costs per pound shipped fluctuated
within a narrow range during the Predecessor period of 2007,
reflecting the cost levels inherent in the inventory valuation
from the Xstrata Acquisition completed in August 2006 and the
relatively stable cost environment.
Average upstream cost per pound shipped during the May 18,
2007 to December 31, 2007 Successor period is substantially
higher than in the January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
Predecessor period reflecting the impact of a
step-up in
the cost basis of inventory at the time of the Apollo
Acquisition and the impact of higher depreciation expense
resulting from the higher purchase price allocation to property,
plant and equipment. The
step-up in
cost basis is not as significant in the downstream business
because the pass-through nature of the metal costs causes those
costs to approximate current market rates, except in periods of
rapid change as were experienced in the last half of 2008. In
the downstream business, the higher per pound cost of sales in
2008 reflects lower of cost or market value, which we refer to
as LCM reserves resulting from the dramatic decline
in LME prices.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses and other
(SG&A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
SG&A expenses
|
|
|
$
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
73.8
|
|
As a % of sales
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
As a percentage of sales, SG&A was higher in the Successor
periods than in Predecessor periods due to the costs related to
the December 2008 workforce reduction. Additionally, losses on
disposal of assets increased significantly as a
$2.9 million write-down occurred in our downstream division
related to uninstalled rolling mill equipment. The remainder of
the difference is a result of an increase in consulting and
other professional fees associated with activities related to
the transition to operating as a stand-alone company, including
costs incurred in our debt and equity registration process.
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
131.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
86.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
As a % of sales
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
64
The decrease in operating income in the year ended
December 31, 2008 was attributable to the impact of the
global economic contraction, the fourth quarter impairment write
down and a one-time charge for termination benefits. Higher 2008
raw material and conversion costs, including $17.6 million
in higher natural gas costs, had a $35.9 million
unfavorable impact on 2008 operating income. An
$18.1 million unfavorable impact from lower aluminum prices
more than offset an $11.8 million favorable impact from
product mix and volume. The remaining decrease was primarily due
to higher selling, general and administrative expenses
associated with operating for a full year as a stand-alone
company, including higher consulting and other professional fees
and costs incurred in the Companys debt registration
process.
65
Pro
forma year ended December 31, 2006 compared to pro forma
year ended December 31, 2007
We have presented the results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007, on a pro forma basis, which
reflects the pro forma assumptions and adjustments as if the
Apollo Transactions had occurred on January 1, 2006. We
believe that this approach is beneficial to the reader because
it provides an
easier-to-read
discussion of the results of operations and provides the reader
with information from which to analyze our financial results.
The following table sets forth certain consolidated pro forma
financial information for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
1,312.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,395.1
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,133.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,205.3
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses and other
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
|
56.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,261.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
139.4
|
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
Other expenses (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent and a related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties, net
|
|
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
|
125.5
|
|
|
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
$
|
643.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
698.9
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
668.8
|
|
|
|
|
696.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,312.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,395.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
$
|
141.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
124.1
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
139.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments (pounds in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
496.5
|
|
|
|
|
523.4
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
555.0
|
|
|
|
|
554.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
409.3
|
|
|
|
|
371.6
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of comparability to other periods, brokered metal
sales are excluded from downstream pounds because the related
metal was sold without fabrication premiums. |
66
Sales in 2007 were $1,395.1 million, compared to
$1,312.7 million in 2006, an increase of 6.3%. Sales to
external customers in our upstream business grew from
$643.9 million in 2006 to $698.9 million in 2007, an
increase of 8.5%, due to an increase in the average realized
Midwest primary aluminum price from 120 cents per pound in 2006
compared to 123 cents per pound in 2007, and a 5.4% increase in
shipments during the period. Sales in our downstream business
increased from $668.8 million in 2006 to
$696.2 million in 2007. This increase relates to stronger
aluminum prices and $51.4 million of sales of excess
quantities of metal in which our downstream business sold excess
supplies of purchased primary aluminum raw material inventory.
The increase was offset by a decline in sales of HVAC finstock,
which was affected by the recent downturn in the housing market
and a corresponding weakening in demand for aluminum in building
products.
Cost of sales on a pro forma basis, in 2007 was
$1,205.3 million, compared to $1,133.8 million in
2006, an increase of 6.3%. The cost of sales was primarily
impacted by the $51.5 million of costs associated with
brokered metal sales as well as increases in shipments to
external customers. On a pro forma basis, cost of sales in our
upstream business was $531.5 million in 2007, compared to
$473.8 million in 2006, an increase of 12.2%. The increase
was primarily due to a 5.4% increase in shipments during the
period as well as increases in power and insurance costs. On a
pro forma basis, cost of sales in our downstream business of
$673.8 million in 2007 increased 2.1% compared to
$660.0 million in 2006. This is a result of the brokered
metal sales and an increase in aluminum prices, offset in part
by decreased shipment volumes, as a result of a decline in sales
of HVAC finstock.
Selling, general and administrative expenses and other on
a pro forma basis, increased $16.5 million from
$39.5 million in 2006 to $56.0 million in 2007. The
increase relates to stock compensation expense (including
$4.1 million expense related to repricing of stock
options), additional consulting, registration and sponsor fees
and a $2.4 million bonus paid by Xstrata to our current
management upon the closing of the Apollo Acquisition.
Operating income on a pro forma basis decreased
$5.6 million from $139.4 million in 2006 to
$133.8 million in 2007. This decrease was impacted by a
slight decrease in overall third-party shipment volumes and
increases in the average Midwest realized primary aluminum
price, but was driven primarily by the $16.5 million
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as
discussed above.
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments and hedging activities
in 2007 consisted of a $44.1 million loss compared to
$22.0 million loss in 2006, an increase of
$22.1 million. The increase in loss in 2007 was primarily
the result of the change in the fair value of forward contracts
entered into to hedge our exposure to aluminum price
fluctuations and the change in the fair value of interest rate
swaps entered into to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the
London Interbank Offering Rate or LIBOR. The loss in
2006 resulted from the fair value of natural gas financial swaps
entered into to hedge our exposure to natural gas price
fluctuations.
Income tax expense totaled $0.8 million in 2006 on a
pro forma basis, compared to $1.7 million in 2007 on a pro
forma basis. The provision for income taxes resulted in an
effective tax (benefit) rate for continuing operations of 21.8%
for 2007, compared with an effective tax rate of 5.8% for 2006.
The change in effective tax rates was primarily related to a
permanent difference in cancellation of debt income related to
the divestiture of a subsidiary, state income tax expense,
foreign equity earnings and the impact of the Internal Revenue
Code Section 199 manufacturing deduction.
Net income on a pro forma basis decreased
$22.6 million from $13.1 million in 2006 to a
$9.5 million loss in 2007. This decrease is primarily the
result of the combined effects of a $5.6 million decrease
in operating income (impacted primarily by increased selling,
general and administrative expenses) and a $22.1 million
unfavorable impact from derivative instruments and hedging
activities.
67
Year
ended pro forma December 31, 2007 compared to year ended
December 31, 2008
The following table sets forth certain consolidated pro forma
financial information for the year ended December 31, 2007
as though the Apollo Transactions and the Special Dividend had
occurred on January 1, 2007 and certain consolidated
historical financial information for the year ended
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,395.1
|
|
|
|
|
1,266.4
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,205.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,122.7
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses and other
|
|
|
56.0
|
|
|
|
|
73.8
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,222.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
Other expenses (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
|
89.2
|
|
Loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
|
151.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(107.0
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
698.9
|
|
|
|
|
660.7
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
696.2
|
|
|
|
|
605.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,395.1
|
|
|
|
|
1,266.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
124.8
|
|
|
|
|
78.4
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments (pounds in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
523.4
|
|
|
|
|
509.5
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
554.6
|
|
|
|
|
589.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
371.6
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
346.1
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For purposes of comparability to other periods, brokered metal
sales are excluded from downstream pounds because the related
metal was sold without fabrication premiums.
|
68
Sales for 2008 were $1,266.4 million, down 9.2% from
sales of $1,395.1 million in 2007. In the upstream
business, sales decreased 5.5% to $660.7 million in 2008
from $698.9 million in 2007. $24.0 million of the
decrease in sales resulted from a decrease in external shipment
volumes with the remaining decrease primarily attributable to a
decrease in the average MWTP. In the downstream business, sales
decreased 13.0% to $605.7 million in 2008 compared to
$696.2 million in 2007, which included $51.4 million
in brokered metal sales. There were no brokered metal sales in
2008. Volume drove a $44.2 million negative impact from
lower volumes as a result of the continued decline in demand in
business and construction markets offset a slight increase in
average fabrication premiums associated with a change in product
mix.
Total upstream metal shipments for the twelve months of 2008
were 589.9 million pounds, up 35.3 million pounds from
the 554.6 million pounds shipped during the twelve months
of 2007. Of the total amount shipped in 2008, 509.5 million
pounds were shipped to external customers, while the remaining
80.4 million pounds were intersegment shipments to the
downstream business. External shipments were down
13.9 million pounds in 2008 compared to 2007 as a result of
a decline in demand for value-added products, particularly due
to a drop in demand from our housing and construction end
markets. This decline was more than offset by a
49.2 million pound increase in shipments to the downstream
operation and a 55.9 million increase in external sow
shipments.
Cost of sales on a pro forma basis, in 2007 was
$1,205.3 million, compared to $1,122.7 million in
2008, a decrease of 6.9%. The decrease in cost of sales was
primarily due to decreases in shipments to external customers.
On a pro forma basis, cost of sales in our upstream business was
$530.6 million in 2007, compared to $525.2 million in
2008, a decrease of 1%. The decrease was primarily due to a 3.3%
decrease in shipments during 2008, partially offset by increases
in natural gas costs. On a pro forma basis, cost of sales in our
downstream business of $674.7 million in 2007 decreased
11.4% compared to $597.5 million in 2008. This is a result
of the decrease of brokered metal sales as well as decreased
shipment volumes as a result of a decline in sales of HVAC
finstock.
Selling, general and administrative expenses and other on
a pro forma basis, increased $17.8 million from
$56.0 million in 2007, on a pro forma basis, to
$73.8 million in 2008. This relates to costs incurred as a
result of our December 2008 restructuring program in the amount
of $9.1 million as well as an increase of $7.9 million
on losses related to disposal of assets. A significant portion
of the disposal balance is due to a $2.9 million write-down
related to uninstalled rolling mill equipment in our downstream
division. The remainder of the difference is a result of an
increase in consulting and other professional fees associated
with activities related to the transition to operating as a
stand-alone company, including costs incurred in our debt and
equity registration process.
Operating income decreased $89.4 million from
$133.8 million in 2007, on a pro forma basis, to
$44.4 million in 2008. The decrease was attributable to the
impact of the global economic contraction, the fourth quarter
impairment write-down and a one-time charge for termination
benefits.
Loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities in
2007 consisted of $44.1 million compared to
$69.9 million in 2008, an increase of $25.8 million.
This change was primarily the result of the change in the fair
value of fixed price swaps entered into to hedge our exposure to
aluminum price fluctuations and the change in the fair value of
interest rate swaps entered into to hedge our exposure to
fluctuations in LIBOR. In addition, the loss in 2008 increased
as a result of the fair value of natural gas financial swaps
entered into to hedge our exposure to natural gas price
fluctuations.
Income tax expense totaled $1.7 million in 2007 on a
pro forma basis compared to an income tax benefit of
$32.9 million in 2008. The provision for income taxes
resulted in an effective tax rate for continuing operations of
21.8% for 2007, compared with an effective tax rate of 30.8% for
2008. The change in effective tax rates was primarily related to
a permanent difference in cancellation of debt income related to
the divestiture of a subsidiary, a permanent difference related
to a goodwill impairment, state income tax expense, foreign
equity earnings and the impact of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 199 manufacturing deduction.
Net loss increased $64.6 million from a
$9.5 million loss in 2007 on a pro forma basis to a
$74.1 million loss in 2008. This increase is primarily the
result of the effects of an $89.4 million decrease in
operating
69
income, a $25.8 million increase in losses from derivative
instruments and hedging activities, as well as less equity from
unconsolidated companies in the amount of $3.9 million.
This amount was partially offset by a tax benefit of
$32.9 million in 2008 compared to income tax expense in the
amount of $1.7 million in 2007 on a pro forma basis, a
difference of $34.6 million, and less interest expense in
the amount of $19.8 million in 2008 compared to 2007 on a
pro forma basis.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to nine months
ended September 30, 2009
The following table sets forth certain historical condensed
consolidated financial information for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2008 and the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Statements of Operations
Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,004.9
|
|
|
|
540.6
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
846.8
|
|
|
|
566.5
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
Excess insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895.9
|
|
|
|
617.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
(77.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
(104.1
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(193.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
603.8
|
|
|
|
260.2
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
482.0
|
|
|
|
305.0
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(80.9
|
)
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,004.9
|
|
|
|
540.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
133.9
|
|
|
|
(28.1
|
)
|
Downstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.4
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(24.9
|
)
|
|
|
(25.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
(77.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
374.5
|
|
|
|
221.9
|
|
Intersegment (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total aluminum shipments (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
435.7
|
|
|
|
256.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External alumina (kMts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.5
|
|
External bauxite (kMts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145.0
|
|
Downstream (pounds, in millions)
|
|
|
273.3
|
|
|
|
235.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Figures may not add due to rounding. |
70
Sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2009
were $540.6 million compared to $1,004.9 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of
46.2%.
Sales to external customers in our upstream aluminum business
were $235.6 million in the first nine months of 2009; a
54.9% decrease from the $522.8 million reported in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, driven primarily by a
decline in LME aluminum prices, lower volumes of value-added
shipments due to a decline in end-market demand and lower sow
volumes related to the New Madrid power outage.
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in pricing, due to a 42.8% decrease in realized
MWTP, resulted in a decrease of $107.8 million in external
revenues. In the first nine months of 2009 and the first nine
months of 2008, the average LME aluminum price per pound was
$0.71 and $1.28, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total upstream aluminum shipments for the first nine months of
2009 decreased 179.4 million pounds to 256.3 million
pounds or 41.2% compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Intersegment shipments to our downstream business decreased
26.8 million pounds to 34.4 million pounds or 43.8%,
as a result of the power outage at New Madrid. The downstream
business has sufficient external alternate sources of supply to
meet its aluminum needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
External aluminum shipments decreased to 221.9 million
pounds in the first nine months of 2009 from 374.5 million
pounds in the first nine months of 2008. This 40.7% decrease in
external shipments resulted in lower external revenues of
$213.1 million and is largely the result of lower
production levels because of the smelter outage and the
continued decline in demand for value-added products. Shipments
of value-added products totaled 214.6 million pounds in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to 331.4 million pounds
in the first nine months of 2008. This lower volume was driven
by lower end-market demand in transportation and building
markets. The power outage at the New Madrid smelter had minimal
impact on these value-added volume declines, as we sourced
third-party metal to offset the hot metal production outage. The
re-melt capability and value-added processing capacity within
the New Madrid facility were sufficient to serve our
customers demands for products such as billet and rod.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the first nine months of 2009 include
$29.4 million related to 103.5 kMt of alumina shipped to
external customers and $4.4 million related to 145 kMt of
bauxite shipped to external customers.
|
Sales in our downstream business were $305.0 million for
the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of 36.7% compared to
sales of $482.1 million for the first nine months of 2008.
The decrease was primarily due to a negative impact from
pricing, as well as lower shipments to external customers.
|
|
|
|
|
The LME price decline contributed $110.1 million to the
sales decrease. Fabrication premiums were relatively unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased shipment volumes reduced revenues by
$67.0 million. Downstream shipment volumes decreased to
235.3 million pounds in the first nine months of 2009 from
273.3 million pounds in the first nine months of 2008. This
13.9% decrease was primarily due to lower end-market demand in
the building and construction markets.
|
Cost of sales decreased to $566.5 million for the
first nine months of 2009 from $846.8 million in the first
nine months of 2008. Costs incurred related to the New Madrid
power outage totaled $17.5 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, which were offset entirely by insurance
proceeds. The 33.1% decrease was mainly the result of lower
shipment volumes for value-added products to external customers,
offset by increases in the cost of raw materials.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 were $51.7 million
compared to $49.1 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, a 5.3% increase.
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased due to a
$1.8 million increase in pension expense in the first nine
months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008 due to
lower return
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
on plan assets per our actuarial estimates. Additionally, we
wrote off an unused mill in the downstream business resulting in
$3.0 million of increased expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional and consulting fees decreased $3.5 million
year over year, as a result of our cost-saving initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option modification costs in the first nine months of 2009
decreased from the prior years due to a modification of certain
stock options resulting in a payout of $2.4 million during
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All selling, general and administrative expenses associated with
the power outage at New Madrid of $6.6 million were offset
by insurance proceeds for the first nine months of 2009.
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset
impairment: In connection with the preparation of
our condensed consolidated financial statements for first
quarter 2009, we concluded that it was appropriate to
re-evaluate our goodwill and intangibles for potential
impairment in light of the power outage at the New Madrid
smelter and accelerated deteriorations of demand volumes in both
our upstream and downstream segments. Based on our interim
impairment analysis during first quarter 2009, we recorded an
impairment charge of $2.8 million on trade names in the
downstream segment and $40.2 million on goodwill in the
downstream segment. We finalized certain valuations related to
the goodwill impairment analysis during second quarter 2009,
which did not result in any adjustments to the impairment
charges recorded during first quarter. No further deterioration
was noted in the third quarter 2009; therefore, no goodwill
impairment testing was necessary at September 30, 2009.
However, future impairment charges could be required if we do
not achieve our cash flow, revenue and profitability projections.
Our analyses included assumptions about future profitability and
cash flows of our segments, which we believe reflects our best
estimates at the date the valuations were performed. The
estimates were based on information that was known or knowable
at the date of the valuations, and is at least reasonably
possible that the assumptions we employed will be materially
different from the actual amounts or results, and that
additional impairment charges for either or both segments will
be necessary during 2009. No further deterioration was noted in
third quarter 2009; therefore, no goodwill impairment testing
was necessary at September 30, 2009. Future impairment
charges could be required if we do not achieve our current cash
flow, revenue and profitability projections.
Excess insurance proceeds: We reached a
$67.5 million settlement with our insurance carriers all of
which has been received as of September 30, 2009. The
settlement proceeds of $67.5 million were allocated to cost
of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses to the
extent losses were realized and eligible for recovery under our
insurance policies. The line item titled Excess insurance
proceeds reflects the residual after applying the total
proceeds recognized against losses incurred through
September 30, 2009. This amount is not intended to
represent a gain on the insurance claim, but only a timing
difference between proceeds recognized and claim-related costs
incurred. We will continue to incur costs and may incur costs
that exceed the total $67.5 million in proceeds.
Operating income (loss) in the first nine months of 2009
was $77.2 million loss compared to operating income of
$109.0 million in the first nine months of 2008. The
decrease relates to
period-over-period
sales margin (sales minus cost of sales) reductions of
$184.1 million, and a $2.6 million increase in
selling, general and administrative and other expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin for the first nine months of 2009 was a
$26.0 million loss compared to income of
$158.1 million in the first nine months of 2008. This
$184.1 million decrease resulted from the impact of a 42.8%
decrease in realized MWTP coupled with a decrease in higher
margin sales of value-added products and higher production costs
(as a percent of sales) in the upstream business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$51.7 million in the first nine months of 2009 and were
relatively stable compared to $49.1 million in the first
nine months of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income was also impacted by goodwill and other
intangible asset impairment charges in the first nine months of
2009 of $43.0 million, offset by excess insurance proceeds
of $43.5 million.
|
72
Interest expense, net in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was $42.6 million compared to
$65.1 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008, a decrease of $22.5 million. Decreased interest
expense is related to lower LIBOR interest rates as well as
lower average debt outstanding on the term B loan (due to the
$24.5 million principal payment in April 2009) and the
AcquisitionCo Notes and HoldCo Notes (due to the debt
repurchases, discussed further below). These reductions in
principal balance were partially offset by the increased
revolver balance; however, the revolver maintains a lower
interest rate than the HoldCo Notes and AcquisitionCo Notes.
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net was a
$104.1 million gain in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the $50.5 million loss
in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. We
discontinued hedge accounting for our entire remaining aluminum
fixed-price sale swaps on January 29, 2009. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, the amount reclassified
from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings was
$149.3 million. As a result of the de-designation,
$77.8 million was reclassified into earnings because it is
probable that the original forecasted transactions will not
occur.
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
was a $79.0 million loss for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to income of $3.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease
was primarily attributable to impairment charges of
$80.3 million during the first nine months of 2009.
Our analyses of impairment included assumptions about future
profitability and cash flows of the joint ventures, which we
believe reflect our best estimates at the date the valuations
were performed. The estimates were based on information that was
known or knowable at the date of the valuations, and it is at
least reasonably possible that the assumptions we employed will
be materially different from the actual amounts or results.
Gain on debt repurchase: For the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, we repurchased
$320.8 million principal aggregate amount of our
outstanding HoldCo Notes, AcquisitionCo Notes, term B loan and
revolving credit facility for a price of $123.0 million,
plus fees. Of this amount, we repaid $6.6 million of our
revolving credit facility borrowings, resulting in our borrowing
capacity being reduced $7.3 million to $242.7 million.
We recognized a gain of $193.2 million representing the
difference between the reacquisition price and the carrying
amount of repurchased debt.
Income tax expense (benefit): Our effective
income tax rates were approximately 63.0% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 55.2% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The increase in the effective tax
rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008 were primarily impacted by state income
taxes, equity method investee income, the Internal Revenue Code
Section 199 manufacturing deduction, and goodwill
impairment in 2009. Each interim period is considered an
integral part of the annual period and tax expense is measured
using the estimated annual effective tax rate. Estimates of the
annual effective tax rate at the end of interim periods are, of
necessity, based on evaluations of possible future events and
transactions and may be subject to subsequent refinement or
revision. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, we used the annual effective tax rate
based on estimated ordinary income for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had
unrecognized income tax benefits (including interest) of
approximately $11.3 million and $11.0 million,
respectively (of which approximately $7.4 million and
$7.2 million, respectively, if recognized, would favorably
impact the effective income tax rate). As of September 30,
2009, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding
interest) increased by an immaterial amount. It is expected that
the unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next twelve
months; however, due to Xstratas indemnification of us for
tax obligations related to periods ending on or before the
acquisition date, we do not expect the change to have a
significant impact on our results of operations or our financial
position.
In April 2009, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
commenced an examination of our U.S. income tax return for
2006. As part of the Apollo Acquisition, Xstrata indemnified us
for tax obligations related to
73
periods ending on or before the acquisition date. Therefore, we
do not anticipate that the IRS examination will have a material
impact on our financial statements.
Net income was $36.5 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to a $1.7 million
loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This
$38.2 million increase was the net effect of the items
described above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operating
activities and cash on hand. Our main continuing liquidity
requirements are to finance working capital, capital
expenditures and acquisitions, and debt service.
We have incurred substantial indebtedness in connection with the
Apollo Transactions and the Special Dividend. As of
December 31, 2009, our total indebtedness was
$952.2 million. Based on the amount of indebtedness
outstanding and interest rates at December 31, 2009, our
annualized cash interest expense is approximately
$34.5 million, all of which represents interest expense on
floating-rate obligations (and thus is subject to increase in
the event interest rates were to rise), prior to any
consideration of the impact of interest rate swaps. Of this
amount, we have the right under the applicable indebtedness to
pay approximately $22.3 million by issuing additional
indebtedness rather than in cash. We issued additional
indebtedness as payment for our interest due May 15, 2009
and November 15, 2009 under our bond indentures. Further,
we have notified the trustee for Noranda HoldCo and Noranda
AcquisitionCo bondholders of our election to pay the
May 15, 2010 interest payments by issuing additional
indebtedness. In 2010, through the date of this prospectus we
used available cash balances to repay $150.0 million of our
revolving credit facility borrowings. As of January 12,
2010, we had $227.8 million of cash and revolving credit
facility available borrowings.
In addition to the indebtedness incurred as a result of the
Apollo Transactions and the Special Dividend, we may borrow
additional amounts under the revolving credit facility to fund
our working capital, capital expenditure and other corporate and
strategic needs. As of September 30, 2009, of our revolving
credit facilitys $242.7 million borrowing capacity,
we had a drawn balance of $216.9 million and outstanding
letters of credit of $24.2 million, resulting in
$1.6 million available for borrowing under the facility. As
of September 30, 2009, we had reduced the outstanding
amount of our term loan to $349 million through voluntary
and mandatory repayments and negotiated repurchases. The balance
of the term loan is due and payable in full in 2014. The
revolving credit facility is available until 2013. The
AcquisitionCo Notes and the HoldCo Notes will be due and payable
in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Our existing senior secured credit facilities contain various
restrictive covenants that restrict our ability to incur
indebtedness or liens, make investments, prepay subordinated
indebtedness or declare or pay dividends. However, all of these
covenants are subject to significant exceptions. For more
information, see Description of Certain
Indebtedness Secured credit facilities.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal, to pay
interest on, or to refinance our indebtedness, or to fund
planned capital expenditures, will depend on our ability to
generate cash in the future. This ability is, to a certain
extent, subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control.
Based on our current level of operations, we believe that cash
flow from operations and available cash will be adequate to meet
our short-term liquidity needs. We cannot assure you, however,
that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from
operations or that future borrowings will be available to us
under our existing senior secured credit facilities in an amount
sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our
other liquidity needs. In addition, upon the occurrence of
certain events, such as a change of control, we could be
required to repay or refinance our indebtedness. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our
indebtedness, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
74
Cash
Flows
Predecessor
Periods
Historically, our principal sources of liquidity have been cash
generated from operations and available borrowings. We also,
from time to time, borrowed from related-party lenders and
factored certain receivables in the Predecessor periods. Our
primary liquidity requirements had been the funding of capital
expenditures and working capital.
The following table sets forth certain historical consolidated
cash flow information for 2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
|
107.8
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
|
160.8
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31.8
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1,197.7
|
)
|
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
(83.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,112.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
(37.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities totaled
$41.2 million in the period from January 1, 2007 to
May 17, 2007 and $160.8 million in the period from
May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007, compared to
$81.9 million in the period from January 1, 2006 to
August 15, 2006 and $107.8 million in the period from
August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006. The increase in
cash flows from operating activities in 2007 compared with 2006
was mainly due to an increase in the price of primary aluminum
and reductions in working capital.
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities totaled
inflows of $5.1 million in the period from January 1,
2007 to May 17, 2007 and outflows of $1,197.7 million
in the period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007,
compared to outflows of $20.5 million in the period from
January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006 and
$31.8 million in the period from August 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006. The increase in cash flows used in
investing activities in 2007 was mainly due to cash used in the
Apollo Acquisition of $1,161.5 million, which consisted of
the purchase consideration including acquisition costs.
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities totaled
outflows of $83.7 million in the period from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007 and inflows of
$1,112.5 million in the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, compared to outflows of
$37.7 million in the period from January 1, 2006 to
August 15, 2006 and $60.5 million in the period from
August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006. The increase in
cash flows provided in financing activities in 2007 compared to
2006 was mainly due to the proceeds from the debt issued on
May 18, 2007 by Noranda AcquisitionCo in connection with
the Apollo Transactions and the HoldCo Notes issued by Noranda
HoldCo on June 7, 2007 totaling $1,227.8 million, the
equity contribution by Apollo in connection with the Apollo
Transactions of $214.2 million, the equity contribution by
our management of $1.9 million and the capital
contributions from our former parent company of
$101.3 million, which was offset by the payment of a
Special Dividend in June 2007 of $216.1 million, the
deferred financing costs of $39.0 million incurred as part
of the Apollo Transactions and the HoldCo Notes issue, the
voluntary repayment of $75.0 million of term B loan on
June 28, 2007 and the repayment of long-term debt with
Noranda Islandi EHF, a company under common control of Xstrata,
of $160.0 million.
75
Successor
Period
Following the Apollo Transactions, our primary sources of
liquidity are the cash flows from operations and funds available
under our existing senior secured revolving credit facility. Our
primary continuing liquidity needs are to finance our working
capital, capital expenditures, debt obligations, and restoring
our New Madrid smelter to full capacity. We have incurred
substantial indebtedness in connection with the Transactions and
incurred additional indebtedness in connection with the payment
of a special dividend to our stockholders. Our significant debt
service obligations could have material consequences to
investors.
The following table sets forth certain historical consolidated
cash flow information for 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
|
160.8
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1,197.7
|
)
|
|
|
(51.1
|
)
|
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(83.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,112.5
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(37.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities used $46.2 million of cash flow
in the fourth quarter, including $35.1 million for interest
payments, $18.3 million for tax payments and
$26.3 million in advance payment of January obligations for
raw materials. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled
$65.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to $41.2 million for the period from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007 and
$160.8 million for the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007. Operating cash flows for 2008 were
negatively impacted by lower aluminum prices and higher raw
material costs which offset the impact of slightly higher
volumes.
In light of business conditions present beginning in late
September 2008, along with our current and future cash needs,
management has notified the trustee for the HoldCo Notes and
AcquisitionCo Notes bondholders of its election to pay the
May 15, 2009 interest payment entirely by increasing the
principal amount of those notes.
Investing Activities: Capital expenditures
were $51.7 million during the Successor period ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $5.8 million in the
Predecessor period from January 1, 2007 to May 17,
2007 and $36.2 million in the Successor period from
May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007. The higher level of
capital expenditures in 2008 is primarily attributable to
capital expenditure projects aimed at increasing productivity,
including $16.2 million invested in the $48.0 million
smelter expansion project in our upstream business. Since 2008,
as a result of declining market conditions and the January 2009
power outage, we reduced the near-term scale of the New Madrid
smelter expansion program and have not determined a revised
timeline for the program.
During the Predecessor period from January 1, 2007 to
May 17, 2007, investing cash flows were affected by a
$10.9 million advance from the Predecessor parent. The
Successor period from May 18, 2007 to December 31,
2007 was affected by the $1.2 billion purchase price paid
by the Successor for the acquisition of Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
Financing Activities: During the Predecessor
period from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007, financing
cash flows were affected by the contribution of cash from the
Predecessor parent, the settlement of intercompany accounts, and
the distributions of amounts to the Predecessor parent, in
preparation for the Apollo Acquisition.
76
During the Successor period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, financing cash flows were affected by
the proceeds from issuance of the notes and the term B loan as
funding for the Apollo Acquisition. We made a $75.0 million
voluntary pre-payment of the term B loan in June 2007, as
described in the Long-Term Debt note to the audited
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we made a
$30.3 million principal payment as called for by our senior
secured credit facilities cash flow sweep provisions. As
discussed in the Long-Term Debt note to the
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus,
similar cash flow sweep payments may be required annually. Our
Board of Directors declared and we paid a $102.2 million
dividend ($4.70 per share) in June 2008.
In late September 2008, in light of concerns about instability
in the financial markets and general business conditions, in
order to preserve our liquidity, we borrowed $225 million
under the revolving portion of our senior secured credit
facilities and invested the proceeds in highly liquid cash
equivalents, including U.S. Government treasury bills and
money market funds holding only U.S. Government treasury
securities, with the remainder held in our bank accounts. Our
operating activities used $46.2 million of cash during the
fourth quarter, including $35.1 million for interest
payments, $18.3 million for tax payments, and
$26.3 million in advance payment of January 2009
obligations for raw materials and power, partially offset by
favorable working capital.
On January 29, 2009, Standard & Poors
downgraded its ratings of both Noranda HoldCo and Noranda
AcquisitionCo. Both remain on CreditWatch with negative
implications. On January 29, 2009, Moodys placed
Noranda HoldCo and Noranda AcquisitionCo under review for
possible downgrade.
The following table sets forth certain historical condensed
consolidated financial information for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2008 and the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
111.7
|
|
|
|
230.4
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
(149.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
169.4
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities in the first nine months of 2009
reflected $119.7 million of proceeds from hedge
terminations under our hedge settlement agreement with Merrill
Lynch and $18.0 million from reduction of working capital.
Investing Activities: Capital expenditures
amounted to $32.2 million through September 2009 and
$37.5 million in the comparable 2008 period. This amount is
offset in 2009 by $11.1 million of cash acquired during the
Joint Venture Transaction. $11.5 million of our capital
spending in 2009 related to the New Madrid restart all of which
was funded with insurance proceeds. Except for the New Madrid
restart, we expect to devote our remaining 2009 capital
expenditures primarily to maintenance spending.
Financing Activities: During the first nine
months of 2009, our financing cash flows mainly reflected debt
reduction. We utilized net proceeds from our hedge settlement
agreement to repurchase $320.8 million aggregate principal
amount of our HoldCo Notes and AcquisitionCo Notes for a total
price of $123.0 million (plus transaction fees).
Additionally, we made a required $24.5 million repayment of
our term B loan and repaid $1.5 million of borrowings under
our revolving credit facility.
We issued additional indebtedness as payment for our interest
due May 15, 2009 and November 15, 2009 under our bond
indentures. Further, we have notified the trustee for Noranda
HoldCo and Noranda AcquisitionCo bondholders of our election to
pay the May 15, 2010 interest payments by issuing
additional indebtedness.
In June 2008, we paid a $102.2 million dividend to our
common stockholders.
77
Covenant
Compliance
Upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a change of
control, we could be required to repay or refinance our
indebtedness. In addition, certain covenants contained in our
debt agreements restrict our ability to take certain actions
(including incurring additional secured or unsecured debt,
expanding borrowings under existing term loan facilities, paying
dividends and engaging in mergers, acquisitions and certain
other investments) unless we meet certain standards in respect
of the ratio of our Adjusted EBITDA, calculated on a trailing
four-quarter basis, to our fixed charges (the fixed-charge
coverage ratio) or the ratio of our senior secured net
debt to our Adjusted EBITDA, calculated on a trailing
four-quarter basis (the net senior secured leverage
ratio). Furthermore, our ability to take certain actions,
including paying dividends and making acquisitions and certain
other investments, depends on the amounts available for such
actions under the applicable covenants, which amounts accumulate
with reference to our Adjusted EBITDA on a quarterly basis.
The minimum or maximum ratio levels set forth in our covenants
as conditions to our undertaking certain actions and our actual
performance are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Ratio
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Covenant
|
|
December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Covenants
|
|
Threshold
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Noranda HoldCo:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due
2014(1)
|
|
Fixed Charge
Coverage Ratio
|
|
Minimum
1.75 to 1.0
|
|
2.5 to 1
|
|
1.3 to 1
|
Noranda AcquisitionCo:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due
2015(1)
|
|
Fixed Charge
Coverage Ratio
|
|
Minimum
2.0 to 1.0
|
|
3.2 to 1
|
|
1.7 to 1
|
Senior Secured Credit
Facilities(1)(2)
|
|
Net Senior
Secured Leverage
Ratio
|
|
Maximum
3.0 to 1.0(3)
|
|
1.9 to 1
|
|
3.2 to 1
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of measuring Adjusted EBITDA in order to compute
the ratios, pro forma effect is given to the Joint Venture
Transaction as if it had occurred at the beginning of the
trailing four-quarter period. Fixed charges are the sum of
consolidated interest expenses and all cash dividend payments in
respect of preferred stock. In measuring interest expense for
the ratio, pro forma effect is given to any repayment or
issuance of debt as if such transaction occurred at the
beginning of the trailing four-quarter period. |
|
|
|
|
|
For Noranda HoldCo and Noranda AcquisitionCo, the pro forma
impact of the Joint Venture Transaction on Adjusted EBITDA for
the four quarters ended September 30, 2009 was
$23.2 million. For Noranda HoldCo, fixed charges on a pro
forma basis (giving effect to debt repayments) for the four
quarters ended December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2009 were $94.7 million and $80.6 million,
respectively. For Noranda AcquisitionCo, fixed charges on a pro
forma basis (giving effect to debt repayments) for the four
quarters ended December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2009 were $73.4 million and $61.8 million,
respectively. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As used in calculating this ratio, senior secured net
debt means the amount outstanding under our term B loan
and the revolving credit facility, plus other first-lien secured
debt (of which we have none presently), less unrestricted
cash and permitted investments (as defined
under our senior secured credit facilities). At
December 31, 2008, senior secured debt was
$618.5 million and unrestricted cash and permitted
investments amounted to $160.6 million, resulting in senior
secured net debt of $457.9 million. At September 30,
2009, senior secured debt was $565.9 million and
unrestricted cash and permitted investments aggregated
$235.0 million, resulting in senior secured net debt of
$330.9 million. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The maximum ratio was 2.75 to 1 until December 31, 2008 and
changed to 3.0 to 1 on January 1, 2009. |
Because we currently do not satisfy these ratio levels, we
currently are limited in our ability to incur additional debt,
make acquisitions or certain other investments and pay
dividends. These restrictions do not interfere with the
day-to-day-conduct
of our business. Moreover, our debt agreements do not require us
to maintain any financial performance metric or ratio in order
to avoid a default.
78
As used herein, Adjusted EBITDA (which is defined as
EBITDA in our debt agreements) means net income
before income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and
amortization, adjusted to eliminate related party management
fees, business optimization expenses and restructuring changes,
certain charges resulting from the use of purchase accounting
and other specified items of income or expense.
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under
U.S. GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures used by other companies in our industry. Adjusted
EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from or as an
alternative to net income, income from continuing operations,
operating income or any other performance measures derived in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an
analytical tool and you should not consider it in isolation or
as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under
U.S. GAAP. For example, Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain tax
payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;
does not reflect any cash requirements for the assets being
depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the
future; does not reflect capital cash expenditures, future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual
commitments; does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements
for, our working capital needs; and does not reflect the
significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary
to service interest or principal payments, on our indebtedness.
Adjusted EBITDA also includes incremental stand-alone costs and
adds back non-cash hedging gains and losses, and certain other
non-cash charges that are deducted in calculating net income.
However, these are expenses that may recur, vary greatly and are
difficult to predict. In addition, certain of these expenses can
represent the reduction of cash that could be used for other
corporate purposes. You should not consider our Adjusted EBITDA
as an alternative to operating or net income, determined in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of our operating
performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating
activities, determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an
indicator of our cash flows or as a measure of liquidity.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to Adjusted
EBITDA for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
|
113.9
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
(74.1
|
)
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
73.4
|
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
|
|
98.2
|
|
|
|
83.8
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
Joint venture
EBITDA(a)
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
LIFO
adjustment(b)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
LCM
adjustment(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(193.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(193.2
|
)
|
New Madrid power
outage(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
Charges related to termination of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
Non-cash hedging gains and
losses(e)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
(69.6
|
)
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
(80.2
|
)
|
Non-recurring natural gas
losses(f)
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
68.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
Joint Venture impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.3
|
|
Purchase
accounting(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Incremental stand-alone
costs(h)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items,
net(i)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
296.3
|
|
|
|
309.3
|
|
|
|
234.9
|
|
|
|
79.2
|
|
|
|
225.6
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
The following table reconciles cash flow from operating
activities to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities
|
|
|
189.7
|
|
|
|
202.0
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
|
|
184.2
|
|
|
|
111.7
|
|
|
|
230.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on hedging activities
|
|
|
(22.1
|
)
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)
|
|
|
(47.0
|
)
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
(36.4
|
)
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements from hedge terminations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance proceeds applied to capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in pension and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(41.8
|
)
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
(32.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in asset and liabilities, net
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
(61.9
|
)
|
|
|
(28.3
|
)
|
|
|
(33.0
|
)
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture
EBITDA(a)
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO
adjustment(b)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCM
adjustment(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
New Madrid power
outage(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash hedging gains and
losses(e)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
(69.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Charges related to termination of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-recurring natural gas
losses(f)
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
accounting(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental stand-alone
costs(h)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance proceeds applied to depreciation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other items,
net(i)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
296.3
|
|
|
|
309.3
|
|
|
|
234.9
|
|
|
|
79.2
|
|
|
|
225.6
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Prior to the consummation of the Joint Venture Transaction on
August 31, 2009, our reported Adjusted EBITDA includes 50%
of the net income of Gramercy and St. Ann, based on transfer
prices that are generally in excess of the actual costs incurred
by the joint venture operations. To reflect the underlying
economics of the vertically integrated upstream business, this
adjustment eliminates the following components of equity income
to reflect 50% of the EBITDA of the joint ventures, for the
following aggregated periods (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Net tax expense
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total joint venture EBITDA adjustments
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Our New Madrid smelter and downstream facilities use the LIFO
method of inventory accounting for financial reporting and tax
purposes. This adjustment restates net income to the FIFO method
by eliminating LIFO expenses related to inventory held at the
New Madrid smelter and downstream facilities. Inventories at
Gramercy and St. Ann are stated at lower of weighted average
cost or market, and are not subject to the LIFO adjustment. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Reflects adjustments to reduce inventory to the lower of cost
(adjusted for purchase accounting) or market value. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents the portion of the insurance settlement used for
claim-related capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
We use derivative financial instruments to mitigate effects of
fluctuations in aluminum and natural gas prices. This adjustment
eliminates the non-cash gains and losses resulting from fair
market value changes of aluminum swaps, but does not affect the
following cash settlements (received)/ paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminum swaps fixed-price
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(88.6
|
)
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)
|
Aluminum swaps variable-price
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
(23.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The previous table presents cash settlement amounts net of early
terminations of fixed-price aluminum swaps and bond buybacks. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
During 2006, as mandated by Falconbridge Limited, our former
parent entity, we entered into natural gas swaps for the period
between April and December 2006 in response to rising natural
gas costs at the end of 2005. Natural gas prices, however,
decreased in 2006, and as a result, we generated losses on the
natural gas swaps. Our credit agreements provide for the
exclusion of losses incurred from those natural gas swaps. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents impact from inventory
step-up and
other adjustments arising from adjusting assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the Joint Venture Transaction to their
fair values. |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Reflects (i) the incremental insurance, audit and other
administrative costs on a stand-alone basis, net of certain
corporate overheads allocated by the former parent that we no
longer expect to incur on a go-forward basis and (ii) the
elimination of income from administrative and treasury services
provided by Noranda Aluminum, Inc.s former parent and its
affiliates that are no longer provided. |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Other items, net, consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sponsor fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Pension expense non-cash portion
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Employee compensation items
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Consulting and non-recurring fees
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Restructuring-project renewal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
Contractual
Obligations and Contingencies
The following table reflects certain of our contractual
obligations as of December 31,
2008(1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 and
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
beyond
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term
debt(2)
|
|
|
1,372.9
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225.0
|
|
|
|
1,115.6
|
|
Interest on long-term
debt(3)
|
|
|
478.8
|
|
|
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
Operating lease
commitments(4)
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Purchase
obligations(5)
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Other contractual
obligations(6)(7)
|
|
|
204.5
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
112.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,085.1
|
|
|
|
145.7
|
|
|
|
93.5
|
|
|
|
94.4
|
|
|
|
95.2
|
|
|
|
317.2
|
|
|
|
1,339.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsequent to December 31, 2008, we have made repurchases
of our outstanding debt, lowering our debt balances. Our total
outstanding debt at December 31, 2009 was
$952.2 million. Our annualized interest expense based on
debt balances and interest rates at December 31, 2009 is
approximately $34.5 million. In addition, in connection
with the August 31, 2009 Joint Venture Transaction, we may
assumed other contractual obligations and contingencies which
are not reflected in the table. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We may be subject to required annual paydowns on our term B
loan, depending on our annual performance; however, payments in
future years related to the term loan cannot be reasonably
estimated and are not reflected. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Interest on long-term debt was calculated based on the
weighted-average effective LIBOR rate of 2.13% at
December 31, 2008. The fronting fee and the undrawn
capacity fee of the revolving credit facility are not included
here. In addition, interest rate swap obligations are not
included and interest is assumed to be paid entirely in cash,
with the exception of the May 15, 2009 interest payment,
for which we have elected to pay in kind. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business.
Our operating leases include the leases on certain of our
manufacturing and warehouse facilities. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Purchase obligations include minimum purchase requirements under
New Madrids power contract over the
15-year life
of the contract. Additionally,
take-or-pay
obligations related to the purchase of metal units through 2008
for Norandal, USA, Inc. are included, for which we calculated
related expected future cash flows based on the LME forward
market at December 31, 2008, increased for an estimated
Midwest Premium. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
We have other contractual obligations that are reflected in the
consolidated financial statements, including pension
obligations, asset retirement obligations and environmental
matters, and service agreements. See the Income
Taxes footnote to Consolidated Financial Statements for
information regarding income taxes. As of December 31,
2008, the noncurrent portion of our income tax liability,
including accrued interest and penalties, related to
unrecognized tax benefits, was approximately $11.0 million,
which was not included in the total above. At this time, the
settlement period for the noncurrent portion of our income tax
liability cannot be determined. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
The GOJ and NBL are parties to an Establishment Agreement that
governs the relationship between them as to the operation of our
bauxite mine in St. Ann, Jamaica. On December, 31, 2009, NBL
arrived at an understanding with the GOJ to amend the
Establishment Agreement. This amendment sets the fiscal regime
structure of the Establishment Agreement from January 1,
2009 through December 31, 2014. The amendment provides for
a commitment by NBL to make certain expenditures for haulroad
development, maintenance, dredging, land purchases, contract
mining, training and other general capital expenditures from
2009 through 2014. |
82
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In addition to the risks inherent in our operations, we are
exposed to financial, market and economic risks. The following
discussion provides information regarding our exposure to the
risks of changing commodity prices and interest rates. The
interest rate, aluminum and natural gas contracts are held for
purposes other than trading. They are used primarily to mitigate
uncertainty and volatility, and to cover underlying exposures.
Commodity
Price Risks
In 2007 and 2008, we implemented a hedging strategy designed to
reduce commodity price risk and protect operating cash flows in
the upstream business. Beginning in first quarter 2009, we
entered into fixed-price aluminum purchase swaps to lock in a
portion of the favorable position of our fixed-price sale swaps.
The average margin per pound was $0.40 locked in as of
September 30, 2009. To the extent we have entered into
offsetting fixed-price swaps, we are no longer hedging our
exposure to price risk. In addition, in March 2009, we entered
into a hedge settlement agreement allowing us to monetize a
portion of these hedges and use these proceeds to repurchase
debt.
Specifically, we entered into fixed-price aluminum sales swaps
with respect to a portion of our expected future upstream
shipments. Under this arrangement, if the fixed-price of primary
aluminum established per the swap for any monthly calculation
period exceeds the average market price of primary aluminum (as
determined by reference to prices quoted on the LME) during such
monthly calculation period, our counterparty in this hedging
arrangement will pay us an amount equal to the difference
multiplied by the quantities as to which the swap agreement
applies during such period. If the average market price during
any monthly calculation period exceeds the fixed-price of
primary aluminum specified for such period, we will pay an
amount equal to the difference multiplied by the contracted
quantity to our counterparty.
Effective January 1, 2008, we designated these contracts
for hedge accounting treatment, and therefore, gains or losses
resulting from the change in the fair value of these contracts
were recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
As a result of the New Madrid power outage during the week of
January 26, 2009, and in anticipation of fixed-price
aluminum purchase swaps described below, we discontinued hedge
accounting for all of our aluminum fixed-price sale swaps on
January 29, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, we had outstanding fixed-price
aluminum sale and purchase swaps that were entered into to hedge
aluminum shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Hedged
|
|
|
Pounds Hedged
|
|
Year
|
|
Price per Pound
|
|
|
Annually
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
72,268
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
290,541
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
272,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Hedged
|
|
|
Pounds Hedged
|
|
Year
|
|
Price per Pound
|
|
|
Annually
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
245,264
|
|
2011
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
231,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net asset for the 477,102 pounds of sale swaps offset by
purchase swaps is $191.3 million.
83
Natural
Gas
We purchase natural gas to meet our production requirements.
These purchases expose us to the risk of changing market prices.
To offset changes in the Henry Hub Index Price of natural gas,
we entered into financial swaps, by purchasing the fixed forward
price for the Henry Hub Index and simultaneously entering into
an agreement to sell the actual Henry Hub Index Price. The
natural gas financial swaps we entered into prior to 2009 were
not designated as hedging instruments. Accordingly, any gains or
losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the financial
swap contracts were recorded in (gain) loss on hedging
activities in the consolidated statements of operations. During
the fourth quarter of 2009, we entered into additional natural
gas hedges. The following table summarizes our fixed price
natural gas swaps per year as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price per
|
|
Notional Amount
|
Year
|
|
Million BTU
|
|
Million BTUs
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
8,012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
|
|
8,048
|
|
2012
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
The contracts entered into during the fourth quarter of 2009
were designated as hedges for accounting purposes. Accordingly,
any effective gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair
value of the gas swap contracts were recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income and any ineffective portions were
recorded in (gain) loss on hedging activities in the
consolidated statements of operations. Total volume per year for
these trades are as follows (in millions of BTUs): 4,000 for
2010, 6,029 for 2011 and 6,069 for 2012.
Interest
Rates
We have floating-rate debt, which is subject to variations in
interest rates. On August 16, 2007, we entered into an
interest rate swap agreement to limit our exposure to floating
interest rates for the periods from November 15, 2007 to
November 15, 2011. The interest rate swap agreement was not
designated as a hedging instrument. Accordingly, any gains or
losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the interest
rate swap contract are recorded in (gain) loss on hedging
activities in the consolidated statements of operations. As of
September 30, 2009, the fair value of that contract was a
$19.7 million liability. The following table presents the
interest rate swap schedule as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Int Rate Swap Values
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
11/16/2009
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
05/17/2010
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
11/15/2010
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
05/16/2011
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
11/15/2011
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
12/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performance
Risk
Our derivatives were recorded at fair value, the measurement of
which includes the effect of our non-performance risk for
derivatives in a liability position, and of the counterparty for
derivatives in an asset position. As of September 30, 2009,
our $186.4 million of derivative fair value was in an asset
position, which is net of a broker margin asset of
$1.7 million. As such, in accordance with our master
agreement described below, we used our counterpartys
credit adjustment for the fair value adjustment.
Merrill Lynch is the counterparty for a substantial portion of
our derivatives. All swap arrangements with Merrill Lynch are
part of a master arrangement which is subject to the same
guarantee and security provisions as the senior secured credit
facilities. At current hedging levels and given our locked-in
aluminum sale swap value which acts as collateral for recent
natural gas hedging activities, the master arrangement does not
require
84
us to post additional collateral or cash margin. However, in
the future, as the locked-in aluminum sale swap value is
monetized or rolls-off, we may be required to post collateral.
The maximum amount of collateral that we would have to post
pursuant to natural gas hedging activities cannot exceed
$37.1 million. In the future, if we enter into additional
hedging arrangements to mitigate commodity risk, we may be
subject to higher maximum potential future collateral posting
requirements. While management may alter our hedging strategies
in the future based on our view of actual forecasted prices,
there are no plans in place that would require us to post cash
under the master agreement with Merrill Lynch.
We have also entered into variable-priced aluminum swaps with
counterparties other than Merrill Lynch. To the extent those
swap contracts are in an asset position for us, management
believes there is minimal counterparty risk because these
counterparties are backed by the LME. To the extent these
contracts are in a liability position for us, the swap
agreements provide for us to establish margin accounts in favor
of the broker. These margin account balances are netted in the
settlement of swap liability. At September 30, 2009, the
margin account balances were $1.7 million.
85
BUSINESS
Company
Overview
We are a leading North American integrated producer of
value-added primary aluminum products and high quality rolled
aluminum coils. We have two businesses: our primary metals, or
upstream business, and our rolled products, or downstream
business. Our upstream business consists of our aluminum smelter
near New Madrid, Missouri, and supporting operations at our
vertically integrated bauxite mine and alumina refinery. New
Madrid has annual production capacity of approximately
580 million pounds (263,000 metric tonnes), which
represents more than 15% of total U.S. primary aluminum
production as estimated by CRU. Our downstream business is one
of the largest aluminum foil producers in North America and
consists of four rolling mill facilities with a combined maximum
annual production capacity of 410 to 495 million pounds,
depending on our production mix.
The integration in our upstream business provides security of
raw material supply, which gives us a competitive advantage when
supplies of alumina and bauxite are scarce. St. Ann provides a
secure source of bauxite to Gramercy, which in turn provides a
strategic supply of alumina to our New Madrid smelter at costs
below recent spot market prices for alumina. Because our captive
alumina and bauxite production capacity exceeds our internal
requirements, we also sell these raw materials to third parties.
The margin from these sales effectively lowers the cost of our
alumina supply. In addition, we have a long-term, secure power
contract at New Madrid that extends through 2020. This contract
gives Noranda an advantage over aluminum smelters facing
frequent power shortages or disruptions. In addition, our power
costs are not linked to LME aluminum prices, unlike the power
costs of some of our competitors, particularly in North America.
We believe our combination of captive alumina and bauxite,
secure electric power and strategically located assets gives us
meaningful operating flexibility.
In addition to providing security of supply, we believe our
fully integrated upstream cost structure benefits us in an
environment of rising aluminum prices. Furthermore, the cost of
our supply of alumina, which we own, is positively affected by a
rising LME price due to our realization of higher margins on
third-party sales of alumina and bauxite.
Primary aluminum is a global commodity and its price is set on
the LME. Due to a long-term domestic supply deficit in the
U.S. and transportation costs, our primary aluminum
products typically earn a Midwest U.S. premium on top of
the LME price, the sum of which is known as the MWTP. In
addition, we typically sell a majority of our primary aluminum
shipments in the form of value-added products, such as billet,
rod and foundry, which include a fabrication premium over MWTP.
Our downstream business is a low-cost domestic producer of
aluminum rolled products. We own and operate four rolling mills,
including the West plant in Huntingdon, Tennessee, which is
recognized by CRU as one of the most advanced rolled aluminum
production facilities in North America. Versatile manufacturing
capabilities and advantageous geographic locations provide our
rolling mills with the flexibility to serve a diverse range of
end-users. We believe that this flexibility, when combined with
our strong customer service, product quality and strategic sales
support, has allowed our downstream business to gain market
share during a period of weakness in end-market demand. The
downstream business prices its products at the MWTP plus a
fabrication premium. Notwithstanding periodic metal margin gains
or losses during times of volatility in aluminum prices, our
downstream earnings are substantially insulated from
fluctuations in primary aluminum prices. As a result, the
downstream businesss performance is predominantly driven
by fluctuations in volumes and the fabrication premium we are
able to achieve. The geographic proximity of our upstream and
downstream businesses creates a further degree of vertical
integration, providing for additional operational flexibility.
86
The following chart indicates the percentages of sales
represented by each of our segments for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
The following chart indicates the percentages of operating
income represented by each of our segments for the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All segments experienced operating losses during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. |
Industry
Overview
The aluminum industry consists broadly of upstream primary
aluminum production and downstream rolled product manufacturing.
Upstream production involves the power intensive process of
producing primary aluminum from alumina, which is derived from
the raw material bauxite. Downstream manufacturing involves the
value-added process of converting primary aluminum into aluminum
products, such as finstock, light gauge sheet, foil and other
products.
Upstream Business. Primary aluminum is a
highly functional metal because of its metallurgical properties
and environmentally friendly attributes, such as its light
weight and recyclability. Significant amounts of aluminum are
required for basic infrastructure and transportation needs and
as growth trends in developing economies such as China, India
and Russia continue, aluminum usage is expected to enjoy
significant growth. Global trends by consumers and governments
suggest a rising preference to use environmentally responsible
materials which may drive increased intensity of use for
aluminum versus other heavier materials that are not as
frequently recycled. For example, in the automotive industry,
the amount of aluminum per vehicle has steadily increased in
recent years, helping to drive increased fuel efficiency and
higher post-consumer recycling of automotive parts. In the field
of electricity conductors, new power cable designs employ
significantly more aluminum per cable foot in an effort to
increase efficiency and conductivity. As energy and resource
conservation and post-consumer recycling efforts continue to
intensify, aluminum demand is expected to benefit.
Following significant weakness related to the global recession
and credit crisis which began in late 2007 and continued through
2009, aluminum prices have begun to recover, rising just over
75% through December 31, 2009 from their record lows
reached in February 2009. Prices would need to rise by almost
87
50% from December 31, 2009 levels to equal peak prices
reached in July 2008. Pressure remains on global producers to
cut operating costs.
According to CRU, the global business operating production cost
curve for aluminum has fallen significantly from year-end 2008
to September 30, 2009. This decrease is related to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
lower costs for alumina, which is indexed to the LME price of
aluminum for many global producers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
decreased power costs, due to changes in power tariffs by
regulatory authorities around the world and, in some cases,
indexing of power prices to the LME price of aluminum;
|
|
|
|
|
|
emergence of approximately one million metric tonnes per year of
new low-cost capacity outside of China;
|
|
|
|
|
|
shut-down of approximately three and a half million metric
tonnes per year of high-cost global capacity (after accounting
for recent restarts), including nearly one-third of
U.S. smelter capacity; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
large regional LME hub premiums (such as the Midwest premium
Noranda earns), which analysts measure as a credit against
producers cash costs.
|
While primary aluminum demand has improved since the trough in
prices in early 2009, global inventories remain high, and
end-market demand, particularly in North America, has been slow
to recover. Weakness in the supply and demand balance has been
offset, in part, by curtailment of global production capacity as
well as strong recent growth and stimulus measures in emerging
economies and particularly, China. Metal premiums in South East
Asia, Europe and the U.S. have risen in relation to the LME
price, aided by improving demand, metal financing contracts and
net imports into China tightening the spot market. Higher
premiums in Asia and a recovery from the trough in the
U.S. economy has aided U.S. producers and lifted MWTP.
In 2010, global demand is expected to grow by approximately 13%
over 2009 levels according to CRU. In addition, there is a
shortage of domestically produced primary aluminum in the
U.S. United States aluminum production is approximately 52%
of the total of U.S. aluminum demand per 2008 CRU
production and demand statistics.
The following chart illustrates the expected growth in aluminum
global consumption, according to CRU. Demand is expected to
increase by 22% from 2008 to 2012, and by nearly 81% between
2008 and 2020.
Source: CRU
88
Notwithstanding weakness in the current and recent supply and
demand trends for aluminum, we believe the medium and long-term
supply and demand outlook for aluminum supports sustainable,
higher LME prices due to the following trends:
|
|
|
|
|
global demand driven by long-term and sustained economic growth,
higher standards of living and increased demand from emerging
markets, especially China and India;
|
|
|
|
|
|
long-term world-wide increases in the cost of power, which is a
significant input cost in the production of primary aluminum;
|
|
|
|
|
|
barriers to entry for greenfield smelters due to high capital
costs, long lead time to market, required regulatory approvals
and increasing scarcity of power;
|
|
|
|
|
|
substitution away from other metals (e.g., steel and copper) to
aluminum due to aluminums
strength-to-weight
and
value-to-weight
ratios and relative price compared to other metals; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a weaker U.S. dollar relative to historical periods.
|
We are a North American producer with a majority of our primary
aluminum sales in the form of value-added products delivered
within a one day delivery radius of New Madrid. Therefore, while
global market trends determine the LME price and impact our
margins, domestic supply and demand for our value-added products
also directly impact our margins.
Similar to the trend in the cost to produce aluminum, the global
business operating production cost curve for alumina has fallen
significantly from an average of $259 per tonne in calendar year
2008 to $211 per tonne in the first three quarters of 2009. The
decrease in alumina refining costs has been driven by lower
input costs and capacity rationalization.
The bulk of smelter grade alumina is generally sold on a
contract basis with prices typically ranging from
12-15% of
the LME price depending on the contract term and alumina market
dynamics. The spot alumina market has improved following
rationalization of high-cost alumina refinery capacity and
postponement of large greenfield projects in response to record
low alumina prices earlier this year. CRU estimates that around
a fifth of global alumina capacity was idle in the early part of
this year. More recently, there have been restarts in refining
capacity accompanying restarts in smelting capacity within
China. Recently, the Atlantic region, where we sell our alumina,
has seen particularly strong support for alumina prices due to
the closure of a greater portion of alumina production capacity
versus other regions according to CRU. Transaction prices for
smelter grade alumina in the Atlantic region are strong relative
to historic ranges due, we believe, to a supply/demand balance
that is relatively tight.
Downstream Business. Our downstream business
is a leading producer of foil and certain light gauge sheet
products. Industry-wide, these two product groups accounted for
approximately 1.5 billion pounds of demand in North America
in 2008.
Profit margins in the downstream business are generally
unaffected by short-term volatility in the underlying LME price.
The price of any given end-product is equal to the cost of the
metal, or MWTP, plus a negotiated fabrication premium. These
fabrication premiums are determined in large part by industry
capacity utilization, which in turn is driven by supply-demand
fundamentals for our product. Since 2007, the downturn in the
U.S. economy generally and the housing market in particular
have resulted in lower industry volumes and, in addition,
reduced fabrication premiums in certain key product areas.
89
Competitive
Strengths
Vertically Integrated Assets and Long-term Electricity
Supply. Our vertical integration and long-term
electricity supply result in a high correlation between changes
in the MWTP and our operating earnings. Our upstream business is
integrated from bauxite to alumina to primary aluminum metal. In
strengthening LME environments, the net cost of our alumina
generally becomes increasingly attractive relative to contracted
and spot market alumina prices. We believe that this cost
advantage in rising markets and the security of our bauxite and
alumina supply provide us with a competitive advantage versus
aluminum producers that are dependent on LME price indexed
alumina supplies. At New Madrid, we seek to maximize value-added
product sales, but in weak markets, our downstream business
provides a reliable source of commodity grade ingot demand.
Power is the most significant component of our upstream cash
cost to produce primary aluminum. Our New Madrid smelter has
entered into a long-term power supply contract through May 2020,
ensuring the secure supply of power. This contract gives Noranda
an advantage over aluminum smelters facing frequent power
shortages or disruptions. In addition, our power costs are not
linked to LME aluminum prices, unlike the power costs of some of
our competitors, particularly in North America.
Strong Liquidity Position. As of
January 12, 2010, we had $227.8 million of cash and
revolving credit facility available borrowings. As of
December 31, 2009, we had cash and revolving credit
facility borrowings available totaling $167.9 million. As
of the date of this prospectus, we had $127.3 million of
locked in hedge gains that we will receive during the course of
2010 and 2011 or which we have the option to monetize early to
retire debt under our hedge settlement agreement. In 2010,
through the date of this prospectus, we have used available cash
balances to repay $150.0 million of our revolving credit
facility borrowings. In the year ended December 31, 2009,
our cash interest payments totaled $17.3 million, following
our elections to pay interest in-kind on our HoldCo Notes and
AcquisitionCo Notes beginning in the third quarter of 2008. We
also have no debt maturities prior to 2013 and no maintenance
covenants in our debt facilities. The combination of significant
sources of liquidity, a low cash interest burden relative to our
debt and no near-term maturities provides for our favorable
liquidity position and the ability to invest in and grow our
business.
Strategically Located Assets. The ease of
access and proximity of Gramercy to St. Ann and New Madrid to
Gramercy provide us with an attractive freight cost advantage.
New Madrid is the closest Midwest smelter to the Gulf Coast, the
location of our alumina refinery and the entry point for
approximately 75% of the alumina shipped to the U.S. We
believe this proximity allows our New Madrid smelter to source
its alumina from Gramercy at an advantageous freight cost
compared to other U.S. based smelters. In addition, our New
Madrid smelter is located in close proximity to its customers,
with more than 80% of shipments to customers located within a
one-day
truck delivery distance.
High Quality Downstream Assets. Our downstream
businesss largest rolling mill, the Huntingdon
West facility, is recognized by CRU as one of the most advanced
rolled aluminum production facilities in North America. This
mill began production in 2000 at a capital cost of
$238 million and has the lowest conversion cost (excluding
metal) for foil stock production in North America, according to
CRU. We have the ability to shift production and produce a
variety of products based on customer demand and forecasted
volume, pricing and profitability trends. Our rolling mills are
designed and configured to produce a broad suite of products,
which permits rapid reaction to changing customer and market
demand. In turn, the ready supply of commodity primary aluminum
production provides security of supply to our downstream
facilities, thereby allowing us to take advantage of short-term
surges in downstream demand.
Experienced Management Team. We have a
seasoned management team, whose members average more than
21 years of experience in cyclical and commodity
industries. Our senior management team, led by CEO and President
Layle K. Kip Smith, has achieved substantial
cost-cutting and commercial goals since the onset of the global
economic slowdown, allowing us to operate in the midst of a
severe downturn in aluminum pricing and demand, while
positioning us for better performance as markets return.
Financial discipline has been a priority, including the strict
control of operating expenses and cash flow.
90
Business
Strategy
Expand Our Production and Sales. Over the five
years ending in 2008, we increased our upstream production by
37 million pounds and we believe we will have similar
opportunities to increase production through major capital
investments and debottlenecking projects in the future. We are
also undertaking a capital project to expand capacity at our rod
mill at New Madrid, given strong trends in the market for rod
used in conductor applications. In addition to the significant
sales opportunities for smelter grade alumina and bauxite, which
we now have by virtue of our sole ownership of our alumina
refinery and bauxite mining operation, we believe there is an
opportunity to increase our sales of hydrate, or chemical grade
alumina, an attractive specialty product.
Pursue Opportunistic External Growth. We
regularly review potential opportunities to acquire additional
upstream and downstream businesses. We recently completed the
Joint Venture Transaction, which offers us the opportunity to
increase our sales and subsidize our smelter operating costs.
Our focused commercial activities since the closing of the Joint
Venture Transaction have yielded sufficient contracted demand to
support full production levels at our alumina refinery through
2012. Operating at full production volumes will allow us to
better leverage the fixed costs at our refinery. In addition, we
believe that there are meaningful cost-cutting opportunities at
Gramercy and St. Ann. The Joint Venture Transaction and
subsequent increase in our alumina sales to third parties serve
to increase the impact of changes in the LME price on our
operating cash flow.
Focus on Productivity Improvements. Our
management team is committed to reducing costs at our production
facilities by investing in high-return capital improvements,
optimizing labor productivity and implementing projects that
improve the operating and energy efficiencies of our production
processes. In late 2008, we initiated a comprehensive
productivity program called Cost-Out Reliability and
Effectiveness, or CORE. Through September 30,
2009, CORE generated approximately $35 million in cost
savings from headcount reductions and operating improvements. We
believe that opportunities exist to drive additional cost
savings and efficiencies, particularly at Gramercy and St. Ann.
Our upstream cash cost of primary aluminum has declined from
$0.81 per pound for the full year ended 2008 to $0.76 per pound
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This
significant improvement, which occurred notwithstanding the
inefficiencies from low capacity utilization rates at New Madrid
in 2009, has been driven by CORE as well as favorable price
trends in some of our major cost inputs, including natural gas
and caustic soda. In the downstream business, we have identified
and implemented the early stages of various capital projects
that will increase our ability to use scrap metal to reduce
costs. In addition, we maintain lean manufacturing and Six Sigma
programs to rationalize our cost base in the upstream and
downstream operations.
Maximize Cash Flow. Senior management has
implemented a focused strategy to maximize profitability and
cash flow. Our ability to maintain positive cash flows from
operations during the recent economic downturn and concurrent
smelter production outage is a testament to our strong focus on
cash conservation and productivity. In addition, we have been
able to generate significant cash flow through the prudent
management of working capital, capital expenditures and
operating expenses. We intend to continue this keen focus on
cash flow, even as market conditions improve. From the date of
the Apollo Acquisition through September 30, 2009, working
capital reductions contributed $145 million to cash flow
from operating activities, and we will continue to target
working capital efficiencies throughout our businesses without
sacrificing our product availability or lead times.
Improve Capital Structure and Financial
Profile. Since the Apollo Acquisition through
September 30, 2009, we have retired or repurchased
$453 million principal amount of our indebtedness. These
debt reductions, which were funded with cash flow generated from
our operations and gains realized from aluminum hedges, have led
to significant equity value creation while allowing us to
maintain a strong liquidity position. In addition to reducing
leverage, we seek to improve our financial profile by mitigating
our exposure to rising input costs and falling product prices.
We believe that prudent and opportunistic hedging of the
commodities that impact our business, including aluminum,
natural gas and crude oil, allows us to protect the value of our
enterprise from large and sometimes rapid commodity price
fluctuations. In October and November of 2009, we entered into
natural gas purchase swaps that raised our hedge profile to
approximately
91
45% of our forecasted natural gas needs in each of 2010, 2011
and 2012. In addition, approximately 8% of our 2010 and 2011
aluminum sales are hedged at fixed prices. We continue to
evaluate our hedging strategy based on our financial leverage
and our view of actual and forecasted commodity prices.
Enhance Safety Performance and Continue Stable Employee
Relations. We believe that maintaining employee
safety and a positive working relationship with our employees
are key drivers of a well performing business. We have
consistently improved our company-wide safety performance
through focused procedures and training programs. In 2009, our
company-wide annual number of recordable safety incidents per
man hour had decreased by over 45% from 2005 levels. There have
been no significant labor disruptions at any facility under our
management since 1996 and we have recently successfully
renegotiated agreements with our labor unions, including at St.
Ann in 2008 and at our downstream rolling mill in Salisbury,
North Carolina in 2009.
The
Transactions
The Apollo Acquisition was consummated on May 18, 2007,
when Noranda AcquisitionCo acquired the Noranda aluminum
business of Xstrata (Schweiz) A.G., or Xstrata, by
acquiring the stock of a subsidiary of Xstrata. Noranda HoldCo
and Noranda AcquisitionCo were formed by Apollo solely for the
purpose of completing the Apollo Acquisition.
In order to partially finance the Apollo Acquisition, Noranda
AcquisitionCo issued the AcquisitionCo Notes and entered into
senior secured credit facilities, consisting of a term loan and
a revolving credit facility. For a more detailed discussion of
the AcquisitionCo Notes and existing senior secured credit
facilities, see Description of Certain Indebtedness.
As used in this prospectus, the term Apollo
Transactions means, collectively, the Apollo Acquisition
and the related financings.
In addition, at the time of the Apollo Acquisition, Apollo, in
exchange for common stock of Noranda HoldCo, contributed cash of
$214.2 million to Noranda HoldCo, which was contributed to
Noranda AcquisitionCo. The proceeds from the issuance of
AcquisitionCo Notes, borrowings under the existing senior
secured credit facilities and the investment by Apollo were used
to pay the purchase price for the Apollo Acquisition. Subsequent
to the Apollo Acquisition, on May 29, 2007, certain members
of management of Noranda HoldCo contributed an additional
$1.9 million in cash to Noranda HoldCo, in exchange for
common stock of Noranda HoldCo.
On June 7, 2007, Noranda HoldCo issued the HoldCo Notes.
Noranda HoldCo used the proceeds from the offering of the HoldCo
Notes, as well as $4.3 million of cash on hand, to pay a
$216.1 million net cash distribution to its stockholders,
which included Apollo and certain members of its management, to
make a cash payment of $4.1 million to its optionholders
(as part of an adjustment to preserve the value of the Noranda
HoldCo options following the dividend), and to pay for fees and
expenses related to the offering of the HoldCo Notes.
Prior to December 31, 2005, Xstrata accumulated a 19.9%
ownership interest in Falconbridge Limited, which owned 100% of
Noranda Aluminum, Inc. at that time. On August 15, 2006,
through a tender offer, Xstrata effectively acquired the
remaining 80.1% of the outstanding shares in Falconbridge
Limited by which Noranda Aluminum, Inc. became Xstratas
wholly owned subsidiary. We refer to this acquisition as the
Xstrata Acquisition.
92
Primary
Metal Upstream Business
Business Overview. The upstream business is
vertically integrated with operations in bauxite mining, alumina
refining and aluminum smelting.
The process of making aluminum is power intensive and requires a
large amount of alumina (aluminum oxide), which is derived from
the raw material bauxite. Approximately four pounds of bauxite
are required to produce approximately two pounds of alumina, and
the two pounds of alumina will produce approximately one pound
of aluminum.
All of our primary aluminum production occurs at our smelter in
New Madrid, which has production capacity of approximately
580 million pounds (263,000 metric tonnes) of primary
aluminum annually. The plant site also includes a fabrication
facility that converts molten aluminum into value-added
products. The fabrication facility has the capacity to produce
annually approximately 160 million pounds of rod,
286 million pounds of extrusion billet and 75 million
pounds of foundry ingot. Molten aluminum that is not used in
these product lines is produced as primary ingots for transfer
to our downstream business or sale to other aluminum fabricators.
93
A majority of our value-added products are sold at the prior
months MWTP plus a fabrication premium. Our value-added
products are supported by excellent customer service and
delivery, which we believe results in a higher net realized
price versus some of our competitors. Our major target customers
are located in the Midwestern United States and Mexico, with 90%
of our customers within
one-day
truck delivery.
New Madrid Primary Aluminum Smelter. New
Madrid produces approximately 580 million pounds (263,000
metric tonnes) of primary aluminum annually at full capacity,
accounting for approximately 15% of total United States primary
aluminum production. New Madrid is strategically located as the
closest Midwest facility to the supply of alumina. It is also
located in an area with abundant sources of electrical power.
See Raw Materials and Supply below. The
smelter was built in 1971 and underwent significant capacity
expansions in 1976, 1983 and 2001. The smelter is located aside
the Mississippi River near New Madrid, Missouri. It occupies
250 acres, including 44 acres under roof, of the
4,200 acre St. Jude Industrial Park, the largest
industrial park in the State of Missouri. Noranda owns and
manages approximately 2,600 acres of the St. Jude
Industrial Park, providing us land for either expansion or sale
to prospective tenants.
In January 2009, an ice storm disrupted the power grid
throughout Southeastern Missouri. The resulting power outage
disabled two of New Madrids three production lines,
initially reducing our daily production to 25% of pre-outage
levels. This event had a substantial negative impact on our 2009
operating results By December 31, 2009, we had restored New
Madrids production to 80% of pre-outage volumes and we are
currently scheduled to return daily production to 100% of
capacity during the first quarter of 2010. We reached a
settlement with our insurance providers equal to approximately
$68 million, all of which had been received by
September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009,
approximately $11.5 million and $24.0 million had been
spent on capital expenditures and costs related to the
restoration program, respectively, with $32.0 million of
settlement funds remaining and earmarked to fund the completion
of the restoration program by early 2010.
The smelter is fully integrated with its own raw material
unloading facility, environmental control systems and aluminum
reduction plant, including carbon anode fabrication. New Madrid
has three production lines. This diversity of lines facilitates
the maintenance of steady production levels near full capacity
and, in rare instances of severe production threats such as the
power outage from the ice storm in early 2009, helps insulate us
from complete plant shutdowns
The plant site also includes a fabrication facility for the
production of continuous cast rod, extrusion billet and foundry
ingot. This business converts molten aluminum into value-added
products. The fabrication facility has the capacity to produce
annually approximately 160 million pounds of rod, used
mainly for electrical applications and steel de-oxidation;
286 million pounds of extrusion billet, used mainly for
building construction and architectural and transportation
applications; and 75 million pounds of foundry ingot, used
mainly for transportation. New Madrid produces 18% of the rod
manufactured in North America and supplies 9% of North American
primary extrusion billet. Molten aluminum that is not used in
these product lines is produced as primary ingots for transfer
to our downstream business or sale to other aluminum fabricators.
94
A majority of the products are sold at the prior months
MWTP plus a fabrication premium. The remainder is either sold at
current month pricing plus the MWTP or is fixed 30 days
prior to the pricing period. The products are considered to be
premium priced and supported by excellent customer service and
delivery. Our major target customers are located in the
Midwestern United States and Mexico, with the majority of these
customers within
one-day
truck delivery. We employ on average approximately
900 people at New Madrid.
Competition. The market for primary aluminum
is diverse and highly competitive. We believe that we compete on
the basis of price, quality, timeliness of delivery and customer
service, with our focus on the latter three areas. We also
compete on a global basis with other producers and other
materials on the basis of cost. The marginal cost of these
producers who are in the highest cost quartile is one factor in
determining the market price for aluminum. Aluminum also
competes with other materials such as steel, plastic, copper,
titanium and glass based upon functionality and relative pricing.
Raw Materials and Supply. Energy and alumina
are the main cost components for primary aluminum production.
Energy. The smelter is located in an area with
abundant sources of electrical power. New Madrid has a power
purchase agreement with Ameren, pursuant to which New Madrid has
agreed to purchase substantially all of its electricity through
May 2020. This contract is for regulated power and cannot be
altered without the approval of the Missouri Public Service
Commission. Ameren applied for an 18% rate increase in July 2009
and we expect a ruling from the Missouri Public Service
Commission not later than June 24, 2010. In addition to
opposing the rate increase request by Ameren, we are currently
negotiating with consumer groups on rate design to obtain relief
in our power rates regardless of any rate increase. However, if
Ameren is fully successful in its rate request and we are
unsuccessful in our rate design settlement with other consumer
groups, New Madrids costs will increase by as much as
$24 million annually.
Our Gramercy refinery has contracts with two local suppliers of
natural gas, Coral Energy Resources, L.P. and Atmos Energy
Marketing, LLC, which each expire on April 30, 2010. These
contracts guarantee a secure supply of natural gas at a price
based on the Henry Hub Index plus transportation/ pipeline
costs. In addition, our contract with Atmos provides security in
case of a short-term supply emergency (such as a hurricane or
other force majeure situation), by granting Gramercy the option
to obligate Atmos to utilize its storage assets to supply
Gramercys full natural gas supply requirements.
Fuel is a substantial component of the cost structure at our St.
Ann bauxite mine and is generally linked to the price of oil.
Our fuel costs may fluctuate, and we may not be able to mitigate
the effect of higher fuel costs. Any increases in fuel costs
could cause our operating costs to increase and negatively
affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
Raw materials. Our upstream business is fully
integrated from bauxite to alumina to primary aluminum metal,
ensuring security of raw material supply at long-term
competitive costs. Our aluminum smelter in New Madrid,
Missouri receives substantially all of its alumina requirements
from Gramercy. We believe New Madrid has a freight cost
advantage relative to other smelters because of the proximity of
Gramercy to St. Ann and New Madrid to Gramercy. In addition, New
Madrid is the closest Midwest smelter to the Gulf Coast, the
entry point for approximately 75% of the alumina shipped to the
United States based on statistics by Brook Hunt, a leading
international mining and metals consulting firm. We believe our
location allows New Madrid to internally source its alumina from
Gramercy or purchase alumina from third parties at a lower
freight cost than other U.S. based smelters.
At the Gramercy refinery, bauxite is chemically refined and
converted into alumina, the principal raw material used in the
production of primary aluminum. Extensive portions of the
Gramercy refinery were rebuilt and modernized from 2000 through
2002. Gramercy has an annual production capacity of
1.2 million metric tonnes of alumina, approximately 40% of
which is supplied to our New Madrid facility. The Gramercy
refinery is the source for the vast majority, if not all, of New
Madrids alumina requirements. New Madrid purchases alumina
from time to time from third parties, but the quantities are
minimal. The remaining alumina production at the Gramercy
refinery that is not taken by New Madrid is in the form of
smelter grade alumina
95
and alumina hydrate, or chemical grade alumina. This alumina is
sold to third parties and used to effectively reduce the cost of
New Madrids alumina supply.
Bauxite is the principal raw material used in the production of
alumina and substantially all of the bauxite used at our
Gramercy refinery is purchased from St. Ann. We transport
bauxite from St. Ann to Gramercy by oceangoing vessels, which
are the only available means of transportation. We currently
have a contract through December 2010 (with an option to renew
through December 2011) with a third-party for bauxite ocean
vessel freight, which contains escalators related to the cost of
fuel. The contract was negotiated at arms length in 2006
based upon a tendering process that included identifying the
availability of vessels equipped to carry bauxite in the volumes
and frequencies required and related costs.
We operate the St. Ann bauxite mine through Noranda Bauxite
Limited, a Jamaican limited liability company formerly known as
St. Ann Bauxite Limited. NBLs bauxite mining assets
consist of: (1) a concession from the Government of
Jamaica, or GOJ, to mine bauxite in Jamaica through
2030 and (2) a 49% interest in St. Ann Jamaica Bauxite
Partnership, or SAJPB, which holds the physical
mining assets and conducts the mining and related operations
pursuant to the concession. The GOJ owns the remaining 51% of
SAJPB. The physical mining assets consist primarily of rail
facilities, other mobile equipment, dryers and loading and dock
facilities. The age and remaining lives of the mining assets
vary and they may be repaired or replaced from time to time as
part of SAJBPs ordinary capital expenditure plan. Under
the terms of the GOJ concession, SAJBP mines the land covered by
the concession and the GOJ retains surface rights and ownership
of the land. The GOJ granted the concession and entered into
other agreements with NBL for the purpose of ensuring the
Gramercy plant will have sufficient reserves to meet its annual
alumina requirements and existing or contemplated future
obligations under third-party contracts. Under the concession,
NBL is entitled annually to ship 4.5 million dry metric
tonnes (DMT) of bauxite from mining operations in
the specified concession area through September 30, 2030.
The GOJ is required to provide additional concessions if the
specified concession does not contain sufficient quantities of
commercially exploitable bauxite. NBL is responsible for
reclamation of the land that it mines. In addition, NBL assumed
reclamation obligations related to operations prior to the
acquisition of the St. Ann mining operations from Kaiser
Aluminum & Chemical Company in 2004. The outstanding
reclamation liability at December 31, 2008 was
$7.4 million.
Pursuant to an Establishment Agreement that governs the
relationship between NBL and the GOJ, NBL manages the operations
of the partnership (SAJPB), pays operating costs and is entitled
to all of its bauxite production. NBL pays the GOJ according to
a negotiated fiscal structure, which consists of the following
elements: (i) a royalty based on the amount of bauxite
mined, (ii) an annual asset usage fee for the
use of the GOJs 51% interest in the mining assets,
(iii) customary income and other taxes and fees,
(iv) a production levy, which was waived for certain
historical periods, but which is applicable in 2009 and future
periods, and (v) certain fees for lands owned by the GOJ
that are covered by the concession. In calculating income tax on
revenues related to sales to our Gramercy refinery, NBL uses a
set market price, which is negotiated periodically between NBL
and the GOJ.
Currently, approximately 50% of the bauxite from St. Ann is
refined into alumina at our Gramercy refinery, and the remainder
is sold to Sherwin Alumina Company. These third-party sales
reduce the net cost of bauxite transferred to Gramercy. During
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, St. Ann
mined 4.9 million, 4.5 million and 4.5 million
DMTs of bauxite, respectively.
Sales and Marketing; Customers. We employ a
sales force consisting of inside and outside salespeople. Inside
salespeople are responsible for maintaining customer
relationships, receiving and soliciting individual orders and
responding to service and other inquiries by customers. Our
outside sales force is responsible for identifying potential
customers and calling on them to explain our services as well as
maintaining and expanding our relationships with our current
customers. The sales force is trained and knowledgeable about
the characteristics and applications of various metals, as well
as the manufacturing methods employed by our customers.
Our sales and marketing focus is on the identification of
original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and other
metals end-users that could achieve significant cost savings
through the use of our inventory management, value-added
processing,
just-in-time
delivery and other services. We use a variety of methods to
96
identify potential customers, including the use of databases,
direct mail and participation in manufacturers trade
shows. Customer referrals and the knowledge of our sales force
about regional end-users also result in the identification of
potential customers. Once a potential customer is identified,
our outside salespeople assume responsibility for visiting the
appropriate contact, typically the vice-president of purchasing
or operations and business owners.
All of our value-added (billet, foundry, rod) sales are on a
negotiated price basis. In some cases, sales are the result of a
competitive bid process where a customer provides a list of
products, along with requirements, to us and several competitors
and we submit a bid on each product. We have a diverse customer
base, with no single customer accounting for more than 8% of our
net sales in each of the last three full fiscal years. In 2008
and through the first nine months of 2009, our ten largest
customers represented 45% and 44%, respectively, of our net
upstream sales.
Rolling
Mills Downstream Business
Business Overview. Our downstream business is
an integrated manufacturer of aluminum foil and light sheet and
is recognized by CRU as one of the most advanced rolled aluminum
production facilities in North America. Our rolling mills are
located in the southeastern United States, in Huntingdon,
Tennessee, Salisbury, North Carolina and Newport, Arkansas, with
a combined maximum annual production capacity of 410 to
495 million pounds, depending on our production mix. Our
products include heavy gauge foil products such as finstock and
semi-rigid container stock, light gauge converter foils used for
packaging applications, consumer foils and light gauge sheet
products such as transformer windings and building products. We
primarily sell our products to OEMs of air conditioners,
transformers, semi-rigid containers and foil packaging, most of
whom are located in the eastern and central part of the United
States. Our plants are well situated to serve these customers
and approximately 66% of sales are within a
one-day
delivery distance, resulting in freight savings and customer
service benefits. Versatile manufacturing capabilities and
advantageous geographic locations provide our rolling mills the
flexibility to serve a diverse range of end uses while
maintaining a low cost base. Our downstream business maintains a
continuous improvement philosophy rooted in a Six Sigma culture
to minimize variation and help optimize manufacturing and
related processes. Additionally, the Huntingdon site has ISO
9001-2000
certification from the International Organization for
Standardization with regards to its quality management system.
Our products are produced at our four rolling mill facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant
|
|
Location
|
|
Maximum Capacity
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
(in pounds)
|
|
|
|
|
Huntingdon West
|
|
Huntingdon, TN
|
|
|
235 million
|
|
|
Finstock, container stock, intercompany reroll and miscellaneous
heavy gauge products
|
Huntingdon East
|
|
Huntingdon, TN
|
|
|
130 million
|
|
|
Finstock, transformer windings, household foil, and
miscellaneous heavy gauge products
|
Salisbury
|
|
Salisbury, NC
|
|
|
95 million
|
|
|
Light gauge products including flexible packaging, finstock,
lithographic sheet, intercompany reroll and miscellaneous
leveled products
|
Newport
|
|
Newport, AR
|
|
|
35 million
|
|
|
Light gauge products including flexible packaging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
495 million
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Capacity includes intra-company
reroll. Based on production mix at December 31, 2009,
effective annual capacity of our rolling mills is
410 million pounds.
|
We price our products at the MWTP plus a negotiated fabrication
premium. The fabrication premium is designed to cover all
conversion costs to fabricate the rolled products and allow for
a profit margin. The cost
97
of primary metal is passed through to customers. Therefore, our
profitability is largely insulated from movement in aluminum
prices. We use both primary aluminum, which is sourced from
various smelters, and discounted metal units, which usually take
the form of scrap or recycled scrap ingot. We seek to maximize
profitability by optimizing both the mix of rolled products
produced and the
prime-to-scrap
ratio in our metal feed. Historically, approximately 15% of our
upstream businesss primary aluminum production is shipped
to our downstream mills, providing security of supply to our
downstream facilities, and allowing us to take advantage of
short-term surges in demand.
Competition. The aluminum rolled products
market is highly competitive. We face domestic competition from
a number of companies in the markets in which we operate. Our
primary competitors are JW Aluminum, Aleris and Hindalco
(Novelis). Some of our competitors are substantially larger,
have more diversified operations, and compete in product lines
in which we do not operate. We also face competition from
imports, mainly from Asia. The factors influencing competition
vary by region and end-use, but we generally compete on the
basis of our value proposition, including price, product
quality, the ability to meet customers specifications,
range of products offered, lead times, technical support and
customer service.
In addition to competition from within the aluminum rolled
products industry, the industry faces competition from
non-aluminum materials. In the packaging market, aluminum rolled
products primary competitors are plastics and cardboard.
However, for our most important heat exchanger customers, usage
of aluminum finstock is well entrenched because no other
material offers more favorable economics. Factors affecting
competition with substitute materials include technological
innovation, relative prices, ease of manufacture, consumer
preference and performance characteristics.
Raw Materials and Supply. The principal raw
materials that we use in rolled products manufacturing include
primary aluminum, recycled aluminum and alloying elements. Total
metal units purchased in 2008 were approximately
371 million pounds. These raw materials are generally
available from several sources and are not subject to supply
constraints under normal market conditions. We also consume
considerable amounts of energy in the operation of our
facilities, which is a significant component of our non-metal
conversion costs.
In the downstream business, natural gas and electricity
represented 100% of our energy consumption in 2008. Fuel oil can
be used at our Salisbury plant as a substitute for natural gas,
but was not consumed in 2008. The majority of energy usage
occurs during the melting/casting process in the form of natural
gas. Most of our electricity is consumed in the cold rolling
process. We purchase our natural gas on the open market. Recent
natural gas pricing volatility in the United States has
decreased our energy cost. The forward natural gas purchase
contracts we may enter into from time to time help mitigate gas
price volatility. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk for a summary of the price and quantity
of these contracts.
Electricity is purchased through medium-term contracts at
competitive industrial rates from regional utilities supplied
through local distributors. Supply reliability at all plants has
been excellent.
Sales and Marketing; Customers. Our sales
force consists of inside and outside salespeople. Our outside
sales force is primarily responsible for identifying potential
customers and calling on them to negotiate profitable business
and handling any subsequent issues that may arise. Inside
salespeople are primarily responsible for maintaining customer
relationships, receiving and soliciting individual orders and
responding to service and other inquiries by customers. The
sales force is trained and knowledgeable about the
characteristics and applications of our various products, as
well as our manufacturing methods and the end-use markets in
which our customers are involved.
Our sales and marketing focus is on servicing OEMs who are major
participants in the markets where our products are used as
inputs. However, our staff participate in industry groups and
attend trade shows in order to keep abreast of market
developments and to identify potential new accounts. Once a
potential new customer is identified, our outside salespeople
assume responsibility for visiting the appropriate contact,
typically the purchasing manager or manager of operations, to
explore and develop business opportunities.
98
Nearly all business is conducted on a negotiated price basis
with a few sales made at list prices, typically to smaller
accounts.
Our downstream business has a diverse customer base. Prior to
2009, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our net
sales in each of the last three years. At September 30,
2009, one customer represented 14% of downstream net
year-to-date
sales. In 2008 and through the first nine months of 2009, our
ten largest downstream customers represented 50% and 58%,
respectively, of downstream net sales. Of our ten largest
customers, we have done business with eight for ten years or
more, and with six for 20 years or more.
Products. Aluminum foil has several
outstanding characteristics that account for a wide range of
commercial applications:
|
|
|
|
|
long life: the aluminum surface has a natural hard, transparent
layer of oxide which substantially precludes further oxidation;
|
|
|
|
high electrical and thermal conductivity;
|
|
|
|
nontoxic and nonabsorbent;
|
|
|
|
excellent moisture barrier even at thicknesses less than the
diameter of a human hair;
|
|
|
|
light weight;
|
|
|
|
highly reflective and attractive in appearance;
|
|
|
|
dead fold for packaging applications;
|
|
|
|
the most plentiful metal in the earths crust;
|
|
|
|
the most recycled packaging material in the world; and
|
|
|
|
attractive
cost-to-weight
ratio compared to other metals such as copper and tin.
|
We have a variety of distinctive product and service
capabilities, providing us with a strong competitive position.
Our main product lines are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Finstock: Bare aluminum foil and sheet ranging
in gauge from 0.002 to 0.007 is widely used as a
heat exchanger in air conditioners because it provides more heat
transfer area per unit of cost than any other material. Aluminum
sheet and foil finstock are used in commercial, residential and
automotive applications.
|
|
|
|
Semi-Rigid Containers: These products are
typically made with harder alloys than finstock although the
range of gauges is similar, encompassing both foil and light
sheet. Formed, disposable aluminum containers are among the most
versatile of all packages and are widely used for pre-packaged
foods, easily withstanding all normal extremes of heating and
freezing.
|
|
|
|
Flexible Packaging: Aluminum foil is laminated
to papers, paperboards and plastic films to make flexible and
semi-rigid pouches and cartons for a wide range of food, drink,
agricultural and industrial products. The laminating process is
known as converting, hence the term converter
foil for rolled aluminum products used in this application.
|
|
|
|
Transformer Windings: Aluminum sheet cut into
strips and insulated is widely used as the conducting medium
that forms the windings of electrical transformers widely used
on power grids. Aluminums relatively low cost is key to
this application.
|
99
Facilities. We operate four plants at three
locations in the southeastern United States and our divisional
offices, which consist of leased office space aggregating to
approximately 30 thousand square feet are located at our
corporate headquarters in Franklin, Tennessee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Plant
|
|
Location
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Huntingdon West
|
|
Huntingdon, TN
|
|
|
357
|
(1)
|
Huntingdon East
|
|
Huntingdon, TN
|
|
|
0
|
(2)
|
Salisbury
|
|
Salisbury, NC
|
|
|
147
|
|
Newport
|
|
Newport, AR
|
|
|
98
|
|
Divisional Office
|
|
Franklin, TN
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes hourly, salaried, and temporary employees for the
entire Huntingdon plant as of December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
All hourly, salaried, and temporary employees for the
Huntingdon East plant are included in the
Huntingdon West total. |
Huntingdon. Our largest production site is in
Huntingdon, Tennessee, with a maximum annual capacity of up to
365 million pounds, depending on production mix. The
Huntingdon site is subject to a long-term lease arrangement with
the Industrial Development Board of the Town of Huntingdon,
pursuant to which we functionally own the facility and can
acquire legal title for the nominal sum of $100. The site
includes a long established casting and rolling facility which
was built in 1967 and acquired from Archer Aluminum by Noranda
in 1979, which we refer to as the East plant. Construction began
on a second plant in 1998 and production started in 2000 at a
capital cost of $238 million, which we refer to as the West
plant. The two plants are physically separate, but are operated
with shared administration and maintenance personnel, and with
some sharing of production capabilities. The
Huntingdon West facility is recognized by CRU as one
of the most advanced rolled aluminum production facilities, and
has the lowest conversion cost (excluding metal) for foil stock
production in North America according to CRU.
Salisbury. This plant was originally
constructed in 1965 and has a maximum annual capacity of up to
95 million pounds, depending on production mix. The
Salisbury plant is one of the largest U.S. producers of
intermediate width light gauge product (0.000X thickness),
typically sold to customers who laminate the foil with paper,
plastic or cardboard used in flexible packaging applications
such as juice boxes. The facility also has a tension
leveling line which enables production of lithographic
sheet, a higher margin item used in the printing industry.
Newport. The Newport plant is a rolling and
finishing operation only and relies on intermediate gauge
reroll supplied by Salisbury or Huntingdon. We
believe this plant has the widest light gauge mills in North
America. The Newport plant has a maximum annual capacity of up
to 35 million pounds, depending on production mix.
Government
Regulation and Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to a number of federal, state and
local regulations relating to the protection of the environment
and to workplace health and safety. In particular, our
operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local
laws and regulations governing emissions to air, discharges to
water emissions, the generation, storage, transportation,
treatment or disposal of hazardous materials or wastes and
employee health and safety matters. We have spent, and expect to
spend, significant amounts for compliance with those laws and
regulations.
On June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives
approved adoption of the American Clean Energy and Security Act
of 2009. ACESA would establish an economy-wide cap on emissions
of green house gasses in the United States and would require
entities to obtain GHG emission allowances corresponding to
their
100
annual emissions. The U.S. Senate has also begun work on
its own legislation for controlling and reducing emissions of
GHGs in the United States. Any laws or regulations that may be
adopted to restrict or reduce emissions of GHGs would lead to
higher energy costs at our New Madrid smelter and our Gramercy
refinery and could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Whether or not new congressional legislation is passed governing
GHG emissions, there is a risk that the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency could regulate such GHGs, which could also
result in similar energy cost increases and related impacts on
our business.
The 1990 amendments to the U.S. Clean Air Act impose
stringent standards on the aluminum industrys air
emissions. These amendments affect our operations, as
technology-based standards relating to reduction facilities and
carbon plants have been instituted. Although we cannot predict
with certainty how much we will be required to spend to comply
with these standards, our general capital expenditure plan
includes certain projects designed to improve our compliance
with both known and anticipated air emissions requirements. In
addition, under certain environmental laws which may impose
liability regardless of fault, we may be liable for the costs of
remediation of contamination at our currently and formerly owned
or operated properties or adjacent areas where such
contamination may have migrated, third-party sites at which
wastes generated by our operations have been disposed of or for
the amelioration of damage to natural resources, subject to our
right to recover certain of such costs from other potentially
responsible parties or from indemnitors or insurers. We may also
be liable for personal injury claims or workers
compensation claims relating to exposure to hazardous
substances. We cannot predict what environmental laws or
regulations will be enacted or amended in the future, how
existing or future laws or regulations will be interpreted or
enforced or the amount of future expenditures that may be
required to comply with such laws or regulations. Such future
requirements may result in liabilities which may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
We have incurred, and in the future will continue to incur,
capital expenditures and operating expenses for matters relating
to environmental compliance. As part of our general capital
expenditure plan, we also expect to incur capital expenditures
for other capital projects that may, in addition to improving
operations, reduce certain environmental impacts.
We accrue for costs associated with environmental investigations
and remedial efforts when it becomes probable that we are liable
and the associated costs can be reasonably estimated. Our
aggregate environmental related accrued liabilities were
$8.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2008, which
consisted entirely of asset retirement obligations related to
our new Madrid smelter. In connection with the Joint Venture
Transaction, we assumed certain other environmental liabilities.
Related to St. Ann, we assumed land reclamation costs to
rehabilitate the land disturbed by St. Anns mining
operations. With respect to the Gramercy refinery, we assumed
costs associated with the disposal of hazardous waste materials
at the refinery as well as costs associated with the future
closure and post-closure care of the red mud lakes
at the Gramercy facility, where Gramercy disposes of
non-hazardous red mud wastes from its refining process. Gramercy
also has an environmental liability in connection with the
remediation of historic contamination at the facility.
Our aggregate environmental-related accrued liabilities at
September 30, 2009 were $22.7 million. Additionally,
at September 30, 2009, we had $6.2 million of
restricted cash in an escrow account as security for the payment
of red mud lake closure obligations that would arise under state
environmental laws upon the termination of operations at the
Gramercy facility.
All accrued amounts have been recorded without giving effect to
any possible future recoveries. With respect to ongoing
environmental compliance costs, including maintenance and
monitoring, we expense the costs when incurred.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we employed approximately
2,700 persons. As of December 31, 2009, approximately
1,900 of our employees (or 70%) at various sites were members of
the following unions: the United Steelworkers of America; the
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers;
the University and Allied Workers Union (UAWU); and
the Union of Technical, Administrative and Supervisory Personnel
(UTASP). Within the consolidated business segments,
there has not been a labor disruption at any
101
of the facilities since 1996. Within Gramercy and St. Ann,
approximately 75% and 95% of the workforce is unionized,
respectively. Since we formed the joint venture in 2004, our
management has successfully negotiated a labor contract with the
United Steelworkers at Gramercy and labor contracts with each of
the two Jamaican-based unions at St. Ann.
We are a party to six collective bargaining agreements,
including three at Gramercy and St. Ann, which expire at
various times. We entered into a five-year labor contract at New
Madrid effective September 1, 2007, which provides for an
approximately 3% increase per year in compensation. Two
agreements with unions at St. Ann expired in 2007. We agreed to
a new contract with the UTASP in December 2008. We have
occasionally experienced brief work slowdowns in connection with
these negotiations. A work stoppage, although possible, is not
anticipated. All other collective bargaining agreements expire
within the next five years. A new collective bargaining
agreement at our Salisbury plant became effective
November 20, 2009. The contract at our Newport rolling mill
expires May 31, 2011. During 2009, we received a claim from
the UAWU which alleges that we failed to properly negotiate with
the union in advance of declaring approximately 150 UAWU members
redundant. We are defending the claim vigorously and believe
that our position will prevail. As such, we have not recorded a
liability related to this allegation.
From time to time, there are shortages of qualified operators of
metals processing equipment. In addition, during periods of low
unemployment, turnover among less-skilled workers can be
relatively high. We believe that our relations with our
employees are satisfactory.
See Risk Factors Risks Related to Our
Business The loss of certain members of our
management may have an adverse effect on our operating
results and Risk Factors Risks Related
to Our Business We could experience labor disputes
that disrupt our business.
Commodity
Risk Management
Because primary aluminum is a global commodity we have
experienced, and expect to continue to be subject to volatile
primary aluminum prices. Increases or decreases in primary
aluminum prices result in increases and decreases in our
revenues (assuming all other factors are unchanged). Since the
Apollo Acquisition, we have hedged this volatility through the
use of derivative financial instruments.
Natural gas is the largest cost component at our Gramercy
refinery and a key cost component at our rolling mill
facilities. Our Gramercy refinery has contracts to guarantee
secure supply from two suppliers at an index-based price. Our
downstream business purchases natural gas on the open market.
The price of natural gas can be particularly volatile. As a
result, our natural gas costs may fluctuate dramatically, and we
may not be able to mitigate the effect of higher natural gas
costs on our cost of sales. Any substantial increases in energy
costs could cause our operating costs to increase and could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. We enter into
financial swaps to offset changes in natural gas prices.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for further
discussion of fixed price aluminum swaps. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates for further discussion
of our accounting for these hedges.
The primary purpose of our commodity risk management activities
is to hedge our exposure to aluminum, natural gas and crude oil
input prices and thereby protect our enterprise against adverse
price fluctuations. We may alter our hedging strategy, including
increasing or decreasing the percentage of our exposures which
we hedge, based on our view in the future of actual and
forecasted commodity prices.
Insurance
The primary risks in our operations are bodily injury, first
party property damage and vehicle liability. Programs have been
implemented covering general/products and umbrella/excess
liability, auto liability, workers compensation, property
insurance (including business interruption, extra expense and
contingent business interruption/extra expense) and other
coverage customary for a company such as Noranda at levels which
we consider sufficient to protect us against catastrophic loss
due to claims associated with bodily injury
102
and/or
property damage. All policies will be underwritten with insurers
that are rated A- or better by A.M. Best Company.
Safety
Our goal is to provide an accident-free workplace. We are
committed to continuing and improving upon each facilitys
focus on safety in the workplace. We have a number of safety
programs in place, which include regular weekly safety meetings
and training sessions to teach proper safe work procedures.
Our executive management, along with site managers and union
leadership, are actively involved in supporting and promoting
the ongoing emphasis on workplace safety. Improvement in safety
performance is a key metric used in determining annual incentive
awards for our salaried employees.
Research
and Development
We do not incur material expenses in research and development
activities but from time to time participate in various research
and development programs. We address research and development
requirements and product enhancement by maintaining a staff of
technical support, quality assurance and engineering personnel.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims,
lawsuits and other disputes arising in the ordinary course of
business. We believe the resolution of these matters and the
incurrence of their related costs and expenses should not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity. While it is not feasible to
predict the outcome of all pending suits and claims, the
ultimate resolution of these matters as well as future lawsuits
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or reputation.
103
MANAGEMENT
Our senior management team and our directors as of the date of
this prospectus are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Executive Officers and Senior Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Layle K. Smith
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Kyle D. Lorentzen
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
Robert B. Mahoney
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Alan K. Brown
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Secretary and Vice President of Human Resources
|
Scott Croft
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
President of Norandal USA, Inc.
|
Keith Gregston
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
President, Primary Division of Noranda
Aluminum, Inc.
|
John Habisreitinger
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Vice President of Procurement and Logistics
|
Thomas N. Harris
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
Vice President of Strategic Development
|
Ethan Lane
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Vice President of Information Technology
|
Charles C. Skoda
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Vice President of Operations Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Layle K. Smith
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Director
|
William H. Brooks
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
Eric L. Press
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Director
|
Gareth Turner
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director
|
M. Ali Rashid
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
Director
|
Matthew H. Nord
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Director
|
Matthew R. Michelini
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Director
|
Scott Kleinman
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Director
|
Alan H. Schumacher
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
Thomas R. Miklich
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
Robert Kasdin
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
Layle K. Smith, 54, became President and Chief Executive
Officer and a director of Noranda HoldCo on March 3, 2008.
From April 2007 to December 2007, Mr. Smith held the
position of Executive Director with the Berry Plastics
Corporation. From June 2006 to March 2007, he was CEO and a
member of the Board of Directors of Covalence Specialty
Materials Corporation until it merged under common Apollo
control with Berry Plastics Corporation. From September 2004 to
May 2005, Mr. Smith was President and Chief Operating
Officer of Resolution Performance Products LLC, an Apollo
portfolio company that merged under common Apollo control with
Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. Mr. Smith served as a
Divisional President at Hexion until his departure in June 2006.
Previously, Mr. Smith held roles at Ballard Power Systems
and The Dow Chemical Company. Mr. Smith graduated in 1981
from Harvard University with an MBA and in 1977 with a BA in
Chemistry.
Kyle D. Lorentzen, 44, became Chief Operating Officer of
Noranda HoldCo in May 2008. With the retirement of the Chief
Financial Officer, Mr. Lorentzen served in that capacity
from October 2008 to May 2009 at which time he returned to his
position as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Lorentzen was the
Vice President of Corporate Development with Berry Plastics
Corporation from April 2007 to May 2008. From February 2007 to
April 2007, he was the Vice President of Strategic Development
for Covalence Specialty Materials, until it merged under common
Apollo control with Berry Plastics Corporation. From May 2005 to
February 2007, Mr. Lorentzen was the Vice President of
Finance for Hexions Epoxy and Phenolics Division. From May
1999 to May 2005, Mr. Lorentzen served as the Director of
Finance at Borden Chemical, an Apollo portfolio company that
merged under common Apollo control to form Hexion in May
2005.
104
Mr. Lorentzen holds a BA in Economics from Wake Forest
University and an MBA from University of Massachusetts.
Robert B. Mahoney, 56, was appointed Chief Financial
Officer in May 2009. He was most recently Chief Executive
Officer of Hi-P International Limited in Shanghai China, a
publicly traded (SGX) supplier of plastic injection components
and stamped parts. From 1995 to 2007 Mr. Mahoney was
employed by Molex Inc. in a number of operating and financial
positions. He was Chief Financial Officer of Molex from 1996
through 2003. Mr. Mahoney received a BA in Economics and
History from the University of Virginia and an MBA from the
Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of
Michigan.
Alan K. Brown, 62, has been Vice President of Legal and
Human Resources of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. since 1992 and has
been Secretary of Noranda HoldCo since May 18, 2007 and was
General Counsel of Noranda HoldCo from June 4, 2007 until
August 23, 2009. His previous assignments were Vice
President Human Resources, Beazer East, Director Compensation
and Benefits, Koppers Co., and Staff Vice President Allegeny
International, all of Pennsylvania. Mr. Brown holds a BA
from the College of William and Mary and a JD from Case Western
Reserve University, and is a member of the Ohio bar.
Scott Croft, 46, was appointed President of the Rolling
Mills division in 2006 and has been the President and a director
of Norandal USA, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, since 2006.
His previous assignments included Site Manager at Huntingdon
from 2002 to 2006, Director of Foil Operations from 2001 to
2002, Plant Manager at Salisbury from 1995 to 2000 and
Production Manager at Huntingdon from 1993 to 1995.
Mr. Croft holds a BS in Metallurgical Engineering from the
University of Pittsburgh and an MBA from Syracuse University.
Keith Gregston, 60, was appointed Executive Director of
the New Madrid Plant in 2010. His previous assignment was
President and General Manager of the New Madrid Plant where he
served from 2004 to 2010. Other assignments include Director of
Operations at New Madrid from 2002 to 2004, Reduction Plant
Manager, Value-Added Products Manager and Senior Engineer.
Mr. Gregston has 38 years of experience in the
aluminum industry. Mr. Gregston holds a BS in Metallurgical
Engineering from the University of Kentucky and completed the
Manufacturing Executive Program at the University of Michigan
Business School.
John Habisreitinger, 45, was appointed Vice President of
Procurement & Logistics in October 2008. His previous
positions included Site Manager at Huntingdon from 2006 to 2008,
Vice President Commercial for Gramercy Alumina LLC and St. Ann
Bauxite Limited from 2004 to 2006 and Vice President Commercial
Sales for Kaiser Aluminum from 2003 to 2004.
Mr. Habisreitinger has 21 years of experience in the
aluminum industry and holds a BA in Marketing Management from
Southeastern Louisiana University and an MBA from the University
of New Orleans.
Thomas N. Harris, 33, was appointed Vice President of
Strategic Development in October 2009 after having served as
Director of Corporate Development since joining Noranda in June
2009. From 2006 to 2009, Mr. Harris held various positions
in the Investment Banking division of Merrill Lynch &
Co, most recently as Vice President of Global Leveraged Finance,
and from 1998 to 2006 Mr. Harris was a member of the US
High Yield and Diversified Industries Groups of TD Securities,
the investment banking arm of TD Bank Financial Group.
Mr. Harris holds a BS in Finance and Economics from the NYU
Stern School of Business and graduated Beta Gamma Sigma with an
MBA from Columbia Graduate Business School.
Ethan Lane, 43 was appointed Vice President of
Information Technology in October 2009 and prior to that time
was Director of Information Technologies since joining Noranda
in April 2008. Prior to joining Noranda, Mr. Lane held
various positions with Pfizer Inc., most recently as Director of
Information Technology from 1998 to 2008. Mr. Lane holds a
BS from Purdue University and an MS degree from Purdues
Krannert School of Management.
Charles Skoda, 41, was appointed Vice President of
Operations Support in February 2009. Prior to joining Noranda,
Mr. Skoda was the Senior Manager of Sales, Marketing and
Development with Capital One Auto Finance from 2005 to 2008.
From 2002 to 2005, he was the Director of Leadership of
Afterburner Inc., an Inc 500 seminar and consulting company.
Prior to that, he served an 11 year decorated career as a
Strike/
105
Fighter pilot with the US Navy including tours in combat, as an
F/A-18
instructor pilot, and an
F/A-18
dynamic demonstration pilot. Mr. Skoda holds a BS in
Aerospace Engineering from the University of Southern California.
William H. Brooks, 66, has been a director of Noranda
HoldCo since July 2, 2007 and became Chairman of the Board
of Noranda HoldCo on March 3, 2008. Mr. Brooks was the
President and CEO of Noranda HoldCo from May 18, 2007 to
March 3, 2008 on which date he retired from employment. His
previous assignments included President of the Aluminum
Business, President of the Rolling Mills Division, President of
Primary Products Division and Plant Manager at Huntingdon.
Mr. Brooks has 30 years of experience in the aluminum
industry, having been with Noranda Aluminum for 22 of those
years. Mr. Brooks holds a BS in Business from Cleveland
State University and an MBA from the University of Tennessee and
is a Certified Public Accountant.
Eric L. Press, 44, became a director of Noranda HoldCo on
March 27, 2007. Mr. Press is a partner of Apollo.
Prior to joining Apollo in 1998, Mr. Press was associated
with the law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz,
specializing in mergers, acquisitions, restructurings and
related financing transactions. From 1987 to 1989,
Mr. Press was a consultant with The Boston Consulting Group
(BCG), a management consulting firm focused on
corporate strategy. Mr. Press has been engaged in all
aspects of Apollos lodging, leisure and entertainment
investment activities, as well as Apollos investments in
basic industries and financial services. Mr. Press serves
on the boards of directors of Apollo Commercial Real Estate
Finance, Inc., Athene Re, Prestige Cruise Holdings, Affinion
Group, Metals USA Holdings Corp., Harrahs Entertainment,
Inc., Innkeepers USA Trust and Verso Paper Corp. He also serves
on the Board of Trustees of the Rodeph Sholom School in New York
City. Mr. Press graduated magna cum laude from Harvard
College with an AB in Economics, and from Yale Law School, where
he was a Senior Editor of the Yale Law Review.
Gareth Turner, 45, became a director of Noranda HoldCo on
May 18, 2007. Mr. Turner joined Apollo in 2005 and is
based in London. From 1997 to 2005, Mr. Turner was employed
by Goldman Sachs as a Managing Director in its Industrial and
Natural Resources investment banking group. Based in London from
2003 to 2005, Mr. Turner was head of the Global Metals and
Mining Group. He has a broad range of experience in both capital
markets and M&A transactions. Prior to joining Goldman
Sachs, Mr. Turner was employed at Lehman Brothers from 1992
to 1997, and prior to this, he worked for Salomon Brothers from
1991 to 1992 and RBC Dominion Securities from 1986 to 1989.
Mr. Turner serves on the board of directors of CEVA Group
plc. Mr. Turner graduated from the University of Western
Ontario with an MBA with Distinction in 1991 and from the
University of Toronto with his BA in 1986.
M. Ali Rashid, 33, became a director of Noranda HoldCo on
May 18, 2007. Mr. Rashid is a partner of Apollo. He
has been employed with Apollo since 2000. Prior to that time,
Mr. Rashid was employed by the Goldman Sachs Group in the
Financial Institutions Group of its Investment Banking Division.
Mr. Rashid serves on the board of directors of Metals USA
Holdings Corp., Quality Distribution and Realogy Corporation.
Mr. Rashid received an MBA from the Stanford Graduate
School of Business and graduated Magna Cum Laude and Beta Gamma
Sigma from Georgetown University with a BS in Business
Administration.
Matthew H. Nord, 30, became a director of Noranda HoldCo
on March 27, 2007. Mr. Nord is a principal of Apollo
and has been associated with Apollo since 2003. From 2001 to
2003, Mr. Nord was a member of the Investment Banking
division of Salomon Smith Barney Inc. Mr. Nord serves on
the board of directors of Affinion Group Inc., Hughes Telematics
and SOURCECORP, Inc. Mr. Nord graduated summa cum laude
with a BS in Economics from the Wharton School of the University
of Pennsylvania.
Matthew R. Michelini, 28, became a director of Noranda
HoldCo on March 27, 2007. Mr. Michelini joined Apollo
in 2006. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Michelini was a
member of the mergers and acquisitions group of Lazard
Frères & Co. from 2004 to 2006.
Mr. Michelini also serves on the board of directors of
Metals USA Holdings Corp. Mr. Michelini graduated from
Princeton University with a BS in Mathematics and a Certificate
in Finance.
Scott Kleinman, 37, became a director of Noranda HoldCo
on December 7, 2007. Mr. Kleinman is a partner at
Apollo, where he has worked since February 1996. Prior to that
time, Mr. Kleinman was employed
106
by Smith Barney Inc. in its Investment Banking division.
Mr. Kleinman is also a director of Hexion Specialty
Chemicals, Momentive Performance Materials, Realogy Corporation
and Verso Paper Corp. Mr. Kleinman received a BA and a BS
from the University of Pennsylvania and the Wharton School of
Business, respectively, graduating magna cum laude, Phi Beta
Kappa.
Alan H. Schumacher, 63, became a director of Noranda
HoldCo on January 18, 2008. From 1977 to 2000,
Mr. Schumacher served in various financial positions at
American National Can and American National Can Group, most
recently serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Schumacher is currently a member of the
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board. He is a director of
BlueLinx Holdings, Quality Distribution, Inc., Hilco Inc. and
Traxis Holdings B.V.
Thomas R. Miklich, 62, became a director of Noranda
HoldCo on January 18, 2008. Mr. Miklich was a director
of OM Group, Inc., a specialty chemical company, from 1994 to
2002 and was Chief Financial Officer from 2002 to 2004. Prior to
that he was a director of Titan Technology, Inc, a private IT
consulting and outsourcing company, from 2000 to 2007 and was
Chief Financial Officer from 2005 to 2007.
Robert Kasdin, 51, became a director of Noranda HoldCo on
February 21, 2008. Mr. Kasdin was appointed Senior
Executive Vice President of Columbia University in March 2002
and assumed his responsibilities as of September 1, 2002.
Prior to joining Columbia University, he served as the Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the University of
Michigan. Before his service at the University of Michigan, he
was the Treasurer and Chief Investment Officer for The
Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, and the Vice
President and General Counsel for Princeton University
Investment Company. He started his career as a corporate
attorney at Davis Polk & Wardwell. He is a trustee of
the National September 11 Memorial & Museum.
Mr. Kasdin earned his AB from Princeton and his JD from
Harvard Law School.
There are no family relationships between any of the executive
officers or directors of Noranda HoldCo.
Director
Independence
As a privately held company, we are not required to have
independent directors on our Board of Directors. However, our
Board has determined that, under current New York Stock Exchange
listing standards (which we are not currently subject to) and
taking into account any applicable committee standards,
Messrs. Schumacher, Miklich and Kasdin are independent
directors. Messrs. Brooks and Smith are not considered
independent under any general listing standards due to their
current and past employment relationships with us, and
Messrs. Press, Turner, Rashid, Nord, Michelini and Kleinman
are not considered independent under any general listing
standards due to their relationship with Apollo, our largest
stockholder. As Apollo will continue to control a majority of
our voting stock upon the closing of this offering, under New
York Stock Exchange listing standards, we qualify as a
controlled company and, accordingly, are exempt from
its requirements to have a majority of independent directors and
a nominating/corporate governance committee and a Compensation
Committee each composed entirely of independent directors.
Committees
of our Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors currently has an audit committee,
Compensation Committee, executive committee and environmental,
health and safety committee. Our Board of Directors has
determined that Alan Schumacher, Thomas Miklich and Robert
Kasdin are independent directors according to the New York Stock
Exchange Rules.
Audit
Committee
Our audit committee consists of Matthew Nord, Matthew Michelini,
Alan Schumacher and Thomas Miklich. As we do not have publicly
traded equity outstanding, we are not required to have an audit
committee financial expert. However, our Board of Directors has
determined that Messrs. Schumacher and Miklich are
audit committee financial experts as defined by the
SEC and also meet the additional criteria for independence of
audit committee members set forth in Rule of 10A-3(b)(1) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act).
107
The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee
are to oversee and monitor the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our financial reporting process and internal control system;
|
|
|
|
the integrity of our financial statements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the independence, qualifications and performance of our
independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the performance of our internal audit function; and
|
|
|
|
our compliance with legal, ethical and regulatory matters.
|
Compensation
Committee
The current members of the Compensation Committee are
Messrs. Press and Nord. The principal duties and
responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to review, evaluate and make recommendations to the full Board
of Directors regarding our compensation policies and establish
performance-based incentives that support our long-term goals,
objectives and interests;
|
|
|
|
to review and approve the compensation of our chief executive
officer, all employees who report directly to our chief
executive officer and other members of our senior management;
|
|
|
|
to review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors
with respect to our incentive compensation plans and
equity-based compensation plans;
|
|
|
|
to set and review the compensation of and reimbursement policies
for members of the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
to provide oversight concerning selection of officers,
management succession planning, expense accounts,
indemnification and insurance matters, and separation
packages; and
|
|
|
|
to prepare an annual Compensation Committee report, provide
regular reports to the Board, and take such other actions as are
necessary and consistent with the governing law and our
organizational documents.
|
Executive
Committee
The current members of the executive committee are
Messrs. Smith, Press and Nord. The principal duties and
responsibilities of the executive committee are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
subject to applicable law, to exercise the powers and the duties
of the Board of Directors between board meetings and while the
Board of Directors is not in session; and
|
|
|
|
to implement the policy decisions of the Board of Directors.
|
Environmental,
Health and Safety Committee
The current members of the environmental, health and safety
committee are Messrs. Brooks, Turner and Kleinman. The
principal duties and responsibilities of the environmental,
health and safety committee are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to review our policies, practices and programs with respect to
the management of environmental, health and safety affairs,
including those related to sustainability and natural resource
management;
|
|
|
|
to monitor our compliance with environmental, health and safety
laws and regulations, and our policies relating thereto; and
|
|
|
|
to receive reports from management regarding significant
legislation or regulations, judicial decisions, treaties,
protocols, conventions or other agreements, public policies or
medical or other scientific
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
developments involving environmental, health and safety issues
that will or may have an effect on our business.
|
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all of our officers and employees, including our
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer. Our Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics can be accessed on our website at
www.norandaaluminum.com.
109
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Overview
and Objectives of Compensation Program
Our compensation program aims to retain our executives, while
also motivating them to achieve specific financial objectives
and aligning their interests with our shareowners. Our
compensation program is intended to promote strong governance of
Noranda HoldCo and its subsidiaries, excellent cash management,
long-term earnings growth and safety performance.
Role of
the Compensation Committee
On December 7, 2007, the Board of Directors of Noranda
HoldCo established a compensation committee to assist the Board
in more fully developing and implementing the compensation
program for our Chief Executive Officer (the CEO)
and other executives and to ensure that the total compensation
and benefits paid to or provided to executives is reasonable,
fair, and competitive (hereafter, said Board of Directors and
the compensation committee (together with our Board of Directors
where appropriate) are referred to in this prospectus as the
Compensation Committee). The current members of the
Compensation Committee are Mr. Press, as Chairman, and
Mr. Nord.
In evaluating the type and amount of compensation for our
executives, we review their current pay, their opportunities for
future compensation, their contributions to the goals and
objectives outlined for them within the Company and its
subsidiaries and their long-term prospects within the Company
and its subsidiaries. We believe this compensation philosophy
provides strong long-term incentives, effective cash flow
management and investment in the long-term growth of the
business.
The Compensation Committees specific roles under the
Compensation Committee Charter are:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve and recommend to our Board of Directors all
compensation plans for (1) the CEO, (2) all employees
of the Company and its subsidiaries who report directly to the
CEO and (3) other members of senior management of the
Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Senior
Management Group), as well as all compensation for our
Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
to approve the short-term compensation of the Senior Management
Group and to recommend short term compensation for members of
our Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
to approve and authorize grants under the Companys or its
subsidiaries incentive plans, including all equity plans
and long-term incentive plans; and
|
|
|
|
to prepare any report on executive compensation required by
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations for
inclusion in our annual proxy statement, if any.
|
Role of Executive Officers in Compensation
Decisions. The Compensation Committee evaluates
the performance of the CEO and determines the CEOs
compensation in light of the goals and objectives of the
compensation program on at least an annual basis. The
Compensation Committee and the CEO assess the performance and
compensation of the other named executives. The Compensation
Committee, together with the CEO, annually reviews the
performance of each member of the Senior Management Group as
compared with the achievement of the Company or operating
division goals, as the case may be, together with each
executives individual goals. The Compensation Committee
can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended
adjustments or awards to the executives. Both performance and
compensation are evaluated to ensure that the Company is able to
attract and retain high quality executives in vital positions
and that the compensation, taken as a whole, is competitive and
appropriate compared to that of similarly situated executives in
other corporations within the industry.
Setting Executive Compensation. Based on the
above objectives and philosophies, the Compensation Committee
has established both an annual cash bonus plan and a long-term
equity compensation plan to motivate the executives to achieve,
and hopefully exceed, the business goals established by the
Company and to fairly reward such executives for achieving such
goals. The Compensation Committee has not retained a
compensation consultant to review our policies and procedures
with respect to executive compensation. The
110
Compensation Committee periodically conducts a review of the
aggregate level and mix of our executive compensation against
other companies in our industry (both publicly and privately
held), as well as in other industrial companies. The
Compensation Committee intends that the aggregate level of
executive compensation opportunities for our executive officers
should be consistent with the range of compensation paid by
other similarly situated companies given the achievement of
similar financial and operating performance. The Compensation
Committee periodically reviews which peer companies should be
used for these benchmarking purposes. Such peer companies may
include some or all of the following companies: Alcoa Inc.,
Aleris International Inc., Allegheny Technologies Incorporated,
Aluminum Corporation of China Limited, Carpenter Technologies
Limited, Century, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Kaiser Aluminum
Corporation, Nucor Corporation, OM Group, Inc., Quanex Building
Products Corporation, and Titanium Metals Corporation. The
Compensation Committee generally endeavors to set compensation
levels in proximity to the midpoint of peer company levels, but
makes individualized determinations based on the particular
goals of each compensation decision.
Elements
Used to Achieve Compensation Objectives
The Companys compensation programs are designed to
emphasize and reward the key areas for our business: strong
governance, safety, cash flow management and earnings growth.
The Companys compensation programs include five basic
elements: (1) annual cash compensation; (2) management
equity investment; (3) equity compensation awards pursuant
to the Noranda 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
(4) post-employment compensation; and (5) other
personal benefits. The Companys arrangements for its
executive officers use a mix of base salary and incentive bonus,
an opportunity to purchase equity in the Company and stock
option grants in amounts relative to the amount of equity
purchased, in addition to other personal benefits (as described
below).
Base Salaries. Our executive officers
base salaries depend on their position within the Company and
its subsidiaries, the scope of their responsibilities, the
period during which they have been performing those
responsibilities and their overall performance.
We have, for a number of years, used the Hay Associates job
evaluation system to assist in determining salary grades for all
salaried employees including executive officers. The Company has
not in recent years retained Hay Associates as a consultant,
although it has purchased access to certain Hay databases. The
Hay system measures factors such as accountability, decision
making authority, problem solving requirements and other
measures of job content to evaluate the relative ranking of jobs
within the Company. That data is then matched with salary data
for similar jobs in the broader marketplace to arrive at market
competitive salary levels for Company jobs. Company jobs with
similar job content and market place values are then grouped
into salary grades. Salary grades at the Company are used to
determine both base salary levels and target bonus amounts for
Company employees. Base salaries are reviewed on an annual
basis, and will be adjusted from time to time to realign
salaries with market levels after taking into account individual
responsibilities, performance and experience, as well as the
terms of any agreements we have in place with the executive
officer.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Compensation Committee
increased the base salaries of Mr. Gregston, Mr. Croft
and Mr. Brown by $25,000 to reflect the elimination of the
perquisite allowance and Company-provided automobile lease
programs discussed below under Perquisites and Other
Personal Benefits.
In addition, effective April 1, 2009, the Compensation
Committee increased the base salary of Mr. Lorentzen by
$115,000 in recognition of his increased role and
responsibilities.
2009 Annual Incentive Plan. The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors approved the framework for a
2009 Annual Incentive Plan for Salaried Employees at its
March 16, 2009 meeting, which plan was finalized effective
as of April 1, 2009. The plan establishes the metrics and
bonus targets for the Companys executive officers for
2009. For 2009 the bonus targets for Messrs. Smith,
Lorentzen and Mahoney are 100%, 65% and 60% of base salary,
respectively, and the bonus targets for Messrs. Gregston,
Croft, and Brown are 50% of base salary. Actual annual incentive
payments in respect of our 2009 fiscal year, if any, will be
determined exclusively by the actual achievement of financial
goals established by the Compensation
111
Committee. For Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen, Mahoney and
Brown, 90% of their 2009 incentive award, if any, is based on
the arithmetic average of the results of Norandal and New Madrid
and 10% is based on the cash cost of Alumina production at
Gramercy. Messrs. Gregstons and Crofts
financial metrics are split equally between the Companys
overall financial achievement (with this portion determined on a
90/10% weighting as described above with respect to
Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen, Mahoney and Brown) and that of
the subsidiary which the applicable executive leads, which are
New Madrid and Norandal, respectively. For New Madrid, the
applicable financial metrics were metal production (10%
weighting), cash cost (50% weighting), safety performance (10%
weighting) and divisional adjusted EBITDA (10% weighting). For
Norandal, the applicable financial metrics were divisional
adjusted EBITDA (20% weighting), divisional free cash flow (50%
weighting) and safety performance (10% weighting). Each of New
Madrids and Norandals objectives also included
Company-wide
EBITDA goals (10% weighting) and
Company-wide
cash flow (10% weighting). The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors has at the time of this filing not yet
completed its review of the level of achievement of the
applicable performance goals. Accordingly, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors has not yet determined what
bonuses, if any, will be payable to Messrs. Smith,
Lorentzen, Mahoney, Brown, Gregston and Croft under the 2009
Annual Incentive Plan. In addition to potential payments under
the 2009 Annual Incentive Plan, at its March 16, 2009
meeting, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
awarded Mr. Lorentzen a two hundred thousand dollar bonus
based on his performance. This bonus was paid on March 31,
2009.
2010 Annual Incentive Plan. The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors has at the time of this
filing not yet approved the 2010 Annual Incentive Plan for
salaried employees which will incorporate the financial metrics
and bonus targets for executive officers of the Company. It is
expected that the Plan will provide that actual annual incentive
payments made to executive officers in respect of the
2010 year, if any, will be determined exclusively by the
achievement of financial and operating goals established by the
Compensation Committee.
Management Equity Investments. Pursuant to
subscription agreements entered into in 2007 in connection with
the consummation of the Apollo Acquisition, each of
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft and certain other
management participants agreed to make equity investments in
Noranda HoldCo through the purchase of common shares of Noranda
HoldCo at $10.00 per share, the same price paid by Apollo in
connection with the Apollo Acquisition. Messrs. Brown,
Gregston and Croft each purchased 25,000 shares. In
connection with his commencement of employment, Mr. Smith
purchased 100,000 common shares of Noranda HoldCo on
March 10, 2008, at a purchase price of $20.00 per share,
which was the fair market value of a common share of Noranda
HoldCo on the date of purchase. As more fully described under
Mr. Lorentzens Employment Agreement
below, Mr. Lorentzen was given the right to purchase a
number of shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock having a
then-current fair market value of up to $250,000.
Mr. Lorentzen initially purchased 6,750 shares of
Noranda HoldCo common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$135,000 pursuant to this right. In connection with certain
actions undertaken by us in November, 2009, which are more fully
described below, Mr. Lorentzen purchased an additional
8,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $18,240. As more fully described
under Mr. Mahoneys Employment Agreement
below, Mr. Mahoney was given the right to purchase up to
30,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock at fair market
value at the time of purchase. Mr. Mahoney has purchased
all 30,000 shares.
All equity securities purchased by Messrs. Brown, Gregston,
Croft, Smith, Lorentzen and Mahoney are subject to restrictions
on transfer, repurchase rights and other limitations set forth
in a security holders agreement. See Item 13. Certain
Relationships and Person Related Transactions, and Director
Independence Security Holders Agreement. We
believe that these investments by the executive officers in
Noranda HoldCo contribute significantly to the alignment of
their interests with those of the Company.
The Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan and
Equity Compensation Awards Granted Under the
Plan. In connection with the completion of the
Apollo Acquisition, Noranda HoldCo adopted the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan, which permits Noranda HoldCo to grant
stock options, rights to purchase shares, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, and other stock-based rights to
employees and directors of, or consultants or investor director
providers to, us or any of our subsidiaries. The Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan is administered by the Board of
Directors of Noranda HoldCo or, if determined by such
112
board, by the Compensation Committee. Approximately
1.9 million shares of the common stock of Noranda HoldCo
have been reserved for issuance under the Noranda 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan.
The Compensation Committee has not established any formal
program, plan or practice for the issuance of equity awards to
employees. We do not have any program, plan or practice in place
for selecting grant dates for awards under the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan in coordination with the release of
material non-public information. Under the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan, the exercise price for the option
awards is the fair market value of the stock of Noranda HoldCo
on the date of grant. The fair market value for this purpose is
determined by the Board of Directors by applying industry
appropriate multiples to our current EBITDA, and the valuations
take into account a level of net debt that excluded cash
required for working capital purposes. The Compensation
Committee is not prohibited from granting awards at times when
it is in possession of material non-public information. However,
no inside information was taken into account in determining the
number of options previously awarded under the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan or the exercise price for those awards,
and we did not time the release of any material
non-public information to affect the value of those awards.
The Compensation Committee believes that the granting of awards
under the Noranda 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan promotes, on a
short-term and long-term basis, an enhanced personal interest
and alignment of interests of those executives receiving equity
awards with the goals and strategies of the Company. The
Compensation Committee also believes that the equity grants
provide not only financial rewards to such executives for
achieving Company goals but also additional incentives for
executives to remain with the Company. In connection with the
Apollo Acquisition, we awarded stock options to certain of our
employees, including to Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft
and in connection with their respective commencement of
employment, we awarded stock options to Messrs. Smith,
Lorentzen and Mahoney. In connection with his commencement of
employment and purchase of Noranda HoldCo common stock, we
awarded Mr. Mahoney 60,000 stock options pursuant to the
Noranda 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan on June 9, 2009, at
an exercise price of $1.37 per share.
The options that we granted to our employees (including to
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft) in connection with the
Apollo Acquisition, as well as options that we have granted to
other employees in connection with their commencement of
employment with us (including to Messrs. Smith and
Lorentzen), generally have been evenly divided between
time-based vesting options and performance-based vesting
options. In light of the downturn in the economy and its affect
on the achievement of potential performance goals, the
Compensation Committee determined that we should grant
Mr. Mahoney solely time-vesting options in connection with
the commencement of his employment. Specifically, the options
that we granted to Mr. Mahoney vest, subject to his
continued service with the Company and its subsidiaries through
each applicable vesting date, as to a percentage of the options
on the first five anniversaries of his commencement of
employment as follows: 15% on the first and second
anniversaries, 20% on the third anniversary and 25% on the
fourth and fifth anniversaries.
The Compensation Committee later considered the potential value
to the Company of the options that we granted to certain
employees after the Apollo Acquisition (including those granted
to Messrs. Lorentzen and Smith) in light of the downturn in
the economy and its effect on the value of the options. The
Compensation Committee determined that those options no longer
served their intended incentive and retentive purposes as their
exercise prices significantly exceeded the per-share value of
our underlying common stock and the likelihood of achievement of
the applicable performance goals was significantly diminished as
a result of the Companys performance. In light of the
important role that equity compensation plays in the overall
compensation program of the Company and in the overall makeup of
employees compensation, and in order to ensure that the
options granted to certain key employees (including
Messrs. Smith and Lorentzen) continued to serve their
intended incentive and retentive purposes, on November 12,
2009, the Company entered into amended and restated stock option
agreements with certain of its employees, including with
Messrs. Smith (covering 200,000 options) and Lorentzen
(covering separate grants of 50,000 options and 6,750 options),
which reduced the exercise prices of their underlying options
and amended the vesting schedule of the options, as described
below. The amended and restated option agreements reduced the
exercise price of Messrs. Smiths and Lorentzens
options from $18.00 per share to $2.28 per share and provided
that the 50%
113
of the options which were originally scheduled to vest based
upon the achievement of performance goals would vest based on
continued service, with 15% scheduled to vest on each of the
first and second anniversaries of the amendment and restatement
date, 20% scheduled to vest on the third anniversary of the
amendment and restatement date and 25% scheduled to vest on each
of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the amendment and
restatement date. In addition, we granted Mr. Lorentzen
options to purchase up to 17,000 shares of Company common
stock. The additional 17,000 options granted to
Mr. Lorentzen on November 12, 2009, at an exercise
price of $2.28 per share, vest, subject to
Mr. Lorentzens continued service, as to 15% of the
options on each of the first and second anniversaries of the
date of grant, 20% of the options on the third anniversary of
the date of grant and 25% of the options on each of the fourth
and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant.
Mr. Lorentzens new options were subject to partial or
complete forfeiture in the event that he failed to purchase up
to 8,000 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price
of $2.28 per share within 30 days of the date of grant of
the options. The Company entered into similar agreements with
certain of its other employees.
The maximum term of these options is ten years from the date of
grant. However, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the
applicable stock option award agreement, unvested options will
automatically expire upon the date of a grantees
termination of employment. All of the time-vesting options may
become vested earlier upon the grantees continued
employment for 18 months following a change of
control of Noranda HoldCo or upon certain qualifying
terminations of employment prior to such
18-month
anniversary. Vested options will generally expire 90 days
following the termination of a grantees employment without
cause or with good reason (each as
defined in the applicable stock option agreement), 60 days
(in some cases, 90 days) following the grantees
termination of employment without good reason and 180 days
following a grantees death or disability. All options will
be forfeited upon a termination of the grantees employment
for cause. The options granted to Mr. Smith in connection
with the commencement of his employment contain certain unique
terms described more fully below (See Management
Agreements Mr. Smiths Employment
Agreement). We believe that the grant of stock options to
the executive officers contributes significantly to the
alignment of their interests and those of the Company, and that
the enhanced protections in the event of a change of control
promote retentive goals that serve shareholder interests.
Shares of Company common stock acquired under the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan are subject to restrictions on
transfer, repurchase rights and other limitations set forth in a
security holders agreement. See Item 13. Certain
Relationships and Person Related Transactions, and Director
Independence Security Holders Agreement.
Upon completion of this offering, we will no longer grant awards
under the Noranda 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
2010
Incentive Award Plan
Prior to the completion of this offering, we intend to adopt the
2010 Incentive Award Plan. The principal purpose of the 2010
Incentive Award Plan will be to promote the success and enhance
the value of our company by linking the personal interests of
selected employees, consultants and directors to those of our
stockholders and by providing such individuals with an incentive
for outstanding performance. The 2010 Incentive Award Plan is
further intended to attract, retain and motivate selected
employees, consultants and directors through the granting of
stock-based compensation awards.
The 2010 Incentive Award Plan will provide for a variety of such
awards, including non-qualified stock options, or
NSOs, incentive stock options, or ISOs
(within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue
Code, or the Code), stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, deferred
stock awards, dividend equivalents, performance share awards,
performance-based awards, stock payment awards and other
stock-based awards. We will
reserve shares
of common stock for issuance under the 2010 Incentive Award
Plan. The maximum number of shares that may be subject to awards
granted under the 2010 Incentive Award Plan to any individual in
any calendar year will
be
and the maximum amount that may be paid in cash to any
individual in any calendar year with respect to any
performance-based awards will be
$ ; provided that this limitation
will not apply prior to the
114
consummation of this offering, and following such consummation,
this limitation will not apply until the earliest of:
(a) the first material modification of the 2010 Incentive
Award Plan (including any increase in the number of shares
reserved for issuance under the 2010 Incentive Award Plan);
(b) the issuance of all of the shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under the 2010 Incentive Award Plan;
(c) the expiration of the 2010 Incentive Award Plan;
(d) the first meeting of stockholders at which members of
the board are to be elected, which occurs after the close of the
third calendar year following the calendar year in which any of
our equity securities are registered under Section 12 of
the Exchange Act; or (e) such other date required by
Section 162(m) of the Code and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
Administration. The 2010 Incentive Award Plan
will be administered by our Board of Directors, unless and until
the board delegates administration to the Compensation Committee
or other applicable committee of the board. The board of
directors or Compensation Committee may delegate administration
to one or more members of our Board of Directors. Our Board of
Directors, or the Compensation Committee if so empowered, will
have the power to interpret the 2010 Incentive Award Plan and to
adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation and
application of the 2010 Incentive Award Plan according to its
terms. Our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee
shall determine the number of shares of common stock that will
be subject to each award and may take into account the
recommendations of our senior management in determining the
award recipients and the terms and conditions of such awards.
Our Board of Directors may not delegate to the Compensation
Committee or otherwise the power to grant stock awards to our
independent directors.
Grant of Awards. Certain employees,
consultants and directors will be eligible to be granted awards
under the 2010 Incentive Award Plan. Our Board of Directors, or
the Compensation Committee if so empowered, will determine:
|
|
|
|
|
which employees, consultants and directors are to be granted
awards;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the type of award that is granted;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares subject to the awards; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of such awards, consistent with the
2010 Incentive Award Plan. Our Board of Directors, or the
Compensation Committee if so empowered, will have the
discretion, subject to the limitations of the 2010 Incentive
Award Plan and applicable laws, to grant ISOs, NSOs, stock
bonuses and rights to acquire restricted stock (except that only
our employees may be granted ISOs).
|
Limitation on ISO Treatment. Even if an option
is designated as an ISO, no option will qualify as an ISO if the
aggregate fair market value of the stock (as determined as of
the date of grant) with respect to all of a holders ISOs
exercisable for the first time during any calendar year under
the 2010 Incentive Award Plan exceeds $100,000. Any option
failing to qualify as an ISO will be deemed to be an NSO.
Stock Option Exercise Price. Our Board of
Directors, or the Compensation Committee if so empowered, shall
set the per share exercise price, subject to the following rules:
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of ISOs and NSOs, the per share option exercise
price shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of
shares of our common stock on the grant date; and
|
|
|
|
for any persons owning (within the meaning of
Section 424(d) of the Code) more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of our capital stock or of
any of our subsidiaries, the per share exercise price shall be
not less than 110% of the fair market value of the shares of our
common stock on the grant date.
|
Expiration of Stock Options. The term of an
option is set by our Board of Directors, or the Compensation
Committee if so empowered, subject to the following conditions:
(1) no option term shall be longer than ten years from the
date of grant; and (2) the option term for an ISO granted
to a person owning more than 10% of the total combined voting
power of all classes of our capital stock shall not exceed five
years from the date of grant. Upon termination of an outstanding
optionholders services with us, the holder
115
may exercise his or her options within the period of time
specified in the option grant, to the extent that the options
were vested at the time of termination.
Other Equity Awards. In addition to stock
options, the Compensation Committee may also grant to certain
employees, consultants and directors stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, deferred
stock awards, dividend equivalents, performance share awards,
performance-based awards, stock payment awards or other
stock-based awards, with such terms and conditions as our Board
of Directors (or, if applicable, the Compensation Committee)
may, subject to the terms of the 2010 Incentive Award Plan,
establish. Under the 2010 Incentive Award Plan,
performance-based stock awards are intended to comply with the
requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and its
underlying regulations, in order to allow these awards, when
payable, to be fully tax deductible by us.
Performance Bonus Awards. Under the 2010
Incentive Award Plan, the Compensation Committee has the
authority in its discretion to make performance-based cash bonus
payments to our designated employees, including our executive
officers, with respect to a specified period (for example, a
calendar year). Such bonuses are payable upon the attainment of
pre-established performance goals. Such performance goals may
relate to one or more corporate business criteria with respect
to us or any of our subsidiaries, including but not limited to:
net earnings (either before or after interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization), gross or net sales or revenue,
net income (either before or after taxes), operating earnings or
profit, cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash
flow and free cash flow), return on assets, return on capital,
return on stockholders equity, return on sales, gross or
net profit or operating margin, costs, funds from operations,
expenses, working capital, net income (loss) per share, price
per share of Common Stock, regulatory body approval for
commercialization of a product, implementation or completion of
critical projects, market share, objective measures of
productivity, operating efficiency, economic value added, cash
flow return on capital and return on net assets, any of which
may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any
incremental increase or decrease or as compared to results of a
peer group or to market performance indicators or indices.
Adjustments of Awards. In the event a stock
dividend, stock split, combination, merger, consolidation,
spin-off, recapitalization or other change in our capitalization
affects our common stock in a manner that causes dilution or
enlargement of benefits or potential benefits under the 2010
Incentive Award Plan, as determined by our Board of Directors,
or the Compensation Committee, if so empowered, then our Board
of Directors or the Compensation Committee shall equitably
adjust:
|
|
|
|
|
the aggregate number of, and kind of, shares of our common stock
subject to the 2010 Incentive Award Plan;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the number of, and kind of, shares of our common stock subject
to the outstanding awards;
|
|
|
|
the price per share of our common stock upon exercise of
outstanding options; and
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of any outstanding awards, including
the financial or other performance targets specified in each
option agreement for determining the exercisability of options.
|
Change in Control. With respect to any awards,
in connection with any change in control (or other unusual or
nonrecurring transaction affecting us or our financial
statements), our Board of Directors or the Compensation
Committee if so empowered, in its sole discretion, may
(i) provide for the termination of any award in exchange
for an amount of cash, if any, equal to the amount that would
have been payable upon the exercise of such award or realization
of the participants rights as of the date of such change
in control or other transaction; (ii) purchase any
outstanding awards for a cash amount or replace outstanding
awards with other rights or property; (iii) provide that
after the occurrence of the transaction, the award cannot vest,
be exercised or become payable; (iv) provide that only for
a specified period of time after such transaction, an award
shall be exercisable or payable or fully vested with respect to
all shares covered thereby, notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in the 2010 Incentive Award Plan or the applicable
award agreement; or (v) provide that each outstanding award
shall be assumed or substituted for an equivalent award, right
or property by any successor corporation. Any such action may be
effectuated by the Compensation Committee either by the terms of
the applicable option agreement or by action of the Compensation
Committee taken prior to the change in control.
116
Amendment and Termination. Our Board of
Directors, or the Compensation Committee if so empowered, is
generally authorized to adopt, amend and rescind rules relating
to the administration of the 2010 Incentive Award Plan, and our
Board of Directors is authorized to amend, suspend and terminate
the 2010 Incentive Award Plan. We have attempted to structure
the 2010 Incentive Award Plan in a manner such that remuneration
attributable to stock options and other awards will not be
subject to the deduction limitation contained in
Section 162(m) of the Code. However, we must generally
obtain approval of our stockholders: (i) to increase the
number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under
the 2010 Incentive Award Plan; or (ii) to decrease the
exercise price of any outstanding option or stock appreciation
right granted under the 2010 Incentive Award Plan.
Senior
Executive Bonus Plan
Prior to the completion of this offering, we intend to adopt the
Senior Executive Bonus Plan. The Senior Executive Bonus Plan is
intended to provide an incentive for superior work and to
motivate covered key executives toward even greater achievement
and business results, to tie their goals and interests to those
of ours and our stockholders and to enable us to attract and
retain highly qualified executives.
The Senior Executive Bonus Plan is a performance-based bonus
plan under which our designated key executives, including our
executive officers, are eligible to receive bonus payments with
respect to a specified period (for example, our fiscal year).
Bonuses are generally payable under the Senior Executive Bonus
Plan upon the attainment of pre-established performance goals.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may pay bonuses (including,
without limitation, discretionary bonuses) to participants under
the Senior Executive Bonus Plan based upon such other terms and
conditions as the Compensation Committee may in its discretion
determine.
Performance goals under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan may
relate to one or more corporate business criteria with respect
to us or any of our subsidiaries, including but not limited to:
net earnings (either before or after interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization), adjusted EBITDA, economic value
added, sales or revenue, net income (either before or after
taxes), operating earnings, cash flow (including, but not
limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash flow
return on capital, return on net assets, return on
stockholders equity, return on assets, return on capital,
stockholder returns, return on sales, gross or net profit
margin, productivity, expense, margins, operating efficiency,
objective measures of customer satisfaction, working capital,
net income (loss) per share, price per share of stock, market
share, acquisitions or strategic transactions, and number of
customers, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms
or as compared to any incremental increase or decrease, or as
compared to results of a peer group.
The Senior Executive Bonus Plan is administered by the
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will select
the participants in the Senior Executive Bonus Plan and the
performance goals to be utilized with respect to the
participants, establish the bonus formulas for each
participants annual bonus, and certify whether any
applicable performance goals have been met with respect to a
given performance period. We may amend or terminate the Senior
Executive Bonus Plan at any time in our sole discretion. Any
amendments to the Senior Executive Bonus Plan will require
stockholder approval only to the extent required by applicable
law, rule or regulation.
Post-Employment Compensation. We provide
post-employment compensation to our employees, including our
named executive officers, as a continuance of the
post-retirement programs applicable to our employees prior to
the Apollo Acquisition. The Compensation Committee believes that
offering post-employment compensation allows us to attract and
retain qualified employees and executives in a highly
competitive marketplace and to reward our employees and
executives for their contribution to the Company during their
employment. The principal components of our post-employment
executive officer compensation program include a qualified
defined contribution 401(k) plan, a qualified defined benefit
pension plan, a non-qualified supplemental defined benefit
pension plan and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) Plan. Our executive officers are
eligible to participate in our Company-wide 401(k) qualified
plan for salaried and non-union hourly employees. The Company
matches 50% of employee contributions up to 6% of employee pay.
Company matching contributions are 100% vested after three years
of service.
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan. Our executive officers
participate in our Company-wide non-contributory defined benefit
pension plan for salaried and non-union hourly employees.
Benefits are vested after five years of service and are based on
average annual compensation and length of service of the
employee.
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. We
also maintain the Noranda Aluminum, Inc. Management Supplemental
Benefit Plan, a separate supplemental non qualified pension plan
in which executive officers and other highly compensated Company
employees participate. This Plan provides retirement benefits
equal to the difference, if any, between the maximum benefit
allowed under the qualified defined benefit pension plan under
applicable Internal Revenue Code limits and the amount that
would be provided under the pension plan if no such limits were
applied. The non-qualified pension plan also recognizes as
covered earnings deferred salary and bonuses, which are not
recognized as such by the pension plan.
|
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan. Under our
non-qualified deferred compensation plan, executive officers and
other highly compensated Company employees may defer a portion
of their base salary and annual bonus. Amounts deferred are not
actually invested, but are credited with interest at a rate
equal to the sum of the credited portfolio rate of return
published annually by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
(which for 2008, was 7.5%, for 2009 was 6.5% and for 2010 is
6.15%) and 1.5%. The Company maintains a rabbi trust to provide
for its obligations under the supplemental executive retirement
plan and the deferred compensation plan.
|
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. The
Compensation Committee, continuing a multi-year Company trend of
phasing out perquisites, determined in 2008 that the practice of
providing perquisite allowances and company leased automobiles
to certain executives should cease on January 1, 2009, or
in the case of then-existing leased automobiles, the later of
January 1, 2009 or the expiration of the lease. The
Compensation Committee at the same time determined that
consistent with our compensation philosophy that perquisites and
other personal benefits that are reasonable, competitive and
consistent with our overall compensation program are necessary
in order to enable us to attract and retain qualified employees
for key positions, the cash value of the perquisite allowances
($13,500) and auto leases ($11,500) should be added to the base
salary of executives who are affected by the elimination of the
programs. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee determined to
increase the base salaries of Messrs. Gregston, Croft and
Brown by $25,000 effective January 1, 2009. In the case of
Messrs. Croft and Brown, whose automobile leases terminated
in May and August 2009 respectively, the Company deducted the
value of the monthly lease from the monthly compensation of the
executive until lease termination.
Management
Agreements
The Company is party to employment agreement term sheets with
certain of its current executive officers, including
Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen and Mahoney.
Mr. Smiths Term Sheet. On
February 22, 2008, we entered into a definitive, binding
term sheet with Mr. Smith, with a five-year term commencing
as of March 3, 2008, and with automatic annual renewals
thereafter unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at
least 90 days prior to a renewal date. In connection with,
and in order to reflect, the amendment and restatement of
Mr. Smiths stock option agreement, we entered into an
amendment to Mr. Smiths term sheet on
November 12, 2009.
Pursuant to the term sheet, Mr. Smith will serve as our CEO
during the term, and will serve on our Board of Directors. While
serving as our CEO, Mr. Smith will receive an annual base
salary of $750,000 and will be eligible for an annual bonus with
a target amount equal to 100% of his annual base salary. Actual
bonus amounts will be determined based on performance.
In the event that Mr. Smiths employment as our CEO is
terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Smith
for good reason (each, an Involuntary
Termination), he would be entitled to 18 months of
base salary, payable in a lump sum, a prorated annual bonus for
the year of termination and 18 months of continued health
care benefits. In the event that Mr. Smiths
employment as our CEO is terminated by us due
118
to his disability or death, he, or his estate, would be
entitled to 12 months of base salary, payable in a lump sum.
In connection with entering into the term sheet, Mr. Smith
agreed to make an investment of $2 million in shares of
Noranda HoldCo common stock and, in connection with such
investment, Noranda HoldCo granted Mr. Smith stock options
in respect of 200,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common
stock. See Elements Used to Achieve Compensation
Objectives The Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan and Equity Compensation Award Granted Under the
Plan above. The terms of his investment and stock options
are generally similar to those applicable to Messrs. Brown,
Gregston and Croft other than with respect to price and vesting,
except that Mr. Smiths shares are subject to
repurchase rights only in the case of termination for cause (in
which case we may repurchase his shares at the lesser of his
original purchase price or fair market value), Mr. Smith
may be entitled under certain circumstances to potentially
longer post-termination exercise periods for vested stock
options than are generally applicable to our stock options, and
Mr. Smith was entitled, pursuant to the original terms of
his term sheet, in the event of a change of control of Noranda
HoldCo prior to or on the
18-month
anniversary of his commencement of employment, to full vesting
of all time-vesting stock options and the right to re-sell his
100,000 purchased shares to us for no less than $8 million.
Mr. Smiths options were amended and restated in
November, 2009 as described in Elements Used to Achieve
Compensation Objectives The Amended and Restated
2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan and Equity Compensation Award
Granted Under the Plan above. The amendment to
Mr. Smiths term sheet extended this period from the
18-month
anniversary of Mr. Smiths commencement of employment
with the Company to the
60-month
anniversary of his commencement of employment with the Company
and clarified that all of his stock options (including those
that were formerly performance-vesting options) would be treated
in the same manner in the event of such a change of control.
However, in the event of such a change of control, any cash
received by Mr. Smith for those shares would be subject to
a continued service requirement pursuant to which his right to
the cash would vest 50% on the six-month anniversary of the
change of control and 50% on the first anniversary of the change
of control, subject to accelerated vesting upon an Involuntary
Termination.
Mr. Lorentzens Term Sheet. On
May 8, 2008, we entered into a definitive, binding term
sheet with Mr. Lorentzen, with a two-year term commencing
as of May 5, 2008, and with automatic annual renewals
thereafter unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at
least 90 days prior to a renewal date.
Pursuant to the term sheet, Mr. Lorentzen served as Chief
Operating Officer until being elected Chief Financial Officer on
October 13, 2008. Mr. Lorentzen served as our Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer until
Mr. Mahoneys commencement of employment on
May 11, 2009, when Mr. Lorentzen returned solely to
serving as our Chief Operating Officer. While serving with
Noranda HoldCo, Mr. Lorentzen receives an annual base
salary of at least $310,000 (since increased to $425,000 as
described above) and is eligible for an annual bonus with a
target amount equal to 65% of his annual base salary. Actual
bonus amounts will be determined based on performance.
In the event that Mr. Lorentzens employment is
terminated by us without cause or by
Mr. Lorentzen for good reason, he would be
entitled to 12 months of base salary, payable in
installments through the end of the year of termination, with
the remainder paid in a lump sum, a prorated annual bonus for
the year of termination and continued health care benefits for a
limited period.
In connection with entering into the term sheet, Noranda HoldCo
granted Mr. Lorentzen 25,000 unrestricted shares of Noranda
HoldCo common stock and stock options in respect of
50,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock. See
Elements Used to Achieve Compensation
Objectives The Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan and Equity Compensation Award Granted Under the
Plan above. The terms of such stock options are generally
similar to those applicable to Messrs. Brown, Gregston and
Croft other than with respect to price and vesting.
Pursuant to the term sheet, during his employment,
Mr. Lorentzen had the right, upon one business days
notice to us, to purchase an additional number of shares of
Noranda HoldCo common stock having a then-current fair market
value of $250,000 for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000.
In the event that Mr. Lorentzen exercised such right,
Noranda HoldCo was required to grant Mr. Lorentzen one
option to purchase a share of Noranda HoldCo common stock for
each additional share of Noranda HoldCo common
119
stock purchased, with such options to have an exercise price
equal to the then-current fair market value. The terms of such
stock options were generally to be similar to those applicable
to Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft, other than with
respect to price and vesting, except that 100% of any additional
options were to be performance-vesting options.
Mr. Lorentzen purchased 6,750 shares of Noranda HoldCo
common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $135,000 and
was, accordingly, granted options to purchase an additional
6,750 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stocks having the
terms and conditions described immediately above.
Mr. Lorentzens options were amended and restated in
November, 2009 as described in Elements Used to Achieve
Compensation Objectives The Amended and Restated
2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan and Equity Compensation Award
Granted Under the Plan above. In connection with, and in
order to reflect, the amendment and restatement of
Mr. Lorentzens stock options, we entered into an
amendment to his employment term sheet, which is set forth in
his amended and restated stock option agreement. The amendment
to Mr. Lorentzens term sheet capped the number of
shares that Mr. Lorentzen could purchase pursuant to the
subsequent share purchase provision of his term sheet at 5,750,
and provided for time-based vesting of any stock options that
were granted to Mr. Lorentzen in connection with a
subsequent share purchase.
Mr. Mahoneys Term Sheet. On
April 22, 2009, we entered into a definitive, binding term
sheet with Mr. Mahoney, with a three-year term commencing
as of May 11, 2009, and with automatic annual renewals
thereafter unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at
least 90 days prior to a renewal date.
Pursuant to the term sheet, Mr. Mahoney serves as our Chief
Financial Officer during the term and is entitled to receive an
annual base salary of $375,000 and is eligible for an annual
bonus with a target amount equal to 60% of his annual base
salary.
In the event that Mr. Mahoneys employment is
terminated by us without cause or by
Mr. Mahoney for good reason, subject to his
execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us,
he would be entitled to (i) 12 months of base salary,
payable in accordance with our regular payroll practices until
the end of the calendar year in which the termination occurs,
with the remainder payable in a lump sum in January of the year
following termination, (ii) a prorated annual bonus for the
year of termination, based on actual performance, and
(iii) continued health benefits for him and his eligible
dependents during any notice period as if he were covered by our
general severance plan for executives.
In connection with entering into the term sheet,
Mr. Mahoney was given the right to purchase up to
30,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo. common stock at $1.37 per
share (the fair market value at the time of purchase). As a
result of Mr. Mahoneys purchase of these shares,
Noranda HoldCo granted Mr. Mahoney stock options in respect
of 60,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock. See
Elements Used to Achieve Compensation
Objectives The Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan and Equity Compensation Award Granted Under the
Plan above.
Senior Managers Severance Plan. Each of
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft is eligible to
participate in our senior managers severance plan applicable to
the senior management employees who directly report to our
President. In the event that a participant incurs an involuntary
termination of employment due to a permanent reduction in force,
the elimination of a job or position, a corporate reorganization
(generally a merger or similar transaction resulting in
employment terminations) or a demonstrated insufficient aptitude
for continued employment not attributable to any willful cause
or effect, then, subject to execution of a release of claims,
the participant will receive an amount calculated based on the
length of service and base salary of the participant (subject to
a maximum severance amount of 104 weeks of base pay),
provided that the participant will be ineligible for severance
in the event of a voluntary resignation, misconduct (including
unethical or illegal conduct), a lay-off expected to be
short-term in nature or the refusal to accept reassignment where
reassignment is at substantially similar pay, benefits and
reporting duties and not more than 50 miles from the prior
location. The senior managers severance plan has been a
component of our executive compensation program for many years
prior to the Apollo Acquisition. We believe that this
arrangement provides a retentive benefit and represents part of
an industry-competitive benefits program, and assists in
ensuring the impartial and dedicated service of our executive
officers, notwithstanding concerns that they might have
regarding their continued employment following corporate
transactions or otherwise.
120
Conclusion. Our compensation policies are
designed to reasonably and fairly motivate, retain and reward
our executives for achieving our objectives and goals.
Summary
Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned
by each of the named executive officers from Noranda HoldCo or
Noranda AcquisitionCo for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Non-qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position(a)
|
|
Year(b)
|
|
|
($)(c)(1)
|
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
|
($)(e)(2)
|
|
|
($)(f)(2)
|
|
|
($)(g)(3)
|
|
|
($)
(h)(4)
|
|
|
($)(i)(5)
|
|
|
($)(j)
|
|
|
Layle K. Smith,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,776
|
|
|
|
7,041
|
|
|
|
1,120,297
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
625,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,263
|
|
|
|
506,250
|
|
|
|
62,930
|
|
|
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
1,912,292
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle D. Lorentzen,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
396,250
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,276
|
|
|
|
8,339
|
|
|
|
720,751
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
204,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
181,180
|
|
|
|
108,799
|
|
|
|
10,363
|
|
|
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
1,009,560
|
|
Robert B. Mahoney,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
241,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,926
|
|
|
|
47,909
|
|
|
|
363,997
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Brown,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
244,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,216
|
|
|
|
9,290
|
|
|
|
434,241
|
|
Secretary and General
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
218,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,723
|
|
|
|
88,978
|
|
|
|
117,015
|
|
|
|
24,410
|
|
|
|
775,261
|
|
Counsel
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
132,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,753
|
|
|
|
59,328
|
|
|
|
25,155
|
|
|
|
12,879
|
|
|
|
626,743
|
|
Keith Gregston,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
249,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,216
|
|
|
|
9,330
|
|
|
|
633,087
|
|
President and General
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
222,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,723
|
|
|
|
111,127
|
|
|
|
264,536
|
|
|
|
26,609
|
|
|
|
951,901
|
|
Manager, New Madrid
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
135,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,753
|
|
|
|
76,824
|
|
|
|
36,198
|
|
|
|
13,473
|
|
|
|
658,777
|
|
Scott Croft,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
237,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,952
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
415,234
|
|
President, Rolling Mills
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
210,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,723
|
|
|
|
67,936
|
|
|
|
28,421
|
|
|
|
24,107
|
|
|
|
657,972
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
128,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,753
|
|
|
|
61,062
|
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
|
|
12,370
|
|
|
|
602,842
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For 2009, represents regular base
salary paid to our named executive officers by us between
January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The annual base
salaries for each of Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen, Mahoney,
Brown, Gregston and Croft as of December 31, 2009 were
$750,000, $425,000, $375,000, $244,735, $249,541 and $237,330
respectively. For 2007, represents regular base salary paid to
our named executive officers by us between May 18, 2007
(the date of the completion of the Apollo Acquisition) and
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
In connection with the completion
of the Apollo Acquisition, Messrs. Brown, Gregston and
Croft were awarded options to acquire 61,300, 61,300 and
61,300 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock, respectively.
Generally, 50% of the options are time-vesting options that were
to have become vested and exercisable in five equal annual
installments on each anniversary of the consummation of the
Apollo Acquisition beginning on May 18, 2008 and ending on
May 18, 2012 and 50% of the options are performance-vesting
options that were to have become vested upon the achievement of
certain performance goals related to the internal rate of return
of funds managed by Apollo with respect to its investment in the
Company (the performance-vesting options also time-vest on the
seventh anniversary of grant if they have not previously
vested). In each case, the vesting of options is generally
subject to the executives continued provision of services
to the Company or one of its subsidiaries as of the applicable
vesting date. In connection with the Special Dividend
distribution by Noranda HoldCo on June 12, 2007, the
options granted to the Companys employees, including
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft, were adjusted to reflect
the dividend by reducing the exercise price thereof from $10 per
share to $6 per share, and by paying each optionholder $6 per
share in cash per option. In connection with the 2008 Dividend
distribution by Noranda HoldCo on June 13, 2008, the
options granted to the Companys employees, including
Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen, Brown, Gregston and Croft, were
adjusted to preserve the value of the options following the
dividend by reducing the exercise price thereof by $2.00 per
share and by paying each optionholder $2.70 per share in cash
per option. Twenty percent of the time-vesting options for
Messrs. Brown, Croft and Gregston became vested and
exercisable on May 18, 2008 and twenty percent became
vested and exercisable on May 18, 2009. On June 13,
2008, the performance-vesting options for Messrs. Brown,
Croft and Gregston became vested and exercisable. Pursuant to
his employment term sheet entered into on March 3, 2008,
Mr. Smith was awarded options to acquire
200,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock. In respect
of the original grant, fifty percent of the options were
time-vesting options that would become vested and exercisable in
five equal annual installments on each anniversary of grant
beginning March 10, 2009 and ending March 10, 2013 and
fifty percent of the options were performance-vesting options
that were to have vested upon the achievement of certain
performance goals related to the internal rate of return of
funds managed by Apollo with respect to its investment in the
Company (the performance-vesting options also time-vest on the
seventh anniversary of grant if they have not previously
vested). Pursuant to his employment term sheet entered into on
May 8, 2008, Mr. Lorentzen was awarded
25,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock (the fair
market value of which is reflected in column (e)) and was
awarded options to acquire 50,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo
common stock. In respect of his original grant, fifty percent of
the
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
options were time-vesting options
that would become vested and exercisable in five equal annual
installments on each anniversary of grant beginning May 8,
2009 and ending May 8, 2013 and fifty percent of the
options were performance-vesting options that were to have
vested upon the achievement of certain performance goals related
to the internal rate of return of funds managed by Apollo with
respect to its investment in the Company (the
performance-vesting options also time-vest on the seventh
anniversary of grant if they have not previously vested). On
May 13, 2008, in respect of a purchase of 6,750 shares
of Noranda HoldCo common stock, Mr. Lorentzen was awarded
options to acquire 6,750 performance-vesting options that were
to have vested upon the achievement of certain performance goals
related to the internal rate of return of funds managed by
Apollo with respect to its investment in the Company (the
performance-vesting options were also to time-vest on the
seventh anniversary of grant if they had not previously vested).
On November 12, 2009, the Company entered into amended and
restated stock option agreements with certain of its employees,
including with Messrs. Smith (covering 200,000 options) and
Lorentzen (covering separate grants of 50,000 options and 6,750
options), which reduced the exercise prices of their underlying
options and amended the vesting schedule of the options. The
amended and restated option agreements reduced the exercise
price of Messrs. Smiths and Lorentzens options
from $18.00 per share to $2.28 per share and provided that the
portion of the options which were originally scheduled to vest
based upon achievement of performance goals would vest based on
continued service, with 15% scheduled to vest on each of the
first and second anniversaries of the amendment and restatement
date, 20% scheduled to vest on the third anniversary of the
amendment and restatement date and 25% scheduled to vest on each
of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the amendment and
restatement date. In addition, on November 12, 2009,
Mr. Lorentzen was awarded an option to purchase an
additional 17,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock.
The additional 17,000 options granted to Mr. Lorentzen on
November 12, 2009, at an exercise price of $2.28 per share,
vest, subject to Mr. Lorentzens continued service, as
to 15% of the options on each of the first and second
anniversaries of the date of grant, 20% of the options on the
third anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of the options on
each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant.
Mr. Lorentzens new options were subject to partial or
complete forfeiture in the event that he failed to purchase up
to 8,000 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price
of $2.28 per share within 30 days of the date of grant of
the options. Messrs. Smith and Lorentzen had 20,000 and
5,000 stock options, respectively, that vested on March 3,
2009 and May 8, 2009. In connection with his commencement
of employment and purchase of stock, Mr. Mahoney was
awarded 60,000 stock options pursuant to the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan on June 9, 2009, at an exercise
price of $1.37 per share. The options granted to
Mr. Mahoney vest, as to 15% of the options on each of the
first and second anniversaries of the date of grant, 20% of the
options on the third anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of
the options on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the
date of grant. The amounts in Column (f) represent the
SFAS No. 123R expense recognized for options in 2007,
2008 and 2009, which include the expense for option
modifications on June 12, 2007, June 13, 2008 and
November 12, 2009, plus any cash dividend distribution paid
in conjunction with such option modifications. For a discussion
of the assumptions made in the option valuation, please see the
Shareholders Equity and Share-Based Payments
footnote of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
For 2007, represents annual bonuses
under our 2007 Annual Incentive Plan paid to the named executive
officers on March 14, 2008. For 2008, represents annual
bonuses under our 2008 Annual Incentive Plan paid to the named
executive officers on March 15, 2009. Bonus amounts under
the 2009 Annual Incentive Plan are expected to be paid on
March 15, 2010. The Compensation Committee has not yet
determined what bonuses, if any, will be payable under the 2009
Annual Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes (i) the aggregate
change in the actuarial present values of the named executive
officers accumulated benefit under the Noranda Aluminum
Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan and the
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, which for
Messrs. Brown, Gregston, Croft, Smith, Lorentzen and
Mahoney was $175,881, $370,386, $168,952, $150,776, $32,276 and
$28,926, respectively; and (ii) above-market or
preferential earnings under our non-qualified deferred
compensation plan from January 1, 2009 to December 31,
2009, which for Messrs. Brown and Gregston were $4,335 and
$3,830, respectively. The foregoing amounts assume earnings of
2.55% in excess of 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate
pursuant to our non-qualified deferred compensation plan, under
which amounts deferred are credited with interest at a rate
equal to the sum of the credited portfolio rate of return
published annually by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance plus
1.5%. Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen, Mahoney and Croft did not
participate in our non-qualified deferred compensation plan in
2009 or in any prior years.
|
122
The changes in pension values described above are based on the
following calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
Name(a)
|
|
Plan Name(b)
|
|
($)(c)(a)
|
|
Smith, Layle K.
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
28,023
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
122,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
150,776
|
|
Lorentzen, Kyle D.
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
15,169
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
17,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
32,276
|
|
Mahoney, Robert B.
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
18,983
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
9,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,926
|
|
Brown, Alan
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
112,463
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
63,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
175,881
|
|
Gregston, David K.
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
199,229
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
171,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
370,386
|
|
Croft, Scott
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
136,395
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
32,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
168,952
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Present values shown represent the
increase in present value of accrued pension benefits from
December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009. Benefits are
assumed to begin at age 65 (which is the plans
earliest unreduced retirement age). Present values assume
mortality in accordance with the IRS prescribed static table for
2009 for Healthy Annuitants as of December 31, 2008 and the
IRS prescribed static table for 2010 for Healthy Annuitants as
of December 31, 2009. Benefits are assumed payable as a
joint and 75% survivor annuity if the executive is married, or
as a five-year certain and life annuity if the executive is
single. The discount rates at December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 for financial reporting purposes are 5.8%
and 6.1% respectively for the Retirement Plan and 5.6% and 5.9%
respectively for the Management Supplemental Benefit Plan.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Amounts reported in column
(i) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Term
|
|
Company 401(k)
|
|
COBRA
|
|
Moving
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Life(a)
|
|
Match(b)
|
|
Reimbursement
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Total
|
|
Layle K. Smith
|
|
|
3,366
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,041
|
|
Kyle D. Lorentzen
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
5,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,339
|
|
Robert B. Mahoney
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
39,313
|
|
|
|
47,909
|
|
Alan Brown
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,290
|
|
Keith Gregston
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,330
|
|
Scott Croft
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
7,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Under our group term life insurance policies, the Company
provides coverage in amounts up to two-times the named executive
officers base pay (limited to $850,000). Amounts reported
in the table above represent the dollar value of insurance
premiums paid on behalf of each named executive officer during
the period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our
Company-wide 401(k) qualified plan for salaried employees. The
Company matches 50% of employee contributions up to 6% of
employee pay. Company matching contributions are 100% vested
after three years of service. Amounts reported in the table
above represent the amount of Company matching contributions
made during the period between January 1, 2009 and
December 31, 2009.
|
123
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Modi-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
fication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
or Base
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Price of
|
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
|
|
|
Stock or
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Name(a)
|
|
Date(b)
|
|
|
($)(c)(1)
|
|
|
($)(d)(1)
|
|
|
($)(e)(1)
|
|
|
(#)(f)
|
|
|
(#)(g)
|
|
|
(#)(h)
|
|
|
(#)(i)
|
|
|
(#)(j)(2)
|
|
|
($/Sh)(k)
|
|
|
($)(l)(3)
|
|
|
(m)
|
|
|
Layle Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,480
|
|
Kyle Lorentzen
|
|
|
11/12/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,562
|
|
|
|
515,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
22,440
|
|
|
|
61,446
|
|
Robert Mahoney
|
|
|
06/09/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,886
|
|
|
|
289,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
45,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Brown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,368
|
|
|
|
244,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Gregston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,771
|
|
|
|
249,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Croft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,665
|
|
|
|
237,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts reflect target and maximum
bonus levels under our 2009 Annual Incentive Plan. The plan does
not provide for a threshold payout level. See Executive
Compensation Elements Used to Achieve Compensation
Objectives 2009 Annual Incentive Plan for
a more detailed description of the plan.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
In connection with his commencement
of employment and purchase of stock, Mr. Mahoney was
awarded 60,000 stock options pursuant to the Noranda 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan on June 9, 2009, at an exercise
price of $1.37 per share. The options granted to
Mr. Mahoney vest, as to 15% of the options on each of the
first and second anniversaries of the date of grant, 20% of the
options on the third anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of
the options on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the
date of grant. Mr. Mahoney had no stock options that vested
in 2009. On November 12, 2009, the Company entered into
amended and restated stock option agreements with certain of its
employees, including with Mr. Smith (covering 200,000
options) and Mr. Lorentzen (covering separate grants of
50,000 options and 6,750 options), which reduced the exercise
prices of their underlying options and amended the vesting
schedule of the options. The amended and restated option
agreements reduced the exercise price of the options from $18.00
per share to $2.28 per share and provided that the 50% of the
options which were originally scheduled to vest based upon
performance vesting would vest based on continued service, with
15% scheduled to vest on each of the first and second
anniversaries of the amendment and restatement date, 20%
scheduled to vest on the third anniversary of the amendment and
restatement date and 25% scheduled to vest on each of the fourth
and fifth anniversaries of the amendment and restatement date.
In addition, on November 12, 2009, Mr. Lorentzen was
awarded an option to purchase an additional 17,000 shares
of Noranda HoldCo common stock. The additional 17,000 options
granted to Mr. Lorentzen on November 12, 2009, at an
exercise price of $2.28 per share, vest, subject to
Mr. Lorentzens continued service, as to 15% of the
options on each of the first and second anniversaries of the
date of grant, 20% of the options on the third anniversary of
the date of grant and 25% of the options on each of the fourth
and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant.
Mr. Lorentzens new options were subject to partial or
complete forfeiture in the event that he failed to purchase up
to 8,000 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price
of $2.28 per share within 30 days of the date of grant of
the options. Mr. Lorentzen had 5,000 stock options that
vested in 2009.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Amounts reported in column
(l) include, with respect to stock awards, the then-current
fair market value of the underlying shares.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
or Payout
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
of Unearned
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Name(a)
|
|
(b)(1)
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
|
|
(#)(d)(1)
|
|
|
($)(e)(2)
|
|
|
(f)(3)
|
|
|
(#)(g)
|
|
|
Vested ($)(h)
|
|
|
(#)(i)
|
|
|
($)(j)
|
|
|
Layle Smith
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
March 10, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Lorentzen
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
May 8, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Lorentzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
May 13, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Lorentzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
November 12, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Mahoney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
June 9, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Brown
|
|
|
42,910
|
|
|
|
18,390
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Gregston
|
|
|
42,910
|
|
|
|
18,390
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Croft
|
|
|
42,910
|
|
|
|
18,390
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
May 29, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Pursuant to option agreements
entered into in connection with the consummation of the Apollo
Acquisition or commencement of employment, each of our named
executive officers received grants of stock options to acquire
common shares of Noranda HoldCo at
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
an exercise price of $10 per share
(in the case of Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft), $20 per
share (in the case of Messrs. Smith and Lorentzen) or $1.37
per share (in the case of Mr. Mahoney). Options reported in
columns (b) and (c) were granted to
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft on May 29, 2007 in
connection with the completion of the Apollo Acquisition and,
other than with respect to the 17,000 options granted to
Mr. Lorentzen on November 12, 2009, were granted to
Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen and Mahoney in connection with
their respective commencement of employment. Other than with
respect to Mr. Mahoney, the initial grants to each of our
named executive officers generally consisted of 50% of
time-vesting options that become vested and exercisable in five
equal annual installments on the first five anniversaries of
grant (or, in the case of options granted in connection with the
Apollo Acquisition, on each of the first five anniversaries of
the consummation of the Apollo Acquisition), and 50% of
performance-vesting options that vest upon the achievement of
certain performance goals related to the internal rate of return
of funds managed by Apollo with respect to its investment in the
Company. In June 2008, the performance goals applicable to the
performance-vesting options for Messrs. Brown, Gregston and
Croft were achieved, and such options vested. In each case, the
vesting of options is generally subject to the grantees
continued provision of services to the Company or one of its
subsidiaries through the applicable vesting date. In connection
with the dividend distribution by Noranda HoldCo on
June 12, 2007, the options granted to the Companys
employees, including the Companys named executive
officers, were adjusted by reducing the exercise price thereof
from $10 per share to $6 per share, and by paying each
optionholder $6 per option. Additionally, in connection with the
dividend distribution by Noranda HoldCo on June 13, 2008,
the options granted to the Companys employees on
May 29, 2007, including Messrs. Brown, Gregston and
Croft, were adjusted by reducing the exercise price thereof from
$6 per share to $4 per share, and by paying optionholders
including Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft $2.70 per share
in cash per option. In connection with the dividend distribution
by Noranda HoldCo on June 13, 2008, Messrs. Smith and
Lorentzens stock options were adjusted from $20 per share
to $18 per share and each was paid $2.70 per option. On
November 12, 2009 the Company entered into amended and
restated stock option agreements with certain of its employees,
including with Messrs. Smith (covering 200,000 options) and
Lorentzen (covering separate grants of 50,000 options and 6,750
options), which reduced the exercise prices of their underlying
options and amended the vesting schedule of the options. The
amended and restated option agreements reduced the exercise
price of Messrs. Smiths and Lorentzens options
from $18.00 per share to $2.28 per share and provided that the
50% of the options which were originally scheduled to vest based
upon the performance goal described above would vest based on
continued service, with 15% scheduled to vest on each of the
first and second anniversaries of the amendment and restatement
date, 20% scheduled to vest on the third anniversary of the
amendment and restatement date and 25% scheduled to vest on each
of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the amendment and
restatement date. In addition, on November 12, 2009,
Mr. Lorentzen was awarded an option to purchase an
additional 17,000 shares of Noranda HoldCo common stock.
The additional 17,000 options granted to Mr. Lorentzen on
November 12, 2009, at an exercise price of $2.28 per share,
vest, subject to Mr. Lorentzens continued service, as
to 15% of the options on each of the first and second
anniversaries of the date of grant, 20% of the options on the
third anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of the options on
each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant.
Mr. Lorentzens new options were subject to partial or
complete forfeiture in the event that he failed to purchase up
to 8,000 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price
of $2.28 per share within 30 days of the date of grant of
the options. Messrs. Smith and Lorentzen had 20,000 and
5,000 stock options, respectively that vested in March 3,
2009 and May 8, 2009, respectively. In connection with his
commencement of employment and purchase of stock,
Mr. Mahoney was awarded 60,000 stock options pursuant to
the Noranda 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan on June 9, 2009,
at an exercise price of $1.37 per share. The options granted to
Mr. Mahoney vest, as to 15% of the options on each of the
first and second anniversaries of the date of grant, 20% of the
options on the third anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of
the options on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the
date of grant. All of the time-vesting options may become vested
earlier upon the optionees continued employment for
18 months following a change of control or upon
certain qualifying terminations of employment prior to such
18-month
anniversary.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The exercise price per share of
Noranda HoldCos common stock subject to the options was
$10 per share on the date of grant for Messrs. Brown,
Gregston and Croft, $20 per share on the date of grant for
Messrs. Smith and Lorentzen and $1.37 per share on the
date of grant for Mr. Mahoney. In connection with the
dividend distribution by Noranda HoldCo on June 12, 2007,
the options granted to the Companys employees, including
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft were adjusted to reflect
the dividend by reducing the exercise price thereof from $10 per
share to $6 per share. Additionally, in connection with the
dividend distribution by Noranda HoldCo on June 13, 2008,
the options granted to the Companys employees, including
Messrs. Brown, Gregston, Croft, Smith and Lorentzen were
adjusted to reflect the dividend by reducing the exercise price
thereof from $6 per share to $4 per share and from $20 per share
to $18 per share for Messrs. Smith and Lorentzen.
Accordingly, the option exercise price at fiscal year end was $4
per share for Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft and
$18 per share for Messrs. Smith and Lorentzen. On
November 12, 2009, the Company entered into amended and
restated stock option agreements with certain of its employees,
including with Messrs. Smith (covering 200,000 options) and
Lorentzen (covering separate grants of 50,000 options and 6,750
options), which reduced the exercise prices of their underlying
options and amended the vesting schedule of the options. The
amended and restated option agreements reduced the exercise
price of Messrs. Smiths and Lorentzens options
from $18.00 per share to $2.28 per share.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
All outstanding options held by
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft on December 31, 2009
were granted on May 29, 2007 and will expire ten years from
the date of grant. All outstanding options held by
Mr. Smith on December 31, 2009 were granted on
March 3, 2008 and will expire ten years from the date of
grant. The outstanding options held by Mr. Lorentzen on
December 31, 2009 and granted on May 8, 2008,
May 13, 2008 and November 12, 2009, will expire ten
years from the date of grant. The outstanding options held by
Mr. Mahoney on December 31, 2009 were granted on
June 9, 2009 and will expire ten years from the date of
grant. However, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the
applicable stock option award agreement, unvested options will
automatically expire upon the date of the optionees
termination of employment, and vested options will generally
expire 90 days following the termination of the
optionees employment without cause or with
good reason (each as defined in the applicable stock
option agreement), 60 days
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
following the optionees
termination of employment without good reason and 180 days
following the optionees death or disability. All options
will be forfeited upon a termination of the optionees
employment for cause.
|
Pension
Benefits
The chart below sets forth, for each of our named executive
officers, such officers years of credited service, present
value of accumulated benefit as of December 31, 2009, and
payments during 2009, under each of our defined benefit pension
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Present Value
|
|
During
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
of Accumulated
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Year
|
Name (a)
|
|
Plan
Name(b)(1)
|
|
(#)(c)
|
|
($)(d)(2)
|
|
($)(e)
|
|
Layle K. Smith
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
45,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
167,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle D. Lorentzen
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
22,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
19,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert B. Mahoney
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
18,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
9,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Brown
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
649,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
227,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
877,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
David K. Gregston
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
1,246,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
459,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Croft.
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
271,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Inc. Management Supplemental Benefit Plan
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
51,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The Aluminum Group Retirement Plan
is a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan that provides a
benefit of 1.75% of final five-year average compensation, with
an offset of 0.75% of the executives Social Security
benefit for each year of credited service (maximum
40 years). Pay reflected in the formula is total
compensation, excluding deferred compensation, and is subject to
certain limits required by the Internal Revenue Code. Benefits
commence at age 65, or as early as age 55 with a
reduction of 3% for each year by which commencement precedes
age 65. Accrued benefits are vested when the employee has
completed 5 years of service. All of the named executive
officers are currently eligible for early retirement benefits,
except Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen and Mahoney who do not yet
have 5 years of service and Mr. Croft who is not yet
55 years of age. Upon disability before retirement, the
accrued benefit is payable immediately and is reduced for early
commencement before age 65, and, if the employee remains
disabled until age 65, a benefit is payable at age 65
equal to the benefit the employee would have earned had he
remained employed until age 65 at his last rate of pay.
Upon retirement, the benefit is paid as a monthly annuity for
the employees life, with 5 years of payments
guaranteed. Alternatively, employees can elect an actuarially
equivalent benefit in the form of a joint and 50% survivor
annuity (which married participants must elect unless they
obtain spousal consent), a 75% and 100% joint survivor annuity,
a life annuity, a life annuity with 10 years guaranteed,
or, if the present value of the benefit is less than $25,000, a
lump sum payment. If a married employee dies before retirement,
a survivor benefit is paid to the surviving spouse equal to the
benefit the spouse would have received if the employee had
retired and chosen the 50% joint and survivor annuity. The
qualified plan is subject to certain IRS limits on pay which can
be recognized and benefits that can be paid, and also does not
recognize deferred compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Management Supplemental Benefit
Plan is a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan that uses
the same benefit formula as the qualified plan and provides any
benefit accruals that would have been provided under the
qualified plan if not for the pay and benefit limits of the
Internal Revenue Code and if the executive had not deferred
compensation. Executives can elect to receive non-qualified plan
payments in an actuarially equivalent lump sum or in two, three,
five or ten annual installments, and can elect to begin
receiving benefits at age 55, 60, 65 or 70 (but not before
6 months after termination of employment).
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Present values shown represent the
present value of accrued pension benefits at December 31,
2009. Benefits are assumed to begin at age 65 (which is the
plans earliest unreduced retirement age). Present values
assume mortality in accordance with the IRS prescribed
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
static table for 2010 for Healthy
Annuitants as of December 31, 2009. Retirement Plan
benefits are assumed payable as a joint and 75% survivor annuity
if the executive is married, or as a five-year certain and life
annuity if the executive is single. Management Supplemental
Benefit Plan benefits are assumed payable as lump sums. The
discount rates at December 31, 2009 for financial reporting
purposes are 5.8% for the Retirement Plan and 5.6% for the
Management Supplemental Benefit Plan.
|
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
The chart below sets forth, for each named executive officer,
such officers participation levels and earnings history in
our non qualified deferred compensation plan for 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
in Last FY
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
at Last FYE
|
|
Name (a)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
|
($)(b)(1)
|
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
|
($)(d)(2)
|
|
|
($)(e)
|
|
|
($)(f)
|
|
|
Layle K. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle D. Lorentzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert B. Mahoney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Brown
|
|
|
157,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,774
|
|
Keith Gregston
|
|
|
119,116
|
|
|
|
35,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,719
|
|
Scott Croft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Under our nonqualified deferred
compensation plan, executive officers and other highly
compensated Company employees may defer up to 33% of their base
salary and annual bonus, with a minimum annual deferral amount
of $2,000. Under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan,
distribution elections are irrevocable once made, and elections
made in a prior year will not be affected by elections made in
future years. All distributions are made in cash in either a
lump sum payment or in equal annual installments over a period
of 5, 10 or 15 years. For each future deferral election,
distributions commence beginning on March 15 of either
(a) the year following the participants attainment of
a specified age (as early as age 55 or as late as
age 70), even if the participant is actively employed at
such age; or (b) the March 15 following the later of the
date the participant leaves active employment with the Company
or attains age 55, in each case, subject to any required
delays as a result of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts deferred are not actually
invested, but are credited with interest at a rate equal to the
sum of the credited portfolio rate of return published annually
by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (which, for 2009,
was 6.15%) and 1.5%.
|
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
Mr. Smiths Term
Sheet. Mr. Smiths term sheet is
described under Management Agreements above.
Pursuant to Mr. Smiths term sheet, in the event that
Mr. Smiths employment as our CEO is terminated by us
without cause or by Mr. Smith for good
reason (each, an Involuntary Termination), he
would be entitled to 18 months of base salary, payable in a
lump sum, a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination
and 18 months of continued health care benefits. In the
event that Mr. Smiths employment as our CEO is
terminated by us due to his disability or death, he, or his
estate, would be entitled to 12 months of base salary,
payable in a lump sum. In addition, Mr. Smith would be
entitled, in the event of a change of control of Noranda HoldCo
prior to or on the
60-month
anniversary of his commencement of employment, to full vesting
of all time-vesting stock options and the right to re-sell his
100,000 purchased shares to us for no less than $8 million.
However, in the event of such a change of control, any cash
received by Mr. Smith for those shares would be subject to
a continued service requirement pursuant to which his right to
the cash would vest 50% on the six-month anniversary of the
change of control and 50% on the first anniversary of the change
of control, subject to accelerated vesting upon an Involuntary
Termination.
Mr. Lorentzens Term
Sheet. Mr. Lorentzens term sheet is
described under Management Agreements above.
Pursuant to Mr. Lorentzens term sheet, in the event
that Mr. Lorentzens employment is terminated by us
without cause or by Mr. Lorentzen for
good reason, he would be entitled to 12 months
of base salary, payable in installments through the end of the
year of termination, with the remainder paid in a lump sum, a
prorated annual bonus for the year of termination and continued
health benefits for a limited period.
Mr. Mahoneys Term
Sheet. Mr. Mahoneys term sheet is
described under Management Agreements above.
Pursuant to Mr. Mahoneys term sheet, in the event
that Mr. Mahoneys employment is terminated by
127
us without cause or by Mr. Mahoney for
good reason, he would be entitled to 12 months
of base salary, payable in installments through the end of the
year of termination, with the remainder paid in a lump sum, a
prorated annual bonus for the year of termination and continued
health benefits for a limited period.
Senior Managers Severance Plan. Each of
Messrs. Brown, Gregston and Croft is eligible to
participate in our senior managers severance plan
applicable to the senior management employees who directly
report to the Companys President. In the event that a
participant incurs an involuntary termination of employment due
to a permanent reduction in force, the elimination of a job or
position, a corporate reorganization (generally a merger or
similar transaction resulting in employment terminations), or a
demonstrated insufficient aptitude for continued employment not
attributable to any willful cause or effect, then, subject to
execution of a release of claims, the participant will receive
six months base salary plus 1.25 weeks base
salary per full year of service plus 1.25 weeks base
salary for each $9,120 of annual base salary (or portion
thereof) (subject to a maximum severance amount of
104 weeks of base pay), provided that the participant will
be ineligible for severance in the event of a voluntary
resignation, misconduct (including unethical or illegal
conduct), a lay-off expected to be short-term in nature, or the
refusal to accept reassignment where reassignment is at
substantially similar pay, benefits and reporting duties (and
not more than 50 miles from the prior location).
Acceleration of Equity Under Certain
Circumstances. Except as described for
Mr. Smith in the next sentence, in the event of a
change in control of the Company, all time-vesting
options granted to our named executive officers will vest upon
the grantees continued employment for 18 months
following the change in control, or sooner upon a termination of
employment by the Company without cause or by the grantee for
good reason prior to such
18-month
anniversary. As described above, in the event of a change of
control of Noranda HoldCo prior to or on the
60-month
anniversary of his commencement of employment, Mr. Smith
would be entitled to full vesting of all time-vesting stock
options and would have the right to re-sell his 100,000
purchased shares to us for no less than $8 million.
If on December 31, 2009, each of our named executive
officers who was employed with us as of such date had been
terminated under the circumstances described above giving rise
to severance benefits under the severance plan (or with respect
to Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen and Mahoney, terminated by the
Company without cause or by the named executive officer for good
reason), Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen, Mahoney, Brown, Gregston
and Croft would have received cash severance amounts of
approximately $1,125,000, $425,000, $375,000, $380,233,
$499,082, and $369,824, respectively, under the severance plan
(or, with respect to Messrs. Smith, Lorentzen and Mahoney
pursuant to their term sheets). In the event that such
termination had followed a change of control and
that all time-vesting options had been settled based upon a
price of $2.28 per share, the fair market value at
December 31, 2009, then each of Messrs. Smith,
Lorentzen, Brown, Gregston and Croft would have received $0 in
settlement of his time-vesting options because the exercise
price of each of the options exceeded or was equal to $2.28 per
share and Mr. Mahoney would have received $54,600 in
settlement of his time-vesting options. In addition, in the
event that Mr. Smiths employment as our CEO had been
terminated by us due to his disability or death, he (or his
estate) would have been entitled to 12 months of base
salary, or $750,000, payable in a lump sum.
Director
Compensation
Prior to the closing of the Apollo Acquisition, Apollo entered
into a definitive and binding term sheet with Mr. Brooks,
who was then serving as the Companys CEO. Mr. Brooks
retired from his position as CEO and President effective
March 3, 2008, and now serves as Chairman of our Board of
Directors. Mr. Brooks term sheet provides for a
three-year term commencing as of the effective time of the
Apollo Acquisition. Pursuant to the term sheet, Mr. Brooks
is entitled to receive $300,000 per year until the third
anniversary of the consummation of the Apollo Acquisition,
subject to Mr. Brooks agreement to serve on the
Companys Board of Directors if requested by Apollo.
Mr. Smith received no additional compensation for serving
as a director of Noranda HoldCo. All other directors are paid
under compensation schedules approved by the Board of Directors
of Noranda HoldCo. None of our Directors associated with Apollo
received compensation for their services as directors in 2009.
However, as discussed below, Apollo Management VI, L.P. and
Apollo Alternative Assets, L.P. received equity-based
remuneration for making available certain non-employee Directors
to the Company.
128
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company
to each non-employee director for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Total
|
Name(a)
|
|
($)(b)(1)
|
|
($)(c)(2)
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
Joshua J. Harris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric L. Press
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gareth Turner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ali Rashid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew H. Nord
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew R. Michelini
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Kleinman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan H. Schumacher
|
|
$
|
101,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
101,000
|
|
Thomas R. Miklich
|
|
$
|
99,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
99,000
|
|
Robert A. Kasdin
|
|
$
|
87,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,000
|
|
William Brooks
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As described immediately below, Messrs. Harris, Press,
Turner, Nord, Michelini and Kleinman received no compensation
for their services in 2009. Rather, director fees were paid to
Apollo Management VI, L.P. and Apollo Alternative Assets, L.P.
for making available for service our non-employee directors in
2009. As more fully described below, Apollo Management VI, L.P.
and Apollo Alternative Assets, L.P. received $458,026 and
$65,432, respectively, in retainers and fees in respect of
Messrs. Harris, Press, Turner, Rashid, Nord, Michelini and
Kleinman in 2009. As described above, Mr. Brooks received
$300,000 for his services as a director in 2009 pursuant to the
terms of his term sheet with Apollo. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As described immediately below, Messrs. Harris, Press,
Turner, Nord, Michelini and Kleinman received no compensation
for their services in 2009. Rather, options were granted to
Apollo Management VI, L.P. and Apollo Alternative Assets, L.P.
for making available for service our non-employee directors in
2009 As more fully described below, Apollo Management VI, L.P.
and Apollo Alternative Assets, L.P. were granted 61,250 and
8,750 options, respectively, in respect of Messrs. Harris,
Press, Turner, Rashid, Nord, Michelini and Kleinman in 2007. |
Compensation as Director. Effective
January 1, 2008, each non-employee director of Noranda
HoldCo was entitled to an annual retainer of $75,000, paid
quarterly, in advance, plus $2,000 for each meeting of the Board
of Directors attended in person ($1,000 if attended by
telephone).
Compensation as Committee Members. Each
non-employee director of Noranda HoldCo who is a member of a
committee of the Board is entitled to receive $2,000 for each
committee meeting attended in person ($1,000 if attended by
telephone).
Apollo Designees. Notwithstanding the general
compensation rates described above, to the extent that the
service of any non-employee director of Noranda HoldCo is made
available to the Company by Apollo (such a non-employee
director, an Apollo Designee), such Apollo Designee
will not be eligible to receive any annual retainers and
meetings fees described above (whether as a director or as a
Committee Member). Instead, in consideration for providing the
services of such Apollo Designee, Apollo Management VI, L.P.
will receive 87.5% of the amount of such retainers or fees and
Apollo Alternative Assets, L.P. will receive the remaining 12.5%.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Prior to December 7, 2007, our entire Board of Directors
performed the functions of a Compensation Committee. Other than
Messrs. Brooks and Smith, none of such directors has ever
been one of our officers or employees. None of such directors
during 2009 had any relationship that requires disclosure in
this prospectus as a transaction with a related person. During
2009, none of our executive officers served as a member of the
Compensation Committee of another entity.
129
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31,
2009 for:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common
stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
each member of our Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
all of our executive officers and members of our Board of
Directors as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
Owned(1)
|
|
Name of Beneficial
Owner(2)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Apollo Management, L.P. and
affiliates(3)
|
|
|
21,490,000
|
|
|
|
97.9
|
|
Layle K. Smith
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kyle D.
Lorentzen(4)
|
|
|
44,750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert Mahoney
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Alan Brown
|
|
|
67,910
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Keith Gregston
|
|
|
67,910
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Scott Croft.
|
|
|
67,910
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bill Brooks
|
|
|
92,670
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Eric L. Press
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gareth Turner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ali Rashid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew H. Nord
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew R. Michelini
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Kleinman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan H. Schumacher
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas R. Miklich
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert Kasdin
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (21 persons)
|
|
|
503,150
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
The amounts and percentages of interests beneficially owned are
reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the
determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the
rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a beneficial
owner of a security if that person has or shares voting
power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of
such security, or investment power, which includes the power to
dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A
person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities
of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership
within 60 days. Securities that can be so acquired are
deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing such
persons ownership percentage, but not for purposes of
computing any other persons percentage. Under these rules,
more than one person may be deemed beneficial owner of the same
securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner
of securities as to which such person has no economic interest.
Except as otherwise indicated in these footnotes, each of the
beneficial owners has, to our knowledge, sole voting and
investment power with respect to the indicated ownership
interests. Beneficial ownership amounts for Messrs. Smith,
Lorentzen, Brooks, Brown, Gregston, Croft, Schumacher, Miklich
and Kasdin include 20,000, 5,000, 47,670, 42,910, 42,910,
42,910, 4,000, 4,000, and 4,000 shares, respectively, that
may be acquired upon the exercise of options. |
|
(2) |
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is
c/o Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation, 801 Crescent Centre Drive,
Suite 600, Franklin, Tennessee 37067. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents all equity interest of Noranda HoldCo held of record
by Apollo Investment Fund VI, L.P. (Investment
Fund VI) and Noranda Holdings, LP (Noranda
Holdings, together with Investment Fund VI, the
Apollo Investors). Also includes 70,000 shares
issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options issued to
Apollo Management VI, L.P. (Management VI) and
Apollo Alternative Assets, L.P. (Alternative
Assets). Apollo Advisors VI, L.P. (Advisors
VI) is the general partner of Investment |
130
|
|
|
|
|
Fund VI and Apollo Capital Management VI, LLC (ACM
VI) is the general partner of Advisors VI. Apollo
Principal Holdings, I, L.P. (Apollo Principal)
is the sole member of ACM VI and Apollo Principal Holdings, I
GP, LLC (Apollo Principal GP) is the general partner
of Apollo Principal. Noranda Holdings LLC (Holdings
LLC) is the general partner of Noranda Holdings.
Management VI serves as the manager of Investment Fund VI
and of Holdings LLC, and as such has voting and investment power
over the shares of Noranda HoldCo held by Investment
Fund VI and Noranda Holdings. AIF VI Management, LLC
(AIF VI LLC) is the general partner of Management
VI, Apollo Management, L.P. (Apollo Management) is
the sole member and manager of AIF VI LLC, and Apollo Management
GP, LLC (Apollo Management GP) is the general
partner of Apollo Management. Apollo International Management,
L.P. (AIM LP) is the managing general partner of
Alternative Assets, and Apollo International Management GP, LLC
(International Management GP) is the general partner
of AIM LP. Apollo Management Holdings, LP (AMH) is
the sole member and manager of Apollo Management GP and
International Management GP. Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC
(AMH GP and together with the Apollo Investors,
Alternative Assets, Advisors VI, ACM VI, Apollo Principal,
Apollo Principal GP, Holdings LLC, Management VI, AIF VI LLC,
Apollo Management, Apollo Management GP, AIM LP, International
Management GP and AMH, the Apollo Entities) is the
general partner of AMH. Each of the Apollo Entities disclaims
beneficial ownership of all shares of Noranda HoldCo held by the
Apollo Investors or beneficially owned by Management VI or
Alternative Assets, except to the extent of any pecuniary
interest therein. The address of Investment Fund VI, Advisors
VI, ACM VI, Apollo Principal and Apollo Principal GP is 1
Manhattanville Road, Suite 201, Purchase, New York 10577.
The address of Management VI, AIF VI LLC, AMH, AMH GP, Apollo
Management, Apollo Management GP, AIM LP and International
Management GP is 9 West 57th Street, 43rd Floor, New York,
NY 10019. The address of Alternative Assets is
c/o Walkers
SPV Limited, PO Box 908GT, Walker House, Mary Street,
George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, B.W.I. Leon Black,
Joshua Harris and Marc Rowan are the members of the board of
managers of Apollo Principal GP and AMH GP. Each of
Messrs. Black, Harris and Rowan disclaims beneficial
ownership of all shares of Noranda HoldCo held by the Apollo
Investors or beneficially owned by Management VI or Alternative
Assets, except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein.
The address of Messrs. Black, Harris and Rowan is
c/o Apollo
Management, L.P., 9 West 57th Street, New York,
New York 10019. |
|
|
|
|
|
Each of Messrs. Press, Turner, Rashid, Nord, Michelini and
Kleinman, are affiliated with Apollo, disclaim beneficial
ownership of any shares of Noranda HoldCo that may be deemed
beneficially owned by any of the Apollo Entities, except to the
extent of any pecuniary interest therein. The address of
Messrs. Press, Turner, Rashid, Nord, Michelini and Kleinman
is
c/o Apollo
Management, L.P., 9 West 57th Street, New York, New
York 10019. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Does not include Mr. Lorentzens right, pursuant his
employment agreement, to purchase, during his employment and
upon one business days notice to us, an additional number
of shares having a then-current fair market value of $115,000
for an aggregate purchase price of $115,000. |
131
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Amended
and Restated Securityholders Agreement
Noranda HoldCo, Apollo and those members of our management team
who hold shares of common stock of Noranda HoldCo or options to
acquire shares of common stock of Noranda HoldCo expect to enter
into an amended and restated securityholders agreement prior to
the completion of this offering, which will provide for, among
other things, a restriction on the transferability of each
management members equity ownership in Noranda HoldCo,
piggyback registration rights, repurchase rights by Noranda
HoldCo and Apollo in certain circumstances, demand registration
rights for Apollo, and certain restrictions on each such
persons ability to compete with us or solicit our
employees or customers.
In addition, the amended and restated securityholders agreement
will provide that, except as otherwise required by applicable
law, if Apollo continues to hold (1) at least 30% but less
than 50% of our outstanding common stock, it will have the right
to designate at least six director nominees; (2) at least
20% but less than 30% of our outstanding common stock, it will
have the right to designate at least five director nominees; and
(3) at least 10% but less than 20% of our outstanding
common stock, it will have the right to designate at least four
director nominees. If, at any time, the Board of Directors
decreases the size of the Board of Directors to nine or fewer
directors, Apollo will have the right to designate at least
four, three and two director nominees, respectively, according
to the ownership levels detailed above. Once Apollo owns less
than 10% of our outstanding common stock, it will have no right
to designate director nominees. Except as otherwise required by
applicable law, Apollo will have the right to designate a
replacement to fill a vacancy on Noranda HoldCos Board of
Directors that was designated by Apollo. See Description
of Capital Stock Composition of Board of Directors;
Election and Removal of Directors. The amended and
restated securityholders agreement is being negotiated among
management, Noranda HoldCo and Apollo, and Noranda HoldCo
believes the amended and restated securityholders agreement will
be on arms-length terms.
Apollo
Management Agreement and Transaction Fee
We entered into a management agreement with Apollo upon the
closing of the Apollo Acquisition, pursuant to which Apollo
provides us with management services. Under the agreement, we
pay Apollo an annual management fee of $2.0 million. The
agreement terminates on May 18, 2017. Apollo may terminate
the agreement at any time, in which case we will pay Apollo, as
consideration for terminating the agreement, the net present
value of all management fees payable through the end of the term
of the management agreement. In addition, Apollo is entitled to
receive a transaction fee in connection with certain subsequent
merger, acquisition, financing or similar transactions equal to
1% of the aggregate transaction value. The management agreement
contains customary indemnification provisions in favor of
Apollo, as well as expense reimbursement provisions with respect
to expenses incurred by Apollo in connection with its
performance of services thereunder. The terms and fees payable
to Apollo under the management agreement were determined through
arms-length negotiations between us and Apollo, and
reflect the understanding of us and Apollo of the fair value for
such services, based in part on market conditions and what
similarly-situated companies have paid for similar services. We
paid Apollo a $12.3 million fee for services rendered in
connection with the Apollo Acquisition and reimbursed Apollo for
certain expenses incurred in rendering those services. Upon the
consummation of this offering, Apollo intends to terminate the
management agreement, and as a result will receive
$ million. Apollo also will
receive a $ million
transaction fee related to this offering.
Other
Transactions
Apollo previously owned 41% of Goodman Global, Inc. On
February 14, 2008, Goodman Global, Inc. was acquired by
affiliates of Hellman & Friedman LLC. We sell rolled
aluminum products to Goodman Global, Inc. under a two-year sales
contract that extends through 2009. The original contract was
entered into prior to our affiliation with Apollo. Recent
amendments were the result of arms-length negotiations and
we feel that they are on terms at least as favorable to us as
those we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties at
the time. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008, sales to Goodman Global, Inc. totaled
$55.0 million, $63.8 million and $60.4 million,
respectively.
132
Apollo owns approximately 76% of Berry Plastics Group. We sell
rolled aluminum products to subsidiaries of Berry Plastics Group
under annual sales contracts, including a contract for 2008. The
original contract was entered into prior to our affiliation with
Apollo. Subsequent contracts were the result of
arms-length negotiations and we feel that they are on
terms at least as favorable to us as those we could have
obtained from unaffiliated third parties at the time. During the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, sales
to these subsidiaries totaled $9.3 million,
$13.5 million and $8.7 million, respectively.
Mr. Smith, who became our CEO on March 3, 2008, was
the Executive Director at Berry Plastics Group from April 2007
to December 2007. Mr. Lorentzen, who became our COO on
May 8, 2008 and our CFO on October 10, 2008, was the
Vice President of Corporate Development at Berry Plastics Group
from April 2007 to May 2008.
Review
and Approval of Related Person Transactions
Our audit committee is responsible for the review and approval
of all related-party transactions; however, the audit committee
does not have a written policy regarding the approval of related
person transactions. As part of its review and approval of a
related person transaction, the audit committee considers:
|
|
|
|
|
the nature of the related-persons interest in the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the material terms of the transaction, including the amount
involved and type of transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the importance of the transaction to the related person and to
us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director
or executive officer to act in our best interest; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
any other matters the audit committee deems appropriate.
|
133
DESCRIPTION
OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
We summarize below the principal terms of the agreements that
govern the senior secured credit facilities and certain hedging
arrangements with Merrill Lynch International, as well as our
notes. This summary is not a complete description of all of the
terms of the relevant agreements. Copies of the senior secured
credit facilities and the indentures governing the notes have
been filed with the SEC.
Secured
credit facilities
Noranda AcquisitionCo entered into senior secured credit
facilities on May 18, 2007, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a term B loan that matures in 2014 with an original principal
amount of $500.0 million, which was fully drawn on
May 18, 2007; of which $151.0 million had been repaid
or repurchased (some at a discount) and $349.0 million
remained outstanding as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
a $242.7 million revolving credit facility that matures in
2013, which includes borrowing capacity available for letters of
credit and for borrowing on
same-day
notice. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
repurchased a face value amount of $6.5 million of the
revolving credit facility for $4.0 million. As a result of
the repurchase, our maximum borrowing capacity was reduced
$7.3 million from $250.0 million to
$242.7 million. Outstanding letters of credit on the
revolving credit facility totaled $24.2 million and
outstanding borrowings totaled $216.9 million as of
September 30, 2009.
|
The senior secured credit facilities permit Noranda
AcquisitionCo to incur incremental term and revolving loans
under such facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to
$200.0 million. Incurrence of such incremental indebtedness
under the senior secured credit facilities is subject to, among
other things, Noranda AcquisitionCos compliance with a
maximum Senior Secured Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio (in
each case as defined in the credit agreement governing our
senior secured credit facilities) of 3.0 to 1.0. As of
September 30, 2009, our Senior Secured Net debt to Adjusted
EBITDA ratio was above 3.0 to 1.0. At December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, Noranda AcquisitionCo had no
commitments from any lender to provide such incremental loans.
The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by us and by
all of the existing and future direct and indirect wholly owned
domestic subsidiaries of Noranda AcquisitionCo that are not
designated as unrestricted under the senior secured
credit facilities. These guarantees are full and unconditional.
NHB Capital LLC (NHB), in which we have 100%
ownership interest, is the only unrestricted subsidiary and the
only domestic subsidiary that has not guaranteed these
obligations. The credit facilities are secured by first priority
pledges of all of the equity interests in Noranda AcquisitionCo
and all of the equity interests in each of the existing and
future direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of
Noranda AcquisitionCo other than subsidiaries of unrestricted
subsidiaries. The senior secured credit facilities are also
secured by first priority security interests in substantially
all of the assets of Noranda AcquisitionCo, as well as those of
each of our existing and future direct and indirect wholly owned
domestic subsidiaries that have guaranteed the senior secured
credit facilities.
On May 7, 2009, participating lenders approved an amendment
to the senior secured credit facilities to permit discounted
prepayments of the term B loan and revolving credit facility
through a modified Dutch auction procedure. The
amendment also permits us to conduct open market purchases of
the revolving credit facility and term B loan at a discount.
Term B
loan
Interest on the loan is based either on LIBOR or the prime rate,
at Noranda AcquisitionCos election, in either case plus an
applicable margin (2.00% over LIBOR at December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2009) that depends upon the ratio of
Noranda AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to its
EBITDA (in each case as defined in the credit agreement
governing the term B loan). The interest rates at
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 were 4.24%
and 2.25%, respectively. Interest on the term B loan is payable
no less frequently than quarterly, and such loan amortizes at a
rate of 1% per annum, payable quarterly, beginning on
September 30, 2007. On June 28, 2007, Noranda
AcquisitionCo made an optional prepayment of
134
$75.0 million on the term B loan. The optional prepayment
was applied to reduce in direct order the remaining amortization
installments in forward order of maturity, which served to
effectively eliminate the 1% per annum required principal
payment.
Noranda AcquisitionCo is required to prepay amounts outstanding
under the credit agreement based on an amount equal to 50% of
our Excess Cash Flow (as calculated in accordance with the terms
of the credit agreement governing the term B loan) within
95 days after the end of each fiscal year. The required
percentage of Noranda AcquisitionCos Excess Cash Flow
payable to the lenders under the credit agreement governing the
term B loan may be reduced from 50% to either 25% or 0% based on
Noranda AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to EBITDA
ratio (in each case as defined in the credit agreement governing
the term B loan) or the principal amount of term B loan that has
been repaid. A mandatory prepayment of $24.5 million
pursuant to the cash flow sweep provisions of the credit
agreement was paid in April 2009 and was equal to 50% of Noranda
AcquisitionCos Excess Cash Flow for 2008. When the final
calculation was performed, the payment was reduced from the
estimated amount reported at December 31, 2008 of
$32.3 million.
Revolving
credit facility
Interest on the revolving credit facility is based either on
LIBOR or the prime rate, at Noranda AcquisitionCos
election, in either case plus an applicable margin (2.00% over
LIBOR at December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2009) that depends upon the ratio of Noranda
AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to its EBITDA (in
each case as defined in the applicable credit facility) and is
payable at least quarterly. The interest rate on the revolver
was 2.46% at December 31, 2008 and 2.23% at
December 31, 2009. Noranda AcquisitionCo had outstanding
letters of credit totaling $7.0 million and
$26.1 million under the revolving credit facility at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, $225.0 million was drawn down on
the facility leaving $18.0 million available for borrowing.
As a result of the revolving credit facility repurchase, our
borrowing capacity was reduced $7.3 million from
$250.0 million to $242.7 million, and at
December 31, 2009, $215.9 million was drawn down on
the facility, leaving $0.7 million available under the
facility.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under
the revolving credit facility, Noranda AcquisitionCo is required
to pay:
|
|
|
|
|
a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving credit
facility in respect of unutilized commitments at a rate equal to
0.5% per annum subject to step down if certain financial tests
are met; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
additional fees related to outstanding letters of credit under
the revolving credit facility at a rate equal to the margin
applicable to loans under the revolving credit facility,
presently 2.0% per annum.
|
Certain
covenants
We have no financial maintenance covenants on any borrowings.
Certain covenants contained in our debt agreements governing our
senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing
our notes restrict our ability to take certain actions if we are
unable to meet certain ratios of Adjusted EBITDA to fixed
charges and Senior Secured Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA. These
actions include incurring additional secured or unsecured debt,
expanding borrowings under existing term loan facilities, paying
dividends, engaging in mergers, acquisitions and certain other
investments, and retaining proceeds from asset sales. As a
result of not meeting certain of the minimum and maximum
financial levels established by our debt agreements as of
September 30, 2009 as conditions to the execution of
certain transactions, our ability to incur future indebtedness,
grow through acquisitions, make certain investments, pay
dividends and retain proceeds from asset sales may be limited.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Covenant Compliance.
In addition to the restrictive covenants described above, upon
the occurrence of certain events, such as a change of control,
our debt agreements could require that we repay or refinance our
indebtedness.
135
Noranda
AcquisitionCo Notes
In addition to the senior secured credit facilities, on
May 18, 2007, Noranda AcquisitionCo issued
$510.0 million Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015. The
Noranda AcquisitionCo Notes mature on May 15, 2015. The
initial interest payment on the AcquisitionCo Notes was paid on
November 15, 2007, entirely in cash. For any subsequent
period through May 15, 2011, Noranda AcquisitionCo may
elect to pay interest: (i) entirely in cash, (ii) by
increasing the principal amount of the AcquisitionCo Notes or by
issuing new notes (the AcquisitionCo PIK interest)
or (iii) 50% in cash and 50% in AcquisitionCo PIK interest.
For any subsequent period after May 15, 2011, Noranda
AcquisitionCo must pay all interest in cash. The AcquisitionCo
Notes cash interest accrues at six-month LIBOR plus 4.0% per
annum, reset semi-annually, and the AcquisitionCo PIK interest,
if any, will accrue at six-month LIBOR plus 4.75% per annum,
reset semi-annually. The PIK interest rate was 7.35% at
December 31, 2008 and 6.16% at September 30, 2009.
On May 15, 2009, Noranda AcquisitionCo issued
$16.6 million in AcquisitionCo Notes as AcquisitionCo PIK
interest due May 15, 2009, and on November 15, 2009,
Noranda AcquisitionCo issued $11.9 million in AcquisitionCo
Notes as AcquisitionCo PIK interest due November 15, 2009.
The AcquisitionCo Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed
on a senior unsecured, joint and several basis by the existing
and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of Noranda
AcquisitionCo that guarantee the senior secured credit
facilities. As discussed elsewhere in this Description of
Certain Indebtedness, NHB is not a guarantor of the senior
secured credit facilities, and is therefore not a guarantor of
the AcquisitionCo Notes. Noranda HoldCo fully and
unconditionally guarantees the AcquisitionCo Notes on a joint
and several basis with the existing guarantors. The guarantee by
Noranda HoldCo is not required by the indenture governing the
AcquisitionCo Notes and may be released by Noranda HoldCo at any
time. Noranda HoldCo has no independent operations or any assets
other than its interest in Noranda AcquisitionCo. Noranda
AcquisitionCo is a wholly owned finance subsidiary of Noranda
HoldCo with no operations independent of its subsidiaries which
guarantee the AcquisitionCo Notes.
We have notified the trustee for the AcquisitionCo Notes
bondholders of our election to pay the May 15, 2010
interest payment on the AcquisitionCo Notes entirely in
AcquisitionCo PIK interest. If the AcquisitionCo Notes would
otherwise constitute applicable high yield discount obligations
(AHYDO) within the meaning of applicable U.S.
federal income tax law, Noranda AcquisitionCo will be required
to make mandatory principal redemption payments in cash at such
times and in such amounts as is necessary to prevent the
AcquisitionCo Notes from being treated as an AHYDO.
The indenture governing the AcquisitionCo Notes limits Noranda
AcquisitionCos and its subsidiaries ability, among
other things, to (i) incur additional indebtedness;
(ii) declare or pay dividends or make other distributions
or repurchase or redeem our stock; (iii) make investments;
(iv) sell assets, including capital stock of restricted
subsidiaries; (v) enter into agreements restricting our
subsidiaries ability to pay dividends;
(vi) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all
or substantially all of our assets; (vii) enter into
transactions with our affiliates; and (viii) incur liens.
As of September 30, 2009, there were $387.0 million in
principal amount of AcquisitionCo Notes outstanding.
Noranda
HoldCo Notes
On June 7, 2007, Noranda HoldCo issued Senior Floating Rate
Notes due 2014 in aggregate principal amount of
$220.0 million, with a discount of 1.0% of the principal
amount. The HoldCo Notes mature on November 15, 2014. The
HoldCo Notes are not guaranteed. The initial interest payment on
the HoldCo Notes was paid on November 15, 2007, in cash;
for any subsequent period through May 15, 2012, we may
elect to pay interest: (i) entirely in cash, (ii) by
increasing the principal amount of the HoldCo Notes or by
issuing new notes (the HoldCo PIK interest) or
(iii) 50% in cash and 50% in HoldCo PIK interest. For any
subsequent period after May 15, 2012, we must pay all
interest in cash. The HoldCo Notes cash interest accrues at
six-month LIBOR plus 5.75% per annum, reset semi-annually, and
the HoldCo PIK interest, if any,
136
will accrue at six-month LIBOR plus 6.5% per annum, reset
semi-annually. The PIK interest rate was 9.10% at
December 31, 2008 and 7.91% at September 30, 2009.
On May 15, 2009, HoldCo issued $3.3 million in HoldCo
Notes as HoldCo PIK interest due May 15, 2009, and on
November 15, 2010, HoldCo issued $2.7 million in
HoldCo Notes as HoldCo PIK interest due November 15, 2009.
We notified the trustee for the HoldCo Notes bondholders of our
election to pay the May 15, 2010 interest payment on the
HoldCo Notes entirely in HoldCo PIK Interest. If the HoldCo
Notes would otherwise constitute applicable high yield discount
obligations within the meaning of applicable U.S. federal income
tax law, Noranda HoldCo will be required to make mandatory
principal redemption payments in cash at such times and in such
amounts as is necessary to prevent the HoldCo Notes from being
treated as an AHYDO.
The indenture governing the HoldCo Notes limits our ability,
among other things, to (i) incur additional indebtedness;
(ii) declare or pay dividends or make other distributions
or repurchase or redeem our stock; (iii) make investments;
(iv) sell assets, including capital stock of restricted
subsidiaries; (v) enter into agreements restricting our
subsidiaries ability to pay dividends;
(vi) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all
or substantially all of our assets; (vii) enter into
transactions with our affiliates; and (viii) incur liens.
As of September 30, 2009, there were $68.0 million in
principal amount of HoldCo Notes outstanding.
Debt
repurchase
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, we
repurchased or repaid $320.8 million principal aggregate
amount of our outstanding HoldCo Notes, AcquisitionCo Notes,
term B loan and revolving credit facility for a price of
$123.0 million, plus fees. HoldCo Notes with an aggregate
principal balance of $154.7 million and net carrying amount
of $153.8 million (including deferred financing fees and
debt discounts) were repurchased at a price of
$38.7 million, plus fees. AcquisitionCo Notes with an
aggregate principal balance of $139.6 million and net
carrying amount of $137.8 million (including deferred
financing fees and debt discounts) were repurchased at a price
of $67.4 million, plus fees. Of the HoldCo Notes and
AcquisitionCo Notes repurchased, we retired a face value amount
of $155.4 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. In addition to our $24.5 million
payment in April 2009 related to 2008 excess cash flows on the
term B loan, we repurchased a face value amount of
$19.9 million of the term B loan for $13.0 million. We
repurchased $6.6 million of our revolving credit facility
borrowings for $4.0 million. As a result of the revolving
credit facility repurchase, our borrowing capacity was reduced
$7.3 million from $250.0 million to
$242.7 million.
Aluminum
swaps
In March 2009, we entered into a hedge settlement agreement with
Merrill Lynch. As amended and restated in October 2009, the
agreement provides a mechanism for us to monetize up to
$400.0 million of the favorable net position of our
long-term derivatives to fund debt repurchases. The agreement
states that Merrill Lynch will only settle fixed-price
aluminum sale swaps that are offset by fixed-price aluminum
purchase swaps. We settled offsetting fixed-price aluminum
purchase swaps and sale swaps to fund our debt repurchases
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, we received
$120 million in proceeds from the hedge settlement
agreement. As of the date of this prospectus, we had
$127.3 million of locked in hedge gains that we will
receive during the course of 2010 and 2011 or which we have the
option to monetize early to retire debt under our hedge
settlement agreement.
The amended and restated agreement also provides that a portion
of locked in value from the offsetting swaps may be used to meet
collateral posting requirements for any new hedge volumes we
enter into with Merrill Lynch.
137
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a description of the material terms of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws as
each will be in effect as of the consummation of this offering,
and of specific provisions of Delaware law. The following
description is intended as a summary only and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated bylaws
and the Delaware General Corporation Law, or
DGCL.
General
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, our capital stock will consist
of
total authorized shares, of
which shares,
par value $0.01 per share, will be designated as common
stock
and shares,
par value $0.01 per share, will be designated as preferred
stock. Immediately following the completion of this
offering, we will
have shares
of common stock outstanding,
including shares
that will be issued to the underwriters upon the exercise of
their over-allotment option. There will be no shares of
preferred stock outstanding immediately following this offering.
Common
Stock
Voting Rights. Holders of common stock are
entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon
by the stockholders. The holders of common stock do not have
cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.
Dividend Rights. Holders of common stock are
entitled to receive ratably dividends if, as and when dividends
are declared from time to time by our Board of Directors out of
funds legally available for that purpose, after payment of
dividends required to be paid on outstanding preferred stock, as
described below, if any. Under Delaware law, we can only pay
dividends either out of surplus or out of the
current or the immediately preceding years net profits.
Surplus is defined as the excess, if any, at any given time, of
the total assets of a corporation over its total liabilities and
statutory capital. The value of a corporations assets can
be measured in a number of ways and may not necessarily equal
their book value.
Liquidation Rights. Upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are
entitled to receive ratably the assets available for
distribution to the stockholders after payment of liabilities
and accrued but unpaid dividends and liquidation preferences on
any outstanding preferred stock.
Other Matters. The common stock has no
preemptive or conversion rights. There are no redemption or
sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. All
outstanding shares of our common stock are fully paid and
non-assessable, and the shares of our common stock offered in
this offering, upon payment and delivery in accordance with the
underwriting agreement, will be fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred
Stock
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, shares of preferred stock will be issuable from
time to time, in one or more series, with the designations of
the series, the voting rights (if any) of the shares of the
series, the powers, preferences and relative, participation,
optional or other special rights, if any, and any
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as our Board
of Directors from time to time may adopt by resolution, subject
to certain limitations. Each series will consist of that number
of shares as will be stated and expressed in the certificate of
designations providing for the issuance of the stock of the
series. All shares of any one series of preferred stock will be
identical.
Composition
of Board of Directors; Election and Removal of
Directors
In accordance with our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, the number of
directors comprising our Board of Directors will be determined
from time to time by our Board of Directors, and only a majority
of the Board of Directors may fix the number of directors. We
intend to avail ourselves of the controlled company
exception under the New York Stock Exchange rules which exempts
us from certain requirements, including the requirements that we
have a majority of
138
independent directors on our Board of Directors and that we have
compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees
composed entirely of independent directors. We will, however,
remain subject to the requirement that we have an audit
committee composed entirely of independent members. Upon the
closing of this offering, it is anticipated that we will have
12 directors. Each director is to hold office until his or
her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her
earlier death, resignation or removal. At any meeting of our
Board of Directors, except as otherwise required by law, a
majority of the total number of directors then in office will
constitute a quorum for all purposes.
The amended and restated securityholders agreement Noranda
HoldCo expects to enter into with Apollo and certain members of
our management will provide that, except as otherwise required
by applicable law, if Apollo continues to hold (1) at least
30% but less than 50% of our outstanding common stock, it will
have the right to designate at least six director nominees;
(2) at least 20% but less than 30% of our outstanding
common stock, it will have the right to designate at least five
director nominees; and (3) at least 10% but less than 20%
of our outstanding common stock, it will have the right to
designate at least three director nominees. If, at any time, the
Board of Directors decreases the size of the Board of Directors
to nine or fewer directors, Apollo will have the right to
designate at least four, three and two director nominees,
respectively, according to the ownership levels detailed above.
Once Apollo owns less than 10% of our outstanding common stock,
it will have no right to designate directors. Except as
otherwise required by applicable law, Apollo will have the right
to designate a replacement to fill a vacancy on Noranda
HoldCos Board of Directors that was designated by Apollo.
See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Amended and Restated Securityholders
Agreement.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that our Board of Directors is divided into three
classes of directors, with the classes to be as nearly equal in
number as possible. As a result, approximately one-third of our
Board of Directors will be elected each year. The classification
of directors has the effect of making it more difficult for
stockholders to change the composition of our board. Our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation will also provide that
stockholders do not have the right to cumulative votes in the
election of directors.
Under the DGCL, unless otherwise provided in our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation, directors serving on a
classified board may be removed by the stockholders only for
cause. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
will not make an exception to this rule. In addition, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
provide that, except to the extent otherwise provided in the
amended and restated securityholders agreement, any vacancies on
our Board of Directors will be filled only by the affirmative
vote of a majority of the remaining directors, although less
than a quorum, subject to Apollos rights as described
above.
Special
Meetings of Stockholders
Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that special
meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the Board of
Directors and the chairman.
Section 203
of the DGCL
In our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we
will elect not to be subject to Section 203 of the DGCL. In
general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware
corporation from engaging in a business combination
with an interested stockholder for a three-year
period following the time that this stockholder becomes an
interested stockholder, unless the business combination is
approved in the manner prescribed therein. A business
combination includes a merger, asset sale or other
transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested
stockholder. An interested stockholder is a person
who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or, in some
cases, within three years prior, did own) 15% or more of the
corporations voting stock.
139
Certain
Corporate Anti-Takeover Provisions
Certain provisions in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws summarized below
may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay,
deter or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a
stockholder might consider to be in its best interests,
including attempts that might result in a premium being paid
over the market price for the shares held by stockholders.
Preferred
Stock
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
contain provisions that permit our Board of Directors to issue,
without any further vote or action by the stockholders, shares
of preferred stock in one or more series and, with respect to
each such series, to fix the number of shares constituting the
series and the designation of the series, the voting rights (if
any) of the shares of the series, and the powers, preferences
and relative, participation, optional and other special rights,
if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions, of
the shares of such series. See Preferred
Stock.
Classified
Board; Number of Directors
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that our Board of Directors is divided into three
classes of directors, with the classes to be as nearly equal in
number as possible and the number of directors on our board may
be fixed only by the majority of our Board of Directors, as
described above in Composition of Board of
Directors; Election and Removal of Directors.
Removal
of Directors, Vacancies
Our stockholders will be able to remove directors only for cause
and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote in
the election of directors. Vacancies on our Board of Directors
may be filled only by a majority of our Board of Directors.
Except as otherwise required by applicable law, the amended and
restated securityholders agreement will provide that Apollo will
have the right to designate a replacement to fill a vacancy on
Noranda HoldCos Board of Directors that was designated by
Apollo. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Amended and Restated Securityholders
Agreement.
No
Cumulative Voting
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that stockholders do not have the right to cumulative
votes in the election of directors. Cumulative voting rights
would have been available to the holders of our common stock if
our amended and restated articles of incorporation had not
negated cumulative voting.
Calling
of Special Meetings of Stockholders
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our
amended and restated bylaws will provide that special meetings
of our stockholders may be called only by our Board of Directors
or the Chairman of our Board of Directors.
Advance
Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and Director
Nominations
Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that stockholders
seeking to nominate candidates for election as directors or to
bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders must
provide timely notice of their proposal in writing to the
corporate secretary.
Generally, to be timely, a stockholders notice must be
received at our principal executive offices not less than
90 days or more than 120 days prior to the first
anniversary date of the previous years annual meeting. Our
amended and restated bylaws will also specify requirements as to
the form and content of a stockholders notice. These
provisions may impede stockholders ability to bring
matters before an annual meeting of stockholders or make
nominations for directors at an annual meeting of stockholders.
140
Delaware
Takeover Statute
All the foregoing proposed provisions of our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated
bylaws could discourage potential acquisition proposals and
could delay or prevent a change in control. These provisions are
intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability
in the composition of the Board of Directors and in the policies
formulated by the Board of Directors and to discourage certain
types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened
change of control. These provisions are designed to reduce our
vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal. The
provisions also are intended to discourage certain tactics that
may be used in proxy fights. These same provisions may delay,
deter or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a
stockholder might consider to be in its best interest. In
addition, such provisions could have the effect of discouraging
others from making tender offers for our shares and, as a
consequence, they also may inhibit fluctuations in the market
price of our common stock that could result from actual or
rumored takeover attempts. Such provisions also may have the
effect of preventing changes in our management.
Corporate
Opportunity
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that no officer or director of us who is also an
officer, director, employee, managing director or other
affiliate of Apollo will be liable to us or our stockholders for
breach of any fiduciary duty by reason of the fact that any such
individual directs a corporate opportunity to Apollo instead of
us, or does not communicate information regarding a corporate
opportunity to us that the officer, director, employee, managing
director or other affiliate has directed to Apollo.
Amendment
of Our Certificate of Incorporation
Under applicable law, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation will provide that it may be amended only with the
affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled
to vote thereon; provided that Apollos prior written
approval is required for any modification, amendment or repeal
of the provisions discussed above regarding the ability of
Apollo-related directors to direct or communicate corporate
opportunities to Apollo. See Corporate
Opportunity.
Amendment
of Our Bylaws
Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that they can be
amended by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
then entitled to vote or by the vote of a majority of the Board
of Directors.
Limitation
of Liability and Indemnification
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that no director will be personally liable for monetary
damages for breach of any fiduciary duty as a director, except
with respect to liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or
our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
under Section 174 of the DGCL (governing distributions to
stockholders); or
|
|
|
|
for any transaction from which the director derived any improper
personal benefit.
|
However, if the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action
further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of
directors, then the liability of our directors will be
eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the
DGCL, as so amended. The modification or repeal of this
provision of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation will not adversely affect any right or protection
of a director existing at the time of such modification or
repeal.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that we will, to the fullest extent from time to time
permitted by law, indemnify our directors and officers against
all liabilities and expenses in any
141
suit or proceeding, arising out of their status as an officer or
director or their activities in these capacities. We will also
indemnify any person who, at our request, is or was serving as a
director, officer or employee of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. We may,
by action of our Board of Directors, provide indemnification to
our employees and agents within the same scope and effect as the
foregoing indemnification of directors and officers.
The right to be indemnified will include the right of an officer
or a director to be paid expenses in advance of the final
disposition of any proceeding, provided that, if required by
law, we receive an undertaking to repay such amount if it will
be determined that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified.
Our Board of Directors may take such action as it deems
necessary to carry out these indemnification provisions,
including adopting procedures for determining and enforcing
indemnification rights and purchasing insurance policies. Our
Board of Directors may also adopt bylaws, resolutions or
contracts implementing indemnification arrangements as may be
permitted by law. Neither the amendment nor the repeal of these
indemnification provisions, nor the adoption of any provision of
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
inconsistent with these indemnification provisions, will
eliminate or reduce any rights to indemnification relating to
their status or any activities prior to such amendment, repeal
or adoption.
We believe these provisions will assist in attracting and
retaining qualified individuals to serve as directors.
Listing
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the trading symbol NOR.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock
is .
142
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock, and no predictions can be made about the effect,
if any, that market sales of shares of our common stock or the
availability of such shares for sale will have on the market
price prevailing from time to time. Nevertheless, the actual
sale of, or the perceived potential for the sale of, our common
stock in the public market may have an adverse effect on the
market price for the common stock and could impair our ability
to raise capital through future sales of our securities. See
Risk Factors Risks Related to an Investment in
Our Common Stock and This Offering Future sales or
the possibility of future sales of a substantial amount of our
common stock may depress the price of shares of our common
stock.
Sale of
Restricted Shares
Upon completion of this offering, we will have an aggregate
of shares
of our common stock outstanding. Of these shares,
the shares
of our common stock to be sold in this offering will be freely
tradable without restriction or further registration under the
Securities Act, except for any shares which may be acquired by
any of our affiliates as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the Securities Act, which will be subject to
the resale limitations of Rule 144. The
remaining shares
of our common stock outstanding will be restricted securities,
as that term is defined in Rule 144, and may in the future
be sold without restriction under the Securities Act to the
extent permitted by Rule 144 or any applicable exemption
under the Securities Act.
We have granted Apollo, our equity sponsor, demand and
incidental registration rights with respect to the shares of our
common stock owned by it after this offering, and have granted
our management members incidental registration rights with
respect to
the shares
of our common stock owned by them after this offering
( shares
of our common stock if the underwriters exercise the
over-allotment option in full). See Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions Amended and Restated
Securityholders Agreement.
Equity
Incentive Plan
Following the completion of this offering, we intend to file a
registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act with the SEC to
register shares
of our common stock issued or reserved for issuance under our
long-term incentive plan. As of the date of this prospectus, we
have granted options to
purchase shares
of our common stock, of
which shares
are vested and exercisable. Subject to the expiration of any
lock-up
restrictions as described below and following the completion of
any vesting periods, shares of our common stock issuable upon
the exercise of options granted or to be granted under our plan
will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities
Act, unless such shares are held by any of our affiliates.
Lock-up
Agreements
Executive officers, directors and significant stockholders,
including Apollo, have agreed not to sell any shares of our
common stock for a period of 180 days from the date of this
prospectus, subject to certain exceptions. See
Underwriting for a description of these
lock-up
provisions.
143
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR NON-U.S.
HOLDERS
The following is a general discussion of material
U.S. federal income tax considerations with respect to the
ownership and disposition of our common stock applicable to
non-U.S. holders
who acquire such shares in this offering. This discussion is
based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, existing and proposed U.S. Treasury
regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative rulings
and court decisions in effect as of the date hereof, all of
which are subject to change at any time, possibly with
retroactive effect.
For purposes of this discussion, the term
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock other than:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
the United States or under the laws of the United States, any
state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is includible in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a court within the United States is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to
control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (2) it
has a valid election in effect under applicable
U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes holds shares of our common
stock, the tax treatment of a person treated as a partner
generally will depend on the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. Persons that for
U.S. federal income tax purposes are treated as a partner
in a partnership holding shares of our common stock should
consult their tax advisors.
This discussion assumes that a
non-U.S. holder
holds shares of our common stock as a capital asset within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code
(generally, property held for investment). This discussion does
not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation
that may be important to a
non-U.S. holder
in light of that holders particular circumstances or that
may be applicable to holders subject to special treatment under
U.S. federal income tax law (including, for example,
financial institutions, dealers in securities, traders in
securities that elect
mark-to-market
treatment, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, holders who
acquired our common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee
stock options or otherwise as compensation, entities or
arrangements treated as partnerships for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, holders liable for the alternative minimum
tax, certain former citizens or former long-term residents of
the United States, and holders who hold our common stock as part
of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion
transaction). In addition, this discussion does not address
U.S. federal tax laws other than those pertaining to the
U.S. federal income tax, nor does it address any aspects of
U.S. state, local or
non-U.S. taxes.
Accordingly, prospective investors should consult with their own
tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local,
non-U.S. income
and other tax considerations of acquiring, holding and disposing
of shares of our common stock.
THIS SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE
DESCRIPTION OF ALL TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE OWNERSHIP
AND DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON STOCK. PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS OF OUR
COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING
THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM (INCLUDING THE APPLICATION AND
EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL,
NON-U.S. INCOME
AND OTHER TAX LAWS) OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR
COMMON STOCK.
144
Dividends
In general, any distributions we make to a
non-U.S. holder
with respect to its shares of our common stock that constitute
dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be
subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30% of the
gross amount (or a reduced rate prescribed by an applicable
income tax treaty) unless the dividends are effectively
connected with a trade or business carried on by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (and, if an income tax treaty applies,
are attributable to a permanent establishment of the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States). A distribution will constitute a
dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent
of our current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Any distribution not
constituting a dividend will be treated as first reducing the
adjusted basis in the
non-U.S. holders
shares of our common stock and, to the extent it exceeds the
adjusted basis in the
non-U.S. holders
shares of our common stock, as gain from the sale or exchange of
such shares.
Dividends effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business (and, if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to
a U.S. permanent establishment) of a
non-U.S. holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax if
the
non-U.S. holder
complies with applicable certification and disclosure
requirements. Instead, such dividends generally will be subject
to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis, in the
same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a resident of the United States. A
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may be subject to an additional
branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower
rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty) on
the repatriation from the United States of its effectively
connected earnings and profits, subject to certain
adjustments.
Gain on
Sale or Other Disposition of our Common Stock
In general, a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to U.S. federal income or, subject to
the discussion below under the heading Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding, withholding tax on any
gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of our common
stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business
carried on by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (in which case the branch profits tax
discussed above may also apply if the
non-U.S. holder
is a corporation) and, if required by an applicable income tax
treaty, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment
of the
non-U.S. holder;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual and is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and
certain other conditions are satisfied; or
|
|
|
|
we are or have been a U.S. real property holding
corporation (a USRPHC) for U.S. federal income
tax purposes at any time within the shorter of the five-year
period ending on the date of the disposition and the
non-U.S. holders
holding period and certain other conditions are satisfied. We
believe that we currently are not, and we do not anticipate
becoming, a USRPHC.
|
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to
each
non-U.S. holder
the amount of dividends paid to, and the tax withheld with
respect to, each
non-U.S. holder.
These reporting requirements apply regardless of whether
withholding was reduced or eliminated by an applicable tax
treaty. Copies of this information also may be made available
under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement with the
tax authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides or is established.
U.S. backup withholding tax (currently, at a rate of 28%)
is imposed on certain payments to persons that fail to furnish
the information required under the U.S. information
reporting rules. Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
generally will be exempt from backup withholding if the
non-U.S. holder
provides a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
Under U.S. Treasury regulations, the payment of proceeds
from the disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
effected at a U.S. office of a broker generally will be
subject to information reporting and backup withholding, unless
the beneficial owner, under penalties of perjury, certifies,
among other things, its
145
status as a
non-U.S. holder
or otherwise establishes an exemption. The payment of proceeds
from the disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
effected at a
non-U.S. office
of a broker generally will not be subject to backup withholding
and information reporting, except as noted below. In the case of
proceeds from a disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
effected at a
non-U.S. office
of a broker that is:
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. person;
|
|
|
|
a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
a foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income from certain
periods is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business; or
|
|
|
|
a foreign partnership if at any time during its tax year
(a) one or more of its partners are U.S. persons who,
in the aggregate, hold more than 50% of the income or capital
interests of the partnership or (b) the foreign partnership
is engaged in a U.S. trade or business;
|
information reporting will apply unless the broker has
documentary evidence in its files that the owner is a
non-U.S. holder
and certain other conditions are satisfied, or the beneficial
owner otherwise establishes an exemption (and the broker has no
knowledge or reason to know to the contrary). Backup withholding
will apply if the sale is subject to information reporting and
the broker has actual knowledge that you are a United States
person.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
non-U.S. holder
can be refunded or credited against the
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service in a timely manner.
146
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement
dated ,
2010, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters named below,
for
whom
is acting as a representative, the following respective numbers
of shares of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters
obligation to purchase shares of common stock depends on the
satisfaction of the conditions contained in the underwriting
agreement including:
|
|
|
|
|
the obligation to purchase all of the shares of common stock
offered hereby (other than those shares of common stock covered
by their option to purchase additional shares as described
below), if any of the shares are purchased;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties made by us to the
underwriters are true;
|
|
|
|
there is no material change in our business or the financial
markets; and
|
|
|
|
we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters.
|
Commissions
and Expenses
The following table shows the initial public offering price, the
underwriting discounts and commissions we will pay to the
underwriters and proceeds before expenses to us. The total
amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of
the underwriters option to purchase up to an
additional shares.
The underwriting fee is the difference between the initial price
to the public and the amount the underwriters pay to us for the
shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Initial public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The representative of the underwriters has advised us that the
underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
directly to the public at the public offering price on the cover
of this prospectus and to selected dealers, which may include
the underwriters, at such offering price less a selling
concession not in excess of $ per
share. The underwriters may allow, and the selected dealers may
re-allow, a discount from the concession not in excess of
$ per share to brokers and
dealers. After the offering, the representative may change the
offering price and other selling terms.
The expenses of the offering that are payable by us are
estimated to be approximately $
(excluding underwriting discounts and commissions).
Option to
Purchase Additional Shares
We have granted the underwriters an option exercisable for
30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase,
from time to time, in whole or in part, up to an aggregate
of shares
at the public offering price less underwriting discounts and
commissions. This option may be exercised if the underwriters
sell more
than shares
in connection with this offering. To the extent the underwriters
exercise this option, each underwriter will be committed, so
long as the conditions of the underwriting agreement are
satisfied, to
147
purchase a number of additional shares of common stock
proportionate to that underwriters initial commitment as
indicated in the preceding table, and we will be obligated to
sell the additional shares of common stock to the underwriters.
Directed
Share Program
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up
to % of the shares of common stock
for sale at the initial public offering price to persons who are
directors, officers or employees, or who are otherwise
associated with us, through a directed share program. The sales
will be made through a directed share program. The number of
shares of common stock available for sale to the general public
will be reduced by the number of directed shares purchased by
participants in the program. We do not know if these persons
will choose to purchase all or any portion of these reserved
shares, but any purchases they do make will reduce the number of
shares available to the general public. These persons must
commit to purchase by 8:00 a.m. on the day following the
date of this prospectus. Any reserved shares not so purchased
will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the
same terms as the other shares. Except for certain of our
officers and directors who have entered into
lock-up
agreements as contemplated under
Lock-up
Agreements below, each person buying shares through the
directed share program has agreed that, for a period of 25
calendar days from the date of this prospectus, he or she will
not, without the prior written consent
of ,
offer, pledge, announce the intention to sell, sell, contract to
sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any
option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant
to purchase or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, enter
into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in
part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our
common stock, or make any demand for or exercise any right with
respect to the registration of any shares or any security
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of
common stock. For officer and directors purchasing share through
the directed share program, the
lock-up
agreements contemplated under
Lock-up
Agreements below shall govern with respect to their
purchases.
Lock-Up
Agreements
We, all of our directors and executive officers and certain of
our other existing stockholders, including Apollo, have agreed
that, subject to certain exceptions without the prior written
consent of the representative, we and they will not directly or
indirectly, (1) offer for sale, sell, pledge, or otherwise
dispose of (or enter into any transaction or device that is
designed to, or could be expected to, result in the disposition
by any person at any time in the future of) any shares of common
stock (including, without limitation, shares of common stock
that may be deemed to be beneficially owned by us or them in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and shares
of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of any options
or warrants) or securities convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for common stock, (2) enter into any swap or
other derivatives transaction that transfers to another, in
whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership
of the common stock, (3) make any demand for or exercise
any right or file or cause to be filed a registration statement,
including any amendments thereto, with respect to the
registration of any shares of common stock or securities
convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into common stock or
any of our other securities, or (4) publicly disclose the
intention to do any of the foregoing for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus.
The 180-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
extended if:
|
|
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the
180-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to us occurs; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
180-day
period, in which case the restrictions described in the
preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration
of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
announcement of the material
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
news or occurrence of a material event, unless such extension is
waived in writing by the representative.
|
The representative, in its sole discretion, may release the
common stock and other securities subject to the
lock-up
agreements described above in whole or in part at any time with
or without notice. When determining whether or not to release
common stock and other securities from
lock-up
agreements, the representative will consider, among other
factors, the holders reasons for requesting the release,
the number of shares of common stock and other securities for
which the release is being requested and market conditions at
the time.
Offering
Price Determination
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price will be
negotiated between the representative and us and will not
necessarily reflect the market price of our common stock
following this offering. In determining the initial public
offering price of our common stock, the representative will
consider:
|
|
|
|
|
the history and prospects for the industry in which we compete;
|
|
|
|
our financial information;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our management and our business potential and
earning prospects;
|
|
|
|
the prevailing securities markets at the time of this offering;
|
|
|
|
the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly traded
shares of generally comparable companies; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
this offering.
|
Indemnification
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act,
liabilities arising from breaches of the representations and
warranties contained in the underwriting agreement and to
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make for these liabilities.
Stabilization,
Short Positions and Penalty Bids
The underwriters may engage in stabilizing transactions, short
sales and purchases to cover positions created by short sales,
and penalty bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing
or maintaining the price of our common stock, in accordance with
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
|
A short position involves a sale by the underwriters of shares
in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated
to purchase in the offering, which creates the syndicate short
position. This short position may be either a covered short
position or a naked short position. In a covered short position,
the number of shares involved in the sales made by the
underwriters in excess of the number of shares they are
obligated to purchase is not greater than the number of shares
that they may purchase by exercising their option to purchase
additional shares. In a naked short position, the number of
shares involved is greater than the number of shares in their
option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters may close
out any short position by either exercising their option to
purchase additional shares, in whole or in part,
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source
of shares to close out the short position, the underwriters will
consider, among other things, the price of shares available for
purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which
they may purchase shares through their option to purchase
additional shares. A naked short position is more likely to be
created if the underwriters are concerned that there could be
downward pressure on the price of the
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely
affect investors who purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representative to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result,
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation
or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect
that the transactions described above may have on the price of
the common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the
underwriters make representation that the underwriters will
engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any
transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without
notice.
Electronic
Distribution
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
Internet sites or through other online services maintained by
one or more of the underwriters
and/or
selling group members participating in this offering, or by
their affiliates. In those cases, prospective investors may view
offering terms online and, depending upon the particular
underwriter or selling group member, prospective investors may
be allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may agree
with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale to
online brokerage account holders. Any such allocation for online
distributions will be made by the underwriters on the same basis
as other allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on any underwriters or selling group members website
and any information contained in any other website maintained by
an underwriter or selling group member is not part of the
prospectus or the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, has not been approved
and/or
endorsed by us or any underwriter or selling group member in its
capacity as underwriter or selling group member and should not
be relied upon by investors.
New York
Stock Exchange
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol NOR.
Discretionary
Sales
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend to
confirm sales to discretionary accounts that exceed 5% of the
total number of shares offered by them.
Stamp
Taxes
Purchasers of the shares of our common stock offered in this
prospectus may be required to pay stamp taxes and other charges
under the laws and practices of the country of purchase, in
addition to the offering price listed on the cover page of this
prospectus. Accordingly, we urge you to consult a tax advisor
with respect to whether you may be required to pay those taxes
or charges, as well as any other tax consequences that may arise
under the laws of the country of purchase.
Relationships
The underwriters may in the future perform investment banking
and advisory services for us from time to time for which they
may in the future receive customary fees and expenses.
150
European
Economic Area
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area
that has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a relevant
member state), with effect from and including the date on which
the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member
state (the relevant implementation date), an offer of securities
described in this prospectus may not be made to the public in
that relevant member state prior to the publication of a
prospectus in relation to the securities that has been approved
by the competent authority in that relevant member state or,
where appropriate, approved in another relevant member state and
notified to the competent authority in that relevant member
state, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except
that, with effect from and including the relevant implementation
date, an offer of securities may be offered to the public in
that relevant member state at any time:
|
|
|
|
|
to any legal entity that is authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities or
|
|
|
|
to any legal entity that has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000,
as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts or
|
|
|
|
in any other circumstances that do not require the publication
of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus
Directive.
|
Each purchaser of securities described in this prospectus
located within a relevant member state will be deemed to have
represented, acknowledged and agreed that it is a
qualified investor within the meaning of
Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive.
For purposes of this provision, the expression an offer to
the public in any relevant member state means the
communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be
offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or
subscribe for the securities, as the expression may be varied in
that member state by any measure implementing the Prospectus
Directive in that member state, and the expression
Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and
includes any relevant implementing measure in each relevant
member state.
The sellers of the securities have not authorized and do not
authorize the making of any offer of securities through any
financial intermediary on their behalf, other than offers made
by the underwriters with a view to the final placement of the
securities as contemplated in this prospectus. Accordingly, no
purchaser of the securities, other than the underwriters, is
authorized to make any further offer of the securities on behalf
of the sellers or the underwriters.
United
Kingdom
This prospectus is only being distributed to, and is only
directed at, persons in the United Kingdom that are qualified
investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the
Prospectus Directive (Qualified Investors) that are
also (i) investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order) or
(ii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it
may lawfully be communicated, falling within
Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons
together being referred to as relevant persons).
This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not
be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or
disclosed by recipients to any other persons in the United
Kingdom. Any person in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant
persons should not act or rely on this document or any of its
contents.
151
LEGAL
MATTERS
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz will pass upon for us
the validity of the shares of our common stock offered hereby.
The underwriters have been represented by Fried, Frank, Harris,
Shriver & Jacobson LLP.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation at December 31, 2008 (Successor) and
December 31, 2007 (Successor) and for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the periods from May 18, 2007
through December 31, 2007 (Successor) and January 1,
2007 through May 17, 2007 (Predecessor) and of Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. for the periods August 16, 2006 through
December 31, 2006 (Predecessor) and January 1, 2006
through August 15, 2006 (Pre-predecessor), appearing in
this Registration Statement have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing
elsewhere herein, which, as to the years 2008 and 2007, are
based in part on the reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, and
Deloitte & Touche Chartered Accountants, Jamaica,
independent auditors.
The financial statements of Gramercy Alumina LLC as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended
included elsewhere in this Registration Statement have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
appearing herein and elsewhere in this Registration Statement.
The financial statements of St. Ann Bauxite Limited as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended (not
presented separately herein) have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche Chartered Accountants, Jamaica, as
stated in their report included herein.
The financial statements referred to above are included in
reliance upon such reports given on the authority of such firms
as experts in accounting and auditing.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act relating to the common stock that
includes important business and financial information about us
that is not included in or delivered with this prospectus. If we
have made references in this prospectus to any contracts,
agreements or other documents and also filed any of those
contracts, agreements or other documents as exhibits to the
registration statement, you should read the relevant exhibit for
a more complete understanding of the document or the matter
involved.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other
information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we
file with the SEC at the SECs public reference room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC
filings are also available to the public at the SECs
website at
http://www.sec.gov.
You may obtain copies of the information and documents
incorporated by reference in this prospectus at no charge by
writing or telephoning us at the following address or telephone
number:
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
801 Crescent Centre Drive, Suite 600
Franklin, TN 37067
Attention: Investor Relations
(615) 771-5700
We also maintain an Internet site at
http://www.norandaaluminum.com.
We will, as soon as reasonably practicable after the electronic
filing of our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports if applicable, make available
such reports free of charge on our website. Our website and
the information contained therein or connected thereto shall not
be deemed to be incorporated into this prospectus or
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part and
you should not rely on any such information in making your
decision whether to purchase our securities.
152
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
Periods from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006,
August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006, January 1,
2007 to May 17, 2007, May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, and Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity (Deficiency) for the Periods from January 1, 2006 to
August 15, 2006, August 16, 2006 to December 31,
2006, January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007, May 18,
2007 to December 31, 2007 and Year Ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
Periods from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006,
August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006, January 1,
2007 to May 17, 2007, May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, and Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
|
|
|
GRAMERCY ALUMINA LLC
|
|
|
|
F-100
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
|
|
|
|
|
F-102
|
|
|
|
|
F-103
|
|
|
|
|
F-104
|
|
|
|
|
F-105
|
|
|
|
|
F-106
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation (the Company)
as of December 31, 2008 (Successor) and December 31,
2007 (Successor) and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity (deficiency), and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor) and
the periods from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
(Predecessor) and from May 18, 2007 to December 31,
2007 (Successor). These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. The financial statements of
Gramercy Alumina LLC (Gramercy) and St. Ann Bauxite Limited
(St. Ann) (corporations in which the Company has 50%
interests), have been audited by other auditors whose reports
have been furnished to us, and our opinion on the Companys
consolidated financial statements, insofar as it relates to the
amounts included for Gramercy and St. Ann before consolidation
adjustments, is based solely on the reports of the other
auditors. In the Companys consolidated financial
statements (in thousands), the Companys investments in
Gramercy and St. Ann are stated at $101,888 and $103,769,
respectively, at December 31, 2008 (Successor) and at
$92,480 and $106,394, respectively, at December 31, 2007
(Successor), and the Companys equity in the net income
before consolidation adjustments of Gramercy and St. Ann is
$12,695 and $2,495, respectively for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (Successor) and $4,103 and $2,877,
respectively, for the period from January 1, 2007 to
May 17, 2007 (Predecessor) and $8,604 and $3,451,
respectively, for the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 (Successor).
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of the
other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other
auditors, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation at
December 31, 2008 (Successor) and at December 31, 2007
(Successor), and the consolidated results of its operations and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
and the periods from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
(Predecessor) and from May 18, 2007 to December 31,
2007 (Successor), in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements, on January 1, 2007, the Company changed its
method of accounting for income tax contingencies in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48.
Nashville, Tennessee
February 19, 2009, except for Note 16 and Note 23
as to which the date is January 14, 2010
F-2
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors of
Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity (deficiency) and cash
flows of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. (the Company) for
the periods from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor) and August 16, 2006 to December 31,
2006 (Predecessor). These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
results of operations and cash flows of Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
for the periods from January 1, 2006 to August 15,
2006 (Pre-predecessor) and August 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 (Predecessor), in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada,
April 9, 2008, except for Note 23
as to which the date is January 14, 2010
F-3
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS REPORT
To the members of
ST. ANN BAUXITE LIMITED AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
St. Ann Bauxite Limited and its subsidiary (the Group) as at
December 31, 2007 and 2008 and the related consolidated
profit and loss account and statements of changes in equity and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
directors and management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of
material misstatements. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by directors and management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion such consolidated financial statements, present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Group as at December 31, 2007 and 2008 and of the results
of its financial performance and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2008 prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
US
GAAP Reconciliation
Accounting principles under International Financial Reporting
Standards vary in certain significant respects from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Information relating to the nature and effect of such
differences is presented in note 23 of the financial
statements.
Chartered Accountants
Kingston, Jamaica,
February 6, 2009
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
75,630
|
|
|
|
184,716
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
97,169
|
|
|
|
74,472
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
180,250
|
|
|
|
139,019
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
21,163
|
|
|
|
81,717
|
|
Tax receivable
|
|
|
8,072
|
|
|
|
13,125
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
387,385
|
|
|
|
496,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates
|
|
|
198,874
|
|
|
|
205,657
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
657,811
|
|
|
|
599,623
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
256,122
|
|
|
|
242,776
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
70,136
|
|
|
|
66,367
|
|
Long-term derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255,816
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
80,216
|
|
|
|
69,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,650,544
|
|
|
|
1,936,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
32,505
|
|
|
|
34,816
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
27,571
|
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
31,742
|
|
|
|
32,453
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
12,182
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
5,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
14,181
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
22,355
|
|
|
|
24,277
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt due to third-party
|
|
|
30,300
|
|
|
|
32,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
175,913
|
|
|
|
160,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,121,372
|
|
|
|
1,314,308
|
|
Long-term derivative liabilities
|
|
|
65,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and OPEB liabilities
|
|
|
46,186
|
|
|
|
120,859
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
29,730
|
|
|
|
39,582
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
211,421
|
|
|
|
262,383
|
|
Common stock subject to redemption at redemption value
(100,000 shares at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficiency):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (100,000,000 shares authorized; $0.01 par
value; 21,610,298 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2007; 21,749,548 shares issued and
21,746,548 outstanding at December 31, 2008, including
100,000 shares subject to redemption at December 31,
2008)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
11,767
|
|
|
|
14,383
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,280
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(12,059
|
)
|
|
|
198,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity (deficiency)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
36,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
(deficiency)
|
|
|
1,650,544
|
|
|
|
1,936,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
816,042
|
|
|
|
|
496,681
|
|
|
|
527,666
|
|
|
|
|
867,390
|
|
|
|
1,266,427
|
|
Operating costs and expenses Cost of sales
|
|
|
660,529
|
|
|
|
|
408,968
|
|
|
|
424,505
|
|
|
|
|
768,010
|
|
|
|
1,122,676
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
23,933
|
|
|
|
|
14,029
|
|
|
|
16,853
|
|
|
|
|
39,159
|
|
|
|
73,831
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
Other recoveries, net
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684,406
|
|
|
|
|
422,440
|
|
|
|
441,321
|
|
|
|
|
806,715
|
|
|
|
1,222,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
131,636
|
|
|
|
|
74,241
|
|
|
|
86,345
|
|
|
|
|
60,675
|
|
|
|
44,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net Parent and a related party
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
|
|
|
7,059
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
|
67,243
|
|
|
|
89,154
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
16,632
|
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
56,467
|
|
|
|
|
(12,497
|
)
|
|
|
69,938
|
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(8,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,189
|
)
|
|
|
(4,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7,375
|
)
|
|
|
(7,702
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,012
|
|
|
|
|
8,632
|
|
|
|
58,433
|
|
|
|
|
47,371
|
|
|
|
151,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
|
|
110,624
|
|
|
|
|
65,609
|
|
|
|
27,912
|
|
|
|
|
13,304
|
|
|
|
(106,970
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
38,744
|
|
|
|
|
23,577
|
|
|
|
13,655
|
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
(32,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
71,880
|
|
|
|
|
42,032
|
|
|
|
14,257
|
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
(74,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,603
|
|
|
|
21,720
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,665
|
|
|
|
21,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
par Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(Deficiency)
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 (Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
488,470
|
|
|
|
(13,364
|
)
|
|
|
(2,784
|
)
|
|
|
472,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,880
|
|
Pension adjustment, net of tax of $(337)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,321
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,428
|
)
|
Stock option expense and excess tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, August 15, 2006 (Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
483,603
|
|
|
|
58,516
|
|
|
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
|
538,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reflect push-down of Xstrata Acquisition
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
949,999
|
|
|
|
17,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967,393
|
|
For the period from August 16, 2006 to December 31,
2006 (Predecessor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,032
|
|
Pension adjustment, net of tax of $(2,735)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,578
|
)
|
|
|
(4,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,454
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
953,653
|
|
|
|
59,425
|
|
|
|
(4,578
|
)
|
|
|
1,008,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
(Predecessor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of new accounting standard (FIN 48)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,257
|
|
Pension adjustment, net of tax of $(1,494)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,463
|
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,600
|
|
Distribution to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
Non-cash distribution to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, May 17, 2007 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,082,253
|
|
|
|
45,915
|
|
|
|
(1,372
|
)
|
|
|
1,126,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reflect Apollo Acquisition (Successor)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
215,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,130
|
|
For the period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
(Successor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
Pension adjustment, net of tax of $(7,368)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,059
|
)
|
|
|
(12,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,892
|
)
|
Distribution to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207,963
|
)
|
|
|
(8,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216,130
|
)
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 (Successor)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
11,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,059
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,057
|
)
|
Pension adjustment, net of tax of $(31,842)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,408
|
)
|
|
|
(53,408
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax of $150,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,782
|
|
|
|
263,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,317
|
|
Distribution to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,223
|
)
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
14,383
|
|
|
|
(176,280
|
)
|
|
|
198,315
|
|
|
|
36,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
71,880
|
|
|
|
|
42,032
|
|
|
|
14,257
|
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
(74,057
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,259
|
|
|
|
|
32,914
|
|
|
|
29,637
|
|
|
|
|
69,709
|
|
|
|
98,300
|
|
Non-cash interest
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
|
5,305
|
|
|
|
6,277
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
|
|
16,632
|
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
56,467
|
|
|
|
|
(12,497
|
)
|
|
|
46,952
|
|
Equity in net income of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(8,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,189
|
)
|
|
|
(4,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7,375
|
)
|
|
|
(7,702
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
39,114
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
(14,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
(73,422
|
)
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
Changes in other assets
|
|
|
(8,634
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,120
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
(8,477
|
)
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
Changes in pension and OPEB and other long term liabilities
|
|
|
9,021
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(4,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
4,312
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of
acquisitions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(15,542
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,289
|
)
|
|
|
(8,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
39,779
|
|
|
|
22,697
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(14,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,030
|
)
|
|
|
(18,069
|
)
|
|
|
|
43,565
|
|
|
|
41,231
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
16,956
|
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
(18,584
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(27,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
43,481
|
|
|
|
(13,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
Taxes payable/receivable
|
|
|
(8,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
4,888
|
|
|
|
13,011
|
|
|
|
|
(9,052
|
)
|
|
|
278
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
|
7,607
|
|
|
|
(27,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
21,434
|
|
|
|
(26,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
81,875
|
|
|
|
|
107,811
|
|
|
|
41,169
|
|
|
|
|
160,791
|
|
|
|
65,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(20,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21,034
|
)
|
|
|
(5,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
(36,172
|
)
|
|
|
(51,653
|
)
|
Net (decrease) increase in advances due from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,711
|
)
|
|
|
10,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of equipment
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
Payments for the Apollo Acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,161,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(20,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31,745
|
)
|
|
|
5,157
|
|
|
|
|
(1,197,691
|
)
|
|
|
(51,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,130
|
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Distribution to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216,130
|
)
|
|
|
(102,223
|
)
|
Capital contributions from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(7,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in advances payable to parent
|
|
|
21,723
|
|
|
|
|
(24,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on long-term debt
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227,800
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(125,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
(160,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
(76,250
|
)
|
|
|
(30,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(37,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60,548
|
)
|
|
|
(83,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,112,530
|
|
|
|
94,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23,657
|
|
|
|
|
15,518
|
|
|
|
(37,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
75,630
|
|
|
|
109,086
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
|
25,031
|
|
|
|
40,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
25,031
|
|
|
|
|
40,549
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
|
75,630
|
|
|
|
184,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-8
Basis
of presentation
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation (Noranda,
Successor or Company), and its wholly
owned subsidiary, Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation
(Noranda AcquisitionCo), were formed by affiliates
of Apollo Management, L.P. (Apollo) on
March 27, 2007 for the purpose of acquiring Noranda
Intermediate Holding Corporation (Noranda
Intermediate), which owns all of the outstanding shares of
Noranda Aluminum, Inc. (the Predecessor and
Pre-predecessor as defined below).
The Company has two integrated businesses: the
primary metals, or upstream business (upstream),
which includes an aluminum smelter in New Madrid, Missouri, and
the rolling mills, or downstream business
(downstream), which includes four rolling mills in
the southeastern United States in Huntingdon, Tennessee,
Salisbury, North Carolina and Newport, Arkansas. As a result of
a major winter storm in Southeastern Missouri on
January 28, 2009, the New Madrid, Missouri smelter facility
experienced a power outage. The interruption was managed safely
with no
on-site
incidents recorded. The outage affects approximately 75% of New
Madrids plant capacity. The Company is currently assessing
the impact on our operations as further discussed in Note 2.
The Company holds 50% interests in a Gramercy, Louisiana
aluminum refinery partnership and a Jamaican bauxite mining
partnership. The Companys investments in non-controlled
entities in which it has the ability to exercise equal or
significant influence over operating and financial policies are
accounted for by the equity method. All significant intercompany
transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
On April 10, 2007, Noranda AcquisitionCo entered into a
Stock Purchase Agreement with Noranda Finance, Inc.
(subsequently renamed Noranda Intermediate), an indirect wholly
owned subsidiary of Xstrata plc (together with its subsidiaries,
Xstrata), and Xstrata (Schweiz) A.G., a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Xstrata, pursuant to which it agreed
to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Noranda
Intermediate, which together with its subsidiaries constituted
the Noranda aluminum business of Xstrata. The acquisition was
completed on May 18, 2007 (the Apollo
Acquisition). Noranda and Noranda AcquisitionCo had no
assets or operations prior to the acquisition of Noranda
Intermediate on May 18, 2007.
Prior to December 31, 2005, Xstrata accumulated a 19.9%
ownership in Falconbridge Limited, which owned 100% of Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. at that time. On August 15, 2006, through a
tender offer, Xstrata effectively acquired the remaining 80.1%
of shares of Falconbridge Limited, which resulted in Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. being Xstratas wholly owned subsidiary (the
Xstrata Acquisition). Management accounted for the
Xstrata Acquisition under the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141,
Business Combinations,
(SFAS No. 141) by treating the
transactions leading to the Xstrata Acquisition as a step
acquisition using the purchase method. Therefore, the Xstrata
Acquisition and Apollo Acquisition are accounted for under the
purchase method of SFAS No. 141.
The application of the provisions of SFAS No. 141
results in adjustments to the assets and liabilities of Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. at each of the Xstrata Acquisition and the Apollo
Acquisition dates. As a result, the consolidated financial
statements subsequent to these acquisition dates are not
comparable to the consolidated financial statements prior to
these acquisition dates. The financial information for the
period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
includes the results of operations and cash flows for Noranda
Aluminum, Inc. on a basis reflecting the historical carrying
values of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. prior to the Xstrata
Acquisition and is referred to as Pre-predecessor.
The financial information as of December 31, 2006 and for
the periods from August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006
and from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007 includes the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for
Noranda Aluminum, Inc. on a basis reflecting the
stepped-up
values of Noranda Aluminum, Inc., prior to the Apollo
Acquisition but subsequent to the Xstrata Acquisition, and is
referred to as Predecessor. The financial
information as of December 31, 2007 and for
F-9
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
includes the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows for Noranda on a basis reflecting the impact of the
preliminary purchase allocation of the Apollo Acquisition, and
is referred to as Successor.
The consolidated financial statements of Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation include the accounts of Noranda
AcquisitionCo and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Noranda
Intermediate, Noranda Aluminum, Inc., Norandal USA, Inc. and
Gramercy Alumina Holdings Inc. References to the Company refer
to the Successor, Predecessor, and Pre-predecessor periods of
Noranda and Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the
Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP). In managements opinion, the
financial statements include all normal and recurring
adjustments that are considered necessary for the fair
presentation of the Companys financial position and
operating results including the elimination of all intercompany
accounts and transactions among wholly owned subsidiaries.
Acquisitions
Apollo
Acquisition
In connection with the Apollo Acquisition, Noranda AcquisitionCo
incurred $1,010,000 of funded debt, consisting of (i) a
$500,000 term B loan, and (ii) $510,000 of senior floating
rate notes, and entered into a $250,000 revolving credit
facility which was undrawn at the date of the Apollo
Acquisition. In addition to the debt incurred, affiliates of
Apollo contributed cash of $214,200 to Noranda, which was
contributed to Noranda AcquisitionCo. The purchase price for
Noranda Intermediate was $1,150,000, excluding acquisition
costs. Subsequent to the Apollo Acquisition, certain members of
the Companys management contributed $1,930 in cash through
the purchase of common shares of the Company.
The Company finalized the purchase price allocation related to
the Apollo Acquisition in the first quarter of 2008. The final
allocation of the purchase consideration was determined based on
a number of factors, including the final evaluation of the fair
value of the Companys tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed as of the closing date of the
transaction.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Total purchase
consideration was $1,164,650 including acquisition costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
141,152
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
223,815
|
|
Investments in affiliates
|
|
|
191,500
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
687,949
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
72,471
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
268,276
|
|
Pension and other assets
|
|
|
48,648
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(250,639
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(118,997
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(102,656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration assigned, net of $3,131 cash
acquired
|
|
|
1,161,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain balances in the above table have been revised from
amounts previously reported because of adjustments to the
purchase price allocation, primarily based on an updated
valuation of the investment in
F-10
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
joint ventures and additional analyses of the Companys tax
accounts, as well as settlement of an $8,200 payable to Xstrata,
which represented the Companys obligation to remit payment
for taxes deemed applicable to the period from April 10,
2007 to May 18, 2007.
Goodwill from the Apollo Acquisition is not deductible for tax
purposes.
See Note 8 for further discussions related to changes in
goodwill.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents
the results of operations as if the Apollo Acquisition had
occurred at the beginning of each year presented after giving
effect to certain adjustments, including changes in depreciation
and amortization expenses resulting from fair value adjustments
to tangible and intangible assets, increase in interest expense
resulting from additional indebtedness incurred and amortization
of debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the Apollo
Acquisition and financing, increase in selling, general and
administrative expense related to the annual management fee paid
to Apollo, and elimination for certain historical intercompany
balances which were not acquired as part of the Apollo
Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,312,723
|
|
|
|
|
1,395,056
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
13,102
|
|
|
|
|
(9,476
|
)
|
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to
represent the consolidated results of operations the Company
would have reported had the Apollo Acquisition been completed at
January 1, 2006, nor are they necessarily indicative of
future results.
Xstrata
Acquisition
The total investment for the Xstrata Acquisition was $1,167,393,
which consisted of $950,000 consideration paid for the
Companys stock and $200,000 of assumed debt, plus $17,393
representing Xstratas share of the Companys earnings
during the period of its 19.9% ownership of the Company. For the
purposes of applying push-down accounting to the two individual
steps of this acquisition, management has determined that the
purchase consideration applicable to the acquisition of the
19.9% ownership interest was $115,000, with the consideration
applicable to the acquisition of the remaining 80.1% being
$1,035,000.
Management recorded 19.9% of the assets and liabilities at their
fair value on the date the 19.9% ownership interest was acquired
in the first phase of the step acquisition. For the second phase
of the step acquisition on August 16, 2006, the Company
recorded the remaining 80.1% of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at fair market value at that date.
F-11
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the allocation of the total
consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as
of August 15, 2006, which was the date at which Xstrata
acquired effective control of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
129,491
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
160,363
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
|
|
176,569
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
683,525
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
284,338
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
53,001
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,120
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(222,426
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(93,282
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(41,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price assigned
|
|
|
1,150,000
|
|
Long-term debt to related parties
|
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital and capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill from the Xstrata Acquisition is not deductible for tax
purposes.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to previously issued
financial statements in order to conform to the 2008
presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net
income or net cash flows.
Revenue
recognition
Revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss pass to
customers in accordance with contract terms. The Company
periodically enters into supply contracts with customers and
receives advance payments for product to be delivered in future
periods. These advance payments are recorded as deferred
revenue, and revenue is recognized as shipments are made and
title, ownership, and risk of loss pass to the customer during
the term of the contracts.
Cash
equivalents
Cash equivalents comprise cash and short-term highly liquid
investments with initial maturities of three months or less.
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount
and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
the Companys best estimate of the amount of probable
credit losses in the Companys existing accounts
receivable; however, changes in circumstances relating to
accounts receivable may result in a requirement for additional
allowances in the future. The Company determines the allowance
based on historical write-off experience, current market trends
and, for larger accounts, the ability to pay outstanding
balances. Account balances are charged against the allowance
after all collection efforts have been exhausted and the
potential for recovery is considered remote.
F-12
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market
(LCM). The Company uses the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method of valuing the majority of
the Companys inventories, including raw materials, work in
progress and finished goods.
The remaining inventories (principally supplies) are stated at
cost using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method.
Property,
plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Betterments,
renewals and repairs that extend the life of the asset are
capitalized; other maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred. Assets, asset retirement obligations and
accumulated depreciation accounts are relieved for dispositions
or retirements with resulting gains or losses recorded as
selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statements of operations. Depreciation is based on the estimated
service lives of the assets computed principally by the
straight-line method for financial reporting purposes.
Impairment
of long-lived assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived
assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS No. 144). SFAS No. 144
requires periodic assessment of certain long-lived assets for
possible impairment when events or circumstances indicate that
the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets
are grouped and evaluated for impairment at the lowest levels
for which there are identifiable cash flows that are independent
of the cash flows of other groups of assets. If it is determined
that the carrying amounts of such long-lived assets are not
recoverable, the assets are written down to their estimated fair
value.
The Company transfers net property and equipment to assets held
for sale when a plan to dispose of the assets has been committed
to by management. Assets transferred to assets held for sale are
recorded at the lesser of their estimated fair value less
estimated costs to sell or carrying amount. Subsequent to the
date that an asset is held for sale, depreciation expense is not
recorded.
Self-insurance
The Company is primarily self-insured for workers
compensation. The self-insurance liability is determined based
on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet
reported. Based on actuarially determined estimates and discount
rates of 3.6% in 2007 and 1.3% in 2008, as of December 31,
2007 and 2008, the Company had $2,990 and $3,299, respectively,
of accrued liabilities and $7,182 and $9,159, respectively, of
other long-term liabilities related to these claims.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2008, the Company has placed
$3,612 and $3,412, respectively, in a restricted cash account to
secure the payment of workers compensation obligations.
This restricted cash is included in non-current other assets in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Environmental
expenditures
Environmental expenditures related to current operations are
expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures related to
an existing condition caused by past operations, which do not
contribute to current or future period revenue generation, are
expensed. Environmental liabilities are provided when
assessments or remedial efforts are probable and the related
amounts can be reasonably estimated. The Company had no reserves
for remediation activities associated with leased properties at
December 31, 2007 or 2008.
F-13
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Goodwill
and other intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition consideration paid
over the fair value of identifiable net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142), goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are
reviewed for impairment at least annually, in the fourth
quarter, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain triggering
events.
Goodwill is allocated among and evaluated for impairment at the
reporting unit level, which, in the Companys circumstances
are the same as its operating segments: upstream and downstream.
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment using a two-step
process provided by SFAS No. 142. The first step is to
compare the fair value of each of its reporting units to their
respective book values, including goodwill. If the fair value of
a reporting unit exceeds its book value, reporting unit goodwill
is not considered impaired and the second step of the impairment
test is not required. If the book value of a reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test
is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the impairment test compares the implied fair
value of the reporting units goodwill with the book value
of that goodwill. If the book value of the reporting units
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same
manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business
combination. See Notes 8 and 9 for further information.
Intangible assets with a definite life (primarily customer
relationships) are amortized over their expected lives and are
tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate
that a carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Investments
in affiliates
The Company holds 50% interests in a Gramercy, Louisiana
refinery, Gramercy Alumina LLC, and in St. Ann Bauxite Ltd., a
Jamaican bauxite mining partnership. The Companys
interests in these affiliates provide the ability to exercise
significant influence, but not control, over the operating and
financial decisions of the affiliates; accordingly, the Company
uses the equity method of accounting in accordance with
Accounting Principles Bulletin (APB) 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock,
for its investments in and share of earnings or losses of
those affiliates. See Note 21 for further information.
The Company considers whether the fair values of any of its
equity method investments have declined below carrying value
whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate
that recorded values may not be recoverable. If the Company
considered any such decline to be other than temporary (based on
various factors, including historical financial results, product
development activities and the overall health of the
affiliates industry), a write-down to estimated fair value
would be recorded.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Financial
instruments
The Companys financial instruments with third parties, as
defined by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
(SFAS No. 107), consist of cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, derivative assets and
liabilities, advances due from parent, accounts payable and
long-term debt due
F-14
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to third parties and a related party. The following table
presents the carrying values and fair values of the
Companys related party and third-party debt outstanding as
of December 31, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2014
|
|
|
217,922
|
|
|
|
180,400
|
|
|
|
|
218,158
|
|
|
|
30,800
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
408,000
|
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
153,000
|
|
Term B loan due 2014
|
|
|
423,750
|
|
|
|
423,750
|
|
|
|
|
393,450
|
|
|
|
393,024
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,151,672
|
|
|
|
1,012,150
|
|
|
|
|
1,346,608
|
|
|
|
801,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining financial instruments are carried at amounts that
approximate fair value.
Deferred
financing costs
Costs relating to obtaining debt are capitalized and amortized
over the term of the related debt using the straight-line
method, which approximates the effective interest method. When
all or a portion of a loan is repaid, an associated amount of
unamortized financing costs are removed from the related
accounts and charged to interest expense.
Concentration
of credit risk
Financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents and
accounts receivable, expose the Company to market and credit
risks which, at times, may be concentrated with certain groups
of counterparties. The financial condition of such
counterparties is evaluated periodically. The Company generally
does not require collateral for trade receivables. Full
performance is anticipated. Cash investments are held with major
financial institutions and trading companies including
registered broker dealers.
Income
taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability
method, whereby deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect
of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. On January 1, 2007, the
Company changed its method of accounting for income tax
contingencies in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48. In evaluating the
Companys ability to realize deferred tax assets, the
Company uses judgment in considering the relative impact of
negative and positive evidence. The weight given to the
potential effect of negative and positive evidence is
commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively
verified. Based on the weight of evidence, both
negative and positive, if it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be
realized, a valuation allowance is established.
Shipping
and handling costs
Shipping and handling costs are classified as a component of
cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations.
Pensions
and other post-retirement benefits
The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan, which is
accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions
(SFAS No. 87), and
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Retirement Plans,
(SFAS No. 158). These standards
F-15
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
require that expenses and liabilities recognized in financial
statements be actuarially calculated. Under these accounting
standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of
benefit obligations and the future performance of plan assets.
According to SFAS No. 158, the Company is required to
recognize the funded status of the plans as an asset or
liability in the financial statements, measure defined benefit
post-retirement plan assets and obligations as of the end of the
employers fiscal year, and recognize the change in the
funded status of defined benefit postretirement plans in other
comprehensive income. The primary assumptions used in
calculating pension expense and liability are related to the
discount rate at which the future obligations are discounted to
value the liability, expected rate of return on plan assets, and
projected salary increases. These rates are estimated annually
as of December 31.
Other post-retirement benefits are accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for
Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
(SFAS No. 106). Pension and
post-retirement benefit obligations are actuarially calculated
using managements best estimates and based on expected
service periods, salary increases and retirement ages of
employees. Pension and post-retirement benefit expense includes
the actuarially computed cost of benefits earned during the
current service periods, the interest cost on accrued
obligations, the expected return on plan assets based on fair
market value and the straight-line amortization of net actuarial
gains and losses and adjustments due to plan amendments. All net
actuarial gains and losses are amortized over the expected
average remaining service life of the employees.
Post-employment
benefits
The Company provides certain benefits to former or inactive
employees after employment but before retirement and accrues for
the related cost over the service lives of the employees as
required by SFAS No. 112, Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
(SFAS No. 112). Those benefits
include, among others, disability, severance, and workers
compensation. The Company is self-insured for these liabilities.
At December 31, 2008, the Company carried a liability
totaling $1,065 for these benefits, based on actuarially
determined estimates. These estimates have not been discounted
due to the short duration of the future payments.
Asset
retirement obligations
The Company is subject to environmental regulations which create
legal obligations related to the disposal of certain spent pot
liners used in the Companys smelter facility operations.
The Company accounts for its asset retirement obligations in
accordance with SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations (SFAS No. 143)
and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations (FIN 47), an Interpretation of
SFAS No. 143. Under these standards, the Company
recognizes liabilities, at fair value, for existing legal asset
retirement obligations. Such liabilities are adjusted for
accretion costs and revisions in estimated cash flows. The
related asset retirement costs are capitalized as increases to
the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and
accumulated depreciation on these capitalized costs is
recognized.
Share-based
compensation
Prior to August 16, 2006, Falconbridge Limited granted
stock options to key employees of the Company, to purchase
common stock in Falconbridge Limited. The fair value of these
stock options were recorded by the Company as compensation
expense over their vesting period with corresponding increases
to capital in excess of par value. Falconbridge Limited
determined the fair value of these stock options in accordance
with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS No. 123), using a
Black-Scholes valuation model. Expenses previously recorded for
which the related option has been forfeited were reversed in the
period of forfeiture.
F-16
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On August 16, 2006, Xstrata acquired all of the outstanding
common stock of Falconbridge Limited. Prior to the acquisition,
all outstanding stock options were exercised.
On May 29, 2007, the Board of Directors of Noranda approved
the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Noranda (the
Incentive Plan). Currently, 1,500,000 shares of
Noranda common stock have been reserved under the Incentive
Plan. A total of 687,678 shares of non-qualified stock
options were granted to certain employees of the Company on the
date the Incentive Plan was adopted. The fair value of each
employees options with graded vesting is estimated using
either the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model or a
path-dependent lattice model, in accordance with the fair-value
based method of SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R).
Derivative
instruments and hedging activities
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS No. 133), as amended.
For derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow
hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument is initially recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income as a separate component of
stockholders equity and subsequently reclassified into
earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or
loss is reported in loss (gain) on derivative instruments and
hedging activities immediately. For derivative instruments not
designated as hedging instruments, changes in the fair values
are reported in loss (gain) on derivative instruments and
hedging activities in the period of change.
In April 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP)
FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of
Amounts Related to Certain Contracts (FSP
FIN 39-1).
FSP
FIN 39-1
permits entities that enter into master netting arrangements
with the same counterparty as part of their derivative
transactions to offset in their financial statements net
derivative positions against the fair value of amounts
recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the
obligation to return cash collateral under those arrangements.
The effects of FSP
FIN 39-1
were applied by adjusting all financial statements presented
beginning January 1, 2008.
Impact
of recently issued accounting standards
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141R). According to
transition rules of the new standard, the Company will apply it
prospectively to any business combinations with an acquisition
date on or after January 1, 2009, except that certain
changes in SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, may apply to acquisitions which were completed prior
to January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted.
SFAS No. 141R amends SFAS No. 109 to require
the acquirer to recognize changes of the valuation allowance on
its previously existing deferred tax assets because of the
business combination in the income from continuing operation.
For 2008, $11,935 of valuation allowances, if recognized, would
have resulted in an adjustment to goodwill. However, for years
beginning after December 31, 2008, SFAS No. 141R
will require subsequent changes to valuation allowances recorded
in purchase accounting to be recorded as income tax expense
(regardless of when the acquisition occurred).
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements An Amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160).
SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. According to transition
rules of the new standard, we will apply it for the
Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The
Company is currently evaluating the effect of
SFAS No. 160 on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
F-17
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company adopted portions of SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), on
January 1, 2008. Issued in February 2008,
FSP 157-2,
Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157
(FSP 157-2),
deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157, for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities which are
recognized or disclosed on a non-recurring basis to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities which are recognized or
disclosed at fair value on a non recurring basis on its
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. See Note 15 for further discussion.
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and
financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses
on items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. The
implementation of this standard did not have a material impact
on the Companys condensed consolidated financial position
and results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161
amends and expands the disclosure requirements for derivative
instruments and about hedging activities with the intent to
provide users of financial statements with an enhanced
understanding of how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies
for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit risk-related contingent features in
derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 does not change
accounting for derivative instruments and is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008.
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP
No. FAS 132(R)-1), to provide guidance on an
employers disclosures about plan assets of a defined
benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP
No. FAS 132(R)-1 does not change the accounting for
defined benefit pensions or other postretirement plans; however,
it expands on the disclosure of investment strategy, plan asset
categories, valuation techniques, and concentrations of risk
within the plan assets. FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 applies
to an employer that is subject to the disclosure requirements of
FAS 132(R), Employers Disclosures about Pensions
and Other Postretirement Benefits, and is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.
|
|
2.
|
NEW
MADRID POWER OUTAGE
|
During the week of January 26, 2009, power supply to
Norandas New Madrid smelter, which supplies all of its
upstream businesss production, was interrupted numerous
times because of a severe ice storm in Southeastern Missouri. As
a result of the outage, Noranda lost approximately 75% of the
smelter capacity. The smelting production facility is being
cleaned out, inspected, and restarted. Based on Norandas
current assessment, the Company expects that the smelter could
return to full production during second half of 2009 with
partial capacity phased in during the intervening months. In
addition, with the current available capacity and re-melt
capability within the facility, Noranda expects to service its
customer base with minimal interruptions. The New Madrid power
outage and temporary lost capacity will have no impact on
Norandas ability to serve customers for the downstream
foil operations.
Because of the desire to restart production as quickly as
possible and the need for Norandas skilled, dedicated
workforce during the repair and restart process, Noranda expects
to retain as many jobs as possible with a goal of maintaining
all jobs throughout the restart process. Noranda has notified
its insurance carrier
F-18
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and is diligently working through the claim process. The Company
has received insurance proceeds of $4,200 in pre-funding and has
a request for an additional $800 pending. In addition, the
Company holds pot line freeze insurance covering up to $77,000
of losses, which management expects to apply to costs of
restorating and restarting pot lines. The Company believes that
insurance will cover a substantial portion, if not all, of the
cost of restoring capacity; however, there can be no assurance
that the full amount of the claim submitted by Noranda will be
reimbursed or the timing of such reimbursement.
In December 2008, Noranda announced a company-wide workforce and
business process restructuring that will reduce Norandas
operating costs, conserve liquidity and improve operating
efficiencies. This restructuring is expected to generate cash
cost savings and operating efficiencies through the work force
reduction of approximately $23 million annually (unaudited).
The work force restructuring plan involves a total staff
reduction of approximately 338 employees and contract
workers. The reduction in the employee work force includes 228
affected employees in Norandas upstream business. These
reductions were substantially completed during the fourth
quarter of 2008. The reductions at the downstream facilities in
Huntingdon, Tennessee, Salisbury, North Carolina, and Newport,
Arkansas include 96 affected employees.
The following table summarizes the impact of the restructuring:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Window
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Benefits(a)
|
|
|
Benefits(b)
|
|
|
Charge(c)
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
6,353
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
7,375
|
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
Benefits Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
8,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Window benefits are recorded in pension liability on the
consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(b) |
|
One-time termination benefits are recorded in accrued
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(c) |
|
The total restructuring charge of $9,145 is included in the
consolidated statement of operations as selling, general and
administrative expenses. |
F-19
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
|
Statements
of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent and a related party
|
|
|
16,321
|
|
|
|
|
9,440
|
|
|
|
16,016
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
69,853
|
|
|
|
91,148
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent and a related party
|
|
|
(3,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,381
|
)
|
|
|
(8,829
|
)
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,025
|
)
|
|
|
(1,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,610
|
)
|
|
|
(1,994
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
12,672
|
|
|
|
|
6,327
|
|
|
|
6,235
|
|
|
|
|
67,243
|
|
|
|
89,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
15,485
|
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
7,371
|
|
|
|
|
51,519
|
|
|
|
87,175
|
|
Income taxes (refunded) paid, net
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,464
|
)
|
|
|
20,148
|
|
|
|
|
21,583
|
|
|
|
48,071
|
|
|
|
5.
|
CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
75,630
|
|
|
|
8,107
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
75,630
|
|
|
|
184,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly
liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at
the date of purchase. The Company places its temporary cash
investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At
times such cash may be in excess of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limit. At
December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $75,254 of
cash in excess of FDIC insured limits. During 2008 FDIC limits
increased and at December 31, 2008, all cash balances,
excluding the money market funds, are fully insured by the FDIC.
The Companys money market funds are invested entirely in
U.S. Treasury securities, which do not expose the Company
to significant credit risk. The Company considers its
investments in money market funds to be available for use in its
operations. The Company reports money market funds at fair
value, which approximates amortized cost.
F-20
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of inventories, stated at the lower of LIFO cost
or market, are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
50,683
|
|
|
|
55,311
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
43,190
|
|
|
|
37,945
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
46,070
|
|
|
|
28,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory subject to LIFO valuation, at FIFO cost
|
|
|
139,943
|
|
|
|
121,972
|
|
LIFO Adjustment
|
|
|
34,015
|
|
|
|
40,379
|
|
Less lower of LIFO cost or market reserve
|
|
|
(14,323
|
)
|
|
|
(51,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory at lower of LIFO cost or market
|
|
|
159,635
|
|
|
|
111,032
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
20,615
|
|
|
|
27,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
180,250
|
|
|
|
139,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The LCM reserve is based on the Companys best estimates of
product sales prices as indicated by the price of aluminum in
commodity markets at year end and customer demand patterns,
which are subject to general economic conditions. It is at least
reasonably possible that the estimates used by the Company to
determine its provision for inventory losses will be materially
different from the actual amounts or results. These differences
could result in materially higher than expected inventory
losses, which could have a material effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition in the near term.
Work-in-process
and finished goods inventories consist of the cost of materials,
labor and production overhead costs.
The Company uses the LIFO method of valuing raw materials,
work-in process and finished goods inventories. An actual
valuation of these components under the LIFO method is made at
the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at
that time. During the period from May 18, 2007 to
December 31, 2007, the Company recorded a LIFO liquidation
loss of $3,282 due to a decrement in inventory quantities.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
recorded a LIFO liquidation loss of $10,596 due to a decrement
in inventory quantities.
F-21
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Lives
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,921
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
10 - 47
|
|
|
|
85,566
|
|
|
|
87,155
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 - 50
|
|
|
|
604,019
|
|
|
|
632,834
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,524
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723,109
|
|
|
|
754,405
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,298
|
)
|
|
|
(154,782
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,811
|
|
|
|
599,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales includes depreciation expense of the following
amount in each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
23,636
|
|
Period from August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
32,509
|
|
Period from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
28,639
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
67,374
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
94,531
|
|
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition consideration paid
over the fair value of identifiable net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets are not amortized, but are reviewed for
impairment at least annually, in the fourth quarter, or upon the
occurrence of certain triggering events. The Company evaluates
goodwill for impairment using a two-step process provided by
SFAS No. 142.
The following presents changes in the carrying amount of
goodwill for the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at August 15, 2006 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
210,678
|
|
|
|
73,123
|
|
|
|
283,801
|
|
Changes in purchase price allocations
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
211,215
|
|
|
|
73,123
|
|
|
|
284,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 18, 2007 (Successor)
|
|
|
120,890
|
|
|
|
136,599
|
|
|
|
257,489
|
|
Changes in purchase price allocations
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
|
|
(5,330
|
)
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 (Successor)
|
|
|
124,853
|
|
|
|
131,269
|
|
|
|
256,122
|
|
Changes in purchase price allocations
|
|
|
4,588
|
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
Tax adjustment
|
|
|
8,269
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,500
|
)
|
|
|
(25,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
137,710
|
|
|
|
105,066
|
|
|
|
242,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Based upon the final evaluation of the fair value of the
Companys tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the closing date of the Apollo
Acquisition, we recorded valuation adjustments that increased
goodwill and decreased property, plant and employment $4,124 in
March 2008.
In accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 93-7
(EITF 93-7),
Uncertainties Related to Income Taxes in a Purchase Business
Combinations, adjustments upon resolution of income tax
uncertainties that predate or result from a purchase business
combination should be recorded as an increase or decrease to
goodwill, if any. Following the guidance of
EITF 93-7,
the Company recorded a $10,989 adjustment to increase goodwill
in June 2008 to account for the difference between the estimated
deferred tax asset for the carryover basis of acquired federal
net operating loss and minimum tax credit carryforwards and the
final deferred tax asset for such net operating loss and minimum
tax credit carryforwards. In December 2008, the Company recorded
a $2,959 adjustment to decrease goodwill to reflect the final
determination of taxes owed from the Predecessor period.
At October 1, 2008, no impairment was indicated for either
reporting unit in the first step of the Companys October 1
annual impairment test. However, during the fourth quarter as
the impact of the global economic contraction began to be
realized in both reporting units and as the Company announced
its workforce and business process restructuring (See
Note 3), additional impairment testing was necessary at
December 31, 2008. The additional testing resulted in a
$25,500 impairment write down of goodwill in the downstream
business, reflecting continued weakness in end markets and the
view that the acute decline in foil demand continues to put
pressure on pricing as industry capacity utilization is
operating well below historic levels. The Companys
SFAS No. 142 analyses included assumptions about
future profitability and cash flows of its reporting units,
which the Company believes to reflect its best estimates at the
date the valuations were performed (October 1 and
December 31.) The estimates were based on information that
was known or knowable at the date of the valuations, and it is
at least reasonably possible that the assumptions employed by
the Company will be materially different from the actual amounts
or results, and that additional impairment charges for either or
both reporting units will be necessary in 2009.
|
|
9.
|
OTHER
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortizable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names (indefinite life)
|
|
|
20,494
|
|
|
|
20,494
|
|
Amortizable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships (15 year weighted-average life)
|
|
|
51,288
|
|
|
|
51,288
|
|
Other (2.5 year weighted-average life)
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,471
|
|
|
|
72,471
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(2,335
|
)
|
|
|
(6,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
|
|
70,136
|
|
|
|
66,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company recognized in amortization expense related to
intangible assets the following amounts in each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
|
|
|
667
|
|
Period from August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006
|
|
|
332
|
|
Period from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
|
|
|
998
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
3,769
|
|
Expected amortization of intangible assets for each of the next
five years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
|
|
10.
|
DETAILS
OF CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS
|
Accounts receivable, net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
97,394
|
|
|
|
76,031
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(1,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
97,169
|
|
|
|
74,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net of amortization
|
|
|
33,777
|
|
|
|
27,736
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
25,243
|
|
|
|
15,727
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21,196
|
|
|
|
26,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
80,216
|
|
|
|
69,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
13,331
|
|
|
|
16,301
|
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
|
3,299
|
|
Asset retirement and site restoration obligations
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
Due to Xstrata
|
|
|
6,980
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Pension liability and other
|
|
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
|
31,742
|
|
|
|
32,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Asset retirement and site restoration obligations
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
|
|
6,602
|
|
Workers compensation benefits
|
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
|
9,159
|
|
FIN 48 liability
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
9,560
|
|
Deferred compensation and other
|
|
|
7,390
|
|
|
|
14,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
29,730
|
|
|
|
39,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
In April 2007, the Predecessor and its parent settled
intercompany receivables and payables, and the Company
transferred to its parent all of the stock of various
subsidiaries, including American Racing Equipment of Kentucky,
Inc. (ARE) and GCA Lease Holding, Inc. In connection
with these transactions, the Predecessors parent made
capital contributions of $128,600 (of which $101,256 was in
cash) and received a dividend of $26,541 (of which $25,000 was
in cash).
Pursuant to a transaction fee agreement between the Company and
Apollo, the Company paid Apollo approximately $12,349 at the
consummation of the Apollo Acquisition for various services
performed by Apollo and its affiliates in connection with the
Apollo Acquisition and to reimburse Apollo for related expenses.
In connection with the Apollo Acquisition, the Company entered
into a management consulting and advisory services agreement
with Apollo and its affiliates for the provision of certain
structuring, management and advisory services for an initial
term ending on December 31, 2018. The Company also agreed
to indemnify Apollo and its affiliates and their directors,
officers, and representatives for potential losses relating to
the services contemplated under these agreements. Terms of the
agreement provide for annual fees of $2,000, payable in one lump
sum annually. The Company records the fees within selling,
general and administrative expenses in the Companys
statements of operations.
F-25
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounts payable to affiliates consist of the following and are
due in the ordinary course of business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
Gramercy Alumina LLC
|
|
|
27,571
|
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
The Company purchased alumina in transactions with Gramercy
Alumina LLC, a 50% owned joint venture with Century Aluminum
Company, and at prices which management believes approximated
market values. Purchases from Gramercy Alumina LLC were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
94,369
|
|
Period from August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
40,614
|
|
Period from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
51,731
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
87,120
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
163,548
|
|
The Company sells rolled aluminum products to Goodman Global,
Inc., a previous portfolio company of Apollo which was sold in
February 2008, under a two-year sales contract that extends
through 2009. The Company also sells rolled aluminum products to
Berry Plastics Corporation, a portfolio company of Apollo, under
an annual sales contract. Sales to these entities were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodman
|
|
Berry Plastics
|
|
|
|
|
Global, Inc.
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
38,955
|
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
60,423
|
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of long-term debt is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Noranda:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2014 (unamortized discount of
$2,078 and $1,842 at December 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively)
|
|
|
217,922
|
|
|
|
218,158
|
|
Noranda AcquisitionCo:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term B loan due 2014
|
|
|
423,750
|
|
|
|
393,450
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,151,672
|
|
|
|
1,346,608
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(30,300
|
)
|
|
|
(32,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121,372
|
|
|
|
1,314,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Secured
Credit Facilities
In connection with the Apollo Acquisition, Noranda AcquisitionCo
entered into senior secured credit facilities on May 18,
2007, which consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $500,000 term B loan with a maturity of seven years, which was
fully drawn on May 18, 2007, of which $76,250 and $106,550
of which had been repaid at December 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
a $250,000 revolving credit facility with a maturity of six
years, which includes borrowing capacity available for letters
of credit and for borrowing on
same-day
notice. Outstanding letter of credit amounts consisted of $3,500
and $7,012 at December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
|
The senior secured credit facilities permit Noranda
AcquisitionCo to incur incremental term and revolving loans
under such facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to
$200,000. Incurrence of such incremental indebtedness under the
senior secured facilities is subject to, among other things,
Noranda AcquisitionCos compliance with a Senior Secured
Net Debt to EBITDA ratio (in each case as defined in the credit
agreement governing the term B loan) of 2.75 to 1.0 until
December 31, 2008 and 3.0 to 1.0 thereafter. At
December 31, 2007 and 2008, Noranda AcquisitionCo had no
commitments from any lender to provide such incremental loans.
The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by the
Company and by all of the existing and future direct and
indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of Noranda
AcquisitionCo and are secured by first priority pledges of all
the equity interests in Noranda AcquisitionCo and all of the
equity interests in each of the existing and future direct and
indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of Noranda
AcquisitionCo. The senior secured credit facilities are also
secured by first priority security interests in substantially
all of the assets of Noranda AcquisitionCo, as well as those of
each of its existing and future direct and indirect wholly owned
domestic subsidiaries.
Term B
loan
Interest on the term B loan is based either on LIBOR or the
prime rate, at Noranda AcquisitionCos election, in either
case plus an applicable margin (2.00% over LIBOR at
December 31, 2007 and 2008) that depends upon the
ratio of Noranda AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to
its EBITDA (in each case as defined in the credit agreement
governing the term B loan). The interest rate at
December 31, 2007 and 2008 was 6.91% and 4.24%,
respectively. Interest on the term B loan is payable no less
frequently than quarterly, and such loan amortizes at a rate of
1% per annum, payable quarterly, beginning on September 30,
2007. On June 28, 2007, Noranda AcquisitionCo made an
optional prepayment of $75,000 on the term B loan. The optional
prepayment was applied to reduce in direct order the remaining
amortization installments in forward order of maturity, which
served to effectively eliminate the 1% per annum required
principal payment.
Noranda AcquisitionCo is required to prepay amounts outstanding
under the credit agreement based on an amount equal to 50% of
the Companys Excess Cash Flow (as calculated in accordance
with the terms of the credit agreement governing the term B
loan) within 95 days after the end of each fiscal year
after 2008. The required percentage of Noranda
AcquisitionCos Excess Cash Flow payable to the lenders
under the credit agreement governing the term B loan shall be
reduced from 50% to either 25% or 0% based on Noranda
AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to EBITDA ratio (in
each case as defined in the credit agreement governing the term
B loan) or the amount of term B loan that has been repaid. This
amount is $30,300 and $32,300 at December 31, 2007 and
2008, respectively.
Revolving
credit facility
In late September 2008, in light of concerns about instability
in the financial markets and general business conditions, in
order to preserve its liquidity, the Company borrowed $225,000
under the revolving
F-27
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
portion of its senior credit facility and invested the proceeds
in highly liquid cash equivalents, including
U.S. Government treasury bills and money market funds
holding only U.S. government securities, with the remainder
held in the Companys bank accounts.
Interest on the revolving credit facility is based either on
LIBOR or the prime rate, at Noranda AcquisitionCos
election, in either case plus an applicable margin (2.00% over
LIBOR at December 31, 2007 and 2008) that depends upon
the ratio of Noranda AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net
Debt to its EBITDA (in each case as defined in the applicable
credit facility) and is payable no less frequently than
quarterly. The interest rate at December 31, 2008 was
2.46%. The revolving credit facility was undrawn on the closing
of the Apollo Acquisition and on December 31, 2007. As of
December 31, 2008, $225,000 had been drawn on the revolving
credit facility. Noranda AcquisitionCo has outstanding letters
of credit totaling $3,500 and $7,012 under the revolving credit
facility at December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and
$246,500 and $17,988 was available for borrowing under this
facility at December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under
the revolving credit facility, Noranda AcquisitionCo is required
to pay:
|
|
|
|
|
a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving credit
facility in respect of unutilized commitments at a rate equal to
0.5% per annum subject to step down if certain financial tests
are met; and
|
|
|
|
additional fees related to outstanding letters of credit under
the revolving credit facility at a rate of 2.0% per annum.
|
Certain
Covenants
The senior secured credit facilities contain various restrictive
covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict Noranda
AcquisitionCos ability to incur indebtedness or liens,
make investments or declare or pay any dividends. The company
was in compliance with all restrictive covenants at
December 31, 2007 and 2008.
AcquisitionCo
Notes
In addition to the senior secured credit facilities, on
May 18, 2007, Noranda AcquisitionCo issued $510,000 Senior
Floating Rate Notes (the AcquisitionCo Notes). The
AcquisitionCo Notes mature on May 15, 2015. The proceeds of
the AcquisitionCo Notes were used to finance the Apollo
Acquisition and to pay related fees and expenses. The initial
interest payment on the AcquisitionCo Notes was paid on
November 15, 2007, entirely in cash; for any subsequent
period through May 15, 2011, Noranda AcquisitionCo may
elect to pay interest: (i) entirely in cash, (ii) by
increasing the principal amount of the AcquisitionCo Notes or by
issuing new notes (the AcquisitionCo PIK interest)
or (iii) 50% in cash and 50% in AcquisitionCo PIK interest.
For any subsequent period after May 15, 2011, Noranda
AcquisitionCo must pay all interest in cash. The AcquisitionCo
Notes cash interest accrues at six-month LIBOR plus 4.0% per
annum, reset semi-annually, and the AcquisitionCo PIK interest,
if any, will accrue at six-month LIBOR plus 4.75% per annum,
reset semi-annually. The cash interest rate was 8.80% at
December 31, 2007 and 7.35% at December 31, 2008.
The AcquisitionCo Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed
on a senior unsecured, joint and several basis by the existing
and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of Noranda
AcquisitionCo that guarantee the senior secured credit
facilities. In addition, on September 7, 2007, Noranda
fully and unconditionally guaranteed the AcquisitionCo Notes on
a joint and several basis along with the existing guarantors.
The guarantee by Noranda is not required by the indenture
governing the AcquisitionCo Notes and may be released by Noranda
at any time. Noranda has no independent operations or any assets
other than its
F-28
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
interest in Noranda AcquisitionCo. Noranda AcquisitionCo is a
wholly owned finance subsidiary of Noranda with no operations
independent of its subsidiaries which guarantee the
AcquisitionCo Notes.
In light of business conditions present beginning in late
September 2008, along with the Companys current and future
cash needs, management has notified the trustee for the HoldCo
and Acquisition Co bondholders of its election to pay the
May 15, 2009 interest payment entirely by increasing the
principal amount of those notes.
The indenture governing the AcquisitionCo Notes limits Noranda
AcquisitionCos and Norandas ability, among other
things, to (i) incur additional indebtedness;
(ii) declare or pay dividends or make other distributions
or repurchase or redeem Norandas stock; (iii) make
investments; (iv) sell assets, including capital stock of
restricted subsidiaries; (v) enter into agreements
restricting Norandas subsidiaries ability to pay
dividends; (vi) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise
dispose of all or substantially all of Norandas assets;
(vii) enter into transactions with Norandas
affiliates; and (viii) incur liens.
HoldCo
Notes
On June 7, 2007, Noranda issued Senior Floating Rate Notes
(the HoldCo Notes) in aggregate principal amount of
$220,000, with a discount of 1.0% of the principal amount. The
HoldCo Notes mature on November 15, 2014. The HoldCo Notes
are not guaranteed. The initial interest payment on the HoldCo
Notes was paid on November 15, 2007, in cash; for any
subsequent period through May 15, 2012, Noranda may elect
to pay interest: (i) entirely in cash, (ii) by
increasing the principal amount of the HoldCo Notes or by
issuing new notes (the HoldCo PIK interest) or
(iii) 50% in cash and 50% in HoldCo PIK interest. For any
subsequent period after May 15, 2012, Noranda must pay all
interest in cash. The HoldCo Notes cash interest accrues at
six-month LIBOR plus 5.75% per annum, reset semi-annually, and
the HoldCo PIK interest, if any, will accrue at six-month LIBOR
plus 6.5% per annum, reset semi-annually. The cash interest rate
was 10.55% at December 31, 2007 and 9.10% at
December 31, 2008.
As discussed above, management has notified the trustee for the
HoldCo and AcquisitionCo bondholders of its election to pay the
May 15, 2009 interest payment entirely by increasing the
principal amount of those notes.
The indenture governing the HoldCo Notes limits Noranda
AcquisitionCos and Norandas ability, among other
things, to (i) incur additional indebtedness;
(ii) declare or pay dividends or make other distributions
or repurchase or redeem Norandas stock; (iii) make
investments; (iv) sell assets, including capital stock of
restricted subsidiaries; (v) enter into agreements
restricting Norandas subsidiaries ability to pay
dividends; (vi) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise
dispose of all or substantially all of Norandas assets;
(vii) enter into transactions with Norandas
affiliates; and (viii) incur liens.
Subsequent to December 31, 2008, the Company acquired
$131,835 aggregate principal amount of HoldCo notes for an
aggregate purchase price of $32,959.
|
|
13.
|
PENSIONS
AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
Pension
benefits
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans for hourly
and salaried employees.
The Companys funding policy is to contribute annually an
amount based on actuarial and economic assumptions designed to
achieve adequate funding of the projected benefit obligations
and to meet the minimum funding requirements of ERISA. In
addition, the Company provides supplemental executive retirement
benefits (SERP) for certain executive officers. The Company uses
a measurement date of December 31 to determine the pension and
other post-retirement benefits (OPEB) liabilities.
F-29
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 4, 2008, the Company announced a company wide
workforce and business process restructuring designed to reduce
operating costs, conserve liquidity and improve operating
efficiencies. Refer to Note 3 for further information on
the restructuring. As a result, the Company offered special
voluntary termination benefits (window benefits) to
employees that (1) met certain criteria for early
retirement and (2) accepted the window benefit by the
required deadline of December 19, 2008.
The Company has accounted for the window benefits in accordance
with SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits
(SFAS No. 88). For the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company recognized a termination
benefit loss of $2,127 and curtailment loss of $1,124 within net
periodic benefit cost.
Plan
assets
The Companys pension plans weighted-average asset
allocations at December 31, 2007 and 2008 and the target
allocation for 2009, by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
The Company seeks a balanced return on plan assets through a
diversified investment strategy.
Plan assets consist principally of equities and fixed income
accounts. In developing the long-term rate of return assumption
for plan assets, management evaluates the plans historical
cumulative actual returns over several periods, which have all
been in excess of related broad indices, as well as long-term
inflation assumptions. Management anticipates that the
plans investments will continue to generate long-term
returns of at least 8.25% per annum.
Other
post-retirement benefits
The Company also sponsors other post-retirement benefit plans
for certain employees. The Company sponsored post-retirement
benefits include life insurance benefits and health insurance
benefits and are funded as retirees submit claims. These health
insurance benefits only cover eight employees. The OPEB benefit
obligation included estimated health insurance benefits of $576,
$672 and $206 at December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. The healthcare cost trend rates used in developing
the periodic cost and the projected benefit obligation are 9%
grading to 5% over four years.
F-30
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The change in benefit obligation and change in plan assets are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
|
217,379
|
|
|
|
|
224,300
|
|
|
|
242,388
|
|
|
|
|
244,199
|
|
|
|
259,843
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
8,234
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
|
|
5,364
|
|
|
|
|
9,127
|
|
|
|
16,474
|
|
Plan changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
|
5,879
|
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
(Gains) losses
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(5,692
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,957
|
)
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,369
|
)
|
|
|
(11,327
|
)
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
|
224,300
|
|
|
|
|
242,388
|
|
|
|
244,199
|
|
|
|
|
259,843
|
|
|
|
275,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
200,966
|
|
|
|
|
203,818
|
|
|
|
213,910
|
|
|
|
|
219,096
|
|
|
|
220,761
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
|
12,416
|
|
|
|
8,148
|
|
|
|
|
(1,148
|
)
|
|
|
(67,328
|
)
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
|
|
|
8,182
|
|
|
|
18,256
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(5,692
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,957
|
)
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,369
|
)
|
|
|
(11,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
|
203,818
|
|
|
|
|
213,910
|
|
|
|
219,096
|
|
|
|
|
220,761
|
|
|
|
160,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
|
8,332
|
|
|
|
|
8,298
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
|
7,460
|
|
|
|
7,526
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Plan changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains) losses
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(939
|
)
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
|
8,298
|
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
7,460
|
|
|
|
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
7,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net liability is recorded in the consolidated balance sheets
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current liability
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
(2,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
Non-current liability
|
|
|
(38,660
|
)
|
|
|
(113,705
|
)
|
|
|
(7,526
|
)
|
|
|
(7,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status
|
|
|
(39,082
|
)
|
|
|
(115,903
|
)
|
|
|
(7,526
|
)
|
|
|
(7,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
13,883
|
|
|
|
100,772
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
5,697
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
19,580
|
|
|
|
104,233
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net periodic benefit costs were comprised of the following
elements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
8,234
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
|
|
5,364
|
|
|
|
|
9,127
|
|
|
|
16,474
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(11,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,655
|
)
|
|
|
(6,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11,417
|
)
|
|
|
(18,156
|
)
|
Net amortization and deferral
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
Curtailment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Termination benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
10,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Net periodic benefit costs were comprised of the following
elements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
August 16,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
May 18,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
|
2007 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 17,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization and deferral
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
The effects of one-percentage-point change in assumed health
care cost trend rate on post-retirement obligation are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Decrease
|
|
Assumed
|
|
1% Increase
|
|
|
in Rates
|
|
Rates
|
|
in Rates
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
Aggregated service and interest cost
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
7,431
|
|
|
|
7,433
|
|
|
|
7,434
|
|
F-33
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amounts applicable to the Companys pension plan with
projected and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
259,838
|
|
|
|
275,909
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
244,826
|
|
|
|
263,631
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
220,761
|
|
|
|
160,006
|
|
Expected
employer contributions:
The Company expects to contribute $2,655 to the pension plan and
$278 to the health insurance plan in 2009. The Company had no
regulatory contribution requirements for 2008.
Expected
future benefit payments:
The following table provides the estimated future benefit
payments for the pension and other post- retirement benefit
plans of the Company at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Year ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
13,646
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
2010
|
|
|
12,630
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,828
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
2012
|
|
|
15,053
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16,264
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
2014-2018
|
|
|
99,995
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
171,416
|
|
|
|
3,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
The Company also has defined contribution retirement plans that
cover its eligible employees. The purpose of these defined
contribution plans is generally to provide additional financial
security during retirement by providing employees with an
incentive to make regular savings. The Companys
contributions to these plans are based on employee contributions
and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
Period from August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
663
|
|
Period from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
F-34
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
|
Common
Stock Subject to Redemption
In March 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with Layle K. Smith to serve as the Companys chief
executive officer (the CEO) and to serve on the
Companys Board of Directors. As part of that employment
agreement, the CEO agreed to purchase 100,000 shares of
common stock at $20 per share, for a total investment of $2,000.
The shares purchased include a redemption feature which
guarantees total realization on these shares of at least $8,000
(or, at his option, equivalent consideration in the acquiring
entity) in the event a change in control occurs prior to
September 3, 2009 and the CEO remains employed with the
Company through the
12-month
anniversary of such change in control or experiences certain
qualifying terminations of employment, after which the per share
redemption value is fair value.
Because of the existence of the conditional redemption feature,
the carrying value of these 100,000 shares of common stock
has been reported outside of permanent equity. In accordance
with FASB Staff Position 123R-4, Classification of Options
and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation that
Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent
Event, the carrying amount of the common stock subject to
redemption is reported as the $2,000 proceeds, and has not been
adjusted to reflect the $8,000 redemption amount, as it is not
probable that a change in control event will take place prior to
September 3, 2009.
Noranda
Long-Term Incentive Plan
On May 29, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
approved the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Noranda (the
Incentive Plan) and reserved 1,500,000 shares
of Noranda common stock for issuance under the Incentive Plan.
The Company subsequently amended and restated the Incentive Plan
on October 23, 2007 to permit the grant of awards to
entities that make available non-employee directors to the
Company.
Options granted under the Incentive Plan generally have a ten
year term. Employee option grants generally consist of
time-vesting options (Tranche A) and
performance vesting options (Tranche B). The
time-vesting options generally vest in equal one-fifth
installments on each of the first five anniversaries of the date
of grant or on the closing of Apollos acquisition of the
Company, as specified in the applicable award agreements,
subject to continued service through each applicable vesting
date. The performance-vesting options vest upon the
Companys investors realization of a specified level
of investor internal rate of return (investor IRR),
subject to continued service through each applicable vesting
date.
The employee options generally are subject to a Company (or
Apollo) call provision which expires upon the earlier of a
qualified public offering or May 2014 and provides the Company
(or Apollo) the right to repurchase the underlying shares at the
lower of their cost or fair market value upon certain
terminations of employment. A qualified public offering
transaction is defined in the Amended and Restated Security
Holders agreement as a public offering that raises at least
$200,000. This call provision represents a substantive
performance vesting condition with a life through May 2014;
therefore, the Company recognizes compensation expense for
service awards through May 2014. Performance-vesting options
issued in May 2007 have met their performance vesting provision.
However, the shares underlying the options remain subject to the
Company (or Apollo) call provision. Accordingly, the options
currently are subject to service conditions and stock
compensation expense is being recorded over the remaining call
provision through May 2014.
Prior to October 23, 2007, shares issued upon the exercise
of employee options were subject to a call provision that would
expire upon a qualified public offering. The call provision
provided the Company (or Apollo) the right to repurchase the
underlying shares at the lower of their cost or fair market
value in connection with certain terminations of employment.
Because a substantive performance vesting condition necessary
for vesting was not probable, no expense was recognized for
employee options issued prior to October 23, 2007. At
October 23, 2007, existing options were modified so that
the Company call provision
F-35
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expired upon the earlier of a qualified public offering, or
seven years. As a result, the Company started expensing the
stock options over seven years in the fourth quarter of 2007.
The number of employees affected was 24. The total incremental
compensation cost resulting from the modification was $5,143,
which is being amortized over a period through May 2014.
Employee options issued subsequent to October 23, 2007
contain this modified Company call provision.
On June 13, 2007, the Company executed a recapitalization
in which the proceeds of a $220,000 debt offering were
distributed to the investors. The fair value of the Company was
determined to be $15.50 per share prior to the distribution of
$10 per share; the resulting value of the Company after the
distribution was $5.50 per share. The award holders were given
$10 of value in the form of an immediately vested cash payment
of $6 per share and a modification of the exercise price of the
option from $10 per share to $6 per share. Under
SFAS 123(R), this was considered a modification due to an
equity restructuring. Twenty-four employees were affected by
this modification. The total incremental compensation cost
resulting from the modification was $4,126.
On October 23, 2007, the Company granted 200,000 options to
Apollo Management VI L.P. and Apollo Alternative Assets funds
for making available certain non-employee directors to the
Company. It was subsequently determined that due to an
administrative error, the number of options awarded on
October 23, 2007 exceeded the amount intended to be awarded
and the exercise price was lower than intended. In order to
correct the administrative error, on March 10, 2008, the
Company modified the term of options granted in October 2007
from 200,000 options at $6 per share to 60,000 options at $20
per share. Options granted to Apollo Management VI L.P. and
Apollo Alternative Assets are fully vested at grant. This
modification did not result in any additional stock compensation
expense for the year ended December 31, 2008.
On June 13, 2008, the Company paid a $4.70 per share cash
dividend to the investors. The fair value of the Company was
determined to be $20.00 per share prior to the distribution of
$4.70 per share; the resulting value of the Company after the
distribution was $15.30. The award holders were given $4.70 of
value in the form of an immediately vested cash payment of $2.70
per share and a modification of the price of the options from $6
per share to $4 per share and $20 per share to $18 per share.
Twenty-nine employees were affected by this modification. The
total incremental compensation cost resulting from this
modification was $3,894.
The Company entered into a Termination and Consulting Agreement
with Rick Anderson on October 14, 2008, in connection with
his retirement on October 31, 2008 as Chief Financial
Officer. Pursuant to that agreement, in October 2008 the Company
recorded approximately $463 of compensation cost for cash
severance, all of which was paid by January 2009. Additionally,
the Company recorded approximately $675 of compensation cost
associated with the accelerated vesting of
Mr. Andersons unvested stock options, since, pursuant
to the agreement, Mr. Andersons Company stock options
will continue to vest during the consulting term, although
Mr. Anderson will generally be unable to exercise the
options until the expiration of the term of the agreement in May
2012. Mr. Anderson has agreed to certain ongoing
confidentiality obligations and to non-solicitation and
non-competition covenants following his retirement from the
Company.
At December 31, 2008 the expiration of the call option upon
a qualified public offering would have resulted in the immediate
recognition of $3,118 of compensation expense related to the
cost of Tranche B options where the investor IRR targets
were previously met and $620 of compensation expense related to
the cost of options where the offering (together with a $4.70
per share dividend paid in June 2008) would cause the
performance option to be met. Further, the period over which the
Company recognizes compensation expense for service awards would
change from May 2014 to five years prospectively from the date
of the qualified public offering, which, based on options
outstanding at December 31, 2008, would increase annual
stock compensation expense by approximately $776.
F-36
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The summary of company stock option activity and related
information for the Noranda stock option plan is as follows,
after reflecting the effects of modifications to exercise price
discussed above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Options and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee
|
|
|
|
Investor Director
|
|
|
|
Director Options
|
|
|
|
Provider Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding May 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
687,678
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(23,835
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding December 31, 2007
|
|
|
663,843
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
308,500
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
Modified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(62,119
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding December 31, 2008
|
|
|
910,224
|
|
|
$
|
8.61
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully vested end of period (weighted average
remaining contractual term of 8.5 years)
|
|
|
366,438
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently exercisable end of period (weighted
average remaining contractual term of 8.5 years)
|
|
|
329,658
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Tranche A options, the fair value of each
employees options with graded vesting was estimated using
the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The
weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during
the period May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007 was
$16.25 for employee options and $17.06 for Non-Apollo Director
options and the weighted-average grant date fair value of
options granted for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
$7.10 for employee options and $9.79 for Non-Apollo Director
options.
For Tranche B options, the options associated with an
investor rate of return target, an adaptation of the
Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model, which took into
consideration the internal rate of return thresholds, was used
to estimate fair value. The Company believes this model
adaptation is equivalent to the use of a path-dependent lattice
model. Options granted to Investor Director
Providers are valued using the same option pricing models
as those used for employee options, being the
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model.
F-37
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following weighted-average assumptions were used for these
estimates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Apollo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Apollo
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
|
|
45.7
|
%
|
Expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of
representative peer companies stocks. The expected term
assumption at grant date is generally based on the assumed date
of a qualified public offering or other
change-in-control
event, plus an estimated additional holding period until option
exercise. Expected dividend yield was based on managements
expectation of no dividend payments. Risk free interest rates
were based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at
the grant date.
As of December 31, 2008, total compensation expense related
to non-vested options which was not yet recognized was $8,411
and will be recognized over the weighted-average period of
5.9 years. The total fair value of shares that vested
during the period from May 18, 2007 to December 31,
2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $3,584
and $6,473, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the
following amounts of share-based compensation expense, excluding
cash payments made upon the modification of outstanding options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
Falconbridge
Stock Option Plan
Under the Employee Stock Option Plan (the Falconbridge
Plan), Falconbridge Limited historically granted stock
options (the Falconbridge Options) to key employees
of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. to purchase common stock in
Falconbridge Limited. Option grants under this plan had terms of
10 years, with certain restrictions. Prior to the Xstrata
Acquisition, all outstanding stock options were immediately
vested and then exercised.
The Company amortized the fair value of all stock based awards
on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period,
which generally was the vesting period. The fair value per
option was determined by Falconbridge Limited.
There were no options granted under the Falconbridge Plan for
any of the reported periods.
F-38
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The summary of company stock option activity and related
information for the stock option plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Period From January 1, 2006 to
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding beginning of period
|
|
|
1,751,060
|
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,751,060
|
)
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of August 15, 2006, all options that had been issued to
Noranda Aluminum, Inc. employees and directors had been fully
vested and exercised.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the
following amounts of stock-based compensation expense under the
Falconbridge Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 to
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006 to
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 to
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
21,228
|
|
|
|
26,785
|
|
|
|
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
38,320
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
2,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
22,438
|
|
|
|
28,140
|
|
|
|
|
7,757
|
|
|
|
40,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
36,002
|
|
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
|
|
(15,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,765
|
)
|
|
|
(70,160
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
|
(6,953
|
)
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,114
|
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
(14,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,620
|
)
|
|
|
(73,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,744
|
|
|
|
|
23,577
|
|
|
|
13,655
|
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
(32,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has state net
operating loss carryforwards of approximately $68,464 expiring
in years 2015 through 2025. In addition, the Company has state
tax credit carryforwards at December 31, 2008 of $1,849
expiring in years 2015 through 2026.
SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance against
deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized. Accordingly, the Company recorded an additional
$8,554 valuation allowance on such assets in 2008. At
December 31, 2008,
F-39
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$11,935 of valuation allowances, if recognized, would have
resulted in an adjustment to goodwill. However, for years
beginning after December 31, 2008, SFAS No. 141R
(See Note 1) will require subsequent changes to
valuation allowances recorded in purchase accounting to be
recorded as income tax expense (regardless of when the
acquisition occurred).
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has not provided for
withholding or United States federal income taxes on
approximately $42,068 of accumulated undistributed earnings of
its foreign subsidiaries as they are considered by management to
be permanently reinvested. If these undistributed earnings were
not considered to be permanently reinvested, approximately
$19,499 of deferred income taxes would have been provided.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amount of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
and liabilities as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property related
|
|
|
189,109
|
|
|
|
164,760
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
45,345
|
|
|
|
44,153
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
26,770
|
|
|
|
25,067
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,065
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
286,917
|
|
|
|
358,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation related
|
|
|
21,074
|
|
|
|
62,370
|
|
Capital and net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
6,511
|
|
|
|
13,326
|
|
Minimum tax credit and state tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,845
|
|
|
|
7,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
57,411
|
|
|
|
84,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
(12,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
53,141
|
|
|
|
71,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
|
233,776
|
|
|
|
286,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reconciliation
of Income Taxes
The reconciliation of the income taxes, calculated at the rates
in effect, with the effective tax rate shown in the statements
of operations, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 to
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006 to
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 to
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
(Decrease) increase in tax rate resulting from State &
local income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Equity method investee income
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
IRC Sec. 199 manufacturing deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Discharge of indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other permanent items
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a
result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company
recognized a decrease of approximately $1,226 to the
January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. As part of the
Apollo Acquisition, Xstrata indemnified the Company for tax
exposures. Therefore, the Company had a receivable of $4,033 and
$4,379 from Xstrata at December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, equal to the
Companys FIN 48 liability (net of federal benefits)
for the tax exposures related to tax positions occurring through
the date of the Apollo Acquisition. As of December 31, 2007
and December 31, 2008, the Company had unrecognized income
tax benefits of approximately $10,059 and $10,111, respectively.
F-41
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008 amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
10,011
|
|
|
|
10,059
|
|
Tax positions related to the current period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross additions
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Gross reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax positions related to prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Gross reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lapses on statute of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
10,059
|
|
|
|
10,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For years ending prior to December 31, 2008, the total
amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized,
would affect the effective tax rate was not material because the
majority of unrecognized tax benefits relate to periods prior to
the Apollo Acquisition and their recognition, if any, would have
resulted in an adjustment to goodwill. However, for years
beginning after December 31, 2008, SFAS No. 141R
(See Note 1) will require subsequent recognition of
unrecognized tax benefits recorded in purchase accounting to be
recorded as income tax expense (regardless of when the
acquisition occurred) and, as a result, the total amount of net
unrecognized tax benefits as of 2008 that, if recognized, would
affect the effective tax rate is $7,196. The Company elected to
accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits in its provision for income taxes. The Company has
accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits of approximately $228 at December 31, 2007 and
$906 at December 31, 2008, respectively.
The Company files a consolidated federal and various state
income tax returns. The earliest years open to examination in
the Companys major jurisdictions is 2006 for federal
income tax returns and 2005 for state income tax returns. The
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concluded an
examination of the Companys U.S. income tax return
for 2005 in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company agreed to
the IRS proposed settlement of all issues and recorded a
tax receivable of $1,072. Pursuant to the terms of the Apollo
Acquisition, the $1,072 in federal income tax refunds will be
remitted to Xstrata once received from the IRS.
Within the next twelve months, the Company estimates that the
unrecognized benefits could change; however, due to the Xstrata
indemnification, the Company does not expect the change to have
a significant impact on the results of operations or the
financial position of the Company.
|
|
16.
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
The Company presents both basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share (EPS) on the face of the consolidated
statements of operations. As provided by SFAS 128,
Earnings per Share, basic EPS is calculated as net income
(loss) available to common stockholders divided by the
weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS is calculated using the weighted-average outstanding
common shares determined using the treasury stock method for
options.
F-42
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,167
|
|
|
$
|
(74,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,603
|
|
|
|
21,720
|
|
Effect of diluted securities
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21,665
|
|
|
|
21,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain stock options whose terms and conditions are described
in Note 14 could potentially dilute basic EPS in the
future, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS
because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods
presented: period from May 18, 2007 to December 31,
2007 331,918; for the year ended December 31,
2008 980,225.
The Company operates certain manufacturing and warehouse
facilities under operating leases. In most cases, management
expects that in the normal course of business, leases will be
renewed or replaced when they expire with other leases.
The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments
required under operating leases that have initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
$
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
2013
|
|
|
728
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
752
|
|
The following schedule shows the composition of total rental
expense for all operating leases except those with terms of a
month or less that were not renewed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 to
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006 to
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 to
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Minimum rentals
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Contingent rentals
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
2,277
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent rentals represent transportation equipment operating
lease payments made on the basis of mileage.
F-43
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
DERIVATIVE
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The Company uses derivative instruments to mitigate the risks
associated with fluctuations in aluminum and natural gas prices
and interest rates. SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS No. 133), requires companies to
recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or
liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial
position. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the Company
designates fixed price aluminum swaps as cash flow hedges, thus
the effective portion of such derivatives is adjusted to fair
value through other comprehensive (loss) income, with the
ineffective portion reported through earnings. Derivatives that
do not qualify for hedge accounting are adjusted to fair value
through earnings in loss (gain) on derivative instruments and
hedging activities in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2008, all derivatives are held for
purposes other than trading.
Cash
flow hedges
Aluminum
swaps fixed price
In order to reduce the commodity price risk in the upstream
business, the Company has implemented an economic hedging
strategy for approximately 50% of forecasted aluminum shipments
through December 2012. These sale swap arrangements result in
fixed sale prices that we consider attractive relative to
historical levels and which management believes will stabilize
the economic impact of fluctuations in aluminum prices.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as
cash flow hedges, the effective portion of any gain or loss on
the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss and reclassified into earnings in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings. As of December 31, 2008, the pre-tax amount of
the effective portion of cash flow hedges recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income was $414,078. Gains and
losses on the derivatives representing either hedge
ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment
of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
Due to declines in demand for certain of the Companys
value-added products and uncertain business conditions, at
November 30, 2008 management concluded that certain hedged
sale transactions were no longer probable of occurring and
de-designated hedge accounting for approximately 20,000 pounds
of notional amounts settling in 2008, 245,000 pounds of notional
amounts settling in 2009, and 32,000 pounds of notional amounts
settling in 2010. Based on revised forecasts in place at
December 31, 2008, the Company re-designated approximately
144,000 pounds of notional amounts settling in 2009 and
approximately 20,000 pounds of notional amounts settling in
2010. In connection with discontinuing hedge accounting for
these notional amounts, the Company reclassified $5,184 into
earnings because it is probable that these original forecasted
transactions will not occur. As a result of the New Madrid power
outage on January 28, 2009, and in anticipation of fixed
price aluminum purchase swaps described below, the Company
discontinued hedge accounting for all of its aluminum
fixed-price sale swaps on January 29, 2009.
The following table summarizes our remaining fixed price
aluminum sale swaps as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Hedged
|
|
Pounds Hedged
|
Year
|
|
Price per Pound
|
|
Annually
|
|
|
$
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
289,070
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
290,536
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
290,955
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
291,825
|
|
F-44
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
From January 1, 2009 through February 19, 2009 the
Company entered into fixed price aluminum purchase swaps
covering approximately 424 million pounds of aluminum
purchases in 2010, 2011 and 2012 at an average price of
approximately $0.75 per pound.
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS No. 133
Aluminum
swaps variable price
The Company also enters into forward contracts with its
customers to sell aluminum in the future at fixed prices in the
normal course of business. Because these contracts expose the
Company to aluminum market price fluctuations, the Company
economically hedges this risk by entering into variable price
swap contracts with various brokers, typically for terms not
greater than one year.
These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS No. 133; therefore, any gains or losses related
to the change in fair value of these contracts are recorded in
loss (gain) on derivative instruments and hedging activities in
the consolidated statements of operations.
Interest
rate swaps
The Company has floating-rate debt which is subject to
variations in interest rates. On August 16, 2007, the
Company entered into interest rate swap agreement to limit the
Companys exposure to floating interest rates for the
periods from November 15, 2007 to November 15, 2011
with notional amounts of $500,000, which decline in increments
over time beginning in May 2009 at a 4.98% fixed interest rate.
The interest rate swap agreements were not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, any gains
or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the
interest rate swap contracts were recorded in loss (gain) on
derivative instruments and hedging activities in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Natural
gas swaps
Noranda purchases natural gas to meet its production
requirements. These purchases expose Noranda to the risk of
fluctuating natural gas prices. To offset changes in the Henry
Hub Index Price of natural gas, Noranda enters into financial
swaps, by purchasing the fixed forward price for the Henry Hub
Index and simultaneously entering into an agreement to sell the
actual Henry Hub Index Price.
At December 31, 2008, the Company entered into fixed-price
swap contracts as an economic hedge for the following volumes of
natural gas purchases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price Per
|
|
Notional Amount
|
Year
|
|
Million BTU $
|
|
Million BTUs
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
5,995,784
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
4,011,984
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9.31
|
|
|
|
2,019,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
9.06
|
|
|
|
2,022,996
|
|
These contracts were not designated as hedges for accounting
purposes. Accordingly, any gains or losses resulting from
changes in the fair value of the gas swap contracts were
recorded in loss (gain) on derivative instruments and hedging
activities in the consolidated statements of operations.
F-45
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the fair values and carrying values
of the Companys derivative instruments outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminum swaps-fixed price
|
|
|
(33,000
|
)
|
|
|
(33,000
|
)
|
|
|
401,909
|
|
|
|
401,909
|
|
Aluminum swaps-variable price
|
|
|
(5,208
|
)
|
|
|
(5,208
|
)
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(11,704
|
)
|
|
|
(11,704
|
)
|
|
|
(21,472
|
)
|
|
|
(21,472
|
)
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,404
|
)
|
|
|
(33,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(49,912
|
)
|
|
|
(49,912
|
)
|
|
|
337,533
|
|
|
|
337,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The December 31, 2008 variable priced aluminum swap balance
is net of a $20,321 broker margin call asset.
The Company recorded losses (gains) for the change in the fair
value of derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment, as well as the ineffectiveness of
derivatives that do qualify for hedge accounting treatment as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Qualified
|
|
|
Derivatives not Qualified as Hedges
|
|
as Hedges
|
|
|
Amount Reclassified
|
|
Hedge
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
From AOCI
|
|
Ineffectiveness
|
|
Fair value
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
Period from January 1, 2006 through August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,632
|
|
|
|
16,632
|
|
Period from August 16, 2006 through December 31, 2006
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
Period from January 1, 2007 through May 17, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,467
|
|
|
|
56,467
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 through December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,497
|
)
|
|
|
(12,497
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
24,205
|
|
|
|
(13,365
|
)
|
|
|
59,098
|
|
|
|
69,938
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the amount
reclassified from AOCI includes $5,184 reclassified into
earnings because it is probable that the original forecasted
transactions will not occur.
Based on the aluminum price curves at December 31, 2008,
the company expects to reclassify a gain of $93,625 from
accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings during 2009.
|
|
19.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
As discussed in Note 1, effective January 1, 2008, the
Company adopted portions of SFAS No. 157, which
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP
and requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities
measured at fair value. SFAS No. 157 does not expand
the application of fair value accounting to any new
circumstances.
As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date (exit price). The Company incorporates
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability, and utilizes market data to the maximum
extent possible. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, fair
value
F-46
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
incorporates nonperformance risk (i.e., the risk that an
obligation will not be fulfilled). In measuring fair value, the
Company reflects the impact of its own credit risk on its
liabilities, as well as any collateral. The Company also
considers the credit standing of its counterparties in measuring
the fair value of its assets.
The table below sets forth by level within the fair value
hierarchy the companys assets and liabilities that were
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
176,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,609
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,909
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
176,609
|
|
|
|
337,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157 outlines three valuation techniques to
measure fair value (i.e., the market approach, the income
approach, and the cost approach). The Company determined that
the income approach provides the best indication of fair value
for its assets and liabilities given the nature of the
Companys financial instruments and the reliability of the
inputs used in arriving at fair value.
Under SFAS No. 157, the inputs used in applying
valuation techniques include assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (i.e.,
assumptions about risk). Inputs may be observable or
unobservable. The Company uses observable inputs in its
valuation techniques, and classifies those inputs in accordance
with the fair value hierarchy set out in SFAS No. 157
which prioritizes those inputs.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). More
specifically, the three levels of the fair value hierarchy
defined by SFAS No. 157 are as follows:
Level 1 inputs Unadjusted quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
Company has access as of the reporting date. Active markets are
those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information
on an ongoing basis. Fair value measurements that may fall into
Level 1 include exchange-traded derivatives or listed
equities.
Level 2 inputs Inputs other than quoted
prices included in Level 1, which are either directly or
indirectly observable as of the reporting date. A Level 2
input must be observable for substantially the full term of the
asset or liability. Fair value measurements that may fall into
Level 2 could include financial instruments with observable
inputs such as interest rates or yield curves.
Level 3 inputs Unobservable inputs that
reflect the Companys own assumptions about the assumptions
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Fair value measurements that may be classified as Level 3
could, for example, be determined from a Companys
internally developed model that results in managements
best estimate of fair value. Fair value measurements that may
fall into Level 3 could include certain structured
derivatives or financial products that are specifically tailored
to a customers needs.
Cash equivalents are comprised of money market funds that are
invested entirely in U.S. Treasury securities. These
instruments are valued based upon unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets and are classified within Level 1.
Fair values of all derivative instruments within the scope of
SFAS No. 157 are classified as Level 2. Those
fair values are primarily measured using industry standard
models that incorporate inputs including: quoted forward prices
for commodities, interest rates, and current market prices for
those assets and liabilities. Substantially all of the inputs
are observable, as defined in SFAS No. 157, throughout
the full term of the instrument.
F-47
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and
liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety. The Companys assessment of the significance of a
particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment, and may affect the fair value of assets and
liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
20.
|
ASSET
RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
|
The Companys asset retirement obligations consist
primarily of costs related to the disposal of certain spent pot
liners associated with smelter facilities. The current portion
of the liability of $2,463 and $2,193 is recorded in accrued
liabilities at December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
The remaining non-current portion is included in other long-term
liabilities.
The following is a reconciliation of the aggregate carrying
amount of liabilities for the asset retirement obligations
(ARO):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 to
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006 to
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 to
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Balance, beginning of year/period
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
|
|
|
8,679
|
|
|
|
8,781
|
|
|
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
Additional liabilities incurred
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Liabilities settled
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,213
|
)
|
|
|
(2,161
|
)
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year/period
|
|
|
8,679
|
|
|
|
|
8,781
|
|
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
|
8,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company may have other AROs that may arise in the
event of a facility closure. An ARO has not been recorded for
these obligations due to the fact that the liability is not
reasonably estimated, as the facility assets have indeterminate
economic lives.
|
|
21.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Raw
Materials Commitments
The Company receives alumina at cost plus freight from its
Gramercy refinery joint venture (See Note 21). The alumina
the Company receives from Gramercy is purchased under a
take-or-pay
contract, and the Company is obligated to take receipt of its
share of Gramercys alumina production, even if such
amounts are in excess of the Companys requirements. During
fourth quarter 2008, the cost of alumina purchased from Gramercy
exceeded the cost of alumina available from other sources. The
Company continues to evaluate options to reduce the purchase
cost of alumina including evaluating with its joint venture
partner the curtailment of Gramercys operation.
Labor
commitments
We are a party to six collective bargaining agreements,
including three at our joint ventures, which expire at various
times. We entered into a five-year labor contract at New Madrid
effective September 1, 2007, which provides for an
approximately 3% increase per year in compensation. Two
agreements with unions at St. Ann expired in 2007. We agreed to
a new contract in December 2008, but negotiations continue at
the Industrial Disputes Tribunal, Jamaicas primary labor
arbitrator. We experienced a brief work slowdown in April 2008
in connection with these negotiations. A work stoppage, although
possible, is not anticipated. All other collective
F-48
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
bargaining agreements expire within the next five years. A new
collective bargaining agreement at our Newport rolling mill
became effective June 1, 2008. The contract at our
Salisbury plant expires in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Legal
contingencies
The Company is a party to legal proceedings incidental to its
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability
with respect to these actions will not materially affect the
operating results or the financial position of the Company.
Guarantees
In connection with the disposal of a former subsidiary, American
Racing Equipment of Kentucky, Inc, (ARE) the Company
guaranteed certain outstanding leases for the automotive wheel
facilities located in Rancho Dominguez, Mexico. The leases have
various expiration dates that extend through December 2011. The
remaining maximum future payments under these lease obligations
as of December 31, 2007 totaled approximately $6,952.
During March 2008, the Company was released from the guarantee
obligation on one of the properties, resulting in a reduction of
the remaining maximum future lease obligation. As of
December 31, 2008 the remaining maximum future payments
under these lease obligations totaled approximately $2,654. The
Company has concluded that it is not probable that it will be
required to make payments pursuant to these guarantees and has
not recorded a liability for these guarantees. Further,
AREs purchaser has indemnified the Company for all losses
associated with the guarantees.
|
|
22.
|
INVESTMENTS
IN AFFILIATES
|
The Company holds a 50% interest in a Gramercy, Louisiana
refinery, Gramercy Alumina LLC. Pursuant to the agreements
governing the joint ventures, the Company and its joint venture
partner are required to begin negotiations concerning the future
of the joint ventures after December 2010.
The Company also holds a 50% interest in St. Ann Bauxite Limited
(SABL) a Jamaican limited liability company jointly
owned with Century Aluminum Company (Century). St.
Ann owns 49% of St. Ann Jamaica Bauxite Partnership
(SAJBP), a partnership of which the Government of
Jamaica (GOJ) owns 51%. As part of a concession, GOJ
grants mining rights that give St. Ann the right to mine bauxite
in Jamaica through 2030.
SABL manages the operations of the partnership, pays operating
costs and is entitled to all of its bauxite production. SABL is
responsible for reclamation of the land that it mines. SABL pays
the GOJ according to a negotiated fiscal structure, which
consists of the following elements: (i) a royalty based on
the amount of bauxite shipped, (ii) an annual asset
usage fee for the use of the GOJs 51% interest in
the mining assets, (iii) customary income and other taxes
and fees, (iv) a production levy, which currently has been
waived, and (v) certain fees for lands owned by the GOJ
that are mined by SAJBP. In calculating income tax on revenues
related to sales to our Gramercy refinery, SABL uses a set
market price, which is negotiated periodically between SABL and
the GOJ. SABL is currently in the process of negotiating
revisions to the fiscal structure with the GOJ, which may be
effective retroactive to January 1, 2008.
The excess of the carrying values of the investments over the
amounts of underlying equity in net assets totaled $124,453 at
December 31, 2007 and $116,965 at December 31, 2008.
This excess is being amortized
F-49
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
on a straight-line basis over a 20 year period for each
affiliate. Amortization expense included in equity in net income
of investment affiliates is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Period from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006
(Pre-predecessor)
|
|
|
4,048
|
|
Period from August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
Period from January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
Summarized financial information for the joint ventures (as
recorded in their respective financial statements, at full
value, excluding the amortization of the excess carrying values
of the Companys investments over the underlying equity in
net assets of the affiliates), is as follows:
Summarized balance sheet information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
151,133
|
|
|
|
173,661
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
92,073
|
|
|
|
110,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
243,206
|
|
|
|
284,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
78,007
|
|
|
|
89,736
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
16,441
|
|
|
|
17,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
94,448
|
|
|
|
107,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
148,758
|
|
|
|
177,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
243,206
|
|
|
|
284,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized income statement information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 to
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006 to
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 to
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Net sales(1)
|
|
|
287,465
|
|
|
|
|
173,326
|
|
|
|
181,854
|
|
|
|
|
303,496
|
|
|
|
539,375
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
31,609
|
|
|
|
|
12,120
|
|
|
|
16,435
|
|
|
|
|
27,157
|
|
|
|
25,258
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
25,240
|
|
|
|
|
11,968
|
|
|
|
13,960
|
|
|
|
|
24,109
|
|
|
|
30,380
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net sales include sales to related parties, which include
alumina sales to the Company and its joint venture partner, and
bauxite sales to Gramercy: |
F-50
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 to
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2006 to
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 to
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2007 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Company and joint venture partner
|
|
|
238,366
|
|
|
|
|
144,898
|
|
|
|
122,242
|
|
|
|
|
269,017
|
|
|
|
441,222
|
|
Third-party sales
|
|
|
49,099
|
|
|
|
|
28,428
|
|
|
|
59,612
|
|
|
|
|
34,479
|
|
|
|
98,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,465
|
|
|
|
|
173,326
|
|
|
|
181,854
|
|
|
|
|
303,496
|
|
|
|
539,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, St. Ann received a transfer of income tax
credits from its previous owner, Kaiser Aluminum
(Kaiser), in settlement of a dispute regarding the
existence of a postretirement healthcare plan. St. Ann valued
these transferred tax credits at zero because of uncertainty
related to the Jamaican taxing authorities approving the
transfer as well as the timing and amount of the income tax
credits. As part of allocating fair value within St. Ann for the
purchase price allocation from the Apollo Acquisition in May
2007, the Company valued the tax uncertainty associated with the
income tax credits received from Kaiser at zero. In June 2008,
St. Ann, reached agreement with the Department of Revenue in
Jamaica regarding the timing and amount of the income tax
credits. The agreement resolved the tax uncertainty and resulted
in a $5,280 reduction of St. Anns tax provision and
increase to its net income. The Company recorded a $2,640
adjustment to increase equity in net income of investments in
affiliates. The Company considered this adjustment to be the
settlement of a tax uncertainty existing at the date of the
Apollo acquisition. However applicable, U.S. GAAP provides
this amount to be included in equity in net income of investment
in affiliates, because there were no equity method intangible
assets (including goodwill).
|
|
23.
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
Management at the Company has chosen to organize segments based
upon differences in products and services. The Company is
comprised of two operating segments, Upstream and Downstream.
The upstream business produces value-added aluminum products in
the form of billet, used mainly for building construction,
architectural and transportation applications, rod, used mainly
for electrical applications and steel deoxidation, value-added
sow, used mainly for aerospace, and foundry, used mainly for
transportation. In addition to these value-added products, the
Company produces commodity grade sow, the majority of which is
used in our rolling mills. The downstream business has rolling
mill facilities whose major foil products are finstock, used
mainly for the air conditioning, ventilation and heating
industry, referred to as HVAC finstock, and container stock,
used mainly for food packaging, pie pans and convenience food
containers.
On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement
with Century Aluminum Company (together with its subsidiaries,
(Century) whereby the Company would become the sole
owner of both Gramercy and St. Ann. The transaction closed
on August 31, 2009 (the Joint Venture
Transaction). In connection with the Joint Venture
Transaction, the Company re-evaluated its segment structure and
determined it was appropriate to exclude corporate expenses from
its reportable segments. As such, corporate expenses are
unallocated. The following segment disclosures have been
adjusted to reflect this new structure.
The Company manages and operates the business segments based on
the markets they serve and the products and services provided to
those markets. The Company evaluates performance and allocates
resources based on profit from operations before income taxes.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in Note 1, Accounting Policies.
Major
Customer Information
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, there were
no major customers from whom at least 5% of consolidated revenue
was derived. No single customer accounted for more than 8% of
upstream net sales and 10% of downstream net sales for the last
three years. In addition for the periods within the years
F-51
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, there was no
dependence of a segment on a customer or a few customers which
if lost would have a material adverse effect on the segment.
Geographic
Region Information
Substantially all of the Companys sales are within the
United States. All long-lived assets are located in the United
States.
Summary
of Business by Segment
The following is our operating segment information for the
periods from January 1, 2006 to August 15, 2006, from
August 16, 2006 to December 31, 2006, from
January 1, 2007 to May 17, 2007 and from May 18,
2007 to December 31, 2007 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008 which also includes segment asset
balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period from January 1, 2006 to August 15,
2006
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
400,316
|
|
|
|
415,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816,042
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
44,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,737
|
|
|
|
415,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,421
|
)
|
|
|
816,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
305,974
|
|
|
|
398,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,421
|
)
|
|
|
660,529
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9,054
|
|
|
|
6,631
|
|
|
|
8,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,933
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,028
|
|
|
|
405,551
|
|
|
|
8,248
|
|
|
|
(44,421
|
)
|
|
|
684,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
129,709
|
|
|
|
10,175
|
|
|
|
(8,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,672
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,632
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,337
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,443
|
|
|
|
7,633
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,259
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
13,706
|
|
|
|
6,793
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,538
|
|
F-52
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period from August 16, 2006 to December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
243,563
|
|
|
|
253,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,681
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
25,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,223
|
|
|
|
253,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,660
|
)
|
|
|
496,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
194,100
|
|
|
|
240,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,660
|
)
|
|
|
408,968
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,952
|
|
|
|
4,603
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,029
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,052
|
|
|
|
244,574
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
(25,660
|
)
|
|
|
422,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
69,171
|
|
|
|
8,544
|
|
|
|
(3,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,327
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,189
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,923
|
|
|
|
7,915
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,914
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
15,692
|
|
|
|
5,097
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period from January 1, 2007 to May 17,
2007
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
275,157
|
|
|
|
252,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527,666
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
16,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,089
|
|
|
|
252,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,932
|
)
|
|
|
527,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
203,510
|
|
|
|
237,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,932
|
)
|
|
|
424,505
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
6,468
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,853
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,583
|
|
|
|
244,358
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
(16,932
|
)
|
|
|
441,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
85,506
|
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
(7,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,235
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,467
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,407
|
|
|
|
8,111
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,637
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,768
|
|
F-53
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period from May 18, 2007 to December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
423,742
|
|
|
|
443,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
867,390
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
21,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445,210
|
|
|
|
443,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,468
|
)
|
|
|
867,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
356,783
|
|
|
|
432,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,468
|
)
|
|
|
768,010
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,558
|
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
|
|
20,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,159
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369,341
|
|
|
|
438,799
|
|
|
|
20,043
|
|
|
|
(21,468
|
)
|
|
|
806,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
75,869
|
|
|
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
(20,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,243
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,497
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
52,548
|
|
|
|
17,021
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,709
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
31,517
|
|
|
|
4,564
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
660,754
|
|
|
|
605,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,266,427
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
97,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758,585
|
|
|
|
605,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,831
|
)
|
|
|
1,266,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
623,021
|
|
|
|
597,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,831
|
)
|
|
|
1,122,676
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26,183
|
|
|
|
16,680
|
|
|
|
30,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,831
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649,204
|
|
|
|
639,666
|
|
|
|
30,968
|
|
|
|
(97,831
|
)
|
|
|
1,222,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
109,381
|
|
|
|
(33,993
|
)
|
|
|
(30,968
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,154
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,938
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
72,009
|
|
|
|
25,997
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,300
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42,157
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,653
|
|
F-54
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Segment assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
876,883
|
|
|
|
786,839
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
604,531
|
|
|
|
505,086
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
179,858
|
|
|
|
646,825
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(10,728
|
)
|
|
|
(2,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,650,544
|
|
|
|
1,936,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
184,716
|
|
|
|
256,516
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
74,472
|
|
|
|
101,846
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
139,019
|
|
|
|
176,503
|
|
Derivative assets, net
|
|
|
81,717
|
|
|
|
70,481
|
|
Taxes receivable
|
|
|
13,125
|
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
17,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
496,416
|
|
|
|
625,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates
|
|
|
205,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
599,623
|
|
|
|
759,962
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
242,776
|
|
|
|
202,576
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
66,367
|
|
|
|
82,780
|
|
Long-term derivative assets, net
|
|
|
255,816
|
|
|
|
115,932
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
69,516
|
|
|
|
88,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,936,171
|
|
|
|
1,875,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
34,816
|
|
|
|
62,147
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
32,740
|
|
|
|
61,586
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
24,277
|
|
|
|
27,742
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
32,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
160,404
|
|
|
|
151,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,314,308
|
|
|
|
1,020,985
|
|
Pension and OPEB liabilities
|
|
|
120,859
|
|
|
|
140,581
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
39,582
|
|
|
|
62,135
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
262,383
|
|
|
|
341,667
|
|
Unallocated purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,259
|
|
Common stock subject to redemption (100,000 shares at
December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (100,000,000 shares authorized; $0.01 par
value; 21,746,548 and 21,766,789 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2009, respectively; including 100,000 shares subject to
redemption at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
14,383
|
|
|
|
17,444
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(176,280
|
)
|
|
|
(139,799
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
198,315
|
|
|
|
149,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noranda shareholders equity
|
|
|
36,635
|
|
|
|
26,923
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
36,635
|
|
|
|
30,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,936,171
|
|
|
|
1,875,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
357,410
|
|
|
|
218,559
|
|
|
|
1,004,906
|
|
|
|
540,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
312,906
|
|
|
|
218,468
|
|
|
|
846,823
|
|
|
|
566,532
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,414
|
|
|
|
18,739
|
|
|
|
49,100
|
|
|
|
51,682
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
Excess insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,320
|
|
|
|
222,925
|
|
|
|
895,923
|
|
|
|
617,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
32,090
|
|
|
|
(4,366
|
)
|
|
|
108,983
|
|
|
|
(77,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
19,816
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
65,043
|
|
|
|
42,551
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
45,496
|
|
|
|
(5,747
|
)
|
|
|
50,497
|
|
|
|
(104,073
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
(3,862
|
)
|
|
|
78,961
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,574
|
)
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
(193,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expenses
|
|
|
66,964
|
|
|
|
(20,884
|
)
|
|
|
112,880
|
|
|
|
(175,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(34,874
|
)
|
|
|
16,518
|
|
|
|
(3,897
|
)
|
|
|
98,591
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(12,445
|
)
|
|
|
12,190
|
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
62,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
|
(22,429
|
)
|
|
|
4,328
|
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
|
36,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,750
|
|
|
|
21,801
|
|
|
|
21,711
|
|
|
|
21,765
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21,750
|
|
|
|
21,801
|
|
|
|
21,711
|
|
|
|
21,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
F-57
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
of Par Value
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
11,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,057
|
)
|
Pension adjustment, net of tax benefit of $31,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,408
|
)
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains, net of taxes of $159,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,201
|
|
Reclassification amounts realized in net income, net of tax
benefit of $8,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,317
|
|
Distribution to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,223
|
)
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
14,383
|
|
|
|
(176,280
|
)
|
|
|
198,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,481
|
|
Pension adjustment, net of tax benefit of $132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains, net of taxes of $26,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,970
|
|
Reclassification of amounts realized in net income, net of tax
benefit of $54,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,774
|
)
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Reclassification of redeemable stock upon expiration of
redemption feature
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
17,444
|
|
|
|
(139,799
|
)
|
|
|
149,060
|
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
30,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
F-58
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
|
36,481
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
74,049
|
|
|
|
66,317
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
25,086
|
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
Insurance proceeds applied to capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,495
|
)
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net of cash settlements
|
|
|
36,416
|
|
|
|
(63,100
|
)
|
Settlements from hedge terminations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,722
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
(193,224
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(3,862
|
)
|
|
|
78,961
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(9,826
|
)
|
|
|
78,691
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
Changes in other assets
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
(8,380
|
)
|
Changes in pension and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(9,564
|
)
|
|
|
31,966
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(26,432
|
)
|
|
|
(7,066
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
17,887
|
|
|
|
20,614
|
|
Taxes receivable
|
|
|
(22,516
|
)
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(4,628
|
)
|
|
|
18,679
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
41,959
|
|
|
|
13,712
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(3,662
|
)
|
|
|
(25,069
|
)
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
10,644
|
|
|
|
(1,775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
111,685
|
|
|
|
230,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(37,464
|
)
|
|
|
(32,211
|
)
|
Proceeds from insurance related to capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Cash acquired in business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(36,980
|
)
|
|
|
(9,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Distribution to shareholders
|
|
|
(102,223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
250,500
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Repayments on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(25,500
|
)
|
|
|
(14,500
|
)
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(30,300
|
)
|
|
|
(24,500
|
)
|
Repurchase of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,019
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
94,702
|
|
|
|
(149,068
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
169,407
|
|
|
|
71,800
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
75,630
|
|
|
|
184,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
245,037
|
|
|
|
256,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements
F-59
Basis
of presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements represent the
consolidation of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and all
companies that we directly or indirectly control
(Noranda, the Company, we,
us, and our). HoldCo refers
only to Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, excluding its
subsidiaries.
We are a vertically integrated producer of value-added primary
aluminum products and high quality rolled aluminum coils. Our
principal operations include an aluminum smelter in New Madrid,
Missouri (New Madrid) and four rolling mills in the
southeastern United States. New Madrid is supported by our
alumina refinery in Gramercy, Louisiana (Noranda Alumina, LLC,
or Gramercy) and a bauxite mining operation in St.
Ann, Jamaica (St. Ann Bauxite Limited, or St. Ann).
As discussed further in Note 23, we report our activities
in two segments. Our primary aluminum business (the
upstream business or upstream) comprises
New Madrid, Gramercy and St. Ann. Our downstream comprises our
four rolling mills, which are located in Huntingdon, Tennessee,
Salisbury, North Carolina and Newport, Arkansas.
On May 18, 2007, Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation
(AcquisitionCo), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
HoldCo, purchased all of the outstanding shares of Noranda
Intermediate Holding Corporation (Noranda
Intermediate) from Xstrata plc (together with its
subsidiaries, Xstrata), and Xstrata (Schweiz) A.G.,
a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Xstrata (the Apollo
Acquisition). Noranda Intermediate and its subsidiaries
constituted the Noranda aluminum business of Xstrata. HoldCo and
AcquisitionCo were formed by affiliates of Apollo Management,
L.P. (collectively, Apollo) and had no assets or
operations prior to the Apollo Acquisition.
All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated
in consolidation.
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information.
The consolidated financial statements, including these notes,
are unaudited and exclude some of the disclosures required in
annual financial statements. Consolidated balance sheet data as
of December 31, 2008 was derived from audited financial
statements. In managements opinion, the consolidated
financial statements include all adjustments (including normal
recurring accruals) that are considered necessary for the fair
presentation of our financial position and operating results.
The operating results presented for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
any other interim period or for the entire year. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our 2008 annual
financial statements included in our
Form 10-K,
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on February 25, 2009.
Subsequent events have been evaluated through November 13,
2009, the date these financial statements were issued.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications were made to financial statements
issued in the prior year. We incurred a $1.2 million loss
on debt repayments, which was previously classified in interest
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
reclassification to (gain) loss on debt repurchases is reflected
on the consolidated statements of operations as well as the
consolidated statements of cash flows.
In connection with the Joint Venture Transaction (defined and
discussed in Note 2 below), we re-evaluated our segment
structure and determined it was appropriate to exclude corporate
expenses from our
F-60
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
upstream reportable segment. Corporate expenses will be
unallocated. Current year and prior year reported segment
results have been adjusted to reflect the new structure.
Foreign
currency translation
The primary economic currency of our Jamaican bauxite mining
operation is the U.S. dollar. Certain transactions,
however, such as salary and wages and local vendor payments, are
made in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These
transactions are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on
the dates of the transactions.
Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items
and on the retranslation of monetary items are immaterial and
are included in selling, general and administrative expenses on
the statement of operations. Non-monetary items that are
measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are
not retranslated.
|
|
2.
|
JOINT
VENTURE TRANSACTION
|
On August 3, 2009, we entered into an agreement with
Century Aluminum Company (together with its subsidiaries,
(Century) whereby we would become the sole owner of
both Gramercy and St. Ann. The transaction closed on
August 31, 2009 (the Joint Venture
Transaction). In the transaction, Noranda and Gramercy
released Century from certain obligations. These obligations
included (i) approximately $23.0 million Century owed
Gramercy for pre-transaction alumina purchases, and
(ii) Centurys guarantee to fund future payments of
environmental and asset retirement obligations.
We believe achieving 100% ownership of the Gramercy alumina
refinery and the St. Ann bauxite mining operation provides an
opportunity for value creation and continues to ensure a secure
supply of alumina to our New Madrid smelter.
We adopted FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations
(ASC Topic 805) on January 1, 2009 and
therefore applied its provisions to our accounting for the Joint
Venture Transaction. Our circumstances involved two significant
areas where ASC Topic 805 changed previous accounting guidance
for business combinations.
|
|
|
|
|
The Joint Venture Transaction was a business combination
achieved in stages, since we owned 50% of both Gramercy and St.
Ann prior to August 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under ASC Topic 805, if an acquirer owns a noncontrolling equity
investment in the acquiree immediately before obtaining control,
the acquirer should re-measure that investment to fair value as
of the acquisition date and recognize any remeasurement gains or
losses in earnings.
|
|
|
|
The preliminary acquisition-date fair value of our previous
equity interests is $142.4 million, which exceeds the
acquisition-date carrying value of $125.9 million. We have
recorded the difference of $16.5 million, net of tax of
$4.0 million, as unallocated purchase price in long-term
liabilities. Pending the finalization of the valuation, we may
record a gain for any remaining difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Joint Venture Transaction may be a bargain purchase. We
assumed the remaining portion of Gramercy and St. Ann in
exchange for releasing Century from certain obligations which
included (i) approximately $23.0 million Century owed
Gramercy for pre-transaction alumina purchases, and
(ii) Centurys guarantee to fund future payments of
environmental and asset retirement obligations. To the extent
permitted by U.S. GAAP, we are assigning a fair value to
the liabilities related to the guarantee from which we released
Century. We are in the process of reassessing the recognition
and measurement of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. Based on the preliminary fair values assigned to the
assets of acquired and liabilities assumed, we have recorded the
unallocated purchase price of $114.8 million in long-term
liabilities. Pending the conclusion of that reassessment
|
F-61
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
process, we may record a gain on the Joint Venture Transaction
resulting from any remaining unallocated purchase price after
the reassessment process is completed and the valuations are
finalized.
|
The calculation of our unallocated purchase price is summarized
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Transaction date preliminary fair value of our previous 50%
equity interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction date carrying value of our 50% equity interest
|
|
|
125,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated purchase price related to revaluing our previous 50%
equity interest
|
|
|
16,491
|
|
|
|
142,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in SAJBP (see Note 19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,247
|
|
Preliminary fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
61,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
63,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
198,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
22,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
25,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(38,969
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
(58,507
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental, land and reclamation liabilities
|
|
|
(24,642
|
)
|
|
|
261,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated purchase price from acquired interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our estimates and assumptions are subject to change, depending
on the final identification and evaluation of the fair value of
the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the closing date of the transaction. The balance
sheet caption unallocated purchase price comprises
the following components at September 30, 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Unallocated purchase price from acquired interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,779
|
|
Unallocated purchase price related to revaluing our previous 50%
equity interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated purchase price
|
|
|
16,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(4,011
|
)
|
|
|
12,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unallocated purchase price, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are utilizing a third party valuation firm to assist us in
determining the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in the Joint Venture Transaction. See
Note 22 for further discussion of significant assumptions
used so far in measuring these fair values.
Prior to the Joint Venture Transaction, our 50% investment
interests in the joint ventures were accounted for by the equity
method (see Note 21). The results of operations related to
Gramercy and St. Ann are included in our consolidated financial
statements from the closing date of the transaction and are
recorded in our upstream business. The amount of revenue and
earnings of Gramercy and St. Ann included in our
F-62
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
consolidated statement of operations from the transaction date
to September 30, 2009, is summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
19,545
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,364
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma condensed
statement of operations data for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009 and reflects
the results of operations as if the Joint Venture Transaction
had been effective January 1, 2008. These amounts have been
calculated by adjusting the results of Gramercy and St. Ann to
reflect the additional inventory cost, depreciation and
amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair
value adjustments to inventory, property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets had been applied on January 1, 2008,
together with the consequential tax effects. The unaudited pro
forma financial information is not intended to represent the
consolidated results of operations we would have reported if the
acquisition had been completed at January 1, 2008, nor is
it necessarily indicative of future results.
Pro forma condensed statement of operations is presented below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Ended Sept. 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
444,624
|
|
|
|
277,966
|
|
|
|
1,271,024
|
|
|
|
677,640
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
30,127
|
|
|
|
(18,651
|
)
|
|
|
120,869
|
|
|
|
(102,439
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(24,411
|
)
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
57,324
|
|
|
|
3.
|
NEW
MADRID POWER OUTAGE
|
During the week of January 26, 2009, power supply to our
New Madrid smelter, which supplies all of the upstream
business aluminum production, was interrupted several
times because of a severe ice storm in Southeastern Missouri. As
a result of the damage caused by the outage, we lost
approximately 75% of the smelter capacity. The smelter has
returned to operating above 65% of capacity as of
September 30, 2009.
Management believes the smelter outage has had minimal impact on
our value-added shipments of rod and billet. We have been able
to continue to supply our value-added customers because the
re-melt capability within the New Madrid facility allowed us to
make external metal purchases and then utilize our value-added
processing capacity. The downstream business has traditionally
purchased metal from New Madrid as well as from external sources
of supply and increased its purchases from external suppliers to
replace the metal New Madrid was not able to supply.
We reached a $67.5 million settlement with our insurance
carriers, all of which has been received as of
September 30, 2009. Insurance proceeds funded
$11.5 million of capital expenditures during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
F-63
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table shows the insurance activity as presented in
our financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Incurred
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Incurred
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
3,697
|
|
|
|
(3,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,464
|
|
|
|
(17,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,569
|
|
|
|
(6,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
(18,375
|
)
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
24,033
|
|
|
|
(67,500
|
)
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance cash receipts through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In recording costs and losses associated with the power outage,
we followed applicable U.S. GAAP to determine asset
write-downs, changes in estimated useful lives, and accruals for
out-of-pocket
costs. To the extent the realization of the claims for costs and
losses were considered probable at any interim balance sheet
date, we recorded expected proceeds only to the extent that
costs and losses were reflected in the financial statements in
accordance with applicable U.S. GAAP. For claim amounts
resulting in gains or in excess of costs and losses that have
been reflected in the financial statements, we recorded such
amounts only when those portions of the claims, including all
contingencies, were settled.
The line item titled Excess insurance proceeds
reflects the residual insurance recovery after applying total
proceeds recognized against the losses incurred through
September 30, 2009. This amount is not intended to
represent a gain on the insurance claim, but only a timing
difference between proceeds and claim-related costs incurred. We
will continue to incur costs into the future related to bringing
the production back to full capacity and may incur costs that
exceed the total insurance settlement.
In December 2008, we announced a Company-wide workforce and
business process restructuring that reduced our operating costs,
conserved liquidity and improved operating efficiencies.
The workforce restructuring plan involved a total staff
reduction of approximately 338 employees and contract
workers. The reduction in the employee workforce included 2
affected corporate employees, and 240 affected employees in our
upstream business. These reductions were substantially completed
during fourth quarter 2008. The reductions at the downstream
facilities included 96 affected employees and were substantially
completed during fourth quarter 2008.
F-64
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact of the restructuring
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Time Involuntary
|
|
|
Total Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Window Benefits(a)
|
|
|
Termination Benefits(b)
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restructuring expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
4,197
|
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
7,375
|
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
Benefits paid in 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
8,613
|
|
Benefits paid in 2009 Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
Benefits paid in 2009 Upstream
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(3,412
|
)
|
|
|
(3,525
|
)
|
Benefits paid in 2009 Downstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,360
|
)
|
|
|
(2,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Window benefits were recorded in pension liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets. Benefits paid represent estimated
expenses. The actual balance will be determined actuarially at
the pension remeasurement date. |
(b) |
|
One-time involuntary termination benefits were recorded in
accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
|
5.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA
|
Statements of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19,986
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
66,736
|
|
|
|
42,687
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
19,816
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
65,043
|
|
|
|
42,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of cash flows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
52,102
|
|
|
|
13,700
|
|
Cash (refunded) paid for income taxes
|
|
|
29,768
|
|
|
|
(8,999
|
)
|
F-65
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
8,107
|
|
|
|
33,166
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
176,609
|
|
|
|
173,350
|
|
Short-term treasury bills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
184,716
|
|
|
|
256,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly
liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at
the date of purchase. During 2008, FDIC limits increased and at
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, all cash
balances, excluding the money market funds and the short-term
treasury bills, were fully insured by the FDIC. All of our money
market funds are invested entirely in U.S. treasury
securities, which we believe do not expose us to significant
credit risk. We consider our investments in money market funds
and short-term treasury bills to be available for use in our
operations. We report money market funds and short-term treasury
bills at fair value.
We use the
last-in-first-out
(LIFO) method of valuing raw materials,
work-in-process
and finished goods inventories at our New Madrid smelter and our
rolling mills. Inventories at Gramercy and St. Ann are valued at
weighted average cost. The components of our inventories are (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Raw materials, at cost
|
|
|
55,311
|
|
|
|
51,635
|
|
Work-in-process,
at cost
|
|
|
37,945
|
|
|
|
48,915
|
|
Finished goods, at cost
|
|
|
28,716
|
|
|
|
26,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory, at cost
|
|
|
121,972
|
|
|
|
126,683
|
|
LIFO adjustment(1)
|
|
|
40,379
|
|
|
|
26,073
|
|
Lower of cost or market (LCM) reserve
|
|
|
(51,319
|
)
|
|
|
(15,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, at lower of cost or market
|
|
|
111,032
|
|
|
|
136,837
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
27,987
|
|
|
|
39,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
|
139,019
|
|
|
|
176,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Inventories at Gramercy and St. Ann are stated at weighted
average cost and are not subject to the LIFO adjustment.
Gramercy and St. Ann inventories comprise 0.0% and 30.7% of
total inventories (at cost) at December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, respectively. |
Work-in-process
and finished goods inventories consist of the cost of materials,
labor and production overhead costs. Supplies inventory consists
primarily of maintenance supplies expected to be used within the
next twelve months. In connection with the Joint Venture
Transaction, we recorded $15.9 million of maintenance
supplies inventory.
During third quarter 2009, due to changes in estimates regarding
the usage rates of certain maintenance supplies, we reclassified
$5.8 million of maintenance supplies to a non-current
supplies account. Non-current maintenance supplies are included
in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F-66
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
An actual valuation of inventories valued under the LIFO method
is made at the end of each year based on inventory levels and
costs at that time. Quarterly inventory determinations under
LIFO are based on assumptions about projected inventory levels
at the end of the year. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we recorded a LIFO loss of
$12.6 million due to a decrement in inventory quantities
because management does not expect to rebuild the decrement in
2009.
|
|
8.
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation
is based on the estimated useful lives of the assets computed
principally by the straight-line method for financial reporting
purposes.
Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Lives
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11,921
|
|
|
|
52,985
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
10 - 47
|
|
|
|
87,155
|
|
|
|
101,434
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 - 50
|
|
|
|
632,834
|
|
|
|
783,595
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,495
|
|
|
|
30,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754,405
|
|
|
|
968,554
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,782
|
)
|
|
|
(208,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,623
|
|
|
|
759,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales includes depreciation expense of the following
amount in each period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
23,774
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
19,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
71,225
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
63,410
|
|
Depreciation expense for 2009 in the tables above excludes
insurance recoveries related to the power outage discussed in
Note 3.
In connection with the power outage at New Madrid, we wrote off
assets with net book values of $0.3 million and
$2.1 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. In addition, due to
damage from the power outage, the lives of certain remaining
assets were reduced by approximately one year during first
quarter 2009, resulting in $0.7 million and
$3.4 million of increased depreciation expense for the
respective three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2009. Finally, in connection with the power outage we also
continued to depreciate idle pots, recording $0.8 and
$3.4 million in depreciation expense during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In August 2009, based on changes in expectations about the
utilization of certain equipment, we wrote off excess downstream
segment mill equipment which was previously reported as
construction in progress with a net book value of
$3.0 million.
F-67
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition consideration paid
over the fair value of identifiable net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are
reviewed for impairment at least annually, in the fourth
quarter, or upon the occurrence of certain triggering events.
We evaluate goodwill for impairment using a two-step process.
The first step is to compare the fair value of each of our
segments to their respective book values, including goodwill. If
the fair value of a segment exceeds the book value, segment
goodwill is not considered impaired and the second step of the
impairment test is not required. If the book value of a segment
exceeds the fair value, the second step of the impairment test
is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the impairment test compares the implied fair
value of the segments goodwill with the book value of that
goodwill. If the book value of the segments goodwill
exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The
implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner
as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination.
The following presents changes in the carrying amount of
goodwill for the following periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
124,853
|
|
|
|
131,269
|
|
|
|
256,122
|
|
Changes in purchase price allocations
|
|
|
4,588
|
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
Tax adjustments
|
|
|
8,269
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,500
|
)
|
|
|
(25,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
137,710
|
|
|
|
105,066
|
|
|
|
242,776
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,200
|
)
|
|
|
(40,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009
|
|
|
137,710
|
|
|
|
64,866
|
|
|
|
202,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based upon the final evaluation of the fair value of our
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
as of the closing date of the Apollo Acquisition, we recorded
valuation adjustments that increased goodwill and decreased
property, plant and equipment $4.1 million in March 2008.
For acquisitions entered into prior to January 1, 2009,
when income tax uncertainties that resulted from a purchase
business combination were resolved, adjustments are recorded to
increase or decrease goodwill. Accordingly, in June 2008, we
recorded a $10.9 million adjustment to increase goodwill to
account for the difference between the estimated deferred tax
asset for the carryover basis of acquired federal net operating
loss and minimum tax credit carryforwards and the final deferred
tax asset for such net operating loss and minimum tax credit
carryforwards. In December 2008, we recorded a $2.9 million
adjustment to decrease goodwill to reflect the final
determination of taxes.
Impairments
During fourth quarter 2008, as the impact of the global economic
contraction began to be realized, we recorded a
$25.5 million impairment write-down of goodwill in the
downstream business. In connection with the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements for first quarter 2009, we
concluded that it was appropriate to re-evaluate our goodwill
and intangibles for potential impairment in light of the power
outage at our New Madrid smelter and the accelerated
deteriorations of demand volumes in both our upstream and
downstream segments. Based on our interim impairment analysis
during first quarter 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of
$2.8 million on trade names and $40.2 million on
goodwill in the downstream segment.
F-68
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
No further impairment indicators were noted in the second or
third quarters of 2009 regarding the recoverability of goodwill;
therefore, no goodwill impairment testing was necessary at
June 30, 2009 or September 30, 2009.
Our analyses included assumptions about future profitability and
cash flows of our segments, which we believe reflect our best
estimates at the date the valuations were performed. The
estimates were based on information that was known or knowable
at the date of the valuations. It is at least reasonably
possible that the assumptions we employed will be materially
different from the actual amounts or results, and that
additional impairment charges for either or both segments will
be necessary.
|
|
10.
|
OTHER
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Other intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Non-amortizable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names (indefinite life)
|
|
|
20,494
|
|
|
|
17,694
|
|
Amortizable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships (12.9 year weighted average life)
|
|
|
51,288
|
|
|
|
73,408
|
|
Other (2.5 year weighted average life)
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,471
|
|
|
|
91,791
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(6,104
|
)
|
|
|
(9,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
66,367
|
|
|
|
82,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the Joint Venture Transaction, we recorded identifiable
intangible assets with a preliminary value of
$22.1 million. These assets consist of contractual and
non-contractual customer relationships and will be amortized
over a range preliminarily estimated to be 7
9 years.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses of the following
amount in each period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
944
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
As part of our interim impairment analysis of intangible assets
during first quarter 2009 discussed in Note 9, we recorded
an impairment charge of $2.8 million related to the
indefinite-lived trade names in the downstream business. Future
impairment charges for either or both segments could be required
if we do not achieve cash flow, revenue and profitability
projections.
F-69
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
DETAILS
OF CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS
|
Accounts receivable, net consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
76,031
|
|
|
|
101,996
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,559
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
74,472
|
|
|
|
101,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
|
|
6,601
|
|
Current deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,547
|
|
Employee loans receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current assets
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
17,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net of amortization
|
|
|
27,736
|
|
|
|
19,849
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
26,159
|
|
|
|
21,738
|
|
Pension asset (see Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609
|
|
Restricted cash (see Note 18)
|
|
|
3,412
|
|
|
|
10,869
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
6,928
|
|
|
|
17,357
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
69,516
|
|
|
|
88,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
16,301
|
|
|
|
31,737
|
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
3,299
|
|
|
|
3,494
|
|
Asset retirement obligations (see Note 18)
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
Land and reclamation obligations (see Note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,103
|
|
Pension and OPEB liabilities
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
One-time involuntary termination benefits
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Property, sales, and use taxes
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
13,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
|
32,740
|
|
|
|
61,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-70
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Reserve for uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
9,560
|
|
|
|
9,889
|
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
9,159
|
|
|
|
9,455
|
|
Asset retirement obligations (see Note 18)
|
|
|
6,602
|
|
|
|
12,937
|
|
Environmental remediation obligation (see Note 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,240
|
|
Land and reclamation obligations (see Note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,406
|
|
Deferred interest payable
|
|
|
7,344
|
|
|
|
11,059
|
|
Deferred compensation and other
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
39,582
|
|
|
|
62,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges net of taxes
of $150,296 and $122,669
|
|
|
263,782
|
|
|
|
215,386
|
|
Pension and OPEB adjustments, net of tax benefit of $39,078 and
$39,210
|
|
|
(64,679
|
)
|
|
|
(66,326
|
)
|
Equity in accumulated other comprehensive income of
equity-method investees, net of tax benefit of $132 and $0
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
198,315
|
|
|
|
149,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This balance was reversed through our accounting for the Joint
Venture Transaction. The balance at August 31, 2009
immediately prior to the reversal was a $2.0 million loss. |
|
|
12.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
In connection with the Apollo Acquisition, we entered into a
management consulting and advisory services agreement with
Apollo for the provision of certain structuring, management and
advisory services for an initial term ending on May 18,
2017. Terms of the agreement provide for annual fees of
$2.0 million, payable in one lump sum annually. We expense
approximately $0.5 million of such fees each quarter within
selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated
statements of operations.
We purchase alumina in transactions with Gramercy. Until the
Joint Venture Transaction on August 31, 2009, Gramercy was
our 50% owned joint venture, and purchases from Gramercy were
considered related party transactions. Related party purchases
from Gramercy prior to the Joint Venture Transaction were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
41,019
|
|
Period from July 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009
|
|
|
11,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
122,984
|
|
Period from January 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009
|
|
|
56,019
|
|
F-71
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Subsequent to the Joint Venture Transaction, purchases from
Gramercy are eliminated in consolidation as intercompany
transactions. Accounts payable to affiliates at
December 31, 2008 consisted of a $34.2 million
liability to Gramercy. This liability is eliminated in
consolidation at September 30, 2009 following the Joint
Venture Transaction.
We sell rolled aluminum products to Berry Plastics Corporation,
a portfolio company of Apollo, under an annual sales contract.
Sales to this entity were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4,057
|
|
The following table presents the carrying values and fair values
of our debt outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Noranda:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2014 (unamortized discount of
$1,842 and $538 at December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2009, respectively)
|
|
|
218,158
|
|
|
|
30,800
|
|
|
|
67,996
|
|
|
|
33,998
|
|
AcquisitionCo:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term B loan due 2014
|
|
|
393,450
|
|
|
|
393,024
|
|
|
|
349,012
|
|
|
|
349,012
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
153,000
|
|
|
|
387,047
|
|
|
|
259,322
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
216,930
|
|
|
|
216,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,346,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(32,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,314,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
credit facilities
AcquisitionCo entered into senior secured credit facilities on
May 18, 2007, which consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $500.0 million term B loan with a maturity of seven
years, which was fully drawn on May 18, 2007; of which
$151.0 million has been repaid or repurchased (some at a
discount) as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
a $242.7 million revolving credit facility which matures in
2013, which includes borrowing capacity available for letters of
credit and for borrowing on
same-day
notice. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
repurchased a face value amount of $6.5 million of the
revolving credit facility for $4.0 million. As a result of
the repurchase, our maximum borrowing capacity was reduced
$7.3 million from $250.0 million to
$242.7 million. Outstanding letter of credit amounts on the
revolving credit facility totaled $24.2 million at
September 30, 2009.
|
F-72
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The senior secured credit facilities permit AcquisitionCo to
incur incremental term and revolving loans under such facilities
in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million.
Incurrence of such incremental indebtedness under the senior
secured credit facilities is subject to, among other things,
AcquisitionCos compliance with a Senior Secured Net Debt
to Adjusted EBITDA ratio (in each case as defined in the credit
agreement governing the term B loan) of 2.75 to 1.0 until
December 31, 2008 and 3.0 to 1.0 thereafter. At
September 30, 2009, our Senior Secured Net debt to Adjusted
EBITDA ratio was below 3.0 to 1.0. At December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, AcquisitionCo had no commitments from
any lender to provide such incremental loans.
The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by us and by
all of the existing and future direct and indirect wholly owned
domestic subsidiaries of AcquisitionCo that do not qualify as
unrestricted under the senior secured credit
facilities. These guarantees are full and unconditional. NHB
Capital LLC (NHB), in which we have 100% ownership
interest, is the only unrestricted subsidiary and the only
domestic subsidiary that has not guaranteed these obligations.
See Note 24 for the discussion of NHB. The credit
facilities are secured by first priority pledges of all of the
equity interests in AcquisitionCo and all of the equity
interests in each of the existing and future direct and indirect
wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of AcquisitionCo. The senior
secured credit facilities are also secured by first priority
security interests in substantially all of the assets of
AcquisitionCo, as well as those of each of our existing and
future direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries
that have guaranteed the senior secured credit facilities.
On May 7, 2009, participating lenders approved an amendment
to the senior secured credit facilities to permit discounted
prepayments of the term B loan and revolving credit facility
through a modified Dutch auction procedure. The
amendment also permits us to conduct open market purchases of
the revolving credit facility and term B loan at a discount.
Term B
loan
Interest on the loan is based either on LIBOR or the prime rate,
at AcquisitionCos election, in either case plus an
applicable margin (2.00% over LIBOR at December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2009) that depends upon the ratio of
AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to its EBITDA (in
each case as defined in the credit agreement governing the term
B loan). The interest rates at December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009 were 4.24% and 2.25%, respectively.
Interest on the term B loan is payable no less frequently than
quarterly, and such loan amortizes at a rate of 1% per annum,
payable quarterly, beginning on September 30, 2007. On
June 28, 2007, AcquisitionCo made an optional prepayment of
$75.0 million on the term B loan. The optional prepayment
was applied to reduce in direct order the remaining amortization
installments in forward order of maturity, which served to
effectively eliminate the 1% per annum required principal
payment.
AcquisitionCo is required to prepay amounts outstanding under
the credit agreement based on an amount equal to 50% of our
Excess Cash Flow (as calculated in accordance with the terms of
the credit agreement governing the term B loan) within
95 days after the end of each fiscal year. The required
percentage of AcquisitionCos Excess Cash Flow payable to
the lenders under the credit agreement governing the term B loan
shall be reduced from 50% to either 25% or 0% based on
AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to EBITDA ratio (in
each case as defined in the credit agreement governing the term
B loan) or the principal amount of term B loan that has been
repaid. A mandatory prepayment of $24.5 million pursuant to
the cash flow sweep provisions of the credit agreement was paid
in April 2009 and was equal to 50% of AcquisitionCos
Excess Cash Flow for 2008. When the final calculation was
performed, the payment was reduced from the estimated amount
reported at December 31, 2008 of $32.3 million.
Revolving
credit facility
Interest on the revolving credit facility is based either on
LIBOR or the prime rate, at AcquisitionCos election, in
either case plus an applicable margin (2.00% over LIBOR at
December 31, 2008 and
F-73
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2009) that depends upon the ratio of
AcquisitionCos Senior Secured Net Debt to its EBITDA (in
each case as defined in the applicable credit facility) and is
payable at least quarterly. The interest rate on the revolver
was 2.46% at December 31, 2008 and 2.25% at
September 30, 2009. AcquisitionCo had outstanding letters
of credit totaling $7.0 million and $24.2 million
under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2009, respectively. At December 31,
2008, $225.0 million was drawn down on the facility leaving
$18.0 million available for borrowing. As a result of the
revolving credit facility repurchase, our borrowing capacity was
reduced $7.3 million from $250.0 million to
$242.7 million, and at September 30, 2009,
$216.9 million was drawn down on the facility, leaving
$1.6 million available under the facility.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under
the revolving credit facility, AcquisitionCo is required to pay:
|
|
|
|
|
a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving credit
facility in respect of unutilized commitments at a rate equal to
0.5% per annum subject to step down if certain financial tests
are met; and
|
|
|
|
additional fees related to outstanding letters of credit under
the revolving credit facility at a rate of 2.0% per annum.
|
Certain
covenants
We have no financial maintenance covenants on any borrowings.
Certain covenants contained in our debt agreements governing our
senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing
our notes restrict our ability to take certain actions if we are
unable to meet defined Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges and net
senior secured debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratios. These actions
include incurring additional secured or unsecured debt,
expanding borrowings under existing term loan facilities, paying
dividends, engaging in mergers, acquisitions and certain other
investments, and retaining proceeds from asset sales. As a
result of not meeting certain of the minimum and maximum
financial levels established by our debt agreements as of
September 30, 2009 as conditions to the execution of
certain transactions, our ability to incur future indebtedness,
grow through acquisitions, make certain investments, pay
dividends and retain proceeds from asset sales may be limited.
In addition to the restrictive covenants described above, upon
the occurrence of certain events, such as a change of control,
our debt agreements could require that we repay or refinance our
indebtedness.
AcquisitionCo
notes
In addition to the senior secured credit facilities, on
May 18, 2007, AcquisitionCo issued $510.0 million
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015 (the AcquisitionCo
Notes). The AcquisitionCo Notes mature on May 15,
2015. The initial interest payment on the AcquisitionCo Notes
was paid on November 15, 2007, entirely in cash. For any
subsequent period through May 15, 2011, AcquisitionCo may
elect to pay interest: (i) entirely in cash, (ii) by
increasing the principal amount of the AcquisitionCo Notes or by
issuing new notes (the AcquisitionCo PIK interest)
or (iii) 50% in cash and 50% in AcquisitionCo PIK interest.
For any subsequent period after May 15, 2011, AcquisitionCo
must pay all interest in cash. The AcquisitionCo Notes cash
interest accrues at six-month LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum, reset
semi-annually, and the AcquisitionCo PIK interest, if any, will
accrue at six-month LIBOR plus 4.75% per annum, reset
semi-annually. The PIK interest rate was 7.35% at
December 31, 2008 and 6.16% at September 30, 2009.
On May 15, 2009, AcquisitionCo issued $16.6 million in
AcquisitionCo Notes as payment for PIK interest due May 15,
2009.
F-74
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The AcquisitionCo Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed
on a senior unsecured, joint and several basis by the existing
and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of AcquisitionCo
that guarantee the senior secured credit facilities. As
discussed elsewhere in this note, NHB is not a guarantor of the
senior secured credit facilities, and is therefore not a
guarantor of the AcquisitionCo Notes. See Note 24 for
further discussion of NHB. HoldCo fully and unconditionally
guarantees the AcquisitionCo Notes on a joint and several basis
with the existing guarantors. The guarantee by HoldCo is not
required by the indenture governing the AcquisitionCo Notes and
may be released by HoldCo at any time. HoldCo has no independent
operations or any assets other than its interest in
AcquisitionCo. AcquisitionCo is a wholly owned finance
subsidiary of HoldCo with no operations independent of its
subsidiaries which guarantee the AcquisitionCo Notes.
We have notified the trustee for the HoldCo and AcquisitionCo
bondholders of our election to pay the November 15, 2009
and May 15, 2010 interest payments entirely in kind.
The indenture governing the AcquisitionCo Notes limits
AcquisitionCos and our ability, among other things, to
(i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) declare or pay
dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem
our stock; (iii) make investments; (iv) sell assets,
including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
(v) enter into agreements restricting our
subsidiaries ability to pay dividends;
(vi) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all
or substantially all of our assets; (vii) enter into
transactions with our affiliates; and (viii) incur liens.
HoldCo
notes
On June 7, 2007, HoldCo issued Senior Floating Rate Notes
due 2014 (the HoldCo Notes) in aggregate principal
amount of $220.0 million, with a discount of 1.0% of the
principal amount. The HoldCo Notes mature on November 15,
2014. The HoldCo Notes are not guaranteed. The initial interest
payment on the HoldCo Notes was paid on November 15, 2007,
in cash; for any subsequent period through May 15, 2012, we
may elect to pay interest: (i) entirely in cash,
(ii) by increasing the principal amount of the HoldCo Notes
or by issuing new notes (the HoldCo PIK interest) or
(iii) 50% in cash and 50% in HoldCo PIK interest. For any
subsequent period after May 15, 2012, we must pay all
interest in cash. The HoldCo Notes cash interest accrues at
six-month LIBOR plus 5.75% per annum, reset semi-annually, and
the HoldCo PIK interest, if any, will accrue at six-month LIBOR
plus 6.5% per annum, reset semi-annually. The PIK interest rate
was 9.10% at December 31, 2008 and 7.91% at
September 30, 2009.
On May 15, 2009, HoldCo issued $3.3 million in HoldCo
Notes as payment for PIK interest due May 15, 2009.
As discussed above, we have notified the trustee for the HoldCo
and AcquisitionCo bondholders of our election to pay the
November 14, 2009 and May 15, 2010 interest payments
entirely in kind.
The indenture governing the HoldCo Notes limits
AcquisitionCos and our ability, among other things, to
(i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) declare or pay
dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem
our stock; (iii) make investments; (iv) sell assets,
including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
(v) enter into agreements restricting our
subsidiaries ability to pay dividends;
(vi) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all
or substantially all of our assets; (vii) enter into
transactions with our affiliates; and (viii) incur liens.
Debt
repurchase
For the three month period ended September 30, 2009, we
repurchased or repaid $81.1 million principal aggregate
amount of our outstanding HoldCo Notes, AcquisitionCo Notes, and
term B loan for a price of $52.2 million, plus fees. HoldCo
Notes with an aggregate principal balance of $5.5 million
and net carrying amount of $5.6 million (including deferred
financing fees and debt discounts) were repurchased at a price
of $2.5 million, plus fees. AcquisitionCo Notes with an
aggregate principal balance of $74.7 million and net
carrying amount of $74.5 million (including deferred
financing fees and debt discounts) were repurchased at a
F-75
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
price of $49.0 million, plus fees. We repurchased a face
value amount of $0.9 million of the term B loan for
$0.7 million. We recognized a gain of $28.6 million
representing the difference between the repurchase price and the
carrying amounts of repurchased debt for the three month period
ended September 30, 2009.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, we
repurchased or repaid $320.8 million principal aggregate
amount of our outstanding HoldCo Notes, AcquisitionCo Notes,
term B loan and revolving credit facility for a price of
$123.0 million, plus fees. HoldCo Notes with an aggregate
principal balance of $154.7 million and net carrying amount
of $153.8 million (including deferred financing fees and
debt discounts) were repurchased at a price of
$38.7 million, plus fees. AcquisitionCo Notes with an
aggregate principal balance of $139.6 million and net
carrying amount of $137.8 million (including deferred
financing fees and debt discounts) were repurchased at a price
of $67.4 million, plus fees. Of the HoldCo Notes and
AcquisitionCo Notes repurchased, we retired a face value amount
of $155.4 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. In addition to our $24.5 million
payment in April 2009 related to 2008 excess cash flows on the
term B loan, we repurchased a face value amount of
$19.9 million of the term B loan for $13.0 million. We
repurchased $6.6 million of our revolving credit facility
borrowings for $4.0 million. As a result of the revolving
credit facility repurchase, our borrowing capacity was reduced
$7.3 million from $250.0 million to
$242.7 million. We recognized a gain of $193.2 million
representing the difference between the repurchase price and the
carrying amounts of repurchased debt for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2009.
The gains have been reported as Gain on debt
repurchase in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2009. For tax purposes, gains from our
2009 debt repurchase will be deferred until 2014, and then
included in taxable income ratably from 2014 to 2018.
|
|
14.
|
PENSIONS
AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans for hourly and salaried
employees. Benefits under our sponsored defined benefit pension
plans are based on years of service
and/or
eligible compensation prior to retirement. We also sponsor other
post-retirement benefit (OPEB) plans for certain
employees. Our sponsored post-retirement benefits include life
insurance benefits and health insurance benefits. These health
insurance benefits cover 21 retirees and beneficiaries. In
addition, we provide supplemental executive retirement benefits
(SERP) for certain executive officers. Plans in
existence prior to the Joint Venture Transaction are referred to
as Noranda Plans below. We acquired the plans in
existence at Gramercy and St. Ann in the Joint Venture
Transaction. These plans, referred to below as Gramercy
Plans and St. Ann Plans, include defined
benefit pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans.
The net periodic cost disclosures below include the Gramercy
Plans and the St. Ann Plans from the date of the Joint Venture
Transaction.
Our pension funding policy is to contribute annually an amount
based on actuarial and economic assumptions designed to achieve
adequate funding of the projected benefit obligations and to
meet the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA). OPEB benefits are
funded as retirees submit claims.
We use a measurement date of December 31 to determine the
pension and OPEB liabilities.
F-76
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Net periodic benefit costs comprise the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6,052
|
)
|
|
|
(3,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization and deferral
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
6,176
|
|
|
|
6,133
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
12,359
|
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(13,617
|
)
|
|
|
(9,855
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization and deferral
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
5,382
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
|
5,323
|
|
|
|
15,475
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and OPEB assets and liabilities consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pension assets included in other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Ann pension plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and OPEB liabilities included in accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Plans
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and OPEB liabilities long term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Plans
|
|
|
120,859
|
|
|
|
132,318
|
|
Gramercy Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,959
|
|
St. Ann OPEB Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,859
|
|
|
|
140,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer
contributions
We have contributed $2.4 million to the SERP,
$0.3 million to the Gramercy pension plan, and
$1.3 million to the Noranda pension plan during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. We expect to contribute a
minimum of $0.4 million to the Noranda pension plan and
$0.1 million to the Gramercy pension plan during the
remainder of 2009. We may elect to contribute additional funds
to the plans.
F-77
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
|
Common
stock subject to redemption
In March 2008, we entered into an employment agreement with
Layle K. Smith to serve as our Chief Executive Officer (the
CEO) and to serve on our Board of Directors. As part
of that employment agreement, the CEO agreed to purchase
100,000 shares of common stock at $20 per share, for a
total investment of $2.0 million. The shares purchased
include a redemption feature which guarantees total realization
on these shares of at least eight million dollars (or, at his
option under certain circumstances, equivalent consideration in
the acquiring entity) in the event an early
change-in-control,
as defined in Mr. Smiths employment agreement occurs
prior to September 3, 2009 and the CEO remains employed
with us through the
12-month
anniversary of such change in control or experiences certain
qualifying terminations of employment, after which the per share
redemption value is fair value.
Prior to September 2009, because of the existence of the
conditional redemption feature, the carrying value of these
100,000 shares of common stock has been reported outside of
permanent equity. The redemption feature expired on
September 3, 2009, and the carrying amount was reclassified
to equity.
On November 12, 2009, our Board of Directors voted to
extend to March 3, 2013 the period during which
Mr. Smith may be entitled to benefits in the event of an
early
change-in-control.
The Board of Directors also provided that all of
Mr. Smiths stock options will receive the same
treatment in the event of an early
change-in-control
or other change in control of the Company.
Noranda
long-term incentive plan
Under our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Incentive
Plan) we have reserved 1,500,000 shares of our common
stock for issuance to employees and non-employee directors under
the Incentive Plan. Of this amount at September 30, 2009,
management investors owned 346,790 shares and there were
1,022,519 option grants outstanding. The remaining
130,691 shares remained available for issuance. On
November 12, 2009, our Board of Directors voted to amend
and restate the Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares
of Company common stock reserved for grant under the Incentive
Plan from 1,500,000 shares to 1,900,000 shares.
Options granted under the Incentive Plan generally have a ten
year term. Employee option grants historically have consisted of
time-vesting options and performance-vesting options. The
time-vesting options generally vest in equal one-fifth
installments on each of the first five anniversaries of the date
of grant or on the closing of Apollos acquisition of us,
as specified in the applicable award agreements, subject to
continued service through each applicable vesting date. The
performance-vesting options vest upon our investors
realization of a specified level of investor internal rate of
return (investor IRR), subject to continued service
through each applicable vesting date.
The employee options generally are subject to our (or
Apollos) call provision which expires upon the earlier of
a qualified public offering or May 2014 and provides us (or
Apollo) the right to repurchase the underlying shares at the
lower of their cost or fair market value upon certain
terminations of employment. A qualified public offering
transaction is defined in the documents governing the options as
a public offering that raises at least $200.0 million. This
call provision represents a substantive performance-vesting
condition with a life through May 2014; therefore, we recognize
stock compensation expense for service awards through May 2014.
Performance-vesting options issued in May 2007 have met their
performance-vesting provision. However, the shares underlying
the options remain subject to our (or Apollo) call provision.
Accordingly, the options currently are subject to service
conditions, and stock compensation expense is being recorded
over the remaining call provision through May 2014.
F-78
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At September 30, 2009, the expiration of the call option
upon a qualified public offering would have resulted in the
immediate recognition of $2.4 million of stock compensation
expense related to the cost of options where the investor IRR
targets were previously met and $0.7 million of stock
compensation expense related to the cost of options where the
offering (together with a $4.70 per share dividend paid in June
2008) would cause the performance option to be met.
Further, the period over which we recognize stock compensation
expense for service awards would change from May 2014 to five
years prospectively from the date of the qualified public
offering, which, based on options outstanding at
September 30, 2009, would increase quarterly stock
compensation expense by approximately $0.7 million.
Our Board of Directors declared and we paid a
$102.2 million cash dividend ($4.70 per share) in June
2008. The award holders were given $4.70 of value in the form of
an immediately vested cash payment of $2.70 per share and a
modification of the price of the options from $6 per share to $4
per share and $20 per share to $18 per share.
The summary of our stock option activity and related information
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Options and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee Director Options
|
|
|
Investor Director Provider Options
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding December 31, 2008
|
|
|
910,224
|
|
|
$
|
8.61
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(17,705
|
)
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding September 30, 2009
|
|
|
952,519
|
|
|
$
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully vested end of period (weighted average
remaining contractual term of 7.7 years)
|
|
|
447,397
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently exercisable end of period (weighted
average remaining contractual term of 7.7 years)
|
|
|
404,487
|
|
|
$
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options was estimated at the grant date
using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The
following summarizes information concerning stock option grants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Expected price volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
47.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Weighted average expected lives in years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Weighted average fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
We recorded stock compensation expense of the following amounts
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
399
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, total unrecognized stock
compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was
$7.3 million with a weighted average expense recognition
period of 4.7 years.
On November 12, 2009, our Board of Directors voted to amend
and restate stock option agreements with certain employees to
change the exercise prices of the underlying options and to
amend the vesting schedule of those options. The amended and
restated option agreements change the exercise price of these
options to $2.28 per share. This modification affects
5 employees and 269,500 options. The amendment also
provides that the 50% of the options which were originally
scheduled to vest based upon Companys investors
realization of investor IRR will now vest based on continued
service, with 15% scheduled to vest on each of the first and
second anniversaries of the amendment and restatement date, 20%
scheduled to vest on the third anniversary of the amendment and
restatement date and 25% scheduled to vest on each of the fourth
and fifth anniversaries of the amendment and restatement date.
This modification affected 5 employees and 138,125 options.
Our effective income tax rate was approximately 63.0% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 55.2% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. The effective tax rates
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008 were primarily impacted by, state income
taxes, equity method investee income, the Internal Revenue Code
Section 199 manufacturing deduction and goodwill impairment
in 2009. Each interim period is considered an integral part of
the annual period and tax expense is measured using the
estimated annual effective tax rate. Estimates of the annual
effective tax rate at the end of interim periods are, of
necessity, based on evaluations of possible future events and
transactions and may be subject to subsequent refinement or
revision. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, we used the annual effective tax rate
based on estimated ordinary income for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had
unrecognized income tax benefits (including interest) of
approximately $11.3 million, and $11.0 million,
respectively (of which approximately $7.4 million, if
recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax
rate). As of September 30, 2009, the gross amount of
unrecognized tax benefits changed by an immaterial amount. It is
expected that the unrecognized tax benefits may change in the
next twelve months; however, due to Xstratas
indemnification of us for tax obligations related to periods
ending on or before the acquisition date, we do not expect the
change to have a significant impact on our results of operations
or our financial position.
In April 2009, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
commenced an examination of our U.S. income tax return for
2006. As part of the Apollo Acquisition, Xstrata indemnified us
for tax obligations related to periods ending on or before the
acquisition date. Therefore, we do not anticipate that the IRS
examination will have a material impact on our financial
statements.
F-80
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
17.
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
The Company presents both basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share (EPS) on the face of the consolidated
statements of operations. As provided by SFAS 128,
Earnings per Share, basic EPS is calculated as net income
(loss) available to common stockholders divided by the
weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS is calculated using the weighted-average outstanding
common shares determined using the treasury stock method for
options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
For the Three
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(22,429
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,328
|
|
|
$
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,750
|
|
|
|
21,801
|
|
|
|
21,711
|
|
|
|
21,765
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21,750
|
|
|
|
21,801
|
|
|
|
21,711
|
|
|
|
21,765
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Certain stock options whose terms and conditions are described
in Note 15 could potentially dilute basic EPS in the
future, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS
because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods
presented: three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 1,042,343; three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 1,022,519.
|
|
18.
|
DERIVATIVE
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
We use derivative instruments to mitigate the risks associated
with fluctuations in aluminum price, natural gas prices and
interest rates. We recognize all derivative instruments as
either assets or liabilities at fair value in our balance sheet.
We designated our fixed-price aluminum sale swaps as cash flow
hedges through January 29, 2009, the week of the power
outage discussed in Note 3; thus the effective portion of
such derivatives was adjusted to fair value through accumulated
other comprehensive income (AOCI) through
January 29, 2009, with the ineffective portion reported
through earnings. As of September 30, 2009, the pre-tax
amount of the effective portion of cash flow hedges recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income was $338.1 million.
Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting or have not
been designated for hedge accounting treatment are adjusted to
fair value through earnings in gains (losses) on hedging
activities in the consolidated statements of operations. As of
September 30, 2009, all derivatives were held for purposes
other than trading.
Merrill Lynch is the counterparty for a substantial portion of
our derivatives. All swap arrangements with Merrill Lynch are
part of a master arrangement which is subject to the same
guarantee and security provisions as the senior secured credit
facilities. At current hedging levels, the master arrangement
does not require us to post additional collateral, nor are we
subject to margin requirements. We present the fair values of
derivatives where Merrill Lynch is the counterparty in a net
position on the consolidated balance sheet as a result of our
F-81
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
master netting agreement. The following is a gross presentation
of the derivative balances as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current derivative assets
|
|
|
111,317
|
|
|
|
91,299
|
|
Current derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(29,600
|
)
|
|
|
(20,818
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative assets, net
|
|
|
81,717
|
|
|
|
70,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term derivative assets
|
|
|
290,877
|
|
|
|
140,514
|
|
Long-term derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(35,061
|
)
|
|
|
(24,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term derivative asset, net
|
|
|
255,816
|
|
|
|
115,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the carrying values, which were
recorded at fair value, of our derivative instruments
outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminum swaps-fixed-price
|
|
|
401,909
|
|
|
|
229,243
|
|
Aluminum swaps-variable-price
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(21,472
|
)
|
|
|
(19,669
|
)
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
(33,404
|
)
|
|
|
(25,731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
337,533
|
|
|
|
186,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The September 30, 2009 variable-price aluminum swap balance
is net of a $1.7 million broker margin call asset.
We recorded (gains) losses for the change in the fair value of
derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment or have not been designated for hedge accounting
treatment, as well as the ineffectiveness of derivatives that do
qualify for hedge accounting treatment as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not Qualified
|
|
|
Derivatives Qualified as Hedges
|
|
as Hedges
|
|
|
Amount Reclassified
|
|
Hedge
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
From AOCI
|
|
Ineffectiveness
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
Quarter-to-date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
21,887
|
|
|
|
(1,714
|
)
|
|
|
25,323
|
|
|
|
45,496
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
(24,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,498
|
|
|
|
(5,747
|
)
|
Year-to-date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
45,057
|
|
|
|
(4,138
|
)
|
|
|
9,578
|
|
|
|
50,497
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
(149,272
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
45,268
|
|
|
|
(104,073
|
)
|
As a result of the hedge de-designation at January 29, 2009
discussed below, as well as revised forecasts during 2009, we
expect to reclassify a gain of $87.0 million from
accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings from
October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010.
F-82
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
De-designated
cash flow hedges
Fixed-price
aluminum sale swaps
In 2007 and 2008, we implemented a hedging strategy designed to
reduce commodity price risk and protect operating cash flows in
the upstream business through the use of fixed-price aluminum
sale swaps. As a result of the New Madrid power outage during
the week of January 26, 2009, and in anticipation of
fixed-price aluminum purchase swaps described below, we
discontinued hedge accounting for all of our remaining
fixed-price aluminum sale swaps on January 29, 2009. During
first quarter 2009, we entered into fixed-price aluminum
purchase swaps to lock in a portion of the favorable market
position of our fixed-price aluminum sale swaps. The average
margin per pound locked in was $0.40 at September 30, 2009.
To the extent we have entered into fixed-price aluminum purchase
swaps, the fixed-price aluminum sale swaps are no longer hedging
our exposure to price risk.
For the three months and nine months ended September 30,
2009, the amount reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income to earnings was $24.2 million and
$149.3 million, respectively. These amounts are noted in
the table above. Of these amounts, $78.5 million was
reclassified into earnings during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 because it was probable that the
original forecasted transactions would not occur. Changes to
forecasts had no impact on the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
In March 2009, we entered into a hedge settlement agreement with
Merrill Lynch. As amended in April 2009, the agreement provides
a mechanism for us to monetize up to $400.0 million of the
favorable net position of our long-term derivatives to fund debt
repurchases. The agreement states that Merrill Lynch will only
settle fixed-price aluminum sale swaps that are offset by
fixed-price aluminum purchase swaps. We settled offsetting
fixed-price aluminum purchase swaps and sale swaps to fund our
debt repurchases during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009. In the three months ended
September 30, 2009, we received $49.6 million in
proceeds from the hedge settlement agreement. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, we received
$119.7 million in proceeds from the hedge settlement
agreement.
On October 29, 2009, we amended our hedge settlement
agreement. The amendment provides that a portion of locked in
value from the offsetting swaps may be used to meet collateral
posting requirements for any new hedge volumes we enter into
with Merrill Lynch.
As of September 30, 2009, we had outstanding fixed-price
aluminum sales swaps as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Hedged Price
|
|
Pounds Hedged
|
Year
|
|
per Pound
|
|
Annually
|
|
|
$
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
72,268
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
290,541
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
272,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments
Fixed-price
aluminum purchase swaps
As previously discussed, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we entered into fixed-price aluminum
purchase swaps to offset a portion of our existing fixed-price
aluminum sale swaps. Beginning first
F-83
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
quarter 2009, we entered into fixed-price purchase swaps to
offset the fixed-price sale swaps. The following table
summarizes fixed-price aluminum purchase swaps as of
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Hedged Price
|
|
Pounds Hedged
|
Year
|
|
per Pound
|
|
Annually
|
|
|
$
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
245,264
|
|
2011
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
231,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-price
aluminum swaps
We also enter into forward contracts with our customers to sell
aluminum in the future at fixed prices in the normal course of
business. Because these contracts expose us to aluminum market
price fluctuations, we economically hedge this risk by entering
into variable-price aluminum swap contracts with various
brokers, typically for terms not greater than one year.
These swap contracts are not designated as hedging instruments;
therefore, any gains or losses related to the change in fair
value of these contracts were recorded in (gain) loss on hedging
activities in the consolidated statements of operations. We
recorded a gain of $4.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and a gain of $8.5 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The following table summarizes our variable-price aluminum
purchase swaps as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Hedged Price
|
|
Pounds Hedged
|
Year
|
|
per Pound
|
|
Annually
|
|
|
$
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
16,321
|
|
2010
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
14,342
|
|
We sold 8.8 million and 34.7 million pounds of
aluminum that were hedged with variable-priced aluminum swaps in
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively.
Interest
rate swap
We have floating-rate debt, which is subject to variations in
interest rates. On August 16, 2007, we entered into an
interest rate swap agreement to limit our exposure to floating
interest rates for the periods from November 15, 2007 to
November 15, 2011 with a notional amount of
$500.0 million, which such notional amount declines in
increments over time beginning in May 2009 at a 4.98% fixed
interest rate.
The interest rate swap agreement was not designated as a hedging
instrument. Accordingly, any gains or losses resulting from
changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts
were recorded in (gain) loss on hedging activities in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Natural
gas swaps
We purchase natural gas to meet our production requirements.
These purchases expose us to the risk of fluctuating natural gas
prices. To offset changes in the Henry Hub Index Price of
natural gas, we enter into financial swaps, by purchasing the
fixed forward price for the Henry Hub Index and simultaneously
entering into an agreement to sell the actual Henry Hub Index
Price.
F-84
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes our fixed-price natural gas swap
contracts per year at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price per
|
|
Notional Amount
|
Year
|
|
Million BTU $
|
|
Million BTUs
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
4,012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9.31
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
2012
|
|
|
9.06
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
These contracts were not designated as hedges for accounting
purposes. Accordingly, any gains or losses resulting from
changes in the fair value of the gas swap contracts were
recorded in (gain) loss on hedging activities in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Subsequent to September 30, 2009, we entered into
additional purchase swaps with respect to a portion of our
natural gas volume. The following table summarizes our
fixed-price natural gas swap contracts that we entered into
during the fourth quarter of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price per
|
|
Notional Amount
|
Year
|
|
Million BTU $
|
|
Million BTUs
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
|
|
6,069
|
|
These contracts were designated as hedges for accounting
purposes. Accordingly, any effective gains or losses resulting
from changes in the fair value of the gas swap contracts were
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and any
ineffective portions were recorded in (gain) loss on hedging
activities in the consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
19.
|
LAND,
RECLAMATION, AND ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
|
Land
and reclamation obligations
St. Ann has a reclamation obligation to rehabilitate land
disturbed by St. Anns bauxite mining operations. The
process to restore the disturbed land to its original condition
must be in compliance with the Government of Jamaicas
(GOJ) regulations and includes filling the open
mining pits and planting vegetation. GOJ regulations require the
reclamation process to be completed within three years of the
date a mining pit is mined-out certified by the GOJ. Liabilities
for reclamation are accrued as lands are disturbed and are based
on the approximate acreage to be rehabilitated and the average
historical cost per acre to rehabilitate lands. At
September 30, 2009, the current and long-term portions of
the reclamation obligation of $1.8 million and
$5.9 million are included in accrued liabilities and other
long-term liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet.
If land to be mined is privately owned, St. Ann offers to
purchase the residents homes for cash, relocate the
residents to another area, or a combination of these two
options. These costs are recorded as liabilities are incurred.
At September 30, 2009, the current and long-term portions
of the land obligation of $2.3 million and
$4.5 million are included in accrued liabilities and other
long-term liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet.
F-85
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the aggregate carrying
amount of liabilities for the reclamation and land obligations
at St. Ann (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Month Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed in connection with the Joint Venture
Transaction
|
|
|
14,540
|
|
Additional liabilities incurred
|
|
|
143
|
|
Liabilities settled
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
14,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligations
Our asset retirement obligations (ARO) consist of
costs related to the disposal of certain spent pot liners
associated with the New Madrid smelter, as well as costs
associated with the future closure of red mud lakes and the
removal of hazardous materials at the Gramercy refinery. We
believe the AROs recorded represent reasonable estimates of the
costs associated with these future costs. However, given the
relatively long time until closure of these assets, such
estimates are subject to changes due to a number of factors
including, changes in regulatory requirements, costs of labor
and materials, and other factors. In addition, we may have other
obligations that may arise in the event of a facility closure.
The current portion of the liability of $2.2 million and
$2.1 million relates to the disposal of spent pot-liners at
New Madrid and is recorded in accrued liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The remaining
non-current portion of $6.6 million and $12.9 million
is included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, respectively.
The following is a reconciliation of the aggregate carrying
amount of liabilities for the asset retirement obligations (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
|
8,795
|
|
Additional liabilities incurred
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
Liabilities assumed in connection with the Joint Venture
Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,864
|
|
Liabilities settled
|
|
|
(2,161
|
)
|
|
|
(2,745
|
)
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
8,795
|
|
|
|
15,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period ended September 30, 2009, ARO balances
reported in the above reconciliation have been adjusted in
connection with the asset disposals and additions related to the
power outage at our New Madrid smelter.
At September 30, 2009, we had $6.2 million of
restricted cash in an escrow account as security for the payment
of red mud lake closure obligations that would arise under state
environmental laws upon the termination of operations at the
Gramercy facility. This amount is included in other assets in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
F-86
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
20.
|
NONCONTROLLING
INTEREST
|
Through St. Ann, we hold a 49% partnership interest in St. Ann
Jamaica Bauxite Partners (SAJBP), in which the GOJ
holds 51% interest. SAJBP mines bauxite, approximately 50% of
which is sold to Gramercy, with the balance sold to third
parties.
St. Ann is a party to several agreements (collectively the
Mining Agreements) with the GOJ. St. Ann and the GOJ
have equal voting rights in SAJBPs executive committee.
St. Ann manages the mining operations under a management
agreement. St. Ann receives bauxite from SAJBP at SAJBPs
cost and pays the GOJ a return on its investment in SAJBP
through the fees discussed below. St. Ann has a special mining
lease with the GOJ for the supply of bauxite. The lease ensures
access to sufficient reserves to allow St. Ann to ship annually
4.5 million dry metric tonnes (DMT) of bauxite
from mining operations in a specified concession area through
September 30, 2030. In return for these rights, St. Ann is
required to pay annual fees consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
Dedication fee Base dedication fee of
$0.6 million per year is tied to a land base of
13,820 acres. The sum actually paid will vary with the
current total of bauxite lands owned by the GOJ which is still
being used by SAJBP expressed as a proportion of the total land
base.
|
|
|
|
Depletion fee A base depletion fee of
$0.2 million is paid on a base shipment of 4,000,000 DMT
per annum. Variations in amounts paid will be proportional to
changes in shipments.
|
|
|
|
Asset usage fee St. Ann also pays the GOJ 10%
annually on the GOJs 51% share of the mining assets. For
the period ended December 31, 2008, payments were
$1.7 million
|
|
|
|
Production levy A production levy is determined by a
formula applied to the average realized price of primary
aluminum as determined by regulation of the GOJ, on all bauxite
shipped from Jamaica other than sales to the GOJ and its
agencies.
|
|
|
|
Royalty Royalties are payable to any person for the
mining of bauxite at a rate of US $1.50 per dry metric ton of
monohydrate bauxite shipped and US $2.00 per dry metric ton of
trihydrate bauxite shipped, provided that during any period when
the production levy is payable the royalty shall be at a rate of
US $0.50 per dry metric ton.
|
We have determined that SAJBP is a variable interest entity
under U.S. GAAP, and St. Ann is SAJBPs primary
beneficiary. Therefore, we consolidate SAJBP into our financial
statements beginning with the date of the Joint Venture
Transaction. Due to the consolidation of SAJBP, we reflect the
following amounts in our balance sheet (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
311
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
11,931
|
|
Inventories, consisting of maintenance supplies inventory and
fuel
|
|
|
10,651
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
33,707
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(43,137
|
)
|
Environmental, land and reclamation liabilities
|
|
|
(7,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest (at 51%)
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-87
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating SAJBP do
not represent additional claims on our general assets.
SAJBPs creditors have claims only on the specific assets
of SAJBP and St. Ann. Similarly, the assets of SAJBP we
consolidate do not represent additional assets available to
satisfy claims against our general assets.
St. Ann receives bauxite from SAJBP at SAJBPs cost
therefore, SAJBP operates at breakeven. Further, all returns to
the GOJ are provided through the payments from St. Ann under the
various fees, levies, and royalties described above. In these
circumstances, no portion of SAJBPs net income (loss) or
consolidated comprehensive income (loss) is allocated to the
noncontrolling interest. We do not expect the balance of the
non-controlling interest to change from
period-to-period
unless there is an adjustment to the fair value of inventory or
property, plant and equipment, as may occur in a LCM or asset
impairment scenario.
|
|
21.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Labor
commitments
We are a party to nine collective bargaining agreements which
expire at various times. Agreements with two unions at St. Ann
expire in May and December 2010, respectively. Our agreement
with the union at Gramercy expires in September 2010. All other
collective bargaining agreements expire within the next five
years.
Legal
contingencies
We are a party to legal proceedings incidental to our business.
In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability with
respect to these actions will not materially affect our
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Environmental
matters
In addition to our asset retirement obligations discussed in
Note 18, we have identified certain environmental
conditions requiring remedial action or ongoing monitoring at
the Gramercy refinery. As of September 30, 2009, we
recorded a $3.2 million liability for remediation of
Gramercys known environmental conditions. This liability
is recorded on the balance sheet in other long-term liabilities.
Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement for Gramercy in
2004, $1.2 million remains in escrow from the previous
owner to reimburse Gramercy for expenses to be incurred in the
performance of the environmental remediation. This restricted
cash is included in other assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009.
We believe our environmental liabilities are not likely to have
a material adverse effect on financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows. However, it is at least reasonably
possible that future requirements will result in material
liabilities.
Production
Levy
The production levy provided for in the Mining Agreements (see
Note 19) was formally waived by the GOJ for St. Ann
through December 31, 2007. The waiver continued informally
through December 31, 2008. We are actively involved in
negotiations with the GOJ to formalize the waiver of the levy
for 2008, as well as the process for establishing the fiscal
regime structure beyond 2008 which will include addressing the
levy and related funding issues. Although St. Ann has prepared
its financial statements under the assumption that the
production levy continues to be waived through
September 30, 2009, there is a possibility that St. Ann
would pay a production levy ranging up to $5.0 million for
bauxite mined prior to September 30, 2009.
F-88
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Guarantees
In connection with the 2005 disposal of a former subsidiary,
American Racing Equipment of Kentucky, Inc (ARE), we
guaranteed certain outstanding leases for the automotive wheel
facilities located in Rancho Dominguez, Mexico. The leases have
various expiration dates that extend through December 2011.
Since March 2008, we were released from the guarantee obligation
on one of the properties, resulting in a reduction of the
remaining maximum future lease obligations. As of
September 30, 2009 the remaining maximum future payments
under these lease obligations totaled approximately 18% per
year. We have concluded that it is not probable that we will be
required to make payments pursuant to these guarantees and we
have not recorded a liability for these guarantees. Further,
AREs purchaser has indemnified us for all losses
associated with the guarantees.
Power
Contract
On July 24, 2009, Ameren, Missouris largest electric
utility, which provides electric service to our New Madrid
smelter, petitioned the Missouri Public Service Commission
(MoPSC) for a general rate increase of approximately
18% across all customer categories, including Noranda. Ameren
also requested that our contract be modified to include a
take-or-pay
arrangement. Although we cannot predict the outcome of the rate
case, if MoPSC grants Amerens entire rate request, our
rate would increase approximately 18% or $24.0 million per
year. We expect the case to be decided by the MoPSC in June
2010, if not settled prior to that time.
|
|
22.
|
INVESTMENTS
IN AFFILIATES
|
Through August 31, 2009, we held a 50% interest in Gramercy
and in St. Ann. On August 31, 2009, we became sole owner of
Gramercy and St. Ann. See Note 2 for further information
regarding the Joint Venture Transaction.
Summarized financial information for the joint ventures (as
recorded in their respective financial statements, at full
value, excluding the amortization of the excess carrying values
of our investments over the underlying equity in net assets of
the affiliates), is presented as of August 31, 2009, prior
to the Joint Venture Transaction. Since the transaction date,
the results of operations of Gramercy and St. Ann have been
included in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Summarized balance sheet information is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
173,661
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
110,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
284,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
89,736
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
17,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
107,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
177,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
284,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-89
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Summarized statements of operations information is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
July 1
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net sales(1)
|
|
|
137,054
|
|
|
|
51,342
|
|
|
|
403,491
|
|
|
|
208,135
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
(5,144
|
)
|
|
|
26,552
|
|
|
|
5,783
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
20,065
|
|
|
|
11,309
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net sales include sales to related parties, which include
alumina sales to us and our joint venture partner, and bauxite
sales from St. Ann to Gramercy (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
July 1
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
St. Ann to Gramercy
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
|
|
40,730
|
|
|
|
29,057
|
|
St. Ann to third parties
|
|
|
17,331
|
|
|
|
6,608
|
|
|
|
47,342
|
|
|
|
19,987
|
|
Gramercy to us and our joint venture partner
|
|
|
83,996
|
|
|
|
22,294
|
|
|
|
246,209
|
|
|
|
112,149
|
|
Gramercy to third parties
|
|
|
23,819
|
|
|
|
13,588
|
|
|
|
69,210
|
|
|
|
46,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,054
|
|
|
|
51,342
|
|
|
|
403,491
|
|
|
|
208,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
Beginning in fourth quarter 2008 and continuing through second
quarter 2009, the cost of alumina purchased from the Gramercy
refinery exceeded the spot prices of alumina available from
other sources. Because of the reduced need for alumina caused by
the smelter power outage and depressed market conditions, during
first quarter 2009 Gramercy reduced its annual production rate
of smelter grade alumina from approximately 1.0 million
metric tonnes to approximately 0.5 million metric tonnes
and implemented other cost saving activities.
These production changes led us to evaluate our investment in
the joint ventures for impairment in first quarter 2009, which
resulted in a $45.3 million write down ($39.3 million
for St. Ann and $6.0 million for Gramercy). In second
quarter 2009, we recorded a $35.0 million impairment charge
related to our equity-method investment in St. Ann. This
impairment reflects second quarter 2009 revisions to our
assumptions about St. Anns future profitability and cash
flows. Each impairment expense is recorded within equity in net
(income) loss of investments in affiliates in the consolidated
statements of operations.
Our analyses included assumptions about future profitability and
cash flows of the joint ventures, which we believe to reflect
our best estimates at the date the valuations were performed.
The estimates were based on information that was known or
knowable at the date of the valuations, and it is at least
reasonably possible that the assumptions employed by us will be
materially different from the actual amounts or results.
Carrying
value compared to underlying equity
The excess of the carrying values of our share of the
investments over the amounts of underlying equity in net assets
totaled $117.0 million at December 31, 2008. This
excess was attributed to long-lived assets such as plant and
equipment at Gramercy and mining rights at St. Ann. At
September 30, 2009 the excess has been
F-90
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
written off, after the effects of business combination
accounting in connection with the Joint Venture Transaction.
Prior to the Joint Venture Transaction, the excess was amortized
on a straight-line basis for each affiliate as part of recording
our share of each joint ventures earnings or losses.
Amortization expense recorded in equity in net (income) loss of
investments in affiliates is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
Period from July 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
|
|
$
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
5,616
|
|
Period from January 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
|
|
23.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date (exit
price). We incorporate assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability, and utilize market
data to the maximum extent possible. Our fair value measurements
incorporate nonperformance risk (i.e., the risk that an
obligation will not be fulfilled). In measuring fair value, we
reflect the impact of our own credit risk on our liabilities, as
well as any collateral. We also consider the credit standing of
our counterparties in measuring the fair value of our assets.
We use any of three valuation techniques to measure fair value:
the market approach, the income approach, and the cost approach.
We determine the appropriate valuation technique based on the
nature of the asset or liability being measured and the
reliability of the inputs used in arriving at fair value.
The inputs used in applying valuation techniques include
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability (i.e., assumptions about risk). Inputs may be
observable or unobservable. We use observable inputs in our
valuation techniques, and classify those inputs in accordance
with the fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes those inputs.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).
Level 1 inputs Unadjusted quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we
have access as of the reporting date. Active markets are those
in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information
on an ongoing basis. Fair value measurements that may fall into
Level 1 include exchange-traded derivatives or listed
equities.
Level 2 inputs Inputs other than quoted
prices included in Level 1, which are either directly or
indirectly observable as of the reporting date. A Level 2
input must be observable for substantially the full term of the
asset or liability. Fair value measurements that may fall into
Level 2 could include financial instruments with observable
inputs such as interest rates or yield curves.
Level 3 inputs Unobservable inputs that
reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Fair
value measurements that may be classified as Level 3 could,
for example, be determined from our internally developed model
that results in our best estimate of fair value. Fair value
measurements that may fall into Level 3 could include
certain structured derivatives or financial products that are
specifically tailored to a customers needs.
F-91
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance
of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment, and may affect the fair value of assets and
liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.
Valuations
on a recurring basis
The table below sets forth by level within the fair value
hierarchy our assets and liabilities that were measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
223,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,350
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,813
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
223,350
|
|
|
|
186,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents are invested entirely in U.S. treasury
securities and short-term treasury bills. These instruments are
valued based upon unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets
and are classified within Level 1.
Fair values of all derivative instruments are classified as
Level 2. Those fair values are primarily measured using
industry standard models that incorporate inputs including:
quoted forward prices for commodities, interest rates, and
current market prices for those assets and liabilities.
Substantially all of the inputs are observable throughout the
full term of the instrument. The counterparty of our derivative
trades is Merrill Lynch, with the exception of a small portion
of our variable price aluminum swaps.
In Note 13, we disclose the fair values of our debt
instruments. Those fair values are classified as Level 2
within the hierarchy. While the Senior Floating Rates Notes due
2014 and 2015 have quoted market prices, we do not believe
transactions on those instruments occur in sufficient enough
frequency or volume to warrant a Level 1 classification.
Further, the fair values of the term B loan and revolving credit
facility are based on interest rates available at each balance
date, resulting in a Level 2 classification as well.
Valuations
on a non-recurring basis
Fair value of goodwill, trade names and investment in affiliates
(prior to the Joint Venture Transaction) are classified as
Level 3 within the hierarchy, as their fair values are
measured using managements assumptions about future
profitability and cash flows. Such assumptions include a
combination of discounted cash flow and market-based valuations.
Discounted cash flow valuations require assumptions about future
profitability and cash flows, which we believe reflects the best
estimates at the date the valuations were performed. Key
assumptions used to determine discounted cash flow valuations at
March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 include:
(a) each with cash flow periods of five years;
(b) terminal values based upon long-term growth rates
ranging from 1.0% to 2.0%; and (c) discount rates based on
a risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital ranging from
12.5% to 13.8% for intangibles and to 19.0% for investment in
affiliates.
Accounting for the Joint Venture Transaction involved a number
of individual measurements based on significant inputs that are
not observable in the market and, therefore, represent a
Level 3 measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary fair value of consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of 50% equity interest. The fair
values of our existing 50% interests in Gramercy and St. Ann
were based on discounted cash flow valuations. These valuations
require assumptions about future profitability and cash flows,
which we believe reflects the best estimates at August 31,
2009.
|
F-92
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Key assumptions include: (a) cash flow periods of five
years; (b) terminal values based upon long-term growth
rates ranging from 1.0% to 2.0%; and (c) discount rates
based on a risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital
ranging 17.0% to 20.0%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest. The value of
GOJs noncontrolling interest in SAJBP was calculated as
51% of the net fair value of SAJBPs assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets,
and accounts payable and accrued liabilities balances were
recorded at their carrying values, which approximate fair value.
|
|
|
|
Inventories were valued at their net realizable value. Except
for supplies inventory, the fair value of acquired inventory was
a function of the inventories stage of production, with separate
values established for finished goods,
work-in-process,
and raw materials. Key inputs included ultimate selling cost,
costs to complete in-process material, and disposal or selling
costs.
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment were valued using a market
approach where we were able to identify comparable sales of real
estate and used machinery and equipment. Where comparable sales
of used machinery and equipment were not available, we estimated
fair value based on the replacement cost of new plant and
equipment, less depreciation and decreases in value due to
physical depreciation, functional obsolescence and economic
obsolescence. Whether valuations were based on comparable sales
or depreciated replacement cost, we considered the highest and
best use for the assets being valued, which was determined to be
their current use in the production of alumina or the mining of
bauxite.
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets consist of contractual and non-contractual
customer relationships. Valuations for these assets were based
on discounted cash flow valuations. These valuations require
assumptions about future profitability and cash flows, which we
believe reflects the best estimates at August 31, 2009. Key
assumptions include: (a) cash flow periods over the
estimated contract lives based on customer retention rates, and
(b) discount rates based on a risk-adjusted weighted
average cost of capital ranging 20.0% to 23.0%
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations and reclamation liabilities were
valued at fair value using a discounted cash flow approach with
credit-adjusted risk free rates ranging from 9.0% to 10.0%.
|
F-93
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In connection with the Joint Venture Transaction, we
re-evaluated our segment structure and now exclude corporate
expenses from our upstream reportable segment. Corporate
expenses going forward will be unallocated. Prior year segment
disclosures have been adjusted to reflect the new structure.
Refer to Note 1 for a description of the segments. The
following tables summarize the operating results and assets of
our reportable segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
108,678
|
|
|
|
109,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,559
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
5,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,462
|
|
|
|
109,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,784
|
)
|
|
|
218,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
127,071
|
|
|
|
97,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,784
|
)
|
|
|
218,468
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,739
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess insurance proceeds
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,055
|
|
|
|
102,415
|
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
(5,784
|
)
|
|
|
222,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,593
|
)
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
|
(9,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,747
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,636
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
8,721
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,851
|
|
F-94
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
235,592
|
|
|
|
304,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,553
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
24,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,640
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,232
|
|
|
|
304,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,640
|
)
|
|
|
540,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
317,346
|
|
|
|
273,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,640
|
)
|
|
|
566,532
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14,476
|
|
|
|
11,542
|
|
|
|
25,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,682
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
Excess insurance proceeds
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,355
|
|
|
|
328,368
|
|
|
|
25,664
|
|
|
|
(24,640
|
)
|
|
|
617,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(28,123
|
)
|
|
|
(23,407
|
)
|
|
|
(25,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,551
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,073
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,961
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
49,412
|
|
|
|
16,659
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,317
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
27,483
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,211
|
|
Segment assets, as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
896,457
|
|
|
|
455,025
|
|
|
|
525,984
|
|
|
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
1,875,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
182,548
|
|
|
|
174,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,410
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,975
|
|
|
|
174,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,427
|
)
|
|
|
357,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
169,503
|
|
|
|
170,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,427
|
)
|
|
|
312,906
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
2,602
|
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,029
|
|
|
|
173,432
|
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
(27,427
|
)
|
|
|
325,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
36,946
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
(6,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,816
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,496
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,565
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,718
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
11,091
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,188
|
|
F-95
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Upstream
|
|
|
Downstream
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
|
522,823
|
|
|
|
482,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,906
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
80,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,937
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603,760
|
|
|
|
482,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,937
|
)
|
|
|
1,004,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
454,982
|
|
|
|
472,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,937
|
)
|
|
|
846,823
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14,882
|
|
|
|
9,260
|
|
|
|
24,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469,864
|
|
|
|
482,038
|
|
|
|
24,958
|
|
|
|
(80,937
|
)
|
|
|
895,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
133,896
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(24,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,043
|
|
(Gain) loss on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,497
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,862
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53,709
|
|
|
|
20,094
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,049
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
30,544
|
|
|
|
6,569
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,464
|
|
Segment assets at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
786,839
|
|
|
|
505,086
|
|
|
|
646,825
|
|
|
|
(2,579
|
)
|
|
|
1,936,171
|
|
|
|
25.
|
NON-GUARANTOR
SUBSIDIARY
|
In February 2009, we formed NHB, a 100%-owned subsidiary of
AcquisitionCo for the purpose of acquiring outstanding HoldCo
Notes. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
contributed capital of $36.1 million to NHB to fund these
debt purchases. As of September 30, 2009, NHB had acquired
HoldCo Notes with an aggregate principal balance totaling
$138.9 million, for an aggregate purchase price of
$36.0 million, plus fees. None of the Holdco Notes
purchased by NHB have been retired.
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, NHBs only assets were an
immaterial amount of cash and the acquired HoldCo Notes, which
are carried at their fair value of $71.8 million, including
$4.3 million of accrued interest. At September 30,
2009, NHB owed $1.2 million to a guarantor affiliate for
the payment of fees on NHBs behalf, and carried a
$5.9 million liability to a guarantor affiliate for
estimated taxes.
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NHBs
only cash activities were $36.1 million of capital
contributions, $0.2 million of cash receipts from
AcquisitionCo to pay transaction costs, and the purchase of
HoldCo Notes with an aggregate principal balance of
$138.9 million for the price of $36.0 million, plus
fees.
|
F-96
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2009
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
NHB
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
21,527
|
|
|
|
234,958
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,516
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,846
|
|
Interest due from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
(4,332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,503
|
|
Derivative assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,481
|
|
Taxes receivable
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
16,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
21,759
|
|
|
|
603,526
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
(4,332
|
)
|
|
|
625,316
|
|
Investments in affiliates
|
|
|
211,083
|
|
|
|
64,788
|
|
|
|
67,536
|
|
|
|
(343,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Advances due from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
(5,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759,962
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,576
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,780
|
|
Long-term derivative assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,932
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
87,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
233,443
|
|
|
|
1,923,425
|
|
|
|
65,989
|
|
|
|
(347,739
|
)
|
|
|
1,875,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
62,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,147
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,586
|
|
Accrued interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(6,544
|
)
|
|
|
34,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,742
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,208
|
)
|
|
|
158,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,332
|
)
|
|
|
151,721
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
212,934
|
|
|
|
952,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144,939
|
)
|
|
|
1,020,985
|
|
Pension and OPEB liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,581
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
60,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,135
|
|
Advances due to affiliates
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
(4,391
|
)
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
277,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,984
|
|
|
|
341,667
|
|
Unallocated purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,259
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
17,444
|
|
|
|
216,605
|
|
|
|
36,088
|
|
|
|
(252,693
|
)
|
|
|
17,444
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(178,018
|
)
|
|
|
(179,382
|
)
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
213,701
|
|
|
|
(139,799
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
173,860
|
|
|
|
173,860
|
|
|
|
24,800
|
|
|
|
(223,460
|
)
|
|
|
149,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noranda shareholders equity
|
|
|
13,504
|
|
|
|
211,083
|
|
|
|
64,788
|
|
|
|
(262,452
|
)
|
|
|
26,923
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
211,083
|
|
|
|
64,788
|
|
|
|
(262,452
|
)
|
|
|
30,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
233,443
|
|
|
|
1,923,425
|
|
|
|
65,989
|
|
|
|
(347,739
|
)
|
|
|
1,875,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-97
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
HoldCo
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
NHB
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,468
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
18,011
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,739
|
|
Excess insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
222,197
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
(3,638
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
4,372
|
|
|
|
11,128
|
|
|
|
(2,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
Gain (loss) on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,747
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(7,312
|
)
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,017
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(25,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,005
|
)
|
|
|
(28,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expenses
|
|
|
(3,009
|
)
|
|
|
(19,964
|
)
|
|
|
(2,923
|
)
|
|
|
5,012
|
|
|
|
(20,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
16,326
|
|
|
|
2,919
|
|
|
|
(5,012
|
)
|
|
|
16,518
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(2,643
|
)
|
|
|
9,014
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
12,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
|
4,928
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
(8,617
|
)
|
|
|
4,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
HoldCo
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
NHB
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566,532
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
|
49,315
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,682
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
Excess insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,356
|
)
|
|
|
(74,827
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
13,960
|
|
|
|
38,919
|
|
|
|
(10,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,551
|
|
Gain (loss) on hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,073
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
75,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
78,961
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase
|
|
|
(11,078
|
)
|
|
|
(79,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,203
|
)
|
|
|
(193,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expenses
|
|
|
4,693
|
|
|
|
(70,036
|
)
|
|
|
(10,328
|
)
|
|
|
(100,114
|
)
|
|
|
(175,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,049
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
100,114
|
|
|
|
98,591
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(5,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
6,417
|
|
|
|
63,984
|
|
|
|
62,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
|
(1,738
|
)
|
|
|
(1,811
|
)
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
36,130
|
|
|
|
36,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NORANDA
ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
NHB
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(4,140
|
)
|
|
|
234,790
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
230,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,211
|
)
|
Purchase of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,742
|
)
|
|
|
36,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from insurance related to capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Cash acquired in business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,573
|
)
|
|
|
(36,742
|
)
|
|
|
36,742
|
|
|
|
(9,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Distribution to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Repayments on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,500
|
)
|
Repurchase of debt
|
|
|
(2,673
|
)
|
|
|
(84,298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,048
|
)
|
|
|
(123,019
|
)
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,500
|
)
|
Intercompany advances
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
(3,249
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution (to subsidiary) from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,088
|
)
|
|
|
36,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution (to parent from subsidiary)
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
(1,280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
(150,874
|
)
|
|
|
36,288
|
|
|
|
(36,048
|
)
|
|
|
(149,068
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
74,343
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,800
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
24,101
|
|
|
|
160,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
21,527
|
|
|
|
234,958
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-99
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Managers of
Gramercy Alumina LLC
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Gramercy
Alumina LLC (the Company) as of December 31,
2007 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, changes
in members equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows
for each of the years then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended,
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
/s/ DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
February 18, 2009
F-100
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
Trade receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
55,553
|
|
|
|
67,875
|
|
Others
|
|
|
8,932
|
|
|
|
6,081
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31,749
|
|
|
|
32,825
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
98,883
|
|
|
|
113,302
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Net
|
|
|
33,402
|
|
|
|
47,391
|
|
OTHER ASSETS Including restricted cash of $7,787 and
$7,846 in 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
10,145
|
|
|
|
9,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
142,430
|
|
|
$
|
170,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
27,781
|
|
|
$
|
26,570
|
|
Accrued employee costs
|
|
|
6,731
|
|
|
|
6,349
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
Due to affiliate
|
|
|
7,388
|
|
|
|
9,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
44,033
|
|
|
|
46,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
4,180
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
9,188
|
|
|
|
10,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
53,221
|
|
|
|
56,665
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
|
89,209
|
|
|
|
113,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
142,430
|
|
|
$
|
170,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
$
|
269,172
|
|
|
$
|
278,234
|
|
|
$
|
325,932
|
|
Others
|
|
|
84,355
|
|
|
|
94,091
|
|
|
|
98,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
353,527
|
|
|
|
372,325
|
|
|
|
424,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF SALES AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization (includes
affiliated purchases of $55,378, $54,317, and $54,262 in 2006
(unaudited), 2007, and 2008, respectively)
|
|
|
328,306
|
|
|
|
339,495
|
|
|
|
388,019
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
5,060
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,957
|
|
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales and expenses
|
|
|
334,362
|
|
|
|
347,891
|
|
|
|
399,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
19,165
|
|
|
|
24,434
|
|
|
|
25,017
|
|
INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
OTHER INCOME Net
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
21,262
|
|
|
$
|
25,414
|
|
|
$
|
25,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-102
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY January 1, 2006 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
42,702
|
|
Net income (unaudited)
|
|
|
21,262
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) minimum pension
liability adjustment (unaudited)
|
|
|
64
|
|
Adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to
initially apply SFAS No. 158 (Note 6) (unaudited)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY December 31, 2006
(unaudited)
|
|
|
63,831
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
25,414
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) Pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations (Note 6)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY December 31, 2007
|
|
|
89,209
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
25,390
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) Pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations (Note 6)
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
113,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,262
|
|
|
$
|
25,414
|
|
|
$
|
25,390
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
21,326
|
|
|
$
|
25,378
|
|
|
$
|
24,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,262
|
|
|
$
|
25,414
|
|
|
$
|
25,390
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from insurance settlements
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
|
5,334
|
|
Interest income on restricted cash net of $0, $70
and $0 cash received in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
(11,258
|
)
|
|
|
(20,731
|
)
|
|
|
(9,471
|
)
|
Due to/from affiliates
|
|
|
(7,414
|
)
|
|
|
8,023
|
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
|
|
210
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(5,868
|
)
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
(1,992
|
)
|
Accrued employee costs
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Other operating liabilities
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
6,703
|
|
|
|
12,108
|
|
|
|
21,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(6,723
|
)
|
|
|
(12,565
|
)
|
|
|
(18,268
|
)
|
Proceeds from insurance settlements
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,843
|
)
|
|
|
(12,395
|
)
|
|
|
(18,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of year
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of year
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING
ACTIVITIES Payables for capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,121
|
|
|
$
|
781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-105
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2008, AND
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 (UNAUDITED), 2007, AND
2008
(Information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Organization and Operations Gramercy Alumina
LLC (the Company) was formed as a limited liability
company on March 2, 2004, by Gramercy Alumina Holdings Inc.
and Century Louisiana, Inc. Gramercy Alumina Holdings Inc. (a
subsidiary of Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation (Noranda)
effective May 18, 2007, and Xstrata Plc prior thereto) and
Century Louisiana, Inc. (a subsidiary of Century Aluminum
Company) each have a 50% ownership interest in the Company. The
Company began operations on October 1, 2004. Pursuant to
the agreements governing the Company, the members are required
to begin negotiations in 2009 concerning continuation of the
Company after December 31, 2010.
The Company operates a refinery located in Gramercy, Louisiana.
The Gramercy refinery chemically refines bauxite into alumina,
the principal raw material used in the production of primary
aluminum. The majority of the Companys alumina production
is supplied to production facilities owned by the Companys
members. The remaining sales are generally to third-party users
in various industries, including water treatment, flame
retardants, building products, detergents, and glass.
Gramercy Alumina Holdings Inc. and Century Louisiana, Inc.
acquired the Gramercy alumina refinery and related bauxite
mining assets in Jamaica pursuant to the terms of an Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated May 17, 2004, with an unrelated
third party. The sale was completed on September 30, 2004.
The Company was formed to own and operate the Gramercy alumina
refinery and St. Ann Bauxite Limited was formed to own and
operate the bauxite mining assets in Jamaica.
Gramercy Alumina Holdings Inc. and Century Louisiana, Inc. each
contributed as initial capital contributions their 100% interest
in the acquired net assets of the Gramercy refinery.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well
as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes
revenue when the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred
to the customer. Shipping terms are generally F.O.B. shipping
point.
Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company
considers highly liquid short-term investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventories The Companys inventories,
including bauxite and alumina inventories, are stated at the
lower of cost (using average cost) or market.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on
the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets (12 years weighted average
machinery and equipment). Maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred. Major improvements are capitalized. When
items of property, plant, and equipment are sold or retired, the
related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the statement of
operations.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company
reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to
be generated by the asset. Any impairment of the asset is
F-106
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
recognized when it is probable that such undiscounted cash flows
will be less than the carrying value of the asset. If the
undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then
impairment is measured based on fair value compared to carrying
value, with fair value typically based on a cash flow model,
comparable asset sales or solicited offers. No impairment of
long-lived assets was recorded for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Self-Insurance The Company is primarily
self-insured for workers compensation and healthcare
costs. Self-insurance liabilities are determined based on claims
filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, the Company had
$1.6 million and $1.5 million of accrued liabilities
related to these claims. The Company has $1.4 million in a
restricted cash account to secure the payment of workers
compensation obligations as of December 31, 2007 and 2008.
Such amount is included in other assets in the accompanying
balance sheets.
Asset Retirement Obligations In accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, the Company records the fair value of a legal
liability for asset retirement obligations (ARO) in the period
in which they are incurred and capitalizes the ARO by increasing
the carrying amount of the related assets. The obligations are
accreted to their present value each period and the capitalized
cost is depreciated over the estimated useful lives (17 to
20 years) of the related assets (see Note 5).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The
carrying values of the Companys financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts
payable, due to affiliate, and certain accrued liabilities,
approximate fair market value due to their short-term nature.
Environmental Liabilities Costs related to
environmental liabilities are accrued when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably
estimated. These amounts are based on the future estimated costs
under existing regulatory requirements using existing technology
(see Note 7).
Income Taxes The Company has elected to be
treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. Accordingly,
income taxes are the responsibility of the members and the
financial statements include no provision for income taxes.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive
income (loss) includes net income and other comprehensive income
(loss) which, in the case of the Company, consists solely of
adjustments related to pension and postretirement benefit
obligations. Accumulated other comprehensive losses totaled
$234,000 and $957,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2008,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (SFAS No. 162), which
identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that are presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. The effective
date of SFAS No. 162 is November 15, 2008. The
adoption of SFAS No. 162 did not have an effect on the
Companys financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an Amendment to FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS No. 161), which requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for
using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit risk related to contingent features in
derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. Early adoption has been encouraged by
the FASB. Management is currently assessing
SFAS No. 161, but does anticipate that implementation
of the new standard will have a material impact on the
Companys financial statements.
F-107
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes
new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Specifically, it requires the recognition of a
noncontrolling interest as equity in the consolidated financial
statements and separate from the parents equity. The
amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the
income statement. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes
in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do
not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the
parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition,
SFAS No. 160 requires that a parent recognize a gain
or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such
gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the
noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date.
SFAS No. 160 also requires expanded disclosure
requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its
noncontrolling interests. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Management
believes that the implementation of SFAS No. 160 will
not have a material impact on the Companys financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)). According to transition rules
of the new standard, the Company will apply it prospectively to
any business combinations with an acquisition date on or after
January 1, 2009, except that certain changes in
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, may
apply to acquisitions, which were completed prior to
January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted.
Management believes that the implementation of
SFAS No. 141(R) will not have a material impact on the
Companys financial statements.
|
|
2.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
At December 31, 2007 and 2008, due from (to) affiliates
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Trade receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Century Alumina of Kentucky LLC
|
|
$
|
27,982
|
|
|
$
|
33,625
|
|
Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
|
|
|
27,571
|
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
55,553
|
|
|
$
|
67,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to affiliate St. Ann Bauxite Limited
|
|
$
|
(7,388
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company purchases the majority of its bauxite from St. Ann
Bauxite Limited (SABL), an entity affiliated through common
ownership and control (see Note 7). In certain instances,
the Company advances funds to SABL prior to the shipment of
bauxite. Purchases from SABL approximated $55.4 million,
$54.3 million, and $54.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2006 (unaudited), 2007, and 2008, respectively.
The Company is reimbursed for certain management personnel,
support personnel, and services (purchasing, IT services, and
accounting) provided to SABL. Included in the statements of
operations for 2006 (unaudited), 2007, and 2008 is approximately
$547,000, $546,000, and $712,000, respectively, of amounts
charged to SABL for such personnel, support, and services.
The Company sells a substantial portion of its production to its
members or entities affiliated with its members at sales prices
which are substantially equivalent to its actual cost per metric
ton. Revenues derived from sales to Century Aluminum Company
and/or its
affiliates and Noranda
and/or its
affiliates (Xstrata Plc prior to May 18,
2007) approximated $134.2 million and
$135.0 million, respectively, in 2006 (unaudited),
$139.4 million and $138.9 million, respectively, in
2007, and $162.4 million and $163.5 million,
respectively in 2008. (See Note 8)
F-108
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of inventories at December 31, 2007 and
2008, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
14,661
|
|
|
$
|
14,081
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
6,019
|
|
|
|
7,188
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
8,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,749
|
|
|
$
|
32,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
At December 31, 2007 and 2008, property, plant and
equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
8,583
|
|
|
$
|
13,373
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
23,869
|
|
|
|
29,661
|
|
Estimated closure costs associated with asset retirement
obligations
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
2,639
|
|
|
|
11,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,782
|
|
|
|
56,831
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4,380
|
)
|
|
|
(9,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,402
|
|
|
$
|
47,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended
December 31, 2006 (unaudited), 2007, and 2008, totaled
$0.952 million, $2.830 million and
$5.060 million, respectively.
|
|
5.
|
ASSET
RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
|
The Companys asset retirement obligations relate primarily
to costs associated with the future closure of certain red mud
lakes at the Gramercy refinery.
A reconciliation of changes in the asset retirement obligations
for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 (unaudited),
2007, and 2008, is presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,833
|
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
Revisions in previous estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
$
|
1,833
|
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
|
$
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes its asset retirement obligations represent
reasonable estimates of the costs associated with the future
closure of certain red mud lakes at the Gramercy facility.
However, given the relatively long time until closure of these
assets, such estimates are subject to changes due to a number of
factors including, but not limited to, changes in regulatory
requirements, costs of labor and materials, and other factors.
At December 31, 2007 and 2008, the Company had
$6.2 million of restricted cash in an escrow account as
security for the payment of these closure obligations that would
arise under state environmental laws upon
F-109
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
the termination of operations at the Gramercy facility. These
amounts are included in other assets in the accompanying balance
sheets.
The Company has a salaried employee savings plan and an hourly
employee savings plan for eligible employees. The Company
matches 50% of each salaried employees pre-tax contributed
dollars up to 6% of the employees total pre-tax
contribution to the plan. Effective January 1, 2006, the
Company matches 50% of a specified percentage (ranging from 2%
for 2006 to 6% for 2010) of each hourly employees
pre-tax contributed dollars. Certain hourly employees earn a
fixed dollar amount contribution from the Company ranging from
$800 to $2,400 based on the participants age and service.
Plan expenses of approximately $504,000, $398,000, and $399,000
were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2006
(unaudited), 2007, and 2008, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company established a
defined contribution pension plan for its eligible salaried
employees. The Company contributes a percentage ranging from 1%
to 10% of a participants earnings based on the
participants age at the beginning of a plan year. Plan
expenses of approximately $598,000, $645,000, and $790,000 were
recorded during the years ended December 31, 2006
(unaudited), 2007, and 2008, respectively.
The Company entered into an agreement with the United
Steelworkers of America (USWA) to establish a defined benefit
pension plan for its eligible hourly employees effective
January 1, 2005 (the Pension Plan). The defined
benefit is $52 per month for each year of benefit service prior
to 2010, plus $53 per month for each year of benefit service
earned on or after January 1, 2010, for each participant.
Plan expense of approximately $1,106,000, $1,045,000 and
$1,033,000 were recorded by the Company in 2006 (unaudited),
2007, and 2008, respectively.
The Companys medical reimbursement plan (the Medical
Plan) provides certain medical benefits to employees and
their spouses upon retirement. To be eligible, a former employee
must have greater than 5 years of service and retire after
age 55. Plan expenses of approximately $119,000, $124,000
and $143,000 were recorded by the Company in 2006 (unaudited),
2007, and 2008, respectively.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an Amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).
SFAS No. 158 requires, among other things, an employer
to fully recognize a plans overfunded or underfunded
status in its balance sheets and recognize the changes in a
plans funded status in comprehensive income in the year in
which the changes occur. Implementation of these provisions of
SFAS No. 158 was required for fiscal years ended after
December 15, 2006. The Company adopted SFAS No. 158
effective on December 31, 2006. SFAS No. 158
further requires an employer to measure plan assets and
obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of
its fiscal year. The Company already measures its plan assets
and liabilities as of December 31; therefore, this provision did
not impact the Companys financial statements.
F-110
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the changes in benefit
obligations, changes in plan assets, and the estimated funded
status for the Pension Plan and the Medical Plan and the amounts
recognized by the Company as of December 31, 2006, 2007,
and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Medical Plan
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,255
|
|
|
$
|
2,292
|
|
|
$
|
3,402
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation end of year
|
|
$
|
2,292
|
|
|
$
|
3,403
|
|
|
$
|
4,514
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
2,221
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets end of year
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
2,221
|
|
|
$
|
2,210
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of plan end of year
|
|
$
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
|
$
|
(333
|
)
|
|
$
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
|
$
|
(333
|
)
|
|
$
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued employee costs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(1,182
|
)
|
|
|
(2,304
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amounts recognized
|
|
$
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
|
$
|
(333
|
)
|
|
$
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-111
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net periodic benefit cost for the Pension Plan and the Medical
Plan for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008,
includes the following components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Medical Plan
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
978
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost amortization
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,106
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized
in other comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Medical Plan
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current year actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
769
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
Recognition of prior service (credit) cost
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated loss and prior service cost for the pension plan
that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year
are $35,000 and $19,000 respectively. The estimated gain and
prior service cost for the medical plan that will be amortized
from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic
benefit cost over the next fiscal year are ($2,000) and $2,000,
respectively.
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Companys
Pension Plan at December 31, 2007 and 2008 approximated
$3.4 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
Projected benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costs are
based on actuarial estimates and assumptions. The
weighted-average discount rate used in determining the actuarial
present value of the projected benefit obligation for the
Pension Plan was 6.30% and 6.15% at December 31, 2007 and
2008, respectively, while the discount rate used in determining
the benefit obligation for the Medical Plan was 5.95% and 6.00%
at December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Discount rates
of 5.70%, 5.90% and 6.30%, respectively, were used to determine
pension expense and discount rates of 5.50%, 5.80% and 5.95%,
respectively, were used to determine the medical reimbursement
plan expense for the years ended December 31, 2006
(unaudited), 2007, and 2008.
The Companys expected long-term rate of return on the
Pension Plan assets is 8.00% at December 31, 2007 and 2008.
The Company seeks a balanced return on Pension Plan assets
through a diversified investment strategy, including a target
asset allocation of 65% equity securities, 30% fixed income
securities and 5% cash. The Companys Pension Plan asset
portfolio at December 31, 2007 and 2008, reflects a balance
of investments split approximately 50% and 50%, and 70% and 30%
between equity and fixed income securities, respectively.
The Company expects to contribute $1,344,000 to the Pension Plan
and $47,000 to the Medical Plan in 2009.
F-112
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following annual benefit payments, which reflect expected
future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
Medical
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
Plan
|
|
Plan
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
2010
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
2011
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
2012
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
2013
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
2014 2018
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
In addition, the Company has agreed with the USWA to contribute
to a Voluntary Employee Benefits Association (VEBA) plan to
provide health care retiree benefits for eligible hourly
employees. The Company made contributions of $200,000 to the
VEBA in 2006 (unaudited), 2007, and 2008. Annual contributions
of $200,000 are scheduled from 2006 to 2009, and $500,000
contributions are scheduled from 2010 to 2012. Additional
variable contributions may be negotiated with the USWA when the
current labor agreement expires in September 2010.
|
|
7.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Operating Leases The Company leases certain
equipment under operating leases. Minimum future rental payments
under noncancelable operating leases at December 31, 2008,
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
2010
|
|
|
906
|
|
2011
|
|
|
248
|
|
2012
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense for all operating leases approximated $1,243,000,
$1,429,000, and $1,224,000 for the years ended December 31,
2006 (unaudited), 2007, and 2008, respectively.
Purchase Commitments The Company has a
contract with SABL to purchase approximately 2.4 million
metric tonnes of Jamaican bauxite per year at a mutually agreed
upon purchase price per dry metric ton. The quantity amount is
mutually agreed upon periodically and may vary slightly with
respect to shipping schedules. This is a key raw material used
in the chemical process to produce alumina. The contract
terminates on December 31, 2010, unless the parties
mutually agree to terminate the contract earlier.
Labor Commitments The Company is a party to a
collective bargaining and benefits agreement with the USWA,
which agreement expires on September 30, 2010. USWA
employees represent the majority of the Companys workforce.
Environmental Matters Prior to purchasing the
Gramercy facility, the members commissioned a pre-purchase due
diligence investigation of the environmental conditions present
at the facility. The results of this investigation were
submitted to state regulatory officials by the Company. In
addition, as part of this submittal, the Company agreed to
undertake certain specified remedial activities at the facility.
Based on the submission, and conditioned on completion of the
specified remedial activities, state environmental officials
have confirmed that the Company met the conditions for bona fide
prospective purchase protections (BFPP) against liability for
preexisting environmental conditions at the facility. Based on
information obtained during the due
F-113
GRAMERCY
ALUMINA LLC
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
diligence, the Company recorded a liability for the estimated
cost for the BFPP remediation work and continues to monitor and
update such estimates as necessary. A reconciliation of changes
in the asset retirement obligations for each of the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008, is presented below (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,300
|
|
|
$
|
4,769
|
|
|
$
|
4,558
|
|
Remediation performed
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
$
|
4,769
|
|
|
$
|
4,558
|
|
|
$
|
4,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement for
the Gramercy facility, the previous owner agreed to escrow
$2.5 million to reimburse the Company for expenses to be
incurred in the performance of the BFPP environmental
remediation at the facility. Included in other assets in the
accompanying balance sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2008,
is a long-term receivable of $2.0 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, from the previous owner for
such future expense reimbursements.
The Company believes its environmental liabilities are not
likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial
statements. However, there can be no assurance that future
requirements will not result in liabilities which may have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Letters of Credit At December 31, 2008,
outstanding letters of credit were $1.13 million.
Legal Contingencies The Company is a party to
various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution
of these legal proceedings will not have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity.
During the week of January 26, 2009, power supply to
Norandas New Madrid smelter was interrupted numerous times
because of a severe ice storm in Southeastern Missouri. As a
result of the outage, Noranda lost 75% of the smelter capacity.
The smelting production facility is being cleaned-out,
inspected, and restarted. Based on Norandas current
assessment, they expect that the smelter could return to full
production during the second half of 2009 with partial capacity
phased in during the intervening months. As disclosed in
Note 2, a substantial portion of the Companys alumina
production is sold to Noranda for use in the New Madrid smelter
facility. For the year ended December 31, 2008, revenues
derived from sales to Noranda for use in its New Madrid facility
approximated $163.5 million.
As further described in Note 2, the Company sells a
substantial portion of its alumina production to its members or
entities affiliated with its members at sales prices which are
substantially equivalent to its actual cost per metric ton.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the cost of alumina purchased
by the Companys members exceeded the cost of alumina
available from other sources. The members continue to evaluate
options to reduce their purchase cost of alumina, including
evaluating curtailment of the Companys operations.
At this time, the effects of the events described above on the
Companys financial position, results of operations and
cash flows are not determinable.
******
F-114
Through and
including ,
2010 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
Shares
Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
,
2010
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other
than underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation (the Registrant) in
connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities
being registered. All amounts are estimates, except the SEC
registration, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
and the New York Stock Exchange filing fees.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Registration fee
|
|
$
|
9,825
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange filing fee and listing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Listing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Transfer agents fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal and accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. filing fee
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
The Registrant is a Delaware corporation. Section 145(a) of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
DGCL) provides that a Delaware corporation may
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation or is or was
serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses,
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit
or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
action or proceeding, had no cause to believe his conduct was
unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the DGCL provides that a Delaware
corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation
to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that
such person acted in any of the capacities set forth above,
against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit
if he acted under similar standards, except that no
indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or
matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be
liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the
court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine
that despite the adjudication of liability, such person is
fairly and reasonably entitled to be indemnified for such
expenses which the court shall deem proper.
Section 145 of the DGCL further provides that to the extent
a director or officer of a corporation has been successful in
the defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in
subsections (a) and (b) or in the defense of any
claim, issue, or matter therein, he shall be indemnified against
any expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection therewith; that indemnification provided for by
Section 145 shall not be deemed exclusive of any other
rights to which the indemnified party may be entitled; and that
the corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of
a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation
against any liability asserted against him or incurred by him in
any such capacity or arising out of
II-1
his status as such whether or not the corporation would have the
power to indemnify him against such liabilities under
Section 145.
Article VIII of our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation provides for the indemnification of directors,
officers, employees or agents to the fullest extent permitted by
the DGCL. Article VIII of our Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation also provides that, in any action
initiated by a person seeking indemnification, we shall bear the
burden of proof that the person is not entitled to
indemnification.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a Delaware
corporation may, with certain limitations, set forth in its
certificate of incorporation a provision eliminating or limiting
the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty
as a director, provided that such provision shall not eliminate
or limit the liability of a director (i) for any breach of
the directors duty of loyalty to the registrant or its
stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith
or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation
of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL or
(iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit. Article VIII of our Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation includes such a provision.
Section 145(g) of the DGCL provides that a Delaware
corporation has the power to purchase and maintain insurance on
behalf of any director, officer, employee or other agent of the
corporation or, if serving in such capacity at the request of
the corporation, of another enterprise, against any liability
asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any
such capacity, or arising out of such persons status as
such, whether or not the corporation has the power to indemnify
such person against such liability under the DGCL.
Article VIII of our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation permits us to maintain insurance, at our expense,
to protect us or any of our directors, officers, employees or
agents or another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust
or other enterprise against any such expense, liability or loss,
whether or not we would have the power to indemnify such person
against such expense, liability or loss under the DGCL.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
|
Set forth below in chronological order is certain information
regarding securities issued by the Registrant since
March 27, 2007 (the Registrants date of
incorporation) in transactions that were not registered under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), including the consideration, if any, received by the
Registrant for such issuances.
Since our incorporation, we have issued unregistered securities
to a limited number of persons, as described below. None of
these transactions involved any underwriters or any public
offerings. Each of these transactions was exempt from
registration under the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D or
Rule 701 promulgated thereunder, as transactions by an
issuer not involving a public offering. With respect to each
transaction listed below, no general solicitation was made by
either the Registrant or any person acting on its behalf; the
recipient of our securities agreed that the securities would be
subject to the standard restrictions applicable to a private
placement of securities under applicable state and federal
securities laws; and appropriate legends were affixed to the
certificates issued in such transactions.
On March 27, 2007, the Registrant issued 100 shares of
common stock to Apollo Management VI, L.P. for an aggregate
purchase price of $100.
On May 18, 2007, the Registrant issued
21,420,000 shares of common stock to affiliates of Apollo
Management, L.P. for an aggregate purchase price of $214,200,000.
On May 29, 2007, the Registrant issued 193,043 shares
of common stock to certain key employees at a purchase price of
$10 per share.
On May 29, 2007, the Registrant granted stock options to
certain key employees to purchase 687,678 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $10 per share.
On June 7, 2007, the Registrant issued $220,000,000
aggregate principal amount of its Senior Floating Rate Notes due
2014 to Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, as the initial purchaser, who subsequently resold
the notes to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A under the Securities Act
II-2
and to
non-U.S. persons
outside the United States in reliance on Regulation S under
the Securities Act. The notes were sold to the initial purchaser
at a price of 99.0% of par value.
On October 23, 2007, the Registrant granted stock options
to affiliates of Apollo Management, L.P. to purchase
60,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of
$20 per share.
On December 10, 2007, the Registrant granted stock options
to affiliates of Apollo Management, L.P. to purchase
10,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of
$20 per share.
On January 18, 2008, the Registrant issued
4,500 shares to certain key employees at a purchase price
of $20 per share.
On January 18, 2008, the Registrant granted stock options
to certain key employees to purchase 12,750 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $20 per share.
On January 22, 2008, the Registrant granted stock options
to certain non-employee directors to purchase 20,000 shares
of its common stock at an exercise price of $20 per share.
On February 11, 2008, the Registrant issued
3,000 shares to a certain key employee at a purchase price
of $20 per share.
On February 11, 2008, the Registrant granted stock options
to a certain key employee to purchase 9,000 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $20 per share.
On February 21, 2008, the Registrant granted stock options
to a non-employee director to purchase 10,000 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $20 per share.
On March 3, 2008, the Registrant issued 100,000 shares
to a certain key employee at a purchase price of $20 per share.
On March 3, 2008, the Registrant granted stock options to a
certain key employee to purchase 200,000 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $20 per share.
On May 8, 2008, the Registrant issued 25,000 shares to
a certain key employee at a purchase price of $20 per share.
On May 8, 2008, the Registrant granted stock options to a
certain key employee to purchase 50,000 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $20 per share.
On May 13, 2008, the Registrant issued 6,750 shares to
a certain key employee at a purchase price of $20 per share.
On May 13, 2008, the Registrant granted stock options to a
certain key employee to purchase 6,750 shares of its common
stock at an exercise price of $20 per share.
On June 9, 2009, the Registrant issued 30,000 shares
to a certain key employee at a purchase price of $1.37 per share.
On June 9, 2009, the Registrant granted stock options to a
certain key employee to purchase 60,000 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $1.37 per share.
On November 12, 2009, the Registrant issued
109,626 shares to certain key employees at a purchase price
of $2.28 per share.
On November 12, 2009, the Registrant granted stock options
to certain key employees to purchase 125,551 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $2.28 per share.
II-3
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 10, 2007, by and
among Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, Noranda Finance,
Inc. and Xstrata (Schweiz) A.G. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws, as amended, of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment
No. 1 to Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on April 11, 2008)
|
|
3
|
.3*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
|
|
3
|
.4*
|
|
Form of Bylaws, as amended, of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, dated May 18, 2007, by and among Noranda
Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, the Guarantors named therein,
and Wells Fargo Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 7, 2007,
among Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Noranda Aluminum
Acquisition Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, dated June 7, 2007, between Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Senior Floating Rate Note due 2015 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Senior Floating Rate Note due 2014 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.6*
|
|
Form of common stock certificate of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation*
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2007, among Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation, Noranda Aluminum Acquisition
Corporation, the lenders party thereto from time to time,
Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent and
the other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of May 18,
2007, among Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Noranda
Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, each of its Subsidiaries
identified therein, and Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, as
Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Management Incentive Compensation Plan Term Sheet, dated
May 24, 2007, between William Brooks and Apollo Management
VI, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated November 12, 2009
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 29,
2007, between Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and William
Brooks (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Management
Holders) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Investor Director
Providers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Management Equity Investment and Incentive Term Sheet, dated
February 22, 2008, by and among Noranda Aluminum, Inc.,
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and Layle K. Smith
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Amendment
No. 1 to Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on April 11, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amended and Restated Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated
as of November 12, 2009, between Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation and Layle K. Smith (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Management Equity Investment and Incentive Term Sheet, dated
May 8, 2008, by and among Noranda Aluminum, Inc., Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation and Kyle D. Lorentzen (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Establishment Agreement, dated September 30, 2004, between
the Government of Jamaica and St. Ann Bauxite Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Special Mining Lease No. 165, dated October 1, 2004,
granted by the Government of Jamaica to St. Ann Bauxite Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Alumina Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2004,
by and between Gramercy Alumina LLC and Gramercy Alumina
Holdings Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14
of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2004, by and between
Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE and Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Letter Agreement (amending the Establishment Agreement), dated
as of February 14, 2006, from St. Ann Bauxite Limited to
Dr. Carlton Davis, Cabinet Secretary, Jamaica (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment to the Management Equity Investment and Incentive Term
Sheet, dated November 12, 2009, between Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation and Layle K. Smith (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Amended and Restated Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated
as of November 12, 2009, between Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation and Kyle D. Lorentzen (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Non Qualified Stock Option
Agreement (Management Holders) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Form of Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Management
Holders) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Letter Agreement (amending the Establishment Agreement), dated
as of December 31, 2009, from Jamaica Bauxite Mining
Limited to Noranda Bauxite Limited
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Securityholders Agreement
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation 2010 Incentive Award Plan
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation Senior Executive Bonus Plan
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (included in
Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (Toronto)
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (Nashville)
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (New Orleans)
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (Jamaica)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included in signature pages)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to
a confidential treatment request. |
|
|
(b)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
No financial statement schedules are included herein. All other
schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulation of the SEC are not required under the
related instructions, are inapplicable, or the information is
included in the consolidated financial statements, and have
therefore been omitted.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(i) for purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective; and
(ii) for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Franklin, State of Tennessee, on the
14th day
of January, 2010.
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Name: Layle K. Smith
Title: President and Chief Executive
Officer
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
Each of the undersigned directors and officers of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation hereby constitutes and appoints
Layle K. Smith, Robert B. Mahoney and Alan K. Brown, and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and his name
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to execute any and
all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this
registration statement, to sign any registration statement filed
pursuant to Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, and
to cause the same to be filed with all exhibits thereto, and all
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and desirable to
be done in and about the premises as fully and to all intents
and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all acts and things that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed below by the following
persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Layle
K. Smith
Layle
K. Smith
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
B. Mahoney
Robert
B. Mahoney
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H. Brooks
William
H. Brooks
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Eric
L. Press
Eric
L. Press
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gareth
Turner
Gareth
Turner
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ M.
Ali Rashid
M.
Ali Rashid
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
II-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew
H. Nord
Matthew
H. Nord
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew
R. Michelini
Matthew
R. Michelini
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott
Kleinman
Scott
Kleinman
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan
Schumacher
Alan
Schumacher
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
Miklich
Thomas
Miklich
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
Kasdin
Robert
Kasdin
|
|
Director
|
|
January 14, 2010
|
II-8
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 10, 2007, by and
among Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, Noranda Finance,
Inc. and Xstrata (Schweiz) A.G. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws, as amended, of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment
No. 1 to Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on April 11, 2008)
|
|
3
|
.3*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
|
|
3
|
.4*
|
|
Form of Bylaws, as amended, of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, dated May 18, 2007, by and among Noranda
Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, the Guarantors named therein,
and Wells Fargo Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 7, 2007,
among Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Noranda Aluminum
Acquisition Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, dated June 7, 2007, between Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Senior Floating Rate Note due 2015 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Senior Floating Rate Note due 2014 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
4
|
.6*
|
|
Form of common stock certificate of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation*
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2007, among Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation, Noranda Aluminum Acquisition
Corporation, the lenders party thereto from time to time,
Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent and
the other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of May 18,
2007, among Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Noranda
Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, each of its Subsidiaries
identified therein, and Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, as
Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Management Incentive Compensation Plan Term Sheet, dated
May 24, 2007, between William Brooks and Apollo Management
VI, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation
Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated November 12, 2009
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 29,
2007, between Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and William
Brooks (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Management
Holders) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Investor Director
Providers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on January 31, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Management Equity Investment and Incentive Term Sheet, dated
February 22, 2008, by and among Noranda Aluminum, Inc.,
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and Layle K. Smith
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Amendment
No. 1 to Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on April 11, 2008)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amended and Restated Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated
as of November 12, 2009, between Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation and Layle K. Smith (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Management Equity Investment and Incentive Term Sheet, dated
May 8, 2008, by and among Noranda Aluminum, Inc., Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporation and Kyle D. Lorentzen (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Establishment Agreement, dated September 30, 2004, between
the Government of Jamaica and St. Ann Bauxite Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Special Mining Lease No. 165, dated October 1, 2004,
granted by the Government of Jamaica to St. Ann Bauxite Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Alumina Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2004,
by and between Gramercy Alumina LLC and Gramercy Alumina
Holdings Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14
of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2004, by and between
Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE and Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Letter Agreement (amending the Establishment Agreement), dated
as of February 14, 2006, from St. Ann Bauxite Limited to
Dr. Carlton Davis, Cabinet Secretary, Jamaica (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 25, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment to the Management Equity Investment and Incentive Term
Sheet, dated November 12, 2009, between Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation and Layle K. Smith (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Amended and Restated Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated
as of November 12, 2009, between Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation and Kyle D. Lorentzen (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Non Qualified Stock Option
Agreement (Management Holders) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Form of Non Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Management
Holders) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 16, 2009)
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Letter Agreement (amending the Establishment Agreement), dated
as of December 31, 2009, from Jamaica Bauxite Mining
Limited to Noranda Bauxite Limited
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Securityholders Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation 2010 Incentive Award Plan
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation Senior Executive Bonus Plan
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (included in
Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (Toronto)
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (Nashville)
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (New Orleans)
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (Jamaica)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included in signature pages)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain portions of this document have been omitted pursuant to
a confidential treatment request. |