FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2008
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Transition Period from
to
|
Commission File Number
000-20202
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-1999511
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
25505 W. Twelve Mile Road
Southfield, Michigan
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
48034-8339
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(248) 353-2700
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
Common Stock
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of 3,667,364 shares of the
Registrants common stock held by non-affiliates on
June 30, 2008 was approximately $93.7 million. For
purposes of this computation all officers, directors and 10%
beneficial owners of the Registrant are assumed to be
affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission
that such officers, directors and beneficial owners are, in
fact, affiliates of the Registrant.
At February 20, 2009, there were 30,747,018 shares of
the Registrants common stock issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement
pertaining to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the
Proxy Statement) filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A are incorporated herein by reference into
Part III.
CREDIT
ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
INDEX TO
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
1B.
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
10.
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
12.
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
14.
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
15.
|
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
85
|
|
2
PART I
General
Since 1972, Credit Acceptance (referred to as the
Company, Credit Acceptance,
we, our or us) has provided
auto loans to consumers, regardless of their credit history. Our
product is offered through a nationwide network of automobile
dealers who benefit from sales of vehicles to consumers who
otherwise could not obtain financing; from repeat and referral
sales generated by these same customers; and from sales to
customers responding to advertisements for our product, but who
actually end up qualifying for traditional financing.
Without our product, consumers are often unable to purchase a
vehicle or they purchase an unreliable one. Further, as we
report to the three national credit reporting agencies, an
important ancillary benefit of our program is that we provide a
significant number of our consumers with an opportunity to
improve their lives by improving their credit score and move on
to more traditional sources of financing.
Credit Acceptance was founded to collect retail installment
contracts (referred to as Consumer Loans) originated
by automobile dealerships owned by our founder, majority
shareholder, and Chairman, Donald Foss. During the 1980s, we
began to market this service to non-affiliated dealers and, at
the same time, began to offer dealers a non-recourse cash
payment (referred to as an advance) against
anticipated future collections on Consumer Loans serviced for
that dealer.
We refer to dealers who participate in our programs, and share
our commitment to changing consumers lives, as
dealer-partners. Upon enrollment in our programs,
the dealer-partner enters into a dealer servicing agreement with
Credit Acceptance that defines the legal relationship between
Credit Acceptance and the dealer-partner. The dealer servicing
agreement assigns the responsibilities for administering,
servicing, and collecting the amounts due on Consumer Loans from
the dealer-partners to us. A consumer who does not qualify for
conventional automobile financing can purchase a used vehicle
from a Credit Acceptance dealer-partner and finance the purchase
through us. We are an indirect lender from a legal perspective,
meaning the Consumer Loan is originated by the dealer-partner
and immediately assigned to us.
Consumers and dealer-partners benefit from our programs as
follows:
Consumers. We help change the lives of
consumers who do not qualify for conventional automobile
financing by helping them obtain quality transportation. An
important ancillary benefit of our program is that we provide
consumers with an opportunity to establish or reestablish their
credit through the timely repayment of their Consumer Loan.
Dealer-Partners. Our program increases
dealer-partners profits in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Enables dealer-partners to sell cars to consumers who may not be
able to obtain financing without our program. In addition,
consumers often become repeat customers by financing future
vehicle purchases either through our program or, after they have
successfully established or reestablished their credit, through
conventional financing.
|
|
|
|
Allows dealer-partners to share in the profits not only from the
sale of the vehicle, but also from its financing.
|
|
|
|
Enables dealer-partners to attract consumers by advertising
guaranteed credit approval, where allowed by law.
The consumers will often use other services of the
dealer-partners and refer friends and relatives to them.
|
|
|
|
Enables dealer-partners to attract consumers who mistakenly
assume they do not qualify for conventional financing.
|
Business
Segments
We have two reportable business segments: United States and
Other. The United States segment is our dominant segment and
consists of the United States automobile financing business. The
Other segment consists of
3
businesses in liquidation, primarily represented by the
discontinued United Kingdom automobile financing business. For
information regarding our reportable segments, see Note 11
to the consolidated financial statements of this
Form 10-K.
Principal
Business
We have two primary programs: the Portfolio Program and the
Purchase Program. Under the Portfolio Program, we advance money
to dealer-partners (referred to as a Dealer Loan) in
exchange for the right to service the underlying Consumer Loan.
Under the Purchase Program, we buy the Consumer Loan from the
dealer-partner (referred to as a Purchased Loan) and
keep all amounts collected from the consumer. Dealer Loans and
Purchased Loans are collectively referred to as
Loans. The following table shows the percentage of
Consumer Loans assigned to us under each of the programs for
each of the last 12 quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Portfolio Program
|
|
Purchase Program
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
96.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
96.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
94.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
74.5
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
70.6
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
69.2
|
%
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
Dealer-partners that enroll in our programs have the option to
either pay an upfront, one-time enrollment fee of $9,850 or
defer payment by agreeing to allow us to keep 50% of their first
accelerated dealer holdback payment (Portfolio Profit
Express). Portfolio Profit Express is paid to qualifying
dealer-partners after a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans has
been closed. Dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs prior
to 2008 have the option to assign Consumer Loans under either
the Portfolio Program or the Purchase Program. During 2008, we
changed our eligibility requirements for new dealer-partner
enrollments to restrict access to the Purchase Program. For
dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs during the first
eight months of 2008, only dealer-partners that elected to pay
the upfront, one-time enrollment fee were initially allowed to
assign Consumer Loans under either program. Dealer-partners that
elected the deferred option during this period were only granted
access to the Purchase Program after the first Portfolio Profit
Express payment has been made under the Portfolio Program. For
all dealer-partners enrolling in our programs after
August 31, 2008, access to the Purchase Program is only
granted after the first Portfolio Profit Express payment has
been made under the Portfolio Program.
Portfolio
Program
As payment for the vehicle, the dealer-partner generally
receives the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a down payment from the consumer;
|
|
|
|
a cash advance from us; and
|
|
|
|
after the advance has been recovered by us, the cash from
payments made on the Consumer Loan, net of certain collection
costs and our servicing fee (dealer holdback).
|
We record the amount advanced to the dealer-partner as a Dealer
Loan, which is classified within Loans receivable in our
consolidated balance sheets. Cash advanced to dealer-partners is
automatically assigned to the originating dealer-partners
open pool of advances. At the dealer-partners option, a
pool containing at least 100 Consumer Loans can be closed and
subsequent advances assigned to a new pool. All advances due
from a dealer-
4
partner are secured by the future collections on the
dealer-partners portfolio of Consumer Loans assigned to
us. For dealer-partners with more than one pool, the pools are
cross-collateralized so the performance of other pools is
considered in determining eligibility for dealer holdback. We
perfect our security interest in the Dealer Loans by taking
possession of the Consumer Loans.
The dealer servicing agreement provides that collections
received by us during a calendar month on Consumer Loans
assigned by a dealer-partner are applied on a
pool-by-pool
basis as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
First, to reimburse us for certain collection costs;
|
|
|
|
Second, to pay us our servicing fee;
|
|
|
|
Third, to reduce the aggregate advance balance and to pay any
other amounts due from the dealer-partner to us; and
|
|
|
|
Fourth, to the dealer-partner as payment of dealer holdback.
|
Dealer-partners have an opportunity to receive Portfolio Profit
Express at the time a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans is
closed. The amount paid to the dealer-partner is calculated
using a formula that considers the forecasted collections and
the advance balance on the closed pool. If the collections on
Consumer Loans from a dealer-partners pool are not
sufficient to repay the advance balance, the dealer-partner will
not receive dealer holdback.
Since typically the combination of the advance and the
consumers down payment provides the dealer-partner with a
cash profit at the time of sale, the dealer-partners risk
in the Consumer Loan is limited. We cannot demand repayment from
the dealer-partner of the advance except in the event the
dealer-partner is in default of the dealer servicing agreement.
Advances are made only after the Consumer Loan is approved,
accepted and assigned to us and all other stipulations required
for funding have been satisfied. The dealer-partner can also opt
to repurchase Consumer Loans assigned under the Portfolio
Program at their own discretion.
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the
Portfolio Program are not considered to be loans to consumers.
Instead, our accounting reflects that of a lender to the
dealer-partner. The classification as a Dealer Loan for
accounting purposes is primarily a result of (1) the
dealer-partners financial interest in the Consumer Loan
and (2) certain elements of our legal relationship with the
dealer-partner. The cash amount advanced to the dealer-partner
is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. The aggregate
amount of all advances to an individual dealer-partner, plus
finance charges, plus dealer holdback payments, plus Portfolio
Profit Express payments, less collections (net of certain
collection costs), less write-offs, comprises the amount of the
Dealer Loan recorded in Loans receivable.
Purchase
Program
We began offering a Purchase Program on a limited basis in March
of 2005. The Purchase Program differs from our traditional
Portfolio Program in that the dealer-partner receives a single
payment from us at the time of origination instead of a cash
advance and dealer holdback. Purchase Program volume increased
significantly beginning in 2007 as the program was offered to
additional dealer-partners.
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the
Purchase Program are considered to be originated by the
dealer-partner and then purchased by us. The cash amount paid to
the dealer-partner is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet.
The aggregate amount of all amounts paid to purchase Consumer
Loans from dealer-partners, plus finance charges, less
collections (net of certain collection costs), less write-offs,
comprises the amount of Purchased Loans recorded in Loans
receivable.
Revenue
Sources
Credit Acceptance derives its revenues from the following
principal sources:
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges, which are comprised of: (1) servicing fees
earned as a result of servicing Consumer Loans assigned to us by
dealer-partners under the Portfolio Program, (2) finance
charge income from Purchased Loans, (3) fees earned from
our third party ancillary product offerings, (4) monthly
program fees of $599,
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
charged to dealer-partners under the Portfolio Program for
access to our Credit Approval Processing System
(CAPS), administration, servicing and collection
services offered by the Company, documentation related to or
affecting our program, and all tangible and intangible property
owned by Credit Acceptance; and (5) fees associated with
certain Loans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned, which primarily consist of premiums earned from
VSC Re Company (VSC Re), a wholly-owned subsidiary
formed during the fourth quarter of 2008, that is engaged in the
business of reinsuring coverage under vehicle service contracts
sold to consumers by dealer-partners on vehicles financed by us;
|
|
|
|
Program fees, as explained above in finance charges, charged to
dealer-partners that only participate in our Purchase Program;
|
|
|
|
Other income, which primarily consists of: marketing income,
remarketing charges, vehicle service contract and Guaranteed
Asset Protection (GAP) profit sharing income, dealer
support products and services, interest income, and dealer
enrollment fees. For additional information, see Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements.
|
The following table sets forth the percent relationship to total
revenue from continuing operations of each of these sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Percent of Total Revenue from Continuing Operations
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
|
91.8
|
%
|
|
|
91.9
|
%
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Program fees (1)
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective January 1, 2007, we implemented a change to our
method of charging program fees designed to positively impact
dealer-partner attrition. We continue to charge a monthly fee of
$599, but instead of collecting and recognizing the revenue from
the fee in the current period, we collect it from future dealer
holdback payments. As a result of this change, we now record
program fees for dealer-partners on the Portfolio Program as a
yield adjustment, recognizing these fees as finance charge
revenue over the forecasted net cash flows of the Dealer Loan.
During 2008 and 2007, the limited amount of program fee revenue
recognized relates to certain dealer-partners that only
participate in our Purchase Program. |
Our business is seasonal with peak Consumer Loan acceptances and
collections occurring during the first quarter of the year.
However, this seasonality does not have a material impact on our
interim results.
Operations
in the United States
Our target market is approximately 60,000 independent and
franchised automobile dealers in the United States. The number
of dealer-partner enrollments and active dealer-partners for
each of the last five years are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer-Partner
|
|
Active
|
Year
|
|
Enrollments
|
|
Dealer-Partners (1)
|
|
2004
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
2005
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received
funding for at least one Loan during the period. |
6
A new dealer-partner is required to enter into a dealer
servicing agreement with Credit Acceptance that defines the
legal relationship between Credit Acceptance and the
dealer-partner. The dealer servicing agreement assigns the
responsibilities for administering, servicing, and collecting
the amounts due on Consumer Loans from the dealer-partners to
us. Under the typical dealer servicing agreement, a
dealer-partner represents that it will only assign Consumer
Loans to us which satisfy criteria established by us, meet
certain conditions with respect to their binding nature and the
status of the security interest in the purchased vehicle, and
comply with applicable state, federal and foreign laws and
regulations.
The typical dealer servicing agreement may be terminated by us
or by the dealer-partner upon written notice. We may terminate
the dealer servicing agreement immediately in the case of an
event of default by the dealer-partner. Events of default
include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the dealer-partners refusal to allow us to audit its
records relating to the Consumer Loans assigned to us;
|
|
|
|
the dealer-partner, without our consent, is dissolved; merges or
consolidates with an entity not affiliated with the
dealer-partner; or sells a material part of its assets outside
the course of its business to an entity not affiliated with the
dealer-partner; or
|
|
|
|
the appointment of a receiver for, or the bankruptcy or
insolvency of, the dealer-partner.
|
While a dealer-partner can cease assigning Consumer Loans to us
at any time without terminating the dealer servicing agreement,
if the dealer-partner elects to terminate the dealer servicing
agreement or in the event of a default, the dealer-partner must
immediately pay us:
|
|
|
|
|
any unreimbursed collection costs on Dealer Loans;
|
|
|
|
any unpaid advances and all amounts owed by the dealer-partner
to us; and
|
|
|
|
a termination fee equal to 15% of the then outstanding amount of
the Consumer Loans accepted or purchased by us.
|
Upon receipt of such amounts in full, we reassign the Consumer
Loans and our security interest in the financed vehicles to the
dealer-partner. In the event of a termination, we may continue
to service Consumer Loans assigned by dealer-partners accepted
prior to termination in the normal course of business without
charging a termination fee.
Dealer-partners receive a monthly statement from us summarizing
all activity on Consumer Loans assigned by such dealer-partner.
Consumer Loan Assignment. Once a
dealer-partner has enrolled in our program, the dealer-partner
may begin assigning Consumer Loans to us. A Consumer Loan
originates when a consumer enters into a contract with a
dealer-partner that sets forth the terms of the agreement
between the consumer and the dealer-partner for the payment of
the purchase price of the vehicle. The amount of the Consumer
Loan consists of the total principal and interest that the
consumer is required to pay over the term of the Consumer Loan.
Virtually all Consumer Loans accepted and purchased by us are
processed through CAPS. CAPS allows dealer-partners to input a
consumers credit application and view the response from us
via the Internet. CAPS allows dealer-partners to:
(1) receive a quick approval from us; and (2) interact
with our proprietary credit scoring system to optimize the
structure of each transaction prior to delivery. All responses
include the amount of funding (advance for a Dealer Loan or
purchase price for a Purchased Loan), as well as any
stipulations required for funding. The amount of funding is
determined using a formula which considers a number of factors
including the timing and amount of cash flows expected on the
related Consumer Loan and our target return on capital at the
time the Consumer Loan is assigned. The estimated future cash
flows are determined based upon our proprietary credit scoring
system, which considers numerous variables, including attributes
contained in the consumers credit bureau report, data
contained in the consumers credit application, the
structure of the proposed transaction, vehicle information and
other factors, to calculate a composite credit score that
corresponds to an expected collection rate. Our proprietary
credit scoring system forecasts the collection rate based upon
the historical performance of Consumer Loans in our portfolio
that share similar characteristics. The performance of our
proprietary credit scoring system is evaluated monthly by
comparing projected to actual Consumer Loan performance.
Adjustments are made to our proprietary credit scoring system as
necessary. For additional information on adjustments to
forecasted collection rates, please see the
7
Critical Accounting Estimates section in Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
While a dealer-partner can assign any legally compliant Consumer
Loan to us, the decision whether to provide funding to the
dealer-partner and the amount of any funding is made solely by
us. We perform all significant functions relating to the
processing of the Consumer Loan applications and bear certain
costs of Consumer Loan acceptances, including the cost of
assessing the adequacy of Consumer Loan documentation,
compliance with underwriting guidelines and the cost of
verifying employment, residence and other information provided
by the dealer-partner.
If we discover a misrepresentation by the dealer-partner
relating to a Consumer Loan assigned to us, we can demand that
the Consumer Loan be repurchased for the current balance of the
Consumer Loan less the amount of any unearned finance charge
plus the applicable termination fee, which is generally $500.
Upon receipt of such amount in full, we will reassign the
Consumer Loan and our security interest in the financed vehicle
to the dealer-partner. The dealer-partner can also opt to
repurchase their Consumer Loan portfolio assigned under the
Portfolio Program, at their discretion, for a fee.
In the majority of states, Consumer Loan contracts are written
on a contract form provided by us. The Consumer Loan transaction
is not funded by the Company until we have received and approved
all the related stipulations for funding. The acceptance of the
Consumer Loan from the dealer-partner occurs after both the
consumer and dealer-partner sign the contract and the original
contract and supporting documentation are received and approved
by us. Although the dealer-partner is named in the Consumer Loan
contract, the dealer-partner generally does not have legal
ownership of the Consumer Loan for more than a moment and the
Company, not the dealer-partner, is listed as lien holder on the
vehicle title. Consumers are obligated to make payments on the
Consumer Loan directly to us, and any failure to make such
payments will result in us pursuing payment through collection
efforts.
Our business model allows us to share the risk and reward of
collecting on the Consumer Loans with the dealer-partners. Such
sharing is intended to motivate the dealer-partner to assign
better quality Consumer Loans, follow our underwriting
guidelines, comply with various legal regulations, meet our
credit compliance requirements, and provide appropriate service
and support to the consumer after the sale. In order to assist
the dealer-partner in these, and other areas, we offer the
services of our Dealer-Partner Service Center
(DPSC). We believe this arrangement, along with the
support of the DPSC, aligns the interests of the Company, the
dealer-partner and the consumer. During the third quarter of
2005, we began to outsource DPSC functions related to legal
regulation compliance and credit compliance to a company in
India. In the second quarter of 2008, we discontinued the
outsourcing of our credit compliance functions. As of
December 31, 2008, only legal regulation compliance
validation functions remain outsourced to India.
We measure various criteria for each dealer-partner against
other dealer-partners in their area as well as the top
performing dealer-partners. Dealer-partners are assigned a
dealer rating based upon the performance of their Consumer Loans
in both the Portfolio and Purchase Programs as well as other
criteria. The dealer rating is one of the factors used to
determine the amount paid to dealer-partners as an advance or to
acquire a Purchased Loan. Sales representatives regularly review
the performance of each dealer-partner and, together with the
dealer-partner, create an action plan to improve the
dealer-partners dealer rating and overall success with our
program.
Information on our Consumer Loans is presented in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Average Consumer Loan Data
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Average size of Consumer Loan accepted
|
|
$
|
14,518
|
|
|
$
|
13,878
|
|
|
$
|
12,722
|
|
|
$
|
12,015
|
|
|
$
|
12,765
|
|
Percentage growth (decline) in average size of Consumer Loan
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Average initial term (in months)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Collections. Our largest group of collectors
work Loans that are in the early stages of delinquency. These
collectors are organized into three primary groups: (1) the
first payment missed teams; (2) the delinquency teams; and
(3) the specialized teams. The first payment missed teams
service Consumer Loans of consumers who have
8
failed to make one of their first three payments on time.
Collection efforts for these teams typically consist of placing
a call to the consumer within one day of the missed due date for
any of the first three payments. After a consumer has made their
initial three payments, collection efforts on the Consumer Loan
are serviced by either our delinquency teams or our specialized
teams. Members of the delinquency teams are assigned Consumer
Loans that are segmented into dialing pools by various phone
contact profiles in an effort to maximize contact with the
consumer. Our specialized teams include collectors with higher
skill levels and access to additional tools. These teams locate
consumers by finding new contact information to assist in their
collection efforts or to return the Consumer Loan to the
delinquency teams. The specialized teams service Consumer Loans
with the following characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
no valid phone contact information;
|
|
|
|
valid contact information without any contact in seven
days; or
|
|
|
|
various specialty segments (such as military personnel,
abandoned vehicles, voluntary surrenders, and accounts requiring
investigation).
|
The decision to repossess a vehicle is based on statistical
models or policy based criteria. When a Consumer Loan is
approved for repossession, the account is transferred to our
repossession team. Repossession personnel continue to service
the Consumer Loan as it is being assigned to a third party
repossession contractor, who works on a contingency fee basis.
Once a vehicle has been repossessed, the consumer can negotiate
a redemption, whereby the vehicle is returned to the consumer in
exchange for a payment which reduces or eliminates the past due
balance, or where appropriate or, if required by law, the
vehicle is returned to the consumer and the Consumer Loan is
reinstated in exchange for paying off the Consumer Loan balance.
If the redemption process is not successful, the vehicle is sold
at a wholesale automobile auction. Prior to sale, the vehicle is
usually inspected by our remarketing representatives who
authorize repair and reconditioning work in order to maximize
the net sale proceeds at auction.
If the vehicle sale proceeds are not sufficient to satisfy the
balance owing on the Consumer Loan, the Consumer Loan is
serviced by either: (1) our senior collection team, in the
event the consumer is willing to make payments on the deficiency
balance; or (2) where permitted by law, our legal team, if
it is believed that legal action is required to reduce the
deficiency balance owing on the Consumer Loan. Our legal team
generally assigns Consumer Loans to third party collection
attorneys who work on a contingency fee basis. The third party
collection attorneys then file a claim, and upon obtaining a
judgment, garnish wages or other assets. Additionally, we may
sell or assign Consumer Loans to a third party collection
company.
Collectors rely on two systems; the Collection System
(CS) and the Loan Servicing System
(LSS). The CS and the LSS are connected through a
batch interface. The present CS has been in service since June
2002. The CS interfaces with a predictive dialer and records all
activity on a Consumer Loan, including details of past phone
conversations with the consumer, collection letters sent,
promises to pay, broken promises, repossession orders and
collection attorney activity. The LSS maintains a record of all
transactions relating to Consumer Loans assigned after July 1990
and is a primary source of data utilized to:
|
|
|
|
|
evaluate our proprietary credit scoring system;
|
|
|
|
forecast future collections;
|
|
|
|
establish the amount of revenue recognized by us; and
|
|
|
|
analyze the profitability of our program.
|
During the third quarter of 2005, we began an initiative to
outsource a portion of our collection function to a company in
India. In the second quarter of 2006, we entered into another
outsourcing arrangement with a company in Costa Rica. These
outsourced collectors service accounts using the CS and
typically work accounts that are less than sixty days past due.
Outsourcing reduces the geographic risk of having two collection
centers in the United States, provides additional flexibility to
scale our operation, comparable performance at a lower wage rate
and the opportunity to share best practices with outside
collection companies.
9
Ancillary
Products
We provide dealer-partners the ability to offer vehicle service
contracts to consumers. Buyers Vehicle Protection Plan, Inc.
(BVPP), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company,
has relationships with third party administrators
(TPAs) whereby the TPAs process claims on vehicle
service contracts that are underwritten by third party insurers.
BVPP receives a commission for all vehicle service contracts
sold by our dealer-partners when the vehicle is financed by us.
The commission is included in the retail price of the vehicle
service contract which is added to the Consumer Loan. We provide
dealer-partners with an additional advance based on the retail
price of the vehicle service contract. We recognize our
commission from the vehicle service contracts as part of finance
charges on a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we formed VSC Re, a
wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged in the business of
reinsuring coverage under vehicle service contracts sold to
consumers by dealer-partners on vehicles financed by us. VSC Re
currently reinsures vehicle service contracts that are
underwritten by two of our three third party insurers. Vehicle
service contract premiums, which represent the selling price of
the vehicle service contract to the consumer less commissions
and certain administrative costs, are contributed to trust
accounts controlled by VSC Re. These premiums are used to fund
claims covered under the vehicle service contracts. The Company
has entered into arrangements with third-party insurance
companies that limit our exposure to fund claims to the amount
of premium dollars contributed, less amounts earned and
withdrawn, plus $0.5 million of equity contributed. With
the reinsurance structure, we will be able to access projected
excess trust assets monthly and will record revenue and expense
on an accrual basis. Premiums are earned over the life of the
vehicle service contract using an average of the pro rata and
rule of 78 methods. Claims are expensed in the period the claim
was incurred. Our financial results for the year ended
December 31, 2008 reflect two months of VSC Re activity,
including $3.9 million in premiums earned and
$2.7 million in provision for claims. Under Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (FIN 46), we are considered the
primary beneficiary of the trusts and as a result, the trust
assets have been consolidated on our balance sheet as restricted
cash and cash equivalents.
Prior to the formation of VSC Re, our agreements with two of our
TPAs allowed us to receive profit sharing payments depending
upon the performance of the vehicle service contract programs.
The agreements also required that vehicle service contract
premiums be placed in trust accounts. Funds in the trust
accounts were utilized by the TPA to pay claims on the vehicle
service contracts. Upon the formation of VSC Re during the
fourth quarter of 2008, the unearned premiums on the majority of
the vehicle service contracts that had been written through
these two TPAs were ceded to VSC Re along with any related trust
assets. As the trust assets transferred to VSC Re exceeded the
ceded unearned premiums, we recorded a deferred gain of
$4.3 million upon the formation of VSC Re. The deferred
gain will be recognized as premiums earned revenue over a
26 month period (average remaining life of the ceded
vehicle service contracts) using an average of the pro rata and
rule of 78 methods. Vehicle service contracts written prior to
2008 through one of the TPAs remain under this profit sharing
arrangement. Profit sharing payments, if any, on the vehicle
service contracts are distributed to us periodically after the
term of the vehicle service contracts have substantially expired
provided certain loss rates are met. Under FIN 46, we are
considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts. As a result,
the assets and liabilities of the remaining trust have been
consolidated on our balance sheet.
We formed VSC Re in order to enhance our control and the
security of the trust assets that will be used to pay future
vehicle service contract claims. The income we expect to earn
from vehicle service contracts over time will likely not be
impacted as, both before and after the formation of VSC Re, the
income we receive is based on the amount by which vehicle
service contract premiums exceed claims. The only change in our
risk associated with adverse claims experience relates to the
$0.5 million equity contribution that was required as part
of this new structure, which is now at risk in the event claims
exceed premiums. Under the prior structure, our risk was limited
to the amount of premiums contributed to the trusts.
BVPP also has a relationship with a TPA that allows
dealer-partners to offer a GAP product to consumers whereby the
TPA processes claims that are underwritten by a third party
insurer. GAP provides the consumer protection by paying the
difference between the loan balance and the amount covered by
the consumers insurance policy in the event the vehicle is
totaled or stolen. We receive a commission for all GAP contracts
sold by our dealer-
10
partners when the vehicle is financed by us, and do not bear any
risk of loss for claims. The commission is included in the
retail price of the GAP contract which is added to the Consumer
Loan. We provide dealer-partners with an additional advance
based on the retail price of the GAP contract. We recognize our
commission from the GAP contracts as part of finance charges on
a level-yield basis based upon forecasted cash flows. We are
eligible to receive profit sharing payments depending on the
performance of the GAP program. Profit sharing payments from the
third party are received once a year, if eligible.
During the second quarter of 2006, we began to provide
dealer-partners in certain states the ability to purchase Global
Positioning Systems (GPS) with Starter Interrupt
Devices (SID). Through this program, dealer-partners
can install a GPS-based SID (GPS-SID) on vehicles
financed by us that can be activated if the consumer fails to
make payments on their account, and can result in the prompt
repossession of the vehicle. Installation of the GPS-SID will
allow for increased collections and an opportunity for the
dealer-partner to increase their initial advance.
Dealer-partners purchase the GPS-SID directly from the third
party and ownership of the GPS-SID device resides with the
dealer-partner. The third party pays us a marketing fee for each
device sold and installed, at which time the marketing fee
revenue is recognized in other income within our consolidated
statements of income.
Businesses
in Liquidation
Effective June 30, 2003, we decided to stop originating
Consumer Loans in the United Kingdom and we sold the remainder
of the portfolio on December 30, 2005. Over the last three
years we have had minimal activity as we have been liquidating
our United Kingdom subsidiary.
Competition
The market for consumers who do not qualify for conventional
automobile financing is large and highly competitive. The market
is currently served by buy here, pay here
dealerships, banks, captive finance affiliates of automobile
manufacturers, credit unions and independent finance companies
both publicly and privately owned. Many of these companies are
much larger and have greater resources than us. These companies
typically target higher credit tier customers within our market.
We compete by offering a profitable and efficient method for
dealer-partners to finance customers who would be more difficult
or less profitable to finance through other methods. In
addition, we compete on the basis of the level of service
provided by our origination and sales personnel.
Customer
and Geographic Concentrations
No single dealer-partner accounted for more than 10% of total
revenues during any of the last three years. Additionally, no
single dealer-partners Loan receivable balance accounted
for more than 10% of total Loans receivable balance as of
December 31, 2008 or 2007. The following table provides
information regarding the five states that are responsible for
the largest dollar amount of Consumer Loans accepted or
purchased and the number of active dealer-partners in the United
States during 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
Active Dealer-Partners (1)
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
$
|
149,554
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
131,022
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
119,902
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
119,133
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
93,037
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other states
|
|
|
1,148,117
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,760,765
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received
funding for at least one Loan during the year. |
11
The following table provides information regarding the five
states that are responsible for the largest dollar amount of
Consumer Loans accepted or purchased and the number of active
dealer-partners in the United States during 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
Active Dealer-Partners (1)
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
$
|
134,758
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
108,055
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
98,595
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
86,240
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
75,916
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other states
|
|
|
977,123
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,480,687
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received
funding for at least one Loan during the year. |
Geographic
Financial Information
For the three years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
revenues from continuing operations were primarily derived from
operations in the United States and long-lived assets were
primarily located in the United States. For additional
geographic financial information, see Note 11 to the
consolidated financial statements of this
Form 10-K.
Regulation
Our businesses are subject to various state, federal and foreign
laws and regulations, which:
|
|
|
|
|
require licensing and qualification;
|
|
|
|
regulate interest rates, fees and other charges;
|
|
|
|
require specified disclosures to consumers;
|
|
|
|
govern the sale and terms of ancillary products; and
|
|
|
|
define our rights to collect Consumer Loans and repossess and
sell collateral.
|
Failure to comply with, or an adverse change in, these laws or
regulations could have a material adverse effect on us by, among
other things, limiting the jurisdictions in which we may
operate, restricting our ability to realize the value of the
collateral securing the Consumer Loans, or resulting in
potential liability related to our collection of Consumer Loans.
In addition, governmental regulations depleting the supply of
used vehicles, such as environmental protection regulations
governing emissions or fuel consumption, could have a material
adverse effect on us. We are not aware of any such legislation
currently pending that could have a material adverse effect on
us.
The sale of insurance products in connection with Consumer Loans
assigned to or purchased by us from dealer-partners is also
subject to state laws and regulations. However, as we do not
deal directly with consumers in the sale of insurance products,
we do not believe that such laws and regulations significantly
affect our business. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance
that insurance regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in
which such products are offered by dealer-partners will not seek
to regulate us or restrict the operation of our business in such
jurisdictions. Any such action could materially adversely affect
the income received from such products.
We believe that we maintain all material licenses and permits
required for our current operations and are in substantial
compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Our
agreements with dealer-partners provide that the dealer-partner
shall indemnify us with respect to any loss or expense we incur
as a result of the dealer-partners failure to comply with
applicable laws and regulations.
12
Team
Members
As of December 31, 2008, we had 1,048 full and part-time
team members. Our team members have no union affiliations and we
believe our relationship with our team members is good. The
table below presents team members by function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Team Members
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Function
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Originations (1)
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Servicing (2)
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Support (3)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The originations function includes team members in the DPSC,
sales and sales support departments. |
|
(2) |
|
The servicing function primarily includes team members in the
collections, repossession, and remarketing departments. |
|
(3) |
|
The support function primarily includes team members in the
information technology, finance, analytics, corporate legal, and
human resources departments. |
Available
Information
Our Internet address is creditacceptance.com. We make
available, free of charge on the web site, copies of reports we
file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
or furnish such reports.
13
Our
inability to accurately forecast and estimate the amount and
timing of future collections could have a material adverse
effect on results of operations.
Substantially all of the Consumer Loans assigned to us are made
to individuals with impaired or limited credit histories, or
higher debt-to-income ratios than are permitted by traditional
lenders. Consumer Loans made to these individuals generally
entail a higher risk of delinquency, default and repossession,
and higher losses than loans made to consumers with better
credit. Since cash flows available to repay the Loans are
generated, in most cases, from the underlying Consumer Loans,
the ability to accurately forecast Consumer Loan performance is
critical to our success. At the time of Consumer Loan acceptance
or purchase, we forecast future expected cash flows from the
Consumer Loan. Based on these forecasts, which include estimates
for wholesale vehicle prices in the event of vehicle
repossession and sale, we make an advance or cash payment to the
related dealer-partner at a level designed to achieve an
acceptable return on capital. If Consumer Loan performance
equals or exceeds original expectations, it is likely the target
return on capital will be achieved. However, actual cash flows
from any individual Consumer Loan are often different than cash
flows estimated at Consumer Loan inception. There can be no
assurance that our estimates will be accurate or that Consumer
Loan performance will be as expected. In the event that we
underestimate the default risk or under-price products, the
financial position, liquidity and results of operations could be
adversely affected, possibly to a material degree.
We may be
unable to continue to access or renew funding sources and obtain
capital on favorable terms needed to maintain and grow the
business.
We currently use four primary sources of debt financing:
(1) a revolving secured line of credit with a commercial
bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities
with institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A
asset-backed secured borrowings (Term ABS 144A) with
qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual
credit facility with an institutional investor. In August 2009,
our $325.0 million warehouse facility and our
$50.0 million residual credit facility mature. There can be
no assurance that new or additional financing can be obtained,
or that it will be available on acceptable terms. If our various
financing alternatives were to become limited or unavailable, we
may be unable to accept Consumer Loans in the volume that we
anticipate, and operations could be materially adversely
affected.
Requirements
under credit facilities to meet financial and portfolio
performance covenants.
Our credit facilities contain various covenants requiring
certain levels of financial performance and asset quality.
Failure to meet any of these covenants could result in an event
of default under these agreements.
If we cannot comply with the requirements in our credit
facilities, then the lenders may increase our borrowing costs,
require us to repay immediately all of the outstanding debt,
enforce their interests against collateral pledged under these
agreements or restrict our ability to obtain additional
borrowings under these facilities. If our debt were accelerated,
our assets might not be sufficient to fully repay the debt.
These lenders may require us to use all of our available cash to
repay our debt or foreclose upon their collateral. In such case,
our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations
would suffer.
The
conditions of the U.S. and international capital markets may
adversely affect lenders the Company has relationships with,
causing us to incur additional cost and reducing our sources of
liquidity, which may adversely affect our financial position,
liquidity and results of operations.
Turbulence in the global capital markets and economic slowdown
or recession may result in disruptions in the financial sector
and potentially affect lenders the Company has relationships
with. Although the Company continues to utilize low levels of
financial leverage and has not suffered any significant
liquidity issues as a result of recent events, the cost and
availability of funds may be adversely affected by illiquid
credit markets as our lenders realize the impact of adverse
conditions in the capital markets. In addition, the severity and
duration of adverse conditions is unknown and may increase the
Companys exposure to credit risk and adversely affect the
ability of lenders to perform under the terms of their lending
arrangements with us. Failure by our lenders to perform
14
under the terms of our lending agreements could cause the
Company to incur additional costs that may adversely affect our
liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and
profitability.
Due to
competition from traditional financing sources and
non-traditional lenders, we may not be able to compete
successfully.
The automobile finance market for consumers who do not qualify
for conventional automobile financing is large and highly
competitive. The market is served by a variety of companies
including buy here, pay here dealerships. The market
is also currently served by banks, captive finance affiliates of
automobile manufacturers, credit unions and independent finance
companies both publicly and privately owned. Many of these
companies are much larger and have greater financial resources
than are available to us, and many have long standing
relationships with automobile dealerships. Providers of
automobile financing have traditionally competed based on the
interest rate charged, the quality of credit accepted, the
flexibility of loan terms offered and the quality of service
provided to dealers and consumers. There is potential that
significant direct competition could emerge and that we may be
unable to compete successfully. Additionally, if we are
unsuccessful in maintaining and expanding our relationships with
dealer-partners, we may be unable to accept Consumer Loans in
the volume and on the terms that we anticipate.
We may
not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our
outstanding debt and fund operations.
We currently have substantial outstanding indebtedness and our
credit facilities allow us to incur significant amounts of
additional debt. The ability to make payments of principal or
interest on indebtedness will depend in part on our future
operating performance, which to a certain extent is subject to
economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our
control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow in
the future to service our debt, we may be required to refinance
all or a portion of our existing debt or obtain additional
financing. There can be no assurance that any such refinancing
will be possible or that any additional financing can be
obtained on acceptable terms.
Interest
rate fluctuations may adversely affect our borrowing costs,
profitability and liquidity.
Our profitability may be directly affected by the level of and
fluctuations in interest rates, which affects our borrowing
costs. Our profitability and liquidity could be adversely
affected during any period of higher interest rates, possibly to
a material degree. We monitor the interest rate environment and
employ hedging strategies designed to mitigate the impact of
increases in interest rates. We can provide no assurance,
however, that hedging strategies will mitigate the impact of
increases in interest rates.
The
regulation to which we are subject could result in a material
adverse affect on our business.
Our business is subject to various laws and regulations which
require licensing and qualification; limit interest rates, fees
and other charges associated with the Consumer Loans assigned to
us; require specified disclosures by dealer-partners to
consumers; govern the sale and terms of ancillary products; and
define the rights to repossess and sell collateral. Failure to
comply with, or an adverse change in, these laws or regulations
could have a material adverse effect on us by, among other
things, limiting the jurisdictions in which we may operate,
restricting the ability to realize the value of the collateral
securing the Consumer Loans, making it more costly or burdensome
to do business, or resulting in potential liability. In
addition, governmental regulations which would deplete the
supply of used vehicles, such as environmental protection
regulations governing emissions or fuel consumption, could have
a material adverse effect on us.
The sale of insurance products in connection with Consumer Loans
assigned to us by dealer-partners is also subject to state laws
and regulations. As the holder of the Consumer Loans that
contain these products, some of these state laws and regulations
may apply to our servicing and collection of the Consumer Loans.
Although we do not believe that such laws and regulations
significantly affect our business because we do not deal
directly with consumers in the sale of insurance products, there
can be no assurance that insurance regulatory authorities in the
jurisdictions in which such products are offered by
dealer-partners will not seek to regulate or restrict the
operation
15
of the business in such jurisdictions. Any such action could
materially adversely affect the income received from such
products.
Adverse
changes in economic conditions, the automobile or finance
industries, or the non-prime consumer market, could adversely
affect our financial position, liquidity and results of
operations, the ability of key vendors that we depend on to
supply us with certain services, and our ability to enter into
future financing transactions.
We are subject to general economic conditions which are beyond
our control. During periods of economic slowdown or recession,
delinquencies, defaults, repossessions and losses may increase.
These periods may also be accompanied by decreased consumer
demand for automobiles and declining values of automobiles
securing outstanding Consumer Loans, which weakens collateral
coverage and increases the amount of a loss in the event of
default. Significant increases in the inventory of used
automobiles during periods of economic recession may also
depress the prices at which repossessed automobiles may be sold
or delay the timing of these sales. Because our business is
focused on consumers who do not qualify for conventional
automobile financing, the actual rates of delinquencies,
defaults, repossessions and losses on these Consumer Loans could
be higher than that of those experienced in the general
automobile finance industry, and could be more dramatically
affected by a general economic downturn. In addition, we rely on
vendors to provide us with services we need to operate our
business. Any disruption in our operations due to the untimely
or discontinued supply of these services could substantially
adversely affect our operations. Finally, during an economic
slowdown or recession, our servicing costs may increase without
a corresponding increase in service fee income. Any sustained
period of increased delinquencies, defaults, repossessions or
losses or increased servicing costs could also materially
adversely affect our financial position, liquidity and results
of operations and our ability to enter into future financing
transactions.
Litigation
we are involved in from time to time may adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
As a result of the consumer-oriented nature of the industry in
which we operate and uncertainties with respect to the
application of various laws and regulations in some
circumstances, we are subject to various consumer claims and
litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties, based upon,
among other things, usury, disclosure inaccuracies, wrongful
repossession, violations of bankruptcy stay provisions,
certificate of title disputes, fraud and breach of contract.
Some litigation against us could take the form of class action
complaints by consumers. As the assignee of Consumer Loans
originated by dealer-partners, we may also be named as a
co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against
dealer-partners. The Company may also have disputes and
litigation with dealer-partners. The claims may allege, among
other theories of liability, that the Company breached its
dealer servicing agreement. The damages and penalties that may
be claimed by consumers or dealer-partners in these types of
matters can be substantial. The relief requested by the
plaintiffs varies but includes requests for compensatory,
statutory and punitive damages. A significant judgment against
us in connection with any litigation could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
We are
dependent on our senior management and the loss of any of these
individuals or an inability to hire additional team members
could adversely affect our ability to operate
profitably.
Our senior management average over 9 years of experience
with the Company. Our success is dependent upon the management
and the leadership skills of this team. In addition, competition
from other companies to hire our team members possessing the
necessary skills and experience required could contribute to an
increase in team member turnover. The loss of any of these
individuals or an inability to attract and retain additional
qualified team members could adversely affect us. There can be
no assurance that we will be able to retain our existing senior
management or attract additional qualified team members.
Our
inability to properly safeguard confidential consumer
information.
If third parties or our employees are able to breach our network
security or otherwise misappropriate our customers
personal information or loan information, or if we give third
parties or our employees improper access to our customers
personal information or loan information, we could be subject to
liability. This liability could
16
include identity theft or other similar fraud-related claims.
This liability could also include claims for other misuses or
losses of personal information, including for unauthorized
marketing purposes. Other liabilities could include claims
alleging misrepresentation of our privacy and data security
practices.
We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed
from third parties to provide the security and authentication
necessary to effect secure online transmission of confidential
consumer information. Advances in computer capabilities, new
discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or
developments may result in a compromise or breach of the
algorithms that we use to protect sensitive customer transaction
data. A party who is able to circumvent our security measures
could misappropriate proprietary information or cause
interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend
capital and other resources to protect against such security
breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. Our
security measures are designed to protect against security
breaches, but our failure to prevent such security breaches
could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability, and
damage our reputation.
Our
operations could suffer from telecommunications or technology
downtime or increased costs.
The temporary or permanent loss of our computer and
telecommunications equipment, software systems and Internet
access, through system conversions or operating malfunction,
could disrupt our operations. In the normal course of our
business, we must record and process significant amounts of data
quickly and accurately to access, maintain and expand the
databases we use for our origination and collection activities.
Any failure of our information systems or software and our
backup systems could interrupt our business operations and harm
our business.
Our ability to integrate computer and telecommunications
technologies into our business is essential to our competitive
position and our success. Computer and telecommunications
technologies are evolving rapidly and are characterized by short
product life cycles. We may not be successful in anticipating,
managing or adopting technological changes on a timely basis.
While we believe that our existing information systems are
sufficient to meet our current demands and continued expansion,
our future growth may require additional investment in these
systems. We cannot ensure that adequate capital resources will
be available to us at the appropriate time.
Natural
disasters, acts of war, terrorist attacks and threats or the
escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or
otherwise may negatively affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Natural disasters, acts of war, terrorist attacks and the
escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or
otherwise may have negative and significant effects, such as
imposition of increased security measures, changes in applicable
laws, market disruptions and job losses. Such events may have an
adverse effect on the economy in general. Moreover, the
potential for future terrorist attacks and the national and
international responses to such threats could affect the
business in ways that cannot be predicted. The effect of any of
these events or threats could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
United
States and Other
Our headquarters are located at 25505 West Twelve Mile
Road, Southfield, Michigan 48034. We purchased the office
building in 1993 and have a mortgage loan from a commercial bank
that is secured by a first mortgage lien on the property. The
office building includes approximately 136,000 square feet
of space on five floors. We occupy approximately
120,000 square feet of the building, with most of the
remainder of the building leased to various tenants.
17
We lease approximately 14,000 square feet of office space
in Southfield, Michigan and approximately 20,000 square
feet of office space in Henderson, Nevada. The lease for the
Southfield, Michigan space expires in April 2013 and the lease
for the Henderson, Nevada space expires in October 2009.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In the normal course of business and as a result of the
consumer-oriented nature of the industry in which we operate,
industry participants are frequently subject to various consumer
claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties.
The claims allege, among other theories of liability, violations
of state, federal and foreign
truth-in-lending,
credit availability, credit reporting, consumer protection,
warranty, debt collection, insurance and other consumer-oriented
laws and regulations, including claims seeking damages for
physical and mental damages relating to our repossession and
sale of the consumers vehicle and other debt collection
activities. As we accept assignments of Consumer Loans
originated by dealer-partners, we may also be named as a
co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against
dealer-partners. The Company may also have disputes and
litigation with dealer-partners. The claims may allege, among
other theories of liability, that the Company breached its
dealer servicing agreement. Many of these cases are filed as
purported class actions and seek damages in large dollar
amounts. An adverse ultimate disposition in any such action
could have a material adverse impact on our financial position,
liquidity and results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of the shareholders during
the fourth quarter of 2008.
18
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
|
Stock
Price
During the year ended December 31, 2008 our common stock
was traded on The Nasdaq Global
Market®
(Nasdaq) under the symbol CACC. The following table
sets forth the high and low sale prices as reported by the
Nasdaq for the common stock for the relevant periods during 2008
and 2007. Such bid information reflects inter-dealer prices,
without retail
mark-up,
mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
$
|
20.97
|
|
|
$
|
13.20
|
|
|
$
|
33.97
|
|
|
$
|
21.74
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
31.52
|
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
|
29.11
|
|
|
|
25.21
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
25.94
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
27.28
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
19.97
|
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
|
|
25.08
|
|
|
|
15.44
|
|
As of February 13, 2009, the number of beneficial holders
and shareholders of record of the common stock was approximately
1,100 based upon securities position listings furnished to us.
Dividends
We have not paid any cash dividends during the periods
presented. Our credit agreements contain financial covenants
pertaining to our maximum ratio of funded debt to tangible net
worth, which may indirectly limit the payment of dividends on
common stock.
19
Stock
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the percentage change in the
cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock during
the period beginning January 1, 2004 and ending on
December 31, 2008 with the cumulative total return on the
Nasdaq Market Index and a peer group index based upon
approximately 100 companies included in the Dow
Jones US General Financial Index. The comparison
assumes that $100 was invested on January 1, 2004 in our
common stock and in the foregoing indices and assumes the
reinvestment of dividends.
COMPARE
5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP.,
NASDAQ MARKET INDEX AND DJ US GENERAL FINANCE INDEX
ASSUMES $100
INVESTED ON JANUARY 1, 2004
ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2008
Stock
Repurchases
In 1999, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase
program which authorizes us to purchase common shares in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions at price
levels we deem attractive. As of December 31, 2008, we have
repurchased approximately 20.4 million shares under the
stock repurchase program at a cost of $399.2 million.
Included in the stock repurchases to date are 12.5 million
shares of common stock purchased through four modified Dutch
auction tender offers at a cost of $304.4 million. As of
December 31, 2008, we have authorization to repurchase an
additional $29.1 million of our common stock.
The following table summarizes our stock repurchases for the
three months ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
that May Yet Be Used
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
to Purchase Shares
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
October 1 through October 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,113,295
|
|
November 1 through November 30, 2008
|
|
|
62
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,113,295
|
|
December 1 through December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,113,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Amount represents shares of common stock released to the
Company by employees as payment of tax withholdings due to the
Company upon the vesting of restricted stock. |
20
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The selected income statement and balance sheet data presented
below are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements and should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, and notes thereto and
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included
elsewhere in this Annual Report. Certain amounts for prior
periods have been reclassified to conform to the current
presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
312,186
|
|
|
$
|
239,927
|
|
|
$
|
219,332
|
|
|
$
|
201,268
|
|
|
$
|
172,071
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
68,993
|
|
|
|
55,396
|
|
|
|
41,015
|
|
|
|
39,093
|
|
|
|
35,300
|
|
General and administrative (A)
|
|
|
27,511
|
|
|
|
27,271
|
|
|
|
36,485
|
|
|
|
20,834
|
|
|
|
20,724
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
16,703
|
|
|
|
17,441
|
|
|
|
16,624
|
|
|
|
14,275
|
|
|
|
11,915
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
46,029
|
|
|
|
19,947
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
6,526
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
43,189
|
|
|
|
36,669
|
|
|
|
23,330
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
11,660
|
|
Provision for claims
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
205,149
|
|
|
|
156,815
|
|
|
|
128,686
|
|
|
|
94,724
|
|
|
|
87,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
107,037
|
|
|
|
83,112
|
|
|
|
90,646
|
|
|
|
106,544
|
|
|
|
84,676
|
|
Foreign currency (loss) gain
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
107,012
|
|
|
|
83,181
|
|
|
|
90,640
|
|
|
|
108,356
|
|
|
|
86,326
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
39,944
|
|
|
|
29,567
|
|
|
|
31,793
|
|
|
|
40,159
|
|
|
|
30,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
67,068
|
|
|
|
53,614
|
|
|
|
58,847
|
|
|
|
68,197
|
|
|
|
56,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from operations of discontinued United Kingdom
segment (B)
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
67,177
|
|
|
$
|
54,916
|
|
|
$
|
58,640
|
|
|
$
|
72,601
|
|
|
$
|
57,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
30,249,783
|
|
|
|
30,053,129
|
|
|
|
33,035,693
|
|
|
|
36,991,136
|
|
|
|
38,617,787
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
31,105,043
|
|
|
|
31,153,688
|
|
|
|
35,283,478
|
|
|
|
39,207,680
|
|
|
|
41,017,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,017,917
|
|
|
$
|
810,553
|
|
|
$
|
625,780
|
|
|
$
|
563,528
|
|
|
$
|
526,011
|
|
All other assets
|
|
|
121,437
|
|
|
|
131,629
|
|
|
|
99,433
|
|
|
|
55,866
|
|
|
|
65,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,139,354
|
|
|
$
|
942,182
|
|
|
$
|
725,213
|
|
|
$
|
619,394
|
|
|
$
|
591,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
641,714
|
|
|
$
|
532,130
|
|
|
$
|
392,175
|
|
|
$
|
146,905
|
|
|
|
193,547
|
|
Dealer reserve payable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,675
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
159,889
|
|
|
|
144,602
|
|
|
|
122,691
|
|
|
|
99,463
|
|
|
|
81,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
801,603
|
|
|
|
676,732
|
|
|
|
514,866
|
|
|
|
246,368
|
|
|
|
290,423
|
|
Shareholders equity (C)
|
|
|
337,751
|
|
|
|
265,450
|
|
|
|
210,347
|
|
|
|
373,026
|
|
|
|
300,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,139,354
|
|
|
$
|
942,182
|
|
|
$
|
725,213
|
|
|
$
|
619,394
|
|
|
$
|
591,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
2006 includes $11.2 million of additional legal expenses
related to an increase in the Companys estimated loss
related to a class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri. |
|
(B) |
|
2005 includes gain on sale of United Kingdom loan portfolio of
$3.0 million. |
|
(C) |
|
No dividends were paid during the periods presented. |
21
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
related notes included in Item 8 - Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data in this
Form 10-K.
Critical
Success Factors
Critical success factors include the ability to accurately
forecast Consumer Loan performance and access to capital.
At the time of Consumer Loan acceptance or purchase, we forecast
future expected cash flows from the Consumer Loan. Based on
these forecasts, an advance or one time payment is made to the
related dealer-partner at a level designed to achieve an
acceptable return on capital. If Consumer Loan performance
equals or exceeds our original expectation, it is likely our
target return on capital will be achieved.
Our strategy for accessing the capital required to grow is to:
(1) maintain consistent financial performance;
(2) maintain modest financial leverage; and
(3) maintain multiple funding sources. Our funded debt to
equity ratio is 1.9:1 at December 31, 2008. We currently
use four primary sources of financing: (1) a revolving
secured line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate;
(2) revolving secured warehouse facilities with
institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A
asset-backed secured borrowings (Term ABS 144A) with
qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual
credit facility with an institutional investor.
Consumer
Loan Performance
Since the cash flows available to repay Loans are generated, in
most cases, from the underlying Consumer Loans, the performance
of the Consumer Loans is critical to our financial results. The
following table compares our forecast of Consumer Loan
collection rates as of December 31, 2008, with the
forecasts as of December 31, 2007 and at the time of
assignment, segmented by year of assignment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted Collection Percentage as of
|
|
|
Variance in Forecasted Collection Percentage from
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
Loan Assignment Year
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007 (1)
|
|
|
Forecast
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Forecast
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
|
|
72.0
|
%
|
|
|
73.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
2000
|
|
|
72.5
|
%
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
|
|
72.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
2001
|
|
|
67.4
|
%
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
|
|
70.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
2002
|
|
|
70.4
|
%
|
|
|
70.6
|
%
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
2003
|
|
|
73.8
|
%
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
72.0
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
73.4
|
%
|
|
|
73.5
|
%
|
|
|
73.0
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
73.8
|
%
|
|
|
74.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
70.9
|
%
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
2007
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
|
|
71.1
|
%
|
|
|
70.7
|
%
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
2008
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These forecasted collection percentages differ from those
previously reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 as they have been
revised for a new methodology for forecasting future collections
on Loans that we implemented during the first quarter of 2008. |
We forecast future Loan cash flows by comparing Loans in our
current portfolio to historical Loans with the same attributes.
The attributes include both variables captured at Loan
origination like credit bureau data, application data, loan data
and vehicle data, as well as variables captured subsequent to
Loan origination such as collection and delinquency data. Prior
to the second quarter of 2008, our forecasted cash flows were
based on an assumption that Loans within our current portfolio
would produce similar collection rates as produced by historical
Loans with the same attributes. During the second quarter of
2008, we modified our forecast to assume that Loans
22
originated in 2006, 2007, and 2008 would perform 100 to
300 basis points worse than historical Loans with the same
attributes. This modification reduced estimated future net cash
flows by $22.2 million or 1.7% of the total undiscounted
cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we again realized lower than
expected collection rates and as a result implemented an
additional modification to our forecasting methodology. This
modification reduced estimated future net cash flows by
$9.5 million or 0.7% of the total undiscounted cash flow
stream expected from our Loan portfolio. The adjustment impacted
only Loans originated subsequent to September 30, 2007 with
more recent Loans impacted more severely and more seasoned Loans
within this time period impacted less severely. Forecasted
collection rates on Loans originated on or before
September 30, 2007 were not modified as collection results
during the fourth quarter of 2008 were consistent with our
expectations for these Loans. In addition, during the fourth
quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated timing of future
collections to reflect recent trends in prepayment frequency. In
recent periods we have experienced a reduction in prepayments,
which typically result from payoffs that occur when customers
reestablish a positive credit history, trade-in their vehicle,
and finance another vehicle purchase with a more traditional
auto loan. As the availability of traditional financing has been
curtailed as a result of current economic conditions, prepayment
rates have declined.
As a result of the forecast modifications implemented in the
second and fourth quarters of 2008, we now expect Loans
originated in 2006, 2007, and 2008 to perform worse than similar
Loans originated in 2003 through 2005. The impact of our
forecasting changes is summarized in the table below by year of
assignment:
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
Reduction in
|
Assignment Year
|
|
Forecasted Performance
|
|
2006
|
|
|
100 basis points
|
|
2007
|
|
|
200 basis points
|
|
2008
|
|
|
400 basis points
|
|
As a result of current economic conditions and uncertainty about
future conditions, we are cautious about our forecasts of future
collection rates. However, we believe our current estimates are
reasonable for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Our forecasts start with the assumption that Loans in our
current portfolio will perform like historical Loans with
similar attributes.
|
|
|
|
We reduced our forecasts during the second quarter on Loans
originated in 2006 through 2008 by 100 to 300 basis points
as these Loans began to perform worse than expected.
|
|
|
|
Actual Loan performance during the third and fourth quarters of
2008 was consistent with our forecast as of June 30, 2008
for Loans originated prior to October 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
As described above, we further reduced our forecasts during the
fourth quarter of 2008 on Loans originated subsequent to
September 30, 2007. Although the performance of these Loans
was consistent with expectations during the third quarter of
2008, during the fourth quarter of 2008 the performance of these
Loans was worse than expected.
|
|
|
|
We have adjusted our estimated timing of future net cash flows
to reflect recent trends relating to Loan prepayments.
|
|
|
|
We have reduced the forecasted collection rate used at Loan
inception to price new Loan originations. From September 1,
2008 through January 31, 2009, the forecasted collection
rate used at Loan inception was approximately 300 basis
points lower than identical Loans originated a year ago.
Beginning February 1, 2009, we decreased the forecasted
collection rate used at Loan inception by an additional
100 basis points.
|
|
|
|
Our current forecasting methodology, when applied against
historical data, produces a consistent forecasted collection
rate as the Loans age.
|
|
|
|
During January and February of 2009, realized net Loan cash
flows were consistent with our current forecast.
|
23
If the economic environment continues to deteriorate, our Loan
collection rates may continue to decline. Knowing this, we set
prices at Loan inception to increase the likelihood of achieving
an acceptable return on capital, even if collection results are
worse than we currently forecast.
The following table presents forecasted Consumer Loan collection
rates, advance rates (includes amounts paid to acquire Purchased
Loans), the spread (the forecasted collection rate less the
advance rate), and the percentage of the forecasted collections
that had been realized as of December 31, 2008. Payments of
dealer holdback and Portfolio Profit Express are not included in
the advance percentage paid to the dealer-partner. All amounts
are presented as a percentage of the initial balance of the
Consumer Loan (principal + interest). The table includes both
Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Forecasted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Forecast
|
|
Loan Assignment Year
|
|
Collection %
|
|
|
Advance %
|
|
|
Spread %
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
|
|
48.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
99.7
|
%
|
2000
|
|
|
72.5
|
%
|
|
|
47.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
99.3
|
%
|
2001
|
|
|
67.4
|
%
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
98.8
|
%
|
2002
|
|
|
70.4
|
%
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
98.5
|
%
|
2003
|
|
|
73.8
|
%
|
|
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
98.0
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
73.4
|
%
|
|
|
44.0
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
97.1
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
82.4
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
|
|
46.5
|
%
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
2008
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
The following table presents forecasted Consumer Loan collection
rates, advance rates (includes amounts paid to acquire Purchased
Loans), and the spread (the forecasted collection rate less the
advance rate) as of December 31, 2008 for Purchased Loans
and Dealer Loans separately:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
Forecasted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment Year
|
|
|
Collection %
|
|
|
Advance %
|
|
|
Spread %
|
|
|
Purchased Loans
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
67.6
|
%
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
66.9
|
%
|
|
|
47.0
|
%
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
Dealer Loans
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
68.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
%
|
|
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
Although the advance rate on Purchased Loans is higher as
compared to the advance rate on Dealer Loans, Purchased Loans do
not require us to pay dealer holdback.
24
The following table summarizes changes in Consumer Loan dollar
and unit volume in each of the last 12 quarters as compared with
the same period in the previous year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
|
Year over Year Percent Change
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Dollar Volume
|
|
|
Unit Volume
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
43.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
During 2008 we reduced advance rates in response to a more
favorable competitive environment and projected capital
availability. Reducing advance rates increases our return on
capital, but reduces Consumer Loan unit volume.
For the three months ended December 31, 2008, as compared
to the same period in 2007, unit volume declined by 13.4% and
dollar volume declined by 21.0%. Unit volume declined due to a
decrease in volume per active dealer-partner, partially offset
by an increase in the number of active dealer-partners. Dollar
volume declined more than unit volume due to reductions in the
average Loan size caused by the pricing changes implemented in
the third quarter of 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the
same period in 2007, unit volume increased by 13.7% and dollar
volume increased by 18.9%. Unit volume increased due to an
increase in the number of active dealer-partners offset by
decreased volume per active dealer-partner. The decrease in
volume per active dealer-partner was caused by various pricing
changes implemented in 2007 and 2008, partially offset by an
improving competitive environment. Dollar volume increased due
to the increase in unit volume and an increase in the percentage
of Purchased Loans accepted by us. On average, the amount paid
to acquire a Purchased Loan is larger than the amount advanced
on a Dealer Loan. These increases were partially offset by
reductions in the average Loan size during the third and fourth
quarters of 2008 caused by various pricing changes implemented
in the second and third quarters of 2008.
25
Results
of Operations
The following is a discussion of the results of operations and
income statement data for the Company on a consolidated basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
$
|
286,823
|
|
|
|
91.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
220,473
|
|
|
|
91.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
188,605
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Program fees
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
13,589
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
21,203
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
18,810
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
16,095
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
312,186
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
239,927
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
219,332
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
68,993
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
55,396
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
41,015
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
27,511
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
27,271
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
36,485
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
16,703
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
17,441
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
16,624
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
46,029
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
19,947
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
43,189
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
36,669
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
23,330
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Provision for claims
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
205,149
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
156,815
|
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
|
|
128,686
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
107,037
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
83,112
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
90,646
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
Foreign currency (loss) gain
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
107,012
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
83,181
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
90,640
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
39,944
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
29,567
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
31,793
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
67,068
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
53,614
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
58,847
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
Discontinued operations
Gain (loss) from discontinued United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kingdom operations
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
67,177
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
54,916
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
58,640
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
30,249,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,053,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,035,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
31,105,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,153,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,283,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Continuing
Operations
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2007
The following table highlights changes for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Average outstanding balance of Loan portfolio
|
|
|
33.8
|
%
|
Finance charges
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
130.8
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
Income from continuing operations increased for the year ended
December 31, 2008 primarily due to the Company being able
to achieve operating expense efficiencies while growing the Loan
portfolio. The increase in the average outstanding balance of
our Loan portfolio, partially offset by a decrease in the
average yield on our Loan portfolio of 1.1%, has resulted in an
increase in finance charges. The average outstanding balance of
our Loan portfolio increased due to an increase in the number of
active dealer-partners partially offset by a reduction in volume
per active dealer-partner. The average yield on our Loan
portfolio decreased primarily due to worsening Loan performance
partially offset by more attractive pricing on 2008 originations.
Income from continuing operations grew slower than finance
charges due to a significant increase in the provision for
credit losses resulting from reductions in forecasted collection
rates during the second and fourth quarters of 2008. The
increase in the provision for credit losses was partially offset
by slower growth in operating expenses and interest expense.
The following table summarizes the changes in active
dealer-partners and corresponding Consumer Loan unit volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Consumer Loan unit volume
|
|
|
121,282
|
|
|
|
106,693
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
Active dealer-partners (1)
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per active dealer-partner
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners active both
periods
|
|
|
99,176
|
|
|
|
95,067
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Dealer-partners active both periods
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per dealer-partner active both periods
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Consumer Loan unit volume from new dealer-partners
|
|
|
21,659
|
|
|
|
19,914
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
New active dealer-partners (2)
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per new active dealer-partner
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Attrition (3)
|
|
|
−10.9
|
%
|
|
|
−10.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received
funding for at least one Loan during the period. |
|
(2) |
|
New active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who enrolled in
our program and have received funding for their first Loan from
us during the periods presented. |
|
(3) |
|
Attrition is measured according to the following formula:
decrease in Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners who
have received funding for at least one Loan during the
comparable period of the prior year but did not receive funding
for any Loans during the current period divided by prior year
comparable period Consumer Loan unit volume. |
27
Premiums Earned and Provision for
Claims. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we
formed VSC Re in order to enhance our control and the security
of the trust assets that will be used to pay future vehicle
service contract claims. VSC Re currently reinsures vehicle
service contracts that are underwritten by two of our three
third party insurers. Our financial results for the year ended
December 31, 2008 reflect two months of VSC Re activity,
including $3.9 million in premiums earned and
$2.7 million in provision for claims.
Other Income. The following table highlights
the changes, as a percentage of revenue, of other income for the
year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Interest income on secured financings
|
|
|
−0.5
|
%
|
Income from dealer support products and services
|
|
|
−0.4
|
%
|
Seminars and conventions
|
|
|
−0.3
|
%
|
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
−0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in other income, as a percentage of revenue, was
primarily a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased interest income on secured financings due to a
decrease in interest rates earned on cash investments relating
to secured financing transactions.
|
|
|
|
Decreased income from dealer support products and services due
to the lower utilization of, and discontinuance of, certain
dealer-partner support programs.
|
|
|
|
Decreased income from seminars and conventions due to the
elimination of our national dealer-partner convention during
2008. Expense from seminars and conventions is recorded in sales
and marketing. During 2008 and 2007, seminars and conventions
expense was greater than the income earned.
|
The decreases above were offset by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in periodic vehicle service contract and GAP profit
sharing payments received during the year from third party
vehicle service contract and guaranteed asset protection
providers. Since we have only received these payments since
2007, the amounts of these payments are currently not estimable
due to a lack of historical information. As a result, the
revenue related to these payments was recognized in the period
the payments were received. For the year ended December 31,
2008 we received a total of $3.7 million in vehicle service
contract and GAP profit sharing payments compared to
$1.2 million in payments received in 2007.
|
Salaries and Wages. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, salaries and wages expense, as a
percentage of revenue, decreased from 23.1% to 22.2%, as
compared to 2007. Salaries and wages expense can be categorized
into originations, servicing and support functions. Salaries and
wages expense related to originations and servicing remained
consistent, as a percentage of revenue, while support grew
slower than revenue, due to a decrease in stock compensation
expense primarily related to restricted stock units granted in
the first quarter of 2007.
28
General and Administrative. The following
table summarizes the change in general and administrative
expenses, as a percentage of revenue, for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Data processing and computer consulting fees
|
|
|
−0.8
|
%
|
Legal expense
|
|
|
−0.3
|
%
|
Michigan single business tax
|
|
|
−0.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
−1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, in general and
administrative expense was primarily a result of various support
expenses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Higher expense in 2007 related to data processing and computer
consulting fees for investments in new systems, processes, and
facilities to support growth initiatives.
|
|
|
|
Higher legal expense in 2007 related to a legal settlement.
|
|
|
|
The Michigan single business tax is recorded in provision for
income taxes starting in 2008 due to a change in the nature of
the tax.
|
Sales and Marketing. The following table shows
the changes in sales and marketing expense and the unit volume
of Loan originations for the year ended December 31, 2008,
as compared to 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense
|
|
|
−4.2
|
%
|
Unit volume of Loan originations
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
The decrease in sales and marketing expense was due to the
discontinuance of certain dealer-partner support programs, lower
utilization of various other dealer-partner programs, and the
elimination of our national dealer-partner convention during
2008, offset by an increase in sales commissions due to the
increase in the unit volume of Loan originations.
Provision for Credit Losses. The increase in
the provision for credit losses for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007, was primarily due
to reductions in our forecasted collection rates during the
second and fourth quarters of 2008 as a result of lower than
expected realized collection rates during these periods. During
the second quarter of 2008, we reduced estimated future net cash
flows by $22.2 million or 1.7% of the total undiscounted
net cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio, which
resulted in a provision for credit losses of $20.8 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we reduced estimated future
net cash flows by an additional $9.5 million or 0.7% of the
total undiscounted net cash flow stream expected from our Loan
portfolio. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2008, we
revised the estimated timing of future collections to reflect
reduced prepayment expectations as a result of recent trends.
The fourth quarter of 2008 forecast modifications resulted in a
provision for credit losses of $10.6 million. For
additional information regarding the reduction in forecasted
collection rates, see discussions of Consumer Loan Performance
and Critical Accounting Estimates.
29
Interest. The following table shows interest
expense, the average outstanding debt balance and the pre-tax
average cost of debt for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
43,189
|
|
|
$
|
36,669
|
|
Average outstanding debt balance
|
|
$
|
660,804
|
|
|
$
|
469,704
|
|
Pre-tax average cost of debt
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
The increase in interest expense was primarily the result of an
increase in the average outstanding debt balance from borrowings
used to fund new Loans, offset by a reduction in our pre-tax
average cost of debt due to reductions in market rates.
Provision for Income Taxes. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, the effective tax rate increased to
37.3%, from 35.6% in the same period of 2007. The increase was
primarily due to a decrease in our reserve for uncertain tax
positions recorded in 2007.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2006
The following table highlights changes for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as compared to 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Average outstanding balance of Loan portfolio
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
Finance charges
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
Program fees
|
|
|
−97.9
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
81.2
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
57.2
|
%
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
−8.9
|
%
|
Income from continuing operations decreased for the year ended
December 31, 2007 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We changed how we account for our program fees due to changing
our methodology of collecting these fees from our
dealer-partners. This change reduced program fees by 97.9%.
|
|
|
|
Loan pricing changes implemented during the third quarter of
2006.
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock and restricted stock units granted in the first
quarter of 2007 caused salaries and wages to increase 35.1%.
|
|
|
|
We increased our use of debt to fund share repurchases and new
Loans. The average ratio of debt to equity for the year
increased from 1.1 to 2.0. Increased debt levels, offset by
reductions in market rates, caused interest expense to increase
57.2%.
|
|
|
|
The provision for credit losses increased 81.2% primarily due to
increases in the provision for credit losses required to reduce
the carrying value of the Dealer Loans to maintain the initial
yield established at the inception of each Dealer Loan.
|
The increase in the average outstanding balance of our Loan
portfolio has resulted in an increase in finance charges,
partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on our Loan
portfolio of 1.8%. The average outstanding balance of our Loan
portfolio increased due to an increase in the number of active
dealer-partners on our program partially offset by a decrease in
volume per active dealer-partner. The average yield on our Loan
portfolio decreased primarily due to the impact of pricing
changes made during 2006 and early 2007 in response to a
difficult competitive environment.
30
The following table summarizes the changes in active
dealer-partners and corresponding Consumer Loan unit volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Consumer Loan unit volume
|
|
|
106,693
|
|
|
|
91,344
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Active dealer-partners (1)
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per active dealer-partner
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners active both
periods
|
|
|
86,265
|
|
|
|
81,756
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Dealer-partners active both periods
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per dealer-partner active both periods
|
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Consumer Loan unit volume from new dealer-partners
|
|
|
19,914
|
|
|
|
16,779
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
New active dealer-partners (2)
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per new active dealer-partner
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
Attrition (3)
|
|
|
−10.5
|
%
|
|
|
−9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who have received
funding for at least one Loan during the period. |
|
(2) |
|
New active dealer-partners are dealer-partners who enrolled in
our program and have received funding for their first Loan from
us during the periods presented. |
|
(3) |
|
Attrition is measured according to the following formula:
decrease in Consumer Loan unit volume from dealer-partners who
have received funding for at least one Loan during the
comparable period of the prior year but did not receive funding
for any Loans during the current period divided by prior year
comparable period Consumer Loan unit volume. |
Program Fees. Program fees represent monthly
fees of $599, charged to dealer-partners that only participate
in our Purchase Program, for access to CAPS, administration,
servicing and collection services offered by the Company,
documentation related to or affecting our program, and all
tangible and intangible property owned by Credit Acceptance.
Prior to January 1, 2007, program fees represented CAPS
fees charged to dealer-partners on a monthly basis. The decrease
in program fees for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
compared to the same period in 2006, was primarily due to a
change in our method of collecting these fees. Effective
January 1, 2007, we implemented a change designed to
positively impact dealer-partner attrition. We continue to
charge a monthly fee of $599, but instead of collecting and
recognizing the revenue from the fee in the current period, we
collect it from future dealer holdback payments. As a result of
this change, we now record program fees as a yield adjustment,
recognizing these fees as finance charge revenue over the
forecasted net cash flows of the Dealer Loan. The decrease in
program fees was partially offset by increases in finance
charges as a result of this change.
Other Income. The following table highlights
the changes, as a percentage of revenue, of other income for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same
period in 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Interest income on secured financings
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Income from dealer support products and services
|
|
|
−0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in other income was primarily a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in periodic vehicle service contract and GAP profit
sharing payments received from third party vehicle service
contract and guaranteed asset protection providers. For the year
ended December 31, 2007 we received a total of
$1.2 million in vehicle service contract and GAP profit
sharing payments. We did not receive vehicle service contract
and GAP profit sharing payments prior to 2007.
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in interest income on secured financings due to an
increase in interest rates earned on cash investments relating
to secured financing transactions.
|
The increases above, for the year ended December 31, 2007,
were offset by decreased income from dealer support products and
services due to the discontinuance of certain dealer-partner
support programs.
Salaries and Wages. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, salaries and wages expense, as a
percentage of revenue, increased from 18.7% to 23.1%, as
compared to 2006. Salaries and wages expense can be categorized
into originations, servicing and support functions. Salaries and
wages expense related to originations and servicing remained
consistent, as a percentage of revenue, while support grew
faster than revenue, due to an increase in stock compensation
expense primarily related to restricted stock and restricted
stock units granted in the first quarter of 2007.
General and Administrative. The following
table summarizes the change in general and administrative
expenses, as a percentage of revenue, for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
Legal expense
|
|
|
−5.3
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenue, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, in general and
administrative expense was primarily a result of higher than
normal legal expense in 2006 primarily related to an
$11.2 million increase in our estimated loss related to a
class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri.
Provision for Credit Losses. The increase in
the provision for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
primarily due to an increase in the provision for credit losses
required to reduce the carrying value of the Dealer Loans to
maintain the initial yield established at the inception of each
Dealer Loan.
Interest. The following table shows interest
expense, average outstanding debt balance and the pre-tax
average cost of debt for the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
36,669
|
|
|
$
|
23,330
|
|
Average outstanding debt balance
|
|
$
|
469,704
|
|
|
$
|
259,802
|
|
Pre-tax average cost of debt
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
The increase in interest expense was primarily the result of an
increase in the average outstanding debt balance due to
borrowings used to fund new Loans during 2007 and 2006 and stock
repurchases during 2006, offset by a reduction in our pre-tax
average cost of debt due to reductions in market rates.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (US GAAP). The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis,
we review our accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and
judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented
fairly and in accordance with US GAAP.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated
herein by reference. We believe that the following accounting
estimates are the most critical to aid in
32
fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial
results, and involve a high degree of subjective or complex
judgment, and the use of different estimates or assumptions
could produce materially different financial results.
|
|
|
Finance Charge Revenue & Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Captions:
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
|
Income Statement Captions:
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
|
Nature of Estimates Required:
|
|
Estimating the amount and timing of future collections and
dealer holdback payments.
|
|
|
|
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
|
|
We recognize finance charge income and determine our allowance
for credit losses on Loans in a manner consistent with the
provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Statement of Position (SOP)
03-3
Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired
in a Transfer.
SOP 03-3
requires us to recognize finance charges under the interest
method such that revenue is recognized on a level-yield basis
based upon forecasted cash flows. For Dealer Loans, finance
charge revenue and the allowance for credit losses are
calculated after first aggregating Dealer Loans outstanding for
each dealer-partner. For the same purpose, Purchased Loans are
aggregated according to the month the Loan was purchased. Under
SOP 03-3,
an allowance for credit losses is maintained at an amount that
reduces the net asset value (Loan balance less the allowance) to
the value of forecasted future cash flows discounted at the
yield established at the inception of the Loan (origination date
for a Dealer Loan or purchase date for a Purchased Loan). The
discounted value of future cash flows is comprised of estimated
future collections on the Loans, less any estimated dealer
holdback payments related to Dealer Loans. We write off Loans
once there are no forecasted future collections on any of the
associated Consumer Loans.
|
|
|
Cash flows from any individual Dealer Loan or pool of Purchased
Loans are often different than estimated cash flows at Loan
inception. If such difference is favorable, the difference is
recognized prospectively into income over the remaining life of
the Dealer Loan or pool of Purchased Loans through a yield
adjustment. If such difference is unfavorable, a provision for
credit losses is recorded immediately as a current period
expense and a corresponding allowance for credit losses is
established. Because differences between estimated cash flows at
inception and actual cash flows occur often, an allowance is
required for a significant portion of our Loan portfolio. An
allowance for credit losses does not necessarily indicate that a
Dealer Loan or pool of Purchased Loans is unprofitable, and in
recent years, very seldom are cash flows from a Dealer Loan or
pool of Purchased Loans insufficient to repay the initial
amounts advanced or paid to the dealer-partner.
|
|
|
Future collections on Dealer and Purchased Loans are forecasted
based on the historical performance of loans with similar
characteristics. Dealer holdback is forecasted based on the
expected future collections and current advance balance of each
Dealer Loan.
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2008, we implemented a new
methodology for forecasting future collections on Consumer
Loans. The new methodology increased the dollar amount of
overall forecasted collections by 0.3%. While the new
methodology produces overall collection rates that are very
similar to those produced by the prior methodology, the new
methodology utilizes a more sophisticated approach which allows
us to expand the number of variables on which the forecast is
based. As a result, we believe the new forecast improves the
precision of our estimates in two respects: (i) the new
forecast is believed to be more accurate when applied to a
smaller group of Consumer Loans which allows us to forecast more
accurately at the dealer pool level and more precisely measure
the performance of specific segments of our portfolio and
(ii) the new forecast is believed to be more sensitive to
changes in Consumer Loan performance and will allow us to react
more quickly to changes in Consumer Loan performance.
Implementation of the new methodology resulted in a reversal of
$3.4 million in provision for credit losses as higher
forecasted collections reduced the amount of Loan impairment. In
conjunction with our implementation of the new forecasting
methodology, we reevaluated our forecast of future collections
on old, fully-reserved Dealer Loans. As a result, we wrote off
$22.7 million of Dealer Loans and the related allowance for
credit losses as we were no longer forecasting any future
collections on these Dealer Loans. This write-off had no impact
on net income for the first quarter of 2008 as all of these
Dealer Loans were fully-reserved.
|
|
|
Our forecast of future collections prior to the second quarter
of 2008 assumed that Loans within our current portfolio would
produce similar collection rates as produced by historical Loans
with the same attributes. During the second quarter of 2008, we
modified our forecast to assume that Loans originated in 2006,
2007 and 2008 would perform 100 to 300 basis points lower
than historical Loans with the same attributes. As a result we
reduced our estimate of future cash flows on these same Loans by
$22.2 million, or 1.7%. Of the total reduction,
$20.8 million was recorded as provision for credit losses
during the second quarter of 2008. We did not modify our
forecast related to 2005 and prior Loans as these Loans continue
to perform as expected.
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we again realized lower than
expected collection rates and as a result implemented an
additional modification to our forecasting methodology. This
modification reduced estimated future net cash flows by
$9.5 million or 0.7% of the total undiscounted cash flow
stream expected from our Loan portfolio. The adjustment impacted
only Loans originated subsequent to September 30, 2007 with
more recent Loans impacted more severely and more seasoned Loans
within this time period impacted less severely. Forecasted
collection rates on Loans originated on or before
September 30, 2007 were not modified as collection results
during the fourth quarter of 2008 were consistent with our
expectations for these Loans. In addition, during the fourth
quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated timing of future
collections to reflect recent trends in prepayment frequency. In
recent periods, we have experienced a reduction in prepayments,
which typically result from payoffs that occur when customers
reestablish a positive credit history, trade-in their vehicle,
and finance another vehicle purchase with a more traditional
auto loan. As the availability of traditional financing has been
curtailed as a result of current economic conditions, prepayment
rates have declined. As a result of these forecast
modifications, we recognized a provision for credit losses of
$10.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Key Factors:
|
|
Variances in the amount and timing of future collections and
dealer holdback payments from current estimates could materially
impact earnings in future periods.
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, a 1% decline in the forecasted future
net cash flows on Loans would result in approximately an
$8.3 million pre-tax charge to the provision for credit
losses. For additional information, see Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption:
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
Income Statement Caption:
|
|
Salaries and Wages
|
|
|
|
Nature of Estimates Required:
|
|
Stock-based Compensation Expense is based on the estimated fair
value on the date the equity instrument is granted or awarded by
the Company, and is recognized over the expected vesting period
of the equity instrument. We also estimate expected forfeiture
rate of restricted stock awards.
|
|
|
|
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, all stock options were vested and
all related expense had been recognized.
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards. In recognizing
restricted stock compensation expense, we make assumptions
regarding the expected forfeiture rate of the restricted stock
awards. We also make assumptions regarding the expected vesting
dates of performance-based restricted stock awards.
|
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock awards are estimated as if
they were vested and issued on the grant date and are recognized
over the expected vesting period of the restricted stock award.
For additional information, see Notes 2 and 10 to the
consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
|
Stock Options. As of December 31, 2007,
all stock options were vested and all related expenses had been
recognized. We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
estimate the fair value of stock option grants. This model
calculates the fair value using various assumptions, including
the expected life of the option, the expected volatility of the
underlying stock, and the expected dividend yield on the
underlying stock.
|
|
|
|
Key Factors:
|
|
Changes in the expected vesting dates of performance-based
restricted stock awards and expected forfeiture rates would
impact the amount and timing of stock-based compensation expense
recognized in future periods.
|
Litigation and Contingent Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption:
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
Income Statement Caption:
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
Nature of Estimates Required:
|
|
Estimating the likelihood of adverse legal judgments and any
resulting damages owed.
|
|
|
|
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
|
|
The Company, with assistance from our legal counsel, determines
if the likelihood of an adverse judgment for various claims and
litigation is remote, reasonably possible, or probable. To the
extent we believe an adverse judgment is probable and the amount
of the judgment is estimable, we recognize a liability. For
information regarding the potential various consumer claims
against us, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
Key Factors:
|
|
Negative variances in the ultimate disposition of claims and
litigation outstanding from current estimates could result in
additional expense in future periods.
|
Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Captions:
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
Income Statement Caption:
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
35
|
|
|
Nature of Estimates Required:
|
|
Estimating the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the
income tax return.
|
|
|
|
Assumptions and Approaches Used:
|
|
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48) which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entitys
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes
for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, tax
benefits related to uncertain income tax positions can only be
recognized if such positions are more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. The tax
benefit of an uncertain income tax position is required to be
recorded at the largest benefit that has a greater than 50%
likelihood of being sustained. For additional information, see
Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
Key Factors:
|
|
Changes in tax laws and variances in projected future results
from current estimates that impact judgments could impact our
provision for income taxes in future periods.
|
36
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We need capital to fund new Loans and pay dealer holdback. Our
primary sources of capital are cash flows from operating
activities, collections of Consumer Loans and borrowings through
four primary sources of financing: (1) a revolving secured
line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate;
(2) revolving secured warehouse facilities with
institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A
asset-backed secured borrowings (Term ABS 144A) with
qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual
credit facility with an institutional investor. There are
various restrictive debt covenants for each source of financing
and we are in compliance with those covenants as of
December 31, 2008. For information regarding these
financings and the covenants included in the related documents,
see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, which
are incorporated herein by reference.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we have:
|
|
|
|
|
Expanded our bank line of credit from $75.0 million to
$153.5 million and renewed it until June 2010
|
|
|
|
Renewed our $325.0 million warehouse facility to August 2009
|
|
|
|
Completed a $150.0 million asset-backed secured financing
with an institutional investor
|
|
|
|
Completed a $50.0 million two-year revolving credit
facility with another institutional investor
|
|
|
|
Renewed our $50.0 million residual credit facility until
August 2009
|
Our target growth rate in 2009 will depend on our success in
securing additional financing and renewing our existing debt
facilities. If no additional capital is obtained, we expect to
target unit volumes during the first six months of 2009 that are
approximately 10% lower than the prior year comparable period.
In August of 2009, our $325.0 million warehouse facility
and our $50.0 million residual credit facility
(collectively referred to as the maturing
facilities) mature. If we are unsuccessful in renewing the
maturing facilities, and alternative financing cannot be
obtained, additional reductions in Loan origination volumes will
be required. Given current conditions in the credit markets,
there can be no assurance that the maturing facilities will be
renewed or that alternative financing will be obtained. In the
event that the maturing facilities are not renewed, no further
advances would be made under the maturing facilities. Assuming
the Company continues to be in compliance with all debt
covenants, the amount outstanding would be repaid over time as
the collections on the Loans securing the maturing facilities
are received.
The following table summarizes maximum Loan origination volumes
under two scenarios: (1) the maturing facilities are
renewed (or replaced) but no other additional capital is
obtained during 2009; and (2) no additional capital is
obtained during 2009 and the maturing facilities are not renewed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum for the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming Maturing
|
|
|
Assuming Maturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities are
|
|
|
Facilities are Not
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Renewed
|
|
|
Renewed
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(or Replaced)
|
|
|
(or Replaced)
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan dollar volume
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
Average Loans receivable balance, net
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,050
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents increased to $3.2 million as of
December 31, 2008 from $0.7 million at
December 31, 2007. Our total balance sheet indebtedness
increased to $641.7 million at December 31, 2008 from
$532.1 million at December 31, 2007. This increase was
primarily a result of borrowings used to fund new Loans in 2008.
37
Restricted cash and cash equivalents increased to
$80.3 million at December 31, 2008 from
$74.1 million at December 31, 2007. The following
table summarizes restricted cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collections related to secured financings
|
|
$
|
48,956
|
|
|
$
|
42,518
|
|
Cash held in trusts for future vehicle service contract claims
(1)
|
|
|
31,377
|
|
|
|
18,266
|
|
Cash held in escrow related to settlement of class action
lawsuit (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
80,333
|
|
|
$
|
74,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A claims reserve associated with the trusts is included in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
For additional information related to the settlement of the
class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri, see Note 12
to the consolidated financial statements. |
Restricted securities available for sale were $3.3 million
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007. Restricted securities
consist of amounts held in accordance with vehicle service
contract trust agreements.
A summary of the total future contractual obligations requiring
repayments as of December 31, 2008 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities and capital leases
(1)
|
|
$
|
641,714
|
|
|
$
|
434,826
|
|
|
$
|
206,888
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations (2)
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other future obligations (3)
|
|
|
12,274
|
|
|
|
12,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations (4)
|
|
$
|
656,386
|
|
|
$
|
448,421
|
|
|
$
|
207,827
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long-term debt obligations included in the above table consist
solely of principal repayments. We are also obligated to make
interest payments at the applicable interest rates, as discussed
in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. Based
on the actual amounts outstanding under our revolving line of
credit and warehouse facilities at December 31, 2008, the
forecasted amounts outstanding on all other debt and the actual
interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2008, interest
is expected to be approximately $11.5 million during 2009;
$4.6 million during 2010; and $0.6 million during 2011
and thereafter. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations consist solely of contractual obligations
related to the information system needs of the Company. |
|
(3) |
|
Other future obligations included in the above table consist
solely of reserves for uncertain tax positions recognized under
FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Tax An Interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). |
|
(4) |
|
We have contractual obligations to pay dealer holdback to our
dealer-partners; however, as payments of dealer holdback are
contingent upon the receipt of customer payments and the
repayment of advances, these obligations are excluded from the
table above. |
Based upon anticipated cash flows, management believes that cash
flows from operations and its various financing alternatives
will provide sufficient financing for debt maturities and for
future operations, subject, as discussed above, to the need to
reduce Loan originations if we are unable to renew or refinance
our maturing facilities. Our ability to borrow funds may be
impacted by economic and financial market conditions. If the
various financing alternatives were to become limited or
unavailable to us, our operations and liquidity could be
materially and adversely affected.
38
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or
are reasonably likely to have a material current or future
effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results
of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources.
Market
Risk
We are exposed primarily to market risks associated with
movements in interest rates. Our policies and procedures
prohibit the use of financial instruments for trading purposes.
A discussion of our accounting policies for derivative
instruments is included in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Interest Rate Risk. We rely on various sources
of financing, some of which are at floating rates of interest
and expose us to risks associated with increases in interest
rates. We manage such risk primarily by entering into interest
rate cap and interest rate swap agreements.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $61.3 million of
floating rate debt outstanding on our revolving secured line of
credit, with no interest rate protection. For every 1.0%
increase in rates on our revolving secured line of credit,
annual after-tax earnings would decrease by approximately
$0.4 million, assuming we maintain a level amount of
floating rate debt.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $306.0 million in
floating rate debt outstanding under our revolving secured
warehouse facilities, with interest rate caps of 6.75% on the
underlying commercial paper rates. Based on the difference
between the rates on our revolving secured warehouse facilities
at December 31, 2008 and the interest rate caps, our
maximum interest rate risk on the secured warehouse facilities
is 4.42%. This maximum interest rate risk would reduce annual
after-tax earnings by approximately $8.5 million, assuming
we maintain a level amount of floating rate debt.
As of December 31, 2008 we had $76.0 million in fixed
rate debt, and $192.2 million in floating rate debt
outstanding under Term ABS 144A asset-backed secured borrowings.
We have entered into two interest rate swaps, which were
effective on the closing date of the financings, to convert
$50.0 million and $150.0 million in floating rate Term
ABS 144A asset-backed secured borrowings into fixed rate debt
bearing a rate of 6.28% and 6.37%, respectively. The fair value
of the interest rate swaps is based on quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, which are influenced by a number
of factors, including interest rates, amount of debt
outstanding, and number of months until maturity. As we have not
designated the interest rate swap related to the
$50.0 million in floating rate debt as a hedge as defined
under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), changes in the fair value of this
swap will increase or decrease interest expense.
We have designated the interest rate swap related to the
$150.0 million floating rate debt as a cash flow hedge as
defined under SFAS 133. The effective portion of changes in
the fair value will be recorded in other comprehensive income,
net of income taxes, and the ineffective portion of changes in
fair value will be recorded in interest expense. There has been
no such ineffectiveness since the inception of this hedge
through December 31, 2008.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance
regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods of
those fiscal years. However, on February 12, 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP
FAS 157-2),
which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
FSP
FAS 157-2
defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years for items within the scope of FSP
FAS 157-2.
We adopted the applicable portions of SFAS 157 on
January 1, 2008 (See Note 3). The deferred portions of
SFAS 157 will not have
39
an impact on our financial statements. The adoption of the
applicable portions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and
liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities. In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to
choose to measure financial assets and liabilities (except for
those that are specifically exempted from SFAS 159) at
fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or
liability at fair value can be made on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value
and fair value at the election date is recorded as a transition
adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in
fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. At this time, we have not elected to measure any financial
assets or liabilities at fair value under SFAS 159.
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The
adoption of SFAS 161 will have no financial impact on our
consolidated financial statements but will expand our
disclosures.
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable
Interest Entities. In September 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests
in Variable Interest Entities (FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8). FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 requires additional disclosures about
transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest
entities. FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 amends both FASB Statement No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and FASB
Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (Revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
to require: (1) additional disclosures about
transferors continuing involvements with transferred
financial assets; (2) additional disclosures about a public
entities (including sponsors) involvement with variable
interest entities; and (3) disclosures by a public
enterprise that is: (a) a sponsor of a qualifying
special-purpose entity (SPE) that holds a variable
interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of
financial assets to the qualifying SPE; and (b) a servicer
of a qualifying SPE that holds a significant variable interest
in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of financial
assets to the qualifying SPE. The adoption of FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 for the year ended December 31, 2008
had no financial impact on our consolidated financial statements
but did expand our disclosures.
Forward-Looking
Statements
We make forward-looking statements in this report and may make
such statements in future filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. We may also make forward-looking statements
in our press releases or other public or shareholder
communications. Our forward-looking statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties and include information about our
expectations and possible or assumed future results of
operations. When we use any of the words may,
will, should, believes,
expects, anticipates,
assumes, forecasts,
estimates, intends, plans,
target or similar expressions, we are making
forward-looking statements.
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 for all of our forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements represent our outlook only as of the
date of this report. While we believe that our forward-looking
statements are reasonable, actual results could differ
materially since the statements are based on our current
expectations, which are subject to risks and uncertainties.
Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not
limited to, the factors set forth under Item 1A. Risk
Factors elsewhere in this report and the risks and
uncertainties discussed in our other reports filed or furnished
from time to time with the SEC.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The information called for by Item 7A is incorporated by
reference from the information in Item 7 under the caption
Market Risk in this
Form 10-K.
40
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
42
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
43
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
|
|
|
44
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
|
|
|
45
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
|
|
|
46
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
47
|
|
41
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Credit Acceptance Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Credit Acceptance Corporation (a Michigan Corporation) and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Credit Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report
dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP
Southfield, Michigan
February 27, 2009
42
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
80,333
|
|
|
|
74,102
|
|
Restricted securities available for sale
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
Loans receivable (including $15,383 and $16,125 from affiliates
as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively)
|
|
|
1,148,752
|
|
|
|
944,698
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
(130,835
|
)
|
|
|
(134,145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
1,017,917
|
|
|
|
810,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,049
|
|
|
|
20,124
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,712
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13,556
|
|
|
|
12,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,139,354
|
|
|
$
|
942,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
83,948
|
|
|
$
|
79,834
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
61,300
|
|
|
|
36,300
|
|
Secured financing
|
|
|
574,175
|
|
|
|
488,065
|
|
Mortgage note and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
6,239
|
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
75,060
|
|
|
|
64,768
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
801,603
|
|
|
|
676,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies See Note 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares
authorized, 30,666,691 and 30,240,859 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
11,829
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
328,178
|
|
|
|
261,001
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax of
$1,478 and $(7) at December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively
|
|
|
(2,562
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
337,751
|
|
|
|
265,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
1,139,354
|
|
|
$
|
942,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
$
|
286,823
|
|
|
$
|
220,473
|
|
|
$
|
188,605
|
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
Program fees
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
13,589
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
21,203
|
|
|
|
18,810
|
|
|
|
16,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
312,186
|
|
|
|
239,927
|
|
|
|
219,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
68,993
|
|
|
|
55,396
|
|
|
|
41,015
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
27,511
|
|
|
|
27,271
|
|
|
|
36,485
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
16,703
|
|
|
|
17,441
|
|
|
|
16,624
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
46,029
|
|
|
|
19,947
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
43,189
|
|
|
|
36,669
|
|
|
|
23,330
|
|
Provision for claims
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
205,149
|
|
|
|
156,815
|
|
|
|
128,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
107,037
|
|
|
|
83,112
|
|
|
|
90,646
|
|
Foreign currency (loss) gain
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
107,012
|
|
|
|
83,181
|
|
|
|
90,640
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
39,944
|
|
|
|
29,567
|
|
|
|
31,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
67,068
|
|
|
|
53,614
|
|
|
|
58,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued United Kingdom operations
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
67,177
|
|
|
$
|
54,916
|
|
|
$
|
58,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
30,249,783
|
|
|
|
30,053,129
|
|
|
|
33,035,693
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
31,105,043
|
|
|
|
31,153,688
|
|
|
|
35,283,478
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
373,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,027
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
$
|
29,746
|
|
|
$
|
(1,566
|
)
|
|
$
|
344,513
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
Cumulative affect due to adoption of SFAS 123R modified
prospective application
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,566
|
)
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
58,640
|
|
|
$
|
58,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax of
$3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(247,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,796
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(53,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
12,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
12,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit for exercised stock options
|
|
|
13,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
210,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,180
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,253
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative affect due to adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
54,916
|
|
|
$
|
54,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax of
$(26)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(9,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,081
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit for exercised stock options
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
265,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,241
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,001
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
67,177
|
|
|
$
|
67,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap, net of tax of $1,488
|
|
|
(2,580
|
)
|
|
|
(2,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,580
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax of
$(3)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit for exercised stock options
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
337,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,667
|
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
11,829
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
328,178
|
|
|
$
|
(2,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
67,177
|
|
|
$
|
54,916
|
|
|
$
|
58,640
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
46,029
|
|
|
|
19,947
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
|
|
4,105
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
Loss (gain) on retirement of property and equipment
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11,777
|
|
|
|
20,346
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
4,659
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
Decrease (increase) in income taxes receivable
|
|
|
21,593
|
|
|
|
(8,978
|
)
|
|
|
(7,712
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
(3,425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
155,480
|
|
|
|
97,892
|
|
|
|
86,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,231
|
)
|
|
|
(28,493
|
)
|
|
|
(32,136
|
)
|
Purchases of restricted securities available for sale
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of restricted securities available for sale
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Maturities of restricted securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Principal collected on Loans receivable
|
|
|
609,487
|
|
|
|
576,543
|
|
|
|
551,792
|
|
Advances to dealers and accelerated payments of dealer holdback
|
|
|
(524,496
|
)
|
|
|
(571,197
|
)
|
|
|
(532,869
|
)
|
Purchases of Consumer Loans
|
|
|
(280,326
|
)
|
|
|
(139,340
|
)
|
|
|
(25,562
|
)
|
Payments of dealer holdback
|
|
|
(58,503
|
)
|
|
|
(70,950
|
)
|
|
|
(70,110
|
)
|
Net decrease in other receivables
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(6,341
|
)
|
|
|
(7,659
|
)
|
|
|
(1,536
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(266,290
|
)
|
|
|
(240,399
|
)
|
|
|
(107,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit
|
|
|
809,700
|
|
|
|
633,500
|
|
|
|
414,630
|
|
Repayments under line of credit
|
|
|
(784,700
|
)
|
|
|
(635,600
|
)
|
|
|
(412,530
|
)
|
Proceeds from secured financing
|
|
|
605,700
|
|
|
|
619,500
|
|
|
|
678,500
|
|
Repayments of secured financing
|
|
|
(519,590
|
)
|
|
|
(476,579
|
)
|
|
|
(434,856
|
)
|
Principal payments under mortgage note and capital lease
obligations
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
(1,502
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(9,530
|
)
|
|
|
(247,168
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
12,091
|
|
Tax benefits from stock based compensation plans
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
13,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
112,974
|
|
|
|
134,958
|
|
|
|
22,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
|
|
(7,816
|
)
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
8,528
|
|
|
|
7,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
8,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
43,255
|
|
|
$
|
36,131
|
|
|
$
|
23,056
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,681
|
|
|
$
|
14,506
|
|
|
$
|
25,427
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment acquired through capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
1,785
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
|
Principal Business. Since 1972, Credit
Acceptance (referred to as the Company, Credit
Acceptance, we, our or
us) has provided auto loans to consumers, regardless
of their credit history. Our product is offered through a
nationwide network of automobile dealers who benefit from sales
of vehicles to consumers who otherwise could not obtain
financing; from repeat and referral sales generated by these
same customers; and from sales to customers responding to
advertisements for our product, but who actually end up
qualifying for traditional financing.
We refer to dealers who participate in our programs, and share
our commitment to changing consumers lives, as
dealer-partners. Upon enrollment in our programs,
the dealer-partner enters into a dealer servicing agreement with
Credit Acceptance that defines the legal relationship between
Credit Acceptance and the dealer-partner. The dealer servicing
agreement assigns the responsibilities for administering,
servicing, and collecting the amounts due on retail installment
contracts (referred to as Consumer Loans) from the
dealer-partners to us.
A consumer who does not qualify for conventional automobile
financing can purchase a used vehicle from a Credit Acceptance
dealer-partner and finance the purchase through us. We are an
indirect lender from a legal perspective, meaning the Consumer
Loan is originated by the dealer-partner and immediately
assigned to us. If we discover a misrepresentation by the
dealer-partner relating to a Consumer Loan assigned to us, we
can demand that the Consumer Loan be repurchased for the current
balance of the Consumer Loan less the amount of any unearned
finance charge plus the applicable termination fee, which is
generally $500. Upon receipt of such amount in full, we will
reassign the Consumer Loan and our security interest in the
financed vehicle to the dealer-partner.
We have two primary programs: the Portfolio Program and the
Purchase Program. Under the Portfolio Program, we advance money
to dealer-partners (referred to as a Dealer Loan) in
exchange for the right to service the underlying Consumer Loan.
Under the Purchase Program, we buy the Consumer Loan from the
dealer-partner (referred to as a Purchased Loan) and
keep all amounts collected from the consumer. Dealer Loans and
Purchased Loans are collectively referred to as
Loans. The following table shows the percentage of
Consumer Loans assigned to us under each of the programs for
each of the last 12 quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Portfolio Program
|
|
Purchase Program
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
96.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
96.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
94.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
74.5
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
70.6
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
69.2
|
%
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
Dealer-partners that enroll in our programs have the option to
either pay an upfront, one-time enrollment fee of $9,850 or
defer payment by agreeing to allow us to keep 50% of their first
accelerated dealer holdback payment (Portfolio Profit
Express). Portfolio Profit Express is paid to qualifying
dealer-partners after a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans has
been closed. Dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs prior
to 2008 have the option to assign Consumer Loans under either
the Portfolio Program or the Purchase Program. During 2008, we
changed our eligibility requirements for new dealer-partner
enrollments to restrict access to the Purchase Program. For
dealer-partners that enrolled in our programs during the first
eight months of 2008, only dealer-partners that elected to pay
the upfront, one-time enrollment fee were initially allowed to
assign Consumer Loans under either program. Dealer-
47
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
1.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS (Continued)
|
partners that elected the deferred option during this period
were only granted access to the Purchase Program after the first
Portfolio Profit Express payment has been made under the
Portfolio Program. For all dealer-partners enrolling in our
programs after August 31, 2008, access to the Purchase
Program is only granted after the first Portfolio Profit Express
payment has been made under the Portfolio Program.
Portfolio Program
As payment for the vehicle, the dealer-partner generally
receives the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a down payment from the consumer;
|
|
|
|
a cash advance from us; and
|
|
|
|
after the advance has been recovered by us, the cash from
payments made on the Consumer Loan, net of certain collection
costs and our servicing fee (dealer holdback).
|
We record the amount advanced to the dealer-partner as a Dealer
Loan, which is classified within Loans receivable in our
consolidated balance sheets. Cash advanced to dealer-partners is
automatically assigned to the originating dealer-partners
open pool of advances. At the dealer-partners option, a
pool containing at least 100 Consumer Loans can be closed and
subsequent advances assigned to a new pool. All advances due
from a dealer-partner are secured by the future collections on
the dealer-partners portfolio of Consumer Loans assigned
to us. For dealer-partners with more than one pool, the pools
are cross-collateralized so the performance of other pools is
considered in determining eligibility for dealer holdback. We
perfect our security interest in the Dealer Loans by taking
possession of the Consumer Loans.
The dealer servicing agreement provides that collections
received by us during a calendar month on Consumer Loans
assigned by a dealer-partner are applied on a
pool-by-pool
basis as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
First, to reimburse us for certain collection costs;
|
|
|
|
Second, to pay us our servicing fee;
|
|
|
|
Third, to reduce the aggregate advance balance and to pay any
other amounts due from the dealer-partner to us; and
|
|
|
|
Fourth, to the dealer-partner as payment of dealer holdback.
|
Dealer-partners have an opportunity to receive Portfolio Profit
Express at the time a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans is
closed. The amount paid to the dealer-partner is calculated
using a formula that considers the forecasted collections and
the advance balance on the closed pool. If the collections on
Consumer Loans from a dealer-partners pool are not
sufficient to repay the advance balance, the dealer-partner will
not receive dealer holdback.
Since typically the combination of the advance and the
consumers down payment provides the dealer-partner with a
cash profit at the time of sale, the dealer-partners risk
in the Consumer Loan is limited. We cannot demand repayment from
the dealer-partner of the advance except in the event the
dealer-partner is in default of the dealer servicing agreement.
Advances are made only after the Consumer Loan is approved,
accepted and assigned to us and all other stipulations required
for funding have been satisfied. The dealer-partner can also opt
to repurchase Consumer Loans assigned under the Portfolio
Program, at their discretion, for a fee.
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the
Portfolio Program are not considered to be loans to consumers.
Instead, our accounting reflects that of a lender to the
dealer-partner. The classification as a Dealer Loan for
accounting purposes is primarily a result of (1) the
dealer-partners financial interest in the Consumer Loan
and (2) certain elements of our legal relationship with the
dealer-partner. The cash amount advanced to the dealer-partner
is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. The aggregate
amount of all advances to an individual dealer-partner, plus
finance charges, plus dealer holdback payments, plus Portfolio
Profit Express payments, less
48
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
1.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS (Concluded)
|
collections (net of certain collection costs), less write-offs,
comprises the amount of the Dealer Loan recorded in Loans
receivable.
Purchase Program
We began offering a Purchase Program on a limited basis in March
of 2005. The Purchase Program differs from our traditional
Portfolio Program in that the dealer-partner receives a single
payment from us at the time of origination instead of a cash
advance and dealer holdback. Purchase Program volume increased
significantly beginning in 2007 as the program was offered to
additional dealer-partners.
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the
Purchase Program are considered to be originated by the
dealer-partner and then purchased by us. The cash amount paid to
the dealer-partner is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet.
The aggregate amount of all amounts paid to purchase Consumer
Loans from dealer-partners, plus finance charges, less
collections (net of certain collection costs), less write-offs,
comprises the amount of Purchased Loans recorded in Loans
receivable.
Businesses in Liquidation. Effective
June 30, 2003, we decided to stop originating Consumer
Loans in the United Kingdom and we sold the remainder of the
portfolio on December 30, 2005. Over the last three years
we have had minimal activity as we have been liquidating our
United Kingdom subsidiary.
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Our primary
subsidiaries are: Buyers Vehicle Protection Plan, Inc.,
Vehicle Remarketing Services, Inc., VSC Re Company, CAC
Warehouse Funding Corp. II, CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2006-1,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2006-2,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-1,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-2, and
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2008-1.
Reportable
Business Segments
We are organized into two primary business segments: United
States and Other. For more information regarding our reportable
segments, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (US GAAP) requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The
accounts which are subject to significant estimation include the
allowance for credit losses, finance charge revenue, stock-based
compensation expense, contingencies, and taxes. Actual results
could materially differ from those estimates.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of readily marketable securities with
original maturities at the date of acquisition of three months
or less.
49
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
Restricted
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amount of restricted cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of these
instruments. The following table summarizes restricted cash and
cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collections related to secured financings
|
|
$
|
48,956
|
|
|
$
|
42,518
|
|
Cash held in trusts for future vehicle service contract claims
(1)
|
|
|
31,377
|
|
|
|
18,266
|
|
Cash held in escrow related to settlement of class action
lawsuit (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
80,333
|
|
|
$
|
74,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The unearned premium and claims reserve associated with the
trusts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
For additional information related to the settlement of the
class action lawsuit in the state of Missouri, see Note 12
to the consolidated financial statements. |
Restricted
Securities Available for Sale
Restricted securities consist of amounts held in accordance with
vehicle service contract trust agreements. We determine the
appropriate classification of our investments in debt securities
at the time of purchase and reevaluate such determinations at
each balance sheet date. Debt securities for which we do not
have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as
available for sale, and stated at fair value with unrealized
gains and losses, net of income taxes included in the
determination of comprehensive income and reported as a
component of shareholders equity.
Restricted securities available for sale consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and agency securities
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
3,317
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and agency securities
|
|
$
|
1,584
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,624
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
3,270
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and estimated fair values of debt securities by
contractual maturity were as follows (securities with multiple
maturity dates are classified in the period of final maturity).
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay
obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
50
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
$
|
1,096
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
Over one year to five years
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
3,317
|
|
|
$
|
3,345
|
|
|
$
|
3,270
|
|
|
$
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
Charges
Finance charges is comprised of: (1) servicing fees earned
as a result of servicing Consumer Loans assigned to us by
dealer-partners under the Portfolio Program; (2) finance
charge income from Purchased Loans; (3) fees earned from
our third party ancillary product offerings; (4) monthly
program fees charged to dealer-partners under the Portfolio
Program; and (5) fees associated with certain Loans. We
recognize finance charge income on Loans in a manner consistent
with the provisions of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP)
03-3
Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired
in a Transfer.
SOP 03-3
requires us to recognize finance charges under the interest
method such that revenue is recognized on a level-yield basis
based upon forecasted cash flows.
For Dealer Loans only, certain direct origination costs such as
salaries and credit reports are deferred and the net costs are
recognized as an adjustment to finance charges over the life of
the related Dealer Loan on a level-yield basis. This treatment
is in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 91, Accounting for
Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or
Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.
Buyers Vehicle Protection Plan, Inc. (BVPP), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, has relationships with
third party administrators (TPAs) whereby the TPAs
process claims on vehicle service contracts that are
underwritten by third party insurers. BVPP receives a commission
for all vehicle service contracts sold by our dealer-partners
when the vehicle is financed by us. The commission is included
in the retail price of the vehicle service contract which is
added to the Consumer Loan. We provide dealer-partners with an
additional advance based on the retail price of the vehicle
service contract. We recognize our commission from the vehicle
service contracts as part of finance charges on a level-yield
basis based upon forecasted cash flows.
BVPP also has a relationship with a TPA that allows
dealer-partners to offer a Guaranteed Asset Protection
(GAP) product to consumers whereby the TPA processes
claims that are underwritten by a third party insurer. GAP
provides the consumer protection by paying the difference
between the loan balance and the amount covered by the
consumers insurance policy in the event the vehicle is
totaled or stolen. We receive a commission for all GAP contracts
sold by our dealer-partners when the vehicle is financed by us,
and do not bear any risk of loss for claims. The commission is
included in the retail price of the GAP contract which is added
to the Consumer Loan. We provide dealer-partners with an
additional advance based on the retail price of the GAP
contract. We recognize our commission from the GAP contracts as
part of finance charges on a level-yield basis based upon
forecasted cash flows.
Program fees represent monthly fees of $599 charged to
dealer-partners for access to our Credit Approval Processing
System (CAPS); administration, servicing and
collection services offered by the Company; documentation
related to or affecting our program; and all tangible and
intangible property owned by Credit Acceptance. Effective
January 1, 2007, we implemented a change designed to
positively impact dealer-partner attrition. We continue to
charge a monthly fee of $599 to dealer-partners participating in
our Portfolio Program, but instead of collecting and recognizing
the revenue from the fee in the current period, we collect it
from future dealer holdback
51
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
payments. As a result of this change, we now record program fees
under the Portfolio Program as a yield adjustment, recognizing
these fees as finance charge revenue over the forecasted net
cash flows of the Dealer Loan.
Premiums
Earned
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we formed VSC Re Company
(VSC Re), a wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged
in the business of reinsuring coverage under vehicle service
contracts sold to consumers by dealer-partners on vehicles
financed by us. VSC Re currently reinsures vehicle service
contracts that are underwritten by two of our three third party
insurers. Vehicle service contract premiums, which represent the
selling price of the vehicle service contract to the consumer
less commissions and certain administrative costs, are
contributed to trust accounts controlled by VSC Re. These
premiums are used to fund claims covered under the vehicle
service contracts. The Company has entered into arrangements
with third-party insurance companies that limit our exposure to
fund claims to the amount of premium dollars contributed, less
amounts earned and withdrawn, plus $0.5 million of equity
contributed. With the reinsurance structure, we will be able to
access projected excess trust assets monthly and will record
revenue and expense on an accrual basis. Premiums are earned
over the life of the vehicle service contract using an average
of the pro rata and rule of 78 methods. Claims are expensed as
provision for claims in the period the claim was incurred. Our
financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008
reflect two months of VSC Re activity, including
$3.9 million in premiums earned and $2.7 million in
provision for claims. Under Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46), we are considered the primary
beneficiary of the trusts and as a result, trust assets of
$29.3 million at December 31, 2008 have been
consolidated on our balance sheet as restricted cash and cash
equivalents. As of December 31, 2008, accounts payable and
accrued liabilities includes $23.3 million of unearned
premium and $0.9 million of claims reserve related to our
reinsurance of vehicle service contracts.
Prior to the formation of VSC Re, our agreements with two of our
TPAs allowed us to receive profit sharing payments depending
upon the performance of the vehicle service contract programs.
The agreements also required that vehicle service contract
premiums be placed in trust accounts. Funds in the trust
accounts were utilized by the TPA to pay claims on the vehicle
service contracts. Upon the formation of VSC Re during the
fourth quarter of 2008, the unearned premiums on the majority of
the vehicle service contracts that had been written through
these two TPAs were ceded to VSC Re along with any related trust
assets. As the trust assets transferred to VSC Re exceeded the
ceded unearned premiums, we recorded a deferred gain of
$4.3 million upon the formation of VSC Re. The deferred
gain will be recognized as premiums earned revenue over a
26 month period (average remaining life of the ceded
vehicle service contracts) using an average of the pro rata and
rule of 78 methods. Vehicle service contracts written prior to
2008 through one of the TPAs remains under this profit sharing
arrangement. Profit sharing payments, if any, on the vehicle
service contracts are distributed to us periodically after the
term of the vehicle service contracts have substantially expired
provided certain loss rates are met. Under FIN 46, we are
considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts. As a result,
the assets and liabilities of the remaining trust have been
consolidated on our balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008,
the remaining trust had $5.4 million in assets available to
pay claims and a related claims reserve of $4.7 million.
The trust assets are included in restricted cash and cash
equivalents and restricted securities available for sale. The
claims reserve is included in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. A third party
insures claims in excess of funds in the trust accounts.
We formed VSC Re in order to enhance our control and the
security of the trust assets that will be used to pay future
vehicle service contract claims. The income we expect to earn
from vehicle service contracts over time will likely not be
impacted as, both before and after the formation of VSC Re, the
income we receive is based on the amount by which vehicle
service contract premiums exceed claims. The only change in our
risk associated with adverse claims experience relates to the
$0.5 million equity contribution that was required as part
of this new structure, which is now at risk in the event claims
exceed premiums. Under the prior structure, our risk was limited
to the amount of premiums contributed to the trusts.
52
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
Our determination to consolidate the VSC Re trusts and the
profit sharing trusts under FIN 46 was based on the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
First, we determined that the trusts qualified as variable
interest entities as defined under FIN 46. The trusts have
insufficient equity at risk as no parties to the trusts were
required to contribute assets that provide them with any
ownership interest.
|
|
|
|
Next, we determined that we have variable interests in the
trusts. We have a residual interest in the assets of the trusts,
which is variable in nature, given that it increases or
decreases based upon the actual loss experience of the related
service contracts. In addition, for VSC Re, we are required to
absorb any losses in excess of the trusts assets, up to the
$0.5 million of equity contributed.
|
|
|
|
Finally, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of
the trusts. The trusts are not expected to generate losses that
need to be absorbed by the parties to the trusts. The trusts are
expected to generate residual returns and we are entitled to all
of those returns.
|
The limited amounts of premiums earned and provision for claims
in 2007 and 2006 relate to coverage we reinsured under credit
life and disability insurance sold to consumers by
dealer-partners on vehicles financed by us. We ceased financing
this product in 2006.
Program
Fees
As discussed further under Finance Charges, effective
January 1, 2007, we made a change in how we collect the
monthly program fee of $599 charged to dealer-partners
participating in our Portfolio Program. As a result of this
change, we now recognize program fees under the Portfolio
Program as finance charge revenue. During 2008 and 2007, the
limited amount of program fee revenue recognized relates to
certain dealer-partners that only participate in our Purchase
Program. During 2006, program fee revenue recognized relates to
dealer-partners participating in both our Portfolio and Purchase
Programs. Program fee revenue is recognized in the period
charged to the dealer-partner.
Other
Income
Other income consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing income
|
|
$
|
4,198
|
|
|
$
|
2,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,515
|
|
Remarketing charges
|
|
|
4,021
|
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income
|
|
|
3,738
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Dealer support products and services
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
Dealer enrollment fees
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
Seminars and conventions
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,203
|
|
|
$
|
18,810
|
|
|
$
|
16,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing income primarily consists of payments received on a
monthly basis from vendors that charge a fee to consumers to
process or expedite their payments. The amount of income we earn
is based on the amount of payments processed by the vendors and
is paid to us according to a tiered structure. Marketing income
also includes
53
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
fees we receive from third parties for providing dealer-partners
in certain states the ability to purchase Global Positioning
Systems (GPS) with Starter Interrupt Devices
(SID). Through this program, dealer-partners can
install a GPS-based SID (GPS-SID) on vehicles
financed by us that can be activated if the consumer fails to
make payments on their account, and can result in the prompt
repossession of the vehicle. Dealer-partners purchase the
GPS-SID directly from the third party and the third party pays
us a marketing fee for each device sold. GPS-SID revenue is
recognized when the unit is sold and installed in the
consumers vehicle.
Remarketing charges are fees retained from the sale of
repossessed vehicles by Vehicle Remarketing Services, Inc.
(VRS), a wholly-owned subsidiary that is responsible
for remarketing vehicles for Credit Acceptance. VRS coordinates
vehicle repossessions with a nationwide network of repossession
agents, the redemption of the vehicle by the consumer, or the
sale of the vehicle through a nationwide network of vehicle
auctions. VRS recognizes income from the retained fees at the
time of the sale. VRS does not retain a fee if a repossessed
vehicle is redeemed by the consumer prior to the sale. In
addition, any skip tracing fees incurred by VRS are passed on to
us and are included in remarketing charges.
Vehicle service contract and GAP profit sharing income is from
payments received from TPAs based upon the performance of
vehicle service contracts and GAP products provided by BVPP.
Profit sharing payments from the TPAs are received periodically
during the year, if eligible. Profit sharing payments are
currently not estimable due to a lack of historical information
and therefore, revenue related to these payments is recognized
in the period the payments are received.
Dealer support products and services revenue primarily relates
to products and services provided to dealer-partners to assist
with their vehicle inventory and is recognized in the period the
service is provided.
Interest income includes income on restricted cash relating to
collections on securitized Loans and income related to amounts
in the vehicle service contract trust accounts and is recognized
in the month earned.
Dealer enrollment fees include fees from dealer-partners that
enroll in our programs by either paying an upfront, one-time
enrollment fee of $9,850 or deferring payment by agreeing to
allow us to keep 50% of their first Portfolio Profit Express
payment. For dealer-partners that choose to pay the upfront,
one-time enrollment fee of $9,850, revenue related to these fees
is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of
the dealer-partner relationship. For dealer-partners that choose
to defer payment, we do not recognize any revenue for the
enrollment fee until the dealer-partner has met the eligibility
requirements to receive an accelerated dealer holdback payment
and the amount of the first payment, if any, has been
calculated. Once the accelerated dealer holdback payment has
been calculated, we defer the 50% portion that we keep and
recognize it on a straight-line basis over the remaining
estimated life of the dealer-partner relationship.
Loans
Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses
Dealer Loans. At the time of acceptance,
Consumer Loans that meet certain criteria are eligible for an
advance, which is computed on a formula basis. The Dealer Loan
is increased as revenue is recognized, dealer holdback payments
are made, and Portfolio Profit Express Payments are made, and
decreased as collections (net of certain collection costs) are
received and write-offs are recorded. We follow an approach
consistent with the provisions of
SOP 03-3
in determining our allowance for credit losses. Consistent with
SOP 03-3,
an allowance for credit losses is maintained at an amount that
reduces the net asset value (Dealer Loan balance less the
allowance) to the value of forecasted future cash flows
discounted at the yield established at the inception of the
Dealer Loan. This allowance is calculated on a dealer-partner by
dealer-partner basis. The discounted value of future cash flows
is comprised of estimated future collections on the Consumer
Loans, less any estimated dealer holdback payments. We write off
Dealer Loans once there are no forecasted future collections on
any of the associated Consumer Loans.
Future collections on Dealer Loans are forecasted based on the
historical performance of loans with similar characteristics.
Dealer holdback is forecasted based on the expected future
collections and current advance balance of each Dealer Loan.
Cash flows from any individual Dealer Loan are often different
than estimated cash flows at
54
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
Dealer Loan inception. If such difference is favorable, the
difference is recognized prospectively into income over the
remaining life of the Dealer Loan through a yield adjustment. If
such difference is unfavorable, a provision for credit losses is
recorded immediately as a current period expense and a
corresponding allowance for credit losses is established.
Because differences between estimated cash flows at inception
and actual cash flows occur often, an allowance is required for
a significant portion of our Dealer Loan portfolio. An allowance
for credit losses does not necessarily indicate that a Dealer
Loan is unprofitable, and in recent years, very seldom are cash
flows from a Dealer Loan insufficient to repay the initial
amounts advanced to the dealer-partner. Due to recent trends and
a concern about the worsening economic environment, forecasted
collection amounts on Dealer Loans originated in 2006 through
2008 were reduced by 100 to 400 basis points.
Cash advanced to dealer-partners is automatically assigned to
the originating dealer-partners open pool of business. At
the dealer-partners option, a pool containing at least 100
Consumer Loans can be closed and subsequent advances assigned to
a new pool. All advances due from a dealer-partner are secured
by the future collections on the dealer-partners portfolio
of Consumer Loans that have been assigned to us. Net collections
on all related Consumer Loans within the pool, after payment of
our servicing fee and reimbursement of certain collection costs,
are applied to reduce the aggregate advance balance owing
against those Consumer Loans. Once the advance balance has been
repaid, the dealer-partner is entitled to receive future
collections from Consumer Loans within that pool, after payment
of our servicing fee and reimbursement of certain collection
costs. If the collections on Consumer Loans from a
dealer-partners pool are not sufficient to repay the
advance balance, the dealer-partner will not receive the dealer
holdback. Additionally, for dealer-partners with more than one
pool, the pools are cross-collateralized so the performance of
other pools is considered in determining eligibility for dealer
holdback payments.
Purchased Loans. The Purchased Loan amount
reflected on our balance sheet is increased as revenue is
recognized and decreased as collections (net of certain
collection costs) are received and write-offs are recorded. We
aggregate Purchased Loans into pools based on the month of
purchase for revenue recognition and impairment purposes. We
follow
SOP 03-3
in determining our allowance for credit losses. Under
SOP 03-3,
an allowance for credit losses is maintained at an amount that
reduces the net asset value (Purchased Loan pool balance less
the allowance) to the value of forecasted future cash flows
discounted at the yield established at the date of purchase. The
discounted value of future cash flows is comprised of estimated
future collections on the pool of Purchased Loans. We write off
pools of Purchased Loans once there are no forecasted future
collections on any of the Purchased Loans included in the pool.
Future collections on Purchased Loans are forecasted based on
the historical performance of loans with similar
characteristics. Cash flows from any individual pool of
Purchased Loans are often different than estimated cash flows at
the date of purchase. If such difference is favorable, the
difference is recognized prospectively into income over the
remaining life of the pool of Purchased Loans through a yield
adjustment. If such difference is unfavorable, a provision for
credit losses is recorded immediately as a current period
expense and a corresponding allowance for credit losses is
established. Due to recent trends and a concern about the
worsening economic environment, forecasted collection amounts on
Purchased Loans originated in 2006 through 2008 were reduced by
100 to 400 basis points.
Property
and Equipment
Purchases of property and equipment are recorded at cost.
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful life of the asset. Estimated useful lives are
generally as follows: buildings 40 years,
building improvements 10 years, data processing
equipment 3 years, software
5 years, office furniture and equipment
7 years, and leasehold improvements the lesser
of the lease term or 7 years. The cost of assets sold or
retired and the related accumulated depreciation are removed
from the balance sheet at the time of disposition and any
resulting gain or loss is included in operations. Maintenance,
repairs and minor replacements are charged to operations as
incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized.
We evaluate long-lived assets for
55
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Software developed for internal use is capitalized and generally
amortized on a straight-line basis in accordance with Statement
of Position
98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use
(SOP 98-1).
As required by
SOP 98-1,
we capitalize the costs incurred during the application
development stage. Capitalized development costs are amortized
over five years while costs incurred to maintain existing
product offerings are expensed as incurred.
Deferred
Debt Issuance Costs
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, deferred debt issuance
costs were $3.4 million (net of accumulated amortization of
$5.6 million) and $3.3 million (net of accumulated
amortization of $2.0 million), respectively, and are
included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Expenses associated with the issuance of debt instruments are
capitalized and amortized as interest expense over the term of
the debt instrument on a level-yield basis for term secured
financings and on a straight-line basis for lines of credit and
revolving secured financings.
Income
Taxes
Provisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes are
calculated on reported pre-tax earnings based on current tax law
and also include, in the current period, the cumulative effect
of any changes in tax rates from those used previously in
determining deferred tax assets and liabilities. Such provisions
differ from the amounts currently receivable or payable because
certain items of income and expense are recognized in different
time periods for financial reporting purposes than for income
tax purposes.
Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities and their tax bases and are stated at enacted tax
rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or
recovered.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and
measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the
tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of
available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the
position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of
related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step
is to measure the tax benefit as the largest benefit that has a
greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained. We consider many
factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax
benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may
not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. The cumulative effect
of implementation of FIN 48 was approximately a
$0.1 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax
benefits, which was accounted for as a decrease in the
January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. Furthermore,
in accordance with FIN 48, effective January 1, 2007,
we began to recognize interest and penalties related to income
tax matters in the provision for income taxes. Prior to
January 1, 2007, interest related to income tax matters was
recognized in interest expense and penalties related to income
tax matters were recognized in general and administrative
expense.
Prior to January 1, 2008, the Company had state tax
obligations in the State of Michigan under the Single Business
Tax act that were not considered an income tax under the
provisions of SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS 109). On July 12, 2007, the Michigan
legislature enacted the Michigan Business Tax and Michigan Gross
Receipts Tax, effective January 1, 2008, both of which are
considered an income tax under the provisions of SFAS 109.
56
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
Derivative
Instruments
Interest Rate Caps. We purchase interest rate
cap agreements to manage the interest rate risk on our
$325.0 million and $50.0 million revolving secured
warehouse facilities. As we have not designated these agreements
as hedges as defined under SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 133), as amended,
changes in the fair value of these agreements will increase or
decrease net income.
As of December 31, 2008, seven interest rate cap agreements
with various maturities between July 2009 and February 2011 were
outstanding with a cap rate of 6.75% and a fair value of $1,000.
As of December 31, 2007, four interest rate cap agreements
with various maturities between May 2008 and June 2010 were
outstanding with a cap rate of 6.75% and a fair value of $6,000.
Interest Rate Swaps. As of December 31,
2008 we had $76.0 million in fixed rate debt, and
$192.2 million in floating rate debt outstanding under Term
ABS 144A asset-backed secured borrowings. We have entered into
two interest rate swaps, which were effective on the closing
date of the financings, to convert $50.0 million and
$150.0 million in floating rate Term ABS 144A asset-backed
secured borrowings into fixed rate debt bearing a rate of 6.28%
and 6.37%, respectively. The fair value of the interest rate
swaps is based on quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets, which are influenced by a number of factors,
including interest rates, amount of debt outstanding, and number
of months until maturity. As we have not designated the interest
rate swap related to the $50.0 million in floating rate
debt as a hedge as defined under SFAS 133, changes in the
fair value of this swap will increase or decrease interest
expense. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the impact of changes in fair value on interest expense was
$0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the interest rate swap had a
fair value of ($0.8) million and ($0.5) million,
respectively.
We have designated the interest rate swap related to the
$150.0 million floating rate debt as a cash flow hedge as
defined under SFAS 133. The effective portion of changes in
the fair value will be recorded in other comprehensive income,
net of income taxes, and the ineffective portion of changes in
fair value will be recorded in interest expense. There has been
no such ineffectiveness since the inception of this hedge
through December 31, 2008. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, the impact of changes in fair value on
other comprehensive income, net of tax, was approximately
($2.6) million. As of December 31, 2008, the interest
rate swap had a fair value of ($4.1) million.
For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify
as hedging instruments, we formally document all relationships
between the hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various
hedge transactions. This process includes linking all
derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to specific
assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. We also formally
assess (both at the hedges inception and on a quarterly
basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging
transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in
the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may
be expected to remain highly effective in the future periods.
When it is determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to
be) highly effective as a hedge, we would discontinue hedge
accounting prospectively.
At December 31, 2008, we had minimal exposure to credit
loss on the interest rate swaps. We do not believe that any
reasonably likely change in interest rates would have a
materially adverse effect on our financial position, our results
of operations or our cash flows.
We recognize our derivative financial instruments as either
other assets or accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our
consolidated balance sheets.
Stock
Compensation Plans
At December 31, 2008, we have three stock-based
compensation plans for employees and directors, which are
described more fully in Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements. On January 1, 2006, we adopted
revised
57
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment under
the modified prospective application method. We had previously
adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, under the retroactive restatement transition
method in 2003. Adoption of SFAS No. 123R primarily
resulted in a change in our estimated forfeitures for unvested
stock-based compensation awards, which resulted in a cumulative
reversal of stock-based compensation expense of
$0.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
Employee
Benefit Plan
We sponsor a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all of our
employees. Through March 31, 2008, employees could elect to
contribute to the plan from 1% to 20% of their salary subject to
statutory limitations. Beginning April 1, 2008, employees
could elect to contribute to the plan from 1% to 75% of their
salary subject to statutory limitations. During 2008, we made
matching contributions equal to 50% of the employee
contributions, up to a maximum of $1,250 per employee, which
becomes 100% vested on a 6 year graded schedule. We
recognized compensation expense of $0.5 million in 2008 and
2007, and $0.4 million in 2006 for our matching
contributions to the plan. Beginning January 1, 2009, we
will make matching contributions equal to 50% of the employee
contributions, up to a maximum of 3% of each employees
annual gross pay. All previous and future matching contributions
will become 100% vested immediately.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses
were $0.4 million for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, and $0.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance
regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods of
those fiscal years. However, on February 12, 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP
FAS 157-2),
which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
FSP
FAS 157-2
defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years for items within the scope of FSP
FAS 157-2.
We adopted the applicable portions of SFAS 157 on
January 1, 2008 (See Note 3). The deferred portions of
SFAS 157 will not have an impact on our financial
statements. The adoption of the applicable portions of
SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have
a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities. In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to
choose to measure financial assets and liabilities (except for
those that are specifically exempted from SFAS 159) at
fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or
liability at fair value can be made on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value
and fair value at the election date is recorded as a transition
adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in
fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. At this time, we have not elected to measure any financial
assets or liabilities at fair value under SFAS 159.
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning
58
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Concluded)
|
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
The adoption of SFAS 161 will have no financial impact on
our consolidated financial statements but will expand our
disclosures.
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable
Interest Entities. In September 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests
in Variable Interest Entities (FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8). FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 requires additional disclosures about
transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest
entities. FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 amends both FASB Statement No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and FASB
Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (Revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
to require: (1) additional disclosures about
transferors continuing involvements with transferred
financial assets; (2) additional disclosures about a public
entities (including sponsors) involvement with variable
interest entities; and (3) disclosures by a public
enterprise that is: (a) a sponsor of a qualifying
special-purpose entity (SPE) that holds a variable
interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of
financial assets to the qualifying SPE; and (b) a servicer
of a qualifying SPE that holds a significant variable interest
in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of financial
assets to the qualifying SPE. The adoption of FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 for the year ended December 31, 2008
had no financial impact on our consolidated financial statements
but did expand our disclosures.
Reclassification
Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to
conform to the current presentation.
|
|
3.
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the
fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it
is practicable to estimate their value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash
Equivalents. The carrying amount of cash and cash
equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents approximate
their fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Restricted Securities Available for
Sale. Restricted securities consist of amounts
held in trusts by TPAs to pay claims on vehicle service
contracts. Securities for which we do not have the intent or
ability to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale
and stated at fair value. The fair value of restricted
securities are based on quoted market values.
Net Investment in Loans Receivable. Loans
receivable, net represents our net investment in Consumer Loans.
The fair value is determined by calculating the present value of
future Loan payment inflows and dealer holdback outflows
estimated by the Company utilizing a discount rate comparable
with the rate used to calculate our allowance for credit losses.
Derivative Instruments. The fair value of
interest rate caps and interest rate swaps are based on quoted
prices for similar instruments in active markets.
Liabilities. The fair value of debt is
determined using quoted market prices, if available, or
calculated using the estimated value of each debt instrument
based on current rates offered to us for debt with similar
maturities.
59
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS (Concluded)
|
A comparison of the carrying value and estimated fair value of
these financial instruments is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$
|
83,487
|
|
|
$
|
83,487
|
|
|
$
|
74,814
|
|
|
$
|
74,814
|
|
Restricted securities available for sale
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
Net investment in Loans receivable
|
|
|
1,017,917
|
|
|
|
1,042,790
|
|
|
|
810,553
|
|
|
|
826,828
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
$
|
61,300
|
|
|
$
|
61,300
|
|
|
$
|
36,300
|
|
|
$
|
36,300
|
|
Secured financing
|
|
|
574,175
|
|
|
|
569,811
|
|
|
|
488,065
|
|
|
|
434,655
|
|
Mortgage note
|
|
|
5,274
|
|
|
|
5,415
|
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
|
|
5,867
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157, which
clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the
amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement
that should be determined based on assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a
basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157
establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the
inputs used in measuring fair value. As required under
SFAS 157, we group assets and liabilities at fair value in
three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and
liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions
used to determine fair value. These levels are:
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments
traded in active markets.
|
|
|
Level 2
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based
valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are
observable in the market.
|
|
|
Level 3
|
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at
least one significant assumption not observable in the market.
These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates or assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability.
|
The following table provides the fair value measurements of
applicable assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2008
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
3,345
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,345
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,895
|
|
|
$
|
4,895
|
|
60
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loans receivable consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dealer Loans receivable
|
|
$
|
823,567
|
|
|
$
|
804,245
|
|
Purchased Loans receivable
|
|
|
325,185
|
|
|
|
140,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
$
|
1,148,752
|
|
|
$
|
944,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of changes in Loans receivable is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Dealer Loans
|
|
|
Purchased Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
804,245
|
|
|
$
|
140,453
|
|
|
$
|
944,698
|
|
New loans (1)
|
|
|
524,496
|
|
|
|
280,326
|
|
|
|
804,822
|
|
Transfers (2)
|
|
|
(7,953
|
)
|
|
|
7,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer holdback payments
|
|
|
58,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,503
|
|
Net cash collections on loans
|
|
|
(506,600
|
)
|
|
|
(103,429
|
)
|
|
|
(610,029
|
)
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(48,723
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(48,869
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Net change in other loans
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
823,567
|
|
|
$
|
325,185
|
|
|
$
|
1,148,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dealer Loans
|
|
|
Purchased Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
724,645
|
|
|
$
|
29,926
|
|
|
|
754,571
|
|
New loans (1)
|
|
|
571,197
|
|
|
|
139,340
|
|
|
|
710,537
|
|
Transfers (2)
|
|
|
(4,748
|
)
|
|
|
4,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer holdback payments
|
|
|
70,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,950
|
|
Net cash collections on loans
|
|
|
(543,846
|
)
|
|
|
(33,398
|
)
|
|
|
(577,244
|
)
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(14,376
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(14,568
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Net change in other loans
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
804,245
|
|
|
$
|
140,453
|
|
|
$
|
944,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
New Dealer Loans includes advances to dealer-partners and
Portfolio Profit Express. |
|
(2) |
|
Transfers relate to Dealer Loans that are now considered to be
Purchased Loans when we exercise our right to the dealer
holdback of certain dealer-partners Consumer Loans once
they are inactive and have originated less than 100 Consumer
Loans. |
61
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
LOANS
RECEIVABLE (Continued)
|
A summary of changes in the Allowance for credit losses is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Dealer Loans
|
|
|
Purchased Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
133,201
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
134,145
|
|
Provision for credit losses (1)
|
|
|
29,608
|
|
|
|
16,178
|
|
|
|
45,786
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(48,723
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(48,869
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
113,831
|
|
|
$
|
17,004
|
|
|
$
|
130,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dealer Loans
|
|
|
Purchased Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
127,881
|
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
|
|
128,791
|
|
Provision for credit losses (2)
|
|
|
19,468
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
19,665
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(14,376
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(14,568
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
133,201
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
134,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include a provision for credit losses of $243 related
to other items. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include a provision for credit losses of $282 related
to other items. |
The increase in the provision for credit losses for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to the prior year was
primarily due to a reduction in estimated future collection
rates during the second and fourth quarters of 2008.
Our forecast of future collections prior to the second quarter
of 2008 assumed that Loans within our current portfolio would
produce similar collection rates as produced by historical Loans
with the same attributes. During the second quarter of 2008, we
modified our forecast to assume that Loans originated in 2006,
2007 and 2008 would perform 100 to 300 basis points lower
than historical Loans with the same attributes. As a result we
reduced our estimate of future cash flows on these same Loans by
$22.2 million, or 1.7%. Of the total reduction,
$20.8 million was recorded as provision for credit losses
during the second quarter of 2008. We did not modify our
forecast related to 2005 and prior Loans as these Loans continue
to perform as expected. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we
again realized lower than expected collection rates and as a
result implemented an additional modification to our forecasting
methodology. This modification reduced estimated future net cash
flows by $9.5 million or 0.7% of the total undiscounted
cash flow stream expected from our Loan portfolio. The
adjustment impacted only Loans originated subsequent to
September 30, 2007 with more recent Loans impacted more
severely and more seasoned Loans within this time period
impacted less severely. Forecasted collection rates on Loans
originated on or before September 30, 2007 were not
modified as collection results during the fourth quarter of 2008
were consistent with our expectations for these Loans. In
addition, during the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the
estimated timing of future collections to reflect recent trends
in prepayment frequency. In recent periods, we have experienced
a reduction in prepayments, which typically result from payoffs
that occur when customers reestablish a positive credit history,
trade-in their vehicle, and finance another vehicle purchase
with a more traditional auto loan. As the availability of
traditional financing has been curtailed as a result of current
economic conditions, prepayment rates have declined. As a result
of these forecast modifications, we recognized a provision for
credit losses of $10.6 million during the fourth quarter of
2008.
During the first quarter of 2008, in conjunction with our
implementation of a new forecasting methodology, we reevaluated
our forecast of future collections on old, fully-reserved Dealer
Loans. As a result, we wrote off
62
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
LOANS
RECEIVABLE (Concluded)
|
$22.7 million of Dealer Loans and the related allowance for
credit losses as we were no longer forecasting any future
collections on these Dealer Loans. This write-off had no impact
on net income for the first quarter of 2008 as all of these
Dealer Loans were fully-reserved. During the third quarter of
2008, we wrote off $16.5 million of Loans to one individual
dealer-partner in accordance with our write-off policy as we
were no longer forecasting any future collections on these
Loans. This dealer-partner has not assigned any Consumer Loans
to us for several years. As of December 31, 2007, we had an
allowance for credit losses of $16.2 million on Loans to
this dealer-partner.
We lease office space and office equipment. We expect that in
the normal course of business, leases will be renewed or
replaced by other leases. Total rental expense from continuing
operations on all operating leases was $1.0 million,
$0.8 million and $0.5 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Contingent rentals under the operating leases were
insignificant. Our total minimum future lease commitments under
operating leases as of December 31, 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Future Lease Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
973
|
|
2010
|
|
|
393
|
|
2011
|
|
|
272
|
|
2012
|
|
|
274
|
|
2013
|
|
|
138
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$
|
2,582
|
|
|
$
|
2,582
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
11,926
|
|
|
|
11,175
|
|
Data processing equipment and software
|
|
|
37,381
|
|
|
|
35,073
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
55,705
|
|
|
|
51,699
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation on property and equipment
|
|
|
(32,574
|
)
|
|
|
(30,302
|
)
|
Accumulated depreciation on capital leased assets
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
|
|
(1,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(34,656
|
)
|
|
|
(31,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,049
|
|
|
$
|
20,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment included capital leased assets of
$2.7 million and $2.4 million as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Depreciation expense on property
and equipment, including capital leased assets, was
$5.3 million, $4.1 million and $4.6 million in
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
63
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT (Concluded)
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we
capitalized software developed for internal use of
$3.4 million, $1.5 million, and $0.7 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, capitalized
software costs, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled
$4.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
We currently use four primary sources of debt financing:
(1) a revolving secured line of credit with a commercial
bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities
with institutional investors; (3) SEC Rule 144A
asset-backed secured financings (Term ABS 144A) with
qualified institutional investors; and (4) a residual
credit facility with an institutional investor. General
information for each of the Companys financing
transactions in place as of December 31, 2008 is as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate at
|
|
|
Wholly-owned
|
|
Issue
|
|
|
|
Revolving
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
December 31,
|
Financings
|
|
Subsidiary (1)
|
|
Number
|
|
Close Date
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
January 25, 2008
|
|
June 22, 2010
|
|
$
|
153,500
|
|
|
At the Companys option, either Eurodollar rate plus
125 basis points (1.70%) or the prime rate minus
60 basis points (2.65)%
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (1)
|
|
CAC Warehouse Funding Corp. II
|
|
2003-2
|
|
August 27, 2008
|
|
August 26, 2009
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
|
Commercial paper rate plus 100 basis points (3.33%) or
LIBOR plus 200 basis points (2.44%) (4) (5)
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (1)
|
|
CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC
|
|
2008-2
|
|
May 27, 2008
|
|
May 23, 2010
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
Commercial paper rate plus 77.5 basis points (3.10%) or LIBOR
plus 177.5 basis points (2.21%)(4)
|
Term ABS 144A
2006-2(1)
|
|
Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2006-2
|
|
2006-2
|
|
November 21, 2006
|
|
November 15, 2007 (2)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
Fixed rate (5.38)%
|
Term ABS 144A
2007-1(1)
|
|
Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2007-1
|
|
2007-1
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
April 15, 2008 (2)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
Fixed rate (5.32)%
|
Term ABS 144A
2007-2(1)
|
|
Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2007-2
|
|
2007-2
|
|
October 29, 2007
|
|
October 15, 2008 (2)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
Fixed rate (6.22%) (3)
|
Term ABS 144A
2008-1(1)
|
|
Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2008-1
|
|
2008-1
|
|
April 18, 2008
|
|
April 15, 2009 (2)
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
Fixed rate (6.37%) (3)
|
Residual Credit Facility(1)
|
|
Credit Acceptance
Residual Funding LLC
|
|
2006-3
|
|
August 27, 2008
|
|
August 26, 2009
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
LIBOR plus 350 basis points (3.94%) or the commercial paper
rate plus 250 basis points (4.83%) (4) (5)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financing made available only to a specified subsidiary of
the Company. |
|
(2) |
|
Loans will amortize after the revolving maturity date based
on the cash flows of the contributed assets. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes a floating rate obligation that has been converted
to a fixed rate via an interest rate swap. |
|
(4) |
|
The LIBOR rate is used if funding is not available from the
commercial paper market. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes a floating rate obligation that has been converted
to a fixed rate via interest rate caps. |
64
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additional information related to the amounts outstanding on
each facility is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance
|
|
$
|
128,400
|
|
|
$
|
73,400
|
|
Average outstanding balance
|
|
|
59,991
|
|
|
|
40,874
|
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility
(2003-2)
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance
|
|
$
|
320,000
|
|
|
$
|
293,500
|
|
Average outstanding balance
|
|
|
262,884
|
|
|
|
216,984
|
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility
(2008-2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Average outstanding balance
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes amounts owing after February 12, 2008 to an
institutional investor that did not renew their participation in
the facility. The amount due did not reduce the amount available
on the Warehouse Facility. See Revolving Secured Warehouse
Facilities for additional information. |
65
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
61,300
|
|
|
$
|
36,300
|
|
Letter(s) of credit
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Amount available for borrowing
|
|
|
91,645
|
|
|
|
38,527
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility
(2003-2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
256,000
|
|
|
$
|
198,100
|
|
Amount available for borrowing
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
226,900
|
|
Contributed eligible Loans
|
|
|
344,111
|
|
|
|
254,294
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility
(2008-2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Amount available for borrowing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed eligible Loans
|
|
|
62,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Term ABS 144A
2006-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,965
|
|
Contributed eligible Dealer Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,950
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
Term ABS 144A
2007-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
33,915
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Contributed eligible Dealer Loans
|
|
|
87,155
|
|
|
|
130,841
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
Term ABS 144A
2007-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
84,260
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Contributed eligible Dealer Loans
|
|
|
114,054
|
|
|
|
132,695
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
6.22
|
%
|
|
|
6.22
|
%
|
Term ABS 144A
2008-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contributed eligible Loans
|
|
|
184,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
6.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Residual Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Certificate Pledged
|
|
|
52,944
|
|
|
|
28,513
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
6.56
|
%
|
Line of
Credit Facility
During the first quarter of 2008, we increased the amount of our
line of credit facility with a commercial bank syndicate from
$75.0 million to $153.5 million. In addition, the
maturity of the line of credit facility was extended from
June 20, 2009 to June 22, 2010. There were no other
material changes to the terms of the line of credit facility.
66
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Borrowings under the line of credit facility are subject to a
borrowing-base limitation. This limitation equals 80% of the net
book value of Loans, less a hedging reserve (not exceeding
$1.0 million), the amount of letters of credit issued under
the line of credit, and the amount of other debt secured by the
collateral which secures the line of credit. Borrowings under
the line of credit agreement are secured by a lien on most of
our assets. We must pay annual and quarterly fees on the amount
of the facility.
Revolving
Secured Warehouse Facilities
We have two revolving secured warehouse facilities that are
provided to wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. One is a
$325.0 million facility with an institutional investor and
the other is a $50.0 million facility with another
institutional investor.
During the first quarter of 2008, we extended the maturity of
the $325.0 million facility from February 13, 2008 to
February 11, 2009. The amount of the facility was reduced
from $425.0 million to $325.0 million. The reduction
in the amount of the facility is due to one of the two
institutional investors (the Nonextending Investor)
not renewing their participation in the facility. The amount
owing to the Nonextending Investor has been reduced to zero.
During the third quarter of 2008, we extended the maturity of
the $325.0 million facility from February 11, 2009 to
August 26, 2009 and agreed to an increase in the interest
rate on borrowings under the facility from a floating rate equal
to the commercial paper rate plus 65 basis points, to the
commercial paper rate plus 100 basis points.
The $325.0 million facility requires that certain amounts
outstanding under the facility be refinanced within
360 days of the most recent refinancing. The most recent
refinancing occurred in October of 2008. If such refinancing
does not occur, the facility will cease to revolve, will
amortize as collections are received and, at the option of the
institutional investor, may be subject to acceleration and
foreclosure.
During the second quarter of 2008, we entered into a
$50.0 million revolving warehouse facility with an
institutional investor. This facility was fully drawn as of
December 31, 2008.
Under these facilities we can contribute Loans to our
wholly-owned subsidiaries in return for cash and equity in each
subsidiary. In turn, each subsidiary pledges the Loans as
collateral to institutional investors to secure financing that
will fund the cash portion of the purchase price of the Loans.
The financing provided to each subsidiary under the applicable
facility is limited to the lesser of 80% of the net book value
of the contributed Loans or the facility limit.
The subsidiaries are liable for any amounts due under the
applicable facility. Even though the subsidiaries and the
Company are consolidated for financial reporting purposes, the
financing is non-recourse to us. As the subsidiaries are
organized as separate legal entities from the Company, assets of
the subsidiaries (including the conveyed Loans) will not be
available to satisfy the general obligations of the Company. All
of each subsidiarys assets have been encumbered to secure
its obligations to its respective creditors.
Interest on borrowings under the facilities has been limited to
a maximum rate of 6.75% through interest rate cap agreements.
The subsidiaries pay us a monthly servicing fee equal to 6% of
the collections received with respect to the conveyed Loans. The
fee is paid out of the collections. Except for the servicing fee
and holdback payments due to dealer-partners, we do not have any
rights in any portion of such collections until all outstanding
principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees and other related
costs are paid in full.
Term ABS
144A Financings
In 2007 and 2008, three of our wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Funding LLCs), each completed a secured financing
transaction. In connection with these transactions, we conveyed
Loans on an arms-length basis to each Funding LLC for cash and
the sole membership interest in that Funding LLC. In turn, each
Funding LLC conveyed the Loans to a respective trust that issued
notes to qualified institutional investors. Financial insurance
policies were
67
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
issued in connection with the 2007 transactions. The policies
guarantee the timely payment of interest and ultimate repayment
of principal on the final scheduled distribution date. In the
2007 transactions, the notes were initially rated
Aaa by Moodys Investor Service
(Moodys) and AAA by
Standard & Poors Rating Services
(S&P) based upon the financial insurance
policy. As of December 31, 2008, due to downgrades in the
debt ratings of the insurers, the 2007 transactions were rated
A3 by Moodys. The Term ABS 114A
2007-1
transaction continued to be rated as AAA by S&P
and the Term ABS 114A
2007-2
transaction was rated as A− by S&P. The
2008 transaction was rated A by S&P.
Each financing has a specified revolving period during which we
may be required, and are likely, to convey additional Loans to
each Funding LLC. Each Funding LLC will then convey the Loans to
their respective trust. At the end of the revolving period, the
debt outstanding under each financing will begin to amortize.
The financings create loans for which the trusts are liable and
which are secured by all the assets of each trust. Such loans
are non-recourse to us, even though the trusts, the Funding LLCs
and the Company are consolidated for financial reporting
purposes. Because the Funding LLCs are organized as separate
legal entities from the Company, their assets (including the
conveyed Loans) are not available to satisfy our general
obligations. We receive a monthly servicing fee on each
financing equal to 6% of the collections received with respect
to the conveyed Loans. The fee is paid out of the collections.
Aside from the servicing fee and payments due to
dealer-partners, we do not receive, or have any rights in the
collections. However, in our capacity as Servicer of the Loans,
we do have a limited right to exercise a
clean-up
call option to purchase Loans from the Funding LLCs under
certain specified circumstances. Alternatively, when a
trusts underlying indebtedness is paid in full, either
through collections or through a prepayment of the indebtedness,
the trust is to pay any remaining collections over to its
Funding LLC as the sole beneficiary of the trust. The
collections will then be available to be distributed to us as
the sole member of the respective Funding LLC.
The table below sets forth certain additional details regarding
the outstanding Term ABS 144A Financings (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
Term ABS 144A
|
|
Issue
|
|
|
|
Dealer Loans
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
Financing
|
|
Number
|
|
Close Date
|
|
Conveyed at Closing
|
|
|
Revolving Period
|
|
Rates (1)
|
|
|
Term ABS 144A
2007-1
|
|
2007-1
|
|
April 12, 2007
|
|
$
|
125,700
|
|
|
12 months (Through April 15, 2008)
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
Term ABS 144A
2007-2
|
|
2007-2
|
|
October 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
12 months (Through October 15, 2008)
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Term ABS 144A
2008-1
|
|
2008-1
|
|
April 18, 2008
|
|
$
|
86,615
|
|
|
12 months (Through April 15, 2009)
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes underwriters fees, insurance premiums and
other costs. |
Residual
Credit Facility
Another wholly-owned subsidiary, Credit Acceptance Residual
Funding LLC (Residual Funding), has a
$50.0 million secured credit facility with an institutional
investor. This facility allows Residual Funding to finance its
purchase of trust certificates from special-purpose entities
(the Term SPEs) that have purchased Dealer Loans
under our term securitization transactions. Historically, the
Term SPEs residual interests in Dealer Loans, represented
by their trust certificates, have proven to have value that
increases as their term securitization obligations amortize.
This facility enables the Term SPEs to realize and distribute to
us up to 70% of that increase in value prior to the time the
related term securitization senior notes are paid in full.
Residual Fundings interests in Dealer Loans, represented
by its purchased trust certificates, are subordinated to the
interests of term securitization senior noteholders. However,
the entire arrangement is non-recourse to us. Residual Funding
is organized as a separate legal entity from the Company.
Therefore its assets, including
68
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
purchased trust certificates, are not available to satisfy our
general obligations, even though Residual Funding and the
Company are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
During the third quarter of 2008, we extended the maturity of
the facility from September 9, 2008 to August 26, 2009
and agreed to an increase in the interest rate on borrowings
under the facility from a floating rate equal to the commercial
paper rate plus 145 basis points, to the commercial paper
rate plus 250 basis points.
Mortgage
Loan
We have a mortgage loan from a commercial bank that is secured
by a first mortgage lien on our headquarters building and an
assignment of all leases, rents, revenues and profits under all
present and future leases of the building. There was
$5.3 million and $6.1 million outstanding on this loan
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The loan
matures on June 9, 2009, bears interest at a fixed rate of
5.35%, and requires monthly payments of $92,156 and a balloon
payment at maturity for the balance of the loan.
Capital
Lease Obligations
As of December 31, 2008, we had various capital lease
obligations outstanding for computer equipment, with monthly
payments totaling $63,000. The total amount of capital lease
obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
were $1.0 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
These capital lease obligations bear interest at rates ranging
from 6.41% to 8.71% and have maturity dates between April 2009
and October 2010.
Letters
of Credit
Letters of credit are issued by a commercial bank syndicate and
reduce amounts available under our revolving line of credit. As
of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had
letters of credit outstanding of $0.6 million and
$0.2 million, respectively. The letters of credit relate to
reinsurance agreements. The letters of credit expire on
May 26, 2009 and October 31, 2009, at which time they
will be automatically extended for a period of one year unless
we are notified otherwise by the commercial bank syndicate.
Principal
Debt Maturities
The scheduled principal maturities of our debt at
December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Secured
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Note and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
Term ABS 144A
|
|
|
Capital Lease
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Financings (1)
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
256,000
|
|
|
$
|
172,926
|
|
|
$
|
5,900
|
|
|
$
|
434,826
|
|
2010
|
|
|
61,300
|
|
|
|
25,461
|
|
|
|
95,249
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
182,349
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,539
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,300
|
|
|
$
|
306,000
|
|
|
$
|
268,175
|
|
|
$
|
6,239
|
|
|
$
|
641,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The principal maturities of the Term ABS 144A transactions are
estimated based on forecasted collections. |
Debt
Covenants
As of December 31, 2008, we are in compliance with our
restrictive debt covenants that require the maintenance of
certain financial ratios and other financial conditions. The
most restrictive covenants require a minimum ratio of our assets
to debt and a minimum ratio of our earnings before interest,
taxes and non-cash expenses to fixed charges. The covenants also
limit the maximum ratio of our funded debt to tangible net
worth.
69
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additionally, we must maintain consolidated net income of not
less than $1 for the two most recently ended fiscal quarters.
Some of the debt covenants may indirectly limit the payment of
dividends on common stock.
|
|
8.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
In the normal course of our business, we have Dealer Loans with
affiliated dealer-partners owned or controlled by: (1) our
majority shareholder and Chairman; (2) a member of the
Chairmans immediate family; and (3) our former
President, Keith McCluskey. Mr. McCluskey resigned from his
position with the Company effective September 1, 2006.
Transactions with Mr. McCluskey are reported below through
December 31, 2006. Our Dealer Loans to affiliated
dealer-partners and non-affiliated dealer-partners are on the
same terms.
Affiliated Dealer Loan balances were $15.4 million and
$16.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Affiliated Dealer Loans balances were 1.9% and
2.0% of total consolidated Dealer Loan balances as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A summary of
related party Dealer Loan activity is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Affiliated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dealer-partner
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
dealer-partner
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
dealer-partner
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
activity
|
|
|
consolidated
|
|
|
activity
|
|
|
consolidated
|
|
|
activity
|
|
|
consolidated
|
|
|
New Loans
|
|
$
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,111
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,851
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Affiliated dealer-partner revenue
|
|
$
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,347
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Dealer holdback payments
|
|
$
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Beginning in 2002, entities owned by our majority shareholder
and Chairman began offering secured lines of credit to third
parties in a manner similar to a program previously offered by
us. In December of 2004, our majority shareholder and Chairman
sold his ownership interest in these entities; however, he
continues to have indirect control over these entities and has
the right or obligation to reacquire the entities under certain
circumstances until December 31, 2014 or the repayment of
the related purchase money note.
Pursuant to an employment agreement with the Companys
former President, Mr. McCluskey, dated April 19, 2001,
we loaned Mr. McCluskeys dealerships
$0.9 million. Obligations under this note, including all
principal and interest, were paid in full on August 16,
2006. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, we
loaned Mr. McCluskey approximately $0.5 million. The
note, including all principal and interest, is due on
April 19, 2011, bears interest at 5.22% and is unsecured.
The balance of the note including accrued but unpaid interest
was approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
70
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
|
The income tax provision, excluding the results of the
discontinued United Kingdom operations, consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for
income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
107,319
|
|
|
$
|
82,966
|
|
|
$
|
90,506
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
107,012
|
|
|
$
|
83,181
|
|
|
$
|
90,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provision (benefit) for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
23,800
|
|
|
$
|
8,446
|
|
|
$
|
30,902
|
|
State
|
|
|
3,333
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,106
|
|
|
|
8,498
|
|
|
|
31,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
13,541
|
|
|
|
19,201
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
State
|
|
|
(1,783
|
)
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,763
|
|
|
|
20,371
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and penalties expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penalties
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
39,944
|
|
|
$
|
29,567
|
|
|
$
|
31,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2007, we began to recognize interest
and penalties related to income tax matters in provision for
income taxes expense.
71
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
INCOME
TAXES (Continued)
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
$
|
47,330
|
|
|
$
|
49,148
|
|
Deferred state net operating loss
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
56,257
|
|
|
|
52,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of receivables
|
|
|
126,606
|
|
|
|
113,407
|
|
Depreciable assets
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
Deferred origination costs
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
131,317
|
|
|
|
117,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
75,060
|
|
|
$
|
64,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred state net operating loss tax asset arising from the
operating loss carry forward for state income tax purposes is
expected to be fully realized by 2012.
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the
Companys effective tax rate, excluding the results of the
discontinued United Kingdom operations, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Foreign income taxes
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Distributed foreign earnings
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Interest and penalties
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
|
|
35.6
|
%
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rates for 2008, 2007, and 2006 differed from
the federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to state
income taxes and reserves for uncertain tax positions and
related interest and penalties that are included in the
provision for income taxes. The provision for 2008 state
income taxes was reduced by $1.1 million as a result of an
adjustment to the deferred tax liability arising from changes in
the effective state income tax rate.
We adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of
the implementation, we recognized a $0.1 million increase
to reserves for uncertain tax positions. This increase was
accounted for as an adjustment to the beginning balance of
retained earnings on the balance sheet. As of December 31,
2008, changes to our tax contingencies that
72
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
INCOME
TAXES (Concluded)
|
are reasonably possible in the next twelve months are not
material. The following table is a summary of changes of the
reserve for unrecognized gross tax benefits (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Gross tax contingencies balance at January 1,
|
|
$
|
9,451
|
|
|
$
|
9,974
|
|
Additions based on tax position related to current year
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the statute of limitations
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross tax contingencies balance at December 31,
|
|
$
|
12,274
|
|
|
$
|
9,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2007, upon the FIN 48 implementation,
we had approximately $3.0 million of accrued interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had approximately
$5.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, of
accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions.
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income
tax in multiple state jurisdictions. We have substantially
concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years
through 2003. Substantially all material state and local tax
matters have been concluded for years through 2003 and foreign
tax matters have been concluded through 2003. The federal income
tax returns for 2004, 2005 and 2006 have been under examination
by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) since February
2007.
In February 2009, we received a notice of proposed adjustment
(NOPA) from the IRS disputing the tax valuation of
our loan portfolio. We disagree with the NOPA and believe that
the valuation of our loan portfolio, which was performed by an
independent valuation firm, is appropriate. We intend to
vigorously defend our position. If the IRS were to prevail with
their current position without compromise, we would owe
$55.3 million of additional taxes and $18.3 million of
additional interest related to 2004, 2005, and 2006. The
$55.3 million of additional taxes is an acceleration of
taxes already provided for and recorded as a deferred income tax
liability in our balance sheet and therefore would have no
effect on our income statement. As we believe our position will
be sustained, we have not recorded a reserve for the interest
amounts under FIN 48 at December 31, 2008. If the IRS
were to prevail, the payments for interest would reduce our net
income by $11.5 million after tax. We would likely also owe
additional amounts for 2007 and 2008; however, we are not able
to estimate these amounts at this time as the IRS has not
provided their valuation assumptions for these periods as these
periods are not under audit.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we remitted substantially all of our
accumulated earnings from foreign subsidiaries as profits to the
U.S. and accrued or paid U.S. income taxes accordingly.
73
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net
Income Per Share
Basic net income per share has been computed by dividing net
income by the basic number of common shares outstanding. Diluted
net income per share has been computed by dividing net income by
the diluted number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding using the treasury stock method. The share effect is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
30,249,783
|
|
|
|
30,053,129
|
|
|
|
33,035,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options
|
|
|
596,541
|
|
|
|
1,040,575
|
|
|
|
2,238,255
|
|
Dilutive effect of restricted stock and restricted stock units
|
|
|
258,719
|
|
|
|
59,984
|
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding
|
|
|
31,105,043
|
|
|
|
31,153,688
|
|
|
|
35,283,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock options or restricted stock that would be
anti-dilutive for the years presented.
Stock
Repurchase Program
In 1999, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase
program which authorizes us to purchase common shares in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions at price
levels we deem attractive. As of December 31, 2008, we have
repurchased approximately 20.4 million shares under the
stock repurchase program at a cost of $399.2 million.
Included in the stock repurchases to date are 12.5 million
shares of common stock purchased through four modified Dutch
auction tender offers at a cost of $304.4 million. As of
December 31, 2008, we have authorization to repurchase an
additional $29.1 million of our common stock.
Stock
Compensation Plans
Pursuant to our Incentive Compensation Plan (the Incentive
Plan), which was approved by shareholders on May 13,
2004, we reserved 1.0 million shares of our common stock
for the future granting of restricted stock, restricted stock
units, stock options, and performance awards to employees,
officers, and directors at any time prior to April 1, 2014.
All of the terms and conditions relating to grants will be
included in an agreement between the recipient and us and will
be determined by our compensation committee. Options granted
under the Incentive Plan may be either incentive stock options
or nonqualified stock options. The exercise price will not be
less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of
grant and, for incentive stock options, the exercise price must
be at least 110% of fair market value if the recipient is the
holder of more than 10% of our common stock. Through
December 31, 2008, we have only granted restricted stock
and awards of restricted stock units under the Incentive Plan.
Shares available for future grants under the Incentive Plan
totaled 33,464 at December 31, 2008.
74
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
CAPITAL
TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
|
A summary of the restricted stock activity under the Incentive
Plan for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
98,879
|
|
|
$
|
19.83
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
117,264
|
|
|
|
24.10
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(70,115
|
)
|
|
|
22.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
146,028
|
|
|
$
|
22.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
56,669
|
|
|
|
26.29
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
20.28
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
23.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
201,872
|
|
|
$
|
23.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
80,123
|
|
|
|
16.54
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(20,399
|
)
|
|
|
25.71
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(16,267
|
)
|
|
|
21.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
245,329
|
|
|
$
|
21.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares of restricted stock are part of the annual incentive
compensation program and are granted annually based on attaining
certain individual and company performance criteria. Based on
the terms of individual restricted stock grants, time-based
shares generally vest over a period of three to five years,
based on continuous employment, while performance-based shares
generally vest based on the increase in adjusted net income, a
non-US GAAP financial measure.
A summary of the restricted stock unit activity under the
Incentive Plan for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Date
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
of Vested
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
26.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
February 22, 2014
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
26.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
14.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
February 22, 2016
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
|
|
26.30
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
26.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
640,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.99
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
26.30
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
CAPITAL
TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
|
The restricted stock units are part of a long-term incentive
compensation program. Each restricted stock unit represents and
has a value equal to one share of common stock. The restricted
stock units will be earned over a five year period based upon
the annual increase in our adjusted economic profit, a non-US
GAAP financial measure.
Pursuant to our 1992 Stock Option Plan (the 1992
Plan), we had reserved 8.0 million shares of our
common stock for the future granting of options to officers and
other employees. Pursuant to our Director Stock Option Plan (the
Director Plan), we had reserved 200,000 shares
of our common stock for future granting of options to members of
our Board of Directors. The exercise price of the options is no
less than the fair market value on the date of the grant.
Options expire ten years from the date of grant. The 1992 Plan
and the Director Plan were terminated as to future grants on
May 13, 2004, with shareholder approval of the Incentive
Plan. All options outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007
are vested.
Additional stock option information relating to the 1992 Plan
and the Director Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 Plan
|
|
|
Director Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Per
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Per
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
3,457,694
|
|
|
$
|
6.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(1,801,943
|
)
|
|
|
6.32
|
|
|
$
|
39,611
|
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
2,174
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(2,710
|
)
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,653,041
|
|
|
$
|
7.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(374,985
|
)
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
$
|
6,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
6.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,277,056
|
|
|
$
|
7.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(306,047
|
)
|
|
|
7.76
|
|
|
$
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
7.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
969,509
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1,641,672
|
|
|
$
|
7.67
|
|
|
$
|
12,587
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,277,056
|
|
|
$
|
7.91
|
|
|
$
|
17,115
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
2008
|
|
|
969,509
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
|
$
|
5,630
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
76
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
CAPITAL
TRANSACTIONS (Concluded)
|
The following tables summarize information about options
outstanding under the 1992 Plan and the Director Plan at
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Options as of
|
|
|
Remaining Contractual
|
|
Exercise Price Per
|
|
Range of Exercisable Prices
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
Life
|
|
Share
|
|
|
1992 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3.63 - $ 6.64
|
|
|
280,960
|
|
|
|
1.0 Years
|
|
|
$
|
3.93
|
|
$ 6.64 - $ 9.95
|
|
|
573,969
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
$ 9.95 - $13.27
|
|
|
104,580
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
10.46
|
|
$16.59 - $17.05
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
969,509
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$17.25
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
5.2 Years
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
All outstanding options were fully vested as of
December 31, 2007. The total fair value of options vested
during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was
$0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
We account for compensation costs related to grants under our
stock compensation plans in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, which was adopted on January 1,
2006 under the modified prospective application method. We had
previously accounted for these costs under the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123.
Stock compensation expense consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
$
|
2,138
|
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,309
|
|
|
$
|
4,659
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table details how the expenses associated with
restricted stock and restricted stock units, which are expected
to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.4 years, will be recorded assuming performance targets
are achieved in the periods currently estimated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Total Projected
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Unit Award
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Expense (pre-tax)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,954
|
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
|
$
|
5,155
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,233
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
2012
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
2013
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,188
|
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
9,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
CAPITAL
TRANSACTIONS (Concluded)
|
|
|
11.
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
Reportable
Segment Overview
We have two reportable business segments: United States and
Other. The United States segment primarily consists of the
United States automobile financing business. The Other segment
consists of businesses in liquidation, primarily represented by
the discontinued United Kingdom automobile financing business.
We are currently liquidating all businesses classified in the
Other segment.
Measurement
The table below presents information for each reportable segment
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
$
|
286,791
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
286,823
|
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
Program fees
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
21,198
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
21,203
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
45,883
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
46,029
|
|
Interest expense (income)
|
|
|
43,248
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
43,189
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
39,966
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
39,944
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
67,354
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
67,068
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,139,214
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
1,139,354
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
$
|
220,386
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
220,473
|
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
Program fees
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
18,772
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
18,810
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
19,807
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
19,947
|
|
Interest expense (income)
|
|
|
36,716
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
36,669
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
4,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,105
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
29,596
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29,567
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
53,370
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
53,614
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
940,307
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
942,182
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
$
|
188,508
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
188,605
|
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
Program fees
|
|
|
13,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,589
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
15,937
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
16,095
|
|
Provision (credit) for credit losses
|
|
|
11,171
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
23,157
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
23,330
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4,623
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
31,977
|
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
31,793
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
58,508
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
58,847
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
724,008
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
725,213
|
|
78
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION (Concluded)
|
Information
About Geographic Locations
We operate primarily in the United States. As such, our revenues
from continuing operations and long-lived assets are evaluated
primarily through the above reportable segments. Therefore, in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, no enterprise-wide disclosures of information
about geographic locations are necessary.
Information
About Products and Services
We manage our product and service offerings primarily through
the above reportable segments. Therefore, in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 131, no enterprise-wide
disclosures of information about products and services are
necessary.
Major
Customers
We did not have any dealer-partners that provided 10% or more of
our revenue during 2008, 2007, or 2006. Additionally, no single
dealer-partners Loan receivable balance accounted for more
than 10% of total Loans as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
|
|
12.
|
LITIGATION
AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
In the normal course of business and as a result of the
customer-oriented nature of the industry in which the Company
operates, industry participants are frequently subject to
various customer claims and litigation seeking damages and
statutory penalties. The claims allege, among other theories of
liability, violations of state, federal and foreign
truth-in-lending,
credit availability, credit reporting, customer protection,
warranty, debt collection, insurance and other customer-oriented
laws and regulations, including claims seeking damages for
physical and mental damages relating to the Companys
repossession and sale of the customers vehicle and other
debt collection activities. The Company, as the assignee of
Consumer Loans originated by dealer-partners, may also be named
as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by customers principally
against dealer-partners. The Company may also have disputes and
litigation with dealer-partners. The claims may allege, among
other theories of liability, that the Company breached its
dealer servicing agreement. Many of these cases are filed as
purported class actions and seek damages in large dollar
amounts. An adverse ultimate disposition in any such action
could have a material adverse impact on the Companys
financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
The Company was a defendant in a class action pending in the
Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri. On December 5,
2007, the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri entered an
Order and Final Judgment approving a Memorandum of Understanding
executed on February 9, 2007 whereby the parties agreed to
settle the lawsuit. The Company, without any admission of
liability, agreed to pay $12.5 million in full and final
settlement of all claims against the Company. Pursuant to an
adjustment mechanism in the Memorandum of Understanding, the
Company agreed to pay an additional $0.6 million. The Order
and Final Judgment became final thirty days after the entry date
of December 5, 2007, and the appeal period lapsed on
January 19, 2008. The entire settlement amount was accrued
and was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as
of December 31, 2007, and was paid in full during the first
quarter of 2008.
79
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)
|
The following is a summary of the quarterly financial position
and results of operations as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Certain amounts for prior periods have
been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
934,568
|
|
|
$
|
1,012,150
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,407
|
|
|
$
|
1,017,917
|
|
All other assets
|
|
|
145,210
|
|
|
|
139,951
|
|
|
|
133,949
|
|
|
|
121,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,079,778
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,101
|
|
|
$
|
1,170,356
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
638,814
|
|
|
$
|
703,359
|
|
|
$
|
691,937
|
|
|
$
|
641,714
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
155,069
|
|
|
|
151,012
|
|
|
|
158,693
|
|
|
|
159,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
793,883
|
|
|
|
854,371
|
|
|
|
850,630
|
|
|
|
801,603
|
|
Shareholders equity (1)
|
|
|
285,895
|
|
|
|
297,730
|
|
|
|
319,726
|
|
|
|
337,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,079,778
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,101
|
|
|
$
|
1,170,356
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
70,778
|
|
|
$
|
75,005
|
|
|
$
|
80,107
|
|
|
$
|
86,296
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
43,053
|
|
|
|
58,535
|
|
|
|
47,168
|
|
|
|
56,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
27,725
|
|
|
|
16,470
|
|
|
|
32,939
|
|
|
|
29,903
|
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
27,712
|
|
|
|
16,470
|
|
|
|
32,937
|
|
|
|
29,893
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
10,131
|
|
|
|
6,091
|
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
11,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
17,581
|
|
|
|
10,379
|
|
|
|
20,331
|
|
|
|
18,777
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
17,620
|
|
|
$
|
10,344
|
|
|
$
|
20,657
|
|
|
$
|
18,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
30,106,881
|
|
|
|
30,252,873
|
|
|
|
30,310,053
|
|
|
|
30,327,802
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
30,891,227
|
|
|
|
31,088,428
|
|
|
|
31,024,455
|
|
|
|
31,038,088
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No dividends were paid during the periods presented. |
80
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Concluded)
|
|
13.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA
(unaudited) (Concluded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
707,601
|
|
|
$
|
744,159
|
|
|
$
|
755,996
|
|
|
$
|
810,553
|
|
All other assets
|
|
|
105,270
|
|
|
|
112,438
|
|
|
|
115,198
|
|
|
|
131,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
812,871
|
|
|
$
|
856,597
|
|
|
$
|
871,194
|
|
|
$
|
942,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
446,998
|
|
|
$
|
485,148
|
|
|
$
|
490,510
|
|
|
$
|
532,130
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
139,016
|
|
|
|
131,592
|
|
|
|
130,858
|
|
|
|
144,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
586,014
|
|
|
|
616,740
|
|
|
|
621,368
|
|
|
|
676,732
|
|
Shareholders equity (1)
|
|
|
226,857
|
|
|
|
239,857
|
|
|
|
249,826
|
|
|
|
265,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
812,871
|
|
|
$
|
856,597
|
|
|
$
|
871,194
|
|
|
$
|
942,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
57,351
|
|
|
$
|
58,286
|
|
|
$
|
61,058
|
|
|
$
|
63,232
|
|
Costs and expenses (2)
|
|
|
34,436
|
|
|
|
37,889
|
|
|
|
39,698
|
|
|
|
44,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
22,915
|
|
|
|
20,397
|
|
|
|
21,360
|
|
|
|
18,440
|
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
22,919
|
|
|
|
20,431
|
|
|
|
21,386
|
|
|
|
18,445
|
|
Provision for income taxes (2)
|
|
|
7,532
|
|
|
|
7,938
|
|
|
|
7,917
|
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
15,387
|
|
|
|
12,493
|
|
|
|
13,469
|
|
|
|
12,265
|
|
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,360
|
|
|
$
|
12,330
|
|
|
$
|
14,742
|
|
|
$
|
12,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
30,054,349
|
|
|
|
30,140,590
|
|
|
|
30,015,048
|
|
|
|
30,007,476
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
31,283,695
|
|
|
|
31,312,139
|
|
|
|
31,139,612
|
|
|
|
30,897,546
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No dividends were paid during the periods presented. |
|
(2) |
|
The first quarter 2007 figures differ from those previously
reported in our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. Interest and
penalties related to tax for the quarter were reclassified to
provision for income taxes. |
81
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our management, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and
reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. There have not been any changes in our
internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by
this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control
over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated
financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In
addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this
assessment, we used the criteria set forth in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on our assessment, we believe that as of December 31,
2008, our internal control over financial reporting is effective
based on those criteria.
82
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Credit Acceptance Corporation
We have audited Credit Acceptance Corporation (a Michigan
Corporation) and subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO). Credit Acceptance Corporation
and subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Credit
Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Credit Acceptance Corporation and
subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Credit Acceptance Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2008 and our report dated
February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Southfield, Michigan
February 27, 2009
83
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information is contained under the captions Matters to
Come Before the Meeting Election of Directors
(excluding the Report of the Audit Committee) and
Section 16 (a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance in the Companys Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information is contained under the caption Compensation of
Executive Officers (excluding the Report of the Executive
Compensation Committee) in the Companys Proxy Statement
and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information is contained under the caption Common Stock
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in
the Companys Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Our Incentive Compensation Plan (the Incentive
Plan), which was approved by shareholders on May 13,
2004, provides for the granting of restricted stock, restricted
stock units, stock options, and performance awards to employees,
officers, and directors. We also have two stock option plans
pursuant to which we have granted stock options with time or
performance-based vesting requirements to employees, officers,
and directors. Our 1992 Stock Option Plan (the 1992
Plan) was approved by shareholders in 1992 prior to our
initial public offering and was terminated as to future grants
on May 13, 2004, when shareholders approved the Incentive
Plan. Our Director Stock Option Plan (the Director
Plan) was approved by shareholders in 2002 and was
terminated as to future grants on May 13, 2004, with
shareholder approval of the Incentive Plan.
The following table sets forth, with respect to each of the
equity compensation plans, (1) the number of shares of
common stock to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding
options or restricted stock units, (2) the weighted average
exercise price of outstanding options, and (3) the number
of shares remaining available for future issuance, as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
|
Number of shares to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
|
issued upon exercise of
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
for future issuance
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
under equity
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
outstanding options
|
|
|
compensation plans(a)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 Plan
|
|
|
969,509
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Plan
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
17.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,769,509
|
|
|
$
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
33,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For additional information regarding our equity compensation
plans, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information is contained under the caption Certain
Relationships and Transactions and Election of
Directors Meetings and Committees of the Board of
Directors in the Companys Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference.
84
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information is contained under the caption Independent
Accountants in the Companys Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(1)
|
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company
and Report of Independent Public Accountants are contained in
Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
|
Report of Independent Public Accountants
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,
2008 and 2007
Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because they are
not applicable or are not required or the information required
to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
are listed in the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
85
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Brett A. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 27, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on February 27, 2009 on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRETT
A. ROBERTS
Brett
A. Roberts
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ KENNETH
S. BOOTH
Kenneth
S. Booth
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ GLENDA
J. CHAMBERLAIN
Glenda
J. Chamberlain
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ DONALD
A. FOSS
Donald
A. Foss
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
N. TRYFOROS
Thomas
N. Tryforos
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ SCOTT
J. VASSALLUZZO
Scott
J. Vassalluzzo
|
|
Director
|
86
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following documents are filed as part of this report. Those
exhibits previously filed and incorporated herein by reference
are identified below. Exhibits not required for this report have
been omitted. The Companys commission file number is
000-20202.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3(a)(1)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation, as amended July 1, 1997.
|
|
3(b)
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as amended,
February 24, 2005.
|
|
4(c)(19)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated September 20, 2006, to the
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of
February 7, 2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are
parties thereto from time to time and Comerica Bank as
administrative agent.
|
|
4(c)(20)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated January 19, 2007, to the Fourth
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 7,
2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto
from time to time and Comerica Bank as administrative agent.
|
|
4(c)(21)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3, dated June 14, 2007, to the Fourth
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 7,
2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto
from time to time and Comerica Bank as administrative agent.
|
|
4(c)(22)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4, dated January 25, 2008, to the Fourth
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 7,
2006, among the Company, the Lenders which are parties thereto
from time to time and Comerica Bank as administrative agent.
|
|
4(f)(40)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Second Amendment, dated as of June 10, 2002, to the
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 15, 1998,
among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders
and note holders.
|
|
4(f)(53)
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Contribution Agreement, dated September 30, 2003, between
the Company and CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II.
|
|
4(f)(55)
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Back-Up
Servicing Agreement, dated September 30, 2003, among the
Company, Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.,
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, and CAC Warehouse Funding
Corporation II.
|
|
4(f)(67)
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
The Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
February 7, 2006, between the Company, the Lenders which
are parties thereto from time to time, Comerica Bank, as
administrative agent, and Banc of America Securities LLC as sole
lead arranger and sole book manager.
|
|
4(f)(68)
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated
February 7, 2006, between the Company, certain subsidiaries
of the Company and Comerica Bank, as agent.
|
|
4(f)(77)
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Certificate Funding Agreement, dated September 20, 2006,
between the Company, Credit Acceptance Residual Funding LLC,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable Funding Capital
Company LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC.
|
|
4(f)(78)
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Indenture, dated November 21, 2006, between Credit
Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2006-2
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.
|
|
4(f)(79)
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated November 21, 2006,
among the Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2006-2,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2006-2,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, N.A., and
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(80)
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Backup Servicing Agreement, dated November 21, 2006, among
the Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2006-2,
Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2006-2,
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc., Radian Asset
Assurance Inc., XL Capital Assurance Inc. and Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas.
|
|
4(f)(81)
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated
November 21, 2006, between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2006-2 and
U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
|
|
4(f)(82)
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Contribution Agreement, dated November 21, 2006, between
the Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2006-2.
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4(f)(87)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Indenture, dated April 12, 2007, between Credit Acceptance
Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-1
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
|
4(f)(88)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated April 12, 2007, among
the Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-1,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-1 and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
|
4(f)(89)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Backup Servicing Agreement, dated April 12, 2007, among the
Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-1,
Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-1,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and XL Capital Assurance
Inc.
|
|
4(f)(90)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated April 12,
2007, between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-1 and
U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
|
|
4(f)(91)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Contribution Agreement, dated April 12, 2007, between the
Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-1.
|
|
4(f)(93)
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated
August 31, 2007, between the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding
Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association, JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company, LLC, Park
Avenue Receivables Company, LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(94)
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated September 11, 2007, to the
Certificate Funding Agreement dated as of September 20,
2006, between the Company, Credit Acceptance Residual Funding
LLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable Funding
Capital Company LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC.
|
|
4(f)(95)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Indenture, dated October 29, 2007, between Credit
Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-2
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
|
4(f)(96)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, among
the Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-2,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-2 and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
|
4(f)(97)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Backup Servicing Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, among
the Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-2,
Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-2,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and XL Capital Assurance
Inc.
|
|
4(f)(98)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated
October 29, 2007, between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-2 and
U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
|
|
4(f)(99)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Contribution Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, between the
Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-2.
|
|
4(f)(100)
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated December 21, 2007, to the
Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as
of August 31, 2007, between the Company, CAC Warehouse
Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company,
LLC, Park Avenue Receivables Company, LLC, Wachovia Capital
Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(101)
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 13, 2008, to the
Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated
as of August 31, 2007, among the Company, CAC Warehouse
Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company,
LLC, Park Avenue Receivables Company LLC, Wachovia Capital
Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(102)
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
New Bank Addendum, dated as of February 26, 2008, to the
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
February 7, 2006, by and among the Company, the Banks and
Comerica Bank, as Agent for the Banks.
|
|
4(f)(103)
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Indenture dated April 18, 2008 between Credit Acceptance
Auto Loan
Trust 2008-1
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
|
4(f)(104)
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Sale and Servicing Agreement dated April 18, 2008 among the
Company, Credit Acceptance Auto Loan
Trust 2008-1,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2008-1, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4(f)(105)
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Backup Servicing Agreement dated April 18, 2008 among the
Company, Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2008-1,
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan
Trust 2008-1,
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
|
4(f)(106)
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated April 18,
2008 between Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2008-1 and
U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
|
|
4(f)(107)
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Contribution Agreement dated April 18, 2008 between the
Company and Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2008-1.
|
|
4(f)(109)
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated May 23, 2008 among the
Company, CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC, Fifth Third Bank,
Relationship Funding Company, LLC and Systems &
Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(110)
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Backup Servicing Agreement dated May 23, 2008 among the
Company, CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC, Fifth Third Bank and
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(111)
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Contribution Agreement dated May 23, 2008 between the
Company and CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC.
|
|
4(f)(112)
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement dated May 23, 2008 among the
Company, CAC Warehouse Funding Corporation II, Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC
2006-2,
Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2006-2,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-1,
Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-1,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2007-2,
Credit Acceptance Auto Dealer Loan
Trust 2007-2,
Credit Acceptance Funding LLC
2008-1,
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan
Trust 2008-1,
CAC Warehouse Funding III, LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC,
as agent, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as agent,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as agent, Comerica Bank,
as agent, and Fifth Third Bank, as agent.
|
|
4(f)(113)
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4 as of August 27, 2008, to the Second
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of
August 31, 2007 among the Company, CAC Warehouse Funding
Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable
Funding Capital Company, LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(114)
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Second Amendment dated as of August 27, 2008, to the
Certificate Funding Agreement dated September 20, 2006,
among the Company, Credit Acceptance Residual Funding LLC,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, Variable Funding Capital
Company LLC, and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC.
|
|
4(f)(115)
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3 dated as of July 10, 2008, to the
Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated
as of August 31, 2007, among the Company, CAC Warehouse
Funding Corporation II, Wachovia Bank, National Association,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Variable Funding Capital Company,
LLC, Park Avenue Receivables Company LLC, Wachovia Capital
Markets, LLC and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
|
|
4(f)(116)
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Third Amendment, dated as of July 31, 2008, to
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 15, 1998,
among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders
and note holders.
|
|
4(f)(117)
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment, dated as of July 31, 2008, to the Fourth
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated February 7,
2006, between Credit Acceptance Corporation, the Banks which are
parties thereto from time to time, and Comerica Bank as
Administrative Agent for the Banks.
|
|
4(f)(118)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 21, 2008, to the
Third Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated
February 7, 2006, between the Company, certain subsidiaries
of the Company and Comerica Bank, as agent.
|
|
4(f)(119)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Sixth Amendment, dated as of December 9, 2008, to the
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
February 7, 2006, between Credit Acceptance Corporation,
the Banks which are parties thereto from time to time, and
Comerica Bank as Administrative Agent for the Banks.
|
|
4(g)(2)
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of December 15, 1998,
among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders
and note holders.
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4(g)(5)
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of March 30, 2001, to the
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 15, 1998,
among Comerica Bank, as collateral agent, and various lenders
and note holders.
|
|
Note:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other instruments, notes or extracts from agreements defining
the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company or its
subsidiaries have not been filed because (i) in each case
the total amount of long-term debt permitted there under does
not exceed 10% of the Companys consolidated assets and
(ii) the Company hereby agrees that it will furnish such
instruments, notes and extracts to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon its request.
|
|
10(d)(9)
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
Form of Servicing Agreement, as of April 2003.
|
|
10(d)(10)
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
Purchase Program Agreement Recitals, as of April 2007.
|
|
10(f)(4)*
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Credit Acceptance Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended
and restated May 1999.
|
|
10(g)(2)*
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Employment agreement for Keith P. McCluskey, Chief Marketing
Officer, dated April 19, 2001.
|
|
10(p)
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Credit Acceptance Corporation Director Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10(q)*
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Credit Acceptance Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan,
effective April 1, 2004.
|
|
10(q)(2)*
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement.
|
|
10(q)(3)*
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Incentive Compensation Bonus Formula for 2005.
|
|
10(q)(4)*
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement, dated
February 22, 2007.
|
|
10(q)(5)*
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement, dated February 22, 2007.
|
|
10(q)(6)*
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement, dated October 2, 2008.
|
|
10(q)(7)*
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement, dated November 13, 2008.
|
|
10(q)(8)*
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
Credit Acceptance Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement, dated November 13, 2008.
|
|
21(1)(a)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Schedule of Credit Acceptance Corporation Subsidiaries.
|
|
23(a)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.
|
|
31(a)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act.
|
|
31(b)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act.
|
|
32(a)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32(b)
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management compensatory contracts and arrangements. |
|
1 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
2 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on Form
10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
3 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
June 19, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
4 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
January 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
5 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
90
|
|
|
6 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
7 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K dated
February 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
8 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
September 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
9 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
November 27, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
April 18, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
11 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
September 7, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
12 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
September 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
13 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
November 2, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
14 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
December 27, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
15 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
February 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
16 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
March 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
17 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
April 24, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
18 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
June 2, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
19 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
August 29, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
20 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
21 |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
22 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-K
Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1998, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
23 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
24 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
25 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
26 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
27 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-K
Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
28 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
29 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K dated
March 2, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. |
91
|
|
|
30 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K dated
April 4, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
31 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
February 28, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
32 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
October 7, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
33 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K, dated
November 19, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
92