10-Q Document 30SEPT12
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_______________________
FORM 10-Q
_______________________
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
Commission File Number 000-52833
_____________________
United Insurance Holdings Corp.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
_______________________
|
| | | | |
| Delaware | | 75-3241967 | |
| (State of Incorporation) | | (IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
360 Central Avenue, Suite 900
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
727-895-7737
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
_______________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | |
Large accelerated filer | £ | | Accelerated filer | £ |
Non-accelerated filer | £ | | Smaller reporting company | þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No R
As of November 14, 2012; 10,448,839 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
|
| | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| Item 1. Financial Statements | |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | |
| Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income | |
| Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |
| Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
| Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | |
| Item 4. Controls and Procedures | |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |
| Item 1. Legal Proceedings | |
| Item 1A. Risk Factors | |
| Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |
| Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | |
| Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures | |
| Item 5. Other Information | |
| Item 6. Exhibits | |
Signatures | |
Throughout this Form 10-Q, we present amounts in all tables in thousands, except for share amounts, per share amounts, policy counts or where more specific language or context indicates a different presentation. In the narrative sections of this Quarterly Report, we show full values rounded to the nearest thousand.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of September 30, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 (Form 10-Q) or in documents that we incorporate by reference that do not represent historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Reform Litigation Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements about our ability to reduce our geographic concentration and related effects, our ability to obtain rate increases when needed and the impact of any such increases on our revenues, estimated unpaid losses on insurance policies that we write, our investment returns and expectations about our liquidity. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and market in which we operate, and management's beliefs and assumptions. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “estimate,” or “continue” or the negative variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. The risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, uncertainties related to estimates, assumptions and projections relating to unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and other accounting policies; the regulatory, economic and weather conditions present in the states in which we operate; the impact of new federal or state regulations that affect the property and casualty insurance market; the costs of reinsurance; assessments charged by various governmental agencies; pricing competition and other initiatives by competitors; our ability to attract and retain the services of senior management; the outcome of litigation pending against us, including the terms of any settlements; dependence on investment income and the composition of our investment portfolio and related market risks; our exposure to catastrophic events and severe weather conditions; downgrades in our financial strength rating; and other matters described from time to time by us in this Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC.
We caution you not to place reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us described in our filings with the SEC. The forward-looking events that we discuss in this Form 10-Q are based on assumptions and expectations existing as of the date of this Form 10-Q and may not occur in light of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that we describe in our filings with the SEC. A detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from our forward-looking statements is included in the section entitled RISK FACTORS in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation and disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
In addition, we prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which prescribe when we may reserve for particular risks, including litigation exposures. Accordingly, our results for a given reporting period could be significantly affected if and when we establish a reserve for a major contingency. Therefore, the results we report in certain accounting periods may appear to be volatile.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| September 30, 2012 |
| December 31, 2011 |
ASSETS |
| (Unaudited) | | |
Investments available for sale, at fair value: |
| | | |
Fixed maturities (amortized cost of $118,256 and $116,863, respectively) |
| $ | 124,457 |
|
| $ | 120,378 |
|
Equity securities (adjusted cost of $3,245 and $3,284, respectively) |
| 3,742 |
|
| 3,581 |
|
Other long-term investments |
| 300 |
|
| 300 |
|
Total investments |
| $ | 128,499 |
|
| $ | 124,259 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
| 90,892 |
|
| 41,639 |
|
Accrued investment income |
| 800 |
|
| 986 |
|
Premiums receivable, net of allowances for credit losses of $93 and $77, respectively |
| 17,405 |
|
| 11,205 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses |
| 3,013 |
|
| 4,458 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
| 77,774 |
|
| 40,968 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
| 16,952 |
|
| 12,324 |
|
Other assets |
| 1,560 |
|
| 4,376 |
|
Total Assets |
| $ | 336,895 |
|
| $ | 240,215 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
| $ | 35,801 |
|
| $ | 33,600 |
|
Unearned premiums |
| 131,832 |
|
| 100,130 |
|
Reinsurance payable |
| 72,679 |
|
| 16,571 |
|
Other liabilities |
| 15,414 |
|
| 17,866 |
|
Notes payable |
| 16,176 |
| | 17,059 |
|
Total Liabilities |
| $ | 271,902 |
|
| $ | 185,226 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity: |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
| — |
|
| — |
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 10,660,922 and 10,573,932 issued; 10,448,839 and 10,361,849 outstanding for 2012 and 2011, respectively |
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
| 102 |
|
| 75 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost; 212,083 shares |
| (431 | ) |
| (431 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
| 4,114 |
|
| 2,341 |
|
Retained earnings |
| 61,207 |
|
| 53,003 |
|
Total Stockholders' Equity |
| $ | 64,993 |
|
| $ | 54,989 |
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
| $ | 336,895 |
|
| $ | 240,215 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
| $ | 59,461 |
|
| $ | 44,266 |
|
| $ | 195,385 |
|
| $ | 160,337 |
|
(Increase) decrease in gross unearned premiums |
| (903 | ) |
| 2,861 |
|
| (31,702 | ) |
| (28,585 | ) |
Gross premiums earned |
| 58,558 |
|
| 47,127 |
|
| 163,683 |
|
| 131,752 |
|
Ceded premiums earned |
| (28,335 | ) |
| (23,267 | ) |
| (75,948 | ) |
| (66,485 | ) |
Net premiums earned |
| $ | 30,223 |
|
| $ | 23,860 |
|
| $ | 87,735 |
|
| $ | 65,267 |
|
Net investment income |
| 807 |
|
| 807 |
|
| 2,331 |
|
| 2,041 |
|
Net realized gains |
| 37 |
|
| — |
|
| 155 |
|
| 112 |
|
Other revenue |
| 1,205 |
|
| 826 |
|
| 3,118 |
|
| 2,536 |
|
Total revenue |
| $ | 32,272 |
|
| $ | 25,493 |
|
| $ | 93,339 |
|
| $ | 69,956 |
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
| 16,950 |
|
| 8,414 |
|
| 39,401 |
|
| 29,399 |
|
Policy acquisition costs |
| 9,404 |
|
| 7,568 |
|
| 26,535 |
|
| 21,293 |
|
Operating expenses |
| 1,670 |
|
| 1,146 |
|
| 4,860 |
|
| 3,946 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
| 3,031 |
|
| 2,368 |
|
| 8,124 |
|
| 6,785 |
|
Interest expense |
| 71 |
|
| 142 |
|
| 283 |
|
| 453 |
|
Total expenses |
| $ | 31,126 |
|
| $ | 19,638 |
|
| $ | 79,203 |
|
| $ | 61,876 |
|
Income before other (income) expenses |
| 1,146 |
|
| 5,855 |
|
| 14,136 |
|
| 8,080 |
|
Other (income) expenses |
| (1 | ) |
| (23 | ) |
| 268 |
|
| 256 |
|
Income before income taxes |
| $ | 1,147 |
|
| $ | 5,878 |
|
| $ | 13,868 |
|
| $ | 7,824 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
| 164 |
|
| 2,228 |
|
| 5,146 |
|
| 2,961 |
|
Net income |
| $ | 983 |
|
| $ | 3,650 |
|
| $ | 8,722 |
|
| $ | 4,863 |
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain on investments |
| 1,442 |
|
| 2,441 |
|
| 3,042 |
|
| 3,470 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized investment gains |
| (37 | ) |
| — |
|
| (155 | ) |
| (112 | ) |
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income |
| (542 | ) |
| (941 | ) |
| (1,114 | ) |
| (1,295 | ) |
Total comprehensive income |
| $ | 1,846 |
|
| $ | 5,150 |
|
| $ | 10,495 |
|
| $ | 6,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
| 10,361,849 |
|
| 10,361,849 |
|
| 10,361,849 |
|
| 10,469,056 |
|
Diluted | | 10,448,839 |
| | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,396,455 |
| | 10,469,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
| $ | 0.09 |
|
| $ | 0.35 |
|
| $ | 0.84 |
|
| $ | 0.46 |
|
Diluted | | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 0.05 |
|
| $ | — |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 8,722 |
| | $ | 4,863 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 946 |
| | 911 |
|
Net realized gains | | (155 | ) | | (112 | ) |
Provision for uncollectible premiums/over and short | | 26 |
| | 18 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net | | 190 |
| | (921 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | |
Accrued investment income | | 186 |
| | (490 | ) |
Premiums receivable | | (6,226 | ) | | (4,203 | ) |
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses | | 1,445 |
| | 20,661 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums | | (36,806 | ) | | (24,845 | ) |
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net | | (4,628 | ) | | (3,746 | ) |
Other assets | | 993 |
| | (1,470 | ) |
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses | | 2,201 |
| | (7,557 | ) |
Unearned premiums | | 31,702 |
| | 28,585 |
|
Reinsurance payable | | 56,108 |
| | 40,683 |
|
Other liabilities | | (2,529 | ) | | 2,377 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 52,175 |
| | $ | 54,754 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments available for sale | | 28,793 |
| | 24,285 |
|
Purchases of investments available for sale | | (30,419 | ) | | (102,463 | ) |
Cost of capitalized software acquired | | — |
| | (15 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (1,626 | ) | | $ | (78,193 | ) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Repayments of borrowings | | (883 | ) | | (882 | ) |
Repurchases of common stock | | — |
| | (431 | ) |
Dividends | | (518 | ) | | — |
|
Bank overdrafts | | 105 |
| | 2,811 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | $ | (1,296 | ) | | $ | 1,498 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash | | 49,253 |
| | (21,941 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 41,639 |
| | 71,644 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 90,892 |
| | $ | 49,703 |
|
| | | | |
Supplemental Cash Flows Information | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 242 |
| | $ | 464 |
|
Income taxes paid | | $ | 6,593 |
| | $ | 1,580 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
1) ORGANIZATION, CONSOLIDATION AND PRESENTATION
(a)Business
United Insurance Holdings Corp (UIHC) is a property and casualty insurance holding company that sources, writes, and services residential property and casualty insurance policies using a network of independent agents and a group of wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries. Our primary insurance subsidiary is United Property & Casualty Insurance Company (UPC), which was formed in Florida in 1999 and has operated continuously since that time. Our other subsidiaries include United Insurance Management, L.C. (UIM), the managing general agent that manages substantially all aspects of UPC's business; Skyway Claims Services, LLC (SCS), a claims adjusting company that provides services to UPC; and UPC Re, which provides a portion of the reinsurance protection purchased by UPC.
Our primary product is homeowners' insurance, which we currently offer in Florida, South Carolina, Massachusetts and Rhode Island under authorization from the insurance regulatory authorities in each state. UPC has also applied to insurance regulatory authorities in two additional states to write property and casualty lines.
We conduct our operations under one business segment.
(b)Consolidation and Presentation
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). While preparing our financial statements, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Reported amounts that require us to make extensive use of estimates include our reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, reinsurance recoverable, deferred policy acquisition costs, and investments. Except for the captions on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Income, we generally use the term loss(es) to collectively refer to both loss and loss adjustment expenses.
We include all of our subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements, eliminating all significant intercompany balances and transactions during consolidation.
We prepared the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2012, with the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet amounts as of December 31, 2011, presented for comparative purposes, and the related unaudited consolidated Statements of Income and Statements of Cash Flows in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. In compliance with those instructions, we have omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, though management believes the disclosures made herein are sufficient to ensure that the information presented is not misleading.
Our results of operations and our cash flows as of the end of the interim periods reported herein do not necessarily indicate the results we may experience for the remainder of the year or for any other future period.
Management believes our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements include all the normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2012, our Consolidated Statements of Income and our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. Our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and footnotes should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and footnotes included within our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (2011 Form 10-K).
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
2) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Changes to significant accounting policies
We have made no material changes to our significant accounting policies as reported in our 2011 Form 10-K.
On January 1, 2012, two new Accounting Standards Updates became effective: ASU No. 2010-26, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts and ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The amendments in ASU No. 2010-26 addressed diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral; they clarified which costs should be deferred and which costs should be expensed when incurred. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-05 gave entities the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The two pronouncements did not require us to change our significant accounting policies; therefore, they did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
(b) Fair value assumptions
The carrying amounts for the following financial instrument categories approximate their fair values at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, because of their short-term nature: cash and cash equivalents, accrued investment income, premiums receivable, reinsurance recoverable, reinsurance payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses. The carrying amount of notes payable approximates fair value as the interest rate is variable.
(c) Pending Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-12 delay the effective date of certain provisions in ASU No. 2011-05 that relate to reclassification items until such time as the FASB has time to re-deliberate the presentation of those items. All other provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 take effect on the date originally noted in that ASU.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
3) INVESTMENTS
The following table details the difference between cost or adjusted/amortized cost and estimated fair value, by major investment category, at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost or Adjusted/Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | |
U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 49,366 |
| | $ | 432 |
| | $ | 177 |
| | $ | 49,621 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions | 17,128 |
| | 1,864 |
| | — |
| | 18,992 |
|
Corporate securities | 51,332 |
| | 4,080 |
| | — |
| | 55,412 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks | 430 |
| | 3 |
| | 1 |
| | 432 |
|
Total fixed maturities | $ | 118,256 |
| | $ | 6,379 |
| | $ | 178 |
| | $ | 124,457 |
|
Common stocks | 2,973 |
| | 540 |
| | 35 |
| | 3,478 |
|
Nonredeemable preferred stocks | 272 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | 264 |
|
Total equity securities | $ | 3,245 |
| | $ | 540 |
| | $ | 43 |
| | $ | 3,742 |
|
Other long-term investments | 300 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 300 |
|
Total investments | $ | 121,801 |
| | $ | 6,919 |
| | $ | 221 |
| | $ | 128,499 |
|
| | | | | | | |
December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | |
U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 48,011 |
| | $ | 219 |
| | $ | 111 |
| | $ | 48,119 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions | 17,159 |
| | 1,207 |
| | — |
| | 18,366 |
|
Corporate securities | 51,135 |
| | 2,366 |
| | 145 |
| | 53,356 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks | 558 |
| | — |
| | 21 |
| | 537 |
|
Total fixed maturities | $ | 116,863 |
| | $ | 3,792 |
| | $ | 277 |
| | $ | 120,378 |
|
Common stocks | 2,807 |
| | 359 |
| | 43 |
| | 3,123 |
|
Nonredeemable preferred stocks | 477 |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | 458 |
|
Total equity securities | $ | 3,284 |
| | $ | 359 |
| | $ | 62 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
|
Other long-term investments | 300 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 300 |
|
Total investments | $ | 120,447 |
| | $ | 4,151 |
| | $ | 339 |
| | $ | 124,259 |
|
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
On September 25, 2012, we acquired an investment in a limited partnership, recorded in other assets, that is currently being accounted for at cost. Our total investment in the partnership is $750,000 and is currently bifurcated between a capital contribution of $187,500 and a note receivable of $562,500 that will be utilized to fund our future capital contributions. We are not required to fund any additional amounts in excess of our initial $750,000 investment. At September 30, 2012, the cost basis of our investment approximated its fair value.
When we sell investments, we calculate the gain or loss realized on the sale by comparing the sales price (fair value) to the cost or adjusted/amortized cost of the security sold. We determine the cost or adjusted/amortized cost of the security sold using the specific-identification method. The following table details our realized gains (losses) by major investment category for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| Gains (Losses) | | Fair Value at Sale | | Gains (Losses) | | Fair Value at Sale |
Three Months Ended September 30, | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturities | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 3,066 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Total realized gains | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 3,066 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Realized losses on equity securities | (5 | ) | | 200 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total realized losses | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | 200 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Net realized investment gains | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 3,266 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturities | $ | 198 |
| | $ | 7,340 |
| | $ | 110 |
| | $ | 12,046 |
|
Equity securities | 119 |
| | 887 |
| | 10 |
| | 65 |
|
Total realized gains | $ | 317 |
| | $ | 8,227 |
| | $ | 120 |
| | $ | 12,111 |
|
Fixed maturities | (141 | ) | | 9,243 |
| | (8 | ) | | 2,990 |
|
Equity securities | (21 | ) | | 391 |
| | — |
| | 96 |
|
Total realized losses | $ | (162 | ) | | $ | 9,634 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | 3,086 |
|
Net realized investment gains | $ | 155 |
| | $ | 17,861 |
| | $ | 112 |
| | $ | 15,197 |
|
We realized $37,000 and $155,000, respectively, of net investment gains during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $0 and $112,000, respectively, of net investment gains during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
The table below summarizes our fixed maturities at September 30, 2012, by contractual maturity periods. Actual results may differ as issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without penalties, prior to the contractual maturity of those obligations.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2012 |
| Cost or Amortized Cost | | Percent of Total | | Fair Value | | Percent of Total |
Due in one year or less | $ | 42,293 |
| | 35.8 | % | | $ | 42,309 |
| | 34.0 | % |
Due after one year through five years | 20,492 |
| | 17.3 |
| | 21,151 |
| | 17.0 |
|
Due after five years through ten years | 37,128 |
| | 31.4 |
| | 40,979 |
| | 32.9 |
|
Due after ten years | 18,343 |
| | 15.5 |
| | 20,018 |
| | 16.1 |
|
Total | $ | 118,256 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 124,457 |
| | 100.0 | % |
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
The following table summarizes our net investment income by major investment category:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Fixed maturities | $ | 757 |
| | $ | 678 |
| | $ | 2,202 |
| | $ | 1,780 |
|
Equity securities | 34 |
| | 34 |
| | 104 |
| | 110 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments | 16 |
| | 95 |
| | 25 |
| | 151 |
|
Net investment income | $ | 807 |
| | $ | 807 |
| | $ | 2,331 |
| | $ | 2,041 |
|
Investment expenses | (23 | ) | | (24 | ) | | (117 | ) | | (116 | ) |
Net investment income, less investment expenses | $ | 784 |
| | $ | 783 |
| | $ | 2,214 |
| | $ | 1,925 |
|
The following table presents an aging of our unrealized investment losses by investment class:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less Than Twelve Months | | Twelve Months or More |
|
Number of Securities* | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | |
Number of Securities* | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government and agency securities | 4 |
| | $ | 177 |
| | $ | 10,277 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 102 |
|
Total fixed maturities | 4 |
| | $ | 177 |
| | $ | 10,277 |
| | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 102 |
|
Common stocks | 9 |
| | 27 |
| | 516 |
| | 1 |
| | 8 |
| | 48 |
|
Nonredeemable preferred stocks | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 8 |
| | 264 |
|
Total equity securities | 9 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 516 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 312 |
|
Total | 13 |
| | $ | 204 |
| | $ | 10,793 |
| | 4 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 414 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government and agency securities | 2 |
| | $ | 90 |
| | $ | 16,915 |
| | 1 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 1,627 |
|
Corporate securities | 3 |
| | 145 |
| | 3,924 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | 21 |
| | 537 |
|
Total fixed maturities | 5 |
| | $ | 235 |
| | $ | 20,839 |
| | 5 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 2,164 |
|
Common stocks | 12 |
| | 40 |
| | 740 |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | 9 |
|
Nonredeemable preferred stocks | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 19 |
| | 458 |
|
Total equity securities | 12 |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 740 |
| | 4 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 467 |
|
Total | 17 |
| | $ | 275 |
| | $ | 21,579 |
| | 9 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | $ | 2,631 |
|
* This amount represents the actual number of discrete securities, not the number of shares of those securities. The numbers are not presented in thousands.
During our quarterly evaluations of our securities for impairment, we determined that none of our investments in debt and equity securities that reflected an unrealized loss position were other-than-temporarily impaired. The issuers of our debt securities continue to make principal and interest payments on a timely basis. We do not intend to sell nor is it likely that we would be required to sell the debt securities before we recover our amortized cost basis. All the issuers of the equity securities we own had near-term prospects that indicated we could recover our cost basis, and we also have the ability and the intent to hold these securities until their value equals or exceeds their cost.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
The following table presents the fair value of our financial instruments measured on a recurring basis by level at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 |
September 30, 2012 | | | | | |
U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 49,621 |
| | $ | 31,821 |
| | $ | 17,800 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions | 18,992 |
| | — |
| | 18,992 |
|
Corporate securities | 55,412 |
| | — |
| | 55,412 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks | 432 |
| | 432 |
| | — |
|
Total fixed maturities | $ | 124,457 |
| | $ | 32,253 |
| | $ | 92,204 |
|
Common stocks | 3,478 |
| | 3,478 |
| | — |
|
Nonredeemable preferred stocks | 264 |
| | 264 |
| | — |
|
Total equity securities | $ | 3,742 |
| | $ | 3,742 |
| | $ | — |
|
Other long-term investments | 300 |
| | 300 |
| | — |
|
Total investments | $ | 128,499 |
| | $ | 36,295 |
| | $ | 92,204 |
|
| | | | | |
December 31, 2011 | | | | | |
U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 48,119 |
| | $ | 24,176 |
| | $ | 23,943 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions | 18,366 |
| | — |
| | 18,366 |
|
Corporate securities | 53,356 |
| | — |
| | 53,356 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks | 537 |
| | 537 |
| | — |
|
Total fixed maturities | $ | 120,378 |
| | $ | 24,713 |
| | $ | 95,665 |
|
Common stocks | 3,123 |
| | 3,123 |
| | — |
|
Nonredeemable preferred stocks | 458 |
| | 458 |
| | — |
|
Total equity securities | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | — |
|
Other long-term investments | 300 |
| | 300 |
| | — |
|
Total investments | $ | 124,259 |
| | $ | 28,594 |
| | $ | 95,665 |
|
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The hierarchy for inputs used in determining fair value maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Assets and liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value are categorized in the fair value hierarchy based on the observability of inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1: Assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the Company can access.
Level 2: Assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following:
(a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
(b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or
(c) Valuation models whose inputs are observable, directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the assets and liabilities.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
We are responsible for the determination of fair value and the supporting assumptions and methodologies. We gain assurance on the overall reasonableness and consistent application of valuation methodologies and inputs and compliance with accounting standards through the execution of various processes and controls designed to provide assurance that our assets and liabilities are appropriately valued. For fair values received from third parties, our processes are designed to provide assurance that the valuation methodologies and inputs are appropriate and consistently applied, the assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the objective of determining fair value, and the fair values are accurately recorded.
We do not hold any investments that require unobservable inputs to determine their fair value. At the end of each quarter, we determine whether we need to transfer the fair values of any securities between levels of the fair value hierarchy and, if so, we report the transfer as of the end of the quarter. We made no such transfers during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
For our investments in U.S. government securities that do not have prices in active markets, agency securities, state and municipal governments, and corporate bonds, we obtain the fair values from Synovus Trust Company, NA, which uses a third-party valuation service. The valuation service calculates prices for our investments in the aforementioned security types on a month-end basis by using several matrix-pricing methodologies that incorporate inputs from various sources. The model the valuation service uses to price U.S. government securities and securities of states and municipalities incorporates inputs from active market makers and inter-dealer brokers. To price corporate bonds and agency securities, the valuation service calculates non-call yield spreads on all issuers, uses option-adjusted yield spreads to account for any early redemption features, then adds final spreads to the U.S. Treasury curve at 3 p.m. (ET) as of quarter end. Since the inputs the valuation service uses in their calculations are not quoted prices in active markets, but are observable inputs, they represent Level 2 inputs.
4) EARNINGS PER SHARE
The table below reflects the diluted weighted-average number of common stock shares outstanding using the treasury stock method:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Weighted-average shares - basic | 10,361,849 | | 10,361,849 | | 10,361,849 | | 10,469,056 |
Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents: | | | | | | | |
Restricted stock award 1 | 86,990 |
| | — |
| | 34,606 |
| | — |
|
Weighted-average shares - diluted | 10,448,839 | | 10,361,849 | | 10,396,455 | | 10,469,056 |
1 Includes 86,990 shares of restricted common stock awarded on June 14, 2012. See Note 12 for additional information.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we had 7,077,375 warrants outstanding, all of which were anti-dilutive during that period. Prior to their expiration on October 4, 2011, each warrant could have been exercised for one share of common stock.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
The basic and diluted EPS computations are calculated as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Basic EPS: | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to common shareholders | $ | 983 |
| | $ | 3,650 |
| | $ | 8,722 |
| | $ | 4,863 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,469,056 |
|
Basic EPS | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Diluted EPS: | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to common shareholders | $ | 983 |
| | $ | 3,650 |
| | $ | 8,722 |
| | $ | 4,863 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,469,056 |
|
Weighted average dilutive shares | 86,990 |
| | — |
| | 34,606 |
| | — |
|
Total Weighted Average Shares | 10,448,839 |
| | 10,361,849 |
| | 10,396,455 |
| | 10,469,056 |
|
Diluted EPS | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
|
5) REINSURANCE
Our reinsurance program is primarily designed to address our exposure to natural catastrophes. Our program provides reinsurance protection for catastrophes including hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornadoes. These reinsurance agreements are part of our catastrophe management strategy, which is intended to provide our shareholders an acceptable return on the risks assumed in our property business and to reduce variability of earnings, while providing protection to our policyholders.
During the second quarter of 2012, we placed our reinsurance program for the 2012 hurricane season. The contracts are effective June 1, 2012, for a one-year term and include both coverage from private reinsurers and the statutorily-mandated coverage in Florida provided by the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (FHCF). The FHCF is a Florida State-sponsored trust fund that provides reimbursement to Florida property insurers for covered hurricane losses. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company's total 2012-2013 catastrophe reinsurance coverage included $353,101,000 of coverage from the FHCF and $184,218,000 of coverage from private reinsurers. The contracts include provisions which are designed to protect the Company from losses sustained in a single event as well as losses from multiple events in a single hurricane season.
In addition to our catastrophe reinsurance program, we purchase a limited amount of reinsurance designed specifically to protect against large non-catastrophe losses. Our non-catastrophe reinsurance agreement provides excess-of-loss coverage for losses arising out of property business up to $1,700,000 in excess of $1,000,000 per risk. Should a loss recovery, or series of loss recoveries, exhaust the coverage provided under the agreement for losses arising out of property business, one reinstatement of the full coverage amount is included at 50% additional premium. The agreement, including reinstatements, therefore provides aggregate coverage of $3,400,000 for losses arising out of property business, while any single occurrence is limited to $1,700,000.
We write flood insurance under an agreement with the National Flood Insurance Program. We cede 100% of the premiums written and the related risk of loss to the federal government. We earn commissions for the issuance of flood policies based upon a fixed percentage of net written premiums and the processing of flood claims based upon a fixed percentage of incurred losses, and we can earn additional commissions by meeting certain growth targets for the number of in-force policies. We recognized commission revenue from our flood program of $151,000 and $109,000, for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $392,000 and $302,000 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
We realized recoveries under our reinsurance agreements totaling $61,000 and $13,963,000 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $1,623,000 and $20,542,000 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively. As of June 1, 2011, our 2005 FHCF contract was commuted. As a result, we recorded a reinsurance receivable of $12,738,000 related to losses incurred from Hurricane Wilma, which we received from the FHCF during the third quarter of 2011.
6) LONG-TERM DEBT
Our long-term debt at September 30, 2012, consisted of a note payable to the Florida State Board of Administration. At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, we owed $16,176,000 and $17,059,000, respectively, on the note and the interest rate was 1.60% and 1.99%, respectively. All other terms and conditions of the note remain as described in our 2011 Form 10-K.
The $16,176,000 note payable to Florida's State Board of Administration (SBA note) requires UPC to maintain surplus as regards policyholders at or above a calculated level, which was $37,127,000 at September 30, 2012. We monitor UPC's surplus as regards policyholders each quarter and, for various reasons, we occasionally provide additional capital to UPC. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we did not contribute any capital to UPC. We currently do not foresee a need for any material contributions of capital to UPC; however, any future contributions of capital will depend on circumstances at the time.
Our SBA note requires that we maintain a 2:1 ratio of net written premium to surplus, or net writing ratio, (the SBA note agreement defines surplus for the purpose of calculating the required ratios as the $20,000,000 of capital contributed to UPC under the agreement plus the outstanding balance of the note) or a 6:1 ratio of gross written premium to surplus, or gross writing ratio, to avoid additional interest penalties. At September 30, 2012, our net written premium to surplus ratio was 2.95:1, which is well above the 2:1 required ratio. Our gross written premium to surplus ratio was 6.1:1, which meets the required ratio of 6:1. Should we fail to exceed either a net writing ratio of 1.5:1 or a gross writing ratio of 4.5:1, our interest rate will increase by 450 basis points above the 10-year Constant Maturity Treasury rate which was 1.68% at the end of September. Any other writing ratio deficiencies result in an interest rate penalty of 25 basis points above the stated rate of the note, which is 1.60%. Our SBA note further provides that the SBA may, among other things, declare its loan immediately due and payable for all defaults existing under the SBA note; however, any payment is subject to approval by the insurance regulatory authority. At September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with the covenants of the SBA note.
At September 30, 2012, and during the three and nine months then ended, we complied with all covenants as specified in the SBA note. During the first quarter of 2011, we paid $11,000 of additional interest as a result of violating the writing ratio covenant during the fourth quarter of 2010.
7) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in claims-related legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We accrue amounts resulting from claims-related legal actions in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses during the period that we determine an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and we can estimate the amounts. Management makes revisions to our estimates based on its analysis of subsequent information that we receive regarding various factors, including: (i) per claim information; (ii) company and industry historical loss experience; (iii) judicial decisions and legal developments in the awarding of damages, and (iv) trends in general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation.
See Note 6 for information regarding commitments related to long-term debt, and Note 8 for commitments related to regulatory actions.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
8) STATUTORY ACCOUNTING AND REGULATION
The insurance industry is heavily regulated. State laws and regulations, as well as national regulatory agency requirements, govern the operations of all insurers such as UPC. The various laws and regulations require that insurers maintain minimum amounts of statutory surplus and risk-based capital, they restrict insurers' ability to pay dividends, they specify allowable investment types and investment mixes, and they subject insurers to assessments. At September 30, 2012, and during the three and nine months then ended, UPC met all regulatory requirements of the states in which it operates, and it did not incur any assessments during that same three- and nine-month period.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners published risk-based capital guidelines for insurance companies that are designed to assess capital adequacy and to raise the level of protection that statutory surplus provides for policy holders. Most states, including Florida, have enacted the NAIC guidelines as statutory requirements, and insurers having less statutory surplus than required will be subject to varying degrees of regulatory action, depending on the level of capital inadequacy. State insurance regulatory authorities could require an insurer to cease operations in the event the insurer fails to maintain the required statutory capital.
Florida law permits an insurer to pay dividends or make distributions out of that part of statutory surplus derived from net operating profit and net realized capital gains. The law further provides calculations to determine the amount of dividends or distributions that can be made without the prior approval of the insurance regulatory authority and the amount of dividends or distributions that would require prior approval of the insurance regulatory authority. Statutory risk-based capital requirements may further restrict UPC’s ability to pay dividends or make distributions if the amount of the intended dividend or distribution would cause statutory surplus to fall below minimum risk-based capital requirements.
The note payable to the SBA is considered a surplus note pursuant to statutory accounting principles. As a result, UPC is subject to the authority of the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Florida with regard to its ability to repay principal and interest on the surplus note. Any payment of principal or interest requires permission from the insurance regulatory authority.
We have reported our insurance subsidiary’s assets, liabilities and results of operations in accordance with GAAP, which varies from statutory accounting principles prescribed or permitted by state laws and regulations, as well as by general industry practices. The following items are principal differences between statutory accounting and GAAP:
| |
• | Statutory accounting requires that we exclude certain assets, called non-admitted assets, from the balance sheet. |
| |
• | Statutory accounting requires us to expense policy acquisition costs when incurred, while GAAP allows us to defer and amortize policy acquisition costs over the estimated life of the policies. |
| |
• | Statutory accounting dictates how much of a deferred income tax asset that we can admit on a statutory balance sheet. |
| |
• | Statutory accounting requires that we record certain investments at cost or amortized cost, while we record other investments at fair value; however, GAAP requires that we record all investments at fair value. |
| |
• | Statutory accounting requires that surplus notes, also known as surplus debentures, be recorded in statutory surplus, while GAAP requires us to record surplus notes as a liability. |
Our insurance subsidiary must file with the various insurance regulatory authorities an “Annual Statement” which reports, among other items, net income (loss) and surplus as regards policyholders, which is called stockholder’s equity under GAAP. UPC recorded statutory net losses of $(3,539,000) and $(467,000) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and $(3,365,000) and $(5,281,000) for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Since UPC is domiciled in Florida, it remains subject to the laws of that state, one of which requires that UPC maintain capital and surplus equal to the greater of 10% of its total liabilities or $5,000,000. At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, UPC's surplus as regards policyholders was $44,528,000 and $47,599,000, respectively.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
9) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In 2003, we entered into an investment-management agreement, in effect until terminated by either party, with Synovus Trust. For the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, our subsidiaries incurred combined fees under the agreement of $14,000 and $85,000, respectively. Synovus Financial Corporation (Synovus) owns Synovus Trust, which provides investment-management services for the investment accounts of our subsidiaries. On September 28, 2011, Synovus, which owned 14.9% of our outstanding common stock, sold all shares of our common stock that it owned. Though they are no longer a related party, we continue to use Synovus Trust's services.
Effective March 30, 2011, UPC purchased $2,250,000 of promissory notes offered by Hamilton Risk Management Co., a Florida corporation engaged in the business of providing automobile insurance in Florida through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The HRM notes bear interest at the rate of two percent per annum. All outstanding principal of and interest on the HRM notes was to be due on March 30, 2014. In consideration for its purchase of the HRM notes, UPC received a Class A limited partnership interest in Acadia Acquisition Partners, L.P., the parent company of Hamilton Risk Management. One of our former directors acts as Executive Chairman of Hamilton Risk Management on an interim basis, and another of our former directors serves as one of two managers of the limited liability company that serves as general partner of Acadia Acquisition Partners. We bifurcated the cash consideration of $2,250,000 by allocating $1,948,000 to the note receivable based on its fair value (using a discounted cash flow model) and allocating the residual amount of $302,000 to our limited partnership interest. We reduced the carrying amount of the limited partnership interest to zero by recording a charge to other expenses because our share of Acadia's losses for the second quarter of 2011 exceeded the carrying amount of the partnership interest.
During the second quarter ended June 30, 2012, it came to our attention that Hamilton Risk Management breached a covenant contained in the Note Purchase Agreement, by reason of Kingsway Amigo Insurance Company's Surplus falling below $13,000,000. On July 17, 2012, we notified HRM of the breach and requested that HRM remedy the breach. On July 20, 2012, our Board of Directors unanimously agreed to enter into negotiations with HRM to settle the outstanding note receivable and to terminate our partnership interest in Acadia Acquisition Partners, L.P. We settled the total outstanding note receivable and the partnership interest at an amount equal to $1,750,000 and received the funds from HRM on August 13, 2012. We recorded a $316,000 impairment on the note receivable in June to reflect the difference between the carrying amount and the proposed settlement amount, which was recorded in other expenses on the income statement.
Effective August 29, 2011, we entered into a Management Services Agreement (MSA) with 1347 Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kingsway Financial Services, Inc., a property and casualty insurance company. One of our former directors serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Kingsway, as well as a Managing Director of 1347 Advisors. The MSA, which was effective for a six-month period with automatic three-month extensions unless otherwise terminated, stipulated that 1347 Advisors was to provide us with the services of an interim CFO, in addition to actuarial and other services. Hassan Baqar served as our interim CFO under the MSA until April 2, 2012, when he submitted his resignation effective concurrently with the termination of the MSA described in the final paragraph of this section. Mr. Baqar serves as a Managing Director of 1347 Advisors and a Vice President of Kingsway America, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. In exchange for the services, we paid 1347 Advisors a monthly consulting fee of $60,000 plus any reasonable expenses. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $0 and $180,000, respectively, under the MSA.
In response to a letter UPC received from Florida's insurance regulatory authority more fully described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2012, UIM notified 1347 Advisors on April 2, 2012, of its desire to terminate the MSA. Mr. Pratt, Mr. Swets, and Mr. Zuhlke resigned from our Board on March 28, 2012; March 30, 2012; and April 4, 2012, respectively. Effective April 2, 2012, UIM and 1347 Advisors entered into a Termination Agreement and Release (Termination Agreement) pursuant to which the parties agreed to a mutual termination of the MSA effective immediately. As a result of the foregoing, UIM is no longer obligated to pay 1347 Advisors the management services fee described above. The Termination Agreement provides that 1347 Advisors shall cooperate with United to effect the transition of certain actuarial services to United or another company.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
10) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
We report changes in other comprehensive income items within comprehensive income on the Consolidated Statements of Income, and we include accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders' equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The table below details the components of accumulated other comprehensive income at period end:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pre-Tax Amount | | Tax (Expense)Benefit | | Net-of-Tax Amount |
December 31, 2011 | $ | 3,812 |
| | $ | (1,471 | ) | | $ | 2,341 |
|
Changes in net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 3,042 |
| | (1,174 | ) | | 1,868 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains | (155 | ) | | 60 |
| | (95 | ) |
September 30, 2012 | $ | 6,699 |
| | $ | (2,585 | ) | | $ | 4,114 |
|
11) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
On July 20, 2012, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, of the Company. The dividend was paid to the stockholders of record on August 3, 2012. Each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value (Preferred Shares), of the Company, at a price of $27.00 per one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share, subject to adjustment. The rights are not exercisable until the distribution date, and will expire on July 20, 2022, unless the rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by us.
On March 14, 2012, our Board declared a $0.05 per share cash dividend. Our transfer agent paid the $518,000 dividend on April 5, 2012 to stockholders of record on March 26, 2012.
On May 19, 2011, we purchased a total of 212,083 shares of our common stock at a per-share price of $2.00. Inclusive of fees and commissions, we paid a total of $431,000, or $2.03 per share.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
12) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We account for stock-based compensation under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718 - “Compensation - Stock Compensation.”
On June 14, 2012, John Forney began serving as our Chief Executive Officer and we awarded him 86,990 shares of restricted common stock in connection with his employment with our company. The restricted shares will vest in equal parts on each anniversary of Mr. Forney's commencement as CEO ending on the fifth anniversary of this date, provided that Mr. Forney is continuously employed by our company from June 14, 2012, through June 14, 2017.
The following table presents certain information related to non-vested shares:
|
| | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| Non-Vested Shares |
| Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011 | — |
| — |
|
Granted | 86,990 |
| $ | 5.25 |
|
Vested | — |
| — |
|
Outstanding as of September 30, 2012 | 86,990 |
| $ | 5.25 |
|
There was approximately $430,000 of unrecognized stock compensation expense related to non-vested compensation granted, which we expect to recognize over the next five years. We have recognized $27,000 of compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 .
13) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We evaluate all subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in our financial statements. During October 2012, the Company experienced minor losses from Hurricane Sandy. As of November 14, 2012, we had 107 claims reported with gross incurred loss of less than $600,000. It is too early to determine what our ultimate losses from Hurricane Sandy may be, but this event is not expected to have a significant or materially adverse effect on the Company's operations.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
OUR BUSINESS
United Insurance Holdings Corp. is a property and casualty insurance holding company incorporated in Delaware. Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, we write and service property and casualty insurance policies in Florida, South Carolina, Massachusetts and Rhode Island. We incorporated three of our subsidiaries under Florida law, including United Property & Casualty Insurance Company (UPC), which writes insurance policies; United Insurance Management, L.C. (UIM), the managing general agent that manages substantially all aspects of UPC's business; and Skyway Claims Services, LLC (SCS), a claims adjusting company that provides services to UPC. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company has been operating continuously in Florida since 1999. Our fourth subsidiary, UPC Re, which we formed in 2011, operates
as a reinsurer under the laws of the Cayman Islands and provides a portion of the reinsurance coverage purchased by UPC.
We provide our customers with standardized policies for a broad range of exposures, which include coverage options for single-family homeowners, tenants (renters), and condominium unit owners. We also write flood policies in all states in which we write our other products under the "write your own" federal flood insurance program pursuant to which we earn a commission while ceding all risk to the U.S. government. In each of our business lines, we attempt to use rates that provide us the ability to be competitive in the market while still earning profits and adequately managing our potential catastrophe exposure. On all insurance policies that we write, we endeavor to offer competitive rates that provide an adequate risk-adjusted return on capital. We employ rigorous underwriting criteria in support of these goals. Our rates are subject to review and approval by insurance regulators in the states in which we operate.
On July 1, 2010, UPC began writing policies in South Carolina and also assumed an existing book of business in that state. On November 1, 2011, and March 1, 2012, UPC began writing policies in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, respectively. We have applied to insurance regulatory authorities in two additional states, New Jersey and North Carolina, to allow UPC to write property and casualty lines. We began operating in new states in an effort to increase our revenue and profit and reduce our geographic concentration of exposure to catastrophic losses in Florida.
To reach a broad range of prospective policyholders, we use numerous independent agents to produce policies for us, and we also assume policies from Citizens Property Insurance Corporation and from other carriers. We refer to policies produced by our agents as direct policies or direct business. As of September 30, 2012, policies we originally assumed from Citizens represented only 9% of our homeowner in-force policies, while direct policies and policies we assumed from other carriers represented 91% of our homeowner in-force policies. At September 30, 2012, we had approximately 124,500 homeowner policyholders, compared to 101,800 at December 31, 2011, and 97,600 at September 30, 2011.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we must make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts we report. Certain of these estimates result from judgments that can be subjective and complex. As a result of that subjectivity and complexity, and because we continuously evaluate these estimates and assumptions based on a variety of factors, actual results could materially differ from our estimates and assumptions if changes in one or more factors require us to make accounting adjustments. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we reassessed our critical accounting policies and estimates as disclosed within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (2011 Form 10-K); we have made no material changes or additions with regard to such policies and estimates.
RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Please refer to Note 2 in the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting standards that may affect us.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION - SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 COMPARED TO DECEMBER 31, 2011
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and related notes, and in conjunction with the section entitled MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS included within our 2011 Form 10-K.
Investments
We classify all of our investments as available-for-sale. Our investments at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, consisted mainly of U.S. government and agency securities and securities of investment-grade corporate issuers. Our equity holdings consisted mainly of securities issued by companies in the energy, consumer products, healthcare, technology and telecommunications industries. Most of the corporate bonds we held reflected a similar diversification. At September 30, 2012, approximately 80% of our fixed maturities were U.S. Treasuries or corporate bonds rated “A” or better, and 20% were corporate bonds rated “BBB”.
At September 30, 2012, securities in an unrealized loss position for a period of twelve months or longer reflected gross unrealized losses of $17,000; approximately $1,000 of the total related to one fixed maturity, while three equity securities reflected unrealized losses of $16,000. We currently have no plans to sell these four securities, and we expect to fully recover our cost basis. We reviewed these securities and determined that we did not need to record impairment charges at September 30, 2012.
Reinsurance Payable
During the second quarter of 2012, we placed our reinsurance program for the 2012 hurricane season. The contracts reinsure for personal lines property excess catastrophe losses caused by multiple perils including hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornadoes. The agreements are effective June 1, 2012, for a one-year term and incorporate the mandatory coverage required by and placed with the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (FHCF). The FHCF is a Florida State-sponsored trust fund that provides reimbursement to Florida property insurers for covered hurricane losses. For UPC, the FHCF coverage includes an estimated maximum provisional limit of 90% of $392,334,000, or $353,101,000, in addition to our retention and private reinsurance of $184,218,000, and also includes reimbursement of eligible loss adjustment expenses of 5%. The limit and retention of the FHCF coverage are subject to re-measurement based on June 30th exposure data. In addition, the FHCF's retention is subject to adjustment upward or downward to an actual retention based on submitted exposures to the FHCF by all participants.
See Note 5 for additional information regarding our reinsurance program.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - COMPARISON OF THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
Revenue
Revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, increased $6,779,000, or 27%, to $32,272,000, from $25,493,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2011. The increase in revenues primarily resulted from a $6,363,000, or 27%, increase in net premiums earned. The growth in net premiums earned for the quarter was driven by continued growth in new business production in Florida and other states.
Expenses
Expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, increased $11,488,000, or 58%, primarily due to increased loss and loss adjustment expenses (losses). Losses increased $8,536,000, or 101%, primarily due to increased policy counts in 2012, as evidenced by the $11,431,000 increase in gross premiums earned, catastrophe losses related to Tropical Storms Debby and Isaac and an increase in our Florida non-catastrophe loss ratio related to our 2012 accident year. Policy acquisition costs increased $1,836,000, or 24%, primarily due to the 24% increase in gross premiums earned. Operating costs increased $524,000, or 46%, as a result of the growth of new business writings. General and administrative expenses have increased $663,000, or 28%, due to increased personnel costs and increased professional services costs.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - COMPARISON OF THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
Revenues
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, increased $23,383,000, or 33%, to $93,339,000, from $69,956,000 for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in revenues was primarily driven by a $22,468,000, or 34%, increase in net premiums earned. The growth in net premiums earned for the year has been fueled by continued growth in new business in Florida and other states.
Expenses
Expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, increased $17,327,000, or 28%, primarily due to increased losses. Losses increased $10,002,000, or 34%, primarily due to increased policy counts in 2012, as evidenced by the $31,931,000 increase in gross premiums earned. On a direct basis, our gross loss ratio (defined as losses relative to gross premiums earned) increased from 22.3% to 24.1%, or 8.1%, due mainly to two catastrophe events: Tropical Storms Debby and Isaac. Excluding catastrophes, the direct loss ratio was unchanged at 22.3% for both 2012 and 2011. Policy acquisition costs increased $5,242,000, or 25%, primarily due to the 24% increase in gross premiums earned. Operating costs have increased $914,000, or 23%, as a direct correlation to the growth of new business writings. General and administrative expenses have increased $1,339,000, or 20%, due to increased personnel costs and increased professional services costs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We generate cash through premium collections, reinsurance recoveries, investment income and the sale or maturity of invested assets. We use our cash to pay reinsurance premiums, claims and related costs, policy acquisition costs, salaries and employee benefits, other expenses and stockholder dividends, as well as to purchase investments. We refer to the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiary, UPC as "surplus as regards policyholders" or "statutory surplus", which is equivalent to shareholders' equity of a non-insurance entity.
Operating Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, our operations generated cash of $52,175,000, compared to $54,754,000 during the same period in 2011. The decrease in cash generated by our operating activities resulted primarily from increased operating costs and general and administrative expenses.
Investing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, our investing activities used $1,626,000 of cash compared to using $78,193,000 of cash in the same period of the prior year, primarily because we purchased approximately $72,044,000 more securities during the first nine months of 2011, a result of our reinvestment of the proceeds from the securities we sold in December 2010 as well as a portion of the excess cash provided by operations.
Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, our financing activities used $1,296,000 compared to providing cash of $1,498,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Our holding company has no business operations of its own and is largely dependent on liquidity from its subsidiaries. United Insurance Management, L.C.'s primary source of revenue and liquidity is the management fee and commissions it receives from our insurance company subsidiary, UPC. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company is subject to extensive state regulation, including approval of any management fee it pays to UIM for services rendered. In accordance with Florida law, UPC may pay dividends or make distributions out of that part of its statutory surplus derived from its net operating profit and its net realized capital gains. Florida law further provides calculations to determine the amount of dividends or distributions that can be made without the prior approval of the insurance regulatory authority and the amount of dividends or distributions that would require prior approval of the insurance regulatory authority. The risk-based capital guidelines published by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners may further restrict UPC’s ability to pay dividends or make distributions if the amount of the intended dividend or distribution would cause its surplus as regards policyholders to fall below minimum risk-based capital guidelines. Most states, including Florida, have adopted the NAIC requirements, and insurers having less surplus as regards policyholders than required will be subject to varying degrees of regulatory action,
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
depending on the level of capital inadequacy. State insurance regulatory authorities could require us to cease operations in the event we fail to maintain the statutory surplus required in UPC.
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which differs in some respects from reporting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. For UPC to retain its certificate of authority in Florida, Florida law requires UPC to maintain surplus as regards policyholders equal to the greater of 10% of our total liabilities or $5,000,000. At September 30, 2012, UPC’s surplus as regards policyholders was $44,528,000, exceeding the minimum requirements. Florida law also requires UPC to adhere to prescribed premium-to-capital surplus ratios, with which we were in compliance at September 30, 2012.
We repurchased 212,083 shares of our common stock in May 2011. While we have not adopted a formal stock repurchase plan at this time, we may repurchase additional shares of our common stock from time to time as financial conditions permit. We consider several factors in determining whether to make share repurchases, including among other things, our cost of equity, our after-tax cost of borrowing, our debt-to-total-capitalization targets and our expected future cash needs.
Our Board of Directors declared a $0.05 per share dividend on March 14, 2012. Our transfer agent paid the $518,000 dividend on April 5, 2012, to stockholders of record on March 26, 2012. Any future dividends will depend upon circumstances at the time, and our Board must approve and declare any such dividends.
We believe our current capital resources, together with cash provided from our operations, will be sufficient to meet currently anticipated working capital requirements. We cannot provide assurance, however, that such will be the case in the future.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At September 30, 2012, we had no off-balance-sheet arrangements.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
See Note 9 in our Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our related party transactions, including those with Hamilton Risk Management and 1347 Advisors.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act; therefore, pursuant to Regulation S-K we are not required to make disclosures under this Item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. We designed our disclosure controls with the objective of ensuring we accumulate and communicate this information to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on our evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012, we made no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in claims-related legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We accrue amounts resulting from claims-related legal actions in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses during the period that we determine an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and we can estimate the amounts. Management makes revisions to our estimates based on its analysis of subsequent information that we receive regarding various factors, including: (i) per claim information; (ii) company and industry historical loss experience; (iii) judicial decisions and legal developments in the awarding of damages; and (iv) trends in general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our 2011 Form 10-K sets forth information relating to various risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Those risk factors continue to be relevant to an understanding of our business, financial condition and operating results. Certain of those risk factors have been updated in this Form 10-Q to provide updated information, as set forth below.
Because we rely on independent insurance agents, the loss of these agent relationships or our ability to attract new agents could have an adverse impact on our business.
We currently market our policies to a broad range of prospective policyholders through more than 2,000 independent agents. Independent insurance agents own their customer relationships and our agency contracts limit our ability to directly solicit business from our existing policyholders. Independent agents most commonly represent other insurance companies and we do not control their activities. Historically, we have used marketing relationships with two well-known national insurance companies that do not write new homeowners insurance policies in Florida and two associations of independent insurance agents in Florida to attract and retain agents and agency groups. The loss of these marketing relationships could adversely impact our ability to attract new agents or retain our independent agency network.
State regulations limiting rate increases and requiring us to underwrite business in certain areas are beyond our control and may adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition.
States have from time to time passed legislation, and regulators have taken action, that has the effect of limiting the ability of insurers to manage catastrophe risk, such as legislation prohibiting insurers from reducing exposures or withdrawing from catastrophe-prone areas, or mandating that insurers participate in residual markets. In addition, following catastrophes, there are sometimes legislative initiatives and court decisions which seek to expand insurance coverage for catastrophe claims beyond the original intent of the policies. Further, our ability to increase pricing to the extent necessary to offset rising costs of catastrophes requires approval of insurance regulatory authorities.
One example of such legislation occurred following the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons, when the Florida legislature required all insurers issuing replacement cost policies to pay the full replacement cost of damaged properties without depreciation whether or not the insureds repaired or replaced the damaged property. Under prior law, insurers would have paid the depreciated amount of the property until insureds commenced repairs or replacement. This law has led to an increase in disagreements regarding the scope of damage. Despite our efforts to adjust claims and promptly pay meritorious amounts, our operating results have been affected by a claims environment in Florida that produces opportunities for fraudulent or overstated claims.
Our ability or willingness to manage our catastrophe exposure by raising prices, modifying underwriting terms or reducing exposure to certain geographies may be limited due to considerations of public policy, the evolving political environment and our ability to penetrate other geographic markets, which may cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We cannot predict whether and to what extent new legislation and regulations that would affect our ability to manage our exposure to catastrophic events will be adopted, the timing of adoption or the effects, if any, they would have on our ability to manage our exposure to catastrophic events.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Our inability to obtain reinsurance on acceptable terms would increase our loss exposure or limit our ability to underwrite policies.
We use, and we expect to continue to use, reinsurance to help manage our exposure to property and casualty risks, including catastrophic losses due to windstorms. The availability and cost of reinsurance are each subject to prevailing market conditions beyond our control which can affect business volume and profitability. We may be unable to maintain our current reinsurance coverage, to obtain additional reinsurance coverage in the event our current reinsurance coverage is exhausted by a catastrophic event, or to obtain other reinsurance coverage in adequate amounts or at acceptable rates. Similar risks exist whether we are seeking to replace coverage terminated during the applicable coverage period or to renew or replace coverage upon its expiration. We can provide no assurance that we can obtain sufficient reinsurance to cover losses resulting from one or more storms in the future, or that we can obtain such reinsurance in a timely or cost-effective manner. If we are unable to renew our expiring coverage or to obtain new reinsurance coverage, either our net exposure to risk would increase or, if we are unwilling to accept an increase in net risk exposures, we would have to reduce the amount of risk we underwrite. Either increasing our net exposure to risk or reducing the amount of risk we underwrite may cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition.
In each of the past ten years, a portion of our reinsurance protection has been provided by the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (“FHCF”), a government sponsored entity that provides a layer of reinsurance protection at a price that is lower than otherwise available in the commercial market. The FHCF provides catastrophe reinsurance on a subsidized-basis as an incentive to make homeowners insurance available in the State of Florida. There is no assurance that FHCF will continue to make such reinsurance available on terms consistent with historical practice. The loss of reinsurance provided by FHCF would have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, we did not sell any unregistered equity securities.
Working Capital Restrictions and Other Limitations on Payment of Dividends. Under Florida law, a Florida-domiciled insurer may not pay any dividend or distribute cash or other property to its shareholders except out of that part of its available and accumulated surplus funds which is derived from realized net operating profits on its business and net realized capital gains. Additionally, Florida-domiciled insurers may not make dividend payments or distributions to shareholders without the prior approval of the insurance regulatory authority if the dividend or distribution would exceed the larger of:
| |
a. | ten percent of capital surplus, or |
| |
b. | net gain from operations, or |
| |
c. | net income, not including realized capital gains, plus a two-year carryforward, |
| |
2. | ten percent of capital surplus with dividends payable constrained to unassigned funds minus 25% of unrealized capital gains, or |
| |
a. | ten percent of capital surplus, or |
| |
b. | net investment income plus a three-year carryforward with dividends payable constrained to unassigned funds minus 25% of unrealized capital gains. |
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Alternatively, UPC may pay a dividend or distribution without the prior written approval of the insurance regulatory authority when:
| |
1. | the dividend is equal to or less than the greater of: |
| |
a. | ten percent of the insurer’s surplus as to policyholders derived from realized net operating profits on its business and net realized capital gains, or |
| |
b. | the insurer’s entire net operating profits and realized net capital gains derived during the immediately preceding calendar year, and: |
| |
i. | the insurer will have surplus as to policyholders equal to or exceeding 115% of the minimum required statutory surplus as to policyholders after the dividend or distribution is made, and |
| |
ii. | the insurer files a notice of the dividend or distribution with the insurance regulatory authority at least ten business days prior to the dividend payment or distribution, and |
| |
iii. | the notice includes a certification by an officer of the insurer attesting that, after the payment of the dividend or distribution, the insurer will have at least 115% of required statutory surplus as to policyholders. |
Except as provided above, a Florida-domiciled insurer may only pay a dividend or make a distribution (i) subject to prior approval by the insurance regulatory authority, or (ii) 30 days after the insurance regulatory authority has received notice of intent to pay such dividend or distribution and has not disapproved it within such time. At September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with these requirements.
Our note payable to the SBA prevents UPC from paying any dividends if any payments of principal or interest on the note are past due. To date, we have always paid amounts due the SBA on time. The minimum surplus requirement stipulated by the note agreement could also limit the amount of any dividend UPC may want to declare.
Repurchases. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, we did not repurchase equity securities.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information
None
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference:
|
| | |
Exhibit | | Description |
| | |
3.1 | | Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended to include the Certificate of Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of United Insurance Holdings Corp.) (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.1 | | Rights Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2012, between United Insurance Holdings Corp. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, which includes as Exhibit A thereto a summary of the terms of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B thereto the Form of Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C thereto the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares (included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-A filed July 23, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.1 |
| Federal Income Tax Allocation Agreement between United Insurance Holdings Corp., United Insurance Management, L.C., Skyway Claims Services, LLC, United Property & Casualty Insurance Company, and UPC Re dated July 1, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.2 | | Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated September 14, 2012, by and between United Insurance Holdings Corp. and John Forney (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on September 14, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.3 | | Form of Indemnification Agreement between United Insurance Holdings Corp. and its Directors, dated October 10, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on October 10, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.4 | | Employment Agreement, dated November 5, 2012, between United Insurance Management, L.C. and John Langowski (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-KA filed on November 8, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.5 | | Employment Agreement between United Insurance Holdings Corp. and Mr. B. Bradford Martz, dated October 31, 2012 and effective October 1, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-KA filed on November 6, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
| | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
| | UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP. |
| | |
November 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ John L. Forney |
| | John L. Forney, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer and duly authorized officer) |
|
| | |
November 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ B. Bradford Martz |
| | B. Bradford Martz, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) |