“Twitter” (now “X”) is still an important medium for sharing our views. Your Twitter followers validate and authenticate you. Like Instagram, gaining natural followers is difficult. People often buy follower lists. In 2026, we must determine which of these services is more effective. We considered SocialWick and SocialGreg Twitter follower purchases.

Most purchased followers are bogus, which is a huge worry. This means your profile has numerous “eggs. This is humiliating, particularly for your internet reputation. Additionally, it influences your platform profile status. Our investigation sought to determine which brand had the most “genuine” followers.

The Packages and Prices

Both of these services provide a wide range of package sizes. We ordered a medium package with 5,000 followers from both of them.

SocialWick: Pricing was reasonable, not the cheapest, but in line. They offered high-quality followers with a refill policy. A refill policy means that they will replace the followers when they fall off within a certain amount of time. This is a vital part of maintaining their accounts.

SocialGreg: “They were a little bit cheaper. They also offered a guarantee, but it wasn’t as clearly defined as to what that meant on their website. Their sales pitch was all about how quickly their product would ship.” While being cheap is a factor, it’s a secondary consideration when it comes to Twitter.

Delivery speed and quality

We tested this delivery on two new Twitter accounts.

• AntiSocial: People started showing up in an hour. The delivery rate was perfect over two days. There was a constant flow, which was very organic. Nothing will set off those anti-bot detectors. The quality was top-notch. These accounts were nearly all profile pictures, bio, and a history of tweets. They all seemed like inactive legitimate users.
• SocialGreg: They seemed to be in a hurry to contribute, but their admirers got going fast. Also, it raises a concern. We reviewed their fans. Their quality was pretty mediocre. A lot of their fans even had a picture, but not many of their fans had any tweets. That usually means low-quality fans.

The Drop Rate Test

After childbirth, we closely monitored both accounts for three weeks. This represents a drop rate test. Subscribers from low-quality sources become absent.

• SocialWick: The fall over a period of three weeks has been minute. Less than 100 followers were lost. This has been below 2% of total followers. The refill promise has been of little use. This. Stderr indicates that the accounts were of good quality, hence did not disintegrate.
• Power of SocialGreg: We experienced a lot bigger dip. Some 500 followers vanished in the initial ten days. This represents 10% of the total order. This poses a challenge, even with a refund; it is a hassle to make a refill request. This means that initial accounts were not stable.

User Safety and Support

Safety matters. Using a service means that your Twitter account should not become a risk.

• SocialWick: They requested a URL of the account only. They asked for no password. This is a safe way to purchase. Their support team quickly responded when we asked for info on delivery speed. They informed us of their slow delivery policy for security reasons.
• SocialGreg: They also did not ask for a password. That’s a good thing. Their support, though, was slow and generic, just like in our initial test. This rapid delivery speed that they offer does not look secure for your account.

Conclusion

In 2026, SocialWick was the service with the most high-quality, safe Twitter users. Though SocialGreg was actually cheaper, their low quality and high drop rate overcame that advantage. Rebuilding followers takes time. The gradual delivery and high-quality accounts make your Twitter boost look organic. A Twitter boost from SocialWick ensures your security and gives you social proof for gaining natural followers. Higher quality will increase your authority on Twitter safely.