FORM 10-K
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-K
 
     
(Mark One)    
þ
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
OR
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the Transition Period from         to        
 
Commission File Number 000-20202
 
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
     
Michigan   38-1999511
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
25505 W. Twelve Mile Road
Southfield, Michigan
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  48034-8339
(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(248) 353-2700
 
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock
 
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
             
Large accelerated filer o
  Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of 3,667,364 shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2008 was approximately $93.7 million. For purposes of this computation all officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the Registrant are assumed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such officers, directors and beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.
 
At February 20, 2009, there were 30,747,018 shares of the Registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement pertaining to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) filed pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated herein by reference into Part III.
 


 

 
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
 
INDEX TO FORM 10-K
 
                 
Item
      Page
 
PART I
 
1.
    Business     3  
 
1A.
    Risk Factors     14  
 
1B.
    Unresolved Staff Comments     17  
 
2.
    Properties     17  
 
3.
    Legal Proceedings     18  
 
4.
    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     18  
 
PART II
 
5.
    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters     19  
 
6.
    Selected Financial Data     21  
 
7.
    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     22  
 
7A.
    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     40  
 
8.
    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     41  
 
9.
    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     82  
 
9A.
    Controls and Procedures     82  
 
PART III
 
10.
    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance     84  
 
11.
    Executive Compensation     84  
 
12.
    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters     84  
 
13.
    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence     84  
 
14.
    Principal Accountant Fees and Services     85  
 
PART IV
 
15.
    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules     85  


2


 

 
PART I
 
ITEM 1.   BUSINESS
 
General
 
Since 1972, Credit Acceptance (referred to as the “Company”, “Credit Acceptance”, “we”, “our” or “us”) has provided auto loans to consumers, regardless of their credit history. Our product is offered through a nationwide network of automobile dealers who benefit from sales of vehicles to consumers who otherwise could not obtain financing; from repeat and referral sales generated by these same customers; and from sales to customers responding to advertisements for our product, but who actually end up qualifying for traditional financing.
 
Without our product, consumers are often unable to purchase a vehicle or they purchase an unreliable one. Further, as we report to the three national credit reporting agencies, an important ancillary benefit of our program is that we provide a significant number of our consumers with an opportunity to improve their lives by improving their credit score and move on to more traditional sources of financing.
 
Credit Acceptance was founded to collect retail installment contracts (referred to as “Consumer Loans”) originated by automobile dealerships owned by our founder, majority shareholder, and Chairman, Donald Foss. During the 1980s, we began to market this service to non-affiliated dealers and, at the same time, began to offer dealers a non-recourse cash payment (referred to as an “advance”) against anticipated future collections on Consumer Loans serviced for that dealer.
 
We refer to dealers who participate in our programs, and share our commitment to changing consumers’ lives, as “dealer-partners”. Upon enrollment in our programs, the dealer-partner enters into a dealer servicing agreement with Credit Acceptance that defines the legal relationship between Credit Acceptance and the dealer-partner. The dealer servicing agreement assigns the responsibilities for administering, servicing, and collecting the amounts due on Consumer Loans from the dealer-partners to us. A consumer who does not qualify for conventional automobile financing can purchase a used vehicle from a Credit Acceptance dealer-partner and finance the purchase through us. We are an indirect lender from a legal perspective, meaning the Consumer Loan is originated by the dealer-partner and immediately assigned to us.
 
Consumers and dealer-partners benefit from our programs as follows:
 
Consumers.  We help change the lives of consumers who do not qualify for conventional automobile financing by helping them obtain quality transportation. An important ancillary benefit of our program is that we provide consumers with an opportunity to establish or reestablish their credit through the timely repayment of their Consumer Loan.
 
Dealer-Partners.  Our program increases dealer-partners’ profits in the following ways:
 
  •  Enables dealer-partners to sell cars to consumers who may not be able to obtain financing without our program. In addition, consumers often become repeat customers by financing future vehicle purchases either through our program or, after they have successfully established or reestablished their credit, through conventional financing.
 
  •  Allows dealer-partners to share in the profits not only from the sale of the vehicle, but also from its financing.
 
  •  Enables dealer-partners to attract consumers by advertising “guaranteed credit approval”, where allowed by law. The consumers will often use other services of the dealer-partners and refer friends and relatives to them.
 
  •  Enables dealer-partners to attract consumers who mistakenly assume they do not qualify for conventional financing.
 
Business Segments
 
We have two reportable business segments: United States and Other. The United States segment is our dominant segment and consists of the United States automobile financing business. The Other segment consists of


3


 

businesses in liquidation, primarily represented by the discontinued United Kingdom automobile financing business. For information regarding our reportable segments, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-K.
 
Principal Business
 
We have two primary programs: the Portfolio Program and the Purchase Program. Under the Portfolio Program, we advance money to dealer-partners (referred to as a “Dealer Loan”) in exchange for the right to service the underlying Consumer Loan. Under the Purchase Program, we buy the Consumer Loan from the dealer-partner (referred to as a “Purchased Loan”) and keep all amounts collected from the consumer. Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans are collectively referred to as “Loans”. The following table shows the percentage of Consumer Loans assigned to us under each of the programs for each of the last 12 quarters:
 
                 
Quarter Ended
  Portfolio Program   Purchase Program
 
March 31, 2006
    94.9 %     5.1 %
June 30, 2006
    95.8 %     4.2 %
September 30, 2006
    96.3 %     3.7 %
December 31, 2006
    96.5 %     3.5 %
March 31, 2007
    94.8 %     5.2 %
June 30, 2007
    83.8 %     16.2 %
September 30, 2007
    74.5 %     25.5 %
December 31, 2007
    70.6 %     29.4 %
March 31, 2008
    70.2 %     29.8 %
June 30, 2008
    65.4 %     34.6 %
September 30, 2008
    69.2 %     30.8 %
December 31, 2008
    78.2 %     21.8 %
 
Dealer-partners that enroll in our programs have the option to either pay an upfront, one-time enrollment fee of $9,850 or defer payment by agreeing to allow us to keep 50% of their first accelerated dealer holdback payment (“Portfolio Profit Express”). Portfolio Profit Express is paid to qualifying dealer-partners after a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans has been closed. Dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs prior to 2008 have the option to assign Consumer Loans under either the Portfolio Program or the Purchase Program. During 2008, we changed our eligibility requirements for new dealer-partner enrollments to restrict access to the Purchase Program. For dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs during the first eight months of 2008, only dealer-partners that elected to pay the upfront, one-time enrollment fee were initially allowed to assign Consumer Loans under either program. Dealer-partners that elected the deferred option during this period were only granted access to the Purchase Program after the first Portfolio Profit Express payment has been made under the Portfolio Program. For all dealer-partners enrolling in our programs after August 31, 2008, access to the Purchase Program is only granted after the first Portfolio Profit Express payment has been made under the Portfolio Program.
 
Portfolio Program
 
As payment for the vehicle, the dealer-partner generally receives the following:
 
  •  a down payment from the consumer;
 
  •  a cash advance from us; and
 
  •  after the advance has been recovered by us, the cash from payments made on the Consumer Loan, net of certain collection costs and our servicing fee (“dealer holdback”).
 
We record the amount advanced to the dealer-partner as a Dealer Loan, which is classified within Loans receivable in our consolidated balance sheets. Cash advanced to dealer-partners is automatically assigned to the originating dealer-partner’s open pool of advances. At the dealer-partner’s option, a pool containing at least 100 Consumer Loans can be closed and subsequent advances assigned to a new pool. All advances due from a dealer-


4


 

partner are secured by the future collections on the dealer-partner’s portfolio of Consumer Loans assigned to us. For dealer-partners with more than one pool, the pools are cross-collateralized so the performance of other pools is considered in determining eligibility for dealer holdback. We perfect our security interest in the Dealer Loans by taking possession of the Consumer Loans.
 
The dealer servicing agreement provides that collections received by us during a calendar month on Consumer Loans assigned by a dealer-partner are applied on a pool-by-pool basis as follows:
 
  •  First, to reimburse us for certain collection costs;
 
  •  Second, to pay us our servicing fee;
 
  •  Third, to reduce the aggregate advance balance and to pay any other amounts due from the dealer-partner to us; and
 
  •  Fourth, to the dealer-partner as payment of dealer holdback.
 
Dealer-partners have an opportunity to receive Portfolio Profit Express at the time a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans is closed. The amount paid to the dealer-partner is calculated using a formula that considers the forecasted collections and the advance balance on the closed pool. If the collections on Consumer Loans from a dealer-partner’s pool are not sufficient to repay the advance balance, the dealer-partner will not receive dealer holdback.
 
Since typically the combination of the advance and the consumer’s down payment provides the dealer-partner with a cash profit at the time of sale, the dealer-partner’s risk in the Consumer Loan is limited. We cannot demand repayment from the dealer-partner of the advance except in the event the dealer-partner is in default of the dealer servicing agreement. Advances are made only after the Consumer Loan is approved, accepted and assigned to us and all other stipulations required for funding have been satisfied. The dealer-partner can also opt to repurchase Consumer Loans assigned under the Portfolio Program at their own discretion.
 
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the Portfolio Program are not considered to be loans to consumers. Instead, our accounting reflects that of a lender to the dealer-partner. The classification as a Dealer Loan for accounting purposes is primarily a result of (1) the dealer-partner’s financial interest in the Consumer Loan and (2) certain elements of our legal relationship with the dealer-partner. The cash amount advanced to the dealer-partner is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. The aggregate amount of all advances to an individual dealer-partner, plus finance charges, plus dealer holdback payments, plus Portfolio Profit Express payments, less collections (net of certain collection costs), less write-offs, comprises the amount of the Dealer Loan recorded in Loans receivable.
 
Purchase Program
 
We began offering a Purchase Program on a limited basis in March of 2005. The Purchase Program differs from our traditional Portfolio Program in that the dealer-partner receives a single payment from us at the time of origination instead of a cash advance and dealer holdback. Purchase Program volume increased significantly beginning in 2007 as the program was offered to additional dealer-partners.
 
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the Purchase Program are considered to be originated by the dealer-partner and then purchased by us. The cash amount paid to the dealer-partner is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. The aggregate amount of all amounts paid to purchase Consumer Loans from dealer-partners, plus finance charges, less collections (net of certain collection costs), less write-offs, comprises the amount of Purchased Loans recorded in Loans receivable.
 
Revenue Sources
 
Credit Acceptance derives its revenues from the following principal sources:
 
  •  Finance charges, which are comprised of: (1) servicing fees earned as a result of servicing Consumer Loans assigned to us by dealer-partners under the Portfolio Program, (2) finance charge income from Purchased Loans, (3) fees earned from our third party ancillary product offerings, (4) monthly program fees of $599,


5


 

  charged to dealer-partners under the Portfolio Program for access to our Credit Approval Processing System (“CAPS”), administration, servicing and collection services offered by the Company, documentation related to or affecting our program, and all tangible and intangible property owned by Credit Acceptance; and (5) fees associated with certain Loans;
 
  •  Premiums earned, which primarily consist of premiums earned from VSC Re Company (“VSC Re”), a wholly-owned subsidiary formed during the fourth quarter of 2008, that is engaged in the business of reinsuring coverage under vehicle service contracts sold to consumers by dealer-partners on vehicles financed by us;
 
  •  Program fees, as explained above in finance charges, charged to dealer-partners that only participate in our Purchase Program;
 
  •  Other income, which primarily consists of: marketing income, remarketing charges, vehicle service contract and Guaranteed Asset Protection (“GAP”) profit sharing income, dealer support products and services, interest income, and dealer enrollment fees. For additional information, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
The following table sets forth the percent relationship to total revenue from continuing operations of each of these sources:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
Percent of Total Revenue from Continuing Operations
  2008     2007     2006  
 
Finance charges
    91.8 %     91.9 %     86.0 %
Premiums earned
    1.3 %     0.2 %     0.5 %
Program fees (1)
    0.1 %     0.1 %     6.2 %
Other income
    6.8 %     7.8 %     7.3 %
                         
Total revenue
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
                         
 
(1) Effective January 1, 2007, we implemented a change to our method of charging program fees designed to positively impact dealer-partner attrition. We continue to charge a monthly fee of $599, but instead of collecting and recognizing the revenue from the fee in the current period, we collect it from future dealer holdback payments. As a result of this change, we now record program fees for dealer-partners on the Portfolio Program as a yield adjustment, recognizing these fees as finance charge revenue over the forecasted net cash flows of the Dealer Loan. During 2008 and 2007, the limited amount of program fee revenue recognized relates to certain dealer-partners that only participate in our Purchase Program.
 
Our business is seasonal with peak Consumer Loan acceptances and collections occurring during the first quarter of the year. However, this seasonality does not have a material impact on our interim results.
 
Operations in the United States
 
Our target market is approximately 60,000 independent and franchised automobile dealers in the United States. The number of dealer-partner enrollments and active dealer-partners for each of the last five years are presented in the table below:
 
                 
    Dealer-Partner
  Active
Year
  Enrollments   Dealer-Partners (1)
 
2004
    534       1,215  
2005
    956       1,766  
2006
    1,172       2,214  
2007
    1,835       2,827  
2008
    1,646       3,264  
 
(1) Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the period.


6


 

 
A new dealer-partner is required to enter into a dealer servicing agreement with Credit Acceptance that defines the legal relationship between Credit Acceptance and the dealer-partner. The dealer servicing agreement assigns the responsibilities for administering, servicing, and collecting the amounts due on Consumer Loans from the dealer-partners to us. Under the typical dealer servicing agreement, a dealer-partner represents that it will only assign Consumer Loans to us which satisfy criteria established by us, meet certain conditions with respect to their binding nature and the status of the security interest in the purchased vehicle, and comply with applicable state, federal and foreign laws and regulations.
 
The typical dealer servicing agreement may be terminated by us or by the dealer-partner upon written notice. We may terminate the dealer servicing agreement immediately in the case of an event of default by the dealer-partner. Events of default include, among other things:
 
  •  the dealer-partner’s refusal to allow us to audit its records relating to the Consumer Loans assigned to us;
 
  •  the dealer-partner, without our consent, is dissolved; merges or consolidates with an entity not affiliated with the dealer-partner; or sells a material part of its assets outside the course of its business to an entity not affiliated with the dealer-partner; or
 
  •  the appointment of a receiver for, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of, the dealer-partner.
 
While a dealer-partner can cease assigning Consumer Loans to us at any time without terminating the dealer servicing agreement, if the dealer-partner elects to terminate the dealer servicing agreement or in the event of a default, the dealer-partner must immediately pay us:
 
  •  any unreimbursed collection costs on Dealer Loans;
 
  •  any unpaid advances and all amounts owed by the dealer-partner to us; and
 
  •  a termination fee equal to 15% of the then outstanding amount of the Consumer Loans accepted or purchased by us.
 
Upon receipt of such amounts in full, we reassign the Consumer Loans and our security interest in the financed vehicles to the dealer-partner. In the event of a termination, we may continue to service Consumer Loans assigned by dealer-partners accepted prior to termination in the normal course of business without charging a termination fee.
 
Dealer-partners receive a monthly statement from us summarizing all activity on Consumer Loans assigned by such dealer-partner.
 
Consumer Loan Assignment.  Once a dealer-partner has enrolled in our program, the dealer-partner may begin assigning Consumer Loans to us. A Consumer Loan originates when a consumer enters into a contract with a dealer-partner that sets forth the terms of the agreement between the consumer and the dealer-partner for the payment of the purchase price of the vehicle. The amount of the Consumer Loan consists of the total principal and interest that the consumer is required to pay over the term of the Consumer Loan. Virtually all Consumer Loans accepted and purchased by us are processed through CAPS. CAPS allows dealer-partners to input a consumer’s credit application and view the response from us via the Internet. CAPS allows dealer-partners to: (1) receive a quick approval from us; and (2) interact with our proprietary credit scoring system to optimize the structure of each transaction prior to delivery. All responses include the amount of funding (advance for a Dealer Loan or purchase price for a Purchased Loan), as well as any stipulations required for funding. The amount of funding is determined using a formula which considers a number of factors including the timing and amount of cash flows expected on the related Consumer Loan and our target return on capital at the time the Consumer Loan is assigned. The estimated future cash flows are determined based upon our proprietary credit scoring system, which considers numerous variables, including attributes contained in the consumer’s credit bureau report, data contained in the consumer’s credit application, the structure of the proposed transaction, vehicle information and other factors, to calculate a composite credit score that corresponds to an expected collection rate. Our proprietary credit scoring system forecasts the collection rate based upon the historical performance of Consumer Loans in our portfolio that share similar characteristics. The performance of our proprietary credit scoring system is evaluated monthly by comparing projected to actual Consumer Loan performance. Adjustments are made to our proprietary credit scoring system as necessary. For additional information on adjustments to forecasted collection rates, please see the


7


 

Critical Accounting Estimates section in Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
While a dealer-partner can assign any legally compliant Consumer Loan to us, the decision whether to provide funding to the dealer-partner and the amount of any funding is made solely by us. We perform all significant functions relating to the processing of the Consumer Loan applications and bear certain costs of Consumer Loan acceptances, including the cost of assessing the adequacy of Consumer Loan documentation, compliance with underwriting guidelines and the cost of verifying employment, residence and other information provided by the dealer-partner.
 
If we discover a misrepresentation by the dealer-partner relating to a Consumer Loan assigned to us, we can demand that the Consumer Loan be repurchased for the current balance of the Consumer Loan less the amount of any unearned finance charge plus the applicable termination fee, which is generally $500. Upon receipt of such amount in full, we will reassign the Consumer Loan and our security interest in the financed vehicle to the dealer-partner. The dealer-partner can also opt to repurchase their Consumer Loan portfolio assigned under the Portfolio Program, at their discretion, for a fee.
 
In the majority of states, Consumer Loan contracts are written on a contract form provided by us. The Consumer Loan transaction is not funded by the Company until we have received and approved all the related stipulations for funding. The acceptance of the Consumer Loan from the dealer-partner occurs after both the consumer and dealer-partner sign the contract and the original contract and supporting documentation are received and approved by us. Although the dealer-partner is named in the Consumer Loan contract, the dealer-partner generally does not have legal ownership of the Consumer Loan for more than a moment and the Company, not the dealer-partner, is listed as lien holder on the vehicle title. Consumers are obligated to make payments on the Consumer Loan directly to us, and any failure to make such payments will result in us pursuing payment through collection efforts.
 
Our business model allows us to share the risk and reward of collecting on the Consumer Loans with the dealer-partners. Such sharing is intended to motivate the dealer-partner to assign better quality Consumer Loans, follow our underwriting guidelines, comply with various legal regulations, meet our credit compliance requirements, and provide appropriate service and support to the consumer after the sale. In order to assist the dealer-partner in these, and other areas, we offer the services of our Dealer-Partner Service Center (“DPSC”). We believe this arrangement, along with the support of the DPSC, aligns the interests of the Company, the dealer-partner and the consumer. During the third quarter of 2005, we began to outsource DPSC functions related to legal regulation compliance and credit compliance to a company in India. In the second quarter of 2008, we discontinued the outsourcing of our credit compliance functions. As of December 31, 2008, only legal regulation compliance validation functions remain outsourced to India.
 
We measure various criteria for each dealer-partner against other dealer-partners in their area as well as the top performing dealer-partners. Dealer-partners are assigned a dealer rating based upon the performance of their Consumer Loans in both the Portfolio and Purchase Programs as well as other criteria. The dealer rating is one of the factors used to determine the amount paid to dealer-partners as an advance or to acquire a Purchased Loan. Sales representatives regularly review the performance of each dealer-partner and, together with the dealer-partner, create an action plan to improve the dealer-partner’s dealer rating and overall success with our program.
 
Information on our Consumer Loans is presented in the following table:
 
                                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
Average Consumer Loan Data
  2008     2007     2006     2005     2004  
 
Average size of Consumer Loan accepted
  $ 14,518     $ 13,878     $ 12,722     $ 12,015     $ 12,765  
Percentage growth (decline) in average size of Consumer Loan
    4.6 %     9.1 %     5.9 %     (5.9 )%     4.6 %
Average initial term (in months)
    42       41       37       35       37  
 
Collections.  Our largest group of collectors work Loans that are in the early stages of delinquency. These collectors are organized into three primary groups: (1) the first payment missed teams; (2) the delinquency teams; and (3) the specialized teams. The first payment missed teams service Consumer Loans of consumers who have


8


 

failed to make one of their first three payments on time. Collection efforts for these teams typically consist of placing a call to the consumer within one day of the missed due date for any of the first three payments. After a consumer has made their initial three payments, collection efforts on the Consumer Loan are serviced by either our delinquency teams or our specialized teams. Members of the delinquency teams are assigned Consumer Loans that are segmented into dialing pools by various phone contact profiles in an effort to maximize contact with the consumer. Our specialized teams include collectors with higher skill levels and access to additional tools. These teams locate consumers by finding new contact information to assist in their collection efforts or to return the Consumer Loan to the delinquency teams. The specialized teams service Consumer Loans with the following characteristics:
 
  •  no valid phone contact information;
 
  •  valid contact information without any contact in seven days; or
 
  •  various specialty segments (such as military personnel, abandoned vehicles, voluntary surrenders, and accounts requiring investigation).
 
The decision to repossess a vehicle is based on statistical models or policy based criteria. When a Consumer Loan is approved for repossession, the account is transferred to our repossession team. Repossession personnel continue to service the Consumer Loan as it is being assigned to a third party repossession contractor, who works on a contingency fee basis. Once a vehicle has been repossessed, the consumer can negotiate a redemption, whereby the vehicle is returned to the consumer in exchange for a payment which reduces or eliminates the past due balance, or where appropriate or, if required by law, the vehicle is returned to the consumer and the Consumer Loan is reinstated in exchange for paying off the Consumer Loan balance. If the redemption process is not successful, the vehicle is sold at a wholesale automobile auction. Prior to sale, the vehicle is usually inspected by our remarketing representatives who authorize repair and reconditioning work in order to maximize the net sale proceeds at auction.
 
If the vehicle sale proceeds are not sufficient to satisfy the balance owing on the Consumer Loan, the Consumer Loan is serviced by either: (1) our senior collection team, in the event the consumer is willing to make payments on the deficiency balance; or (2) where permitted by law, our legal team, if it is believed that legal action is required to reduce the deficiency balance owing on the Consumer Loan. Our legal team generally assigns Consumer Loans to third party collection attorneys who work on a contingency fee basis. The third party collection attorneys then file a claim, and upon obtaining a judgment, garnish wages or other assets. Additionally, we may sell or assign Consumer Loans to a third party collection company.
 
Collectors rely on two systems; the Collection System (“CS”) and the Loan Servicing System (“LSS”). The CS and the LSS are connected through a batch interface. The present CS has been in service since June 2002. The CS interfaces with a predictive dialer and records all activity on a Consumer Loan, including details of past phone conversations with the consumer, collection letters sent, promises to pay, broken promises, repossession orders and collection attorney activity. The LSS maintains a record of all transactions relating to Consumer Loans assigned after July 1990 and is a primary source of data utilized to:
 
  •  evaluate our proprietary credit scoring system;
 
  •  forecast future collections;
 
  •  establish the amount of revenue recognized by us; and
 
  •  analyze the profitability of our program.
 
During the third quarter of 2005, we began an initiative to outsource a portion of our collection function to a company in India. In the second quarter of 2006, we entered into another outsourcing arrangement with a company in Costa Rica. These outsourced collectors service accounts using the CS and typically work accounts that are less than sixty days past due. Outsourcing reduces the geographic risk of having two collection centers in the United States, provides additional flexibility to scale our operation, comparable performance at a lower wage rate and the opportunity to share best practices with outside collection companies.


9


 

Ancillary Products
 
We provide dealer-partners the ability to offer vehicle service contracts to consumers. Buyers Vehicle Protection Plan, Inc. (“BVPP”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, has relationships with third party administrators (“TPAs”) whereby the TPAs process claims on vehicle service contracts that are underwritten by third party insurers. BVPP receives a commission for all vehicle service contracts sold by our dealer-partners when the vehicle is financed by us. The commission is included in the retail price of the vehicle service contract which is added to the Consumer Loan. We provide dealer-partners with an additional advance based on the retail price of the vehicle service contract. We recognize our commission from the vehicle service contracts as part of finance charges on a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we formed VSC Re, a wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged in the business of reinsuring coverage under vehicle service contracts sold to consumers by dealer-partners on vehicles financed by us. VSC Re currently reinsures vehicle service contracts that are underwritten by two of our three third party insurers. Vehicle service contract premiums, which represent the selling price of the vehicle service contract to the consumer less commissions and certain administrative costs, are contributed to trust accounts controlled by VSC Re. These premiums are used to fund claims covered under the vehicle service contracts. The Company has entered into arrangements with third-party insurance companies that limit our exposure to fund claims to the amount of premium dollars contributed, less amounts earned and withdrawn, plus $0.5 million of equity contributed. With the reinsurance structure, we will be able to access projected excess trust assets monthly and will record revenue and expense on an accrual basis. Premiums are earned over the life of the vehicle service contract using an average of the pro rata and rule of 78 methods. Claims are expensed in the period the claim was incurred. Our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008 reflect two months of VSC Re activity, including $3.9 million in premiums earned and $2.7 million in provision for claims. Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”), we are considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts and as a result, the trust assets have been consolidated on our balance sheet as restricted cash and cash equivalents.
 
Prior to the formation of VSC Re, our agreements with two of our TPAs allowed us to receive profit sharing payments depending upon the performance of the vehicle service contract programs. The agreements also required that vehicle service contract premiums be placed in trust accounts. Funds in the trust accounts were utilized by the TPA to pay claims on the vehicle service contracts. Upon the formation of VSC Re during the fourth quarter of 2008, the unearned premiums on the majority of the vehicle service contracts that had been written through these two TPAs were ceded to VSC Re along with any related trust assets. As the trust assets transferred to VSC Re exceeded the ceded unearned premiums, we recorded a deferred gain of $4.3 million upon the formation of VSC Re. The deferred gain will be recognized as premiums earned revenue over a 26 month period (average remaining life of the ceded vehicle service contracts) using an average of the pro rata and rule of 78 methods. Vehicle service contracts written prior to 2008 through one of the TPAs remain under this profit sharing arrangement. Profit sharing payments, if any, on the vehicle service contracts are distributed to us periodically after the term of the vehicle service contracts have substantially expired provided certain loss rates are met. Under FIN 46, we are considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts. As a result, the assets and liabilities of the remaining trust have been consolidated on our balance sheet.
 
We formed VSC Re in order to enhance our control and the security of the trust assets that will be used to pay future vehicle service contract claims. The income we expect to earn from vehicle service contracts over time will likely not be impacted as, both before and after the formation of VSC Re, the income we receive is based on the amount by which vehicle service contract premiums exceed claims. The only change in our risk associated with adverse claims experience relates to the $0.5 million equity contribution that was required as part of this new structure, which is now at risk in the event claims exceed premiums. Under the prior structure, our risk was limited to the amount of premiums contributed to the trusts.
 
BVPP also has a relationship with a TPA that allows dealer-partners to offer a GAP product to consumers whereby the TPA processes claims that are underwritten by a third party insurer. GAP provides the consumer protection by paying the difference between the loan balance and the amount covered by the consumer’s insurance policy in the event the vehicle is totaled or stolen. We receive a commission for all GAP contracts sold by our dealer-


10


 

partners when the vehicle is financed by us, and do not bear any risk of loss for claims. The commission is included in the retail price of the GAP contract which is added to the Consumer Loan. We provide dealer-partners with an additional advance based on the retail price of the GAP contract. We recognize our commission from the GAP contracts as part of finance charges on a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows. We are eligible to receive profit sharing payments depending on the performance of the GAP program. Profit sharing payments from the third party are received once a year, if eligible.
 
During the second quarter of 2006, we began to provide dealer-partners in certain states the ability to purchase Global Positioning Systems (“GPS”) with Starter Interrupt Devices (“SID”). Through this program, dealer-partners can install a GPS-based SID (“GPS-SID”) on vehicles financed by us that can be activated if the consumer fails to make payments on their account, and can result in the prompt repossession of the vehicle. Installation of the GPS-SID will allow for increased collections and an opportunity for the dealer-partner to increase their initial advance. Dealer-partners purchase the GPS-SID directly from the third party and ownership of the GPS-SID device resides with the dealer-partner. The third party pays us a marketing fee for each device sold and installed, at which time the marketing fee revenue is recognized in other income within our consolidated statements of income.
 
Businesses in Liquidation
 
Effective June 30, 2003, we decided to stop originating Consumer Loans in the United Kingdom and we sold the remainder of the portfolio on December 30, 2005. Over the last three years we have had minimal activity as we have been liquidating our United Kingdom subsidiary.
 
Competition
 
The market for consumers who do not qualify for conventional automobile financing is large and highly competitive. The market is currently served by “buy here, pay here” dealerships, banks, captive finance affiliates of automobile manufacturers, credit unions and independent finance companies both publicly and privately owned. Many of these companies are much larger and have greater resources than us. These companies typically target higher credit tier customers within our market. We compete by offering a profitable and efficient method for dealer-partners to finance customers who would be more difficult or less profitable to finance through other methods. In addition, we compete on the basis of the level of service provided by our origination and sales personnel.
 
Customer and Geographic Concentrations
 
No single dealer-partner accounted for more than 10% of total revenues during any of the last three years. Additionally, no single dealer-partner’s Loan receivable balance accounted for more than 10% of total Loans receivable balance as of December 31, 2008 or 2007. The following table provides information regarding the five states that are responsible for the largest dollar amount of Consumer Loans accepted or purchased and the number of active dealer-partners in the United States during 2008:
 
                                         
    Consumer Loans     Active Dealer-Partners (1)        
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount     % of Total     Number     % of Total        
 
Texas
  $ 149,554       8.5 %     240       7.4 %        
Michigan
    131,022       7.4       198       6.1          
Alabama
    119,902       6.8       120       3.7          
Ohio
    119,133       6.8       182       5.6          
New York
    93,037       5.3       174       5.3          
All other states
    1,148,117       65.2       2,350       71.9          
                                         
Total
  $ 1,760,765       100.0 %     3,264       100.0 %        
                                         
 
(1) Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the year.


11


 

 
The following table provides information regarding the five states that are responsible for the largest dollar amount of Consumer Loans accepted or purchased and the number of active dealer-partners in the United States during 2007:
 
                                         
    Consumer Loans     Active Dealer-Partners (1)        
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount     % of Total     Number     % of Total        
 
Texas
  $ 134,758       9.1 %     186       6.6 %        
Michigan
    108,055       7.3       168       5.9          
Alabama
    98,595       6.7       89       3.1          
Ohio
    86,240       5.8       157       5.6          
Mississippi
    75,916       5.1       71       2.5          
All other states
    977,123       66.0       2,156       76.3          
                                         
Total
  $ 1,480,687       100.0 %     2,827       100.0 %        
                                         
 
(1) Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the year.
 
Geographic Financial Information
 
For the three years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, revenues from continuing operations were primarily derived from operations in the United States and long-lived assets were primarily located in the United States. For additional geographic financial information, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-K.
 
Regulation
 
Our businesses are subject to various state, federal and foreign laws and regulations, which:
 
  •  require licensing and qualification;
 
  •  regulate interest rates, fees and other charges;
 
  •  require specified disclosures to consumers;
 
  •  govern the sale and terms of ancillary products; and
 
  •  define our rights to collect Consumer Loans and repossess and sell collateral.
 
Failure to comply with, or an adverse change in, these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us by, among other things, limiting the jurisdictions in which we may operate, restricting our ability to realize the value of the collateral securing the Consumer Loans, or resulting in potential liability related to our collection of Consumer Loans. In addition, governmental regulations depleting the supply of used vehicles, such as environmental protection regulations governing emissions or fuel consumption, could have a material adverse effect on us. We are not aware of any such legislation currently pending that could have a material adverse effect on us.
 
The sale of insurance products in connection with Consumer Loans assigned to or purchased by us from dealer-partners is also subject to state laws and regulations. However, as we do not deal directly with consumers in the sale of insurance products, we do not believe that such laws and regulations significantly affect our business. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that insurance regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which such products are offered by dealer-partners will not seek to regulate us or restrict the operation of our business in such jurisdictions. Any such action could materially adversely affect the income received from such products.
 
We believe that we maintain all material licenses and permits required for our current operations and are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Our agreements with dealer-partners provide that the dealer-partner shall indemnify us with respect to any loss or expense we incur as a result of the dealer-partner’s failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations.


12


 

Team Members
 
As of December 31, 2008, we had 1,048 full and part-time team members. Our team members have no union affiliations and we believe our relationship with our team members is good. The table below presents team members by function:
 
                 
    Number of Team Members  
    December 31,  
Function
  2008     2007  
 
Originations (1)
    260       232  
Servicing (2)
    553       510  
Support (3)
    235       229  
                 
Total
    1,048       971  
                 
 
(1) The originations function includes team members in the DPSC, sales and sales support departments.
 
(2) The servicing function primarily includes team members in the collections, repossession, and remarketing departments.
 
(3) The support function primarily includes team members in the information technology, finance, analytics, corporate legal, and human resources departments.
 
Available Information
 
Our Internet address is creditacceptance.com. We make available, free of charge on the web site, copies of reports we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such reports.


13


 

ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS
 
Our inability to accurately forecast and estimate the amount and timing of future collections could have a material adverse effect on results of operations.
 
Substantially all of the Consumer Loans assigned to us are made to individuals with impaired or limited credit histories, or higher debt-to-income ratios than are permitted by traditional lenders. Consumer Loans made to these individuals generally entail a higher risk of delinquency, default and repossession, and higher losses than loans made to consumers with better credit. Since cash flows available to repay the Loans are generated, in most cases, from the underlying Consumer Loans, the ability to accurately forecast Consumer Loan performance is critical to our success. At the time of Consumer Loan acceptance or purchase, we forecast future expected cash flows from the Consumer Loan. Based on these forecasts, which include estimates for wholesale vehicle prices in the event of vehicle repossession and sale, we make an advance or cash payment to the related dealer-partner at a level designed to achieve an acceptable return on capital. If Consumer Loan performance equals or exceeds original expectations, it is likely the target return on capital will be achieved. However, actual cash flows from any individual Consumer Loan are often different than cash flows estimated at Consumer Loan inception. There can be no assurance that our estimates will be accurate or that Consumer Loan performance will be as expected. In the event that we underestimate the default risk or under-price products, the financial position, liquidity and results of operations could be adversely affected, possibly to a material degree.
 
We may be unable to continue to access or renew funding sources and obtain capital on favorable terms needed to maintain and grow the business.
 
We currently use four primary sources of debt financing: (1) a revolving secured line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities with institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A asset-backed secured borrowings (“Term ABS 144A”) with qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual credit facility with an institutional investor. In August 2009, our $325.0 million warehouse facility and our $50.0 million residual credit facility mature. There can be no assurance that new or additional financing can be obtained, or that it will be available on acceptable terms. If our various financing alternatives were to become limited or unavailable, we may be unable to accept Consumer Loans in the volume that we anticipate, and operations could be materially adversely affected.
 
Requirements under credit facilities to meet financial and portfolio performance covenants.
 
Our credit facilities contain various covenants requiring certain levels of financial performance and asset quality. Failure to meet any of these covenants could result in an event of default under these agreements.
 
If we cannot comply with the requirements in our credit facilities, then the lenders may increase our borrowing costs, require us to repay immediately all of the outstanding debt, enforce their interests against collateral pledged under these agreements or restrict our ability to obtain additional borrowings under these facilities. If our debt were accelerated, our assets might not be sufficient to fully repay the debt. These lenders may require us to use all of our available cash to repay our debt or foreclose upon their collateral. In such case, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations would suffer.
 
The conditions of the U.S. and international capital markets may adversely affect lenders the Company has relationships with, causing us to incur additional cost and reducing our sources of liquidity, which may adversely affect our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
 
Turbulence in the global capital markets and economic slowdown or recession may result in disruptions in the financial sector and potentially affect lenders the Company has relationships with. Although the Company continues to utilize low levels of financial leverage and has not suffered any significant liquidity issues as a result of recent events, the cost and availability of funds may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets as our lenders realize the impact of adverse conditions in the capital markets. In addition, the severity and duration of adverse conditions is unknown and may increase the Company’s exposure to credit risk and adversely affect the ability of lenders to perform under the terms of their lending arrangements with us. Failure by our lenders to perform


14


 

under the terms of our lending agreements could cause the Company to incur additional costs that may adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and profitability.
 
Due to competition from traditional financing sources and non-traditional lenders, we may not be able to compete successfully.
 
The automobile finance market for consumers who do not qualify for conventional automobile financing is large and highly competitive. The market is served by a variety of companies including “buy here, pay here” dealerships. The market is also currently served by banks, captive finance affiliates of automobile manufacturers, credit unions and independent finance companies both publicly and privately owned. Many of these companies are much larger and have greater financial resources than are available to us, and many have long standing relationships with automobile dealerships. Providers of automobile financing have traditionally competed based on the interest rate charged, the quality of credit accepted, the flexibility of loan terms offered and the quality of service provided to dealers and consumers. There is potential that significant direct competition could emerge and that we may be unable to compete successfully. Additionally, if we are unsuccessful in maintaining and expanding our relationships with dealer-partners, we may be unable to accept Consumer Loans in the volume and on the terms that we anticipate.
 
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our outstanding debt and fund operations.
 
We currently have substantial outstanding indebtedness and our credit facilities allow us to incur significant amounts of additional debt. The ability to make payments of principal or interest on indebtedness will depend in part on our future operating performance, which to a certain extent is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow in the future to service our debt, we may be required to refinance all or a portion of our existing debt or obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any such refinancing will be possible or that any additional financing can be obtained on acceptable terms.
 
Interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect our borrowing costs, profitability and liquidity.
 
Our profitability may be directly affected by the level of and fluctuations in interest rates, which affects our borrowing costs. Our profitability and liquidity could be adversely affected during any period of higher interest rates, possibly to a material degree. We monitor the interest rate environment and employ hedging strategies designed to mitigate the impact of increases in interest rates. We can provide no assurance, however, that hedging strategies will mitigate the impact of increases in interest rates.
 
The regulation to which we are subject could result in a material adverse affect on our business.
 
Our business is subject to various laws and regulations which require licensing and qualification; limit interest rates, fees and other charges associated with the Consumer Loans assigned to us; require specified disclosures by dealer-partners to consumers; govern the sale and terms of ancillary products; and define the rights to repossess and sell collateral. Failure to comply with, or an adverse change in, these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us by, among other things, limiting the jurisdictions in which we may operate, restricting the ability to realize the value of the collateral securing the Consumer Loans, making it more costly or burdensome to do business, or resulting in potential liability. In addition, governmental regulations which would deplete the supply of used vehicles, such as environmental protection regulations governing emissions or fuel consumption, could have a material adverse effect on us.
 
The sale of insurance products in connection with Consumer Loans assigned to us by dealer-partners is also subject to state laws and regulations. As the holder of the Consumer Loans that contain these products, some of these state laws and regulations may apply to our servicing and collection of the Consumer Loans. Although we do not believe that such laws and regulations significantly affect our business because we do not deal directly with consumers in the sale of insurance products, there can be no assurance that insurance regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which such products are offered by dealer-partners will not seek to regulate or restrict the operation


15


 

of the business in such jurisdictions. Any such action could materially adversely affect the income received from such products.
 
Adverse changes in economic conditions, the automobile or finance industries, or the non-prime consumer market, could adversely affect our financial position, liquidity and results of operations, the ability of key vendors that we depend on to supply us with certain services, and our ability to enter into future financing transactions.
 
We are subject to general economic conditions which are beyond our control. During periods of economic slowdown or recession, delinquencies, defaults, repossessions and losses may increase. These periods may also be accompanied by decreased consumer demand for automobiles and declining values of automobiles securing outstanding Consumer Loans, which weakens collateral coverage and increases the amount of a loss in the event of default. Significant increases in the inventory of used automobiles during periods of economic recession may also depress the prices at which repossessed automobiles may be sold or delay the timing of these sales. Because our business is focused on consumers who do not qualify for conventional automobile financing, the actual rates of delinquencies, defaults, repossessions and losses on these Consumer Loans could be higher than that of those experienced in the general automobile finance industry, and could be more dramatically affected by a general economic downturn. In addition, we rely on vendors to provide us with services we need to operate our business. Any disruption in our operations due to the untimely or discontinued supply of these services could substantially adversely affect our operations. Finally, during an economic slowdown or recession, our servicing costs may increase without a corresponding increase in service fee income. Any sustained period of increased delinquencies, defaults, repossessions or losses or increased servicing costs could also materially adversely affect our financial position, liquidity and results of operations and our ability to enter into future financing transactions.
 
Litigation we are involved in from time to time may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
As a result of the consumer-oriented nature of the industry in which we operate and uncertainties with respect to the application of various laws and regulations in some circumstances, we are subject to various consumer claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties, based upon, among other things, usury, disclosure inaccuracies, wrongful repossession, violations of bankruptcy stay provisions, certificate of title disputes, fraud and breach of contract. Some litigation against us could take the form of class action complaints by consumers. As the assignee of Consumer Loans originated by dealer-partners, we may also be named as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against dealer-partners. The Company may also have disputes and litigation with dealer-partners. The claims may allege, among other theories of liability, that the Company breached its dealer servicing agreement. The damages and penalties that may be claimed by consumers or dealer-partners in these types of matters can be substantial. The relief requested by the plaintiffs varies but includes requests for compensatory, statutory and punitive damages. A significant judgment against us in connection with any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
 
We are dependent on our senior management and the loss of any of these individuals or an inability to hire additional team members could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.
 
Our senior management average over 9 years of experience with the Company. Our success is dependent upon the management and the leadership skills of this team. In addition, competition from other companies to hire our team members possessing the necessary skills and experience required could contribute to an increase in team member turnover. The loss of any of these individuals or an inability to attract and retain additional qualified team members could adversely affect us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain our existing senior management or attract additional qualified team members.
 
Our inability to properly safeguard confidential consumer information.
 
If third parties or our employees are able to breach our network security or otherwise misappropriate our customers’ personal information or loan information, or if we give third parties or our employees improper access to our customers’ personal information or loan information, we could be subject to liability. This liability could


16


 

include identity theft or other similar fraud-related claims. This liability could also include claims for other misuses or losses of personal information, including for unauthorized marketing purposes. Other liabilities could include claims alleging misrepresentation of our privacy and data security practices.
 
We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect secure online transmission of confidential consumer information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms that we use to protect sensitive customer transaction data. A party who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend capital and other resources to protect against such security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. Our security measures are designed to protect against security breaches, but our failure to prevent such security breaches could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability, and damage our reputation.
 
Our operations could suffer from telecommunications or technology downtime or increased costs.
 
The temporary or permanent loss of our computer and telecommunications equipment, software systems and Internet access, through system conversions or operating malfunction, could disrupt our operations. In the normal course of our business, we must record and process significant amounts of data quickly and accurately to access, maintain and expand the databases we use for our origination and collection activities. Any failure of our information systems or software and our backup systems could interrupt our business operations and harm our business.
 
Our ability to integrate computer and telecommunications technologies into our business is essential to our competitive position and our success. Computer and telecommunications technologies are evolving rapidly and are characterized by short product life cycles. We may not be successful in anticipating, managing or adopting technological changes on a timely basis.
 
While we believe that our existing information systems are sufficient to meet our current demands and continued expansion, our future growth may require additional investment in these systems. We cannot ensure that adequate capital resources will be available to us at the appropriate time.
 
Natural disasters, acts of war, terrorist attacks and threats or the escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or otherwise may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Natural disasters, acts of war, terrorist attacks and the escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or otherwise may have negative and significant effects, such as imposition of increased security measures, changes in applicable laws, market disruptions and job losses. Such events may have an adverse effect on the economy in general. Moreover, the potential for future terrorist attacks and the national and international responses to such threats could affect the business in ways that cannot be predicted. The effect of any of these events or threats could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
ITEM 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.
 
ITEM 2.   PROPERTIES
 
United States and Other
 
Our headquarters are located at 25505 West Twelve Mile Road, Southfield, Michigan 48034. We purchased the office building in 1993 and have a mortgage loan from a commercial bank that is secured by a first mortgage lien on the property. The office building includes approximately 136,000 square feet of space on five floors. We occupy approximately 120,000 square feet of the building, with most of the remainder of the building leased to various tenants.


17


 

We lease approximately 14,000 square feet of office space in Southfield, Michigan and approximately 20,000 square feet of office space in Henderson, Nevada. The lease for the Southfield, Michigan space expires in April 2013 and the lease for the Henderson, Nevada space expires in October 2009.
 
ITEM 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
In the normal course of business and as a result of the consumer-oriented nature of the industry in which we operate, industry participants are frequently subject to various consumer claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties. The claims allege, among other theories of liability, violations of state, federal and foreign truth-in-lending, credit availability, credit reporting, consumer protection, warranty, debt collection, insurance and other consumer-oriented laws and regulations, including claims seeking damages for physical and mental damages relating to our repossession and sale of the consumer’s vehicle and other debt collection activities. As we accept assignments of Consumer Loans originated by dealer-partners, we may also be named as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against dealer-partners. The Company may also have disputes and litigation with dealer-partners. The claims may allege, among other theories of liability, that the Company breached its dealer servicing agreement. Many of these cases are filed as purported class actions and seek damages in large dollar amounts. An adverse ultimate disposition in any such action could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
 
ITEM 4.   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
No matters were submitted to a vote of the shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2008.


18


 

 
PART II
 
ITEM 5.   MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
Stock Price
 
During the year ended December 31, 2008 our common stock was traded on The Nasdaq Global Market® (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol CACC. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices as reported by the Nasdaq for the common stock for the relevant periods during 2008 and 2007. Such bid information reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
 
                                 
    2008     2007  
Quarter Ended
  High     Low     High     Low  
 
March 31
  $ 20.97     $ 13.20     $ 33.97     $ 21.74  
June 30
    31.52       15.43       29.11       25.21  
September 30
    25.94       11.00       27.28       20.01  
December 31
    19.97       10.59       25.08       15.44  
 
As of February 13, 2009, the number of beneficial holders and shareholders of record of the common stock was approximately 1,100 based upon securities position listings furnished to us.
 
Dividends
 
We have not paid any cash dividends during the periods presented. Our credit agreements contain financial covenants pertaining to our maximum ratio of funded debt to tangible net worth, which may indirectly limit the payment of dividends on common stock.


19


 

Stock Performance Graph
 
The following graph compares the percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock during the period beginning January 1, 2004 and ending on December 31, 2008 with the cumulative total return on the Nasdaq Market Index and a peer group index based upon approximately 100 companies included in the Dow Jones — US General Financial Index. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on January 1, 2004 in our common stock and in the foregoing indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends.
 
COMPARE 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP.,
NASDAQ MARKET INDEX AND DJ US GENERAL FINANCE INDEX
 
(LINE GRAPH)
 
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON JANUARY 1, 2004
ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2008
 
Stock Repurchases
 
In 1999, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorizes us to purchase common shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at price levels we deem attractive. As of December 31, 2008, we have repurchased approximately 20.4 million shares under the stock repurchase program at a cost of $399.2 million. Included in the stock repurchases to date are 12.5 million shares of common stock purchased through four modified Dutch auction tender offers at a cost of $304.4 million. As of December 31, 2008, we have authorization to repurchase an additional $29.1 million of our common stock.
 
The following table summarizes our stock repurchases for the three months ended December 31, 2008:
 
                                 
                Total Number of
    Maximum Dollar Value
 
                Shares Purchased as
    that May Yet Be Used
 
    Total Number
          Part of Publicly
    to Purchase Shares
 
    of Shares
    Average Price
    Announced Plans
    Under the Plans
 
Period   Purchased     Paid per Share     or Programs     or Programs  
 
October 1 through October 31, 2008
        $           $ 29,113,295  
November 1 through November 30, 2008
    62 *                 29,113,295  
December 1 through December 31, 2008
                      29,113,295  
                                 
          $                
                                 
 
* Amount represents shares of common stock released to the Company by employees as payment of tax withholdings due to the Company upon the vesting of restricted stock.


20


 

 
ITEM 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
The selected income statement and balance sheet data presented below are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, and notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
 
                                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)   2008     2007     2006     2005     2004  
 
Income Statement Data:
                                       
Revenue
  $ 312,186     $ 239,927     $ 219,332     $ 201,268     $ 172,071  
Costs and expenses:
                                       
Salaries and wages
    68,993       55,396       41,015       39,093       35,300  
General and administrative (A)
    27,511       27,271       36,485       20,834       20,724  
Sales and marketing
    16,703       17,441       16,624       14,275       11,915  
Provision for credit losses
    46,029       19,947       11,006       5,705       6,526  
Interest
    43,189       36,669       23,330       13,886       11,660  
Provision for claims
    2,651       39       226       308       343  
Other expenses
    73       52             623       927  
                                         
Total costs and expenses
    205,149       156,815       128,686       94,724       87,395  
                                         
Operating income
    107,037       83,112       90,646       106,544       84,676  
Foreign currency (loss) gain
    (25 )     69       (6 )     1,812       1,650  
                                         
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    107,012       83,181       90,640       108,356       86,326  
Provision for income taxes
    39,944       29,567       31,793       40,159       30,073  
                                         
Income from continuing operations
    67,068       53,614       58,847       68,197       56,253  
                                         
Gain (loss) from operations of discontinued United Kingdom segment (B)
    307       (562 )     (297 )     6,194       1,556  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    198       (1,864 )     (90 )     1,790       484  
                                         
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
    109       1,302       (207 )     4,404       1,072  
                                         
Net income
  $ 67,177     $ 54,916     $ 58,640     $ 72,601     $ 57,325  
                                         
Net income per common share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 2.22     $ 1.83     $ 1.78     $ 1.96     $ 1.48  
                                         
Diluted
  $ 2.16     $ 1.76     $ 1.66     $ 1.85     $ 1.40  
                                         
Income from continuing operations per common share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 2.22     $ 1.78     $ 1.78     $ 1.84     $ 1.46  
                                         
Diluted
  $ 2.16     $ 1.72     $ 1.67     $ 1.74     $ 1.37  
                                         
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 0.00     $ 0.04     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.12     $ 0.03  
                                         
Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ 0.04     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.11     $ 0.03  
                                         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                                       
Basic
    30,249,783       30,053,129       33,035,693       36,991,136       38,617,787  
Diluted
    31,105,043       31,153,688       35,283,478       39,207,680       41,017,205  
                                         
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Loans receivable, net
  $ 1,017,917     $ 810,553     $ 625,780     $ 563,528     $ 526,011  
All other assets
    121,437       131,629       99,433       55,866       65,302  
                                         
Total assets
  $ 1,139,354     $ 942,182     $ 725,213     $ 619,394     $ 591,313  
                                         
Total debt
  $ 641,714     $ 532,130     $ 392,175     $ 146,905       193,547  
Dealer reserve payable, net
                            15,675  
Other liabilities
    159,889       144,602       122,691       99,463       81,201  
                                         
Total liabilities
    801,603       676,732       514,866       246,368       290,423  
Shareholders’ equity (C)
    337,751       265,450       210,347       373,026       300,890  
                                         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,139,354     $ 942,182     $ 725,213     $ 619,394     $ 591,313  
                                         
 
(A) 2006 includes $11.2 million of additional legal expenses related to an increase in the Company’s estimated loss related to a class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri.
 
(B) 2005 includes gain on sale of United Kingdom loan portfolio of $3.0 million.
 
(C) No dividends were paid during the periods presented.


21


 

 
ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Form 10-K.
 
Critical Success Factors
 
Critical success factors include the ability to accurately forecast Consumer Loan performance and access to capital.
 
At the time of Consumer Loan acceptance or purchase, we forecast future expected cash flows from the Consumer Loan. Based on these forecasts, an advance or one time payment is made to the related dealer-partner at a level designed to achieve an acceptable return on capital. If Consumer Loan performance equals or exceeds our original expectation, it is likely our target return on capital will be achieved.
 
Our strategy for accessing the capital required to grow is to: (1) maintain consistent financial performance; (2) maintain modest financial leverage; and (3) maintain multiple funding sources. Our funded debt to equity ratio is 1.9:1 at December 31, 2008. We currently use four primary sources of financing: (1) a revolving secured line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities with institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A asset-backed secured borrowings (“Term ABS 144A”) with qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual credit facility with an institutional investor.
 
Consumer Loan Performance
 
Since the cash flows available to repay Loans are generated, in most cases, from the underlying Consumer Loans, the performance of the Consumer Loans is critical to our financial results. The following table compares our forecast of Consumer Loan collection rates as of December 31, 2008, with the forecasts as of December 31, 2007 and at the time of assignment, segmented by year of assignment:
 
                                         
    Forecasted Collection Percentage as of     Variance in Forecasted Collection Percentage from  
    December 31,
    December 31,
    Initial
    December 31,
    Initial
 
Loan Assignment Year
  2008     2007 (1)     Forecast     2007     Forecast  
 
1999
    72.1 %     72.0 %     73.6 %     0.1 %     (1.5 )%
2000
    72.5 %     72.4 %     72.8 %     0.1 %     (0.3 )%
2001
    67.4 %     67.3 %     70.4 %     0.1 %     (3.0 )%
2002
    70.4 %     70.6 %     67.9 %     (0.2 )%     2.5 %
2003
    73.8 %     74.1 %     72.0 %     (0.3 )%     1.8 %
2004
    73.4 %     73.5 %     73.0 %     (0.1 )%     0.4 %
2005
    74.1 %     73.8 %     74.0 %     0.3 %     0.1 %
2006
    70.3 %     70.9 %     71.4 %     (0.6 )%     (1.1 )%
2007
    67.9 %     71.1 %     70.7 %     (3.2 )%     (2.8 )%
2008
    67.9 %           69.7 %           (1.8 )%
 
(1) These forecasted collection percentages differ from those previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as they have been revised for a new methodology for forecasting future collections on Loans that we implemented during the first quarter of 2008.
 
We forecast future Loan cash flows by comparing Loans in our current portfolio to historical Loans with the same attributes. The attributes include both variables captured at Loan origination like credit bureau data, application data, loan data and vehicle data, as well as variables captured subsequent to Loan origination such as collection and delinquency data. Prior to the second quarter of 2008, our forecasted cash flows were based on an assumption that Loans within our current portfolio would produce similar collection rates as produced by historical Loans with the same attributes. During the second quarter of 2008, we modified our forecast to assume that Loans


22


 

originated in 2006, 2007, and 2008 would perform 100 to 300 basis points worse than historical Loans with the same attributes. This modification reduced estimated future net cash flows by $22.2 million or 1.7% of the total undiscounted cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we again realized lower than expected collection rates and as a result implemented an additional modification to our forecasting methodology. This modification reduced estimated future net cash flows by $9.5 million or 0.7% of the total undiscounted cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio. The adjustment impacted only Loans originated subsequent to September 30, 2007 with more recent Loans impacted more severely and more seasoned Loans within this time period impacted less severely. Forecasted collection rates on Loans originated on or before September 30, 2007 were not modified as collection results during the fourth quarter of 2008 were consistent with our expectations for these Loans. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated timing of future collections to reflect recent trends in prepayment frequency. In recent periods we have experienced a reduction in prepayments, which typically result from payoffs that occur when customers reestablish a positive credit history, trade-in their vehicle, and finance another vehicle purchase with a more traditional auto loan. As the availability of traditional financing has been curtailed as a result of current economic conditions, prepayment rates have declined.
 
As a result of the forecast modifications implemented in the second and fourth quarters of 2008, we now expect Loans originated in 2006, 2007, and 2008 to perform worse than similar Loans originated in 2003 through 2005. The impact of our forecasting changes is summarized in the table below by year of assignment:
 
         
Loan
  Reduction in
Assignment Year
 
Forecasted Performance
 
2006     100 basis points  
2007     200 basis points  
2008     400 basis points  
 
As a result of current economic conditions and uncertainty about future conditions, we are cautious about our forecasts of future collection rates. However, we believe our current estimates are reasonable for the following reasons:
 
  •  Our forecasts start with the assumption that Loans in our current portfolio will perform like historical Loans with similar attributes.
 
  •  We reduced our forecasts during the second quarter on Loans originated in 2006 through 2008 by 100 to 300 basis points as these Loans began to perform worse than expected.
 
  •  Actual Loan performance during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 was consistent with our forecast as of June 30, 2008 for Loans originated prior to October 1, 2007.
 
  •  As described above, we further reduced our forecasts during the fourth quarter of 2008 on Loans originated subsequent to September 30, 2007. Although the performance of these Loans was consistent with expectations during the third quarter of 2008, during the fourth quarter of 2008 the performance of these Loans was worse than expected.
 
  •  We have adjusted our estimated timing of future net cash flows to reflect recent trends relating to Loan prepayments.
 
  •  We have reduced the forecasted collection rate used at Loan inception to price new Loan originations. From September 1, 2008 through January 31, 2009, the forecasted collection rate used at Loan inception was approximately 300 basis points lower than identical Loans originated a year ago. Beginning February 1, 2009, we decreased the forecasted collection rate used at Loan inception by an additional 100 basis points.
 
  •  Our current forecasting methodology, when applied against historical data, produces a consistent forecasted collection rate as the Loans age.
 
  •  During January and February of 2009, realized net Loan cash flows were consistent with our current forecast.


23


 

 
If the economic environment continues to deteriorate, our Loan collection rates may continue to decline. Knowing this, we set prices at Loan inception to increase the likelihood of achieving an acceptable return on capital, even if collection results are worse than we currently forecast.
 
The following table presents forecasted Consumer Loan collection rates, advance rates (includes amounts paid to acquire Purchased Loans), the spread (the forecasted collection rate less the advance rate), and the percentage of the forecasted collections that had been realized as of December 31, 2008. Payments of dealer holdback and Portfolio Profit Express are not included in the advance percentage paid to the dealer-partner. All amounts are presented as a percentage of the initial balance of the Consumer Loan (principal + interest). The table includes both Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans.
 
                                 
    As of December 31, 2008  
    Forecasted
                % of Forecast
 
Loan Assignment Year
  Collection %     Advance %     Spread %     Realized  
 
1999
    72.1 %     48.7 %     23.4 %     99.7 %
2000
    72.5 %     47.9 %     24.6 %     99.3 %
2001
    67.4 %     46.0 %     21.4 %     98.8 %
2002
    70.4 %     42.2 %     28.2 %     98.5 %
2003
    73.8 %     43.4 %     30.4 %     98.0 %
2004
    73.4 %     44.0 %     29.4 %     97.1 %
2005
    74.1 %     46.9 %     27.2 %     95.2 %
2006
    70.3 %     46.6 %     23.7 %     82.4 %
2007
    67.9 %     46.5 %     21.4 %     55.1 %
2008
    67.9 %     44.6 %     23.3 %     21.2 %
 
The following table presents forecasted Consumer Loan collection rates, advance rates (includes amounts paid to acquire Purchased Loans), and the spread (the forecasted collection rate less the advance rate) as of December 31, 2008 for Purchased Loans and Dealer Loans separately:
 
                                 
    Loan
    Forecasted
             
    Assignment Year     Collection %     Advance %     Spread %  
 
Purchased Loans
    2007       67.6 %     48.9 %     18.7 %
      2008       66.9 %     47.0 %     19.9 %
Dealer Loans
    2007       68.0 %     45.9 %     22.1 %
      2008       68.4 %     43.4 %     25.0 %
 
Although the advance rate on Purchased Loans is higher as compared to the advance rate on Dealer Loans, Purchased Loans do not require us to pay dealer holdback.


24


 

The following table summarizes changes in Consumer Loan dollar and unit volume in each of the last 12 quarters as compared with the same period in the previous year:
 
                 
    Consumer Loans
 
    Year over Year Percent Change  
Three Months Ended
  Dollar Volume     Unit Volume  
 
March 31, 2006
    11.1 %     12.6 %
June 30, 2006
    6.1 %     6.8 %
September 30, 2006
    26.4 %     12.4 %
December 31, 2006
    36.1 %     18.2 %
March 31, 2007
    41.1 %     25.0 %
June 30, 2007
    43.9 %     26.8 %
September 30, 2007
    2.2 %     0.2 %
December 31, 2007
    23.3 %     13.8 %
March 31, 2008
    28.5 %     16.0 %
June 30, 2008
    40.6 %     26.1 %
September 30, 2008
    27.5 %     26.9 %
December 31, 2008
    (21.0 )%     (13.4 )%
 
During 2008 we reduced advance rates in response to a more favorable competitive environment and projected capital availability. Reducing advance rates increases our return on capital, but reduces Consumer Loan unit volume.
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, unit volume declined by 13.4% and dollar volume declined by 21.0%. Unit volume declined due to a decrease in volume per active dealer-partner, partially offset by an increase in the number of active dealer-partners. Dollar volume declined more than unit volume due to reductions in the average Loan size caused by the pricing changes implemented in the third quarter of 2008.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, unit volume increased by 13.7% and dollar volume increased by 18.9%. Unit volume increased due to an increase in the number of active dealer-partners offset by decreased volume per active dealer-partner. The decrease in volume per active dealer-partner was caused by various pricing changes implemented in 2007 and 2008, partially offset by an improving competitive environment. Dollar volume increased due to the increase in unit volume and an increase in the percentage of Purchased Loans accepted by us. On average, the amount paid to acquire a Purchased Loan is larger than the amount advanced on a Dealer Loan. These increases were partially offset by reductions in the average Loan size during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 caused by various pricing changes implemented in the second and third quarters of 2008.


25


 

Results of Operations
 
The following is a discussion of the results of operations and income statement data for the Company on a consolidated basis:
 
                                                 
    Year Ended
          Year Ended
          Year Ended
       
    December 31,
    % of
    December 31,
    % of
    December 31,
    % of
 
    2008     Revenue     2007     Revenue     2006     Revenue  
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)                                
 
Revenue:
                                               
Finance charges
  $ 286,823       91.8 %   $ 220,473       91.9 %   $ 188,605       86.0 %
Premiums earned
    3,967       1.3       361       0.2       1,043       0.5  
Program fees
    193       0.1       283       0.1       13,589       6.2  
Other income
    21,203       6.8       18,810       7.8       16,095       7.3  
                                                 
Total revenue
    312,186       100.0       239,927       100.0       219,332       100.0  
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Salaries and wages
    68,993       22.2       55,396       23.1       41,015       18.7  
General and administrative
    27,511       8.8       27,271       11.4       36,485       16.6  
Sales and marketing
    16,703       5.4       17,441       7.3       16,624       7.6  
Provision for credit losses
    46,029       14.7       19,947       8.3       11,006       5.0  
Interest
    43,189       13.8       36,669       15.3       23,330       10.6  
Provision for claims
    2,651       0.8       39             226       0.1  
Other expense
    73             52                    
                                                 
Total costs and expenses
    205,149       65.7       156,815       65.4       128,686       58.6  
                                                 
Operating income
    107,037       34.3       83,112       34.6       90,646       41.4  
Foreign currency (loss) gain
    (25 )           69             (6 )      
                                                 
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    107,012       34.3       83,181       34.6       90,640       41.4  
Provision for income taxes
    39,944       12.8       29,567       12.3       31,793       14.5  
                                                 
Income from continuing operations
    67,068       21.5       53,614       22.3       58,847       26.9  
Discontinued operations
Gain (loss) from discontinued United
                                               
Kingdom operations
    307       0.1       (562 )     (0.2 )     (297 )     (0.1 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    198       0.1       (1,864 )     (0.8 )     (90 )      
                                                 
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
    109             1,302       0.6       (207 )     (0.1 )
                                                 
Net income
  $ 67,177       21.5 %   $ 54,916       22.9 %   $ 58,640       26.8 %
                                                 
Net income per common share:
                                               
Basic
  $ 2.22             $ 1.83             $ 1.78          
                                                 
Diluted
  $ 2.16             $ 1.76             $ 1.66          
                                                 
Income from continuing operations per common share:
                                               
Basic
  $ 2.22             $ 1.78             $ 1.78          
                                                 
Diluted
  $ 2.16             $ 1.72             $ 1.67          
                                                 
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
                                               
Basic
  $ 0.00             $ 0.04             $ (0.01 )        
                                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.00             $ 0.04             $ (0.01 )        
                                                 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                                               
Basic
    30,249,783               30,053,129               33,035,693          
Diluted
    31,105,043               31,153,688               35,283,478          


26


 

Continuing Operations
 
Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
 
The following table highlights changes for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007:
 
         
    Year Ended
 
    December 31,
 
    2008  
 
Average outstanding balance of Loan portfolio
    33.8 %
Finance charges
    30.1 %
Operating expenses
    13.1 %
Provision for credit losses
    130.8 %
Interest expense
    17.8 %
Income from continuing operations
    25.1 %
 
Income from continuing operations increased for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to the Company being able to achieve operating expense efficiencies while growing the Loan portfolio. The increase in the average outstanding balance of our Loan portfolio, partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on our Loan portfolio of 1.1%, has resulted in an increase in finance charges. The average outstanding balance of our Loan portfolio increased due to an increase in the number of active dealer-partners partially offset by a reduction in volume per active dealer-partner. The average yield on our Loan portfolio decreased primarily due to worsening Loan performance partially offset by more attractive pricing on 2008 originations.
 
Income from continuing operations grew slower than finance charges due to a significant increase in the provision for credit losses resulting from reductions in forecasted collection rates during the second and fourth quarters of 2008. The increase in the provision for credit losses was partially offset by slower growth in operating expenses and interest expense.
 
The following table summarizes the changes in active dealer-partners and corresponding Consumer Loan unit volume:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     % Change  
 
Consumer Loan unit volume
    121,282       106,693       13.7  
Active dealer-partners (1)
    3,264       2,827       15.5  
                         
Average volume per active dealer-partner
    37.2       37.7       (1.3 )
Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners active both periods
    99,176       95,067       4.3  
Dealer-partners active both periods
    2,020       2,020        
                         
Average volume per dealer-partner active both periods
    49.1       47.1       4.3  
Consumer Loan unit volume from new dealer-partners
    21,659       19,914       8.8  
New active dealer-partners (2)
    1,202       1,162       3.4  
                         
Average volume per new active dealer-partner
    18.0       17.1       5.3  
Attrition (3)
    −10.9 %     −10.5 %        
 
(1) Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the period.
 
(2) New active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who enrolled in our program and have received funding for their first Loan from us during the periods presented.
 
(3) Attrition is measured according to the following formula: decrease in Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the comparable period of the prior year but did not receive funding for any Loans during the current period divided by prior year comparable period Consumer Loan unit volume.


27


 

 
Premiums Earned and Provision for Claims.  During the fourth quarter of 2008, we formed VSC Re in order to enhance our control and the security of the trust assets that will be used to pay future vehicle service contract claims. VSC Re currently reinsures vehicle service contracts that are underwritten by two of our three third party insurers. Our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008 reflect two months of VSC Re activity, including $3.9 million in premiums earned and $2.7 million in provision for claims.
 
Other Income.  The following table highlights the changes, as a percentage of revenue, of other income for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007:
 
         
    Year Ended  
 
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
    7.8 %
Interest income on secured financings
    −0.5 %
Income from dealer support products and services
    −0.4 %
Seminars and conventions
    −0.3 %
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income
    0.7 %
Other
    −0.5 %
         
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2008
    6.8 %
         
 
The decrease in other income, as a percentage of revenue, was primarily a result of:
 
  •  Decreased interest income on secured financings due to a decrease in interest rates earned on cash investments relating to secured financing transactions.
 
  •  Decreased income from dealer support products and services due to the lower utilization of, and discontinuance of, certain dealer-partner support programs.
 
  •  Decreased income from seminars and conventions due to the elimination of our national dealer-partner convention during 2008. Expense from seminars and conventions is recorded in sales and marketing. During 2008 and 2007, seminars and conventions expense was greater than the income earned.
 
The decreases above were offset by the following:
 
  •  An increase in periodic vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing payments received during the year from third party vehicle service contract and guaranteed asset protection providers. Since we have only received these payments since 2007, the amounts of these payments are currently not estimable due to a lack of historical information. As a result, the revenue related to these payments was recognized in the period the payments were received. For the year ended December 31, 2008 we received a total of $3.7 million in vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing payments compared to $1.2 million in payments received in 2007.
 
Salaries and Wages.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, salaries and wages expense, as a percentage of revenue, decreased from 23.1% to 22.2%, as compared to 2007. Salaries and wages expense can be categorized into originations, servicing and support functions. Salaries and wages expense related to originations and servicing remained consistent, as a percentage of revenue, while support grew slower than revenue, due to a decrease in stock compensation expense primarily related to restricted stock units granted in the first quarter of 2007.


28


 

General and Administrative.  The following table summarizes the change in general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007:
 
         
    Year Ended  
 
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
    11.4 %
Data processing and computer consulting fees
    −0.8 %
Legal expense
    −0.3 %
Michigan single business tax
    −0.2 %
Other
    −1.3 %
         
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2008
    8.8 %
         
 
The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, in general and administrative expense was primarily a result of various support expenses as follows:
 
  •  Higher expense in 2007 related to data processing and computer consulting fees for investments in new systems, processes, and facilities to support growth initiatives.
 
  •  Higher legal expense in 2007 related to a legal settlement.
 
  •  The Michigan single business tax is recorded in provision for income taxes starting in 2008 due to a change in the nature of the tax.
 
Sales and Marketing.  The following table shows the changes in sales and marketing expense and the unit volume of Loan originations for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007:
 
         
    Year Ended
 
    December 31,
 
    2008  
 
Sales and marketing expense
    −4.2 %
Unit volume of Loan originations
    13.7 %
 
The decrease in sales and marketing expense was due to the discontinuance of certain dealer-partner support programs, lower utilization of various other dealer-partner programs, and the elimination of our national dealer-partner convention during 2008, offset by an increase in sales commissions due to the increase in the unit volume of Loan originations.
 
Provision for Credit Losses.  The increase in the provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007, was primarily due to reductions in our forecasted collection rates during the second and fourth quarters of 2008 as a result of lower than expected realized collection rates during these periods. During the second quarter of 2008, we reduced estimated future net cash flows by $22.2 million or 1.7% of the total undiscounted net cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio, which resulted in a provision for credit losses of $20.8 million. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we reduced estimated future net cash flows by an additional $9.5 million or 0.7% of the total undiscounted net cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated timing of future collections to reflect reduced prepayment expectations as a result of recent trends. The fourth quarter of 2008 forecast modifications resulted in a provision for credit losses of $10.6 million. For additional information regarding the reduction in forecasted collection rates, see discussions of Consumer Loan Performance and Critical Accounting Estimates.


29


 

Interest.  The following table shows interest expense, the average outstanding debt balance and the pre-tax average cost of debt for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
 
                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007  
(Dollars in thousands)        
 
Interest expense
  $ 43,189     $ 36,669  
Average outstanding debt balance
  $ 660,804     $ 469,704  
Pre-tax average cost of debt
    6.5 %     7.8 %
 
The increase in interest expense was primarily the result of an increase in the average outstanding debt balance from borrowings used to fund new Loans, offset by a reduction in our pre-tax average cost of debt due to reductions in market rates.
 
Provision for Income Taxes.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the effective tax rate increased to 37.3%, from 35.6% in the same period of 2007. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in our reserve for uncertain tax positions recorded in 2007.
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
The following table highlights changes for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to 2006:
 
         
    Year Ended
 
    December 31,
 
    2007  
 
Average outstanding balance of Loan portfolio
    23.3 %
Finance charges
    16.9 %
Program fees
    −97.9 %
Operating expenses
    6.4 %
Provision for credit losses
    81.2 %
Interest expense
    57.2 %
Income from continuing operations
    −8.9 %
 
Income from continuing operations decreased for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily due to the following:
 
  •  We changed how we account for our program fees due to changing our methodology of collecting these fees from our dealer-partners. This change reduced program fees by 97.9%.
 
  •  Loan pricing changes implemented during the third quarter of 2006.
 
  •  Restricted stock and restricted stock units granted in the first quarter of 2007 caused salaries and wages to increase 35.1%.
 
  •  We increased our use of debt to fund share repurchases and new Loans. The average ratio of debt to equity for the year increased from 1.1 to 2.0. Increased debt levels, offset by reductions in market rates, caused interest expense to increase 57.2%.
 
  •  The provision for credit losses increased 81.2% primarily due to increases in the provision for credit losses required to reduce the carrying value of the Dealer Loans to maintain the initial yield established at the inception of each Dealer Loan.
 
The increase in the average outstanding balance of our Loan portfolio has resulted in an increase in finance charges, partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on our Loan portfolio of 1.8%. The average outstanding balance of our Loan portfolio increased due to an increase in the number of active dealer-partners on our program partially offset by a decrease in volume per active dealer-partner. The average yield on our Loan portfolio decreased primarily due to the impact of pricing changes made during 2006 and early 2007 in response to a difficult competitive environment.


30


 

The following table summarizes the changes in active dealer-partners and corresponding Consumer Loan unit volume:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2007     2006     % Change  
 
Consumer Loan unit volume
    106,693       91,344       16.8  
Active dealer-partners (1)
    2,827       2,214       27.7  
                         
Average volume per active dealer-partner
    37.7       41.3       (8.7 )
Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners active both periods
    86,265       81,756       5.5  
Dealer-partners active both periods
    1,634       1,634        
                         
Average volume per dealer-partner active both periods
    52.8       50.0       5.5  
Consumer Loan unit volume from new dealer-partners
    19,914       16,779       18.7  
New active dealer-partners (2)
    1,162       857       35.6  
                         
Average volume per new active dealer-partner
    17.1       19.6       (12.8 )
Attrition (3)
    −10.5 %     −9.6 %        
 
(1) Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the period.
 
(2) New active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who enrolled in our program and have received funding for their first Loan from us during the periods presented.
 
(3) Attrition is measured according to the following formula: decrease in Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the comparable period of the prior year but did not receive funding for any Loans during the current period divided by prior year comparable period Consumer Loan unit volume.
 
Program Fees.  Program fees represent monthly fees of $599, charged to dealer-partners that only participate in our Purchase Program, for access to CAPS, administration, servicing and collection services offered by the Company, documentation related to or affecting our program, and all tangible and intangible property owned by Credit Acceptance. Prior to January 1, 2007, program fees represented CAPS fees charged to dealer-partners on a monthly basis. The decrease in program fees for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006, was primarily due to a change in our method of collecting these fees. Effective January 1, 2007, we implemented a change designed to positively impact dealer-partner attrition. We continue to charge a monthly fee of $599, but instead of collecting and recognizing the revenue from the fee in the current period, we collect it from future dealer holdback payments. As a result of this change, we now record program fees as a yield adjustment, recognizing these fees as finance charge revenue over the forecasted net cash flows of the Dealer Loan. The decrease in program fees was partially offset by increases in finance charges as a result of this change.
 
Other Income.  The following table highlights the changes, as a percentage of revenue, of other income for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006:
 
         
    Year Ended  
 
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2006
    7.3 %
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income
    0.6 %
Interest income on secured financings
    0.4 %
Income from dealer support products and services
    −0.5 %
         
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
    7.8 %
         
 
The increase in other income was primarily a result of:
 
  •  An increase in periodic vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing payments received from third party vehicle service contract and guaranteed asset protection providers. For the year ended December 31, 2007 we received a total of $1.2 million in vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing payments. We did not receive vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing payments prior to 2007.


31


 

 
  •  An increase in interest income on secured financings due to an increase in interest rates earned on cash investments relating to secured financing transactions.
 
The increases above, for the year ended December 31, 2007, were offset by decreased income from dealer support products and services due to the discontinuance of certain dealer-partner support programs.
 
Salaries and Wages.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, salaries and wages expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased from 18.7% to 23.1%, as compared to 2006. Salaries and wages expense can be categorized into originations, servicing and support functions. Salaries and wages expense related to originations and servicing remained consistent, as a percentage of revenue, while support grew faster than revenue, due to an increase in stock compensation expense primarily related to restricted stock and restricted stock units granted in the first quarter of 2007.
 
General and Administrative.  The following table summarizes the change in general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006:
 
         
    Year Ended  
 
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2006
    16.6 %
Legal expense
    −5.3 %
Other
    0.1 %
         
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
    11.4 %
         
 
The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, in general and administrative expense was primarily a result of higher than normal legal expense in 2006 primarily related to an $11.2 million increase in our estimated loss related to a class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri.
 
Provision for Credit Losses.  The increase in the provision for the year ended December 31, 2007 was primarily due to an increase in the provision for credit losses required to reduce the carrying value of the Dealer Loans to maintain the initial yield established at the inception of each Dealer Loan.
 
Interest.  The following table shows interest expense, average outstanding debt balance and the pre-tax average cost of debt for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
 
                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2007     2006  
(Dollars in thousands)            
 
Interest expense
  $ 36,669     $ 23,330  
Average outstanding debt balance
  $ 469,704     $ 259,802  
Pre-tax average cost of debt
    7.8 %     9.0 %
 
The increase in interest expense was primarily the result of an increase in the average outstanding debt balance due to borrowings used to fund new Loans during 2007 and 2006 and stock repurchases during 2006, offset by a reduction in our pre-tax average cost of debt due to reductions in market rates.
 
Critical Accounting Estimates
 
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we review our accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with US GAAP.
 
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated herein by reference. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in


32


 

fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and involve a high degree of subjective or complex judgment, and the use of different estimates or assumptions could produce materially different financial results.
 
     
Finance Charge Revenue & Allowance for Credit Losses
   
     
Balance Sheet Captions:
  Loans receivable
    Allowance for credit losses
     
Income Statement Captions:
  Finance charges
    Provision for credit losses
     
Nature of Estimates Required:
  Estimating the amount and timing of future collections and dealer holdback payments.
     
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
  We recognize finance charge income and determine our allowance for credit losses on Loans in a manner consistent with the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-3 “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” SOP 03-3 requires us to recognize finance charges under the interest method such that revenue is recognized on a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows. For Dealer Loans, finance charge revenue and the allowance for credit losses are calculated after first aggregating Dealer Loans outstanding for each dealer-partner. For the same purpose, Purchased Loans are aggregated according to the month the Loan was purchased. Under SOP 03-3, an allowance for credit losses is maintained at an amount that reduces the net asset value (Loan balance less the allowance) to the value of forecasted future cash flows discounted at the yield established at the inception of the Loan (origination date for a Dealer Loan or purchase date for a Purchased Loan). The discounted value of future cash flows is comprised of estimated future collections on the Loans, less any estimated dealer holdback payments related to Dealer Loans. We write off Loans once there are no forecasted future collections on any of the associated Consumer Loans.
    Cash flows from any individual Dealer Loan or pool of Purchased Loans are often different than estimated cash flows at Loan inception. If such difference is favorable, the difference is recognized prospectively into income over the remaining life of the Dealer Loan or pool of Purchased Loans through a yield adjustment. If such difference is unfavorable, a provision for credit losses is recorded immediately as a current period expense and a corresponding allowance for credit losses is established. Because differences between estimated cash flows at inception and actual cash flows occur often, an allowance is required for a significant portion of our Loan portfolio. An allowance for credit losses does not necessarily indicate that a Dealer Loan or pool of Purchased Loans is unprofitable, and in recent years, very seldom are cash flows from a Dealer Loan or pool of Purchased Loans insufficient to repay the initial amounts advanced or paid to the dealer-partner.
    Future collections on Dealer and Purchased Loans are forecasted based on the historical performance of loans with similar characteristics. Dealer holdback is forecasted based on the expected future collections and current advance balance of each Dealer Loan.


33


 

     
    During the first quarter of 2008, we implemented a new methodology for forecasting future collections on Consumer Loans. The new methodology increased the dollar amount of overall forecasted collections by 0.3%. While the new methodology produces overall collection rates that are very similar to those produced by the prior methodology, the new methodology utilizes a more sophisticated approach which allows us to expand the number of variables on which the forecast is based. As a result, we believe the new forecast improves the precision of our estimates in two respects: (i) the new forecast is believed to be more accurate when applied to a smaller group of Consumer Loans which allows us to forecast more accurately at the dealer pool level and more precisely measure the performance of specific segments of our portfolio and (ii) the new forecast is believed to be more sensitive to changes in Consumer Loan performance and will allow us to react more quickly to changes in Consumer Loan performance. Implementation of the new methodology resulted in a reversal of $3.4 million in provision for credit losses as higher forecasted collections reduced the amount of Loan impairment. In conjunction with our implementation of the new forecasting methodology, we reevaluated our forecast of future collections on old, fully-reserved Dealer Loans. As a result, we wrote off $22.7 million of Dealer Loans and the related allowance for credit losses as we were no longer forecasting any future collections on these Dealer Loans. This write-off had no impact on net income for the first quarter of 2008 as all of these Dealer Loans were fully-reserved.
    Our forecast of future collections prior to the second quarter of 2008 assumed that Loans within our current portfolio would produce similar collection rates as produced by historical Loans with the same attributes. During the second quarter of 2008, we modified our forecast to assume that Loans originated in 2006, 2007 and 2008 would perform 100 to 300 basis points lower than historical Loans with the same attributes. As a result we reduced our estimate of future cash flows on these same Loans by $22.2 million, or 1.7%. Of the total reduction, $20.8 million was recorded as provision for credit losses during the second quarter of 2008. We did not modify our forecast related to 2005 and prior Loans as these Loans continue to perform as expected.
    During the fourth quarter of 2008, we again realized lower than expected collection rates and as a result implemented an additional modification to our forecasting methodology. This modification reduced estimated future net cash flows by $9.5 million or 0.7% of the total undiscounted cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio. The adjustment impacted only Loans originated subsequent to September 30, 2007 with more recent Loans impacted more severely and more seasoned Loans within this time period impacted less severely. Forecasted collection rates on Loans originated on or before September 30, 2007 were not modified as collection results during the fourth quarter of 2008 were consistent with our expectations for these Loans. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated timing of future collections to reflect recent trends in prepayment frequency. In recent periods, we have experienced a reduction in prepayments, which typically result from payoffs that occur when customers reestablish a positive credit history, trade-in their vehicle, and finance another vehicle purchase with a more traditional auto loan. As the availability of traditional financing has been curtailed as a result of current economic conditions, prepayment rates have declined. As a result of these forecast modifications, we recognized a provision for credit losses of $10.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2008.
     
Key Factors:
  Variances in the amount and timing of future collections and dealer holdback payments from current estimates could materially impact earnings in future periods.

34


 

     
    At December 31, 2008, a 1% decline in the forecasted future net cash flows on Loans would result in approximately an $8.3 million pre-tax charge to the provision for credit losses. For additional information, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
   
     
Balance Sheet Caption:
  Paid-in capital
     
Income Statement Caption:
  Salaries and Wages
     
Nature of Estimates Required:
  Stock-based Compensation Expense is based on the estimated fair value on the date the equity instrument is granted or awarded by the Company, and is recognized over the expected vesting period of the equity instrument. We also estimate expected forfeiture rate of restricted stock awards.
     
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
  As of December 31, 2007, all stock options were vested and all related expense had been recognized.
    Restricted Stock Awards.  In recognizing restricted stock compensation expense, we make assumptions regarding the expected forfeiture rate of the restricted stock awards. We also make assumptions regarding the expected vesting dates of performance-based restricted stock awards.
    The fair value of restricted stock awards are estimated as if they were vested and issued on the grant date and are recognized over the expected vesting period of the restricted stock award. For additional information, see Notes 2 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated herein by reference.
    Stock Options.  As of December 31, 2007, all stock options were vested and all related expenses had been recognized. We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock option grants. This model calculates the fair value using various assumptions, including the expected life of the option, the expected volatility of the underlying stock, and the expected dividend yield on the underlying stock.
     
Key Factors:
  Changes in the expected vesting dates of performance-based restricted stock awards and expected forfeiture rates would impact the amount and timing of stock-based compensation expense recognized in future periods.
Litigation and Contingent Liabilities
   
     
Balance Sheet Caption:
  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
     
Income Statement Caption:
  General and administrative expense
     
Nature of Estimates Required:
  Estimating the likelihood of adverse legal judgments and any resulting damages owed.
     
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
  The Company, with assistance from our legal counsel, determines if the likelihood of an adverse judgment for various claims and litigation is remote, reasonably possible, or probable. To the extent we believe an adverse judgment is probable and the amount of the judgment is estimable, we recognize a liability. For information regarding the potential various consumer claims against us, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
     
Key Factors:
  Negative variances in the ultimate disposition of claims and litigation outstanding from current estimates could result in additional expense in future periods.
Taxes
   
     
Balance Sheet Captions:
  Deferred income taxes, net
    Income taxes receivable
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
     
Income Statement Caption:
  Provision for income taxes

35


 

     
Nature of Estimates Required:
  Estimating the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return.
     
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
  In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, tax benefits related to uncertain income tax positions can only be recognized if such positions are more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. The tax benefit of an uncertain income tax position is required to be recorded at the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained. For additional information, see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
     
Key Factors:
  Changes in tax laws and variances in projected future results from current estimates that impact judgments could impact our provision for income taxes in future periods.

36


 

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We need capital to fund new Loans and pay dealer holdback. Our primary sources of capital are cash flows from operating activities, collections of Consumer Loans and borrowings through four primary sources of financing: (1) a revolving secured line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities with institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A asset-backed secured borrowings (“Term ABS 144A”) with qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual credit facility with an institutional investor. There are various restrictive debt covenants for each source of financing and we are in compliance with those covenants as of December 31, 2008. For information regarding these financings and the covenants included in the related documents, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated herein by reference.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we have:
 
  •  Expanded our bank line of credit from $75.0 million to $153.5 million and renewed it until June 2010
 
  •  Renewed our $325.0 million warehouse facility to August 2009
 
  •  Completed a $150.0 million asset-backed secured financing with an institutional investor
 
  •  Completed a $50.0 million two-year revolving credit facility with another institutional investor
 
  •  Renewed our $50.0 million residual credit facility until August 2009
 
Our target growth rate in 2009 will depend on our success in securing additional financing and renewing our existing debt facilities. If no additional capital is obtained, we expect to target unit volumes during the first six months of 2009 that are approximately 10% lower than the prior year comparable period.
 
In August of 2009, our $325.0 million warehouse facility and our $50.0 million residual credit facility (collectively referred to as the “maturing facilities”) mature. If we are unsuccessful in renewing the maturing facilities, and alternative financing cannot be obtained, additional reductions in Loan origination volumes will be required. Given current conditions in the credit markets, there can be no assurance that the maturing facilities will be renewed or that alternative financing will be obtained. In the event that the maturing facilities are not renewed, no further advances would be made under the maturing facilities. Assuming the Company continues to be in compliance with all debt covenants, the amount outstanding would be repaid over time as the collections on the Loans securing the maturing facilities are received.
 
The following table summarizes maximum Loan origination volumes under two scenarios: (1) the maturing facilities are renewed (or replaced) but no other additional capital is obtained during 2009; and (2) no additional capital is obtained during 2009 and the maturing facilities are not renewed.
 
                         
          Maximum for the Year Ended
 
          December 31, 2009  
          Assuming Maturing
    Assuming Maturing
 
          Facilities are
    Facilities are Not
 
    Year Ended
    Renewed
    Renewed
 
    December 31, 2008     (or Replaced)     (or Replaced)  
(Dollars in millions)                  
 
Loan dollar volume
  $ 805     $ 660     $ 580  
Average Loans receivable balance, net
  $ 967     $ 1,080     $ 1,050  
 
Cash and cash equivalents increased to $3.2 million as of December 31, 2008 from $0.7 million at December 31, 2007. Our total balance sheet indebtedness increased to $641.7 million at December 31, 2008 from $532.1 million at December 31, 2007. This increase was primarily a result of borrowings used to fund new Loans in 2008.


37


 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents increased to $80.3 million at December 31, 2008 from $74.1 million at December 31, 2007. The following table summarizes restricted cash and cash equivalents:
 
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
(in thousands)            
 
Cash collections related to secured financings
  $ 48,956     $ 42,518  
Cash held in trusts for future vehicle service contract claims (1)
    31,377       18,266  
Cash held in escrow related to settlement of class action lawsuit (2)
          13,318  
                 
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents
  $ 80,333     $ 74,102  
                 
 
(1) A claims reserve associated with the trusts is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
(2) For additional information related to the settlement of the class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Restricted securities available for sale were $3.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007. Restricted securities consist of amounts held in accordance with vehicle service contract trust agreements.
 
A summary of the total future contractual obligations requiring repayments as of December 31, 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
 
                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
          Less than
                   
    Total     1 year     1-3 Years     3-5 Years     Other  
 
Long-term debt, including current maturities and capital leases (1)
  $ 641,714     $ 434,826     $ 206,888     $     $  
Operating lease obligations
    2,050       973       939       138        
Purchase obligations (2)
    348       348                    
Other future obligations (3)
    12,274       12,274                    
                                         
Total contractual obligations (4)
  $ 656,386     $ 448,421     $ 207,827     $ 138     $  
                                         
 
(1) Long-term debt obligations included in the above table consist solely of principal repayments. We are also obligated to make interest payments at the applicable interest rates, as discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. Based on the actual amounts outstanding under our revolving line of credit and warehouse facilities at December 31, 2008, the forecasted amounts outstanding on all other debt and the actual interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2008, interest is expected to be approximately $11.5 million during 2009; $4.6 million during 2010; and $0.6 million during 2011 and thereafter.
 
(2) Purchase obligations consist solely of contractual obligations related to the information system needs of the Company.
 
(3) Other future obligations included in the above table consist solely of reserves for uncertain tax positions recognized under FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”).
 
(4) We have contractual obligations to pay dealer holdback to our dealer-partners; however, as payments of dealer holdback are contingent upon the receipt of customer payments and the repayment of advances, these obligations are excluded from the table above.
 
Based upon anticipated cash flows, management believes that cash flows from operations and its various financing alternatives will provide sufficient financing for debt maturities and for future operations, subject, as discussed above, to the need to reduce Loan originations if we are unable to renew or refinance our maturing facilities. Our ability to borrow funds may be impacted by economic and financial market conditions. If the various financing alternatives were to become limited or unavailable to us, our operations and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected.


38


 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
 
Market Risk
 
We are exposed primarily to market risks associated with movements in interest rates. Our policies and procedures prohibit the use of financial instruments for trading purposes. A discussion of our accounting policies for derivative instruments is included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Interest Rate Risk.  We rely on various sources of financing, some of which are at floating rates of interest and expose us to risks associated with increases in interest rates. We manage such risk primarily by entering into interest rate cap and interest rate swap agreements.
 
As of December 31, 2008, we had $61.3 million of floating rate debt outstanding on our revolving secured line of credit, with no interest rate protection. For every 1.0% increase in rates on our revolving secured line of credit, annual after-tax earnings would decrease by approximately $0.4 million, assuming we maintain a level amount of floating rate debt.
 
As of December 31, 2008, we had $306.0 million in floating rate debt outstanding under our revolving secured warehouse facilities, with interest rate caps of 6.75% on the underlying commercial paper rates. Based on the difference between the rates on our revolving secured warehouse facilities at December 31, 2008 and the interest rate caps, our maximum interest rate risk on the secured warehouse facilities is 4.42%. This maximum interest rate risk would reduce annual after-tax earnings by approximately $8.5 million, assuming we maintain a level amount of floating rate debt.
 
As of December 31, 2008 we had $76.0 million in fixed rate debt, and $192.2 million in floating rate debt outstanding under Term ABS 144A asset-backed secured borrowings. We have entered into two interest rate swaps, which were effective on the closing date of the financings, to convert $50.0 million and $150.0 million in floating rate Term ABS 144A asset-backed secured borrowings into fixed rate debt bearing a rate of 6.28% and 6.37%, respectively. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, which are influenced by a number of factors, including interest rates, amount of debt outstanding, and number of months until maturity. As we have not designated the interest rate swap related to the $50.0 million in floating rate debt as a hedge as defined under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), changes in the fair value of this swap will increase or decrease interest expense.
 
We have designated the interest rate swap related to the $150.0 million floating rate debt as a cash flow hedge as defined under SFAS 133. The effective portion of changes in the fair value will be recorded in other comprehensive income, net of income taxes, and the ineffective portion of changes in fair value will be recorded in interest expense. There has been no such ineffectiveness since the inception of this hedge through December 31, 2008.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
Fair Value Measurements.  In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods of those fiscal years. However, on February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP FAS 157-2”), which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP FAS 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of FSP FAS 157-2. We adopted the applicable portions of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008 (See Note 3). The deferred portions of SFAS 157 will not have


39


 

an impact on our financial statements. The adoption of the applicable portions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities.  In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure financial assets and liabilities (except for those that are specifically exempted from SFAS 159) at fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or liability at fair value can be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as a transition adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. At this time, we have not elected to measure any financial assets or liabilities at fair value under SFAS 159.
 
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The adoption of SFAS 161 will have no financial impact on our consolidated financial statements but will expand our disclosures.
 
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.  In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities” (“FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8”). FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest entities. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 amends both FASB Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, and FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46 (Revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, to require: (1) additional disclosures about transferors’ continuing involvements with transferred financial assets; (2) additional disclosures about a public entities’ (including sponsors) involvement with variable interest entities; and (3) disclosures by a public enterprise that is: (a) a sponsor of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“SPE”) that holds a variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of financial assets to the qualifying SPE; and (b) a servicer of a qualifying SPE that holds a significant variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of financial assets to the qualifying SPE. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 for the year ended December 31, 2008 had no financial impact on our consolidated financial statements but did expand our disclosures.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
We make forward-looking statements in this report and may make such statements in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We may also make forward-looking statements in our press releases or other public or shareholder communications. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and include information about our expectations and possible or assumed future results of operations. When we use any of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “assumes,” “forecasts,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans”, “target” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.
 
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for all of our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent our outlook only as of the date of this report. While we believe that our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially since the statements are based on our current expectations, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” elsewhere in this report and the risks and uncertainties discussed in our other reports filed or furnished from time to time with the SEC.
 
ITEM 7A.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
The information called for by Item 7A is incorporated by reference from the information in Item 7 under the caption “Market Risk” in this Form 10-K.


40


 

ITEM 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
         
    Page
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    42  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
    43  
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
    44  
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
    45  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
    46  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
    47  


41


 

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Credit Acceptance Corporation
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Credit Acceptance Corporation (a Michigan Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP
 
Southfield, Michigan
February 27, 2009


42


 

 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
                 
    As of December 31,  
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)   2008     2007  
 
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 3,154     $ 712  
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
    80,333       74,102  
Restricted securities available for sale
    3,345       3,290  
Loans receivable (including $15,383 and $16,125 from affiliates as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)
    1,148,752       944,698  
Allowance for credit losses
    (130,835 )     (134,145 )
                 
Loans receivable, net
    1,017,917       810,553  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    21,049       20,124  
Income taxes receivable
          20,712  
Other assets
    13,556       12,689  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 1,139,354     $ 942,182  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  $ 83,948     $ 79,834  
Line of credit
    61,300       36,300  
Secured financing
    574,175       488,065  
Mortgage note and capital lease obligations
    6,239       7,765  
Deferred income taxes, net
    75,060       64,768  
Income taxes payable
    881        
                 
Total Liabilities
    801,603       676,732  
                 
Commitments and Contingencies — See Note 12
               
Shareholders’ Equity:
               
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
           
Common stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized, 30,666,691 and 30,240,859 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
    306       302  
Paid-in capital
    11,829       4,134  
Retained earnings
    328,178       261,001  
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax of $1,478 and $(7) at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
    (2,562 )     13  
                 
Total Shareholders’ Equity
    337,751       265,450  
                 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 1,139,354     $ 942,182  
                 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


43


 

 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
                         
    For the Years Ended December 31,  
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)   2008     2007     2006  
 
Revenue:
                       
Finance charges
  $ 286,823     $ 220,473     $ 188,605  
Premiums earned
    3,967       361       1,043  
Program fees
    193       283       13,589  
Other income
    21,203       18,810       16,095  
                         
Total revenue
    312,186       239,927       219,332  
                         
Costs and expenses:
                       
Salaries and wages
    68,993       55,396       41,015  
General and administrative
    27,511       27,271       36,485  
Sales and marketing
    16,703       17,441       16,624  
Provision for credit losses
    46,029       19,947       11,006  
Interest
    43,189       36,669       23,330  
Provision for claims
    2,651       39       226  
Other expense
    73       52        
                         
Total costs and expenses
    205,149       156,815       128,686  
                         
Operating income
    107,037       83,112       90,646  
Foreign currency (loss) gain
    (25 )     69       (6 )
                         
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    107,012       83,181       90,640  
Provision for income taxes
    39,944       29,567       31,793  
                         
Income from continuing operations
    67,068       53,614       58,847  
                         
Discontinued operations
                       
Gain (loss) from discontinued United Kingdom operations
    307       (562 )     (297 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    198       (1,864 )     (90 )
                         
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
    109       1,302       (207 )
                         
Net income
  $ 67,177     $ 54,916     $ 58,640  
                         
Net income per common share:
                       
Basic
  $ 2.22     $ 1.83     $ 1.78  
                         
Diluted
  $ 2.16     $ 1.76     $ 1.66  
                         
Income from continuing operations per common share:
                       
Basic
  $ 2.22     $ 1.78     $ 1.78  
                         
Diluted
  $ 2.16     $ 1.72     $ 1.67  
                         
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
                       
Basic
  $ 0.00     $ 0.04     $ (0.01 )
                         
Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ 0.04     $ (0.01 )
                         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
    30,249,783       30,053,129       33,035,693  
Diluted
    31,105,043       31,153,688       35,283,478  
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


44


 

 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
                                                                 
                                              Accumulated
 
    Total
                            Unearned
          Other
 
    Shareholders’
    Comprehensive
    Common Stock     Paid-In
    Stock
    Retained
    Comprehensive
 
(Dollars in Thousands)   Equity     Income     Number     Amount     Capital     Compensation     Earnings     Income (Loss)  
 
Balance, January 1, 2006
  $ 373,026               37,027     $ 370     $ 29,746     $ (1,566 )   $ 344,513     $ (37 )
Cumulative affect due to adoption of SFAS 123R modified prospective application
                                    (1,566 )     1,566                  
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net income
    58,640     $ 58,640                                       58,640          
Other comprehensive income:
                                                               
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax of $3
    1       1                                               1  
                                                                 
Total comprehensive income
          $ 58,641                                                  
                                                                 
Stock-based compensation
    87                               87                          
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
                  47                                      
Repurchase of common stock
    (247,168 )             (8,796 )     (87 )     (53,181 )             (193,900 )        
Stock options exercised
    12,091               1,902       19       12,072                          
Tax benefit for exercised stock options
    13,670                           13,670                          
                                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2006
    210,347               30,180       302       828             209,253       (36 )
                                                                 
Cumulative affect due to adoption of FIN 48
    (87 )                                             (87 )        
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net income
    54,916     $ 54,916                                       54,916          
Other comprehensive income:
                                                               
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax of $(26)
    49       49                                               49  
                                                                 
Total comprehensive income
          $ 54,965                                                  
                                                                 
Stock-based compensation
    4,659                               4,659                          
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
                  57                                      
Repurchase of common stock
    (9,530 )             (371 )           (6,449 )             (3,081 )        
Stock options exercised
    2,584               375             2,584                          
Tax benefit for exercised stock options
    2,512                           2,512                          
                                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2007
    265,450               30,241       302       4,134             261,001       13  
                                                                 
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net income
    67,177     $ 67,177                                       67,177          
Other comprehensive income:
                                                               
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap, net of tax of $1,488
    (2,580 )     (2,580 )                                             (2,580 )
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax of $(3)
    5       5                                               5  
                                                                 
Total comprehensive income
          $ 64,602                                                  
                                                                 
Stock-based compensation
    4,309               60               4,309                          
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
                  80       1       (1 )                        
Repurchase of common stock
    (66 )             (4 )           (66 )                        
Forfeiture of restricted stock
                  (16 )                                    
Stock options exercised
    2,375               306       3       2,372                          
Tax benefit for exercised stock options
    1,081                           1,081                          
                                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $ 337,751               30,667     $ 306     $ 11,829     $     $ 328,178     $ (2,562 )
                                                                 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


45


 

 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
(Dollars in Thousands)   2008     2007     2006  
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
                       
Net income
  $ 67,177     $ 54,916     $ 58,640  
Adjustments to reconcile cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Provision for credit losses
    46,029       19,947       11,006  
Depreciation
    5,342       4,105       4,624  
Loss (gain) on retirement of property and equipment
    74       196       (271 )
Provision for deferred income taxes
    11,777       20,346       636  
Stock-based compensation
    4,309       4,659       87  
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    46       1,453       22,589  
Decrease (increase) in income taxes receivable
    21,593       (8,978 )     (7,712 )
(Increase) decrease in other assets
    (867 )     1,248       (3,425 )
                         
Net cash provided by operating activities
    155,480       97,892       86,174  
                         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
                       
Increase in restricted cash and cash equivalents
    (6,231 )     (28,493 )     (32,136 )
Purchases of restricted securities available for sale
    (1,514 )     (550 )     (795 )
Proceeds from sale of restricted securities available for sale
    373             302  
Maturities of restricted securities available for sale
    1,094       898       278  
Principal collected on Loans receivable
    609,487       576,543       551,792  
Advances to dealers and accelerated payments of dealer holdback
    (524,496 )     (571,197 )     (532,869 )
Purchases of Consumer Loans
    (280,326 )     (139,340 )     (25,562 )
Payments of dealer holdback
    (58,503 )     (70,950 )     (70,110 )
Net decrease in other receivables
    167       349       3,050  
Purchases of property and equipment
    (6,341 )     (7,659 )     (1,536 )
                         
Net cash used in investing activities
    (266,290 )     (240,399 )     (107,586 )
                         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
                       
Borrowings under line of credit
    809,700       633,500       414,630  
Repayments under line of credit
    (784,700 )     (635,600 )     (412,530 )
Proceeds from secured financing
    605,700       619,500       678,500  
Repayments of secured financing
    (519,590 )     (476,579 )     (434,856 )
Principal payments under mortgage note and capital lease obligations
    (1,526 )     (1,429 )     (1,502 )
Repurchase of common stock
    (66 )     (9,530 )     (247,168 )
Proceeds from stock options exercised
    2,375       2,584       12,091  
Tax benefits from stock based compensation plans
    1,081       2,512       13,670  
                         
Net cash provided by financing activities
    112,974       134,958       22,835  
                         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
    278       (267 )     15  
                         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    2,442       (7,816 )     1,438  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    712       8,528       7,090  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 3,154     $ 712     $ 8,528  
                         
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
                       
Cash paid during the period for interest
  $ 43,255     $ 36,131     $ 23,056  
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
  $ 3,681     $ 14,506     $ 25,427  
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Transactions:
                       
Property and equipment acquired through capital lease obligations
  $     $ 563     $ 1,785  
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


46


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1.   DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
Principal Business.  Since 1972, Credit Acceptance (referred to as the “Company”, “Credit Acceptance”, “we”, “our” or “us”) has provided auto loans to consumers, regardless of their credit history. Our product is offered through a nationwide network of automobile dealers who benefit from sales of vehicles to consumers who otherwise could not obtain financing; from repeat and referral sales generated by these same customers; and from sales to customers responding to advertisements for our product, but who actually end up qualifying for traditional financing.
 
We refer to dealers who participate in our programs, and share our commitment to changing consumers’ lives, as “dealer-partners”. Upon enrollment in our programs, the dealer-partner enters into a dealer servicing agreement with Credit Acceptance that defines the legal relationship between Credit Acceptance and the dealer-partner. The dealer servicing agreement assigns the responsibilities for administering, servicing, and collecting the amounts due on retail installment contracts (referred to as “Consumer Loans”) from the dealer-partners to us.
 
A consumer who does not qualify for conventional automobile financing can purchase a used vehicle from a Credit Acceptance dealer-partner and finance the purchase through us. We are an indirect lender from a legal perspective, meaning the Consumer Loan is originated by the dealer-partner and immediately assigned to us. If we discover a misrepresentation by the dealer-partner relating to a Consumer Loan assigned to us, we can demand that the Consumer Loan be repurchased for the current balance of the Consumer Loan less the amount of any unearned finance charge plus the applicable termination fee, which is generally $500. Upon receipt of such amount in full, we will reassign the Consumer Loan and our security interest in the financed vehicle to the dealer-partner.
 
We have two primary programs: the Portfolio Program and the Purchase Program. Under the Portfolio Program, we advance money to dealer-partners (referred to as a “Dealer Loan”) in exchange for the right to service the underlying Consumer Loan. Under the Purchase Program, we buy the Consumer Loan from the dealer-partner (referred to as a “Purchased Loan”) and keep all amounts collected from the consumer. Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans are collectively referred to as “Loans”. The following table shows the percentage of Consumer Loans assigned to us under each of the programs for each of the last 12 quarters:
 
                 
Quarter Ended
  Portfolio Program   Purchase Program
 
March 31, 2006
    94.9 %     5.1 %
June 30, 2006
    95.8 %     4.2 %
September 30, 2006
    96.3 %     3.7 %
December 31, 2006
    96.5 %     3.5 %
March 31, 2007
    94.8 %     5.2 %
June 30, 2007
    83.8 %     16.2 %
September 30, 2007
    74.5 %     25.5 %
December 31, 2007
    70.6 %     29.4 %
March 31, 2008
    70.2 %     29.8 %
June 30, 2008
    65.4 %     34.6 %
September 30, 2008
    69.2 %     30.8 %
December 31, 2008
    78.2 %     21.8 %
 
Dealer-partners that enroll in our programs have the option to either pay an upfront, one-time enrollment fee of $9,850 or defer payment by agreeing to allow us to keep 50% of their first accelerated dealer holdback payment (“Portfolio Profit Express”). Portfolio Profit Express is paid to qualifying dealer-partners after a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans has been closed. Dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs prior to 2008 have the option to assign Consumer Loans under either the Portfolio Program or the Purchase Program. During 2008, we changed our eligibility requirements for new dealer-partner enrollments to restrict access to the Purchase Program. For dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs during the first eight months of 2008, only dealer-partners that elected to pay the upfront, one-time enrollment fee were initially allowed to assign Consumer Loans under either program. Dealer-


47


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
1.   DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS — (Continued)
 
partners that elected the deferred option during this period were only granted access to the Purchase Program after the first Portfolio Profit Express payment has been made under the Portfolio Program. For all dealer-partners enrolling in our programs after August 31, 2008, access to the Purchase Program is only granted after the first Portfolio Profit Express payment has been made under the Portfolio Program.
 
Portfolio Program
 
As payment for the vehicle, the dealer-partner generally receives the following:
 
  •  a down payment from the consumer;
 
  •  a cash advance from us; and
 
  •  after the advance has been recovered by us, the cash from payments made on the Consumer Loan, net of certain collection costs and our servicing fee (“dealer holdback”).
 
We record the amount advanced to the dealer-partner as a Dealer Loan, which is classified within Loans receivable in our consolidated balance sheets. Cash advanced to dealer-partners is automatically assigned to the originating dealer-partner’s open pool of advances. At the dealer-partner’s option, a pool containing at least 100 Consumer Loans can be closed and subsequent advances assigned to a new pool. All advances due from a dealer-partner are secured by the future collections on the dealer-partner’s portfolio of Consumer Loans assigned to us. For dealer-partners with more than one pool, the pools are cross-collateralized so the performance of other pools is considered in determining eligibility for dealer holdback. We perfect our security interest in the Dealer Loans by taking possession of the Consumer Loans.
 
The dealer servicing agreement provides that collections received by us during a calendar month on Consumer Loans assigned by a dealer-partner are applied on a pool-by-pool basis as follows:
 
  •  First, to reimburse us for certain collection costs;
 
  •  Second, to pay us our servicing fee;
 
  •  Third, to reduce the aggregate advance balance and to pay any other amounts due from the dealer-partner to us; and
 
  •  Fourth, to the dealer-partner as payment of dealer holdback.
 
Dealer-partners have an opportunity to receive Portfolio Profit Express at the time a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans is closed. The amount paid to the dealer-partner is calculated using a formula that considers the forecasted collections and the advance balance on the closed pool. If the collections on Consumer Loans from a dealer-partner’s pool are not sufficient to repay the advance balance, the dealer-partner will not receive dealer holdback.
 
Since typically the combination of the advance and the consumer’s down payment provides the dealer-partner with a cash profit at the time of sale, the dealer-partner’s risk in the Consumer Loan is limited. We cannot demand repayment from the dealer-partner of the advance except in the event the dealer-partner is in default of the dealer servicing agreement. Advances are made only after the Consumer Loan is approved, accepted and assigned to us and all other stipulations required for funding have been satisfied. The dealer-partner can also opt to repurchase Consumer Loans assigned under the Portfolio Program, at their discretion, for a fee.
 
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the Portfolio Program are not considered to be loans to consumers. Instead, our accounting reflects that of a lender to the dealer-partner. The classification as a Dealer Loan for accounting purposes is primarily a result of (1) the dealer-partner’s financial interest in the Consumer Loan and (2) certain elements of our legal relationship with the dealer-partner. The cash amount advanced to the dealer-partner is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. The aggregate amount of all advances to an individual dealer-partner, plus finance charges, plus dealer holdback payments, plus Portfolio Profit Express payments, less


48


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
1.   DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS — (Concluded)
 
collections (net of certain collection costs), less write-offs, comprises the amount of the Dealer Loan recorded in Loans receivable.
 
Purchase Program
 
We began offering a Purchase Program on a limited basis in March of 2005. The Purchase Program differs from our traditional Portfolio Program in that the dealer-partner receives a single payment from us at the time of origination instead of a cash advance and dealer holdback. Purchase Program volume increased significantly beginning in 2007 as the program was offered to additional dealer-partners.
 
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the Purchase Program are considered to be originated by the dealer-partner and then purchased by us. The cash amount paid to the dealer-partner is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. The aggregate amount of all amounts paid to purchase Consumer Loans from dealer-partners, plus finance charges, less collections (net of certain collection costs), less write-offs, comprises the amount of Purchased Loans recorded in Loans receivable.
 
Businesses in Liquidation.  Effective June 30, 2003, we decided to stop originating Consumer Loans in the United Kingdom and we sold the remainder of the portfolio on December 30, 2005. Over the last three years we have had minimal activity as we have been liquidating our United Kingdom subsidiary.
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Our primary subsidiaries are: Buyer’s Vehicle Protection Plan, Inc., Vehicle Remarketing Services, Inc., VSC Re Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corp. II, CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2006-1, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2006-2, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-1, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-2, and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2008-1.
 
Reportable Business Segments
 
We are organized into two primary business segments: United States and Other. For more information regarding our reportable segments, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The accounts which are subject to significant estimation include the allowance for credit losses, finance charge revenue, stock-based compensation expense, contingencies, and taxes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash equivalents consist of readily marketable securities with original maturities at the date of acquisition of three months or less.


49


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The carrying amount of restricted cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The following table summarizes restricted cash and cash equivalents:
 
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
(in thousands)
               
Cash collections related to secured financings
  $ 48,956     $ 42,518  
Cash held in trusts for future vehicle service contract claims (1)
    31,377       18,266  
Cash held in escrow related to settlement of class action lawsuit (2)
          13,318  
                 
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents
  $ 80,333     $ 74,102  
                 
 
(1) The unearned premium and claims reserve associated with the trusts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
(2) For additional information related to the settlement of the class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Restricted Securities Available for Sale
 
Restricted securities consist of amounts held in accordance with vehicle service contract trust agreements. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments in debt securities at the time of purchase and reevaluate such determinations at each balance sheet date. Debt securities for which we do not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale, and stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes included in the determination of comprehensive income and reported as a component of shareholders’ equity.
 
Restricted securities available for sale consisted of the following:
 
                                 
    As of December 31, 2008  
          Gross
    Gross
       
          Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Estimated Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
 
(in thousands)
                               
US Government and agency securities
  $ 842     $ 53     $     $ 895  
Corporate bonds
    2,475       9       (34 )     2,450  
                                 
Total restricted securities available for sale
  $ 3,317     $ 62     $ (34 )   $ 3,345  
                                 
 
                                 
    As of December 31, 2007  
          Gross
    Gross
       
          Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Estimated Fair
 
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
 
(in thousands)
                               
US Government and agency securities
  $ 1,584     $ 40     $     $ 1,624  
Corporate bonds
    1,686       10       (30 )     1,666  
                                 
Total restricted securities available for sale
  $ 3,270     $ 50     $ (30 )   $ 3,290  
                                 
 
The cost and estimated fair values of debt securities by contractual maturity were as follows (securities with multiple maturity dates are classified in the period of final maturity). Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
 


50


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
                                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
          Estimated
          Estimated
 
    Cost     Fair Value     Cost     Fair Value  
 
(in thousands)
                               
Contractual Maturity
                               
Within one year
  $ 1,665     $ 1,670     $ 1,096     $ 1,100  
Over one year to five years
    1,652       1,675       2,174       2,190  
                                 
Total restricted securities available for sale
  $ 3,317     $ 3,345     $ 3,270     $ 3,290  
                                 
 
Finance Charges
 
Finance charges is comprised of: (1) servicing fees earned as a result of servicing Consumer Loans assigned to us by dealer-partners under the Portfolio Program; (2) finance charge income from Purchased Loans; (3) fees earned from our third party ancillary product offerings; (4) monthly program fees charged to dealer-partners under the Portfolio Program; and (5) fees associated with certain Loans. We recognize finance charge income on Loans in a manner consistent with the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-3 “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” SOP 03-3 requires us to recognize finance charges under the interest method such that revenue is recognized on a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows.
 
For Dealer Loans only, certain direct origination costs such as salaries and credit reports are deferred and the net costs are recognized as an adjustment to finance charges over the life of the related Dealer Loan on a level-yield basis. This treatment is in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 91, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases”.
 
Buyers Vehicle Protection Plan, Inc. (“BVPP”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, has relationships with third party administrators (“TPAs”) whereby the TPAs process claims on vehicle service contracts that are underwritten by third party insurers. BVPP receives a commission for all vehicle service contracts sold by our dealer-partners when the vehicle is financed by us. The commission is included in the retail price of the vehicle service contract which is added to the Consumer Loan. We provide dealer-partners with an additional advance based on the retail price of the vehicle service contract. We recognize our commission from the vehicle service contracts as part of finance charges on a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows.
 
BVPP also has a relationship with a TPA that allows dealer-partners to offer a Guaranteed Asset Protection (“GAP”) product to consumers whereby the TPA processes claims that are underwritten by a third party insurer. GAP provides the consumer protection by paying the difference between the loan balance and the amount covered by the consumer’s insurance policy in the event the vehicle is totaled or stolen. We receive a commission for all GAP contracts sold by our dealer-partners when the vehicle is financed by us, and do not bear any risk of loss for claims. The commission is included in the retail price of the GAP contract which is added to the Consumer Loan. We provide dealer-partners with an additional advance based on the retail price of the GAP contract. We recognize our commission from the GAP contracts as part of finance charges on a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows.
 
Program fees represent monthly fees of $599 charged to dealer-partners for access to our Credit Approval Processing System (“CAPS”); administration, servicing and collection services offered by the Company; documentation related to or affecting our program; and all tangible and intangible property owned by Credit Acceptance. Effective January 1, 2007, we implemented a change designed to positively impact dealer-partner attrition. We continue to charge a monthly fee of $599 to dealer-partners participating in our Portfolio Program, but instead of collecting and recognizing the revenue from the fee in the current period, we collect it from future dealer holdback

51


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
payments. As a result of this change, we now record program fees under the Portfolio Program as a yield adjustment, recognizing these fees as finance charge revenue over the forecasted net cash flows of the Dealer Loan.
 
Premiums Earned
 
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we formed VSC Re Company (“VSC Re”), a wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged in the business of reinsuring coverage under vehicle service contracts sold to consumers by dealer-partners on vehicles financed by us. VSC Re currently reinsures vehicle service contracts that are underwritten by two of our three third party insurers. Vehicle service contract premiums, which represent the selling price of the vehicle service contract to the consumer less commissions and certain administrative costs, are contributed to trust accounts controlled by VSC Re. These premiums are used to fund claims covered under the vehicle service contracts. The Company has entered into arrangements with third-party insurance companies that limit our exposure to fund claims to the amount of premium dollars contributed, less amounts earned and withdrawn, plus $0.5 million of equity contributed. With the reinsurance structure, we will be able to access projected excess trust assets monthly and will record revenue and expense on an accrual basis. Premiums are earned over the life of the vehicle service contract using an average of the pro rata and rule of 78 methods. Claims are expensed as provision for claims in the period the claim was incurred. Our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008 reflect two months of VSC Re activity, including $3.9 million in premiums earned and $2.7 million in provision for claims. Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”), we are considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts and as a result, trust assets of $29.3 million at December 31, 2008 have been consolidated on our balance sheet as restricted cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2008, accounts payable and accrued liabilities includes $23.3 million of unearned premium and $0.9 million of claims reserve related to our reinsurance of vehicle service contracts.
 
Prior to the formation of VSC Re, our agreements with two of our TPAs allowed us to receive profit sharing payments depending upon the performance of the vehicle service contract programs. The agreements also required that vehicle service contract premiums be placed in trust accounts. Funds in the trust accounts were utilized by the TPA to pay claims on the vehicle service contracts. Upon the formation of VSC Re during the fourth quarter of 2008, the unearned premiums on the majority of the vehicle service contracts that had been written through these two TPAs were ceded to VSC Re along with any related trust assets. As the trust assets transferred to VSC Re exceeded the ceded unearned premiums, we recorded a deferred gain of $4.3 million upon the formation of VSC Re. The deferred gain will be recognized as premiums earned revenue over a 26 month period (average remaining life of the ceded vehicle service contracts) using an average of the pro rata and rule of 78 methods. Vehicle service contracts written prior to 2008 through one of the TPAs remains under this profit sharing arrangement. Profit sharing payments, if any, on the vehicle service contracts are distributed to us periodically after the term of the vehicle service contracts have substantially expired provided certain loss rates are met. Under FIN 46, we are considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts. As a result, the assets and liabilities of the remaining trust have been consolidated on our balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, the remaining trust had $5.4 million in assets available to pay claims and a related claims reserve of $4.7 million. The trust assets are included in restricted cash and cash equivalents and restricted securities available for sale. The claims reserve is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. A third party insures claims in excess of funds in the trust accounts.
 
We formed VSC Re in order to enhance our control and the security of the trust assets that will be used to pay future vehicle service contract claims. The income we expect to earn from vehicle service contracts over time will likely not be impacted as, both before and after the formation of VSC Re, the income we receive is based on the amount by which vehicle service contract premiums exceed claims. The only change in our risk associated with adverse claims experience relates to the $0.5 million equity contribution that was required as part of this new structure, which is now at risk in the event claims exceed premiums. Under the prior structure, our risk was limited to the amount of premiums contributed to the trusts.


52


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
Our determination to consolidate the VSC Re trusts and the profit sharing trusts under FIN 46 was based on the following:
 
  •  First, we determined that the trusts qualified as variable interest entities as defined under FIN 46. The trusts have insufficient equity at risk as no parties to the trusts were required to contribute assets that provide them with any ownership interest.
 
  •  Next, we determined that we have variable interests in the trusts. We have a residual interest in the assets of the trusts, which is variable in nature, given that it increases or decreases based upon the actual loss experience of the related service contracts. In addition, for VSC Re, we are required to absorb any losses in excess of the trusts assets, up to the $0.5 million of equity contributed.
 
  •  Finally, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the trusts. The trusts are not expected to generate losses that need to be absorbed by the parties to the trusts. The trusts are expected to generate residual returns and we are entitled to all of those returns.
 
The limited amounts of premiums earned and provision for claims in 2007 and 2006 relate to coverage we reinsured under credit life and disability insurance sold to consumers by dealer-partners on vehicles financed by us. We ceased financing this product in 2006.
 
Program Fees
 
As discussed further under Finance Charges, effective January 1, 2007, we made a change in how we collect the monthly program fee of $599 charged to dealer-partners participating in our Portfolio Program. As a result of this change, we now recognize program fees under the Portfolio Program as finance charge revenue. During 2008 and 2007, the limited amount of program fee revenue recognized relates to certain dealer-partners that only participate in our Purchase Program. During 2006, program fee revenue recognized relates to dealer-partners participating in both our Portfolio and Purchase Programs. Program fee revenue is recognized in the period charged to the dealer-partner.
 
Other Income
 
Other income consists of the following:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     2006  
 
(in thousands)
                       
Marketing income
  $ 4,198     $ 2,691     $ 1,515  
Remarketing charges
    4,021       2,954       3,029  
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income
    3,738       1,201       51  
Dealer support products and services
    2,416       2,779       3,598  
Interest income
    2,019       3,020       1,799  
Dealer enrollment fees
    1,905       1,859       1,725  
Seminars and conventions
    527       1,034       1,244  
Rental income
    306       404       458  
Other
    2,073       2,868       2,676  
                         
    $ 21,203     $ 18,810     $ 16,095  
                         
 
Marketing income primarily consists of payments received on a monthly basis from vendors that charge a fee to consumers to process or expedite their payments. The amount of income we earn is based on the amount of payments processed by the vendors and is paid to us according to a tiered structure. Marketing income also includes


53


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
fees we receive from third parties for providing dealer-partners in certain states the ability to purchase Global Positioning Systems (“GPS”) with Starter Interrupt Devices (“SID”). Through this program, dealer-partners can install a GPS-based SID (“GPS-SID”) on vehicles financed by us that can be activated if the consumer fails to make payments on their account, and can result in the prompt repossession of the vehicle. Dealer-partners purchase the GPS-SID directly from the third party and the third party pays us a marketing fee for each device sold. GPS-SID revenue is recognized when the unit is sold and installed in the consumer’s vehicle.
 
Remarketing charges are fees retained from the sale of repossessed vehicles by Vehicle Remarketing Services, Inc. (“VRS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary that is responsible for remarketing vehicles for Credit Acceptance. VRS coordinates vehicle repossessions with a nationwide network of repossession agents, the redemption of the vehicle by the consumer, or the sale of the vehicle through a nationwide network of vehicle auctions. VRS recognizes income from the retained fees at the time of the sale. VRS does not retain a fee if a repossessed vehicle is redeemed by the consumer prior to the sale. In addition, any skip tracing fees incurred by VRS are passed on to us and are included in remarketing charges.
 
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income is from payments received from TPAs based upon the performance of vehicle service contracts and GAP products provided by BVPP. Profit sharing payments from the TPAs are received periodically during the year, if eligible. Profit sharing payments are currently not estimable due to a lack of historical information and therefore, revenue related to these payments is recognized in the period the payments are received.
 
Dealer support products and services revenue primarily relates to products and services provided to dealer-partners to assist with their vehicle inventory and is recognized in the period the service is provided.
 
Interest income includes income on restricted cash relating to collections on securitized Loans and income related to amounts in the vehicle service contract trust accounts and is recognized in the month earned.
 
Dealer enrollment fees include fees from dealer-partners that enroll in our programs by either paying an upfront, one-time enrollment fee of $9,850 or deferring payment by agreeing to allow us to keep 50% of their first Portfolio Profit Express payment. For dealer-partners that choose to pay the upfront, one-time enrollment fee of $9,850, revenue related to these fees is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the dealer-partner relationship. For dealer-partners that choose to defer payment, we do not recognize any revenue for the enrollment fee until the dealer-partner has met the eligibility requirements to receive an accelerated dealer holdback payment and the amount of the first payment, if any, has been calculated. Once the accelerated dealer holdback payment has been calculated, we defer the 50% portion that we keep and recognize it on a straight-line basis over the remaining estimated life of the dealer-partner relationship.
 
Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses
 
Dealer Loans.  At the time of acceptance, Consumer Loans that meet certain criteria are eligible for an advance, which is computed on a formula basis. The Dealer Loan is increased as revenue is recognized, dealer holdback payments are made, and Portfolio Profit Express Payments are made, and decreased as collections (net of certain collection costs) are received and write-offs are recorded. We follow an approach consistent with the provisions of SOP 03-3 in determining our allowance for credit losses. Consistent with SOP 03-3, an allowance for credit losses is maintained at an amount that reduces the net asset value (Dealer Loan balance less the allowance) to the value of forecasted future cash flows discounted at the yield established at the inception of the Dealer Loan. This allowance is calculated on a dealer-partner by dealer-partner basis. The discounted value of future cash flows is comprised of estimated future collections on the Consumer Loans, less any estimated dealer holdback payments. We write off Dealer Loans once there are no forecasted future collections on any of the associated Consumer Loans.
 
Future collections on Dealer Loans are forecasted based on the historical performance of loans with similar characteristics. Dealer holdback is forecasted based on the expected future collections and current advance balance of each Dealer Loan. Cash flows from any individual Dealer Loan are often different than estimated cash flows at


54


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
Dealer Loan inception. If such difference is favorable, the difference is recognized prospectively into income over the remaining life of the Dealer Loan through a yield adjustment. If such difference is unfavorable, a provision for credit losses is recorded immediately as a current period expense and a corresponding allowance for credit losses is established. Because differences between estimated cash flows at inception and actual cash flows occur often, an allowance is required for a significant portion of our Dealer Loan portfolio. An allowance for credit losses does not necessarily indicate that a Dealer Loan is unprofitable, and in recent years, very seldom are cash flows from a Dealer Loan insufficient to repay the initial amounts advanced to the dealer-partner. Due to recent trends and a concern about the worsening economic environment, forecasted collection amounts on Dealer Loans originated in 2006 through 2008 were reduced by 100 to 400 basis points.
 
Cash advanced to dealer-partners is automatically assigned to the originating dealer-partner’s open pool of business. At the dealer-partner’s option, a pool containing at least 100 Consumer Loans can be closed and subsequent advances assigned to a new pool. All advances due from a dealer-partner are secured by the future collections on the dealer-partner’s portfolio of Consumer Loans that have been assigned to us. Net collections on all related Consumer Loans within the pool, after payment of our servicing fee and reimbursement of certain collection costs, are applied to reduce the aggregate advance balance owing against those Consumer Loans. Once the advance balance has been repaid, the dealer-partner is entitled to receive future collections from Consumer Loans within that pool, after payment of our servicing fee and reimbursement of certain collection costs. If the collections on Consumer Loans from a dealer-partner’s pool are not sufficient to repay the advance balance, the dealer-partner will not receive the dealer holdback. Additionally, for dealer-partners with more than one pool, the pools are cross-collateralized so the performance of other pools is considered in determining eligibility for dealer holdback payments.
 
Purchased Loans.  The Purchased Loan amount reflected on our balance sheet is increased as revenue is recognized and decreased as collections (net of certain collection costs) are received and write-offs are recorded. We aggregate Purchased Loans into pools based on the month of purchase for revenue recognition and impairment purposes. We follow SOP 03-3 in determining our allowance for credit losses. Under SOP 03-3, an allowance for credit losses is maintained at an amount that reduces the net asset value (Purchased Loan pool balance less the allowance) to the value of forecasted future cash flows discounted at the yield established at the date of purchase. The discounted value of future cash flows is comprised of estimated future collections on the pool of Purchased Loans. We write off pools of Purchased Loans once there are no forecasted future collections on any of the Purchased Loans included in the pool.
 
Future collections on Purchased Loans are forecasted based on the historical performance of loans with similar characteristics. Cash flows from any individual pool of Purchased Loans are often different than estimated cash flows at the date of purchase. If such difference is favorable, the difference is recognized prospectively into income over the remaining life of the pool of Purchased Loans through a yield adjustment. If such difference is unfavorable, a provision for credit losses is recorded immediately as a current period expense and a corresponding allowance for credit losses is established. Due to recent trends and a concern about the worsening economic environment, forecasted collection amounts on Purchased Loans originated in 2006 through 2008 were reduced by 100 to 400 basis points.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Purchases of property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Estimated useful lives are generally as follows: buildings — 40 years, building improvements — 10 years, data processing equipment — 3 years, software — 5 years, office furniture and equipment — 7 years, and leasehold improvements — the lesser of the lease term or 7 years. The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet at the time of disposition and any resulting gain or loss is included in operations. Maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are charged to operations as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. We evaluate long-lived assets for


55


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
 
Software developed for internal use is capitalized and generally amortized on a straight-line basis in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use” (“SOP 98-1”). As required by SOP 98-1, we capitalize the costs incurred during the application development stage. Capitalized development costs are amortized over five years while costs incurred to maintain existing product offerings are expensed as incurred.
 
Deferred Debt Issuance Costs
 
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, deferred debt issuance costs were $3.4 million (net of accumulated amortization of $5.6 million) and $3.3 million (net of accumulated amortization of $2.0 million), respectively, and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Expenses associated with the issuance of debt instruments are capitalized and amortized as interest expense over the term of the debt instrument on a level-yield basis for term secured financings and on a straight-line basis for lines of credit and revolving secured financings.
 
Income Taxes
 
Provisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes are calculated on reported pre-tax earnings based on current tax law and also include, in the current period, the cumulative effect of any changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining deferred tax assets and liabilities. Such provisions differ from the amounts currently receivable or payable because certain items of income and expense are recognized in different time periods for financial reporting purposes than for income tax purposes.
 
Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases and are stated at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.
 
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. The cumulative effect of implementation of FIN 48 was approximately a $0.1 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as a decrease in the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. Furthermore, in accordance with FIN 48, effective January 1, 2007, we began to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in the provision for income taxes. Prior to January 1, 2007, interest related to income tax matters was recognized in interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters were recognized in general and administrative expense.
 
Prior to January 1, 2008, the Company had state tax obligations in the State of Michigan under the Single Business Tax act that were not considered an income tax under the provisions of SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS 109”). On July 12, 2007, the Michigan legislature enacted the Michigan Business Tax and Michigan Gross Receipts Tax, effective January 1, 2008, both of which are considered an income tax under the provisions of SFAS 109.


56


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
Derivative Instruments
 
Interest Rate Caps.  We purchase interest rate cap agreements to manage the interest rate risk on our $325.0 million and $50.0 million revolving secured warehouse facilities. As we have not designated these agreements as hedges as defined under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), as amended, changes in the fair value of these agreements will increase or decrease net income.
 
As of December 31, 2008, seven interest rate cap agreements with various maturities between July 2009 and February 2011 were outstanding with a cap rate of 6.75% and a fair value of $1,000. As of December 31, 2007, four interest rate cap agreements with various maturities between May 2008 and June 2010 were outstanding with a cap rate of 6.75% and a fair value of $6,000.
 
Interest Rate Swaps.  As of December 31, 2008 we had $76.0 million in fixed rate debt, and $192.2 million in floating rate debt outstanding under Term ABS 144A asset-backed secured borrowings. We have entered into two interest rate swaps, which were effective on the closing date of the financings, to convert $50.0 million and $150.0 million in floating rate Term ABS 144A asset-backed secured borrowings into fixed rate debt bearing a rate of 6.28% and 6.37%, respectively. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, which are influenced by a number of factors, including interest rates, amount of debt outstanding, and number of months until maturity. As we have not designated the interest rate swap related to the $50.0 million in floating rate debt as a hedge as defined under SFAS 133, changes in the fair value of this swap will increase or decrease interest expense. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the impact of changes in fair value on interest expense was $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the interest rate swap had a fair value of ($0.8) million and ($0.5) million, respectively.
 
We have designated the interest rate swap related to the $150.0 million floating rate debt as a cash flow hedge as defined under SFAS 133. The effective portion of changes in the fair value will be recorded in other comprehensive income, net of income taxes, and the ineffective portion of changes in fair value will be recorded in interest expense. There has been no such ineffectiveness since the inception of this hedge through December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the impact of changes in fair value on other comprehensive income, net of tax, was approximately ($2.6) million. As of December 31, 2008, the interest rate swap had a fair value of ($4.1) million.
 
For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we formally document all relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. We also formally assess (both at the hedge’s inception and on a quarterly basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in the future periods. When it is determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to be) highly effective as a hedge, we would discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.
 
At December 31, 2008, we had minimal exposure to credit loss on the interest rate swaps. We do not believe that any reasonably likely change in interest rates would have a materially adverse effect on our financial position, our results of operations or our cash flows.
 
We recognize our derivative financial instruments as either other assets or accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
 
Stock Compensation Plans
 
At December 31, 2008, we have three stock-based compensation plans for employees and directors, which are described more fully in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. On January 1, 2006, we adopted revised


57


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Continued)
 
SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” under the modified prospective application method. We had previously adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, under the retroactive restatement transition method in 2003. Adoption of SFAS No. 123R primarily resulted in a change in our estimated forfeitures for unvested stock-based compensation awards, which resulted in a cumulative reversal of stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
 
Employee Benefit Plan
 
We sponsor a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all of our employees. Through March 31, 2008, employees could elect to contribute to the plan from 1% to 20% of their salary subject to statutory limitations. Beginning April 1, 2008, employees could elect to contribute to the plan from 1% to 75% of their salary subject to statutory limitations. During 2008, we made matching contributions equal to 50% of the employee contributions, up to a maximum of $1,250 per employee, which becomes 100% vested on a 6 year graded schedule. We recognized compensation expense of $0.5 million in 2008 and 2007, and $0.4 million in 2006 for our matching contributions to the plan. Beginning January 1, 2009, we will make matching contributions equal to 50% of the employee contributions, up to a maximum of 3% of each employee’s annual gross pay. All previous and future matching contributions will become 100% vested immediately.
 
Advertising Costs
 
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses were $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
Fair Value Measurements.  In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods of those fiscal years. However, on February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP FAS 157-2”), which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP FAS 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of FSP FAS 157-2. We adopted the applicable portions of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008 (See Note 3). The deferred portions of SFAS 157 will not have an impact on our financial statements. The adoption of the applicable portions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities.  In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure financial assets and liabilities (except for those that are specifically exempted from SFAS 159) at fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or liability at fair value can be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as a transition adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. At this time, we have not elected to measure any financial assets or liabilities at fair value under SFAS 159.
 
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning


58


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES — (Concluded)
 
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The adoption of SFAS 161 will have no financial impact on our consolidated financial statements but will expand our disclosures.
 
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.  In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities” (“FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8”). FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest entities. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 amends both FASB Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, and FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46 (Revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, to require: (1) additional disclosures about transferors’ continuing involvements with transferred financial assets; (2) additional disclosures about a public entities’ (including sponsors) involvement with variable interest entities; and (3) disclosures by a public enterprise that is: (a) a sponsor of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“SPE”) that holds a variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of financial assets to the qualifying SPE; and (b) a servicer of a qualifying SPE that holds a significant variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of financial assets to the qualifying SPE. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 for the year ended December 31, 2008 had no financial impact on our consolidated financial statements but did expand our disclosures.
 
Reclassification
 
Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
 
3.   FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate their value.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents.  The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
 
Restricted Securities Available for Sale.  Restricted securities consist of amounts held in trusts by TPAs to pay claims on vehicle service contracts. Securities for which we do not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale and stated at fair value. The fair value of restricted securities are based on quoted market values.
 
Net Investment in Loans Receivable.  Loans receivable, net represents our net investment in Consumer Loans. The fair value is determined by calculating the present value of future Loan payment inflows and dealer holdback outflows estimated by the Company utilizing a discount rate comparable with the rate used to calculate our allowance for credit losses.
 
Derivative Instruments.  The fair value of interest rate caps and interest rate swaps are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets.
 
Liabilities.  The fair value of debt is determined using quoted market prices, if available, or calculated using the estimated value of each debt instrument based on current rates offered to us for debt with similar maturities.


59


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
3.   FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS — (Concluded)
 
A comparison of the carrying value and estimated fair value of these financial instruments is as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
    Carrying
    Estimated
    Carrying
    Estimated
 
    Amount     Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value  
 
Assets
                               
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
  $ 83,487     $ 83,487     $ 74,814     $ 74,814  
Restricted securities available for sale
    3,345       3,345       3,290       3,290  
Net investment in Loans receivable
    1,017,917       1,042,790       810,553       826,828  
Derivative instruments
    1       1       6       6  
Liabilities
                               
Line of credit
  $ 61,300     $ 61,300     $ 36,300     $ 36,300  
Secured financing
    574,175       569,811       488,065       434,655  
Mortgage note
    5,274       5,415       6,070       5,867  
Derivative instruments
    4,895       4,895       478       478  
 
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157, which clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. As required under SFAS 157, we group assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
 
  Level 1  Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
 
  Level 2  Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
 
  Level 3  Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
 
The following table provides the fair value measurements of applicable assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
 
                         
                Total
 
    Level 1     Level 2     Fair Value  
 
Assets
                       
Restricted securities available for sale
  $ 3,345     $     $ 3,345  
Derivative instruments
          1       1  
Liabilities
                       
Derivative instruments
  $     $ 4,895     $ 4,895  


60


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
4.   LOANS RECEIVABLE
 
Loans receivable consists of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
Dealer Loans receivable
  $ 823,567     $ 804,245  
Purchased Loans receivable
    325,185       140,453  
                 
Loans receivable
  $ 1,148,752     $ 944,698  
                 
 
A summary of changes in Loans receivable is as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2008  
    Dealer Loans     Purchased Loans     Total  
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 804,245     $ 140,453     $ 944,698  
New loans (1)
    524,496       280,326       804,822  
Transfers (2)
    (7,953 )     7,953        
Dealer holdback payments
    58,503             58,503  
Net cash collections on loans
    (506,600 )     (103,429 )     (610,029 )
Write-offs
    (48,723 )     (146 )     (48,869 )
Recoveries
          28       28  
Net change in other loans
    (123 )           (123 )
Currency translation
    (278 )           (278 )
                         
Balance, end of period
  $ 823,567     $ 325,185     $ 1,148,752  
                         
 
                         
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2007  
    Dealer Loans     Purchased Loans     Total  
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 724,645     $ 29,926       754,571  
New loans (1)
    571,197       139,340       710,537  
Transfers (2)
    (4,748 )     4,748        
Dealer holdback payments
    70,950             70,950  
Net cash collections on loans
    (543,846 )     (33,398 )     (577,244 )
Write-offs
    (14,376 )     (192 )     (14,568 )
Recoveries
          29       29  
Net change in other loans
    154             154  
Currency translation
    269             269  
                         
Balance, end of period
  $ 804,245     $ 140,453     $ 944,698  
                         
 
(1) New Dealer Loans includes advances to dealer-partners and Portfolio Profit Express.
 
(2) Transfers relate to Dealer Loans that are now considered to be Purchased Loans when we exercise our right to the dealer holdback of certain dealer-partners’ Consumer Loans once they are inactive and have originated less than 100 Consumer Loans.


61


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
4.   LOANS RECEIVABLE — (Continued)
 
 
A summary of changes in the Allowance for credit losses is as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2008  
    Dealer Loans     Purchased Loans     Total  
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 133,201     $ 944     $ 134,145  
Provision for credit losses (1)
    29,608       16,178       45,786  
Write-offs
    (48,723 )     (146 )     (48,869 )
Recoveries
          28       28  
Currency translation
    (255 )           (255 )
                         
Balance, end of period
  $ 113,831     $ 17,004     $ 130,835  
                         
 
                         
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2007  
    Dealer Loans     Purchased Loans     Total  
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 127,881     $ 910       128,791  
Provision for credit losses (2)
    19,468       197       19,665  
Write-offs
    (14,376 )     (192 )     (14,568 )
Recoveries
          29       29  
Currency translation
    228             228  
                         
Balance, end of period
  $ 133,201     $ 944     $ 134,145  
                         
 
(1) Does not include a provision for credit losses of $243 related to other items.
 
(2) Does not include a provision for credit losses of $282 related to other items.
 
The increase in the provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the prior year was primarily due to a reduction in estimated future collection rates during the second and fourth quarters of 2008.
 
Our forecast of future collections prior to the second quarter of 2008 assumed that Loans within our current portfolio would produce similar collection rates as produced by historical Loans with the same attributes. During the second quarter of 2008, we modified our forecast to assume that Loans originated in 2006, 2007 and 2008 would perform 100 to 300 basis points lower than historical Loans with the same attributes. As a result we reduced our estimate of future cash flows on these same Loans by $22.2 million, or 1.7%. Of the total reduction, $20.8 million was recorded as provision for credit losses during the second quarter of 2008. We did not modify our forecast related to 2005 and prior Loans as these Loans continue to perform as expected. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we again realized lower than expected collection rates and as a result implemented an additional modification to our forecasting methodology. This modification reduced estimated future net cash flows by $9.5 million or 0.7% of the total undiscounted cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio. The adjustment impacted only Loans originated subsequent to September 30, 2007 with more recent Loans impacted more severely and more seasoned Loans within this time period impacted less severely. Forecasted collection rates on Loans originated on or before September 30, 2007 were not modified as collection results during the fourth quarter of 2008 were consistent with our expectations for these Loans. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated timing of future collections to reflect recent trends in prepayment frequency. In recent periods, we have experienced a reduction in prepayments, which typically result from payoffs that occur when customers reestablish a positive credit history, trade-in their vehicle, and finance another vehicle purchase with a more traditional auto loan. As the availability of traditional financing has been curtailed as a result of current economic conditions, prepayment rates have declined. As a result of these forecast modifications, we recognized a provision for credit losses of $10.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2008.
 
During the first quarter of 2008, in conjunction with our implementation of a new forecasting methodology, we reevaluated our forecast of future collections on old, fully-reserved Dealer Loans. As a result, we wrote off


62


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
4.   LOANS RECEIVABLE — (Concluded)
 
$22.7 million of Dealer Loans and the related allowance for credit losses as we were no longer forecasting any future collections on these Dealer Loans. This write-off had no impact on net income for the first quarter of 2008 as all of these Dealer Loans were fully-reserved. During the third quarter of 2008, we wrote off $16.5 million of Loans to one individual dealer-partner in accordance with our write-off policy as we were no longer forecasting any future collections on these Loans. This dealer-partner has not assigned any Consumer Loans to us for several years. As of December 31, 2007, we had an allowance for credit losses of $16.2 million on Loans to this dealer-partner.
 
5.   LEASED PROPERTIES
 
We lease office space and office equipment. We expect that in the normal course of business, leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases. Total rental expense from continuing operations on all operating leases was $1.0 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Contingent rentals under the operating leases were insignificant. Our total minimum future lease commitments under operating leases as of December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
 
         
Minimum Future Lease Commitments
     
 
2009
  $ 973  
2010
    393  
2011
    272  
2012
    274  
2013
    138  
Thereafter
     
         
    $ 2,050  
         
 
6.   PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
Land and land improvements
  $ 2,582     $ 2,582  
Building and improvements
    11,926       11,175  
Data processing equipment and software
    37,381       35,073  
Office furniture and equipment
    3,472       2,525  
Leasehold improvements
    344       344  
                 
Total property and equipment
    55,705       51,699  
Less:
               
Accumulated depreciation on property and equipment
    (32,574 )     (30,302 )
Accumulated depreciation on capital leased assets
    (2,082 )     (1,273 )
                 
Total accumulated depreciation
    (34,656 )     (31,575 )
                 
    $ 21,049     $ 20,124  
                 
 
Property and equipment included capital leased assets of $2.7 million and $2.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Depreciation expense on property and equipment, including capital leased assets, was $5.3 million, $4.1 million and $4.6 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.


63


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
6.   PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT — (Concluded)
 
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we capitalized software developed for internal use of $3.4 million, $1.5 million, and $0.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, capitalized software costs, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled $4.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
 
7.   DEBT
 
We currently use four primary sources of debt financing: (1) a revolving secured line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities with institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A asset-backed secured financings (“Term ABS 144A”) with qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual credit facility with an institutional investor. General information for each of the Company’s financing transactions in place as of December 31, 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                             
                          Interest Rate at
    Wholly-owned
  Issue
      Revolving
  Financing
    December 31,
Financings   Subsidiary (1)   Number   Close Date   Maturity Date   Amount     2008
 
Revolving Line of Credit   n/a   n/a   January 25, 2008   June 22, 2010   $ 153,500     At the Company’s option, either Eurodollar rate plus 125 basis points (1.70%) or the prime rate minus 60 basis points (2.65)%
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (1)   CAC Warehouse Funding Corp. II   2003-2   August 27, 2008   August 26, 2009   $ 325,000     Commercial paper rate plus 100 basis points (3.33%) or LIBOR plus 200 basis points (2.44%) (4) (5)
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (1)   CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC   2008-2   May 27, 2008   May 23, 2010   $ 50,000     Commercial paper rate plus 77.5 basis points (3.10%) or LIBOR plus 177.5 basis points (2.21%)(4)
Term ABS 144A 2006-2(1)   Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2006-2
  2006-2   November 21, 2006   November 15, 2007 (2)   $ 100,000     Fixed rate (5.38)%
Term ABS 144A 2007-1(1)   Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2007-1
  2007-1   April 12, 2007   April 15, 2008 (2)   $ 100,000     Fixed rate (5.32)%
Term ABS 144A 2007-2(1)   Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2007-2
  2007-2   October 29, 2007   October 15, 2008 (2)   $ 100,000     Fixed rate (6.22%) (3)
Term ABS 144A 2008-1(1)   Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2008-1
  2008-1   April 18, 2008   April 15, 2009 (2)   $ 150,000     Fixed rate (6.37%) (3)
Residual Credit Facility(1)   Credit Acceptance
Residual Funding LLC
  2006-3   August 27, 2008   August 26, 2009   $ 50,000     LIBOR plus 350 basis points (3.94%) or the commercial paper rate plus 250 basis points (4.83%) (4) (5)
 
(1) Financing made available only to a specified subsidiary of the Company.
 
(2) Loans will amortize after the revolving maturity date based on the cash flows of the contributed assets.
 
(3) Includes a floating rate obligation that has been converted to a fixed rate via an interest rate swap.
 
(4) The LIBOR rate is used if funding is not available from the commercial paper market.
 
(5) Includes a floating rate obligation that has been converted to a fixed rate via interest rate caps.


64


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   DEBT — (Continued)
 
 
Additional information related to the amounts outstanding on each facility is as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
Revolving Line of Credit
               
Maximum outstanding balance
  $ 128,400     $ 73,400  
Average outstanding balance
    59,991       40,874  
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2003-2) (1)
               
Maximum outstanding balance
  $ 320,000     $ 293,500  
Average outstanding balance
    262,884       216,984  
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2008-2)
               
Maximum outstanding balance
  $ 50,000     $  
Average outstanding balance
    50,000        
 
(1) Includes amounts owing after February 12, 2008 to an institutional investor that did not renew their participation in the facility. The amount due did not reduce the amount available on the Warehouse Facility. See “Revolving Secured Warehouse Facilities” for additional information.
 


65


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   DEBT — (Continued)
 
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
Revolving Line of Credit
               
Balance outstanding
  $ 61,300     $ 36,300  
Letter(s) of credit
    555       173  
Amount available for borrowing
    91,645       38,527  
Interest rate
    1.70 %     5.60 %
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2003-2)
               
Balance outstanding
  $ 256,000     $ 198,100  
Amount available for borrowing
    69,000       226,900  
Contributed eligible Loans
    344,111       254,294  
Interest rate
    3.33 %     5.76 %
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2008-2)
               
Balance outstanding
  $ 50,000     $  
Amount available for borrowing
           
Contributed eligible Loans
    62,562        
Interest rate
    2.21 %      
Term ABS 144A 2006-2
               
Balance outstanding
  $     $ 89,965  
Contributed eligible Dealer Loans
          129,950  
Interest rate
          5.38 %
Term ABS 144A 2007-1
               
Balance outstanding
  $ 33,915     $ 100,000  
Contributed eligible Dealer Loans
    87,155       130,841  
Interest rate
    5.32 %     5.32 %
Term ABS 144A 2007-2
               
Balance outstanding
  $ 84,260     $ 100,000  
Contributed eligible Dealer Loans
    114,054       132,695  
Interest rate
    6.22 %     6.22 %
Term ABS 144A 2008-1
               
Balance outstanding
  $ 150,000     $  
Contributed eligible Loans
    184,595        
Interest rate
    6.37 %      
Residual Credit Facility
               
Balance outstanding
  $     $  
Certificate Pledged
    52,944       28,513  
Interest rate
    4.83 %     6.56 %
 
Line of Credit Facility
 
During the first quarter of 2008, we increased the amount of our line of credit facility with a commercial bank syndicate from $75.0 million to $153.5 million. In addition, the maturity of the line of credit facility was extended from June 20, 2009 to June 22, 2010. There were no other material changes to the terms of the line of credit facility.

66


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   DEBT — (Continued)
 
Borrowings under the line of credit facility are subject to a borrowing-base limitation. This limitation equals 80% of the net book value of Loans, less a hedging reserve (not exceeding $1.0 million), the amount of letters of credit issued under the line of credit, and the amount of other debt secured by the collateral which secures the line of credit. Borrowings under the line of credit agreement are secured by a lien on most of our assets. We must pay annual and quarterly fees on the amount of the facility.
 
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facilities
 
We have two revolving secured warehouse facilities that are provided to wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. One is a $325.0 million facility with an institutional investor and the other is a $50.0 million facility with another institutional investor.
 
During the first quarter of 2008, we extended the maturity of the $325.0 million facility from February 13, 2008 to February 11, 2009. The amount of the facility was reduced from $425.0 million to $325.0 million. The reduction in the amount of the facility is due to one of the two institutional investors (the “Nonextending Investor”) not renewing their participation in the facility. The amount owing to the Nonextending Investor has been reduced to zero. During the third quarter of 2008, we extended the maturity of the $325.0 million facility from February 11, 2009 to August 26, 2009 and agreed to an increase in the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from a floating rate equal to the commercial paper rate plus 65 basis points, to the commercial paper rate plus 100 basis points.
 
The $325.0 million facility requires that certain amounts outstanding under the facility be refinanced within 360 days of the most recent refinancing. The most recent refinancing occurred in October of 2008. If such refinancing does not occur, the facility will cease to revolve, will amortize as collections are received and, at the option of the institutional investor, may be subject to acceleration and foreclosure.
 
During the second quarter of 2008, we entered into a $50.0 million revolving warehouse facility with an institutional investor. This facility was fully drawn as of December 31, 2008.
 
Under these facilities we can contribute Loans to our wholly-owned subsidiaries in return for cash and equity in each subsidiary. In turn, each subsidiary pledges the Loans as collateral to institutional investors to secure financing that will fund the cash portion of the purchase price of the Loans. The financing provided to each subsidiary under the applicable facility is limited to the lesser of 80% of the net book value of the contributed Loans or the facility limit.
 
The subsidiaries are liable for any amounts due under the applicable facility. Even though the subsidiaries and the Company are consolidated for financial reporting purposes, the financing is non-recourse to us. As the subsidiaries are organized as separate legal entities from the Company, assets of the subsidiaries (including the conveyed Loans) will not be available to satisfy the general obligations of the Company. All of each subsidiary’s assets have been encumbered to secure its obligations to its respective creditors.
 
Interest on borrowings under the facilities has been limited to a maximum rate of 6.75% through interest rate cap agreements. The subsidiaries pay us a monthly servicing fee equal to 6% of the collections received with respect to the conveyed Loans. The fee is paid out of the collections. Except for the servicing fee and holdback payments due to dealer-partners, we do not have any rights in any portion of such collections until all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees and other related costs are paid in full.
 
Term ABS 144A Financings
 
In 2007 and 2008, three of our wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Funding LLCs”), each completed a secured financing transaction. In connection with these transactions, we conveyed Loans on an arms-length basis to each Funding LLC for cash and the sole membership interest in that Funding LLC. In turn, each Funding LLC conveyed the Loans to a respective trust that issued notes to qualified institutional investors. Financial insurance policies were


67


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   DEBT — (Continued)
 
issued in connection with the 2007 transactions. The policies guarantee the timely payment of interest and ultimate repayment of principal on the final scheduled distribution date. In the 2007 transactions, the notes were initially rated “Aaa” by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”) and “AAA” by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”) based upon the financial insurance policy. As of December 31, 2008, due to downgrades in the debt ratings of the insurers, the 2007 transactions were rated “A3” by Moody’s. The Term ABS 114A 2007-1 transaction continued to be rated as “AAA” by S&P and the Term ABS 114A 2007-2 transaction was rated as “A−” by S&P. The 2008 transaction was rated “A” by S&P.
 
Each financing has a specified revolving period during which we may be required, and are likely, to convey additional Loans to each Funding LLC. Each Funding LLC will then convey the Loans to their respective trust. At the end of the revolving period, the debt outstanding under each financing will begin to amortize.
 
The financings create loans for which the trusts are liable and which are secured by all the assets of each trust. Such loans are non-recourse to us, even though the trusts, the Funding LLCs and the Company are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. Because the Funding LLCs are organized as separate legal entities from the Company, their assets (including the conveyed Loans) are not available to satisfy our general obligations. We receive a monthly servicing fee on each financing equal to 6% of the collections received with respect to the conveyed Loans. The fee is paid out of the collections. Aside from the servicing fee and payments due to dealer-partners, we do not receive, or have any rights in the collections. However, in our capacity as Servicer of the Loans, we do have a limited right to exercise a “clean-up call” option to purchase Loans from the Funding LLCs under certain specified circumstances. Alternatively, when a trust’s underlying indebtedness is paid in full, either through collections or through a prepayment of the indebtedness, the trust is to pay any remaining collections over to its Funding LLC as the sole beneficiary of the trust. The collections will then be available to be distributed to us as the sole member of the respective Funding LLC.
 
The table below sets forth certain additional details regarding the outstanding Term ABS 144A Financings (dollars in thousands):
 
                             
            Net Book Value of
        Expected
 
Term ABS 144A
  Issue
      Dealer Loans
        Annualized
 
Financing
  Number   Close Date   Conveyed at Closing     Revolving Period   Rates (1)  
 
Term ABS 144A
2007-1
  2007-1   April 12, 2007   $ 125,700     12 months (Through April 15, 2008)     7.2 %
Term ABS 144A
2007-2
  2007-2   October 29, 2007   $ 125,000     12 months (Through October 15, 2008)     8.0 %
Term ABS 144A
2008-1
  2008-1   April 18, 2008   $ 86,615     12 months (Through April 15, 2009)     6.9 %
 
(1) Includes underwriter’s fees, insurance premiums and other costs.
 
Residual Credit Facility
 
Another wholly-owned subsidiary, Credit Acceptance Residual Funding LLC (“Residual Funding”), has a $50.0 million secured credit facility with an institutional investor. This facility allows Residual Funding to finance its purchase of trust certificates from special-purpose entities (the “Term SPEs”) that have purchased Dealer Loans under our term securitization transactions. Historically, the Term SPEs’ residual interests in Dealer Loans, represented by their trust certificates, have proven to have value that increases as their term securitization obligations amortize. This facility enables the Term SPEs to realize and distribute to us up to 70% of that increase in value prior to the time the related term securitization senior notes are paid in full.
 
Residual Funding’s interests in Dealer Loans, represented by its purchased trust certificates, are subordinated to the interests of term securitization senior noteholders. However, the entire arrangement is non-recourse to us. Residual Funding is organized as a separate legal entity from the Company. Therefore its assets, including


68


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   DEBT — (Continued)
 
purchased trust certificates, are not available to satisfy our general obligations, even though Residual Funding and the Company are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
 
During the third quarter of 2008, we extended the maturity of the facility from September 9, 2008 to August 26, 2009 and agreed to an increase in the interest rate on borrowings under the facility from a floating rate equal to the commercial paper rate plus 145 basis points, to the commercial paper rate plus 250 basis points.
 
Mortgage Loan
 
We have a mortgage loan from a commercial bank that is secured by a first mortgage lien on our headquarters building and an assignment of all leases, rents, revenues and profits under all present and future leases of the building. There was $5.3 million and $6.1 million outstanding on this loan as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The loan matures on June 9, 2009, bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.35%, and requires monthly payments of $92,156 and a balloon payment at maturity for the balance of the loan.
 
Capital Lease Obligations
 
As of December 31, 2008, we had various capital lease obligations outstanding for computer equipment, with monthly payments totaling $63,000. The total amount of capital lease obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $1.0 million and $1.7 million, respectively. These capital lease obligations bear interest at rates ranging from 6.41% to 8.71% and have maturity dates between April 2009 and October 2010.
 
Letters of Credit
 
Letters of credit are issued by a commercial bank syndicate and reduce amounts available under our revolving line of credit. As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had letters of credit outstanding of $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The letters of credit relate to reinsurance agreements. The letters of credit expire on May 26, 2009 and October 31, 2009, at which time they will be automatically extended for a period of one year unless we are notified otherwise by the commercial bank syndicate.
 
Principal Debt Maturities
 
The scheduled principal maturities of our debt at December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                         
          Revolving Secured
          Mortgage Note and
       
    Line of Credit
    Warehouse
    Term ABS 144A
    Capital Lease
       
Year   Facility     Facilities     Financings (1)     Obligations     Total  
 
2009
  $     $ 256,000     $ 172,926     $ 5,900     $ 434,826  
2010
    61,300       25,461       95,249       339       182,349  
2011
          24,539                   24,539  
2012
                             
2013
                             
Thereafter
                             
                                         
    $ 61,300     $ 306,000     $ 268,175     $ 6,239     $ 641,714  
                                         
 
(1) The principal maturities of the Term ABS 144A transactions are estimated based on forecasted collections.
 
Debt Covenants
 
As of December 31, 2008, we are in compliance with our restrictive debt covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and other financial conditions. The most restrictive covenants require a minimum ratio of our assets to debt and a minimum ratio of our earnings before interest, taxes and non-cash expenses to fixed charges. The covenants also limit the maximum ratio of our funded debt to tangible net worth.


69


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   DEBT — (Concluded)
 
Additionally, we must maintain consolidated net income of not less than $1 for the two most recently ended fiscal quarters. Some of the debt covenants may indirectly limit the payment of dividends on common stock.
 
8.   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
In the normal course of our business, we have Dealer Loans with affiliated dealer-partners owned or controlled by: (1) our majority shareholder and Chairman; (2) a member of the Chairman’s immediate family; and (3) our former President, Keith McCluskey. Mr. McCluskey resigned from his position with the Company effective September 1, 2006. Transactions with Mr. McCluskey are reported below through December 31, 2006. Our Dealer Loans to affiliated dealer-partners and non-affiliated dealer-partners are on the same terms.
 
Affiliated Dealer Loan balances were $15.4 million and $16.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Affiliated Dealer Loans balances were 1.9% and 2.0% of total consolidated Dealer Loan balances as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A summary of related party Dealer Loan activity is as follows (in thousands):
 
                                                 
    For The Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     2006  
    Affiliated
          Affiliated
          Affiliated
       
    dealer-partner
    % of
    dealer-partner
    % of
    dealer-partner
    % of
 
    activity     consolidated     activity     consolidated     activity     consolidated  
 
New Loans
  $ 10,325       2.0 %   $ 10,111       1.8 %   $ 17,851       3.3 %
Affiliated dealer-partner revenue
  $ 4,045       1.9 %   $ 4,529       2.4 %   $ 6,347       3.6 %
Dealer holdback payments
  $ 2,121       3.6 %   $ 1,801       2.5 %   $ 2,355       3.4 %
 
Beginning in 2002, entities owned by our majority shareholder and Chairman began offering secured lines of credit to third parties in a manner similar to a program previously offered by us. In December of 2004, our majority shareholder and Chairman sold his ownership interest in these entities; however, he continues to have indirect control over these entities and has the right or obligation to reacquire the entities under certain circumstances until December 31, 2014 or the repayment of the related purchase money note.
 
Pursuant to an employment agreement with the Company’s former President, Mr. McCluskey, dated April 19, 2001, we loaned Mr. McCluskey’s dealerships $0.9 million. Obligations under this note, including all principal and interest, were paid in full on August 16, 2006. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, we loaned Mr. McCluskey approximately $0.5 million. The note, including all principal and interest, is due on April 19, 2011, bears interest at 5.22% and is unsecured. The balance of the note including accrued but unpaid interest was approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.


70


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
8.   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS — (Continued)
 
9.   INCOME TAXES
 
The income tax provision, excluding the results of the discontinued United Kingdom operations, consists of the following (in thousands):
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     2006  
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes:
                       
Domestic
  $ 107,319     $ 82,966     $ 90,506  
Foreign
    (307 )     215       134  
                         
    $ 107,012     $ 83,181     $ 90,640  
                         
Current provision (benefit) for income taxes:
                       
Federal
  $ 23,800     $ 8,446     $ 30,902  
State
    3,333       93       687  
Foreign
    (27 )     (41 )     (435 )
                         
      27,106       8,498       31,154  
                         
Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes:
                       
Federal
    13,541       19,201       166  
State
    (1,783 )     1,159       232  
Foreign
    5       11       241  
                         
      11,763       20,371       639  
                         
Interest and penalties expense (benefit):
                       
Interest
    1,227       749        
Penalties
    (152 )     (51 )      
                         
      1,075       698        
                         
Provision for income taxes
  $ 39,944     $ 29,567     $ 31,793  
                         
 
Effective January 1, 2007, we began to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in provision for income taxes expense.


71


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
9.   INCOME TAXES — (Continued)
 
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
Deferred tax assets:
               
Allowance for credit losses
  $ 47,330     $ 49,148  
Deferred state net operating loss
    995       297  
Stock-based compensation
    3,395       2,058  
Other, net
    4,537       1,044  
                 
Total deferred tax assets
    56,257       52,547  
                 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Valuation of receivables
    126,606       113,407  
Depreciable assets
    1,382       873  
Deferred origination costs
    1,817       1,756  
Other, net
    1,512       1,279  
                 
Total deferred tax liabilities
    131,317       117,315  
                 
Net deferred tax liability
  $ 75,060     $ 64,768  
                 
 
The deferred state net operating loss tax asset arising from the operating loss carry forward for state income tax purposes is expected to be fully realized by 2012.
 
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate, excluding the results of the discontinued United Kingdom operations, is as follows:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     2006  
 
U.S. federal statutory rate
    35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %
State income taxes
    0.9       1.0       0.7  
Foreign income taxes
    0.1       (0.1 )     (0.3 )
Distributed foreign earnings
    (0.1 )     0.7       0.1  
Interest and penalties
    1.0       0.8        
Other
    0.4       (1.8 )     (0.4 )
                         
Provision for income taxes
    37.3 %     35.6 %     35.1 %
                         
 
The effective tax rates for 2008, 2007, and 2006 differed from the federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and reserves for uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties that are included in the provision for income taxes. The provision for 2008 state income taxes was reduced by $1.1 million as a result of an adjustment to the deferred tax liability arising from changes in the effective state income tax rate.
 
We adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation, we recognized a $0.1 million increase to reserves for uncertain tax positions. This increase was accounted for as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, changes to our tax contingencies that


72


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
9.   INCOME TAXES — (Concluded)
 
are reasonably possible in the next twelve months are not material. The following table is a summary of changes of the reserve for unrecognized gross tax benefits (in thousands):
 
                 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
Gross tax contingencies balance at January 1,
  $ 9,451     $ 9,974  
Additions based on tax position related to current year
    1,897       2,162  
Additions for tax positions of prior years
    1,081       59  
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
          (2,518 )
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the statute of limitations
    (155 )     (226 )
                 
Gross tax contingencies balance at December 31,
  $ 12,274     $ 9,451  
                 
 
As of January 1, 2007, upon the FIN 48 implementation, we had approximately $3.0 million of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had approximately $5.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
 
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. We have substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2003. Substantially all material state and local tax matters have been concluded for years through 2003 and foreign tax matters have been concluded through 2003. The federal income tax returns for 2004, 2005 and 2006 have been under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) since February 2007.
 
In February 2009, we received a notice of proposed adjustment (“NOPA”) from the IRS disputing the tax valuation of our loan portfolio. We disagree with the NOPA and believe that the valuation of our loan portfolio, which was performed by an independent valuation firm, is appropriate. We intend to vigorously defend our position. If the IRS were to prevail with their current position without compromise, we would owe $55.3 million of additional taxes and $18.3 million of additional interest related to 2004, 2005, and 2006. The $55.3 million of additional taxes is an acceleration of taxes already provided for and recorded as a deferred income tax liability in our balance sheet and therefore would have no effect on our income statement. As we believe our position will be sustained, we have not recorded a reserve for the interest amounts under FIN 48 at December 31, 2008. If the IRS were to prevail, the payments for interest would reduce our net income by $11.5 million after tax. We would likely also owe additional amounts for 2007 and 2008; however, we are not able to estimate these amounts at this time as the IRS has not provided their valuation assumptions for these periods as these periods are not under audit.
 
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we remitted substantially all of our accumulated earnings from foreign subsidiaries as profits to the U.S. and accrued or paid U.S. income taxes accordingly.


73


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
10.   CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS
 
Net Income Per Share
 
Basic net income per share has been computed by dividing net income by the basic number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share has been computed by dividing net income by the diluted number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding using the treasury stock method. The share effect is as follows:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     2006  
 
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
                       
Basic number of common shares outstanding
    30,249,783       30,053,129       33,035,693  
                         
Dilutive effect of stock options
    596,541       1,040,575       2,238,255  
Dilutive effect of restricted stock and restricted stock units
    258,719       59,984       9,530  
                         
Dilutive number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
    31,105,043       31,153,688       35,283,478  
                         
 
There were no stock options or restricted stock that would be anti-dilutive for the years presented.
 
Stock Repurchase Program
 
In 1999, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorizes us to purchase common shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at price levels we deem attractive. As of December 31, 2008, we have repurchased approximately 20.4 million shares under the stock repurchase program at a cost of $399.2 million. Included in the stock repurchases to date are 12.5 million shares of common stock purchased through four modified Dutch auction tender offers at a cost of $304.4 million. As of December 31, 2008, we have authorization to repurchase an additional $29.1 million of our common stock.
 
Stock Compensation Plans
 
Pursuant to our Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which was approved by shareholders on May 13, 2004, we reserved 1.0 million shares of our common stock for the future granting of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, and performance awards to employees, officers, and directors at any time prior to April 1, 2014. All of the terms and conditions relating to grants will be included in an agreement between the recipient and us and will be determined by our compensation committee. Options granted under the Incentive Plan may be either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. The exercise price will not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant and, for incentive stock options, the exercise price must be at least 110% of fair market value if the recipient is the holder of more than 10% of our common stock. Through December 31, 2008, we have only granted restricted stock and awards of restricted stock units under the Incentive Plan. Shares available for future grants under the Incentive Plan totaled 33,464 at December 31, 2008.


74


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
10.   CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS — (Continued)
 
A summary of the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is presented below:
 
                 
          Weighted-
 
          Average
 
          Grant-Date
 
    Number of
    Fair Value
 
Restricted Stock   Shares     Per Share  
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
    98,879     $ 19.83  
Granted
    117,264       24.10  
Forfeited
    (70,115 )     22.19  
                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
    146,028     $ 22.34  
                 
Granted
    56,669       26.29  
Vested
    (808 )     20.28  
Forfeited
    (17 )     23.14  
                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    201,872     $ 23.25  
                 
Granted
    80,123       16.54  
Vested
    (20,399 )     25.71  
Forfeited
    (16,267 )     21.37  
                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    245,329     $ 21.65  
                 
 
The shares of restricted stock are part of the annual incentive compensation program and are granted annually based on attaining certain individual and company performance criteria. Based on the terms of individual restricted stock grants, time-based shares generally vest over a period of three to five years, based on continuous employment, while performance-based shares generally vest based on the increase in adjusted net income, a non-US GAAP financial measure.
 
A summary of the restricted stock unit activity under the Incentive Plan for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 is presented below:
 
                                                 
    Nonvested     Vested     Total        
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
             
          Average
          Average
          Distribution Date
 
    Number of
    Grant-Date
    Number of
    Grant-Date
    Number of
    of Vested
 
    Restricted Stock
    Fair Value
    Restricted Stock
    Fair Value
    Restricted Stock
    Restricted Stock
 
Restricted Stock Units
  Units     Per Share     Units     Per Share     Units     Units  
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
        $           $                
Granted
    300,000       26.30                   300,000       February 22, 2014  
Vested
                                     
                                                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    300,000     $ 26.30           $       300,000          
                                                 
Granted
    400,000       14.61                   400,000       February 22, 2016  
Vested
    (60,000 )     26.30       60,000       26.30                
                                                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    640,000     $ 18.99       60,000     $ 26.30       700,000          
                                                 


75


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
10.   CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS — (Continued)
 
The restricted stock units are part of a long-term incentive compensation program. Each restricted stock unit represents and has a value equal to one share of common stock. The restricted stock units will be earned over a five year period based upon the annual increase in our adjusted economic profit, a non-US GAAP financial measure.
 
Pursuant to our 1992 Stock Option Plan (the “1992 Plan”), we had reserved 8.0 million shares of our common stock for the future granting of options to officers and other employees. Pursuant to our Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”), we had reserved 200,000 shares of our common stock for future granting of options to members of our Board of Directors. The exercise price of the options is no less than the fair market value on the date of the grant. Options expire ten years from the date of grant. The 1992 Plan and the Director Plan were terminated as to future grants on May 13, 2004, with shareholder approval of the Incentive Plan. All options outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are vested.
 
Additional stock option information relating to the 1992 Plan and the Director Plan is as follows:
 
                                                 
    1992 Plan     Director Plan  
          Weighted
                Weighted
       
          Average
    Aggregate
          Average
    Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Exercise Per
    Intrinsic Value
    Number of
    Exercise Per
    Intrinsic Value
 
    Options     Share     (in thousands)     Options     Share     (in thousands)  
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
    3,457,694     $ 6.97               200,000     $ 12.13          
Options granted
                                       
Options exercised
    (1,801,943 )     6.32     $ 39,611       (100,000 )     7.00     $ 2,174  
Options forfeited
    (2,710 )     8.04                              
                                                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
    1,653,041     $ 7.68               100,000     $ 17.25          
                                                 
Options granted
                                       
Options exercised
    (374,985 )     6.90     $ 6,933                 $  
Options forfeited
    (1,000 )     6.46                              
                                                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    1,277,056     $ 7.91               100,000     $ 17.25          
                                                 
Options granted
                                       
Options exercised
    (306,047 )     7.76     $ 3,004                 $  
Options forfeited
    (1,500 )     7.79                              
                                                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    969,509     $ 8.14               100,000     $ 17.25          
                                                 
Exercisable at December 31:
                                               
2006
    1,641,672     $ 7.67     $ 12,587       40,000     $ 17.25     $ 690  
2007
    1,277,056     $ 7.91     $ 17,115       100,000     $ 17.25     $ 407  
2008
    969,509     $ 8.14     $ 5,630       100,000     $ 17.25     $  


76


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
10.   CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS — (Concluded)
 
The following tables summarize information about options outstanding under the 1992 Plan and the Director Plan at December 31, 2008:
 
                         
    Options Outstanding and Exercisable  
          Weighted-Average
  Weighted-Average
 
    Options as of
    Remaining Contractual
  Exercise Price Per
 
Range of Exercisable Prices
  12/31/2008     Life   Share  
 
1992 Plan
                       
$ 3.63 - $ 6.64
    280,960       1.0 Years     $ 3.93  
$ 6.64 - $ 9.95
    573,969       3.0     $ 9.62  
$ 9.95 - $13.27
    104,580       4.0     $ 10.46  
$16.59 - $17.05
    10,000       5.2     $ 17.05  
                     
Totals
    969,509       2.6     $ 8.14  
                     
Director Plan
                       
$17.25
    100,000       5.2 Years     $ 17.25  
 
All outstanding options were fully vested as of December 31, 2007. The total fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
 
We account for compensation costs related to grants under our stock compensation plans in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, which was adopted on January 1, 2006 under the modified prospective application method. We had previously accounted for these costs under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123.
 
Stock compensation expense consists of the following (in thousands):
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2008     2007     2006  
 
Restricted stock
  $ 2,138     $ 1,216     $ 608  
Restricted stock units
    2,171       3,374        
Stock options
          69       (521 )
                         
    $ 4,309     $ 4,659     $ 87  
                         
 
The following table details how the expenses associated with restricted stock and restricted stock units, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years, will be recorded assuming performance targets are achieved in the periods currently estimated (in thousands):
 
                         
Years Ended
  Restricted Stock
    Restricted Stock
    Total Projected
 
December 31,   Unit Award     Awards     Expense (pre-tax)  
 
2009
  $ 3,954     $ 1,201     $ 5,155  
2010
    2,233       209       2,442  
2011
    1,240       25       1,265  
2012
    527             527  
2013
    234             234  
                         
    $ 8,188     $ 1,435     $ 9,623  
                         


77


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
10.   CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS — (Concluded)
 
11.   BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
 
Reportable Segment Overview
 
We have two reportable business segments: United States and Other. The United States segment primarily consists of the United States automobile financing business. The Other segment consists of businesses in liquidation, primarily represented by the discontinued United Kingdom automobile financing business. We are currently liquidating all businesses classified in the Other segment.
 
Measurement
 
The table below presents information for each reportable segment (in thousands):
 
                         
    United
          Total
 
    States     Other     Company  
 
Year Ended December 31, 2008
                       
Finance charges
  $ 286,791     $ 32     $ 286,823  
Premiums earned
    3,967             3,967  
Program fees
    193             193  
Other income
    21,198       5       21,203  
Provision for credit losses
    45,883       146       46,029  
Interest expense (income)
    43,248       (59 )     43,189  
Depreciation expense
    5,342             5,342  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    39,966       (22 )     39,944  
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    67,354       (286 )     67,068  
Segment assets
    1,139,214       140       1,139,354  
Year Ended December 31, 2007
                       
Finance charges
  $ 220,386     $ 87     $ 220,473  
Premiums earned
    361             361  
Program fees
    283             283  
Other income
    18,772       38       18,810  
Provision for credit losses
    19,807       140       19,947  
Interest expense (income)
    36,716       (47 )     36,669  
Depreciation expense
    4,105             4,105  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    29,596       (29 )     29,567  
Income from continuing operations
    53,370       244       53,614  
Segment assets
    940,307       1,875       942,182  
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                       
Finance charges
  $ 188,508     $ 97     $ 188,605  
Premiums earned
    1,043             1,043  
Program fees
    13,589             13,589  
Other income
    15,937       158       16,095  
Provision (credit) for credit losses
    11,171       (165 )     11,006  
Interest expense
    23,157       173       23,330  
Depreciation expense
    4,620       3       4,623  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    31,977       (184 )     31,793  
Income from continuing operations
    58,508       339       58,847  
Segment assets
    724,008       1,205       725,213  


78


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
11.   BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION — (Concluded)
 
Information About Geographic Locations
 
We operate primarily in the United States. As such, our revenues from continuing operations and long-lived assets are evaluated primarily through the above reportable segments. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, no enterprise-wide disclosures of information about geographic locations are necessary.
 
Information About Products and Services
 
We manage our product and service offerings primarily through the above reportable segments. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131, no enterprise-wide disclosures of information about products and services are necessary.
 
Major Customers
 
We did not have any dealer-partners that provided 10% or more of our revenue during 2008, 2007, or 2006. Additionally, no single dealer-partner’s Loan receivable balance accounted for more than 10% of total Loans as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
 
12.   LITIGATION AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
 
In the normal course of business and as a result of the customer-oriented nature of the industry in which the Company operates, industry participants are frequently subject to various customer claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties. The claims allege, among other theories of liability, violations of state, federal and foreign truth-in-lending, credit availability, credit reporting, customer protection, warranty, debt collection, insurance and other customer-oriented laws and regulations, including claims seeking damages for physical and mental damages relating to the Company’s repossession and sale of the customer’s vehicle and other debt collection activities. The Company, as the assignee of Consumer Loans originated by dealer-partners, may also be named as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by customers principally against dealer-partners. The Company may also have disputes and litigation with dealer-partners. The claims may allege, among other theories of liability, that the Company breached its dealer servicing agreement. Many of these cases are filed as purported class actions and seek damages in large dollar amounts. An adverse ultimate disposition in any such action could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
 
The Company was a defendant in a class action pending in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri. On December 5, 2007, the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri entered an Order and Final Judgment approving a Memorandum of Understanding executed on February 9, 2007 whereby the parties agreed to settle the lawsuit. The Company, without any admission of liability, agreed to pay $12.5 million in full and final settlement of all claims against the Company. Pursuant to an adjustment mechanism in the Memorandum of Understanding, the Company agreed to pay an additional $0.6 million. The Order and Final Judgment became final thirty days after the entry date of December 5, 2007, and the appeal period lapsed on January 19, 2008. The entire settlement amount was accrued and was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2007, and was paid in full during the first quarter of 2008.


79


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
13.   QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)
 
The following is a summary of the quarterly financial position and results of operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
 
                                 
    2008  
    Quarter Ended  
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)   March 31     June 30     September 30     December 31  
 
Balance Sheets
                               
Loans receivable, net
  $ 934,568     $ 1,012,150     $ 1,036,407     $ 1,017,917  
All other assets
    145,210       139,951       133,949       121,437  
                                 
Total assets
  $ 1,079,778     $ 1,152,101     $ 1,170,356     $ 1,139,354  
                                 
Total debt
  $ 638,814     $ 703,359     $ 691,937     $ 641,714  
Other liabilities
    155,069       151,012       158,693       159,889  
                                 
Total liabilities
    793,883       854,371       850,630       801,603  
Shareholders’ equity (1)
    285,895       297,730       319,726       337,751  
                                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,079,778     $ 1,152,101     $ 1,170,356     $ 1,139,354  
                                 
Income Statements
                               
Revenue
  $ 70,778     $ 75,005     $ 80,107     $ 86,296  
Costs and expenses
    43,053       58,535       47,168       56,393  
                                 
Operating income
    27,725       16,470       32,939       29,903  
Foreign exchange loss
    (13 )           (2 )     (10 )
                                 
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    27,712       16,470       32,937       29,893  
Provision for income taxes
    10,131       6,091       12,606       11,116  
                                 
Income from continuing operations
    17,581       10,379       20,331       18,777  
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
    39       (35 )     326       (221 )
                                 
Net income
  $ 17,620     $ 10,344     $ 20,657     $ 18,556  
                                 
Net income per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.59     $ 0.34     $ 0.68     $ 0.61  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.57     $ 0.33     $ 0.67     $ 0.60  
                                 
Income from continuing operations per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.58     $ 0.34     $ 0.67     $ 0.62  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.57     $ 0.33     $ 0.66     $ 0.60  
                                 
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.01     $ (0.01 )
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.01     $ (0.01 )
                                 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    30,106,881       30,252,873       30,310,053       30,327,802  
Diluted
    30,891,227       31,088,428       31,024,455       31,038,088  
 
(1) No dividends were paid during the periods presented.


80


 

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Concluded)
 
13.   QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited) — (Concluded)
 
                                 
    2007  
    Quarter Ended  
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)   March 31     June 30     September 30     December 31  
 
Balance Sheets
                               
Loans receivable, net
  $ 707,601     $ 744,159     $ 755,996     $ 810,553  
All other assets
    105,270       112,438       115,198       131,629  
                                 
Total assets
  $ 812,871     $ 856,597     $ 871,194     $ 942,182  
                                 
Total debt
  $ 446,998     $ 485,148     $ 490,510     $ 532,130  
Other liabilities
    139,016       131,592       130,858       144,602  
                                 
Total liabilities
    586,014       616,740       621,368       676,732  
Shareholders’ equity (1)
    226,857       239,857       249,826       265,450  
                                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 812,871     $ 856,597     $ 871,194     $ 942,182  
                                 
Income Statements
                               
Revenue
  $ 57,351     $ 58,286     $ 61,058     $ 63,232  
Costs and expenses (2)
    34,436       37,889       39,698       44,792  
                                 
Operating income
    22,915       20,397       21,360       18,440  
Foreign exchange gain
    4       34       26       5  
                                 
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    22,919       20,431       21,386       18,445  
Provision for income taxes (2)
    7,532       7,938       7,917       6,180  
                                 
Income from continuing operations
    15,387       12,493       13,469       12,265  
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (27 )     (163 )     1,273       219  
                                 
Net income
  $ 15,360     $ 12,330     $ 14,742     $ 12,484  
                                 
Net income per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.51     $ 0.41     $ 0.49     $ 0.42  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.49     $ 0.39     $ 0.47     $ 0.40  
                                 
Income from continuing operations per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.51     $ 0.41     $ 0.45     $ 0.41  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.49     $ 0.40     $ 0.43     $ 0.40  
                                 
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.00     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.04     $ 0.01  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.04     $ 0.01  
                                 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    30,054,349       30,140,590       30,015,048       30,007,476  
Diluted
    31,283,695       31,312,139       31,139,612       30,897,546  
 
(1) No dividends were paid during the periods presented.
 
(2) The first quarter 2007 figures differ from those previously reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. Interest and penalties related to tax for the quarter were reclassified to provision for income taxes.


81


 

ITEM 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
 
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
 
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
 
  •  pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
 
  •  provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
 
  •  provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, we believe that as of December 31, 2008, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.


82


 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Credit Acceptance Corporation
 
We have audited Credit Acceptance Corporation (a Michigan Corporation) and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries’ maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
 
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
 
Southfield, Michigan
February 27, 2009


83


 

 
PART III
 
ITEM 10.   DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
Information is contained under the captions “Matters to Come Before the Meeting — Election of Directors” (excluding the Report of the Audit Committee) and “Section 16 (a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Information is contained under the caption “Compensation of Executive Officers” (excluding the Report of the Executive Compensation Committee) in the Company’s Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 12.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
Information is contained under the caption “Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Our Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which was approved by shareholders on May 13, 2004, provides for the granting of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, and performance awards to employees, officers, and directors. We also have two stock option plans pursuant to which we have granted stock options with time or performance-based vesting requirements to employees, officers, and directors. Our 1992 Stock Option Plan (the “1992 Plan”) was approved by shareholders in 1992 prior to our initial public offering and was terminated as to future grants on May 13, 2004, when shareholders approved the Incentive Plan. Our Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”) was approved by shareholders in 2002 and was terminated as to future grants on May 13, 2004, with shareholder approval of the Incentive Plan.
 
The following table sets forth, with respect to each of the equity compensation plans, (1) the number of shares of common stock to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or restricted stock units, (2) the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, and (3) the number of shares remaining available for future issuance, as of December 31, 2008:
 
                         
                Number of shares
 
    Number of shares to be
          remaining available
 
    issued upon exercise of
    Weighted-average
    for future issuance
 
    outstanding options,
    exercise price of
    under equity
 
Plan Category
  warrants and rights     outstanding options     compensation plans(a)  
 
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:
                       
1992 Plan
    969,509     $ 8.14        
Director Plan
    100,000       17.25        
Incentive Plan
    700,000               33,464  
                         
Total
    1,769,509     $ 8.99       33,464  
                         
 
(a) For additional information regarding our equity compensation plans, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
ITEM 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
Information is contained under the caption “Certain Relationships and Transactions” and “Election of Directors — Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


84


 

ITEM 14.   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
 
Information is contained under the caption “Independent Accountants” in the Company’s Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
PART IV
 
ITEM 15.   EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
  (a)(1) The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and Report of Independent Public Accountants are contained in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
 
Report of Independent Public Accountants
 
Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
— Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
 
— Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
 
— Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
 
— Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
  (2)  Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
 
  (3)  The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference.


85


 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
 
  By: 
/s/  BRETT A. ROBERTS
Brett A. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 27, 2009
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on February 27, 2009 on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.
 
         
Signature   Title
 
     
/s/  BRETT A. ROBERTS

Brett A. Roberts
  Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
     
/s/  KENNETH S. BOOTH

Kenneth S. Booth
  Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
     
/s/  GLENDA J. CHAMBERLAIN

Glenda J. Chamberlain
  Director
     
/s/  DONALD A. FOSS

Donald A. Foss
  Director and Chairman of the Board
     
/s/  THOMAS N. TRYFOROS

Thomas N. Tryforos
  Director
     
/s/  SCOTT J. VASSALLUZZO

Scott J. Vassalluzzo
  Director


86


 

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
The following documents are filed as part of this report. Those exhibits previously filed and incorporated herein by reference are identified below. Exhibits not required for this report have been omitted. The Company’s commission file number is 000-20202.
 
                 
Exhibit
       
No.
     
Description
 
  3(a)(1)       1     Articles of Incorporation, as amended July 1, 1997.
  3(b)       2     Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as amended, February 24, 2005.
  4(c)(19)       3     Amendment No. 1, dated September 20, 2006, to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 7, 2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto from time to time and Comerica Bank as administrative agent.
  4(c)(20)       3     Amendment No. 2, dated January 19, 2007, to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 7, 2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto from time to time and Comerica Bank as administrative agent.
  4(c)(21)       3     Amendment No. 3, dated June 14, 2007, to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 7, 2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto from time to time and Comerica Bank as administrative agent.
  4(c)(22)       4     Amendment No. 4, dated January 25, 2008, to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 7, 2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto from time to time and Comerica Bank as administrative agent.
  4(f)(40)       5     Second Amendment, dated as of June 10, 2002, to the Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 15, 1998, among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders and note holders.
  4(f)(53)       6     Contribution Agreement, dated September 30, 2003, between the Company and CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II.
  4(f)(55)       6     Back-Up Servicing Agreement, dated September 30, 2003, among the Company, Systems & Services Technologies, Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, and CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II.
  4(f)(67)       7     The Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated February 7, 2006, between the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, Comerica Bank, as administrative agent, and Banc of America Securities LLC as sole lead arranger and sole book manager.
  4(f)(68)       7     Third Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated February 7, 2006, between the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company and Comerica Bank, as agent.
  4(f)(77)       8     Certificate Funding Agreement, dated September 20, 2006, between the Company, Credit Acceptance Residual Funding LLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable Funding Capital Company LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC.
  4(f)(78)       9     Indenture, dated November 21, 2006, between Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2006-2 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.
  4(f)(79)       9     Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated November 21, 2006, among the Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2006-2, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2006-2, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, N.A., and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(80)       9     Backup Servicing Agreement, dated November 21, 2006, among the Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2006-2, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2006-2, Systems & Services Technologies, Inc., Radian Asset Assurance Inc., XL Capital Assurance Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.
  4(f)(81)       9     Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated November 21, 2006, between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2006-2 and U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
  4(f)(82)       9     Contribution Agreement, dated November 21, 2006, between the Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2006-2.


87


 

                 
Exhibit
       
No.
     
Description
 
  4(f)(87)       10     Indenture, dated April 12, 2007, between Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
  4(f)(88)       10     Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated April 12, 2007, among the Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-1, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
  4(f)(89)       10     Backup Servicing Agreement, dated April 12, 2007, among the Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-1, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-1, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and XL Capital Assurance Inc.
  4(f)(90)       10     Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated April 12, 2007, between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-1 and U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
  4(f)(91)       10     Contribution Agreement, dated April 12, 2007, between the Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-1.
  4(f)(93)       11     Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 31, 2007, between the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company, LLC, Park Avenue Receivables Company, LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(94)       12     Amendment No. 1, dated September 11, 2007, to the Certificate Funding Agreement dated as of September 20, 2006, between the Company, Credit Acceptance Residual Funding LLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable Funding Capital Company LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC.
  4(f)(95)       13     Indenture, dated October 29, 2007, between Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
  4(f)(96)       13     Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, among the Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-2, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
  4(f)(97)       13     Backup Servicing Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, among the Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-2, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-2, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and XL Capital Assurance Inc.
  4(f)(98)       13     Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-2 and U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
  4(f)(99)       13     Contribution Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, between the Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-2.
  4(f)(100)       14     Amendment No. 1, dated December 21, 2007, to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 31, 2007, between the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company, LLC, Park Avenue Receivables Company, LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(101)       15     Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 13, 2008, to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2007, among the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company, LLC, Park Avenue Receivables Company LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(102)       16     New Bank Addendum, dated as of February 26, 2008, to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated February 7, 2006, by and among the Company, the Banks and Comerica Bank, as Agent for the Banks.
  4(f)(103)       17     Indenture dated April 18, 2008 between Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust 2008-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
  4(f)(104)       17     Sale and Servicing Agreement dated April 18, 2008 among the Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust 2008-1, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2008-1, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.

88


 

                 
Exhibit
       
No.
     
Description
 
  4(f)(105)       17     Backup Servicing Agreement dated April 18, 2008 among the Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2008-1, Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust 2008-1, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
  4(f)(106)       17     Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated April 18, 2008 between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2008-1 and U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
  4(f)(107)       17     Contribution Agreement dated April 18, 2008 between the Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2008-1.
  4(f)(109)       18     Loan and Security Agreement dated May 23, 2008 among the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC, Fifth Third Bank, Relationship Funding Company, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(110)       18     Backup Servicing Agreement dated May 23, 2008 among the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC, Fifth Third Bank and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(111)       18     Contribution Agreement dated May 23, 2008 between the Company and CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC.
  4(f)(112)       18     Intercreditor Agreement dated May 23, 2008 among the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2006-2, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2006-2, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-1, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-1, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2007-2, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan Trust 2007-2, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC 2008-1, Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust 2008-1, CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as agent, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as agent, Comerica Bank, as agent, and Fifth Third Bank, as agent.
  4(f)(113)       19     Amendment No. 4 as of August 27, 2008, to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2007 among the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable Funding Capital Company, LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(114)       19     Second Amendment dated as of August 27, 2008, to the Certificate Funding Agreement dated September 20, 2006, among the Company, Credit Acceptance Residual Funding LLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable Funding Capital Company LLC, and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC.
  4(f)(115)       20     Amendment No. 3 dated as of July 10, 2008, to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2007, among the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company, LLC, Park Avenue Receivables Company LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
  4(f)(116)       20     Third Amendment, dated as of July 31, 2008, to Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 15, 1998, among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders and note holders.
  4(f)(117)       20     Fifth Amendment, dated as of July 31, 2008, to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated February 7, 2006, between Credit Acceptance Corporation, the Banks which are parties thereto from time to time, and Comerica Bank as Administrative Agent for the Banks.
  4(f)(118)       21     First Amendment, dated as of November 21, 2008, to the Third Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated February 7, 2006, between the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company and Comerica Bank, as agent.
  4(f)(119)       21     Sixth Amendment, dated as of December 9, 2008, to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated February 7, 2006, between Credit Acceptance Corporation, the Banks which are parties thereto from time to time, and Comerica Bank as Administrative Agent for the Banks.
  4(g)(2)       22     Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of December 15, 1998, among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders and note holders.

89


 

                 
Exhibit
       
No.
     
Description
 
  4(g)(5)       23     First Amendment, dated as of March 30, 2001, to the Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 15, 1998, among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders and note holders.
  Note:             Other instruments, notes or extracts from agreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company or its subsidiaries have not been filed because (i) in each case the total amount of long-term debt permitted there under does not exceed 10% of the Company’s consolidated assets and (ii) the Company hereby agrees that it will furnish such instruments, notes and extracts to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.
  10(d)(9)       24     Form of Servicing Agreement, as of April 2003.
  10(d)(10)       25     Purchase Program Agreement Recitals, as of April 2007.
  10(f)(4)*       26     Credit Acceptance Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated May 1999.
  10(g)(2)*       23     Employment agreement for Keith P. McCluskey, Chief Marketing Officer, dated April 19, 2001.
  10(p)       27     Credit Acceptance Corporation Director Stock Option Plan.
  10(q)*       28     Credit Acceptance Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan, effective April 1, 2004.
  10(q)(2)*       29     Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement.
  10(q)(3)*       30     Incentive Compensation Bonus Formula for 2005.
  10(q)(4)*       31     Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement, dated February 22, 2007.
  10(q)(5)*       31     Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated February 22, 2007.
  10(q)(6)*       32     Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated October 2, 2008.
  10(q)(7)*       33     Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated November 13, 2008.
  10(q)(8)*       33     Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated November 13, 2008.
  21(1)(a)       21     Schedule of Credit Acceptance Corporation Subsidiaries.
  23(a)       21     Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.
  31(a)       21     Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.
  31(b)       21     Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.
  32(a)       21     Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32(b)       21     Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
* Management compensatory contracts and arrangements.
 
1 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
2 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
3 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 19, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
4 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
5 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.

90


 

 
6 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
7 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
8 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
9 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 27, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
10 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 18, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
11 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 7, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
12 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
13 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 2, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
14 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 27, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
15 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
16 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
17 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 24, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
18 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 2, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
19 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 29, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
20 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
21 Filed herewith.
 
22 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
23 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
24 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
25 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
26 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
27 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
28 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
29 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.


91


 

 
30 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
31 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 28, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
32 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 7, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
33 Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 19, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.


92