e10-q
Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2001
or

[   ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from    to

Commission file number: 0-27892

 
SIPEX Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
     
Massachusetts 04-6135748


(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
22 Linnell Circle, Billerica, Massachusetts 01821


(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
(978) 667-8700

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
 

Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

      There were 24,736,158 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock issued and outstanding as of October 26, 2001.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk:
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EX-10.1 COMERICA BANK - CALIFORNIA WAIVER


Table of Contents

SIPEX CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2001

INDEX

           
Item
Number
Page


PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2001 and December 31, 2000 3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000 5
Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 6-8
Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 9-12
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk 13
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings 13
Item 2 Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds *
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities *
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders *
Item 5 Other Information *
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 13
SIGNATURES 14

*   No information provided due to inapplicability of item.

2


Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Financial Statements

SIPEX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)

                     
Sept 29, December 31,
2001 2000


(Unaudited) (Audited)


ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,199 $ 1,732
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $1,017 and $2,889 at September 29, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively 14,638 20,688
Inventories 29,372 33,324
Deferred income taxes-current 5,515 5,515
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,571 1,504


Total current assets 55,295 62,763
Restricted cash equivalents and securities 36,750
Property, plant, and equipment, net 66,272 32,993
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization) 3,078 3,360
Deferred income taxes 23,622 12,713
Other assets 177 189


Total assets $ 148,444 $ 148,768


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 6,574 $ 10,583
Accrued expenses 5,047 5,372
Deferred income 1,732 1,963


Total current liabilities 13,353 17,918
Long-term debt 7,344 7,057
Other long-term liabilities 996


Total liabilities 20,697 25,971


Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized and no shares issued or outstanding at September 29, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000 shares authorized and 24,732 and 22,502 shares issued and outstanding at September 29, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively 247 225
Additional paid-in capital 146,990 124,897
Accumulated deficit (19,261 ) (2,211 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (229 ) (114 )


Total shareholders’ equity 127,747 122,797


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 148,444 $ 148,768


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3


Table of Contents

SIPEX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

                                     
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended


Sept 29, Sept 30, Sept 29, Sept 30,
2001 2000 2001 2000




Net sales $ 15,031 $ 35,711 $ 55,320 $ 93,848
Cost of sales 18,282 20,531 58,750 57,125




Gross profit (loss) (3,251 ) 15,180 (3,430 ) 36,723




Operating expenses:
Research and development 2,742 3,333 10,301 9,450
Marketing and selling 2,421 2,637 7,708 7,805
General and administrative 1,703 2,203 5,883 6,700
Restructuring and facility exit costs 177




Total operating expenses 6,866 8,173 24,069 23,955




Income (loss) from operations (10,117 ) 7,007 (27,499 ) 12,768
Other income (expense), net (479 ) 408 (452 ) 1,452




Income (loss) before income taxes (10,596 ) 7,415 (27,951 ) 14,220
Income tax expense (benefit) (4,133 ) 2,669 (10,901 ) 5,119




Net income (loss) $ (6,463 ) $ 4,746 $ (17,050 ) $ 9,101




Net income (loss) per common share-basic $ (0.26 ) $ 0.21 $ (0.72 ) $ 0.41




Net income (loss) per common share-assuming dilution $ (0.26 ) $ 0.20 $ (0.72 ) $ 0.38




Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic 24,732 22,178 23,743 22,017




Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding-assuming dilution 24,732 24,078 23,743 23,655




See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4


Table of Contents

SIPEX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

                       
Nine Months Ended

Sept 29, Sept 30,
2001 2000


Operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ (17,050 ) $ 9,101
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
(Increase) decrease in deferred income taxes (10,909 ) 106
Allowance for receivables 967 734
Depreciation and amortization 6,184 4,247
Change in other long-term liabilities (1,396 )
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable 5,083 (9,999 )
Decrease (increase) in inventories 3,952 (8,843 )
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,067 ) (665 )
Decrease in other assets 12 38
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable (4,009 ) 1,775
Decrease in accrued expenses (325 ) (1,468 )
(Decrease) increase in deferred income (231 ) 797


Net cash used in operating activities (18,789 ) (4,177 )


Investing activities:
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities 5,734
Proceeds from restricted cash 36,750
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment (38,781 ) (12,490 )


Net cash used in investing activities (2,031 ) (6,756 )


Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 22,115 11,918
Net proceeds from debt obligations 287 1,755


Net cash provided by financing activities 22,402 13,673


Effect of foreign currency translation adjustments (115 ) (75 )


Increase in cash and cash equivalents 1,467 2,665
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 1,732 1,355


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 3,199 $ 4,020


Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes $ (238 ) $ 522
Interest $ 491 $

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5


Table of Contents

SIPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

      The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sipex Corporation (the “Company”) and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

      The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared by Sipex pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2000, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filing. The accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting solely of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods presented and were prepared based upon the accounting policies disclosed in Company’s Form 10-K. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

   Revenue Recognition

      Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company began deferring revenue on shipments to the Company’s largest distributor until the product is resold by the distributor to the end user (sell-through) because the arrangement with this distributor includes returns and price concessions which the Company can no longer reasonably estimate. For all other product sales, revenue is recognized at the time of shipment. For product sales recognized at the time of shipment, the Company accrues for estimated sales returns and price concessions upon shipment. Revenue from engineering service contracts is recorded as performance is completed.

   New Accounting Pronouncements

      In July 2001, the Financial Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 141, Business Combinations (“FAS 141”) and SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“FAS 142”). FAS 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. FAS 141 also specifies the criteria that intangible assets acquired in a purchase method business combination must meet to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill. FAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives will no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment, at least annually, in accordance with the provisions of FAS 142. FAS 142 will also require that intangible assets with definite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of.

      The provisions of FAS 141 are effective immediately, except with regard to business combinations initiated prior to September 29, 2001. FAS 142 will be effective as of January 1, 2002. Goodwill and other intangible assets determined to have an indefinite useful life that are acquired in a business combination completed after July 1, 2001 will not be amortized, but will continue to be evaluated for impairment in accordance with appropriate pre-FAS 142 accounting literature. Goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in business combinations completed before July 1, 2001 will continue to be amortized prior to the adoption of FAS 142. Only July 1, 2001, the Company adopted FAS 141. There was no impact on the Company’s results from operations and financial position from this adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FAS 142 will have on its results of operations and financial position, however, the Company does not believe there will be a material effect.

      FASB recently issued SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (“SFAS 143”) which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS 143 requires an enterprise to record the fair value of an asset retirement

6


Table of Contents

obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset. SFAS 143 also requires the enterprise to record the contra to the initial obligation as an increase to the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and to depreciate that cost over the remaining useful life of the asset. The liability is changed at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the initial fair value measurement. SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company is currently examining the impact of this pronouncement on the results of operations and financial position of the Company, but currently believes the impact will not be material.

      On October 3, 2001, FASB issued SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes FASB Statement No.121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. SFAS 144 retains many of the fundamental provisions of that Statement. SFAS 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principle Board Opinion 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions (“ABP 30”), for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, it retains the requirement in APB 30 to report separately discontinued operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently examining the impact of this pronouncement on the results of operations and financial position of the Company, but currently believes the impact will not be material.

3. Restructuring and Facility Exit Costs

      In the second quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $494,000 for severance payments related to the reduction of the Company’s workforce by approximately 65 people as a result of the continued slowness in the semiconductor market. As of September 29, 2001 approximately $416,000 has been paid and the balance of the accrual for restructuring of $78,000 is expected to be paid in the fourth quarter of 2001.

      During the first quarter of 2001, Sipex accrued $40,000 for severance costs for an approximate 4% reduction in the Company’s workforce at the Company’s Milpitas facility, which was paid in the second quarter of 2001.

      In the fourth quarter of 1999, management of Sipex and the Board of Directors approved a plan to close certain manufacturing facilities in California, which were acquired through a merger with Calogic. The remaining balance of the accrual as of December 31, 2000 was $506,000, consisting of $133,000 of employee termination costs and $373,000 of facility exit related costs.

      The following table summarizes the accrual activity in facility exit costs for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001:

                                 
Accrual Balance Incurred Adjustments Accrual Balance
12/31/00 2001 to Accrual 09/29/01




People related costs $ 133 $ (51 ) $ (82 ) $
Facility related costs 373 (98 ) (275 )




$ 506 $ (149 ) $ (357 ) $




      At the end of the first quarter of 2001, Sipex sold the Calogic Fremont fabrication facility, which was planned for closure by the end of the quarter. As a result of the sale, the Company reduced both the facility exit related and employee termination portions of the accrual due to the assumption of the facility by the new owners who retained many of the employees that the Company had planned to pay severance costs.

4. Property, Plant and Equipment

      In June 2001, the Company purchased the land, building and equipment of its Milpitas wafer fabrication facility, which was being leased under a five-year operating lease. In accordance with the provisions of the lease agreement, the Company paid $35.0 million, consisting of $6.0 million for the land, $16.9 million for the building and $12.1 million for machinery and equipment. The recorded cost of the machinery and equipment purchased was reduced by a $1.4 million long-term liability recorded by the Company through June 30, 2001 as its estimated liability under the

7


Table of Contents

lease for the guaranteed residual value of the equipment. Proceeds for the buyout were provided through the use of restricted cash of $36.8 million that had previously secured the lease of the facility and equipment.

5. Long-term Debt

      As of September 29, 2001, the Company had long-term debt consisting of $7.3 million borrowed under the Company’s bank line of credit. On March 22, 2001, the line of credit was increased to a $20.0 million borrowing limit with a borrowing base of 80% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable. Funds advanced under the line are due June 1, 2003 and are collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company. The amended loan agreement requires compliance with certain minimum tangible net worth and financial ratios. For the quarter ended September 29, 2001, the Company was not in compliance with the net income debt covenant and has obtained a waiver from the lender as of September 29, 2001 and an amendment to the net income requirement for the fourth quarter of 2001 and for 2002.

6. Net Income (Loss) Per Share

      Net income (loss) per share-basic is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Net income (loss) per share assuming dilution is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding assuming dilution. Common equivalent shares, consisting of outstanding stock options, are included in the per share calculations where the effect of their inclusion would be dilutive.

      A reconciliation of basic weighted average common shares with weighted average shares assuming dilution is as follows (in thousands):

                                 
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended


Sept 29, Sept 30, Sept 29, Sept 30,
2001 2000 2001 2000




Weighted average shares — basic 24,732 22,178 23,743 22,017
Net effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding based on the Treasury stock method using the average market price 1,900 1,638




Weighted average common shares assuming dilution 24,732 24,078 23,743 23,655




Antidilutive potential common shares excluded from the computation above 4,443 4,429 10




7. Shareholders’ Equity

      On May 16, 2001, the Company issued 2,190,000 shares of common stock through a private placement of securities, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $21.6 million, net of placement agent fees and expenses. Proceeds from the offering were used to reduce the Company’s indebtedness under its bank line of credit and to provide funding for operations.

8. Legal Proceedings

      Between July 10 and July 19, 2001, two virtually identical purported securities class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, captioned “Darren Suprina v. Sipex Corp. et al” (C.A. No. 01-11185-DPW) and “Doug Howell v. Sipex Corp. et al” (C.A. No. 01-11243-DPW). The suits name as defendants Sipex and certain officers of the Company. The suits are purportedly brought on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased Sipex’s common stock from July 20, 2000 through and including January 11, 2001. The suits allege, among other things, that the Company’s financial statements for the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2000 contain misstatements and assert violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5. The suits seek an unspecified award of damages. Sipex believes that the allegations in the complaints are without merit and intends to contest them vigorously.

8


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

      This Form 10-Q contains certain statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or the future financial performance of the Company and the Company’s actual future results may differ significantly from such statements. In evaluating such statements, the various factors identified in the caption “Factors Affecting Future Operating Results” should be considered.

Overview

      Sipex designs, manufactures and markets precision high performance and high value added analog integrated circuits using standard BiCMOS and dielectrically isolated BiCMOS technologies. Analog integrated circuits address a wide range of real-world signal processing applications associated with such naturally occurring physical phenomena as temperature, pressure, weight, position, light and sound. These circuits play a fundamental and important role in coupling the real world to the digital computer and vice versa. Sipex’s products include single, dual and multi-protocol serial interface circuits, linear and switching power management products, optical storage and electroluminescent driver circuits.

Results of Operations

      The table below presents the statements of operations for the three month and nine month periods ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000, as a percentage of net sales and provides the percentage increase (decrease) of such items comparing the interim periods ended September 29, 2001 to the corresponding period from the prior fiscal year.

                                                     
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended


Percentage Percentage
Sept 29, Sept 30, Increase Sept 29, Sept 30, Increase
2001 2000 (Decrease) 2001 2000 (Decrease)






Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 % (57.9 )% 100.0 % 100.0 % (41.1 )%
Cost of sales 121.6 57.5 (11.0 ) 106.2 60.9 2.8






Gross profit (loss) (21.6 ) 42.5 (121.4 ) (6.2 ) 39.1 (109.3 )






Operating expenses:
Research and development 18.3 9.3 (17.7 ) 18.6 10.1 9.0
Marketing and selling 16.1 7.4 (8.2 ) 13.9 8.3 (1.2 )
General and administrative 11.3 6.2 (22.7 ) 10.7 7.1 (12.2 )
Restructuring and facility exit costs N/A 0.3 N/A






Total operating expenses 45.7 22.9 (16.0 ) 43.5 25.5 0.5






Income (loss) from operations (67.3 ) 19.6 (244.4 ) (49.7 ) 13.6 (315.4 )
Other income (expense), net (3.2 ) 1.2 (217.4 ) (0.8 ) 1.6 (131.1 )






Income (loss) before income taxes (70.5 ) 20.8 (242.9 ) (50.5 ) 15.2 (296.6 )
Income tax expense (benefit) (27.5 ) 7.5 (254.9 ) (19.7 ) 5.5 (313.0 )






Net income (loss) (43.0 )% 13.3 % (236.2 )% (30.8 )% 9.7 % (287.3 )%






      Net sales for the third quarter decreased 57.9% to $15.0 million and decreased 41.1% to $55.3 million for the first nine months of 2001, as compared to the same periods last year. The decreases for the third quarter and year-to-date 2001, as compared to the respective prior year periods, were primarily due to the global slowdown in the semiconductor technology end-markets resulting in lower shipment levels. During the third quarter of 2001, net sales were further reduced by the disruptive effects of the events of September 11, 2001, which caused shipping delays to and from the Company’s assembly contractors due to interruptions in commercial aviation schedules and delays due to increased security measures at the customs houses. Net sales were also reduced in the 2001 periods by reductions in the selling price of some of the Company’s telecommunication products. Year-to-date 2001 net sales were also effected by $4.5 million in the first quarter of 2001, which related to the timing of revenue recognition for sales into distribution, which was adopted by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2000. The $4.5 million represented sales of inventory into distribution for which revenue was previously recognized and therefore reduced sell-through revenue for this distributor. International sales were 72.3% and 69.1% of net sales for the third quarters of 2001 and 2000,

9


Table of Contents

respectively. For the first nine months of 2001, international sales were 63.8%, as compared to 71.8% for the same period in 2000. Third quarter and year-to-date 2001 sales decreased in all regions except for Europe, as compared with the respective 2000 periods. Sequentially, third quarter sales decreased in all regions except for Europe, as compared to the second quarter of 2001.

      Gross profit was a (loss) of $(3.2) million and $(3.4) million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001, respectively, as compared to gross profit of $15.2 million and $36.7 million for the respective prior year periods. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit was a loss of (21.6)% and (6.2)% for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001, respectively, as compared to a profit of 42.5% and 39.1% for the same periods last year. The decreased gross profit for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001, as compared to the respective prior year periods, was mainly due to the higher operating costs of the Hillview fab, lower capacity utilization, wafer fab yield and the lowered selling prices of some of the Company’s telecommunication products.

      Research and development expenses for the third quarter of 2001 decreased $591,000 or 17.7% and increased $851,000 or 9.0% for the first nine months of 2001 over the respective prior year periods. The reduction in the third quarter of 2001 from the prior year respective quarter was due to cost saving measures taken by the Company due to the continued slowness in the semiconductor industry. The year-to-date increase in 2001 over the same prior year period was mainly due to continued process development in the new wafer fabrication facility and increased new product development expenses during the first half of the year, partially offset by the third quarter 2001 spending decreases. As a percentage of net sales, research and development increased to 18.3% and 18.6% for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001, respectively, as compared to 9.3% and 10.1% for the same periods in the previous year. The increases as a percentage of net sales in the 2001 periods were mainly due to the decreased sales base.

      Marketing and selling expenses decreased 8.2% and 1.2% to $2.4 million and $7.7 million, respectively, for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001, as compared with $2.6 million and $7.8 million, respectively, for the same periods of the previous year. The decreases for the quarter and first nine months of 2001 was mainly due to lower commissions on decreased sales and was partially offset by increased advertising and additional sales resources in Asia. As a percentage of net sales, marketing and selling expenses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001 increased to 16.1% and 13.9%, respectively, as compared to 7.4% and 8.3%, in the same prior year periods. The increase as a percent of sales is due to the lower sales base.

      General and administrative expenses decreased by $500,000 and $817,000 or 22.7% and 12.2% for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001, respectively, as compared to the same periods of the previous year. The decrease in spending for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001, as compared to the same period a year ago was mainly due to controls over spending and decreased salaries and bonuses in 2001. As a percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001 increased to 11.3% and 10.7%, respectively, as compared to 6.2% and 7.1% for the same periods in the previous year. The increase as a percent of sales is due to the lower sales base.

      In the second quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $494,000 for severance payments related to the reduction of the Company’s workforce by approximately 65 people as a result of the continued slowness in the semiconductor market. As of September 29, 2001 approximately $416,000 has been paid and the balance of the accrual for restructuring of $78,000 is expected to be paid in the fourth quarter of 2001. During the first quarter of 2001, Sipex accrued $40,000 for severance costs for an approximate 4% reduction in the Company’s workforce at the Company’s Milpitas facility, which was paid in the second quarter of 2001. These 2001 restructuring costs were offset by $(357,000) of first quarter 2001 adjustments to the remaining 1999 restructuring accrual, which resulted from reduced costs as a result of the sale of the Calogic Fremont fabrication facility.

      Other income (expense), net was $(479,000) and $(452,000) for the third quarter and first nine months of 2001 as compared to $408,000 and $1.5 million for respective 2000 periods. The decrease in the respective periods of 2001 was due to increased interest expense as a result of borrowings on the Company’s bank line of credit, decreased interest income due to lower cash and investments and lower reduced interest rates and increased royalty expenses.

      The Company recorded an income tax benefit at an effective rate of 39.0% for the 2001 periods and income tax expense of 36.0% for the 2000 periods. The Company recorded the tax benefit for the current period and the related increase in deferred tax assets as it believes it is more likely than not, considering the level of historical taxable income and expectations for future taxable income, that the operating loss will be utilized in the future to offset

10


Table of Contents

taxable income. Through September 29, 2001, the Company had net losses to offset future taxable income for federal and state income tax purposes of $42.0 million and $19.0 million, respectively. The expiration date for the utilization of these losses ranges from 2005 to 2020 and 2005 and 2010 for federal and state income tax purposes, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      At September 29, 2001, the Company had working capital of $41.9 million and available funds of $3.2 million consisting of cash and cash equivalents.

      On May 16, 2001, the Company issued 2,190,000 shares of Sipex common stock through a private placement of securities, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $21.6 million, net of underwriting commissions and expenses. Proceeds from the offering were used to reduce the Company’s indebtedness under its bank line of credit and to provide funding for operations.

      In June 2001, the Company purchased the land, building and equipment of its Milpitas wafer fabrication facility, which was being leased under a five-year operating lease. In accordance with the provisions of the lease agreement, the Company paid $35.0 million, consisting of $6.0 million for the land, $16.9 million for the building and $12.1 million for machinery and equipment. The recorded cost of the machinery and equipment purchased was reduced by a $1.4 million long-term liability recorded by the Company through June 30, 2001 as its estimated liability under the lease for the Guaranteed residual value of the equipment. Proceeds for the buyout were provided through the use of restricted cash of $36.8 million that had previously secured the lease of the facility and equipment.

      As of September 29, 2001, the Company had long-term debt consisting of $7.3 million borrowed under the Company’s $20.0 million bank line of credit. For the quarter ended September 29, 2001, the Company was not in compliance with the net income debt covenant and has obtained a waiver of noncompliance from the lender as of September 29, 2001 and a modification to the net income requirements for the fourth quarter of 2001 and for 2002. The Company expects to be in compliance with the debt covenants for at least the next twelve months.

      In addition to the issuance of common stock, the Company increased cash flows from operations through a series of salary and spending reductions in the second and third quarters of 2001. Sipex anticipates that the available funds, bank loans and cash provided from operations will be sufficient to meet cash and working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

Factors Affecting Future Operating Results

      From time to time, information provided by Sipex, statements made by its employees or information included in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including in this form 10-Q) may contain statements which are not historical facts, so called “forward-looking statements”, and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In particular, certain statements contained in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations which are not historical facts (including, but not limited to, statements concerning anticipated availability of capital for working capital and for capital expenditures and statements regarding the pending litigation against the Company) constitute “forward-looking” statements. Sipex’s actual future results may differ materially from those stated in any forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed below and the other risks discussed in Sipex’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on May 24, 2001.

      Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward looking statements contained herein including, without limitation, whether, and to the extent which, demand for the Company’s products increases and reflects real end-user demand; whether customer cancellations and delays of outstanding orders increase, and whether the Company is able to manufacture in the correct mix to respond to orders on hand and new orders received in the future; the amount of lead time provided by the Company’s customers; whether the Company is able to achieve its new product development and introduction goals, including, without limitation, goals for conceiving and introducing timely new products that are well received in the marketplace such as optical storage products and its Power Management product line; and its ability to design and introduce new products based on new technologies. In addition, the Company may experience unexpected delays or problems in qualifying and ramping up

11


Table of Contents

production in its new fab in Milpitas, California and the failure of the Company to implement the new fab successfully and in a timely fashion may impact future revenue growth and operating results.

      Other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted include, without limitation, overall economic conditions in the United States, resulting from the events of September 11th, and abroad, including currency and other economic issues affecting Asian and other countries, demand for electronic products and semiconductors generally, demand for the end-user products for which the Company’s semiconductors are suited, timely availability of raw materials (including subcontractor wafers from Taiwan), equipment, supplies and services, unanticipated manufacturing problems, technological and product development risks, including, but not limited to, fluctuations in manufacturing yields and efficiencies and availability of foundry capacity, the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property, the Company’s ability to retain key personnel, the outcome of the securities litigation against the Company, competitors’ actions, and other risk factors described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on May 24, 2001.

      Past performance of the Company may not be a good indicator of future performance due to factors affecting the Company, its competitors, the semiconductor industry and the overall domestic and international economy. The semiconductor industry is characterized by rapid technological change, price erosion, cyclical market patterns, occasional shortages of materials, capacity constraints, variation in manufacturing efficiencies and significant expenditures for capital equipment and product development. Furthermore, new product introductions and patent protection of existing products are critical factors for future sales growth and sustained profitability.

      As is outlined below in Part II, Item 1, the Company has been named in two, virtually identical purported securities class action lawsuits. The complaints allege, among other things, incorrect statements in the Company’s financial statements for the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2000 and seek an unspecified award of damages. The Company believes that the allegations in the complaints are without merit and intends to contest them vigorously. The litigation process is inherently uncertain and unpredictable, however, and there can be no guarantee as to the ultimate outcome of this pending litigation.

      Although the Company believes that it has sufficient product lines, manufacturing facilities and technical and financial resources for its current operations, sales and profitability can be significantly affected by the above and other risks discussed from time to time in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and its Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on May 24, 2001. Additionally, the Company’s common stock could be subject to significant price volatility should sales and/or earnings fail to meet expectations of the investment community.

12


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk:

      Sipex invests excess cash in financial instruments that are sensitive to market risks as part of its investment strategy. None of these market-sensitive instruments are held for trading purposes. Sipex does not own derivative financial instruments in its portfolio. The investment portfolio contains instruments that are subject to the risk of a decline in interest rates.

      Investment Rate Risk — The Company’s investment portfolio includes debt instruments that are primarily United States government bonds of less than one year in duration. These bonds are subject to interest rate risk and could decline in value if interest rates fluctuate. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of these instruments, the Company does not believe that it has a material exposure to interest rate risk.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

      Between July 10 and July 19, 2001, two virtually identical purported securities class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, captioned “Darren Suprina v. Sipex Corp. et al” (C.A. No. 01-11185-DPW) and “Doug Howell v. Sipex Corp. et al” (C.A. No. 01-11243-DPW). The suits name as defendants Sipex and certain officers of the Company. The suits are purportedly brought on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased Sipex’s common stock from July 20, 2000 through and including January 11, 2001. The suits allege, among other things, that the Company’s financial statements for the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2000 contain misstatements and assert violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5. The suits seek an unspecified award of damages. Sipex believes that the allegations in the complaints are without merit and intends to contest them vigorously.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

      a)   Exhibit 10.1        Comerica Bank — California Waiver

      b)   Reports on Form 8-K
None

13


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

     
SIPEX CORPORATION
 
Date: November 9, 2001 /s/ Frank R. DiPietro

Frank R. DiPietro
Executive Vice President, Finance
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
(Duly Authorized Officer &
Principal Financial Officer)

14