e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-32747
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
86-0460233 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
One BriarLake Plaza, Suite 2000
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South
Houston, Texas 77042
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(713) 954-5500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 1, 2010, there were 103,268,257 shares issued and outstanding of the issuers
common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
PART I
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,846 |
|
|
$ |
8,919 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $1,024 and $3,408 as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
128,719 |
|
|
|
148,725 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
7,681 |
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
42,809 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
7,268 |
|
|
|
22,615 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
28,384 |
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
224,707 |
|
|
|
212,321 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, full cost method |
|
|
5,472,404 |
|
|
|
5,117,273 |
|
Unproved properties, not subject to amortization |
|
|
453,164 |
|
|
|
292,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas properties |
|
|
5,925,568 |
|
|
|
5,409,510 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
56,268 |
|
|
|
55,695 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
(3,142,994 |
) |
|
|
(2,884,411 |
) |
Other property and equipment |
|
|
(11,116 |
) |
|
|
(8,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(3,154,110 |
) |
|
|
(2,892,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,827,726 |
|
|
|
2,572,559 |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
33,366 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Deferred Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,491 |
|
Other Assets, net of amortization |
|
|
75,858 |
|
|
|
68,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
3,161,657 |
|
|
$ |
2,867,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,320 |
|
|
$ |
3,579 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
127,460 |
|
|
|
137,206 |
|
Accrued capital costs |
|
|
94,200 |
|
|
|
140,941 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
12,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
80,249 |
|
|
|
54,915 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
28,533 |
|
|
|
8,262 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
27,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
356,740 |
|
|
|
372,611 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
301,569 |
|
|
|
362,972 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
18,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,463,930 |
|
|
|
1,194,850 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
35,431 |
|
|
|
38,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,822,595 |
|
|
|
1,611,639 |
|
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares
authorized, 103,227,031 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2010; 180,000,000 shares authorized,
101,806,825 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2009 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,272,043 |
|
|
|
1,257,526 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
40,107 |
|
|
|
(25,955 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(329,838 |
) |
|
|
(348,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
982,322 |
|
|
|
882,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
3,161,657 |
|
|
$ |
2,867,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
4
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
92,655 |
|
|
$ |
130,046 |
|
|
$ |
302,581 |
|
|
$ |
425,747 |
|
Oil |
|
|
91,434 |
|
|
|
80,908 |
|
|
|
283,569 |
|
|
|
220,787 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
22,808 |
|
|
|
15,736 |
|
|
|
70,634 |
|
|
|
30,398 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
25,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
210,677 |
|
|
|
227,346 |
|
|
|
664,562 |
|
|
|
702,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
59,436 |
|
|
|
65,325 |
|
|
|
172,089 |
|
|
|
165,816 |
|
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
6,691 |
|
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
19,711 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
Transportation expense |
|
|
4,484 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
14,574 |
|
|
|
13,627 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
18,379 |
|
|
|
18,922 |
|
|
|
69,690 |
|
|
|
57,455 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
93,620 |
|
|
|
106,218 |
|
|
|
288,250 |
|
|
|
301,305 |
|
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,731 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
|
11,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
184,655 |
|
|
|
200,532 |
|
|
|
569,976 |
|
|
|
1,266,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
26,022 |
|
|
|
26,814 |
|
|
|
94,586 |
|
|
|
(563,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(20,769 |
) |
|
|
(19,702 |
) |
|
|
(61,124 |
) |
|
|
(51,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
|
7,168 |
|
|
|
34,235 |
|
|
|
(614,543 |
) |
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
(3,436 |
) |
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
(15,447 |
) |
|
|
211,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
4,222 |
|
|
$ |
18,788 |
|
|
$ |
(402,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(4.29 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(4.29 |
) |
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
101,521,119 |
|
|
|
100,752,532 |
|
|
|
101,296,525 |
|
|
|
93,848,859 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
102,775,156 |
|
|
|
101,084,502 |
|
|
|
102,600,971 |
|
|
|
93,848,859 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
5
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Paid-In- |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
101,807 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,526 |
|
|
$ |
(25,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(348,626 |
) |
|
$ |
882,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued
restricted stock |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock bought and
cancelled on same day |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,838 |
) |
Forfeiture of restricted stock |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,071 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,788 |
|
|
|
18,788 |
|
Change in fair value of
derivative hedging instruments
net of income taxes of
$45,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,780 |
|
Hedge settlements reclassified
to income net of income taxes
of $(8,765) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,650 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,062 |
|
|
|
18,788 |
|
|
|
84,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
103,227 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,272,043 |
|
|
$ |
40,107 |
|
|
$ |
(329,838 |
) |
|
$ |
982,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Paid-In- |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
88,846 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1,071,347 |
|
|
$ |
78,181 |
|
|
$ |
(29,217 |
) |
|
$ |
1,120,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued equity
offering |
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
159,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,674 |
|
Common shares issued
restricted stock |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock bought and
cancelled on same day |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
Forfeiture of restricted stock |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,114 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402,683 |
) |
|
|
(402,683 |
) |
Change in fair value of
derivative hedging instruments
net of income taxes of
$30,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,797 |
|
Hedge settlements reclassified
to income net of income taxes
of $(68,115) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,983 |
) |
|
|
(402,683 |
) |
|
|
(470,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
101,856 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,250,151 |
|
|
$ |
10,198 |
|
|
$ |
(431,900 |
) |
|
$ |
828,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
6
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
18,788 |
|
|
$ |
(402,683 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
15,447 |
|
|
|
(211,860 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
288,250 |
|
|
|
301,305 |
|
Ineffectiveness of derivative instruments |
|
|
(1,757 |
) |
|
|
812 |
|
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,731 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
17,051 |
|
|
|
18,360 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,128 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,393 |
|
|
|
7,046 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
21,309 |
|
|
|
83,357 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
22,841 |
|
Cash from liquidation of hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,562 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(37,005 |
) |
|
|
(26,222 |
) |
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(26,972 |
) |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
302,122 |
|
|
|
538,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties |
|
|
(588,376 |
) |
|
|
(468,980 |
) |
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
(2,141 |
) |
Proceeds from property conveyances |
|
|
26,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(562,089 |
) |
|
|
(471,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility borrowings |
|
|
551,000 |
|
|
|
350,221 |
|
Credit facility repayments |
|
|
(283,000 |
) |
|
|
(855,221 |
) |
Repurchase of stock |
|
|
(5,838 |
) |
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
Debt redetermination costs |
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
|
|
(2,306 |
) |
Debt offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,906 |
) |
Proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,736 |
|
Proceeds from debt issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,279 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
260,894 |
|
|
|
(64,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
8,919 |
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
9,846 |
|
|
$ |
6,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of amount capitalized) |
|
$ |
37,301 |
|
|
$ |
29,238 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
7
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Operations Mariner Energy, Inc. (Mariner or the Company) is an independent oil and gas
exploration, development and production company with principal operations in the Permian Basin,
Gulf Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico, both shelf and deepwater. Unless otherwise indicated,
references to Mariner, the Company, we, our, ours and us refer to Mariner Energy, Inc.
and its subsidiaries collectively.
Interim Financial Statements The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of a normal and recurring nature)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in
conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Use of Estimates The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. The Companys most significant financial estimates are based on remaining proved natural
gas and oil reserves. Estimates of proved reserves are key components of Mariners depletion rate
for natural gas and oil properties, its unevaluated properties and its full cost ceiling test. In
addition, estimates are used in computing taxes, preparing accruals of operating costs and
production revenues, asset retirement obligations, fair value and effectiveness of derivative
instruments and fair value of stock options and the related compensation expense. Because of the
inherent nature of the estimation process, actual results could differ materially from these
estimates.
Principles of Consolidation Mariners condensed consolidated financial statements as of and
for the period ended September 30, 2010 and consolidated financial statements as of and for the
period ended December 31, 2009 include its accounts and the accounts of its subsidiaries. All
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Income Taxes The Companys provision for taxes includes both federal and state taxes. The
Company records its federal income taxes using an asset and liability approach which results in the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the book carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carryforwards are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely
than not to be recovered.
The Company had no uncertain tax positions during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 or
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued authoritative guidance which requires an entity to provide a greater level of
disaggregated information about the credit quality of its financing receivables and its allowance
for credit losses. In addition, an entity is required to disclose credit quality indicators, past
due information, and modifications of its financing receivables. These disclosures are intended to
help financial statement users assess an entitys credit risk exposures and evaluate the adequacy
of its allowance for credit losses. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact of adopting the guidance.
8
Mariner will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in its annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010.
In April 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which provides clarification that an
employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market
in which a substantial portion of the entitys equity securities trade should not be considered to
contain a condition that is not a market, performance or service condition. Therefore, the award
would be classified as an equity award if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The guidance is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the guidance.
In February 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which requires additional information
to be disclosed principally in respect of Level 3 fair value measurements and transfers to and from
Level 1 and Level 2 measurements. In addition, enhanced disclosure is required concerning inputs
and valuation techniques used to determine Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The
guidance is generally effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2009; however, the requirements to disclose separately purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the Level 3 reconciliation are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2010 (and for interim periods within such years). The Company adopted the standard effective
January 1, 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
2. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Onshore Acquisition On December 31, 2009, Mariner acquired the reorganized subsidiaries and
operations of Edge Petroleum Corporation (Edge). The assets acquired consist primarily of (i)
estimated proved reserves, (ii) undeveloped oil and gas property, primarily in Texas and New
Mexico, (iii) exploration assets in the form of seismic data, and (iv) certain tax attributes of
the acquired subsidiaries. The effective date of the acquisition was June 30, 2009 and the purchase
price was $260.0 million, less adjustments which resulted in a net purchase price as of December
31, 2009 of approximately $213.6 million, subject to final adjustments. Mariner financed the net
purchase price by borrowing under its secured revolving credit facility.
Pro Forma Financial Information: The unaudited pro forma information set forth below gives
effect to the acquisition of the reorganized Edge subsidiaries as if it had been consummated as of
the beginning of the applicable period. The unaudited pro forma information has been derived from
the historical Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and of Edge. The unaudited pro
forma information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different
had each of the acquired Edge subsidiaries been an independent company and had the companies always
been combined. No reliance should be placed on the pro forma financial information as being
indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the acquisition occurred in
the past or the future financial results that the Company will achieve after the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
per share amounts) |
Pro Forma: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
238,838 |
|
|
$ |
750,782 |
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(3,177 |
) |
|
$ |
(492,186 |
) |
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.24 |
) |
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.24 |
) |
9
3. Long-Term Debt
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Companys long-term debt was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Bank credit facility |
|
$ |
573,000 |
|
|
$ |
305,000 |
|
7 1/2% Senior Notes, due April 15, 2013, net of discount |
|
|
298,552 |
|
|
|
298,125 |
|
8% Senior Notes, due May 15, 2017 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
11 3/4% Senior Notes, due June 30, 2016, net of discount |
|
|
292,378 |
|
|
|
291,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,463,930 |
|
|
$ |
1,194,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Credit Facility The Company has a secured revolving credit facility with a group of
banks pursuant to an amended and restated credit agreement dated March 2, 2006, as further amended.
The credit facility matures January 31, 2012 and is subject to a borrowing base which is
redetermined periodically. The outstanding principal balance of loans under the credit facility may
not exceed the borrowing base. The most recent borrowing base redetermination concluded in April
2010 when the credit facility was amended to:
|
|
|
Increase the borrowing base by $150.0 million to $950.0 million until the next
redetermination under the credit agreement, |
|
|
|
|
Reschedule the regular periodic borrowing base redeterminations to begin in February and
August of each year, |
|
|
|
|
Give the lenders an option to redetermine the borrowing base upon termination of hedge
contracts with more than six months remaining in their original nominal term, |
|
|
|
|
Increase the maximum permitted ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit
agreement) to 3.5 to 1.0 from 2.5 to 1.0, and |
|
|
|
|
Give Mariner optionality to issue before January 1, 2011 up to $400.0 million in additional
unsecured debt with a non-default interest rate of up to 13% per annum (plus a maximum
default rate of 3%) and a scheduled maturity date no earlier than March 2, 2015. Upon closing
such a debt issuance, the borrowing base automatically would reduce by 25% of the aggregate
principal amount of the debt issued until otherwise redetermined under the credit agreement. |
As of September 30, 2010, maximum credit availability under the facility was $1.0 billion,
including up to $50.0 million in letters of credit, subject to a borrowing base of $950.0 million.
As of September 30, 2010, there were $573.0 million in advances outstanding under the credit
facility and four letters of credit outstanding totaling $4.7 million, of which $4.2 million is
required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of the Companys offshore fields. As
of September 30, 2010, after accounting for the $4.7 million of letters of credit, the Company had
$372.3 million available to borrow under the credit facility.
Borrowings under the bank credit facility bear interest at either a LIBOR-based rate or a
prime-based rate, at the Companys option, plus a specified margin. At September 30, 2010, when
borrowings at both LIBOR and prime-based rates were outstanding, the blended interest rate was
2.77% on all amounts borrowed. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the commitment fee
on unused capacity was 0.5% per annum. Commitment fees are included in Accrued interest in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report.
The credit facility subjects the Company to various restrictive covenants and contains other
usual and customary terms and conditions, including limits on additional debt, cash dividends and
other restricted payments, liens, investments, asset dispositions, mergers and speculative hedging.
Financial covenants under the credit facility require the Company to, among other things:
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to
consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and |
|
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of not more
than 3.5 to 1.0. |
10
The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of September 30, 2010 when the ratio of
consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities was
2.16 to 1.0 and the ratio of total debt to EBITDA was 2.71 to 1.0.
The Companys payment and performance of its obligations under the credit facility (including
any obligations under commodity and interest rate hedges entered into with facility lenders) are
secured by liens upon substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, except
its Canadian subsidiary, and guaranteed by its subsidiaries, other than Mariner Energy Resources,
Inc. which is a co-borrower, and its Canadian subsidiary.
Senior Notes In 2009, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount
of its 113/4% senior notes due 2016 (the 113/4% Notes). In 2007, the Company sold and issued $300.0
million aggregate principal amount of its 8% senior notes due 2017 (the 8% Notes). In 2006, the
Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 71/2% senior notes due 2013
(the 71/2% Notes and together with the 113/4% Notes and the 8% Notes, the Notes). The Notes are
governed by indentures that are substantially identical for each series. The Notes are senior
unsecured obligations of the Company. The 113/4% Notes mature on June 30, 2016 with interest payable
on June 30 and December 30 of each year beginning December 30, 2009. The 8% Notes mature on May 15,
2017 with interest payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The 71/2% Notes mature on April
15, 2013 with interest payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year. There is no sinking fund
for the Notes. The Company and its restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain financial and
non-financial covenants under each of the indentures governing the Notes. The Company was in
compliance with the financial covenants under the Notes as of September 30, 2010.
Capitalized Interest For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
capitalized interest totaled $6.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively. For the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, capitalized interest totaled $18.3 million and $9.7
million, respectively.
4. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock Offering On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued 11.5 million shares of
its common stock, par value $.0001 per share, at a public offering price of $14.50 per share in an
underwritten offering registered under the 1933 Act. The total sold included 1.5 million shares
issued upon full exercise of the underwriters overallotment option. Net offering proceeds, after
deducting underwriters discounts and estimated offering expenses but before giving effect to the
underwriters reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering expenses, were approximately $159.2
million. The Company used net offering proceeds to repay debt under its bank credit facility.
5. Oil and Gas Properties
The Companys oil and gas properties are accounted for using the full cost method of
accounting. All direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition,
exploration and development of oil and gas properties are capitalized, including eligible general
and administrative costs (G&A). G&A costs associated with production, operations, marketing and
general corporate activities are expensed as incurred. These capitalized costs, coupled with the
Companys estimated asset retirement obligations recorded in accordance with accounting for asset
retirement and environmental obligations under GAAP, are included in the amortization base and
amortized to expense using the unit-of-production method. Amortization is calculated based on
estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas
properties are applied to reduce net capitalized costs unless the sale or disposition causes a
significant change in the relationship between costs and the estimated value of proved reserves.
For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, capitalized G&A totaled $7.0 million
and $5.0 million, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
capitalized G&A totaled $20.8 million and $15.3 million, respectively.
11
Capitalized costs (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization and deferred
income taxes) of proved oil and gas properties are subject to a full cost ceiling limitation. The
ceiling limits these costs to an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated
future net cash flows from estimated proved reserves less estimated future operating and
development costs, abandonment costs (net of salvage value) and estimated related future income
taxes. In accordance with SEC rules, the natural gas and oil prices used to calculate the full cost
ceiling limitation for periods ending on or after December 31, 2009 are the 12-month average
prices, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for
each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are
defined by contractual arrangements. Prices are adjusted for basis or location differentials.
Price is held constant over the life of the reserves. The Company uses derivative financial
instruments that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting under GAAP to hedge against the volatility
of oil and natural gas prices. In accordance with SEC guidelines, Mariner includes estimated future
cash flows from its hedging program in the ceiling test calculation. If net capitalized costs
related to proved properties exceed the ceiling limit, the excess is impaired and recorded in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 the ceiling limit exceeded the net capitalized
costs of the Companys proved oil and gas properties and no impairment was recorded. The ceiling
limit of its proved reserves for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was calculated based
upon 12-month average prices of $4.41 per Mcf for gas and $77.34 per barrel for oil, calculated as
the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the
12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual
arrangements. Prices are adjusted for basis or location differentials. The Company may be
required to recognize non-cash impairment charges in future reporting periods if average 12-month
market prices for oil and natural gas were to decline. At September 30, 2010, the Company had
67,383,758 MMbtus of natural gas and 3,656,456 Bbls of oil of future production hedged.
Based on quoted market prices adjusted for market differentials of $3.30 per Mcf for gas and
$70.21 per barrel for oil at September 30, 2009, the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas
properties exceeded the ceiling limit and the Company calculated a non-cash ceiling test impairment
of $4.6 million ($3.0 million, net of tax) for the third quarter. The indicated impairment would
have been $71.6 million ($46.0 million, net of tax) if the Company had not used hedge adjusted
prices for the volumes that were subject to hedges. In accordance SEC guidelines in effect at
September 30, 2009, subsequent commodity price increases could be utilized to calculate the ceiling
value and reserves. Subsequent to September 30, 2009 the quoted market prices of gas and oil
increased. Based on commodity prices of $4.10 per Mcf for gas and $77.04 per barrel for oil at
October 30, 2009, the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas properties did not exceed the
ceiling limit and the Company did not record an impairment for the three months ended September 30,
2009.
No ceiling test impairment was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The
Company recorded a non-cash ceiling test impairment of $704.7 million ($454.6 million, net of tax)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of the net capitalized cost of proved oil
and gas properties exceeding the ceiling limit at March 31, 2009. The impairment would have been
$808.0 million ($521.3 million, net of tax) if the Company had not used hedge adjusted prices for
the volumes that were subject to hedges. The ceiling limit of its proved reserves was calculated
based upon quoted market prices adjusted for market differentials of $3.63 per Mcf for gas and
$49.65 per barrel for oil at March 31, 2009.
6. Accrual for Future Abandonment Liabilities
In accordance with accounting for asset retirement and environmental obligations under GAAP,
the Company records the fair value of a liability for the legal obligation to retire an asset in
the period in which it is incurred with the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the
carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Upon adoption, the Company recorded an asset
retirement obligation to reflect the Companys legal obligations related to future plugging and
abandonment of its oil and natural gas wells. The liability is accreted to its then present value
each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. If
the liability is settled for an amount other than the recorded amount, the difference is recognized
in proved oil and gas properties.
To estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation, the Company employs a present
value technique, which reflects certain assumptions, including its credit-adjusted risk-free
interest rate, the estimated settlement date
12
of the liability and the estimated current cost to settle the liability. Changes in timing or
to the original estimate of cash flows will result in changes to the carrying amount of the
liability.
The following roll forward is provided as a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
aggregate carrying amounts of the asset retirement obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Abandonment liability as of January 1, 2010 (1) |
|
$ |
417,887 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
1,092 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(42,597 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
26,786 |
|
Revisions to previous estimates |
|
|
(21,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability as of September 30, 2010 (2) |
|
$ |
381,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $54.9 million classified as a current liability at January 1, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $80.2 million classified as a current liability at September 30, 2010. |
In September 2010, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEM)
along with the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) issued a Notice to Lessees (NTL) to
require oil and gas companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico to set permanent plugs in
nonproducing wells that are currently completed with a subsurface safety valve in place and to
dismantle oil and gas production platforms no longer being used for exploration or production.
The NTL mandates that any well that has not been used during the past five years for exploration or
production must be plugged, and associated production platforms and pipelines must be
decommissioned if no longer involved with exploration or production activities. The NTL became
effective October 15, 2010 and companies have 120 days from then to submit a company-wide plan for
decommissioning these facilities and wells. Mariner is developing a plan and evaluating the impact
that compliance with the NTL will have on the Companys abandonment liability.
7. Share-Based Compensation
Applicable Plans In May 2009, the Companys stockholders approved the Mariner Energy, Inc.
Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan) in which the Companys
directors, employees and consultants are eligible to participate. Awards of up to an aggregate
12,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock may be made under the Stock Incentive Plan in the
form of incentive stock options, non- qualified stock options or restricted stock. Restricted
common stock and non-qualified stock options are outstanding under the Stock Incentive Plan.
Options to purchase the Companys common stock granted to certain employees in connection with a
March 2006 merger transaction also are outstanding but are not governed by the Stock Incentive Plan
(Rollover Options).
Plan Activity The Company recorded total compensation expense related to restricted stock
and stock options of $6.1 million and $7.0 million for the three-month periods ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively and $20.1 million and $21.1 million for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 2010
for the unvested portion of restricted stock granted under the Stock Incentive Plan was $51.0
million and for unvested options was $0.
Share-based compensation, including restricted stock and options under each of the Companys
plans, for the periods reflected was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Share-based compensation included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
$ |
5,211 |
|
|
$ |
6,152 |
|
|
$ |
17,051 |
|
|
$ |
18,360 |
|
Oil and natural gas properties under full cost method |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation |
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
6,970 |
|
|
$ |
20,071 |
|
|
$ |
21,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Share-based compensation charged to earnings for the periods reflected was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Charged to earnings |
|
$ |
5,211 |
|
|
$ |
6,152 |
|
|
$ |
17,051 |
|
|
$ |
18,360 |
|
Tax benefit |
|
|
(2,319 |
) |
|
|
(2,184 |
) |
|
|
(6,786 |
) |
|
|
(6,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,892 |
|
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
10,265 |
|
|
$ |
11,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a summary of stock option activity under the Stock Incentive Plan
and under Rollover Options for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
644,160 |
|
|
$ |
13.88 |
|
|
$ |
6,667 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(24,118 |
) |
|
|
11.77 |
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
618,442 |
|
|
|
13.96 |
|
|
$ |
6,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based upon the difference between the closing price per share of Mariners common stock on
September 30, 2010 of $24.23 and the option exercise price of in-the-money options. |
A summary of the activity for unvested restricted stock awards under the Stock Incentive Plan
as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and changes during the nine-month periods then
ended is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares under |
|
|
|
Stock Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total unvested shares at beginning of period: January 1 |
|
|
3,660,265 |
|
|
|
2,697,926 |
|
Shares granted (1) |
|
|
1,709,086 |
|
|
|
1,708,795 |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(965,222 |
) |
|
|
(591,049 |
) |
Shares forfeited (2) |
|
|
(12,995 |
) |
|
|
(25,131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unvested shares at end of period: September 30 |
|
|
4,391,134 |
|
|
|
3,790,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for future grant as options or restricted stock |
|
|
5,676,336 |
|
|
|
7,021,666 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 92,832 shares granted during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 4,741
shares granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 under the Stock Incentive
Plans 2008 Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program discussed below. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 4,741 shares forfeited in each of the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
under the Stock Incentive Plans 2008 Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program. |
14
The following table summarizes the status under the provisions for accounting for stock
compensation under GAAP of the Companys restricted stock, including long-term performance based
restricted stock, at September 30, 2010 and the changes during the nine months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
($ thousands) |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
Unvested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
3,660,265 |
|
|
$ |
21.51 |
|
|
$ |
78,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,709,086 |
|
|
|
15.67 |
|
|
|
26,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(965,222 |
) |
|
|
17.61 |
|
|
|
(16,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(12,995 |
) |
|
|
15.21 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
4,391,134 |
|
|
|
20.11 |
|
|
$ |
88,315 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program In June 2008, Mariners board of
directors adopted a Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program (the Program) under the
Stock Incentive Plan. Shares of restricted common stock subject to the Program were granted in
2008, 2009 and 2010. Vesting of these shares is contingent, begins upon satisfaction of specified
thresholds of $38.00 and $46.00 for the market price per share of Mariners common stock, and
continues in installments over five to seven years thereafter, assuming, in most instances,
continued employment by Mariner. The fair value of restricted stock grants made under the Program
is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. For the three months and nine months ended September
30, 2010, stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock grants totaled $1.9
million and $6.4 million, respectively.
Weighted average fair values and valuation assumptions used to value Program grants for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
Weighted average fair value of grants |
|
$ |
16.02 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
60.24 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected life |
|
10 years |
|
Expected volatility is calculated based on the average historical stock price volatility of
Mariner and a peer group as of September 30, 2010. The peer group consisted of the following seven
independent oil and gas exploration and production companies: ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Callon
Petroleum Co., Energy Partners, Ltd., McMoRan Exploration Co., Plains Exploration & Production
Company, Stone Energy Corporation and W&T Offshore, Inc.
The risk-free interest rate is determined at the grant date and is based on 10-year, zero-coupon
government bonds with maturity equal to the contractual term of the awards, converted to a
continuously compounded rate. The expected life is based upon the contractual terms of the
restricted stock grants under the Program.
8. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
The energy markets historically have been very volatile, and Mariner expects oil and gas
prices will be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. In an effort to reduce the effects of
the volatility of the price of oil and natural gas on the Companys operations, management has
elected to hedge oil and natural gas prices from time to time through the use of commodity price
swap agreements and costless collars. While the use of these hedging arrangements limits the
downside risk of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from favorable movements. In
addition, forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used to assess and measure
the ineffectiveness of the Companys open contracts at the end of each period.
For derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges pursuant to accounting
for derivatives and hedging under GAAP, the portion of the gain or loss on the derivative
instrument that is effective in offsetting the variable cash flows associated with the hedged
forecasted transaction is reported as a component of
15
other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated
with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction
affects earnings (e.g., in revenues when the hedged transactions are commodity sales). The
remaining gain or loss on the derivative contract in excess of the cumulative change in the present
value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any (i.e., the ineffective portion) is recognized
in earnings during the current period. The Company currently does not exclude any component of the
derivative contracts gain or loss from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
On January 29, 2009, the Company liquidated crude oil fixed price swaps that previously had
been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes in respect of 977,000 barrels of crude
oil in exchange for a cash payment to Mariner of $10.0 million and installment payments of $13.5
million to be paid monthly to Mariner through 2009. On April 16, 2009, the Company received a $10.5
million cash settlement on the hedges that were settled in monthly installments at January 29,
2009. Since, at the time of liquidation, the forecasted sales of crude oil volumes were still
expected to occur, the accumulated losses through January 29, 2009 on the related derivative
contracts remained in accumulated other comprehensive income. These accumulated losses were
reclassified to oil revenues throughout 2009 as the physical transactions occurred. Additionally,
all changes in the value of these derivative contracts subsequent to January 29, 2009 were also
reclassified monthly from accumulated other comprehensive income to current period oil revenues.
The table immediately below reflects these reclassifications for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
Derivative gains and losses are recorded by commodity type in oil and gas revenues in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effects on the Companys oil and gas revenues
from its hedging activities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash Gain on Settlements (1) |
|
$ |
10,745 |
|
|
$ |
52,644 |
|
|
$ |
22,658 |
|
|
$ |
173,648 |
|
Reclassification of Liquidated Swaps (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,059 |
|
Gain (Loss) on Hedge Ineffectiveness (3) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,882 |
|
|
$ |
55,694 |
|
|
$ |
24,415 |
|
|
$ |
189,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Designated as cash flow hedges pursuant to accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP. |
|
(2) |
|
Net gain realized in 2009 on liquidated natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps that do
not qualify for hedge accounting. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) recognized in natural gas revenue related to the ineffective portion
of open contracts designated as cash flow hedges that are not eligible for deferral under GAAP
due primarily to the basis differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at
the point of sale. |
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Fixed Price |
|
|
Asset/(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 December 31, 2010 |
|
|
9,815,113 |
|
|
$ |
5.57 |
|
|
$ |
15,897 |
|
January 1 December 31, 2011 |
|
|
29,389,843 |
|
|
$ |
5.79 |
|
|
|
39,936 |
|
January 1 December 31, 2012 |
|
|
22,338,802 |
|
|
$ |
6.11 |
|
|
|
22,701 |
|
January 1 December 31, 2013 |
|
|
5,840,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.76 |
|
|
|
8,210 |
|
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 December 31, 2010 |
|
|
775,192 |
|
|
$ |
73.36 |
|
|
|
(6,044 |
) |
January 1 December 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,978,364 |
|
|
$ |
79.33 |
|
|
|
(10,315 |
) |
January 1 December 31, 2012 |
|
|
494,100 |
|
|
$ |
80.76 |
|
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
January 1 December 31, 2013 |
|
|
408,800 |
|
|
$ |
82.81 |
|
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The Company has reviewed the financial strength of its counterparties and believes the credit
risk associated with these swaps to be minimal. Hedges with counterparties that are lenders under
the Companys bank credit facility are secured under the bank credit facility.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes, all
realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations
during the current period. This will result in non-cash gains or losses being reported in Mariners
operating results.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company expects to realize within the next 12 months a net gain
of approximately $35.5 million resulting from hedging activities that are currently recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income. The net hedging gain is expected to be realized as a
decrease of $15.3 million to oil revenues and an increase of $50.8 million to natural gas revenues.
Additional Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had derivative financial instruments
under GAAP recorded in its consolidated balance sheets as set forth below (in thousands). The fair
values are recorded by netting asset and liability positions where counterparty master netting
arrangements contain provisions for net settlement. See Note 12, Fair Value Measurement for
information regarding the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of the Companys
derivative financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Contracts |
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
Derivatives designated as cash
flow hedging contracts |
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
Current Assets: Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
42,809 |
|
|
Current Assets: Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
2,239 |
|
|
|
Long-Term Assets: Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
|
33,366 |
|
|
Long-Term Assets: Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$ |
76,175 |
|
|
Total:
|
|
$ |
3,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Contracts |
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
Derivatives designated as
cash flow hedging contracts |
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
Current Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
7,329 |
|
|
Current Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
27,708 |
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$ |
10,942 |
|
|
Total:
|
|
$ |
42,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the effect on income (loss) of
derivative financial instruments under GAAP was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of gain/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gain/(loss) |
|
|
gain/(loss) |
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain/(loss) |
|
Derivatives |
|
recognized in OCI |
|
|
reclassified from |
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in income |
|
designated as cash |
|
on derivative |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
income (effective |
|
|
Location of gain/(loss) |
|
on derivative |
|
flow hedging |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
into income |
|
portion) |
|
|
recognized in income |
|
(ineffective portion) |
|
contracts under |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
(effective |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
on derivative |
|
Third Quarter |
|
GAAP |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
portion) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(ineffective portion) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
$ |
38,638 |
|
|
$ |
(21,216 |
) |
|
Revenues-Natural Gas |
|
$ |
12,628 |
|
|
$ |
50,521 |
|
|
Revenues-Natural Gas |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
(809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues-Crude Oil |
|
|
(1,883 |
) |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,745 |
|
|
$ |
52,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (loss)/gain recognized |
|
|
|
Location of (loss)/gain |
|
|
in income on derivative |
|
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging contracts |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
under GAAP |
|
derivative |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Revenues-Natural Gas |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
Revenues-Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the effect on income (loss) of
derivative financial instruments under GAAP was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of gain/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gain |
|
|
gain/(loss) |
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain/(loss) |
|
Derivatives |
|
recognized in OCI |
|
|
reclassified from |
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in income |
|
designated as cash |
|
on derivative |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
income (effective |
|
|
Location of gain/(loss) |
|
|
on derivative |
|
flow hedging |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
into income |
|
portion) |
|
|
recognized in income |
|
|
(ineffective portion) |
|
contracts under |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
(effective |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
on derivative |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
GAAP |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
portion) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(ineffective portion) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
$ |
127,475 |
|
|
$ |
42,135 |
|
|
Revenues-Natural Gas |
|
$ |
32,985 |
|
|
$ |
152,334 |
|
|
Revenues-Natural Gas |
|
$ |
1,757 |
|
|
$ |
(812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues-Crude Oil |
|
|
(10,327 |
) |
|
|
21,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,658 |
|
|
$ |
173,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (loss)/gain recognized |
|
|
|
Location of (loss)/gain |
|
in income on derivative |
|
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging |
|
recognized in income on |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
contracts under GAAP |
|
derivative |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Revenues-Natural Gas |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
Revenues-Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 11, Comprehensive Income (Loss) for more information related to the Companys
derivative financial instruments.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Minimum Future Lease Payments The Company leases certain office facilities and other
equipment under long-term operating lease arrangements. Minimum future lease obligations under the
Companys operating leases in effect at September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
2011 |
|
$ |
739 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,886 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,467 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,101 |
|
2015 and thereafter |
|
|
8,228 |
|
Other Commitments In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into long-term
commitments to purchase seismic data and other geological information such as maps, logs and
studies. The minimum annual payments under these contracts are $4.0 million in 2011.
Insurance Matters
Current Insurance Against Hurricanes
Mariner is a member of OIL Insurance Limited (OIL), an energy industry insurance
cooperative, which provides Mariner windstorm insurance coverage. During 2009, the coverage was
subject to a $10.0 million per-occurrence deductible, a $250.0 million per-occurrence loss limit,
and a $750.0 million industry aggregate per-event loss limit. Effective January 1, 2010, the
coverage is subject to a $10.0 million per-occurrence deductible; a $150.0 million per-occurrence
loss limit per member that Mariner elected to supplement with $25.0 million in additional coverage
which if used, would be repayable, interest free, over five years; an annual maximum of $300.0
million per member; and a $750.0 million industry aggregate per-event loss limit. Annual industry
windstorm losses of $300.0 million or less will be mutualized among all members. Annual industry
windstorm losses exceeding $300.0 million will be mutualized among windstorm members in two pools,
one for offshore and one for onshore, with future premiums based upon a pools loss experience and
a members weighted percent of the pools asset base. Mariner anticipates these changes to increase
its loss retention by approximately $100.0 million for windstorm losses, which it expects to either
self insure, insure through the commercial market, insure through the purchase of additional OIL
coverage or a combination of these.
18
Mariner annually considers whether the commercial market offers supplemental or excess
insurance that would, based on Mariners historical experience, supplement its OIL coverage on a
cost-effective basis. In 2010, Mariner elected to purchase insurance from the commercial market to
supplement the reduced windstorm coverage offered by OIL. The supplemental insurance will provide
up to an additional $78.3 million of aggregate annual coverage in respect of windstorms, of which
up to $49.1 million could cover revenues lost as a result of constructive total losses of
third-party owned structures through which a material amount of Mariner production is routed and
cannot be rerouted.
As of September 30, 2010, Mariner accrued approximately $41.2 million for an OIL withdrawal
premium contingency. As part of its OIL membership, Mariner is obligated to pay a withdrawal
premium if it elects to withdraw from OIL. Mariner does not anticipate withdrawing from OIL;
however, due to the contingency, Mariner periodically reassesses the sufficiency of its accrued
withdrawal premium based on OILs periodic calculation of the potential withdrawal premium in light
of past losses, and Mariner may adjust its accrual accordingly in the future. OIL requires smaller
members to provide a letter of credit or other acceptable security in favor of OIL to secure
payment of the withdrawal premium. Acceptable security has included a letter of credit or a
security agreement pursuant to which a member grants OIL a security interest in certain claim
proceeds payable by OIL to the member. Mariner has entered into such a security agreement, granting
to OIL a senior security interest in up to the next $50.0 million in excess of $100.0 million of
Mariners Hurricane Ike claim proceeds payable by OIL. Mariner has the ability to replace the
security agreement with a letter of credit or other acceptable security in favor of OIL.
Hurricane Ike (2008)
In 2008, the Companys operations were adversely affected by Hurricane Ike. The hurricane
resulted in shut-in and delayed production as well as facility repairs and replacement expenses.
The Company estimates that repairs and plugging and abandonment costs resulting from Hurricane Ike
will total approximately $160.0 million net to Mariners interest. OIL has advised the Company that
industry-wide damages from Hurricane Ike are expected to substantially exceed OILs $750.0 million
industry aggregate per event loss limit and that OIL expects to initially prorate the payout of all
OIL members Hurricane Ike claims at approximately 50%, subject to further adjustment. OIL also has
indicated that the scaling factor it expects to apply to Mariners Hurricane Ike claims will result
in settlement at less than 70%. Mariner expects that approximately 75% of the shortfall in its
primary insurance coverage will be covered under applicable commercial excess coverage. In respect
of Hurricane Ike claims that the Company made through September 30, 2010, the Company received
approximately $37.0 million from OIL and $14.0 million from excess carriers. Although in 2009
Mariner started receiving payment in respect of its Hurricane Ike claims, due to the magnitude of
the storm and the complexity of the insurance claims being processed by the insurance industry,
Mariner expects to maintain a potentially significant insurance receivable through 2010 while it
actively pursues settlement.
Litigation The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is a claimant and/or a defendant
in various legal proceedings, including proceedings as to which the Company has insurance coverage
and those that may involve the filing of liens against the Company or its assets. The Company does
not consider its exposure in these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to be material.
Letters of Credit Mariners bank credit facility has a letter of credit subfacility of up to
$50.0 million that is included as a use of the borrowing base. As of September 30, 2010, four such
letters of credit totaling $4.7 million were outstanding of which $4.2 million is required for
plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of Mariners offshore fields.
Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill As a result of the Deepwater Horizon incidents in April 2010, the
DOI has issued a series of reforms to the oversight and management of offshore drilling activities
on the federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). On July 12, 2010, the Secretary of the DOI directed
the BOEM to issue a suspension until November 30, 2010 of drilling activities that use subsea
blowout preventers or surface blowout preventers on floating facilities. The moratorium was
suspended on October 12, 2010. However, Mariners Gulf of Mexico offshore operations have been
impacted and likely may be impacted in the future by increased regulatory oversight and permitting
delays, which may increase the cost of OCS wells such as Lucius, Heidelberg and Bass Lite, and
delay drilling and production therefrom.
19
10. Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share does not include dilution and is computed by dividing net income or
loss attributed to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur upon
vesting of restricted common stock or exercise of options to purchase common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
4,222 |
|
|
$ |
18,788 |
|
|
$ |
(402,683 |
) |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
101,521 |
|
|
|
100,753 |
|
|
|
101,297 |
|
|
|
93,849 |
|
Add dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average shares
outstanding and dilutive
securities |
|
|
102,775 |
|
|
|
101,085 |
|
|
|
102,601 |
|
|
|
93,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(4.29 |
) |
Diluted: |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(4.29 |
) |
Shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase common stock and unvested shares of
restricted stock that would have been anti-dilutive are excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, none of the Companys shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options and approximately 1,099,000 unvested shares of restricted
stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was
anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, none of the Companys shares issuable
upon exercise of stock options and approximately 1,085,000 unvested shares of restricted stock were
excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive.
As a result of the Companys net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, all of the
Companys shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock
(approximately 644,721 and 1,969,881, respectively) were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30,
2009, 612,805 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and 1,793,914 unvested shares of
restricted stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
effect was anti-dilutive.
The provisions of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, state
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends or
dividend equivalents are participating securities prior to vesting and are required to be included
in the earnings allocations in computing basic earnings per share under the two-class method. These
participating securities had a negligible impact on earnings per share.
20
11. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and certain items recorded directly to
stockholders equity and classified as other comprehensive income (loss). The table below
summarizes comprehensive income (loss) and provides the components of the change in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
4,222 |
|
|
$ |
18,788 |
|
|
$ |
(402,683 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative hedging instruments,
net of taxes |
|
|
24,767 |
|
|
|
6,921 |
|
|
|
81,780 |
|
|
|
53,797 |
|
Derivative contracts settled and reclassified, net of taxes |
|
|
(6,975 |
) |
|
|
(35,717 |
) |
|
|
(15,650 |
) |
|
|
(121,780 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
17,887 |
|
|
|
(28,796 |
) |
|
|
66,062 |
|
|
|
(67,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
19,708 |
|
|
$ |
(24,574 |
) |
|
$ |
84,850 |
|
|
$ |
(470,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Fair Value Measurement
Certain of Mariners assets and liabilities are reported at fair value in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such assets and liabilities include amounts for both
financial and nonfinancial instruments. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and accounts payable (including income taxes payable and accrued expenses) approximated
fair value at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. These assets and liabilities are not
included in the following tables.
GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques
used to measure fair value. As presented in the table below, the hierarchy consists of three broad
levels. Level 1 inputs on the hierarchy consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets and liabilities and have the highest priority. Level 2 inputs are market-based and
are directly or indirectly observable but not considered Level 1 quoted prices, including quoted
prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active; or valuation techniques whose inputs are observable.
Where observable inputs are available, directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of
the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2. Level 3 inputs are unobservable
(meaning they reflect Mariners own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the
asset or liability based on the best available information) and therefore have the lowest priority.
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any
input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Mariner believes it uses appropriate
valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of its assets and
liabilities.
GAAP requires a credit adjustment for non-performance in calculating the fair value of
financial instruments. The credit adjustment for derivatives in an asset position is determined
based on the credit rating of the counterparty and the credit adjustment for derivatives in a
liability position is determined based on Mariners credit rating.
21
The following table provides fair value measurement information for the Companys derivative
financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Value(1) |
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil
fixed price swaps Short
Term |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,066 |
|
|
$ |
(16,586 |
) |
|
$ |
35,480 |
|
Natural gas and crude oil
fixed price swaps Long
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,932 |
|
|
|
(6,179 |
) |
|
|
29,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Financial
Instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
87,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
87,998 |
|
|
$ |
(22,765 |
) |
|
$ |
65,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil
fixed price swaps Short
Term |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(27,708 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(27,708 |
) |
|
$ |
2,239 |
|
|
$ |
(25,469 |
) |
Natural gas and crude oil
fixed price swaps Long
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,562 |
) |
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
(14,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Financial
Instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(44,270 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(44,270 |
) |
|
$ |
4,686 |
|
|
$ |
(39,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derivative fair values are based on analysis of each contract as required by accounting for
fair value measurements and disclosures under GAAP. Derivative assets and liabilities with the
same counterparty are presented here on a gross basis even where the legal right of offset
exists. |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of Mariners
derivative financial instruments in the table above.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
The fair values of the natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps are estimated using
internal discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward commodity price curves, terms of each
contract, and a credit adjustment based on the credit rating of the Company and its counterparties
as of September 30, 2010.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The Company had no Level 3 financial instruments as of September 30, 2010.
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in
accordance with the requirements of accounting for financial instruments under GAAP, which Mariner
adopted effective March 31, 2009. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using
available market information and valuation methodologies described below. Considerable judgment is
required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different
market assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair
value amounts.
22
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Bank credit facility |
|
$ |
573,000 |
|
|
$ |
573,000 |
|
7 1/2% Notes, net of discount |
|
|
298,552 |
|
|
|
311,064 |
|
8% Notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
326,625 |
|
11 3/4% Notes, net of discount |
|
|
292,378 |
|
|
|
379,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,463,930 |
|
|
$ |
1,590,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the amounts outstanding under the bank credit facility at September 30, 2010
is based on rates currently available for debt instruments with similar terms and average
maturities from companies with similar credit ratings in the industry. The fair value of the Notes,
excluding discount, is based on quoted market prices based on trades of such debt at September 30,
2010 or the nearest actual trade date.
13. Segment Information
The FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing standards for reporting information about
operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in
activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses. Separate financial information is
available and this information is regularly evaluated by the chief decision maker for the purpose
of allocating resources and assessing performance.
Mariner measures financial performance as a single enterprise, allocating capital resources on
a project-by-project basis across its entire asset base to maximize profitability. Mariner utilizes
a company-wide management team that administers all enterprise operations encompassing the
exploration, development and production of natural gas and oil. Since Mariner follows the full cost
method of accounting and all of its oil and gas properties and operations are located in the United
States, the Company has determined that it has one reporting unit. Inasmuch as Mariner is one
enterprise, the Company does not maintain comprehensive financial statement information by area but
does track basic operational data by area.
14. Supplemental Guarantor Information
On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its
11 3/4% Notes. On April 30, 2007, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal
amount of its 8% Notes. On April 24, 2006, the Company sold and issued to eligible purchasers
$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7 1/2% Notes. The Notes are jointly and severally
guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Companys existing and certain of its future domestic
subsidiaries (Subsidiary Guarantors). The guarantees are full and unconditional, and the
guarantors are wholly-owned. In the future, the guarantees may be released or terminated under
certain circumstances.
The following information sets forth Mariners Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, its Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and its Condensed Consolidating
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Mariner accounts for investments in its subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting;
accordingly, entries necessary to consolidate Mariner, the parent company, and its Subsidiary
Guarantors are reflected in the eliminations column.
23
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
September 30, 2010
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,394 |
|
|
$ |
2,181 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,846 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances |
|
|
68,926 |
|
|
|
59,797 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,719 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
7,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
42,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,809 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
7,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,268 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
26,910 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
153,361 |
|
|
|
71,079 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,707 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, full
cost method |
|
|
2,791,203 |
|
|
|
2,680,414 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,472,404 |
|
Unproved properties, not subject to
amortization |
|
|
401,243 |
|
|
|
46,080 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas properties |
|
|
3,192,446 |
|
|
|
2,726,494 |
|
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,925,568 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
20,480 |
|
|
|
35,358 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,268 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion
and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
(1,644,963 |
) |
|
|
(1,498,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,142,994 |
) |
Other property and equipment |
|
|
(8,066 |
) |
|
|
(2,969 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion
and amortization |
|
|
(1,653,029 |
) |
|
|
(1,501,000 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,154,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,559,897 |
|
|
|
1,260,852 |
|
|
|
6,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,827,726 |
|
Investment in Subsidiaries |
|
|
709,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(709,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Receivables |
|
|
204,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Note Receivable |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
33,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
15,701 |
|
|
|
81,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, net of amortization |
|
|
75,240 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,758,931 |
|
|
$ |
1,413,913 |
|
|
$ |
7,244 |
|
|
$ |
(1,018,431 |
) |
|
$ |
3,161,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
$ |
4,240 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,320 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
97,365 |
|
|
|
30,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,460 |
|
Accrued capital costs |
|
|
46,199 |
|
|
|
47,992 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,200 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
12,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,649 |
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
17,547 |
|
|
|
62,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,249 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
28,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,533 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
211,702 |
|
|
|
145,029 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,740 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
62,200 |
|
|
|
239,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,569 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,065 |
) |
|
|
18,052 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,613 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,463,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463,930 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
35,089 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,431 |
|
Intercompany note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,564,832 |
|
|
|
566,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(308,802 |
) |
|
|
1,822,595 |
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value;
20,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value;
180,000,000 shares authorized,
103,227,031 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,272,043 |
|
|
|
1,050,275 |
|
|
|
8,166 |
|
|
|
(1,058,441 |
) |
|
|
1,272,043 |
|
Partner capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
|
40,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,107 |
|
Accumulated retained deficit |
|
|
(329,838 |
) |
|
|
(388,771 |
) |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
389,627 |
|
|
|
(329,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
982,397 |
|
|
|
702,319 |
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
(709,629 |
) |
|
|
982,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,758,931 |
|
|
$ |
1,413,913 |
|
|
$ |
7,244 |
|
|
$ |
(1,018,431 |
) |
|
$ |
3,161,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
December 31, 2009
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,365 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
551 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,919 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances |
|
|
94,958 |
|
|
|
53,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,725 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
8,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
22,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,615 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
10,450 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
148,405 |
|
|
|
63,365 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,321 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, full
cost method |
|
|
2,472,963 |
|
|
|
2,644,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,117,273 |
|
Unproved properties, not subject to
amortization |
|
|
246,037 |
|
|
|
46,134 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas properties |
|
|
2,719,000 |
|
|
|
2,690,444 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,409,510 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
19,926 |
|
|
|
35,358 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,695 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion
and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
(1,499,787 |
) |
|
|
(1,384,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,884,411 |
) |
Other property and equipment |
|
|
(6,145 |
) |
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion
and amortization |
|
|
(1,505,932 |
) |
|
|
(1,386,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,892,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,232,994 |
|
|
|
1,339,088 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,572,559 |
|
Investment in Subsidiaries |
|
|
715,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(715,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Receivables |
|
|
222,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Note Receivable |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
902 |
|
Deferred Income Tax |
|
|
35,583 |
|
|
|
(23,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,491 |
|
Other Assets, net of amortization |
|
|
68,631 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,431,735 |
|
|
$ |
1,379,662 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
(945,220 |
) |
|
$ |
2,867,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,569 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,579 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
107,537 |
|
|
|
29,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,206 |
|
Accrued capital costs |
|
|
71,420 |
|
|
|
69,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,941 |
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
10,632 |
|
|
|
44,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,915 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
8,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,262 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
27,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
229,128 |
|
|
|
143,473 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,611 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
71,320 |
|
|
|
291,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,972 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
15,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,194,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194,850 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
38,458 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,800 |
|
Intercompany note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,319,645 |
|
|
|
521,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,448 |
) |
|
|
1,611,639 |
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value;
20,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value;
180,000,000 shares authorized,
101,806,825 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,257,526 |
|
|
|
1,098,156 |
|
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
|
(1,099,694 |
) |
|
|
1,257,526 |
|
Partner capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(25,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,955 |
) |
Accumulated retained deficit |
|
|
(348,626 |
) |
|
|
(416,433 |
) |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
416,946 |
|
|
|
(348,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
882,962 |
|
|
|
714,747 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
(715,772 |
) |
|
|
882,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,431,735 |
|
|
$ |
1,379,662 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
(945,220 |
) |
|
$ |
2,867,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
53,018 |
|
|
$ |
39,637 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92,655 |
|
Oil |
|
|
51,413 |
|
|
|
40,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,434 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
15,407 |
|
|
|
7,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,808 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
123,900 |
|
|
|
86,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
37,482 |
|
|
|
33,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,611 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
18,464 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,379 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
48,790 |
|
|
|
44,807 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,620 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
106,552 |
|
|
|
77,991 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
17,348 |
|
|
|
8,786 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,022 |
|
Earnings of Affiliates |
|
|
5,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Income/(Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized |
|
|
(20,769 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(20,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
8,712 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(5,208 |
) |
|
|
5,257 |
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
5,318 |
|
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,208 |
) |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
98,896 |
|
|
$ |
31,150 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130,046 |
|
Oil |
|
|
53,265 |
|
|
|
27,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,908 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
13,226 |
|
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,736 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
165,984 |
|
|
|
61,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
39,616 |
|
|
|
34,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,199 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
17,774 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,922 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
64,656 |
|
|
|
41,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,218 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
122,491 |
|
|
|
78,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
43,493 |
|
|
|
(16,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,814 |
|
Loss of Affiliates |
|
|
(11,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(19,632 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(19,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
(16,826 |
) |
|
|
11,357 |
|
|
|
7,168 |
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
(8,415 |
) |
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
4,222 |
|
|
$ |
(11,357 |
) |
|
$ |
11,357 |
|
|
$ |
4,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
181,300 |
|
|
$ |
121,281 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
302,581 |
|
Oil |
|
|
155,211 |
|
|
|
128,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,569 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
46,875 |
|
|
|
23,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,634 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
6,531 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
389,917 |
|
|
|
274,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
109,002 |
|
|
|
97,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,374 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
66,468 |
|
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,690 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
153,010 |
|
|
|
135,159 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,250 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
333,563 |
|
|
|
236,062 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
56,354 |
|
|
|
38,583 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,586 |
|
Earnings of Affiliates |
|
|
27,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Income/(Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
773 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized |
|
|
(61,098 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
(61,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
23,563 |
|
|
|
38,334 |
|
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(27,319 |
) |
|
|
34,235 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(4,775 |
) |
|
|
(10,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
18,788 |
|
|
$ |
27,662 |
|
|
$ |
(343 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,319 |
) |
|
$ |
18,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
307,051 |
|
|
$ |
118,696 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
425,747 |
|
Oil |
|
|
159,210 |
|
|
|
61,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,787 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
23,416 |
|
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,398 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
17,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
497,590 |
|
|
|
205,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
103,091 |
|
|
|
88,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,111 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
56,247 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,455 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
171,449 |
|
|
|
129,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,305 |
|
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
342,595 |
|
|
|
362,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,731 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
9,482 |
|
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
682,864 |
|
|
|
583,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,266,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS |
|
|
(185,274 |
) |
|
|
(378,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(563,910 |
) |
Loss of Affiliates |
|
|
(265,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
|
|
443 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(50,880 |
) |
|
|
(3,602 |
) |
|
|
3,406 |
|
|
|
(51,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Taxes |
|
|
(497,529 |
) |
|
|
(382,238 |
) |
|
|
265,224 |
|
|
|
(614,543 |
) |
Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
94,846 |
|
|
|
117,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(402,683 |
) |
|
$ |
(265,224 |
) |
|
$ |
265,224 |
|
|
$ |
(402,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
165,815 |
|
|
$ |
136,574 |
|
|
$ |
(267 |
) |
|
$ |
302,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties |
|
|
(480,032 |
) |
|
|
(101,791 |
) |
|
|
(6,553 |
) |
|
|
(588,376 |
) |
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(573 |
) |
Proceeds from property conveyances |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
25,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(478,919 |
) |
|
|
(76,596 |
) |
|
|
(6,574 |
) |
|
|
(562,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility borrowings |
|
|
551,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551,000 |
|
Credit facility repayments |
|
|
(283,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283,000 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
44,133 |
|
|
|
(57,800 |
) |
|
|
6,561 |
|
|
|
(7,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
312,133 |
|
|
|
(57,800 |
) |
|
|
6,561 |
|
|
|
260,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
927 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
8,365 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
8,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
7,394 |
|
|
$ |
2,181 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
9,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
MARINER
ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
390,197 |
|
|
$ |
147,912 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
538,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties |
|
|
(299,947 |
) |
|
|
(169,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(468,980 |
) |
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
13,453 |
|
|
|
(15,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,141 |
) |
Repayments of notes from affiliates |
|
|
169,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(117,469 |
) |
|
|
(184,627 |
) |
|
|
(169,025 |
) |
|
|
(471,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility borrowings |
|
|
350,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,221 |
|
Credit facility repayments |
|
|
(855,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(855,221 |
) |
Repayments of notes from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,025 |
) |
|
|
169,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
235,478 |
|
|
|
205,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(269,522 |
) |
|
|
36,317 |
|
|
|
169,025 |
|
|
|
(64,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
6,016 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
15. Apache Merger
On April 15, 2010, Mariner and Apache Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Apache),
announced that they entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which Apache will acquire
Mariner in a stock and cash transaction. The Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 14, 2010, as
amended (the Merger Agreement), by and among Apache, Mariner and Apache Deepwater LLC (f/k/a ZMZ
Acquisitions LLC), a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Apache
(Merger Sub), contemplates a merger (the Merger) whereby Mariner will be merged with and into
Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Apache.
The total amount of cash and shares of Apache common stock that will be paid and issued,
respectively, pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fixed, and Mariner stockholders will be entitled
to receive (on an aggregate basis) 0.17043 of a share of Apache common stock, par value $0.625 per
share, and $7.80 in cash for each share of Mariner common stock (the Mixed Consideration).
Mariner stockholders have the right to elect to receive all cash ($26.00 per share), all Apache
common stock (0.24347 of a share of Apache common stock) or the Mixed Consideration, subject to
proration procedures as provided in the Merger Agreement.
Upon completion of the Merger, each outstanding option to purchase Mariner common stock will
be converted into a fully vested option to purchase 0.24347 of a share of Apache common stock.
In addition, each outstanding share of Mariner restricted stock (other than restricted stock
granted pursuant to Mariners 2008 Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program) that is
not subject to an unsatisfied price or other condition and that has not lapsed will vest and each
holder will have the opportunity to elect the form of consideration as described above. Forty
percent of the outstanding shares of Mariner restricted stock granted pursuant to its 2008
Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program will vest and each holder will have the
opportunity to elect the form of consideration as described above, and the remaining portion of
such shares of Mariner restricted stock will be cancelled.
The Merger Agreement has been approved by the boards of directors of Apache, Mariner, and
Merger Sub. The completion of the Merger is subject to certain conditions, including: (i) the
adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Mariner; (ii) subject to certain
materiality exceptions, the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by Apache and
Mariner; (iii) the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 that will be filed by
Apache for the issuance of its common stock in the Merger, and the approval of the listing of these
shares on the New York Stock Exchange; (iv) the termination or expiration of the applicable waiting
period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended; (v) the delivery
of customary opinions from counsel to Apache and Mariner that the Merger will be treated as a
tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (vi) compliance by Apache and Mariner
with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (vii) the absence of legal
impediments prohibiting the Merger.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties that the parties have
made to each other as of specific dates. Apache and Mariner also have each agreed to certain
covenants in the Merger Agreement. Among other covenants, Mariner has agreed, subject to certain
exceptions, not to initiate, solicit, negotiate, provide information in furtherance of, approve,
recommend or enter into an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement).
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Apache and Mariner,
including if the Merger is not completed by January 31, 2011. In the event of a termination of the
Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, Mariner may be required to pay to Apache a
termination fee of $67.0 million. In certain circumstances involving the termination of the Merger
Agreement, one of Apache or Mariner will be obligated to reimburse the others expenses incurred in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $7.5 million. Any reimbursement of expenses by Mariner to Apache will reduce the amount of
any termination fee paid by Mariner to Apache.
34
In connection with the Merger Agreement, Mariner and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company (the Rights Agent), entered into an Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 14,
2010 (the Amendment), to the Rights Agreement dated as of October 12, 2008 (the Rights
Agreement), between Mariner and the Rights Agent, in connection with the execution of the Merger
Agreement. Undefined capitalized terms used in this paragraph have the meaning ascribed to them in
the Rights Agreement. The Amendment provides that none of (i) the announcement of the Merger, (ii)
the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, (iii) the conversion of shares of Mariner
common stock into the right to receive the Merger Consideration (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) or (iv) the consummation of the Merger or any other transaction contemplated by the
Merger Agreement will cause (1) Apache, Merger Sub or any of their Affiliates or Associates to
become an Acquiring Person, or (2) the occurrence of a Flip-In Event, a Flip-Over Event, a
Distribution Date or a Stock Acquisition Date under the Rights Agreement.
Subsequent to the announcement of the merger with Apache, two stockholder lawsuits styled as
class actions were commenced on behalf of Mariner stockholders challenging the merger. City of
Livonia Employees Retirement System v. Mariner Energy, Inc., et al, Cause No. 2010-24355, was
filed in the 334th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas against Mariner and its
directors. Plaintiff alleges that the Mariner directors breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing
to sell the company through an unfair process and at an unfair price, and that Mariner aided and
abetted those breaches of fiduciary duties. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the transaction and to be
awarded attorneys fees. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Scott D. Josey, et
al, cause No. 5427-VCP, was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against
Mariner, its directors, certain Mariner officers, Apache and Merger Sub. Plaintiff alleges that the
Mariner directors breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to sell the company through an unfair
process and at an unfair price, and by agreeing to the vesting of certain restricted stock held by
Mariner management. Plaintiff also alleges that Apache and Merger Sub aided and abetted in those
breaches of fiduciary duties. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the merger and to be awarded attorneys
fees.
On August 1, 2010, the parties to the Delaware action entered into a memorandum of
understanding, which, when reduced to a settlement agreement, is intended to be a final resolution
of that action. Also on August 1, 2010, the parties to the Texas action agreed to be bound by the
memorandum of understanding with respect to that action. In connection with the settlement, and in
exchange for the releases described below, Apache and Mariner agreed to, and on August 2, 2010
Apache, Mariner and Merger Sub did, amend the Merger Agreement to eliminate the termination fee in
the event that Mariner terminates the Merger Agreement in order to enter into a superior proposal
with another party and to make certain additional disclosures in the proxy statement/prospectus for
the transaction filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, in the event that
any proceedings regarding appraisal rights under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law are commenced following the merger, Apache and Mariner have waived and will not present any
argument that shares of Mariner restricted stock granted pursuant to Mariners 2008 Long-Term
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program will be counted in determining the total number of
Mariner shares outstanding in such proceeding.
The parties have completed agreed-upon confirmatory discovery and continue to negotiate in
good faith to finalize a settlement agreement to present to the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware for final approval. Pursuant to the settlement, the Delaware action will be dismissed with
prejudice on the merits, the plaintiffs in the Texas action will voluntarily dismiss that action
with prejudice, and all defendants will be released from any and all claims relating to, among
other things, the merger, the Merger Agreement and any disclosures made in connection therewith.
The settlement is subject to customary conditions, including consummation of the merger, completion
of certain confirmatory discovery, class certification, and final approval by the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware. The settlement will not affect the form or amount of the consideration to
be received by Mariner stockholders in the merger.
The defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing or liability with respect to
all claims, events, and transactions complained of in these actions or that they have engaged in
any wrongdoing. The defendants entered into the settlement to eliminate the uncertainty, burden,
risk, expense and distraction of further litigation.
35
16. Subsequent Events
On October 1, 2010, Mariner announced the date and record date for the special meeting of
stockholders of Mariner at which stockholders of Mariner will consider and vote on, among other
things, approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement. The special meeting is scheduled for
November 10, 2010, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time. The record date for stockholders entitled to vote at
the meeting was October 12, 2010.
The Company has assessed the impact of subsequent events through the date of issuance of its
financial statements and has concluded there were no additional events that require adjustment to,
or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
36
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our business and the
results of operations together with our present financial condition. This section should be read in
conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes
included in this Quarterly Report, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009. For meanings of natural gas and oil terms used in the Quarterly Report,
please refer to Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas Terms under Business in Part I, Item 1 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in our discussion may be forward-looking. These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. We caution that a number of factors could cause future production,
revenues and expenses to differ materially from our expectations. Please see Risk Factors in Item
1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report regarding certain risk factors relating to us.
Overview
We are an independent oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with
principal operations in the Permian Basin, the Gulf Coast and the Gulf of Mexico. During 2009, we
produced approximately 21.1 MMboe and our average daily production rate was 58 Mboe. At December
31, 2009, we had 181.2 MMboe of estimated proved reserves, of which approximately 56% were onshore
(47% in the Permian Basin and 8% in the Gulf Coast), with the balance offshore (15% in the Gulf of
Mexico deepwater and 29% on the Gulf of Mexico shelf); 53% were natural gas; and 47% were oil and
natural gas liquids (NGLs). Approximately 66% of our estimated proved reserves were classified as
proved developed.
Our revenues, profitability and future growth depend substantially on prevailing prices for
oil and natural gas and our ability to find, develop and acquire oil and gas reserves that are
economically recoverable while controlling and reducing costs. The energy markets historically have
been very volatile. Oil and natural gas prices increased to, and then declined significantly from,
historical highs in mid-2008 and may fluctuate and decline significantly in the future. Although we
attempt to mitigate the impact of price declines and provide for more predictable cash flows
through our hedging strategy, a substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices or
poor drilling results could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, cash flows, quantities of natural gas and oil reserves that we can economically produce
and our access to capital. Conversely, the use of derivative instruments also can prevent us from
realizing the full benefit of upward price movements.
The recent worldwide financial and credit crisis has reduced the availability of liquidity and
credit to fund the continuation and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The
shortage of liquidity and credit combined with recent substantial losses in worldwide equity
markets could lead to an extended worldwide economic recession. A sustained recession or slowdown
in economic activity could further reduce worldwide demand for energy and result in lower oil and
natural gas prices, which could materially adversely affect our profitability and results of
operations.
Recent Developments
Apache Merger. On April 15, 2010, Mariner and Apache Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(Apache), announced that they entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which Apache will
acquire Mariner in a stock and cash transaction. The Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 14,
2010, as amended (the Merger Agreement), by and among Apache, Mariner and Apache Deepwater LLC
(f/k/a ZMZ Acquisitions LLC), a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of
Apache (Merger Sub), contemplates a merger (the Merger) whereby Mariner will be merged with and
into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Apache.
The total amount of cash and shares of Apache common stock that will be paid and issued,
respectively, pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fixed, and Mariner stockholders will be entitled
to receive (on an aggregate basis) 0.17043 of a share of Apache common stock, par value $0.625 per
share, and $7.80 in cash for each share of Mariner common stock (the Mixed Consideration).
Mariner stockholders have the right to elect to receive all cash ($26.00 per share), all Apache
common stock (0.24347 of a share of Apache common stock) or the Mixed
37
Consideration, subject to proration procedures as provided in the Merger Agreement. Upon
completion of the Merger, each outstanding option to purchase Mariner common stock will be
converted into a fully vested option to purchase 0.24347 of a share of Apache common stock.
In addition, each outstanding share of Mariner restricted stock (other than restricted stock
granted pursuant to Mariners 2008 Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program) that is
not subject to an unsatisfied price or other condition and that has not lapsed will vest and each
holder will have the opportunity to elect the form of consideration as described above. Forty
percent of the outstanding shares of Mariner restricted stock granted pursuant to its 2008
Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program will vest and each holder will have the
opportunity to elect the form of consideration as described above, and the remaining portion of
such shares of Mariner restricted stock will be cancelled.
The Merger Agreement has been approved by the boards of directors of Apache, Mariner, and
Merger Sub. On October 1, 2010, Mariner announced the date and record date for the special meeting
of stockholders of Mariner at which stockholders of Mariner will consider and vote on, among other
things, approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement. The special meeting is scheduled for
November 10, 2010, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time. The record date for stockholders entitled to vote at
the meeting was October 12, 2010. If stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement, the
parties expect the Merger to be completed shortly after the special meeting.
The completion of the Merger is subject to certain conditions, including: (i) the adoption of
the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of Mariner; (ii) subject to certain materiality
exceptions, the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by Apache and Mariner; (iii)
the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 that will be filed by Apache for the
issuance of its common stock in the Merger, and the approval of the listing of these shares on the
New York Stock Exchange; (iv) the termination or expiration of the applicable waiting period under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended; (v) the delivery of customary
opinions from counsel to Apache and Mariner that the Merger will be treated as a tax-free
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (vi) compliance by Apache and Mariner with
their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (vii) the absence of legal impediments
prohibiting the Merger.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties that the parties have
made to each other as of specific dates. Apache and Mariner also have each agreed to certain
covenants in the Merger Agreement. Among other covenants, Mariner has agreed, subject to certain
exceptions, not to initiate, solicit, negotiate, provide information in furtherance of, approve,
recommend or enter into an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement).
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Apache and Mariner,
including if the Merger is not completed by January 31, 2011. In the event of a termination of the
Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, Mariner may be required to pay to Apache a
termination fee of $67.0 million. In certain circumstances involving the termination of the Merger
Agreement, one of Apache or Mariner will be obligated to reimburse the others expenses incurred in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $7.5 million. Any reimbursement of expenses by Mariner to Apache will reduce the amount of
any termination fee paid by Mariner to Apache.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, Mariner and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company (the Rights Agent), entered into an Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 14,
2010 (the Amendment), to the Rights Agreement dated as of October 12, 2008 (the Rights
Agreement), between Mariner and the Rights Agent, in connection with the execution of the Merger
Agreement. Undefined capitalized terms used in this paragraph have the meaning ascribed to them in
the Rights Agreement. The Amendment provides that none of (i) the announcement of the Merger, (ii)
the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, (iii) the conversion of shares of Mariner
common stock into the right to receive the Merger Consideration (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) or (iv) the consummation of the Merger or any other transaction contemplated by the
Merger Agreement will cause (1) Apache, Merger Sub or any of their Affiliates or Associates to
become an Acquiring Person, or (2) the occurrence of a Flip-In Event, a Flip-Over Event, a
Distribution Date or a Stock Acquisition Date under the Rights Agreement.
38
Subsequent to the announcement of the merger with Apache, two stockholder lawsuits styled as
class actions were commenced on behalf of Mariner stockholders challenging the merger. City of
Livonia Employees Retirement System v. Mariner Energy, Inc., et al, Cause No. 2010-24355, was
filed in the 334th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas against Mariner and its
directors. Plaintiff alleges that the Mariner directors breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing
to sell the company through an unfair process and at an unfair price, and that Mariner aided and
abetted those breaches of fiduciary duties. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the transaction and to be
awarded attorneys fees. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Scott D. Josey, et
al, cause No. 5427-VCP, was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against
Mariner, its directors, certain Mariner officers, Apache and Merger Sub. Plaintiff alleges that the
Mariner directors breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to sell the company through an unfair
process and at an unfair price, and by agreeing to the vesting of certain restricted stock held by
Mariner management. Plaintiff also alleges that Apache and Merger Sub aided and abetted in those
breaches of fiduciary duties. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the merger and to be awarded attorneys
fees.
On August 1, 2010, the parties to the Delaware action entered into a memorandum of
understanding, which, when reduced to a settlement agreement, is intended to be a final resolution
of that action. Also on August 1, 2010, the parties to the Texas action agreed to be bound by the
memorandum of understanding with respect to that action. In connection with the settlement, and in
exchange for the releases described below, Apache and Mariner agreed to, and on August 2, 2010
Apache, Mariner and Merger Sub did, amend the Merger Agreement to eliminate the termination fee in
the event that Mariner terminates the Merger Agreement in order to enter into a superior proposal
with another party and to make certain additional disclosures in the proxy statement/prospectus for
the transaction filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, in the event that
any proceedings regarding appraisal rights under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law are commenced following the merger, Apache and Mariner have waived and will not present any
argument that shares of Mariner restricted stock granted pursuant to Mariners 2008 Long-Term
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program will be counted in determining the total number of
Mariner shares outstanding in such proceeding.
The parties have completed agreed-upon confirmatory discovery and continue to negotiate in
good faith to finalize a settlement agreement to present to the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware for final approval. Pursuant to the settlement, the Delaware action will be dismissed with
prejudice on the merits, the plaintiffs in the Texas action will voluntarily dismiss that action
with prejudice, and all defendants will be released from any and all claims relating to, among
other things, the merger, the Merger Agreement and any disclosures made in connection therewith.
The settlement is subject to customary conditions, including consummation of the merger, completion
of certain confirmatory discovery, class certification, and final approval by the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware. The settlement will not affect the form or amount of the consideration to
be received by Mariner stockholders in the merger.
The defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing or liability with respect to
all claims, events, and transactions complained of in these actions or that they have engaged in
any wrongdoing. The defendants entered into the settlement to eliminate the uncertainty, burden,
risk, expense and distraction of further litigation.
Acquisitions. On December 31, 2009, we acquired the reorganized subsidiaries and operations of
Edge Petroleum Corporation (Edge). The material assets acquired consist primarily of (i)
estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2009 of 100.5 Bcfe, of which approximately 75% are
developed (consisting of 69% natural gas and 31% oil and NGLs), 81% are located in South Texas, and
44% are in the Flores/Bloomberg field in Starr County, Texas, (ii) approximately 60,000 net acres
of undeveloped leasehold, primarily in Texas and New Mexico, and (iii) deferred tax assets of
approximately $83.3 million, comprised of approximately $61.2 million in net operating loss
carryforwards and $22.1 million in built-in losses from carryover tax basis in the properties. The
effective date of the acquisition was June 30, 2009 and the purchase price was $260.0 million, less
adjustments which resulted in a net purchase price as of December 31, 2009 of approximately $213.6
million, subject to final adjustments. We financed the net purchase price by borrowing under our
secured revolving credit facility.
Third Quarter 2010 Highlights
In third quarter 2010 we reported net income of $1.8 million, for diluted earnings per share
(EPS) of $0.02. During third quarter 2009, we reported net income of $4.2 million and $0.04 diluted
EPS. Other financial and operational items include:
39
|
|
|
Average daily production during third quarter 2010 decreased 15% to 51 Mboe per day
from 60 Mboe per day during third quarter 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010
decreased 48% to $103.9 million from $200.4 million for the same period in 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues during third quarter 2010 decreased 7% to $210.7 million from $227.3
million during third quarter 2009. |
Operational Update
Offshore We drilled three offshore wells in the third quarter of 2010, all of which were
successful. Information regarding these wells is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
Well Name |
|
Operator |
|
Working Interest |
|
Water Depth (Ft) |
|
Location |
West Cameron 110 #19 |
|
Mariner |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Conventional Shelf |
East Cameron 24 #2 |
|
Apex |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
40 |
|
|
Conventional Shelf |
Eugene Island 330 #B-9 |
|
Apache |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
248 |
|
|
Conventional Shelf |
As of September 30, 2010 two offshore wells were drilling.
We are a non-operator and own a 12.5% working interest in the Heidelberg discovery comprised
of Green Canyon blocks 816, 859, 860 and 903. The original discovery well drilled on Green Canyon
Block 859 was temporarily abandoned. The appraisal well drilled on Green Canyon Block 903 was
plugged and abandoned without reaching the depth necessary to test the targeted objectives. The
operator plans to drill a substitute appraisal well on Green Canyon Block 903 in order to delineate
the objectives tested in the Green Canyon Block 859 well and test the deeper objectives not reached
in that well. Drilling operations for the well were suspended while the former U.S. Gulf of Mexico
drilling moratorium was in effect and are planned to commence after regulatory permits are
obtained. Our estimated net cost for the substitute appraisal well is $14.0 million.
We operate Atwater Valley 426 (Bass Lite) in which we own a 53.8% working interest. During
first quarter 2010, production of approximately 2,700 Boe/d, net to our interest, was shut-in due
to a suspected downhole mechanical failure in one of the two wells at the property. We plan to
perform a well intervention during first half of 2011 in an effort to recommence production.
As a result of the Deepwater Horizon incidents in April 2010, the U.S. Department of the
Interior (DOI) has issued a series of reforms to the oversight and management of offshore
drilling activities on the federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). On July 12, 2010, the Secretary
of the DOI directed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, to issue a
suspension until November 30, 2010 of drilling activities that use subsea blowout preventers or
surface blowout preventers on floating facilities. The moratorium was suspended on October 12,
2010. However, our Gulf of Mexico offshore operations have been impacted and likely may be impacted
in the future by increased regulatory oversight and permitting delays, which may increase the cost
of OCS wells such as Lucius, Heidelberg and Bass Lite and delay drilling and production therefrom.
Onshore In the third quarter of 2010, in the Permian Basin we drilled 23 development wells
and 13 extension wells, all of which were successful. We also drilled two wells on our other
onshore properties, both of which were successful. As of September 30, 2010, eight rigs were
operating, seven on our Permian Basin properties and one on our other onshore properties.
40
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
The following table sets forth summary information with respect to our oil and gas operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except net production, average sales prices and % change) |
|
Summary Operating Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
17,458 |
|
|
|
24,121 |
|
|
|
(6,663 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Natural gas liquids (MBbls) |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Total barrel of oil equivalent (Mboe) |
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
5,553 |
|
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Average daily production (Mboe/d) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Hedging Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue gain |
|
$ |
12,765 |
|
|
$ |
47,875 |
|
|
$ |
(35,110 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
)% |
Oil revenue (loss) gain |
|
|
(1,883 |
) |
|
|
7,819 |
|
|
|
(9,702 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hedging revenue gain |
|
$ |
10,882 |
|
|
$ |
55,694 |
|
|
$ |
(44,812 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Sales Prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) realized(1) |
|
$ |
5.31 |
|
|
$ |
5.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Natural gas (per Mcf) unhedged |
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
71.97 |
|
|
|
73.15 |
|
|
|
(1.18 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Oil (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
73.45 |
|
|
|
66.08 |
|
|
|
7.37 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
41.93 |
|
|
|
36.85 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
41.93 |
|
|
|
36.85 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Total barrel of oil equivalent ($/Mboe)
realized(1) |
|
|
43.80 |
|
|
|
40.83 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Total barrel of oil equivalent ($/Mboe)
unhedged |
|
|
41.49 |
|
|
|
30.80 |
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Summary of Financial Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue |
|
$ |
92,655 |
|
|
$ |
130,046 |
|
|
$ |
(37,391 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Oil revenue |
|
|
91,434 |
|
|
|
80,908 |
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Natural gas liquids revenue |
|
|
22,808 |
|
|
|
15,736 |
|
|
|
7,072 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Other revenues |
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
476 |
% |
Lease operating expense |
|
|
59,436 |
|
|
|
65,325 |
|
|
|
(5,889 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
6,691 |
|
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
4,484 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
18,379 |
|
|
|
18,922 |
|
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
93,620 |
|
|
|
106,218 |
|
|
|
(12,598 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
Net interest expense |
|
|
20,765 |
|
|
|
19,646 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
|
7,168 |
|
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
2,946 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
4,222 |
|
|
$ |
(2,401 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Unit Costs per Mboe: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
$ |
12.58 |
|
|
$ |
11.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
19.82 |
|
|
|
19.13 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average sales prices include the effects of hedging |
41
Net Income for third quarter 2010 was $1.8 million compared to $4.2 million for the comparable
period in 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in revenues of $16.7 million
resulting from lower natural gas production (discussed further below) and lower realized natural
gas and crude oil prices. Partially offsetting the lower net income were decreases in depreciation,
depletion and amortization and lease operating expense of $12.6 million and $5.9 million,
respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share for third quarter 2010 were $0.02 for each
measure compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.04 for third quarter 2009.
Net Production for third quarter 2010 was approximately 4,724 Mboe, down 15% from 5,553 Mboe
for third quarter 2009. Natural gas production for third quarter 2010 comprised approximately 62%
of total net production compared to approximately 72% for third quarter 2009.
Natural gas production for third quarter 2010 decreased 28% to approximately 190 MMcf per day,
compared to approximately 262 MMcf per day for third quarter 2009. Oil production for third quarter
2010 increased 15% to approximately 13,809 barrels per day, compared to approximately 12,018
barrels per day for third quarter 2009. Natural gas liquids production for third quarter 2010
increased 27% to approximately 5,913 barrels per day, compared to approximately 4,641 barrels per
day for third quarter 2009.
Period over period changes in our production were primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
Increased production of 242.2 Mboe, or 31%, from our Permian Basin properties,
primarily as a result of our drilling and development of existing acreage. |
|
|
|
|
Increased production of 314.1 Mboe from our Gulf Coast and other onshore properties as
a result of the Edge acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Decreased production of 1,159.2 Mboe, or 44%, from our Gulf of Mexico deepwater
properties at Geauxpher located in Garden Banks 462 (517.5 Mboe), Bass Lite located in
Atwater 426 (323.8 Mboe) and East Breaks 602 (161.8 Mboe). These decreases were primarily
attributable to premature water breakthroughs discovered on Geauxpher, normal production
declines on East Breaks 602 and permitting delays and equipment unavailability for Bass
Lite resulting from the Deepwater Horizon incident and U.S. Gulf of Mexico drilling
moratorium. |
|
|
|
|
Decreased production of 226.2 Mboe, or 10%, from our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties as
a result of a recompletion not performed at High Island 116 (221.5 Mboe) as production was
still flowing, and normal depletion declines at West Cameron 172 (112.3 Mboe) and South
Marsh Island 76 (71.9 Mboe). These decreases were partially offset by increased production
at South Timbalier 148 (143.4 Mboe). |
Natural gas, oil and NGL revenues for third quarter 2010 decreased 9% to $206.9 million
compared to $226.7 million for third quarter 2009 as a result of a decrease in total production
(approximately $33.8 million), partially offset by higher average sales prices (approximately $14.0
million, net of the effect of hedging).
During third quarter 2010, our revenues reflected a net recognized hedging gain of $10.9
million comprised of $10.8 million in favorable cash settlements and an unrealized gain of $0.1
million related to the ineffective portion of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral
under accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP due primarily to the basis differentials
between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale. This compares to a net
recognized hedging gain of approximately $55.7 million for third quarter 2009, comprised of $52.6
million in favorable cash settlements on our hedges, a $3.9 million gain reclassification on our
liquidated swaps and an unrealized loss of $0.8 million related to the ineffective portion of open
contracts that are not eligible for deferral under GAAP.
42
Our natural gas and oil average sales prices, and the effects of hedging activities on those
prices, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging |
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
Unhedged |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
% Change |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.31 |
|
|
$ |
4.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
71.97 |
|
|
|
73.45 |
|
|
|
(1.48 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.39 |
|
|
$ |
3.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
73.15 |
|
|
|
66.08 |
|
|
|
7.07 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Other revenues for third quarter 2010 increased approximately $3.1 million to $3.8 million
from $0.7 million for third quarter 2009 primarily as a result of $2.4 million in pipeline income
and $0.4 million in increased third party gas sales.
Lease operating expense (LOE) for third quarter 2010 decreased approximately $5.9 million to
$59.4 million from $65.3 million for third quarter 2009 due primarily to decreases of $7.9 million
in hurricane repairs, $3.4 million attributable to shut-in production on one of two wells at
Atwater 426 (Bass Lite), $2.2 million in workovers at our Permian Basin properties and $1.3 million
in pipeline repairs for Mississippi Canyon (Pluto). These decreases were partially offset by
increases of $3.1 million from properties related to the Edge acquisition, $2.3 million of expenses
related to Ewing Bank 921 (Black Widow), $1.6 million attributable to the increase in development
of our Permian Basin properties, $1.0 million in pipeline repairs for Vermillion 326 and $0.8
million in well costs at Vermillion 35.
Severance and ad valorem tax for third quarter 2010 increased approximately $2.3 million to
$6.7 million from $4.4 million for third quarter 2009 due to an increase of $0.8 million from
properties related to the Edge acquisition and a $1.4 million increase attributable to development
in our onshore properties and increased production from our Permian Basin properties.
General and administrative expense (G&A) for third quarter 2010 decreased approximately
$0.5 million to $18.4 million from $18.9 million for
third quarter 2009 due primarily to increases of $2.0 million in
capitalized G&A resulting from a greater number of employees associated with
our acquisition, exploration and development activities and a rise in stock compensation
expense related to those employees and $0.5
million of overhead recovery, decreases of $0.9 million in stock compensation expense and $0.2 million in corporate office and other administrative
expenses. These were partially offset by increases of $1.5 million in salaries and wages resulting
from an average increase of 18% in headcount period over period, $0.8 million attributable to
professional fees associated with the pending Apache merger and $0.5 million in office, computer
and corporate expenditures due to professional and industry
subscription costs.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense for third quarter 2010 decreased
approximately $12.6 million to $93.6 million ($19.82 per Mboe) from $106.2 million ($19.13 per
Mboe) for third quarter 2009. This decrease primarily resulted from a $14.5 million decrease in
expense due to lower total production, partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in the depletion
rate due to capital additions and the Edge acquisition.
Other miscellaneous expense for third quarter 2010 increased approximately $0.8 million to
$2.0 million from $1.2 million for third quarter 2009 due primarily to an increase of $0.4 million
in third party gas purchases made to satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments and an
increase of $0.3 million in bad debt expense.
Net interest expense for third quarter 2010 increased approximately $1.2 million to $20.8
million from $19.6 million for third quarter 2009 due primarily to an increase in interest expense
on our credit facility of $3.4 million as a result of an increased balance, partially offset by an
increase in capitalized interest of $2.3 million.
Provision for income taxes for third quarter 2010 reflected an effective tax rate of 65.4% as
compared to 41.1% for third quarter 2009. The third quarter 2010 effective tax rate includes the
impact of additional tax expenses totaling $1.1 million attributable to non-deductible Apache
merger costs, stock award vesting shortfalls, and change of tax estimates. Without the impact of
these combined adjustments, the effective tax rate would have been 44.5%.
43
The third quarter 2009 tax provision included tax expense totaling $0.4 million attributable
to stock award vesting shortfalls. Without the impact of the shortfalls, the effective tax rate for
third quarter 2009 would have been 35.5%. The higher effective tax
rate for third quarter 2010 was attributable to recurring
non deductable costs in relation to pre-tax income.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
The following table sets forth summary information with respect to our oil and gas operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except net production, average sales prices and % change) |
|
Summary Operating Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
55,857 |
|
|
|
69,979 |
|
|
|
(14,122 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Natural gas liquids (MBbls) |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
Total barrel of oil equivalent (Mboe) |
|
|
14,840 |
|
|
|
15,949 |
|
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Average daily production (Mboe/d) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Hedging Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue gain |
|
$ |
34,742 |
|
|
$ |
149,685 |
|
|
$ |
(114,943 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
)% |
Oil revenue (loss) gain |
|
|
(10,327 |
) |
|
|
40,210 |
|
|
|
(50,537 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hedging revenue gain |
|
$ |
24,415 |
|
|
$ |
189,895 |
|
|
$ |
(165,480 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Sales Prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) realized(1) |
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Natural gas (per Mcf) unhedged |
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
72.76 |
|
|
|
67.83 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
75.41 |
|
|
|
55.48 |
|
|
|
19.93 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
43.27 |
|
|
|
29.46 |
|
|
|
13.81 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
43.27 |
|
|
|
29.46 |
|
|
|
13.81 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Total barrel of oil equivalent ($/Mboe)
realized(1) |
|
|
44.26 |
|
|
|
42.44 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Total barrel of oil equivalent ($/Mboe)
unhedged |
|
|
42.61 |
|
|
|
30.54 |
|
|
|
12.07 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Summary of Financial Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue |
|
$ |
302,581 |
|
|
$ |
425,747 |
|
|
$ |
(123,166 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Oil revenue |
|
|
283,569 |
|
|
|
220,787 |
|
|
|
62,782 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Natural gas liquids revenue |
|
|
70,634 |
|
|
|
30,398 |
|
|
|
40,236 |
|
|
|
132 |
% |
Other revenues |
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
25,720 |
|
|
|
(17,942 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
)% |
Lease operating expense |
|
|
172,089 |
|
|
|
165,816 |
|
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
19,711 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
8,043 |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
14,574 |
|
|
|
13,627 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
69,690 |
|
|
|
57,455 |
|
|
|
12,235 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
288,250 |
|
|
|
301,305 |
|
|
|
(13,055 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,731 |
|
|
|
(704,731 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
|
11,960 |
|
|
|
(6,298 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
)% |
Net interest expense |
|
|
60,351 |
|
|
|
50,633 |
|
|
|
9,718 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before taxes |
|
|
34,235 |
|
|
|
(614,543 |
) |
|
|
648,778 |
|
|
|
106 |
% |
Provision (Benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
15,447 |
|
|
|
(211,860 |
) |
|
|
227,307 |
|
|
|
107 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
18,788 |
|
|
$ |
(402,683 |
) |
|
$ |
421,471 |
|
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Unit Costs per Mboe: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
$ |
11.60 |
|
|
$ |
10.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
19.42 |
|
|
|
18.89 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average sales prices include the effects of hedging |
44
Net Income (Loss) for first nine months 2010 was $18.8 million compared to $(402.7) million
for the comparable period in 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to no indication of a
full-cost ceiling test impairment in first nine months 2010 compared to an impairment of $704.7
million in first nine months 2009. The increase in net income was partially offset by a decrease in
tax benefit of $227.3 million, a decrease in revenues of $38.1 million, and increases in general
and administrative expense and net interest expense of $12.2 million and $9.7 million,
respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share for first nine months 2010 were $0.19 and $0.18,
respectively, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $(4.29) for each measure for
first nine months 2009.
Net Production for first nine months 2010 was approximately 14,840 Mboe, down 7% from 15,949
Mboe for first nine months 2009. Natural gas production for first nine months 2010 comprised
approximately 63% of total net production compared to approximately 73% for first nine months 2009.
Natural gas production for first nine months 2010 decreased 20% to approximately 205 MMcf per
day, compared to approximately 256 MMcf per day for first nine months 2009. Oil production for
first nine months 2010 increased 20% to approximately 14,276 barrels per day, compared to
approximately 11,922 barrels per day for first nine months 2009. Natural gas liquids production for
first nine months 2010 increased 58% to approximately 5,980 barrels per day, compared to
approximately 3,778 barrels per day for first nine months 2009.
Period over period changes in our production were primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
Increased production of 496.7 Mboe, or 22%, from our Permian Basin properties,
primarily as a result of our drilling and development of existing acreage. |
|
|
|
|
Increased production of 1,047.6 Mboe from our Gulf Coast and other onshore properties
as a result of the Edge acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Decreased production of 1,694.9 Mboe, or 25%, from our Gulf of Mexico deepwater
properties at Atwater 426 (635.4 Mboe), East Breaks 558 (434.6 Mboe), Garden Banks 195
(270.2 Mboe), Green Canyon 472 (208.6 Mboe), East Breaks 602 (202.6 Mboe) and Viosca Knoll
917 (153.4 Mboe). These decreases were primarily attributable to normal production
declines, except for Bass Lite which was attributable to permitting delays and equipment
unavailability resulting from the Deepwater Horizon incident and U.S. Gulf of Mexico
drilling moratorium. Decreases in production were partially offset by increased production
at Geauxpher located in Garden Banks 462 (314.6 Mboe). |
|
|
|
|
Decreased production of 963.1 Mboe, or 14%, from our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties as
a result of normal depletion declines at South Marsh Island 76 (445.1 Mboe) and High Island
163 (180.7 Mboe), recompletion delays at High Island 116 (555.7 Mboe) and High Island A 467
(159.2 Mboe). These decreases were partially offset by increased production at certain of
our properties including Vermilion 380 (335.2 Mboe), where production was shut-in due to
Hurricane Ike in the prior year period, and South Timbalier 49 (208.8 Mboe), due to a new
producing well in the current period. |
Natural gas, oil and NGL revenues for first nine months 2010 decreased 3% to $656.8 million
compared to $676.9 million for first nine months 2009 as a result of a decrease in total production
(approximately $47.1 million, net of the effect of hedging) partially offset by higher average
sales prices (approximately $27.0 million, net of the effect of hedging).
During first nine months 2010, our revenues reflected a net recognized hedging gain of $24.4
million comprised of $22.7 million in favorable cash settlements and an unrealized gain of $1.7
million related to the ineffective portion of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral
under accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP due primarily to the basis differentials
between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale. This compares to a net
recognized hedging gain of approximately $189.9 million for first nine months 2009, comprised of
$173.6 million in favorable cash settlements on our hedges, a $17.1 million gain reclassification
on our liquidated swaps and an unrealized loss of $0.8 million related to the ineffective portion
of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral under GAAP.
45
Our natural gas and oil average sales prices, and the effects of hedging activities on those
prices, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging |
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
Unhedged |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
% Change |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
|
$ |
4.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
72.76 |
|
|
|
75.41 |
|
|
|
(2.65 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
67.83 |
|
|
|
55.48 |
|
|
|
12.35 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Other revenues for first nine months 2010 decreased approximately $17.9 million to $7.8
million from $25.7 million for first nine months 2009 primarily as a result of our receipt of a
$16.6 million arbitration award in 2009 related to a consummated acquisition, a $3.3 million
decrease in third party gas sales and a $0.3 million decrease in income from gathering systems.
Partially offsetting the decreases were $2.4 million in pipeline income and a $0.6 million gain on
retirement of other property.
Lease operating expense (LOE) for first nine months 2010 increased approximately $6.3
million to $172.1 million from $165.8 million for first nine months 2009, due primarily to
increases of $8.9 million from properties related to the Edge acquisition, $5.6 million of expenses
related to Ewing Bank 921 (Black Widow), $5.3 million due to workovers primarily on West Cameron
110 and South Marsh Island 76, $4.8 million resulting from routine maintenance and platform repairs
on offshore shelf properties, $4.4 million in helicopter and boat expenses, $2.0 million in
methanol charges on Garden Banks 462 (Geauxpher) and $1.9 million in pipeline repairs for
Mississippi Canyon 673 (Pluto). These were partially offset by decreases of $15.1 million in hurricane
reimbursements received in first nine months 2010, $6.8 million related to the retrospective
contingent OIL insurance premium in first nine months 2010 and $4.9 million resulting from shut-in
production on one of two wells at Atwater 426 (Bass Lite).
Severance and ad valorem tax for first nine months 2010 increased approximately $8.0 million
to $19.7 million from $11.7 million for first nine months 2009 due to an increase of $3.2 million
from properties related to the Edge acquisition and a $4.8 million increase attributable to
development in our onshore properties and increased production from our Permian Basin properties.
Transportation expense for first nine months 2010 increased approximately $1.0 million to
$14.6 million from $13.6 million for first nine months 2009 due primarily to increases of $1.1
million at Garden Banks 462 and $0.4 million at Green Canyon 646, both of which were not included
in first nine months 2009 due to production at those fields commencing subsequent to that period
and $0.4 million at High Island A341 attributable to a rate increase. These increases were
partially offset by a decrease in transportation expense of $1.1 million at Ewing Banks 558 due to
decreased production as a result of normal depletion declines.
General and administrative expense for first nine months 2010 increased approximately $12.2
million to $69.7 million from $57.5 million for first nine months 2009 due to increases of $11.0
million in salaries and wages resulting from an average increase of 19% in headcount period over
period. $2.8 million attributable to professional and legal fees associated with the pending Apache
merger, $2.0 million in costs associated with the expansion of our corporate offices and other
administrative expenses, $1.8 million in office, computer and
corporate expenditures due to professional and industry subscription
costs, and $1.2 million in non-recurring projects. These increases were partially
offset by a $5.5 million increase in capitalized G&A resulting from an increase in employees
associated with our acquisition, exploration and development activities and an increase in stock
compensation expense related to those employees and a $1.0 million decrease in stock compensation
expense.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense for first nine months 2010 decreased
approximately $13.0 million to $288.3 million ($19.42 per Mboe) from $301.3 million ($18.89 per
Mboe) for first nine months 2009. This decrease primarily resulted from a $19.1 million decrease in
expense due to lower production. This decrease was partially offset by a $3.8 million increase in
the depletion rate in 2010 due to capital additions and the Edge acquisition.
46
Full cost ceiling test impairment was not recognized for first nine months 2010 due to our
ceiling limit exceeding the net capitalized cost of our proved oil and gas properties. For first
nine months 2009, the net capitalized cost of our proved oil and gas properties exceeded our
ceiling limit and an impairment of $704.7 million was recognized. See Note 5 Oil and Gas
Properties in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more detail on this
impairment.
Other miscellaneous expense for first nine months 2010 decreased approximately $6.3 million to
$5.7 million from $12.0 million for first nine months 2009 due primarily to a decrease in bad debt
expense of approximately $3.1 million, a $2.8 million decrease in third party gas purchases made to
satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments and $1.8 million in imputed interest charges
relating to an offshore rig contract in the current period.
Net interest expense for first nine months 2010 increased approximately $9.7 million to $60.3
million from $50.6 million for first nine months 2009 due primarily to an increase in interest
expense of $15.8 million as a result of our June 2009 issuance of 113/4% senior notes due 2016,
partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest of $8.6 million.
Provision for income taxes for first nine months 2010 reflected an effective tax rate of 45.1%
as compared to 34.5% for first nine months 2009. The effective tax rate for first nine months 2010
includes the impact of additional tax expenses totaling $1.8 million for non-deductible Apache
merger transaction costs, stock award vesting shortfalls, and change of tax estimates. Without the
impact of these combined adjustments, the effective tax rate for first nine months 2010 would have
been 39.8%. The effective tax rate for first nine months 2009 included tax expense totaling $7.6
million associated with stock award vesting shortfalls. Due to the net loss for the first nine
months of 2009, the increase in tax expense reduced the effective tax rate to 34.5%. Without the
impact of the shortfalls, the effective tax rate for first nine months 2009 would have been 35.7%.
The higher rate for first nine months 2010 was attributable to recurring non-deductible costs in
relation to pre-tax income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $236.0 million to $302.1 million from
$538.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease
was due primarily to a decrease in receivable collections of $62.1 million, cash transactions that
occurred in 2009 not occurring in 2010 of $55.0 million, including receipts for liquidated natural
gas and crude oil fixed price swaps reclassified to earnings in subsequent quarters of 2009 of
$38.4 million and an arbitration award of $16.6 million, a decrease in hurricane insurance
proceeds of $37.7 million, an increase in G&A and operating expenses of $27.5 million, a decrease
in accrued liabilities of $21.4 million, a decrease in revenues of $20.1 million and an increase in
asset retirement obligation settlements of $11.1 million.
As of September 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficit of $132.0 million, including an
abandonment liability and a deferred tax liability partially offset by a non-cash current
derivative asset and prepaid assets. In addition, working capital was negatively impacted by
accrued capital expenditures. We expect that this deficit will be funded by cash flow from
operating activities and borrowings under our bank credit facility, as needed.
Net cash flows used in investing activities increased by $91.0 million to $562.1 million from
$471.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, due primarily
to our acquisition of additional interests in the Permian Basin for approximately $100.0 million
and an increase in capital expenditures attributable to greater activity in our drilling programs.
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities increased by $325.1 million to
$260.9 million from $(64.2) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. This increase was due primarily to an increase of $773.0 million in net borrowings
under our bank credit facility, primarily to finance acquisitions (including approximately $100.0
million for additional interests in the Permian Basin), partially offset by $446.2 million of
proceeds received from debt and equity securities offerings in June 2009.
47
Capital Expenditures The following table presents major components of our capital
expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Capital Expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions (property and leasehold) |
|
$ |
232,641 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Offshore natural gas and oil development |
|
|
153,632 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Onshore natural gas and oil development |
|
|
124,738 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Natural gas and oil exploration |
|
|
62,886 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Other items (primarily capitalized overhead) |
|
|
39,636 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
613,533 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above table reflects decreased non-cash capital accruals of $46.7 million that are a
component of working capital changes in the statement of cash flows.
Bank Credit Facility We have a secured revolving credit facility with a group of banks
pursuant to an amended and restated credit agreement dated March 2, 2006, as further amended. The
credit facility matures January 31, 2012 and is subject to a borrowing base which is redetermined
periodically. The outstanding principal balance of loans under the credit facility may not exceed
the borrowing base. The most recent borrowing base redetermination concluded in April 2010 when the
credit facility was amended to:
|
|
|
Increase the borrowing base by $150.0 million to $950.0 million until the next
redetermination under the credit agreement, |
|
|
|
Reschedule the regular periodic borrowing base redeterminations to begin in February
and August of each year, |
|
|
|
Give the lenders an option to redetermine the borrowing base upon termination of hedge
contracts with more than six months remaining in their original nominal term, |
|
|
|
Increase the maximum permitted ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit
agreement) to 3.5 to 1.0 from 2.5 to 1.0, and |
|
|
|
Give us optionality to issue before January 1, 2011 up to $400.0 million in additional
unsecured debt with a non-default interest rate of up to 13% per annum (plus a maximum
default rate of 3%) and a scheduled maturity date no earlier than March 2, 2015. Upon
closing such a debt issuance, the borrowing base automatically would reduce by 25% of the
aggregate principal amount of the debt issued until otherwise redetermined under the credit
agreement. |
As of September 30, 2010, maximum credit availability under the facility was $1.0 billion,
including up to $50.0 million in letters of credit, subject to a borrowing base of $950.0 million.
We expect the regular periodic borrowing base redetermination process that began in August 2010 to
be completed in fourth quarter 2010. As of September 30, 2010, there were $573.0 million in
advances outstanding under the credit facility and four letters of credit outstanding totaling $4.7
million, of which $4.2 million is required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of
our offshore fields. As of September 30, 2010, after accounting for the $4.7 million of letters of
credit, we had $372.3 million available to borrow under the credit facility.
Borrowings under the bank credit facility bear interest at either a LIBOR-based rate or a
prime-based rate, at our option, plus a specified margin. At September 30, 2010, when borrowings at
both LIBOR and prime-based rates were outstanding, the blended interest rate was 2.77% on all
amounts borrowed. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the commitment fee on unused
capacity was 0.5% per annum.
The credit facility subjects us to various restrictive covenants and contains other usual and
customary terms and conditions, including limits on additional debt, cash dividends and other
restricted payments, liens, investments, asset dispositions, mergers and speculative hedging.
Financial covenants under the credit facility require us to, among other things:
48
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to
consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and |
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of not
more than 3.5 to 1.0. |
We were in compliance with these covenants as of September 30, 2010 when the ratio of consolidated
current assets plus the unused borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities was 2.16 to 1.0
and the ratio of total debt to EBITDA was 2.71 to 1.0.
Our payment and performance of our obligations under the credit facility (including any
obligations under commodity and interest rate hedges entered into with facility lenders) are
secured by liens upon substantially all of the assets of us and our subsidiaries, except our
Canadian subsidiary, and guaranteed by our subsidiaries, other than Mariner Energy Resources, Inc.
which is a co-borrower, and our Canadian subsidiary.
Senior Notes In 2009, we sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
113/4% senior notes due 2016 (the 113/4% Notes). In 2007, we sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our 8% senior notes due 2017 (the 8% Notes). In 2006, we sold and issued
$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 71/2% senior notes due 2013 (the 71/2% Notes and
together with the 113/4% Notes and the 8% Notes, the Notes). The Notes are governed by indentures
that are substantially identical for each series. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of
Mariner. The 113/4% Notes mature on June 30, 2016 with interest payable on June 30 and December 30 of
each year beginning December 30, 2009. The 8% Notes mature on May 15, 2017 with interest payable on
May 15 and November 15 of each year. The 71/2% Notes mature on April 15, 2013 with interest payable
on April 15 and October 15 of each year. There is no sinking fund for the Notes. We and our
restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants under each of
the indentures governing the Notes. We were in compliance with the financial covenants under the
Notes as of September 30, 2010.
Future Uses of Capital. Our identified needs for liquidity in the future are as follows:
|
|
|
funding future capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
funding hurricane repairs and hurricane-related abandonment operations; |
|
|
|
financing any future acquisitions that we may identify; |
|
|
|
paying routine operating and administrative expenses; and |
|
|
|
paying other commitments comprised largely of cash settlement of hedging obligations
and debt service. |
2010 Capital Expenditures. We anticipate that our base operating capital expenditures for 2010
will be approximately $667.0 million (excluding hurricane-related expenditures and acquisitions).
This amount includes our net exposure of approximately $62.5 million as a result of the 44 blocks
awarded from the March 2010 MMS Central Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale 213. There is significant
potential for increase or decrease in our capital expenditure budget depending upon drilling
success, acquisition opportunities and cash flow during the year, subject to our obligations under
the Merger Agreement not to exceed the budget by more the $50.0 million in the aggregate without
Apaches prior written consent. Approximately 63% of the base operating capital program is planned
to be allocated to development activities, 28% to exploration activities, and the remainder to
other items (primarily capitalized overhead and interest). In addition, we estimate additional
hurricane-related costs of $44.5 million during 2010 related to Hurricane Ike that we believe are
substantially covered under applicable insurance. Complete recovery or settlement is not expected
to occur during the next 12 months.
Future Capital Resources. Our anticipated sources of liquidity in the future are as follows:
|
|
|
cash flow from operations in future periods; |
|
|
|
proceeds under our bank credit facility; |
49
|
|
|
proceeds from insurance policies relating to hurricane repairs; and |
|
|
|
proceeds from future capital markets transactions as needed. |
Historically, we generally have tailored our operating capital program (exclusive of
hurricane-related expenditures and acquisitions) within our projected operating cash flow so that
our operating capital requirements were largely self-funding. In 2010, we anticipate that this
program will exceed our projected operating cash flow due primarily to accelerated development of
our long-lived, oily Permian Basin properties, and development of two deepwater discoveries and our
unconventional resource portfolio. Based on our current operating plan and assumed price case, our
expected cash flow from operations and continued access to our bank credit facility allows us ample
liquidity to conduct our operations as planned for the foreseeable future. We generally expect to
fund future acquisitions on a case by case basis through a combination of bank debt and capital
markets activities, subject to our obligations under the Apache Merger Agreement.
The timing of expenditures (especially regarding deepwater projects) is unpredictable. Also,
our cash flows are heavily dependent on the oil and natural gas commodity markets, and our ability
to hedge oil and natural gas prices. If either oil or natural gas commodity prices decrease from
their current levels, our ability to finance our planned capital expenditures could be affected
negatively. Amounts available for borrowing under our bank credit facility are largely dependent on
our level of estimated proved reserves and current oil and natural gas prices. If either our
estimated proved reserves or commodity prices decrease, amounts available to us to borrow under our
bank credit facility could be reduced. If our cash flows are less than anticipated or amounts
available for borrowing are reduced, we may be forced to defer planned capital expenditures.
In addition, the recent worldwide financial and credit crisis may adversely affect our
liquidity. We may be unable to obtain adequate funding under our bank credit facility because our
lending counterparties may be unwilling or unable to meet their funding obligations, or because our
borrowing base under the facility may be decreased as the result of a redetermination, reducing it
due to lower oil or natural gas prices, operating difficulties, declines in reserves or other
reasons. If funding is not available as needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may
be unable to meet our obligations as they come due or we may be unable to implement our business
strategies or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive
pressures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Letters of Credit Our bank credit facility has a letter of credit subfacility of up to $50.0
million that is included as a use of the borrowing base. As of September 30, 2010, four such
letters of credit totaling $4.7 million were outstanding.
Fair Value Measurement
We determine the fair value of our natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps by reference to
forward pricing curves for natural gas and oil futures contracts. The difference between the
forward price curve and the contractual fixed price is discounted to the measurement date using a
credit-risk adjusted discount rate. The credit risk adjustment for swap liabilities is based on our
credit quality and the credit risk adjustment for swap assets is based on the credit quality of our
counterparty. Our fair value determinations of our swaps have historically approximated our exit
price for such derivatives.
We have determined that the fair value methodology described above for our swaps is consistent
with observable market inputs and have categorized our swaps as Level 2 in accordance with
accounting for fair value measurements and disclosures under GAAP.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a net asset for the increase in
the fair value of our derivative financial instruments of $104.8 million, principally due to the
decrease in natural gas commodity prices below our swap prices. The increase was comprised of an
increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $81.8 million, net of income
taxes of $45.7 million, approximately $22.7 million of favorable cash hedging settlements during
the period reflected in natural gas and oil revenues and an unrealized,
50
non-cash gain due to hedging ineffectiveness under GAAP of approximately $1.7 million
reflected in natural gas revenues.
We expect the continued volatility of natural gas and oil commodity prices will have a
material impact on the fair value of our derivatives positions. It is our intent to hold all of our
derivatives positions to maturity such that realized gains or losses are generally recognized in
income when the hedged natural gas or oil is produced and sold. While the derivatives settlements
may decrease (or increase) our effective price realized, the ultimate settlement of our derivatives
positions is not expected to materially adversely affect our liquidity, results of operations or
cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance
which requires an entity to provide a greater level of disaggregated information about the credit
quality of its financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. In addition, an entity is
required to disclose credit quality indicators, past due information, and modifications of its
financing receivables. These disclosures are intended to help financial statement users assess an
entitys credit risk exposures and evaluate the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The
guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15,
2010. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the guidance. We will begin
complying with the disclosure requirements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
In April 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which provides clarification that an
employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market
in which a substantial portion of the entitys equity securities trade should not be considered to
contain a condition that is not a market, performance or service condition. Therefore, the award
would be classified as an equity award if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The guidance is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early
adoption is allowed. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the guidance.
In February 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which requires additional information
to be disclosed principally in respect of Level 3 fair value measurements and transfers to and from
Level 1 and Level 2 measurements. In addition, enhanced disclosure is required concerning inputs
and valuation techniques used to determine Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The
guidance is generally effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2009; however, the requirements to disclose separately purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the Level 3 reconciliation are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2010 (and for interim periods within such years). Early adoption is allowed. We adopted the
standard effective January 1, 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Commodity Prices and Related Hedging Activities
Our major market risk exposure continues to be the prices applicable to our natural gas and
oil production. The sales price of our production is primarily driven by the prevailing market
price. Historically, prices received for our natural gas and oil production have been volatile and
unpredictable. Hypothetically, if production levels were to remain at 2010 levels, a 10% increase
in commodity prices from those as of September 30, 2010 would increase our cash flow by
approximately $63.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The energy markets historically have been very volatile, and we can reasonably expect that oil
and gas prices will be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. In an effort to reduce the
effects of the volatility of the price of oil and natural gas on our operations, management has
adopted a policy of hedging oil and natural gas prices from time to time primarily through the use
of commodity price swap agreements and costless collar arrangements. While the use of these hedging
arrangements limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from
favorable movements. In addition, forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used
to assess and measure the ineffectiveness of our open contracts at the end of each period. If open
contracts cease to qualify for
51
hedge accounting, the mark-to-market change in fair value is recognized in oil and natural gas
revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Not qualifying for hedge accounting
and cash flow hedge designation will cause volatility in Net Income. The fair values we report in
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements change as estimates are revised to reflect actual
results, changes in market conditions or other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
On January 29, 2009, we liquidated crude oil fixed price swaps that previously had been
designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes in respect of 977,000 barrels of crude oil
in exchange for a cash payment to us of $10.0 million and installment payments of $13.5 million to
be paid monthly to us through 2009. On April 16, 2009, we received a $10.5 million cash settlement
on the hedges that were settled in monthly installments at January 29, 2009. Since, at the time of
liquidation, the forecasted sales of crude oil volumes were still expected to occur, the
accumulated losses through January 29, 2009 on the related derivative contracts remained in
accumulated other comprehensive income. These accumulated losses were reclassified to oil revenues
throughout 2009 as the physical transactions occurred. Additionally, all changes in the value of
these derivative contracts subsequent to January 29, 2009 were also reclassified monthly from
accumulated other comprehensive income to current period oil revenues. The table below reflects
these reclassifications for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Derivative gains and losses are recorded by commodity type in oil and natural gas revenues in
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effects on our oil and gas revenues from
our hedging activities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash Gain on Settlements (1) |
|
$ |
10,745 |
|
|
$ |
52,644 |
|
|
$ |
22,658 |
|
|
$ |
173,648 |
|
Reclassification of Liquidated Swaps (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,059 |
|
Gain (Loss) on Hedge Ineffectiveness (3) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,882 |
|
|
$ |
55,694 |
|
|
$ |
24,415 |
|
|
$ |
189,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Designated as cash flow hedges pursuant to accounting for derivatives and hedging under GAAP. |
|
(2) |
|
Net gain realized in 2009 on liquidated natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps that do
not qualify for hedge accounting. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) recognized in natural gas revenue related to the ineffective portion
of open contracts designated as cash flow hedges that are not eligible for deferral under GAAP
due primarily to the basis differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at
the point of sale. |
As of September 30, 2010, we had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Fixed Price |
|
|
Asset/(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 December 31, 2010 |
|
|
9,815,113 |
|
|
$ |
5.57 |
|
|
$ |
15,897 |
|
January 1 December 31, 2011 |
|
|
29,389,843 |
|
|
$ |
5.79 |
|
|
|
39,936 |
|
January 1 December 31, 2012 |
|
|
22,338,802 |
|
|
$ |
6.11 |
|
|
|
22,701 |
|
January 1 December 31, 2013 |
|
|
5,840,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.76 |
|
|
|
8,210 |
|
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 December 31, 2010 |
|
|
775,192 |
|
|
$ |
73.36 |
|
|
|
(6,044 |
) |
January 1 December 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,978,364 |
|
|
$ |
79.33 |
|
|
|
(10,315 |
) |
January 1 December 31, 2012 |
|
|
494,100 |
|
|
$ |
80.76 |
|
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
January 1 December 31, 2013 |
|
|
408,800 |
|
|
$ |
82.81 |
|
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have reviewed the financial strength of our counterparties and believe the credit risk
associated with these swaps to be minimal. Hedges with counterparties that are lenders under our
bank credit facility are secured under the bank credit facility.
52
As of September 30, 2010, we expect to realize within the next 12 months a net gain of
approximately $35.5 million resulting from hedging activities that are currently recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income. The net hedging gain is expected to be realized as a
decrease of $15.3 million to oil revenues and an increase of $50.8 million to natural gas revenues.
Interest Rate Market Risk Borrowings under our bank credit facility, as discussed under the
caption Liquidity and Capital Resources, mature on January 31, 2012, and bear interest at either
a LIBOR-based rate or a prime-based rate, at our option, plus a specified margin. Both options
expose us to risk of earnings loss due to changes in market rates. We have not entered into
interest rate hedges that would mitigate such risk. As of September 30, 2010, the blended interest
rate on our outstanding bank debt was 2.77%. If the balance of our bank debt at September 30, 2010
were to remain constant, a 10% change in market interest rates would impact our cash flow by
approximately $0.4 million per quarter.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Mariner, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including
Mariners principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of its disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that Mariners disclosure controls and procedures
are effective as of September 30, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
Mariner in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and
forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
53
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Please refer to Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009.
Various statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Quarterly Report), including those
that express a belief, expectation, or intention, as well as those that are not statements of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements may include projections and estimates
concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, revenues, income
and capital spending. Our forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as
may, estimate, project, predict, believe, expect, anticipate, potential, plan,
goal or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. The forward-looking
statements in this Quarterly Report speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report; we disclaim
any obligation to update these statements unless required by law, and we caution you not to rely on
them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
assumptions about future events. While our management considers these expectations and assumptions
to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive,
regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict
and many of which are beyond our control. We disclose important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from our expectations described in Item 2 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Part I and elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report. These risks, contingencies and uncertainties relate to, among other matters, the
following:
|
|
|
the volatility of oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
discovery, estimation, development and replacement of oil and natural gas reserves; |
|
|
|
cash flow, liquidity and financial position; |
|
|
|
amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future development costs; |
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital; |
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
availability of drilling and production equipment; |
|
|
|
operating costs and other expenses; |
|
|
|
prospect development and property acquisitions; |
|
|
|
risks arising out of our hedging transactions; |
|
|
|
marketing of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
competition in the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
the impact of weather and the occurrence of natural events and natural disasters such
as loop currents, hurricanes, fires, floods and other natural events, catastrophic events
and natural disasters; |
|
|
|
governmental regulation of the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; |
54
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries; |
|
|
|
uninsured or underinsured losses in our oil and natural gas operations; |
|
|
|
risks related to our level of indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
risks related to significant acquisitions or other strategic transactions, such as
failure to realize expected benefits or objectives for future operations. |
On April 14, 2010, we entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which we would be
acquired by Apache Corporation.
Failure to complete the merger or delays in completing the merger could negatively affect our
stock price and future businesses and operations.
There is no assurance that we will be able to consummate the merger. If the merger is not
completed for any reason, we may be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
|
|
|
we will not realize the benefits expected from the merger, including a potentially
enhanced financial and competitive position; |
|
|
|
the current market price of our common stock may reflect a market assumption that the
merger will occur and a failure to complete the merger could result in a negative
perception of us by the stock market and cause a decline in the market price of our common
stock; |
|
|
|
certain costs relating to the merger, including certain investment banking, financing,
legal and accounting fees and expenses, must be paid even if the merger is not completed,
and we may be required to pay substantial fees to Apache if the merger agreement is
terminated under specified circumstances; and |
|
|
|
we would continue to face the risks that we currently face as an independent company. |
Delays in completing the merger could exacerbate uncertainties concerning the effect of the
merger, which may have an adverse effect on our business following the merger and could defer or
detract from the realization of the benefits expected to result from the merger.
There may be substantial disruption to our business and distraction of our management and
employees as a result of the merger.
There may be substantial disruption to our business and distraction of our management and
employees from day-to-day operations because matters related to the merger may require substantial
commitments of time and resources, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities
that could have been beneficial to us.
Business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the merger is pending may have an
adverse effect on us.
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees, suppliers, partners, regulators, and
customers may have an adverse effect on us. These uncertainties may impair our ability to attract,
retain, and motivate key personnel until the merger is consummated and could cause suppliers,
customers and others that deal with us to defer purchases or other decisions concerning us or seek
to change existing business relationships with us. In addition, the merger agreement restricts us
from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions without Apaches approval.
These restrictions could prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise
prior to the completion of the merger.
55
The merger agreement restricts our ability to pursue alternatives to the merger.
The merger agreement contains no shop provisions that, subject to limited fiduciary
exceptions, restrict our ability to initiate, solicit, encourage or facilitate, discuss, negotiate
or accept a competing third party proposal to acquire all or a significant part of us. Further,
there are only a limited number of exceptions that would allow our board of directors to withdraw
or change its recommendation to holders of our common stock that they vote in favor of the adoption
of the merger agreement. If our board of directors were to take such actions as permitted by the
merger agreement, doing so in specified situations could entitle Apache to terminate the merger
agreement and to be paid a termination fee of $67.0 million. These restrictions could deter a
potential acquiror from proposing an alternative transaction.
Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
On April 22, 2010, a deepwater drilling rig, the Deepwater Horizon, operating in the Gulf of
Mexico on Mississippi Canyon Block 252 sank after an apparent blowout and fire, resulting in a
significant spill of hydrocarbons. Neither Apache nor Mariner owns an interest in the field. As a
result of the incident and spill, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) issued a series of
reforms to the oversight and management of offshore exploration drilling activities on the federal
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). On May 30, 2010, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation
and Enforcement (BOEM) of the DOI announced, as a result of the Deepwater Horizon incidents, a
Moratorium Notice to Lessees and Operators (Moratorium NTL), which directed oil and gas lessees
and operators to cease drilling new deepwater (depths greater than 500 feet) wells on the OCS, and
put oil and gas lessees and operators on notice that, with certain exceptions, the BOEM would not
consider drilling permits for deepwater wells and related activities for a period of six months. On
June 22, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana issued a preliminary
injunction prohibiting the enforcement of the moratorium, which the DOI appealed to the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals. On July 8, 2010, the court of appeals denied the governments request
that the district courts order be stayed while the appeal is pending. On July 12, 2010, the
Secretary of the DOI directed the BOEM to issue a suspension until November 30, 2010 of drilling
activities that use subsea blowout preventers or surface blowout preventers on floating facilities,
rather than a moratorium based on water depths. On October 12, 2010, the Secretary of the DOI
directed the BOEM to lift, effective immediately, this current deepwater drilling suspension as to
all deepwater drilling activity, and further directed the BOEM to require, prior to approving any
deepwater drilling activity, that (i) each operator demonstrate that it has in place written and
enforceable commitments that ensure promptly available containment resources in the event of a
deepwater blowout, and (ii) the Chief Executive Officer of each operator seeking to perform
deepwater drilling certify compliance with all applicable regulations, including new drilling
safety rules.
In addition, on June 8, 2010, the BOEM issued a Notice to Lessees focusing on safety measures,
which among other things, requires an OCS operators Chief Executive Officer to certify that such
operator is conducting its operations in compliance with applicable operating regulations found at
30 C.F.R. 250. On October 19, 2010 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
held that this Notice to Lessees was of no lawful force and effect.
In September 2010, the BOEM, along with the DOI, issued a Notice to Lessees (NTL) to
require oil and gas companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico to set permanent plugs in
nonproducing wells that are currently completed with a subsurface safety valve in place and to
dismantle oil and gas production platforms no longer being used for exploration or production.
The NTL mandates that any well that has not been used during the past five years for exploration or
production must be plugged, and associated production platforms and pipelines must be
decommissioned if no longer involved with exploration or production activities. The NTL became
effective October 15, 2010 and companies have 120 days from then to submit a company-wide plan for
decommissioning these facilities and wells. Mariner is developing a plan and evaluating the impact
that compliance with the NTL will have on Mariners abandonment liability.
The Gulf of Mexico offshore operations of Mariner have been impacted, and likely may be
impacted in the future, by increased regulatory oversight, which may increase the cost of OCS wells
and delay drilling and production therefrom. There may be changes in laws and regulations,
increases in insurance costs or decreases in insurance availability, as well as further delays in
offshore exploration and drilling activities in the Gulf of Mexico.
Any of the aforementioned changes could have a material effect on the financial condition or
results of operations of Mariner.
56
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Value) of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
Price Paid |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
Units) |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
July 1, 2010 to July 31, 2010 (1) |
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
$ |
21.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2010 to August 31, 2010 (1) |
|
|
601 |
|
|
$ |
23.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 (1) |
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
$ |
23.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,013 |
|
|
$ |
22.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These shares were withheld upon the vesting of employee restricted stock grants in connection
with payment of required withholding taxes. |
57
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 14, 2010 by and among
Apache Corporation, ZMZ Acquisitions LLC and Mariner Energy, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 16, 2010). |
|
|
|
2.2*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated as of August 2, 2010 to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated as of April 14, 2010 by and among Apache Corporation, ZMZ
Acquisitions LLC and Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2010). |
|
|
|
2.3*
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2009, by and between
Edge Petroleum Corporation, Edge Petroleum Exploration Company, Miller
Exploration Company, Edge Petroleum Operating Company, Inc., Edge
Petroleum Production Company, Miller Oil Corporation, and Mariner Energy,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on January 5, 2010). |
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mariner
Energy, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-132800) filed
on March 29, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008). |
|
|
|
3.3*
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form
S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.2*
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.3*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
May 1, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.4*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.5*
|
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006,
among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and the initial
purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.6*
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2008, between Mariner Energy,
Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
October 14, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.7*
|
|
Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of April 14, 2010, between Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 16,
2010). |
|
|
|
4.8*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, among
Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers,
the Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders, and Union Bank
of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
March 3, 2006). |
58
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
4.9*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.10*
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 18,
2006). |
|
|
|
4.11*
|
|
Amendment No. 3 and Consent, dated as of April 23, 2007, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on April 24, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.12*
|
|
Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 24, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.13*
|
|
Amendment No. 5 and Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2008, among
Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers,
the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on February 5, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.14*
|
|
Master Assignment, Agreement and Amendment No. 6, dated as of June 2,
2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as
Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A.,
as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on June 3, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.15*
|
|
Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 12, 2008, among Mariner Energy,
Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on December 15,
2008). |
|
|
|
4.16*
|
|
Amendment No. 8 and Consent, dated as of March 24, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on March 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.17*
|
|
Amendment No. 9, dated as of June 2, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto,
and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such
Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.18*
|
|
Amendment No. 10, dated as of August 25, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.19*
|
|
Amendment No. 11, dated as of April 8, 2010, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank, N.A. (f/k/a Union Bank of California, N.A.), as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on April 8, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Representatives of the several
Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 9, 2009). |
59
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in
Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources,
Inc., Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC, MC Beltway 8 LLC and Mariner LP LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 9, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, among J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., as Representative of the several Underwriters listed in
Schedule 1 thereto, Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc.,
Mariner LP LLC, and Mariner Energy Texas LP (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner Energy,
Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy
Texas LP and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan,
effective as of May 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference as indicated. |
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Mariner Energy, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on November 5, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Scott D. Josey
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Josey, |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jesus G. Melendrez
|
|
|
|
Jesus G. Melendrez, |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer,
Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
61
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 14, 2010 by and among
Apache Corporation, ZMZ Acquisitions LLC and Mariner Energy, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 16, 2010). |
|
|
|
2.2*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated as of August 2, 2010 to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated as of April 14, 2010 by and among Apache Corporation, ZMZ
Acquisitions LLC and Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2010). |
|
|
|
2.3*
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2009, by and between
Edge Petroleum Corporation, Edge Petroleum Exploration Company, Miller
Exploration Company, Edge Petroleum Operating Company, Inc., Edge
Petroleum Production Company, Miller Oil Corporation, and Mariner Energy,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on January 5, 2010). |
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mariner
Energy, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-132800) filed
on March 29, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008). |
|
|
|
3.3*
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form
S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.2*
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.3*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
May 1, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.4*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.5*
|
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006,
among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and the initial
purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.6*
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2008, between Mariner Energy,
Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
October 14, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.7*
|
|
Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of April 14, 2010, between Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 16,
2010). |
|
|
|
4.8*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, among
Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers,
the Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders, and Union Bank
of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
4.9*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.10*
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 18,
2006). |
|
|
|
4.11*
|
|
Amendment No. 3 and Consent, dated as of April 23, 2007, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on April 24, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.12*
|
|
Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 24, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.13*
|
|
Amendment No. 5 and Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2008, among
Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers,
the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on February 5, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.14*
|
|
Master Assignment, Agreement and Amendment No. 6, dated as of June 2,
2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as
Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A.,
as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on June 3, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.15*
|
|
Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 12, 2008, among Mariner Energy,
Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on December 15,
2008). |
|
|
|
4.16*
|
|
Amendment No. 8 and Consent, dated as of March 24, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on March 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.17*
|
|
Amendment No. 9, dated as of June 2, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto,
and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such
Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.18*
|
|
Amendment No. 10, dated as of August 25, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for
such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
4.19*
|
|
Amendment No. 11, dated as of April 8, 2010, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party
thereto, and Union Bank, N.A. (f/k/a Union Bank of California, N.A.), as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such
Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on April 8, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Representatives of the several
Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 9, 2009). |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in
Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources,
Inc., Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC, MC Beltway 8 LLC and Mariner LP LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 9, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, among J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., as Representative of the several Underwriters listed in
Schedule 1 thereto, Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc.,
Mariner LP LLC, and Mariner Energy Texas LP (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner Energy,
Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy
Texas LP and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan,
effective as of May 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference as indicated. |
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.