Edgar Filing: ORBCOMM Inc.

DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨	Preliminary Proxy Statement.

¨	Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as

permitted

by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).

x	Definitive Proxy Statement.

¨	Definitive Additional Materials.

¨	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12.

ORBCOMM Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x	No fee required.

¨	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

LOGO

March 18, 2016

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

We will hold the Annual Meeting at our corporate headquarters located at 395 W. Passaic Street, Third Floor, Rochelle Park, NJ 07662, on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., local time. At the meeting we will discuss and act on the matters described in the Proxy Statement. At this year’s meeting, you will have an opportunity to vote on the election of two directors, ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, approve the adoption of the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan, approve the adoption of the 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and cast an advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation, as well as to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. Shareholders will then have an opportunity to comment on or to inquire about the affairs of the Company that may be of interest to shareholders generally.

Your vote is important no matter how many or how few shares you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please vote via the Internet, by telephone or by returning your proxy card as soon as possible.

Admission tickets are printed on the outside back cover of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. To enter the meeting, you will need an admission ticket or other proof that you are a shareholder. If you hold your shares through a broker or nominee, you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement showing your ownership as of the March 4, 2016 record date.

We are providing you the Proxy Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. You may also access these materials via the Internet at www.edocumentview.com/orbc. I hope you find them interesting and useful in understanding your company.

Sincerely yours,

Jerome B. Eisenberg

Chairman of the Board

ORBCOMM Inc.

395 West Passaic Street, Third Floor

Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662

Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

To the Shareholders of ORBCOMM Inc.:

The 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of ORBCOMM Inc. will be held at our corporate headquarters located at 395 W. Passaic Street, Third Floor, Rochelle Park, NJ 07662, on Wednesday, April 20, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

(a) to elect two members to our board of directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2019;

(b) to ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of our board of directors of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016;

(d) to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt our 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and

(e) to cast an advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 4, 2016 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2016 Annual Meeting and any postponements, adjournments or delays thereof. A list of such shareholders will be available for inspection by any shareholder at the 2016 Annual Meeting and at the offices of the Company at 395 West Passaic Street, Third Floor, Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662, for at least ten (10) days prior to the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Shareholders are requested to submit a proxy for voting at the 2016 Annual Meeting over the Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope as promptly as possible. Submitting your vote via the Internet, by telephone or by returning a proxy card will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Christian G. Le Brun

Secretary

March 18, 2016

ORBCOMM Inc.

Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ANNUAL MEETING		1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)		4
INFORMATION AS TO NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS AND CONTINUING DIRECTORS		4
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES		7
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION		11
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT		12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		13
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS		15
Compensation Committee		15
Introduction		15
Philosophy and Objectives of Compensation Programs		16
Compensation Committee Consideration of the Company’s 2015 Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation		16
Use of Compensation Consultant		16
Market Assessment		17
Elements of Compensation		18
Health and Welfare Benefits		25
Perquisites		25
401(k) Plan		25
Severance and Change in Control Benefits		25
Clawback Policy		26
Tax and Accounting Implications		27
Role of Executives and Others in Establishing Compensation		27
Hedging Policy		28
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT		29
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		30
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION		45
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS		46
ORBCOMM Europe		46
Satcom International Group plc		46
OHB AG		47
Employment Arrangements		47
Indemnity Agreements		50
Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions		51
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROPOSAL 2)		58
Change of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		58
Principal Accountant Fees		59
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures		59
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF THE 2016 LONG-TERM INCENTIVES PLAN (PROPOSAL 3)		60
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF THE 2016 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (PROPOSAL 4)		70
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (PROPOSAL 5)		74
OTHER MATTERS		75
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE		75
ANNUAL REPORT		75
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR ANNUAL MEETING IN 2017		75
EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION		75

ORBCOMM Inc.

Proxy Statement

2016 ANNUAL MEETING

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the board of directors of ORBCOMM Inc. for use in voting at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of ORBCOMM Inc. to be held on April 20, 2016, and any postponements, adjournments or delays thereof (the “Annual Meeting” or the “2016 Annual Meeting”), for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This proxy statement and the proxy are first being sent to shareholders and being made available on the Internet (www.edocumentview.com/orbc) on or about March 18, 2016. We will refer to our company in this proxy statement as “we”, “us”, the “Company” or “ORBCOMM”.

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ANNUAL MEETING

What am I Voting On at the Annual Meeting?

You will be voting on the following:

•

The election of two members of our board of directors;

•

The ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP (Grant Thornton) as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;

•

A proposal to adopt our 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan;

•

A proposal to adopt our 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and

•

An advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation.

Who is Entitled to Vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only holders of record of the Company’s common stock and Series A convertible preferred stock at the close of business on March 4, 2016, the record date for the meeting, may vote at the Annual Meeting. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock and 1.66611 votes for each share of Series A convertible preferred stock, in each case held on the record date. There is no cumulative voting. On March 4, 2016, the record date for the Annual Meeting, there were 70,794,308 shares of our common stock and 35,759 shares of our Series A convertible preferred stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Who may Attend the Annual Meeting?

All shareholders as of the record date, or individuals holding their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. Please note that if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee in “street name”, you will need to provide a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. If you want directions to the Annual Meeting, they can be obtained by contacting Chris Moore at (703) 433-6403.

How Do I Vote My Shares?

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares right away. Voting now will not affect your right to attend or your ability to vote at the Annual Meeting.

If you are a registered shareholder (that is, your shares are registered directly in your name through our stock transfer agent, Computershare, or you have stock certificates), you may vote:

•

By mail. Complete and mail the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope. Your proxy will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you sign the proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares voted, they will be voted as recommended by our board of directors.

•

By Internet or telephone. Registered shareholders may vote on the Internet at www.envisionreports.com/orbc by following the instructions on your screen, or by telephone by dialing 1-800-652-VOTE (8683). Please have your proxy card ready when voting by Internet or telephone.

•

In person at the meeting. If you attend the meeting you may deliver your proxy card in person or you may vote by completing a ballot, which will be available at the meeting.

If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, held through a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization or nominee), you must provide the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares and can do so as follows:

•

By mail. You will receive instructions from your broker or other nominee explaining how to vote your shares.

•

By Internet or telephone. Street name holders may vote on the Internet at www.envisionreports.com/orbc and following the instructions on your screen, or by telephone by dialing 1-800-652-VOTE (8683). Please have your proxy card ready when voting by Internet or telephone.

•

In person at the meeting. Contact the broker or other nominee who holds your shares to obtain a “legal” proxy from the broker or other nominee and bring it with you to the meeting. You will not be able to vote at the meeting unless you have a legal proxy from your broker. You will also need to sign a ballot in order to have your vote counted.

If you hold your shares of common stock in more than one account, you will receive a proxy card for each account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, please sign, date and return the proxy card for each account. You should vote all of your shares of common stock.

How Will My Proxy Be Voted?

If you use the telephone or Internet voting procedures or duly complete, sign and return a proxy card to authorize the named proxies to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as specified. If your proxy card is signed but does not contain specific instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by our board of directors: “FOR” the election of the nominees for directors set forth herein, “FOR” ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, “FOR” approval of the adoption of the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan, “FOR” the approval of the adoption of the 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and “FOR” approval of the executive compensation. In addition, if other matters come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies in the proxy card will vote in accordance with their best judgment with respect to such matters.

Even if you plan on attending the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote now by giving us your proxy. This will ensure that your vote is represented at the Annual Meeting. If you do attend the Annual Meeting, you can change your vote at that time, if you then desire to do so.

If My Shares Are Held in “Street Name,” How Will My Broker Vote?

If your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization is the holder of record of your shares (that is, your shares are held in “street name”), you will receive voting instructions from the holder of record. You must follow these instructions in order for your shares to be voted. Your broker is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your broker, your broker will not be able to vote your shares with respect to the election of directors (Proposal 1), adoption of the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan (Proposal 3), adoption of the 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Proposal 4) or the advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Proposal 5), but may vote your shares in its discretion with respect to the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2). We urge you to instruct your broker or other nominee how to vote your shares by following those instructions.

May I Revoke My Proxy?

For shareholders of record, whether you vote via the Internet, by telephone or by mail, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by:

•

delivering a written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company so long as it is received prior to the Annual Meeting;

•

casting a later vote using the telephone or Internet voting procedures;

•

submitting a properly signed proxy card with a later date so long as it is received prior to the Annual Meeting; or

•

voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Will My Vote be Confidential?

It is our policy to keep confidential all proxy cards, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders, except as may be necessary to meet any applicable legal requirements and, in the case of any contested proxy solicitation, as may be necessary to permit proper parties to verify the propriety of proxies presented by any person and the results of the voting. The independent inspector of election and any employees involved in processing proxy instructions and cards or ballots and tabulating the vote are required to comply with this policy of confidentiality.

How Many Votes are Needed to Approve a Proposal?

Election of Directors (Proposal 1). Directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast. This means that the two nominees for election as directors who receive the greatest number of votes cast by the holders of our common stock and Series A convertible preferred stock entitled to vote at the meeting, a quorum being present, will become directors.

Selection of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 2); Adoption of the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan (Proposal 3); Adoption of the 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Proposal 4); Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Proposal 5). An affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our common stock and Series A convertible preferred stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter, a quorum being present, is necessary to (1) ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, (2) adopt our 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan, (3) adopt our 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and (4) approve our executive compensation.

What Constitutes a Quorum for the Meeting?

The presence in person or by proxy of a majority of the votes represented by shares of our common stock and Series A convertible preferred stock, considered together as a single class, outstanding on the record date is required for a quorum. As of March 4, 2016, there were 70,830,067 votes represented by outstanding shares of our common stock and Series A convertible preferred stock.

How are Votes Counted?

Under Delaware law and our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws, all votes entitled to be cast by shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter, whether those shareholders vote “for”, “against” or abstain from voting, will be counted for purposes of determining the minimum number of affirmative votes required for approving Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5. The shares of a shareholder who abstains from voting on a matter or whose shares are not voted by reason of a broker non-vote on a matter will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting. An abstention from voting on a matter by a shareholder present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting has no effect in the election of directors, but has the same legal effect as a vote “against” Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5. A broker non-vote on a matter is not deemed to be present or represented by proxy for purposes of determining whether shareholder approval of the matter is obtained and has no effect in the election of directors or on Proposal 2, 3, 4 or 5.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on April 20, 2016.

The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at: www.edocumentview.com/orbc

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)

Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that the board of directors will consist of three classes of directors, as nearly equal in number as possible, serving staggered three-year terms. One class of directors is elected each year with terms extending to the third annual meeting after such election.

The terms of the two directors in Class I expire at the 2016 Annual Meeting. The board has designated Didier Delepine and Gary H. Ritondaro, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as nominees for election as directors at the 2016 Annual Meeting with terms expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. There are seven directors, consisting of two Class I directors, three Class II directors and two Class III directors.

Proxies properly submitted will be voted at the meeting, unless authority to do so is withheld, for the election of the two nominees specified in “Class I — Nominees for Election as Directors with Terms Expiring in 2019” below. If for any reason any of those nominees is not a candidate when the election occurs (which is not expected), proxies and shares properly authorized to be voted will be voted at the meeting for the election of a substitute nominee as selected by the board of directors, and the Company will provide shareholders with the required biographical information of such substitute nominee in advance of the meeting.

A plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to elect directors. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in “street name” do not have the authority to vote on the election of directors when they do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Accordingly, a broker non-vote will not be counted as a vote to elect directors.

INFORMATION AS TO NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS AND CONTINUING DIRECTORS

For each director nominee and each continuing director, we have stated the nominee’s or continuing director’s name, age and principal occupation; his position, if any, with the Company; his period of service as a director of the Company; his business experience for at least the past five years; other directorships held; and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to conclude that the person should serve as a director of the Company. Each nominee for director has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected.

Class I — Nominees for Election as Directors With Terms Expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting


Didier Delepine		Director Since May 2007		Age 68

Mr. Delepine is currently Chairman of the Board of OneAccess S.A. Mr. Delepine served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Equant (now Orange Business Services) (global data networking and managed communications) from 1998 to 2003. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Delepine served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Equant’s network services division and as Chairman and President of Equant’s Integration Services division, Americas. From 1983 to 1995, Mr. Delepine held a range of senior management positions at SITA, the global telecommunications and technology organization supporting the world’s airlines. Mr. Delepine was a director of Intelsat, Ltd., a global provider of communications services, from 2003 to 2005 and Eircom Group plc, an Irish communications company, from 2003 to 2006. Mr. Delepine was Chairman of the Board of Viatel Ltd., a European network infrastructure company from 2005 to 2013 and a director of Global Telecom & Technology, Inc., a multinational telecommunications and internet provider from 2006 to 2013. Mr. Delepine’s high level managerial experience, service on various boards of directors, strong operational expertise and experience and qualifications noted above were among the factors considered by our board of directors in selecting him to serve as a director.


Gary H. Ritondaro		Director Since November 2006		Age 69

Mr. Ritondaro retired in 2010 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of LodgeNet Interactive Corporation (a NASDAQ company and the largest provider of media and connectivity solutions to the hospitality industry), and served in that position from 2001 to April 2010. He also served as Senior Vice President, Finance, Information and Administration of LodgeNet Interactive Corporation from July 2002 to April 2010. Prior to

joining LodgeNet Interactive Corporation, Mr. Ritondaro served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Mail-Well, Inc., an NYSE-listed manufacturer of envelopes, commercial printing and labels, from 1999 to 2001. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Ritondaro was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Ferro Corporation, an NYSE-listed international manufacturer of chemicals, specialty plastics, colors, industrial coatings and ceramics. Mr. Ritondaro’s significant financial expertise, broad understanding of financial issues, significant experience dealing with capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, and his experience and qualifications noted above were among the factors considered by our board of directors in selecting him to serve as a director.

Class II — Continuing Directors With Terms Expiring at the 2017 Annual Meeting


Marc J. Eisenberg		Director Since March 2008		Age 49

Mr. Eisenberg is our Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since March 2008. He served as our Chief Operating Officer from February 2007 to March 2008. From June 2006 to February 2007, he was our Chief Marketing Officer and from March 2002 to June 2006, he was our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing. He was a member of the board of directors of ORBCOMM Holdings LLC from May 2002 until February 2004. Prior to joining ORBCOMM, from 1999 to 2001, Mr. Eisenberg was a Senior Vice President of Cablevision Electronics Investments, where among his duties he was responsible for selling Cablevision services such as video and internet subscriptions through its retail channel. From 1984 to 1999, he held various positions, most recently as the Senior Vice President of Sales and Operations with the consumer electronics company The Wiz, where he oversaw sales and operations and was responsible for over 2,000 employees and $1 billion a year in sales. Mr. Eisenberg is the son of Jerome B. Eisenberg. Mr. Eisenberg’s significant and meaningful knowledge of our Company, in-depth knowledge of our global operations and experience and qualifications noted above were among the factors considered by our board of directors in selecting him to serve as a director.


Timothy Kelleher		Director Since March 2008		Age 53

Mr. Kelleher has been a member of our board of directors since March 2008 and previously served as a member of our board of directors from December 2005 to June 2007. He is a Managing Partner of KMCP Advisors II LLC (formerly PCG Capital Partners Advisors II LLC) (investment management), focusing on providing growth capital to established companies, and was previously a Managing Director of Pacific Corporate Group, which he joined in 2002. He is also a Managing Partner of Silver Canyon Group, LLC. Prior to joining Pacific Corporate Group, Mr. Kelleher was a Partner and Senior Vice President at Desai Capital Management Incorporated from 1992 to 2002 and held positions at Entrecanales, Inc., L.F. Rothschild & Co. Incorporated and Arthur Young & Co. Mr. Kelleher’s significant financial expertise, extensive board level experience helping growth companies achieve their full potential and success dealing with complex business and financial issues and experience and qualifications noted above were among the factors considered by our board of directors in selecting him to serve as a director.


John Major		Director Since April 2007		Age 70

Mr. Major is President of MTSG (strategic consulting and investment company), which he founded in January 2003. From April 2004 to October 2006, Mr. Major also served as Chief Executive Officer of Apacheta Corporation, a privately-held mobile, wireless software company. From August 2000 until January 2003, Mr. Major was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Novatel Wireless, Inc., a wireless data access solutions company. From November 1998 to November 1999, Mr. Major was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Wireless Knowledge, a joint venture of Qualcomm Incorporated and Microsoft Corporation. From 1997 until 1998, he served as President of the Wireless Infrastructure Division of Qualcomm. Prior to that, for approximately 18 years, he held various positions at Motorola, Inc., the most recent of which was Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. Mr. Major is a director of Lennox International, Inc., Littelfuse Inc. and Resonant Inc. Mr. Major was a director of Broadcom Corporation until its acquisition by Avago. Mr. Major’s

senior leadership positions at a number of companies, strong operational expertise, strong background in the technology sector and experience and qualifications noted above were among the factors considered by our board of directors in selecting him to serve as a director.

Class III — Continuing Directors With Terms Expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting


Jerome B. Eisenberg		Director Since February 2004		Age 76

Mr. Eisenberg has been our non-executive Chairman of the Board since March 2008. He served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from January 2006 to March 2008 and our Chief Executive Officer and President from December 2004 to January 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Eisenberg held a number of positions with ORBCOMM Inc. and with ORBCOMM LLC, including Co-Chief Executive Officer of ORBCOMM Inc. Mr. Eisenberg has worked in the satellite industry since 1993 when he helped found Satcom International Group plc. From 1987 to 1992, he was President and CEO of British American Properties, an investment company funded by European and American investors that acquired and managed various real estate and industrial facilities in various parts of the U.S. Prior thereto, Mr. Eisenberg was a partner in the law firm of Eisenberg, Honig & Folger; CEO and President of Helenwood Manufacturing Corporation (presently known as Tennier Industries), a manufacturer of equipment for the U.S. Department of Defense; and Assistant Corporate Counsel for the City of New York. Mr. Eisenberg is the father of Marc Eisenberg, a member of the board of directors and our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Eisenberg was a director of GelTech Solutions, Inc. from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Eisenberg’s significant and meaningful knowledge of our company (as former senior management of the Company), significant experience with the satellite industry and experience and qualifications noted above were among the factors considered by our board of directors in selecting him to serve as a director.


Marco Fuchs		Director Since February 2004		Age 53

Mr. Fuchs has been a member of the board of directors of ORBCOMM LLC since 2001 and of ORBCOMM Holdings LLC from 2001 to February 2004. Mr. Fuchs is currently the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Managing Board of OHB AG (technology and space), positions he has held since 2000. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Fuchs worked at OHB System AG, first as a Prokurist (authorized signatory) and then as Managing Director. Prior to that, he worked as a lawyer from 1992 to 1994 for Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue in New York, and from 1994 to 1995 in Frankfurt am Main. Mr. Fuchs’ significant business and operating experience with satellite companies, significant experience with the satellite industry and experience and qualifications noted above were among the factors considered by our board of directors in selecting him to serve as a director.

The board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election as directors of the two Class I director nominees described above, which is presented as Proposal 1.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES

Our business is managed under the direction of the board of directors. Our board of directors has the authority to appoint committees to perform certain management and administration functions. We currently have an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, composed of at least three members each.

The functions of each of our board committees are described below. The duties and responsibilities of each committee are set forth in committee charters that are available on our website at www.orbcomm.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheading “Corporate Governance”. The committee charters are also available in print to any shareholder upon request. The board of directors held six meetings during fiscal year 2015. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate meetings of the board and committees on which they served. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of the directors attended the 2015 Annual Meeting.

The board has reviewed the independence of its members considering the independence criteria of The NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ, and any other commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships between the directors and the Company. Based on this review, the board has determined that none of the current directors, other than Jerome B. Eisenberg (a former executive officer of the Company), Marc J. Eisenberg (an executive officer of the Company) and Marco Fuchs (a senior executive of OHB AG), has a material relationship with the Company and each of Didier Delepine, Timothy Kelleher, John Major and Gary Ritondaro meets the independence requirements of NASDAQ.

The independent directors meet in executive session without the presence of any executive officer or member of management at least twice a year in conjunction with regular meetings of the board. A director designated by the independent directors will chair the session. The independent directors generally designate the chairman of one of the board committees as chair, depending upon whether the principal items to be considered at the session are within the scope of the applicable committee.

Board Leadership Structure. The board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board or whether the Chairman should be a member of management or a non-management director, as the board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the board. In 2008, in connection with the transition of the Chief Executive Officer position from Jerome Eisenberg to Marc Eisenberg, the board determined that having Jerome Eisenberg continue in his role as Chairman of the Board in a non-executive capacity would provide continuity in the board’s leadership and allow the Chief Executive Officer to focus on the management of the Company’s day-to-day operations. In addition, as the former Chief Executive Officer, Jerome Eisenberg has extensive knowledge of the Company and its business and industry that are an invaluable resource for the board. Although Jerome Eisenberg is not an independent director due to his prior service as an executive officer and continued employment in a non-executive capacity, the board believes that this leadership structure is in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders at this time.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, among other things:

•

reviews and oversees the integrity of our financial statements and internal controls;

•

reviews the qualifications of and recommends to the board of directors the selection of, our independent auditor, subject to ratification by our shareholders, and reviews and approves their fees;

•

reviews and oversees the adequacy of our accounting and financial reporting processes, including our system of internal controls and disclosure controls, and recommendations of the independent auditor with respect to our systems; and

•

reviews and oversees our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Didier Delepine, Timothy Kelleher and Gary Ritondaro currently serve as members of our Audit Committee. Each current member of our Audit Committee meets the independence and financial literacy requirements of NASDAQ, the SEC and applicable law. All members of our Audit Committee are able to read

and understand fundamental financial statements. The board of directors has determined that Gary Ritondaro is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC rules. Mr. Delepine serves as chair of our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met eight times during the 2015 fiscal year.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, among other things:

•

reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of these goals and objectives and determines and approves the level of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation based on this evaluation;

•

determines the base and incentive compensation of other senior executives and the terms of employment of senior executives, including the Chief Executive Officer;

•

reviews, administers, monitors and recommends to the board of directors all executive compensation plans and programs, including incentive compensation and equity-based plans; and

•

evaluates and makes recommendations regarding the compensation of non-employee directors and administration of non-employee director compensation plans or programs.

Timothy Kelleher, John Major and Gary Ritondaro currently serve as members of our Compensation Committee. Each current member of our Compensation Committee meets the independence requirement of NASDAQ and applicable law. John Major serves as chair as of our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met three times during the 2015 fiscal year.

For description of the role of our executive officers on determining or recommending the amount or form of executive or director compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Role of Executives and Others in Establishing Compensation”.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, among other things:

•

oversees our corporate governance policies, practices and programs;

•

reviews the Company’s policies, practices and programs with respect to its relationships and communications with institutional investors, including proxy advisory services, and other interested parties;

•

reviews and recommends to the board of directors the size and composition of the board, the qualification and independence of the directors and the recruitment, selection and evaluation of individuals to serve as directors;

•

reviews and recommends to the board of directors the organization and operation of the board of directors, including the nature, size and composition of committees of the board, the designation of committee chairs, the designation of a Chairman of the Board or similar position and the distribution of information to the board and its committees;

•

coordinates an annual self-assessment by the board of its operations and performance and the operations and performance of the committees and prepares an assessment of the board’s performance for discussion with the board;

•

in coordination with the Compensation Committee, evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of corporate goals and objectives; and

•

develops a Chief Executive Officer succession plan.

Didier Delepine, John Major and Gary Ritondaro currently serve as members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirement of NASDAQ and applicable law. Gary Ritondaro serves as chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met three times during the 2015 fiscal year.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer or other members of the board of directors may identify a need to add new members to the board or to fill a vacancy on the board. In that case, the committee will initiate a search for qualified director candidates, seeking input from other directors, and senior executives, shareholders and, to the extent it deems appropriate, third party search firms to identify potential candidates. The committee will evaluate qualified candidates and then make its recommendation to the board, for its consideration and approval. In making its recommendations to the board, the committee will consider the selection criteria for director candidates set forth in our Board Membership Criteria, including the following:

•

each director should have high level managerial experience in a relatively complex organization or be accustomed to dealing with complex problems.

•

each director should be an individual of the highest character and integrity, have experience at or demonstrated understanding of strategy/policy-setting and reputation for working constructively with others.

•

each director should have sufficient time available to devote to the affairs of the Company in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director.

•

each director should be free of any conflict of interest which would interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director.

While the board does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, it believes that it is essential that the directors represent the balanced, best interests of the shareholders as a whole, rather than special interest groups or constituencies, and takes into consideration in assessing the overall composition and needs of the board such factors as diversity of professional experience, skills and background, age, international background and specialized expertise. The committee from time to time reviews with the board our Board Membership Criteria in the context of current board composition and the Company’s circumstances.

Our Guidelines on Corporate Governance includes a director age policy, pursuant to which any director who has achieved age 75 would be subject to an annual review by the committee with respect to such director’s continued service on the board, considering any factors or other information that is considered appropriate and relevant, including the director’s tenure, the director’s qualifications, the director’s past and expected contributions to the board, the overall composition of the board and whether the director’s resignation from the board would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The board, upon the recommendation of the committee, will then decide whether or not to accept the director’s tendered resignation. Each nominee for director who has achieved age 75 or would achieve age 75 during his or her term if elected is required, upon his or her election, to submit a resignation conditional upon the board’s acceptance in connection with the annual review.

In February 2015, Jerome Eisenberg, after achieving age 75 and upon re-election to the board, tendered his resignation as a member of the board, conditional upon the board’s acceptance in connection with his annual review. The board declined to accept his resignation and Mr. Eisenberg remains as a member of the board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by our shareholders for election to the board of directors. Shareholders wishing to recommend director candidates can do so by writing to the Secretary of ORBCOMM Inc. at 395 West Passaic Street, Third Floor, Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662. Shareholders recommending candidates for consideration by the committee must provide each candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications. Any such recommendation should be accompanied by a written statement from the individual of his or her consent to be named as a candidate and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director. The recommending shareholder must also provide evidence of being a shareholder of record of our common stock at the time. The committee will evaluate properly submitted shareholder recommendations under substantially the same criteria and substantially the same manner as other potential candidates.

In addition, our By-Laws establish a procedure with regard to shareholder proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting, including nominations of persons for election to the board of directors, as described below under “Shareholder Proposals for Annual Meeting in 2017”.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. None of our executive officers currently serves or served during 2015 as a director or member of the compensation committee of another entity with an executive officer who serves on our board of directors or our Compensation Committee. For a description of the members of our Compensation Committee, see “Board of Directors and Committees — Compensation Committee”.

Standards of Business Conduct. The board of directors has adopted a Standards of Business Conduct that is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees. Any material changes made to the Standards of Business Conduct or any waivers granted to any of our directors and executive officers will be publicly disclosed in accordance with applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. A copy of our Standards of Business Conduct is available on our website at www.orbcomm.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheading “Corporate Governance” or upon request, without charge, by contacting our Investor Relations Department by calling 703-433-6505.

Risk Oversight. The board of directors has an active role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing the management of our risks. The board has designated the Audit Committee to take the lead in overseeing risk management and pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management the steps management has taken to assess, monitor and control the Company’s strategic, operational, financial and compliance risks, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which such risk assessment and risk management are undertaken. The entire board is regularly informed by the Audit Committee on these matters. Notwithstanding the Audit Committee’s primary risk oversight role, the entire board is actively involved in the oversight of the operational risks with respect to the Company’s current satellite constellation and proposed next-generation satellites and receives regular presentations from management regarding these matters.

Communications to the Board. Shareholders and other interested parties may send communications to the board of directors, an individual director, the non-management directors as a group, or a specified committee at the following address:

ORBCOMM Inc.

c/o Corporate Secretary

395 West Passaic Street, Third Floor

Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662

Attn: Board of Directors

The Secretary will receive and process all communications before forwarding them to the addressee. The Secretary will forward all communications unless the Secretary determines that a communication is a business solicitation or advertisement, or requests general information about us.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following independent directors: Didier Delepine, Timothy Kelleher, John Major and Gary Ritondaro, each receive an annual retainer of $40,000. In addition to the annual retainer, the chair of the Audit Committee receives $15,000 annually, while the other Audit Committee members each receive $5,000 annually. The chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives $10,000 annually, while the other Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members each receive $3,000 annually. The chair of the Compensation Committee receives $12,000 annually. Jerome Eisenberg receives an annual retainer of $50,000 but does not receive any committee fees. Neither Marco Fuchs nor Marc Eisenberg received any retainer or committee fees for their service on the board of directors in 2015. All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred to attend meetings of the board of directors. Annually, on or about January 2, we grant an award of time-based RSUs with a value of $80,000 (based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant) to certain of our directors, which vest on January 1 of the following year. Accordingly, on January 4, 2016 we granted an award of 10,989 time-based RSUs with a value of $80,000 (based on the closing price of our common stock of $7.28 per share on January 4, 2016) to each of Messrs. Delepine, Jerome Eisenberg, Kelleher, Major and Ritondaro. These RSUs will vest on January 1, 2017.

Under the terms of our directors’ deferred compensation arrangements in effect for fiscal 2015, a non-employee director may elect to defer all or part of the cash payment of director retainer fees until such time as shall be specified, with interest on deferred amounts accruing quarterly at 120% of the Federal long-term rate set each month by the U.S. Treasury Department. Each member of the Audit Committee also had the alternative to determine whether to defer all or any portion of his or her cash retainer fees for Audit Committee service by electing to receive shares or restricted shares of our common stock valued at the closing price of our common stock on NASDAQ on the date each retainer payment would otherwise be made in cash.

Effective fiscal year 2016, a non-employee director may elect to defer all or part of the cash payment of director retainer fees until such time as shall be specified, with interest on deferred amounts accruing quarterly at 120% of the Federal long-term rate set each month by the U.S. Treasury Department. Each non-employee director may also elect to defer the vesting of all or part of such director’s time-based RSU award to a fixed date that is at least one year after the grant date.

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2015


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash			Stock Awards (1)		All Other Compensation			Total
	($)			($)		($)			($)
Jerome Eisenberg		103,750	(2)		80,000		1,832	(3)		185,582
Didier Delepine		48,493			80,000		—			128,493
John Major		57,852			80,000		—			137,852
Gary Ritondaro		60,852			80,000		—			140,852
Timothy Kelleher		51,803			80,000		—			131,803
Marco Fuchs		—			—		—			—

(1)

The amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” column represent the full grant date fair value of the RSU awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. For a discussion of assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the RSU awards shown in the table, see Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

(2)	The amount includes an annual base salary of $53,750 as the non-executive Chairman of the Board.

(3)	The amount represents payment for life insurance premiums of $251 and $1,581 for 401(k) matching contributions.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company, the audits of the financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the qualifications, independence and performance of its independent registered public accounting firm.

Our roles and responsibilities are set forth in a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, which is available on the Company’s website at www.orbcomm.com under the heading “Investors” and the subheading “Corporate Governance”. We review and reassess the charter annually, and more frequently as necessary, to address any changes in NASDAQ corporate governance and SEC rules regarding audit committees, and recommend any changes to the Board of Directors for approval.

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP (Grant Thornton), is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Grant Thornton is also responsible for expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

We are responsible for overseeing the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes. In fulfilling our responsibilities for the accounting and financial processes for fiscal year 2015, we:

•

reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 with management and Grant Thornton;

•

reviewed and discussed management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and Grant Thornton’s audit report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting;

•

discussed with Grant Thornton the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; and

•

received the written disclosures and correspondence from Grant Thornton required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Grant Thornton’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. We also discussed with Grant Thornton its independence.

For information on fees paid to Grant Thornton for 2015, see “Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 2)”.

We reviewed and approved all audit and audit-related fees and services. In 2015 Grant Thornton did not provide the Company any non-audit services. In fulfilling our responsibilities, we met with Grant Thornton, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their audit and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and internal control environment. We considered the status of pending litigation, taxation matters and other areas of oversight relating to the financial reporting and audit process that we determined appropriate.

Based on our review of the audited financial statements and discussions with, and the reports of, management and Grant Thornton, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee has appointed Grant Thornton as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, subject to the ratification of shareholders.

Audit Committee

Didier Delepine, Chairman

Timothy Kelleher

Gary Ritondaro

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows the beneficial ownership, reported to us as of March 4, 2016, of our common stock, including shares as to which a right to acquire ownership within 60 days exists (for example, through the exercise of SARs) of each director, each nominee for director, each named executive officer, of such persons and other executive officers as a group and of beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock. The business address of the named executive officers and directors is c/o ORBCOMM Inc., 395 West Passaic Street, Third Floor, Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662. As of March 4, 2016, there were 70,794,308 outstanding shares of our common stock.


Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares of Common Stock Owned(1)		Percentage of Total Common Stock Held
Greater than 5% Stockholders
Raging Capital Master Fund, Ltd.(2)		8,810,614		12.5	%
Jennison Associates LLC(3)		4,885,986		6.9	%
Ariel Investments, LLC(4)		4,833,159		6.8	%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(5)		4,054,074		5.7	%
The Vanguard Group Inc. (6)		3,732,353		5.3	%
Named Executive Officers and Directors
Marc Eisenberg(7)		1,322,845		1.8	%
Robert G. Costantini(8)		816,782		1.1	%
John J. Stolte, Jr.(9)		472,356		*
Christian G. Le Brun(10)		467,008		*
Craig Malone (11)		83,925		*
Jerome B. Eisenberg(12)		1,244,737		1.7	%
Didier Delepine		91,405		*
Marco Fuchs(13)		2,229,103		3.2	%
Timothy Kelleher		69,937		*
John Major		91,405		*
Gary H. Ritondaro		91,405		*
All executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons)		6,980,908		9.5	%

*	Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.

(1)	Unless otherwise indicated, the amounts shown as being beneficially owned by each stockholder or group listed above represent shares over which that stockholder or group holds sole investment power.

(2)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 16, 2016, Raging Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (“Raging Master”), Raging Capital Management, LLC, in its capacity as the investment manager of Raging Master, and William C. Martin, in his capacity as the Chairman, Chief Investment Officer and Managing Member of Raging Master, by virtue of these relationships may each be deemed the beneficial owner of 8,810,614 shares directly owned by Raging Master. Raging Master, Raging Capital Management, LLC and Mr. Martin each reported having shared power to vote or direct, and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the 8,810,614 shares. The principal business address of Raging Master is c/o Ogier Fiduciary Services (Cayman) Limited, 89 Nexus Way, Camana Bay, Grand Cayman KY 1-9007, Cayman Islands. The principal business address of each of Raging Capital Management, LLC and Mr. Martin is Ten Princeton Avenue, P.O. Box 228, Rocky Hill, New Jersey 08553.

(3)

Based on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by Jennison Associates LLC (“Jennison”) on February 3, 2016, Jennison, in its capacity as investment adviser of several managed portfolios, may be deemed the beneficial owner of shares held by such managed portfolio. Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential”) indirectly owns 100% of equity interests of Jennison. As a result, Prudential may be deemed to have the power to exercise

or to direct the exercise of such voting and/or dispositive power that Jennison may have with respect to the 4,885,986 shares. Jennison’s address is 466 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017.

(4)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by Ariel Investments, LLC on February 12, 2016, Ariel Investments, LLC, in its capacity as investment adviser of several managed portfolios, may be deemed the beneficial owner of shares held by such managed portfolios. Ariel Investments, LLC reported having sole voting power over 3,508,601 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,833,159 shares. Ariel Investment LLC’s address is 200 E. Randolph Drive, Suite 2900, Chicago, IL 60601.

(5)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP on February 9, 2016, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, in its capacity as investment adviser to four registered investment companies and investment manager or sub-adviser to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (collectively with the registered investment companies, the “Funds”) and through certain of its subsidiaries, in their capacities as investment adviser and/or sub-adviser to certain Funds, may be deemed the beneficial owner of shares held by the Funds. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported having sole voting power over 3,927,036 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,054,074 shares. However, all the shares are owned by the Funds and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP’s address is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.

(6)

Based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by the Vanguard Group Inc. on February 11, 2016, the Vanguard Group Inc. reported having sole voting power over 75,994 shares and sole dispositive power over 3,658,159 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group Inc., is the beneficial owner of 74,194 shares or 0.10% of the common stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group Inc., is the beneficial owner of 1,800 shares or 0.00% of the common stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. The Vanguard Group Inc.’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(7)	Includes 246,184 shares of common stock held by Marc Eisenberg. Also includes 1,076,661 shares of common stock underlying SARs that are currently exercisable.

(8)	Includes 164,455 shares of common stock held by Robert G. Costantini. Also includes 652,327 shares of common stock underlying SARs that are currently exercisable.

(9)	Includes 64,436 shares of common stock held by John J. Stolte, Jr. Also includes 407,920 shares of common stock underlying SARs, in each case, that are currently exercisable.

(10)	Includes 53,852 shares of common stock held by Christian G. Le Brun. Also includes 413,156 shares of common stock underlying SARs that are currently exercisable.

(11)	Includes 11,025 shares of common stock held by Craig E. Malone. Also includes 72,900 shares of common stock underlying SARs, in each case, that are currently exercisable.

(12)	Includes 1,033,791 shares of common stock held by Jerome B. Eisenberg and 15,759 shares of common stock held by Cynthia Eisenberg, Mr. Eisenberg’s wife. Also includes 195,187 shares of common stock underlying SARs that are currently exercisable.

(13)

Includes 2,168,779 shares of common stock held by OHB AG, and 60,324 shares of common stock held by ORBCOMM Deutschland AG. Mr. Fuchs is Chief Executive Officer of OHB AG which owns ORBCOMM Deutschland AG. Manfred Fuchs, Marco Fuchs and Christa Fuchs hold voting and investment power with regard to the shares held by OHB AG and ORBCOMM Deutschland AG. OHB AG’s address is Universitaetsalle 27-29, Bremen, D-28539, Germany.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of compensation for the following current executives whose compensation is reported in the Summary Compensation Table (our “Named Executive Officers”):

•

Marc Eisenberg, Chief Executive Officer and President;

•

Robert Costantini, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

•

John Stolte, Executive Vice President, Technology and Operations;

•

Christian Le Brun, Executive Vice President and General Counsel; and

•

Craig Malone, Executive Vice President, Product Development.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to oversight and determination of executive compensation and human resources matters, including the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. A description of the Compensation Committee’s composition, functions, duties and responsibilities is set forth in this proxy statement under “Board of Directors and Committees — Compensation Committee”.

The Compensation Committee’s roles and responsibilities are set forth in a written charter which is available on our website at www.orbcomm.com under the heading “Investors” and the subheading “Corporate Governance” and is available in print to any shareholder upon request.

Introduction

We use base salaries and time-based equity awards to provide current income and retention incentives and a combination of cash and stock-based compensation that reward performance measured against various corporate and individual performance goals based on key business drivers. Our performance targets are based on our annual business plan and we believe that they are established at levels that are achievable if we execute on our business plan. By providing for significant incentives for exceeding certain targets and our business plan, we motivate our Named Executive Officers to achieve strategic business objectives that result in the creation of additional value for our stockholders over the long-term. We believe the general design of our compensation programs, which we have refined over the past several years, provides the appropriate balance for motivating and retaining our Named Executive Officers while providing appropriate rewards for demonstrated performance.

Total Target Pay Mix. The charts below show the allocation of target compensation among salary, annual cash bonus and equity-based long-term incentives for (a) our Chief Executive Officer and (b) our other Named Executive Officers (averaged).

For purposes of determining the percentages shown above, it is assumed that the annual cash bonus is earned at target and the discretionary portion is paid in full, the target number of restricted stock units awarded have a value equal to the market value of the common stock underlying the award on the date of grant and the market performance units (“MPUs”) are earned at the applicable target stock price level for each year in the three-year performance period 2015-2017. Only the MPUs granted in December 2014 relating to the 2015-2017 performance period are reflected in the charts above (MPUs granted in prior periods are not reflected in the charts above, although a portion of these awards may overlap with the 2015-2017 performance period MPUs and be earned in 2015 and later years). Since the various performance-based awards have both upside opportunity and downside risk, these percentages may not reflect the actual amounts realized.

Philosophy and Objectives of Compensation Programs

Our executive compensation philosophy is to create a system that rewards executives for performance and focuses our management team on the critical short-term and long-term objectives. The primary objectives of our executive compensation programs are to attract, motivate and retain talented and dedicated executives, to link annual and long-term cash and stock incentives to achievement of specified performance objectives, and to align executives’ incentives with stockholder value creation. To achieve these objectives, the Compensation Committee has implemented compensation programs that make a substantial portion of the executives’ overall compensation contingent upon achieving key short-term business and long-term strategic goals established by our board of directors or the Compensation Committee based on key drivers of our business, such as growth in profitability and revenue and system expansion. The short-term business and long-term strategic goals consist of the financial and operational performance, as measured by metrics such as Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below), revenues and operational targets, as well as expansion of our communications system, all of which are important drivers of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee’s goal is to set executive compensation at levels the committee believes are competitive against compensation offered by other rapidly growing companies of similar size and stage of development against whom we compete for executive talent in the communications industry, while taking into account our performance and our own strategic goals. To align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders, we design our compensation packages provided to our executives, including our Named Executive Officers, to include both cash and stock-based compensation that reward performance as measured against performance goals that are expected to generate returns for our stockholders, but not for poor performance.

Compensation Committee Consideration of the Company’s 2015 Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

At our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, 99.6% of the shares voted on the matter approved our 2014 executive compensation. Based on this strong endorsement, there were no specific changes to any component of our 2015 executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.

Use of Compensation Consultant

Our Compensation Committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, or Meridian, as its independent compensation consultant for compensation decisions in 2012, and engaged Meridian again in 2014 to refresh their 2012 analysis in connection with compensation decisions in 2014. Meridian provided the Compensation Committee with the following services in 2014:

•

reviewed and provided recommendations on the compensation program for our non-employee directors;

•

provided advice on the Company’s compensation peer group (listed below);

•

provided compensation data for similarly situated executive officers from our peer group; and

•

reviewed the compensation arrangements for all of our Named Executive Officers and recommended certain salary increases for our Named Executive Officers.

The Compensation Committee determined that Meridian is independent and that the provision of services to the Compensation Committee did not create any conflicts of interest. The Compensation Committee has the

authority to hire and terminate its compensation consultant. The Company pays the cost for the consultant’s services. The Compensation Committee is responsible for assessing annually the consultant’s’ independence and whether there are any conflicts of interest. Other than providing services as directed by the Compensation Committee, Meridian did not provide any other services to the Company. Meridian communicated with members of the Compensation Committee, both with and without management present.

In 2015, the Compensation Committee did not engage Meridian to provide any new services, but continued to use the peer group information provided in 2014.

Market Assessment

Our Compensation Committee made compensation decisions based on external market data, the experiences and knowledge of each member, historical pay levels for each executive, historical and/or anticipated future corporate and individual performance, and internal pay equity. The Compensation Committee believed that this comprehensive approach was appropriate for 2015 in order to allow us to maintain a reasonable and responsible cost structure.

In November 2014, Meridian delivered a report to the Compensation Committee that provided the base salary, annual incentive cash bonus opportunities and equity compensation grants for executive officers employed by the peer companies selected for use in 2014.

Executive compensation was reviewed against a 15-company peer group that was established for 2015 to provide a sampling of the market, using the following broad criteria given our Company’s unique industry positioning:

Industry, scope of business operations, and organizational complexity: The peer group focuses on alternative carriers, communication equipment, electronic equipment and instruments, wireless telecommunication services, integrated telecommunication services, systems software, internet software and application software related industries.

Organizational size: The peer group focuses on companies with revenues of between approximately $30 million and $400 million, and market capitalization of between approximately $15 million and $2.8 billion.

Based on the foregoing criteria, the Compensation Committee approved the following 15-company peer group:


CalAmp Corp.		KVH Industries Inc.

The Descartes Systems Group		LoJack Corp.

Digi International Inc.		Lumos Networks Corp.

Enventis Corp.		Numerex Corp.

Fleetmatics plc		Otelco Inc.

Globalstar, Inc.		Spok Holdings, Inc.

GTT Communications		Towerstream Corp.

Iridium Communications

Although our Compensation Committee does not target any specific benchmark against the compensation levels of the peer companies, the Compensation Committee considers compensation near the 50^th percentile generally to be competitive. However, actual compensation may be above or below median to reflect company performance, and each Named Executive Officer’s role relative to peers, as well as individual performance and potential. The Compensation Committee also considers the mix of elements and compensation strategies used by these peer companies as part of its comprehensive approach to establishing executive compensation.

Elements of Compensation

Base Salary. Base salaries are determined on an individual basis, are based on job responsibilities and individual contribution and are intended to provide our executives with current income. Base salaries for our Named Executive Officers are reviewed annually and may be adjusted to reflect any changes in job responsibilities and individual contribution, as well as competitive conditions in the market for executive talent.

Our Chief Executive Officer proposes new base salary amounts for the other Named Executive Officers to the Compensation Committee for approval based on: an evaluation of individual performance and expected future contributions; a goal to ensure competitive compensation against the external market; and comparison of the base salaries of the executive officers who report directly to our Chief Executive Officer to ensure internal equity.

The base salaries of Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone were increased in November 2014 based on the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer (other than for himself) and Meridian. Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte and Malone each received a 5% increase in base salary based primarily on competitive market considerations. Mr. Le Brun received an increase based primarily on competitive market considerations and internal pay-equity. The Named Executive Officers’ base salaries for the 2016 fiscal year are currently at the same level as for the 2015 fiscal year.

Annual Cash Bonus. Annual cash bonuses are designed to align employees’ goals with the Company’s financial and operational objectives for the current year and to reward individual performance. These objectives include financial and operational performance targets such as Adjusted EBITDA, Consolidated Revenues, net subscriber additions and direct channel revenue. Our Compensation Committee defines Adjusted EBITDA as earnings attributable to ORBCOMM Inc., before interest income (expense), provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, non-controlling interests, impairment loss, non-capitalized satellite launch and in-orbit insurance, insurance recovery, acquisition-related and integration costs and other special items. These objectives also relate to strategic factors such as communications system expansion, including launch of the next-generation satellites, regulatory approvals and international licenses. These performance measures were selected to align employees’ goals with key drivers of our business, such as growth in profitability and revenue and system expansion, all of which are important drivers of stockholder value. These performance measures are primarily objective criteria that can be readily measured and generally do not require subjective determinations.

The annual cash bonus also includes discretionary amounts which may be paid based on completion of key projects. Pursuant to their employment arrangements, each Named Executive Officer is eligible to receive a target annual cash bonus, payable in cash based on a percentage of his base salary determined by the Compensation Committee each year, subject to achieving certain performance targets. For the 2015 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee set each Named Executive Officer’s target bonus opportunity (which is described in the table below) based on competitive market and internal pay equity considerations.


	2015 Annual Cash Bonus
	Approximate % of base salary at Target			Payment amounts at Target
Marc Eisenberg		100	%	$	449,546
Robert Costantini		95	%	$	294,495
John Stolte		70	%	$	180,678
Christian Le Brun		70	%	$	171,524
Craig Malone		61	%	$	137,755

On December 17, 2014, our Compensation Committee established 2015 operational and financial performance targets for which annual bonuses would be paid to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone based on achieving those targets.

The 2015 operational and financial performance targets for each of Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone, and the relative weighting of such performance targets as a percentage of the annual bonuses are set forth in the following table:


2015 Performance targets	Marc Eisenberg			Robert Costantini			John Stolte			Christian Le Brun			Craig Malone
Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA		50	%		50	%		50	%		50	%		50	%
Consolidated revenues		25	%		25	%		25	%		25	%		25	%
Direct channel revenues		3.75	%		3.75	%		—			—			5	%
Net subscriber additions		3.75	%		3.75	%		—			—			5	%
Other operational targets(1)		7.5	%		7.5	%		15	%		15	%		5	%
Discretionary		10	%		10	%		10	%		10	%		10	%

		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

(1)	Consists of eight objectives which relate to the individual Named Executive Officer’s roles and responsibilities.

Not all objectives applied to each Named Executive Officer.

For 2015, bonuses were not earned unless at least a threshold level of performance was achieved (i.e., 88% of target for Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA and 96% of target for Consolidated Revenues). Achieving threshold performance for each of the Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA and Consolidated Revenues performance measures would result in payment of 50% of the award payable for target performance for each of the Named Executive Officers.

Achieving maximum performance of the Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA performance measure (i.e., 110% of target for Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA) would result in payment of approximately 244% of the award payable for target performance for Messrs. Eisenberg and Costantini and approximately 175% of the award payable for target performance for Messrs. Stolte, Le Brun and Malone. For performance between threshold and target performance levels, the award payable for all the Named Executive Officers would be calculated on a linear sliding scale basis. For performance between target and maximum performance levels, the award payable would be calculated on a sliding scale basis which increases more rapidly when actual performance exceeds the target performance level. For Messrs. Eisenberg and Costantini, the sliding scale increases at a higher percentage rate than the sliding scale applicable to Messrs. Stolte, Le Brun and Malone.

Achieving maximum performance of the Consolidated Revenues performance measure (i.e., 104% of target) would result in payment of 200% of the award payable for target performance for Messrs. Eisenberg and Costantini and approximately 175% of the award payable for target performance for Messrs. Stolte, Le Brun and Malone. For performance between threshold and target performance levels, the award payable for all the Named Executive Officers would be calculated on a linear sliding scale basis. For performance between target and maximum performance levels, the award payable would be calculated on a linear sliding scale basis for Messrs. Eisenberg and Costantini and on a sliding scale basis which increases more rapidly when actual performance exceeds the target performance level for Messrs. Stolte, Le Brun and Malone.

The following tables summarize the payouts at the threshold, target and maximum performance levels with respect to the Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA and Consolidated Revenues performance measures for each of the Named Executive Officers:

Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA


	Threshold (88% of Target)		Target		Maximum (110% of Target)
Marc Eisenberg	$	112,273	$	224,546	$	548,207
Robert Costantini	$	74,400	$	148,800	$	363,281
John Stolte	$	44,886	$	89,771	$	157,010
Christian Le Brun	$	42,660	$	85,321	$	149,227
Craig Malone	$	34,439	$	68,878	$	120,467

Consolidated Revenues


	Threshold (96% of Target)		Target		Maximum (104% of Target)
Marc Eisenberg	$	56,250	$	112,500	$	225,000
Robert Costantini	$	36,428	$	72,855	$	145,710
John Stolte	$	23,088	$	46,176	$	80,761
Christian Le Brun	$	21,943	$	43,885	$	76,756
Craig Malone	$	17,219	$	34,439	$	60,234

For all operational performance targets, the bonuses were not earned unless the threshold target level of performance was achieved.

Our Compensation Committee, at its sole discretion, awarded the discretionary bonus components in full based on completion of certain key projects, such as integration of acquisitions and new products and services development, for Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone.

2015 Operational and Financial Performance Targets and Results


Performance targets	Threshold target		Target		Maximum target			Performance
Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA	$	36,000,000	$	41,000,000	$	45,000,000		Achieved $43,000,000 on a constant currency basis
Consolidated revenues	$	175,000,000	$	183,000,000	$	190,000,000		Achieved $179,000,000 on a constant currency basis
Net subscriber additions		150,000		N/A		N/A		Achieved approx. 593,000 including 2015 acquisitions
Direct channel revenues	$	60,000,000		N/A		N/A		Achieved $70,300,000
Other operational targets (1)						(1	)	(1)
Discretionary		Based on completion of certain key projects based on the Compensation Committee’s determination						Achieved

(1)	Consists of eight objectives which relate to the individual Named Executive Officer’s roles and responsibilities. Not all objectives applied to each Named Executive Officer. Six of the eight objectives were achieved, while two of the eight objectives were not achieved.

On February 16, 2016, our Compensation Committee determined that the following performance-based annual incentive bonus payout amounts relating to achievement against 2015 operational and financial performance targets were awarded to the Named Executive Officers:


	Marc		Robert		John		Christian		Craig
2015 Performance targets	Eisenberg		Costantini		Stolte		Le Brun		Malone
Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA	$	350,852	$	232,500	$	118,722	$	112,837	$	91,091
Consolidated revenues		84,375		54,641		34,632		32,914		25,829
Direct channel revenues		16,875		10,850		—		—		6,888
Net subscriber additions		16,875		10,850		—		—		6,888
Other operational targets(1)		33,750		21,700		26,777		12,382		6,887
Discretionary		45,000		29,440		17,954		17,554		13,775

	$	547,727	$	359,981	$	198,085	$	175,687	$	151,358

(1)	Consists of eight objectives which relate to the individual Named Executive Officer’s roles and responsibilities. Not all objectives applied to each Named Executive Officer. Six of the eight objectives were achieved, while two of the eight objectives were not achieved.

For purposes of illustrating the payout amount for Mr. Le Brun (whose base salary for fiscal year 2015 was $245,000) with respect to the Consolidated Revenues performance measure, the calculation (with 2015 Consolidated Revenues of $179,000,000 on a constant currency basis, which exceeded the threshold target level of $175,000,000, but fell short of the target level of $183,000,000) is as follows:

Mr. Lebrun’s target payout amount for the Consolidated Revenues performance measure is calculated as 18% of his base salary, or approximately $43,885. The $43,885 is then multiplied by a factor of approximately 75%, representing a discount to reflect the approximately $4,000,000 lower Consolidated Revenues attained than the target amount of $183,000,000, resulting in a payout amount of $32,914.

2016 Operational and Financial Performance Targets

On December 15, 2015, our Compensation Committee established 2016 operational and financial performance targets for which annual bonuses will be paid to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone based on achieving financial and operational performance targets. The 2016 operation and financial performance targets are substantially similar to those for 2015. The 2016 operational and financial performance targets and the relative weighting of such performance targets as a percentage of the annual bonuses are set forth in the following table:


2016 Performance targets	Marc Eisenberg			Robert Costantini			John Stolte			Christian Le Brun			Craig Malone
Fiscal 2016 Adjusted EBITDA		50	%		50	%		50	%		50	%		50	%
Consolidated revenues		25	%		25	%		25	%		25	%		25	%
Other operational targets(1)		15	%		15	%		15	%		15	%		15	%
Discretionary		10	%		10	%		10	%		10	%		10	%

		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

(1)	Consists of seven objectives which relate to the individual Named Executive Officer’s roles and responsibilities.

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives. In addition to the short-term cash compensation payable to our Named Executive Officers, our Compensation Committee believes that the interests of our stockholders are best served when a substantial portion of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation is comprised of equity-based and other long-term incentives that appreciate in value contingent upon increases in the share price of our common stock and other indicators that reflect improvements in business fundamentals. Therefore, it is our

Compensation Committee’s intention to make grants of equity-based awards to our Named Executive Officers and other key employees at such times and in such amounts as may be required to accomplish the objectives of our compensation programs. Please see the Grants of Plan Based awards table and the accompanying narrative disclosures set forth in this proxy statement for more information regarding the grants of equity plan-based awards to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2015.

For the equity-based and other long-term incentives, the table below summarizes the allocation of equity-based awards granted for fiscal year 2016 to each of our Named Executive Officers among performance based restricted stock units (“RSUs”), time-based RSUs and market performance units (“MPUs”) and the grant date values for each type of award:


	Performance Restricted Stock Units					Time Based Restricted Stock Units					Market Performance Units
	% of Long-Term Equity Based Incentives at Target			Grant-date value at Target(1)		% of Long-Term Equity Based Incentives at Target			Grant-date value at Target(1)		% of Long-Term Equity Based Incentives at Target			Grant-date value at Target(2)
Marc Eisenberg		36	%	$	250,000		36	%	$	250,000		28	%	$	202,500
Robert Costantini		26	%	$	75,000		26	%	$	75,000		48	%	$	139,500
John Stolte		26	%	$	62,500		26	%	$	62,500		48	%	$	116,100
Christian Le Brun		27	%	$	62,500		27	%	$	62,500		46	%	$	110,250
Craig Malone		25	%	$	50,000		25	%	$	50,000		50	%	$	101,250

(1)	The amounts set forth in the “Grant-date value at Target” column for time-based and performance-based RSUs represent the market value of the common stock underlying the RSUs on the date of grant.

(2)	The amounts set forth in the “Grant-date value at Target” column for the MPUs represent the dollar value of the award assuming the stock price achieves the applicable target stock price level for each year in the three-year performance period 2016-2018.

We have not timed grants of equity-based awards in coordination with the release of non-public information nor have we timed the release of non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.

Under the 2006 LTIP, the Compensation Committee has the ability to provide a number of equity-based awards, including RSUs, SARs, stock options, common stock, restricted stock, MPUs and performance shares to promote our long-term growth and profitability. Since 2012, our equity based incentives have been a mix of RSUs, SARs and MPUs. This combination of equity-based incentives is intended to benefit stockholders by enabling us to better attract and retain top talent in a marketplace where such incentives are prevalent. We believe that SARs, RSUs and MPUs provide effective vehicles for promoting a long-term share ownership perspective for our senior management and employees and closely align the interests of senior management and employees with our achievement of longer-term financial objectives that enhance stockholder value, while at the same time limiting the dilutive effects of granting stock options. Our stock compensation plan is the principal method by which our executive officers acquire equity or equity-based interests in us. Beginning with grants of equity awards for fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee determined to eliminate new grants of SAR awards and to award an equal number of time-based and performance-based RSU awards.

2015 SAR Grants. A stock appreciation right, or SAR, is the right to receive a payment measured by the increase in the fair market value of a specified number of shares of our common stock from the date of grant of the SAR to the date on which the participant exercises the SAR. Upon the exercise of a SAR, we will deliver the amount of any such increase in cash, shares of our common stock valued at fair market value on the date of exercise or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, as the Compensation Committee may determine. Vested and unvested SARs granted to certain of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, are subject to forfeiture in the event such employees breach the non-competition and/or non-solicitation covenants set forth in their award agreements and unvested SARs are subject to cancellation if, prior to vesting, such employees ceased to be employed by us for any reason.

On December 17, 2014, the Compensation Committee granted the following amount of time-based SARs for fiscal year 2015 to our Named Executive Officers: Mr. Eisenberg — 75,000; Mr. Costantini — 27,000; Messrs. Stolte and Le Brun — 23,000 each; and Mr. Malone —18,000. These time-based SARs vested on January 1, 2016 and have a base price of $6.60 per share, the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

2015 Performance-based RSU grants. A restricted stock unit, or RSU, is a contractual right to receive at a specified future vesting date an amount in respect of each RSU based on the fair market value on such date of one share of our common stock, subject to such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may establish. RSUs that become payable in accordance with their terms and conditions will be settled in cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and our common stock, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may provide for the accumulation of dividend equivalents in cash, with or without interest, or the reinvestment of dividend equivalents in our common stock held subject to the same conditions as the RSU and such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may determine. No participant who holds RSUs will have any ownership interest in the shares of common stock to which such RSUs relate until and unless payment with respect to such RSUs is actually made in shares of common stock. Vested and unvested RSUs awarded to certain of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, will be subject to forfeiture in the event such employees breach their non-competition and/or non-solicitation covenants set forth in their award agreements and unvested RSUs are subject to cancellation if, prior to vesting, such employees ceased to be employed by us for any reason.

On December 17, 2014, the Compensation Committee granted performance-based RSUs under the 2006 LTIP relating to 2015 operational and financial performance targets that we believe are important to our long-term success. Each of the fiscal 2015 performance target components and the percentages for each component with respect to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone are the same as those for their 2015 annual cash bonuses described above under “ — Annual Cash Bonus”. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with management, linked target performance levels to these measures, as we believe that each of them is an important factor in our revenue growth and for sustaining our business model. The Compensation Committee granted the following amounts of performance-based RSUs to our Named Executive Officers: (i) Mr. Eisenberg — 38,000; (ii) Mr. Costantini — 9,000; (iii) each of Messrs. Stolte and Le Brun — 7,000; and (iv) Mr. Malone — 6,000.

On February 16, 2016, our Compensation Committee determined that performance-based RSU awards granted to the Named Executive Officers on December 17, 2014 vested based on achievement of the applicable target levels described above under “2015 Operational and Financial Targets and Results”, as set forth below:


2015 Performance targets	Marc Eisenberg		Robert Costantini		John Stolte		Christian Le Brun		Craig Malone
Fiscal 2015 Adjusted EBITDA		19,000		4,500		3,500		3,500		3,000
Consolidated revenues		—		—		—		—		—
Direct channel revenues		1,425		338		—		—		300
Net subscriber additions		1,425		338		—		—		300
Other operational targets(1)		2,850		674		1,050		525		300
Discretionary		3,800		900		700		700		600

		28,500		6,750		5,250		4,725		4,500

On December 15, 2015, the Compensation Committee granted performance-based RSUs under the 2006 LTIP relating to 2016 operational and financial performance targets that we believe are important to our long-term success. Each of the fiscal 2016 performance target components and the percentages for each component with respect to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone are the same as those for their 2016 annual cash bonuses described above under “ — Annual Cash Bonus”. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with management, linked target performance levels to these measures, as we believe that each of them is an important factor in our revenue growth and for sustaining our business model. The Compensation Committee granted the following awards of performance-based RSUs to our Named Executive Officers:

(i) Mr. Eisenberg — 36,873; (ii) Mr. Costantini —11,061; (iii) each of Messrs. Stolte and Le Brun — 9,218; and (iv) Mr. Malone — 7,374. The 2016 performance-based RSUs vest in 2017 dependent upon achieving financial and operational performance targets for 2016.

We believe that the vesting periods in connection with these performance-based RSU awards are appropriate because they allow the Compensation Committee to formulate performance targets annually that are aligned with our dynamic business plans and external factors.

MPU Grants. A market performance unit, or MPU is a long-term equity-based award denominated in dollars representing up to 45% of the grantee’s base salary, which vests based on achieving stock price targets over a specified three-year performance period. One-third of the MPUs will vest at the end of each one-year performance period if the Company meets the specified stock price target. The value of the MPUs that will be earned each year ranges from 7.5% to 15% of each of the Named Executive Officers’ base salary for the year in which the MPUs were granted depending on the Company’s stock price performance for that year above the specified minimum target price. Under the terms of the MPUs, the annual stock price is calculated by using the average daily closing price of the Company’s common stock for 20 trading days preceding December 31 of the relevant fiscal year. The payout amounts for the MPUs may be paid in cash, stock or a combination of both as determined by the Compensation Committee. If paid in common stock, the payout amount will be calculated based upon the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the payout date. Payment whether paid in cash, common stock or a combination of both must be paid by March 15th of the calendar year immediately following the year in which each performance period ends. If the stock price at the end of each annual year is below the minimum stock price the payout amounts will be zero. If the stock price meets the minimum stock price for each year, the payout amount will be equal to 7.5% of the grantee’s base salary for the year in which the MPUs were granted. If the stock price falls between the minimum and target stock price for each year, the payout amounts will be interpolated on a straight-line basis between the minimum and target stock price.

MPUs 2013-2015 Performance Cycle. On December 13, 2012, the Compensation Committee granted MPUs to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte and Le Brun for the three-year performance period which ended on December 31, 2015 (the “2013 – 2015 MPUs”). On January 1, 2014, the first third of the 2013-2015 MPUs vested based on the stock price performance for 2013 exceeding the specified target price of $5.00 per share. The payout amounts for Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte and Le Brun were 15% of their respective 2013 base salaries ($63,750, $44,226, $36,855 and $31,403, respectively) and were paid in 10,055 shares, 6,976 shares, 5,813 shares and 4,953 shares of common stock, respectively, based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2013 of $6.34 per share. On January 1, 2015, the second third of the 2013-2015 MPUs vested based on the stock price performance for 2014 exceeding the specified target price of $6.00 per share. The payout amounts for Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte and Le Brun were 15% of their respective 2013 base salaries and were paid in 9,748 shares, 6,762 shares, 5,635 shares and 4,802 shares of common stock, respectively, based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2014 of $6.54 per share. On January 1, 2016, the final third of the 2013-2015 MPUs vested based on the stock price performance for 2015 exceeding the specified target price of $7.00 per share. The payout amounts for Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte and Le Brun were 15% of their respective 2013 base salaries and were paid solely in cash: Mr. Eisenberg — $63,750; Mr. Costantini — $44,226; Mr. Stolte — $36,855; and Mr. Le Brun — $31,403.

MPUs 2014-2016 Performance Cycle. On December 12, 2013, the Compensation Committee granted MPUs to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone for the three-year performance period which ends on December 31, 2016 (the “2014-2016 MPUs”). On January 1, 2015, the first third of the 2014-2016 MPUs partially vested based on the stock price performance for 2014 exceeding the specified minimum target price of $5.00 per share but not exceeding the target stock price. The payout amounts for Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone were 13% of their respective 2014 base salaries ($56,063, $38,821, $32,341, $28,374 and $29,250, respectively) and were paid in 8,456 shares, 5,866 shares, 4,889 shares, 4,165 shares and 4,477 shares of common stock, respectively, based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2014 of $6.54 per share. On January 1, 2016, the second third of the 2014-2016 MPUs partially vested based on the stock price performance for 2015 exceeding the specified minimum target price of $5.50 per share. The payout

amounts for Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone were 11% of their respective 2014 base salaries and were paid solely in cash: Mr. Eisenberg — $48,131; Mr. Costantini — $33,391; Mr. Stolte — $27,826; Mr. Le Brun — $23,709; and Mr. Malone — $25,481.

MPUs 2015-2017 Performance Cycle. On December 17, 2014, the Compensation Committee granted MPUs to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone for the three-year performance period which ends on December 31, 2017 (the “2015-2017 MPUs”). On January 1, 2016, the first third of the 2015-2017 MPUs vested based on the stock price performance for 2015 exceeding the specified target price of $7.00 per share. The payout amounts for Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone were 15% of their respective 2015 base salaries and were paid solely in cash: Mr. Eisenberg — $67,500; Mr. Costantini — $46,500; Mr. Stolte — $38,700; Mr. Le Brun — $36,750; and Mr. Malone — $33,750.

MPUs 2016-2018 Performance Cycle. On December 15, 2015, the Compensation Committee granted MPUs to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone for the three-year performance period which ends on December 31, 2018.

2015 Time-based RSU grants. On December 15, 2015, the Compensation Committee granted the following amount of time-based RSUs to our Named Executive Officers: Mr. Eisenberg — 36,873; Mr. Costantini — 11,062; Messrs. Stolte and Le Brun — 9,218 each; and Mr. Malone —7,374. These time-based RSUs vest on January 1, 2017.

We believe that the vesting periods in connection with these time-based RSU awards are appropriate because they are intended to help retain employees, including executives, by rewarding them for continued service with us.

Health and Welfare Benefits

Our Named Executive Officers participate in a variety of retirement, health and welfare, and vacation benefits designed to enable us to attract and retain our workforce in a competitive marketplace. Health and welfare and vacation benefits help ensure that we have a productive and focused workforce through reliable and competitive health and other benefits. Generally these programs are the same offered to all employees.

Perquisites

Our Named Executive Officers are provided a limited number of perquisites whose primary purpose is to minimize distractions from the executives’ attention to the Company’s business.

The principal perquisites offered to our Named Executive Officers are car allowances and life insurance premiums. Please see the Summary Compensation Table and accompanying narrative disclosures set forth in this proxy statement for more information on perquisites and other personal benefits we provide to our Named Executive Officers.

401(k) Plan

We maintain a 401(k) retirement plan intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The plan is a defined contribution plan that covers all our employees who have been employed for three months or longer, beginning on the date of employment. Employees may contribute up to 15% of their eligible compensation (subject to certain limits) as pretax, salary deferral contributions. In addition, the plan contains a discretionary contribution component pursuant to which we may make an additional annual contribution. Contributions made by us vest over a five-year period from the employee’s date of employment. We match the amount contributed by each employee up to 3% of the employee’s salary.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

Severance and change in control benefits are designed to facilitate our ability to attract and retain executives as we compete for talented employees in a marketplace where such protections are commonly offered. The

severance and change in control benefits found in the Named Executive Officers’ employment agreements are designed to encourage employees to remain focused on our business in the event of rumored or actual fundamental corporate changes.

Severance Benefits. Our employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers provide that upon an involuntary termination of employment will pay to the terminated Named Executive Officer cash severance and other benefits in an amount consistent with competitive practice. These benefits include continued base salary payments for a period of one year for all of the Named Executive Officers (except for Mr. Malone), and in certain instances health insurance coverage (typically for a one-year or shorter period). Severance benefits are intended to ease the financial consequences to a Named Executive Officer due to an unplanned termination of employment. We benefit by requiring a general release from a separated Named Executive Officer employees. In addition, we have included post-termination non-compete and non-solicitation covenants in certain individual employment agreements.

Change in Control Benefits. Our employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers provide for change of control benefits of continued base salary payments for a period of eighteen months for all of the Named Executive Officers (except for Mr. Malone), and in certain instances health insurance coverage, health care coverage (typically for an 18 month or shorter period). Under the 2006 LTIP and the award agreements under those plans, our stock options, RSUs, SARs and MPUs generally vest upon a change of control with a specified minimum price threshold, whether or not time vesting requirements or performance targets have been achieved. Under the employment arrangements with our Named Executive Officers, other change of control benefits generally require a change of control, followed by a termination of or change in an executive’s employment, a so-called “double” trigger mechanism. In adopting the so-called “single” trigger treatment for equity-based awards, we were guided by a number of principles: being consistent with current market practice among communications company peers; and keeping employees relatively whole for a reasonable period but avoid creating a “windfall”. Single trigger vesting ensures that ongoing employees are treated the same as terminated employees with respect to outstanding equity-based grants. Single trigger vesting provides employees with the same opportunities as stockholders, who are free to sell their equity at the time of the change in control event and thereby realize the value created at the time of the change of control transaction. Single trigger vesting on performance-based equity awards, in particular, is appropriate given the difficulty of replicating the underlying performance goals.

Under the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan, which is being proposed for shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting, unless otherwise provided in the award agreement, (i) unvested awards that are assumed or otherwise replaced in the change of control transaction with an award that is substantially comparable will include a “double” trigger vesting, requiring a termination of employment without cause or for good reason within two years after a change of control and (ii) unvested awards that are not assumed or replaced with substantially comparable awards will have a “single” trigger vesting, which will fully vest the award upon the change of control. Any awards subject to performance goals will be vested as if the performance goal had been achieved at target (regardless of actual performance) and prorated to reflect the portion of the performance period elapsed as of the vesting date. A change of control is defined under the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan as an event that would be considered a “change in control” under Section 409A of the Code and no longer includes the minimum price threshold that applies under the 2006 LTIP. See “Proposal to Approve the Adoption of the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan (Proposal 3)”.

While we believe the “double” trigger vesting of equity-based awards may be more appropriate where the expected benefits of the unvested equity-based awards are preserved for employees following the change of control transaction, we continue to believe that “single” trigger vesting of equity-based awards is still appropriate under certain circumstances for the reasons described above.

Clawback Policy

The Company has adopted an Executive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy, or clawback policy, applicable to incentive compensation (i.e., cash bonus or equity based awards based on achievement of a performance metric) that are subsequently the subject of certain material restatements of financial statements,

and incentive compensation based on materially inaccurate financial or performance measurements. The clawback policy is applicable to all executive officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, including the Named Executive Officers. The clawback policy extends to incentive compensation awarded within three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date on which a material restatement is required or within three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date on which the Compensation Committee determines that incentive compensation based on materially inaccurate financial or performance measurements has been awarded or paid. Employees covered under the clawback policy shall also be subject to any additional “clawback” or recoupment requirements required by applicable law, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Tax and Accounting Implications

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code limits our tax deductions relating to the compensation paid to Named Executive Officers, unless the compensation is performance-based, the material terms of the applicable performance goals are disclosed to and approved by our stockholders and the other requirements of Section 162(m) are also satisfied. Our 2006 LTIP has received stockholder approval and, to the extent applicable, was prepared with the intention that our incentive compensation may qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Similarly, the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan has been prepared with the intention that incentive compensation under the plan may qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) and the material terms of the applicable performance goals have been disclosed to shareholders and are proposed for shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting. See “Proposal to Approve the Adoption of the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan (Proposal 3)”. However, under both the 2016 LTIP and the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan, we reserve the right to forego deductibility at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and pay performance based compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m). While we intend to continue to rely on performance-based compensation programs, we recognize the need for flexibility in making executive compensation decisions, based on the relevant facts and circumstances, so that we achieve our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. To the extent consistent with this goal and to help us manage our compensation costs, we generally attempt to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) with respect to those elements of our compensation programs that are performance-based, subject to our right to forego the deductibility at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Certain Awards Deferring or Accelerating the Receipt of Compensation

Section 409A of the Code, imposes requirements applicable to “nonqualified deferred compensation plans”. If a nonqualified deferred compensation plan subject to Section 409A fails to meet, or is not operated in accordance with, these new requirements, then all compensation deferred under the plan may become immediately taxable. We intend that awards granted under the 2006 LTIP will comply with the requirements of Section 409A and intend to administer and interpret the 2006 LTIP in such a manner. Similarly, we intend that awards granted under the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan, if approved by shareholders at the Annual Meeting, will comply with the requirements of Section 409A and intend to administer and interpret the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan in such a manner. See “Proposal to Approve the Adoption of the 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan (Proposal 3)”.

Role of Executives and Others in Establishing Compensation

During 2015 our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Eisenberg, reviewed the performance of the Named Executive Officers (other than his own, which was reviewed by the Compensation Committee), and met on a case-by-case basis with each of the other Named Executive Officers to discuss proposed salary adjustments and annual award amounts, which were then presented to the Compensation Committee for approval. The Compensation Committee can exercise discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards to executives. Mr. Eisenberg in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, attended meetings of the Compensation Committee in 2015.

Hedging Policy

As part of its insider trading policy, the Company has a adopted a prohibition on directors, officers and employees of the Company (i) trading in derivative securities of the Company, unless specifically approved in advance in writing by the Company, and (ii) any short selling of the Company’s stock. Although the Company does not have a specific policy on directors and executive officers pledging shares of stock, under the Company’s insider trading policy, any transaction involving Company stock by a director or an executive officer, including pledges of shares, must be pre-cleared in advance by the Company. There are currently no outstanding pledges of our stock by any of our directors or executive officers.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Compensation Committee

John Major, Chairman

Timothy Kelleher

Gary Ritondaro

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary $		Bonus $(1)		Stock Awards $(2)		Option Awards $(3)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation $(4)		All other Compensation $(5)		Total $
Marc Eisenberg		2015	$	450,000	$	45,000	$	612,498	$	—	$	502,727	$	25,740	$	1,635,965
Chief Executive Officer		2014		431,250		43,124		345,300		294,750		447,486		24,252		1,586,162
		2013		425,000		42,500		203,400		219,600		357,000		23,970		1,271,470

Robert Costantini		2015		310,000		29,440		227,494		—		330,541		16,846		914,321
Executive Vice President		2014		298,630		28,359		124,500		106,110		297,780		19,452		874,831
and Chief Financial		2013		294,840		28,000		112,266		98,820		238,000		19,170		791,096
Officer

John J. Stolte, Jr.		2015		258,000		17,954		189,496		—		180,131		8,825		654,406
Executive Vice		2014		248,775		17,212		100,380		90,390		164,420		9,293		630,470
President-Technology		2013		245,700		—		90,580		84,180		133,875		9,570		563,905
and Operations

Christian G. Le Brun		2015		245,000		17,554		186,246		—		158,133		9,100		616,033
Executive Vice President		2014		218,264		15,638		97,650		90,390		149,384		8,370		579,696
and General Counsel		2013		209,352		15,000		83,310		84,180		123,750		8,182		523,774

Craig Malone		2015		225,000		13,776		156,248		—		137,582		8,521		541,127
Executive Vice President		2014		225,000		13,776		86,850		70,740		126,420		8,802		531,588
Product Development		2013		218,550		50,000		56,520		81,000		—		7,789		413,859

(1)	The amounts set forth in the “Bonus” column represent cash amounts of the discretionary portions of the 2015, 2014 and 2013 performance-based annual incentive awards which were paid following the Compensation Committee’s determination of the final amounts earned by the Named Executive Officers.

(2)

The amounts set forth in the “Stock Awards” column for 2015, 2014 and 2013 represent the aggregate grant date fair values of performance-based RSU awards and MPU awards to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. For performance-based RSU awards such amounts are based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. For MPU awards such amounts are based on the share price as of the year-end date. For the MPUs such amounts are based on the vesting of 100% of the MPUs awarded based on achieving the target stock price level. For a discussion of the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of an RSU award and an MPU award shown in the “Stock Awards” column, see Note 4 in our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives” for a further discussion regarding RSU and MPU awards in 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year-End Table for a further discussion regarding outstanding RSU and MPU awards.

(3)

The amounts set forth in the “Options Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair values of time-based SAR awards to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation— Stock Compensation. For a discussion of the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the SAR awards shown in the “Options Awards” column, see Note 4 in our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives” for a further discussion regarding SAR awards in 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year-End Table for a further discussion regarding outstanding SAR awards.

(4)

The amounts set forth in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column represent the annual incentive bonus paid to Messrs. Eisenberg, Costantini, Stolte, Le Brun and Malone under the terms of their respective employment arrangements. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives” and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for a further discussion regarding the 2015 annual incentive payments.

(5)	The amounts set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column are comprised of the following for each Named Executive Officer:

Marc Eisenberg: