gia_10k.htm


UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x        ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
          
o        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   
For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number: 001-33884
 
  GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.  
  (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  
 
Delaware
 
20-3973956
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)

3201 Griffin Road, 4th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(954) 985-1500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
     
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock of $0.01 par value per share
     
NYSE Amex Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
________________
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  ¨    No  þ
 
        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes  ¨    No  þ
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ      No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨    No  þ
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  Yes  ¨    No  þ
 
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o Smaller reporting company  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ¨     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $6,244,756 as of June 30, 2009.

As of March 31, 2010, 3,795,061 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.



 

 
 
GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

2009 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
Page
 
PART I
       
         
Item 1.
Business.
    4  
Item 1A.
Risk Factors. 
    14  
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments. 
    28  
Item 2.
Properties.  
    28  
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
    29  
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
    29  
           
PART II
         
           
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.  
    30  
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
    33  
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
    36  
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
    47  
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
    49  
Item 9.
Changes and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. 
    74  
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures.
    74  
Item 9B.
Other Information.
    75  
           
PART III
         
           
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
    76  
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
    79  
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
    91  
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
    93  
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
    95  
           
PART IV
         
           
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
    97  
 
Signatures
    102  
 

 
2

 
 
PART I

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Our representatives and we may from time to time make written or oral statements that are "forward-looking," including statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, reports to our stockholders and news releases. All statements that express expectations, estimates, forecasts or projections are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. In addition, other written or oral statements which constitute forward-looking statements may be made by us or on our behalf. Words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "projects," "forecasts," "may," "should," variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. These risks may relate to, without limitation:

· 
our business strategy;

● 
our value proposition;

● 
the market opportunity for our services, including expected demand for our services;

● 
information regarding the replacement, deployment, acquisition and financing of certain numbers and types of aircraft, and projected expenses associated therewith;
 
● 
costs of compliance with FAA regulations, Department of Homeland Security regulations and other rules and acts of Congress;
 
● 
the ability to pass taxes, fuel costs, inflation, and various expense to our customers;
 
● 
certain projected financial obligations;
 
● 
our estimates regarding our capital requirements;
 
 ● 
any of our other plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this report that are not historical facts;
 
● 
changing external competitive, business, budgeting, fuel supply, weather or economic conditions;
 
● 
changes in our relationships with employees or code share partners;

● 
availability and cost of funds for financing new aircraft and our ability to profitably manage our existing fleet;

● 
adverse reaction and publicity that might result from any accidents;

● 
the impact of current or future laws and government investigations and regulations affecting the airline industry and our operations;

● 
additional terrorist attacks; and

● 
consumer unwillingness to incur greater costs for flights.

Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in or suggested by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should carefully review the factors described herein and in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and any Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by us.


 
3

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Overview of Our Business

Gulfstream International Group, Inc. is a holding company that operates two independent subsidiaries: Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. (“Gulfstream” or “the Airline”) and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. (the “Academy”). References to “Company” “we,” “our,” and “us,” refer to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and either or both of Gulfstream or the Academy.

Gulfstream is a commercial airline currently operating 147 scheduled flights per day, serving nine destinations in Florida, ten destinations in the Bahamas, and five destinations from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub under the Department of Transportation’s Essential Air Service Program. Our fleet consists of 23 B1900D, 19-seat, turbo-prop aircraft. Operating from our headquarters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Gulfstream was the sixteenth largest regional airline group in the U.S. in 2008 in terms of number of passengers flown, according to the Regional Airline Association. We operate under a principal code share and alliance agreement with Continental Airlines. We are also party to code share agreements with United and Copa Airlines of Panama. In addition to the daily scheduled flights, Gulfstream also offers frequent charter flights within our geographic operating region, including licensed flights to Cuba.

The Academy provides flight training services to fully-licensed commercial pilots. The Academy’s principal program is our First Officer Program, which allows participants to obtain a Second-In-Command type rating in approximately four months. Following receipt of this rating, pilots fly between 250 and 400 hours performing first officer duties at Gulfstream. By attending the Academy, pilots are able to enhance their ability to secure a permanent position with a commercial airline. The Academy’s graduates are typically hired by various regional airlines, including Gulfstream. In 2009 and 2008, 42 and 59 pilots, respectively, entered the First Officer Program.

History

Our business was started by Thomas L. Cooper with the formation of Gulfstream in 1988. Gulfstream began as an airline offering on-demand charter service utilizing nine-passenger, piston-powered aircraft. In 1990, we initiated scheduled commercial service by offering flights from Miami to several locations in the Bahamas. In 1994, after introducing turbo-prop aircraft, we signed our first code share agreement with United Airlines and expanded our routes in both Florida and the Bahamas. Since 1994, we have signed a series of code share agreements with our current code share partners.

Gulfstream first entered into a code share and alliance agreement with Continental, our principal alliance partner, in 1997. Gulfstream and Continental have amended the agreement on several occasions, most recently in March of 2006, which amendment included an extension of the term to 2012. Prior to our acquisition of Gulfstream, Continental assisted Gulfstream from time to time with financial transactions and aircraft acquisitions, and today holds a warrant to purchase 10% of Gulfstream’s outstanding shares.

In December 2005, Gulfstream International Group, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware by a group of investors as Gulfstream Acquisition Group, Inc., and changed its name to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. on June 13, 2007. We were formed to acquire Gulfstream and the Academy. In March 2006, we acquired approximately 89% of G-Air Holdings Corp., Inc. (“G-Air”), which owned approximately 95% of Gulfstream at that time, and 100% of the Academy, which held the remaining 5% of Gulfstream. Subsequently, we acquired the remaining 11% of G-Air. Following these transactions, we are the sole owner of Gulfstream and the Academy, subject to Continental’s warrant to purchase 10% of the outstanding shares of Gulfstream’s common stock.

Our Competitive Strengths

· Long-standing code share agreements with multiple major airlines. Gulfstream has code share agreements with Continental and United. We have been a partner with each of these airlines for more than five years. Recently, our code share agreement with Continental was extended through 2012. We believe that utilizing such agreements enhances our ability to generate revenue from both local and connecting traffic. We also believe that through our alliances, we are able to control costs by contracting for reservations, ground handling and other services at lower costs. In addition, these code share relationships allow us to offer our passengers easy booking through reservation systems maintained by our code share partners and the benefits of associated frequent flier programs.
 
 
4

 
 
·  Well positioned in the Bahamas market. We are a leading carrier to the Bahamas and serve more destinations in the Bahamas than any other U.S. airline. We maintain our own facilities and employees at all ten of our destinations in the Bahamas and we enjoy a close cooperative relationship with Bahamian business and tourism officials. We believe that our focus on the Bahamian market allows us to identify new market opportunities and develop those opportunities more efficiently than new market entrants.

·  Diverse route network and utilization of small aircraft. We have connecting hubs in several key Florida cities, daily charter flights to Cuba, and flights from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub to five smaller cities in Pennsylvania, New York, and West Virginia. This network enables us to establish multiple flight crew and maintenance bases that reduce overall operating costs and enhance operational reliability. The size and scale of this operation create practical barriers to entry for new entrants and increases our ability to shift capacity according to seasonal and business-versus-leisure demand patterns. Additionally, the relatively small size and efficiency of our turboprop aircraft combine to produce trip costs that are substantially lower than operators flying larger and more expensive jet aircraft.

·  We offer reliable, quality service. We have been consistently among the highest-ranked regional airlines in the country in terms of reliability. For 2009, our on-time performance was 79.5%, compared to the 79.6% average on-time performance reported by the Department of Transportation for all reporting airlines. Gulfstream has received the FAA Diamond Award, the highest level of recognition for maintenance training, for 13 consecutive years, including 2009.

·  The Academy has a unique first officer program. We believe the Academy has established a strong reputation for quality instruction. We offer our students the opportunity to accumulate flight hours with an airline regulated under Part 121 of the FAA regulations, sometimes referred to as Part 121 flight hours. Many airlines require pilot applicants to have a certain number of Part 121 flight hours or equivalent experience and so our students enhance their hiring prospects with regional airlines through our first officer program. In addition, the Academy provides Gulfstream with a reliable and cost-effective source of first officers and pilots.

Our Strategy

Our business strategy is to utilize small-capacity aircraft to target markets that are unserved or underserved by competing airlines. Small capacity aircraft allow for lower costs per flight, and enable us to operate profitably with fewer passengers per flight than airlines operating larger equipment.

·  Utilize turboprop aircraft to selectively expand the number of markets we serve. We use 19-passenger turboprop aircraft. Turboprop aircraft offer substantially lower acquisition costs than regional jet aircraft and, in addition, tend to be more fuel efficient than other aircraft. We believe this allows us to provide service on short, lower volume routes and achieve attractive margins, in contrast to airlines that have focused their fleets on larger regional jet aircraft, increasingly in the 70- to 90-seat category. The efficiencies associated with turboprop aircraft are more pronounced on short haul routes such as ours. Additionally, turboprop aircraft have the ability to operate out of airports with runways that are too short for certain regional jets.

We are actively seeking opportunities to grow by adding new routes, aircraft and alliance partners,. We look for unserved or underserved short haul city pairs that have a high degree of potential for long-term profitability. These opportunities will likely include operating in new geographic areas outside our current Florida base. For example, in October 2008 we added flights from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub to five small cities in Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia under the Department of Transportation’s Essential Air Service program. We have held discussions with various parties concerning new code share arrangements and additional turboprop aircraft. Any potential transaction involving a new code share partner would require Continental’s prior consent. There is no assurance that we will be able to reach acceptable terms with regard to any potential transaction and if we are able to do so, that Continental would consent to such a transaction.

·  Use of alliance and code share agreements. Utilizing our alliance and code share agreements enhances our ability to generate revenue for both local and connecting traffic. By having multiple code share partners, we are able to increase our revenue per flight by accessing several sources of connecting passengers relative to what would be available within a single code share partnership arrangement. This is particularly true given that our main connecting airports are not hubs for any of our code share partners. These agreements also provide the opportunity to contract for services at lower costs, as well as to gain access to airport and other facilities, relative to what we would be able to do independently.

Further, we believe that by providing high quality service under our code share partnerships with multiple airlines in existing markets, our opportunities for expanding the scope of our relationship with those carriers may be greater.
 
 
5

 
 
·  Increase enrollment at the Academy. We seek to increase enrollment at the Academy through implementation of various marketing initiatives. We believe we can enhance enrollment by increasing cooperation with other regional airlines and primary flight training centers in order to produce higher levels of applicant referrals. We also encourage enrollment by developing closer integration with accredited higher education institutions offering two- and four-year degrees. Additionally, we seek to attract prospective First Officer candidates from different sources by offering training services to other regional air carriers operating similar aircraft types. We also continuously seek to assist prospective candidates in obtaining tuition financing from third party sources.

Gulfstream International Airlines

Markets Served

Gulfstream serves a number of short distance, low volume routes in Florida and the Bahamas, and offers flights from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub to five small cities in Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia. We offer more Bahamian destinations with more scheduled daily flights than any other U.S. carrier. Further, Gulfstream is the sole provider of scheduled service on a number of our routes. Gulfstream’s current route maps are depicted below.


 
 
6

 
 

 
As of December 31, 2009, we provided non-stop service in 31 city pairs. We believe that we are the highest-frequency service provider in 26 of these 31 city pairs. We tailor our flight schedules to individual market demands in order to optimize both profitability and the number of connecting passengers to and from our code share partners. In 2009, our average fare was $144 and our average flight length was 216 miles.

All of our flights are marketed as Continental. In addition, certain flights are also marketed through our other code share partners. We estimate that over 65% of our passengers are derived from local “point to point” traffic within Florida and the Bahamas. The balance of our passengers are derived from connecting traffic from our code-share partners and other carriers destined primarily for the Bahamas. Continental is our largest connecting partner, with 24% of our passengers connecting to and from Continental flights.

Gulfstream currently leases an average of one Boeing 737-400 daily round trip   under charter agreements associated with our Cuba operations and two to three daily round trip flights to Andros Island under an agreement with a government subcontractor. In addition, Gulfstream operates on-demand charters for various customers throughout the year.

Code Share Agreements

Continental Code Share Agreement

Our primary alliance partner is Continental. Pursuant to an amended and restated alliance agreement with Continental dated March 14, 2006, which we refer to as the Continental code share agreement, Gulfstream displays the Continental “CO” designator code on all of our flights marketed to the public. Our customers may participate in Continental’s One Pass frequent flyer program.

Under this agreement, we pay Continental for various services, including ticketing, reservations, revenue accounting, and various levels of airport services. We also incur fees for computerized reservation system transactions and participation in Continental’s frequent flyer program.
 
 
7

 
 
Gulfstream receives all of the revenue generated by “local,” or non-connecting, passengers flown, and a portion of the total revenue from passengers connecting to or from Continental. Continental sets all prices for connecting markets, and Gulfstream sets prices for our local markets. Approximately 24% of our passengers are from connecting Continental flights.

The term of this agreement will continue through at least May 3, 2012, unless earlier terminated for cause. Cause is defined to include:
 
    ·   
breach of any material provision of the agreement that is not cured within a 60-day period;
    ·   
suspension or revocation of our authority to operate as an airline, either in whole or with respect to the CO-designated flights;
    ·   
citation by any government authority for significant noncompliance with any material marketing or operation law, rule or regulation with respect to a CO-designated flight;
    ·   
the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or against us;
    ·   
our failure to maintain required insurance coverage;
    ·   
our failure to maintain any of our aircraft in an airworthy condition;
    ·   
our failure to conduct operations in accordance with standards, rules and regulations promulgated by any government authority; or
    ·   
except as otherwise agreed by us and Continental, a completion factor by us of less than 95% during any 21 day period or 50% during any three day period with respect to Continental flights operated by us (including in such calculations all flights canceled less than one week prior to the date of its scheduled operation and excluding flights not completed due to weather or ATC).

In addition, Continental may terminate the agreement immediately if there is a change of control, as defined in the agreement, of Gulfstream without Continental’s prior written consent.

Continental has not executed its right to appoint an individual to Gulfstream’s board of directors. It also has the right to observe the Company’s board meetings. Continental may also receive our audited financial statements, inspect our books, accounts and records and audit our operational procedures.

Gulfstream and Continental have agreed to indemnify each other for any damages arising out of either party’s acts or omissions related to the agreement. Specifically, Gulfstream has agreed to indemnify Continental for any losses arising from our possession and use of Continental’s tickets, boarding passes and other materials, including, but not limited, to lost or forged tickets.

With certain exceptions, we are required to obtain Continental’s consent to enter into additional airline code share agreements. We have also agreed to limit utilization of the United Airlines designator code to specific numbers of flights and between specific cities.

In addition to our long-term principal alliance with Continental, we have the following code share agreements:

United Airlines Code Share Agreement

We entered into a code share agreement with United in 1994, which has been amended several times, most recently in October of 2006. We provide code share operations with United to and from Tampa, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Tallahassee, Pensacola, Key West, and Freeport, and Marsh Harbor, and North Eleuthera, and Nassau, in the North Bahamas. Approximately 4% of our passengers are from connecting United flights.  The agreement may be cancelled upon 180 days’ written notice, unless either party breaches the agreement, in which case it may be terminated upon shorter notice.

Revenue sharing formulas for proration of revenue are set forth in a separate prorate agreement, which is amended or replaced bi-annually. Our passengers may also participate in the United frequent flyer program.

Northwest Airlines Code Share Agreement

Gulfstream entered into a code share agreement and related prorate agreement, each dated February 11, 2000, with Northwest. On May 15th 2009 Gulfstream and Northwest executed an agreement to terminate its code-share agreement.  Approximately 1% of our passengers were from connecting Northwest flights.

 
8

 

Copa Code Share Agreement

We entered into a code share agreement on July 1, 2005 with Copa Airlines, to permit us to use the “CM” designator code on Gulfstream’s flights from Miami to Orlando, Tampa and Key West. The agreement requires us to provide certain minimal operational standards. Copa Airlines, a Continental alliance partner, handles reservation services for passengers of CM-designated flights, as it would for all other Copa Airlines flights, through the Continental reservation system and provides check-in and ticketing services. We receive a standard prorated amount for each passenger we fly on a CM-designated flight. To date, this has not been a material source of our revenue.

Marketing

Under our code share agreement, Continental provides all reservations and related services for sales and marketing for CO-designated flights. United and Copa Airlines are responsible for reservations of connecting passengers marketed under their respective codes.
 
We are responsible for the scheduling of all of our flights and are also responsible for setting prices and managing revenue for our local passengers. Local passengers are passengers whose itinerary is not constructed using a single fare over multiple flight segments. Our code share partners are responsible for setting prices and managing revenue for our connecting passengers. We retain all of the revenue associated with our local passengers and a portion of the revenue associated with connecting passengers pursuant to revenue sharing agreements with our code share partners.

Flight Equipment

Our fleet currently consists of B1900D aircraft. The average age of our B1900D fleet is 15 years. The B1900D aircraft is a 19-seat, twin engine turbo prop that has a pressurized, stand-up cabin, and cruises at 300 miles per hour. It is ideal for short trips, and its lower operating costs make it much more economical than larger mid-sized aircraft for the frequent, short flights that we operate. We lease 23 B1900Ds under agreements that expire in 2010 and 2011; however, at our option, we can extend 15 of these leases. We also have the option to purchase up to 21 of these aircraft.

In December 2004, we purchased seven EMB-120 aircraft from Atlantic Southeast Airlines. In March of 2007, we purchased an additional EMB-120, which entered into revenue service in December 2007.  These aircraft were operated until September and October 2008, when all eight aircraft were sold.  

We believe that our B1900D aircraft fleet is well suited for the markets we serve. Our turbo-prop aircraft allow us to operate short distance sectors efficiently and achieve break-even revenues at lower levels than larger jet aircraft. This allows us to operate more flights per day and target smaller markets, which we believe provides us with a key advantage at non-hub airports. In addition, by operating only one aircraft type (since October, 2008), we are able to simplify our maintenance training, documentation, parts inventory and achieve lower overall operating costs. The B1900D aircraft are no longer being manufactured and there is a limited supply of used aircraft of this type.

Training and Aircraft Maintenance

Airframe maintenance performed on our aircraft can be divided into two general categories: line maintenance and heavy maintenance. Line maintenance consists of routine, scheduled maintenance checks, including pre-flight, daily and overnight checks, and any diagnostics and routine repairs. Heavy maintenance consists of more complex inspections and overhauls, and servicing of the aircraft. Most of our line maintenance and heavy maintenance is performed by our own highly experienced technicians at our hangar in Fort Lauderdale. Parts and supply inventories are primarily maintained in Fort Lauderdale and, in smaller amounts, at our locations in Miami, Tampa and West Palm Beach in Florida, and Dubois, Pennsylvania. Some line maintenance is also carried out at other locations in Florida by employees or third-party contractors. Maintenance checks are performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the aircraft manufacturer. These checks are based on the number of hours or calendar months flown by each individual aircraft.

We employ over approximately 140 or 24% of our total employees, as maintenance professionals, including engineers, supervisors, technicians and mechanics and their support staff, who perform airframe maintenance in accordance with maintenance programs that are established by the manufacturer and approved and certified by international aviation authorities. Every mechanic is trained in manufacturer-specified procedures and goes through our rigorous in-house training program. Each of our mechanics is licensed by the Federal Aviation Authority (“FAA”). Our safety and maintenance procedures are reviewed and periodically audited by the FAA. We have received the FAA Diamond Award, the highest level of recognition for maintenance training, for 13 consecutive years, including 2009.

 
9

 
 
We have agreements for maintaining our engines, propellers, landing gears and avionics with FAA certified third-party contractors. Our engines are maintained under a long-term agreement with a third party provider, which provides for engine maintenance under a fleet management program.

Pricing and Revenue Management

We believe effective revenue management, particularly during peak periods, contributes to our strong operating performance. We are responsible for setting prices in local markets and our code share partners are responsible for setting prices in connecting markets. We try to maximize the overall revenue of our flights by utilizing certain revenue management policies. Our revenue management systems and procedures enable us to understand markets, anticipate customer demand and respond quickly to revenue enhancement opportunities.

The number of seats offered at each fare is established through a continual process of forecasting and analysis. Generally, past booking history and seasonal trends are used to forecast anticipated demand. These historical forecasts are combined with current bookings, upcoming events, competitive pressures and other factors to establish a mix of fares designed to maximize revenue. This allows us to balance loads and capture more revenue from existing capacity.

Seasonality

Our business is subject to substantial seasonality, primarily due to leisure and holiday travel patterns, particularly in the Bahamas. Traditionally, we experience the strongest demand from February to July, and the weakest demand from August to October, during which period we typically suffer operating losses. As a result, our operating results for a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year, and historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Our results of operations generally reflect this seasonality. Our operating results are also impacted by numerous other cycles and factors that are not necessarily seasonal.

Government Regulation

All interstate air carriers, including Gulfstream, are subject to regulation by the Department of Transportation (“DOT”), the FAA and other governmental agencies. Regulations promulgated by the DOT primarily relate to economic aspects of air service. The FAA requires operating, air worthiness and other certificates and certain record-keeping procedures. FAA approval is required for personnel who engage in flight, maintenance or operating activities and flight training and retraining programs. Generally, governmental agencies enforce their regulations through certifications, which are necessary for the continued operations of Gulfstream, and proceedings, which can result in civil or criminal penalties or revocation of operating authority. The FAA can also issue maintenance directives and other mandatory orders relating to, among other things, grounding of aircraft, inspection of aircraft, installation of new safety-related items and the mandatory removal and replacement of aircraft parts.

We believe Gulfstream is operating in compliance with FAA regulations and holds all necessary operating and airworthiness certificates and licenses. We incur substantial costs in maintaining current certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules and regulations to which Gulfstream is subject. Our flight operations, maintenance programs, record keeping and training programs are conducted under FAA-approved procedures. We do not operate at any airports where the FAA has restricted landing slots.

All air carriers are required to comply with federal laws and regulations pertaining to noise abatement and engine emissions. All air carriers are also subject to certain provisions of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, because of their extensive use of radio and other communication facilities. Gulfstream is also subject to certain other federal and state laws relating to protection of the environment, labor relations and equal employment opportunity. We believe that Gulfstream is in compliance in all material respects with these laws and regulations.

Safety and Security

We are committed to the safety and security of our passengers and employees. Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Gulfstream has taken many steps, both voluntarily and as mandated by governmental agencies, to increase the safety and security of our operations. Some of the safety and security measures we have taken, along with our code share partners, include: establishing a Safety and Security Committee of the Board of Directors, aircraft security and surveillance, positive bag matching procedures and enhanced passenger and baggage screening and search procedures. We are committed to complying with future safety and security requirements.

 
 
10

 
 
Charter Services

Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc. (“GAC”), a related company which is owned by Thomas L. Cooper, operates licensed charter flights between Miami and Havana. GAC is licensed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury as a carrier and travel service provider for charter air transportation between designated U.S. and Cuban airports.

Pursuant to a services agreement between Gulfstream and GAC, Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft and flight crews at the option of GAC, as well as Gulfstream’s name, insurance, and service personnel, including passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative. Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC. Gulfstream receives 75% of the operating profit generated by GAC’s Cuban charter operation.

In June 2006, Gulfstream began charter services under a long-term subcontract with Computer Sciences Corporation to operate daily flights between West Palm Beach and Andros Town, Bahamas. This contract provides for approximately two to three daily round trips and had an initial period of 21 months from inception, with extensions up to an additional 12 years. The latest 3-year extension was signed on April 1, 2008. The contract is structured as a fixed-fee arrangement, with adjustments for market fuel prices. It further specifies performance standards, as well as bonus payments for exceeding those standards. As part of this agreement, Gulfstream leases two B1900D aircraft from Computer Sciences Corporation to support the contract.

In preparation for this operation, Gulfstream obtained certification from the Commercial Airline Review Board of the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”). Having this certification could have the effect of increasing the number of opportunities for Gulfstream to provide additional charter flights to the DOD.

Gulfstream also provides on-demand passenger charter services based on aircraft availability.

The Academy

The Academy offers training programs for pilots holding commercial, multi-engine, and instrument certifications. Pilots with these ratings are qualified to fly commercial aircraft but seek to improve their marketability by accumulating additional training and flying time. The Academy enhances our student’s career prospects by providing them with the training and experience necessary to obtain pilot positions with commercial airlines.

Traditionally, pilots can work as flight instructors for up to two years to gain this additional training and flying time. The Academy offers an alternative to this traditional means of gathering additional flight experience. By enrolling in the Academy, students are able to more quickly accumulate the qualifications demanded by the commercial airlines. A number of U.S. airlines accept Academy graduates with a lower total flight time than these airlines require of other newly hired pilots, reflecting the value they place on the Academy’s training. The Academy graduates have also experienced a high success rate in completing training at airlines, which translates into cost savings for the airlines.

The principal program offered by the Academy is the First Officer Program, which is a comprehensive program designed to prepare pilots for their commercial airline careers. The program entails a “train to proficiency” concept, typically resulting in well over 500 hours of training time, including ground school, simulator time and observation flights. This first portion of the program can be completed in three months. The second portion of the program involves up to 400 hours of FAA Regulation Part 121 commercial airline flight hours as a First Officer at Gulfstream. FAA Regulation Part 121 established operating standards and is the principal operating regulation applicable to all major US airlines. Gulfstream relies on the Academy as its preferred source of pilots, and nearly all of our permanent pilots are graduates of the First Officer Program.

The Academy also provides training services to Gulfstream. While the Academy holds a FAA Part 142 certificate, enabling us to operate a flight training center on behalf of other airlines, we presently do not provide any training services to other airlines.

As of December 31, 2009 the Academy employed five full-time flight and ground instructors. The Academy’s instructors have, on average, been providing training for approximately 12 years each and have cumulatively amassed in excess of 68,000 actual flight hours. The Academy enrolled 59 and 42 students in 2008 and 2009, respectively. The Company estimates that 95% were or will be hired by airlines after graduation, including those hired by Gulfstream.
 
 
11

 
 
The Academy’s training facility in Fort Lauderdale has several ground school classrooms, a series of flight training devices used for procedural training and cockpit familiarization, as well as two non-motion flight simulators, one of which is for B1900D aircraft training. The Academy contracts for full-motion flight simulators at facilities in Orlando, Florida

Ground Operations

In the Bahamas, we lease ticket counters, check-in and boarding and other facilities and Gulfstream’s employees provide substantially all of the operations services.

In Key West, Florida, we lease our facilities and Gulfstream’s employees provide operations services. At all other Florida airports, Gulfstream contracts out all or a portion of our ground operations. From time to time, Gulfstream reviews these arrangements and evaluates the most economical operations structure.

In the markets we serve from Continental’s Cleveland hub, we lease ticket counters, check-in and boarding and other facilities, and Gulfstream’s employees provide substantially all of the operations services. We also lease gate and ramp space in Dubois and Franklin, Pennsylvania, as well as a 20,000 square foot hangar in Dubois.

Insurance

We maintain insurance policies that we believe are of types customary in the industry and in amounts we believe are adequate to protect against material loss. These policies principally provide coverage for public liability, passenger liability, baggage and cargo liability, property damage, including coverage for loss or damage to our flight equipment, and workers’ compensation insurance. We cannot assure, however, that the amount of insurance we carry will be sufficient to protect us from a material loss.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to environmental protection matters. These laws and regulations govern such matters as environmental reporting, storage and disposal of materials and chemicals and aircraft noise. We are, and expect in the future to be, involved in environmental matters and conditions at, or related to, our properties, but we do not expect the resolution of any such matters to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations. We are not currently subject to any material environmental cleanup orders or actions imposed by regulatory authorities. We are not aware of any active material environmental investigations related to our assets or properties.

Raw Materials and Energy

Fuel costs are a major component of our operating expenses. We contract with World Fuel Services to provide approximately half of our fuel, principally for international destinations. Most of our domestic fuel consumption is provided by Continental. The following chart summarizes our fuel consumption and costs:

  
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
  
 
2008
   
2009
 
Gallons consumed, in thousands
   
8,479
     
6,182
 
Total cost, in thousands (1)
 
$
28,452
   
$
12,375
 
Average price per gallon  (2)
 
$
3.36
   
$
2.00
 
Percent of airline revenue (3)
   
29.6
%
   
16.3
%

(1)  Total cost excludes into-plane service fees.
(2)  Average price per gallon excludes into-plane service fees.
(3)  Includes into-plane service fees.
 
 
12

 
 
Fuel costs are extremely volatile, as they are subject to many global economic and geopolitical factors that we can neither control nor accurately predict. Significant increases in fuel costs would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

We purchase bonded fuel for our international flights on a purchase-order basis from World Fuel Services, which are exempt from federal excise taxes. Therefore, our fuel costs may not be directly comparable to costs incurred by other airlines. Gulfstream has, from time to time, implemented limited fuel cost management programs in the form of pre-ordering of specific quantities of fuel at specific locations at then-market rates. These cost management programs have not had a material impact on our financial results.

In the past, we have not experienced difficulties with fuel availability and we currently expect to be able to obtain fuel at prevailing market prices in quantities sufficient to meet our future needs. Pursuant to our contract flying arrangements with our code share partners, we bear the economic risk of fuel price fluctuations.

Gulfstream was a party to derivative instruments for the purpose of hedging the risks of increases in jet fuel prices through February 2009 covering approximately 20% of its estimated fuel usage. These fuel hedge contracts were established effective September 1, 2008 as a requirement of a financing completed at that time.

Gulfstream recognized a loss on settled hedges of $337,000 for 2009.   We are not a party to any derivative or other arrangements designed to hedge against or manage the risk of an increase in fuel prices subsequent to February 2009.

Trademarks and Trade Names

Our flights are operated under the names of our code share partners, including Continental, United Airlines, and Copa Airlines. Because we do not operate scheduled flights under our trade names, we have not registered any Airline trademarks or trade names.

Employee and Labor Relations

As of December 31, 2009, we had 604 full time employees, of which 592 were employed by Gulfstream and 12 were employed by the Academy. Of the 592 employees of Gulfstream, 139 are union employees.

As of December 31, 2009, Gulfstream employed the following:
 
Classification
     
Pilots and First Officers
    139  
Station personnel
    220  
Maintenance personnel
    142  
Administrative and sales personnel
    37  
Management
    8  
Other flight operations
    46  
Total employees
    592  

Gulfstream’s tenured pilots are represented under a collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters Union. A new agreement was ratified by the members in June 2006 and continued through June 2009. The Company is currently negotiating the collective bargaining agreement renewal with the Teamsters Union. Currently, no other employees are represented by unions. We have never experienced a work stoppage and no labor disputes, strikes or labor disturbances are currently pending or threatened against us. We believe we have good relations with our union employees at each of our facilities. During 2009, we reduced the number of Pilots and First Officers by approximately 30 employees as a result of declining demand and the 2008 sale of our eight Embraer aircraft.

As of December 31, 2009, the Academy employed 7 full-time administrative employees and 4 full-time flight and ground instructors. None of our Academy employees are represented by labor unions.

 
13

 
 
ITEM 1A.  Risk FACTORS.

An investment in our common stock is risky. You should carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information contained in this Form 10-K, before investing. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, business prospects, financial condition, cash flow and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In this case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose part or all of your investment.  We may amend or supplement the risk factors described below from time to time by other reports we file with the SEC in the future.
 
Risks Related To Our Industry
 
If the global economic downturn continues or worsens, our revenues and profitability could decline further.

Consumer demand for our products and services is closely linked to the performance of the general economy and is sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels. Declines in consumer demand due to adverse general economic conditions, risks affecting or reducing travel patterns, lower consumer confidence or adverse political conditions can lower our revenues and profitability.  Our business is also linked to cycles in the general economy and consumer discretionary spending. As a result, changes in consumer demand and general business cycles can subject and have subjected our revenues to significant volatility.

Accordingly, the current global economic downturn has led to a significant decline in demand for our services, which has lowered our revenues and negatively affected our profitability. For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, our total revenues decreased by $18.0 million.

We anticipate that recovery of demand for our services will lag an improvement in economic conditions. We cannot predict how severe or prolonged the global economic downturn will be. Furthermore, current global economic conditions have significantly impacted consumer confidence and behavior and, as a result, historical marketing information that we have collected may be less effective as a means of predicting future demand and operating results. We cannot assure you that we will be able to increase our revenues at the same rate at which they have recently declined, even after the current downturn ends. An extended period of economic weakness would likely have a further adverse impact on our revenues, and financial position, and we my be unable to fund continued operations or meet our financial obligations.

The airline industry is unpredictable.

The airline industry has experienced tremendous challenges in recent years and will likely remain volatile for the foreseeable future. Among other factors, the financial challenges faced by major carriers, including Delta Airlines, United Airlines and Northwest Airlines, and increased hostilities in the Middle East and other regions have significantly affected, and are likely to continue to affect, the U.S. airline industry. These conditions have resulted in declines and shifts in passenger demand, increased insurance costs, volatile fuel prices, increased government regulations and tightened credit markets, all of which have affected, and will continue to affect, the operations and financial condition of participants in the industry, including us, major carriers (including our code share partners), competitors and aircraft manufacturers. These industry developments raise substantial risks and uncertainties which will affect us, major carriers (including our code share partners), competitors and aircraft manufacturers in ways that we currently are unable to predict.

The airline industry is subject to the impact of terrorist activities or warnings.

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and their aftermath negatively impacted the airline industry in general, including our operations. In particular, the primary effects experienced by the airline industry included a substantial loss of passenger traffic and revenue. While airline passenger traffic and revenue have recovered since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, additional terrorist attacks could have a similar or even more pronounced effect. Even if additional terrorist attacks are not launched against the airline industry, there will be lasting consequences of the September 11, 2001 attacks, including increased security and insurance costs, increased concerns about future terrorist attacks, increased government regulation and airport delays due to heightened security. Additional terrorist attacks or warnings of such attacks, and increased hostilities or prolonged military involvement in the Middle East or other regions, could negatively impact the airline industry, and result in decreased passenger traffic and yields, increased flight delays or cancellations associated with new government mandates, as well as increased security, fuel and other costs. There can be no assurance that these events will not harm the airline industry generally or our operations or financial condition in particular.
 
 
14

 
 
Our operations may be adversely impacted by increased security measures mandated by regulatory authorities.

Because of significantly higher security and other costs incurred by airports since September 11, 2001, many airports significantly increased their rates and charges to air carriers, including us, and may do so again in the future. On November 19, 2001, the U.S. Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, also referred to as the Aviation Security Act. This law federalized substantially all aspects of civil aviation security and created the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) to which the security responsibilities previously held by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) were transitioned. The TSA is an agency of the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Homeland Security and the TSA and other agencies within the Department of Homeland Security have implemented numerous security measures, including the passing of the Aviation Security Act, that affect airline operations and costs, and are likely to implement additional measures in the future. The Department of Homeland Security has announced greater use of passenger data for evaluating security measures to be taken with respect to individual passengers, expanded use of federal air marshals on flights (thus displacing revenue passengers), investigating a requirement to install aircraft security systems (such as active devices on commercial aircraft as countermeasures against portable surface to air missiles) and expanded cargo and baggage screening. Funding for airline and airport security required under the Aviation Security Act is provided in part by a $2.50 per segment passenger security fee for flights departing from the U.S., subject to a $10 per roundtrip cap; however, airlines are responsible for costs incurred to meet security requirements beyond those provided by the TSA. There is no assurance this fee will not be raised in the future as the TSA’s costs exceed the revenue it receives from these fees. We could also be adversely affected by any implementation of stricter security measures by the Bahamian government. Fees paid to the TSA are approximately 9 months in arrears which could adversely impact the airline due to a suspension or revocation of the airlines eligibility for licenses, permits, or privileges. We cannot provide assurance that additional security requirements or security-related fees enacted in the future will not adversely affect us financially.

The airline industry is heavily regulated.

All interstate airlines are subject to regulation by the Department of Transportation (the “DOT”), the FAA and other governmental agencies. Regulations promulgated by the DOT primarily relate to economic aspects of air service. The FAA requires operating, air worthiness and other certificates; approval of personnel who may engage in flight, maintenance or operation activities; record keeping procedures in accordance with FAA requirements; and FAA approval of flight training and retraining programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to comply with all present and future laws, rules, regulations and certification requirements or that the cost of continued compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our operations. We incur substantial costs in maintaining our certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules and regulations to which we are subject. A decision by the FAA to ground, or require time-consuming inspections of, or maintenance on, all or any of our aircraft for any reason may have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition to state and federal regulation, airports and municipalities enact rules and regulations that affect our operations. From time to time, various airports throughout the country have considered limiting the use of smaller aircraft, such as our aircraft, at such airports. The imposition of any limits on the use of our aircraft at any airport at which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Because we operate only one type of aircraft and have our operations centered at Fort Lauderdale Airport, we are particularly susceptible to any such limitations.

The FAA may change its method of collecting revenues.

The FAA funds its operations largely through a tax levied on all users of the system based on ticket sales as well as a tax on fuel. As the airline industry changes, the trust fund that provides funding for the FAA’s capital accounts and all or some portion of its operations has experienced an increase in its costs without a corresponding rise in its revenue such that in its fiscal 2004, the FAA’s costs exceeded its revenues by more than $4 billion. Further, the existing authority for the current FAA taxing system expired on September 30, 2007. After almost two years of short-term extensions and continuing resolutions, the Subcommittee on Aviation of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure is presently conducting hearings concerning the FAA. The committee is hoping to have a long-term funding law in place this year. At times during this reauthorization process, eliminating or amending the current tax system and implementing user fees have been discussed that could cause us to incur potentially significant additional expenses. There can be no assurance that the final version of the FAA reauthorization bill would exempt small commercial aircraft such as those operated by Gulfstream from these new charges. If such a user fee or tax rate increase is implemented, we may not be able to pass this increased expense on to our customers. Such an expense could have a material adverse impact on our ability to conduct business.

 
15

 
 
A Senate draft version of the FAA Reauthorization Bill has proposed a $25 per-flight fee be charged on all flights, regardless of aircraft size. The recently passed House version of the Bill does not include such a fee.
 
The airline industry is characterized by low profit margins and high fixed costs.

The airline industry is characterized generally by low profit margins and high fixed costs, primarily for personnel, debt service and rent. The expenses of an aircraft flight do not vary significantly with the number of passengers carried and, as a result, a relatively small change in the number of passengers or in pricing could have a disproportionate effect on an airline’s operating and financial results. Accordingly, a minor shortfall in our expected revenue levels could harm our business.

The airline industry is highly competitive.

In general, the airline industry is highly competitive. Gulfstream not only competes with other regional airlines, some of which are owned by or operated as code share partners of major airlines, but we also face competition from low cost carriers and network airlines on many of our routes. One of our primary competitors in the Bahamas market, Bahamasair, is owned by the government of the Bahamas and receives substantial subsidies to fund operating losses. The receipt of these subsidies may reduce the airline’s requirement to take necessary actions to improve profitability, including raising prices to offset fuel costs. Gulfstream also competes with alternative forms of transportation, such as charter aircraft, automobiles, commercial and private boats and trains.

Barriers to entry in most of Gulfstream’s markets are limited, and some of its competitors are larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources. Moreover, federal deregulation of the industry allows competitors to rapidly enter markets and to quickly discount and restructure fares. The airline industry is particularly susceptible to price discounting because airlines incur only nominal costs to provide service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats.
 
Risks Related To Our Business
We have substantial fixed obligations.

As of December 31, 2009, we had $6.3 million of long-term debt and related warrant liabilities. In addition, we have lease payments of approximately $5.7 million per year on our fleet of 23 B1900D aircraft, as well as restructured creditor obligations of $4.2 million for the return of engines borrowed from the lessor, and other matters, payable over the next several years.

On February 11, 2010, the Company received a notice of default (the “Default Notice”) from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation (“RACC”), the Company’s principal aircraft lessor, pursuant to which RACC notified the Company that the Company is in default of the payment of certain obligations under Airliner Operating Lease Agreements, each dated August 7, 2003, and amended on August 2, 2005, and March 15, 2006 (the “Lease Agreements”), by and between the Company and RACC, pursuant to which the Company currently leases from RACC twenty-one (21) Beech 1900D Airliners. The default resulted as a result of the Company’s failure to make its scheduled lease payments for the month of February. Accordingly, RACC demanded that the Company make such payments on or before February 19, 2010. The failure to make such payment would have given RACC the right to terminate the Lease Agreements, thereby prohibiting the Company from using such airplanes. Also pursuant to the Default Notice, RACC claimed that the Company is in default in make certain other payments under a separate agreement dated as of December 19, 2008 by and the Company and RACC (the “December Agreement”), which defaults are also considered to be defaults under the Lease Agreements. RACC indicated in the Default Notice that if the Company made the required payments under the Lease Agreements by February 19, 2010, it is prepared to discuss the manner in which the Company can cure or otherwise address the December Agreement defaults.

On February 19, 2010, the Company made the required payment to RACC which allowed it to continue operating the airplanes covered by the Lease Agreements. In addition, on February 19, 2010, RACC advised the Company that it would forebear from exercising any of its rights under the December Agreement or the Lease Agreements, provided, that the Company remains current in payment of future lease payments and provides RACC over the next two months with a mutually acceptable debt and financial restructuring plan that provides for a feasible basis to enable the Company to continue to meet its ongoing financial obligations under the Lease Agreement and commence to repay amounts due under the December Agreement. Although the Company believes that it will be able to establish a plan that is acceptable to RACC, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to do so, or will not otherwise default in future payments under the Lease Agreements.
 
 
16

 
 
On February 26, 2010, the Company and Shelter Island entered into a Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Debenture (the “Forbearance Agreement”) which reduced the Company’s potential liability under the put option from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000 and rescheduled certain principal and interest payments under the Debenture (as defined below) to reduce near-term liquidity requirements.

Under the terms of Forbearance Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies under the Shelter Island Agreement until the occurrence of (a) the failure by the Company to comply with the terms, covenants and agreements of the Forbearance Agreement; and (b) the occurrence of any event of default under the Debenture or the Shelter Island Purchase Agreement (collectively, a “Termination Event”).  One of the covenants to be performed by the Company under the Forbearance Agreement is the obligation of the Company to raise an additional $1.5 million of debt or equity financing by March 26, 2010, subsequently changed to March 31, 2010, or otherwise satisfy Shelter Island that the Company has adequate liquidity and working capital. Shelter Island confirmed on March 31, 2010 that the Company complied with this covenant based primarily on the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.

Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the parties amended the Debenture, as follows (i) the Company shall pay interest on the outstanding principal amount monthly in cash, commencing March 31, 2010; (ii) the Company shall pay monthly installments on the outstanding principal amount commencing April 30, 2010 and on the last trading day of each month thereafter until the August 31, 2011 maturity date of the Debenture; and (iii) the Company may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture together with a premium equal to 5% of outstanding principal amount being prepaid; provided that, if such prepayment is made in 2011, there shall be no premium applicable.  The Company, each of its subsidiaries and Shelter Island also entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements pursuant to which, without limitation, the parties agreed to amend the existing guarantees to include the repayment of the Shelter Island Note (see below).

Shelter Island currently holds a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.  Under the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to subordinate its first priority lien on the accounts receivable of the Company and its subsidiaries and the proceeds thereof, to the lien granted to the Investors under the Security Agreement with TBI to the extent of the deferred principal and accrued interest under the Notes.  Shelter Island retained its first priority security interest in all of the other assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries.

As consideration for its financial accommodations, the Company paid Shelter Island an additional $250,000 as a forbearance fee, by delivering a $250,000 promissory note (the “Shelter Island Note”) due on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2011, and (ii) the date the Debenture is permitted or required to be paid in accordance with its terms.  The Shelter Island Note accrues interest at a rate of 9% per annum and is payable in cash on a monthly basis beginning on February 26, 2011.

The Shelter Island Agreement contains Events of Default, which if not waived by the lender, would entitle the lender to accelerate the due date of the Senior Debenture. See Note 20 “Subsequent Events”. The company anticipates not achieving the “minimum quarterly EBITDA” Events of Default and therefore at December 31, 2009, the Company classified all future debenture payments as a short term balance sheet liability.
 
Although the Company believes that its revenues and liquidity will improve, the Company is also actively seeking short-term debt financing to meet its near-term liquidity requirements and to allow sufficient time to increase its equity capital base to support long-term growth opportunities. The Company has received non-binding proposals for additional debt financing which it is seeking to consummate. In addition, the Company has engaged an investment banking firm to assist the Company in connection with equity financing efforts.

 These near-term financing transactions and payment deferrals are essential due to our current liquidity level and several additional factors, including a seasonal business slowdown that is typical in September and October, the ongoing risk posed by a relatively weak economy, the potential for continued volatility in the price of jet fuel, a negotiated settlement of the civil penalty proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration, and scheduled repayments of debt and restructured creditor obligations over the next two years.

We can make no assurance that our near-term efforts to improve liquidity or to obtain a longer-term growth-oriented equity financing will be completed successfully, or that alternative sources of capital will be available under terms acceptable to us, or at all. If an additional financing is not completed in the near-term, we would experience an immediate and significant liquidity shortfall, and would be unable to fund operations or meet our financial obligations.
 
 
17

 
 
Our debentures and warrants create additional risks and obligations.

In September 2008, we consummated a financing in which we issued debentures for $5.1 million (the “Senior Debentures”) and warrants to purchase 578,870 shares of common stock (the “Senior Warrants”) to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC. As a result of this financing, we face additional risks and uncertainties, including those relating to the floating interest rate on the Senior Debentures, the financial covenants of the Senior Debentures, the repayment of the Senior Debentures and the repurchase of the Senior Warrants.

The Senior Debentures bear interest at the higher of (i) a floating rate of prime plus 4% or (ii) a fixed rate of 11%. A significant increase in the prime rate could cause our interest expense to increase and might impair our ability to service this debt. In addition, the Senior Debentures subject the Company to certain covenants, (See Note 20 Subsequent Events) including covenants that we have (i) consolidated minimum quarterly EBITDA starting in the quarter ending December 31, 2008, (ii) six month EBITDA averages starting in the six months ending June 30, 2011, (iii) minimum monthly accounts receivable balance of $3.5 million, and (iv) minimum monthly cash balance of $750,000. If we are not able to comply with these covenants, we would be in default under the Senior Debentures and the holder could elect to accelerate our repayment obligation. On September 30, 2008, we were in violation of the covenant to maintain a minimum monthly accounts receivable balance of $3.5 million, with an accounts receivable balance on such date of $3.1 million. For the quarters ended December 31, 2008, and 2009, we were in violation of the covenant for consolidated minimum quarterly EBITDA. Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC granted one-time waivers with respect to non-compliance with these financial covenants. The company anticipates not achieving the “minimum quarterly EBITDA” in future periods and therefore at December 31, 2009, the Company classified all future debenture payments as a current liability.

On February 26, 2010, the Company and Shelter Island entered into a Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Debenture (the “Forbearance Agreement”) which reduced the Company’s potential liability under the put option from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000 and rescheduled certain principal and interest payments under the Debenture (as defined below) to reduce near-term liquidity requirements.

The Senior Debentures require monthly payments in accordance with the Forbearance Agreement of principal ranging from $25,000 to $250,000 beginning on April 30, 2010, with the remaining principal amount of $1,554,000 due upon maturity. In addition, the holder of the Senior Warrants may, at its option, require us to repurchase the common stock issued upon exercise of the warrant for $1,050,000 at any time after the earlier of the repayment in full of the Senior Debentures or September 2011, until August 2014.
 
Under the terms of Forbearance Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies under the Shelter Island Agreement until the occurrence of (a) the failure by the Company to comply with the terms, covenants and agreements of the Forbearance Agreement; and (b) the occurrence of any event of default under the Debenture or the Shelter Island Purchase Agreement (collectively, a “Termination Event”).  One of the covenants to be performed by the Company under the Forbearance Agreement is the obligation of the Company to raise an additional $1.5 million of debt or equity financing by March 26, 2010,  subsequently changed to March 31, 2010,  otherwise satisfy Shelter Island that the Company has adequate liquidity and working capital. Shelter Island confirmated on March 31, 2010 that the Company complied with this convenant based primarily on the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.

Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the parties amended the Debenture, as follows (i) the Company shall pay interest on the outstanding principal amount monthly in cash, commencing March 31, 2010; (ii) the Company shall pay monthly installments on the outstanding principal amount commencing April 30, 2010 and on the last trading day of each month thereafter until the August 31, 2011 maturity date of the Debenture; and (iii) the Company may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture together with a premium equal to 5% of outstanding principal amount being prepaid; provided that, if such prepayment is made in 2011, there shall be no premium applicable.  The Company, each of its subsidiaries and Shelter Island also entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements pursuant to which, without limitation, the parties agreed to amend the existing guarantees to include the repayment of the Shelter Island Note.

Shelter Island currently holds a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.  Under the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to subordinate its first priority lien on the accounts receivable of the Company and its subsidiaries and the proceeds thereof, to the lien granted to the Investors under the Security Agreement with TBI to the extent of the deferred principal and accrued interest under the Notes.  Shelter Island retained its first priority security interest in all of the other assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries.
 
 
18

 
 
As contemplated in the original warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Shelter Island on August 31, 2008 (the “Original Warrant”), on February 26, 2010 the Company divided the Original Warrant into (a) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant initially exercisable into 70,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Put Warrant”); and (b) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant (the “Remaining Warrant”, and together with the Put Warrant, the "Divided Warrants") such that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of Company that are initially exercisable under the Divided Warrants (inclusive of the 70,000 Shares of Common Stock initially issuable under the Put Warrant) shall equal, in the aggregate, 15% of the fully-diluted shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately following consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Forbearance Agreement and the Purchase Agreements, after giving pro-forma effect to the conversion into Common Stock of all Company convertible securities and the exercise of all Company options and warrants, including the Warrants issued to the Investors.  As a result of consummation of the above transactions with Shelter Island and the TBI Investors, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Divided Warrant is 914,189 shares of Company Common Stock.
 
The Company and Shelter Island also entered into an Amendment to the Put Option Agreement (the “Put Option Amendment”) dated as of August 31, 2008 under which, among other things, the exercise price applicable for all the put shares under the put option was reduced from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000, or $15.00 per share.

As consideration for its financial accommodations, the Company paid Shelter Island an additional $250,000 as a forbearance fee, by delivering a $250,000 promissory note (the “Shelter Island Note”) due on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2011, and (ii) the date the Debenture is permitted or required to be paid in accordance with its terms.  The Shelter Island Note accrues interest at a rate of 9% per annum and is payable in cash on a monthly basis beginning on February 26, 2011.

The Senior Debentures and the repurchase obligation associated with the Senior Warrants represent significant obligations for us and we may not be able to make all of the required payments. We may not have sufficient liquidity to make such payments or repurchase, or such payments or repurchase may significantly impair our liquidity.

On October 7, 2009, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with Gulfstream Funding II, LLC, pursuant to which we borrowed approximately $1.5 million on a subordinated basis.  The interest rate on the loans is 12% per annum.  The outstanding principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon are due on or prior to January 15, 2010.  On January 15, 2010, the Company and the Lender agreed to enter into one or more definitive agreements to extend the maturity date of the Note and to provide for the conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (collectively, the “Debt”) into preferred stock of the Company at current market prices. These loans represent significant obligations for us and we may not be able to make all of the required payments. We may not have sufficient liquidity to make such payments, or such payments may significantly impair our liquidity.
 
We would be adversely affected by the loss of key personnel.

Our success is dependent upon the continued services of our management team. Our executives have substantial experience and expertise in our business and have made significant contributions to our growth and success. The loss of one of our executives or any other key employees (including the senior management team of the Airline and the Academy) could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on our management team.

Expansion of operations could result in operating losses.

We are actively seeking opportunities to grow by adding new routes, aircraft, alliance partners, or by acquiring other regional airlines. These opportunities will likely include operating in areas away from our current Florida base. For example, we redeployed certain assets to profitable routes by initiating service in September 2008 between Continental’s Cleveland hub and five smaller cities in Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia in conjunction with Essential Air Service routes awarded by the Department of Transportation. Similar material increases in the scope or scale of our operations could lead to integration difficulties, which could result in short and/or long-term operating losses.
 
 
19

 
 
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and, as a result, our business could be harmed and current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in us, which could cause our stock price to fall.

We are required to perform the system and process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required to comply with the management certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Auditor attestation requirements of management’s assessment will first apply to us for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. As a result, we expect to incur substantial additional expenses and diversion of management’s time. We cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or their effect on our operations since there is limited precedent available by which to measure compliance adequacy. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities such as the SEC or the NYSE Amex. Any such action could harm our business or investors’ confidence in us, and could cause our stock price to fall.
 
Risks Related To Gulfstream
 
Gulfstream is dependent on our code share relationships.

Gulfstream depends on relationships created by code share agreements with Continental, and United for a significant portion of our revenues. Additionally, virtually all of our “local,” or non-connecting, traffic is booked through Continental’s reservation system. Any material modification to, or termination of, our code share agreements with any of these partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the results of operations. Each of the code share agreements contains a number of grounds for termination by our partners, including failure to meet specified performance levels. Further, these agreements limit our ability to enter into code share agreements with other airlines.

Gulfstream’s code share partners may expand their direct operation of regional jets, thus limiting the expansion of our relationships with them. A decision by any of Gulfstream’s code share partners to phase out Gulfstream’s contract-based code share relationships or enter into similar agreements with one or more of Gulfstream’s competitors could have a material adverse effect on Gulfstream’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Also, our code share partners may be restricted in increasing the level of business that they conduct with Gulfstream, thereby limiting our growth. Union scope clauses at major airlines may limit or prohibit certain types of code share operations, including those by Gulfstream.

Gulfstream is dependent on the financial strength of our code share partners.

Gulfstream is directly affected by the financial and operating strength of its code share partners. In the event of a decrease in the financial or operational strength of any of the code share partners, such partner may be unable to make the payments due to Gulfstream under the code share agreement. It is possible that if any of the code share partners file for bankruptcy, Gulfstream’s code share agreement with such partner may not be assumed in bankruptcy and could be modified or terminated. United Airlines, has recently emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization. There was no impact to the code share agreement as a result of this reorganization.

We operate our code share relationships as revenue-sharing arrangements.

Under the revenue sharing, or pro rate, arrangements that we have in place with our code share partners, we bear substantially all costs associated with our flights. Because we are responsible for such costs, factors such as rising fuel costs, increases in operating expenses and decreases in ticket prices or passenger loads could cause our profits to decrease and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

The availability of additional and/or replacement code share partners is limited and airline strategic consolidations could have an impact on operations in ways yet to be determined.

The airline industry has undergone substantial consolidation, including the recent merger of Delta Airlines and Northwest, and it may in the future undergo additional consolidation. Other developments include domestic and international code share alliances between major carriers, such as the “SkyTeam Alliance,” that currently includes Delta Airlines, Continental and Northwest, among others, and the “Star Alliance,” that currently includes United Airlines and US Airways, among others, and which Continental joined effective in October 2009. Any additional consolidation or significant alliance activity within the airline industry could limit the number of potential partners with whom Gulfstream could enter into code share relationships and materially adversely affect our relationship with our current code share partners.
 
 
20

 
 
There is no assurance that our relationship with our code share partners would survive in the event that any such code share partner merges with another airline.

Similarly, the bankruptcy or reorganization of one or more of our competitors may result in rapid changes to the identity of our competitors in particular markets, a substantial reduction in the operating costs of our competitors or the entry of new competitors into some or all of the markets we serve. We are unable to predict exactly what effect, if any, changes in the strategic landscape might have on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There are constraints on our ability to establish new operations to provide airline service to major airlines other than our code share partners.

Our code share agreement with Continental requires that we seek their consent prior to establishing new code share agreements, subject to limited exceptions, as well as prior to acquiring another regional carrier. In the absence of such consent, we would have to establish a new operating subsidiary, separate from Gulfstream, which would require a substantial expenditure of management time and Company resources.
 
Fluctuations in fuel costs could adversely affect our operating expenses and results.

Aircraft fuel consumes a significant portion of our airline revenue (29.6% for 2008 and 16.3% for 2009). The price of aircraft fuel is unpredictable and has increased significantly in recent periods based on events outside of our control, including geopolitical developments, regional production patterns, environmental concerns and financial speculation. Because of the effect of these events on the price and availability of aircraft fuel, the cost and future availability of fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. We cannot assure you increases in the price of fuel can be offset by higher revenue. We carry limited fuel inventory and we rely heavily on our fuel suppliers. We cannot assure you we will always have access to adequate supplies of fuel in the event of shortages or other disruptions in the fuel supply. Price escalations or reductions in the supply of aircraft fuel will increase our operating expenses and could cause our operating results and net income to decline. Additionally, price escalations or reductions in the supply of aircraft fuel could result in the curtailment of our service. Some of our competitors may be better positioned to obtain fuel in the event of a shortage.

Our business is subject to substantial seasonal and cyclical volatility.

Gulfstream’s business is subject to substantial seasonality, primarily due to leisure and holiday travel patterns, particularly in the Bahamas. Traditionally, we experience the strongest demand from February to July, and the weakest demand from August to October, during which period we typically suffer operating losses. As a result, our operating results for a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year, and historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Our results of operations generally reflect this seasonality. Our operating results are also impacted by numerous other cycles and factors that are not necessarily seasonal. These factors include the extent and nature of fare changes and competition from other airlines, changing levels of operations, national and international events, fuel prices and general economic conditions, including inflation. Because a substantial portion of both personal and business airline travel is discretionary, the industry tends to experience adverse financial results in general economic downturns.
 
 
21

 
 
Any inability to acquire and maintain additional compatible aircraft or engines would increase our operating costs and could harm our profitability.

Our fleet currently consists of 23 B1900D turboprop aircraft, each equipped with two engines. Although our management believes there is an adequate supply of such aircraft and engines available at reasonable prices and terms to meet our current needs, we are unable to predict how long these conditions will continue. Any increase in demand for these aircraft or engines could restrict our ability to obtain additional aircraft, engines and spare parts. Because the aircraft we operate are not in active production, we may be unable to obtain additional suitable aircraft, engines or spare parts on satisfactory terms or at the time needed for our operations or for the implementation of our growth plan. Further, as fuel costs increase or remain at elevated levels, the demand for highly fuel-efficient turboprop aircraft may also increase. This increase in demand could cause a shortage in the supply of reasonably priced turboprop aircraft. Such a decrease could adversely affect our ability to expand our fleet or to replace outdated aircraft, which in turn could hinder our growth or reduce our revenues.

Maintenance expenses for Gulfstream’s fleet could increase.

Gulfstream’s fleet consists of aircraft that were delivered from 1994 to 1996. As the age of our aircraft increases, additional resources may be required to sustain their reliability levels. There can be no assurance that such additional resources will not be material.

Any inability to extend the lease terms of our existing aircraft or obtain financing for additional aircraft could adversely affect our operations.

We finance our aircraft through operating lease financing. Most of our existing fleet of B1900Ds is leased from the manufacturer pursuant to lease agreements that expires in 2010. We have the option to extend the leases for up to 15 aircraft from six to 24 months after the expiration period; however, there can be no assurance that this lease agreement can be extended further on reasonable terms. If we are unable to extend these leases, we also have the option to purchase up to 21 of these aircraft; however, we may not be able to secure financing on acceptable terms, if at all. Further, the B1900D is not currently produced by their manufacturers and there is currently a limited supply of these aircraft. If we are unable to obtain replacement aircraft on economically reasonable terms, our business could be materially adversely affected.

The airline industry has been subject to a number of strikes which could adversely affect our business.

The airline industry has been negatively impacted by a number of labor strikes. Any new collective bargaining agreement entered into by other regional carriers may result in higher industry wages and add increased pressure on Gulfstream to increase the wages and benefits of our employees. Furthermore, since each of Gulfstream’s code share partners is a significant source of revenue, any labor disruption or labor strike by the employees of any one of Gulfstream’s code share partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Competitors or new market entrants may introduce smaller aircraft or direct hub flights, which could reduce our competitive advantage.

We operate relatively small aircraft on short flight routes, which enables us to maintain a low cost structure, giving us a competitive advantage over other airlines. If new market entrants or existing competitors were to introduce smaller aircraft into the marketplace, their costs may be lower than ours, allowing them to gain a competitive advantage. In addition, competitors could introduce new direct flights from their hubs to our key cities which could reduce the competitiveness of our Florida connecting points.

Gulfstream flies and depends upon only one aircraft type, and would be adversely affected if the FAA were to ground our fleet.

Gulfstream’s fleet consists of 23 B1900D turboprop aircraft. The FAA requires operating, air worthiness and other certificates; approval of personnel who may engage in flight, maintenance or operation activities; record keeping procedures in accordance with FAA requirements; and FAA approval of flight training and retraining programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to comply with all present and future laws, rules, regulations and certification requirements or that the cost of continued compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our operations. We incur substantial costs in maintaining our current certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules and regulations to which we are subject. A decision by the FAA to ground or require additional time-consuming inspections of or maintenance on the B1900D aircraft for any reason may have a material adverse effect on the operations of Gulfstream.
 
 
22

 
 
Gulfstream is at risk of losses and adverse publicity stemming from any accident involving our aircraft.

While Gulfstream has never had a fatal crash over our history, it is possible that one or more of our aircraft may crash or be involved in an accident in the future, causing death or injury to individual air travelers and our employees and destroying the aircraft. An accident or incident involving one of Gulfstream’s aircraft could involve significant potential claims of injured passengers and others, as well as repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and our consequential temporary or permanent loss of service. In the event of an accident, our liability insurance may not be adequate to offset the exposure to potential claims and we may be forced to bear substantial losses from the accident. Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of related insurance coverage would harm our operational and financial results. Moreover, any aircraft accident or incident, even if fully insured, could cause a public perception that Gulfstream’s operations are less safe or reliable than other airlines, which could result in a material reduction in passenger revenues.

If Gulfstream is forced to relocate our Fort Lauderdale maintenance base, we may not be able to operate as successfully.

The lease for Gulfstream’s principal maintenance facility, located at Hollywood-Fort Lauderdale International Airport (FLL), expires at the end of May 2010. We are presently in negotiations with Broward County for a lease at a nearby existing site at FLL.  Broward County has been considering for some time an improvement to FLL that will eventually result in a teardown of Gulfstream’s maintenance hangar and require Gulfstream to seek an alternate location for a successor maintenance hangar on the airfield. If Gulfstream is forced to relocate its Fort Lauderdale maintenance operations, it may be prohibitively expensive to relocate and/or construct a maintenance hangar. Gulfstream may not be able to operate as efficiently or successfully from any other location. In addition, it is possible that Gulfstream would be unable to secure a suitable alternative location for our maintenance hangar. Were this to occur, we may be forced to outsource our airplane maintenance for a period of time, which would substantially increase our maintenance costs and cause us significant operational disruptions.

Hurricanes and other adverse weather conditions could adversely affect Gulfstream’s business.

Our routes in Florida and the Bahamas are particularly susceptible to the impact of hurricanes. In the event that a hurricane threatened one of our departure locations, we may be forced to cancel flights and/or relocate our fleet, either of which would cause us to lose revenues. Related storm damage could also affect telecommunications capability, causing interruptions to our operations. A hurricane could cause markets such as the Florida Keys and the Bahamas to sustain severe damage to their tourist destinations and thus cause a longer-term decrease in the number of persons traveling on our routes.

Additionally, during periods of fog, ice, low temperatures, hurricanes, storms or other adverse weather conditions, flights may be cancelled or significantly delayed. A significant interruption or disruption in service due to adverse weather or otherwise, could result in the cancellation or delay of a significant portion of Gulfstream’s flights and, as a result, could have a severe impact on our business, operations and financial performance.

Gulfstream may experience labor disruptions or an increase in labor costs.

All of Gulfstream’s permanent pilots are represented by International Brotherhood of Teamsters Airline Division Local 747, commonly known as the Teamsters. Our collective bargaining agreement with our pilots became subject to amendment in July 2009 and negotiations are currently in process. Although we have never had a work interruption or stoppage and we believe our relations with our union and non-union employees are generally good, Gulfstream is subject to risks of work interruption or stoppage and/or may incur additional administrative expenses associated with union representation of our employees. Any sustained work stoppages could adversely affect Gulfstream’s ability to fulfill our obligations under our code share agreements and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, labor costs constitute a significant percentage of our total operating costs. Our labor costs constitute approximately 27% of our 2009 total operating costs. Any new collective bargaining agreements entered into by other airlines may also result in higher industry wages and increased pressure on us to increase the wages and benefits of our employees. Future agreements with our employees’ unions may be on terms that are not economically as attractive as our current agreements nor comparable to agreements entered into by our competitors. Any future agreements may increase our labor costs or otherwise adversely affect us. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the compensation rates that we have assumed will correctly reflect the market for our non-union employees, or that there will not be future unionization of our currently nonunionized groups, which could adversely affect our costs.
 
 
23

 
 
Our business is heavily dependent on the Bahamas markets and a reduction in demand for air travel to this market would harm our business.

Almost half of our scheduled flights have the Bahamas as either their destination or origin and our revenue is linked primarily to the number of tourists and other passengers traveling to and from the Bahamas. Bahamian tourism levels are affected by, among other things, the political and economic climate in the Bahamas’ main tourism markets, the availability of hotel accommodations, promotional spending by competing destinations, the popularity of the Bahamas as a tourist destination relative to other vacation options, and other global factors, including natural disasters or negative publicity due to safety and security. No assurance can be given that the level of passenger traffic to the Bahamas will not decline in the future. A decline in the level of Bahamas passenger traffic could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The current regulation of travel to Cuba is subject to political conditions and a change in the current restrictions could impair our ability to provide flights or minimize our competitive advantage.

Pursuant to a services agreement that we have entered into with GAC, we may provide the use of our aircraft, flight crews and other services to GAC for its operation of charter flights to Cuba, in exchange for which we receive 75% of the operating profit generated by such charter flights. GAC’s flights to Cuba depend on political conditions prevailing from time to time in Cuba and the United States. Currently, GAC is one of a limited number of operators who provide flights from the United States to Cuba. If relations between the United States and Cuba worsen, these flights may be prohibited entirely and we may lose significant revenues due to GAC’s inability to operate these flights. Conversely, if relations between the United States and Cuba significantly improve, demand for access to Cuba could increase dramatically, causing the market for flights from the United States to Cuba to be flooded with new entrants. In either scenario, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and negatively affected.

Our business operations in Cuba are subject to a number of U.S. federal laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) as well as trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Commerce Department. The FCPA is intended to prohibit bribery of foreign officials or parties and requires public companies in the United States to keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect those companies’ transactions. OFAC and the Commerce Department administer and enforce economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations and individuals, including Cuba.

If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be exposed to claims for damages, financial penalties, reputational harm, incarceration of our employees or restrictions on our operation of flights to and from Cuba. These restrictions could increase our costs of operations, reduce our profits or cause us to forgo development opportunities that would otherwise support our growth.

Cuba’s status as a state sponsor of terrorism could impact the sustainability and growth of the Company’s flights to Cuba.

Cuba is listed as a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. Department of State, and as such, GAC’s flights to Cuba are subject to any restrictions that may be imposed as a result of such designation. GAC could be subjected to regulations and requirements that could increase its costs of operating flights to Cuba, restrict the number or manner of flights it operates to Cuba or prohibit such flights entirely. The Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and negatively affected by further restrictions, or prohibitions, on doing business in Cuba as a country designated as a state sponsor of terrorism.

We rely on third parties to provide us with facilities and services that are integral to our business and can be withdrawn on short notice.

We have entered into agreements with third-party contractors, including other airlines, to provide certain facilities and services required for our operations, such as certain maintenance, ground handling, baggage services and ticket counter space. We will likely need to enter into similar agreements in any new markets we decide to serve. All of these agreements are subject to termination upon short notice. The loss or expiration of these contracts, the loss of FAA certification by our outside maintenance providers or any inability to renew our contracts or negotiate contracts with other providers at comparable rates could harm our business. Our reliance upon others to provide essential services on our behalf also gives us less control over costs and over the efficiency, timeliness and quality of contract services.
 
 
24

 
 
Aviation insurance is a critical safeguard of our financial condition and it might become difficult to obtain adequate insurance at a reasonable rate in the future.

We believe that our insurance policies are of types customary in the industry and in amounts we believe are adequate to protect us against material loss. It is possible, however, that the amount of insurance we carry will not be sufficient to protect us from material loss. Some aviation insurance could become unavailable, available only for reduced amounts of coverage, or available only at substantially higher rates, which could result in our failing to comply with the levels of insurance coverage required by our code share agreements, our other contractual agreements or applicable government regulations. Additionally, war risk coverage or other insurance might cease to be available to our vendors or might only be available for reduced amounts of coverage.

Adverse litigation judgments or settlements resulting from legal proceedings in which we may be involved in the normal course of our business could reduce our profits or limit our ability to operate our business.

In the normal course of our business, we are often involved in various legal proceedings. The outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted. If any of these proceedings were to be determined adversely to us or a settlement involving a payment of a material sum of money were to occur, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, we could become the subject of future claims by third parties, our employees, our investors or regulators. Any significant adverse litigation judgments or settlements would reduce our profits and could limit our ability to operate our business.
 
Risks Related To the Academy

A decrease in demand for regional airline pilots could adversely impact the Academy’s ability to attract and retain students.

We believe that the employment of our graduates is essential to our ability to attract and retain students. In the event that regional airline industry demand for pilots decreases significantly, it would have a detrimental impact on the ability of our graduates to gain employment, which could have an adverse effect on enrollment.

The value of the Academy could be diminished if other airlines lower their required minimum flight hours.

Academy students are pilots who hold commercial, multi-engine and instrument ratings who are qualified to operate commercial flights but who seek to enhance their marketability by logging additional training and flight hours. The Academy offers pilots the opportunity to log flight hours more quickly than the traditional time-building method of flight instructing. If the airlines who hire Academy graduates were to reduce the number of logged hours that they require new pilots to have, the value of the Academy could be diminished and the Academy could suffer decreased enrollment and a loss of revenues.

The inability to finance tuition costs could adversely affect the Academy’s enrollment.

Most of our students depend upon some form of third-party financing to finance part or all of the cost of tuition. This type of financing is only available from limited sources. The inability of prospective students to obtain third-party financing could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain students.

Workplace error by graduates of the Academy could expose us to legal action.

Many of the pilots that graduate from the Academy are ultimately employed by airlines other than Gulfstream. In the event of an accident caused by one of the graduates of the Academy, it is possible that the Academy could be named as a defendant in any lawsuit that may arise. There can be no assurance that our insurance policy will be adequate to cover the potential losses from any such claims.
 
 
25

 
 
Risks Related To Our Common Stock

We do not pay cash dividends on our capital stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the future.

We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do not have current plans to do so. Instead, we will likely retain our future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will likely be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage a takeover.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a takeover.  As described in “Description of Capital Stock — Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and Charter Provisions”, these provisions may:

·      
discourage, delay or prevent a change in the control of our company or a change in our management;
·      
adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock; and
·      
limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

Reports published by securities or industry analysts, including projections in those reports that exceed our actual results, could adversely affect our stock price and trading volume.

We currently expect securities research analysts, including those affiliated with our underwriters, will establish and publish their own quarterly projections for our business. These projections may vary widely from one another and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our stock price may decline if our actual results do not match securities research analysts’ projections. Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who writes reports on us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our stock price or trading volume could decline. While we expect securities research analyst coverage, if no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock and the trading volume could decline.

The issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock will dilute our current stockholders and may depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for us to raise capital.

As a result of issuing the Senior Warrants and the Junior Warrants in September 2008, we may be required to issue an additional 1,999,606 shares of our common stock, representing 31.6% of the outstanding equity as of April 14, 2010.  This is in addition to the October 2009 conversion of the Junior Debentures into 578,342 shares of our common stock.  Further, both the Senior and Junior Warrants include adjustment provisions that could require us to issue a greater number of shares under certain circumstances.

The shares issued upon exercise of the Senior and Junior Warrants represent a significant percentage of our presently outstanding common stock and the issuance of such shares would result in dilution to our current stockholders and could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Potential investors could be prohibited from investing, or choose not to invest, in our common stock because we provide services to a company that operates flights to Cuba.

Cuba has been identified as a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. Department of State. Some potential investors, including certain pension funds or trust funds, may be prohibited from investing, or may choose not to invest, in companies that do business with or in countries designated as sponsors of terrorism. Additionally, unrestricted potential investors may choose not to invest in our common stock based solely or in part on the fact that we provide services to GAC, a company that operates flights to Cuba. The exclusion of such investors may limit the market for shares of our common stock or negatively impact the further development of an active trading market for our common stock.

Our common stock has only been publicly traded for a short period of time, and the price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially, possibly resulting in class action securities litigation.

Before our initial public offering in December 2007, there had been no public market for shares of our common stock.  For the last three months, the average daily trading volume of our common stock has been approximately 11,000 shares. An active public trading market may not develop or, if developed, may not be sustained.
 
 
26

 
 
The stock market in general and airlines in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the underlying businesses. In addition, the airline industry recently experienced a period of significant disruption characterized by the bankruptcy, failure, collapse or sale of various financial institutions, which led to increased volatility in securities prices and a significant level of intervention from the U.S. and other governments in securities markets. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

In addition to the risks described in this section, several factors that could cause the price of our common stock in the public market to fluctuate significantly include, among others, the following:
 
·      
quarterly variations in our operating results compared to market expectations;
·      
announcements of new services or products or significant price reductions by us or our competitors;
·      
size of the public float;
·      
stock price performance of our competitors;
·      
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes;
·      
default on our indebtedness or changes to our liquidity;
·      
changes in senior management or key personnel;
·      
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
·      
negative earnings or other announcements by us or other airlines;
·      
downgrades in our credit ratings or the credit ratings of our competitors;
·      
issuances of capital stock; and
·      
global economic, legal and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance.
 
Because of the low trading volume, our stock price is subject to greater volatility.  Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a company’s securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, reduce our profits, divert our management’s attention and resources and harm our business.

We are not in compliance with NYSE Amex continued listing standards.

Our common stock is listed for trading on the NYSE Amex, which is the successor to the American Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”).  The Exchange requires listed companies to meet certain continued listing standards.  These standards include specified minimum stockholders equity thresholds when an issuer sustains net losses over a number of years.  We have not met the threshold set forth in Section 1003(a) of the Exchange’s Company Guide because, for the 2008 fiscal year, we have stockholder’s equity of less than $2 million and losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in two out of our three most recent fiscal years.  As a result, we have received a notice from the Exchange that we have not met this continued listing requirement.

The NYSE Amex staff has accepted the plan that we submitted to achieve and sustain compliance with all of the NYSE Amex’s listing requirements (the “Plan”), including a time frame for regaining compliance with Section 1003(a)(i) of the Company Guide within 18 months or by November 12, 2010 (the “Plan Period”). We will be able to continue our listing during the Plan Period, during which time we will be subject to periodic review to determine if we are making progress consistent with the Plan. If we are not in compliance with all the continued listing standards of the NYSE Amex Company Guide by November 12, 2010, or if we do not make progress consistent with the Plan during the Plan Period, we may be subject to delisting proceedings. We may appeal a Staff determination to initiate delisting proceedings.

As part of our efforts to achieve and sustain compliance with the Plan, we agreed to convert the Junior Debentures to common stock at a reduced conversion price of $1.975 per share.  This was approved by our stockholders on October 20, 2009.

In the event our common stock was delisted by the Exchange, we would be in breach of a covenant of our loan and security agreement with Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC, and, in the absence of a waiver, the maturity of our secured original issue discount debenture could be accelerated.

 
27

 
 
The liability of our officers and directors is limited.

Our certificate of incorporation limits the liability of directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

·      
any breach of their duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;
·      
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
·      
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or
·      
any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under the federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that we will indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents for damages arising in connection with their actions in such capacities, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the bylaws.

There is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, employees or agents where indemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or proceeding that might result in a claim for indemnification.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

We currently lease all of our facilities, including our corporate headquarters and largest space (other than hanger and ramp space) near the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport.  We lease ticket counter space, gate space and operations space at various airports throughout our system, most of which are not under long-term leases.

Our principal facilities and facilities that we lease under long-term leases, and their primary uses and segments are as follows:
 
             
Location
 
Square Feet
 
Use
 
Segment
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
 
12,600
 
Headquarters, Operations
 
Gulfstream, Academy
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
 
3,750
 
Training Facility
 
Academy
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Florida
 
249,000
 
Hanger and Ramp Space
 
Gulfstream
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
 
8,000
 
Warehouse, Storage and Shop
 
Gulfstream
Miami International Airport
 
1,050
 
Cuba Operations
 
Gulfstream
Tampa International Airport
 
7,613
 
Gate and Ramp Space
 
Gulfstream
Venango Regional Airport
 
684
 
Gate and Ramp Space
 
Gulfstream
Dubois Regional Airport
 
1,133
 
Gate and Ramp Space
 
Gulfstream
Dubois Regional Airport
 
20,000
 
Hangar
 
Gulfstream

We believe that our principal facilities and facilities that we lease are adequate to meet our current needs. Our principal facilities and facilities that we lease are in good condition and are sufficient to conduct our operations. We do not intend to materially renovate, improve, or develop properties. We are not subject to competitive conditions for property and currently have no facility property to insure. We have no policy with respect to investments in real estate or interests in real estate and no policy with respect to investments in real estate mortgages. Further, we have no policy with respect to investments in securities of or interests in persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.
 
 
28

 
 
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On May 7, 2009, the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”) notified the Company that it was seeking a proposed civil penalty of $1,310,000 against the Company for alleged non-compliance with respect to certain record keeping requirements, and regulatory requirements relating to the use of certain replacement parts. The Company has begun an informal conference with the FAA, which is a settlement process prescribed by statute that authorizes the FAA to accept and consider relevant information in order to compromise proposed civil penalties. We have submitted information, evidence and supporting documentation for consideration by the FAA demonstrating that certain alleged violations of the regulations did not occur, or demonstrating why the facts and circumstances in this case do not warrant the proposed civil penalty sought by the FAA. We believe that information submitted by us to the FAA through the informal conference process may result in a significant reduction in the civil penalty initially proposed in this matter, and the Company remains in discussions with the FAA over the terms of the settlement. The FAA has since indicated that, unless the mattersare settled, it could propose additional civil penalties based on additional inspections conducted by the agency in 2009 as part of its routine surveillance of air carriers. If a compromised settlement of the matters is not successful, the FAA, through a U.S Attorney, may initiate a civil action for the full amount of the proposed civil penalty as prescribed by law.

In January 2006, a former salesman of the Academy formed a business that the Company believes competes directly with the Academy for student pilots. Thereafter, the former President of the Academy resigned his position at the Academy and the Company believes he became affiliated with the alleged competing business. The Academy has initiated a lawsuit against these former employees, alleging violation of non-competition and fiduciary obligations. The defendants, including the Academy’s former President, subsequently filed a counterclaim against the Academy based upon lost earnings and breach of contract.

The Academy and the sole remaining defendant have agreed to submit to binding arbitration which is to be held no later than May 1st, 2010 pursuant to the Court’s Order Referring Case to Binding Arbitration entered on February 16, 2010.

From time to time, we are a party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we consider to be a part of the ordinary course of our business. We are not involved currently in legal proceedings that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. We may become involved in material legal proceedings in the future.
 
ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
 
Our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on October 20, 2009 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida at 11:00 a.m. local time.

There were present in person or by proxy 2,333,152 shares of our common stock, of a total of 2,959,600 shares of common stock entitled to vote as of the record date of September 8, 2009.

The number of shares voted in favor of the election of the following nominees for director is set forth opposite each nominee’s name:

Nominee
 
Number of Shares
Thomas A. McFall
 
2,310,952
David F. Hackett
 
2,314,818
Gary P. Arnold
 
2,314,743
Gary L. Fishman
 
2,314,952
Barry S. Lutin
 
2,314,943
Richard R. Schreiber
 
2,314,743

The following six additional proposals were presented to our shareholders and adopted:

The proposal to amend the Company's Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the plan from 350,000 to 650,000 received 2,167,483 votes in favor.

The proposal to amend the Company's certificate of incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock received 2,250,503 votes in favor.

The proposal to authorize the potential issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock which may be convertible into shares of common stock at a price per share not less than 75% of the greater of the market price or book value per share received 2,229,358 votes in favor.

The proposal to ratify the issuance of the junior subordinated debenture, which is convertible into common stock at a price of $3.00 per share, received 2,239,578 votes in favor.

The proposal to approve a reduction in the price at which the outstanding junior subordinated debenture is convertible into common stock from $3.00 per share to $1.98 per share received 2,225,433 votes in favor.

The proposal to appoint Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P as the Company's independent auditors for 2009 received 2,307,652 votes in favor.

 
29

 
 
PART II
 
ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
 
Market Information

Our common stock has been traded on the NYSE Amex (formerly, the American Stock Exchange) under the symbol “GIA” since December 14, 2007.  The below table sets forth the high and low closing prices of our common stock for the periods indicated and reported by the NYSE Amex. The prices set forth below represent inter-dealer quotations, without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not be reflective of actual transactions.

  
 
High
   
Low
 
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
           
Fourth Quarter
 
$
1.80
   
$
1.28
 
Third Quarter
 
$
2.19
   
$
1.67
 
Second Quarter
 
$
4.60
   
$
1.66
 
First Quarter
 
$
2.66
   
$
1.40
 
                 
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
               
Fourth Quarter
 
$
3.27
   
$
1.00
 
Third Quarter
 
$
3.75
   
$
0.75
 
Second Quarter
 
$
5.25
   
$
2.09
 
First Quarter
 
$
9.04
   
$
4.51
 

As of March 31, 2010, 3,795,061 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were issued and outstanding. As of March 31, 2010, there were approximately 53 stockholders of record of our common stock, although we believe that there are a significantly larger number of beneficial owners of our common stock.  On April 12, 2010, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE Amex Exchange was $1.25

Dividends

We have not paid cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the future.  We anticipate that we will retain any earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business.  Additionally, we are party to general agreements that limit our ability to pay dividends.  Under our credit facilities, we and our subsidiaries are prohibited from declaring dividends without the consent of our lender.  Gulfstream is permitted under its primary aircraft lease agreement to pay dividends only if its average cash position after paying the dividend would equal or exceed $4,000,000 over the prior twelve month period.  In addition, in the event that Gulfstream declares a dividend, Gulfstream has an obligation under the warrant held by Continental to pay Continental cash in an amount equal to what Continental would have been entitled to had it exercised its warrant immediately prior to such dividend.  Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, financial conditions, future prospects and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On November 18, 2009, the Company issued 23,333 shares of common stock to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC (“Shelter Island”) as consideration for Shelter Island’s agreement to waive the Company’s non-compliance with certain minimum quarterly EBITDA and monthly cash balance covenants for September 30, 2009 as set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement between Shelter Island and the Company.  The shares represent $35,000 divided by the $1.50 closing price of the Company’s common stock on November 18, 2009.

On January 29, 2010, the Company consummated the first closing under a Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with seven accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors units of its securities (the “Units”) consisting of (i) one share (the “Shares”) of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), at a per Unit purchase price of $1.40 for aggregate gross proceeds of $327,300 (the “Offering”). Upon completion of the first closing of the Offering, the Company sold to the Investors an aggregate of 233,786 Shares and Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 175,339 shares of Common Stock.
 
 
30

 
 
The Warrants expire on July 29, 2013 and are exercisable into shares of Common Stock beginning on July 29, 2010 at an exercise price equal to $3.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Warrants.

In connection with the first closing of the Offering, the Company paid/issued the placement agent (i) cash commissions in the amount of 9% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; (ii) a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 2% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; and (iii) Warrants to purchase 18,703 shares of Common Stock, which represents 8% of the aggregate amount of Shares sold as part of the Units in the first closing.

On February 26, 2010, the Company completed a $1,000,000 debt financing pursuant to purchase agreements for senior secured notes and warrants (the “Purchase Agreements”) with accredited investors and/or qualified institutional purchasers (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) 12% Senior Secured Notes due December 31, 2010 in an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “Notes”); and (ii) warrants, exercisable at $1.22 per share (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) and expiring February 28, 2015 (the “Warrants”), to purchase an aggregate of 409,827 of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”).  The number of Warrants issued to each Investor was determined by dividing (a) 50% of the principal amount of the Notes purchased by the Investors, by (b) the Exercise Price (as defined below) of the Warrants (the “Offering”).  However, if the Notes are not prepaid by the Company in full by June 30, 2010, then the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”) would represent 100% of the original $1,000,000 principal amount of the Notes divided by the Exercise Price. Accordingly, if the Notes are not paid in full by June 30, 2010, assuming no anti-dilution adjustments to the Warrant Shares or the Exercise Price, the aggregate of 409,827 Warrant Shares would increase to 819,654 Warrant Shares.

In connection with the closing of the February 26, 2010 Purchase Agreements, the Company issued to the placement agent, (i) a $50,000 Note (identical to the Investors’ Notes) and a Warrant to purchase 20,491 Warrant Shares, which represents 5% of the total principal amount of the Notes and Warrants sold in the Offering; and (ii) a separate Warrant to purchase 40,982 shares of Common Stock, which represents 10% of the number of Warrant Shares issuable to Investors under the Warrants.

On February 26, 2010, the Company and Shelter Island entered into a Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Debenture (the “Forbearance Agreement”) which reduced the Company’s potential liability under the put option from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000 and rescheduled certain principal and interest payments under the Debenture (as defined below) to reduce near-term liquidity requirements. As consideration for its financial accommodations, the Company paid Shelter Island an additional $250,000 as a forbearance fee, by delivering a $250,000 promissory note (the “Shelter Island Note”) due on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2011, and (ii) the date the Debenture is permitted or required to be paid in accordance with its terms.  The Shelter Island Note accrues interest at a rate of 9% per annum and is payable in cash on a monthly basis beginning on February 26, 2011.

Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the parties amended the secured original issue discount debenture due August 31, 2011 issued to Shelter Island (the “Debenture”), as follows (i) the Company shall pay interest on the outstanding principal amount monthly in cash, commencing March 31, 2010; (ii) the Company shall pay monthly installments on the outstanding principal amount commencing April 30, 2010 and on the last trading day of each month thereafter until the August 31, 2011 maturity date of the Debenture; and (iii) the Company may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture together with a premium equal to 5% of outstanding principal amount being prepaid; provided that, if such prepayment is made in 2011, there shall be no premium applicable.  The Company, each of its subsidiaries and Shelter Island also entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements pursuant to which, without limitation, the parties agreed to amend the existing guarantees to include the repayment of the Shelter Island Note.

In connection with the Forbearance Agreement and as contemplated in the original warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Shelter Island on August 31, 2008 (the “Original Warrant”), on February 26, 2010 the Company divided the Original Warrant into (a) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant initially exercisable into 70,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Put Warrant”); and (b) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant (the “Remaining Warrant”, and together with the Put Warrant, the "Divided Warrants") such that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of Company that are initially exercisable under the Divided Warrants (inclusive of the 70,000 Shares of Common Stock initially issuable under the Put Warrant) shall equal, in the aggregate, 15% of the fully-diluted shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately following consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Forbearance Agreement and the Purchase Agreements, after giving pro-forma effect to the conversion into Common Stock of all Company convertible securities and the exercise of all Company options and warrants, including the Warrants issued to the Investors.  As a result of consummation of the above transactions with Shelter Island and the TBI Investors, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Divided Warrant is 917,646  shares of Company Common Stock.
 
 
31

 
 
The Company and Shelter Island also entered into an Amendment to the Put Option Agreement (the “Put Option Amendment”) dated as of August 31, 2008 under which, among other things, the exercise price applicable for all the put shares under the put option was reduced from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000, or $15.00 per share.

On March 31, 2010, the Company consummated the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with 17 accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) an aggregate of 118,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 and stated value $10.00 per share (the “Preferred Shares”), convertible into 1,185,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) 5-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 592,500 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), representing 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,043,000 (the “Offering”). The Warrants expire on March 31, 2013 and are exercisable into shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $1.75 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Warrants.

Pursuant to the Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company which was filed with the State of Delaware on March 31, 2010 (the “Certificate of Designation”), each Preferred Share is convertible into 10 shares of Common Stock. In addition, the Preferred Shares pay an annual dividend at the rate of 12% per annum, payable quarterly, on the last business day of each December, March, June and September (each a “Dividend Payment Date”), payable on each Dividend Payment Date as follows: (i) 60% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 7% per annum) shall be payable in cash, and (ii) 40% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 5% per annum) shall be payable either in cash, or at the sole option of the Company, in additional shares of Common Stock, calculated for such purposes by dividing the amount of the quarterly dividend then payable by 100% of the market price of the Common Stock on such Dividend Payment Date.  Unless previously converted into Common Stock, all Preferred Shares outstanding on the earlier to occur of (a) the date on which the average of the market prices of the Common Stock for any 20 consecutive trading days shall be $2.00 or higher, or (b) 5 years from the Preferred Shares issuance date, shall be automatically converted into Common Stock at the Conversion Price then in effect.

In addition, on March 31, 2010, 4 of the 7 purchasers of the Company’s units consisting of one share of Common Stock (the “Shares”), and warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Prior Warrants”) which was consummated on January 29, 2010 (the “Prior Offering”), entered into a letter agreement with the Company (the “Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which such purchasers agreed to exchange their Shares and Prior Warrants for Preferred Shares and Warrants, under the same terms and conditions applicable to Investors in the Offering.  Such purchasers also agreed that the Company shall have no further obligations or liabilities in connection with the transaction documents executed and delivered with respect to the Prior Offering, including, without limitation, the Unit Purchase Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement and the Prior Warrant, each dated as of January 29, 2010, and each of which are terminated in any and all respects.

In connection with the first closing of the Offering, the Company paid/issued the placement agent (i) cash commissions in the amount of 9% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; (ii) a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 2% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; and (iii) Warrants to purchase 114,730 shares of Common Stock, which represents 11% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing.

We believe that all of the above offerings and sales were deemed to be exempt under Rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The offerings and sales were made to a limited number of persons, all of whom were accredited investors, business associates of the Company or executive officers of the Company, and transfer was restricted by the Company in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition to representations by the above-referenced persons, we have made independent determinations that all of the above-referenced persons were accredited or sophisticated investors, and that they were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment, and that they understood the speculative nature of their investment. Furthermore, all of the above-referenced persons were provided with access to our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
 
 
32

 
 
Repurchase of Equity Securities

We do not have any programs to repurchase shares of our common stock and no such repurchases were made during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table presents information as of December 31, 2009 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities were authorized for issuance.

 
Plan category
 
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options
 (a)
   
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options
 (b)
   
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column(a)) 
 (c)
 
                   
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
                   
Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (1)
    650,000     $ 3.81       301,676  
                         
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
    -0-       -0-       -0-  
 
Total
    650,000     $ 3.81       301,676  
  
(1)  On May 1, 2009 and October 20, 2009, the board of directors and the Company’s shareholders, respectively, authorized the amended and restated stock incentive plan for purposes of increasing the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the plan from 350,000 to 650,000.  Other than as set forth above, we do not have any stock option, bonus, profit sharing, pension or similar plan with the exception of a tax deferred savings plan with a discretionary profit sharing component which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

The following selected historical and pro forma financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” following this section and our financial statements and related notes included in this annual report.

The following table sets forth selected financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. The selected financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 were derived from our audited financial statements. Our audited financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 are included below under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.  The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected in any future period.

 
33

 

   
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
   
% Change
 
   
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
Revenue
                 
Airline passenger revenue
  $ 88,527     $ 59,753       -32.5%  
Essential air service revenue
    2,512       8,302       230.5%  
Academy, charter and other  revenue
    14,217       19,249       35.4%  
Total Revenue
    105,256       87,304       -17.1%  
                         
Operating Expenses
                       
Flight operations
    12,859       15,005       16.7%  
Aircraft fuel
    30,350       13,918       -54.1%  
Aircraft rent
    5,911       6,093       3.1%  
Maintenance
    24,478       21,625       -11.7%  
Passenger service
    21,759       19,352       -11.1%  
Promotion & sales
    6,623       4,986       -24.7%  
General and administrative
    7,110       7,351       3.4%  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,754       1,218       -55.8%  
Loss on sale of equipment
    4,754       -       -100.0%  
Intangible asset impairment
    2,703       680       -74.8%  
Operating Expenses
    119,301       90,228       -24.4%  
                         
Income (loss) from operations
    (14,045 )     (2,924 )     -79.2%  
                         
Non-Operating Income and (Expense)
                       
Interest (expense)
    (1,306 )     (2,330 )     78.4%  
Other income (expense)
    43       (265 )     -716.3%  
Non-Operating Income and (Expense)
    (1,263 )     (2,595 )     105.5%  
Income (loss) before taxes
    (15,308 )     (5,519 )     -63.9%  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (509 )     2,032       -499.2%  
Net income (loss)
  $ (14,799 )   $ (7,551 )     -49.0%  
                         
Earnings per Share:
                       
Basic
  $ (5.00 )   $ (2.45 )        
Diluted
  $ (5.00 )   $ (2.45 )        
                         
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
 
Basic
    2,957       3,076          
Diluted
    2,957       3,076          
                         
                         
 
 
34

 
 
Operating Statistics. The following table sets forth our major operational statistics and the percentage-of-change for the years identified.
 
   
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31,
 
      2008       2009    
% Change
 
                         
Annual Operating Statistics :
                       
Available seat miles (000's) (1)
    227,386       165,853       -27.1 %
Revenue passenger miles (000's) (2)
    127,092       89,757       -29.4 %
Revenue passengers carried
    629,563       415,867       -33.9 %
Departures flown
    56,598       43,114       -23.8 %
Passenger load factor (3)
    55.9 %     54.1 %     -3.2 %
Average yield per revenue passenger mile (4)
  $ 0.70     $ 0.67       -4.3 %
Revenue per available seat miles (5)
  $ 0.39     $ 0.36       -7.5 %
Operating costs per available seat mile (6)
  $ 0.49     $ 0.48       -3.5 %
Fuel cost per available  passenger miles (9)
  $ 0.13     $ 0.08       -37.1 %
Average passenger fare (7)
  $ 140.62     $ 143.68       2.2 %
Average passenger trip length (miles) (8)
    202       216       6.9 %
Aircraft in service (end of period)
    23       23       0.0 %
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes)
  $ 3.36     $ 2.00       -40.5 %
 
1.  “Available seat miles” or “ASMs” represent the number of seats available for passengers in scheduled flights multiplied by the number of scheduled miles those seats are flown.
2.   “Revenue passenger miles” or “RPMs” represent the number of miles flown by revenue passengers.
3. “Passenger load factor” represents the percentage of seats filled by revenue passengers and is calculated by dividing revenue passenger miles by available seat miles.
4. “Average yield per revenue passenger mile” represents the average passenger revenue received for each mile a revenue passenger is carried.
5. “Revenue per available seat mile” or “RASM” represents the average total operating revenue received for each available seat mile.
6. “Operating cost per available seat mile” represents operating expenses divided by available seat miles.
7. “Average passenger fare” represents passenger revenue divided by the number of revenue passengers carried.
8. “Average passenger trip length” represents revenue passenger miles divided by the number of revenue passengers carried.
9. “Fuel cost per available seat mile” represents fuel cost divided by the number of available seat miles.

The following table sets forth other major financial data:

   
As of December 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2008
   
2009
 
Working Capital
  $ (8,245 )   $ (14,621 )
Property and Equipment, net
    2,793       2,697  
Total Assets
    19,370       14,778  
Long-Term Debt, net of current portion
    2,850       -  
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
  $ (4,665 )   $ (10,939 )

 
35

 
 
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
 
WE URGE YOU TO READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO BEGINNING ON PAGE F-1. THIS DISCUSSION MAY CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF A NUMBER OF FACTORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DISCUSSED UNDER THE HEADING “RISK FACTORS” IN THIS FORM 10-K AND IN OUR OTHER FILINGS WITH THE SEC. IN ADDITION, SEE “CAUTIONARYSTATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSSET FORTH IN THIS REPORT.

Overview

We operate a scheduled airline, scheduled and on-demand charter services, and a flight training academy for commercial pilots.

Our most significant market opportunity relates to the fact that we currently operate in and have targeted future expansion in unserved and underserved short haul markets, which is a growing opportunity for two principal reasons. Many smaller markets are being abandoned by major carriers, as they shift their focus increasingly to international markets and away from domestic markets and hubs. In addition, many smaller markets are also being abandoned by regional airlines, as they continue to gravitate toward larger jet aircraft in the 70-100 seat range, and away from smaller markets that utilize turboprop aircraft. As a result, we continue to seek opportunities to grow in the expanding number of smaller underserved or unserved markets that are suitable for our fleet of small-capacity aircraft.

        Our most significant challenges relate to:
 
    ·      
securing capital to improve liquidity, fund growth opportunities, and acquire our fleet of twenty-one (21) leased aircraft;
    ·      
volatility in the price of aircraft fuel;
    ·      
a weakened economic environment; and
    ·      
securing cost-effective maintenance resources, as the average age of our aircraft fleet increases.

Current Developments

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we generated less cash flow from operations than initially projected at the beginning of the year due to lower revenue and higher fuel costs than forecasted. From October 2008 to December 31, 2009, we also repaid over $4.4 million of debt and restructured creditor obligations.

During the second-half of 2009, Gulfstream experienced significant deterioration in its revenue environment, which, combined with rising fuel costs, resulted in greater than anticipated losses and pressure on its liquidity outlook.  While part of the revenue weakness was the result of recessionary economic conditions, the situation was made particularly acute by new low-fare competition in certain of our markets.

With an increasingly weakened balance sheet, Gulfstream found it necessary to attract new capital beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009. With liquidity needs becoming more urgent, in January 2010 the airline found itself in an unsustainable financial situation.  As such, the Company retained Berger Singerman and Mesirow Financial Advisors to assist in its restructuring and financing activities.  Although the Company believes that its revenue and liquidity will improve in future periods, the Company continued to actively seek short-term financing to meet its near-term liquidity requirements and to allow sufficient time to significantly increase its equity capital base to support long-term growth opportunities, as well as the purchase of its twenty-one (21) aircraft leased from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation.

These near-term financing transactions and restructuring efforts, which are described in detail below in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, are essential due to our current liquidity position, as well as several additional factors, including a highly seasonal business, the ongoing risk posed by a relatively weak economy, the potential for continued volatility in the price of jet fuel, proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration the necessity for funds to satisfy or compromise civil penalties, and scheduled payments of debt and restructured creditor obligations over the next two years.
 
 
36

 
 
We can make no assurance that our efforts to improve liquidity or to obtain longer-term growth-oriented equity financing will be completed successfully, that we will have adequate funds to satisfy or compromise the civil penalties proposed by the FAA or that alternative sources of capital will be available to us. If additional equity capital is not available in the next several months, we would likely experience a significant liquidity shortfall before the end of 2010, and would be unable to fund continued operations or meet our financial obligations.
 
Results of Operations

Comparative Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2009

The following table sets forth our financial results for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009:
 
   
Twelve Months Ended December 31
 
   
2008
   
2009
   
% Change
 
                   
Revenue
                 
Airline passenger revenue
  $ 88,527     $ 59,753       -32.5%  
Essential air service revenue
    2,512       8,302       230.5%  
Academy, charter and other revenue
    14,217       19,249       35.4%  
Total Revenue
    105,256       87,304       -17.1%  
                         
Operating Expenses
                       
Flight operations
    12,859       15,005       16.7%  
Aircraft fuel
    30,350       13,918       -54.1%  
Aircraft rent
    5,911       6,093       3.1%  
Maintenance
    24,478       21,625       -11.7%  
Passenger service
    21,759       19,352       -11.1%  
Promotion & sales
    6,623       4,986       -24.7%  
General and administrative
    7,110       7,351       3.4%  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,754       1,218       -55.8%  
Impairment charge on assets held for sale
    4,754       -       -100.0%  
Goodwill impairment
    2,703       680          
Total Operating Expenses
    119,301       90,228       -24.4%  
                         
Income (loss) from operations
    (14,045 )     (2,924 )     -79.2%  
                         
 Non-operating Income and (Expense)                        
Interest expense     (1,306 )     (2,330 )     78.4%  
Other income (expense)     43       (265 )     -716.3%  
      (1,263 )     (2,595 )     1.05%  
Income (loss) before taxes                        
Provision (benefit) for income taxes     (15,308 )     (5,519 )     -63.9%  
Net income (loss)     (509 )     2,032       -499.2%  
    $ (14,799 )   $ (7,551 )     -49%  
 
        Operating Statistics. The following table sets forth our major operational statistics and the percentage-of-change for the years identified below.
 
     Twelve Months Ended December 31  
     2008      2009      % Change  
Annual Operating Statistics (unaudited):
                 
Available seat miles (000's) (1)
    227,386       165,853       -27 %
Revenue passenger miles (000's) (2)
    127,092       89,757       -29 %
Revenue passengers carried
    629,563       415,867       -34 %
Departures flown
    56,598       43,114       -24 %
Passenger load factor (3)
    55.9 %     54.1 %     -3 %
Average yield per revenue passenger mile (4)
  $ 0.70     $ 0.67       -4 %
Revenue per available seat miles (5)
  $ 0.39     $ 0.36       -7 %
Operating costs per available seat mile (6)
  $ 0.49     $ 0.48       -3 %
Fuel cost per available seat mile (9)
  $ 0.13     $ 0.08       -37 %
Average passenger fare (7)
  $ 140.62     $ 143.68       2 %
Average passenger trip length (miles) (8)
    202       216       7 %
Aircraft in service (end of period)
    23       23       0 %
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes & fees)
  $ 3.36     $ 2.00       -40 %
 
1.  “Available seat miles” or “ASMs” represent the number of seats available for passengers in scheduled flights multiplied by the number of scheduled miles those seats are flown.

 
37

 

2.  “Revenue passenger miles” or “RPMs” represent the number of miles flown by revenue passengers.
3. “Passenger load factor” represents the percentage of seats filled by revenue passengers and is calculated by dividing revenue passenger miles by available seat miles.
4. “Average yield per revenue passenger mile” represents the average passenger revenue received for each mile a revenue passenger is carried.
5. “Revenue per available seat mile” or “RASM” represents the average total operating revenue received for each available seat mile.
6. “Operating cost per available seat mile” represents operating expenses divided by available seat miles.
7. “Average passenger fare” represents passenger revenue divided by the number of revenue passengers carried.
8. “Average passenger trip length” represents revenue passenger miles divided by the number of revenue passengers carried.
9. “Fuel cost per available seat mile” represents fuel cost divided by the number of available seat miles.

Net Income and Operating Income

The Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $7.5 million compared to a net loss of $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Our Net loss in 2009 was affected by two significant non-cash charges; (1) a trade name impairment pre-tax charge of $0.7 million related to the Academy; and (2) a valuation allowance of $2.0 million related to the write-down of the reported value of the deferred tax asset.  In terms of operations, our Net loss in 2009 was also significantly affected by significantly lower demand of 29% as measured by Revenue passenger miles.

Our Net loss in 2008 was affected by two significant non-cash charges; (1) a goodwill impairment pre-tax charge of $2.7 million related to the Academy; and (2) a valuation allowance of $4.0 million related to the write-down of deferred tax assets. In terms of operations, our net loss in 2008 was also significantly affected by the unprecedented rise in fuel prices during 2008, as well as a charge of $4.8 million related to loss on the sale of its fleet of eight Embraer aircraft and increased maintenance expenses related to engine overhaul expenses for the Embraer aircraft.

The year-over-year improvement in operating results for the year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable to lower fuel prices, and to a lesser degree, capacity reductions and cost controls compared to last year. Additionally, in 2008, the Airline incurred a charge of $4.8 million related to loss on the sale of its fleet of eight Embraer aircraft. The following table identifies the operating profit or loss from each of our respective operating components:
 
(In thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
Airline and charter
  $ (6,944 )   $ 3,084  
Academy
    (3,063 )     (886 )
Total income (loss) from operations
    (10,007 )     2,198  
Less: General and administrative
    4,038       5,122  
Consolidated income (loss) from operations
  $ (14,045 )   $ (2,924 )
 
Loss on Sale of its Fleet of Eight Embraer Aircraft.  During the third and fourth quarters of 2008, we completed the sale of our fleet of eight Embraer Brasilia aircraft for a total gross purchase price of $12.8 million. As a result of these sales, we raised cash of approximately $5.1 million, net of expenses and the repayment of $7.2 million of senior bank debt during July 2008. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a pre-tax loss of $4.8 million during 2008.

Impairment Charges. We review for the impairment of identifiable intangible assets at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Our Goodwill of $5,094,000 and Trade name for $0.7 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of the Academy and consisted of the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired.

Operating profits and cash flows of the Academy in 2008 were lower than expected due to the negative impact on student enrollment caused by industry-wide capacity reductions and pilot furloughs due to high fuel prices and a declining economy. Given these circumstances, the remaining goodwill value was eliminated by recognition of an impairment charge of $2.7 million in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008. In 2009, due to 3 consecutive years of operating losses and continued low student enrollment demand due to the ongoing recessionary impact on the airline industry the trade name value was eliminated by recognition of an impairment charge of $0.7 million in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
38

 
 
Revenue.  Total revenue declined 17% to $87.3 million in 2009 from $105.3 million in 2008. The overall revenue decrease was due principally to a 27 % capacity reduction in 2009 that led to a 33% decline in passenger revenue during 2009, offset by an increase $4.2 million of charter revenue during 2008 resulting from the increased Cuba charter revenues associated with the relaxation of travel restrictions for Cuban Americans by the U.S. Government. The following table identifies the revenue contribution from each of our respective operating components:

(In thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
   
% Change
 
 Revenue
                 
Airline passenger revenue
  $ 88,527     $ 59,753       -32.5%  
Essential Air Service
    2,512       8,302       230.5%  
Charter, Academy and other  revenue
    14,217       19,249       35.4%  
Total Revenue
  $ 105,256     $ 87,304       -17.1%  
 
Airline Passenger Revenue.  Airline passenger revenue decreased 32.5% for 2009 compared to 2008.  This decrease was primarily attributable to a 34% decrease in the number of passengers carried, partially offset by a 2% increase in average fares.  Unit revenue, or revenue per available seat mile, for 2009 declined 4% from 2008. The passenger revenue declines are primarily due to capacity reductions implemented in October 2008 to align capacity more closely with declining demand due to a weakened economy.

The decline in airline passenger revenue was partially offset by an increase of $5.8 million of Essential Air Service revenue from the Department of Transportation for the full year of 2009 as compared to the October 2008 initiation of five new routes from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub in.

We reduced our available seat mile capacity for 2009 by 27% compared to 2008. Our average passenger fare increased during 2009 to $143.68 from $140.62 during 2008. The increased fares and the excess baggage fees (included in Charter and other revenue) helped to offset reduced revenue passengers carried.

Charters, Other Revenue and Academy.  Charter and other revenue increased 50% to $17.2 million for 2009 from $11.5 million for 2008. Revenue from the Cuba charter was $12.2 million for 2009 compared to $8.0 million for 2008 resulting from the relaxation of travel restrictions for Cuban Americans by the U.S. government.

Academy revenue decreased 25% for 2009 compared to 2008.  The decrease was due to lower pilot attrition rates at the Airline that resulted in a decline in intercompany revenue charged to Gulfstream for pilot training, as well as fewer commercial pilot students due to a contraction of demand for pilots within the airline industry.

Airline Operating Expenses. The following table presents the Airline’s operating expenses, before general and administrative expenses and the elimination of intercompany expenses, for 2008 and 2009:

Airline Operating Expenses
           
 
 
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
   
Percentage of Airline Revenue
 
(In thousands)
 
2008
   
2009
   
Percent Change
   
2008
   
2009
 
                               
Flight operations
  $ 14,556     $ 15,636       7.4%       14.2%       18.3%  
Aircraft fuel
    30,350       13,918       -54.1%       29.6%       16.3%  
Aircraft rent
    5,911       6,093       3.1%       5.8%       7.1%  
Maintenance
    24,478       21,625       -11.7%       23.9%       25.4%  
Passenger service
    21,759       19,352       -11.1%       21.2%       22.7%  
Promotion & sales
    6,623       4,986       -24.7%       6.5%       5.8%  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,754       1,218       -55.8%       2.7%       1.4%  
Loss on sale of prop. & equip.
    4,754       -    
NM
      4.6%       0.0%  
    $ 111,185     $ 82,828       -25.5%       108.4%       97.1%  
 
 
39

 
 
Flight Operations. Major components of flight operations expense include pilot, flight attendant and other operations personnel compensation, pilot training expenses and wet-lease (aircraft, crews, and fuel) costs for charter flights.  Flight operations expenses for 2009 increased by 7% to $15.6 million compared to $14.6 million for 2008.  

Wet lease costs attributable to Charters increased $2.9 million. The remaining flight operations costs declined primarily due to capacity reductions instituted during 2008 in conjunction with the sale of the Embraer aircraft

Aircraft Fuel. The average price per gallon for jet fuel for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $2.00, compared to $3.36
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as a result of favorable commodity market conditions. Fuel declined as a percent of airline revenue to 16.3% for 2009 from 29.6% for 2008.

Aircraft Rent. Aircraft rent is related to the lease costs associated with our 23 Beech 1900D aircraft. Aircraft rent for the March 2009 quarter included an additional expense of $203,000 associated with a lease provision obligating the Company to repay past aircraft rent concessions, if future jet fuel prices declined below a certain threshold. The maximum cumulative adjustment of this lease provision was $312,000, all of which has been recognized as of December 31, 2009. Aircraft rent expense for 2008 included lease expense for 27 aircraft for a portion of the year..

Maintenance. Major components of maintenance expense include compensation, repair parts and materials, and expenses incurred from third party service providers required to maintain our aircraft engines and other flight equipment. Maintenance expense decreased 12% to $21.6 million for 2009 compared to $24.5 million for 2008. The decrease in maintenance and repairs expense in the year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable the capacity reductions instituted during 2008 primarily due to the sale of the Embraer aircraft offset by additional maintenance expenses associated with the Cleveland hub, which began operation in October 2008 and expenses associated with enhanced maintenance operations.

Passenger Service. Major components of passenger service expense include ground handling services, airport counter and gate rentals, compensation paid to airport employees, passenger liability insurance, security and miscellaneous passenger-related expenses. Passenger service expense decreased 11% to $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $21.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and was primarily attributable to capacity reductions, reduced flights at certain higher-cost airports, as well as lower interrupted trip expenses. These lower expenses were partially offset by higher passenger service costs for our Cuba charter operation.

Promotion and Sales. Major components of promotion and sales expense include credit card and travel agent commissions, frequent flyer program costs and reservation system fees. Promotion and sales expense declined 24.7% to $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $6.6 million for 2008, due primarily to a 34% decline in passengers compared to the same period last year

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $2.8 million for 2008. This decrease was primarily due to the sale of our fleet of eight Embraer aircraft during the third quarter of 2008.

General and Administrative and Academy Operating Expense. Our general and administrative expenses include the expenses of the Academy, as set forth in the following table:
 
Consolidated general and administrative
                 
   
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31,
   
Percent
 
(In thousands)
 
2008
   
2009
   
Change
 
                   
General and administrative expenses
  $ 4,038     $ 5,122       26.8%  
Academy expenses
    3,072       2,229       -27.4%  
Consolidated general and administrative
  $ 7,110     $ 7,351       3.4%  

General and administrative expenses, excluding Academy expenses, increased 26.8% to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $4.0 million for 2008. Most of these increases were attributable to public-company expenses, including Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and the recognition of a loss contingency related to an FAA proposed civil penalty, as well as related expenses for legal and consulting services.
 
 
40

 
 
Academy expenses decreased by 27.4% to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $3.1 million for 2008, primarily due to lower expenses associated with fewer students.

Non-Operating Income and Expense

Interest expense increased to $2.3 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $1.3 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to interest expense, debt discount and issuance expenses related to the $6.1 million of debentures issued in September 2008.

Other non-operating expense increased $260,000 due to amortization of the discount associated with the derivative warrant liability related to the Senior secured debenture.

Income Taxes

The Company's net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance as of December 31, 2009 totaled $8.1 million, most of which relates to net operating losses that expire in various years through 2029. The net deferred tax asset amount of $2.0 million included in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 was fully reserved of December 31, 2009. The Company increased the valuation allowance during 2009 based on both the uncertain economic environment and the Company’s current liquidity position.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Liquidity refers to the liquid financial assets available to fund our business operations and financial obligations. These liquid financial assets consist of cash as well as short-term investments. As of December 31, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $2.3 million, and we had a negative working capital of $13.1 million. As of December 31, 2008, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $3.2 million, and we had a negative working capital of $8.2 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we generated less cash flow from operations than initially projected at the beginning of the year due to lower revenue and higher fuel costs than forecasted. From October 2008 to December 31, 2009, we also repaid over $4.4 million of debt and restructured creditor obligations.

During the second-half of 2009, Gulfstream experienced significant deterioration in its revenue environment, which, combined with rising fuel costs, resulted in greater than anticipated losses and pressure on its liquidity outlook.  While part of the revenue weakness was the result of recessionary economic conditions, the situation was made particularly acute by new low-fare competition in certain of our markets.

With an increasingly weakened balance sheet, Gulfstream found it necessary to attract new capital beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009. With liquidity needs becoming more urgent, in January 2010 the airline found itself in an unsustainable financial situation.  As such, the Company retained Berger Singerman and Mesirow Financial Advisors to assist in its restructuring and financing activities.  Although the Company believes that its revenue and liquidity will improve in future periods, the Company continued to actively seek short-term financing to meet its near-term liquidity requirements and to allow sufficient time to significantly increase its equity capital base to support long-term growth opportunities, as well as the purchase of its twenty-one (21) aircraft leased from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation.

These near-term financing transactions and restructuring efforts, which are described below, are essential due to our current liquidity position, as well as several additional factors, including a highly seasonal business, the ongoing risk posed by a relatively weak economy, the potential for continued volatility in the price of jet fuel, the necessity for funds to satisfy or compromise civil penalties proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration, and scheduled payments of debt and restructured creditor obligations over the next two years.
 
 
41

 
 
We can make no assurance that our efforts to improve liquidity or to obtain longer-term growth-oriented equity financing will be completed successfully, that we will have adequate funds to satisfy or compromise the civil penalties proposed by the FAA or that alternative sources of capital will be available to us. If additional equity capital is not available in the next several months, we would likely experience a significant liquidity shortfall before the end of 2010, and would be unable to fund continued operations or meet our financial obligations.

Conversion of $1 million Subordinated Convertible Debenture
 
At the October 20, 2009 Annual Meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders approved a reduction in the conversion price to $1.975 from $3.00 relating to the $1 million Subordinated Convertible Debenture issued to Gulfstream Funding I, LLC in September 2008. The conversion to equity of the debenture and accrued interest expense was effective on October 20, 2009 and resulted in the issuance of 578,342 shares of the company’s common stock.

Issuance of $1.5 million of Subordinated Notes
 
On October 7, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated note to Gulfstream Funding II, LLC (“GF II”) for $1.5 million that matured on January 15, 2010 and bore interest at 12%. On January 15, 2010, the Company and GF II agreed to enter into one or more definitive agreements to extend the maturity date of the Note and to provide for the conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (collectively, the “Debt”) into preferred stock of the Company at current market prices. Upon the execution of such agreements by the Company and GF II, the Company will file a Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing the transaction and including such agreements as exhibits.  In addition, GF II waived any event of default, which would have occurred due to the Company’s failure to repay the Debt on the maturity date.

Sale of Units of Common Stock and Warrants
 
On January 29, 2010, the Company consummated the closing under a Unit Purchase Agreement with seven accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors units of its securities (the “Units”) consisting of (i) one share of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), at a per Unit purchase price of $1.40 for aggregate gross proceeds of $327,300. Upon completion of the closing, the Company sold to the Investors an aggregate of 233,786 shares of  Common Stock and Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 175,339 shares of Common Stock.

Forbearance Agreement with Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation
 
On February 11, 2010, Gulfstream received a notice of default (the “Default Notice”) from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation (“RACC”), Gulfstream’s principal aircraft lessor, pursuant to which RACC notified Gulfstream that it was in default of the payment of certain obligations under Airliner Operating Lease Agreements, each dated August 7, 2003, and amended on August 2, 2005, and March 15, 2006 (the “Lease Agreements”), by and between Gulfstream and RACC, pursuant to which Gulfstream currently leases from RACC twenty-one (21) Beech 1900D aircraft. The default resulted from Gulfstream’s failure to make its scheduled lease payments for the month of February 2010. Accordingly, RACC demanded that Gulfstream make such payments on or before February 19, 2010. The failure to make such payment would have given RACC the right to terminate the Lease Agreements, thereby prohibiting  Gulfstream from using the leased aircraft. Also pursuant to the Default Notice, RACC claimed that Gulfstream is in default in certain other payments under a separate agreement dated as of December 19, 2008 by and between Gulfstream and RACC (the “December  Agreement”), which defaults are also considered to be defaults under the Lease Agreements. RACC indicated in the Default Notice that if Gulfstream made the required payments under the Lease Agreements by February 19, 2010, it is prepared to discuss the manner in which the Company can cure or otherwise address the December Agreement defaults.
 
On February 19, 2010, Gulfstream made the required payment to RACC, which allowed it to continue operating the aircraft covered by the Lease Agreements. In addition, on February 19, 2010, RACC advised Gulfstream that it would forebear from exercising any of its rights under the December Agreement or the Lease Agreements, provided that Gulfstream remains current in payment of future lease payments and provides RACC by April 20, 2010 with a mutually acceptable debt and financial restructuring plan that provides for a feasible basis to enable Gulfstream to continue to meet its ongoing financial obligations under the Lease Agreement and commence to repay restructured amounts due under the December Agreement, which presently amount to approximately $3 million. We are also engaged in related restructuring discussions with Pratt & Whitney Canada with respect to approximately $2.5 million of past-due creditor obligations. See Note (9) Engine Return Liability and the Restructuring of Other Obligations, for background information regarding this matter.
 
 
42

 
 
Although we believe that we will be able to establish a plan that is acceptable to RACC and Pratt & Whitney Canada regarding the restructuring of current obligations, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so, or will not otherwise default in future payments under the RACC Lease Agreements or the Pratt & Whitney Agreement.

Issuance of $1.0 million of Senior Secured Notes and Warrants
 
On February 26, 2010, the Company completed a $1,000,000 debt financing pursuant to purchase agreements for senior secured notes and warrants with accredited investors and/or qualified institutional purchasers (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) 12% Senior Secured Notes due December 31, 2010 in an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “Notes”); and (ii) warrants, exercisable at $1.22 per share (the “Exercise Price”) (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) and expiring February 28, 2015 (the “Warrants”), to purchase an aggregate of 409,827 of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”).  The number of Warrants issued to each Investor was determined by dividing (a) 50% of the principal amount of the Notes purchased by the Investors, by (b) the Exercise Price of the Warrants.  However, if the Notes are not prepaid by the Company in full by June 30, 2010, then the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”) would represent 100% of the original $1,000,000 principal amount of the Notes divided by the Exercise Price. Accordingly, if the Notes are not paid in full by June 30, 2010, assuming no anti-dilution adjustments to the Warrant Shares or the Exercise Price, the aggregate of 409,827 Warrant Shares would increase to 819,654 Warrant Shares.

Forbearance Agreement with Shelter Island Opportunity Fund and Amendment to Debenture
 
In August 2008, the Company obtained an original $5,100,000 debt financing with Shelter Island Opportunity Fund LLC (“Shelter Island”) pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the “Shelter Island Agreement”) and a secured original issue discount debenture due August 31, 2011 (the “Debenture”) of which $3,659,000 was outstanding as of February 26, 2010.   As part of such financing, the Company granted Shelter Island a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries, issued certain warrants to Shelter Island and granted Shelter Island a right to “put” the warrants to the Company for $3,000,000. In December 2009 and January 2010, Shelter Island agreed to defer the December and January interest payments under the Debenture.

On February 26, 2010, the Company and Shelter Island entered into a Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Debenture (the “Forbearance Agreement”) which reduced the Company’s potential liability under the put option from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000 and rescheduled certain principal and interest payments under the Debenture to reduce near-term liquidity requirements.

Under the terms of the Forbearance Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies under the Shelter Island Agreement until the occurrence of (a) the failure by the Company to comply with the terms, covenants and agreements of the Forbearance Agreement; and (b) the occurrence of any event of default under the Debenture or the Shelter Island Agreement (collectively, a “Termination Event”).  One of the covenants to be performed by the Company under the Forbearance Agreement is the obligation of the Company to raise an additional $1.5 million of debt or equity financing by March 26, 2010, subsequently changed to March 31, 2010, or otherwise satisfy Shelter Island that the Company has adequate liquidity and working capital. Shelter Island confirmed on March 31, 2010 that the Company complied with this covenant based primarily on the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement described below under the heading, Sale of up to $2.5 million of Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants.

Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the parties amended the Debenture, as follows (i) the Company shall pay interest on the outstanding principal amount monthly in cash, commencing March 31, 2010; (ii) the Company shall pay monthly installments on the outstanding principal amount commencing April 30, 2010 and on the last trading day of each month thereafter until the August 31, 2011 maturity date of the Debenture; and (iii) the Company may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture together with a premium equal to 5% of outstanding principal amount being prepaid; provided that, if such prepayment is made in 2011, there shall be no premium applicable.  The Company, each of its subsidiaries and Shelter Island also entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements pursuant to which, without limitation, the parties agreed to amend the existing guarantees to include the repayment of the Shelter Island Note.
 
 
43

 
 
As indicated above, Shelter Island currently holds a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.  Under the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to subordinate its first priority lien on the accounts receivable of the Company and its subsidiaries and the proceeds thereof, to the lien granted to the Investors under the Security Agreement with TBI to the extent of the deferred principal and accrued interest under the Notes.  Shelter Island retained its first priority security interest in all of the other assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries.

As contemplated in the original warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Shelter Island on August 31, 2008 (the “Original Warrant”), on February 26, 2010 the Company divided the Original Warrant into (a) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant initially exercisable into 70,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Put Warrant”); and (b) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant (the “Remaining Warrant”, and together with the Put Warrant, the "Divided Warrants") such that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of Company that are initially exercisable under the Divided Warrants (inclusive of the 70,000 Shares of Common Stock initially issuable under the Put Warrant) shall equal, in the aggregate, 15% of the fully-diluted shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately following consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Forbearance Agreement and the TBI Purchase Agreement, after giving pro-forma effect to the conversion into Common Stock of all Company convertible securities and the exercise of all Company granted options and warrants, including the Warrants issued to the Investors.  As a result of consummation of the above transactions with Shelter Island and the TBI Investors, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Divided Warrant is 914,189 shares of Company Common Stock.

The Company and Shelter Island also entered into an Amendment to the Put Option Agreement (the “Put Option Amendment”) dated as of August 31, 2008 under which, among other things, the exercise price applicable for all the put shares under the put option was reduced from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000, or $15.00 per share.

As consideration for its financial accommodations, the Company paid Shelter Island an additional $250,000 as a forbearance fee, by delivering a $250,000 promissory note (the “Shelter Island Note”) due on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2011, and (ii) the date the Debenture is permitted or required to be paid in accordance with its terms.  The Shelter Island Note accrues interest at a rate of 9% per annum and is payable in cash on a monthly basis beginning on February 26, 2011.

Sale of up to $2.5 million of Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants
 
On March 31, 2010, Gulfstream International Group, Inc. consummated the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with 17 accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) an aggregate of 118,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 and stated value $10.00 per share (the “Preferred Shares”), convertible into 1,185,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) 5-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 592,500 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), representing 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,043,000 (the “Offering”). The Warrants expire on March 31, 2013 and are exercisable into shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $1.75 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Warrants.

Pursuant to the Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company which was filed with the State of Delaware on March 31, 2010 (the “Certificate of Designation”), each Preferred Share is convertible into 10 shares of Common Stock. In addition, the Preferred Shares pay an annual dividend at the rate of 12% per annum, payable quarterly, on the last business day of each December, March, June and September (each a “Dividend Payment Date”), payable on each Dividend Payment Date as follows: (i) 60% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 7% per annum) shall be payable in cash, and (ii) 40% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 5% per annum) shall be payable either in cash, or at the sole option of the Company, in additional shares of Common Stock, calculated for such purposes by dividing the amount of the quarterly dividend then payable by 100% of the market price of the Common Stock on such Dividend Payment Date.  Unless previously converted into Common Stock, all Preferred Shares outstanding on the earlier to occur of (a) the date on which the average of the market prices of the Common Stock for any 20 consecutive trading days shall be $2.00 or higher, or (b) 5 years from the Preferred Shares issuance date, shall be automatically converted into Common Stock at the Conversion Price then in effect.

In addition, on March 31, 2010, 4 of the 7 purchasers of the Company’s units consisting of one share of Common Stock (the “Shares”), and warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Prior Warrants”) which was consummated on January 29, 2010 (the “Prior Offering”) and described above under the heading, Sale of Units of Common Stock and Warrants, entered into a letter agreement with the Company (the “Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which such purchasers agreed to exchange their Shares and Prior Warrants for Preferred Shares and Warrants, under the same terms and conditions applicable to Investors in the Offering.  Such purchasers also agreed that the Company shall have no further obligations or liabilities in connection with the transaction documents executed and delivered with respect to the Prior Offering, including, without limitation, the Unit Purchase Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement and the Prior Warrant, each dated as of January 29, 2010, and each of which are terminated in any and all respects. See Note (20) Subsequent Events, Sale of Units of Common Stock and Warrants.
 
 
44

 
 
On March 31, 2010, the Company and the Investors entered into a Registration Rights Agreement under which the Company is obligated to file a registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) registering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares and upon exercise of the Warrants for resale by the Investors on or prior to April 30, 2010 (the “Filing Date”).  In addition, the Company agreed to use its best efforts to cause the SEC to declare the Registration Statement effective by the earlier of (i) 150 days following the Filing Date; and (ii) 180 days following the Filing Date if the SEC conducts a full review of the Registration Statement.

In connection with the first closing of the Offering, the Company paid/issued the placement agent (i) cash commissions in the amount of 9% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; (ii) a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 2% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; and (iii) Warrants to purchase 114,730 shares of Common Stock, which represents 11% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing.

The following table summarizes key cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009:

 
 
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 
Cash Flow Data:
 
2008
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Cash Flow Provided by (used in):
           
Operating Activities
  $ (8,447 )   $ (718 )
Investing Activities
    10,484       (836 )
Financing Activities
    (2,760 )     599  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (723 )   $ (955 )
 
Operating activities

Cash used in operating activities was $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. During this period, cash was used for payments of the Senior debenture and to creditors for restructured obligations that reduced our accounts payable - restructured by $0.7 million and our engine return liability by $1.7 million and to fund the operating loss.

Cash used in operating activities was $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. During this period, cash was used primarily to fund the operating loss, which was significantly impacted by substantial increases in jet fuel costs and increased maintenance expenses related primarily to our fleet of eight Embraer Brasilia aircraft.

Investing activities

Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.8 million and was primarily due to acquisition of aircraft equipment.

Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $10.5 million and primarily resulted from the sale of our fleet of eight Embraer Brasilia aircraft during the third quarter of 2008.

Financing activities

Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily due to the consummation of a Note Purchase Agreement for $1.46 million but partially offset by payments of $1.2 million on its Senior Debentures

Cash used by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 included debt repayments of $8.7 million, including aircraft financing for aircraft sold in 2008. but offset by $6.1 million of face value from the issuance of debentures, and $0.9 million of net proceeds from the sale to the underwriter of over-allotment shares associated with our initial public offering in December 2007.

 
45

 
 
Debt and Other Contractual Obligations

Maintenance Hangar Lease at Hollywood-Fort Lauderdale Airport

We perform our airplane maintenance and repairs primarily at our maintenance hangar located at Hollywood-Fort Lauderdale Airport. The lease for Gulfstream’s principal maintenance facility expires at the end of May 2010. Broward County has been considering for some time an improvement to FLL that will eventually result in a teardown of Gulfstream’s maintenance hangar and require Gulfstream to seek an alternate location for a successor maintenance hangar on the airfield. We are presently in negotiations with Broward County for a lease at a nearby existing site at FLL.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, or liquidity or capital expenditures.

Seasonality

Gulfstream’s business is subject to substantial seasonality, primarily due to leisure and holiday travel patterns, particularly in the Bahamas. We experience the strongest demand from February to July, and the weakest demand from August to December, during which period we typically incur operating losses. As a result, our operating results for a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year, and historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
 
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
 
Our market risks relate primarily to changes in aircraft fuel costs and in interest rates.

Aircraft Fuel. In the past, we have not experienced difficulties with fuel availability and we currently expect to be able to obtain fuel at prevailing market prices in quantities sufficient to meet our future needs. Pursuant to our contract flying arrangements with our code share partners, we will bear the economic risk of fuel price fluctuations.

We were a party to derivative instruments for the purpose of hedging the risks of increases in jet fuel prices through February 2009 covering approximately 20% of our estimated fuel usage. These fuel hedge contracts were established effective September 1, 2008.

We recognized a loss of $337,000 for the March 2009 quarter to settle unfavorable fuel hedge contracts that terminated in February 2009. Since February 28, 2009, we are not a party to any derivative or other arrangement designed to hedge against or manage the risk of an increase in fuel prices. Accordingly, our statements of operations and cash flows after that date will be affected by changes in the price and availability of fuel.

Interest Rates. The rate of interest of our senior debentures is based on the higher of 11%, or prime plus 4%, which currently equates to 7.25%. Therefore, our statement of operations and our cash flows are not exposed to moderate changes in interest rates, unless the prime rate increases to more than twice its present rate.

 
46

 
 
ITEM 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
 
The information set forth below should be read together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing herein.
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Gulfstream International Group, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the results of operations and cash flows for the years then  ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are described in Notes 1, 20 and 21. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
 
Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
April 14, 2010

 
47

 

GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
 
   
As of December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
Assets
           
Current Assets
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 3,215     $ 2,260  
Accounts receivable, net
    4,205       3,426  
Expendable parts and aircraft  fuel
    1,194       1,210  
Prepaid expenses
    648       1,135  
Total Current Assets
    9,262       8,031  
                 
Property and Equipment
               
Flight equipment
    3,366       3,809  
Other property and equipment
    1,373       1,546  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (1,946 )     (2,658 )
Total Property and Equipment
    2,793       2,697  
                 
Intangible assets, net
    3,778       2,837  
Deferred tax assets
    2,032       -  
Other assets
    1,505       1,213  
Total Assets
  $ 19,370     $ 14,778  
                 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
               
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $ 9,566     $ 12,694  
Accounts payable - restructured, current portion
    2,761       2,606  
Long-term debt, current portion
    529       3,864  
Engine return liability, current portion
    2,432       1,168  
Air traffic liability
    1,491       1,391  
Deferred tuition revenue
    728       929  
Total Current Liabilities
    17,507       22,652  
                 
Long Term Liabilities
               
Accounts payable, restructured, net of current portion
    988       426  
Long-term debt, net of current portion
    2,850       -  
Engine return liability, net of current portion
    461       -  
Warrant liability
    2,229       2,639  
Total Liabilities
    24,035       25,717  
                 
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
               
Common stock
    30       36  
Additional paid-in capital
    13,088       14,236  
Common stock warrants
    252       61  
Accumulated deficit
    (17,721 )     (25,272 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (314 )     -  
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
    (4,665 )     (10,939 )
Total Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
  $ 19,370     $ 14,778  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 
48

 

GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
   
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
Operating Revenues
           
Passenger revenue
  $ 88,526     $ 59,753  
Academy, charter and other revenue
    16,730       27,551  
Total Operating Revenues
    105,256       87,304  
                 
Operating Expenses
               
Flight operations
    12,859       15,005  
Aircraft fuel
    30,350       13,918  
Maintenance
    24,478       21,625  
Passenger and traffic service
    21,759       19,352  
Aircraft rent
    5,911       6,093  
Promotion and sales
    6,623       4,986  
General and administrative
    7,110       7,351  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,754       1,218  
Intangible asset impairment
    2,703       680  
Loss on sale of equipment
    4,754       -  
Total Operating Expenses
    119,301       90,228  
                 
Operating profit (loss)
    (14,045 )     (2,924 )
                 
Non-operating (expense) income
               
Interest expense
    (1,306 )     (2,332 )
Interest income
    38       2  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    -       -  
Other (expense) income
    5       (265 )
Total non-operating (expense) income
    (1,263 )     (2,595 )
                 
Profit (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
    (15,308 )     (5,519 )
Income tax provision (benefit)
    (509 )     2,032  
Net profit (loss)
  $ (14,799 )   $ (7,551 )
                 
                 
Net Income (Loss) per share:
               
Basic
  $ (5.00 )   $ (2.45 )
Diluted
  $ (5.00 )   $ (2.45 )
                 
Shares used in calculating net income (loss) per share:
               
Basic
    2,957       3,076  
Diluted
    2,957       3,076  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 
49

 

GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 
   
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
             
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net income (loss)
  $ (14,799 )   $ (7,551 )
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
               
    provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
   Impairment charge on assets held for sale
    4,754       -  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,754       1,218  
Impairment of intangible assets
    2,703       680  
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
    (524 )     2,032  
Amortization of deferred finance costs
    713       1,284  
Stock-based compensation
    50       101  
Write-off of unamortized overhaul costs
    573       -  
Amortization of warrant discount
    69       258  
Provision for bad debts
    6       28  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
    (1,301 )     751  
Decrease (increase) in expendable parts and fuel
    (303 )     (16 )
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expense
    (109 )     (487 )
Decrease (increase) in due from affiliates
    640       -  
Decrease (increase) in other assets
    (763 )     1  
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (6,303 )     3,324  
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable - restructured
    3,918       (717 )
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
    541       101  
Increase (decrease) in engine return liability
    (1,066 )     (1,725 )
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    (8,447 )     (718 )
                 
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities:
               
Acquisition of property and equipment
    (1,427 )     (836 )
Net Proceeds from sale of equipment
    11,911       -  
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    10,484       (836 )
                 
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities:
               
Unrealized loss on fuel hedge contracts
    (314 )     314  
Proceeds from borrowings
    6,100       1,460  
Repayments of debt
    (9,352 )     (1,175 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    806       -  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (2,760 )     599  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (723 )     (955 )
Cash, beginning of period
    3,938       3,215  
Cash, end of period
  $ 3,215     $ 2,260  
                 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid during the period for interest
  $ 500     $ -  
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
    -       -  
 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
1] The Company reclassified a warrant of $191 from equity to a warrant liability at its fair value during 2009.
2] The Company converted the junior debenture to equity. The debt and associated accrued interest net of unamortized costs resulted in an increase to Additional paid-in capital of $1018. See Note 11 - Long Term Debt
3] In connection with the issuance of debentures in 2008, the Company issued warrants with a discounted net present value of $2,351
4] In 2009, long term debt was reclassifed as disclosed in Note 11- Long Term Debt
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 
50

 

 
GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
(In thousands)
 
   
Common Stock
     Additional Paid-in      Common Stock      Accumulated Other      Retained Earnings        
   
Number of Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Warrants
   
Comprehensive Loss
   
 (Deficit)
   
Total
 
Balance December 31, 2007
    2,840     $ 28     $ 12,234     $ 61     $ -     $ (2,922 )   $ 9,401  
                                                         
Net loss
                                            (14,799 )     (14,799 )
Change in fair value of fuel hedge contracts
                                    (314 )             (314 )
Issuance of common stock upon exercise by underwriter of overallotment option, net of costs
    120       2       804       -       -       -       806  
Share based compensation
    -       -       50       -       -       -       50  
Issuance of warrants to debenture holders
    -       -       -       191       -       -       191  
Balance December 31, 2008
    2,960     $ 30     $ 13,088     $ 252     $ (314 )   $ (17,721 )   $ (4,665 )
                                                         
Net loss
                                            (7,551 )     (7,551 )
Conversion of Subordinated Debt and Accrued Interest, net of deferred costs to Common Stock
    573       6       1,012                               1,018  
Change in fair value of fuel hedge contracts
    -       -       -       -       314       -       314  
Share based compensation
    -       -       101       -       -       -       101  
Reclassification of debenture holders warrants to liabilities
    -       -       -       (191 )     -       -       (191 )
Issuance of Common stock to debenture holders
    23       -       35               -       -       35  
Balance December 31, 2009
    3,556     $ 36     $ 14,236     $ 61     $ -     $ (25,272 )   $ (10,939 )
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
51

 
 
GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(1)  Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
Gulfstream International Group, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in December 2005 as Gulfstream Acquisition Group, Inc., and changed its name to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. in June 2007.  References to “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us,” refer to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and either or both of Gulfstream or the Academy. We were formed for the purpose of acquiring Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. (“Gulfstream”), a wholly-owned subsidiary G-Air Holdings Corp., Inc. (“G-Air”), and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. (“Academy”), collectively referred to as the “Company”.
 
Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc. (“GAC”), a related company which is owned by Thomas L. Cooper, operates charter flights between Miami and Havana.  GAC is licensed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U. S. Department of the Treasury as a carrier and travel service provider for charter air transportation between designated U. S. and Cuban airports.
 
Pursuant to a services agreement between Gulfstream and GAC dated August 8, 2003 and amended on March 14, 2006, Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft, flight crews, the Gulfstream name, insurance, and other personnel, including passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative. Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC. The agreement restricts the right of the owner of GAC to transfer the stock of GAC to anyone except the Company and any sales to the Company of GAC stock would be at a nominal price. The results of the Cuba charter business are consolidated as a variable interest entity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 pursuant to the requirements of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”)
 
All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
 
In connection with the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and in accordance with the recently issued guidance by the FASB, the company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through April 14, 2010.
 
Company Operations
 
Gulfstream is a regional air carrier providing scheduled passenger service to numerous destinations in Florida and the Bahamas.  Gulfstream also provides scheduled passenger service between Continental’s Cleveland hub and five smaller cities in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and New York in conjunction with Essential Air Service Routes awarded by the Department of Transportation. As of December 31, 2009, Gulfstream operated a fleet of twenty-three 19-seat Beechcraft “1900 Turboprop” passenger aircraft.  Gulfstream was incorporated in the state of Florida in November of 1988, and operated initially as an “on-demand” charter airline serving the South Florida area, Cuba and the Bahamas.  Following the Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) approval, Gulfstream began scheduled flight service in December of 1990.
 
In January of 1997, Gulfstream signed a comprehensive five-year Alliance Agreement with Continental Airlines (“Continental”) to act as their “Continental Connection” in Florida and the Bahamas effective April 6, 1997.  Under the terms of this agreement, Continental handles all reservations, ticketing and collections for Gulfstream and all flights appear as Continental flight numbers.  Gulfstream receives passengers connecting from Continental hubs in Newark, Cleveland and Houston.  The agreement with Continental was amended and extended in December 1999, August 2003 and March 2006. The March 2006 amendment provides that the term will expire no sooner than November 3, 2011.  After such date, the Company or Continental may terminate the agreement, with or without cause, upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice. Gulfstream currently also has alliance agreements with United Airlines and Copa Airlines.
 
The Academy was incorporated in March 1997, under the laws of the State of Florida and operates as a flight training academy in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.  The Academy provides flight training services to licensed commercial pilots. The Academy’s principal program is its First Officer Program, which allows participants to qualify as a FAA Regulations Part 121 airline pilot in four months.  Following qualification, students spend 250 hours flying as a FAA Regulations Part 121 first officer at Gulfstream.  By attending the Academy, students are able to enhance their ability to secure a permanent position with a commercial airline.  The Academy’s graduates are typically hired by various regional airlines, including Gulfstream.

 
52

 
 
Earnings Per Share
 
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period presented.  Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common stock issuable through stock based compensation including stock options, restricted stock awards, warrants and other convertible securities, as well as warrants issued by Gulfstream.
 
   
Year ended December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
             
Net loss
  $ (14,799,000 )   $ (7,551,000 )
Effect of GIA warrants
    -       -  
Net loss - diluted
  $ (14,799,000 )   $ (7,551,000 )
                 
Weighted average of shares outstanding - basic and diluted
    2,957,000       3,124,000  
                 
Loss per common share:
               
     Basic
  $ (5.00 )   $ (2.45 )
     Diluted
  $ (5.00 )   $ (2.45 )
 
In 2008 and 2009, there were 1,577,000 and 744,000 shares respectively, attributable to stock options and warrants that have been excluded from the weighted average shares outstanding because the effect on losses per share would have been anti-dilutive.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  Cash equivalents consist of a money market account.
 
At various times during the year, the Company may maintain cash balances in excess of the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).  Effective October 2008 through December 2009, banks were able to elect to participate in the FDIC “Transaction Account Guarantee Program”. For participating banks certain accounts are fully guaranteed by the FDIC through June 30, 2010. The exposure to the Company is solely dependent upon daily bank balances, the respective strength of the financial institutions and the level of the FDIC insurance.  At December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, amounts in excess of the then current FDIC limits totaled approximately $0 and $1.7, million respectively.
 
Accounts Receivable
 
Trade receivables and other receivables are carried at their estimated collectible amounts.  Trade credit is generally extended on a short-term basis; thus trade receivables do not bear interest.  Trade accounts receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability based on past credit history with customers and their current financial position.
 
Expendable Parts and Fuel
 
Expendable parts and aircraft fuel are carried at cost and recorded in a current asset account.  Expendable parts and fuel are charged to expense as they are used.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Flight equipment and other property and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation is being provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:  Airframes years; flight simulators – five to seven years; baggage handling, ground support, etc. - five to seven years; office equipment, fixtures and equipment - five years; computer equipment and software – three years; leasehold improvements - five years; and vehicles – three to five years. Residual values estimated for airframes and aircraft rotable parts are 20 percent of cost.

 
53

 
 
Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
 
Identifiable intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the period of expected benefit, unless they were determined to have indefinite lives.
 
Long-lived assets and intangible assets subject to amortization to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may be impaired.   The Company records an impairment loss if the undiscounted future cash flows are found to be less than the carrying amount of the asset.  If an impairment loss has occurred, a charge is recorded to reduce the carrying amount of the asset to fair value.  Long-lived and intangible assets that are to be disposed of which are subject to amortization are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
 
Intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are tested at least annually for impairment, or if circumstances change that will more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount.

There was no impairment recognized during 2008 for long-lived and identifiable intangible assets. During 2009, as a result of net operating losses for the 3 years including 2009 and the uncertain economic performance in future periods the Academy recognized an impairment of the full value of the trade name of $680,000.
 
Goodwill
 
Goodwill consists of the excess of cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the net assets acquired.  Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested at least annually for impairment, or if circumstances change that will more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount.  As more fully described in Note 4, during the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2.7 million, related to goodwill.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, as a result of the relatively short maturity.  The Company believes the carrying amount of its long-term senior and subordinated debt approximate fair value based upon the interest rates for these instruments being near current market rates. Derivatives are valued at fair value.
 
Maintenance and Repair Costs
 
The Company accounts for major overhaul costs using the direct expense method for leased aircraft and the built-in overhaul method for aircraft it owned.
 
Gulfstream operates under an FAA-approved continuous inspection and maintenance program. Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. We account for major engine maintenance activities for our Beechcraft 1900D leased aircraft on the direct expense method. Under this method, major engine maintenance is performed under a long-term contract with a third party vendor, whereby monthly payments are made on the basis of hours flown and are charged to expense as incurred.
 
In 2008, major engine maintenance for our Embraer 120 Brasilia owned aircraft was based on the built-in overhaul method.  The built-in overhaul method is based on segregation of the aircraft costs into those that should be depreciated over the useful life of the aircraft and those that require overhaul at periodic intervals. Thus, the estimated cost of the overhaul component included in the purchase price was allocated separately from the cost of the airframe. The initial overhaul component was determined based on estimated flying hours remaining to overhaul.  These capitalized overhaul components are amortized based on the ratio of monthly hours flown to estimated hours remaining to overhaul.  When major overhaul expenses are incurred, any unamortized balances are charged to current operating expense and the cost of the new overhaul is capitalized and amortized in the same manner.  During 2008, the Embraer 120 Brasilia were sold. See Note 3 Property and Equipment.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Passenger revenue associated with airline tickets is recognized when transportation service is provided or when the ticket expires, rather than when a ticket is sold.
 
 
54

 
 
Tickets expire one year from the date of issue.  The Company is required to charge certain taxes and fees on these tickets.  These taxes and fees include U.S. federal transportation taxes, federal security charges, airport passenger facility charges and foreign arrival and departure taxes.  These taxes and fees are legal assessments on the customer.  As we have a legal obligation to act as a collection agent with respect to these taxes and fees, these amounts are not included in passenger revenue.  These taxes and fees are recorded as a liability when the amounts are collected and the liability is relieved when payments are made to the applicable government agency or operating carrier.
 
The amounts associated with passenger tickets sold by the Company are included in the consolidated balance sheet as air traffic liability until the transportation service is provided.  Those passenger tickets used during each period are specifically identified and included in the results of operations for the periods in which travel is completed.Charter revenue, excess baggage fees, and miscellaneous revenue are recognized when transportation service is provided. Enrollment fee revenue is based upon actual training hours used by the students of our pilot training academy.  The remaining unused hours represent deferred tuition revenue.
 
Frequent Flyer Awards
 
In connection with its several code share agreements, Gulfstream participates in the respective frequent flyer programs of its code share partners.  However, our code share partners are responsible for the overall administration and costs of the program.
 
Passengers on our airline, who are also participants in the frequent flyer programs of our code share partners, can earn mileage credits in those programs for travel on our airline. Gulfstream incurs costs from its code share partners for mileage credit earned by these passengers in accordance with rates specified in the respective code share agreements.
 
In addition, participants in these frequent flyer programs may use mileage accumulated in those programs to obtain free trips on one of Gulfstream’s flights.  Gulfstream receives revenue from its code share partners for travel awards redeemed by its participants on the Airline’s flight segments in accordance with rates specified in the respective code share agreements.
 
Debt Issue Expenses and Discounts
 
Debt issue expenses and discounts are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the respective financial instrument.
 
Income Taxes
 
Federal, state and local income taxes are calculated and recorded on the current period's activity in accordance with the tax laws and regulations that are in effect.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax return. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The differences relate primarily to reserve or provisional accounts, depreciation and amortization, and deferred revenues.
 
The Company also recognizes a deferred tax asset for the expected value of the future tax benefit recognized as a result of its net operating losses.
 
A deferred tax asset valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The net deferred income tax assets, after reducing the deferred tax assets by the valuation allowance, represent the income tax benefits that are expected to be realized.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
 New, modified and unvested share based payment transactions with employees, such as stock options and restricted stock, are measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
 
See Note (13) Stock Options for a description of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, and information regarding stock options granted during 2009.
 
 
55

 
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASC 810 (originally issued as SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)". Among other items, ASC 810 responds to concerns about the application of certain key provisions of FIN 46(R), including those regarding the transparency of the involvement with variable interest entities. ASC 810 is effective for calendar year companies beginning on January 1, 2010. The Company does not believe the adoption of ASC 810 will have a significant impact on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

On September 23, 2009, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 08-1, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables" (EITF 08-1). EITF 08-1 updates the current guidance pertaining to multiple-element revenue arrangements included in ASC Subtopic 605-25, which originated primarily from EITF 00-21, also titled "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." EITF 08-1 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2011 for calendar-year entities. The Company utilizes the accounting guidance provided in "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple De1iverables" in the timing of recognition of revenue associated with frequent flyer credits with business partners. The Company does not believe the adoption of ASC605-25 will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements

The Company adopted new accounting guidance related to its accounting for certain warrants. The new guidance clarifies the determination of whether an instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an entity’s own stock, which would qualify as a scope exception under U.S. GAAP accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Accordingly, the warrant was reclassified from equity to a liability and is valued at its fair value.
 
(2)  Accounts Receivable

At December 31, 2008 and 2009, receivables consisted primarily of ticket sales. These amounts are reflected on the balance sheet, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $28,000 and $54,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

As a result of the code sharing agreements disclosed in Note 1, Gulfstream has a significant concentration of its revenue and receivables with Continental.  Accounts receivable from Continental as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 amounted to $1,850,000 and $1,360,000, or 41% and 40% of our total accounts receivable, respectively.
 
(3)  Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2008 and 2009 (in thousands):
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
             
             
Aircraft
  $ 300     $ 300  
Aircraft rotable parts
    1,787       1,956  
Flight equipment
    1,280       1,553  
Ground equipment
    783       902  
Computer equipment and software
    123       142  
Office equipment
    71       100  
Leasehold improvements
    244       246  
Vehicles
    151       155  
      4,739       5,354  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    1,946       2,658  
Property and equipment, net
  $ 2,793     $ 2,696  
 
On June 26, 2008, Gulfstream entered into an Aircraft Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) to sell seven of Gulfstream’s total of eight Embraer EMB-120ER aircraft, including the two Pratt & Whitney PW118 engines installed on each aircraft, for a total gross purchase price of $12,250,000. The eighth aircraft was sold to a separate party, including the two Pratt & Whitney PW118 engines installed on the aircraft, for a total gross purchase price for $565,000. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss of $4.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment amounted to $2,454,000 and $874,000 for 2008 and 2009, respectively.

 
56

 
 
(4)  Goodwill
 
            Goodwill of $5.1 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of the Academy and consisted of the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired, (See Note 1 Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and was written down to $2.7 million prior to 2008. In 2008, an unprecedented rise in jet fuel prices and declining economic conditions caused a negative impact on airline travel. The contraction of the airline industry and the furlough of some commercial airline pilots caused a significant reduction in the demand for services provided by the Academy. As a result, the fair value of the Academy’s goodwill at December 31, 2008 was estimated based on the present value of expected future cash flows, and the carrying amount of the Academy goodwill was determined to exceed its fair value. Therefore, an impairment charge of $2.7 million for the remainder of the Academy goodwill was recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
(5)  Intangible Assets
 
Identifiable intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the period of expected benefit, unless they were determined to have indefinite lives. 
 
The Company has deemed the operating certificate to have an indefinite useful life.  An airline must have an operating certificate to provide air service of any kind.  Gulfstream’s certificate was issued under Part 121 of Federal Air Regulations (“FAR’s”) as written and enforced by the FAA.  Once a certificate is issued, it is retained indefinitely as long as Gulfstream complies with various FAA standards including crew training and rest requirements, maintenance and inspection programs, safety equipment, security procedures, etc.  It is Gulfstream’s intent to maintain such FAA standards in order to retain its certificate indefinitely.
 
The Company has also deemed the Academy’s trademark to have an indefinite useful life. Factors indicating potential impairment include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived assets, a significant change in the condition of the long-lived assets and operating cash flow losses associated with the use of the long-lived assets.  The Academy’s operations have produced operating losses in the 3 years ending December 31, 2009.  Management believes that the operating cash flow losses associated with the use of this long-lived asset, do not support the value of the trade name and therefore it was recognized as an impairment charge during 2009.
 
The following table sets forth the components of intangible assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 (in thousands):
 
     
January 1,
 
Year ended December 31,
 
 
Useful life
 
2008
 
Impairment
 
Amortization
   
2008
   
Impairment
   
Amortization
   
2009
 
                               
GIA Affiliation Agreement with Continental
74 months
  $ 1,143       $ (275 )   $ 868           $ (261 )   $ 607  
                                                   
GIA FAR 121 Operating Certificate
Indefinite
    2,230               $ 2,230                   $ 2,230  
                                                   
Gulfstream Training Academy Tradename
Indefinite
    680               $ 680     $ (680 )           $ -  
                                                     
      $ 4,053  
 $                                  -
  $ (275 )   $ 3,778     $ (680 )   $ (261 )   $ 2,837  
 
Accumulated amortization was $1,002 as of December 31, 2009.  Estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31, is as follows (in thousands):
 
       
2010
    261  
2011
    261  
2012
    85  
2013
       
    $ 607  

 
57

 

(6) Other Assets

        Other assets at December 31, 2008 and 2009 are comprised of the following (in thousands):

   
2008
   
2009
 
Deferred debt costs
  $ 628     $ 390  
Deposits
    575       544  
Licenses and operating rights
    283       258  
Other assets
    19       21  
Total other assets
  $ 1,505     $ 1,213  
                 
 
 (7)  Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2009 are comprised of the following (in thousands):
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
Accounts payable
  $ 5,134     $ 7,449  
Accrued payroll and payroll burden
    453       502  
Accrued vacation
    781       904  
Accrued taxes
    623       663  
Accrued fuel
    621       1,295  
Accrued leases
    386       360  
Accrued workers compensation
    21       109  
Accrued interest
    40       35  
Accrued audit and legal fees
    60       181  
Accrued Government Security expense
    56       427  
Accrued customer reservation system fees
    188       174  
Other current liabilities
    1,175       510  
 Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities   $ 9,566       $ 12,694  

(8)  Fuel Hedge
 
       The Company was a party to derivative instruments for the purpose of hedging the risks of increases in jet fuel prices through February 2009 covering approximately 20% of its estimated fuel usage. These fuel hedge contracts were established effective September 1, 2008 as a requirement by the lender pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement for the issuance of the Senior Debentures. See Note 11 Long-Term Debt.

               The Company was a party to derivative instruments for the purpose of hedging the risks of increases in jet fuel prices through February 2009 covering approximately 20% of its estimated fuel usage. These fuel hedge contracts were established effective September 1, 2008 as a requirement by the lender pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement for the issuance of the Senior Debentures. See Note 11 Long-Term Debt.
 
                These derivative contracts qualified as cash flow hedging instruments and are reported on the balance sheet at December 31, 2008 at their fair value. The unrealized gain or loss on the effective portion of the hedge is reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. As the hedged fuel is purchased, the realized gain or loss is recorded in operating expenses. 
 
       The Company recognized a loss on settled hedges of $340,000 for 2008.  At December 31, 2008, the Company recognized unrealized losses of $314,000 on outstanding fuel hedge contracts and included such amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The Company recognized the loss upon settlement of the related hedges in 2009.
 
(9)   Engine Return Liability and the Restructuring of Other Obligations
 
        In June 2003, Gulfstream entered into a tri-party Pooling and Engine Services Agreement with Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation (“RACC”), its aircraft vendor, and Standard Aero, its engine maintenance contractor at the time, that allowed Gulfstream to exchange sixteen (16) of its engines requiring overhaul for mid-life engines owned by and borrowed from RACC that had time remaining before overhaul (“Loaner Engines”). The future overhaul costs of the Loaner Engines were to be shared proportionately between Gulfstream and RACC, with Gulfstream’s portion based on engine hours flown until the next overhaul.  Accordingly, Gulfstream recognized a liability of $5.6 million representing its contractual obligation for its share of the overhaul costs. The Loaner Engines were expected to be returned to RACC prior to December 31, 2009.
 
58

 
        Two Loaner Engines were returned to RACC in early 2007. In March 2007, the Company signed a new engine services agreement with Pratt & Whitney Canada (“P&W”) providing for a fixed rate per hour for engine overhaul services for its fleet engines and the Loaner Engines.  Included in that agreement, and in conjunction with this engine return requirement, P&W committed to perform engine overhaul services beginning March 1, 2007 at a pace that would allow the remaining fourteen Loaner Engines to be returned to RACC in accordance with contractual specifications. In return, Gulfstream agreed to make fixed monthly payments of $167,000 to P&W beginning March 31, 2007 and continuing for twenty four months through February 2009. During 2008, the number of Loaner Engines returned to RACC fell behind schedule, since Gulfstream was unable to make certain payments to P&W to fund the work required to return the Loaner Engines to RACC and to maintain Gulfstream’s fleet engines.
 
On December 19, 2008, Gulfstream entered into a restructuring agreement (the “Agreement”) with RACC, as well as an amended engine maintenance agreement with P&W (the “P&W Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Gulfstream agreed to:
 
(a) Make payments totaling $535,469 by June 2009, which were made, to RACC for costs and expenses to bring Loaner Engines that Gulfstream had previously returned to RACC into compliance with return conditions.
 
(b) Return to RACC seven of the Loaner Engines, with the remainder to be returned no later than August 6, 2010.
 
(c) Make payments for the cost of repairing and overhauling all 14 engines in the total amount of $2,100,000. They were to be made in six installments beginning with a payment of $400,000 on April 30, 2009 and ending with a payment of $100,000 on June 30, 2010.  The Company made aggregate payments of $875,000 during 2009, and currently owes $1,225,000.
 
(d) Make quarterly payments to RACC in an amount equal to 25% of Gulfstream’s excess cash balance in payment for $700,000 of costs and expenses associated with bringing into compliance with return conditions four additional leased aircraft and eight engines previously returned. Following satisfaction of such costs and expenses, the excess cash payments will be applied, in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000, as a credit to reduce Gulfstream’s obligations to satisfy end-of-lease return conditions and then to all other obligations and indebtedness owed to RACC, including past-due aircraft lease obligations totaling $1,113,000. During 2009 Gulfstream paid $40,000 pursuant to this provision.
 
(e) Entered into an amended engine maintenance agreement with P&W that covers past-due obligations and future work on the fleet’s engines and the seven remaining Loaner Engines, and
 
(f) Established terms of repayment of indebtedness owing to two other creditors of Gulfstream, which are required by RACC to be on terms that are no more favorable than the repayment amounts to RACC set forth in documentation supporting the Agreement. See the following section “Payment Arrangements with Other Creditors”.
 
The Agreement provides for certain events of default. See Note (20) Subsequent Events, Forbearance Agreement with Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation, for further discussion of the current status of this matter.
 
Pratt & Whitney Payments
 
The amended P&W Agreement dated December 1, 2008 is effective from September 1, 2008 through August 31, 2011. The Agreement required Gulfstream to pay $1,000,000 for past-due obligations, for which payments were completed by March 2009. In addition, Gulfstream is obligated to pay a rate per engine flight hour throughout the three years of the contract, of which $6.78 per engine flight hour is applied to the repayment of past-due obligations totaling $1,583,000. Beginning in September 2009, the Company was unable to make the certain weekly payments to P&W per the amended agreement. As of December 31, 2009, Gulfstream owed P&W $772,000 for previously restructured rate-based obligations, as well as $829,000 for unpaid weekly payments. See Note (20) Subsequent Events, Forbearance Agreement with Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation, for further discussion of the current status of this matter.
 
Payment Arrangements with Other Creditors.
 
The Agreement requires that the terms of repayment of indebtedness owing to two other creditors of Gulfstream shall be on terms that are no more favorable than the repayment terms applicable to RACC. As such, Gulfstream will repay $376,000 and $326,000, respectively, to two other creditors in equal monthly installments over 36 months beginning February 2009.  As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate debt owed to these creditors was $487,000.
 
59

 
The Company did not recognize a gain or loss on restructuring of these agreements.  The difference between the payments specified by the terms and the carrying amount of the obligations at the date of the restructuring has been treated as interest expense.  This interest expense of $474,889 is being recognized ratably over the period between restructuring and maturity. For the period ended December 31, 2008 and December 31 2009, the Airline recognized interest expense of $60,000 and $244,000, respectively. A portion of the obligation, $1,113,000 owed to RACC for past-due aircraft rent, is payable under a free-cash flow formula as described in the Agreement.  However, the Agreement provides that the lessor has the right to demand payment of this balance at its sole discretion and accordingly, this liability has been classified as current in the accompanying balance sheet.
 
(10)   Capital Transactions
 
Continental Warrant
 
On August 8, 2003, Gulfstream issued a warrant to Continental to acquire 20% of Gulfstream’s common stock at a cost of $.001 per share.  The warrant expires on December 31, 2015.  Simultaneous with the acquisition of the stock of G-Air and the Academy on March 14, 2006, Gulfstream paid $2 million to Continental in return for a reduction from 20% to 10% in the percentage of Gulfstream common stock it could purchase based on exercise of the warrant.
 
The warrant contains certain anti-dilution and cash dividend provisions that would be effected as if the warrant had been previously exercised by Continental.  The warrant also provides for net issue exercise by Continental in lieu of cash payment, as well as providing a call option to Gulfstream to repurchase the warrant prior to expiration at aggregate purchase prices ranging between $5.5 million and $7.5 million. The fair value of the warrants at the date of issue is included in additional paid-in capital in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
Warrants issued in conjunction with Senior Debentures and Junior Debentures
 
Senior Debentures
 
        In September 2008, the Company obtained an original $5,100,000 debt financing with Shelter Island Opportunity Fund LLC (“Shelter Island”) pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the “Shelter Island Purchase Agreement”) and a secured original issue discount debenture due August 31, 2011 (the “Debenture”) of which $3,659,000 was outstanding as of December 31st 2009.   As part of such financing, the Company granted Shelter Island a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries. Further, a Senior Warrant was issued which as of December 31, 2009 was exercisable for 578,870 shares of our common stock at any time following the closing and on or prior to the six-year anniversary of the closing, at a nominal exercise price. The Senior Warrant expires in September 2014. The Senior Warrant is subject to an anti-dilution adjustment for certain future issuances or deemed issuances of common stock at an equity valuation of Gulfstream less than $5.0 million. If the anti-dilution adjustment is triggered, the shares of Gulfstream common stock issuable under the senior warrant would increase so as to maintain the percentage interest in Gulfstream represented by those shares.  From the earlier of the repayment of the senior debentures or August 31, 2011 and until August 31, 2014, the Company issued certain warrants to Shelter Island and granted Shelter Island a right to “put” the warrants to the Company for $3,000,000.
 
On February 26, 2010, the Company and Shelter Island entered into a Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Debenture (the “Forbearance Agreement”) which reduced the Company’s potential liability under the put option from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000.  Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement, the original warrant for 578,870 was divided into (a) a warrant in the form of the original warrant initially exercisable into 70,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Put Warrant”); and (b) a warrant in the form of the original warrant (the “Remaining Warrant”, and together with the Put Warrant, the "Divided Warrants") such that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of Company that are initially exercisable under the Divided Warrants (inclusive of the 70,000 Shares of Common Stock initially issuable under the Put Warrant) shall equal, in the aggregate, 15% of the fully-diluted shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately following consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Forbearance Agreement and the Purchase Agreements, after giving pro-forma effect to the conversion into Common Stock of all Company convertible securities and the exercise of all Company options and warrants, including the Warrants issued to the Investors.  As a result of consummation of the above transaction with Shelter Island, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Divided Warrant is 906,206 shares of Company Common Stock. See Note (20), Subsequent Events for further discussion of the Forbearance Agreement.
 
The Company classified the warrants as of December 31, 2008 as a liability and recorded an initial value of $2,160,000. The warrant liability is revalued at the end of each reporting period with the change in value reported on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, the value is $2,229,000 and $2,638,000. The fair value of the Senior Warrants at the time of issuance was determined based on the present value of the Company’s guaranteed repurchase price of $3,000,000 for the shares of stock underlying the Senior Warrants.
 
60

 
In addition, the Company issued a warrant to the placement agent for the Senior Debenture transaction (the “Agent Warrant”) to purchase 119,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.20 per share.  The Agent Warrant expires on the third anniversary of the transaction closing date.  The Agent Warrant is subject to anti-dilution adjustment to the exercise price for future issuances of common stock at a price that is less than the $3.20 exercise price of this warrant.  The fair value of the Agent Warrant of $41,000 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
 
Junior Debentures
 
In September 2008, Gulfstream sold to Gulfstream Funding, LLC (the Holder), $1.0 million in aggregate principal amount of junior subordinated debentures (the “Junior Debentures”) and a warrant to purchase 225,000 shares of Gulfstream’s common stock (the “Junior Warrant”).  The Junior Warrant was exercisable at an exercise price of $3.20 per share. The Junior Warrant was exercisable through September 16, 2014. The warrant will be subject to an anti-dilution adjustment for certain future issuances or deemed issuances of common stock at a price per share of less than $3.20.
 
For financial reporting purposes, the Company recorded a discount of $150,000 to reflect the fair value of the Junior Warrant issued. The fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  Transaction related fees and expenses totaling $35,000 were deferred.  The discount and deferred debt costs were being amortized over the 38 month term of the Junior Debenture. The Junior Debenture was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $3.00 per share. In October, 2009, the Company reduced the conversion price to the then current fair market value of the Common Stock of $1.975 per share. The Company subsequently entered into an agreement with Junior Debenture holders and on October 20, 2009 converted the Junior Debenture and accrued interest expense into 578,342 shares of the company’s common stock. Upon conversion of the Junior Debentures, the number of shares issuable under the Junior Warrant decreased by 58,333 to 166,667.  The following table summarizes information concerning warrants outstanding:
 
               
Warrants Issued with 2008
 
   
 
   
 
               
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
Senior Subordinated Debt
     Jr. Subordinated Debt  
   
Warrants Issued
with 2006
Subordinated Debt
   
Warrants Issued
with Initial
Public Offering
   
Shelter Island
   
Agent
   
 
Gulfstream Funding, LLC
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
    46,340       64,000       -       -       -  
     Granted
    -       -       578,870       118,750       225,000  
     Exercised
    -       -       -       -       -  
     Forfeited
    -       -       -       -       -  
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    46,340       64,000       578,870       118,750       225,000  
     Granted
    -       -               -       -  
     Exercised
    -       -       -       -       (58,333 )
     Forfeited
    -       -       -       -       -  
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
    -       -       -       -       166,667  
                                         
Average Exercise Price
  $ 5.00     $ 9.60     $ -     $ 3.20     $ 3.20  
                                         
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
    46,340       64,000       578,870       118,750       225,000  
                                         
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
    46,340       64,000       578,870       118,750       166,667  
 
 
61

 
 
 (11)  Long-Term Debt

At December 31, 2008 and 2009, long-term debt consisted of the following:
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Secured Senior Debentures; net of debt and discount costs associated with the loan of $1,284 and secured by all the company's assets and guaranteed by its subsidiaries. The Debentures bear interest at an annual rate of the higher of (i) the sum of the pri                                                                                                     
  $ 2,516     $ 2,376  
                 
Junior Subordinated Debenture; net of debt and discount costs associated with the loan of $141. Interest is 12.00% per annum.  The debenture converted to Equity in October, 2009. See note 10 "Capital Transactions" for further disclosures.
    859       -  
                 
Subordinated Promissory Note; including interest accrued at 12.00% per annum.  The maturity date of this note is January 15, 2010. See note 20 subsequent events for further disclosures.
    -     $ 1,488  
                 
                 
Various other notes payable secured by vehicles
    3       -  
                 
    $ 3,378     $ 3,864  
                 
Less current portion, net of discount and deferred costs
    529       -  
                 
Total Long-term Debt
  $ 2,849     $ 3,864  
 
Senior Debentures
 
In September 2008, the Company raised gross proceeds of $5.1 million from the issuance of a secured original issue discount debenture (the “Senior Debenture”) and warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Senior Warrants”). See Note 10 Capital Transactions.
 
The transaction was effected pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") between the Company and the lender. The Company received proceeds of $4.1 million net of debt discount and transaction costs. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes and payment of principal and interest outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit line. Other significant terms under the Agreement include the following:
 
·  
The Company may prepay all or any portion of the balance due together with a payment equal to 5% of the amount being prepaid.
·  
Gulfstream is subject to certain covenants, including covenants that it have (i) consolidated minimum quarterly EBITDA starting in the quarter ending December 31, 2008, (ii) six month EBITDA averages starting in the six months ending June 30, 2011, (iii) minimum monthly accounts receivable balances of $3.5 million, and (iv) minimum monthly cash balances of $750,000. The Company was not in compliance with the minimum quarterly EBITDA covenant for the quarter ending December 31, 2008. The Company obtained a waiver on March 19, 2009 from the lender relating to violation of the covenant for consolidated minimum quarterly EBITDA for the quarter ended December 31, 2008.  Further the Company was not in compliance in the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. See Note 20 “Subsequent Events”
·  
The Company was required to provide a minimum fuel hedge for a time period of no less than six months equivalent to the product of 20% of the forecasted monthly fuel usage (in gallons) times the number of months utilized in the contract. See Note 8 “Fuel Hedge”
·  
The Senior Debenture contains Events of Default, which if not waived by the lender, would entitle the lender to accelerate the due date of the Senior Debenture. See Note 20 “Subsequent Events”. The company anticipates it will fail to achieve the minimum quarterly EBITDA requirement which is one of the Events of Default. Therefore at December 31, 2009 the Company has classified all future debenture payments as a short term liability on the balance sheet.

For financial reporting purposes, the Company recorded a discount of $2.2 million to reflect the value of the warrants issued and $350,000 to reflect the original issue discount.  In addition, the Company incurred finder’s fees and other related fees and expenses in connection with this transaction totaling $664,000. See Note (20) Subsequent Events.
 
62

 
Junior Debenture
 
In September 2008, the Company issued a $1,000,000 12% junior subordinated debenture (the “Junior Debenture”) and a warrant to purchase up to 225,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Junior Warrant”) to an entity in which members of the Board of Directors of the Company own a minority interest.  The Junior Debenture is payable in a lump sum payment due at maturity on November 2011.  Interest is payable at $50,000 annually plus excess interest accrued but unpaid is due at the end of the 24th and 36th month and at maturity. The timing of payment of interest on the junior debentures in accordance with the above schedule is subject to restrictions contained in the restructuring agreement with RACC, whereby interest payments on the junior debentures cannot be made until all payment obligations to RACC are completed.
 
The Junior Debenture was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $3.00 per share. In October 2009, the Company reduced the conversion price to the then current fair market value of the Common Stock of $1.975 per share. On October 20, 2009, the $1 million convertible debenture and the related interest costs were converted into 578,342 shares of the company’s common stock.
 
 (12)  Lease Obligations
 
Aircraft Leases
 
Gulfstream leases twenty-three (23) aircraft. Two aircraft are leased pursuant to a contract to provide charter services that is renewable every two years, and requires monthly lease payments of $17,000 each. Twenty-one (21) aircraft are leased under various non-cancelable operating lease agreements that require monthly payments of $21,000 each.  The lease agreements expire in August 2010.  Gulfstream has the option to extend each of these individual lease agreements for an additional term of at least six (6) months, but no more than twenty-four (24) months.  Gulfstream is limited to extending no more than fifteen (15) leases for a duration of more than twelve (12) months.  It is required to make contingent payments to the lessor beginning August 1, 2006, and ending on the earlier of the end of the lease terms or at a time when the cumulative contingent payments equal $315,000.  The contingent payments are computed based upon fuel costs per gallon being below specified amounts.   In 2008 and 2009, contingent payments were made such that the maximum cumulative payment level has been achieved.
 
Facility Leases
 
Gulfstream leases office and hangar space for its headquarters, airport facilities and certain other equipment under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through December 31, 2025.
 
During August 2005, Gulfstream and the Academy entered into building facility lease agreements with a related corporation controlled by the major stockholders of G-Air.  The agreements called for both companies to occupy their facilities beginning January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2025.  Rental payments made by Gulfstream and the Academy, respectively, in 2008 were $220,000 and $202,000 and in 2009 were $198,000 and $208,000.
 
At December 31, 2009, the total future minimum rental commitments under all the above operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
 
2010
    4,934  
2011
    363  
2012
    344  
2013
    354  
2014
    365  
Thereafter
    4,009  
    $ 10,369  
 
For 2008 and 2009, lease expense under these operating leases was $8,057,000, and $7,652,000 respectively.
 
(13)   Stock Options
 
Our Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”) was adopted by the board of directors of Gulfstream and approved by our stockholders in 2006. It was further amended in 2009. The 2009 amendment increased the authorized number of shares in the plan from 350,000 to 650,000 as the plan had less than 1% of its shares available for future grants.
 
63

 
Our Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, non-incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, or other stock-based awards to those of our employees, directors or consultants who are selected by members of a committee comprised of members of our board of directors’ compensation committee (the “Committee”). On the date of the grant, the exercise price must equal at least 100% of the fair market value in the case of incentive stock options, or 110% of the fair market value with respect to optionees who own at least 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock. The plan authorizes 650,000 shares of our common stock to be issued under the plan. The Committee administers the plan.
 
The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The Company uses an estimated forfeiture rate of 0% due to limited experience with historical employee forfeitures.  The Black-Scholes option pricing model also requires assumptions for risk free interest rates, dividend rate, stock volatility and expected life of an option grant.  The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Bill rate with a maturity based on the expected life of the options. Dividend rates are based on the Company's dividend history.  The stock volatility factor is based on the NYSE Amex Exchange Airline Stock Index.  Expected life is determined using the “simplified method” permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, since the Company does not have sufficient historical expected life experience.  The fair value of each option grant is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the option on a straight line basis.
 
The following table shows the assumptions used and weighted average fair value for grants in the year ended December 31, 2009. There were no options granted in the year ended December 31, 2008:
 
   
2009
 
       
Expected annual dividend rate
    0.0 %
Risk-free interest rate     1.18-1.58
Average expected life (years)
    6  
Expected volatility of common stock
    45.10 %
Forfeiture rate
    0.0 %
Weighted average fair value of option grants
  $ 0.88  

The following table summarizes information about stock option transactions for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009:
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
   
Number of Options
   
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
   
Number of Options
   
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
   
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
   
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
 
                                     
Outstanding at beginning of year
    210,324     $ 5.00       210,324     $ 5.00       6.8     $ -  
   Granted
    -       -       138,000       2.00       9.1       -  
   Exercised
    -       -       -       -       -          
   Forfeited
    -       -       -       -       -          
                                                 
Outstanding at end of year
    210,324     $ 5.00       348,324     $ 3.81       7.3     $ -  
                                                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
              206,724     $ 5.00       6.8     $ -  
                                                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
              149,124     $ 5.00       7.6     $ -  
 
 
64

 
 
The following table summarizes the status of non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2008 and 2009:
 
   
Number of Shares
   
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
             
Non-vested shares as of January 1, 2008
    81,600     $ 2.44  
                 
   Granted
    -     $ -  
   Vested
    (20,400 )   $ 2.28  
   Cancelled
    -     $ -  
                 
Non-vested shares as of December 31, 2008
    61,200     $ 2.49  
                 
   Granted
    138,000     $ 0.88  
   Vested
    (57,600 )   $ 1.37  
   Cancelled
    -     $ -  
                 
Non-vested shares as of December 31, 2009
    141,600     $ 2.49  
 
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2009:
 
Options Outstanding
   
Options Exercisable
 
Range of Exercise Prices
   
Number Outstanding
   
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
   
Weighted Average Exercise Price
   
Number Exercisable
   
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
$ 0.01 to 10.00       348,324       7.3     $ 3.81       206,724     $ 4.46  
 
The Company recorded $50,000 and $101,000 of compensation expense for stock options during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 respectively. At December 31, 2009 there was a total of $116,785 of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2 years.
 
As of December 31, 2009, an aggregate of 650,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Plan. Stock option grants were outstanding for an aggregate of 348,324 shares of stock, and 301,676 shares remained available for grant. Shares issued pursuant to the Plan will be newly-issued and authorized shares of common stock, or treasury shares.
 
(14)  Defined Contribution Plan
 
Gulfstream sponsors a tax deferred savings plan with a discretionary profit sharing component which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The plan covers all employees with the completion of a ¼ year of service.  The eligible participants are 100% vested in their contributions to the plan, and vest in Company contributions 25% with less than one year of total service, 50% after two years, 75% after three years, and 100% after four years of total service. The plan allows for 25% matching by the Company of up to 4% of the eligible participants’ compensation. During 2008 and 2009, the Company made matching contributions totaling $49,000 and $34,000 respectively.
 
65

 
(15)  Income Taxes
 
Loss before taxes and the current and deferred tax provisions are as follows (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2009
 
             
Income before taxes
  $ (15,308 )   $ (5,519 )
Current tax provision (benefit):
               
   Federal
  $ -     $ -  
   State
    -       -  
      -       -  
Deferred tax provision (benefit):
               
   Federal
    (460 )     1,831  
   State
    (49 )     201  
      (509 )     2,032  
Tax provision (benefit)
  $ (509 )   $ 2,032  
                 

The following is a reconciliation between the federal statutory rate of 34% and the effective rate (in thousands):

 
 
 
December 31,
2008
   
December 31,
2009
 
 
Computed expected provision (benefit) at
                       
   the statutory rates
  $ (5,205 )     34 %   $ (1,877 )     34 %
  Increases (decrease) in income taxes
                               
    resulting from:
                               
  Non-deductible items
    1,275       -8 %     33       -1 %
  Timing differences
    774       -5 %     55       -1 %
  State income tax, net of federal effect
    (460 )     3 %     (192 )     4 %
  Effect of NOL and Sec 338 election
    (852 )     6 %     (80 )     1 %
  Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
    3,958       -26     4,093       -74 %
    $ (509 )     3 %   $ 2,032       -37 %
                                 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant elements of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
2008
   
December 31,
2009
 
Deferred tax assets:
           
  Net operating loss carry forward
  $ 4,772     $ 6,763  
  Amortization of Intangible Assets
    166       224  
  Intangible asset impairment
    1,513       1,623  
  Allowance for Doubtful accounts
    11       12  
  Accrued reserves
    136       19  
  Compensation differences
    152       194  
  Valuation Allowance
    (3,958 )     (8,050 )
Non-current deferred tax assets
    2,792       785  
                 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
  Accelerated depreciation and amortization
    593       573  
  Amortization of Operating Certificate
    167       212  
  Non-current deferred tax liabilities
    760       785  
                 
Net non-current deferred tax assets
  $ 2,032     $ -  

A valuation allowance offsets the net deferred tax assets for which recovery is not considered more likely than not.  A valuation allowance is evaluated considering positive and negative evidence about whether the deferred tax assets will be realized.  At the time of evaluation, the allowance can be either increased or reduced.  A reduction could result in the complete elimination of the allowance, if positive evidence indicates that the value of the deferred tax assets is no longer impaired and the allowance is no longer required. The Company's net operating loss carry forward as of December 31, 2008 was $12.7 million that expires in years up to 2028.

66

 
A valuation allowance of $4.0 million was provided for the net operating loss carry forward and other deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2008. We determined that the rapidly declining economy, especially since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2008, had diminished our visibility regarding future long-term profitability. As a result, we concluded that we would more likely than not fail to realize the full benefit of such assets.

The valuation allowance was increased to $8.0 million as of December 31, 2009, or 100% of deferred tax assets. We determined that the ongoing net operating losses, and the liquidity situation (See Note 21 Liquidity and Capital Resources) has substantially increased the likelihood  of not realizing the tax benefit of the deferred tax assets.
 
As of December 31, 2009, we have not recorded any provisions for accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. When applicable, we recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in general and administrative expense.
 
At December 31, 2009, tax years 2005 through 2008 remain open to examination, and possible adjustment, by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject through September 2012.
 
(16)  Contingencies
 
FAA Loss Contingency
 
On May 7, 2009, the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”) notified the Company that it was seeking a proposed civil penalty of $1,310,000 against the Company for alleged non-compliance with respect to certain record keeping requirements, and regulatory requirements relating to the use of certain replacement parts.  The Company has begun an informal conference with the FAA, which is a settlement process prescribed by statute that authorizes the FAA to accept and consider relevant information in order to compromise proposed civil penalties. We have submitted information, evidence and supporting documentation for consideration by the FAA demonstrating that certain alleged violations of the regulations did not occur, or demonstrating why the facts and circumstances in this case do not warrant the proposed civil penalty sought by the FAA. We believe that information submitted by us to the FAA through the informal conference process may result in a significant reduction in the civil penalty initially proposed in this matter and the Company remains in discussions with the FAA over the terms of the settlement. The FAA has since indicated that, unless the mattersare settled, it could propose additional civil penalties based on additional inspections conducted by the agency in 2009 as part of its routine surveillance of air carriers. If a compromised settlement of the matters is not successful, the FAA, through a U.S Attorney, may initiate a civil action for the full amount of the proposed civil penalty as prescribed by law. The Company recognized a charge to earnings in the June 2009 quarter that did not have a material impact on the company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
Other Contingencies
 
In January 2006, a former salesman of the Academy formed a business that the Company believes competes directly with the Academy for student pilots. Thereafter, the former President of the Academy resigned his position at the Academy and the Company believes he became affiliated with the alleged competing business. The Academy has initiated a lawsuit against these former employees, alleging violation of non-competition and fiduciary obligations. The defendants, including the Academy’s former President, subsequently filed a counterclaim against the Academy based upon lost earnings and breach of contract.
 
The Academy and the sole remaining defendant have agreed to submit to binding arbitration which is to be held no later than May 1st, 2010 pursuant to the Court’s Order Referring Case to Binding Arbitration entered on February 16, 2010.
 
The Company is involved in various legal and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.  While it is not feasible to predict or determine the outcome of these proceedings, in the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to legal proceedings and claims will not materially affect the reported results of operations or the financial position of the Company.
 
(17)   Related-Party Transactions
 
Building lease. The Company leases its facilities for Gulfstream and the Academy from EYW Holdings, Inc., an entity controlled in part by Thomas L. Cooper and Thomas P. Cooper, an officer of Gulfstream. The total amount of rental payments for these facilities during 2008 and 2009 was $414,000 and $405,000, respectively. The amount of rent payable to EYW Holdings, Inc. at December 31, 2008 and 2009 was $33,000 and $67,000 respectively.
 
67

 
Cuba Operations. Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc. (“GAC”), a related company which is owned by Thomas L. Cooper, operates charter flights between Miami and Havana. GAC is licensed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U. S. Department of the Treasury as a carrier and travel service provider for charter air transportation between designated U. S. and Cuban airports.
 
Pursuant to a services agreement between Gulfstream and GAC dated August 8, 2003 and amended on March 14, 2006, Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft, flight crews, the Gulfstream name, insurance, and service personnel, including passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative. Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC. Pursuant to the March 14, 2006 amended agreement, Gulfstream receives 75% of the operating profit generated by GAC’s operation. Prior to March 14, 2006, Gulfstream received all of the operating profit generated up to a cumulative total of $1 million, and then 75% thereafter.
 
We have consolidated the results of the Cuba charter business as a variable interest entity for both the year ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009.
 
As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, GAC owed Gulfstream $0 and $146,000 respectively, pursuant to the services agreement.
 
Other Services
 
The Company leases equipment from entities controlled by Thomas L. Cooper, former Chief Executive Officer of Gulfstream. The amounts paid for 2008 and 2009 were approximately $41,000 each year.
 
Debt Financing

On September 16, 2008, we consummated a financing in which we issued $5.1 million of senior debentures (the “Senior Debentures”) and warrants to purchase 578,870 shares of common stock (the “Senior Warrants”) to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC. On the same date, we issued a 12% subordinated convertible debenture for $1.0 million (the “Junior Debenture”) and a warrant to purchase 225,000 shares of common stock (the “Junior Warrants”) to Gulfstream Funding I LLC, an entity owned in part by Thomas A. McFall, a member of the Board of Directors, and Douglas Hailey, a former member of the Board of Directors.
 
At the October 20, 2009 Annual Meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders approved a reduction in the conversion price to $1.975 from $3.00 relating to the Junior Debenture issued to Gulfstream Funding I, LLC in September 2008. The conversion to equity of the debenture and accrued interest expense was effective on October 20, 2009 and resulted in the issuance of 578,342 shares of the company’s common stock.
 
The Junior Warrants were originally exercisable through September 16, 2014 at an exercise price of $3.20 per share. Upon conversion of the Junior Debenture, the number of shares issuable under the Junior Warrants was decreased from 225,000 to 166,667, or a decrease of 58,333 shares. The Junior Warrants are subject to anti-dilution adjustment for certain future issuances or deemed issuances of Common Stock at a price per share of less than $3.20.
 
On October 7, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated note to Gulfstream Funding II, LLC (“GF II”), an entity owned in part by Thomas A. McFall, a member of the Board of Directors, and Douglas Hailey, a former member of the Board of Directors, for $1.5 million that matured on January 15, 2010 and bore interest at 12%. On January 15, 2010, the Company and GF II agreed to enter into one or more definitive agreements to extend the maturity date of the Note and to provide for the conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (collectively, the “Debt”) into preferred stock of the Company at current market prices. Upon the execution of such agreements by the Company and GF II, the Company will file a Current Report on Form 8 -K disclosing the transaction and including such agreements as exhibits. In addition, GF II waived any event of default, which would have occurred due to the Company’s failure to repay the Debt on the maturity date.

 
 

 

 
 
(18)  Segment Information
 
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
 
The Company has two reportable segments: the airline and charter operation (the Airline) and the flight academy (the Academy).  The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in Note (1).  Although the reportable segments are business units that offer different services and are managed separately, their activities are highly integrated.
 
Virtually all of the Company’s consolidated capital expenditures, depreciation and amortization, and interest expense are attributable to Airline business segment. The following table presents financial information for 2008 and 2009 by business segment (in thousands):
 
68

 
2009
 
Airline and Charter
 
Academy
   
Parent
   
Intercompany Eliminations
 
Total
 
                               
Operating revenues
  $ 85,912     $ 2,023     $ -     $ (631 )   $ 87,304  
Operating expenses:
                                       
Intangible asset impairment
    -       680       -       -       680  
All other operating expenses
    87,263       2,242       674       (631 )     89,548  
Total Operating Expenses
    87,263       2,922       674       -       90,228  
Loss from operations
  $ (1,351 )   $ (899 )   $ (674 )   $ -     $ (2,924 )
Net loss
  $ (3,629 )   $ (845 )   $ (3,077 )   $ -     $ (7,551 )
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 1,206     $ 12     $ -     $ -     $ 1,218  
Interest expense
    244       1       2,087       -       2,332  
Interest income
    2       -       -       -       2  
Income tax provision
    687       202       1,143               2,032  
Capital expenditures
    831       5       -       -       836  
Total assets
    9,424       2,340       15,593       (12,579 )     14,778  
                                         
   
 
 
 
           
 
 
2008
 
Airline and
Charter
   
Flight
Academy
   
Parent
   
Intercompany
Eliminations
 
Total
 
                                         
Operating revenues
  $ 104,144     $ 2,712     $ 97     $ (1,697 )   $ 105,256  
Operating expenses:
                                       
Intangible asset impairment
            2,703                       2,703  
Loss on sale of equipment
    4,754                               4,754  
All other operating expenses
    110,014       3,085       443       (1,697 )     111,844  
Total Operating Expenses
    114,768       5,788       443       (1,697 )     119,301  
Loss from operations
  $ (10,624 )   $ (3,075 )   $ (346 )   $ -     $ (14,045 )
Net loss
  $ (11,322 )   $ (3,000 )   $ (477 )   $ -     $ (14,799 )
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 2,742     $ 12     $ -     $ -     $ 2,754  
Interest expense
    737       -       569       -       1,306  
Interest income
    38       -       -       -       38  
Income tax benefit
    -       -       509       -       509  
Capital expenditures
    1,417       9       -       -       1,426  
Total assets
    15,325       2,918       16,827       (15,700 )     19,370  
 
(19)   Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
 
The following table presents selected quarterly unaudited financial data for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 (in thousands):
 
69

 
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
2009
 
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Revenue
  $ 23,576     $ 23,699     $ 19,525     $ 20,504     $ 87,304  
Operating expenses
    21,756       22,715       22,473       23,284       90,228  
Operating income (loss)
    1,820       984       (2,948 )     (2,780 )     (2,924 )
Non-operating expenses
    (642 )     (610 )     (582 )     (761 )     (2,595 )
Pre-tax income (loss)
    1,178       374       (3,530 )     (3,541 )     (5,519 )
Income tax provision (benefit)
    448       (1,859 )     -       3,443       2,032  
Net income (loss)
  $ 730     $ 2,233     $ (3,530 )   $ (6,984 )   $ (7,551 )
 
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
2008
 
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Revenue
  $ 31,255     $ 31,052     $ 21,066     $ 21,883     $ 105,256  
Operating expenses
    33,187       36,560       25,484       24,070       119,301  
Operating income (loss)
    (1,932 )     (5,508 )     (4,418 )     (2,187 )     (14,045 )
Non-operating expenses
    (138 )     (156 )     (101 )     (868 )     (1,263 )
Pre-tax income (loss)
    (2,070 )     (5,664 )     (4,519 )     (3,055 )     (15,308 )
Income tax provision (benefit)
    (784 )     (2,119 )     (441 )     2,835       (509 )
Net income (loss)
  $ (1,286 )   $ (3,545 )   $ (4,078 )   $ (5,890 )   $ (14,799 )
                                         
 
(20)   Subsequent Events
 
Issuance of $1.5 million of Subordinated Notes
 
On October 7, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated note to Gulfstream Funding II, LLC (“GF II”) for $1.5 million that matured on January 15, 2010 and bore interest at 12%. On January 15, 2010, the Company and GF II agreed to enter into one or more definitive agreements to extend the maturity date of the Note and to provide for the conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (collectively, the “Debt”) into preferred stock of the Company at current market prices. Upon the execution of such agreements by the Company and GF II, the Company will file a Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing the transaction and including such agreements as exhibits.  In addition, GF II waived any event of default, which would have occurred due to the Company’s failure to repay the Debt on the maturity date.
 
Sale of Units of Common Stock and Warrants
 
On January 29, 2010, the Company consummated the closing under a Unit Purchase Agreement with seven accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors units of its securities (the “Units”) consisting of (i) one share of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), at a per Unit purchase price of $1.40 for aggregate gross proceeds of $327,300. Upon completion of the closing, the Company sold to the Investors an aggregate of 233,786 shares of Common Stock and Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 175,339 shares of Common Stock.
 
Forbearance Agreement with Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation
 
On February 11, 2010, Gulfstream received a notice of default (the “Default Notice”) from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation (“RACC”), Gulfstream’s principal aircraft lessor, pursuant to which RACC notified Gulfstream that it was in default of the payment of certain obligations under Airliner Operating Lease Agreements, each dated August 7, 2003, and amended on August 2, 2005, and March 15, 2006 (the “Lease Agreements”), by and between Gulfstream and RACC, pursuant to which Gulfstream currently leases from RACC twenty-one (21) Beech 1900D aircraft. The default resulted from Gulfstream’s failure to make its scheduled lease payments for the month of February 2010. Accordingly, RACC demanded that Gulfstream make such payments on or before February 19, 2010. The failure to make such payment would have given RACC the right to terminate the Lease Agreements, thereby prohibiting Gulfstream from using the leased aircraft. Also pursuant to the Default Notice, RACC claimed that Gulfstream is in default in certain other payments under a separate agreement dated as of December 19, 2008 by and between Gulfstream and RACC (the “December  Agreement”), which defaults are also considered to be defaults under the Lease Agreements. RACC indicated in the Default Notice that if Gulfstream made the required payments under the Lease Agreements by February 19, 2010, it is prepared to discuss the manner in which the Company can cure or otherwise address the December Agreement defaults.

 
70

 
 
On February 19, 2010, Gulfstream made the required payment to RACC, which allowed it to continue operating the aircraft covered by the Lease Agreements. In addition, on February 19, 2010, RACC advised Gulfstream that it would forebear from exercising any of its rights under the December Agreement or the Lease Agreements, provided that Gulfstream remains current in payment of future lease payments and provides RACC by April 20, 2010 with a mutually acceptable debt and financial restructuring plan that provides for a feasible basis to enable Gulfstream to continue to meet its ongoing financial obligations under the Lease Agreement and commence to repay restructured amounts due under the December Agreement, which presently amount to approximately $3 million. We are also engaged in related restructuring discussions with Pratt & Whitney Canada with respect to approximately $2.5 million of past-due creditor obligations. See Note (9) Engine Return Liability and the Restructuring of Other Obligations, for background information regarding this matter.
 
Although we believe that we will be able to establish a plan that is acceptable to RACC and Pratt & Whitney Canada regarding the restructuring of current obligations, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so, or will not otherwise default in future payments under the RACC Lease Agreements or the Pratt & Whitney Agreement.
 
Issuance of $1.0 million of Senior Secured Notes and Warrants
 
On February 26, 2010, the Company completed a $1,000,000 debt financing pursuant to purchase agreements for senior secured notes and warrants with accredited investors and/or qualified institutional purchasers (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) 12% Senior Secured Notes due December 31, 2010 in an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “Notes”); and (ii) warrants, exercisable at $1.22 per share (the “Exercise Price”) (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) and expiring February 28, 2015 (the “Warrants”), to purchase an aggregate of 409,827 of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”).  The number of Warrants issued to each Investor was determined by dividing (a) 50% of the principal amount of the Notes purchased by the Investors, by (b) the Exercise Price of the Warrants.  However, if the Notes are not prepaid by the Company in full by June 30, 2010, then the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”) would represent 100% of the original $1,000,000 principal amount of the Notes divided by the Exercise Price. Accordingly, if the Notes are not paid in full by June 30, 2010, assuming no anti-dilution adjustments to the Warrant Shares or the Exercise Price, the aggregate of 409,827 Warrant Shares would increase to 819,654 Warrant Shares.
 
Forbearance Agreement with Shelter Island Opportunity Fund and Amendment to Debenture
 
In August 2008, the Company obtained an original $5,100,000 debt financing with Shelter Island Opportunity Fund LLC (“Shelter Island”) pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the “Shelter Island Agreement”) and a secured original issue discount debenture due August 31, 2011 (the “Debenture”) of which $3,659,000 was outstanding as of February 26, 2010.   As part of such financing, the Company granted Shelter Island a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries, issued certain warrants to Shelter Island and granted Shelter Island a right to “put” the warrants to the Company for $3,000,000. In December 2009 and January 2010, Shelter Island agreed to defer the December and January interest payments under the Debenture.

On February 26, 2010, the Company and Shelter Island entered into a Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Debenture (the “Forbearance Agreement”) which reduced the Company’s potential liability under the put option from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000 and rescheduled certain principal and interest payments under the Debenture to reduce near-term liquidity requirements.

Under the terms of the Forbearance Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies under the Shelter Island Agreement until the occurrence of (a) the failure by the Company to comply with the terms, covenants and agreements of the Forbearance Agreement; and (b) the occurrence of any event of default under the Debenture or the Shelter Island Agreement (collectively, a “Termination Event”).  One of the covenants to be performed by the Company under the Forbearance Agreement is the obligation of the Company to raise an additional $1.5 million of debt or equity financing by March 26, 2010, subsequently changed to March 31, 2010, or otherwise satisfy Shelter Island that the Company has adequate liquidity and working capital. Shelter Island confirmed on March 31, 2010 that the Company complied with this covenant based primarily on the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement described below under the heading, Sale of up to $2.5 million of Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants.

Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the parties amended the Debenture, as follows (i) the Company shall pay interest on the outstanding principal amount monthly in cash, commencing March 31, 2010; (ii) the Company shall pay monthly installments on the outstanding principal amount commencing April 30, 2010 and on the last trading day of each month thereafter until the August 31, 2011 maturity date of the Debenture; and (iii) the Company may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture together with a premium equal to 5% of outstanding principal amount being prepaid; provided that, if such prepayment is made in 2011, there shall be no premium applicable.  The Company, each of its subsidiaries and Shelter Island also entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements pursuant to which, without limitation, the parties agreed to amend the existing guarantees to include the repayment of the Shelter Island Note.

 
71

 
 
As indicated above, Shelter Island currently holds a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.  Under the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to subordinate its first priority lien on the accounts receivable of the Company and its subsidiaries and the proceeds thereof, to the lien granted to the Investors under the Security Agreement with TBI to the extent of the deferred principal and accrued interest under the Notes.  Shelter Island retained its first priority security interest in all of the other assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries.

As contemplated in the original warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Shelter Island on August 31, 2008 (the “Original Warrant”), on February 26, 2010 the Company divided the Original Warrant into (a) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant initially exercisable into 70,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Put Warrant”); and (b) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant (the “Remaining Warrant”, and together with the Put Warrant, the "Divided Warrants") such that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of Company that are initially exercisable under the Divided Warrants (inclusive of the 70,000 Shares of Common Stock initially issuable under the Put Warrant) shall equal, in the aggregate, 15% of the fully-diluted shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately following consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Forbearance Agreement and the TBI Purchase Agreement, after giving pro-forma effect to the conversion into Common Stock of all Company convertible securities and the exercise of all Company granted options and warrants, including the Warrants issued to the Investors.  As a result of consummation of the above transactions with Shelter Island and the TBI Investors, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Divided Warrant is 914,189 shares of Company Common Stock.

The Company and Shelter Island also entered into an Amendment to the Put Option Agreement (the “Put Option Amendment”) dated as of August 31, 2008 under which, among other things, the exercise price applicable for all the put shares under the put warrant was reduced from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000, or $15.00 per share.

As consideration for its financial accommodations, the Company paid Shelter Island an additional $250,000 as a forbearance fee, by delivering a $250,000 promissory note (the “Shelter Island Note”) due on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2011, and (ii) the date the Debenture is permitted or required to be paid in accordance with its terms.  The Shelter Island Note accrues interest at a rate of 9% per annum and is payable in cash on a monthly basis beginning on February 26, 2011.
 
Sale of up to $2.5 million of Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants
 
On March 31, 2010, Gulfstream International Group, Inc. consummated the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with 17 accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) an aggregate of 118,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 and stated value $10.00 per share (the “Preferred Shares”), convertible into 1,185,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) 5-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 592,500 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), representing 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,043,000 (the “Offering”). The Warrants expire on March 31, 2013 and are exercisable into shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $1.75 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Warrants.

Pursuant to the Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company which was filed with the State of Delaware on March 31, 2010 (the “Certificate of Designation”), each Preferred Share is convertible into 10 shares of Common Stock. In addition, the Preferred Shares pay an annual dividend at the rate of 12% per annum, payable quarterly, on the last business day of each December, March, June and September (each a “Dividend Payment Date”), payable on each Dividend Payment Date as follows: (i) 60% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 7% per annum) shall be payable in cash, and (ii) 40% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 5% per annum) shall be payable either in cash, or at the sole option of the Company, in additional shares of Common Stock, calculated for such purposes by dividing the amount of the quarterly dividend then payable by 100% of the market price of the Common Stock on such Dividend Payment Date.  Unless previously converted into Common Stock, all Preferred Shares outstanding on the earlier to occur of (a) the date on which the average of the market prices of the Common Stock for any 20 consecutive trading days shall be $2.00 or higher, or (b) 5 years from the Preferred Shares issuance date, shall be automatically converted into Common Stock at the Conversion Price then in effect.

 
72

 
 
In addition, on March 31, 2010, 4 of the 7 purchasers of the Company’s units consisting of one share of Common Stock (the “Shares”), and warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Prior Warrants”) which was consummated on January 29, 2010 (the “Prior Offering”) and described above under the heading, Sale of Units of Common Stock and Warrants, entered into a letter agreement with the Company (the “Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which such purchasers agreed to exchange their Shares and Prior Warrants for Preferred Shares and Warrants, under the same terms and conditions applicable to Investors in the Offering.  Such purchasers also agreed that the Company shall have no further obligations or liabilities in connection with the transaction documents executed and delivered with respect to the Prior Offering, including, without limitation, the Unit Purchase Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement and the Prior Warrant, each dated as of January 29, 2010, and each of which are terminated in any and all respects. See Note (20) Subsequent Events, Sale of Units of Common Stock and Warrants.

On March 31, 2010, the Company and the Investors entered into a Registration Rights Agreement under which the Company is obligated to file a registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) registering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares and upon exercise of the Warrants for resale by the Investors on or prior to April 30, 2010 (the “Filing Date”).  In addition, the Company agreed to use its best efforts to cause the SEC to declare the Registration Statement effective by the earlier of (i) 150 days following the Filing Date; and (ii) 180 days following the Filing Date if the SEC conducts a full review of the Registration Statement.

In connection with the first closing of the Offering, the Company paid/issued the placement agent (i) cash commissions in the amount of 9% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; (ii) a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 2% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; and (iii) Warrants to purchase 114,730 shares of Common Stock, which represents 11% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing.
 
(21)   Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we generated less cash flow from operations than initially projected at the beginning of the year due to lower revenue and higher fuel costs than forecasted. From October 2008 to December 31, 2009, we also repaid over $4.4 million of debt and restructured creditor obligations.

During the second-half of 2009, Gulfstream experienced significant deterioration in its revenue environment, which, combined with rising fuel costs, resulted in greater than anticipated losses and pressure on its liquidity outlook.  While part of the revenue weakness was the result of recessionary economic conditions, the situation was made particularly acute by new low-fare competition in certain of our markets.

With an increasingly weakened balance sheet, Gulfstream found it necessary to attract new capital beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009. With liquidity needs becoming more urgent, in January 2010 the airline found itself in an unsustainable financial situation.  As such, the Company retained Berger Singerman and Mesirow Financial Advisors to assist in its restructuring and financing activities.  Although the Company believes that its revenue and liquidity will improve in future periods, the Company continued to actively seek short-term financing to meet its near-term liquidity requirements and to allow sufficient time to significantly increase its equity capital base to support long-term growth opportunities, as well as the purchase of its twenty-one (21) aircraft leased from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation.

These near-term financing transactions and restructuring efforts are essential due to our current liquidity position, as well as several additional factors, including a highly seasonal business, the ongoing risk posed by a relatively weak economy, the potential for continued volatility in the price of jet fuel, the necesity for funds to satisfy or compromise civil penalties proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration, and scheduled payments of debt and restructured creditor obligations over the next two years.

We can make no assurance that our efforts to improve liquidity or to obtain longer-term growth-oriented equity financing will be completed successfully, that we will have adequate funds to satisfy or compromise the civil penalties proposed by the FAA or that alternative sources of capital will be available to us. If additional equity capital is not available in the next several months, we would likely experience a significant liquidity shortfall before the end of 2010, and would be unable to fund continued operations or meet our financial obligations.

 
73

 

ITEM 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C. The firm of Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C. (“Rotenberg”) served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2007. On January 6, 2009, the Company notified Rotenberg that effective January 6, 2009 the Company decided to dismiss Rotenberg as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to dismiss Rotenberg was made and approved by the Audit Committee.

The audit reports of Rotenberg on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During the two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through January 6, 2009, the Company had no disagreements with Rotenberg on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement, if not resolved to their satisfaction, would have caused Rotenberg to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports. In addition, during that time there were no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

McKean, Paul, Chrycy, Fletcher & Co. The firm of McKean, Paul, Chrycy, Fletcher & Co. (“McKean”) served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2008. On April 14, 2009, McKean resigned as the Company’s independent public accounting firm. McKean entered into an agreement with Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P., ("Cherry Bekaert") pursuant to which McKean combined its operations with and certain of the professional staff and partners of McKean joined Cherry Bekaert either as employees or partners of Cherry Bekaert and continue to practice as members of Cherry Bekaert. Concurrent with the resignation of McKean, the Company, through and with the approval of its Audit Committee, engaged Cherry Bekaert, as the Company’s independent public accounting firm.

Prior to engaging Cherry Bekaert, the Company did not consult with Cherry Bekaert regarding the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction or regarding the type of audit opinion that might be rendered by Cherry Bekaert on the Company’s financial statements, and Cherry Bekaert did not provide any written or oral advice that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any such accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.

The report of McKean regarding the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the year ended December 31, 2008 and during the period from the end of the most recently completed fiscal year through April 14, 2009, the date of resignation, there were no disagreements with McKean on any manner of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of McKean would have caused it to make reference to such disagreements in its reports.

ITEM 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(3) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2009 (the “Evaluation Date”).  Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information relating to our company required to be disclosed in our reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud.  A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.
 
 
74

 
 
(b) Changes in internal controls. During the year ended December 31, 2009, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting  

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for our company in accordance with as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the (i) effectiveness and efficiency of operations, (ii) reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (iii) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Our internal controls framework is based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is as of the year ended December 31, 2009. We believe that internal control over financial reporting is effective.  We have not identified any material weaknesses considering the nature and extent of our current operations or any risks or errors in financial reporting under current operations.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
 
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

We do not have any information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2009 that was not reported.

 
75

 
PART III

ITEM 10.   DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Executive Officers and Directors
 
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of the members of our board of directors and executive officers as of the date of this report:

Name
 
Age
 
Position(s)
Thomas A. McFall
 
56
 
Chairman of the Board and Senior Executive Officer
David F. Hackett
 
48
 
Chief Executive Officer and President, Director
Gary P. Arnold
 
68
 
Director
Gary L. Fishman
 
63
 
Director
Barry S. Lutin
 
65
 
Director
Richard R. Schreiber
 
54
 
Director
Robert M. Brown
 
62
 
Chief Financial Officer

Thomas A. McFall, 56, Chairman of the Board and Senior Executive Officer

Mr. McFall has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Senior Executive Officer since March 2006. Mr. McFall currently serves as Chairman of Weatherly Group LLC, a company he co-founded in 2001. Mr. McFall has served as an executive and on the board of directors of numerous companies, including Weatherstar Aviation. Weatherstar Aviation was a New Jersey based aviation operator providing both regularly scheduled and on demand charter flights under an FAA Part 135 certificate. Mr. McFall was President and CEO of Weatherstar Aviation from its inception in 1987 until its sale in 1995. He is currently Chairman of National Molding Corporation and Cattron Group International.

David F. Hackett, 48, Chief Executive Officer and President, Director

Mr. Hackett has been Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since March 2006. Since June 2003, Mr. Hackett has served as President of Gulfstream. From January 2002 to June 2003, he was a financial and strategic consultant to Newgate Associates, LLC. Mr. Hackett has over 20 years experience in the airline industry, beginning with Continental in 1985, where he eventually served as Director, Financial Planning and Analysis.

Gary P. Arnold, 68, Director

Mr. Arnold has been a director since November 2007. He has significant international and domestic experience in the electronics industry in the areas of finance, strategic planning and operations, and has been involved in numerous capital market transactions. He spearheaded the turnaround at Tektronix Corp. where he was chief financial officer from 1990 to 1992, and later served as Chairman and CEO of Analogy, Inc., a provider of design automation software used in the automotive industry from 1993 to 2000. Since 2000, Mr. Arnold has been a private investor and currently serves on the boards of directors of National Semiconductor Corp. (NYSE: NSM) and Orchids Paper Products Company (NYSE AMEX: TIS). Mr. Arnold is a certified public accountant and he holds a B.S. degree in Accounting from East Tennessee State University and a JD degree from the University of Tennessee School of Law.

Gary L. Fishman, 63, Director

Mr. Fishman has been a director since January 2009. He has over 30 years of airline experience, having held executive positions with Northwest Airlines, Continental Airlines and Trans World Airlines in diverse areas including operations, planning and finance. An officer of Northwest Airlines from 1995 to 2005, he held various positions, including Vice President of Customer Service Planning and Security (2002-2004) and Senior Vice President of Alliances (2004-2005). After his retirement from Northwest Airlines, he served from 2005 through 2008 as Vice President of Sales Operations at Ingenix, a division of UnitedHealth Group. He is a graduate of the United States Naval Academy and served as an officer in the US Navy from 1968 through 1973.
 
 
76

 
 
Barry S. Lutin, 65, Director

Mr. Lutin has been a director since November 2007. He has been involved in the aviation industry for more than forty years, serving in various senior positions responsible for certification, operations and financial management for scheduled air operators. Since December 2006, Mr. Lutin has been a Managing Director of Helion Procopter Industries, a subsidiary of Anham Trading and Contracting, LLC of Dubai. Also, since April 2002, Mr. Lutin has been President and CEO of Capitol Rising, LLC. Between 1992 and 2002, Mr. Lutin served as a management consultant and as President and Chief Operating Officer of Shuttle America Corporation. From 1972 to 1992, Mr. Lutin served as Chairman and CEO of Corporate Air, Inc., an FAA Part 135 scheduled cargo carrier. Currently he serves as Chairman and director of Safe Passage International, a U.S.-based security training software development company. Mr. Lutin is a licensed air transport pilot with more than six thousand hours of flight experience.

Richard R. Schreiber, 54, Director

Mr. Schreiber has been a director since March 2006. Since 1982, Mr. Schreiber has been a Partner with Dimeling, Schreiber & Park, an investment firm in Philadelphia. Mr. Schreiber is also employed by Itochu International, Inc. as Director, Principal Investments. He has been on the board of directors of numerous private companies (including New Piper Aircraft and McCall Pattern Company) and public companies (including Wiser Oil Company and Chief Consolidated Mining). Mr. Schreiber was previously a director of Business Express Airlines (a large FAA Part 121 commuter airline), Aeris (a French airline) and Rocky Mountain Helicopters (a large FAA Part 135 operation). Mr. Schreiber received a bachelor’s degree in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Robert M. Brown, 62, Chief Financial Officer

Robert M. Brown has been our Chief Financial Officer since January 2007. From April 2005 to November 2006, Mr. Brown served as the Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc., an online retailer in the United States of brand name baby, toddler, maternity and furniture products that is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. From November 2002 to April 2005, Mr. Brown was a private investor. Mr. Brown was the Chief Financial Officer of Uno Restaurant Corporation from 1987 to 1997, and served as its Executive Vice President-Development from 1997 to 2002. Uno Restaurant Corporation is the operator and franchisor of a nationwide chain of casual-dining restaurants and was publicly-traded on the New York Stock Exchange through 2001. Mr. Brown held several accounting positions prior to 1987 with each of SCA Services, Inc., The Stanley Works, Saab-Scania, Inc. and Price Waterhouse. Mr. Brown is a CPA certified in the State of Connecticut and earned a B.S. degree in Accounting at Fairfield University.

Board of Directors

All directors will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Role of the Board of Directors

Pursuant to Delaware law, our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of the Company’s board of directors. The board has responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies and for the overall performance and direction of the Company, but is not involved in day-to-day operations. Members of the board keep informed of the Company’s business by participating in board meetings, by reviewing analyses and reports sent to them regularly, and through discussions with its executive officers.

Board Committees

The Company established an Audit Committee consisting of Mr. Arnold, who chairs the committee, and Messrs. Lutin and Schreiber, all of whom the Company believes qualify as “independent directors” under NYSE Amex rules. The NYSE Amex listing standards define “financially literate” as being able to read and understand financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter (available in the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website which can be accessed from the Company’s homepage at http//www.gulfstreamair.com by selecting “Corporate Governance”), which must be reviewed and amended, if necessary, on an annual basis.
 
 
77

 
 
Under the charter, the Audit Committee is required to meet at least four times a year and is responsible for reviewing the independence, qualifications and quality control procedures of the Company’s independent auditors, and is responsible for recommending the initial or continued retention, or a change in, the Company’s independent auditors. In addition, the Audit Committee is required to review and discuss with the Company’s management and independent auditors the financial statements and annual and quarterly reports, as well as the quality and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control procedures and critical accounting policies. The Audit Committee’s charter also requires the Audit Committee to review potential conflict of interest situations, including transactions with related parties, and to discuss with the Company’s management other matters related to the Company’s external and internal audit procedures. The Audit Committee will adopt a pre-approval policy for the provision of audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors. The Company believes Mr. Arnold is a “financial expert” as defined under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and as required by the NYSE Amex.

The Company has also established a Compensation Committee consisting of Mr. Lutin, who chairs the committee, and Messrs. Arnold and Schreiber, all of whom the Company believes qualify as “independent directors” under NYSE Amex rules. The Compensation Committee is governed by a written charter (available in the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s Website which can be accessed from the Company’s homepage at http://www.gulfstreamair.com by selecting “Corporate Governance”). The Compensation Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding compensation arrangements for the Company’s executive officers, including annual bonus compensation, and consults with management regarding the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations concerning the adoption of any compensation plans in which management is eligible to participate, including the granting of stock options or other benefits under those plans.

The Company has also established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisting of Mr. Schreiber, who chairs the committee, Mr. Arnold and Mr. Lutin, all of whom the Company believes qualify as “independent directors” under the NYSE Amex rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is governed by a written charter (available in the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s Website which can be accessed from the Company’s homepage at http://wwwgulfstreamair.com by selecting “Corporate Governance”). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee submits to the Board of Directors a proposed slate of directors for submission to the stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting, recommends director candidates in view of pending additions, resignations or retirements, develops criteria for the selection of directors, reviews suggested nominees received from stockholders and reviews corporate governance policies and recommends changes to the full Board of Directors.
 
        In 2009, the Company established a Safety and Security Committee consisting of Mr. Fishman, who chairs the committee, Mr. Hackett and Mr. Lutin. The Safety and Security Committee will be governed by a written charter, which the board of directors intends to adopt during fiscal 2010 (will be available in the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s Website which can be accessed from the Company’s homepage at http://www.gulfstreamair.com by selecting “Corporate Governance”). The Safety and Security Committee is responsible for ensuring that the Company is operating at the highest level of safety and security by reviewing the Company's safety metrics, safety and security standards and any material breaches of safety or security that may occur. Also, it monitors and ensures corrective actions are being taken.
 
Advisory Board
 
We do not currently have an advisory board.

Compensation of the Board of Directors

Directors who are also our employees do not receive additional compensation for serving on the Board. Non-employee directors are paid fees as noted in the compensation of directors table below. In addition, non-employee directors are entitled to receive options under our stock incentive plan. All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board meetings.
 
Director Independence
 
The Company periodically reviews the independence of each director. Pursuant to this review, the directors and officers of the Company, on an annual basis, are required to complete and forward to the Corporate Secretary a detailed questionnaire to determine if there are any transactions or relationships between any of the directors or officers (including immediate family and affiliates) and the Company. If any transactions or relationships exist, the Company then considers whether such transactions or relationships are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent in accordance with the listing standards of the NYSE Amex. Pursuant to this process, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Arnold, Fishman, Lutin and Schreiber each qualify as independent directors.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is comprised of Mr. Lutin, Mr. Arnold and Mr. Schreiber, none of whom are employees or current or former officers of the Company, and none of whom had any relationship with the Company required to be disclosed under Item 13. of this report. None of the Company’s Compensation Committee members and none of the Company’s executive officers have a relationship that would constitute an interlocking relationship with executive officers or directors of another entity or insider participation in compensation decisions.

 
78

 

Family Relationships
 
There are no family relationships among directors and executive officers.
 
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings.

None of our officers or directors have, during the last five years: (i) been convicted in or is currently subject to a pending a criminal proceeding; (ii) been a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations of, or prohibiting or mandating activities subject to any federal or state securities or banking laws including, without limitation, in any way limiting involvement in any business activity, or finding any violation with respect to such law, nor (iii) has any bankruptcy petition been filed by or against the business of which such person was an executive officer or a general partner, whether at the time of the bankruptcy of for the two years prior thereto.
 
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors, executive officers, and shareholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our common stock. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Section 16(a) reports required to be filed by our executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% shareholders were filed on a timely basis, except that Gulfstream Funding, LLC purchased a convertible debenture on September 19, 2008 that was reported on Form 4 on February 20, 2009 and Thomas A. McFall purchased 28,500 shares of Common Stock on December 31, 2008 that was reported on Form 4 on January 6, 2009.

Code of Ethics

The Company has a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy (“Code of Ethics”) that applies to all of its directors, officers, and employees, including its senior financial officers. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available in the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website, which can be accessed from the homepage at http://www.gulfstreamair.com by selecting “Corporate Governance.” The Company will post any amendments to the Code of Ethics in the same section of the Company’s website.

Item 11.   Executive Compensation.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section provides information regarding the compensation programs in place for the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs, and Chief Financial Officer, who we refer to collectively as the named executive officers. This section includes information regarding the overall objectives of our compensation programs and each element of compensation that we provide.

The compensation of our named executive officers is composed principally of a base salary, a quarterly bonus in some instances, a discretionary annual bonus and equity awards in the form of stock options. In addition, our named executive officers are entitled to matching contributions to our 401(k) plan and certain perquisites.

Compensation decisions are made by the board of directors, with significant input from Mr. Hackett for compensation of his direct reports, including Mr. Thomas P. Cooper, Mr. Stagias and Mr. Thomas L. Cooper. In connection with the acquisition in March 2006, we adopted our Stock Incentive Plan and entered into new employment agreements with Mr. Hackett and Mr. Thomas L. Cooper.  In May 2009, we adopted our Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan.

Our Compensation Committee, consisting of Mr. Lutin, who chairs the committee, and Messrs. Arnold and Schreiber, have responsibility for establishing and overseeing our compensation programs for our named executive officers.

 
79

 

 Objective of Compensation
 
Our primary goals with respect to executive compensation are:

·  to attract and retain the most talented and dedicated executives possible;
·  to acknowledge and reward individual contributions to the Company; and
·  to encourage long-term value creation by aligning executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests.

To achieve these goals, the board of directors intends to implement and maintain compensation plans that tie a substantial portion of our named executive officers’ overall compensation to revenue growth and equity appreciation. All of our named executive officers have entered into employment agreements and their compensation is based on the contractual obligations under those agreements. In addition, we evaluate compensation on an ongoing basis and make adjustments as we believe are necessary to fairly compensate our executives and to retain their services.

We do not benchmark our compensation against that of others in our industry and we do not engage compensation consultants to assist us in developing our compensation arrangements.

 Establishing Executive Compensation

Role of the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee is responsible for the compensation of the named executive officers. Its role is to review and approve our compensation programs, policies and practices with respect to the named executive officers. In consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the executive officers following the end of each fiscal year. In connection with their evaluation, the Compensation Committee reviews the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer in order to determine the base compensation for the executive officers for the upcoming fiscal year in light of the objectives of our compensation programs.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer.  The Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee in reaching compensation decisions by developing recommended compensation for the named executive officers other than himself. The Chief Executive Officer meets with each named executive officer formally on an annual basis to review past performance and to discuss performance objectives for the following year. In connection with developing his recommendations for named executive officer compensation, the Chief Executive Officer evaluates the totality of each compensation package with consideration of a variety of factors, including the executive officer’s performance, our financial performance and his sense of the market for executive talent developed through his personal experience, contacts in the airline industry and in the south Florida region, publicly available information and our compensation goals. The Chief Executive Officer may also consult informally with the Compensation Committee prior to presenting his recommendations to the Compensation Committee for their review and discussion to ensure that his recommendations will best reflect our compensation objectives. By the time the Chief Executive Officer presents his recommendations to the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee has already provided informal feedback and therefore the Compensation Committee generally only makes minor adjustments to the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations.

Role of Employment Agreements.  We consider employment agreements to be an important part of recruiting and retaining qualified executive officers. Mr. Hackett and Mr. Cooper have entered into employment agreements with us. Our employment agreements with these executive officers establish their initial base compensation and on-going annual cash bonus as a percentage of a relevant financial metric. Employment agreement terms also include severance and change-in-control provisions. The Compensation Committee’s judgment is that employment agreements are beneficial for us. These employment agreements are described in further detail under “Agreements with Named Executive Officers.”
 
Elements of Compensation
 
We have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Hackett and Mr. Cooper addressing specific compensation arrangements in order to retain those executive officers. Our employment agreement with Mr. Cooper predates the acquisition and was left unchanged. The terms of these employment agreements were individually developed based on a number of factors, including the particular executive’s position, his scope of duties, his experience, his past performance, our compensation goals and the market for executive talent.

 
80

 
 
We do not benchmark our overall compensation arrangements, or any of the individual elements of compensation, against the compensation arrangements of any other company or group of companies. However, based on the knowledge and experience of Mr. Hackett and the board of directors, we do consider the market for executive talent in our industry and in our region as a way to improve our ability to attract and retain talented executive officers.

Executive compensation consists of the following elements:

Base Salary.  All of our named executive officers are entitled to a base salary. We initially set base salaries to attract talented executive officers to the Company. The base salaries of existing named executive officers are reviewed on an ongoing basis, and adjusted from time to time to realign salaries with market levels after taking into account individual responsibilities, performance and experience.

The base salary for each of the other named executive officers is recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation Committee. In determining appropriate levels of base compensation for the named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer develops specific recommendations to review with the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer considers the named executive officer’s individual performance. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. Typically, the Compensation Committee considers two types of potential increases to the base salary of the named executive officers: (1) “merit increases” based upon the named executive officer’s individual performance, and (2) “market adjustments” based upon the Compensation Committee’s opinion of the base compensation for similar executives.

Performance Bonus.  We use two types of bonuses. The first are non-discretionary bonuses based on the financial performance of the Company or one of its businesses. The Compensation Committee believes that tying a bonus payment primarily to financial metrics provides appropriate incentive to the named executive officers contributes to the financial success of the Company.

The second type of bonuses is discretionary bonuses, which the Compensation Committee has the authority to award to any of our named executive officers. Discretionary bonuses are intended to allow the Compensation Committee to reward named executive officers for individual performance over the course of the previous fiscal year independent of the Company’s financial performance. The actual amount of discretionary bonus will be determined following a review of each executive’s individual performance and contribution to our strategic goals conducted after the end of each fiscal year. Our discretionary bonus is paid in cash in a single installment in the first quarter following the completion of a given fiscal year. The Compensation Committee has not fixed a maximum payout for any executive officers’ discretionary bonus. In 2009, we did not award any discretionary bonuses.
 
Equity Compensation.  We believe that positive long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture that encourages such performance by our named executive officers through the use of stock and stock-based awards. The Gulfstream International Group Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was established in March 2006, and amended and restated on Mary and November 2009, to provide certain of our employees, including our named executive officers, with incentives to help align those employees’ interests with the interests of stockholders. The Plan permits the issuance of a variety of equity-based awards, including tax qualified incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards.

The Compensation Committee believes that the use of stock and stock-based awards offers the best approach to achieving our compensation goal of aligning the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. We have not adopted stock ownership guidelines, and our Plan has provided an important method for our named executive officers to acquire equity or equity-linked interests in our Company. Through the growth we hope to achieve and the size of our equity awards, we expect to provide a significant portion of total compensation to our named executive officers through our Plan. Our Compensation Committee is the administrator of the Plan.

Although our Plan permits us to issue a variety of different equity-based awards, since adopting the Plan, we have only granted tax qualified incentive stock options. Stock option grants reflect our desire to provide a meaningful equity incentive for named executive officers to help us succeed over the long term. Stock options provide for financial gain derived from the potential appreciation in our stock price from the date the option is granted until the date that the option is exercised. Our long term performance ultimately determines the value of stock options, because gains recognized from stock option exercises are entirely dependent on the long-term appreciation of our stock price. We expect stock options to continue as a significant component of executive compensation arrangements. In addition to the named executive officers, stock options have been granted to our other executives who are in positions that are key to our long-term success.

 
81

 
 
Stock option grants are made at various times including at the commencement of employment and, occasionally, following a significant change in job responsibilities or to meet other special retention or performance objectives. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves stock option awards to named executive officers based upon its assessment of individual performance, consideration of each executive’s existing long-term incentives, and retention considerations. Periodic stock option grants are made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee to eligible employees and, in appropriate circumstances, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of Mr. Hackett, our Chief Executive Officer, for grants to his direct reports.

Perquisites and Other Compensation.

Employee benefits offered to named executive officers are designed to meet current and future health and security needs for the named executive officers and their families. Executive benefits are the same as those offered to all employees, except that we pay medical insurance premiums in full for the named executive officers enrolled in our medical benefit plan. The employee benefits offered to all eligible employees include medical, dental and life insurance benefits, flexible spending accounts for medical expense reimbursements, and a 401(k) retirement savings plan that, include a partial Company match.

The 401(k) retirement savings plan is a defined contribution plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees may make pre-tax contributions into the plan, expressed as a percentage of compensation, up to prescribed IRS annual limits. We provide an employer matching contribution of 25% on the first 4% of employee pay contributed.

Upon retirement, each named executive officer is entitled to medical, dental and life insurance plan continuation for 18 months under the federal and state COBRA provisions at his or her election. In addition, the executive is entitled to elect to receive distributions from our 401(k) retirement plan, under the terms of that plan. Also any vested but unexercised stock options may be exercised for a period of 60 days and three months, respectively, after retirement.

Other Compensation.

Our named executive officers who were parties to employment agreements will continue to be parties to such employment agreements in their current form until such time as the Compensation Committee determines in its discretion that revisions to such employment agreements are advisable. In addition, consistent with our compensation philosophy, we intend to continue to maintain our current benefits and perquisites for our named executive officers; however, the Compensation Committee in its discretion may revise, amend or add to the officer’s executive benefits and perquisites if it deems it advisable. We currently have no plans to change either the employment agreements (except as required by law or as required to clarify the benefits to which our named executive officers are entitled as set forth herein) or levels of benefits and perquisites provided there under.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the compensation of the chief executive officer and certain of other executive officers of the Company whose aggregate cash compensation exceeded $100,000 for each of the last two fiscal years.

 
Name and principal position
   
Year
 
Salary
   
Bonus (1)
    Option
 Awards (2)
   
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
   
All Other
Compensation (3)
   
Total
 
David F. Hackett
                                       
Chief Executive  Officer and President
 
2009
  $ 170,000     $ 27,091     $ 6,496       -     $ 16,697     $ 220,284  
   
2008
  $ 134,900     $ 23,800       -       -     $ 14,400     $ 173,100  
Thomas P. Cooper
                                                   
Senior Vice  President, Legal Affairs
 
2009
  $ 100,000     $ 4,553     $ 5,113       -     $ 15,884     $ 125,550  
   
2008
  $ 100,000     $ 6,100     $ 4,900       -     $ 13,600     $ 124,670  
                                                     
Robert M. Brown
 
2009
  $ 150,000       -     $ 13,174       -     $ 11,179     $ 161,179  
Chief Financial Officer
 
2008
  $ 150,000       -     $ 14,600       -     $ 9,500     $ 174,100  

———————
(1)  In 2008, Mr. Hackett received discretionary aggregate quarterly bonus payments of $23,800.
 
(2)  Reflects options awarded under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan. These options vest and become exercisable in 20% increments starting on the grant date and 20% on each anniversary of the grant date. These amounts represent the financial reporting expense recognized by the Company in 2008 and 2009 in accordance with SFAS 123R, and not the amounts that may be eventually realized by the named executive officers.

(3)  The All Other Compensation column consists of items not properly reported in the other columns of this table, and for each named executive officer includes perquisites and other personal benefits. The amount for each named executive officer includes health insurance premiums, 401(k) matching contributions, and life insurance premiums.

 
82

 
 
Agreements with Named Executive Officers

David F. Hackett

On March 14, 2006, Mr. Hackett and the Gulfstream entered into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Hackett is to serve as President of Gulfstream for an initial term of two years, subject to automatic one-year extensions absent mutual amendment of the terms or termination by either party as set forth therein. Mr. Hackett is entitled to a base salary of $170,000 (as increased to reflect increases in the consumer price index and at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of Board of Directors) and a bonus determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.  In the event of Mr. Hackett’s death during the term of the agreement, Mr. Hackett’s salary and any bonus will be paid to his designated beneficiary, estate or other legal representative for six months following his death. In the event of Mr. Hackett’s disability during the term of the agreement, Mr. Hackett will be entitled to receive no less than six months’ salary and any bonus following such disability. This disability payment is in addition to other long-term disability benefits provided by the Company to Mr. Hackett. For the purposes of this agreement, “disability” is deemed to have occurred if Mr. Hackett is unable by reason of sickness, disease or accident to substantially perform his duties under the agreement for an aggregate of six months in any one-year period, or if he has a guardian of his person or estate appointed by a court.

Upon termination of the agreement without “cause” by Gulfstream, Mr. Hackett will be entitled to benefits for the remainder of the initial or then-current renewal term of the agreement and compensation in the form of base salary and incentive bonus payments for one year thereafter. For the purposes of this agreement, “cause” is defined as (i) repeated failure or refusal to reasonably cooperate with a governmental investigation of Gulfstream; (ii) willfully committing or participating in any act or omission which constitutes willful misconduct, fraud, misrepresentation, embezzlement or dishonesty that is materially injurious to Gulfstream; (iii) committing or participating in any other act or omission wantonly, willfully, recklessly or in a manner which was grossly negligent that is materially injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise; (iv) engaging in a criminal enterprise involving moral turpitude; (v) any crime resulting in a conviction, which constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction involved (other than a motor vehicle felony that does not result in his incarceration); (vi) any loss of any state or federal license required for Mr. Hackett to perform his material duties or responsibilities for Gulfstream; or (vii) any material breach of the employment agreement by Mr. Hackett.

Mr. Hackett has the right to terminate the agreement upon 30 days notice for one year after any change in control. The Company’s obligations to make payments to Mr. Hackett following such a termination are described more fully below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change In Control”. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Hackett agrees to a covenant not to compete during the term of the agreement and for a period of one year thereafter in the territory of Florida, the Bahamas and portions of Cuba. Mr. Hackett also agrees to maintain the confidentiality of certain information in certain circumstances.

Thomas P. Cooper
On August 7, 2003, Mr. Thomas P. Cooper and Gulfstream entered into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Cooper serves as Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs, or such other position as the Board of Directors of Gulfstream determines, for an initial term of three years, subject to automatic one-year extensions absent mutual amendment of the terms or termination by either party as set forth therein. Mr. Cooper is entitled to a base salary of $100,000 (as increased to reflect increases in the consumer price index or at the discretion of the Compensation Committee) and to a bonus equal to 1% of Gulfstream’s annual pre-tax income which amount is paid quarterly on a trailing twelve month basis, excluding non-recurring gains and losses.
 
 
83

 
 
In the event of Mr. Cooper’s death during the term of the agreement; Mr. Cooper’s salary and incentive bonus will be paid to his designated beneficiary, estate or other legal representative for six months following his death. In the event of Mr. Cooper’s disability during the term of the agreement, Mr. Cooper will be entitled to receive no less than six months’ salary following such disability. This disability payment is in addition to other long-term disability benefits provided by the Company to Mr. Cooper. For the purposes of this agreement, “disability” is deemed to have occurred if Mr. Cooper is unable by reason of sickness, disease or accident to substantially perform his duties under the agreement for an aggregate of six months in any one year period, or if he has a guardian of his person or estate appointed by a court.

Upon termination of the agreement without “cause” by Gulfstream, Mr. Cooper will be entitled to benefits for the remainder of the initial or then-current renewal term of the agreement and base salary for one year plus one month for each year of service with Gulfstream. For the purposes of this agreement, “cause” is defined as (i) willfully committing or participating in any act or omission which constitutes willful misconduct, fraud, misrepresentation, embezzlement or dishonesty that is materially injurious to Gulfstream; (ii) committing or participating in any other act or omission wantonly, willfully, recklessly or in a manner which was grossly negligent that is materially injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise; (iii) engaging in a criminal enterprise involving moral turpitude; (iv) any crime resulting in a conviction, which constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction involved (other than a motor vehicle felony that does not result in his incarceration); (v) any loss of any state or federal license required for Mr. Cooper to perform his material duties or responsibilities for Gulfstream; or (vi) any material breach of the employment agreement by Mr. Cooper.

Mr. Cooper has the right to terminate the agreement upon 30 days notice for one year after any change in control. The Company’s obligations to make payments to Mr. Cooper following such a termination are described more fully below under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change In Control”. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Cooper agrees to a covenant not to compete during the term of the agreement and for a period of six months thereafter in the territory of Florida and the Bahamas (unless terminated without cause by Gulfstream, in which case the noncompetition obligations of Mr. Cooper will end upon his termination). Mr. Cooper also agrees to maintain the confidentiality of certain information in certain circumstances.

Employee Benefit Plans

401(k) Plan. The Company established a 401(k) retirement savings plan in 1996. Each of the Company’s participating employees may contribute to the 401(k) plan, through payroll deductions, up to 50% on a pre-tax basis of his or her compensation, subject to limits imposed by federal law. Beginning on July 1, 2006, the Company matched 25% of the first 4% contributed by participants. The Company may make additional contributions to the 401(k) plan in amounts determined by its Board of Directors. Employees may elect to invest their contributions in various established mutual funds. All amounts contributed by employee participants are fully vested at all times. The amounts matched by the Company are vested 25% in the first year of employment, 50% in the second year of employment, 75% in the third year of employment, and 100% in and after the fourth year of employment. For the year ended December 31, 2009, administrative expenses paid to third-party provider related to the Company’s 401(k) plan were approximately $16,000.

Stock Incentive Plan

The Plan.  The Plan was adopted by its Board of Directors and approved by its stockholders in 2006. The amended and restated plan was adopted by its Board of Directors and approved by its stockholders in 2009. Such plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, non-incentive stock options, SARs, cash-based awards, or other stock-based awards to employees, directors or consultants selected by the Compensation Committee. The plan authorizes 650,000 shares of the Common Stock to be issued under the plan. A detailed description of the Plan can be found below under “Gulfstream International Group Stock Option Plan”.

As of the date of this report, the Company has only awarded options to certain of its officers, employees and directors for an aggregate of 348,324 shares of such Common Stock. None of the options awarded to date have been exercised. No options were awarded in 2008. An aggregate of 60,000 options were awarded in January 2009 to the named executive officers.

 
84

 
 
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End


Option Awards
Name
 
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable
   
Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
(#)
Un-exercisable
   
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)
   
Option
Exercise Price
($)
 
Option Expiration Date
                           
David F. Hackett
    104,324       ––       ––     $ 5.00  
May 31, 2016
      6,000       24,000       ––     $ 2.00  
January 19, 2019
Robert. M. Brown
    18,000       12,000       ––     $ 5.00  
January 26, 2017
      4,000       16,000       ––     $ 2.00  
January 19, 2019
Thomas P. Cooper
    6,000       4,000       ––     $ 5.00  
January 26, 2017
      2,000       8,000       ––     $ 2.00  
January 19, 2019
                                   
 
Awards Granted. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has granted options to purchase 348,324 shares and 301,676 shares remain available for future awards under the Plan, or approximately 46.4% of the 650,000 total shares reserved. The table below sets forth the number of shares subject to awards which have been granted through March 31, 2010 to (i) individual named executive officers, (ii) named executive officers as a group, (iii) all current directors who are not named executive officers, and (iv) all employees, including officers who are not named executive officers, as a group:

Award Recipients
 
Number of
Shares Awarded
 
Named executive officers:
     
David F. Hackett
    134,324  
Robert M. Brown
    50,000  
Thomas P. Cooper
    20,000  
Executive Officers As a Group
    204,324  
All other employees, as a group:
    104,000  
Current Directors who are not named executive officers:
       
Thomas A. McFall
    10,000  
Gary P. Arnold
    4,000  
Gary L. Fishman
    2,000  
Barry S. Lutin
    4,000  
Richard R. Schreiber
    2,000  
Total
    348,324  

 
85

 
 
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-In-Control

The named executive officers are entitled to payments upon termination or change-in-control as set forth in their respective employment agreements, with the exception of Robert M. Brown. The Board of Directors provides payments to named executive officers upon termination or change of control in order to give them some degree of financial protection in the event of certain events occurring. The payment to which each named executive officer is eligible is roughly proportionate to such named executive officer’s level of total compensation.


Payments Made Upon Termination

In the event that a named executive officer’s employment terminates for reasons of voluntary termination, early retirement, involuntary not-for-cause termination, termination following a change of control of the Company and in the event of disability or death of the executive, he is entitled to receive amounts earned during his term of employment. Such amounts include:

·      
quarterly bonus earned for any completed fiscal quarter for Mr. Thomas P. Cooper;
·      
vested options awarded under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan;
·      
vested amounts contributed under the Company’s 401(k) plan; and
·      
pay in lieu of unused vacation.

Payments Made Upon Death or Disability

In the event of the death or disability of a named executive officer, each named executive officer is entitled to certain benefits as described in their employment agreements described above under “—Agreements with Named Executive Officers.” The Company does not maintain a disability plan.

Payments Made Upon a Change in Control

Change in Control of the Company

In the event of a change in control of the Company, the Board of Directors or a committee thereof may provide for accelerated vesting or termination of any outstanding stock options issued under the Stock Incentive Plan in exchange for a cash payment, or the issuance of substitute awards to substantially preserve the terms of any option awards previously granted under the Stock Incentive Plan. A description of the events giving rise to a “change in control” for purposes of the Stock Incentive Plan is set forth below under “— The Gulfstream International Group Stock Incentive Plan”.

Change in Control of Gulfstream

Pursuant to the employment agreements between the Company and each named executive officer, with the exception of Robert Brown, the Company is obligated to make certain payments to such executive if his employment is terminated following a change in control of Gulfstream (as defined above) (other than termination by Gulfstream for cause or by reason of death or disability) or if he terminates his employment within one year after the occurrence of a change in control of Gulfstream, as follows:

·      
continued payment of base salary and incentive bonus payments, in the case of Mr. Hackett one year following termination of the executive’s employment and in the case of Mr. Thomas P. Cooper one year following termination of executive’s employment plus one additional month for each year of service to the Company; and
·      
continued medical and life insurance benefits for the balance of the initial term of the applicable employment agreement.

Generally, pursuant to the agreements, a “change in control” of Gulfstream means a change in control (A) as set forth in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code; or (B) of a nature that would be required to be reported in response to Item 2.01 of a current report on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, as in effect on the date of the relevant agreement, including upon any of the following:

 
86

 
 
·      
any “person” (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) other than the executive is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities then having the right to vote as elections of directors;
·      
the individuals who at the effective date of the applicable employment agreement constitute the Board of Directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof, unless the election, or nomination for election, of each new director was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then in office who were directors at the effective date of the applicable employment agreement;
·      
there is a failure to elect a majority of the Board of Directors from candidates nominated by management of the Company to the Board of Directors; or
·      
the business of Gulfstream for which the executive’s services are principally performed is disposed of by Gulfstream pursuant to a partial or complete liquidation of Gulfstream, a sale of assets (including stock of a subsidiary of Gulfstream) or otherwise.

A change in control is deemed not to have occurred on either of the following circumstances:

·      
where all or any portion of the stock of Gulfstream is offered through an initial or subsequent public offering; and/or
·      
where the executive gives his explicit written waiver stating that for the purposes of the relevant portions of his employment agreement, a change in control shall not be deemed to have occurred.

In the event that the executive’s employment is terminated for any reason other than cause within one year following an “attempted change in control,” the executive shall be entitled to the same benefits and compensation as though he was terminated in the year following a change in control. An “attempted change in control” is deemed to have occurred if any substantial attempt, accompanied by significant work efforts and expenditures of money, is made to accomplish a change in control, whether or not such attempt is made with the approval of a majority of the Board of Directors.

Gulfstream International Group Stock Incentive Plan

The following is a summary of the Gulfstream International Group Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Plan.

Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to provide the Company with a means to assist in recruiting, retaining and rewarding certain employees, directors and consultants and to motivate such individuals to exert their best efforts on behalf of the Company by providing incentives through the granting of awards. By granting awards to such individuals, the Company expects that the interests of the recipients will be better aligned with the interests of the Company.

Stock Subject to the Plan. Currently a total of 650,000 shares of Common Stock may be issued under the Plan, subject to adjustments. The Company may use shares held in treasury in lieu of authorized but unissued shares. If any award expires or terminates, the shares subject to such award shall again be available for purposes of the Plan. Any shares used by the participant as payment to satisfy a purchase price related to an award, and any shares withheld by the Company to satisfy an applicable tax-withholding obligation, shall again be available for purposes of the Plan.

Administration of the Plan. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, all of the members of which are independent as required by law. The Compensation Committee has sole discretion over determining individuals eligible to participate in the Plan and the time or times at which awards will be granted and the number of shares, if applicable, which will be granted under an award. Subject to certain limitations, the Compensation Committee’s power and authority includes, but is not limited to, the ability to interpret the plan, to establish rules and regulations for carrying out the plan and to amend or rescind any rules previously established, to determine the terms and provisions of the award agreements and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the plan.

Eligible Persons. Any employee or director, as well as consultant to the Company, who is selected by the Compensation Committee is eligible to receive awards. The Compensation Committee will consider such factors as it deems pertinent in selecting participants and in determining the type and amount of their respective awards, provided that incentive stock options may only be granted to employees.

Grant of Awards. The types of awards that may be granted under the Plan are stock options (either incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options), stock appreciation rights, performance-based awards, as well as other stock-based awards and cash-based awards?. Awards are evidenced by an agreement and an award recipient has no rights as a stockholder with respect to any securities covered by an award until the date the recipient becomes a holder of record of the Common Stock.

 
87

 
 
On the date of the grant, the exercise price must equal at least 100% of the fair market value in the case of incentive stock options, or 110% of the fair market value with respect to optionees who own at least 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock. The fair market value is determined by computing the arithmetic mean of the high and low stock prices on a given determination date. This price needs not be uniform for all recipients of non-qualified stock options and must not be less than 100% of the fair market value. The exercise price on the date of grant is determined by the Compensation Committee in the case of non-qualified stock options. Options granted under the plan will vest as provided by the Compensation Committee at the time of the grant. The currently outstanding options vest 20% on the date of grant and then ratably at 20% per year over the next four years. The options expire on the date determined by the Compensation Committee but may not extend more than ten years from the grant date. The Compensation Committee may provide for accelerated vesting or termination in exchange for cash of any outstanding awards or the issuance of substitute awards upon consummation of a “change in control”.

For purposes of the Plan, a “change in control” is defined as (i) the purchase or other acquisition (other than from the Company) by any person, entity or group of persons, within the meaning of § 13(d) or § 14(d) of the Exchange Act (excluding, for this purpose, the Company or its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan of the Company or its subsidiaries), of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 51% or more of either the outstanding shares of the Common Stock or the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, each as of the time the Stock Incentive Plan was entered into; or (ii) individuals who constituted the Board of Directors at the time the Stock Incentive Plan was entered into cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors, except for the election of any person who becomes a director subsequent to such date whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the incumbent Board of Directors (other than an individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of directors); or (iii) approval by the Company’s stockholders of a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own more than 50% of, respectively, the Common Stock and the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the reorganized, merged or consolidated corporation’s then outstanding voting securities, or of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or of the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

Stock appreciation rights granted under the plan are subject to the same terms and restrictions as the option grants and may be granted independent of, or in connection with, the grant of options. The Compensation Committee determines the exercise price of stock appreciation rights. A stock appreciation right granted independent of an option entitles the participant to payment in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of the Common Stock on the exercise date over the exercise price per share, times the number of stock appreciation rights exercised. A stock appreciation right granted in connection with an option entitles the participant to surrender an unexercised option and to receive in exchange an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of the Common Stock over the exercise price per share for the option, times the number of shares covered by the option which is surrendered. Fair market value is determined in the same manner as it is determined for options.

The Compensation Committee may also grant awards of stock, restricted stock and other awards valued in whole or in part by reference to the fair market value of the Common Stock. These stock-based awards, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, may be, among other things, subject to completion of a specified period of service, the occurrence of an event or the attainment of performance objectives. Additionally, the Compensation Committee may grant awards of cash, in values to be determined by the Compensation Committee. If any awards are in excess of $1,000,000 such that Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code applies, the committee may, in its discretion, alter its compensation practices to ensure that compensation deductions are permitted.

Awards granted under the plan are generally not transferable by the participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and each award is exercisable, during the lifetime of the participant, only by the participant or his or her guardian or legal representative, unless permitted by the committee.

Amendment. The plan may be amended, altered, suspended or terminated by the administrator at any time. The Company may not alter the rights and obligations under any award granted before amendment of the plan without the consent of the affected participant. Unless terminated sooner, the plan will terminate automatically on February 28, 2016.

 
88

 
 
           Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards

The following is a summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that generally will arise with respect to awards granted under the plan and with respect to the sale of Common Stock acquired under the plan. The federal tax laws may change and the federal, state and local tax consequences for any participant will depend upon his or her individual circumstances. The tax consequences for any particular individual may be different.

Incentive Stock Options. Some options may constitute “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. If the Company grants an incentive stock option, the recipient is not required to recognize income upon the grant of the incentive stock option, and the Company will not be allowed to take a deduction. Similarly, when a recipient exercises any incentive stock options, provided he or she has not ceased to be an employee of the Company and all affiliates for more than three months before the date of exercise, such employee will not be required to recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed to take a deduction. For purposes of the alternative minimum tax, however, the amount by which the aggregate fair market value of Common Stock acquired on exercise of an incentive stock option exceeds the exercise price of that option generally will be an adjustment included in alternative minimum taxable income for the year in which the incentive stock option is exercised. The Code imposes an alternative minimum tax on a taxpayer whose tentative minimum tax, as defined in Section 55(b) (1) of the Code, exceeds the taxpayer’s regular tax.

Additional tax consequences will depend upon how long the recipient holds the shares of Common Stock received after exercising the incentive stock options. If the shares are held for more than two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise of the option, upon disposition of the shares, any gain upon the subsequent sale of the Common Stock will be taxed as a long-term capital gain or loss. If the recipient disposes of shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option which shares were held for two years or less from the date of grant or one year or less from the date of exercise (“Disqualifying Disposition”), the recipient generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of the Disqualifying Disposition.

To the extent that a recipient recognizes ordinary income, the Company is allowed to take a deduction. In addition, a recipient must recognize as short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on whether the holding period for the shares exceeds one year, any amount that is realized upon disposition of those shares which exceeds the fair market value of those shares on the date of exercise of the option.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. If a recipient receives a non-qualified stock option, he or she will not recognize income at the time of the grant of the stock option, nor will the Company be entitled to a deduction. However, such person will recognize ordinary income upon the exercise of the non-qualified stock option. The amount of ordinary income recognized equals the difference between (a) the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise and (b) the amount paid for the stock. The Company will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. The ordinary income recognized will be subject to applicable tax withholding by the Company. When the shares are sold, any difference between the sales price and the basis (i.e., the amount paid for the stock plus the ordinary income recognized) will be treated as a capital gain or loss, depending on the holding period of the shares.

Performance-Based Awards/Stock Appreciation Rights. An award recipient generally will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of performance-based awards or stock appreciation rights. Instead, such person will recognize as ordinary income, and the Company will have as a corresponding deduction, any cash delivered and the fair market value of any Common Stock delivered in payment of an amount due under the performance award or stock appreciation right. The ordinary income recognized will be subject to applicable tax withholding.

Upon selling any Common Stock received by a recipient in payment of an amount due under a performance award or stock appreciation right, such recipient generally will recognize a capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the sale price of the Common Stock and the tax basis in the Common Stock, depending on the holding period for the shares.

Other Stock-Based Awards and Cash-Based Awards. The tax consequences associated with any other stock-based award or cash-based award granted under the Plan will vary depending on the specific terms of the award, including whether the award has a readily ascertainable fair market value, whether or not the award is subject to forfeiture provisions or restrictions on transfer, the nature of the property under the award, the applicable holding period and the recipient’s tax basis.

Income Tax Rates on Capital Gain and Ordinary Income.  Under current tax law, short-term capital gain and ordinary income will be taxable at a maximum federal rate of 35%. Phaseouts of personal exemptions and reductions of allowable itemized deductions at higher levels of income may result in slightly higher effective tax rates. Ordinary compensation income generally will also be subject to the Medicare tax and, under certain circumstances, a social security tax. On the other hand, the relevant long-term capital gain will be taxable at a maximum federal rate of 15%.

 
89

 
 
Effect of Section 162(m) of the Code. Pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid in a taxable year to an individual who, on the last day of the taxable year, is the Company’s chief executive officer or among one of its four other highest compensated officers for that year. The deduction limit, however, does not apply to certain types of compensation, including qualified performance-based compensation. Compensation attributable to incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options granted under the Plan could be treated as qualified performance-based compensation and therefore not be subject to the deduction limit. In addition, the Compensation Committee may structure certain performance-based awards utilizing the performance criteria set forth in the Plan so that payments under such awards may likewise be treated as qualified performance-based compensation.

Compensation of Directors

The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors. In setting director compensation, the Company considers the significant amount of time that Directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the skill level required by the Company with respect to members of the Board of Directors.  Compensation for the Company’s directors in 2009 was as follows:

Name
 
Fees Earned
 or Paid
 in Cash
   
Stock
Awards
   
Option Awards
   
Non-Equity
 Incentive Plan Compensation
   
Nonqualified
 Deferred
 Compensation
 Earnings
   
All Other Compensation
   
Total
 
Thomas A. McFall
    ––       ––       10,000       ––       ––       ––       ––  
Gary P. Arnold
  $ 31,000       ––       4,000       ––       ––       ––     $ 31,000  
Gary L. Fishman
  $ 28,000       ––       2,000       ––       ––       ––     $ 28,000  
David F. Hackett(1)
    ––       ––               ––       ––       ––       ––  
Barry S. Lutin
  $ 34,000       ––       4,000       ––       ––       ––     $ 34,000  
Richard R. Schreiber
  $ 31,000       ––       2,000       ––       ––       ––     $ 31,000  
———————
(1)  Mr. Hackett is not compensated for his service as a director. The compensation of Mr. Hackett as President and Chief Executive Officer is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Following the Company’s initial public offering in December 2007, each director receives an annual fee of $20,000. Each director receives an additional $5,000 for each committee on which he serves as Chairman per year, $3,000 for each committee on which he serves as a member (but not as a Chairman) per year and $500 for each meeting such director attends that is not in conjunction with a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors. The Company reimburses members of the Board of Directors for travel related expenditures related to their services to the Company. Each director will also be entitled to participate in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan. It is expected that new directors will be granted options on the date that they begin service exercisable at the then-current market value.
 
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification

Our certificate of incorporation limits the liability of directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

 
90

 
 
·      
any breach of their duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;
·      
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
·      
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or
·      
any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under the federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that we will indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents for damages arising in connection with their actions in such capacities, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the bylaws.

There is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, employees or agents where indemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or proceeding that might result in a claim for indemnification.
 
ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
 
The following tables set forth certain information known to us with respect to beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of March 31, 2010, by:

·      
each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock;
·      
each of the Company’s directors;
·      
each named executive officer; and
·      
all of the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group.
 
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power over securities. The table below includes the number of shares underlying options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2010. It is therefore based on 3,795,061 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2010. Shares of Common Stock subject to options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2010 are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options or warrants for the purposes of computing beneficial ownership of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. To our knowledge, except as set forth in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property laws, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such person’s name. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each of the persons in this table is as follows: c/o Gulfstream International Group, Inc., 3201 Griffin Road, 4th Floor, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33312.

Beneficial Owners of More Than Five Percent

Name of Beneficial Owner   Number of Shares Beneficially   Percent Beneficially Owned
         
Robert F. Taglich (1)
700 New York Avenue
Huntington, New York 11743
 
280,922
 
7.28%
         
Michael N. Taglich (2)
700 New York Avenue
Huntington, New York 11743
 
                              281,922
 
7.31%
 
 
91

 
 
 
Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC (3)
One East 52nd Street, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10022
937,522
24.70%
 
 
     
Daniel H. Abramowitz (4)
110 North Washington Street, Suite 401
Rockville, Maryland 20850
231,350
7.16%
 
     
Craig Macnab (5)
1860 Summerland Ave.
Winter Park, FL 32789
300,000
7.70%
     
Bahama Investments Family (6)
190 Sykes Loop Drive
Merritt Island, FL 32953   
300,000 
7.70%
     
 Glenn Richard Hicks Roth DCG&T (7)
21 Tanfield Rd.
Tiburon, CA 92920
213,000  5.48% 
 
 
 (1)  Includes 5,000 shares of Common Stock held by Tag/Kent Partnership. Mr. Taglich is a partner of, and holds a 33.33% interest in, the Tag/Kent Partnership.

(2)   Includes 5,000 shares of Common Stock held by Tag/Kent Partnership. Mr. Taglich is a partner of, and holds a 33.33% interest in, the Tag/Kent Partnership.

(3)   Consists of warrants to purchase 914,189 shares of Common Stock at $0.0011 per share.

(4)   Includes 40,000 shares of Common Stock held by Hillson Investments, LLC, 154,350 shares of Common Stock held by Hillson Partners LP, 35,000 shares of Common Stock issuable under a warrant held by Hillson Partners LP and 2,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Abramowitz.

(5)   Consists of 200,000 of common stock issuable upon conversion of 20,000 shares of preferred stock and warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock at $1.75 per share.
 
(6)   Consists of 200,000 of common stock issuable upon conversion of 20,000 shares of preferred stock and warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock at $1.75 per share.
 
(7)   Consists of 142,000 of common stock issuable upon conversion of 14,200 shares of preferred stock and warrants to purchase 71,000 shares of Common Stock at $1.75 per share 
 
Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers

Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
   
 
Percent Beneficially Owned
 
             
David F. Hackett (1)
    149,324       3.9 %
Thomas A. McFall (2)
    93,300       2.5 %
Gary P. Arnold (3)
    84,000       2.2 %
Robert M. Brown (4)
    32,000       *  
Thomas P. Cooper (5)
    25,000       *  
Barry S. Lutin (6)
    4,000       *  
Richard R. Schreiber (7)
    2,000       *  
Gary L. Fishman (8)
    2,000       *  
All directors and officers as a group
(9 persons)  (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
    391,624       10.3 %

*Indicates beneficial ownership of less than one percent.

(1)  Includes 116,324 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Hackett.

(2)  Includes 4,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Thomas A. McFall.

(3)  Includes 4,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Arnold.

(4)  Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Brown.

 
92

 
 
(5)  Includes 12,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Cooper.

(6)  Consist of shares issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Lutin.

(7)  Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Schreiber.

(8)  Consist of shares issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Fishman.

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Since January 1, 2007, there has not been, nor is there currently planned, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which the Company was or is a party in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of the Common Stock or any member of such persons immediate families had or will have a direct or indirect material interest other than the transactions described below.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has responsibility for establishing and maintaining guidelines relating to any related party transactions between the Company and any of its officers or directors. Under the Company’s Code of Ethics (which can be accessed from its homepage at http://www.gulfstreamair.com by selecting “Corporate Governance”), any conflict of interest between a director or officer and the Company must be referred to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for approval. The Company intends to adopt written guidelines for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee which will set forth the requirements for review and approval of any related party transactions.

The transactions reported in the following sections “Management Services Agreement,” “Property Lease,” “Cuba Operations,” “Indemnification and Employment Agreements” and “Other Services” were not entered into pursuant to a formal policy of the Company regarding related party transactions. Each transaction below was entered into prior to the Company’s initial public offering in December 2007.

Management Services Agreement

On March 14, 2006, the Company entered into a management services agreement with Weatherly Group, LLC, one of the entities which formed the Company for the purpose of acquiring Gulfstream and the Academy. Under this agreement, Weatherly Group agreed to provide advisory and management services to the Company in consideration of an annual management fee of $200,000, payable monthly, and financial advisory fees based on a formula if the Company merges with or acquires another company. The agreement was terminated on May 27, 2008 and there were no fees paid during 2008 or 2009.

Property Lease

The Company leases the Gulfstream and Academy headquarters from EYW Holdings, Inc., an entity controlled in part by Thomas L. Cooper, the former Chief Executive Officer and current Chairman Emeritus of Gulfstream, and Thomas P. Cooper, an officer of Gulfstream, for a combined rent of approximately $34,000 per month. This corresponds to a price per square foot of approximately $24.29, which was consistent with lease rates for comparable commercial space at the time this arrangement was entered into.

Cuba Operations

GAC, a related company which is owned by Thomas L. Cooper, the former Chief Executive Officer of Gulfstream, operates charter flights between Miami and Havana.

Pursuant to a services agreement between Gulfstream and GAC dated August 8, 2003 and amended on March 14, 2006, Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft, flight crews, the Gulfstream name, insurance, and service personnel, including passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative. Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC. Pursuant to the March 14, 2006 amended agreement, Gulfstream receives 75% of the operating profit generated by GAC’s Cuban charter operation. Income provided under the services agreement amounted to $425,000 and $1,491,000 for 2008 and 2009, respectively.

This profit-sharing arrangement resulted from arms’ length negotiations with the principal selling stockholder in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy.

 
93

 
 
Debt Financing

On September 16, 2008, we consummated a financing in which we issued $5.1 million of senior debentures (the “Senior Debentures”) and warrants to purchase 578,870 shares of common stock (the “Senior Warrants”) to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC.  On the same date, we issued a 12% subordinated convertible debenture for $1.0 million (the “Junior Debenture”) and a warrant to purchase 225,000 shares of common stock (the “Junior Warrants”) to Gulfstream Funding I LLC, an entity owned in part by Thomas A. McFall, a member of the Board of Directors, and Douglas Hailey, a former member of the Board of Directors.

At the October 20, 2009 Annual Meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders approved a reduction in the conversion price to $1.975 from $3.00 relating to the Junior Debenture issued to Gulfstream Funding I, LLC in September 2008. The conversion to equity of the debenture and accrued interest expense was effective on October 20, 2009 and resulted in the issuance of 578,342 shares of the company’s common stock.

The Junior Warrants were originally exercisable through September 16, 2014 at an exercise price of $3.20 per share.  Upon conversion of the Junior Debenture, the number of shares issuable under the Junior Warrants was decreased from 225,000 to 166,667, or a decrease of 58,333 shares.  The Junior Warrants are subject to anti-dilution adjustment for certain future issuances or deemed issuances of Common Stock at a price per share of less than $3.20.

On October 7, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated note to Gulfstream Funding II, LLC (“GF II”), an entity owned in part by Thomas A. McFall, a member of the Board of Directors, and Douglas Hailey, a former member of the Board of Directors, for $1.5 million that matured on January 15, 2010 and bore interest at 12%. On January 15, 2010, the Company and GF II agreed to enter into one or more definitive agreements to extend the maturity date of the Note and to provide for the conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (collectively, the “Debt”) into preferred stock of the Company at current market prices. Upon the execution of such agreements by the Company and GF II, the Company will file a Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing the transaction and including such agreements as exhibits.  In addition, GF II waived any event of default, which would have occurred due to the Company’s failure to repay the Debt on the maturity date.

Other Services

The Company leases equipment from entities controlled by Thomas L. Cooper, former Chief Executive Officer of Gulfstream. The amounts paid for 2008 and 2009 were approximately $41,000 each year.

Indemnification and Employment Agreements

The Company’s bylaws provide that it may indemnify its directors, officers and employees against claims arising in connection with their actions in such capacities. The Company currently has a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy that insures such persons against the costs of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances. The Company believes that these indemnification and liability provisions are essential to attracting and retaining qualified persons as officers and directors. The Company has also entered into employment agreements with its named executive officers. See “Executive Compensation–Agreements with Named Executive Officers.”

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers. Under these agreements, the Company is required to indemnify them against all expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred, in connection with any actual, or any threatened, proceeding if any of them may be made a party because he or she is or was one of the Company’s directors or officers. The Company is obligated to pay these amounts only if the officer or director acted in good faith and in a manner that he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the Company’s best interests. With respect to any criminal proceeding, the Company is obligated to pay these amounts only if the officer or director had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. The indemnification agreements also set forth procedures that will apply in the event of a claim for indemnification under such agreements.

 
94

 
 
In addition, the Certificate provides that the liability of its directors for monetary damages will be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. Each director will continue to be subject to liability for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty, for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law, for unlawful stock purchases or redemptions and for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. This provision also does not affect a director’s responsibilities under any other laws, such as the federal securities laws or state or federal environmental laws.

 Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Party Transactions
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has responsibility for establishing and maintaining guidelines relating to any related party transactions between the Company and any of its officers or directors. Under the Company’s Code of Ethics (which can be accessed from its homepage at http://www.gulfstreamair.com by selecting “Corporate Governance”), any conflict of interest between a director or officer and the Company must be referred to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for approval. The Company intends to adopt written guidelines for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee which will set forth the requirements for review and approval of any related party transactions.

Director Independence
 
The Company periodically reviews the independence of each director. Pursuant to this review, the directors and officers of the Company, on an annual basis, are required to complete and forward to the Corporate Secretary a detailed questionnaire to determine if there are any transactions or relationships between any of the directors or officers (including immediate family and affiliates) and the Company. If any transactions or relationships exist, the Company then considers whether such transactions or relationships are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent in accordance with the listing standards of the NYSE Amex. Pursuant to this process, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Arnold, Fishman, Lutin and Schreiber qualify as independent directors.

Conflicts of Interest
 
Certain potential conflicts of interest are inherent in the relationships between our officers and directors of and us.
 
Conflicts Relating to Officers and Directors
 
To date, we do not believe that there are any conflicts of interest involving our officers or directors.
 
With respect to transactions involving real or apparent conflicts of interest, we have adopted policies and procedures which require that: (i) the fact of the relationship or interest giving rise to the potential conflict be disclosed or known to the directors who authorize or approve the transaction prior to such authorization or approval, (ii) the transaction be approved by a majority of our disinterested outside directors, and (iii) the transaction be fair and reasonable to us at the time it is authorized or approved by our directors.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Appointment of Auditors. Our Audit Committee and shareholders selected Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. as our auditors for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by McKean, Paul, Chrycy, Fletcher & Co. for the audit of the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 were approximately $203,000. The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. for the audit of the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 were approximately $185,000.

Audit-Related Fees. There were no audit-related fees paid to, or services rendered by, McKean, Paul, Chrycy, Fletcher & Co. or Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. in 2008. In 2009, fees paid to Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. for review of the company’s Form 10-Q filings were approximately $56,000. Also fees paid to Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P to perform a review of the Company’s internal controls to support management’s certification of the validity of its internal controls were $36,265.

 
95

 
 
Tax Fees. The fees paid to McKean, Paul, Chrycy, Fletcher & Co. for tax compliance or tax consulting during 2008 were $36,926. The fees paid to Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. for tax compliance or tax consulting during 2009 were $42,270.

All Other Fees. There were no other fees paid to, or services rendered by McKean, Paul, Chrycy, Fletcher & Co. or Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. in 2008 and 2009.

The Company paid no audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees or other fees to Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. for services rendered in 2008.

Policy Regarding Pre-Approval of Services Provided by the Independent Auditors. The Audit Committee Charter requires the committee’s pre-approval of all services, both audit and permitted non-audit, to be performed for the Company by the independent auditors. In determining whether proposed services are permissible, the committee considers whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence. As part of its consideration of proposed services, the committee may (i) consult with management as part of the decision making process, but may not delegate this authority to management, and (ii) delegate, from time to time, its authority to pre-approve such services to one or more committee members, provided that any such approvals are presented to the full committee at the next scheduled Audit Committee meeting.

The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 that were attributable to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was less than 50%.



 
96

 

PART IV


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS , FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a) Financial Statements and Schedules

1. Financial Statements

The following financial statements are filed as part of this report under Item 8 of Part II “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:

A.           Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
 
B.           Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
 
C.           Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
 
D.           Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended of December 31, 2009 and 2008.

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Financial statement schedules not included herein have been omitted because they are either not required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise included herein.

(b) Exhibits.
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit No.
 
Exhibit
     
3.1
     
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated November 9, 2007, exhibit 3.1
     
3.2
 
Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated November 9, 2007, exhibit 3.3
     
4.1
 
Specimen Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated November 16, 2007, exhibit 4.1
     
4.2
 
Form of Subordinated Debenture, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 4.2
     
10.1
 
Management Services Agreement, dated March 14, 2006, between Weatherly Group, LLC, and the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.1
     
10.2
 
Lease Agreement dated August 1, 2005, by and between Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. and EYW Holdings, Inc., as amended by First Amendment thereto dated as of April 17, 2006, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.2
     
10.3
 
Lease Agreement dated August 1, 2005, by and between Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. and EYW Holdings, Inc., as amended by First Amendment thereto dated as of March 22, 2006, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.3
     
10.4
 
Code Share And Regulatory Cooperation Agreement dated as of April 21, 2003 and as thereafter amended, by and between United Air Lines, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. , incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.4
     
10.5
 
Passenger Prorate Agreement dated as of October 1, 2006 and as thereafter amended, by and between United Air Lines, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.5
 
 
97

 
 
Exhibit No.   Exhibit
     
10.6
 
Codeshare Agreement dated as of February 11, 2000 and as thereafter amended, by and between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. , incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.6
     
10.7
 
Codeshare Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005, by and between Compania Panamenia De Aviacion, S.A. and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. , incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.7
     
10.8
 
Amended and Restated Alliance Agreement dated December 30, 1999 and as thereafter amended, by and between Continental Airlines, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. , incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.8
     
10.9
 
Form of Lease Agreement dated August 3, 2003 between Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., as amended by Amendment Number One dated May 23, 2005 and Amendment dated August 2, 2005, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.9
     
10.10
 
Subcontract Agreement effective as of April 1, 2006 and as thereafter amended, by and between Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. and Computer Sciences Corporation, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.10
     
10.11
 
Business Lease Agreement dated May 14, 1999 between Richard Bulow and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., as amended by Amendment dated June 21, 2004, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-K (File No. 001-33884) dated April 14, 2008, exhibit 10.11
 
       
10.12
 
Form of Used Beechcraft 1900D Airliner Operating Lease Agreement dated June 8, 2006 between CSC Applied Technologies LLC and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., as amended by Consultant Agreement Modification dated July 20, 2006, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.12
 
       
10.13
 
Lease Agreement dated as of July 20, 2000 between Miami-Dade County, Florida and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated October 30, 2007, exhibit 10.13
 
       
10.14
 
Building Lease dated June 1, 2004 between Broward County and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated October 30, 2007, exhibit 10.14
 
       
10.15
 
Lease Agreement dated as of June 18, 2002, by and between Blount Realty Partners, Ltd. and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated October 30, 2007, exhibit 10.15
 
       
10.16
 
Form of Aircraft Lease Agreement dated as of October 28, 2004 between Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. and Mesa Airlines Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.16
 
       
10.17
 
Lease dated August 1, 2006 between CSC Applied Technologies, LLC and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated November 7, 2007, exhibit 10.17
 
       
10.18
 
Agreement dated March 1, 2007 between Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated December 4, 2007, exhibit 10.18
 
       
10.19
 
Services Agreement dated August 8, 2003 and amended March 14, 2006 between Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. and Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated October 30, 2007, exhibit 10.19
 
       
10.20
 
Agreement dated June 13, 2006 between Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. and the Airline Division of The International Brotherhood of Teamsters Representing the Pilots of Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated October 30, 2007, exhibit 10.20
 
       
10.21
 
Loan Agreement dated August 15, 2006 between Wachovia Bank, National Association and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.21
 
       
10.22
 
Loan Agreement dated as of December 29, 2005 between Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., and Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.22
 
 
 
98

 
 
 
Exhibit No.   Exhibit  
       
10.23
 
Gulfstream Acquisition Group, Inc. (predecessor to Gulfstream International Group, Inc.) Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.23
 
       
10.24
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement under Gulfstream Acquisition Group, Inc. (predecessor to Gulfstream International Group, Inc.) Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.24
 
       
10.25
 
Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2006 between Thomas L. Cooper and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.25
 
       
10.26
 
Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2006 between David F. Hackett and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.26
 
       
10.27
 
Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2003 between Thomas P. Cooper and Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.27
 
       
10.28
 
Employment Agreement dated April 6, 2006 between Paul Stagias and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.28
 
       
10.29
 
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of its Directors and Officers, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated November 16, 2007, exhibit 10.29
 
       
10.30
 
Form of Warrant issued in connection with the acquisition of Gulfstream International Airlines and Gulfstream Flight Academy, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated July 5, 2007, exhibit 10.30
 
       
10.31
 
Amended and Restated Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated March 14, 2006 issued by Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. to Continental Airlines, Inc., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated November 7, 2007, exhibit 10.31
 
       
10.32
 
Form of Warrant issued to the Underwriters, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form S-1 (File No. 333-144363) dated November 16, 2007, exhibit 10.32
 
       
10.33
 
Aircraft Purchase and Sale Agreement dated June 26, 2008 between the Company and Pimegal Consultants Ltd., incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated August 14, 2008, exhibit 10.1
 
       
10.34
 
Securities Purchase Agreement entered into on September 12, 2008, and effective on August 31, 2008, by and between Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.1
 
       
10.35
 
$5,100,000 Secured Original Issue Discount Debenture entered into on September 19, 2008, and effective on August 31, 2008, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.2
 
       
10.36
 
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC, entered into on September 19, 2008, and effective on August 31, 2008, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.3
 
       
10.37
 
Security Agreement entered into on September 19, 2008, and effective on August 31, 2008, by and between Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.4
 
       
10.38
 
Put Option Agreement entered into on September 19, 2008, and effective on August 31, 2008, by and between Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.5
 
       
10.39
 
Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 15, 2008, by and between Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and Gulfstream Funding, LLC, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.6
 
       
       
10.40
 
$1,000,000 Junior Subordinated Debenture dated September 16, 2008, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.7
 
       
10.41
 
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Gulfstream Funding, LLC, dated September 16, 2008, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.8
 
 
 
99

 
 
 
Exhibit No
  Exhibit  
       
10.42
 
Letter Agreement Regarding Conversion of Debenture dated September 16, 2008, by and between Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and Gulfstream Funding, LLC, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33884) dated November 14, 2008, exhibit 10.9
 
       
10.43
 
Agreement, dated December 19, 2008 by and between Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. and Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated December 23, 2008, exhibit 10.1
 
       
10.44
 
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of October 7, 2009 by and between Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and Gulfstream Funding II, LLC, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated October 7, 2009, exhibit 10.1.
 
       
10.45
 
Subordinated Promissory Note of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. dated as of October 7, 2009 in favor of Gulfstream Funding II, LLC, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated October 7, 2009, exhibit 10.2.
 
       
10.46
 
Form of Unit Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated January 29, 2010, exhibit 10.1.
 
       
10.47
 
Form of Warrant, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated January 29, 2010, exhibit 10.2.
 
       
10.48
 
Form of Registration Rights Agreement, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated January 29, 2010, exhibit 10.3.
 
       
10.49
 
Form of Purchase Agreement for Senior Secured Notes and Warrants dated as of February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.1.
 
       
10.50
 
Form of 12% Senior Secured Note due December 31, 2010 issued on February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.2.
 
       
10.51
 
Form of Warrant issued on February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.3.
 
       
10.52
 
Security Agreement dated as of February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.4.
 
       
10.53
 
Waiver, Consent and Intercreditor Agreement dated as of February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.5.
 
       
10.54
 
Form of Registration Rights Agreement, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.6.
 
       
10.55
 
Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Debenture dated as of February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.7.
 
       
10.56
 
$250,000 Promissory Note issued to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC on February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.8.
 
       
10.57
 
Put Warrant issued to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC on February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.9.
 
       
10.58
 
Remaining Warrant issued to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC on February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.10.
 
       
10.59
 
Amendment to the Put Option Agreement dated as of February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.11.
 
       
10.60
 
Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements dated as of February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K/A (File No. 001-33884) dated March 5, 2010, exhibit 10.12.
 
       
10.61
 
Form of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated April 5, 2010, exhibit 10.1.
 
       
10.62
 
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Gulfstream International Group dated as of March 31, 2010, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated April 5, 2010, exhibit 10.2.
 
 
 
100

 
 
Exhibit No
  Exhibit  
       
10.63
 
Form of Warrant, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated April 5, 2010, exhibit 10.3.
 
       
10.64
 
Form of Registration Rights Agreement, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated April 5, 2010, exhibit 10.4.
 
       
10.65
 
Form of Exchange Letter Agreement, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884) dated April 5, 2010, exhibit 10.5.
 
       
11.1*
 
Statement re computation of per share earnings
 
       
16.1
 
Letter of Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C. dated January 6, 2009, incorporated by reference to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. Form 8-K (File No. 001-33884)) dated January 8, 2009, exhibit 16.1
 
       
21.1 *
 
List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 
       
31.1 *
 
Certification Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
       
31.2 *
 
Certification Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
       
32.1 *
 
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
       
32.2 *
 
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 

* Filed herewith.

 
101

 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned on April 15, 2010, thereunto duly authorized.

  GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.  
       
 
By:
/s/ David F. Hackett
 
    David F. Hackett  
   
Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
 
   
 
 
 
 
  By:  
/s/ Robert M. Brown  
 
    Robert M. Brown    
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
       
                                     
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Form 10-K Annual Report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE
 
TITLE
 
DATE
         
/s/ David F. Hackett
David F. Hackett
  
Chief Executive Officer, President and 
Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
  
April 15, 2010
         
/s/ Robert M. Brown
Robert M. Brown  
  
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  
April 15, 2010
         
/s/ Thomas A. McFall
Thomas A. McFall
  
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Senior Executive Officer
  
April 15, 2010
         
/s/ Gary P. Arnold
Gary P. Arnold
  
Director
  
April 15, 2010
         
/s/ Gary L. Fishman
Gary L. Fishman
  
Director
  
April 15, 2010
         
/s/ Barry S. Lutin
Barry S. Lutin
  
Director
  
April 15, 2010
         
/s/ Richard R. Schreiber
Richard R. Schreiber
  
Director
  
April 15, 2010
 
 
102