10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
x
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016
or
¨
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission file number: 0-27756
 
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
13-3648318
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
100 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
203-272-2596
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x   No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check One:
Large accelerated filer  x   Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value
224,020,164
Class
Outstanding as of April 26, 2016










 
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Contents

 
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
 
Item 1.
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
Item 3.
 
Item 4.
PART II.
 
Item 1.
 
Item 1A.
 
Item 2.
 
Item 5.
 
Item 6.
SIGNATURES
 
 



Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Assets
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
710,198

 
$
1,010,111

Marketable securities
317,354

 
374,904

Trade accounts receivable, net
586,249

 
532,832

Inventories
293,962

 
289,874

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
219,746

 
208,993

Total current assets
2,127,509

 
2,416,714

Property, plant and equipment, net
749,295

 
697,025

Intangible assets, net
4,627,817

 
4,707,914

Goodwill
5,049,321

 
5,047,885

Other assets
248,503

 
228,343

Total assets
$
12,802,445

 
$
13,097,881

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
42,897

 
$
57,360

Accrued expenses
359,077

 
403,348

Deferred revenue
78,416

 
20,504

Current portion of long-term debt
35,358

 
166,365

Other current liabilities
87,865

 
62,038

Total current liabilities
603,613

 
709,615

Long-term debt, less current portion
3,212,772

 
3,254,536

Contingent consideration
107,085

 
121,424

Facility lease obligation
172,970

 
151,307

Deferred tax liabilities
535,910

 
528,990

Other liabilities
107,818

 
73,393

Total liabilities
4,740,168

 
4,839,265

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

 

Stockholders' Equity:
 
 
 
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 290,000 shares authorized; 231,136 and 230,498 shares issued at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
23

 
23

Additional paid-in capital
7,793,056

 
7,726,560

Treasury stock, at cost, 6,934 and 4,851 shares at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
(1,007,178
)
 
(710,663
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
3,815

 
62,301

Retained earnings
1,272,561

 
1,180,395

Total stockholders' equity
8,062,277

 
8,258,616

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
12,802,445

 
$
13,097,881


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Net product sales
$
700,425

 
$
600,333

Other revenue
613

 

Total revenues
701,038

 
600,333

Cost of sales
58,986

 
69,399

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
Research and development
176,290

 
221,080

Selling, general and administrative
232,561

 
187,116

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
80,094



Change in fair value of contingent consideration
(14,800
)

11,979

Acquisition-related costs
1,339

 

Restructuring expenses
722

 
7,052

Total operating expenses
476,206

 
427,227

Operating income
165,846

 
103,707

Other income and expense:
 
 
 
Investment income
1,551

 
2,884

Interest expense
(23,890
)
 
(651
)
Foreign currency gain
91

 
1,005

Income before income taxes
143,598

 
106,945

Income tax provision
51,432

 
15,622

Net income
$
92,166

 
$
91,323

Earnings per common share
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.41

 
$
0.46

Diluted
$
0.41

 
$
0.45

Shares used in computing earnings per common share
 
 
 
Basic
225,060

 
199,361

Diluted
226,873

 
202,034

 
 
 
 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands)

 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Net income
$
92,166

 
$
91,323

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation
1,996

 
(5,388
)
Unrealized gains on marketable securities
1,498

 
1,057

Unrealized gains (losses) on pension obligation
2,121

 
(252
)
Unrealized (losses) gains on hedging activities, net of tax of $(35,650), and $38,175, respectively
(64,101
)
 
67,287

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
(58,486
)
 
62,704

Comprehensive income
$
33,680

 
$
154,027


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


4


Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands)
 
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
92,166

 
$
91,323

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
96,783

 
10,578

Change in fair value of contingent consideration
(14,800
)
 
11,979

Share-based compensation expense
56,889

 
42,797

Premium amortization of available-for-sale securities
515

 
3,178

Deferred taxes
29,332

 
(24,823
)
Change in excess tax benefit from stock options
(5,917
)
 
(52,521
)
Unrealized foreign currency gain
(13,762
)
 
(3,916
)
Unrealized loss (gain) on forward contracts
17,098

 
(434
)
Other
609

 
7,377

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effect of acquisitions:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(37,287
)
 
(58,918
)
Inventories
(3,838
)
 
2,626

Prepaid expenses and other assets
(65,216
)
 
(38,980
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
(42,460
)
 
(13,659
)
Deferred revenue
57,872

 
46,427

Net cash provided by operating activities
167,984

 
23,034

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
(207,996
)
 
(166,319
)
Proceeds from maturity or sale of available-for-sale securities
269,495

 
176,256

Purchases of trading securities
(3,042
)
 
(2,236
)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(64,204
)
 
(57,075
)
Other
82

 
951

Net cash used in investing activities
(5,665
)
 
(48,423
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Payments on term loan
(175,000
)
 
(12,000
)
Change in excess tax benefit from stock options
5,917

 
52,521

Repurchase of common stock
(296,515
)
 
(60,026
)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based compensation arrangements
3,433

 
24,882

Other
(4,092
)
 
(303
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(466,257
)
 
5,074

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
4,025

 
(6,870
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(299,913
)
 
(27,185
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
1,010,111

 
943,999

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
710,198

 
$
916,814

 
 
 
 
Supplemental cash flow disclosures from investing and financing activities:
 
 
 
Capitalization of construction costs related to facility lease obligations
$
25,647

 
$
7,813

Accrued expenses for purchases of property, plant and equipment
$
24,840

 
$
11,436

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)





1.
Business
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Alexion, the Company, we, our or us) is a biopharmaceutical company focused on serving patients with devastating and ultra-rare disorders through the innovation, development and commercialization of life-transforming therapeutic products.
In our complement franchise, Soliris® (eculizumab) is the first and only therapeutic approved for patients with either paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), a life-threatening and ultra-rare genetic blood disorder, or atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a life-threatening and ultra-rare genetic disease. PNH and aHUS are two severe and ultra-rare disorders resulting from chronic uncontrolled activation of the complement component of the immune system.
In our metabolic franchise, we market Strensiq® (asfotase alfa) for the treatment of patients with hypophosphatasia (HPP) and Kanuma® (sebelipase alfa) for the treatment of patients with lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL-D). HPP is a genetic ultra-rare disease characterized by defective bone mineralization that can lead to deformity of bones and other skeletal abnormalities. LAL-D is a serious, life threatening ultra-rare disease in which genetic mutations result in decreased activity of the LAL enzyme leading to marked accumulation of lipids in vital organs, blood vessels and other tissues.
We are also evaluating additional potential indications for eculizumab in other severe and devastating diseases in which uncontrolled complement activation is the underlying mechanism, and we are progressing in various stages of development with additional product candidates as potential treatments for patients with severe and life-threatening rare disorders.

2.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. These accounting principles were applied on a basis consistent with those of the consolidated financial statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial statements for interim periods in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The financial statements of our subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates for assets and liabilities, historical exchange rates for stockholders' equity and weighted average exchange rates for operating results. Translation gains and losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, in stockholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the results of operations in other income and expense.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a comprehensive new standard which amends revenue recognition principles and provides a single set of criteria for revenue recognition among all industries. The new standard provides a five step framework whereby revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires enhanced disclosures pertaining to revenue recognition in both interim and annual periods. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and allows for adoption using a full retrospective method, or a modified retrospective method. Entities may elect to early adopt the standard for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the method of adoption and the expected impact the new standard has on our financial position and results of operations.

6

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




In April 2015, the FASB issued a new standard simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. The new standard aligns the treatment of debt issuance costs with debt discounts and premiums and requires debt issuance costs be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt. We have adopted the provisions of this standard in the first quarter 2016 and reclassified $8,635 of deferred financing costs from other current assets to the current portion of long term debt and $26,714 other non current assets to the long-term debt, less current portion in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015.
In April 2015, the FASB issued a new standard clarifying the accounting for a customer's fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. Under this standard, if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the customer would account for the software license consistent with other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer would account for the arrangement as a service contract. We adopted the provisions of this standard in the first quarter 2016. The adoption did not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new standard requiring that the rights and obligations arising from leases be recognized on the balance sheet by recording a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability. The new standard also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures to understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases as well as significant management estimates utilized. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires a modified retrospective adoption. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard on our financial condition and results of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued a new standard simplifying aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payments, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, statutory withholding requirements, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard on our financial condition and results of operations.

3.
Acquisitions
On May 6, 2015, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Synageva BioPharma Corp. (Synageva), a publicly-held clinical-stage biotechnology company based in Lexington, Massachusetts for per share consideration of $115 in cash and 0.6581 shares of Alexion stock. At this date, the announced purchase consideration was estimated at approximately $8,400,000, net of Synageva cash, based on the closing price of Alexion stock on May 5, 2015 of $168.55.
On June 22, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Synageva, in a transaction accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Synageva were recorded as of the acquisition date at their respective fair values. Synageva's results of operations are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The acquisition furthers our objective to develop and commercialize life-transforming therapies to an increasing number of patients with devastating and rare diseases. Synageva's lead product candidate, Kanuma.
We acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Synageva for $4,565,524 in cash and 26,125 shares of common stock. At closing of the business combination on June 22, 2015, the purchase consideration was approximately $8,860,000, net of Synageva cash, based on Alexion's closing share price on the date of acquisition of $188.24. We financed the cash consideration with existing cash and proceeds from our new credit facility described further in Note 6.

The aggregate consideration to acquire Synageva consisted of:
Stock consideration
$
4,917,810

Cash consideration
4,565,524

Total purchase price
$
9,483,334


7

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash
$
626,217

Inventory
23,880

In-process research and development (IPR&D)
4,236,000

Deferred tax liabilities, net
(171,638
)
Other assets and liabilities
(26,373
)
Net assets acquired
4,688,086

Goodwill
4,795,248

Total purchase price
$
9,483,334

Our accounting for this acquisition is preliminary. The fair value estimates for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based upon preliminary calculations, and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change as we obtain additional information for our estimates during the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). The areas of these preliminary estimates that are not yet finalized relate primarily to tax-related items and potential contingent liabilities.
We acquired $23,880 of Kanuma inventory. The estimated fair value of work-in-process and finished goods inventory was determined utilizing the comparative sales method, based on the expected selling price of the inventory, adjusted for incremental costs to complete the manufacturing process and for direct selling efforts, as well as for a reasonable profit allowance. The estimated fair value of raw material inventory was valued at replacement cost, which is equal to the value a market participant would pay to acquire the inventory.
Intangible assets associated with IPR&D projects primarily relate to Synageva's lead product candidate, Kanuma. The estimated fair value of IPR&D assets of $4,236,000 was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method, a variation of the income approach. The multi-period excess earnings method estimates the value of an intangible asset equal to the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to that intangible asset. The fair value using the multi-period excess earnings method was dependent on an estimated weighted average cost of capital for Synageva of 10%, which represents a rate of return that a market participant would expect for these assets.
The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition. The goodwill, which is not tax-deductible, has been recorded as a noncurrent asset and is not amortized, but is subject to an annual review for impairment. The goodwill represents future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized and expected synergies that are specific to our business and not available to market participants, including our unique ability to commercialize therapies for rare diseases, our existing relationships with specialty physicians who can identify patients with LAL-D, a global distribution network to facilitate drug delivery and other benefits that we believe will result from combining the operations of Synageva within our operations.
We recorded a net deferred tax liability of $171,638. This amount was primarily comprised of $602,887 of deferred tax liabilities related to the IPR&D and inventory acquired, offset by $431,249 of deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs), tax credits, and other temporary differences, which we expect to utilize.
Acquisition-Related Costs
Acquisition-related costs associated with our business combinations for the years ended for the three months ended, March 31, 2016 and 2015 include the following:
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Transaction costs (1)
$
375

 
$

Integration costs
964

 

 
$
1,339

 
$

 
 
 
 
(1) Transaction costs include investment advisory, legal, and accounting fees
 
 
 



8

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




4.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value. We determine the cost of inventory on a standard cost basis, which approximates average costs.
The components of inventory are as follows:
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Raw materials
$
16,948

 
$
17,924

Work-in-process
162,979

 
180,324

Finished goods
114,035

 
91,626

 
$
293,962

 
$
289,874

 



5.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The following table summarizes the carrying amount of our intangible assets and goodwill, net of accumulated amortization:

 
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Estimated
Life (years)
 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Licenses
6-8
 
$
28,507

 
$
(28,507
)
 
$

 
$
28,507

 
$
(28,504
)
 
$
3

Patents
7
 
10,517

 
(10,517
)
 

 
10,517

 
(10,517
)
 

Purchased technology
6-16
 
4,708,495

 
(196,678
)
 
4,511,817

 
4,708,495

 
(116,584
)
 
4,591,911

Acquired IPR&D
Indefinite
 
116,000

 

 
116,000

 
116,000

 

 
116,000

Total
 
 
$
4,863,519

 
$
(235,702
)
 
$
4,627,817

 
$
4,863,519

 
$
(155,605
)
 
$
4,707,914

Goodwill
Indefinite
 
$
5,052,222

 
$
(2,901
)
 
$
5,049,321

 
$
5,050,786

 
$
(2,901
)
 
$
5,047,885


Amortization expense was $80,097 and $11 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Total estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets is $240,106 for the nine months ending December 31, 2016, and $320,142 for each of the years ending December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2021.
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill:
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
5,047,885

Change in goodwill associated with prior acquisition
1,436

Balance at March 31, 2016
$
5,049,321

    
6.
Debt
In June 2015, Alexion entered into a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks, which provides for a $3,500,000 term loan facility and a $500,000 revolving credit facility maturing in five years. Borrowings under the term loan are payable in quarterly installments equal to 1.25% of the original loan amount, beginning December 31, 2015. Final repayment of the term loan and revolving credit loans are due on June 22, 2020. In addition to borrowings in which prior notice is required, the revolving credit facility includes a sublimit of $100,000 in the form of letters of credit and borrowings on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans, of up to $25,000. Borrowings can be used for working capital requirements, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes. With the consent of the lenders and the administrative agent, and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, we may increase the term loan facility and/or the revolving credit facility in an amount that does not cause our consolidated net leverage ratio to exceed the maximum allowable amount.
In connection with entering into the Credit Agreement, we paid $45,492 in financing costs which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt. Amortization expense associated with deferred financing costs for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $2,513.

9

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




We made principle payments of $175,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2016, we had $3,281,250 outstanding on the term loan. As of March 31, 2016, we had open letters of credit of $12,970, and our borrowing availability under the revolving facility was $487,030.
The fair value of our long term debt, which is measured using Level 2 inputs, approximates book value.

7.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. For purposes of calculating diluted EPS, the denominator reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options, unvested restricted stock, unvested restricted stock units or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, using the treasury stock method.
The following table summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Net income used for basic and diluted calculation
$
92,166

 
$
91,323

Shares used in computing earnings per common share—basic
225,060

 
199,361

Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
Stock awards
1,813

 
2,673

Shares used in computing earnings per common share—diluted
226,873

 
202,034

Earnings per common share:
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.41

 
$
0.46

Diluted
$
0.41

 
$
0.45

We exclude from EPS the weighted-average number of securities whose effect is anti-dilutive. Excluded from the calculation of EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were 3,975 and 2,248 shares of common stock, respectively, because their effect was anti-dilutive.

8.
Marketable Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses and estimated fair value of available-for-sale investments by type of security at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
Amortized Cost Basis
 
Gross Unrealized Holding Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Holding Losses
 
Aggregate Fair Value
Commercial paper
 
$
3,999

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,999

Corporate bonds
 
136,009

 
553

 
(3
)
 
136,559

Municipal bonds
 
50,470

 
43

 
(2
)
 
50,511

Other government-related obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
13,643

 
43

 
(27
)
 
13,659

Foreign
 
141,593

 
244

 
(19
)
 
141,818

 
 
$
345,714

 
$
883

 
$
(51
)
 
$
346,546



10

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Amortized Cost Basis
 
Gross Unrealized Holding Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Holding Losses
 
Aggregate Fair Value
Commercial paper
 
$
254,396

 
$

 
$

 
$
254,396

Corporate bonds
 
133,062

 
23

 
(336
)
 
132,749

Municipal bonds
 
87,173

 
1

 
(63
)
 
87,111

Other government-related obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
25,244

 

 
(94
)
 
25,150

Foreign
 
163,403

 

 
(504
)
 
162,899

Bank certificates of deposit
 
27,000

 

 

 
27,000

 
 
$
690,278

 
$
24

 
$
(997
)
 
$
689,305


The aggregate fair value of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $62,496 and $293,947, respectively. Investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than 12 months were not material. As of March 31, 2016, we believe that the cost basis of our available-for-sale investments is recoverable.
The fair values of available-for-sale securities by classification in the condensed consolidated balance sheet were as follows:
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents
$
40,999

 
$
323,218

Marketable securities
305,547

 
366,087

 
$
346,546

 
$
689,305


The fair values of available-for-sale debt securities at March 31, 2016, by contractual maturity, are summarized as follows:
 
March 31, 2016
Due in one year or less
$
140,145

Due after one year through three years
206,401

 
$
346,546


As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of our trading securities was $11,807 and $8,817, respectively.
We utilize the specific identification method in computing realized gains and losses. Realized gains and losses on our available-for-sale and trading securities were not material for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

9.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We operate internationally and, in the normal course of business, are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The exposures result from portions of our revenues, as well as the related receivables, and expenses that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Euro and Japanese Yen. We manage our foreign currency transaction risk within specified guidelines through the use of derivatives. All of our derivative instruments are utilized for risk management purposes, and we do not use derivatives for speculative trading purposes.
We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts, with durations of up to 60 months, to hedge exposures resulting from portions of our forecasted revenues, including intercompany revenues, that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The purpose of these hedges is to reduce the volatility of exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results and to increase the visibility of the foreign exchange impact on forecasted revenues. These hedges are designated as cash flow hedges

11

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




upon contract inception. At March 31, 2016, we had open contracts with notional amounts totaling $2,088,952 that qualified for hedge accounting.
The impact on accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and earnings from foreign exchange contracts that qualified as cash flow hedges, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Gain (loss) recognized in AOCI, net of tax
$
(49,442
)
 
$
93,809

Gain reclassified from AOCI to net product sales (effective portion), net of tax
$
14,659

 
$
25,447

Gain reclassified from AOCI to other income and expense (ineffective portion), net of tax
$

 
$
1,075

Assuming no change in foreign exchange rates from market rates at March 31, 2016, $39,730 of gain recognized in AOCI will be reclassified to revenue over the next 12 months.
We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts, with durations of approximately 90 days, designed to limit the balance sheet exposure of monetary assets and liabilities. We enter into these hedges to reduce the impact of fluctuating exchange rates on our operating results. Hedge accounting is not applied to these derivative instruments as gains and losses on these hedge transactions are designed to offset gains and losses on underlying balance sheet exposures. As of March 31, 2016, the notional amount of foreign exchange contracts where hedge accounting is not applied was $307,585.
We recognized a (loss) gain of $(12,969) and $6,423, in other income and expense, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, associated with the foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments. These amounts were partially offset by gains or losses on monetary assets and liabilities.
The following tables summarize the fair value of outstanding derivatives at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 
March 31, 2016
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
Other current assets
 
$
55,976

 
Other current liabilities
 
$
15,870

Foreign exchange forward contracts
Other non-current assets
 
35,019

 
Other non-current liabilities
 
30,740

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
Other current assets
 
2,594

 
Other current liabilities
 
16,186

Total fair value of derivative instruments
 
 
$
93,589

 
 
 
$
62,796



12

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)





 
December 31, 2015
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
Other current assets
 
$
85,058

 
Other current liabilities
 
$
1,491

Foreign exchange forward contracts
Other non-current assets
 
66,309

 
Other non-current liabilities
 
4,773

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
Other current assets
 
6,687

 
 
 
4,157

Total fair value of derivative instruments
 
 
$
158,054

 
 
 
$
10,421


Although we do not offset derivative assets and liabilities within our condensed consolidated balance sheets, our International Swap and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements provide for net settlement of transactions that are due to or from the same counterparty upon early termination of the agreement due to an event of default or other termination event. The following tables summarize the potential effect on our condensed consolidated balance sheets of offsetting our foreign exchange forward contracts subject to such provisions:
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
 
Description
 
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets/Liabilities
 
Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Derivative Financial Instruments
 
Cash Collateral Received (Pledged)
 
Net Amount
Derivative assets
 
$
93,589

 
$

 
$
93,589

 
$
(27,928
)
 
$

 
$
65,661

Derivative liabilities
 
(62,796
)
 

 
(62,796
)
 
27,928

 

 
(34,868
)
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
 
Description
 
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets/Liabilities
 
Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Derivative Financial Instruments
 
Cash Collateral Received (Pledged)
 
Net Amount
Derivative assets
 
$
158,054

 
$

 
$
158,054

 
$
(10,421
)
 
$

 
$
147,633

Derivative liabilities
 
(10,421
)
 

 
(10,421
)
 
10,421

 

 


10.
Other Investments
Other investments include our investment of $37,500 in the preferred stock of Moderna LLC. Our investment is recorded at cost within other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The carrying value of this investment was not impaired as of March 31, 2016.


13

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




11.
Stockholders' Equity
In November 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date, and we are not obligated to acquire a particular number of shares. The repurchase program may be discontinued at any time at the Company's discretion. In May 2015, our Board of Directors increased the authorization to acquire shares with an aggregate value of up to $1,000,000 for future purchases under the repurchase program, which superseded all prior repurchase programs. Under the program, we repurchased 2,083 and 334 shares of our common stock at a cost of $296,515 and $60,026 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Subsequent to March 31, 2016, we repurchased 245 shares of our common stock under our repurchase program at a cost of $34,136. As of April 29, 2016, there is a total of $425,213 remaining for repurchases under the repurchase program.

12.
Other Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following tables summarize the changes in AOCI, by component, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Marketable Securities
 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Hedging Activities
 
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
 
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balances, December 31, 2015
$
(9,589
)
 
$
(785
)
 
$
92,670

 
$
(19,995
)
 
$
62,301

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
2,035

 
1,333

 
(49,442
)
 
1,996

 
(44,078
)
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income
86

 
165

 
(14,659
)
 

 
(14,408
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
2,121

 
1,498

 
(64,101
)
 
1,996

 
(58,486
)
Balances, March 31, 2016
$
(7,468
)
 
$
713

 
$
28,569

 
$
(17,999
)
 
$
3,815


 
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Marketable Securities
 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) From Hedging Activities
 
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
 
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balances, December 31, 2014
$
(16,570
)
 
$
(234
)
 
$
87,308

 
$
(13,719
)
 
$
56,785

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
(488
)
 
1,065

 
93,809

 
(5,388
)
 
88,998

Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income
236

 
(8
)
 
(26,522
)
 

 
(26,294
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
(252
)
 
1,057

 
67,287

 
(5,388
)
 
62,704

Balances, March 31, 2015
$
(16,822
)
 
$
823

 
$
154,595

 
$
(19,107
)
 
$
119,489



14

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




The table below provides details regarding significant reclassifications from AOCI during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components
 
Amount Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income during the three months ended March 31,
Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
2016
2015
 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Hedging Activity
 
 
 
 
 
Effective portion of foreign exchange contracts
 
$
22,812

$
29,083

 
Net product sales
Ineffective portion of foreign exchange contracts
 

1,228

 
Foreign currency gain
 
 
22,812

30,311

 
 
 
 
(8,153
)
(3,789
)
 
Income tax provision
 
 
$
14,659

$
26,522

 
 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Marketable Securities
 
 
 
 
 
Realized (loss) gain on sale of securities
 
$
(262
)
$
13

 
Investment income
 
 
(262
)
13

 
 
 
 
97

(5
)
 
Income tax provision
 
 
$
(165
)
$
8

 
 
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service costs and actuarial losses
 
$
(114
)
$
(311
)
 
(a)
 
 
(114
)
(311
)
 
 
 
 
28

75

 
Income tax provision
 
 
$
(86
)
$
(236
)
 
 
 
(a) This AOCI component is included in the computation of net periodic pension benefit cost (see Note 15 for additional details).

13.
Fair Value Measurement
Authoritative guidance establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to the valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.

15

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




The following tables present information about our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we utilized to determine such fair value. 
 
 
Fair Value Measurement at
March 31, 2016
Balance Sheet
Classification
Type of Instrument
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Cash equivalents
Institutional money market funds
$
82,416

 
$

 
$
82,416

 
$

Cash equivalents
Commercial paper
$
3,999

 
$

 
$
3,999

 
$

Cash equivalents
Corporate bonds
$
15,000

 
$

 
$
15,000

 
$

Cash equivalents
Municipal bonds
$
22,000

 
$

 
$
22,000

 
$

Marketable securities
Mutual funds
$
11,807

 
$
11,807

 
$

 
$

Marketable securities
Corporate bonds
$
121,559

 
$

 
$
121,559

 
$

Marketable securities
Municipal bonds
$
28,511

 
$

 
$
28,511

 
$

Marketable securities
Other government-related obligations
$
155,477

 
$

 
$
155,477

 
$

Other current assets
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
58,570

 
$

 
$
58,570

 
$

Other assets
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
35,019

 
$

 
$
35,019

 
$

Other current liabilities
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
32,056

 
$

 
$
32,056

 
$

Other liabilities
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
30,740

 
$

 
$
30,740

 
$

Other current liabilities
Acquisition-related contingent consideration
$
55,343

 
$

 
$

 
$
55,343

Contingent consideration
Acquisition-related contingent consideration
$
107,085

 
$

 
$

 
$
107,085

 

16

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




 
 
Fair Value Measurement at
December 31, 2015
Balance Sheet
Classification
Type of Instrument
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Cash equivalents
Institutional money market funds
$
179,898

 
$

 
$
179,898

 
$

Cash equivalents
Commercial paper
$
192,418

 
$

 
$
192,418

 
$

Cash equivalents
Corporate bonds
$
12,250

 
$

 
$
12,250

 
$

Cash equivalents
Municipal bonds
$
60,001

 
$

 
$
60,001

 
$

Cash equivalents
Other government-related obligations
$
31,549

 
$

 
$
31,549

 
$

Cash equivalents
Bank certificates of deposit
$
27,000

 
$

 
$
27,000

 
$

Marketable securities
Mutual funds
$
8,817

 
$
8,817

 
$

 
$

Marketable securities
Commercial paper
$
61,978

 
$

 
$
61,978

 
$

Marketable securities
Corporate bonds
$
120,499

 
$

 
$
120,499

 
$

Marketable securities
Municipal bonds
$
27,110

 
$

 
$
27,110

 
$

Marketable securities
Other government-related obligations
$
156,500

 
$

 
$
156,500

 
$

Other current assets
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
91,745

 
$

 
$
91,745

 
$

Other assets
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
66,309

 
$

 
$
66,309

 
$

Other current liabilities
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
5,648

 
$

 
$
5,648

 
$

Other liabilities
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$
4,773

 
$

 
$
4,773

 
$

Other current liabilities
Acquisition-related contingent consideration
$
55,804

 
$

 
$

 
$
55,804

Contingent consideration
Acquisition-related contingent consideration
$
121,424

 
$

 
$

 
$
121,424


There were no securities transferred between Level 1, 2 and 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Valuation Techniques
We classify mutual fund investments, which are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets with no valuation adjustment, as Level 1 assets within the fair value hierarchy.
Cash equivalents and marketable securities classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy consist of institutional money market funds, commercial paper, municipal bonds, U.S. and foreign government-related debt, corporate debt securities and certificates of deposit. We estimate the fair values of these marketable securities by taking into consideration valuations obtained from third-party pricing sources. These pricing sources utilize industry standard valuation models, including both income and market-based approaches, for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, to estimate fair value. These inputs include market pricing based on real-time trade data for the same or similar securities, issuer credit spreads, benchmark yields, and other observable inputs. We validate the prices provided by our third-party pricing sources by understanding the models used, obtaining market values from other pricing sources and analyzing pricing data in certain instances.
Our derivative assets and liabilities include foreign exchange derivatives that are measured at fair value using observable market inputs such as forward rates, interest rates, our own credit risk as well as an evaluation of our counterparties’ credit risks. Based on these inputs, the derivative assets and liabilities are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Contingent consideration liabilities related to acquisitions are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy and are valued based on various estimates, including probability of success, discount rates and amount of time until the conditions of the milestone payments are met.

17

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




As of March 31, 2016, there has not been any impact to the fair value of our derivative liabilities due to our own credit risk. Similarly, there has not been any significant adverse impact to our derivative assets based on our evaluation of our counterparties’ credit risks.

Contingent Consideration
In connection with prior acquisitions, we may be required to pay future consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of specified development, regulatory approvals or sales-based milestone events. We determine the fair value of these obligations on the acquisition date using various estimates that are not observable in the market and represent a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The resulting probability-weighted cash flows were discounted using a cost of debt of 5.5% for developmental milestones and a weighted average cost of capital ranging from 10% to 21% for sales-based milestones.
Each reporting period, we adjust the contingent consideration to fair value with changes in fair value recognized in operating earnings. Changes in fair values reflect new information about the probability and timing of meeting the conditions of the milestone payments. In the absence of new information, changes in fair value will only reflect the interest component of contingent consideration related to the passage of time as development work progresses towards the achievement of the milestones.
Estimated future contingent milestone payments related to prior business combinations range from zero if no milestone events are achieved, to a maximum of $826,000 if all development, regulatory and sales-based milestones are reached. As of March 31, 2016, the fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration was $162,428. The following table represents a roll-forward of our acquisition-related contingent consideration:
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
(177,228
)
Change in fair value
14,800

Balance at March 31, 2016
$
(162,428
)
 
14.
Income Taxes
The following table provides a comparative summary of our income tax provision and effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Provision for income taxes
$
51,432

 
$
15,622

Effective tax rate
35.8
%
 
14.6
%
The tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 is attributable to the U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes on our profitable operations. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily attributable to the deferred tax cost associated with the distribution of earnings from our captive foreign partnership. This non-cash deferred tax cost increased the effective tax rate by approximately 19%.
In the first quarter of 2016, we identified a correction to our 2015 tax provision of $8,955 due to a calculation error. This understated income tax expense and the deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2015 and was recorded as an out of period adjustment in the first quarter of 2016. The correction was determined to be immaterial to our consolidated financial statements for the periods ending December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016 as well as our expected results for 2016.
Tax years 2013 and 2014 are currently under review by the Examination Division of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). As of March 31, 2016, we have not been notified of any significant proposed adjustments by the IRS.
We continue to maintain a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets where realization is not certain.

15.
Defined Benefit Plans
We maintain defined benefit plans for employees in certain countries outside the United States, including retirement benefit plans required by applicable local law. The plans are valued by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit

18

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




method. The liabilities correspond to the projected benefit obligations of which the discounted net present value is calculated based on years of employment, expected salary increases, and pension adjustments.
The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows: 
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Service cost
$
2,023

 
$
2,421

Interest cost
60

 
180

Expected return on plan assets
(163
)
 
(243
)
Employee contributions
(352
)
 
(427
)
Amortization
114

 
311

Total net periodic benefit cost
$
1,682

 
$
2,242


16.
Facility Lease Obligations
New Haven Facility Lease Obligation
In November 2012, we entered into a new lease agreement for office and laboratory space to be constructed in New Haven, Connecticut. The term of the new lease commenced in 2015 and will expire in 2030, with a renewal option of ten years. Although we will not legally own the premises, we are deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period based on applicable accounting guidance for build-to-suit leases because of the substantial amount of tenant improvements we directly funded during the construction period. Due to the substantial tenant improvements directly funded during construction, we will continue to be deemed the owner of the building once construction is complete. Accordingly, the landlord's costs of constructing the facility during construction are required to be capitalized, as a non-cash transaction, offset by a corresponding facility lease obligation in our consolidated balance sheet.
Construction of the new facility was completed and the building was placed into service in the first quarter 2016. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our facility lease obligation related to this facility was $134,211 and $132,866, respectively.
Lonza Facility Lease Obligation
During the third quarter 2015, we entered into a new agreement with Lonza Group AG and its affiliates (Lonza) whereby Lonza will construct a new manufacturing facility dedicated to Alexion at its existing Portsmouth, New Hampshire facility. The agreement requires us to make certain payments during the construction of the new manufacturing facility and annual payments for ten years thereafter. As a result of our contractual right to full capacity of the new manufacturing facility, a portion of the payments under the agreement are considered to be lease payments and a portion as payment for the supply of inventory. Although we will not legally own the premises, we are deemed to be the owner of the manufacturing facility during the construction period based on applicable accounting guidance for build-to-suit leases due to our involvement during the construction period. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we recorded a construction-in-process asset of $42,652 and $19,259 and an offsetting facility lease obligation of $35,632 and $15,229 associated with the manufacturing facility, respectively.
Payments made to Lonza under the agreement are allocated to the purchases of inventory and the repayment of the facility lease obligation on a relative fair value basis. In 2016, we made $23,000 of payments to Lonza under this agreement, of which $2,990 was applied against the outstanding facility lease obligation and $20,010 was recognized as a prepayment of inventory.

17.
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Manufacturing Agreements
We have various manufacturing development agreements to support our clinical and commercial product needs. We rely on Lonza, a third party manufacturer, to produce a portion of commercial and clinical quantities of Soliris and Strensiq. We have various agreements with Lonza with remaining total non-cancellable future commitments of approximately $1,134,661. If we terminate certain supply agreements with Lonza without cause, we will be required to pay for product scheduled for

19

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




manufacture under our arrangement. Under an existing arrangement with Lonza, we also pay Lonza a royalty on sales of Soliris manufactured at Alexion Rhode Island Manufacturing Facility (ARIMF) and a payment with respect to sales of Soliris manufactured at Lonza facilities.
In addition to Lonza, we have non-cancellable commitments of $35,035 with other third party manufacturers.

Contingent Liabilities
We are currently involved in various claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings. On a quarterly basis, we review the status of each significant matter and assess its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim, asserted or unasserted, or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Because of uncertainties related to claims and litigation, accruals are based on our best estimates based on available information. On a periodic basis, as additional information becomes available, or based on specific events such as the outcome of litigation or settlement of claims, we may reassess the potential liability related to these matters and may revise these estimates, which could result in a material adverse adjustment to our operating results.
We have in the past received, and may in the future receive, notices from third parties claiming that their patents may be infringed by the development, manufacture or sale of Soliris. Under the guidance of ASC 450, Contingencies, we record a royalty accrual based on our best estimate of the fair value percent of net sales of Soliris that we could be required to pay the owners of patents for technology used in the manufacture and sale of Soliris. A costly license, or inability to obtain a necessary license, could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
In May 2015, we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in various countries. In addition, in October 2015, Alexion received a request from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to Alexion's compliance with the FCPA. The SEC and DOJ also seek information related to Alexion’s recalls of specific lots of Soliris and related securities disclosures. Alexion is cooperating with these investigations. At this time, Alexion is unable to predict the duration, scope or outcome of these investigations. Given the ongoing nature of these investigations, management does not currently believe a loss related to these matters is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated.
In March 2013, we received a Warning Letter (Warning Letter) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) at ARIMF. The Warning Letter followed receipt of a Form 483 Inspectional Observations by the FDA in connection with an FDA inspection that concluded in August 2012. The observations relate to commercial and clinical manufacture of Soliris at ARIMF. We responded to the Warning Letter in a letter to the FDA dated in April 2013. As previously announced, the FDA issued Form 483s in August 2014 and August 2015 relating to observations at ARIMF. The inspectional observations from the August 2015 letter have since been closed out by the FDA.
The observations are inspectional and do not represent a final FDA determination of compliance. We continue to manufacture products, including Soliris, in this facility. While the resolution of the issues raised in the Warning Letter is difficult to predict, we do not currently believe a loss related to this matter is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated.

18.
Restructuring
In connection with the acquisition and integration of Synageva in 2015, we recorded a restructuring benefit of $924 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily related to changes in estimates associated with employee costs. We expect to pay all remaining accrued amounts related to this restructuring activity by the end of 2016.
In the fourth quarter 2014, we announced plans to move our European headquarters from Lausanne to Zurich, Switzerland. The relocation of our European headquarters supports our operational needs based on growth in the European region. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we incurred additional restructuring costs of $1,646. We expect to pay all remaining accrued amounts related to this restructuring activity by the end of 2016.

20

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)




The following table presents a reconciliation of the restructuring reserve recorded within accrued expenses on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet for the three months ended March 31, 2016:
 
Employee Separation Costs
 
Contract Termination Costs
 
Other Costs
 
Total
Liability, beginning of period
$
6,390

 
$
682

 
$
169

 
$
7,241

Restructuring expenses

 
35

 
417

 
452

Cash settlements
(3,806
)
 
(508
)
 
(570
)
 
(4,884
)
Adjustments to previous estimates
(1,148
)
 
1,418

 

 
270

Liability, end of period
$
1,436

 
$
1,627

 
$
16

 
$
3,079

The restructuring reserve of $3,079 is recorded in accrued expenses on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2016.


21

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that have been made pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management's beliefs, and certain assumptions made by our management, and may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the potential benefits and commercial potential of Soliris®, Strensiq® and Kanuma® for approved indications and any expanded uses, timing and effect of sales of our products in various markets worldwide, pricing for our products, level of insurance coverage and reimbursement for our products, level of future product sales and collections, timing regarding development and regulatory approvals for our products in additional indications or in additional territories, the medical and commercial potential of additional indications for Soliris, failure to satisfactorily address the issues raised by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the March 2013 Warning Letter and Form 483s issued by the FDA, costs, expenses and capital requirements, cash outflows, cash from operations, status of reimbursement, price approval and funding processes in various countries worldwide, progress in developing commercial infrastructure and interest about our products and our product candidates in the patient, physician and payer communities, the safety and efficacy of our products and our product candidates, estimates of the potential markets and estimated commercialization dates for our products and our product candidates around the world, sales and marketing plans, any changes in the current or anticipated market demand or medical need for our products or our product candidates, status of our ongoing clinical trials for our product candidates, commencement dates for new clinical trials, clinical trial results, evaluation of our clinical trial results by regulatory agencies, the adequacy of our pharmacovigilance and drug safety reporting processes, prospects for regulatory approval of our product candidates, need for additional research and testing, the uncertainties involved in the drug development process and manufacturing, performance and reliance on third party service providers, our future research and development activities, plans for acquired programs, our ability to develop and commercialize products with our collaborators, assessment of competitors and potential competitors, the outcome of challenges and opposition proceedings to our intellectual property, assertion or potential assertion by third parties that the manufacture, use or sale of our products infringes their intellectual property, estimates of the capacity of manufacturing and other service facilities to support our products and our product candidates, potential costs resulting from product liability or other third party claims, the sufficiency of our existing capital resources and projected cash needs, the possibility that expected tax benefits will not be realized, assessment of impact of recent accounting pronouncements, declines in sovereign credit ratings or sovereign defaults in countries where we sell our products, delay of collection or reduction in reimbursement due to adverse economic conditions or changes in government and private insurer regulations and approaches to reimbursement, uncertainties surrounding government investigations, including our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations, the short and long term effects of other government healthcare measures, the effect of interest rate increases, and the effect of shifting foreign exchange rates. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict; therefore, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in any such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those discussed later in this report under the section entitled “Risk Factors”. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise. However, readers should carefully review the risk factors set forth in this and other reports or documents we file from time to time with the SEC.
Business
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on serving patients with devastating and ultra-rare disorders through the innovation, development and commercialization of life-transforming therapeutic products.
In our complement franchise, Soliris (eculizumab)is the first and only therapeutic approved for patients with either PNH or aHUS. In our metabolic franchise, we market Strensiq (asfotase alfa) for the treatment of patients with HPP and Kanuma (sebelipase alfa) for the treatment of patients with LAL-D.
We are also evaluating additional potential indications for eculizumab in other severe and devastating diseases in which uncontrolled complement activation is the underlying mechanism, and we are progressing in various stages of development with additional product candidates as potential treatments for patients with severe and life-threatening rare disorders.
 
Products and Development Programs
We focus our product development programs on life-transforming therapeutics for devastating and ultra-rare diseases for which current treatments are either non-existent or inadequate.

22

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Marketed Products
Our marketed products include the following:
Product
 
Development Area
 
Indication
 
Development Stage
Soliris (eculizumab)
 
Hematology
 
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH)
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
PNH Registry
 
Phase IV
 
 
Hematology/Nephrology
 
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS)
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
aHUS Registry
 
Phase IV
Strensiq (asfotase alfa)
 
Metabolic Disorders
 
Hypophosphatasia (HPP)
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
HPP Registry
 
Phase IV
Kanuma (sebelipase alfa)
 
Metabolic Disorders
 
Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency (LAL-D)
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
LAL-D Registry
 
Phase IV

Soliris (eculizumab)
Soliris is designed to inhibit a specific aspect of the complement component of the immune system and thereby treat inflammation associated with chronic disorders in several therapeutic areas, including hematology, nephrology, transplant rejection and neurology. Soliris is a humanized monoclonal antibody that effectively blocks terminal complement activity at the doses currently prescribed. The initial indication for which we received approval for Soliris is PNH.
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH)
PNH is a debilitating and life-threatening, ultra-rare genetic blood disorder defined by chronic uncontrolled complement activation leading to the destruction of red blood cells (hemolysis). The chronic hemolysis in patients with PNH may be associated with life-threatening thromboses, recurrent pain, kidney disease, disabling fatigue, impaired quality of life, severe anemia, pulmonary hypertension, shortness of breath and intermittent episodes of dark-colored urine (hemoglobinuria). We continue to work with researchers to expand the base of knowledge in PNH and the utility of Soliris to treat patients with PNH. Soliris is approved for the treatment of PNH in the United States, Europe, Japan and in several other territories. We are sponsoring a multinational registry to gather information regarding the natural history of patients with PNH and the longer term outcomes during Soliris treatment. In addition, Soliris has been granted orphan drug designation for the treatment of PNH in the United States, Europe, Japan and several other territories.
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS)
aHUS is a severe and life-threatening genetic ultra-rare disease characterized by chronic uncontrolled complement activation and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), the formation of blood clots in small blood vessels throughout the body, causing a reduction in platelet count (thrombocytopenia) and life-threatening damage to the kidney, brain, heart and other vital organs. Soliris is approved for the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with aHUS in the United States, Europe and Japan. In addition, the FDA and EC have granted Soliris orphan drug designation for the treatment of patients with aHUS.
Strensiq (asfotase alfa)
Hypophosphatasia (HPP)
HPP is an ultra-rare genetic and progressive metabolic disease in which patients experience devastating effects on multiple systems of the body, leading to debilitating or life-threatening complications. HPP is characterized by defective bone mineralization that can lead to deformity of bones and other skeletal abnormalities, as well as systemic complications such as profound muscle weakness, seizures, pain, and respiratory failure leading to premature death in infants.
Strensiq, a targeted enzyme replacement therapy, is the first and only approved therapy for patients with HPP, and is designed to directly address underlying causes of HPP by aiming to restore the genetically defective metabolic process, thereby preventing or reversing the severe and potentially life-threatening complications in patients with HPP. In 2015, the FDA approved Strensiq for patients with perinatal-, infantile- and juvenile-onset HPP, the European Commission (EC) granted marketing authorization for Strensiq for the treatment of patients with pediatric-onset HPP, and Japan’s Ministry of Health. Labour and Welfare (MHLW) approved Strensiq for the treatment of patients with HPP.

23

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

In April 2016, new long-term data was presented showing clinically significant and sustained improvements in bone healing, respiratory support, and physical function in children with perinatal and infantile-onset HPP treated with Strensiq. In addition, adolescents and adult patients reduced or eliminated their need of ambulatory assistive devices and had improvements in physical function.
Kanuma (sebelipase alfa)
Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency (LAL Deficiency or LAL-D)
LAL-D is a serious, life-threatening ultra-rare disease associated with premature mortality and significant morbidity. LAL-D is a chronic disease in which genetic mutations result in decreased activity of the LAL enzyme that leads to marked accumulation of lipids in vital organs, blood vessels, and other tissues, resulting in progressive and systemic organ damage including hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, liver failure, accelerated atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and other devastating consequences.
Kanuma, a recombinant form of the human LAL enzyme, is the only enzyme-replacement therapy that is approved for the treatment for patients with LAL-D. In 2015, the FDA approved Kanuma for the treatment of patients with LAL-D and the EC granted marketing authorization of Kanuma for long-term enzyme replacement therapy in patients of all ages with LAL-D. On March 28, 2016, we announced that Japan's MHLW approved Kanuma for the treatment of patients of all ages in Japan with LAL-D.
In March 2016, researchers presented new two-year data from an ongoing, open-label Phase 2/3 trial of Kanuma in infants with LAL-D. Data from this study demonstrated a substantial survival benefit to beyond 2 years of age for patients with rapidly progressive LAL-D during infancy who were treated with Kanuma. Patients also had improvements in a number of key parameters, including weight gain, important markers of liver disease, gastrointestinal symptoms, anemia, and hepatosplenomegaly (enlargement of both the liver and spleen), and 4 out of 5 patients demonstrated normal development.




24

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Clinical Development Programs
Our programs, including investigator sponsored clinical programs, include the following:
Product
 
Development Area
 
Indication
 
Development Stage
Soliris (eculizumab)
 
Neurology
 
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG)
 
Phase III
 
 
 
 
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
 
Phase III
 
 
Transplant
 
Delayed Kidney Transplant Graft Function (DGF)
 
Phase III
 
 
 
 
Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) Presensitized Renal Transplant - Living Donor
 
Phase II
 
 
 
 
Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) Presensitized Renal Transplant - Deceased Donor
 
Phase II
 
 
 
 
Treatment of Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) Following Renal Transplantation*
 
Phase II
cPMP (ALXN 1101)
 
Metabolic Disorders

 
MoCD Type A
 
Phase II / III
ALXN 1007
 
Inflammatory Disorders
 
GI Graft versus Host Disease
 
Phase II
 
 
 
 
Anti-phospholipid Syndrome
 
Phase II
SBC-103
 
Metabolic Disorders
 
Mucopolysaccharidoses IIIB
(MPS IIIB)


 
Phase I / II
ALXN 1210
 
Next Generation Complement Inhibitor
 
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH)
 
Phase I / II
ALXN 5500
 
Next Generation Complement Inhibitor
 
 
 
Phase I
*
Investigator sponsored clinical program

Soliris (eculizumab)
Neurology
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG)
gMG is an ultra-rare autoimmune syndrome characterized by complement activation leading to the failure of neuromuscular transmission. We have completed enrollment of patients in a Phase III multinational, placebo-controlled registration trial of eculizumab in patients with refractory generalized gMG. The FDA, EC and MHLW have granted orphan drug designation for eculizumab as a treatment for patients with gMG.
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
NMOSD is a severe and ultra-rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that primarily affects the optic nerves and spinal cord. Enrollment and dosing are ongoing in a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled to evaluate eculizumab as a treatment for patients with relapsing NMOSD. The FDA, EC, and MHLW have each granted orphan designation for eculizumab as a treatment for patients with NMOSD.
Transplant
Delayed Kidney Transplant Graft Function (DGF)
DGF is the term used to describe the failure of a kidney or other organs to function immediately after transplantation due to ischemia-reperfusion and immunological injury. Enrollment is complete in a single, multinational, placebo-controlled DGF registration trial and patient follow-up is ongoing. Eculizumab has been granted orphan drug designation for DGF by the FDA and the EC granted orphan drug designation to eculizumab for prevention of DGF after solid organ transplantation.

25

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) in Presensitized Kidney Transplant Patients
AMR is the term used to describe a type of transplant rejection that occurs when the recipient has antibodies to the donor organ. Enrollment in a multi-national, multi-center controlled clinical trial of eculizumab in presensitized kidney transplant patients at elevated risk for AMR who received kidneys from deceased organ donors was completed in March 2013 and patient follow-up in the trial is continuing. In September 2013, researchers presented positive preliminary data from the eculizumab deceased-donor AMR kidney transplant study. In May 2015, new data from the Phase II single-arm deceased-donor transplant trial of eculizumab in prevention of acute AMR was presented and was consistent with previous positive reports.
 In January 2015, we reported results from a randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase II clinical trial of eculizumab presensitized kidney transplant patients at an elevated risk of AMR who received kidneys from living donors. The primary composite endpoint of the trial did not reach statistical significance. Patient follow-up and data analyses are ongoing and based on discussions with regulators, we are developing plans for next steps for eculizumab in AMR.
The EC granted orphan drug designation to eculizumab for the prevention of graft rejection following solid organ transplantation.

cPMP (ALXN 1101)
Molybdenum Cofactor Deficiency (MoCD) Disease Type A (MoCD Type A)
MoCD Type A is an ultra-rare metabolic disorder characterized by severe and rapidly progressive neurologic damage and death in newborns. MoCD Type A results from a genetic deficiency in cyclic Pyranopterin Monophosphate (cPMP), a molecule that enables the function of certain enzymes and the absence of which allows neurotoxic sulfite to accumulate in the brain. To date, there is no approved therapy available for MoCD Type A. There has been some early clinical experience with the recombinant cPMP replacement therapy in a small number of children with MoCD Type A, and we have completed enrollment in a natural history study in patients with MoCD Type A. In October 2013, cPMP received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA for the treatment of patients with MoCD Type A. Evaluation of our synthetic form of cPMP replacement therapy in a Phase I healthy volunteer study is complete. In addition, we completed enrollment in a multi-center, multinational open-label clinical trial of synthetic cPMP in patients with MoCD Type A switched from treatment with recombinant cPMP. Activities have commenced for the Phase II/III pivotal open-label, single-arm trial of ALXN1101 for treatment-naïve neonates with MoCD Type A.

ALXN 1007
ALXN 1007 is a novel humanized antibody designed to target rare and severe inflammatory disorders and is a product of our proprietary antibody discovery technologies. We have completed enrollment in both a Phase I single-dose, dose escalating safety and pharmacology study in healthy volunteers, as well as in a multi-dose, dose escalating safety and pharmacology study in healthy volunteers. A proof-of-concept study in patients with an ultra-rare disorder, gastrointestinal graft versus host disease (GI-GVHD), is ongoing. Acute GI-GVHD is an immune-mediated disease and a complication of stem cell transplantation occurring in 10-12 percent of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Patients with severe acute GI-GVHD have a 30-40 percent mortality rate within the first six months post-transplant. The study is evaluating patients with GI-GVHD following bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplant experience engrafted hematopoietic cells that attack host gastrointestinal tissues in the first 100 days post-transplant causing damage to the GI tract, liver and skin. In December 2015, we announced that interim data from a Phase II study showed an overall 28 day acute GI-GVHD response rate of 80 percent and a 28 day complete response rate of 70 percent compared to historical response rates of 56 percent and 49 percent, respectively, which supports the continued advancement of ALXN 1007 in GI-GVHD.
In addition, enrollment in a Phase II proof-of-concept study in patients with non-criteria manifestations of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) was discontinued early due to recruitment difficulties. The study is ongoing for initially enrolled patients. APS is an ultra-rare autoimmune, hypercoagulable state caused by antiphospholipid antibodies.

SBC-103
Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIB (MPS IIIB)
MPS IIIB is a rare, devastating and life-threatening disease which typically presents in children during the first few years of life. Genetic mutations result in decreased activity of the alpha-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAGLU) enzyme, which leads to a buildup of abnormal amounts of heparan sulfate (HS) in the brain and throughout the body. Over time, this unrelenting systemic accumulation of HS causes progressive and severe cognitive decline, behavioral problems, speech loss, increasing loss of mobility, and premature death. Current treatments are palliative for the behavioral problems, sleep disturbances, seizures, and other complications, and these treatments do not address the root cause of MPS IIIB or stop disease progression.

26

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

SBC-103, a recombinant form of natural human NAGLU is designed to replace the missing (or deficient) NAGLU enzyme. SBC-103 was granted orphan drug designation by the FDA in April 2013 and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in June 2013. It received Fast Track designation by the FDA in January 2015. In June 2015, the first-in-human trial of patients with MPS IIIB reached its targeted enrollment of nine patients, and the trial is ongoing. In March 2016, researchers presented 24-week results from this study that showed a 26.2 percent mean reduction fin heparan sulfate in cerebrospinal fluid at the highest dose studied (3mg/kg every other week) in a Phase I/II study at six months. Further dose escalation of SBC-103 is now ongoing in this trial.
ALXN 1210
ALXN 1210 is a next-generation complement inhibitor in development for PNH and other indications. Phase I data from the first-in-human single-ascending dose study of ALXN 1210 was published in the journal Blood in December 2015. Results showed that ALXN 1210 was well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and the mean terminal half-life was extended to 32 days, compared to Soliris, which has a terminal half-life of 9 days. Based upon longer terminal half-life and healthy volunteer studies, ALXN 1210 is suitable for longer dosing intervals than Soliris. Enrollment has completed in a multiple-ascending dose study of ALXN 1210 to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of ALXN 1210. Preliminary data in a Phase I/II dose-escalating study showed a rapid reduction of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) following the initial dose. Alexion also has initiated an open-label, multi-dose Phase II study of ALXN 1210 in patients with PNH that is designed to measure change in LDH levels and safety in several dosing cohorts and intervals evaluating monthly and longer dosing intervals.
Manufacturing
We currently rely on internal manufacturing facilities and third party contract manufacturers, including Lonza Group AG and its affiliates (Lonza) to supply clinical and commercial quantities of our commercial products and product candidates. Our internal manufacturing facilities include our Rhode Island manufacturing facility (ARIMF), and facilities in Massachusetts and Georgia. We also utilize third party contract manufacturers for other manufacturing services including purification, product filling, finishing, packaging, and labeling.
We have various agreements with Lonza through 2028, with remaining total non-cancellable commitments of approximately $1,134,661. If we terminate certain supply agreements with Lonza without cause, we will be required to pay for product scheduled for manufacture under our arrangements. Under an existing arrangement with Lonza, we also pay Lonza a royalty on sales of Soliris manufactured at ARIMF and a payment with respect to sales of Soliris manufactured at Lonza facilities. During 2015, we entered into a new supply agreement with Lonza whereby Lonza will construct a new manufacturing facility dedicated to Alexion manufacturing at its existing Portsmouth, New Hampshire facility.
In addition to Lonza, we have non-cancellable commitments of approximately $35,035 through 2019 with other third party manufacturers.
In March 2013, we received a Warning Letter (Warning Letter) from the FDA regarding compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) at ARIMF. The Warning Letter followed receipt of a Form 483 Inspectional Observations by the FDA in connection with an FDA inspection that concluded in August 2012. The observations relate to commercial and clinical manufacture of Soliris at ARIMF. We responded to the Warning Letter in a letter to the FDA dated in April 2013. As previously announced, the FDA issued Form 483s in August 2014 and August 2015 relating to observations at ARIMF. The inspectional observations from the August 2015 letter have since been closed out by the FDA. The observations are inspectional and do not represent a final FDA determination of compliance. We continue to manufacture products, including Soliris, in this facility. While the resolution of the issues raised in the Warning Letter is difficult to predict, we do not currently believe a loss related to this matter is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated.
In April 2014, we purchased a fill/finish facility in Athlone, Ireland.  Following refurbishment of the facility, and after successful completion of the appropriate validation processes and regulatory approvals, the facility will become our first company-owned fill/finish facility for our commercial and clinical products. In November 2015, the construction of office, laboratory and packaging facilities in Dublin, Ireland was completed. In May 2015, we announced plans to construct a new biologics manufacturing facility on our existing property in Dublin, Ireland, which is expected to be completed by 2020.
Critical Accounting Policies and the Use of Estimates
The significant accounting policies and basis of preparation of our consolidated financial statements are described in Note 1, “Business Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

27

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

We believe the judgments, estimates and assumptions associated with the following critical accounting policies have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue recognition;
Contingent liabilities;
Inventories;
Share-based compensation;
Valuation of goodwill, acquired intangible assets and in-process research and development (IPR&D);
Valuation of contingent consideration; and
Income taxes.

For a complete discussion of these critical accounting policies, refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” within “Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included within our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.  We have reviewed our critical accounting policies as disclosed in our Form 10-K, and we have not noted any material changes.

New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a comprehensive new standard which amends revenue recognition principles and provides a single set of criteria for revenue recognition among all industries. The new standard provides a five step framework whereby revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires enhanced disclosures pertaining to revenue recognition in both interim and annual periods. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and allows for adoption using a full retrospective method, or a modified retrospective method. Entities may elect to early adopt the standard for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the method of adoption and the expected impact the new standard has on our financial position and results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued a new standard simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. The new standard aligns the treatment of debt issuance costs with debt discounts and premiums and requires debt issuance costs be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt. We have adopted the provisions of this standard in the first quarter 2016 and reclassified $8,635 of deferred financing costs from other current assets to the current portion of long term debt and $26,714 other non current assets to the long-term debt, less current portion in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015.
In April 2015, the FASB issued a new standard clarifying the accounting for a customer's fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. Under this standard, if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the customer would account for the software license consistent with other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer would account for the arrangement as a service contract. We adopted the provisions of this standard in the first quarter 2016. The adoption did not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new standard requiring that the rights and obligations arising from leases be recognized on the balance sheet by recording a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability. The new standard also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures to understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases as well as significant management estimates utilized. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires a modified retrospective adoption. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard on our financial condition and results of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued a new standard simplifying aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payments, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, statutory withholding requirements, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard on our financial condition and results of operations.

28

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Results of Operations

Net Product Sales

Net product sales by product are as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
% Change
Net product sales:
 
 
 
 
 
Soliris
$
664,655

 
$
600,333

 
11
%
Strensiq
33,242

 

 
N/A

Kanuma
2,528

 

 
N/A

 
$
700,425

 
$
600,333

 
17
%
The components of this increase in revenues are as follows:
Components of change:
 
   Price
(2.0
)%
   Volume
24.0
 %
   Foreign exchange
(5.0
)%
Total change in net product sales
17.0
 %
The increase in net product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to an increase in unit volumes of 24.0%, due to increased demand globally for Soliris therapy for patients with PNH or aHUS during the respective periods and sales of Strensiq during 2016.
Price had a negative impact on net product sales of 2.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 due to increases in estimated rebates.
Foreign exchange had a negative impact of 5.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015. The negative impact on foreign exchange of $30,143 or 5.0%, was due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates (inclusive of hedging activity) versus the U.S. dollar for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The negative impact was primarily due to the weakening of the Euro, Japanese Yen and Russian Ruble. Offsetting the impact of the stronger dollar, we recorded a gain in revenue of $22,812 and $29,082 related to our foreign currency cash flow hedging program for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We expect the strong dollar compared to other currencies to continue to have a negative impact on revenue into 2016 compared to 2015.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes manufacturing costs as well as actual and estimated royalty expenses associated with sales of Soliris.
The following table summarizes cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
Variance
Cost of sales
$
58,986

 
$
69,399

 
$
(10,413
)
Cost of sales as a percentage of net product sales
8.4
%
 
11.6
%
 
(3.2
)%
We recorded an expense of $24,352 in the first quarter of 2015 associated with a portion of a single manufacturing campaign at a third party manufacturer for Strensiq. The costs are comprised of raw materials, internal overhead and external production costs. This expense did not impact the clinical supply of inventory or the commercial launch of Strensiq.
Exclusive of the items mentioned above, cost of sales as a percentage of net product sales were 8.4% and 7.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
Research and Development Expense
Our research and development expense includes personnel, facility and external costs associated with the research and development of our product candidates, as well as product development costs. We group our research and development expenses into two major categories: external direct expenses and all other research and development (R&D) expenses.

29

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

External direct expenses are comprised of costs paid to outside parties for clinical development, product development and discovery research, as well as costs associated with strategic licensing agreements we have entered into with third parties. Clinical development costs are comprised of costs to conduct and manage clinical trials related to eculizumab and other product candidates. Product development costs are those incurred in performing duties related to manufacturing development and regulatory functions, including manufacturing of material for clinical and research activities. Discovery research costs are incurred in conducting laboratory studies and performing preclinical research for other uses of our products and other product candidates. Licensing agreement costs include upfront and milestone payments made in connection with strategic licensing arrangements we have entered into with third parties. Clinical development costs have been accumulated and allocated to each of our programs, while product development and discovery research costs have not been allocated.
All other R&D expenses consist of costs to compensate personnel, to maintain our facilities, equipment and overhead and similar costs of our research and development efforts. These costs relate to efforts on our clinical and preclinical products, our product development and our discovery research efforts. These costs have not been allocated directly to each program.
The following table provides information regarding research and development expenses: 
 
Three months ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
$
 
2016
 
2015
 
Variance
Clinical development
$
49,858

 
$
30,947

 
$
18,911

Product development
29,981

 
19,540

 
10,441

Licensing agreements
3,050

 
112,500

 
(109,450
)
Discovery research
12,867

 
6,044

 
6,823

Total external direct expenses
95,756

 
169,031

 
(73,275
)
Payroll and benefits
71,356

 
44,338

 
27,018

Facilities and other costs
9,178

 
7,711

 
1,467

Total other R&D expenses
80,534

 
52,049

 
28,485

Research and development expense
$
176,290

 
$
221,080

 
$
(44,790
)

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the decrease of $44,790 in research and development expense, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily related to the following:
Decrease of $109,450 in licensing agreement expenses primarily related to upfront payments made in the first quarter 2015.
Partially offset by the following:
Increase of $18,911 in external clinical development expenses related primarily to an expansion of clinical studies for eculizumab, sebelipase alfa, ALXN 1210, and other programs (see table below).
Increase of $10,441 in external product development expenses related primarily to an increase in costs associated with the manufacturing of material for increased clinical research activities and clinical studies as compared to the first quarter of 2015.
Increase of $6,823 in discovery research expenses primarily related to increases in external research expenses associated with our license agreements.
Increase of $27,018 in payroll and benefits expense primarily related to the additional headcount acquired as part of the Synageva acquisition in the second quarter 2015 and the continued global expansion of staff supporting our increasing number of clinical and development programs.

30

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

The following table summarizes external direct expenses related to our clinical development programs. Please refer to "Clinical Development Programs" above for a description of each of these programs:
 
Three months ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
$
 
2016
 
2015
 
Variance
External direct expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Eculizumab
$
22,239

 
$
18,024

 
$
4,215

Asfotase alfa
4,927

 
4,851

 
76

cPMP
2,117

 
1,697

 
420

ALXN 1007
2,598

 
2,033

 
565

Sebelipase alfa
4,906

 

 
4,906

ALXN 1210
4,329

 
597

 
3,732

SBC-103
1,223

 

 
1,223

Other programs
2,966

 
606

 
2,360

Unallocated
4,553

 
3,139

 
1,414

 
$
49,858

 
$
30,947

 
$
18,911

The successful development of our drug candidates is uncertain and subject to a number of risks. We cannot guarantee that results of clinical trials will be favorable or sufficient to support regulatory approvals for our other programs. We could decide to abandon development or be required to spend considerable resources not otherwise contemplated. For additional discussion regarding the risks and uncertainties regarding our development programs, please refer to Item 1A "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-Q.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Our selling, general and administrative expense includes commercial and administrative personnel, corporate facility and external costs required to support the marketing and sales of our commercialized products. These selling, general and administrative costs include: corporate facility operating expenses and depreciation; marketing and sales operations in support of our products; human resources; finance, legal, information technology and support personnel expenses; and other corporate costs such as telecommunications, insurance, audit, government affairs and our global corporate compliance program.
The table below provides information regarding selling, general and administrative expense:
 
Three months ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
$
 
2016
 
2015
 
Variance
Salary, benefits and other labor expense
$
148,170

 
$
124,103

 
$
24,067

External selling, general and administrative expense
84,391

 
63,013

 
21,378

Total selling, general and administrative expense
$
232,561

 
$
187,116

 
$
45,445

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the increase of $45,445 in selling, general and administrative expense, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was related to the following:
Increase in salary, benefits and other labor expenses of $24,067. The increase was a result of increased staff costs related to commercial development activities and increases in payroll and benefits within our general and administrative functions to support our infrastructure growth as a global commercial entity. The increase was also attributable to additional global commercial and general and administrative staff costs due to our acquisition of Synageva in the second quarter 2015.
Increase in external selling, general and administrative expenses of $21,378. The increase was primarily due to an increase in external marketing costs to support the global launches of Strensiq and Kanuma and additional facilities costs as a result of continuing growth of operations worldwide.
Amortization of Purchase Intangible Assets
For the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded amortization expense of $80,094 primarily associated with intangible assets related to Strensiq and Kanuma, for which we received regulatory approval in the third quarter 2015.

31

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Acquisition-related Costs
For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, acquisition-related costs associated with our business combinations included the following:
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Transaction costs (1)
$
375

 
$

Integration costs
964

 

 
$
1,339

 
$

 
 
 
 
(1) Transaction costs include investment advisory, legal, and accounting fees
 
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration
For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the change in fair value of contingent consideration expense associated with our prior business combinations was $(14,800) and $11,979, respectively. The decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared the prior year was primarily due to decreases in the likelihood of payments for contingent consideration.
Restructuring Expenses
In connection with the acquisition and integration of Synageva in 2015 we recorded a benefit of $924 primarily related to changes in estimates for employee costs during the three months ended March 31, 2016. We expect to pay all remaining accrued amounts related to this restructuring activity by the end of 2016.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, we announced plans to relocate our European headquarters from Lausanne, Switzerland to Zurich, Switzerland. The relocation of our European headquarters supports our operational needs based on growth in the European region. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 we incurred additional restructuring costs of $1,646. We expect to pay all accrued amounts related to this restructuring activity in 2016.
Other Income and Expense
The following table provides information regarding other income and expense:
 
Three months ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
$
 
2016
 
2015
 
Variance
Investment income
$
1,551

 
$
2,884

 
$
(1,333
)
Interest expense
(23,890
)
 
(651
)
 
(23,239
)
Foreign currency gain
91

 
1,005

 
(914
)
Total other income and expense
$
(22,248
)
 
$
3,238

 
$
(25,486
)
The increase in interest expense the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the prior year was due to us borrowing $3,500,000 under a term loan facility in connection with the acquisition of Synageva in the second quarter of 2015.
Income Taxes
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded an income tax provision of $51,432 and an effective tax rate of 35.8%, compared to an income tax provision of $15,622 and an effective tax rate of 14.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
The tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 is attributable to the U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes on our profitable operations. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily attributable to the deferred tax cost associated with the distribution of earnings from our captive foreign partnership.
We continue to maintain a valuation allowance against certain other deferred tax assets where the realization is not certain. We periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and reduce the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized.

32

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes the components of our financial condition as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
$
Variance
Cash and cash equivalents
$
710,198

 
$
1,010,111

 
$
(299,913
)
Marketable securities
$
317,354

 
$
374,904

 
$
(57,550
)
Long-term debt (includes current portion)
$
3,281,250

 
$
3,456,250

 
$
(175,000
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets
$
2,127,509

 
$
2,416,714

 
$
(289,205
)
Current liabilities
603,613

 
709,615

 
(106,002
)
Working capital
$
1,523,896

 
$
1,707,099

 
$
(183,203
)
 
The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily attributable to cash utilized to repurchase shares, principal payments on our term loan, purchases of property, plant, and equipment, and purchases of available for sale securities. Offsetting these decreases in cash were cash generated through operations and proceeds from the maturity or sale of available for sale securities.
We expect continued growth in our expenditures, particularly those related to research and product development, clinical trials, regulatory approvals, international expansion, commercialization of products and capital investment. However, we anticipate that cash generated from operations and our existing available cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities should provide us adequate resources to fund our operations as currently planned.
We have financed our operations and capital expenditures primarily through positive cash flows from operations. We expect to continue to be able to fund our operations, including principal and interest payments on our credit facility and contingent payments from our acquisitions principally through our cash flows from operations. We may, from time to time, also seek additional funding through a combination of equity or debt financings or from other sources, if necessary for future acquisitions or other strategic purposes.
Financial Instruments
Until required for use in the business, we may invest our cash reserves in money market funds, bank deposits, and high-quality marketable securities in accordance with our investment policy. The stated objectives of our investment policy is to preserve capital, provide liquidity consistent with forecasted cash flow requirements, maintain appropriate diversification and generate returns relative to these investment objectives and prevailing market conditions.
Financial instruments that potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk are cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable and our foreign exchange derivative contracts. At March 31, 2016, three customers accounted for an aggregate of 44% of the accounts receivable balance, with these individual customers ranging from 12% to 19% of the accounts receivable balance. At December 31, 2015, three customers accounted for an aggregate of 51% of the accounts receivable balance, with these individual customers ranging from 14% to 22% of the accounts receivable balance. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, three customers accounted for an aggregate of 39% of our product sales, with these individual customers ranging from 11% to 16% of our product sales. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, three customers accounted for an aggregate of 39% of our product sales, with these individual customers ranging from 10% to 18% of our product sales.
We continue to monitor economic conditions, including volatility associated with international economies and the associated impacts on the financial markets and our business. A substantial portion of our accounts receivable due from these countries are due from or backed by sovereign or local governments, and the amount of non-sovereign accounts receivable is not material. Although collection of our accounts receivables from certain countries may extend beyond our standard credit terms, we do not expect any such delays to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
We manage our foreign currency transaction risk within specified guidelines through the use of derivatives. All of our derivative instruments are utilized for risk management purposes, and we do not use derivatives for speculative trading purposes. As of March 31, 2016, we have foreign exchange forward contracts with notional amounts totaling $2,396,537. These outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts had a net fair value of $30,793, of which an unrealized gain of $93,589 is included in other assets, offset by an unrealized loss of $62,796 included in other liabilities. The counterparties to these foreign exchange forward contracts are large domestic and multinational commercial banks, and we believe the risk of nonperformance is not material.
At March 31, 2016, our financial assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value. We have classified our financial assets and liabilities as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets

33

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

for identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1 assets consist of mutual fund investments. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, but substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Our Level 2 assets consist primarily of institutional money market funds, commercial paper, municipal bonds, U.S. and foreign government-related debt, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit and foreign exchange forward contracts. Our Level 2 liabilities consist also of foreign exchange forward contracts. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. Our Level 3 liabilities consist of contingent consideration related to acquisitions.
Business Combinations and Contingent Consideration Obligations
 The purchase agreements for our business combinations include contingent payments totaling up to $826,000 that will become payable if and when certain development and commercial milestones are achieved.  Of these milestone amounts, $511,000 and $315,000 of the contingent payments relate to development and commercial milestones, respectively. We do not expect these amounts to have an impact on our liquidity in the near-term, and, during the next 12 months, we expect to make milestone payments of approximately $60,000, associated with our prior business combination. As additional future payments become probable, we will evaluate methods of funding payments, which could be made from available cash and marketable securities, cash generated from operations or proceeds from other financing.
Financing Lease Obligation
In November 2012, we entered into a lease agreement for office and laboratory space to be constructed in New Haven, Connecticut. Although we do not legally own the premises, we were deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period based on applicable accounting guidance for build-to-suit leases due to our involvement during the construction period. Accordingly, the landlord's costs of constructing the facility were required to be capitalized, as a non-cash transaction, offset by a corresponding facility lease obligation in our consolidated balance sheet. Construction of the new facility was completed and the building was placed into service in the first quarter 2016. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our facility lease obligation related to this facility was $134,211 and $132,866, respectively.
During the third quarter 2015, we entered into a new agreement with Lonza whereby Lonza will construct a new manufacturing facility dedicated to Alexion at its existing Portsmouth, New Hampshire facility. As a result of our contractual right to full capacity of the new manufacturing facility, a portion of the payments under the agreement are considered to be lease payments and a portion as payment for the supply of inventory. Although we will not legally own the premises, we are deemed to be the owner of the manufacturing facility during the construction period based on applicable accounting guidance for build-to-suit leases due to our involvement during the construction period. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we recorded a construction-in-process asset of $42,652 and $19,259 and an offsetting facility lease obligation of $35,632 and $15,229 associated with the manufacturing facility, respectively.
License Agreements
Our license agreements include contingent payments that will become payable if and when certain development, regulatory and commercial milestones are achieved. We do not expect the payments associated with these milestones to have a significant impact on our liquidity in the near-term. During the next 12 months, we expect to make milestone payments related to our license agreements of approximately $60,000.
Long-term Debt
On June 22, 2015, Alexion entered into a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks, which provides for a $3,500,000 term loan facility and a $500,000 revolving facility. Borrowings under the term loan facility are payable in quarterly installments equal to 1.25% of the original loan amount, beginning December 31, 2015. Final repayment of the term loan and any draw down of revolving credit loans are due on June 22, 2020. In addition to borrowings in which prior notice is required, the revolving credit facility includes a sublimit of $100,000 in the form of letters of credit and borrowings on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans, of up to $25,000. Borrowings can be used for working capital requirements, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes.
In connection with the acquisition of Synageva in June 2015, we borrowed $3,500,000 under the term loan facility and $200,000 under the revolving facility, and we used our available cash for the remaining cash consideration. In June 2015, we repaid the revolving facility in full. As of March 31, 2016, we had $3,281,250 outstanding on the term loan. As of March 31, 2016, we had open letters of credit of $12,970, and our borrowing availability under the revolving facility was $487,030.  
Manufacturing Obligations
We have supply agreements with Lonza through 2028 relating to the manufacture of Soliris and Strensiq, which requires payments to Lonza at the inception of contract and upon the initiation and completion of product manufactured. On an ongoing

34

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

basis, we evaluate our plans for future levels of manufacturing by Lonza, which depends upon our commercial requirements, the progress of our clinical development programs and the production levels of ARIMF.
We have various agreements with Lonza, with remaining total non-cancellable commitments of approximately $1,134,661 through 2028. Certain commitments may be canceled only in limited circumstances. If we terminate certain supply agreements with Lonza without cause, we will be required to pay for product scheduled for manufacture under our arrangement. Under an existing arrangement with Lonza, we also pay Lonza a royalty on sales of Soliris manufactured at ARIMF and a payment with respect to sales of Soliris manufactured at Lonza facilities.
In addition to Lonza, we have non-cancellable commitments of approximately $35,035 through 2019 with other third party manufacturers.
Taxes
We do not record U.S. tax expense on the undistributed earnings of our controlled foreign corporation (CFC) subsidiaries. These earnings relate to ongoing operations and were approximately $1,012,000 at December 31, 2015. We intend to reinvest these earnings permanently outside the U.S. or repatriate the earnings only when it is tax efficient to do so. Accordingly, we believe that U.S. tax on any earnings that might be repatriated would be substantially offset by realizing the benefit of tax attributes, such as U.S. foreign tax credits or by utilizing deficits in the foreign earnings and profits account.
We do not have any present or anticipated future need for cash held by our CFCs, as cash generated in the U.S., as well as borrowings, are expected to be sufficient to meet U.S. liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. At March 31, 2016, approximately $445,000 of our cash and cash equivalents was held by foreign subsidiaries, a significant portion of which is required for liquidity needs of our foreign subsidiaries. These subsidiaries will settle any outstanding trade payables prior to having excess cash available which could be repatriated to our entities in the United States. While we intend to reinvest CFC earnings permanently outside the U.S. or repatriate the earnings only when it is tax efficient to do so, certain unforeseen future events could impact our permanent reinvestment assertion. Such events include acquisitions, corporate restructurings or tax law changes not currently contemplated.
Common Stock Repurchase Program
In November 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program. In May 2015, our Board of Directors increased the authorization to acquire shares with an aggregate value of up to 1,000,000 for future purchases under the repurchase program, which superseded all prior repurchase programs. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date, and we are not obligated to acquire a particular number of shares. The repurchase program may be discontinued at any time at the Company's discretion. We expect that cash generated from operations and our existing available cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund any share repurchases.
Under the program, we repurchased 2,083 and 334 shares of our common stock at a cost of $296,515 and $60,026 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of March 31, 2016, there is a total of $459,349 remaining for repurchases under the program.
Subsequent to March 31, 2016, we repurchased 245 shares of our common stock under our repurchase program at a cost of $34,136. As of April 29, 2016, there is a total of $425,213 remaining for repurchases under the repurchase program.
Cash Flows
The following summarizes our net change in cash and cash equivalents:
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
Variance
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
167,984

 
$
23,034

 
$
144,950

Net cash used in investing activities
(5,665
)
 
(48,423
)
 
42,758

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(466,257
)
 
5,074

 
(471,331
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
4,025

 
(6,870
)
 
10,895

Net change in cash and cash equivalents
$
(299,913
)
 
$
(27,185
)
 
$
(272,728
)

Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $167,984 compared to $23,034 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in gross margin on product sales of $111,118 resulting primarily from an increase in global demand for Soliris and a decrease in cash outflows related to our

35

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

licensing arrangements of $109,450, offset by an increase in clinical development costs and selling, general and administrative expenses during 2016.
We expect increases in cash flow from operations which will be highly dependent on sales levels, and the related cash collections from sales of our products. We also expect additional cash outflows of approximately $60,000 over the next 12 months related to milestone payments on our license agreements.
Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $5,665 compared to $48,423 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease in cash used was primarily due to the following:
Proceeds from the maturity or sale of available-for-sale marketable securities of $269,495 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to $176,256 for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Partially offset by the following:
Purchases of available-for-sale marketable securities of $207,996 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to $166,319 for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Purchases of property, plant and equipment of $64,204 during the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to $57,075 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 due to increased capital spending associated with the construction of our New Haven headquarters and our manufacturing facility in Ireland.
We expect to continue to have significant spending on property, plant and equipment during 2016 related to the construction of our new biologics manufacturing facility in Ireland.
Financing Activities
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $(466,257) compared to $5,074 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to the following:
Principal payments of $175,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 related to our credit facility.
Repurchases of common stock of $296,515 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to $60,026 for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Partially offset by the following:
Change in excess tax benefits from stock options attributable to the utilization of the excess tax benefit portion of federal and state net operating losses and tax credits of $5,917 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to $52,521 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, due to the utilization of the Synageva federal non-excess tax benefit net operating loss carryforwards during the first quarter 2016.
Proceeds from the issuance of stock for share-based compensation arrangements of $3,433 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to $24,882 for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Contractual Obligations
The disclosure of payments we have committed to make under our contractual obligations are summarized in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, in the section titled “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Contractual Obligations.”

Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
(amounts in thousands, except percentages)
Interest Rate Risk
As of March 31, 2016, we invested our cash in a variety of financial instruments, principally money market funds, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, commercial paper and government-related obligations. Most of our interest-bearing securities are subject to interest rate risk and could decline in value if interest rates fluctuate. Our investment portfolio is comprised of marketable securities of highly rated financial institutions and investment-grade debt instruments, and we have guidelines to limit the term to maturity of our investments. Based on the type of securities we hold, we do not believe a change in interest rates would have a material impact on our financial statements. If interest rates were to increase or decrease by 1%, the fair value of our investment portfolio would (decrease) increase by approximately $(4,531) and $4,103, respectively.

36


In June 2015, we entered into the Credit Agreement with interest at a rate per annum equal to either a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin. The applicable margins on base rate loans range from 0.25% to 1.00% and the applicable margins on Eurodollar loans range from 1.25% to 2.00%, in each case depending upon our consolidated net leverage ratio (as calculated in accordance with the Credit Agreement). Changes in interest rates related to the Credit Agreement could have a material effect on our financial statements. As of March 31, 2016, we had approximately $3,281,250 of variable rate debt outstanding. If interest rates were to increase or decrease by 1% for the year, annual interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $32,813.
Foreign Exchange Market Risk
Our operations include activities in many countries outside the United States, including countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific.  As a result, our financial results are impacted by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets where we operate.  We have exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates, the most significant of which are the Euro and Japanese Yen, against the U.S. dollar.  We are a net receiver of many foreign currencies, and our consolidated financial results benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely impacted by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies in which we sell our product. 
Our monetary exposures on our balance sheet arise primarily from cash, accounts receivable, intercompany receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies.  Approximately 52% of our product sales were denominated in foreign currencies during the three months ended March 31, 2016, and our revenues are also exposed to fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rates over time.  In certain foreign countries, we may sell in U.S. dollar, but our customers may be impacted adversely in fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates which may also impact the timing and amount of our revenue.
Both positive and negative impacts to our international product sales from movements in foreign currency exchange rates are only partially mitigated by the natural, opposite impact that foreign currency exchange rates have on our international operating expenses.  Additionally, we have operations based in Switzerland and Ireland, and accordingly, our expenses are impacted by fluctuations in the value of the Swiss Franc and Euro against the U.S. dollar.
We currently have a derivative program in place to achieve the following: 1) limit the foreign currency exposure of our monetary assets and liabilities on our balance sheet, using contracts with durations of up to 90 days and 2) hedge a portion of our forecasted product sales (in some currencies), including intercompany sales, using contracts with durations of up to 60 months. The objectives of this program are to reduce the volatility of our operating results due to fluctuation of foreign exchange and to increase the visibility of the foreign exchange impact on forecasted revenues. This program utilizes foreign exchange forward contracts intended to reduce, not eliminate, the volatility of operating results due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we held foreign exchange forward contracts with notional amounts totaling $2,396,537 and $2,535,490, respectively. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts had a net fair value of $30,793 and $147,633, respectively. The decrease in the net fair value of outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts is primarily due to the decrease in strength of the U.S. dollar as of March 31, 2016 as compared to December 31, 2015.
We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes. The counterparties to these foreign exchange forward contracts are large domestic and multinational commercial banks. We believe the risk of counterparty nonperformance is not material.
Based on our foreign currency exchange rate exposures at March 31, 2016, a hypothetical 10% adverse fluctuation in exchange rates would decrease the fair value of our foreign exchange forward contracts that are designated as cash flow hedges by approximately $206,485 at March 31, 2016. The resulting loss on these forward contracts would be offset by the gain on the underlying transactions and therefore would have minimal impact on future anticipated earnings and cash flows. Similarly, adverse fluctuations in exchange rates that would decrease the fair value of our foreign exchange forward contracts that are not designated as hedge instruments would be offset by a positive impact of the underlying monetary assets and liabilities.
Credit Risk
As a result of our foreign operations, we are exposed to changes in the general economic conditions in the countries in which we conduct business. A substantial portion of our accounts receivable due from these countries are due from or backed by sovereign or local governments, and the amount of non-sovereign accounts receivable is not material. We continue to monitor economic conditions, including volatility associated with international economies and the associated impacts on the financial markets and our business. Although collection of our accounts receivables from certain countries may extend beyond our credit terms, we do not expect any such delays to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.


37


Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2016. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In May 2015, we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the Enforcement Division of the SEC requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the FCPA in various countries. In addition, in October 2015, Alexion received a request from the DOJ for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to Alexion's compliance with the FCPA. The SEC and DOJ also seek information related to Alexion’s recalls of specific lots of Soliris and related securities disclosures. Alexion is cooperating with these investigations. At this time, Alexion is unable to predict the duration, scope or outcome of these investigations. Given the ongoing nature of these investigations, management does not currently believe a loss related to these matters is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated.

Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
(amounts in thousands, except percentages)
You should carefully consider the following risk factors before you decide to invest in Alexion and our business because these risk factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Products
We depend heavily on the success of our lead product, Soliris. If we are unable to increase sales of Soliris, or sales of Soliris are adversely affected, our business may be materially harmed.
Currently, our ability to generate revenues depends primarily on the commercial success of Soliris and whether physicians, patients and health care payers view Soliris as therapeutically effective and safe relative to cost. Since we launched Soliris in the United States in 2007, substantially all of our revenue has been attributed to sales of Soliris. In 2015, we received marketing approval in the United States, the European Union and Japan, of our second marketed product, Strensiq, for the treatment of HPP. We also received marketing approval in 2015 in the United States and the European Union for our third product, Kanuma, for the treatment of LAL-D. However, we anticipate that Soliris product sales will continue to contribute a significant percentage of our total revenue over the next several years.
The commercial success of Soliris and our ability to generate and increase revenues depends on several factors, as discussed in greater detail below, including safety and efficacy of Soliris, coverage or reimbursement by government or third-party payers, pricing, manufacturing and uninterrupted supply, the introduction of and success of competing products, the size of patient populations and the number of patients diagnosed who may be treated with Soliris, adverse legal, administrative, regulatory or legislative developments, and our ability to develop, register and commercialize Soliris for new indications.
If we are not able to increase revenues from sales of Soliris, or our revenues do not grow as anticipated, our results of operations and stock price could be adversely affected.
Our future commercial success depends on gaining regulatory approval for new products and obtaining approvals for existing products for new indications.
Our long-term success and revenue growth will depend upon the successful development of new products and technologies from our research and development activities, including those licensed or acquired from third parties and approval of additional indications for our existing products. Product development is very expensive and involves a high degree of risk. Only a small number of research and development programs result in the commercialization of a product. The process for obtaining regulatory approval to market a biologic is expensive, often takes many years, and can vary substantially based on the type, complexity, and novelty of the product candidates involved. Our ability to grow revenues would be adversely affected if we are delayed or unable to successfully develop the products in our pipeline, including Soliris for additional indications, obtain marketing approval for Strensiq and Kanuma in additional territories or acquire or license products and technologies from third parties.
We dedicate significant resources to the worldwide development, manufacture and commercialization of our products. We cannot guarantee that any marketing application for our product candidates will be approved or maintained in any country where we seek marketing authorization. If we do not obtain regulatory approval of new products or additional indications for existing products, or are significantly delayed or limited in doing so, our revenue growth will be adversely affected, we may experience surplus inventory, our business may be materially harmed and we may need to significantly curtail operations.

39



Sales of our products depend on reimbursement by government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. If we are unable to obtain, or maintain at anticipated levels, reimbursement for our products, or coverage is reduced, our pricing may be affected or our product sales, results of operations or financial condition could be harmed.
We may not be able to sell our products on a profitable basis or our profitability may be reduced if we are required to sell our products at lower than anticipated prices or reimbursement is unavailable or limited in scope or amount. Our products are significantly more expensive than traditional drug treatments and almost all patients require some form of third party coverage to afford their cost. We depend, to a significant extent, on governmental payers, such as Medicare and Medicaid in the United States or country specific governmental organizations in foreign countries, and private third-party payers to defray the cost of our products to patients. These entities may refuse to provide coverage and reimbursement, determine to provide a lower level of coverage and reimbursement than anticipated, or reduce previously approved levels of coverage and reimbursement, including in the form of higher mandatory rebates or modified pricing terms.
 In certain countries where we sell or are seeking or may seek to commercialize our products, pricing, coverage and level of reimbursement of prescription drugs are subject to governmental control. We may be unable to timely or successfully negotiate coverage, pricing, and reimbursement on terms that are favorable to us, or such coverage, pricing, and reimbursement may differ in separate regions in the same country. In some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country, which may include a combination of distinct potential payers, including private insurance and governmental payers and a HTA assessment of medicinal products for pricing and reimbursement methodologies. Therefore, we may not successfully conclude the necessary processes and commercialize our products in every, or even most countries in which we seek to sell our products.
A significant reduction in the amount of reimbursement or pricing for our products in one or more countries may reduce our profitability and adversely affect our financial condition. Certain countries establish pricing and reimbursement amounts by reference to the price of the same or similar products in other countries. If coverage or the level of reimbursement is limited in one or more countries, we may be unable to obtain or maintain anticipated pricing or reimbursement in current or new territories. In the United States, the European Union member states, and elsewhere, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, efforts to control and reduce health care costs. In the U.S. for example, the price of drugs has come under intense scrutiny by the U.S. Congress. Third party payers decide which drugs they will pay for and establish reimbursement and co-payment levels. Government and other third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged for health care products, examining the cost effectiveness of drugs in addition to their safety and efficacy, and limiting or attempting to limit both coverage and the level of reimbursement for prescription drugs. See additional discussion below under the headings "Changes in healthcare law and implementing regulations, including those based on recently enacted legislation, as well as changes in healthcare policy and government initiatives that affect coverage and reimbursement of drug products may impact our business in ways that we cannot currently predict and these changes could adversely affect our business and financial condition" and "The credit and financial market conditions may aggravate certain risks affecting our business."
The potential increase in the number of patients receiving Soliris may cause third-party payers to modify or limit coverage or reimbursement for Soliris for the treatment of PNH, aHUS, or both indications. To the extent we are successful in developing Soliris for indications other than PNH and aHUS, the potential increase in the number of patients receiving Soliris may cause third-party payers to refuse coverage or reimbursement for Soliris for the treatment of PNH, aHUS or for any other approved indication, or provide a lower level of coverage or reimbursement than anticipated or currently in effect.
Health insurance programs may restrict coverage of some products by using payer formularies under which only selected drugs are covered, variable co-payments that make drugs that are not preferred by the payer more expensive for patients, and by using utilization management controls, such as requirements for prior authorization or failure on another type of treatment. Payers may especially impose these obstacles to coverage for higher-priced drugs, and consequently our products may be subject to payer-driven restrictions. Additionally, U.S. payers are increasingly considering new metrics as the basis for reimbursement rates.
In countries where patients have access to insurance, their insurance co-payment amounts or other benefit limits may represent a barrier to obtaining or continuing Soliris. We have financially supported non-profit organizations that assist patients in accessing treatment for PNH and aHUS, including Soliris. Such organizations assist patients whose insurance coverage imposes prohibitive co-payment amounts or other expensive financial obligations. Such organizations' ability to provide assistance to patients is dependent on funding from external sources, and we cannot guarantee that such funding will be provided at adequate levels, if at all. We have also provided our products without charge to patients who have no insurance coverage for drugs through related charitable purposes. We are not able to predict the financial impact of the support we may provide for these and other charitable purposes; however, substantial support could have a material adverse effect on our profitability in the future.

40


Our commercial success depends on obtaining and maintaining reimbursement at anticipated levels reimbursement for our products. It may be difficult to project the impact of evolving reimbursement mechanics on the willingness of payers to cover our products. If we are unable to obtain or maintain coverage, or coverage is reduced in one or more countries, our pricing may be affected or our product sales, results of operations or financial condition could be harmed.
We may not be able to maintain market acceptance of our products among the medical community or patients, or gain market acceptance of our products in the future, which could prevent us from maintaining profitability or growth.
We cannot be certain that our products will maintain market acceptance in a particular country among physicians, patients, health care payers, and others. Although we have received regulatory approval of our products in certain territories, such approvals do not guarantee future revenue. We cannot predict whether physicians, other health care providers, government agencies or private insurers will determine or continue to accept that our products are safe and therapeutically effective relative to its cost. Physicians' willingness to prescribe, and patients' willingness to accept, our products, depends on many factors, including prevalence and severity of adverse side effects in both clinical trials and commercial use, the timing of the market introduction of competitive drugs, lower demonstrated clinical safety and efficacy compared to other drugs, perceived lack of cost-effectiveness, pricing and lack of availability of reimbursement from third-party payers, convenience and ease of administration, effectiveness of our marketing strategy, publicity concerning the product, our other product candidates and availability of alternative treatments, including bone marrow transplant as an alternative treatment for PNH. The likelihood of physicians to prescribe Soliris for patients with aHUS may also depend on how quickly Soliris can be delivered to the hospital or clinic and our distribution methods may not be sufficient to satisfy this need. In addition, we are aware that medical doctors have determined not to continue Soliris treatment for some patients with aHUS.
If our products fail to achieve or maintain market acceptance among the medical community or patients in a particular country, we may not be able to market and sell our products successfully in such country, which would limit our ability to generate revenue and could harm our overall business.
Manufacturing issues at our facilities or the facilities of our third party service providers could cause product shortages, stop or delay commercialization of our products, disrupt or delay our clinical trials or regulatory approvals, and adversely affect our business.
The manufacture of our products and our product candidates is highly regulated, complex and difficult, requiring a multi-step controlled process and even minor problems or deviations could result in defects or failures. We have limited experience manufacturing commercial quantities of Strensiq and Kanuma. Only a small number of companies have the ability and capacity to manufacture our products for our development and commercialization needs. Due to the highly technical requirements of manufacturing our products and the strict quality and control specifications, we and our third party providers may be unable to manufacture or supply our products despite our and their efforts. Failure to produce sufficient quantities of our products and product candidates could result in lost revenue, diminish our profitability, delay the development of our product candidates, or result in supply shortages for our patients, which may lead to lawsuits or could accelerate introduction of competing products to the market.
The manufacture of our products and product candidates is at high risk of product loss due to contamination, equipment malfunctions, human error, or raw material shortages. Deviations from established manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields, product defects and other supply disruptions. If microbial, viral or other contaminations are discovered in our products or manufacturing facilities, we may need to close our manufacturing facilities for an extended period of time to investigate and remediate the contaminant. The occurrence of any such event could adversely affect our ability to satisfy demand for any of our products, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
Many additional factors could cause production interruptions at our facilities or at the facilities of our third party providers, including natural disasters, labor disputes, acts of terrorism or war. The occurrence of any such event could adversely affect our ability to satisfy demand for Soliris, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
We expect that the demand for Soliris will increase. We may underestimate demand for Soliris or any of our products, or experience product interruptions at Alexion's internal manufacturing facilities or a facility of a third party provider, including as a result of risks and uncertainties described in this report.
We and our third party providers are required to maintain compliance with cGMP and other stringent requirements and are subject to inspections by the FDA and comparable agencies in other jurisdictions to confirm such compliance. Any delay, interruption or other issues that arise in the manufacture, fill-finish, packaging, or storage of our products as a result of a failure of our facilities or the facilities or operations of third parties to pass any regulatory agency inspection could significantly impair our ability to supply our products and product candidates. Significant noncompliance could also result in the imposition of monetary penalties or other civil or criminal sanctions and damage our reputation.
We rely on one to two facilities to manufacture each of our products. We are authorized to sell Soliris that is manufactured by Lonza and at ARIMF in the United States, the European Union, Japan and certain other territories. However,

41


manufacturing Soliris for commercial sale in certain other territories may only be performed at a single facility until such time as we have received the required regulatory approval for an additional facility, if ever. We will continue to depend entirely on one facility to manufacture Soliris for commercial sale in such other territories until that time. We also depend entirely on one facility to manufacture Strensiq and on one facility for the purification of Kanuma for commercial sale. Regarding Kanuma, we rely on two animal facilities to produce the starting material, and a single manufacturing facility to manufacture the drug product.
We depend on a very limited number of third party providers for supply chain services with respect to our clinical and commercial product requirements, including product filling, finishing, packaging, and labeling. Our third party providers operate as independent entities and we do not have control over any third party provider's compliance with our internal or external specifications or the rules and regulations of regulatory agencies, including the FDA, competent authorities of the EU member states, or any other applicable regulations or standards.
Any difficulties or delays in our third party manufacturing, or any failure of our third party providers to comply with our internal and external specifications or any applicable rules, regulations and standards could increase our costs, constrain our ability to satisfy demand for our products from customers, cause us to lose revenue or incur penalties for failure to deliver product, make us postpone or cancel clinical trials, or cause our products to be recalled or withdrawn, such as the voluntary recalls that we initiated in 2013 and 2014 due to the presence of visible particles in a limited number of vials in specific lots. Even if we are able to find alternatives they may ultimately be insufficient for our needs. No guarantee can be made that regulators will approve additional third party providers in a timely manner or at all, or that any third party providers will be able to perform services for sufficient product volumes for any country or territory. Further, due to the nature of the current market for third-party commercial manufacturing, many arrangements require substantial penalty payments by the customer for failure to use the manufacturing capacity for which it contracted. Penalty payments under these agreements typically decrease over the life of the agreement, and may be substantial initially and de minimis or non-existent in the final period. The payment of a substantial penalty could harm our financial condition.
It can take longer than five years to build and validate a new manufacturing facility and it can take longer than three years to qualify and validate a new contract manufacturer. We are currently completing the build-out of a fill-finish facility in Ireland to support global distribution of Soliris and Alexion's other clinical and commercial products. To date, we have relied entirely on third party fill-finish providers and have never operated our own fill-finish facility. We also completed construction of a new facility in Dublin, Ireland in the fourth quarter of 2015, which is comprised of laboratories, packaging and warehousing operations and we intend to make significant further investment in this facility for the manufacture our products. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully and timely complete the appropriate validation processes or obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, or that we will be able to perform the intended supply chain services at either of these facilities for commercial or clinical use.
Certain of the raw materials required in the manufacture and the formulation of our products are derived from biological sources. Such raw materials are difficult to procure and may be subject to contamination or recall. Access to and supply of sufficient quantities of raw materials which meet the technical specifications for the production process is challenging, and often limited to single-source suppliers. Finding an alternative supplier could take a significant amount of time and involve significant expense due to the nature of the products and the need to obtain regulatory approvals. The failure of these single-source suppliers to supply adequate quantities of raw materials for the production process in a timely manner may impact our ability to produce sufficient quantities of our products for clinical or commercial requirements. A material shortage, contamination, recall, or restriction on the use of certain biologically derived substances or any raw material used in the manufacture of our products could adversely impact or disrupt manufacturing.
In addition, Kanuma is a transgenic product. It is produced in the egg whites of genetically modified chickens who receive copies of the human lysosomal acid lipase gene to produce recombinant human lysosomal acid lipase. The facilities on which we rely to produce raw material for recombinant lysosomal acid lipase are the only animal facilities in the world that produces the necessary egg whites from transgenic chickens.  Natural disasters, disease, such as exotic Newcastle disease or avian influenza, or other catastrophic events could have a significant impact on the supply of unpurified Kanuma, or destroy Alexion’s animal operations altogether. If our animal operations are disrupted or destroyed, it will be extremely difficult to set up another animal facility to supply the unpurified Kanuma.  This would adversely affect our ability to satisfy demand for Kanuma, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
Any adverse developments affecting our manufacturing operations or the operations of our third-party providers could result in a product shortage of clinical or commercial requirements, withdrawal of our product candidates or any approved products, shipment delays, lot failures, or product withdrawals or recalls. We may also have to write-off inventory and incur other charges and expenses for products that fail to meet specifications, undertake costly remediation efforts or seek more costly manufacturing alternatives. Such manufacturing issues could increase our cost of goods, cause us to lose revenue, reduce our profitability or damage our reputation.

42


We operate in a highly regulated industry and if we or our third party providers fail to comply with United States and foreign regulations, we or our third party providers could lose our approvals to market our products or our product candidates, and our business would be seriously harmed.
We and our current and future partners, contract manufacturers and suppliers are subject to rigorous and extensive regulation by governmental authorities around the world, including the FDA, EMA, the competent authorities of the European Union member states, and MHLW. If we or a regulatory agency discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, or in the case of Kanuma, problems with animal operations, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product, the manufacturing facility or us. For example, in March 2013, we received a Warning Letter from the FDA relating to compliance with FDA’s cGMP requirements at ARIMF. We are working with the FDA to resolve the issues identified in the Warning Letter. Failure to address the FDA’s concerns may lead the FDA or other regulatory authorities to take regulatory action, including fines, civil penalties, recalls, seizure of product, suspension of manufacturing operations, operating restrictions, injunctions, withdrawal of FDA approval, and/or criminal prosecution.
If we do not resolve outstanding concerns expressed by the FDA in the Warning Letter and the Form 483s to the satisfaction of the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory agency, or we or our third-party providers, including our product fill-finish providers, packagers and labelers, fail to comply fully with applicable regulations, then we may be required to initiate a recall or withdrawal of our products. Like our contract manufacturers’ manufacturing operations, our animal operations will also be subject to FDA inspection to evaluate whether our animal husbandry, containment, personnel, and record keeping practices are sufficient to ensure safety and security of our transgenic chickens and animal products (e.g., eggs, waste, etc.). Our animal operations may also be subject to inspection by the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS), the agency responsible for administering the Animal Welfare Act. Any failure to ensure safety and security of our transgenic chickens and/or animal products could result in regulatory action by the FDA or another regulatory body, including USDA APHIS.
The safety profile of any product continues to be closely monitored by the FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities after approval. Regulations continue to apply after product approval, and cover, among other things, testing, manufacturing, quality control, finishing, filling, labeling, advertising, promotion, risk mitigation, adverse event reporting requirements, and export of biologics. For example, the risk management program established in 2007 upon the FDA's approval of Soliris for the treatment of PNH was replaced with a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program, approved by the FDA in 2010, and further revised in December 2015 concerning prescribing information regarding the level of fever needed to seek medical attention and reporting adverse events. Future changes to the Soliris REMS could be costly and burdensome to implement.
 We are required to report any serious and unexpected adverse experiences and certain quality problems with our products to the FDA, the EMA, and other health agencies. We or any health agency may have to notify health care providers of any such developments. Non-compliance with safety reporting requirements could result in regulatory action that may include civil action or criminal penalties. Regulatory agencies inspect our pharmacovigilance processes, including our adverse event reporting. If regulatory agencies determine that we or other parties, including clinical trial investigators, have not complied with the applicable reporting or other pharmacovigilance requirements, we may become subject to additional inspections, warning letters or other enforcement actions, including monetary fines, marketing authorization withdrawal and other penalties.
As a condition of approval for marketing our products, governmental authorities may require us to conduct additional studies. In connection with the approval of Soliris in the United States, EU and Japan, for the treatment of PNH, we agreed to establish a PNH Registry, monitor immunogenicity, monitor compliance with vaccination requirements, and determine the effects of anticoagulant withdrawal among PNH patients receiving eculizumab, and, specifically in Japan, we agreed to conduct a trial in a limited number of Japanese PNH patients to evaluate the safety of a meningococcal vaccine. In connection with the approval of Soliris in the United States for the treatment of aHUS, we agreed to establish an aHUS Registry and complete additional human clinical studies in adult and pediatric patients. Furthermore, in connection with the approval of Strensiq in the United States, we agreed to conduct a prospective observational study in treated patients to assess the long-term safety of Strensiq therapy and to develop complementary assays. Similarly, in connection with the approval of Kanuma in the United States, we have agreed to conduct a long-term observational study of treated patients, either as a standalone study or as a component of the existing LAL Registry. In the EU, in connection with the grant of authorization for Strensiq, we agreed to conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase 2a study of Strensiq in patients with HPP and to extend the studies ENB-008-10 and ENB-009-10 to provide efficacy data in patients 13 to 18 year-old of age. We also agreed to set up an observational, longitudinal, prospective, long-term registry of patients with HPP to collect information on the epidemiology of the disease, including clinical outcomes and quality of life, and to evaluate safety and effectiveness data in patients treated with Strensiq. In the United States, the FDA can also propose to withdraw approval for a product if it determines that such additional studies are inadequate or if new clinical data or information shows that a product is not safe for use in an approved indication.

43


Failure to comply with the laws and requirements, including statutes and regulations, administered by the FDA, the EC, the competent authorities of the European Union member states, the MHLW or other agencies, including without limitation, failures or delays in resolving the concerns raised by the FDA in the Warning Letter, could result in:
a product recall;
a product withdrawal;
significant administrative and judicial sanctions, including, warning letters or untitled letters;
significant fines and other civil penalties;
suspension, variation or withdrawal of a previously granted approval for Soliris;
interruption of production;
operating restrictions, such as a shutdown of production facilities or production lines, or new manufacturing requirements;
suspension of ongoing clinical trials;
delays in approving or refusal to approve our products including pending BLAs or BLA supplements for our products or a facility that manufactures our products;
seizing or detaining product;
requiring us or our partners to enter into a consent decree, which can include imposition of various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due dates for specific actions and penalties for noncompliance;
injunctions; and/or
criminal prosecution.
If the use of our products harms people, or is perceived to harm patients even when such harm is unrelated to our products, our regulatory approvals could be revoked or otherwise negatively impacted and we could be subject to costly and damaging product liability claims.
The testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of drugs for use in humans exposes us to product liability risks. Side effects and other problems from using our products could (1) lessen the frequency with which physicians decide to prescribe our products, (2) encourage physicians to stop prescribing our products to their patients who previously had been prescribed our products, (3) cause serious adverse events and give rise to product liability claims against us, and (4) result in our need to withdraw or recall our products from the marketplace. Some of these risks are unknown at this time.
Our products and our product candidates treat patients with ultra-rare diseases. We generally test our products in only a small number of patients. For example, the FDA marketing approval for the treatment of patients with aHUS was based on two prospective studies in a total of 37 adult and adolescent patients, together with a retrospective study that included 19 pediatric patients. As more patients use our products, including more children and adolescents, new risks and side effects may be discovered, the rate of known risks or side effects may increase, and risks previously viewed as less significant could be determined to be significant. Previously unknown risks and adverse effects may also be discovered in connection with unapproved uses of our products, which may include administration of our products under acute emergency conditions, such as the Enterohemorrhagic E. coli health crisis in Europe, primarily Germany, which began in May 2011. We do not promote, or in any way support or encourage the promotion of our products for unapproved uses in violation of applicable law, but physicians are permitted to use products for unapproved purposes and we are aware of such uses of Soliris. In addition, we are studying and expect to continue to study Soliris in diseases other than PNH and aHUS in controlled clinical settings, and independent investigators are doing so as well. In the event of any new risks or adverse effects discovered as new patients are treated for approved indications, or as our products are studied in or used by patients for other indications, regulatory authorities may delay or revoke their approvals, we may be required to conduct additional clinical trials and safety studies, make changes in labeling, reformulate our products or make changes and obtain new approvals for our and our suppliers' manufacturing facilities. We may also experience a significant drop in potential sales, experience harm to our reputation and the reputation of our products in the marketplace or become subject to lawsuits, including class actions. Any of these results could decrease or prevent any sales or substantially increase the costs and expenses of commercializing and marketing our products.
We may be sued by people who use our products, whether as a prescribed therapy, during a clinical trial, during an investigator initiated study, or otherwise. Many patients who use our products are already very ill. Any informed consents or waivers obtained from people who enroll in our trials or use our products may not protect us from liability or litigation. Our product liability insurance may not cover all potential types of liabilities or may not cover certain liabilities completely. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain our insurance on acceptable terms. In addition, negative publicity relating to the use of our products or a product candidate, or to a product liability claim, may make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to market and sell. As a result of these factors, a product liability claim, even if successfully defended, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Patients who use our products already often have severe and advanced stages of disease and known as well as unknown significant pre-existing and potentially life-threatening health risks. During the course of treatment, patients may suffer adverse events, including death, for reasons that may or may not be related to our products. Some patients treated with our products,

44


including patients who have participated in our clinical trials, have died or suffered potentially life-threatening diseases either during or after ending their treatments. Patients who delay or miss a dose or discontinue treatment may also experience complications, including death. Such events could subject us to costly litigation, require us to pay substantial amounts of money to injured patients, delay, negatively impact or end our opportunity to receive or maintain regulatory approval to market our products, or require us to suspend or abandon our commercialization efforts. Even in a circumstance in which we do not believe that an adverse event is related to our products, the investigation into the circumstance may be time consuming or inconclusive. These investigations may interrupt our sales efforts, delay our regulatory approval process in other countries, or impact and limit the type of regulatory approvals that our products receive or maintain.
For example, use of C5 Inhibitors, such as Soliris, is associated with an increased risk for certain types of infection, including meningococcal infection. Under controlled settings, patients in our eculizumab trials all receive vaccination against meningococcal infection prior to first administration of Soliris and patients who are prescribed Soliris in most countries are required by prescribing guidelines to be vaccinated prior to receiving their first dose. A physician may not have the opportunity to timely vaccinate a patient in the event of an acute emergency episode, such as in a patient presenting with aHUS or during the health crisis that began in May 2011 in Europe, principally in Germany, due to the epidemic of infections from Enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Vaccination does not, however, eliminate all risk of meningococcal infection. Additionally, in some countries there may not be any vaccine approved for general use or approved for use in infants and children. Some patients treated with Soliris who had been vaccinated have nonetheless experienced meningococcal infection, including patients who have suffered serious illness or death. Each such incident is required to be reported to appropriate regulatory agencies in accordance with relevant regulations.
Clinical evaluations of outcomes in the post-marketing setting are required to be reported to appropriate regulatory agencies in accordance with relevant regulations. Determination of significant complications associated with the delay or discontinuation of our products could have a material adverse effect on our ability to sell our products.
If we are unable to establish and maintain effective sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, or to enter into agreements with third parties to do so, we will be unable to successfully commercialize our products.
We are marketing and selling our products ourselves in the United States, Europe, Japan and several other territories. Strensiq and Kanuma were approved in 2015, are in the early stages of commercial launch and are the second and third new product launches in Alexion's history. If we are unable to establish and/or expand our capabilities to sell, market and distribute our products, either through our own capabilities or by entering into agreements with others, or to maintain such capabilities in countries where we have already commenced commercial sales, we will not be able to successfully sell our products. In that event, we will not be able to generate significant revenues. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to establish and maintain our own capabilities or enter into and maintain any marketing or distribution agreements with third-party providers on acceptable terms, if at all. Even if we hire the qualified sales and marketing personnel we need to support our objectives, or enter into marketing and distribution agreements with third parties on acceptable terms, we may not do so in an efficient manner or on a timely basis. We may not be able to correctly judge the size and experience of the sales and marketing force and the scale of distribution capabilities necessary to successfully market and sell our products. Establishing and maintaining sales, marketing and distribution capabilities are competitive, expensive and time-consuming. Our expenses associated with building up and maintaining the sales force and distribution capabilities around the world may be disproportionate compared to the revenues we may be able to generate on sales. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in commercializing any of our products.
If we fail to comply with laws or regulations, we may be subject to investigations and civil or criminal penalties and our business could be adversely affected.
In addition to FDA and related regulatory requirements, we are subject to health care "fraud and abuse" laws, such as the federal False Claims Act (FCA), the anti-kickback provisions of the federal Social Security Act, and other related federal laws and regulations.  The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind to induce, or reward the purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of any health care item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal health care programs. Liability may be established without a person or entity having actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it. A conviction for violation of the Anti-kickback Statute requires mandatory exclusion from participation in federal health care programs. The majority of states also have statutes similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and false claims laws that apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payer.  We seek to comply with the anti-kickback laws and with the available statutory exemptions and safe harbors. However, our practices may not in all cases fit within the safe harbors, and our practices may therefore be subject to scrutiny on a case-by-case basis. The FCA prohibits any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment of government funds, or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim. Pharmaceutical companies have been investigated and have reached substantial financial settlements with the Federal

45


government under the FCA for a variety of alleged promotional and marketing activities, such as allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product; providing consulting fees and other benefits to physicians to induce them to prescribe products; engaging in promotion for uses that the FDA has not approved, or “off-label” uses; and submitting inflated best price information to the Medicaid Rebate Program. We seek to comply with the FCA laws, but we cannot assure that our compliance program, policies and procedures will always protect Alexion from acts committed by its employees or third-party distributors or service providers. Violations of U.S. federal and state fraud and abuse laws may result in criminal, civil and administrative sanctions, including fines, damages, civil monetary penalties and exclusion from federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid).
Although physicians in the United States are permitted to, based on their medical judgment, prescribe products for indications other than those cleared or approved by the FDA, manufacturers are prohibited from promoting their products for such off-label uses. In the United States, we market our products for their approved uses. Although we believe our marketing materials and training programs for physicians do not constitute off-label promotion, the FDA, the U.S. Justice Department, or other federal or state government agencies may disagree. If the FDA or other government agencies determine that our promotional materials, training or other activities constitute off-label promotion of any of our products, it could request that we modify our training or promotional materials or other activities or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, including the issuance of a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and criminal penalties. It is also possible that other federal or state enforcement authorities might take action if they believe that the alleged improper promotion led to the submission and payment of claims for an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties under other statutory authorities, such as laws prohibiting false or fraudulent claims for payment of government funds.
The EU imposes similar strict restrictions on the promotion and marketing of drug products. The off-label promotion of medicinal products is prohibited in the EU and in other territories. The promotion of medicinal products that are not subject to a marketing authorization is also prohibited in the EU. Violations of the rules governing the promotion of medicinal products in the EU and in other territories could be penalized by administrative measures, fines and imprisonment.
We are subject to FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act, and other anti-corruption laws and regulations that generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials and/or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business and we operate in countries that are recognized as having a greater potential for governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure that our compliance program, policies and procedures will always protect Alexion from acts committed by its employees or third-party distributors or service providers.
In May 2015, we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the Enforcement Division of the SEC requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the FCPA in various countries. The SEC also seeks information related to Alexion’s recalls of specific lots of Soliris and related securities disclosures. In addition, in October 2015, Alexion received a request from the DOJ for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to Alexion's compliance with the FCPA. Alexion is cooperating with these investigations. At this time, Alexion is unable to predict the duration, scope or outcome of these investigations.
Any determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with existing United States or foreign laws or regulations, including by the SEC or DOJ pursuant to its investigation of our compliance with the FCPA and other matters, could result in the imposition of a broad range of civil and criminal sanctions against Alexion and certain of our directors, officers and/or employees, including injunctive relief, disgorgement, substantial fines or penalties, imprisonment, and other legal or equitable sanctions. Additionally, we could experience interruptions of business, harm to our reputation, debarment from government contracts, loss of supplier, vendor or other third-party relationships, and necessary licenses and permits could be terminated. Other internal or government investigations or legal or regulatory proceedings, including lawsuits brought by private litigants, may also follow as a consequence. Cooperating with and responding to the SEC and the DOJ in connection with its investigation of our FCPA practices and other matters, as well as responding to any future U.S. or foreign governmental investigation or whistleblower lawsuit, could result in substantial expenses, and could divert management’s attention from other business concerns and could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition and growth prospects.
Completion of preclinical studies or clinical trials does not guarantee advancement to the next phase of development.
Completion of preclinical studies or clinical trials does not guarantee that we will initiate additional studies or trials for our product candidates, that if further studies or trials are initiated what the scope and phase of the trial will be or that they will be completed, or that if these further studies or trials are completed, that the design or results will provide a sufficient basis to apply for or receive regulatory approvals or to commercialize products. Results of clinical trials could be inconclusive, requiring additional or repeat trials. Data obtained from preclinical studies and clinical trials are subject to varying interpretations that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. If the design or results achieved in our clinical trials are insufficient to proceed to further trials or to regulatory approval of our product candidates, our company could be materially adversely affected. Failure of a clinical trial to achieve its pre-specified primary endpoint, such as the Phase II Soliris trial for AMR that we announced in January 2015, generally increases the likelihood that additional studies or trials will be required if

46


we determine to continue development of the product candidate, reduces the likelihood of timely development of and regulatory approval to market the product candidate, and may decrease the chances for successfully achieving the primary endpoint in scientifically similar indications.
Our clinical studies may be costly and lengthy, and there are many reasons why drug testing could be delayed or terminated.
For human trials, patients must be recruited and each product candidate must be tested at various doses and formulations for each clinical indication. In addition, to ensure safety and effectiveness, the effect of drugs often must be studied over a long period of time, especially for the chronic diseases that we are studying. Many of our programs focus on diseases with small patient populations making patient enrollment difficult. Insufficient patient enrollment in our clinical trials could delay or cause us to abandon a product development program. We may decide to abandon development of a product candidate or a study at any time due to unfavorable results or other reasons, or we may have to spend considerable resources repeating clinical trials or conducting additional trials, either of which would increase costs and delay any revenue from those product candidates, if any. We may open clinical sites and enroll patients in countries where we have little experience. We rely on a small number of clinical research organizations to carry out our clinical trial related activities, and one CRO is responsible for many of our studies. We rely on such parties to accurately report their results. Our reliance on CROs may impact our ability to control the timing, conduct, expense and quality of our clinical trials.
 Additional factors that can cause delay, impairment or termination of our clinical trials or our product development efforts include:
delay or failure in obtaining institutional review board (IRB), approval or the approval of other reviewing entities to conduct a clinical trial at each site;
delay or failure in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations(CROs), and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
withdrawal of clinical trial sites from our clinical trials as a result of changing standards of care or the ineligibility of a site to participate in our clinical trials;
clinical sites and investigators deviating from trial protocol, failing to conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, or dropping out of a trial;
slow patient enrollment, including, for example, due to the rarity of the disease being studied;
delay or failure in having patients complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;
long treatment time required to demonstrate effectiveness;
lack of sufficient supplies of the product candidate;
disruption of operations at the clinical trial sites;
adverse medical events or side effects in treated patients, and the threat of legal claims and litigation alleging injuries;
failure of patients taking the placebo to continue to participate in our clinical trials;
insufficient clinical trial data to support effectiveness of the product candidates;
lack of effectiveness or safety of the product candidate being tested;
lack of sufficient funds;
inability to meet required specifications or to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product candidate for development or commercialization activities in a timely and cost-efficient manner;
decisions by regulatory authorities, the IRB, ethics committee, or us, or recommendation by a data safety monitoring board, to suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time for safety issues or for any other reason;
failure to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for the product candidate or the approvals for the facilities in which such product candidate is manufactured; and
decisions by competent authorities, IRBs or ethics committees to demand variations in protocols or conduct of clinical trials.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property

If we cannot obtain new patents, maintain our existing patents and protect the confidentiality and proprietary nature of our trade secrets and other intellectual property, our business and competitive position will be harmed.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and regulatory protections for our products and investigational compounds, to preserve our trade secrets and other proprietary rights, to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties, and to prevent third parties from circumventing our rights. Due to the time and expense of bringing new products through development and regulatory approval to the marketplace, there is particular importance in obtaining patent and trade secret protection for significant new technologies, products and processes. 
We have and may in the future obtain patents or the right to practice patents through ownership or license. Our patent applications may not result in the issue of patents in the United States or other countries. Our patents may not afford adequate

47


protection for our products. Third parties may challenge our patents, and have challenged our patents in the past. If any of our patents are narrowed, invalidated or become unenforceable, competitors may develop and market products similar to ours that do not conflict with or infringe our patents rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. We may also finance and collaborate in research conducted by government organizations, hospitals, universities or other educational or research institutions. Such research partners may be unwilling to grant us exclusive rights to technology or products developed through such collaborations. There is also a risk that disputes may arise as to the rights to technology or products developed in collaboration with other parties. Our products and product candidates are expensive and time-consuming to test and develop. Even if we obtain and maintain patents, our business may be significantly harmed if the patents are not broad enough to protect our products from copycat products.
Significant legal questions exist concerning the extent and scope of patent protection for biopharmaceutical products and processes in the United States and elsewhere. Accordingly, there is no certainty that patent applications owned or licensed by us will issue as patents, or that our issued patents will afford meaningful protection against competitors. Once issued, patents are subject to challenge through both administrative and judicial proceedings in the U.S. and other countries. Such proceedings include re-examinations, inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews and interference proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, as well as opposition proceedings before the European Patent Office. Litigation may be required to enforce, defend or obtain our patent and other intellectual property rights. Any administrative proceeding or litigation could require a significant commitment of our resources and, depending on outcome, could adversely affect the scope, validity or enforceability of certain of our patent or other proprietary rights.
In addition, our business requires using sensitive technology, techniques and proprietary compounds that we protect as trade secrets. However, we may also rely heavily on collaboration with, or discuss the potential for collaboration with, suppliers, outside scientists and other biopharmaceutical companies. Collaboration and discussion of potential collaboration present a strong risk of exposing our trade secrets. If our trade secrets were exposed, it would help our competitors and adversely affect our business prospects.
If we are found to be infringing on patents owned by others, we may be forced to pay damages to the patent owner and/or obtain a license to continue the manufacture, sale or development of our products. If we cannot obtain a license, we may be prevented from the manufacture, sale or development of our products, which would adversely affect our business.
Parts of our technology, techniques, proprietary compounds and potential product candidates, including those which are or may be in-licensed, may be found to infringe patents owned by or granted to others. We previously reported that certain third parties filed civil lawsuits against us claiming infringement of their intellectual property rights. Each of those matters was resolved. However, additional third parties may claim that the manufacture, use or sale of our products or product candidates infringes patents owned or granted to such third parties. We have in the past received, and may in the future receive, notices from third parties claiming that their patents may be infringed by the development, manufacture or sale of our products or product candidates. We are aware of patents owned by third parties that might be claimed by such third parties to be infringed by the development and commercialization of our products or investigational compounds. In respect to some of these patents, we have obtained licenses, or expect to obtain licenses. However, with regard to other patents, we have determined in our judgment that:
our products and investigational compounds do not infringe the patents;
the patents are not valid or enforceable; and/or
we have identified and are testing various alternatives that should not infringe the patents and which should permit continued development and commercialization of our products and investigational compounds.
Any holder of these patents or other patents covering similar technology could sue us for damages and seek to prevent us from manufacturing, selling or developing our products. Legal disputes can be costly and time consuming to defend. If we cannot successfully defend against any future actions or conflicts, if they arise, we may incur substantial legal costs and may be liable for damages, be required to obtain costly licenses or need to stop manufacturing, using or selling our products, which would adversely affect our business. We may seek to obtain a license prior to or during legal actions in order to reduce further costs and the risk of a court determination that our product infringes the third party's patents. A required license may be costly or may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. A costly license, or inability to obtain a necessary license, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
There can be no assurance that we would prevail in a patent infringement action or that we would be able to obtain a license to any third-party patent on commercially reasonable terms or any terms at all; successfully develop non-infringing alternatives on a timely basis; or license alternative non-infringing technology, if any exists, on commercially reasonable terms. Any impediment to our ability to manufacture, use or sell approved forms of our products or our product candidates could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
It is possible that we could lose market exclusivity for a product earlier than expected, which would harm our competitive position.

48


In our industry, much of an innovative product’s commercial value is realized while it has market exclusivity. When market exclusivity expires and biosimilar or generic versions of the product are approved and marketed, there can be substantial decline in the innovative product’s sales.
Market exclusivity for our products is based upon patent rights and certain regulatory forms of exclusivity. The scope of our product patent rights vary from country to country and are dependent on the availability of meaningful legal remedies in each country. The failure to obtain patent and other intellectual property rights, or limitations on the use, or loss of such rights, could be material to our business. In some countries, patent protections for our products may not exist because certain countries did not historically offer the right to obtain specific types of patents or we did not file patents in those markets.  Also, the patent environment is unpredictable and the validity and enforceability of patents cannot be predicted with certainty. Absent relevant patent protection for a product, once regulatory exclusivity periods expire, biosimilar or generic versions of the product can be approved and marketed.  Even prior to the expiration of regulatory exclusivity, a competitor could seek to obtain marketing approval by submitting its own clinical trial data.
The market exclusivity of our products may be impacted by competitive products that are either innovative or biosimilar or generic copies. In our industry, the potential for biosimilar challenges has been an increasing risk to product market exclusivity. U.S. law includes an approval pathway for biosimilar versions of innovative biological products. Under the pathway, the FDA may approve products that are similar to (but not generic copies of) innovative biologics on the basis of less extensive data than is required for a full biologic license application. After an innovator has marketed its product for four years, other manufacturers may apply for approval of a biosimilar version of the innovator product. However, qualified innovative biological products will receive 12 years of regulatory exclusivity, meaning that the FDA may not actually approve a biosimilar version until 12 years after the innovative product received its approval. The law also provides a mechanism for innovators to enforce their patents that protect their products and for biosimilar applicants to challenge the patents. Such litigation may begin as early as four years after the innovative biological product is first approved by the FDA. Pathways for biosimilar products also exist in many other markets, including Europe and Japan.
Risks Related to Our Operations
We may not accurately forecast demand for our products, including our new products, which may cause our operating results to fluctuate, and we cannot guarantee that we will achieve our financial goals, including our ability to maintain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.
We have maintained profitability on a quarterly basis since the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and on an annual basis beginning with the year ended December 31, 2008. Our quarterly revenues, expenses and net income (loss) may fluctuate, even significantly, due to the risks described in these “Risk Factors” as well as the timing of charges and expenses that we may take. We believe that we formulate our annual operating budgets with reasonable assumptions and targets, however we may not generate sufficient revenues or control expenses to achieve our financial goals, including continued profitability. We may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. You should not consider our financial performance, including our revenue growth, in recent periods as indicative of our future performance. We may not accurately forecast demand for our products, especially Strensiq and Kanuma. Strensiq and Kanuma are in the early stages of commercial launch having each received marketing approval in 2015, and both products treat rare diseases for which there was no existing therapy in a new therapeutic area for us. Product demand is dependent on a number of factors. Our investors may have widely varying expectations that may be materially higher or lower than actual revenues and if our revenues are different from these expectations, our stock price may experience significant volatility. Our revenues are also subject to foreign exchange rate fluctuations due to the global nature of our operations and our results of operations could be adversely affected due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates. Although we use derivative instruments to manage foreign currency risk, our efforts to reduce currency exchange losses may not be successful.
We have significant debt service obligations as a result of the debt we incurred to finance the acquisition of Synageva. Changes in interest rates related to this debt could significantly increase our annual interest expense. As we advance our most robust pipeline in our history and launch our second and third products worldwide, we will have substantial expenses as we continue our research and development efforts, continue to conduct clinical trials and continue to develop manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities worldwide, some of which could be delayed, scaled-back or eliminated to achieve our financial objectives.
We have also recorded, or may be required to record, charges that include inventory write-downs for failed quality specifications or recalls, impairments with respect to investments, fixed assets and long-lived assets, outcomes of litigation and other legal or administrative proceedings, regulatory matters and tax matters, and payments in connection with acquisitions and other business development activities, such as milestone payments.
Each of our products is currently the only approved drug for the disease(s) the product treats. If a competitive product is approved for sale, including a biosimilar or generic product, our market share and our revenues could decline, particularly if the competitive product is perceived to be more effective or is less expensive than our product.

49


We operate in a highly competitive environment. Soliris is currently the only approved therapy for the treatment of PNH and aHUS. We are in advanced clinical studies of Soliris for the treatment of other diseases, and there are currently no approved drugs for any of these other diseases. Strensiq is currently the only product approved to treat HPP and Kanuma is the only product approved to treat LAL-D. In the future, Soliris may compete with new drugs currently in development, and Strensiq and Kanuma may also experience competition. Other companies have initiated clinical studies for the treatment of PNH and NMO, and we are aware of companies that are planning to initiate studies for diseases that we are also targeting.
Pharmaceutical companies have publicly announced intentions to establish or develop rare disease programs and these companies may introduce products that are competitive with ours. These and other companies, many of which have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us, may commercialize products that are cheaper, more effective, safer, or easier to administer than our products. In the future, our products may also compete with biosimilars or generics. We experience competition in drug development from universities and other research institutions, and pharmaceutical companies compete with us to attract universities and academic research institutions as drug development partners, including for licensing their proprietary technology. If our competitors successfully enter into such arrangements with academic institutions, we will be precluded from pursuing those unique opportunities and may not be able to find equivalent opportunities elsewhere.
If a company announces successful clinical trial results for a product that may be competitive with one of our products or product candidates, receives marketing approval of a competitive product, or gets to the market before we do with a competitive product, our business may be harmed or our stock price may decline.
If we fail to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully develop, manufacture or commercialize our products or products candidates.
The success of our business is dependent in large part on our continued ability to attract and retain our senior management, and other highly qualified personnel in our scientific, clinical, manufacturing and commercial organizations. There is intense competition in the biopharmaceutical industry for these types of personnel. Our business is specialized and global and we must attract and retain highly qualified individuals across many geographies. We may not be able to continue to attract and retain the highly qualified personnel necessary for developing, manufacturing and commercializing our products and product candidates. If we are unsuccessful in our recruitment and retention efforts, our business may be harmed.
If we fail to satisfy our debt service obligations or obtain the capital necessary to fund our operations, we may be unable to commercialize our products or continue or complete our product development.

In June 2015, we acquired Synageva and used a substantial portion of our cash on hand and incurred significant debt under the terms of a senior secured credit facility to finance the acquisition. In addition, we have substantial contingent liabilities, including milestone and royalty obligations under earlier acquisitions and strategic transactions. Our increased indebtedness, including increased interest expense, together with our significant contingent liabilities, could, among other things:     
make us more vulnerable to economic or industry downturns and competitive pressures;
make it difficult for us to make payments on the credit facilities and require us to use cash flow from operations to satisfy our debt obligations, which would reduce the availability of our cash flow for other purposes, including business development efforts, research and development and mergers and acquisitions;
limit our ability to incur additional debt or access the capital markets; and
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in, our business.
The Credit Agreement requires us to comply with certain financial covenants on a quarterly basis and includes negative covenants, subject to exceptions, restricting or limiting our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, grant liens, and engage in certain investment, acquisition and disposition transactions. If an event of default occurs, the interest rate would increase and the administrative agent would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the loan.
Our ability to satisfy our obligations under the Credit Agreement and meet our debt service obligations will depend upon our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control.
We may not be able to access the capital and credit markets on terms that are favorable to us.
We may need to raise additional capital to supplement our existing funds and cash generated from operations for working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements, and other business activities. Funding needs may shift and the amount of capital we may need depends on many factors, including, the cost of any acquisition or any new collaborative, licensing or other commercial relationships that we may establish, the time and cost necessary to build our manufacturing facilities or enhance our manufacturing operations, the cost of obtaining and maintaining the necessary regulatory approvals for our manufacturing facilities, and the progress, timing and scope of our preclinical studies and clinical trials. The capital and

50


credit markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption. We may not receive additional funding when we need it or funding may only be available on unfavorable terms. If we cannot raise adequate funds to satisfy our capital requirements, we may have to delay, scale-back or eliminate certain research, development, manufacturing or commercial activities.
Our business involves environmental risks and potential exposure to environmental liabilities.
 As a biopharmaceutical company, our business involves the use of certain hazardous materials in our research, development, manufacturing, and other activities. We and our third party providers are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning the handling and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous wastes, such as medical and biological wastes, and emissions and discharges into the environment, such as air, soils and water sources. We also are subject to laws and regulations that impose liability and clean-up responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the environment and a current or previous owner or operator of property may be liable for the costs of remediating its property or locations, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the contamination. If an accident or environmental discharge occurs, or if we discover contamination caused by prior owners and operators of properties we acquire, we could be liable for remediation obligations, damages and fines that could exceed our insurance coverage and financial resources. Such obligations and liabilities, which to date have not been material, could have a material impact on our business and financial condition. Additionally, the cost of compliance with environmental and safety laws and regulations may increase in the future, and we may be required dedicate more resources to comply with such developments or purchase supplemental insurance coverage.
We are seeking to expand our business through strategic initiatives. Our efforts to identify opportunities or complete transactions that satisfy our strategic criteria may not be successful, and we not realize the anticipated benefits of any completed acquisition or other strategic transaction.
Our business strategy includes expanding our products and capabilities. We regularly evaluate potential merger, acquisition, partnering and in-license opportunities that we expect will expand our pipeline or product offerings, and enhance our research platforms. Acquisitions of new businesses or products and in-licensing of new products may involve numerous risks, including:
substantial cash expenditures;
potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities;
incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, some of which may be difficult or impossible to identify at the time of acquisition;
difficulties in assimilating the operations of the acquired companies;
failure of any acquired businesses or products or in-licensed products to achieve the scientific, medical, commercial or other results anticipated;
diverting our management's attention away from other business concerns;
the potential loss of our key employees or key employees of the acquired companies; and
risks of entering markets in which we have limited or no direct experience.

A substantial portion of our strategic efforts are focused on opportunities for rare disorders and life-saving therapies, but the availability of such opportunities is limited. We may not be able to identify opportunities that satisfy our strategic criteria or are acceptable to us or our stockholders. Several companies have publicly announced intentions to establish or develop rare disease programs and we may compete with these companies for the same opportunities. For these and other reasons, we may not be able to acquire the rights to additional product candidates or approved products on terms that we or our stockholders find acceptable, or at all.
Even if we are able to successfully identify and complete acquisitions and other strategic transactions, we may not be able to integrate them or take full advantage of them. An acquisition or other strategic transaction may not result in short-term or long-term benefits to us. We may also incorrectly judge the value or worth of an acquired company or business or an acquired or in-licensed product.
To effectively manage our current and future potential growth, we must continue to effectively enhance and develop our global employee base, and our operational and financial processes. Supporting our growth strategy will require significant capital expenditures and management resources, including investments in research, development, sales and marketing, manufacturing and other areas of our operations. The development or expansion of our business, any acquired business or any acquired or in-licensed products may require a substantial capital investment by us. We may not have these necessary funds or they might not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. We may also seek to raise funds by selling shares of our capital stock, which could dilute current stockholders' ownership interest in our company, or securities convertible into our capital stock, which could dilute current stockholders' ownership interest in our company upon conversion.

51


We may be required to recognize impairment charges for our goodwill and other intangible assets.
As of March 31, 2016, the net carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $9,677,138.  As required by generally accepted accounting principles, we periodically assess these assets to determine if they are impaired.  Impairment of intangible assets may be triggered by developments both within and outside our control. Deteriorating economic conditions, technological changes, disruptions to our business, inability to effectively integrate acquired businesses, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in use of the assets, intensified competition, divestitures, market capitalization declines and other factors may impair our goodwill and other intangible assets.  Any charges relating to such impairments could adversely affect our results of operations in the periods in which an impairment is recognized.
Our business could be affected by litigation, government investigations and enforcement actions.
We operate in many jurisdictions in a highly regulated industry and we could be subject to litigation, government investigation and enforcement actions on a variety of matters in the United States or foreign jurisdictions, including, without limitation, intellectual property, regulatory, product liability, environmental, whistleblower, Qui Tam, false claims, privacy, anti-kickback, anti-bribery, securities, commercial, employment, and other claims and legal proceedings which may arise from conducting our business. As previously disclosed, in May 2015, we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the Enforcement Division of the SEC requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the FCPA in various countries. The SEC also seeks information related to Alexion’s recalls of specific lots of Soliris and related securities disclosures. In addition, in October 2015, Alexion received a request from the DOJ for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to Alexion's compliance with the FCPA. Legal proceedings, government investigations, including the SEC and DOJ investigations, and enforcement actions can be expensive and time consuming. An adverse outcome could result in significant damages awards, fines, penalties, exclusion from the federal healthcare programs, healthcare debarment, injunctive relief, product recalls, reputational damage and modifications of our business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The intended efficiency of our corporate structure depends on the application of the tax laws and regulations in the countries where we operate and we may have exposure to additional tax liabilities or our effective tax rate could change, which could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
As a company with international operations, we are subject to income taxes, as well as non-income based taxes, in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide tax liabilities.  Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate outcome with respect to the taxes we owe may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements.  If the Internal Revenue Service, or other taxing authority, disagrees with the positions we take, we could have additional tax liability, and this could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. Our effective tax rate could be adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with different statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws and regulations, changes in interpretations of tax laws, including pending tax law changes, changes in our manufacturing activities and changes in our future levels of research and development spending.
We have designed our corporate structure, the manner in which we develop and use our intellectual property, and our intercompany transactions between our affiliates in a way that is intended to enhance our operational and financial efficiency and increase our overall profitability. We are also integrating the Synageva corporate structure into our own in a manner that is also intended to achieve similar efficiencies. The application of the tax laws and regulations of various countries in which we operate and to our global operations is subject to interpretation. We also must operate our business in a manner consistent with our corporate structure to realize such efficiencies. The tax authorities of the countries in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for valuing developed technology or for transfer pricing. If tax authorities determine that the manner in which we operate results in our business not achieving the intended tax consequences, our effective tax rate could increase and harm our financial position and results of operations.
In addition, the United States government and other governments are considering and may adopt tax reform measures that significantly increase our worldwide tax liabilities. The U.S. Congress, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and other government agencies in countries where we and our affiliates operate have focused on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporation, including, for example, in the area of “base erosion and profit shifting,” where payments are made between affiliates from a jurisdiction with high tax rates to a jurisdiction with lower tax rates. We established operations in Ireland in 2013 and Ireland tax authorities announced changes to the treatment of non-resident Irish entities. The changes are not expected to impact existing non-resident Irish entities, such as ours, until after December 31, 2020. These changes and other prospective changes in the United States and other countries in which we and our affiliates operate could increase our effective tax rate, and harm our financial position and results of operations.

52


Our sales and operations are subject to a variety of risks relating to the conduct and expansion of our international business.
We continue to increase our international presence, including in emerging markets. Our operations in foreign countries subject us to a variety of risks, including:

difficulties or the inability to obtain necessary foreign regulatory or reimbursement approvals of our products in a timely manner;
political or economic determinations that adversely impact pricing or reimbursement policies;
economic problems or political instability;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
difficulties or inability to obtain financing in markets;
unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements;
difficulties enforcing contractual and intellectual property rights;
compliance with complex import and export control laws;
trade restrictions and restrictions on direct investments by foreign entities;
compliance with tax, employment and labor laws;
costs and difficulties in recruiting and retaining qualified managers and employees to manage and operate the business in local jurisdictions;
costs and difficulties in managing and monitoring international operations; and
longer payment cycles.
Additionally, our business and marketing methods are subject to the laws and regulations of the countries in which we operate, which may differ significantly from country to country and may conflict with U.S. laws and regulations. The FCPA and anti-bribery laws and regulations are extensive and far-reaching, and we must maintain accurate records and control over the activities of our distributors and third party service providers in countries where we operate. We have policies and procedures designed to help ensure that we and our representatives, including our employees, comply with such laws, however we cannot guarantee that these policies and procedures will protect us against liability under the FCPA or other anti-bribery laws for actions taken by our representatives. Although we conducted due diligence of Synageva's operations prior to the acquisition, we may discover or identify deficiencies or non-compliance with such laws as we complete the integration of the Synageva business and conduct operations. Failure to comply with the laws and regulations of the countries in which we operate could materially harm our business.
Currency fluctuations and changes in exchange rates could adversely affect our revenue growth, increase our costs and negatively affect our profitability.
We conduct a substantial portion of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect our operating results. The exposures result from portions of our revenues, as well as the related receivables, and expenses that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including the Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound, Swiss Franc, and Russian Ruble. As the U.S. dollar strengthens against these foreign currencies, the relative value of sales made in the respective foreign currencies decreases. When the U.S. dollar weakens against these currencies, the relative value of such sales increases. We manage our foreign currency transaction risk within specified guidelines through the use of derivatives. All of our derivative instruments are utilized for risk management purposes, and we do not use derivatives for speculative trading purposes. We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposures resulting from portions of our forecasted revenues, including intercompany revenues, that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The purpose of the hedges of revenue is to reduce the volatility of exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results and to increase the visibility of the foreign exchange impact on forecasted revenues. Further, we enter into foreign exchange forward contracts, with durations of approximately 30 days, designed to limit the balance sheet exposure of monetary assets and liabilities. We enter into these hedges to reduce the impact of fluctuating exchange rates on our operating results. Gains and losses on these hedge transactions are designed to offset gains and losses on underlying balance sheet exposures. While we attempt to hedge certain currency risks, currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which we do business have, in the past, caused foreign currency transaction gains and losses and have also impacted the amounts of revenues and expenses calculated in U.S. dollars and will do so in the future. Likewise, past currency fluctuations have at times resulted in foreign currency transaction gains, and there can be no assurance that these gains can be reproduced. Any significant foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in healthcare laws and policy may affect coverage and reimbursement of our products in ways that we cannot currently predict and these changes could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
 In the U.S., there have been a number of legislative and regulatory initiatives focused on containing the cost of health care. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was enacted in the United States in March 2010. This law

53


substantially changes the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers in the U.S., and significantly impacts the pharmaceutical industry. PPACA contains a number of provisions that are expected to impact our business and operations, in some cases in ways we cannot currently predict. Changes that may affect our business include those governing enrollment in federal healthcare programs, reimbursement changes, rules regarding prescription drug benefits under health insurance exchanges, expansion of the 340B program, expansion of state Medicaid programs, fraud and abuse enforcement and rules governing the approval of biosimilar products. These changes will impact existing government healthcare programs and will result in the development of new programs, including Medicare payment for performance initiatives and improvements to the physician quality reporting system and feedback program. On January 21, 2016, CMS issued final regulations to implement the changes to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program under PPACA.  These regulations become effective on April 1, 2016.  We are evaluating the impact of these regulations on our business and operations. Moreover, in the future, Congress could enact legislation that further increases Medicaid drug rebates or other costs and charges associated with participating in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. The issuance of regulations and coverage expansion by various governmental agencies relating to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program has and will continue to increase our costs and the complexity of compliance, has been and will be time-consuming, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Governments in countries where we operate have adopted or have shown significant interest in pursuing legislative initiatives to reduce costs of health care. We expect that the implementation of current laws and policies, the amendment of those laws and policies in the future, as well as the adoption of new laws and policies, could have a material adverse effect on our industry generally and on our ability to maintain or increase our product sales or successfully commercialize our product candidates, or could limit or eliminate our future spending on development projects. In many cases, these government initiatives, even if enacted into law, are subject to future rulemaking by regulatory agencies. Although we have evaluated these government initiatives and the impact on our business, we cannot know with certainty whether any such law, rule or regulation will adversely affect coverage and reimbursement of our products, or to what extent, until such laws, rules and regulations are promulgated, implemented and enforced, which could sometimes take many years. The announcement or adoption of regulatory or legislative proposals could delay or prevent our entry into new markets, affect our reimbursement or sales in the markets where we are already selling our products and materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to comply with our reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, Medicare, or other governmental pricing programs, we could be subject to additional reimbursement requirements, penalties, sanctions and fines which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Pricing and rebate calculations vary among products and programs. The calculations are complex and are often subject to interpretation by us, governmental or regulatory agencies and the courts. We cannot assure you that our submissions will not be found by CMS to be incomplete or incorrect. Governmental agencies may also make changes in program interpretations, requirements or conditions of participation, some of which may have implications for amounts previously estimated or paid. The Medicaid rebate amount is computed each quarter based on our submission to CMS of our current average manufacturer price and best price for the quarter. If we become aware that our reporting for a prior quarter was incorrect, or has changed as a result of recalculation of the pricing data, we are obligated to resubmit the corrected data for a period not to exceed twelve quarters from the quarter in which the data originally were due, and CMS may request or require restatements for earlier periods as well. Such restatements and recalculations increase our costs for complying with the laws and regulations governing the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. Any corrections to our rebate calculations could result in an overage or underage in our rebate liability for past quarters, depending on the nature of the correction. Price recalculations also may affect the ceiling price at which we are required to offer our products to certain covered entities, such as safety-net providers, under the 340B drug discount program.
We are liable for errors associated with our submission of pricing data. In addition to retroactive rebates and the potential for 340B program refunds, if we are found to have knowingly submitted false average manufacturer price, ASP, or best price information to the government, we may be liable for civil monetary penalties in the amount of $100 per item of false information. If we are found to have made a misrepresentation in the reporting of our ASP, the Medicare statute provides for civil monetary penalties of up to $10 for each misrepresentation for each day in which the misrepresentation was applied. Our failure to submit monthly/quarterly average manufacturer price, ASP, and best price data on a timely basis could result in a civil monetary penalty of $10 per day for each day the information is late beyond the due date. Such failure also could be grounds for CMS to terminate our Medicaid drug rebate agreement, pursuant to which we participate in the Medicaid program. In the event that CMS terminates our rebate agreement, federal payments may not be available under Medicaid or Medicare Part B for our covered outpatient drugs.
Federal law requires that a company must participate in the FSS pricing program to be eligible to have its products paid for with federal funds. If we overcharge the government in connection with our FSS contract or Section 703 Agreement, whether due to a misstated FCP or otherwise, we are required to refund the difference to the government. Failure to make necessary disclosures and/or to identify contract overcharges can result in allegations against us under the FCA and other laws

54


and regulations. Unexpected refunds to the government, and responding to a government investigation or enforcement action, would be expensive and time-consuming, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
We may be subject to numerous and varying privacy and security laws, and our failure to comply could result in penalties and reputational damage.
We are subject to laws and regulations covering data privacy and the protection of personal information including health information. The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve, and there has been an increasing focus on privacy and data protection issues which may affect our business. In the U.S., we may be subject to state security breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws and federal and state consumer protections laws which impose requirements for the collection, use, disclosure and transmission of personal information. Each of these laws are subject to varying interpretations by courts and government agencies, creating complex compliance issues for us. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations we could be subject to penalties or sanctions, including criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain individually identifiable health information from a covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA) or for aiding and abetting the violation of HIPAA.
Numerous other countries have, or are developing, laws governing the collection, use and transmission of personal information as well. European Union member states and other jurisdictions have adopted data protection laws and regulations, which impose significant compliance obligations. For example, the EC adopted the EU Data Protection Directive, as implemented into national laws by the EU member states, which imposed strict obligations and restrictions on the ability to collect, analyze, and transfer personal data, including health data from clinical trials and adverse event reporting. Data protection authorities from different EU member states have interpreted the privacy laws differently, which adds to the complexity of processing personal data in the EU, and guidance on implementation and compliance practices are often updated or otherwise revised. Any failure to comply with the rules arising from the EU Data Protection Directive and related national laws of European Union member states could lead to government enforcement actions and significant penalties against us, and adversely impact our operating results.
In December 2015, a proposal for an EU Data Protection Regulation, intended to replace the current EU Data Protection Directive, was agreed between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the EC. The EU Data Protection Regulation, which will be officially adopted in early 2016, will introduce new data protection requirements in the EU and substantial fines for breaches of the data protection rules. The EU Data Protection Regulation, which will be applicable two years after the date of its publication in the Official Journal for the European Union, will increase our responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms ensuring compliance with the new EU data protection rules.    
Security breaches, cyber-attacks, or other disruptions could expose us to liability and affect our business and reputation.
We are increasingly dependent on our information technology systems and infrastructure for our business. We collect, store, and transmit sensitive information including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information in connection with business operations. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Some of this information could be an attractive target of criminal attack by third parties with a wide range of motives and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hactivists,” patient groups, disgruntled current or former employees, and others. Cyber-attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication, and despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to such attacks or may be breached, including due to employee error or malfeasance. We have implemented information security measures to protect patients’ personal information against the risk of inappropriate and unauthorized external use and disclosure. However, despite these measures, and due to the ever changing information cyber-threat landscape, we may be subject to data breaches through cyber-attacks. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. If our systems become compromised, we may not promptly discover the intrusion. Like other companies in our industry, we have experienced attacks to our data and systems, including malware and computer viruses. If our systems failed or were breached or disrupted, we could lose product sales, and suffer reputational damage and loss of customer confidence. Such incidents would result in notification obligations to affected individuals and government agencies, legal claims or proceedings, and liability under federal and state laws that protect the privacy and security of personal information. Any one of these events could cause our business to be materially harmed and our results of operations would be adversely impacted.
Negative public opinion and increased regulatory scrutiny of recombinant and transgenic products, genetically modified products, and genetically modified animals generally may damage public perception of our current and future products or adversely affect our ability to conduct our business and obtain regulatory approvals we may seek.

55


Kanuma is a transgenic product produced in the egg whites of genetically modified chickens who receive copies of the human lysosomal acid lipase gene to produce recombinant human lysosomal acid lipase. The success of Kanuma will depend in part on public attitudes of the use of genetic engineering. Public attitudes may be influenced by claims and perceptions that these types of activities or products are unsafe, and our products may not gain sufficient acceptance by, or fall out of favor with, the public or the medical community. Negative public attitudes to genetic engineering activities in general could result in more restrictive legislation or regulations and could impede our ability to conduct our business, delay preclinical or clinical studies, or otherwise prevent us from commercializing our product.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price is extremely volatile.
The trading price of our common stock has been extremely volatile and may continue to be volatile in the future. Many factors could have an impact on our stock price, including fluctuations in our or our competitors' operating results, clinical trial results or adverse events associated with our products, product development by us or our competitors, changes in laws, including healthcare, tax or intellectual property laws, intellectual property developments, changes in reimbursement or drug pricing, the existence or outcome of litigation or government proceedings, including the SEC/DOJ investigation, failure to resolve, delays in resolving or other developments with respect to the issues raised in the Warning Letter, acquisitions or other strategic transactions, and the perceptions of our investors that we are not performing or meeting expectations. The trading price of the common stock of many biopharmaceutical companies, including ours, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have at times been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies whose stocks were affected.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter and bylaws and under Delaware law could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult and may frustrate any attempt to remove or replace our current management.
 Our corporate charter and by-law provisions may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change of control that might be beneficial to us or our stockholders. Our bylaws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, the President, the Secretary, or a majority of the Board of Directors, or upon the written request of stockholders who together own of record 25% of the outstanding stock of all classes entitled to vote at such meeting. Our bylaws also specify that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors. Our charter does not include a provision for cumulative voting for directors, which may have enabled a minority stockholder holding a sufficient percentage of a class of shares to elect one or more directors. Under our charter, our board of directors has the authority, without further action by stockholders, to designate up to 5,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred stock that may be issued in the future.
Because we are a Delaware corporation, the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change in control would be beneficial to stockholders. We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Laws, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.


Item 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES (amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

The following table summarizes our common stock repurchase activity during the first quarter of 2016:
Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs
 
Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program
January 1-31, 2016
332

 
$
159.70

 
332

 
$
702,818

February 1-29, 2016
902

 
$
141.51

 
902

 
$
575,234

March 1-31, 2016
849

 
$
136.43

 
849

 
$
459,349

Total
2,083

 
$
142.34

 
2,083

 
 
In November 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date and we are not obligated to acquire a particular number of shares. In May 2015, our Board of Directors

56


increased the authorization to acquire shares with an aggregate value of up to $1,000,000 for future purchases under the repurchase program, which superseded all prior repurchase programs.

Item 5.
OTHER INFORMATION.
None.

Item 6.
EXHIBITS.
(a)
Exhibits:
31.1

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
31.2

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
32.1

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
 
 
32.2

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
 
 
101

The following materials from the Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
10.1

Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2016, by and between Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and David Hallal
 
 
10.2

Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2016, by and between Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Vikas Sinha
 
 
10.3

Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2016, by and between Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Clare Carmichael
 
 
10.4

Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2016, by and between Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Martin Mackay
 
 
10.5

Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2016, by and between Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and John Moriarty
 
 
 


57


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/    David Hallal 
Date: April 29, 2016
 
David Hallal
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/    Vikas Sinha        
Date: April 29, 2016
 
Vikas Sinha, M.B.A., C.A., C.P.A.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)