UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

 

Commission File Number 000-29472

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

1900 South Price Road
Chandler, AZ 85286
(480) 821-5000
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock as of October 31, 2008 was 183,035,405.

 

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2008

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

 

Basis of Presentation.  The Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures as of September 30, 2008 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are unaudited, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The December 31, 2007 Consolidated Balance Sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In our opinion, these financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair statement of the results for the interim periods. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed on Form 10-K with the SEC on February 25, 2008. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

 

Use of Estimates.  The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., using management’s best estimates and judgments where appropriate. These estimates and judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The estimates and judgments will also affect the reported amounts for certain revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and judgments.

 

 

Recently Adopted Standards

 

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value, and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, and have elected not to measure any of our current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, SFAS No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Termination Benefits, SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, and SFAS No. 132(R), Employers’ Disclosure about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a defined benefit pension plan (other than a multi-employer plan) as an asset or liability in the statement of financial position and the recognition of changes in the funded status through comprehensive income in the year in which such changes occur. We adopted the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158 and initially applied those to the funded status of our defined benefit pension plans as of December 31, 2006. In addition, SFAS No. 158 requires that the funded status of a plan be measured as of the date of the year-end statement of financial position for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. We currently measure our funded status as of the balance sheet date. Accordingly, the adoption of the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 158 will have no impact on our financial statements.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”), and in February 2008, the FASB amended SFAS No. 157 by issuing FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-1, Application

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, and FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (collectively “SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is applicable to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, except those relating to lease accounting, and accordingly does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for non-financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Our adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008, with respect to financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, did not have a material impact on our fair value measurements or our financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (“FSP FAS 157-3”). FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 became effective immediately upon issuance, and its adoption did not have an effect on our financial statements. We are currently evaluating the impact the application of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial statements as it relates to the measurement of the funded status of our defined benefit pension plans as of December 31, 2008 and the valuation of our non-financial assets and liabilities, including for the purpose of assessing goodwill impairment and the valuation of property, plant, and equipment when assessing long-lived asset impairment.

 

Recently Issued Standards

 

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 seeks to clarify the hierarchy of accounting principles by raising FASB Statements of Accounting Concepts to the same level as FASB Statements of Accounting Standards and directing the Statement of Auditing Standards No. 69 to entities rather than to auditors. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendment to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The SEC approved the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendment to AU Section 411 on September 18, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (“FSP No. APB 14-1”). FSP No. APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement, unless the embedded conversion option is required to be separately accounted for as a derivative. FSP No. APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of convertible debt instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP No. APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Our convertible debt will continue to be accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Warrants (as amended) and the adoption of FSP No. APB 14-1 will have no impact on our financial statements.

 

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded disclosures related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives. This standard applies prospectively to intangible assets acquired and/or

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

recognized on or after January 1, 2009. We do not expect FSP FAS 142-3 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we have not entered into any derivative transactions.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 requires (1) that non-controlling (minority) interests be reported as a component of stockholders’ equity, (2) that net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest be separately identified in the consolidated statement of operations, (3) that changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, (4) that any retained non-controlling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair value and (5) that sufficient disclosures are provided that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not expect SFAS No. 160 to have a material impact on our financial statements once adopted.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition related items including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date of a controlling interest; and (3) expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired business. SFAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 141(R) will have an impact on our accounting for any future business combinations once adopted.

 

 

We account for our stock option plans in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payments (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be measured at fair value and expensed over the service period (generally the vesting period).

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The following table presents stock-based employee compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

Stock Option Plans

 

 

The following is a summary of all option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

 

 

The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate weighted average fair values of the options granted for the three months ended September 2007 and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. There were no grants during the three months ended September 30, 2008.

 

 

The intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $0.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $4.1 million and $12.0 million, respectively.

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Total unrecognized compensation expense from stock options, excluding any forfeiture estimate, was $11.4 million as of September 30, 2008, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years beginning October 1, 2008.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, cash received under all share-based payment arrangements was $10.2 million and $36.4 million, respectively. There was no tax benefit realized. The related cash receipts are included in financing activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

 

 

Income tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is generally attributable to foreign withholding taxes, income taxes at certain of our profitable foreign operations, and changes in valuation allowances. A tax benefit of $1.6 million associated with the utilization of the acquired foreign net operating loss carryforwards was recorded as a credit to goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

 

Our effective tax rate of 13.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, reflects tax holidays in certain foreign jurisdictions and the utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards. At September 30, 2008, we had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards totaling $399.6 million, which expire at various times through 2028. Additionally, at September 30, 2008, we had $39.5 million of non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, which expire at various times through 2015.

 

We maintain a valuation allowance on all of our U.S. net deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss carryforwards. We also have valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions. We will release such valuation allowances as the related tax benefits are realized on our tax returns or when sufficient net positive evidence exists to conclude that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we established a valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets in Japan which increased income tax expense by $8.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Despite a recent history of positive evidence in certain other foreign jurisdictions, it is management’s conclusion that sufficient positive evidence does not exist to release the valuation allowances in these jurisdictions at this time.

 

The gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2008 was $14.9 million. The gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during the current and prior years increased by $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during prior years decreased by $3.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits also decreased by $0.4 million as a result of a lapse of applicable statutes of limitations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $1.7 million and $1.9 million as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease within twelve months due to statutes of limitations expiring in certain jurisdictions which would decrease our unrecognized tax benefits related to revenue attribution by up to $1.7 million.

 

Our unrecognized tax benefits are subject to change as examinations of specific tax years are completed in the respective jurisdictions. We believe that any taxes, or related interest and penalties, over the amounts accrued will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, nor do we expect that such examinations to be completed in the near term would have a material favorable impact. However, tax return examinations involve uncertainties and there can be no assurances that the outcome of examinations will be favorable.

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS adjusts net income and the outstanding shares for the dilutive effect of stock options and convertible debt. The following table summarizes the computation of basic and diluted EPS:

 

 

The following table summarizes the potential shares of common stock that were excluded from diluted EPS, because the effect of including these potential shares was antidilutive:

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

The components of comprehensive income are summarized below:

 

 

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following:

 

 

The unrecognized pension costs are net of deferred income taxes of $0.6 million and $1.0 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. No income taxes are provided on foreign currency translation gains or losses as foreign earnings are considered permanently invested.

 

 

Inventories consist of the following:

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:

 

 

During April 2008, we sold land and a warehouse in Korea for $14.3 million in cash and reported a gain of $9.9 million, with no net tax effect. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized a gain of $3.1 million in connection with the disposition of real property in Korea used for administrative purposes, and a gain of $1.7 million as a result of an earn-out provision related to our divesture of a specialty test operation in October 2005.

 

The following table reconciles our activity related to property, plant and equipment purchases as presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to property, plant and equipment additions reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

 

The change in the carrying value of goodwill, all of which relates to our packaging services segment, is as follows:

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized a tax benefit of $1.6 million associated with the utilization of acquired foreign net operating loss carryforwards and reduced goodwill.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2008, in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we performed our annual impairment test on goodwill and concluded that goodwill was not impaired.

 

Intangible assets as of September 30, 2008 consist of the following:

 

 

Intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 consist of the following:

 

 

Amortization of identifiable intangible assets for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $2.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Amortization of identifiable intangible assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $7.4 million and $8.0 million, respectively. Based on the amortizing assets recognized in our balance sheet at September 30, 2008, amortization for each of the next five years is estimated as follows:

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

 

 

Accrued royalties relate to our estimate for unpaid royalties owed to Tessera as a result of an interim order received from an arbitration panel on October 27, 2008 (see Note 13).

 

 

Following is a summary of short-term borrowings and long-term debt:

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

In November 2008 (through November 10, 2008), we repurchased $58 million aggregate principal amount of our 2.5% convertible senior subordinated notes due May 2011 and $8 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.125% senior notes due March 2011 using $45 million of our cash on hand. We expect to record a pre-tax gain on extinguishment of approximately $20 million (which is net of approximately $1 million of unamortized deferred debt issuance costs) in the three months ended December 31, 2008.

 

In February 2008, we repaid the remaining balance of $88.2 million of our 9.25% senior notes at the maturity date with cash on hand. With respect to our foreign subsidiaries, we repaid $48.4 million of debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

 

Interest expense related to short-term borrowings and long-term debt is presented net of interest income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $2.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $6.8 million and $6.6 million, respectively.

 

 

Our Philippine, Taiwanese and Japanese subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit plans that cover substantially all of their respective employees who are not covered by statutory plans. Charges to expense are based upon actuarial analyses. The components of net periodic pension cost for these defined benefit plans are as follows:

 

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized a net curtailment loss of $1.6 million related to the remeasurement of two defined benefit plans due to certain reduction in force programs (see Note 15).

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we contributed $0.1 million and $0.3 million to the pension plans, respectively. We expect to contribute an additional $8.7 million during 2008.

 

Our Korean subsidiary participates in an accrued severance plan that covers employees and directors with at least one year of service. Eligible employees are entitled to receive a lump-sum payment upon termination of employment, based on their length of service, seniority and average monthly wages at the time of termination. Accrued severance benefits are estimated assuming all eligible employees were to terminate their employment at the balance sheet date. The provision recorded for severance benefits for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $5.7 million and $9.7 million, respectively. The provision recorded for severance benefits for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $12.6 million and $33.1 million, respectively. The balance

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

recorded in pension and severance obligations for accrued severance at our Korean subsidiary was $141.9 million and $170.9 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. In April 2008, we completed an early voluntary retirement program at our Korean subsidiary that resulted in $2.3 million in additional special termination benefits (see Note 15).

 

 

We have a $100.0 million first lien revolving credit facility with a letter of credit sub-limit of $25.0 million. As of September 30, 2008, we have outstanding $0.5 million of standby letters of credit and have available an additional $24.5 million for letters of credit. Such standby letters of credit are used in the ordinary course of our business and are collateralized by our cash balances.

 

We generally warrant that our services will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner and in compliance with our customers’ specifications. We accrue costs for known warranty issues. Historically, our warranty costs have been immaterial.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

We are involved in claims and legal proceedings and we may become involved in other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. We evaluate these claims and legal matters on a case-by-case basis to make a determination as to the impact, if any, on our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Except as indicated below, we currently believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims and proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our evaluation of the potential impact of these claims and legal proceedings on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows could change in the future. We currently are party to the legal proceedings described below. Attorney fees related to legal matters are expensed as incurred.

 

Tessera, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc.

 

On March 2, 2006, Tessera, Inc. filed a Request for Arbitration (the “Request”) with the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, captioned Tessera, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc. The subject matter of the arbitration is a license agreement (“Agreement”) entered into between Tessera and our predecessor in 1996. The Agreement pertains to certain patents and know-how relating to semiconductor packaging. In its Request, Tessera alleges breach of contract and asserts that Amkor owes Tessera royalties under the Agreement in an amount between $85 and $115 million for semiconductor packages assembled by us through 2005 and claims additional royalties for all accused semiconductor packages that Amkor has assembled thereafter. Since its initial Request, Tessera has asserted royalty claims against additional package types assembled by us and updated their claims to reflect post 2005 packages. As a result, the aggregate royalty amounts alleged by Tessera to date, excluding interest, are substantially higher than $115 million. Tessera has identified a total of six United States patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,679,977, 5,852,326, 5,861,666, 6,133,627, 6,433,419 and 6,465,893), and unspecified know-how as the basis for its claim that royalties are owed under the Agreement. In our Answer and Counterclaim, we denied that any royalties were owed, and asserted, among other defenses, that we are not using any of the licensed Tessera patents or know-how.

 

On April 17, 2007, Tessera sent us a notice of termination of the Agreement. We responded on April 20, 2007, denying that Tessera has the right to terminate the Agreement. The Arbitration Panel denied Tessera’s pre-hearing motion to terminate the Agreement and deferred that issue until the hearing. Also on April 17, 2007, Tessera instituted an action in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against certain of Amkor’s customers, and on May 15, 2007, at Tessera’s request, the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) instituted an investigation of certain Amkor customers. Both the ITC investigation and the Texas action allege infringement of two of the same patents asserted by Tessera in this arbitration, and Tessera may seek to include in those actions some

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

of the same products packaged by Amkor that are at issue in this arbitration. The Arbitration Panel denied our pre-hearing motion to enjoin Tessera insofar as it is pursuing Amkor-assembled packages in the ITC investigation and deferred that issue until the hearing, but stated that it will decide all of the issues related to any dispute between Tessera and us that arises out of the Agreement, including whether the packages prepared by us for our customers utilize Tessera patents. Although Amkor has not been named as a respondent in the ITC investigation or a defendant in the Texas action, Amkor has received notification from certain customers of requests for indemnification in connection with Tessera’s claims in those actions. Amkor has not accepted such requests for indemnification.

 

The arbitration hearing took place from March 31 through April 8, 2008 and final oral argument was held on June 10, 2008. On October 27, 2008, the Arbitration Panel issued an interim order in this matter. While the Panel found that most of the packages accused by Tessera are not subject to the patent royalty provisions of the Agreement, the Panel did find that past royalties are due to Tessera as damages for some infringing packages from March 2002 through March 2008. The Panel ordered that the damages experts for each of the parties calculate the amount of past royalties due for this period based upon the parameters established in the Panel’s interim order, and submit a joint report to the Panel by November 17, 2008. The Panel also denied Tessera’s request to terminate the Agreement. Amkor remains a licensee under the Agreement with the rights and benefits of a licensee along with ongoing obligations to pay royalties for packages subject to the patent royalty provisions.

 

We have accrued $54 million relating to the Tessera matter in the three months ended September 30, 2008. The accrual includes an estimated $50 million for unpaid royalties through September 30, 2008 and an estimated $4 million of pre-judgment interest from March 2, 2006 (the date of filing the request for arbitration as stipulated by the interim order) through September 30, 2008. Our estimate was prepared based upon the evidence presented in the proceeding, including the testimony of the parties’ respective damages experts, and the parameters set forth in the interim order. We made certain assumptions in calculating our estimate, including the amount of offset we would be entitled to as a result of certain payments made to Tessera by some of our customers as well as which packages to include in the calculation of unpaid royalties. Other assumptions we used to calculate our estimate included but were not limited to the interest rate and method used to calculate interest expense on unpaid royalties. We believe that the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable. However, Tessera’s damages experts will estimate the damages owed independently, and therefore their assumptions and estimates may differ from ours. The final award will be determined by the Panel following submission of the joint damages report described above. Although it is not possible to predict the amount of the final award with certainty, we do not expect that any difference between our estimate and the final award to have a material adverse affect on our business, annual results of operations, financial condition or cash flow. We caution, however, that because of the inherent uncertainty in any contested arbitration proceeding, the final award could differ from our estimate and the difference could have a material adverse impact on our quarterly results of operations.

 

Securities Class Action Litigation

 

On January 23, 2006, a purported securities class action suit entitled Nathan Weiss et al. v. Amkor Technology, Inc. et al., was filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Amkor and certain of its current and former officers. Subsequently, other law firms filed two similar cases, which were consolidated with the initial complaint. In August 2006 and again in November 2006, the plaintiffs amended the complaint. The plaintiffs added additional officer, director and former director defendants and alleged improprieties in certain option grants. The amended complaint further alleges that defendants improperly recorded and accounted for the options in violation of generally accepted accounting principles and made materially false and misleading statements and omissions in its disclosures in violation of the federal securities laws, during the period from July 2001 to July 2006. The amended complaint seeks certification as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 23, compensatory damages, costs and expenses, and such other further relief as the Court deems just and proper. On December 28, 2006, pursuant to motion by defendants, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania transferred this action to the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

On September 25, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona dismissed this case with prejudice. On October 23, 2007, plaintiffs filed an appeal from the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The parties have completed briefing of the appeal. Although we believe that we have meritorious defenses in this matter and will continue to seek a judgment in our favor, it is not possible to predict the outcome of this litigation. An adverse decision in this matter could result in material liabilities and could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation

 

In August 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a formal order of investigation regarding certain activities with respect to Amkor securities. The primary focus of the investigation appears to be activities during the period from June 2003 to July 2004. We believe that the investigation continues to relate primarily to transactions in our securities by certain individuals, and that the investigation may in part relate to whether tipping with respect to trading in our securities occurred. The matters at issue involve activities with respect to Amkor securities during the subject period by certain insiders or former insiders and persons or entities associated with them, including activities by or on behalf of certain current and former members of the Board of Directors and Amkor’s Chief Executive Officer. Amkor has cooperated fully with the SEC on the formal investigation and the informal inquiry that preceded it. In October 2007, our former general counsel, whose employment with us terminated in March of 2005, was convicted of violating the securities laws for trading in Amkor securities on the basis of material non-public information. In April 2007, the SEC filed a civil action against our former general counsel based on substantially the same allegations that were charged in the criminal case.

 

As previously disclosed, in July 2006, the Board of Directors established a Special Committee to review our historical stock option practices and informed the SEC of these efforts. The SEC informed us in 2006 that it expanded the scope of its investigation and requested that we provide documentation related to these matters. We provided the requested documentation and intend to continue to cooperate with the SEC. We cannot predict the outcome of the investigation.

 

Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

 

In August 2002, we filed a complaint against Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) in the Superior Court of Delaware seeking declaratory judgment relating to a controversy between us and Motorola concerning: (i) the assignment by Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. (“Citizen”) to us of a Patent License Agreement dated January 25, 1996 between Motorola and Citizen (the “License Agreement”) and concurrent assignment by Citizen to us of Citizen’s interest in U.S. Patents 5,241,133 and 5,216,278 (the “’133 and ’278 Patents”) which patents relate to ball grid array packages; and (ii) our obligation to make certain payments pursuant to an immunity agreement (the “Immunity Agreement”) dated June 30, 1993 between us and Motorola.

 

We and Motorola resolved the controversy with respect to all issues relating to the Immunity Agreement, and all claims and counterclaims filed by the parties in the case relating to the Immunity Agreement were dismissed or otherwise disposed of without further litigation. The claims relating to the License Agreement and the ’133 and ’278 Patents remained pending.

 

We and Motorola both filed motions for summary judgment on the remaining claims, and on October 6, 2003, the Superior Court of Delaware granted our motion for summary judgment. Motorola filed an appeal in the Supreme Court of Delaware and in May 2004, the Supreme Court reversed the Superior Court’s decision, and remanded for further development of the factual record. The bench trial in this matter was concluded on January 27, 2006 and in November 2007, the Superior Court ruled that the assignment by Citizen to Amkor was effective and that Amkor successfully acquired Citizen’s rights in the License Agreement and ‘133 and ‘278 patents. In December 2007, Motorola appealed the Superior Court’s ruling to the Supreme Court of Delaware. On October 8, 2008, the Supreme Court of Delaware issued a final decision affirming the Superior Court’s ruling that Amkor successfully acquired Citizen’s rights in the License Agreement and ‘133 and ‘278 patents.

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Alcatel Business Systems v. Amkor Technology, Inc., Anam Semiconductor, Inc.

 

On November 5, 1999, we agreed to sell certain semiconductor parts to Alcatel Microelectronics, N.V. (“AME”), a subsidiary of Alcatel S.A. The parts were manufactured for us by Anam Semiconductor, Inc. (“ASI”), a predecessor to Dongbu Hitek Co., Ltd. (“Dongbu”), and delivered to AME. AME transferred the parts to another Alcatel subsidiary, Alcatel Business Systems (“ABS”), which incorporated the parts into mobile phone products. In early 2001, a dispute arose as to whether the parts sold by us were defective.

 

Paris Commercial Court.  On March 18, 2002, ABS and its insurer filed suit against us and ASI in the Paris Commercial Court of France, claiming damages of approximately 50.4 million Euros (approximately $72.8 million based on the spot exchange rate at September 30, 2008). We denied all liability associated with this claim. On March 27, 2007, the French Supreme Court (the highest court in the French judicial system) issued a final non-appealable ruling in our favor that the Paris Commercial Court does not have jurisdiction over this matter. Based on this ruling, we do not anticipate any further proceedings in the French courts on this matter.

 

Arbitration.  In December 2006, ABS filed a demand with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) for arbitration in Pennsylvania under the November 1999 agreement, which demand was based on substantially the same claims raised in the French lawsuit described above. The arbitration filed with the AAA in December 2006 remained pending, and was not affected by the French Supreme Court’s final ruling in our favor described above.

 

We previously entered into agreements with ASI whereby ASI agreed to indemnify us against all costs, liabilities, damages, expenses and judgments resulting from or arising out of the claims of AME, ABS and ABS’ insurer in the above matters. In January 2007, Dongbu Electronics (now known as Dongbu Hitek) (“Dongbu”), successor in interest to ASI, acknowledged that it is the indemnifying party with respect to claims against us in the now-ended French proceeding described above, and in this arbitration matter. In May 2008, Dongbu re-confirmed its indemnification obligation to us and assumed the defense of the claims against us.

 

On October 2, 2008, an agreement was reached among the parties to settle the arbitration matter. As part of this settlement agreement, all claims against us have been released, and all settlement amounts are to be paid by Dongbu pursuant to its indemnity obligations described above.

 

Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem Semiconductor Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc.

 

In November 2003, we filed a complaint against Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem Semiconductor Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc. (collectively “Carsem”) with the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in Washington, D.C., alleging infringement of our United States Patent Nos. 6,433,277; 6,455,356 and 6,630,728 (collectively the “Amkor Patents”) and seeking an exclusionary order barring the importation by Carsem of infringing products. Subsequently, we filed a complaint in the Northern District of California, alleging infringement of the Amkor Patents and seeking an injunction enjoining Carsem from further infringing the Amkor Patents, treble damages plus interest, costs and attorney’s fees. We allege that by making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing into the U.S. the Carsem Dual and Quad Flat No-Lead Package, Carsem has infringed on one or more of our MicroLeadFrame packaging technology claims in the Amkor Patents. The District Court action had been stayed pending resolution of the ITC case.

 

The ITC Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted an evidentiary hearing during July and August of 2004 in Washington D.C. and issued an initial determination that Carsem infringed some of our patent claims relating to our MicroLeadFrame package technology, that some of our 21 asserted patent claims are valid, and that all of our asserted patent claims are enforceable. However, the ALJ did not find a statutory violation of the Tariff Act. We filed a petition in November 2004 to have the ALJ’s ruling reviewed by the full International Trade Commission. The ITC ordered a new claims construction related to various disputed claim terms and remanded the case to the ALJ for further proceedings. On November 9, 2005, the ALJ issued an Initial Determination that Carsem infringed some of our patent claims and ruled that Carsem violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act. The ITC subsequently authorized the ALJ to reopen the record on certain discovery issues related to third party documents. On February 9, 2006, the ITC

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

ordered a delay in issuance of the Final Determination, pending resolution of the third party discovery issues. The discovery issues are the subject of a subpoena enforcement action which is pending appeal in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The case we filed in 2003 in the Northern District of California remains stayed pending completion of the ITC investigation.

 

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, we have determined we have two reportable segments, packaging and test. Packaging and test are integral parts of the process of manufacturing semiconductor devices and our customers will engage with us for both packaging and test services, or just packaging or test services. The packaging process creates an electrical interconnect between the semiconductor chip and the system board. In packaging, fabricated semiconductor wafers are separated into individual chips. These chips are typically attached through wire bond or wafer bump technologies to a substrate or leadframe and then encased in a protective material. In the case of an advanced wafer level package, the package is assembled on the surface of a wafer. The packaged chips are then tested using sophisticated equipment to ensure that each packaged chip meets its design and performance specifications.

 

The accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as those for our Consolidated Financial Statements. We evaluate our operating segments based on gross margin and gross property, plant and equipment. We do not specifically identify and allocate total assets by operating segment. Summarized financial information concerning reportable segments is shown in the following table. The “other” column reflects other corporate adjustments to net sales and gross profit and the property, plant and equipment of our sales and corporate offices.

 

 

 

As part of our on going efforts to improve factory performance and manage costs, we regularly evaluate our staffing levels compared to current business needs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we completed voluntary and involuntary reduction in force programs at certain of our foreign locations. The reduction in force programs affected approximately 700 employees. We recorded a charge for special and contractual termination benefits related to these programs of $9.5 million and $11.8 million in the three and nine months ended

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

September 30, 2008, respectively. The amount charged to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $8.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The amount charged to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $10.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively. We paid $2.5 million in cash for severance plan obligations (see Note 12) and $8.7 million for special and contractual termination benefits related to our reduction in force programs. The amount recorded in accrued expenses for contractual and special termination benefits was $3.1 million as of September 30, 2008, which is expected to be paid out in the three months ended December 31, 2008

 

 

We commenced a plan to cease the remaining wafer bumping and die processing operations in our North Carolina facility as part of our ongoing efforts to streamline processes and control costs. The North Carolina facility will focus on research and development activities after the plan is complete. We expect to complete the plan by the middle of 2009. In October 2008, the specific details surrounding the related reduction in force were communicated to the impacted employees at our North Carolina facility. The costs associated with this activity will be accounted for under SFAS No. 146 (As Amended), Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. We currently anticipate an aggregate of $2 million in related termination benefits will be charged to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses as employee service is provided through the completion of the plan.

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including but not limited to statements regarding: (1) our expectations regarding demand for our services, (2) the strategic management of our production lines, (3) allocation of our assets and capacity expansion, (4) the focus and amount of our capital additions, (5) investments in our information systems and cost savings initiatives, (6) our estimates relating to the Tessera arbitration, (7) our expected gain on debt extinguishment, (8) our ability to fund cash requirements for the next twelve months, (9) the payment of dividends and expected use of cash flows, if any in the future, (10) compliance with our covenants, (11) the effect of foreign currency exchange rate exposure on our financial results, (12) the release of valuation allowances related to taxes in the future, (13) the repurchase of outstanding debt, (14) the anticipated effective tax rate for 2008, (15) expected labor cost reductions, and (16) other statements that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “intend” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Because such statements include risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth in the following discussion as well as in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report. The following discussion provides information and analysis of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and our liquidity and capital resources. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with Item 1, “Financial Statements” in this Quarterly Report as well as other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Results of Operations

 

Overview

 

Amkor is one of the world’s largest subcontractors of semiconductor packaging and test services. Packaging and test are integral steps in the process of manufacturing semiconductor devices. The manufacturing process begins with silicon wafers and involves the fabrication of electronic circuitry into complex patterns, thus creating large numbers of individual chips on the wafers. The fabricated wafers are then probe tested to ensure the individual devices meet electrical specifications. The packaging process creates an electrical interconnect between the semiconductor chip and the system board. In packaging, fabricated semiconductor wafers are separated into individual chips. These chips are typically attached through wire bond or wafer bump technologies to a substrate or leadframe and then encased in a protective material. In the case of an advanced wafer level package, the package is assembled on the surface of a wafer.

 

Our packages are designed for application specific body size and electrical connection requirements to provide optimal electrical connectivity and thermal performance. The packaged chips are then tested using sophisticated equipment to ensure that each packaged chip meets its design and performance specifications. Increasingly, packages are custom designed for specific chips and specific end-market applications. We are able to provide turnkey assembly and test solutions including semiconductor wafer bump, wafer probe, wafer backgrind, package design, assembly, test and drop shipment services.

 

Our net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $719.7 million and $689.1 million, respectively. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, sales increased $30.6 million or 4.4% from the three months ended September 30, 2007 due to growth of our advanced packaging solutions and the benefit of our investments in 3D packaging, flip chip and wafer level packaging, as well as test services. The strength in these areas was partially offset by a decrease in our traditional leadframe packaging services.

 

Our business reflects the trends in the worldwide semiconductor industry generally and is affected particularly by levels of consumer spending. Many of our customers are negative on the near term outlook and have reduced their levels of inventory in response to current uncertainties about global economic conditions and reduced demand. Although the current uncertainties about global economic conditions make it very difficult for our customers and us

to accurately forecast and plan future business activities, we expect that demand for our services will decline in the fourth quarter of 2008 and that the weakness may continue into 2009.

 

Gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 17.9% compared to 24.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Included in our cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $9.5 million in charges relating to workforce reduction programs. In addition, we accrued an estimate of $50 million relating to an interim order issued by the arbitration panel relating to our license agreement with Tessera, which is included in cost of sales. Based upon updated information provided by our damages experts, we have increased our estimate of accrued and unpaid royalties for Tessera through September 30, 2008 to $50 million from the $45 million previously disclosed in our third quarter earnings release. The $50 million royalty charge for Tessera reduced our gross margin by seven percentage points for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

 

Net interest expense in the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $0.8 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. Included in net interest expense in the three months ended September 30, 2008 is $4 million as an estimate of interest owed to Tessera for unpaid royalties. This charge is offset by lower interest expense primarily due to reduced debt and the refinancing of certain debt with lower interest rate instruments.

 

Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $29.2 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, compared with net income for the three months ended September 30, 2007 of $60.6 million, or $0.30 per diluted share. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 included an estimate of $52.4 million, net of tax, or $0.25 per diluted share, relating to accrued and unpaid royalties and interest owed to Tessera. This decrease in net income is partially offset by a net foreign currency gain from the remeasurement of certain subsidiaries’ balance sheet items. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we also incurred $11.0 million in charges for termination benefits and a net pension curtailment loss from our workforce reduction programs.

 

Capital additions during the three months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $91.8 million. We continue to strategically manage our production lines, allocate assets and selectively expand our capacity. We currently expect that our full year 2008 capital additions will be approximately 13% of net sales. Our capital additions are aligned with our advanced product development plans and are focused on expanding our product portfolio capabilities in support of our largest customers. We expect our capital additions in 2008 to be primarily focused on our wafer bump and flip chip packaging capacity, test services and advanced laminate packaging services. In addition, we expect to make investments in our information systems and cost savings initiatives centered on improving manufacturing efficiency.

 

Cash provided by operating activities increased $42.9 million to $457.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $414.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Cash flows from operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 funded capital purchases of $317.1 million leaving $140.3 million of free cash flow (defined below). Please see the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below for a further analysis of the changes in our balance sheet and cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

 

The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:

 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007

 

Net Sales.  Net sales increased $30.6 million, or 4.4%, to $719.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $689.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is due to growth of our advanced packaging solutions and the benefit of our investments in 3D packaging, flip chip and wafer level packaging, as well as test services. Our increased sales are primarily attributable to strength in wireless communications products partially offset by a decrease in our traditional leadframe packaging services.

 

Packaging Net Sales.  Packaging net sales increased $19.9 million, or 3.2%, to $636.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $616.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to improved product mix. The improvement in product mix reflected a continued shift to advanced technologies including flip chip and 3D packaging. Packaging unit volume was 2.5 billion and 2.3 billion units in the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Test Net Sales.  Test net sales increased $10.1 million, or 13.8%, to $83.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $73.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to an increase in wafer probe services which have a higher average selling price.

 

Cost of Sales.  Our cost of sales consists principally of materials, labor, depreciation and manufacturing overhead. Because a substantial portion of the costs at our factories is fixed, relatively modest increases or decreases in capacity utilization rates can have a significant effect on our gross margin.

 

Material costs in absolute dollars increased due to the increase in unit volume. Material costs as a percentage of net sales increased to 38.0% in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from 37.3% in the three months ended September 30, 2007 due to a change in product mix to packages with higher material content as a percentage of net sales.

 

Labor costs as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 15.2% in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from 16.4% in the three months ended September 30, 2007 primarily due to the depreciation of the Korean won partially offset by charges incurred for workforce reduction costs.

 

As a percentage of net sales, other manufacturing costs increased to 28.9% in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from 21.6% in the three months ended September 30, 2007. Included in other manufacturing costs for the three months ended September 30, 2008 is an estimate of $50 million relating to accrued and unpaid royalties owed to Tessera. Other manufacturing costs also increased due to higher depreciation costs as a result of our capital expenditures, which are focused on increasing our wafer bump and flip chip packaging capacity, advanced laminate packaging services and test services.

 

Gross Profit.  Gross profit decreased $40.9 million to $129.0 million, or 17.9% of net sales in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $169.9 million, or 24.7% of net sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2007. Included in cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 are charges relating to workforce reduction programs and an estimate of $50 million relating to accrued and unpaid royalties owed to Tessera. The $50 million charge for Tessera reduced our gross margin by seven percentage points. This decrease in gross profit and gross margin was partially offset by an increase due primarily to a change in product mix to packages with higher margin, improved factory performance and a favorable foreign currency effect on labor costs due in part to the depreciation of the Korean won.

 

Packaging Gross Profit.  Gross profit for packaging decreased $42.1 million to $105.7 million, or 16.6% of packaging net sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $147.8 million, or 24.0% of packaging net sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2007. Included in cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 are charges relating to workforce reduction programs and an estimate of $50 million relating to accrued and unpaid royalties owed to Tessera. The packaging gross profit decrease was partially offset by an increase due to a change in product mix to packages with higher margin, improved factory performance and a favorable foreign currency effect on labor costs due in part to the depreciation of the Korean won.

 

Test Gross Profit.  Gross profit for test in the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $0.7 million to $23.3 million, or 28.0% of test net sales from $22.6 million, or 30.9% of test net sales, in the three months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to higher depreciation costs as a result of our

capital investments and charges incurred for termination benefits and a net pension curtailment loss from our workforce reduction programs.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.6 million, or 5.6%, to $60.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008, from $64.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to a reduction in legal costs and professional fees offset by charges incurred for termination benefits and a net pension curtailment loss from our workforce reduction programs.

 

Research and Development.  Research and development activities are focused on advanced laminate, flip chip and wafer level packaging services. Research and development expenses increased $3.8 million to $14.1 million, or 2.0% of net sales in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $10.3 million, or 1.5% of net sales in the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in our research and development expenses was primarily due to our decision to have our North Carolina facility focus on research and development activities as well as specific research and development projects and investments in information technology to support our development efforts.

 

Gain on Sale of Real Estate and Specialty Test Operations.  In the three months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized a gain of $1.7 million as a result of an earn-out provision related to our divesture of a specialty test operation in October 2005.

 

Other (Income) Expense.  Other expense, net decreased $26.2 million to $8.4 million, or 1.2% of net sales in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $34.6 million, or 5.0% of net sales in the three months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease is driven by a $23.0 million foreign currency gain primarily due to the depreciation of the Korean won and the remeasurement of the Korean won denominated severance obligation. Included in the three months ended September 30, 2008 is an estimate of $4.0 million of interest owed to Tessera for unpaid royalties. This charge is offset by lower interest expense due to reduced debt and the refinancing of certain debt with lower interest rate instruments.

 

Income Tax Expense.  In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded an income tax expense of $16.3 million reflecting an effective tax rate of 35.4% as compared to an income tax expense of $1.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007 reflecting an effective tax rate of 1.9%. The increase is primarily attributable to the $54 million accrual of Tessera royalties and interest having only an estimated $1.6 million tax benefit and the establishment of a valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets in Japan which increased income tax expense by $8.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The comparative increase in the effective tax rate also results from the release of a valuation allowance in certain foreign jurisdictions in the three months ended September 30, 2007. Generally, our effective tax rate is substantially below the U.S. federal tax rate of 35% because we have experienced taxable losses in the U.S. and our income is taxed in foreign jurisdictions where we benefit from tax holidays or tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate. Income tax expense primarily consists of taxes related to our profitable foreign tax jurisdictions and foreign withholding taxes. Our effective tax rate fluctuates principally as the relative amount of income tax and foreign withholding tax varies across those jurisdictions. We anticipate the effective tax rate for the full year 2008 will be approximately 13.5%.

 

At September 30, 2008, we had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards totaling $399.6 million, which expire at various times through 2028. At September 30, 2008, we continued to record a valuation allowance on a substantial portion of our deferred tax assets, including all of our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, and will release such valuation allowance as the related tax benefits are realized on our tax returns or when sufficient net positive evidence exists to conclude that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized.

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007

 

Net Sales.  Net sales increased $117.3 million, or 5.9%, to $2,109.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $1,992.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is due to growth of our advanced packaging solutions and the benefit of our investments in 3D packaging, flip chip and wafer level packaging, as well as test services. Our increased sales are primarily attributable to strength in wireless communications products partially offset by a decrease in our traditional leadframe packaging services.

Packaging Net Sales.  Packaging net sales increased $83.9 million, or 4.7%, to $1,863.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $1,779.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to increased unit volumes and improved product mix. The improvement in product mix reflected a continued shift to advanced technologies including flip chip and 3D packaging. Packaging unit volume increased to 6.8 billion units in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from 6.3 billion units in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

 

Test Net Sales.  Test net sales increased $31.9 million, or 14.9%, to $246.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $214.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of units tested in our test facilities.

 

Cost of Sales.  Our cost of sales consists principally of materials, labor, depreciation and manufacturing overhead. Because a substantial portion of the costs at our factories is fixed, relatively modest increases or decreases in capacity utilization rates can have a significant effect on our gross margin.

 

Material costs in absolute dollars increased due to the increase in unit volume. Material costs as a percentage of net sales increased slightly to 38.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from 37.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due to change in product mix to packages with higher material content as a percentage of net sales.

 

As a percentage of net sales, labor costs decreased to 15.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from 16.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to a favorable foreign currency effect on labor costs due to the depreciation of the Korean won partially offset by workforce reduction costs.

 

As a percentage of net sales, other manufacturing costs increased to 24.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from 21.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Included in other manufacturing costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is an estimate of $50 million relating to accrued and unpaid royalties owed to Tessera. Other manufacturing costs also increased due to higher depreciation costs as a result of our capital expenditures, which are focused on increasing our wafer bump and flip chip packaging capacity, advanced laminate packaging services and test services.

 

Gross Profit.  Gross profit decreased $14.8 million to $464.1 million, or 22.0% of net sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $479.0 million, or 24.0% of net sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Included in cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are charges relating to workforce reduction programs and an estimate of $50 million relating to accrued and unpaid royalties owed to Tessera. The decrease in gross profit and gross margin was partially offset by an increase due to enriched product mix, improved factory performance and a favorable foreign currency effect on labor costs due to the depreciation of the Korean won.

 

Packaging Gross Profit.  Gross profit for packaging decreased $23.5 million to $389.4 million, or 20.9% of packaging net sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $412.9 million, or 23.2% of packaging net sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Included in cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are charges relating to workforce reduction programs and an estimate of $50 million relating to accrued and unpaid royalties owed to Tessera. The packaging gross profit decrease was partially offset by an increase due to improved product mix, consisting of an increase in our advanced package technologies including flip chip and 3D packages and a decrease in our traditional, lower margin leadframe packages as well as a favorable foreign currency effect on labor costs due to the depreciation of the Korean won.

 

Test Gross Profit.  Gross profit for test in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $9.2 million to $74.5 million, or 30.3% of test net sales from $65.3 million, or 30.5% of test net sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase in gross profit was primarily due to increased volume. The decrease in gross margin is due to higher depreciation costs as a result of our capital investments and charges incurred for termination benefits and a net pension curtailment loss from our workforce reduction programs.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.1 million, or 0.6%, to $193.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, from $192.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to charges incurred for termination benefits and a net

pension curtailment loss from our workforce reduction programs and the costs incurred in connection with the implementation and subsequent stabilization of a new ERP system in the Philippines. These increases are partially offset by lower legal costs.

 

Gain on Sale of Real Estate and Specialty Test Operations.  In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we sold land and a warehouse in Korea for $14.3 million in cash and reported a gain of $9.9 million, with no net tax effect. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized a gain of $3.1 million in connection with the disposition of real property in Korea used for administrative purposes. Also in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized a gain of $1.7 million as a result of an earn-out provision related to our divesture of a specialty test operation in October 2005.

 

Research and Development.  Research and development activities are focused on advanced laminate, flip chip and wafer level packaging services. Research and development expenses increased $12.1 million to $43.0 million, or 2.0% of net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $30.9 million, or 1.6% of net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in our research and development expenses was primarily due to our decision to have our North Carolina facility focus on research and development activities as well as specific research and development projects and investments in information technology to support our development efforts.

 

Other (Income) Expense.  Other expense, net decreased $79.7 million to $43.5 million, or 2.1% of net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $123.2 million, or 6.2% of net sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized $15.9 million of debt retirement costs, net. In addition, this decrease was driven by a $44.1 million foreign currency gain recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the depreciation of the Korean won and the remeasurement of the Korean won denominated severance obligation. The $11.7 million reduction in net interest expense is due to reduced debt and the refinancing of certain debt with lower rate instruments offset by an estimate of $4 million of interest owed to Tessera for unpaid royalties.

 

Income Tax Expense.  In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded an income tax expense of $26.6 million reflecting an effective tax rate of 13.7% as compared to an income tax expense of $9.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 reflecting an effective tax rate of 7.0%. The increase is primarily attributable to the $54 million accrual of Tessera royalties and interest having only an estimated $1.6 million tax benefit and the establishment of a valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets in Japan which increased income tax expense by $8.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The comparative increase in the effective tax rate also results from the release of a valuation allowance in certain foreign jurisdictions in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Generally, our effective tax rate is substantially below the U.S. federal tax rate of 35% because we have experienced taxable losses in the U.S. and our income is taxed in foreign jurisdictions where we benefit from tax holidays or tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate. Income tax expense primarily consists of taxes related to our profitable foreign tax jurisdictions and foreign withholding taxes. Our effective tax rate fluctuates principally as the relative amount of income tax and foreign withholding tax varies across those jurisdictions.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We generated net income of $166.4 million and $126.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our operating activities provided cash totaling $457.4 million and $414.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash flow from operating activities was sufficient to fully cover cash used for investing activities as well as decrease our debt.

 

Although we have a significant level of debt, with $1,629.5 million outstanding at September 30, 2008, of which $55.8 million is current, we have continued to strengthen our liquidity by using existing cash to reduce our debt and by refinancing debt with lower interest rates and favorable terms as demonstrated by the following:

 

 

 

We were in compliance with all debt covenants at September 30, 2008 and expect to remain in compliance with these covenants for at least the next twelve months. The interest payments required on our debt are significant. For example, in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we paid $76.0 million of interest.

 

In order to reduce leverage and future cash interest payments, we may from time to time repurchase our outstanding notes for cash or exchange shares of our common stock for our outstanding notes. Any such transactions may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions and are subject to the terms of our indentures and other debt agreements, market conditions and other factors.

 

We operate in a capital intensive industry. Servicing our current and future customers requires that we incur significant operating expenses and continue to make significant capital expenditures, which are generally made in advance of the related revenues and without any firm customer commitments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we had capital additions of $309.4 million compared to $192.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. For all of 2008, we expect that our capital additions will be approximately 13% of net sales, of which 60% is expected to be in support of packaging, 24% for test and 16% for research and development, infrastructure and information technology investments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we sold land and a warehouse in Korea for $14.3 million in cash and reported a gain of $9.9 million, with no net tax effect.

 

As part of our ongoing efforts to improve factory and corporate performance and manage costs, from time to time we evaluate our staffing levels compared to current business needs. In the second and third quarters of 2008, we completed early voluntary retirement programs and involuntary reductions in force programs with special termination benefits to employees at certain of our foreign locations. The early voluntary retirement programs and the involuntary reduction in force programs affected approximately 700 employees. We paid $2.5 million in cash for severance plan obligations and $8.7 million for special and contractual termination benefits related to these programs. The amount recorded in accrued expenses for contractual and special termination benefits was $3.1 million as of September 30, 2008, which is expected to be paid out in the three months ended December 31, 2008. We estimate our labor costs will decrease approximately $4 million per quarter for periods beginning after September 30, 2008. However, this estimate does not consider cost increases which will occur from normal hiring activity and wage increases.

 

On October 27, 2008, an interim order was issued by the arbitration panel relating to our license agreement with Tessera. Included in accrued expenses is an estimate of $54 million for accrued and unpaid royalties and interest which is expected to be paid out in early 2009. Our estimate was prepared based upon the evidence presented in the proceeding, including the testimony of the parties’ respective damages experts, and the parameters set forth in the interim order. We made certain assumptions in calculating our estimate, including the amount of offset we would be entitled to as a result of certain payments made to Tessera by some of our customers as well as which packages to include in the calculation of unpaid royalties. Other assumptions we used to calculate our estimate included but were not limited to the interest rate and method used to calculate interest expense on unpaid royalties. We believe that the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable. However, Tessera’s damages experts will estimate the damages owed independently, and therefore their assumptions and estimates may differ

from ours. The final award will be determined by the Panel following submission of a joint damages report. Although it is not possible to predict the amount of the final award with certainty, we do not expect that any difference between our estimate and the final award to have a material adverse affect on our business, annual results of operations, financial condition or cash flow. We caution, however, that because of the inherent uncertainty in any contested arbitration proceeding, the final award could differ from our estimate and the difference could have a material adverse impact on our quarterly results of operations.

 

The source of funds for our operations, including making capital expenditures, paying termination benefits and servicing principal and interest obligations with respect to our debt, is cash flows from our operations, current cash and cash equivalents, borrowings under available debt facilities, or proceeds from any additional debt or equity financings. As of September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $443.8 million and $99.5 million available under our $100 million first lien senior secured revolving credit facility.

 

We assess our liquidity based on our current expectations regarding sales, operating expenses, capital spending and debt service requirements. Based on this assessment, we believe that our cash flow from operating activities together with existing cash and cash equivalents and availability under our first lien senior secured revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements for at least the next twelve months. Thereafter, our liquidity will continue to be affected by, among other things, volatility in the global economy and credit markets, the performance of our business, our capital expenditure levels and our ability to either repay debt out of operating cash flow or refinance debt at or prior to maturity with the proceeds of debt or equity offerings. If our performance or access to the capital markets differs materially from our expectations, our liquidity may be adversely impacted.

 

There is no assurance that we will generate the necessary net income or operating cash flows to meet the funding needs of our business beyond the next twelve months due to a variety of factors, including the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry and the other factors discussed in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

 

Many of our debt agreements restrict our ability to pay dividends. We have never paid a dividend to our stockholders and we do not currently anticipate doing so. We expect cash flows, if any, to be used in the operation and expansion of our business, the repayment or repurchase of debt and for other corporate purposes.

 

Cash flows

 

Cash provided by operating activities was $457.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $414.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Free cash flow (defined below) decreased by $114.2 million to $140.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $254.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:

 

 

Operating activities:  Our cash flow from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $42.9 million. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 adjusted for depreciation and amortization, other operating activities and non-cash items increased $9.6 million which is largely attributable to increased net sales. Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $11.7 million as compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as a result of reduced debt levels as well as refinancing debt with lower interest rate instruments. Operating cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were reduced by $9.0 million in prepayment fees in connection with refinancing our second lien term loan. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $17.0 million

as compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2007 primarily due to the establishment of a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets of an international location.

 

Changes in assets and liabilities increased operating cash flows principally due to the $54 million accrual for estimated unpaid royalties and interest relating to the Tessera matter for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 there is a greater reduction in the Korean severance obligation due to the depreciation of the Korean won.

 

Investing activities:  Our cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $143.5 million. This increase was primarily due to a $157.2 million increase in payments for property, plant and equipment from $159.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to $317.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Investing activities were higher in 2008 principally as a result of our higher level of capital expenditures driven in part by our increased investments in wafer bump. Investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included proceeds of $14.3 million from the sale of land and a warehouse in Korea. Investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment of $5.1 million primarily due to the sale of real property used for administrative purposes in Korea.

 

Financing activities:  Our net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $125.7 million, compared with $169.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily driven by the repayment of the remaining $88.2 million of our 9.25% senior notes at maturity in February 2008. In March 2007, we repaid $142.4 million of our 5% convertible notes at maturity. In June 2007 we redeemed the remaining $21.9 million 2009 10.5% senior subordinated notes. Proceeds from the issuance of stock through our stock compensation plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $10.2 million, compared with $36.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

 

We provide the following supplemental data to assist our investors and analysts in understanding our liquidity and capital resources. Free cash flow represents net cash provided by operating activities less investing activities related to the acquisition of property, plant and equipment. Free cash flow is not defined by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and our definition of free cash flow may not be comparable to similar companies and should not be considered a substitute for cash flow measures in accordance with GAAP. We believe free cash flow provides our investors and analysts useful information to analyze our liquidity and capital resources.

 

 

Capital Additions and Contractual Obligations

 

Our capital additions for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $309.4 million. We expect that our full year 2008 capital additions will be approximately 13% of net sales, as discussed above in the “Overview.” Ultimately, the amount of our 2008 capital additions will depend on several factors including, among others, the performance of our business, the need for additional capacity to service anticipated customer demand and the availability of suitable cash flow from operations or financing. The following table reconciles our activity related to

property, plant and equipment purchases as presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to property, plant and equipment additions reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

Our contractual obligations are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, there have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations as reported in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except for the reduction in debt in 2008 disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We had no off-balance sheet guarantees or other off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2008. Operating lease commitments are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, there have been no significant changes in our lease commitments as reported in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Contingencies, Indemnifications and Guarantees

 

We refer you to Note 13 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report for a discussion of our contingencies related to our patent related litigation, securities litigation and other litigation and legal matters. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur in these matters, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial position and cash flows in the period in which the ruling occurs. The potential impact from the legal proceedings, on our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial position and cash flows, could change in the future.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, there have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies as reported in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included within Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

 

 

Market Risk Sensitivity

 

We are exposed to market risks, primarily related to foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations. In the normal course of business, we employ established policies and procedures to manage the exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency values and changes in interest rates. Our use of derivative instruments, including forward exchange contracts, has been historically insignificant, however, we continue to evaluate the use of hedge instruments to manage market risk. We have not entered into any derivative transactions in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and have no outstanding contracts as of September 30, 2008.

Foreign Currency Risks

 

We currently do not have forward contracts or other instruments to reduce our exposure to foreign currency gains and losses. To the extent possible, we have managed our foreign currency exposures by using natural hedging techniques to minimize the foreign currency rate risk.

 

The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the functional currency for the majority of our foreign subsidiaries including our largest subsidiaries in Korea and the Philippines and also our subsidiaries in China and Singapore. For our subsidiaries in Japan and Taiwan, the local currency is the functional currency. We have foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with the remeasurement of monetary assets and monetary liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. The most significant foreign denominated monetary asset or liability is our Korean severance obligation which represents approximately 67% of the net monetary exposure. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, $32.8 million of the $44.1 million foreign currency gain reported in our Consolidated Statements of Income was related to remeasurement of this severance obligation. We performed a sensitivity analysis of our foreign currency exposure as of September 30, 2008, to assess the potential impact of fluctuations in exchange rates for all foreign denominated assets and liabilities. Assuming a 10% adverse movement for all currencies against the U.S. dollar as of September 30, 2008, our income before income taxes and minority interests would have been approximately $23.4 million lower.

 

In addition, we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure on our results of operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 87% of our net sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining currency exposure is principally Japanese yen, Korean won and Taiwanese dollars in support of local country sales. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 52% of our cost of sales and operating expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars and are largely expenditures for raw materials and factory supplies. The remaining portion of our cost of sales and operating expenses is principally denominated in the Asian currency where our production facilities are located and are largely for labor and utilities. To the extent that the U.S. dollar weakens against these Asian-based currencies, these foreign currency denominated transactions will result in higher sales and higher operating expenses. Similarly, our sales and operating expenses will decrease if the U.S. dollar strengthens against these foreign currencies. We performed a sensitivity analysis of our foreign currency exposure as of September 30, 2008 to assess the potential impact of fluctuations in exchange rates for all foreign denominated sales and expenses. Assuming a 10% adverse movement from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 exchange rates of the U.S. dollar compared to all these Asian-based currencies as of September 30, 2008, our operating income would have been approximately $57.8 million lower.

 

We have foreign currency exchange rate exposure on our stockholders’ equity as a result of the translation of our subsidiaries in Japan and Taiwan where the local currency is the functional currency. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Japanese yen and the Taiwanese dollar, the translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions will result in reduced sales, operating expenses, assets and liabilities. Similarly, our sales, operating expenses, assets and liabilities will increase if the U.S. dollar weakens against the Japanese yen and the Taiwanese dollar. The effect of foreign exchange rate translation on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was a net foreign translation gain of $6.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The gain was recognized as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity through other comprehensive income.

 

There are inherent limitations in the sensitivity analysis presented, primarily due to the assumption that foreign exchange rate movements across multiple jurisdictions are similar and would be linear and instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market or other changes that could arise which may positively or negatively affect our results of operations.

 

Interest Rate Risks

 

We have interest rate risk with respect to our long-term debt. As of September 30, 2008, we had a total of $1,629.5 million of debt of which 83% was fixed rate debt and 17% was variable rate debt. Our variable rate debt principally relates to our foreign borrowings and any amounts outstanding under our $100.0 million revolving line of credit, of which no amounts were drawn as of September 30, 2008. The fixed rate debt consists of senior notes,

senior subordinated notes and subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2007, we had a total of $1,764.1 million of debt of which 81.8% was fixed rate debt and 18.2% was variable rate debt.

 

The table below presents the interest rates and maturities of our fixed and variable rate debt as of September 30, 2008.

 

 

Equity Price Risks

 

We have convertible notes that are convertible into our common stock. We currently intend to repay our remaining convertible notes upon maturity, unless converted, repurchased or refinanced. If investors were to decide to convert their notes to common stock, our future earnings would benefit from a reduction in interest expense but our common stock outstanding would be increased. If we paid a premium to induce such conversion, our earnings could include an additional charge.

 

Further, the trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. Such fluctuations could impact our decision or ability to utilize the equity markets as a potential source of our funding needs in the future.

 

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, based on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures.

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2008. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2008.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

As previously reported, we are implementing SAP which is our new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system over a multi-year program on a company-wide basis. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we implemented several significant modules of SAP at our Philippines subsidiary. The implementation of the ERP system represents a change in our internal control over financial reporting. Therefore, as appropriate, we have

modified the design and documentation of internal control processes and procedures relating to the new system to supplement and complement existing internal control over financial reporting. Post-implementation reviews are being conducted by management to test whether the internal controls surrounding the system implementation processes, key applications, and the financial close process were properly designed and are operating effectively to prevent or detect material financial statement errors. Although management believes internal controls have been maintained or enhanced by the ERP systems implemented, there is a risk that deficiencies that exist could constitute significant deficiencies or in the aggregate, a material weakness. Management will complete our evaluation and testing of the internal control changes as of December 31, 2008.

 

 

Information about legal proceedings is set forth in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report.

 

 

The factors discussed below are cautionary statements that identify important factors and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. For more information regarding the forward-looking statements contained in this report, see the introductory paragraph to Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included in this report, in considering our business and prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing Amkor. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us also may impair our business operations. The occurrence of any of the following risks could affect our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

 

Dependence on the Highly Cyclical Semiconductor and Electronic Products Industries — We Operate in Volatile Industries and Industry Downturns and the Recent Declines in Global Economic and Financial Conditions Could Harm Our Performance.

 

Our business reflects the market conditions in the semiconductor industry, which is cyclical by nature. The semiconductor industry has experienced significant and sometimes prolonged downturns in the past and the recent financial crisis and declining conditions in the global economy are likely to result in a downturn in the semiconductor industry. Reduced economic activity, concerns about a global recession and inflation and deflation, decreased consumer spending, reduced corporate profits and capital spending and adverse business conditions and liquidity concerns could cause significant decreases in demand for our services, accelerated erosion of prices and make it difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities.

 

As a result of the recent financial crisis and tightening of the credit markets, our customers and suppliers may face issues gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could impair our customer’s ability to make timely payments to us and could cause key suppliers to delay shipments and face serious risks of insolvency.

 

Because our business is, and will continue to be, dependent on the requirements of semiconductor companies for subcontracted packaging and test services, any downturn in the semiconductor industry or any other industry that uses a significant number of semiconductor devices, such as consumer electronic products, telecommunication devices, or computing devices could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery and if industry conditions continue to deteriorate, we could suffer significant losses, as we have in the past, which could materially impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Fluctuations in Operating Results and Cash Flows — Our Operating Results and Cash Flows Have Varied and May Vary Significantly as a Result of Factors That We Cannot Control.

 

Many factors could materially and adversely affect our net sales, gross profit, operating results and cash flows, or lead to significant variability of quarterly or annual operating results. Our profitability and ability to generate cash from operations is principally dependent upon demand for semiconductors, the utilization of our capacity, semiconductor package mix, the average selling price of our services and our ability to manage our capital expenditures in response to market conditions, control our costs including labor, material, overhead and financing costs.

 

Our operating results and cash flows have varied significantly from period to period. Our net sales, gross margins, operating income and cash flows have historically fluctuated significantly as a result of many of the following factors, over which we have little or no control and which we expect to continue to impact our business:

 

 

We have historically been unable to accurately predict the impact of these factors upon our results for a particular period. These factors may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, or lead to significant variability of quarterly or annual operating results.

High Fixed Costs — Due to Our High Percentage of Fixed Costs, We Will Be Unable to Maintain Our Gross Margin at Past Levels if We Are Unable to Achieve Relatively High Capacity Utilization Rates.

 

Our operations are characterized by relatively high fixed costs. Our profitability depends in part not only on pricing levels for our packaging and test services, but also on the utilization rates for our packaging and test equipment, commonly referred to as “capacity utilization rates.” In particular, increases or decreases in our capacity utilization rates can significantly affect gross margins since the unit cost of packaging and test services generally decreases as fixed costs are allocated over a larger number of units. In periods of low demand, we experience relatively low capacity utilization rates in our operations, which lead to reduced margins during that period. From time to time we have experienced lower than optimum utilization rates in our operations due to a decline in world-wide demand for our packaging and test services. This can lead to significantly reduced margins during that period. Although our capacity utilization rates at times have been strong, we cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve or maintain relatively high capacity utilization rates, and if we fail to do so, our gross margins may decrease. If our gross margins decrease, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

 

In addition, our fixed operating costs have increased in part as a result of our efforts to expand our capacity through significant capital additions. In the event that forecasted customer demand for which we have made capital investments and, on a more limited basis, expect to make capital investments does not materialize, our sales may not adequately cover our substantial fixed costs resulting in reduced profit levels or causing significant losses, both of which may adversely impact our liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Additionally, we could suffer significant losses if current industry conditions deteriorate, which could materially impact our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

 

Guidance — Our Failure to Meet Our Guidance or Analyst Projections Could Adversely Impact the Trading Prices of Our Securities.

 

We periodically provide guidance to investors with respect to certain financial information for future periods. Securities analysts also periodically publish their own projections with respect to our future operating results. As discussed above under “Fluctuations in Operating Results and Cash Flows — Our Operating Results and Cash Flows Have Varied and May Vary Significantly as a Result of Factors That We Cannot Control,” our operating results and cash flows vary significantly and are difficult to accurately predict. To the extent we fail to meet or exceed our own guidance or the analyst projections for any reason, the trading prices of our securities may be adversely impacted. Moreover, even if we do meet or exceed that guidance or those projections, the analysts and investors may not react favorably, and the trading prices of our securities may be adversely impacted.

 

Declining Average Selling Prices — The Semiconductor Industry Places Downward Pressure on the Prices of Our Packaging and Test Services.

 

Prices for packaging and test services have generally declined over time. Historically, we have been able to partially offset the effect of price declines by successfully developing and marketing new packages with higher prices, such as advanced leadframe and laminate packages, by negotiating lower prices with our material vendors, recovering material cost increases from our customers, and by driving engineering and technological changes in our packaging and test processes which resulted in reduced manufacturing costs. We expect general downward pressure on average selling prices for our packaging and test services in the future and these pricing pressures can be expected to increase during a downturn in the semiconductor industry. If we are unable to offset a decline in average selling prices, including developing and marketing new packages with higher prices, reducing our purchasing costs, recovering more of our material cost increases from our customers and reducing our manufacturing costs, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

 

Decisions by Our IDM Customers to Curtail Outsourcing May Adversely Affect Our Business.

 

Historically, we have been dependent on the trend in outsourcing of packaging and test services by integrated device manufacturers (“IDM”). Our IDM customers continually evaluate the outsourced services against their own in-house packaging and test services. As a result, at any time and for a variety of reasons, IDMs may decide to shift some or all of their outsourced packaging and test services to internally sourced capacity.

The reasons IDMs may shift their internal capacity include: