pre14a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMB APPROVAL |
|
|
|
|
|
OMB Number:
|
|
3235-0059 |
|
|
Expires:
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
Estimated average burden hours per
response |
14.75 |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant
þ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
þ Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
o Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (11-01) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
1776 W. March
Lane, Suite 250
Stockton, California 95207
April , 2006
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of
shareholders of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., which will be held on
June 14, 2006, at 8:00 a.m., Pacific time, at the
Founders Conference Room located in our offices at 4210 Coronado
Avenue, Stockton, California, 95204. A Notice of Meeting, Proxy
Statement, Proxy Form and our 2005 Annual Report are included
with this letter.
At this years annual meeting, you will be asked to
consider and take action with respect to the election of nine
directors to our board of directors, the approval of an
amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
giving effect to a reverse share split, the approval of
amendments to our Amended and Restated Bylaws authorizing our
board of directors to establish the size of the board and, if
and when permitted by California law, to divide the board
members into either two or three classes and any other business
properly presented at the annual meeting. These matters are
described more fully in the enclosed Notice of Meeting and Proxy
Statement.
Because some of the matters being considered at the annual
meeting require the affirmative vote of a majority of our issued
and outstanding common shares in order to be approved or
adopted, it is critical that your shares are represented and
voted at the annual meeting regardless of the manner in which
your shares are held. Accordingly, please complete, sign and
date the enclosed Proxy Form and return it promptly in the
enclosed envelope. If you attend the annual meeting, you may, of
course, withdraw your proxy should you wish to vote in person.
We hope that you will be able to attend the annual meeting and
we look forward to seeing you.
Sincerely,
HENRY R. CARABELLI
President and Chief Executive Officer
1776 W. March
Lane, Suite 250
Stockton, California 95207
NOTICE OF MEETING
The annual meeting of shareholders of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
will be held on June 14, 2006, at 8:00 a.m., Pacific time,
at the Founders Conference Room located in our offices at 4210
Coronado Avenue, Stockton, California, 95204, to consider and
take action with respect to the following matters:
1. the election of nine directors to our board of directors;
2. the approval of (a) an amendment to our Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation giving effect to a reverse
split of our common shares and (b) all ministerial actions
required in connection with effecting such reverse share split;
3. the approval of amendments to our Amended and Restated
Bylaws authorizing our board of directors (a) to establish
the size of the board and (b) if and when permitted by
California law, to divide the board members into either two or
three classes; and
4. the transaction of such other business as may properly
come before the annual meeting and any adjournments or
postponements thereof.
These matters are described more fully in the Proxy Statement
that accompanies this Notice of Meeting and the enclosed Proxy
Form and 2005 Annual Report.
Holders of record of our common shares at the close of business
on April 17, 2006 are entitled to receive notice of and to
vote on all matters presented at the annual meeting and at any
adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of such
shareholders will be available for examination by any
shareholder for any purpose germane to the annual meeting during
normal business hours at our principal executive offices at the
address above.
By Order of the Board of Directors
ROBERT C. MORRISON
Secretary
April , 2006
Your vote is important whether or not you plan to attend the
annual meeting in person and regardless of the number of common
shares you own. Accordingly, please complete, sign and date the
enclosed Proxy Form and mail it promptly in the envelope
provided to help ensure that your common shares will be
represented at the annual meeting. If you attend the annual
meeting, you may, of course, withdraw your proxy and vote in
person. In addition, you may revoke your proxy before it is
voted by delivering written notice to our Corporate Secretary at
our principal executive offices at the address above or by
submission of a later-dated Proxy Form.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
1776 W. March
Lane, Suite 250
Stockton, California 95207
PROXY
STATEMENT
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 14, 2006
This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the holders of common
shares, par value $0.001 per share, of Pac-West Telecomm,
Inc., which we sometimes refer to in this Proxy Statement as
Pac-West, the Company, we,
or us, in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by and on behalf of our board of directors for use at
the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on June 14,
2006, at [8:00 a.m.], Pacific time, and at any
adjournments or postponements thereof. The purpose of the annual
meeting is to consider and take action with respect to the
following matters:
1. the election of nine directors to our board of directors.
2. the approval of (a) an amendment to our Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation giving effect to a reverse
split of our common shares and (b) all ministerial actions
required in connection with effecting such reverse share split;
3. the approval of amendments to our Amended and Restated
Bylaws authorizing our board of directors to (a) establish
the size of the board and (b) if and when permitted by
California law, divide the board members into either two or
three classes; and
4. the transaction of such other business as may properly
come before the annual meeting and any adjournments or
postponements thereof.
This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Meeting, the Proxy Form and
our 2005 Annual Report are being mailed on or about
May , 2006 to holders of record of our common
shares at the close of business on the record date,
April 17, 2006.
If the enclosed Proxy Form is properly signed, dated and
returned to us, the individuals identified as proxies thereon
will vote the shares represented by the Proxy Form in accordance
with the directions noted thereon. If no direction is indicated,
the proxies will vote FOR the nominees identified in this
Proxy Statement as directors, FOR the approval of an
amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
giving effect to a reverse split of our common shares and all
ministerial actions required in connection with effecting such
reverse share split and FOR the amendments to our Amended
and Restated Bylaws authorizing our board of directors to
establish the size of the board and, if and when permitted by
California law, to divide the board members into either two or
three classes. At this time, we are not aware of any matters
other than those discussed in this Proxy Statement that will be
presented for consideration by the shareholders at the annual
meeting. If other matters are properly presented for
consideration by the shareholders, all shares represented by the
Proxy Forms will be voted in accordance with the recommendations
of our management.
Returning your completed Proxy Form will not prevent you from
voting in person at the annual meeting if you are present and
wish to vote. In addition, you may revoke your Proxy Form before
it is voted by delivering written notice to our Corporate
Secretary prior to the beginning of the annual meeting at our
principal executive offices at the address above or by
submission of a later-dated Proxy Form.
Voting
Generally
Only record holders of our common shares at the close of
business on the record date, April 17, 2006, will be
entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Each outstanding common
share entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each of
Propositions 2 and 3. As described more fully below,
shareholders may cumulate votes with respect to the director
nominees set forth in Proposition 1. As of the record date, we
had
common shares outstanding.
Cumulative
Voting for Directors
Cumulative voting is authorized for all shareholders if any
shareholder gives notice at the annual meeting prior to the
voting of the shareholders intention to cumulate such
shareholders votes. Cumulative voting means that each
shareholder, when electing directors, has the right to cumulate
votes and give to one (1) nominee a number of votes equal
to the number of directors to be elected (nine (9) at this
annual meeting) multiplied by the number of votes to which such
shareholders shares are entitled, or may distribute such
number of votes among any or all of the nominees at the
shareholders discretion. Shareholders may exercise their
right to cumulative voting by attaching to their Proxy Form
their instructions indicating how many votes their proxy should
give to each candidate.
Quorum
The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority
of our common shares entitled to vote as of the record date will
constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting business at
the annual meeting.
Abstentions;
Broker Non-Votes
Abstentions will be treated as present and entitled to vote, and
therefore will be counted in determining the existence of a
quorum and will have the effect of a vote against each of
Propositions 2 and 3, which require the affirmative vote of
a majority of our issued and outstanding common shares in order
to be approved or adopted. Broker non-votes will be considered
present but not entitled to vote, and thus will be counted in
determining the existence of a quorum but will have the effect
of a vote against each of Propositions 2 and 3. Broker
non-votes occur when shares held by brokers or nominees
that are present in person or represented by proxy are not voted
on a particular matter because instructions have not been
received from the beneficial owner. In this regard, if you hold
your shares through a broker or nominee, you should be aware
that your broker or nominee may not vote your shares on some or
all of the propositions without instructions from you, which, as
described above, in the case of Propositions 2 and 3 will have
the effect of a vote against these propositions.
Solicitation
of Proxies
We will bear the entire cost of this solicitation, including the
preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this Proxy
Statement, the Notice of Meeting, the Proxy Form, and our 2005
Annual Report. We intend to provide copies of such solicitation
materials to brokerage houses, fiduciaries, custodians and other
persons or entities holding our common shares on behalf of the
beneficial owner so that the solicitation materials may be
forwarded to such beneficial owners. This solicitation, which is
being conducted by mail, may be supplemented by a solicitation
by telephone,
e-mail,
telegram, or other permissible means by our directors, officers
or employees. No additional compensation will be paid to these
individuals for conducting such a solicitation.
In addition, we have retained Georgeson Shareholder
Communications Inc. (Georgeson) to assist us in the
solicitation of proxies, and will pay fees of approximately
$7,500 in connection therewith. Our arrangement with Georgeson
includes provisions obligating us to indemnify it for certain
liabilities that could arise in connection with its solicitation
of proxies on our behalf.
2
PROPOSITION
1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
In accordance with our Amended and Restated Bylaws, our board of
directors currently consists of nine (9) members.
Accordingly, you are being asked to consider and vote for nine
(9) persons nominated by us to serve on our board of
directors; all of whom are currently serving as members of our
board of directors and two of whom have not previously been
elected by shareholders at an annual meeting.
Following are the nine (9) current members of our board of
directors standing for re-election at the annual meeting:
Wallace W. Griffin was appointed President, CEO, and a
Director of Pac-West in September 1998 when an investor group he
was part of purchased and recapitalized the Company. As part of
a succession plan, in June 2001 he transferred the title of
President to Henry R. Carabelli, and in July 2003 he transferred
the title of CEO to Mr. Carabelli and transitioned to a
non-executive Chairman role. Mr. Griffin has over
45 years experience in telecommunications, cable
television, publishing and advertising. Prior to joining
Pac-West, Mr. Griffin served as a Group President for a
number of Jones International companies from 1994 to 1997,
including Jones Lightwave, Ltd., a Competitive Local Exchange
Carrier, and Jones Education Company, a leader in using
technology to deliver education. Concurrently, he was co-owner
of a consulting and business development company, Griffin
Enterprises, Inc. From 1987 through 1992, he served as the
President and CEO of U S West Marketing Resources Group, where
he managed the $1 billion publishing, media software and
advertising services division. Mr. Griffin currently serves
on the Advisory Board for the University of the Pacific
Eberhardt School of Business, the Board of Trustees for the
University of California, Merced and the Board of Trustees for
the Delta College Foundation in Stockton.
Henry R. Carabelli joined Pac-West as President and COO
in June 2001. Effective January 1, 2003, Mr. Carabelli
became a Director of Pac-West, and in July 2003 he also became
CEO. Mr. Carabelli has overall responsibility for the
operations of the Company. Formerly the COO of ICG, a
Colorado-based CLEC, and President of @Link Networks, a
broadband service provider, Mr. Carabelli brings over
28 years of telecom experience to Pac-West. He joined ICG
in 1996 as Executive Vice President of network operations, and
served as COO from 1998 to 1999 with responsibility over network
engineering, customer care, sales, and installation. Prior to
ICG, Mr. Carabelli spent 19 years in management with
Ameritech and Michigan Bell. He is also a director on the
San Joaquin Business Council as well as the University of
San Francisco Telecommunications Advisory Board.
David G. Chandler has served as a Director of Pac-West
since September 1998. Mr. Chandler has served as a Managing
Director of William Blair Capital Partners (and predecessor
entities), a private equity firm, since December 1988. Since
September 2004 Mr. Chandler has also served as a Managing
Director of Chicago Growth Partners, a private equity investment
firm co-founded by Mr. Chandler. Mr. Chandler serves
as a director of a number of privately held companies.
Mr. Chandler holds an M.B.A. from The Amos Tuck School at
Dartmouth College and a B.A. from Princeton University.
Jerry L. Johnson served as Chairman of Pac-Wests
Board of Directors from September 1998 to June 2001. From August
2002 until present, Mr. Johnson has served as President of
eMoney Advisor, Inc. From 1995 until December 2001,
Mr. Johnson was employed by Safeguard Scientifics Inc.,
where he was the Executive Vice President overseeing the partner
companies in the
E-Communications
group. From 1985 to 1995, he worked at U S West in various
positions, including Vice President, Network and Technology
Services, which included managing U S Wests largest
division, and supervising 21,000 management, engineering,
technical and clerical employees. From 1983 to 1985,
Mr. Johnson was President and CEO of Northwestern Bell
Information Technologies. Mr. Johnson holds a Masters in
Management from the Sloan School at MIT, a Masters in Psychology
from Northern Illinois University and a B.S. in Psychology from
Northeastern Missouri. He serves on the boards of Axum Financial
LLC and Education Management Corporation, as well as the boards
of the Philadelphia Orchestra and the Episcopal Academy.
Thomas A. Munro has served as a director since April 2003
and has over 24 years of financial and technology
experience. Mr. Munro currently serves as CEO of
Verimatrix, Inc., a privately held software company specializing
in content security solutions for digital video. In January
2003, he retired from Wireless Facilities, Inc. (WFI), a global
leader in the design, deployment, and management of wireless
mobility and broadband wireless networks.
3
He served as CFO of WFI from 1997 to 2000, and President from
September 2000 until his retirement. Prior to WFI, he was
founder and CEO of @Market, a retail sporting goods website.
From 1994 to 1995, he served as CFO for Precision Digital
Images, Inc. From 1981 to 1994, he was employed with MetLife
Capital Corporation, where he served as CFO and a director on
the companys Board from 1992 to 1994. He holds a
bachelors degree in business administration and an MBA
from the University of Washington and has co-authored two
college level text books on computer programming. Mr. Munro
also serves as a director of Airgain, Inc, BioFortis, Inc.,
Concerto Networks, Inc., Kineticom, Inc., Renaissance Golf Group
and CommNexus.
Samuel A. Plum has served as a Director of Pac-West since
September 1998. Mr. Plum has been a Managing General
Partner of the general partner of SCP Private Equity Partners,
L.P. since its commencement in August 1996, and was employed by
Safeguard Scientifics from 1993 to 1996. From February 1989 to
January 1993, Mr. Plum served as President of Charterhouse,
Inc. and Charterhouse North American Securities, Inc., the
U.S. investment banking and broker-dealer divisions of
Charterhouse PLC, a merchant bank located in the United Kingdom.
From 1973 to 1989, Mr. Plum served in various capacities at
the investment banking divisions of PaineWebber, Inc. and Blyth
Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc. Mr. Plum has over
30 years of investment banking, mergers and acquisitions,
and private equity investment experience. Mr. Plum also
serves as a director of Index Stock Imagery, Inc., Inc.,
Metallurg Holdings, Inc., Traffic.com, Inc. and Pentech
Financial Services Inc.
Timothy A. Samples has served as a Director of Pac-West
since January 2005. Mr. Samples has over 20 years
experience in the communications industry. Since January of
2003, he has been the Principal in Sapience LLC, in Scottsdale,
Arizona, where he does consulting work and serves as a
non-executive director for two telecommunications companies.
From February 2001 to June 2002, he served as CEO, President,
and Chairman of the Board of Management for Completel N.V., a
Dutch registered CLEC, in London, England and Paris, France.
From February 2000 to February 2001, Mr. Samples served as
CEO and President of Firstmark Communications, a Pan-European
broadband company with operations in seven Western European
countries. From September 1997 to February 2000, he was CEO of
One2One, a GSM service operator created through a joint venture
between MediaOne group and Cable and Wireless. From July 1995 to
May 1996, Mr. Samples served as Vice President and General
Manager for US West Cellular/Airtouch in Phoenix, Arizona. Prior
to 1995, Mr. Samples held various management, sales, and
marketing positions with US West/MediaOne Group.
The following are the two current members of our board of
directors who were appointed by our board of directors to fill
vacancies and thus have not previously been elected by
shareholders at an annual meeting:
Frederick D. Lawrence was appointed a Director of
Pac-West in March, 2006. Mr. Lawrence serves as Chairman of
Silicon Systems, a manufacturer of flash storage for the
enterprise market, and as a Venture Partner at Shepherd
Ventures. He has over 36 years of experience in the
telecommunications business in the service, manufacturing, and
financing sectors of the industry. Mr. Lawrence has served
as CEO of Comstream, President of ADC Transmission Systems,
President and CEO of Sprint Florida, as well as a variety of
positions in operations, sales, marketing, supply, director and
general management with United Telecommunications with AT&T.
He served as Chairman & CEO of Adaptive Broadband from
1997 to 2001. In July 2001, Adaptive Broadband filed a voluntary
petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. He has served on a number of private
company, public company and civic boards, currently serving as a
Director of the San Diego Hospice and Palliative Care
Center.
William H. Davidson was appointed a Director of Pac-West
in November 2005. Dr. Davidson served as the Chairman of
MESA (Management Education Service Associates), a research and
consulting organization specializing in business planning and
executive development, from 1985 until 1996. From 1996 to 1997,
he was a National Partner for Deloitte & Touche
Management Consulting and Principal of the Telecommunications
Consulting Practice. From 1997 to 1998, Dr. Davidson was a
partner at TVM Venture Group, a German venture capital group
focused on high-tech
start-ups in
telecommunications, computing and biotechnology. Dr. Davidson
served as a tenured Professor of Management at the Marshall
School of Business, University of Southern California, from 1985
to 1998. Dr. Davidson holds a Doctorate in Business
Administration and Masters of Business Administration from
Harvard Business School, as well as an undergraduate degree in
Economics from Harvard College.
4
Under California law, listed companies are authorized to
implement a classified board of directors, for which
directors may be divided into two or three classes and serve
terms of two or three years, respectively. A listed
company under the California Corporations Code is one whose
shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange or American
Stock Exchange, or quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market (formerly
known as the Nasdaq National Market). Our common shares were
quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market from November 4, 1999,
when we completed our initial public offering, until
May 28, 2002, when our common shares ceased being quoted on
the Nasdaq Global Market and began being quoted on the Nasdaq
Capital Market (formerly known as the Nasdaq SmallCap Market).
Accordingly, although our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws provide for a
classified board of directors, we are currently ineligible to
utilize a classified board of directors until such time as we
may qualify as a listed company under the California
Corporations Code. If our shareholders approve
Proposition 3, our board may at any time thereafter adopt a
resolution dividing the board into two (2) or three
(3) classes if and when we again qualify as a listed
company under California law.
Directors elected at this annual meeting will serve until the
2007 annual meeting of shareholders or until a successor has
been elected or appointed and qualified except in the case of
the death, removal or resignation of such director with all
continuing directors eligible to serve out the remainder of
their original terms.
We believe that each of the nine (9) director nominees
identified above is willing to be elected and to serve on our
board of directors. In the event that any nominee is unable to
serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, which is not now
contemplated, the incumbent directors may or may not select a
substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, all
proxies will be voted for the person selected.
Directors will be elected at the annual meeting by a majority of
the votes cast at the annual meeting by the holders of shares
represented in person or by proxy. Cumulative voting is
authorized for all shareholders if any shareholder gives notice
at the annual meeting prior to the voting of the
shareholders intention to cumulate such shareholders
votes. Cumulative voting means that each shareholder, when
electing directors, has the right to cumulate votes and give to
one nominee a number of votes equal to the number of directors
to be elected nine (9) at this meeting) multiplied by the
number of votes to which such shareholders shares are
entitled, or may distribute such number among any or all of the
nominees at the shareholders discretion.
Shareholders may exercise their right to cumulative voting by
attaching to the Proxy Form their instructions indicating how
many votes their proxy should give to each candidate.
Our board of directors has carefully considered and approved
the nominees and recommends that you vote FOR
all of the nominees listed above.
5
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The table below sets forth certain information as of
March 31, 2006 with respect to our current directors and
executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry R. Carabelli
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
H. Ravi Brar
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President Human Resources
|
Todd M. Putnam
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Chief Information Officer
|
Michael B. Hawn
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Vice President Customer Network
Services
|
Sarita Fernandes
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Vice President Marketing
|
Eric E. Jacobs
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Vice President, General Manager
Service Provider Sales
|
Michael L. Sarina
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Vice President Finance
|
Reid Cox
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President of Business
Development and Investor Relations
|
John F. Sumpter
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Vice President Regulatory
|
Robert C. Morrison
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
  |
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace W. Griffin
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Henry R. Carabelli
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
David G. Chandler
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Director
|
Jerry L. Johnson
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
Thomas A. Munro
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Director
|
Samuel A. Plum
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
Timothy A. Samples
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Director
|
William H. Davidson
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Director
|
Frederick D. Lawrence
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
The present principal occupations and recent employment history
of each of our executive officers listed above, other than those
officers also serving as a director, are set forth below.
Executive
Officers
H. Ravi Brar joined Pac-West in July 1999 as Vice
President of Business Development. He was appointed Vice
President of Customer Operations in October 2000, Vice President
of Finance and Treasurer in August of 2001, Acting Chief
Financial Officer in February of 2002, and Chief Financial
Officer in September 2002. In addition to Chief Financial
Officer, Mr. Brar was appointed Vice President of Human
Resources in 2004. Mr. Brar has responsibility for the
Companys financial and accounting operations, evaluating
strategic growth opportunities, and human resources. Prior to
joining Pac-West, Mr. Brar was employed with Xerox
Corporation from 1991 to August 1999, where he held several
senior level business development and financial management
positions, including Business Development Manager of Developing
Markets Operations in China and Russia, and Area General Manager
and Controller of Xeroxs Business Services division in
Pittsburgh, PA.
Todd M. Putnam joined Pac-West in October 2003 as Chief
Information Officer. Mr. Putnam has responsibility over the
Companys information systems including its Information
Technology strategic plan and infrastructure, including
operating support systems, software development, database
administration, security, system integration, internal and
external web sites, and supplier partnerships. Prior to joining
Pac-West, he completed a consulting assignment with TechNexxus,
LLC (a subsidiary of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo
PC) in Washington D.C. From October 1989 to March 2002, he was
employed with Global Crossing LTD (Frontier Communications,
ConferTech International, and T1 Systems), where he was
responsible for building, operating,
6
and maintaining the global information systems infrastructure
for the entire company. He held a variety of senior
level IT positions, including Vice President of Global IS
Operations, Vice President of North American Systems and
Infrastructure, Vice President of Systems Development, and CIO
of the ConferTech division.
Michael B. Hawn joined Pac-West as Vice President of
Customer Network Services in August 2001. Mr. Hawn has
end-to-end
responsibility over network planning and engineering, service
delivery, operations and maintenance. He has over 19 years
of telecommunications management experience, including network
planning, engineering, service delivery, provisioning, and
software development. His former positions include Vice
President of National Operations and Vice President of Program
Management for @Link Networks, Inc. in Louisville, CO, Vice
President of Planning and Engineering for ICG Communications,
Inc. in Englewood, CO and Technical Manager for Lucent
Technologies Regional Technical Assistance Center in
Lisle, IL and Cockeysville, MD.
Sarita Fernandes joined Pac-West in June of 2004 as the
Director of Service Provider Product Marketing. She was promoted
to Vice President of Marketing in November 2005.
Ms. Fernandes oversees Pac-Wests strategic marketing,
product management, marketing communications, and channel
marketing initiatives. Prior to joining Pac-West,
Ms. Fernandes held several executive level positions
including Vice President of Marketing and Product Management at
ECI Conference Call Services, Vice President of Marketing for
National Accounts and Service Provider Markets as well as Vice
President/General Manager of Sales for the Mid-Atlantic Region
at Winstar Communications.
Eric E. Jacobs joined Pac-West in March of 2003 and was
promoted to Vice President, General Manager of Service Provider
Markets in December 2003. He has over ten years of sales
management experience in the communications industry. Prior to
joining Pac-West, he held positions as Director of Sales for
Metromedia Fiber Network from May 2000 to March 2003, and was
Manager for Corporate Accounts for Nextel Communications, Inc.
from June 1995 to May 2000. Mr. Jacobs has leadership over
the Companys sales, channel marketing and customer
relations teams.
Reid Cox joined Pac-West in August of 2000 as Director of
Investor Relations. He was appointed Vice President of Business
Development and Investor Relations in November 2005.
Mr. Cox oversees Pac-Wests business development,
corporate development and investor relations initiatives. Prior
to joining Pac-West, Mr. Cox was Founder and President of
The Supplier Exchange, LLC, an online global marketplace for
finished retail goods. Mr. Cox has performed various roles
within the financial community in both Canada and the U.S., from
investor relations with the Financial Relations Board, to
corporate finance at Loewen Ondaatje McCutcheon, to financial
research with Deacon Capital Corporation.
Michael L. Sarina joined Pac-West in December 2005 as
Vice President of Finance. Mr. Sarina has responsibility
over accounting, risk management, financial reporting and
compliance, and tax and treasury activities. Prior to joining
Pac-West, Mr. Sarina was an independent business and
financial consultant from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Sarina has held
a number of senior level financial and operations positions,
including Senior Vice President, CFO and COO of Mobex
Communications Corp. (a wireless telecommunications company) and
has held senior financial management positions with Wilbur-Ellis
Inc., Spreckels Industries and California Microwave.
Mr. Sarina also worked at Deloitte & Touche where
he was a Certified Public Accountant.
John F. Sumpter joined Pac-West as Vice President of
Regulatory in July 1999. He is responsible for Pac-Wests
relations with government regulatory agencies, regulatory
compliance, and intercarrier relations. Mr. Sumpter has
over 30 years of experience in the telecommunications
industry. Prior to Pac-West, he was employed with AT&T from
1984 to July 1999, where he held several executive level
regulatory and marketing positions, including
Division Manager of Law and Government Affairs, District
Manager of Switched Services Product Management, and District
Manager of Marketing. He currently serves as Chairman of the
Board of CALTEL, the California Association of Competitive
Telecommunications Companies and of CACE, the California
Alliance for Consumer Education. He was elected to the Board of
Directors for COMPTEL in 2005.
Robert C. Morrison joined Pac-West as Vice President and
General Counsel in January 2003. He served on Pac-Wests
Board of Directors from June 2001 through December 2002. He has
served as our Corporate Secretary since February 2001.
Mr. Morrison has responsibility over corporate governance,
record keeping, documentation and legal administration of
contractual relationships, and managing the Companys
relationships with outside law
7
firms. Prior to joining Pac-West, Mr. Morrison was an
attorney with Neumiller and Beardslee, P.C. in Stockton,
California from 1972 to December 2002. He served as Managing
Director from 1983 to 1990. In July 2002, he completed a term on
the Board of Regents of the University of California. He is a
past president of the Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce, the
San Joaquin County Economic Development Association, and
the alumni association for UC Davis, and is a former member of
the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the Lassen
Volcanic National Park Foundation.
Information
About Our Board of Directors
General
Our board of directors met nine (9) times during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005. Our board of directors has
standing audit, compensation, executive, nominating and
corporate governance, and risk management committees. Each of
our incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate
number of meetings of the board of directors and any committees
on which such director served during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005. Our executive officers are elected by
and serve at the discretion of our board of directors.
Our board of directors assesses the independence of the
directors of the Company, and examines the nature and extent of
any relationships between the Company and its directors, their
families and their affiliates. Based on this assessment, our
board of directors has concluded that seven of the nine nominees
for election to the board of directors, Messrs. Chandler,
Johnson, Munro, Plum, Samples, Lawrence and Davidson qualify as
independent directors in accordance with Securities
and Exchange Commission regulations, our Corporate Governance
Standards and the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock
Market.
Compensation
of Directors
Directors who are employed by us, including Mr. Carabelli
are not currently entitled to receive any compensation for
serving on our board of directors. Our independent directors are
entitled to receive $5,000 per quarter as compensation for
serving on our board of directors, and an additional $500 for
each committee meeting they attend that is held other than on a
board meeting date. However, two of our independent directors,
Messrs. Chandler and Plum, have declined to accept
compensation for service on our board or its committees.
Mr. Griffin receives $5,000 per quarter as
compensation for serving on our board of directors and
$12,500 per quarter for performing the duties of chairman
of the board.
The table below sets forth the grants of options made to certain
of our directors in 2005 to purchase our common shares.
Stock
Options Granted to Directors in 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Underlying
|
|
|
Exercise or Base
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Vesting Term
|
|
|
Options Granted (#)
|
|
|
Price ($/Sh)
|
|
|
Jerry L. Johnson
|
|
|
8/30/2005
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1 year vest
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
Thomas A. Munro
|
|
|
8/30/2005
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
1 year vest
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
Timothy A. Samples
|
|
|
1/25/2005
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
4 year vest
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
Timothy A. Samples
|
|
|
8/30/2005
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1 year vest
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
William H. Davidson
|
|
|
11/15/2005
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
1 year vest
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
In addition, we pay for the reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by each director in connection with attending
board and committee meetings.
Board
Member Nominations
The nominating and corporate governance committee identifies
nominees for director from various sources. At times, the
committee may retain search firms at our expense to identify
potential nominees. In assessing potential nominees, the
committee considers the character, background and professional
experience of candidates. All nominees should possess
unquestioned personal integrity and sound business ethics,
loyalty to us and concern for our success and welfare, the
ability to exercise sound and independent judgment and an
awareness of a directors
8
vital role in our good corporate citizenship. In addition, all
director nominees must be willing to assume broad, fiduciary
responsibility on behalf of all shareholders for the management
of the enterprise. The committee will also carefully consider
any potential conflicts of interest. In addition, to be a
qualified nominee as an independent member of the board of
directors, such nominee must meet the definition of an
independent director pursuant to applicable law,
Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, our Corporate
Governance Standards and the listing requirements of the Nasdaq
Stock Market.
The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider
nominees recommended by shareholders who beneficially own and
have owned for one year prior to the date of the recommendation,
individually or in the aggregate, more than five percent of our
issued and outstanding common shares. Recommendations
for nominees may be submitted by shareholders by accessing the
investor relations page of the company website
http://www.pacwest.com and clicking the appropriate
hyperlink, or via regular mail or overnight delivery service
addressed to: nominating and corporate governance committee,
Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., 1776 W. March Lane,
Suite 250, Stockton, CA 95207. Nominations for the 2007
annual meeting must be received by us no earlier than
September 28, 2006 and no later than December 27,
2006. Recommendations received after December 27, 2006 will
be retained for consideration in the event of a board vacancy
occurring after the date of the 2007 annual meeting. Each
recommendation must contain (i) the legal name and address
of the person making the recommendation, and in the case of
shareholders, the number of shares owned and the length of
ownership thereof, (ii) as to each candidate, the legal
name and contact information of that candidate, and a resume or
biographical description of the candidate sufficient to evaluate
his or her personal qualifications and experience,
(iii) the legal names and contact information of three
personal and business references with respect to the character
and business background and experience of the candidate and
(iv) a statement that the candidate is aware that he or she
has been recommended and has expressed willingness and ability
to serve if nominated and elected.
The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider
and evaluate persons recommended by shareholders meeting the
above requirements in the same manner as potential nominees
identified for nomination by us. The committee will rank the
candidates it receives, conduct interviews of an appropriate
number of candidates at the top of the ranking, cause further
investigation to be performed on those candidates it intends to
recommend for nomination and, subject to successful completion
of such investigation, will recommend to the board of directors
a slate of nominees to be considered for election at the annual
meeting. These procedures are described in greater detail in the
Corporate Governance Standards set forth in the Corporate
Governance section of our website at
http://www.pacwest.com.
Shareholder
Communications with the Board and Annual Meeting
Attendance
Any shareholder or other interested party who has a concern or
inquiry regarding our conduct may communicate directly with
either our independent directors or the full board of directors.
Communications may be confidential or anonymous, and may be
submitted in writing to: lead independent director,
c/o Corporate Secretary Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.,
1776 W. March Lane, Stockton, California 95207 or by
accessing our investor relations page at
http://www.pacwest.com. Our lead independent director
will receive all such communications on behalf of our
independent directors and the full board of directors. A copy of
all such communications will be received by our General Counsel.
All such communications will be reviewed and, if necessary,
investigated
and/or
addressed by the lead independent director who may discuss the
matter with the General Counsel and other members of the
management team as deemed appropriate, with independent
advisors, non-management directors or may take other action or
no action in his or her good faith judgment and discretion.
These matters are described in more detail in our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, which is available in the Corporate
Governance section of our website at
http://www.pacwest.com.
Directors are encouraged to attend annual meetings of our
shareholders. At our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders, three
of the directors then standing for election were in attendance.
9
Code
of Ethics
The Company maintains a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
is applicable to all employees of the Company. The Code of
Ethics for Financial Professionals is intended to supplement the
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and applies to the
Companys chief executive officer, chief financial officer,
controller and any person performing similar functions for the
Company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics embodies the
commitment of the board to manage the business of the Company in
accordance with the highest standards of ethical conduct. Copies
of the foregoing are available at http://www.pacwest.com
or in print to any shareholder upon request and without
charge. The Company intends to disclose on its website any
amendments to, or waivers from, its Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics and Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals, on behalf
of any executive officer, financial professional or director of
the Company.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has standing audit, compensation,
executive, nominating and corporate governance, and risk
management committees, as follows:
Audit Committee. The audit committee is
composed of three independent directors, Messrs. Munro
(Chair), Johnson and Lawrence. Among other functions, the
purpose of the audit committee is to assist our board of
directors generally in its oversight of the integrity of our
financial reporting process and systems of internal controls
regarding finance, accounting and legal compliance, the
independence and performance of our independent accountants, the
engagement and termination of our independent accountants and
any non-audit work performed by our independent accountants and
our legal compliance and ethics policies and procedures. Our
board of directors has determined that all members of the audit
committee are independent, within the meaning of the
listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and the rules of
the Securities Exchange Commission, and that Mr. Munro
qualifies as an audit committee financial expert
within the meaning of the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The audit committee met eleven (11) times
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
A copy of the amended and restated audit committee charter is
attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A, and is
available in the Corporate Governance section of our website at
http://www.pacwest.com.
Compensation Committee. The compensation
committee is composed of three independent directors,
Messrs. Plum (Chair), Samples and Davidson. Among other
functions, the compensation committee makes recommendations to
our board of directors regarding the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer and other senior executive officers, awards
under our compensation and benefit plans and compensation
policies and practices. In particular, the compensation
committee reviews and approves the goals and objectives related
to the Chief Executive Officers compensation, and
evaluates the Chief Executive Officers performance in
light of those goals and objectives. In addition, the
compensation committee approves the compensation of directors
and reviews employment agreements, severance agreements and
change of control agreements with our senior executive officers.
Our board of directors has determined that each of the directors
serving on the compensation committee is independent
within the meaning of the listing requirements of the Nasdaq
Stock Market. The compensation committee met eight
(8) times during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005.
The compensation committees charter is available in the
Corporate Governance section of our website at
http://www.pacwest.com.
Executive Committee. The executive committee
is composed of Messrs. Griffin (Chair), Munro and Plum, in
addition to Mr. Carabelli who serves in an ex officio
non-voting capacity. Among other functions, the executive
committee makes recommendations to our board of directors
regarding matters that arise when the full board is unable to
meet. The executive committee met ten (10) times during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The nominating and corporate
governance committee is composed of three independent directors,
Messrs. Samples (Chair), Johnson and Chandler. Among other
functions, the nominating and corporate governance committee
establishes criteria for selecting new directors and senior
executive officers, identifies individuals qualified to become
members of our board of directors and senior executive officers,
recommends to our board of directors such individuals as
nominees and makes recommendations to the board with respect to
committee assignments and committee chairs. In addition, this
committee periodically
10
reviews and makes recommendations to the board of directors
regarding modifications to our Corporate Governance Standards.
Our board of directors has determined that each of the directors
serving on the nominating and corporate governance committee is
independent within the meaning of the listing
requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The nominating and
corporate governance committee met two (2) times during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
The nominating and corporate governance committees charter
is available in the Corporate Governance section of our website
at http://www.pacwest.com.
Risk Management Committee. The risk management
committee is composed of three directors,
Messrs. Carabelli, Samples and Lawrence. Among other
functions, the risk management committee reviews and consults
with management regarding proposals for insurance coverage for
the Company and oversees the development of procedures and
policies to assess the risk profile of the Company,
vulnerabilities of operating systems and capital facilities to
risk of damage or destruction and or service interruptions and
preventative and remedial plans. The risk management committee
met 2 times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Reports
by Board Committees
The following report of the audit committee shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement
incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement or any portion
hereof into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
(Securities Act), as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
Report
of the Audit Committee
The audit committee of our board of directors consists entirely
of directors who our board of directors has determined to be
independent, within the meaning of the listing
requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and our Corporate Governance
Standards. The members of the audit committee are
Messrs. Munro, Johnson and Lawrence. In addition, our board
has determined Mr. Munro is an audit committee
financial expert within the meaning of the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The audit committee operates
under a written charter adopted by the board of directors, which
charter is reviewed by the audit committee on an annual basis.
The audit committee oversees the financial reporting process,
the systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the
performance and independence of the independent auditor, the
annual audit of Pac-Wests financial statements, and
related matters. Management is responsible for our financial
reporting processes including the Companys system of
internal control and for the preparation of consolidated
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Pac-Wests independent accountants
are responsible for auditing those financial statements. Our
responsibility is to monitor and review these processes.
Therefore, we have relied, without independent verification, on
managements representation that the financial statements
have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and on
the representations of the independent accountants included in
their report on our financial statements.
The audit committee has the sole responsibility for retaining
and, if necessary, terminating Pac-Wests independent
auditors. In addition, the audit committee approves the fees and
terms of all audit engagements and pre-approves all auditing
services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for
Pac-West by the independent auditors (subject to de minimis
exceptions described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the
Exchange Act that are approved by the audit committee prior to
completion of the audit). The audit committee may, from time to
time, delegate its authority to pre-approve non-audit services
on a preliminary basis to one or more audit committee members,
provided that such designees present any such approvals to the
full committee at the next committee meeting.
On September 16, 2005, the audit committee accepted the
resignation of the Companys independent accountants, BDO
Seidman, LLP (BDO Seidman) and engaged the services
of Macias Gini & Company LLP (MGC) as the
Companys new independent accountants for the remainder of
2005, including the 2005 audit. The audit committee has also
engaged MGC as the Companys independent accountants for
2006.
11
BDO Seidmans report on the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004
did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor
was such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit
scope or accounting principles. During 2004 and through the date
of BDO Seidmans resignation, there were: (i) no
disagreements with BDO Seidman on any matter of accounting
principle or practice, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to BDO
Seidmans satisfaction, would have caused it to make
reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in
connection with its report on Pac-Wests consolidated
financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no
reportable events (as such term is defined in the
regulations to the Securities Act and the Exchange Act).
During 2004 and through the date of BDO Seidmans
resignation, we did not consult MGC with respect to the
application of accounting principles to a specified transaction,
either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that
might be rendered on the Companys consolidated financial
statements, or any matter that was the subject of a disagreement
or reportable event as described above.
The audit committee has reviewed and discussed with management
and MGC the audited financial statements contained in
Pac-Wests Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005. The audit committee
reviewed MGCs independence and, as part of that review,
received the written disclosures and letter required by the
Independence Standards Board No. 1 (Independence
Discussions with Audit Committees), as may be modified or
supplemented, relating to MGCs independence from us. The
audit committee also discussed with MGC the matters required to
be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
(Communications with Audit Committees), as may be modified or
supplemented, and had the opportunity to ask MGC questions
relating to such matters.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above,
the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that
the audited financial statements be included in Pac-Wests
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, for filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
As recently as the 2003 annual meeting we submitted to a vote of
our shareholders the matter of ratification of the appointment
of our independent auditors for the year. This vote was only
advisory because historically our board of directors (and now
the audit committee) has the sole responsibility and authority
under applicable law to engage and terminate our independent
auditors. Because of the legal responsibility of the audit
committee related to the retention and oversight of the
independent auditors as set forth in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and related Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we
have dispensed with the formality of seeking ratification of the
appointment of our independent auditors and will not seek such
ratification for 2006.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Thomas A. Munro
Jerry L. Johnson
Frederick D. Lawrence
12
Audit
Fees
The following summarizes the aggregate fees billed by our
current independent accountants, MGC, as well as our former
independent accountants, BDO Seidman and KPMG LLP
(KPMG).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
464,543
|
|
|
$
|
544,704
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees(4)
|
|
|
57,707
|
|
|
|
23,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
525,228
|
|
|
$
|
573,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit Fees are fees for professional services performed by the
principal auditor for the audit of the Companys
consolidated annual financial statements and review of
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys
Forms 10-K
and 10-Q
filings, and services that are normally provided in connection
with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. MGC billed
the Company $390,618 for professional services rendered for the
2005 annual financial statement audit and a quarterly financial
statement review. In addition, BDO Seidman billed the Company
$73,925 and $334,704 in 2005 and 2004, respectively, for
professional services rendered for the annual financial
statement audit and quarterly financial statement reviews for
those years. KPMG billed the Company $210,000 in 2004 for
professional services rendered for the 2004 quarterly financial
statement reviews. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-Related Fees are fees for the assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or review of the Companys consolidated financial
statements. These fees consisted primarily of fees for
professional services provided to assist the company with the
review of certain documents in connection with corporate
transactions. All Audit-Related Fees are attributable to BDO
Seidman. |
|
(3) |
|
The Company uses Deloitte Tax LLP for all tax advisory services. |
|
(4) |
|
All Other Fees are fees for permissible professional services
performed by MGC and BDO Seidman that are not encompassed in the
above categories. |
The audit committee has considered whether the provision of the
services described above is compatible with maintaining the
independence of MGC and has concluded that such services are
compatible with maintaining the independence of our principal
auditor. Representatives of MGC are expected to be present at
the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a
statement if they desire to do so and will be available to
respond to appropriate questions.
13
The following report of the compensation committee shall not
be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement
incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement or any portion
hereof into any filing under the Securities Act, or the Exchange
Act, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The compensation committee of the board of directors is composed
entirely of independent directors within the meaning
of the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and our
Corporate Governance Standards. No member of the compensation
committee is a former or current officer of the Company. The
compensation committee sets and administers the policies
governing annual compensation of executive officers, including
cash compensation, incentive compensation and stock ownership
programs.
Pac-Wests compensation program for executive officers is
established, administered and reviewed by the compensation
committee. The key elements of the total annual compensation for
executive officers consist of fixed compensation in the form of
base salary and incentive compensation in the form of variable
pay, which is pay at risk based on achievement of corporate and
individual performance goals. It is the compensation
committees objective that a significant portion of an
executives total annual compensation be contingent upon
the attainment of multiple performance objectives. Payments of
variable pay for corporate performance are structured to make
compensation dependent upon performance results for the year.
For 2005, the variable pay program for executive officers other
than the CEO was comprised of two elements based on corporate
performance and individual performance. The corporate
performance component of our variable pay program comprised
approximately fifty percent of the total variable pay target and
was paid out in March of 2006 based on corporate results as
determined by the compensation committee. The corporate
performance goals were based on two primary financial
measurements, including earnings measured by net income, and
business growth as measured by sales revenue. In addition,
measurement of corporate performance included planning and
solidifying our new business strategy, focusing on market
opportunity, customer partnerships, capital resources and
network deployment requirements. The individual performance
component of our variable pay program, which was also
compensation at risk based on individual achievement, comprised
approximately 50% of the annual target and was based on each
executives performance and success in meeting strategic
and operational goals.
The compensation committee utilized an executive
compensation-consulting firm to conduct a market review
assessment for each executive officer position. The compensation
evaluation provided competitive bench market data to help the
committee target total executive compensation and the allocation
between base pay, variable pay at risk, and long-term incentives
to ensure effectiveness and competitiveness relative to market
practices and corporate and individual performance.
14
The chief executive officers compensation in 2005
consisted of fixed compensation in the form of base salary as
specified in his employment contract with the Company. In
addition the chief executive officers total compensation
includes an annual variable pay component as determined based on
the Companys overall performance. In setting the amount of
the variable pay component, the compensation committee, in
consultation with the chief executive officer, established, a
set of strategic and operational goals focused on financial,
operating, marketing, business development and regulatory
objectives and, where appropriate, specific performance metrics
based upon the annual budget or industry comparables to serve as
a guideline. These metrics included revenue, operating income,
cash flow, plant performance, balance sheet, business growth and
relative industry performance measurements, including the stock
performance of peer companies. The compensation committee
reviewed the performance of the chief executive officer and
based thereon determined the amount of his incentive variable
pay. Based on the foregoing, the compensation committee
established the 2005 base salary of our chief executive officer
at $358,000 and awarded him variable pay incentive compensation
in the amount of $107,400, plus a one-time retention bonus of
$285,000, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Samuel A. Plum
Timothy A. Samples
William H. Davidson
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The table below provides information regarding securities
authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as
of December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Remaining Available For
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
Plans(1)
|
|
|
Approved Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
5,454,188
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
813,528
|
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489,004
|
|
Non-Approved Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998 Griffin Non-Qualified Stock
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes securities reflected in the first column. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts withheld from employees to purchase stock at
June 30, 2006 are not included. |
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
There are no family relationships between any of our directors
or executive officers and there are no director interlocking
relationships.
15
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes the compensation that was earned
in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 to
our named executive officers, consisting of our chief executive
officer and each of our next four most highly compensated
executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
Other Annual
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Name and Principal Position
Held
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Compensation(1)
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Henry R. Carabelli,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005
|
|
$
|
358,000
|
|
|
$
|
392,400
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
14,935
|
|
|
$
|
356,000
|
(3)
|
Fiscal Year 2004
|
|
|
356,333
|
|
|
|
143,200
|
|
|
|
12,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2003
|
|
|
321,875
|
|
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
|
95,906
|
|
|
|
808,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ravi Brar,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President
of Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005
|
|
|
217,271
|
|
|
|
64,950
|
|
|
|
4,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2004
|
|
|
214,983
|
|
|
|
73,610
|
|
|
|
3,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2003
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
88,200
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael B. Hawn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President Customer Network
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005
|
|
|
216,500
|
|
|
|
64,950
|
|
|
|
7,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2004
|
|
|
215,146
|
|
|
|
73,069
|
|
|
|
7,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2003
|
|
|
212,700
|
|
|
|
82,981
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric E. Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President, General Manager
Service Provider Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005(5)
|
|
|
280,214
|
|
|
|
33,750
|
|
|
|
5,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2004(5)
|
|
|
228,066
|
|
|
|
38,214
|
|
|
|
4,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2003(5)
|
|
|
176,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd M. Putnam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Information Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005
|
|
|
200,417
|
|
|
|
65,929
|
|
|
|
3,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2004
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
59,940
|
|
|
|
35,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2003(6)
|
|
|
28,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All Other Compensation includes company 401K match, life
insurance, long-term disability insurance, club dues and auto
allowance. For fiscal year 2003, Other Annual Compensation
includes relocation costs of $84,622 and $6,213 for Mr.
Carabelli and Mr. Putnam, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Carabellis regular bonus includes the payment of a
retention bonus of $285,000 subject to withholding for income
and employment taxes. The retention bonus was intended to
approximate all taxes imposed on Mr. Carabelli as a result
of the filing of an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal
Revenue Code with respect to the Restricted Stock Awards noted
in the last column as well as the taxes imposed upon the
retention bonus. In the event that Mr. Carabelli voluntarily
terminates his employment with the Company or is terminated by
the Company for cause, he will be required to repay the
retention bonus, except that the repayment obligation will lapse
with respect to $95,000 of the retention bonus on each December
31 of 2006, 2007 and 2008. |
16
|
|
|
(3) |
|
In December 2005, the Company cancelled the prior performance
unit awards from 2003 and granted Mr. Carabelli 400,000
shares of restricted common stock pursuant to a Restricted Stock
Bonus Award Agreement under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The
$356,000 represented the closing market price of the
Companys common stock on the grant date of the 400,000
shares of restricted common stock. |
|
(4) |
|
In December 2003, Mr. Carabelli received a grant of performance
unit awards for 400,000 shares of common stock, which were
cancelled in 2005 as noted in (3) above. The $808,000
represented the closing market price of the Companys
common stock on the grant date of the performance unit awards.
These performance unit awards were canceled in connection with
the December 2005 grant of restricted stock described above. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Jacobs had sales commissions of $130,214, $73,632 and
$84,315 for the years ended 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Putnam joined the Company in October 2003. |
Stock
Incentive Plans
General
We have established the Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan, which authorizes the granting of stock options,
including restricted stock, SARS, dividend equivalent rights,
performance units, performance shares or other similar rights or
benefits to our or our subsidiaries current or future
employees, directors, consultants and advisors. Under the 1999
Stock Incentive Plan, our board of directors is authorized to
issue options to purchase shares of common stock in such
quantity, at such exercise prices, on such terms and subject to
such conditions as established by the board. In addition, we
have established the 1998 Griffin Non-Qualified Stock Incentive
Plan for Mr. Griffin, which authorizes the granting of
stock options, including restricted stock, SARS, dividend
equivalent rights, performance units, performance shares or
other similar rights or benefits to certain of our employees.
An aggregate of 7,601,750 shares of common stock are
currently reserved for option grants under the 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan and the 1998 Griffin Non-Qualified Stock
Incentive Plan. These plans are subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of certain events to prevent any dilution or
expansion of the rights of participants that might otherwise
result from the occurrence of such events. As of
December 31, 2005, we had granted options outstanding with
respect to 5,804,188 of our common shares. As of
December 31, 2005, 807,412 options have been exercised.
Stock
Options Granted to Named Executive Officers in 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Rates
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock Price
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Granted to
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Employees in
|
|
|
Base Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
for Option Term
|
|
Name
|
|
Granted (#)
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
5% ($)
|
|
|
10% ($)
|
|
|
Henry R. Carabelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ravi Brar
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
7/26/2015
|
|
|
|
63,676
|
|
|
|
161,366
|
|
Michael B. Hawn
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
7/26/2015
|
|
|
|
63,676
|
|
|
|
161,366
|
|
Eric Jacobs
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
7/26/2015
|
|
|
|
42,450
|
|
|
|
107,578
|
|
Todd M. Putman
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
7/26/2015
|
|
|
|
84,901
|
|
|
|
215,155
|
|
17
Outstanding
Stock Options and Year-End Values
The following table sets forth information regarding the number
and value of unexercised stock options held by each of our named
executive officers as of December 31, 2005. No named
executive officers exercised options in 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
|
Number of Unexercised
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
|
|
Options at Year End
|
|
|
Options at Year End
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Non-Exercisable
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Non-Exercisable
|
|
Henry R. Carabelli
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
59,500
|
|
|
$
|
23,500
|
|
H. Ravi Brar
|
|
|
236,500
|
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
$
|
54,225
|
|
|
$
|
16,875
|
|
Michael B. Hawn
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
57,750
|
|
|
$
|
11,250
|
|
Eric E. Jacobs
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,250
|
|
|
$
|
6,250
|
|
Todd M. Putnam
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The options referred to in the table above vest over a period of
one to four years and are exercisable to purchase shares of our
common stock in accordance with our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.
In addition, options issued to the above named executives become
fully vested upon a change in control.
Restricted
Stock Awards
In December 2005, we granted Mr. Carabelli
400,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to a
Restricted Stock Bonus Award Agreement under the 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan. In connection with this restricted stock grant,
we and Mr. Carabelli agreed to cancel a prior grant of
400,000 performance unit awards made in December 2003. Subject
to Mr. Carabellis continued employment, all shares of
restricted common stock will vest on June 30, 2009.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the agreement provides for
accelerated vesting of 200,000 shares in the event that the
monthly average fair market value of our common shares is
greater than or equal to $3.00 per common share for a
period of six consecutive calendar months commencing on or after
January 1, 2006. In addition, all shares will become
immediately vested immediately prior to certain corporate
transactions specified in the plan.
Qualified
401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan
We maintain a tax-qualified 401(k) retirement plan for all
full-time employees who are at least 18 years of age and
who have completed 90 days of service. The plan year is
from January 1 to December 31, and we contribute $0.50 for
every $1.00 contributed by the employee, subject to our
contribution not exceeding 3 percent of the employees
salary. Employees become fully vested after six years, although
they vest incrementally on an annual basis after two years of
service. Employees may elect to participate in the plan after
completing 90 days of service with us. Our matching
contributions vest at a rate 20% per year starting with the
employees second year of service. Although we have not
historically done so, we may also make discretionary
profit-sharing contributions to all employees who satisfy plan
participation requirements. Our matching contributions were
$407,000 and $451,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
We maintain an employee stock purchase plan known as the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to
provide our employees with an opportunity to purchase our common
shares through accumulated payroll deductions. Employees may
elect to participate in semi-annual offer periods, commencing
each January 1 and July 1. Employees are eligible to
participate in the plan after 30 days of service, provided,
however, that their customary employment is not 20 hours or
less per week, and not less than 5 months in any calendar
year. Subject to certain limitations, eligible employees may
elect to have payroll deductions made during the relevant offer
periods in amounts between one percent (1%) and not exceeding
ten percent (10%) of the employees compensation. The
maximum number of common shares available for sale under the
plan is 1,000,000 shares, subject to adjustments for
certain defined events. As of December 31, 2005, 510,996
common shares have been purchased pursuant to the plan.
18
Pension
Plans
We do not maintain a pension plan.
Employment-Related
Agreements
Employment
Agreements
On July 1, 2003, we entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Carabelli. Mr. Carabellis employment
agreement had an initial term of two years, which has been
extended by its terms to June 30, 2007. The employment
agreement provided for a base salary for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of $350,000, which was increased to
$358,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, and a bonus
based upon our achievement of certain objectives and subjective
criteria which will approximate 40% of his base salary. The
employment agreement also provides for participation in all
benefit plans made available to our executives, and may be
terminated earlier by us or Mr. Carabelli under certain
conditions.
Upon termination by us without cause or by Mr. Carabelli
for good reason, each as defined in the employment agreement,
Mr. Carabelli will be entitled to receive, subject to
certain conditions (1) severance payments equal to his base
salary for a one-year period after such termination;
(2) immediate vesting of all unvested stock options and
extension of the period of exercise of such options to the end
of the term of the grant; and (3) payment of all health
insurance premiums for him and his eligible dependents with
respect to his continuation coverage rights under the COBRA (or
a similar statute or regulation then in effect) for one-year
after termination or until he and his eligible dependents obtain
coverage through a subsequent employers plans or cease to
be eligible for COBRA.
If the employment period is terminated as a result of
disability, then Mr. Carabelli
and/or his
estate or beneficiaries, as the case may be, will be entitled to
receive benefits under our employee benefit programs as in
effect on the date of such termination to the extent permitted
under such programs. In addition, Mr. Carabelli will be
entitled to receive (1) his base salary for a period ending
on the earlier to occur at one year from such termination and
the end of his employment period; (2) immediate vesting of
all unvested stock options and extension of the period of
exercise of such options to the end of the term of the grant;
(3) COBRA payments; and (4) a prorated amount of any
annual bonus otherwise payable to him for the fiscal year in
which his employment is terminated.
If the employment period is terminated as a result of
Mr. Carabellis death, then he
and/or his
estate or beneficiaries, as the case may be, will be entitled to
receive (1) benefits under our employee benefit programs as
in effect on the date of such termination to the extent
permitted under such programs; (2) immediate vesting of all
unvested stock options and extension of the period of exercise
of such options to the end of the term of the grant; and
(3) a prorated amount of any annual bonus otherwise payable
to him for the fiscal year in which his employment is terminated.
In the event of a change of control (1) in which the
successor does not terminate Mr. Carabelli, but
Mr. Carabelli resigns, effective six months after the
effective date of the change of control or (2) in which
either the Company or the successor terminates
Mr. Carabelli without cause within the fifteen month period
beginning nine months prior to the effective date of the change
of control event and ending six months after such effective
date, Mr. Carabelli would be entitled to receive
(A) an amount equal to 150% times his annual base salary,
(B) immediate vesting of all unvested stock options
and/or
restricted stock and extension of the period of exercise of such
options
and/or
restricted stock to the end of the term of the grant; and
(C) COBRA payments.
19
On October 21, 2003, the Company and Mr. Griffin
entered into a separation agreement in connection with the
earlier than previously anticipated transition of
Mr. Griffins responsibilities as Chief Executive
Officer to Mr. Carabelli, which became effective
July 1, 2003. On July 1, 2003, Mr. Griffin
resigned as Chief Executive Officer, but continued on with us as
the chairman of our board of directors. The separation agreement
provided for, among other things, separation payments to
Mr. Griffin vesting of all unvested options previously
granted to Mr. Griffin, and prospective compensation of
Mr. Griffin as a director and chairman of our board of
directors
Change
of Control Agreements
We have entered into agreements with certain executives which
provide that in the event of a change of control if the
successor does not hire the named executive is demoted or is
terminated by the successor, without cause, within twelve months
following the effective date of the change of control event, the
named executive will be entitled to receive an amount equal to
1.5 times their annual base salary for one year following the
change of control event. The current executives with whom we
have entered into such an agreement are Messrs. Sumpter,
Brar, Hawn, Jacobs, Morrison, Putnam and Cox.
20
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
ownership of our common shares as of March 31, 2006 for:
(1) each person who we know owns beneficially more than 5%
of our outstanding common shares; (2) each of our current
directors and nominees, and executive officers; and (3) all
of our current directors, nominees for director, and executive
officers as a group.
Table of
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
|
Owned(2)
|
|
|
Significant
Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bay Alarm Securities LLC
|
|
|
3,570,688
|
(3)
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
925 Ygnacio Valley Road
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walnut Creek, CA
94596-8140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Blair Capital Partners VI,
L.P.
|
|
|
3,652,649
|
(4)
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
222 West Adams Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCP Private Equity Partners,
L.P.
|
|
|
3,652,649
|
(5)
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
435 Devon Park Drive, Building 300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne, PA 19087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discovery Group I, LLC
|
|
|
2,693,714
|
(6)
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
Hyatt Center,
71 S. Wacker Dr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace W. Griffin
|
|
|
1,617,994
|
(7)
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Henry R. Carabelli
|
|
|
946,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
David G. Chandler
|
|
|
3,652,649
|
(9)
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Jerry L. Johnson
|
|
|
73,929
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas A. Munro
|
|
|
25,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Samuel A. Plum
|
|
|
3,817,649
|
(12)
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
Timothy A. Samples
|
|
|
26,928
|
(13)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Frederick D. Lawrence
|
|
|
20,000
|
(14)
|
|
|
*
|
|
William H. Davidson
|
|
|
17,324
|
(15)
|
|
|
*
|
|
H. Ravi Brar
|
|
|
313,250
|
(16)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael B. Hawn
|
|
|
199,550
|
(17)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Eric E. Jacobs
|
|
|
58,750
|
(18)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Todd M. Putnam
|
|
|
88,400
|
(19)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of Pac-Wests
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
(18 Persons)
|
|
|
11,210,723
|
(20)
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the number of shares of common stock subject to options
exercisable within sixty (60) days of March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Shares of common stock exercisable within sixty (60) days
of March 31, 2006 are considered outstanding for the
purpose of determining the percent of the class held by the
holder of such options, but not for the purpose of computing the
percentage held by others. Percentages of less than one
(1) percent are denoted by an asterisk. |
|
(3) |
|
Based solely upon a Schedule 13G, dated February 14,
2006, filed jointly by Bay Alarm Securities LLC (Bay
Alarm) and the Westphal Family Foundation
(Westphal), Bay Alarm is the direct beneficial owner
of |
21
|
|
|
|
|
3,520,688 shares of common stock and Westphal is the direct
beneficial owner of 50,000 shares of common stock. |
|
(4) |
|
Based solely upon a Schedule 13G, dated February 15,
2006, filed jointly by William Blair Capital Partners VI, L.P.
(WB Partnership) and William Blair Capital Partners
VI, L.L.C. (WB LLC), WB Partnership is the direct
beneficial owner of 3,652,649 shares of common stock. WB
LLC, by virtue of it being the general partner of WB
Partnership, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the
shares of common stock owned by WB Partnership. WB LLC disclaims
beneficial ownership of the 3,652,649 shares of common
stock owned by WB Partnership. |
|
(5) |
|
Based solely upon a Schedule 13G, dated March 10,
2000, filed jointly by SCP Private Equity Partners, L.P.
(Equity Partners), SCP Private Equity Management,
L.P. (Equity Management), Winston J. Churchill
(Churchill), Samuel A. Plum (Plum), and
Safeguard Capital Management, Inc. (Capital
Management), Equity Partners is the direct beneficial
owner of 3,652,649 shares of common stock. Equity
Management, by virtue of it being the general partner of Equity
Partners, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares
of common stock owned by Equity Partners. In addition,
Churchill, Plum and Capital Management, by virtue of their being
general partners of Equity Management, may also be deemed to be
the beneficial owner of the shares of common stock owned by
Equity Partners. Each of Equity Management, Churchill, Plum and
Capital Management disclaims any direct or indirect beneficial
ownership of the 3,652,649 shares of common stock owned by
Equity Partners. |
|
(6) |
|
Based solely upon a Schedule 13G, dated February 7,
2006, filed jointly by Discovery Equity Partners, L.P.
(Discovery Partners) , Discovery Group I, LLC
(Discovery Group), Daniel J. Donoghue and Michael R.
Murphy. Discovery Partners is the direct beneficial owner of
2,303,744 shares of common stock. Discovery Group, by
virtue of it being the general partner of Discovery Partners,
may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of common
stock owned by Discovery Partners, and is the direct beneficial
owner of an additional 389,970 shares of common stock. In
addition, Messrs. Donoghue and Murphy, by virtue of their
being managing members of Discovery Group, may be deemed to be
the beneficial owners of the shares of common stock owned by
Discovery Group and Discovery Partners. |
|
(7) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by
Mr. Griffin include 243,100 shares of common stock
owned directly by Mr. Griffin, and 1,095,694 common shares
subject to vested options. In addition, Mr. Griffin, by
virtue of his being a general partner of Griffin Family Limited
Liability Partnership, L.L.P. (Griffin LLP), may be deemed to be
the beneficial owner of 280,000 common shares owned by Griffin
LLP. |
|
(8) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by
Mr. Carabelli include 471,000 common shares owned directly
by Mr. Carabelli, 400,000 of which are subject to certain
restrictions on transfer, and 475,000 common shares subject to
vested options. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr. Chandler, by virtue of his being a managing director of
WB LLC, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 3,652,649
common shares owned by WB Partnership. Mr. Chandler
expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares owned by
WB Partnership. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by
Mr. Johnson include 31,929 shares of common stock
owned directly by Mr. Johnson, and 42,000 common shares
subject to vested options. |
|
(11) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Munro
include 25,000 common shares subject to vested options. |
|
(12) |
|
The shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by
Mr. Plum include 165,000 common shares owned directly by
Mr. Plum. In addition, Mr. Plum, by virtue of his
being the managing general partner of SCP Private Equity
Partners, L.P. (Equity Partners) may be deemed to be
the beneficial owner of 3,652,649 shares owned by Equity
Partners. Mr. Plum expressly disclaims beneficial ownership
of the shares of common stock owned by Equity Partners. |
|
(13) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by
Mr. Samples include 25,428 shares of common stock
owned directly by Mr. Samples, and 1,500 common shares
subject to vested options. |
|
(14) |
|
All shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by
Mr. Lawrence are owned directly by Mr. Lawrence. |
22
|
|
|
(15) |
|
All shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by
Mr. Davidson are owned directly by Mr. Davidson. |
|
(16) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Brar
include 58,000 common shares owned directly by Mr. Brar,
and 255,250 common shares subject to vested options. |
|
(17) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Hawn
include 5,800 common shares owned directly by Mr. Hawn, and
193,750 common shares subject to vested options. |
|
(18) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Jacobs
include 58,750 common shares subject to vested options. |
|
(19) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Putnam
include 13,400 common shares owned directly by Mr. Putnam,
and 75,000 common shares subject to vested options. |
|
(20) |
|
The common shares shown as beneficially owned by all of
Pac-Wests directors and executive officers as a group
include the common shares beneficially owned by the directors
and the named executive officers described in footnotes 7
through 19 above. |
23
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Registration
Agreement
We completed a recapitalization of our Company in 1998 pursuant
to a merger agreement between us, Bay Alarm Company and John K.
La Rue, the preexisting investors, and PWT Acquisition
Corp., a corporation newly formed by an equity investment group
led by Safeguard 98 Capital, L.P. and William Blair Capital
Partners L.L.P.
In connection with the recapitalization, all of our shareholders
entered into a registration agreement. In accordance with the
registration agreement, at any time after May 7, 2000, each
of the four equity investors in the recapitalization may request
one registration at our expense under the Securities Act of all,
or any portion of, their Pac-West common shares on
Form S-1
or other similar long-form registration and an unlimited number
of
Form S-2
or S-3
or other similar short-form registrations, provided that the
aggregate offering value of the registrable securities requested
to be registered in any long-form registration must equal at
least $5.0 million in all long-form registrations and at
least $1.0 million in all short-form registrations. In the
event that any one of the four equity investors in the
recapitalization makes such a demand registration request, all
other parties to the registration agreement will be entitled to
participate in such registration. The registration agreement
also grants to the parties thereto piggyback registration rights
with respect to all other registrations of our common shares and
we, subject to limited exceptions, will pay all expenses related
to the piggyback registrations.
Non-Competition;
Non-Solicitation; Confidentiality Agreements
In connection with the recapitalization and as provided by the
terms of the merger agreement or their respective employment
agreements, as the case may be, Messrs. LaRue and Griffin
and Bay Alarm Company have also agreed to maintain the
confidentiality of our information and not to solicit our
employees and customers. These provisions remain in effect for
varying periods following the termination of the employment
agreements.
Other
Transactions with Significant Shareholders
Mr. Bruce A. Westphal, who served as our chairman of the
board until the recapitalization and as a director of the
Company until March 16, 2000, is the chairman of the board
of Bay Alarm Company, and until the sale of InReach Internet to
a third party in mid-2005, Mr. Westphal was chairman of the
board InReach Internet. As of March 31, 2006, an affiliate
of Bay Alarm Company beneficially owned approximately 9.6% of
our outstanding common shares. Sales to Bay Alarm Company and
InReach Internet LLC accounted for approximately $963,000,
$1,582,000 and $1,784,000, or approximately 1% of our revenues
for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003. As of March 11, 2005, Bay Alarm Company was among the
customers transferred to U.S. Telepacific Corp. in
connection with the sale of substantially all of our enterprise
customer base, however InReach remains a customer of the
Company. In addition, Bay Alarm Company provides us with
security monitoring services at its normal commercial rates, and
purchased the real property at which our Oakland switch facility
is located. In connection with that purchase, we negotiated a
lease with Bay Alarm Company for our continued use of that
commercial space. The monthly lease payments under the lease
were approximately $29,500 as of December 31, 2005.
24
PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
The following graph compares our cumulative total shareholder
return on an investment of $100 since December 31, 2000
with that of the Nasdaq Composite Index (Nasdaq CI)
and the Nasdaq Telecommunications Index (Nasdaq TI).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Pac-West
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Nasdaq CI
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
Nasdaq TI
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
PROPOSITION
2
APPROVAL OF (A) AN AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED
ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION GIVING EFFECT TO A REVERSE SPLIT OF OUR COMMON
SHARES
AND (B) ALL MINISTERIAL ACTIONS REQUIRED IN CONNECTION
WITH EFFECTING
SUCH REVERSE SHARE SPLIT.
Background
Our common shares are currently quoted on the Nasdaq Capital
Market. In order for our common shares to continue to be quoted
on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we must satisfy various listing
maintenance standards established by Nasdaq. Among other things,
we are required to have stockholders equity of at least
$2.5 million and our common shares held by persons other
than officers, directors and beneficial owners of greater than
10% of our total outstanding shares, often referred to as the
public float, must have an aggregate market value of at least
$1 million. Additionally, at least 300 persons must each
own at least 100 of our common shares and our common shares must
have a minimum bid price of at least $1.00 per share.
We are currently not in compliance with the Nasdaqs
minimum bid price requirement. To regain compliance with this
requirement, the minimum closing bid price of our common shares
must close at $1.00 or above per share for a period of 10
consecutive business days. On September 15, 2005, we
received a letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market notifying us that
the bid price of our common shares had closed below the minimum
bid price required for continued inclusion on the Nasdaq Capital
Market. The letter further notified us that we will be provided
180 calendar days to regain compliance with the minimum bid
price requirement. However, Nasdaq has the discretion to require
a period in excess of 10 business days before determining that
the ability to maintain long-term compliance has been
demonstrated. If we are unable to regain compliance with the
Nasdaqs minimum bid price requirement, but we otherwise
meet the applicable initial listing requirements, we may qualify
for an additional
180-day
compliance period. On March 15, 2006 we received a letter
from Nasdaq notifying us that we had been granted an additional
180 day compliance period. The bid price for our common
shares has not closed above $1.00 per share since
February 22, 2006.
If we do not regain compliance with Nasdaqs minimum bid
price requirement by September 11, 2006, we expect to
receive notification that our shares will be delisted from the
Nasdaq Capital Market. If a delisting were to occur, our common
shares may thereafter be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board
or in the pink sheets maintained by the National
Quotation Bureau, Inc. These alternatives are generally
considered to be less efficient and less broad-based than the
Nasdaq Capital Market.
In response to these notices, our board of directors considered,
and on April 26, 2006 recommended for shareholder approval,
an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation giving effect to a reverse split of our common
shares, the text of which amendment is set forth below. The
purpose of the reverse share split is to increase the market
price of our common shares above $2.00 per share, which is
above the Nasdaq minimum bid requirement of $1.00, in order to
maintain our listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
In connection with the reverse share split, you will receive one
common share in exchange for the number of common shares you
hold, determined in accordance with the formula below.
This formula is designed to calculate a ratio of shares to be
received in connection with the reverse share split that will
ensure that the market price of our common shares immediately
following the reverse share split will be at least
$2.00 per share. In particular, the formula provides that
the number of shares to be combined and exchanged into and for
one share is equal to the first whole number greater than the
result of (i) $2.00 divided by (ii) the average
closing sale price of our common shares, as reported by the
Nasdaq Stock Market over the five trading days immediately
preceding the effective date of the reverse share split during
which a sale transaction with respect to our common shares is
reported by such quotation service. For example, if during the
five trading days preceding the effective date of the reverse
stock split the average closing sale price of our common shares
is $0.95, then three (3) shares ($2.00/$0.95 = 2.11, for
which the first whole number greater than that number is three
(3)) of our issued and outstanding common shares would be
automatically combined and exchanged into and for one common
share.
26
Text of
the Proposed Amendment
If the shareholders and our board of directors approve the
amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
and we implement a reverse share split, we will file a
certificate of amendment of our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of
California, which will effect a reverse split of our common
shares then issued and outstanding using the formula described
above. The certificate of amendment would add the following new
Section 3 to Article III of our Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation:
Section 3. Reverse Share Split.
(a) Effective as of the date of filing of the amendment
giving effect to this Section 3 of Article III with
the office of the Secretary of State of the State of California
(the Split Effective Date), the number of issued and
outstanding common shares of the Corporation determined in
accordance with the formula in the immediately following
sentence are automatically combined and changed into one
(1) common share of the Corporation (the Reverse
Share Split). The number of issued and outstanding common
shares of the Corporation automatically combined and changed
into one (1) share of common stock of the Corporation in
accordance with the foregoing shall be equal to the first whole
number greater than the result of (i) $2.00 divided by
(ii) the average closing sale price of the
Corporations common shares, as reported by the Nasdaq
Stock Market (or such other nationally recognized quotation
service providing bid, offer and price quotation information
with respect to the Corporations common shares) over the
five trading days immediately preceding the Split Effective Date
during which a sale transaction with respect to the
Corporations common shares is reported by such quotation
service.
(b) The Reverse Share Split shall have no affect on the par
value of the common shares of the Corporation or on the number
of authorized common shares of the Corporation set forth in
Section 1 of this Article III. There shall be no
fractional common shares of the Corporation issued in connection
with the Reverse Share Split. In lieu of the issuance of
fractional shares, all fractional shares otherwise issuable to
the holders of record of common shares of the Corporation on the
Split Effective Date shall be aggregated by the
Corporations transfer agent, as agent for the accounts of
all such holders of record. The transfer agent shall effect the
sale of all of the fractional shares as soon as practicable on
or after the Split Effective Date in one or more transactions on
the basis of prevailing market prices for the common shares of
the Corporation as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market (or such
other nationally recognized quotation service providing bid,
offer and price quotation information with respect to the
Corporations common shares) at the time of such
transaction or transactions. A holder of record of common shares
of the Corporation on the Split Effective Date who would
otherwise be entitled to a fraction of a share shall, in lieu
thereof, be entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount
equal to (i) the fraction to which the holder would
otherwise be entitled multiplied by (ii) such holders
pro rata share of the aggregate net proceeds derived from the
sale of all of the fractional shares. The payment in lieu of a
fraction of a common share of the Corporation will be made upon
such other terms and conditions as the officers of the
Corporation, in their judgment, determine to be advisable and in
the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders.
This amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation must be approved by the affirmative vote of a
majority of our common shares issued, outstanding and entitled
to vote as of the record date.
Reasons
for the Reverse Share Split
Our board of directors recommends that shareholders approve the
amendment of our restated articles of incorporation giving
effect to the reverse share split because it believes that the
reverse share split is the most effective means of increasing
the per share market price of our common shares in order to
maintain its listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Our common
shares were quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market since
November 4, 1999, when we completed our initial public
offering, until May 28, 2002, when our common shares ceased
being quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market and began being quoted
on the Capital Market. We are currently not in compliance with
the Nasdaqs minimum bid price requirement. To regain
compliance with this requirement, the minimum closing bid price
of our shares must close at $1.00 or above per share for a
period of 10 consecutive business days. The bid price for our
common shares has not closed above $1.00 per share since
February 22, 2006. If we are unable
27
to regain compliance with the Nasdaqs minimum bid price
requirement, we expect to receive notification that our shares
will be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Our board of directors believes that delisting from the Nasdaq
Capital Market could adversely affect (i) the liquidity and
marketability of shares of our common shares; (ii) the
trading price of our common shares; and (iii) our
relationships with vendors and customers. Our board of directors
also believes that the Nasdaq Capital Market provides a broader
market for the common shares than would two of the principal
alternatives, the OTC Bulletin Board and the pink
sheets maintained by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc.,
and is, therefore, preferable to those alternatives. Our common
shares are currently quoted on the Nasdaq Capital Market under
the symbol PACW. During the period from
January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the closing
sales price per share of our common shares ranged from a high of
$1.64 to a low of $0.76. The closing sales price on
April , 2006 was
$ . Our board of directors believes
that a reverse share split will have the effect of increasing
the trading price of the common shares to a level high enough to
satisfy the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement for continued
listing of the common shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market
immediately following the reverse share split, and that a
reverse share split would be the most effective means available
to avoid a delisting of our common shares.
However, you should be aware that the effect of the reverse
share split upon the market price for our common shares cannot
be accurately predicted. In particular, there is no assurance
that the market price for our common shares will remain at or
above $2.00 for any period of time. Even if an increased share
price can be maintained, the reverse share split may not achieve
the desired results that have been outlined above. Moreover,
because some investors may view the reverse share split
negatively, there can be no assurance that the reverse share
split will not adversely impact the market price of the common
shares or, alternatively, that the market price following the
reverse share split will either exceed or remain in excess of
the current market price.
While we expect the reverse share split to be sufficient to
prevent Nasdaq from delisting our common shares, it is possible
that, even if the reverse share split results in a bid price for
our common shares that exceeds $1.00 per share, we may not
be able to continue to satisfy the additional criteria for
continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. These additional
criteria currently include, among other requirements,
maintaining (i) shareholders equity of at least
$2.5 million or have a market value of its listed
securities of $35 million or have net income from
continuing operations of $500,000, (ii) a public float of
500,000 shares of common shares, (iii) a market value
of the public float of at least $1 million, (iv) at
least 300 shareholders (round lot holders), (v) at
least two market makers for our common shares and
(vi) compliance with certain corporate governance
requirements. We believe that we satisfy all of these other
maintenance criteria as of April , 2006. There
can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in
continuing to meet all requisite maintenance criteria.
Board
Discretion to Implement Reverse Share Split
Under California law, an amendment to our articles of
incorporation requires the approval of the board of directors
and the shareholders entitled to vote in connection with such
matters. The approval of the board of directors may occur either
before or after the approval of the shareholders. Although our
board of directors recommended and approved of submitting the
amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
giving effect to a reverse split of our common shares to a vote
of our shareholders entitled to vote on such matters, the board
of directors has not approved such amendment at this time. Our
board of directors may adopt and approve the amendment to our
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation giving effect to
the reverse split of our common shares at any time it deems
appropriate. Our board of directors will also retain the
authority to decline to adopt and approve the amendment of our
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation or decline to
implement the reverse share split following approval by both the
shareholders and the board of directors if it determines that
the reverse share split is no longer in the best interests of
the Company or its shareholders. The actual timing of
implementation of the reverse share split would be determined by
our board of directors based upon its evaluation as to when such
action would be most advantageous to us and our stockholders;
provided, however, that if the board of directors does not
approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation giving effect to the reverse split of our common
shares or, if the board of directors approves such amendment but
such amendment is not filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of California on or before December 31, 2006, further
shareholder approval will be sought before implementing a
reverse share split.
28
Our board of directors consideration of the amendment to
our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation may be based
upon a variety of factors, including, without limitation, our
ability to meet the listing requirements for the Nasdaq Capital
Market, existing and expected marketability and liquidity of our
common shares, prevailing market conditions and the likely
effect on the market price of the common shares.
Effect of
the Reverse Share Split on Registration and Voting
Rights
Our common shares are currently registered under
Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, and we are subject to
the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange
Act. The reverse share split would not affect the registration
of our common shares under the Exchange Act. After the reverse
share split, the common shares would continue to be reported on
the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol PACW
(although we expect that the Nasdaq Stock Market will likely add
the letter D to the end of the trading symbol, and
the word new to the end of the name of our common
shares, for a period of 20 trading days to indicate that the
reverse share split has occurred).
Proportionate voting rights and other rights of the holders of
common shares would not be affected by the reverse share split
(other than as a result of the payment of cash in lieu of
fractional shares as described below). For example, a holder of
2% of the voting power of the outstanding common shares
immediately prior to the effective time of the reverse share
split would continue to hold 2% of the voting power of the
outstanding common shares after the reverse share split.
Although the reverse share split would not affect the rights of
shareholders or any shareholders proportionate equity
interest in the Company (subject to the treatment of fractional
shares), as described below the number of authorized common
shares would not be reduced and would increase significantly the
number of authorized and unissued shares our board of directors
is empowered to issue without further shareholder action. The
number of shareholders of record would not be affected by the
reverse share split (except to the extent that any stockholder
holds only a fractional share interest and receives cash for
such interest after the reverse share split in accordance with
the procedures described below).
Effect of
the Reverse Share Split on the Authorized But Unissued Common
Shares
As a result of the decrease in the number of outstanding common
shares resulting from the reverse share split, the number of
authorized but unissued common shares available for future
issuance will be increased significantly immediately following
the reverse share split. For example, based on the 37,211,030
common shares outstanding on March 31, 2006, and the
100,000,000 common shares that are currently authorized under
our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, we currently
have available for future issuance 62,788,970 authorized but
unissued common shares. However, assuming that the market price
for our common shares averaged $0.95 over the five trading days
preceding the effective date of the reverse stock split and, as
described above, we therefore complete a reverse share split
using a
one-for-three
ratio, the number of outstanding common shares would be
decreased to approximately 12,404,676 immediately following the
reverse share split. As a result, the number of authorized but
unissued common shares available for future issuance would
increase from 62,788,970 to 87,595,324 immediately following the
reverse share split. You should be aware that this example is
for demonstration purposes only. The actual number of shares to
be split into one share may differ from the example.
The issuance in the future of such additional authorized shares
may have the effect of diluting the earnings per share and book
value per share, as well as the shares ownership and voting
rights, of the currently outstanding common shares. The
effective increase in the number of authorized but unissued
common shares may be construed as having an anti-takeover effect
by permitting the issuance of shares to purchasers who might
oppose a hostile takeover bid or oppose any efforts to amend or
repeal certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation or Amended and Restated Bylaws. Such a use of
these additional authorized shares could render more difficult,
or discourage, an attempt to acquire control of us through a
transaction opposed by our board of directors. We do not have
any current plans, proposals or arrangements that would involve
the issuance of the additional shares (other than existing stock
and option plans).
29
The table set forth below provides examples of the anticipated
effect that the market price of our common shares and the
resulting reverse share split ratio could have on the number of
outstanding and authorized but unissued common shares. You
should be aware that these examples are for demonstration
purposes only. The actual number of shares to be split into one
share may differ from the examples.
Table of
Outcomes
Shares Outstanding and Authorized but Unissued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Market Price for our
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Ratio of Shares Subject to
Reverse Share Split
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
($1.00)
|
|
|
($0.75)
|
|
|
($0.50)
|
|
|
($0.25)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1 for 2
|
|
|
1 for 3
|
|
|
1 for 4
|
|
|
1 for 8
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized But Unissued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Authorized
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
The par value of our common shares would remain $0.001 per
share following the reverse share split, while the number of
common shares issued and outstanding would be reduced as
described above.
Effect of
the Reverse Share Split on Stock Options, Rights and Restricted
Stock
As described above, we have established the Pac-West Telecomm,
Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, which authorizes the granting of
stock options, restricted stock, SARS, dividend equivalent
rights, performance units, performance shares or other similar
rights or benefits to our or our subsidiaries current or
future employees, directors, consultants and advisors. Under the
1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the plan administrator, which is the
compensation committee of our board of directors, is authorized
to issue awards in such quantity, at such exercise prices, on
such terms and subject to such conditions as established by our
board of directors, subject to the limitations of the plan. In
addition, we have established the 1998 Griffin Non-Qualified
Stock Incentive Plan, which authorizes the granting of stock
options to Mr. Griffin.
An aggregate of 7,601,750 common shares are currently reserved
for grants under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1998
Griffin Non-Qualified Stock Incentive Plan. Total grants under
these plans as of December 31, 2005 include
400,000 shares of restricted stock, and options outstanding
with respect to 5,854,188 common shares.
In accordance with the terms of each of our plans, the
administrator of our plans, which is the compensation committee
of our board of directors, has the authority to adjust, among
other terms, the number of shares covered by each outstanding
grant, the number of common shares authorized for issuance under
the plans and the exercise price of grants under the plan in
connection with certain changes in our capitalization, including
reverse share splits. Our compensation committee will authorize
an adjustment to each of these terms in proportion to ratio used
to effect the reverse share split. In addition, the number of
common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock
options and the number of common shares available for issuance
upon exercise of stock options that have not yet been granted
will be rounded to the nearest whole share and no cash payment
will be made in respect of the rounding of shares issuable upon
the exercise of outstanding stock options.
30
The table set forth below provides examples of the anticipated
effect that the market price of our common shares and the
resulting reverse share split ratio could have on the number of
our common shares subject to outstanding options and the number
of our common shares reserved for issuance under our plans. You
should be aware that these examples are for demonstration
purposes only. The actual number of shares to be split into one
share may differ from the examples and the number of our common
shares subject to outstanding options and reserved for issuance
under our plans following the reverse share split may differ
based upon such difference as well as the number of shares
subject to outstanding options that are rounded as described
more fully below.
Table of
Outcomes
Shares Subject to Outstanding Options and Reserved for
Issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Market Price for our
Common Shares and Ratio of Shares Subject to Reverse Share
Split
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
($1.00)
|
|
|
($0.75)
|
|
|
($0.50)
|
|
|
($0.25)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1 for 2
|
|
|
1 for 3
|
|
|
1 for 4
|
|
|
1 for 8
|
|
|
Shares Subject to Outstanding
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Reserved for Issuance
under Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares under Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective
Date
If the proposed amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation giving effect to the reverse share split is
approved at the annual meeting and our board of directors
subsequently approves the amendment to our Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation and elects to implement the reverse
share split, the reverse share split would become effective upon
filing of the certificate of amendment of our Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State
of the State of California. On the effective date of the reverse
share split, common shares issued and outstanding immediately
prior thereto will be, automatically and without any action on
the part of the shareholders, combined and converted into new
common shares in accordance with the reverse share split ratio
determined by our board of directors.
Exchange
of Share Certificates
Shortly after the effective date of the reverse share split, if
any, each holder of an outstanding certificate theretofore
representing common shares will receive from American Stock
Transfer, as our exchange agent for the reverse share split,
instructions for the surrender of such certificate to the
exchange agent. Such instructions will include a form of
Transmittal Letter to be completed and returned to the exchange
agent. As soon as practicable after the surrender to the
exchange agent of any certificate that prior to the reverse
share split represented common shares, together with a duly
executed Transmittal Letter and any other documents the exchange
agent may specify, the exchange agent shall deliver to the
person in whose name such certificate had been issued
certificates registered in the name of such person representing
the number of full common shares into which the common shares
previously represented by the surrendered certificate shall have
been reclassified. In addition, following the aggregation and
sale of fractional shares described below, the exchange agent
will deliver to our shareholders a check for any amounts to be
paid in consideration for fractional shares sold. Until
surrendered as contemplated herein, each certificate that
immediately prior to the reverse share split represented any
common shares shall be deemed at and after the reverse share
split to represent the number of full common shares contemplated
by the preceding sentence. Each certificate representing common
shares issued in connection with the reverse share split will
continue to bear any legends restricting the transfer of such
shares that were borne by the surrendered certificates
representing the common shares.
No service charges, brokerage commissions or transfer taxes
shall be payable by any holder of any certificate that prior to
approval of the reverse share split represented any common
shares, except that if any certificates for common shares are to
be issued in a name other than that in which the certificates
for common shares surrendered are registered, it shall be a
condition of such issuance that (i) the person requesting
such issuance shall pay to us any transfer taxes payable by
reason thereof (or prior to transfer of such certificate, if
any) or establish to our satisfaction
31
that such taxes have been paid or are not payable,
(ii) such transfer shall comply with all applicable federal
and state securities laws, and (iii) such surrendered
certificate shall be properly endorsed and otherwise be in
proper form for transfer.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under California law, our shareholders would not be entitled to
dissenters or appraisal rights with respect to the reverse
share split.
Effect on
Fractional Shares
Shareholders will not receive fractional shares in connection
with the reverse share split. Instead, our exchange agent or
other third party will aggregate all fractional shares held by
Pac-West shareholders into whole shares and arrange for them to
be sold as soon as practicable after the effective date of the
reverse share split at the then prevailing prices on the open
market. We expect that the sale will be conducted over a period
of several days to sell all of the aggregated fractional shares
of common stock. After the sale is completed, shareholders will
receive a cash payment in lieu thereof in an amount equal to the
shareholders pro rata share, if any, of the total net
proceeds of these sales. No transaction costs will be assessed
on these sales, and shareholders will not be entitled to receive
interest for the period of time between the effective date of
the reserve share split and the date the shareholder receives
this cash payment. The proceeds from the sale of any fractional
shares will be subject to certain taxes as described below.
If you do not hold a sufficient number of common shares to
receive at least one share of Pac-West common stock after the
reverse share split you will receive only cash in exchange for
your fractional shares in accordance with the procedure
described above and you will no longer hold any shares of
Pac-West common stock as of the effective time of the reverse
share split.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of certain material United States
federal income tax consequences of the reverse share split, does
not purport to be a complete discussion of all of the possible
federal income tax consequences of the reverse share split and
is included for general information only. Further, it does not
address any state, local or foreign income tax consequences or
consequences under estate, gift or other tax laws. Also, it does
not address the tax consequences to holders that are subject to
special tax rules, such as banks, insurance companies, regulated
investment companies, personal holding companies, foreign
entities, nonresident alien individuals, broker-dealers and
tax-exempt entities. The discussion is based on the provisions
of the United States federal income tax law as of the date
hereof, which is subject to change retroactively as well as
prospectively. This summary also assumes that the pre-reverse
share split shares were, and the post-reverse share split shares
will be, held as a capital asset, as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (i.e., generally,
property held for investment).
Because the tax treatment of a shareholder will vary depending
upon the particular facts and circumstances of such shareholder,
each shareholder is urged to consult with such
shareholders own tax advisor with respect to the tax
consequences of the reverse share split. As used herein, the
term United States holder means a shareholder that is, for
federal income tax purposes: a citizen or resident of the United
States; a corporation or other entity taxed as a corporation
created or organized in or under the laws of the United States,
any State of the United States or the District of Columbia; an
estate the income of which is subject to federal income tax
regardless of its source; or a trust if a U.S. court is
able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of
the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
In general, the federal income tax consequences of the reverse
share split will vary among shareholders depending upon whether
they receive cash for fractional shares or solely a reduced
number of common shares in exchange for their old common shares.
We believe that because the reverse share split is not part of a
plan to increase periodically a shareholders proportionate
interest in our assets or earnings and profits, the reverse
share split will likely have the following federal income tax
effects: a shareholder who receives solely a reduced number of
common shares will not recognize gain or loss. In the aggregate,
such a shareholders basis in the reduced number of common
shares will equal the shareholders basis in its old common
shares. A shareholder who receives a cash
32
payment for fractional shares as a result of the reverse share
split will generally recognize gain or loss based on their
adjusted basis in the fraction share interests sold. The gain or
loss will constitute a capital gain or loss and will constitute
long-term capital gain or loss if the holders holding
period is greater than one year as of the effective date. In the
aggregate, such a shareholders basis in the reduced number
of common shares will equal the shareholders basis in its
old common shares decreased by the basis allocated to the
fractional share for which such shareholder is entitled to
receive cash, and the holding period of the post-reverse share
split shares received will include the holding period of the
pre-reverse share split shares exchanged.
We will not recognize any gain or loss as a result of the
reverse share split.
Our view regarding the tax consequences of the reverse share
split is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the
courts. ACCORDINGLY, EACH SHAREHOLDER SHOULD CONSULT WITH HIS OR
HER OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO ALL OF THE POTENTIAL TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO HIM OR HER OF THE REVERSE SHARE SPLIT.
Board
Recommendation
Our board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR the approval of (a) an amendment to
our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation giving effect
to a reverse split of our common shares and (b) all
ministerial actions required in connection with effecting such
reverse share split.
33
PROPOSITION
3
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF THE COMPANY AUTHORIZING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
TO ESTABLISH THE SIZE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TO
IMPLEMENT A CLASSIFIED BOARD STRUCTURE
Background
Currently, under the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws,
the size of the board of directors is fixed at nine
(9) directors. In addition, our Amended and Restated Bylaws
provide that if and when we are qualified as a
listed company within the meaning of
Section 301.5 of the California Corporation Code, within
10 days after such date the persons then serving as
directors shall divide themselves into three (3) classes,
and the election of directors of each class shall be staggered
such that the directors of one class are elected at each annual
meeting and serve three year terms. A listed company
under the California Corporations Code is one whose shares are
listed on the New York Stock Exchange or American Stock
Exchange, or quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market System. On
April 26, 2006, the board of directors approved resolutions
amending our Amended and Restated Bylaws to (i) authorize
our board of directors to establish the size of the board of
directors; provided that the board of directors shall consist of
not less than seven (7) nor more than nine (9) persons
and (ii) authorize our board to divide itself into either
two or three classes if and when we are qualified as a listed
company under California law; such classes to serve staggered
terms of two or three years as determined in advance by
resolutions of the board. Both of these proposed amendments to
our Amended and Restated Bylaws must be approved by the
affirmative vote of a majority of our common shares issued,
outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date.
Reasons
for Amendments
The board of directors believes that these proposed amendments
to our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide the Company with
valuable flexibility in establishing a board of directors that
is able to effectively fulfill its oversight and advisory roles.
Authorizing the board to establish the size of the board of
directors will allow the board to establish a board of directors
that effectively serves the interests of our shareholders from
time to time and is consistent with evolving best practices at
other publicly traded companies. The highly technical and
heavily regulated environment in which our business operates
demands that our board members possess a specialized base of
knowledge and expertise to enable them to carry out their
advisory and oversight functions. In addition, recent
legislative and administrative developments with respect to
corporate governance have significantly affected the composition
and operation of public company boards of directors. Our board
of directors requires the flexibility to establish a board of
directors of appropriate size to deal with these challenges and
serve the best interests of our shareholders.
Further, our board believes that a classified board of directors
promotes continuity and stability in the management of the
business and affairs of the Company and encourages persons
considering unsolicited, unilateral takeover actions to
negotiate with the target companys board of directors
rather than pursue a non-negotiated takeover attempt. Our board
believes that these outcomes are in the best interests of our
shareholders. Because of this belief, our Amended and Restated
Bylaws currently provide for classification of the board if and
when we are qualified as a listed company, but because our
Amended and Restated Bylaws currently fix the size of the board
at nine (9) members, the number of classes of directors is
fixed at three (3) to allow for an equal number of
directors in each class. If the shareholders authorize our board
to reduce the size of the board pursuant to this
Proposition 3, our board may thereafter require the
authority to divide the directors into either two or three
classes. This proposed amendment provides the board with such
authority.
34
Board
Authorization to Establish Number of Directors
Currently, our Amended and Restated Bylaws fix the size of our
board of directors at nine (9) members. The proposed
amendment would instead establish a permissible range for the
size of our board between seven (7) and nine
(9) members inclusive, and would authorize our board to
establish the size of the board of directors within that range.
If shareholders approve this amendment of our Amended and
Restated Bylaws, our board may by resolution at any time
thereafter, and without further approval of our shareholders,
establish the size of the board of directors at any size between
seven (7) and nine (9) members, or it may determine to
leave the board at its current size of nine (9).
Board
Authorization to Determine Number of Classes of
Directors.
Our board of directors consists of a single class of directors,
each of whom stands for election at each annual meeting of
shareholders. Our Amended and Restated Bylaws currently provide
that if and when we are qualified as a listed company within the
meaning of Section 301.5 of the California Corporations
Code, within 10 days following such date our board will be
divided into three classes of three (3) members each, with
each class serving staggered three year terms. As described in
greater detail above under Proposition
1 Election of Directors, the transfer of
our common shares from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq
Capital Market on May 28, 2002 resulted in us no longer
qualifying as a listed company under the California Corporations
Code. This in turn resulted in our classified board of directors
being restructured by law into a single class of directors. If
and when we meet the qualifications for listing on the Nasdaq
Global Market, which among other things requires the minimum bid
price of our common shares be over $5.00 for inclusion, then to
remain over $1.00 for continued listing, and our common shares
begin trading on the Nasdaq Global Market, we expect to again
qualify as a listed company under California law and our board
will again have the authority under our Amended and Restated
Bylaws to implement a classified board structure. There can be
no assurances that we will again qualify as a listed company
under California law.
Text of
the Proposed Amendments
If shareholders approve Proposition 3, Sections 3.02
and 3.03 of our Amended and Restated Bylaws will be amended and
replaced in their entirety and made legally consistent with one
another in the context of various board sizes to read as follows:
3.02 NUMBER AND QUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
The authorized number of directors of the corporation shall be
nine (9) unless changed by resolution of the board of
directors in accordance with the succeeding sentence. Following
the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, the board of directors
(acting alone and without the requirement of approval by the
shareholders or the outstanding shares) shall have the authority
to establish the size of the board of directors from time to
time by resolution of the board of directors; provided that the
board of directors shall be composed of not less than seven
(7) nor more than nine (9) persons. No reduction of
the authorized number of directors shall have the effect of
involuntarily removing any director before that directors
term of office expires. All directors of the corporation shall
be natural persons, but need not be residents of California or
shareholders of the corporation. At all times the board of
directors shall include a number of independent directors
sufficient to satisfy the then applicable requirements of
federal law or regulation, any exchange on which securities of
the corporation are listed and applicable California law or
regulation.
35
3.03 ELECTION AND TERM OF OFFICE OF DIRECTORS
Until the Corporation becomes a listed Corporation within the
meaning of Section 301.5 of the California Corporations
Code, at each annual meeting of shareholders, directors shall be
elected to hold office until the next annual meeting. Within ten
(10) days following the effective date of the Corporation
becoming a listed Corporation within the meaning of
Section 301.5 of the California Corporations Code, the
persons then serving as directors shall cast lots or otherwise
agree to divide themselves into two or three classes which shall
serve staggered terms of two or three years as determined in
advance by resolution of the board of directors; provided that
the number of directors in each class and the length of their
terms shall comply with applicable limitations set forth from
time to time in the California Corporations Code. Thereafter,
their replacements shall serve staggered terms. Each director,
including a director appointed to fill a vacancy, shall hold
office until the expiration of the term for which elected or
appointed and until a successor has been elected or appointed
and qualified, except in the case of the death, removal, or
resignation of such director.
Board
Recommendation
Our board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR the approval of the amendments to our
Amended and Restated Bylaws authorizing the board of directors
to establish the size of the board and, if and when permitted by
California law, to divide the board into either two or three
classes.
36
SECTION 16(a)
OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, as amended, requires our
executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than
ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to
file certain reports of ownership and changes in ownership with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Stock
Market, as required. These persons are required to furnish us
with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received
by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons
that Forms 5 were not required for those persons, we
believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005, our executive officers, directors and greater than ten
percent beneficial owners complied with all applicable
Section 16(a) filing requirements.
ANNUAL
REPORT
Copies of our 2005 Annual Report are being mailed with this
Proxy Statement to each shareholder entitled to vote at the
annual meeting of shareholders. Shareholders not receiving a
copy of the Annual Report may obtain one by writing
Mr. Reid Cox, Vice President Business Development and
Investor Relations, Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.,
1776 W. March Lane, Suite 250, Stockton,
California 95207, or by contacting Mr. Cox by
e-mail at
rcox@pacwest.com or by telephone at
(209) 926-3417.
SUBMISSION
OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
FOR THE 2007 ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholder proposals for inclusion in the Proxy Statement to be
issued in connection with the 2007 annual meeting of
shareholders must be mailed to the Corporate Secretary, Pac-West
Telecomm, Inc., 1776 W. March Lane, Suite 250,
Stockton, California 95207, and must have been received by the
Corporate Secretary on or before January 3, 2007. For any
proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in the 2007 annual
meeting Proxy Statement, but is instead sought to be presented
directly at the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, such
proposal must be received by the Corporate Secretary at our
principal executive offices at the address above not earlier
than February 4, 2007 nor later than February 24,
2007. We will consider only proposals meeting the requirements
of applicable federal securities laws and SEC rules promulgated
thereunder.
The Board of Directors
April , 2006
37
APPENDIX A
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC.
1. Purpose. The Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors (the Committee) is designated
by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the
Board) to assist the Board generally in its
oversight of:
|
|
|
|
|
the integrity of the Corporations financial reporting
process and systems of internal controls regarding finance,
accounting and legal compliance;
|
|
|
|
the independence and performance of the Corporations
independent auditors and the performance of the
Corporations internal audit function;
|
|
|
|
the hiring and firing of the Corporations auditor and any
non-audit work performed by the Corporations
auditor; and
|
|
|
|
the Corporations legal compliance and ethics policies and
procedures, including the Corporations Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics (the Code).
|
In addition, the Committee is responsible for providing an
avenue of communication among the independent auditors,
management of the Corporation and the Board and the preparation
of the report of audit committee required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Commission) to be included
in the Corporations annual proxy statement. The Committee
shall also serve as a qualified legal compliance committee
(QLCC) within the meaning of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the
Commission promulgated thereunder (the Exchange Act).
The Committee has the authority to conduct any investigation
appropriate to fulfill its responsibilities, and, in connection
therewith, it may contact the independent auditors, internal
auditors or management of the Corporation. In addition, the
Committee has the authority to retain, at the Corporations
expense, special legal, accounting or other advisors or experts
it deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the
performance of its duties.
2. Membership. The Committee shall
consist of at least three members, including a Chairperson (the
Chairperson), comprised solely of
independent directors as defined by the Nasdaq Stock
Markets listing standards, Section 10A(m)(3) of the
Exchange Act. The members of the Committee shall be appointed by
the Board upon the recommendation of the Nominating Committee
members and shall serve one-year terms unless removed (with or
without cause at any time) or reappointed by the Board. Each
member of the Committee shall be financially literate and at
least one member of the Committee must have the requisite
accounting or related financial management experience and
expertise to qualify as an audit committee financial
expert as defined by the Commission. All vacancies on the
Committee shall be filled by the Board. The Board shall
designate one of the members as Chairperson.
3. Meetings. The Committee shall
meet at least quarterly and as often as it determines
appropriate to carry out its obligations under this Charter. The
Committee shall meet periodically (but not less than annually)
with management, the internal auditors and the
Corporations independent auditors in separate executive
sessions. The Committee may request any officer or employee of
the Corporation or the Corporations outside counsel or
independent auditors to attend a Committee meeting or to meet
with any members of, or consultants to, the Committee. Meetings
of the Committee may be held in person or by telephone.
The Committee shall keep a separate book of minutes of their
proceedings and actions. All meetings shall be at the call of
the Chairperson. The Committee shall elect a Secretary to the
Committee who shall give notice personally or by mail,
telephone, facsimile or electronically to each member of the
Committee of all meetings, not later than 12 noon of the day
before the meeting, unless all of the members of the Committee
in office waive notice thereof in writing at or before the
meeting, in which case the meeting may be held without the
aforesaid advance notice. A majority of the members of the
Committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business.
A-1
4. Authority and
Responsibilities. In addition to any other
responsibilities which may be assigned from time to time by the
Board, the Committee is responsible for and has authority to
conduct the following matters:
Retention
of Advisors
(a) The Committee shall have the authority, to the extent
it deems necessary or appropriate, to retain independent legal,
accounting or other advisors. The Corporation shall provide for
appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for payment
of compensation to the independent auditors for the purpose of
rendering or issuing an audit report and to any advisors
employed by the Committee.
Independent
Auditors
(b) The Committee shall have sole authority to retain and
terminate the Corporations independent auditors and to
propose the independent auditors for ratification by the
shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
(c) The Committee shall approve the fees and terms of all
audit engagements and shall pre-approve all auditing services
and permitted non-audit services to be performed for the
Corporation by the independent auditors (subject to
de minimus exceptions described in
Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act that are approved
by the Committee prior to completion of the audit). The
Committee shall establish policies and procedures for such
approval and pre-approval. The Committee may, from time to time,
delegate its authority to pre-approve non-audit services on a
preliminary basis to one or more Committee members, provided
that such designees present any such approvals to the full
Committee at the next Committee meeting. The Committee may
consult with management regarding these matters but may not
delegate this authority to management.
(d) The Committee shall review and approve the scope and
staffing of the independent auditors annual audit plan.
(e) The Committee shall evaluate the independent
auditors qualifications, performance and independence, and
shall present its conclusions and recommendations with respect
to the independent auditors to the full Board at least annually.
As part of such evaluation, at least annually, the Committee
shall:
i. obtain and review a report or reports from the
Corporations independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
|
describing the independent auditors internal
quality-control procedures;
|
|
|
|
describing any material issues raised by (1) the most
recent internal quality-control review or peer review of the
auditing firm, or (2) any inquiry or investigation by
governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding
five years, regarding one or more independent audits carried out
by the auditing firm; and any steps taken to deal with any such
issues;
|
|
|
|
describing all relationships between the independent auditors
and the Corporation; and
|
|
|
|
assuring that Section 10A of the Exchange Act has not been
implicated;
|
ii. review and evaluate the senior members of the
independent auditor team(s), particularly the lead audit and
review partners;
iii. consider whether the lead audit or review partner
should be rotated more frequently than is required by law, so as
to assure continuing auditor independence;
iv. consider whether the independent auditors should be
rotated, so as to assure continuing auditor independence;
v. actively engage in a dialogue with the independent
auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services
that may impact the auditors objectivity and independence;
vi. recommend that the Board take appropriate action in
response to the independent auditors report to satisfy
itself of the auditors independence; and
vii. obtain the opinion of management and the internal
auditors of the independent auditors performance.
A-2
(f) The Committee shall establish policies for the
Corporations hiring of current or former employees of the
independent auditors.
Financial
Statements, Disclosure and other Compliance Matters
(g) Prior to the filing of the Corporations Annual
Reports on
Form 10-K,
the Committee shall review and discuss the audited financial
statements, including the Corporations disclosures under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations with management, the
internal auditors and the independent auditors.
(h) Prior to the filing of the Corporations Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q,
the Committee shall review and discuss the Corporations
quarterly financial statements with management, the internal
auditors and the independent auditors.
(i) Prior to filing a report of the independent auditors
with the Commission, the Committee shall discuss with the
independent auditors:
i. all critical accounting policies and practices to be
used;
ii. all alternative treatments of financial information
within generally accepted accounting principals that have been
discussed with management, ramifications of the use of such
alternative treatments, and the treatment preferred by the
independent auditor;
iii. other material written communications between the
independent auditors and management; and
(iv) all matters required to be discussed with the
Committee by the independent auditors pursuant to Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61.
(j) The Committee shall review, in conjunction with
management, the Corporations policies with respect to the
Corporations earnings press releases and all financial
information, such as earnings guidance, provided to analysts and
rating agencies, including the types of information to be
disclosed and the types of presentation to be made and paying
particular attention to the use of pro forma or
adjusted non-GAAP information.
(k) The Committee shall, in conjunction with the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, review the Corporations internal controls and
disclosure controls and procedures, including whether there are
any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of such
controls and procedures, any corrective actions taken with
regard to such deficiencies and weaknesses and any fraud
involving management or other employees with a significant role
in such controls and procedures.
(l) The Committee shall review the Corporations
policies and practices with respect to risk assessment and risk
management, including discussing with management the
Corporations major financial risk exposures and the steps
that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures.
(m) The Committee shall establish procedures for:
ii. the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints
received by the Corporation regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters; and
iii. the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of
the Corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or
auditing matters.
(n) The Committee shall review any significant complaints
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing
matters received pursuant to such procedures.
(o) The Committee shall prepare the audit committee report
that Commission rules require to be included in the
Corporations annual proxy statement.
(p) The Committee shall meet privately (without members of
management present) and separately with each of the internal
auditors and the independent auditors, at least annually.
A-3
Legal
Compliance and Ethics Oversight
(q) The Committee shall advise the Board with respect to
the Corporations Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the
Code of Conduct), and annually review and assess the
adequacy of the Code of Conduct and recommend any proposed
changes to the Board. In connection with this review and
assessment, the Committee shall discuss with management, the
Corporations independent auditor and General Counsel the
Corporations procedures for monitoring compliance with the
Code of Conduct.
(r) The Committee shall be responsible for receiving,
addressing and responding to alleged violations of the Code of
Conduct and other policies of the Corporation and complaints
involving the Corporations accounting, auditing and
internal auditing controls and disclosure practices.
(s) The Committee shall establish procedures for receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints received by the Committee
alleging violations of the Code of Conduct and other policies of
the Corporation or involving the Corporations accounting,
auditing and internal auditing controls and disclosure practices.
(t) The Committee shall serve as a QLCC, which will be
responsible for, among other things:
iv. receiving reports by the Corporations attorneys
of evidence of a material violation of the securities laws or
breach of fiduciary duty or similar violations by the
Corporation or its agents (a Reported Violation);
v. conducting any necessary inquiry into Reported
Violations;
vi. requiring the Corporation to adopt appropriate remedial
measures to prevent an ongoing, or alleviate a past Reported
Violation, and providing the Board, the Chief Executive Officer
and the General Counsel notice of such remedial
measures; and
vii. notifying the Commission of the Reported Violation if
it decides, by a majority vote, that the Corporation has failed
to take any remedial measure that the QLCC has imposed upon the
Corporation.
Reporting
to the Board
(u) The Committee shall report to the Board periodically.
This report shall include a review of any issues that arise with
respect to the quality or integrity of the Corporations
financial statements, the Corporations compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications,
independence and performance of the Corporations
independent auditors, the performance of the internal audit
function, compliance by the Corporation with legal and
regulatory requirements and any other matters that the Committee
deems appropriate or is requested to be included by the Board.
(v) At least annually, the Committee shall evaluate its own
performance and report to the Board on such evaluation.
(w) The Committee shall periodically review and assess the
adequacy of this Charter and recommend any proposed changes to
the Board. This Charter may only be adopted, amended or repealed
by the Board, upon recommendation by the Committee.
Miscellaneous
(x) The Committee shall perform any other activities
consistent with this Charter, the Companys Articles of
Incorporation, Bylaws and governing law, as the Committee deems
necessary or appropriate.
5. Limitations Inherent in the Audit
Committees Role. It is not the duty of the
Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the
Corporations financial statements are complete and
accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principals. This is the responsibility of management
and the independent auditors of the Corporation. Furthermore,
while the Committee is responsible for reviewing the
Corporations policies and practices with respect to risk
assessment and management, it is the responsibility of the Chief
Executive Officer and senior management to determine the
appropriate level of the Corporations exposure to risk.
A-4
PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC.
1776 W. March Lane, Suite 250
Stockton, California 95207
PROXY
Solicited by the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints H. Ravi Brar, Reid Cox, and each of them, proxies, with power of
substitution and revocation, acting together or, if only one is present and voting, then that one,
to vote the common stock of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., which the undersigned is entitled to vote at
the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on June 14, 2006 and at any adjournments or
postponements thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present, as
designated herein and authorizes the proxies to vote in accordance with the recommendations of the
management of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. upon such other business as may properly come before the
annual meeting of shareholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL IN ITEM 1 AND FOR ITEMS 2 and 3.
|
1. |
|
Elect the nominated directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES BELOW |
|
o |
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FROM ALL NOMINEES BELOW |
|
|
o
|
|
Wallace W. Griffin
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Wallace W. Griffin |
|
|
o
|
|
Henry R. Carabelli
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Henry R. Carabelli |
|
|
o
|
|
David G. Chandler
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
David G. Chandler |
|
|
o
|
|
Jerry L. Johnson
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Jerry L. Johnson |
|
|
o
|
|
Samuel A. Plum
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Samuel A. Plum |
|
|
o
|
|
Thomas A. Munro
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Thomas A. Munro |
|
|
o
|
|
Timothy A. Samples
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Timothy A. Samples |
|
|
o
|
|
Frederick D. Lawrence
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Frederick D. Lawrence |
|
|
o
|
|
William H. Davidson
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
William H. Davidson |
IF YOU WISH TO CUMULATE YOUR VOTE FOR THOSE NOMINEES YOU WISH TO SUPPORT, ATTACH A
SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER SPECIFYING HOW YOU WISH TO ALLOCATE YOUR VOTES BETWEEN THE
CANDIDATES YOU SUPPORT. THE NUMBER OF VOTES YOU ARE ENTITLED TO ALLOCATE IS NINE TIMES THE
NUMBER OF SHARES YOU OWNED AS OF THE RECORD DATE. THE INSPECTOR OF ELECTION SHALL RESOLVE
ALL ISSUES ARISING WITH RESPECT TO ALLOCATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE NOT CLEAR.
|
2. |
|
Approve (a) an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
giving effect to a reverse split of our common shares and (b) all ministerial actions
required in connection with effecting such reverse share split. |
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
3. |
|
Approve amendments to our Amended and Restated Bylaws authorizing our board of
directors to (a) establish the size of the board and (b) divide the board members
into either two or three classes if and when we are qualified as a listed company
under California law. |
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
(Continued and to be signed and dated on the reverse side.)
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY
THE UNDERSIGNED. IF THIS PROXY IS PROPERLY EXECUTED AND TIMELY RETURNED AND NO DIRECTION
IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1, AND FOR ITEMS 2 AND
3.
|
|
|
Please date and sign exactly as names appear on this Proxy. Joint owners should
each sign. Trustees, executors, etc. should indicate the capacity in which they
are signing. |
|
|
|
Dated:
|
|
, 2006 |
Signature(s): |
o Check here if you plan to attend the annual meeting.
o Check here for address change.
New Address: