e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended May 2, 2010
|
|
Commission File Number
1-3822 |
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
|
|
|
New Jersey
State of Incorporation
|
|
21-0419870
I.R.S. Employer Identification No. |
1 Campbell Place
Camden, New Jersey 08103-1799
Principal Executive Offices
Telephone Number: (856) 342-4800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
There were 339,531,815 shares of capital stock outstanding as of June 3, 2010.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I
Item 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
Statements of Earnings
(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
May 2, |
|
May 3, |
|
May 2, |
|
May 3, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
|
$ |
1,686 |
|
|
$ |
6,158 |
|
|
$ |
6,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
3,621 |
|
|
|
3,665 |
|
Marketing and selling expenses |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Administrative expenses |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Other expenses / (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
5,018 |
|
|
Earnings before interest and taxes |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Earnings before taxes |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
Taxes on earnings |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
$ |
.275 |
|
|
$ |
.25 |
|
|
$ |
.80 |
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
August 2, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
Plant assets, net of depreciation |
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of amortization |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,986 |
|
|
$ |
6,056 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
Payable to suppliers and others |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
Dividend payable |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
Campbell Soup Company shareowners equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; authorized 40 shares; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock, $.0375 par value; authorized 560
shares; issued 542 shares |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Earnings retained in the business |
|
|
8,742 |
|
|
|
8,288 |
|
Capital stock in treasury, at cost |
|
|
(7,377 |
) |
|
|
(7,194 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
Total Campbell Soup Company shareowners equity |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
5,986 |
|
|
$ |
6,056 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
May 2, |
|
May 3, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to operating cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Changes in working capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Prepaid assets |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
Pension fund contributions |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Receipts from (payments of) hedging activities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of plant assets |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
Sales of plant assets |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Sale of business, net of cash divested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term repayments |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
Repayments of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(409 |
) |
Treasury stock issuances |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(665 |
) |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
Statements of Equity
(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Shareowners Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
In Treasury |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
in the |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Business |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|
Balance at August 3, 2008 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,812 |
) |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
7,909 |
|
|
$ |
(136 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Pension and postretirement benefits,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
Dividends ($.75 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
Treasury stock issued under
management incentive and
stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
Balance at May 3, 2009 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,079 |
) |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
8,307 |
|
|
$ |
(434 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
|
Balance at August 2, 2009 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,194 |
) |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
8,288 |
|
|
$ |
(718 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefits,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
Dividends ($.80 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
Treasury stock issued under
management incentive and
stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
Balance at May 2, 2010 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,377 |
) |
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
8,742 |
|
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(currency
in millions, except per share amounts)
1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
The financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows
for the indicated periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The accounting
policies used in preparing these financial statements are consistent with those applied in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 2, 2009, except for the adoption of new
financial accounting standards, as discussed in Note 2. Certain amounts in prior-year financial
statements were reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation. The results for the
period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other interim periods or
the full year.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative
guidance which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It requires a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary, which was formerly known as minority interest, to be classified as a separate component
of total equity in the consolidated financial statements. The company retrospectively adopted the
new noncontrolling interest guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption did not have
a material impact on the financial statements. See Note 9 for additional information.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for business combinations, which
establishes the principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes the assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date,
measured at their fair values as of that date with limited exceptions. The guidance requires
acquisition-related transaction costs to be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a
component of the business combination. The provisions as revised were effective as of the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 and will be applied to any business combinations entered into in fiscal 2010
and thereafter.
In September 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which
establishes a definition of fair value, provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands
the disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. This guidance does not require any new
fair value measurements but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
delayed by a year the effective date for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The company
adopted the provisions of the guidance for financial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The company adopted the remaining provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for nonfinancial
assets and liabilities, including goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption likewise did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 13 for additional
information.
In January 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance related to fair value
measurements and disclosures. The guidance requires disclosure of details of significant transfers
in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. Level 1 fair value measurements are
based on unadjusted quoted market prices. Level 2 fair value measurements are based on significant
inputs, other than Level 1, that are observable for the asset/liability through corroboration with
observable market data. The guidance also clarifies the existing disclosure requirements for the
level of disaggregation of fair value measurements and the disclosures on inputs and valuation
techniques. The company adopted these provisions in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The
adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In addition, the
guidance requires a gross presentation of the activity within the Level 3 roll forward, separately
presenting information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The roll forward
information must be provided by the company for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as the provision
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim
reporting periods within those years.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to the calculation of earnings
per share. The guidance provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to
the two-class method. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings
per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and
selected financial data) to conform with the new provisions. The company adopted the new guidance
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Prior periods have been restated. See Note 8 for additional
information.
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to interim disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments. The company prospectively adopted the interim fair value
disclosure guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption did not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial statements. The additional disclosures are included in Note
12.
In June 2009, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) was issued to become
the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be applied by
nongovernmental entities and supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will
become nonauthoritative. The Codification was effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The company adopted the provisions in
the first quarter of 2010. The adoption did not impact the companys consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance related to employers
disclosures about the plan assets of defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The
required disclosures include a description of how investment allocation decisions are made, major
categories of plan assets, valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the
impact of measurements using significant unobservable inputs and concentrations of risk within plan
assets. The disclosures about plan assets required by this additional guidance must be provided
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, and will be effective for the company for fiscal
year-end 2010.
3. Discontinued Operations
On March 18, 2008, the company completed the sale of its Godiva Chocolatier business for $850.
The purchase price was subject to certain post-closing adjustments, which resulted in an
additional $20 of proceeds. The company reflected the results of this business as discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of earnings. The company used approximately $600 of the
net proceeds to purchase company stock. The company recognized a $4 benefit in Earnings from
discontinued operations during the three-month period ended February 1, 2009, as a result of an
adjustment to the tax liability associated with the sale.
4. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net earnings, net foreign currency
translation adjustments, net unamortized pension and postretirement benefits adjustments and net
unrealized gains and losses on cash-flow hedges. Total comprehensive income for the three-month
periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, was $203 and $275, respectively. Total comprehensive
income for the nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, was $829 and $369,
respectively.
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (1) |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax (2) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Unamortized pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(787 |
) |
Prior service cost |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
$ |
(718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a tax expense of $3 as of May 2, 2010, and $7 as of August 2, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a tax benefit of $9 as of May 2, 2010, and $11 as of August 2, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes a tax benefit of $438 as of May 2, 2010, and $442 as of August 2, 2009. |
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, |
|
|
Baking |
|
|
Soup, Sauces |
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sauces and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages |
|
|
Snacking |
|
|
Beverages |
|
|
Foodservice |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at August 2, 2009 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
1,901 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
595 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
1,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth balance sheet information for intangible assets, excluding
goodwill, subject to amortization and intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets |
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
508 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net intangible assets |
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets consist of trademarks. Amortizable intangible assets consist
substantially of process technology and customer intangibles.
Amortization related to these assets was less than $1 for the nine-month periods ended May 2,
2010, and May 3, 2009. The estimated aggregated amortization expense for each of the five
succeeding fiscal years is less than $1 per year. Asset useful lives range from 10 to 20 years.
6. Business and Geographic Segment Information
Campbell Soup Company, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer
and marketer of high-quality, branded convenience food products. The company manages and reports
the results of operations in the following segments: U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages; Baking and
Snacking; International Soup, Sauces and Beverages; and North America Foodservice.
The U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment includes the following retail businesses:
Campbells condensed and ready-to-serve soups; Swanson broth, stocks and canned poultry; Prego
pasta sauce; Pace Mexican sauce; Campbells canned pasta, gravies, and beans; V8 juice and juice
drinks; and Campbells tomato juice.
The Baking and Snacking segment includes the following businesses: Pepperidge Farm cookies,
crackers, bakery and frozen products in U.S. retail; and Arnotts biscuits in Australia and Asia
Pacific.
The International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment includes the soup, sauce and beverage
businesses outside of the United States, including Europe, Latin America, the Asia Pacific region,
as well as the emerging markets of Russia and China and the retail business in Canada.
The North America Foodservice segment represents the distribution of products such as soup,
specialty entrees, beverage products, other prepared foods and Pepperidge Farm products through
various food service channels in the United States and Canada.
Accounting policies for measuring segment assets and earnings before interest and taxes are
substantially consistent with those described in the companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The company evaluates segment performance before interest and taxes. North America Foodservice
products are principally produced by the tangible assets of the companys other segments, except
for refrigerated soups, which are produced in a separate facility, and certain other products,
which are produced under contract
8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
manufacturing agreements. Tangible assets of the companys other
segments are not allocated to the North America Foodservice operations. Depreciation, however, is
allocated to North America Foodservice based on production hours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
|
$ |
3,056 |
|
|
$ |
3,134 |
|
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
|
$ |
1,686 |
|
|
$ |
6,158 |
|
|
$ |
6,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Earnings before interest and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
804 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
Baking and Snacking(1) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
North America Foodservice(1) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Corporate(2) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Earnings before interest and taxes of the North America Foodservice
segment included $12 of restructuring charges in the three- and
nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010. Earnings before interest and
taxes of the Baking and Snacking and North America Foodservice
segments included the effect of restructuring-related costs of $1 and
$5, respectively, in the three-month period ended May 3, 2009.
Earnings before interest and taxes of the Baking and Snacking and
North America Foodservice segments included the effect of
restructuring-related costs of $3 and $18, respectively, in the
nine-month period ended May 3, 2009. See Note 7 for additional
information on restructuring charges. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents unallocated corporate expenses. The three-month period
ended May 3, 2009, included a favorable net adjustment on commodity
hedge positions of $11. The nine-month period ended May 3, 2009,
included unrealized losses on commodity hedges of $14. |
7. Restructuring Charges
On April 28, 2008, the company announced a series of initiatives to improve operational
efficiency and long-term profitability, including selling certain salty snack food brands and
assets in Australia, closing certain production facilities in Australia and Canada, and
streamlining the companys management structure. As a result of these initiatives, in 2008, the
company recorded a restructuring charge of $175 ($102 after tax or $.27 per share). The charge
consisted of a net loss of $120 ($64 after tax) on the sale of certain Australian salty snack food
brands and assets; $45 ($31 after tax) of employee severance and benefit costs, including the
estimated impact of curtailment and other pension charges; and $10 ($7 after tax) of property,
plant and equipment impairment charges. In addition, approximately $7 ($5 after tax or $.01 per
share) of costs related to these initiatives were recorded in Cost of products sold, primarily
representing accelerated depreciation on property, plant and equipment. The aggregate after-tax
impact of restructuring charges and related costs in 2008 was $107, or $.28 per share.
In 2009, the company recorded approximately $22 ($15 after tax or $.04 per share) of costs
related to the 2008 initiatives in Cost of products sold. Approximately $17 ($12 after tax) of the
costs represented accelerated depreciation on property, plant and equipment; approximately $4 ($2
after tax) related to other exit costs; and approximately $1 related to employee severance and
benefit costs, including other pension charges. Of the amount recorded in 2009, costs of $6 ($4
after tax or $.01 per share) were recorded in the third quarter, while costs of $21 ($14 after tax
or $.04 per share) were recorded through the nine-month period ended May 3, 2009. Approximately
$17 ($12 after tax) of the costs represented accelerated depreciation on property, plant and
equipment, and approximately $4 ($2 after tax) related to other exit costs.
9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
In the third quarter of 2010, the company recorded a restructuring charge of $12 ($8 after tax
or $.02 per share) for pension benefit costs, which represented the final costs associated with the
2008 initiatives. The pension benefit costs were included in the pension obligation on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
A summary of restructuring reserves at May 2, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
2010 |
|
Severance pay and benefits |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of restructuring charges incurred in 2008 through 2010 by reportable segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, |
|
|
Baking |
|
|
Soup, Sauces |
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sauces and |
|
|
And |
|
|
And |
|
|
America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages |
|
|
Snacking |
|
|
Beverages |
|
|
Foodservice |
|
|
Total |
|
Severance pay and benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
Asset impairment/accelerated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Other exit costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Earnings per Share
In June 2008, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to the calculation of earnings per
share. The guidance provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities
and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each
class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation
rights in undistributed earnings. The company adopted and retrospectively applied the new guidance
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The retrospective application of the provisions resulted in a
reduction of previously reported basic net earnings per share of $.01, for the three-month period
ended May 3, 2009. There was no change to the previously reported diluted net earnings per share
for the three-month period ended May 3, 2009. For the nine-month period ended May 3, 2009, the
retrospective application resulted in a reduction of the previously reported basic earnings per
share from continuing operations and net earnings of $.03 and of the previously reported diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations and net earnings of $.02. There was no change to the
previously reported basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations for the
nine-month period ended May 3, 2009.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareowners is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
719 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
719 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: stock options |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options to purchase less than 1 million shares of capital stock for the nine-month
period ended May 2, 2010, and stock options to purchase approximately 6 million and 3 million
shares of capital stock for the three-month and nine-month periods ended May 3, 2009, respectively,
were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of
the stock options exceeded the average market price of the capital stock and, therefore, would be
antidilutive. There were no antidilutive stock options in the three-month period ended May 2,
2010.
Additional historical information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
August 3, |
|
|
July 29, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
|
$ |
792 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners basic |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
659 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners basic |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
|
$ |
792 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners diluted |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
659 |
|
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
Less: Allocation to participating securities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to common shareowners diluted |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: stock options |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
August 3, |
|
|
July 29, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
$ |
3.03 |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts does not equal due to rounding. |
9. Noncontrolling Interest
The company owns a 70% controlling interest in a Malaysian manufacturing company. The
noncontrolling interest in this entity is included in Total equity in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest were less than $1 for the three-
and nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, and were included in Other
expenses/(income) in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
10. Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The company sponsors certain defined benefit plans and postretirement medical benefit plans
for employees. Components of benefit expense were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement costs |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The settlement costs in 2010 are related to the closure of a plant in Canada. The settlement
costs are included in Restructuring charges in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. See Note 7
for additional information.
As of May 2, 2010, a contribution of $260 was made to a U.S. pension plan and contributions of
$21 were made to non-U.S. pension plans. No additional U.S. pension plan contributions are
expected this fiscal year. Contributions to non-U.S. pension plans are expected to be
approximately $5 during the remainder of the fiscal year.
11. Taxes on Earnings
In the third quarter of 2010, the company recorded deferred tax expense of $10 due to the
enactment of U.S. health care legislation in March 2010. The law changed the tax treatment of
subsidies to companies that provide prescription drug benefits to retirees. Accordingly, the
company recorded the non-cash charge to reduce the value of the deferred tax asset associated with
the subsidy.
12
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
12. Financial Instruments
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate fair value. The fair value of short-term borrowings and long-term debt as of May 2,
2010, was $979 and $1,661, respectively, and was based on quoted market prices or pricing models
using current market rates.
The principal market risks to which the company is exposed are changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. In addition, the company is exposed to
equity price changes related to certain deferred compensation obligations. In order to manage
these exposures, the company follows established risk management policies and procedures, including
the use of derivative contracts such as swaps, forwards, commodity futures and option contracts.
These derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying
exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The company does not
enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments.
The companys derivative programs include strategies that both qualify and do not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment.
The company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts will fail to
meet their contractual obligations. The company minimizes the counterparty credit risk on these
transactions by dealing only with leading, credit-worthy financial institutions having long-term
credit ratings of A or better. In addition, the contracts are distributed among several
financial institutions, thus minimizing credit-risk concentration. The company does not have
credit-risk-related contingent features in its derivative instruments as of May 2, 2010.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to its international
operations, including non-functional currency, intercompany debt and net investments in
subsidiaries. The company is also exposed to foreign exchange risk as a result of transactions in
currencies other than the functional currency of certain subsidiaries. The company utilizes
foreign exchange forward purchase and sale contracts as well as cross-currency swaps to hedge these
exposures. The contracts are designated as cash-flow hedging instruments or are undesignated. The
company typically hedges portions of its forecasted foreign currency transaction exposure with
foreign exchange forward contracts for up to 18 months. To hedge currency exposures related to
intercompany debt, cross-currency swap contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the
underlying debt. As of May 2, 2010, cross-currency swap contracts mature in 2010 through 2014.
Principal currencies hedged include the Australian dollar, euro, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona,
New Zealand dollar, British pound and Japanese yen. The notional amount of foreign exchange
forward and cross-currency swap contracts accounted for as cash-flow hedges was $339 and $325 at
May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, respectively. The effective portion of the changes in fair value on
these instruments is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into the
Statements of Earnings on the same line item and same period in which the underlying hedge
transaction affects earnings. The notional amount of foreign exchange forward and cross-currency
swap contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges was $852 and $726 at May 2, 2010, and
May 3, 2009, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk
The company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates by optimizing the use of
variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and by utilizing interest rate swaps in order to maintain its
variable-to-total debt ratio within targeted guidelines. Receive fixed rate/pay variable rate
interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair-value hedges. The notional amount of outstanding
fair-value interest rate swaps totaled $500 at May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009. These swaps mature in
fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2014.
During fiscal 2010, the company entered into forward starting interest rate swap contracts
accounted for as cash-flow hedges with a combined notional value of $200 to hedge an anticipated
debt offering.
In June 2008, the company entered into two forward starting interest rate swap contracts
accounted for as cash-flow hedges with a combined notional value of $200 to hedge an anticipated
debt offering in fiscal 2009. These swaps were settled as of November 2, 2008, at a loss of $13,
which was recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). In January 2009, the company issued $300
ten-year 4.50% notes. The loss on the swap contracts is being amortized over the life of the debt
as additional interest expense.
13
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Commodity Price Risk
The company principally uses a combination of purchase orders and various short- and long-term
supply arrangements in connection with the purchase of raw materials, including certain commodities
and agricultural products. The company also enters into commodity futures and options contracts to
reduce the volatility of price fluctuations of natural gas, diesel fuel, wheat, soybean oil, cocoa,
aluminum and corn, which impact the cost of raw materials. Commodity futures and option contracts
are accounted for as cash-flow hedges or are not designated as accounting hedges. Commodity
futures and option contracts are typically entered into to hedge a portion of commodity
requirements for periods up to 18 months. The notional amount of commodity contracts accounted for
as cash-flow hedges was $13 and $23 at May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, respectively. The notional
amount of commodity contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges was $46 and $64 at May
2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, respectively. As of May 2, 2010, all commodity contracts mature within
12 months.
Equity Price Risk
The company hedges a portion of exposures relating to certain deferred compensation
obligations linked to the total return of the Standard & Poors 500 Index, the total return of the
companys capital stock and the total return of the Puritan Fund. Under these contracts, the
company pays variable interest rates and receives from the counterparty either the total return of
the Standard & Poors
500 Index, the total return on company capital stock, or the total return of the Puritan Fund.
These instruments are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. The contracts are
typically entered into for periods not exceeding 12 months. The notional amount of the companys
deferred compensation hedges as of May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, were $72 and $43, respectively.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 2, 2010, and August 2, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Other assets |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Deferred compensation contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The derivative assets and liabilities are presented on a gross basis in the table. Certain
derivative asset and liability balances, including cash collateral, are offset in the balance sheet
when a legally enforceable right of offset exists.
The following tables show the effect of the companys derivative instruments designated as
cash-flow hedges for the three- and nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, on other
comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) and the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
Derivatives Designated as Cash-Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Activity |
|
Three Months Ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at beginning of quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
Effective portion of changes in fair value recognized in OCI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amount of (gain) or loss reclassified from OCI to earnings: |
|
Location in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at end of quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Activity |
|
Nine Months Ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at beginning of year |
|
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
Effective portion of changes in fair value recognized in OCI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Amount of (gain) or loss reclassified from OCI to earnings: |
|
Location in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Forward starting interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI derivative gain/(loss) at end of quarter |
|
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount expected to be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings within
the next 12 months is a loss of $9. The ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness
testing were not material.
The following tables show the effect of the companys derivative instruments designated as
fair-value hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
on Derivatives |
|
|
on Hedged Item |
|
Derivatives Designated |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
as Fair-Value Hedges |
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the effects of the companys derivative instruments not designated
as hedges in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
On Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges |
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
7 |
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
Other expenses/income |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Deferred compensation contracts |
|
Administrative expenses |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Fair Value Measurements
The company is required to categorize financial assets and liabilities based on the following
fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability through corroboration with observable market data. |
16
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions. |
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the
measurement date. When available, the company uses unadjusted quoted market prices to measure the
fair value and classifies such items as Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, the
company bases fair value upon internally developed models that use current market-based or
independently sourced market parameters such as interest rates and currency rates. Items valued
using internally generated models are classified according to the lowest level input or value
driver that is significant to the calculation.
The following table presents the companys financial assets and liabilities that are measured
at fair value on a recurring basis at May 2, 2010, consistent with the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
May 2, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (1) |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts (2) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts (3) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation derivatives (4) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives (5) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
May 2, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (1) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts (2) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swap contracts (3) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives (5) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation obligation (6) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on LIBOR swap rates. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on observable market transactions of spot currency rates and forward rates. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on observable local benchmarks for currency and interest rates. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on LIBOR and equity index swap rates. |
|
(5) |
|
Based on quoted futures exchanges. |
|
(6) |
|
Based on the fair value of the participants investments. |
14. Share Repurchase Programs
In June 2008, the companys Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $1,200 of
company stock through fiscal 2011. This program began in fiscal 2009. In addition to this
publicly announced program, the company repurchases shares to offset the impact of dilution from
shares issued under the companys stock compensation plans.
During the nine-month period ended May 2, 2010, the company repurchased 9 million shares at a
cost of $315. Of this amount, $182 was used to repurchase shares pursuant to the companys June
2008 publicly announced share repurchase program. Approximately $618 remains available under this
program as of May 2, 2010.
17
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
During the nine-month period ended May 3, 2009, the company repurchased 13 million shares at a
cost of $409. Of this amount, $291 was used to repurchase shares pursuant to the companys June
2008 publicly announced share repurchase program.
15. Stock-based Compensation
The company provides compensation benefits by issuing unrestricted stock, restricted stock and
restricted stock units (including EPS performance restricted stock/units and total shareowner
return (TSR) performance restricted stock/units). In previous fiscal years, the company also
issued stock options and stock appreciation rights to provide compensation benefits.
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation recognized in Earnings from continuing operations was
$23 and $19 for the three-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, respectively.
Tax-related benefits of $8 and $7 were also recognized for the three-month periods ended May 2,
2010, and May 3, 2009, respectively. Total pre-tax stock-based compensation recognized in Earnings
from continuing operations was $68 and $63 for the nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3,
2009, respectively. Tax-related benefits of $25 and $23 were also recognized for the nine-month
periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, respectively. Cash received from the exercise of stock
options was $75 and $69 for the nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009,
respectively, and is reflected in cash flows from financing activities in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes stock option activity as of May 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Options in thousands) |
|
Outstanding at August 2, 2009 |
|
|
17,552 |
|
|
$ |
27.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,724 |
) |
|
$ |
27.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
$ |
34.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at May 2, 2010 |
|
|
14,746 |
|
|
$ |
26.84 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at May 2, 2010 |
|
|
14,746 |
|
|
$ |
26.84 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine-month periods ended May 2,
2010, and May 3, 2009, was $17 and $30, respectively. As of January 2009, compensation related to
stock options was fully expensed. The company measured the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The following table summarizes time-lapse restricted stock/units and EPS performance
restricted stock/units as of May 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares/Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Restricted stock/units in thousands) |
|
Nonvested at August 2, 2009 |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
$ |
38.17 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
32.21 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
$ |
37.66 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
$ |
35.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at May 2, 2010 |
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
35.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of time-lapse restricted stock/units and EPS performance restricted stock/units
is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of the companys stock at
the date of grant. Time-lapse restricted stock/units granted in fiscal 2006 and forward are
expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, except for awards issued to
retirement-eligible participants, which are expensed on an accelerated basis. EPS restricted
stock/units are expensed on a graded-vesting basis, except for awards issued to retirement-eligible
participants, which are expensed on an accelerated basis.
As of May 2, 2010, total remaining unearned compensation related to nonvested time-lapse
restricted stock/units and EPS performance restricted stock/units was $43, which will be amortized
over the weighted-average remaining service period of 1.8 years.
18
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The fair value of restricted stock/units vested during the nine-month periods ended May 2,
2010, and May 3, 2009, was $31 and $47, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value
of the restricted stock/units granted during the nine-month period ended May 3, 2009, was $39.59.
The following table summarizes TSR performance restricted stock/units as of May 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares/Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Restricted stock/units in thousands) |
|
Nonvested at August 2, 2009 |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
$ |
36.08 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
$ |
33.84 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
$ |
26.43 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
$ |
31.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at May 2, 2010 |
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
$ |
38.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of TSR performance restricted stock/units is estimated at the grant date using
a Monte Carlo simulation. Expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period.
As of May 2, 2010, total remaining unearned compensation related to TSR performance restricted
stock/units was $64, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining service period of
1.9 years. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, recipients of TSR performance restricted
stock/units earned 85% of their initial grants based upon the companys total shareowner return
ranking in a performance peer group during a three-year period ended July 31, 2009. As a result,
approximately 165,000 shares were forfeited. The total fair value of TSR performance restricted
stock/units vested during the nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, was $31 and
$57, respectively. The grant-date fair value of TSR performance restricted stock/units granted
during the nine-month period ended May 3, 2009, was $47.20.
Prior to fiscal 2009, employees could elect to defer all types of restricted stock awards.
These awards are classified as liabilities because of the possibility that they may be settled in
cash. The fair value is adjusted quarterly. Total cash paid to settle the liabilities during the
nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3, 2009, was not material.
The excess tax benefits on the exercise of stock options and vested restricted stock presented
as cash flows from financing activities for the nine-month periods ended May 2, 2010, and May 3,
2009, were $6 and $18, respectively.
16. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
August 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials, containers and supplies |
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
639 |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Other cash used in operating activities for the nine-month periods is comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Benefit related payments |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Item 2.
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSES OF
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
OVERVIEW
Description of the Company
Campbell Soup Company is a global manufacturer and marketer of high-quality, branded
convenience food products. The company is organized and reports in the following segments: U.S.
Soup, Sauces and Beverages; Baking and Snacking; International Soup, Sauces and Beverages; and
North America Foodservice. The companys well-known brands are sold in approximately 120 countries.
Its principal geographies are the United States, Canada, Australia, France, Germany and Belgium.
Executive Summary
This Executive Summary provides significant highlights from the discussion and analysis that
follows.
|
|
|
Net sales increased 7% in the quarter to $1.802 billion. |
|
|
|
Currency translation contributed 5 percentage points of sales growth. |
|
|
|
|
U.S. soup sales increased 2% on volume gains of 5%. U.S. beverages sales increased 13%. |
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of sales, increased to 41.2% in the quarter, reflecting cost savings from productivity initiatives. |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share for the quarter of $.49 were comparable to the prior year. The
current quarter included $.05 of expenses from items that impacted comparability, as
discussed below. |
|
|
|
|
For the first nine months of 2010, cash from operations increased to $859 million. |
Items Impacting Comparability
The following items impacted the comparability of net earnings and net earnings per share:
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the company recorded a restructuring charge of $12
million ($8 million after tax or $.02 per share) for pension benefit costs related to the
previously announced initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term
profitability. In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the company recorded pre-tax
restructuring-related costs of $6 million ($4 million after tax or $.01 per share) in Cost
of products sold associated with the previously announced initiatives. In the nine months
ended May 3, 2009, the company recorded pre-tax restructuring-related costs of $21 million
($14 million after tax or $.04 per share) in Cost of products sold. See Note 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the company recorded deferred tax expense of $10
million, or $.03 per share, to reduce deferred tax assets as a result of the U.S. health
care legislation enacted in March 2010. The law changed the tax treatment of subsidies to
companies that provide prescription drug benefits to retirees. |
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the company recognized an $11 million ($7 million
after tax or $.02 per share) favorable net adjustment in Cost of products sold on commodity
hedge positions. The year-to-date impact in 2009 from open commodity hedges was $14 million
($9 million after tax or $.03 per share) of unrealized losses. |
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2009, the company recorded a $4 million tax benefit ($.01 per
share) related to the sale of the Godiva Chocolatier business. |
20
The items impacting comparability are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
May 2, |
|
|
May 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
EPS |
|
(Millions, except per share amounts) |
|
Impact |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense from U.S. health care
legislation |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restructuring charges and related costs |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(.04 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on commodity hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from sale of Godiva Chocolatier business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of significant items on net earnings |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
(.05 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
(.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Continuing and Discontinued Operations
The company reported earnings from continuing operations of $168 million for the quarter ended
May 2, 2010, versus $174 million in the comparable quarter a year ago. Earnings per share from
continuing operations were $.49 in both periods. After adjusting for the items impacting
comparability, earnings from continuing operations for the quarter increased primarily due to an
improved gross margin percentage, higher sales, and the impact of currency, partially offset by
higher administrative expenses. Earnings per share from continuing operations in the current
quarter benefited from a reduction in the weighted average diluted shares outstanding, which was
primarily due to share repurchases under the companys strategic share repurchase program.
Earnings per share from continuing operations were positively impacted by $.03 from currency
translation.
For the nine months ended May 2, 2010, earnings from continuing operations were $731 million
compared to $663 million a year ago. Earnings per share from continuing operations were $2.09
compared to $1.82 a year ago. After adjusting for the items impacting comparability, earnings from
continuing operations in the current period increased primarily due to an improved gross margin
percentage, the impact of currency, and lower advertising expenses partially offset by lower sales
volumes and increased administrative costs. Earnings per share from continuing operations in the
current period benefited from a reduction in the weighted average diluted shares outstanding, which
was primarily due to share repurchases under the companys strategic share repurchase program.
Earnings per share from continuing operations were positively impacted by $.08 from currency
translation.
Earnings from discontinued operations of $4 million, or $.01 per share, for the nine-months
ended May 3, 2009, represented an adjustment to the tax liability associated with the sale of the
Godiva Chocolatier business.
Basis of Presentation
All earnings per share amounts included in Managements Discussion and Analysis are presented
on a diluted basis.
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance
related to the calculation of earnings per share. The guidance provides that unvested share-based
payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether
paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings
per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula
that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security
according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The company
adopted and retrospectively applied the new guidance in the first quarter of 2010. The
retrospective application of the provisions resulted in a reduction of previously reported basic net
earnings per share of $.01 for the three-month
21
period ended May 3, 2009. There was no change to
the previously reported diluted net earnings per share for the three-month period ended May 3,
2009. The retrospective application of the provisions resulted in a reduction of previously
reported basic earnings per share from continuing operations and net earnings of $.03 and of the
previously reported diluted earnings per share from continuing operations and net earnings of $.02,
for the nine-month period ended May 3, 2009. There was no change to the previously reported basic
and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations for the nine-month period ended May 3,
2009. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
THIRD-QUARTER DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Sales
An analysis of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
|
$ |
1,686 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An analysis of percent change of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, |
|
Baking |
|
Soup, Sauces |
|
North |
|
|
|
|
Sauces and |
|
and |
|
and |
|
America |
|
|
|
|
Beverages |
|
Snacking |
|
Beverages |
|
Foodservice |
|
Total |
Volume and Mix |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Price and Sales Allowances |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Increased Promotional Spending (1) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Acquisitions/(Divestitures) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents revenue reductions from trade promotion and consumer coupon redemption programs. |
In U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages, U.S. soup sales increased 2% as 5% volume growth was
partly offset by increased promotional spending. Further details below:
|
|
|
Sales of Campbells condensed soups declined 1% with declines in cooking and eating
varieties, as increased promotional spending was only partially offset by volume gains. |
|
|
|
|
Sales of ready-to-serve soups increased 4%. Volume gains in Campbells Chunky and
Select Harvest canned soups were partially offset by increased promotional spending and
declines in microwavable varieties. |
|
|
|
|
Broth sales increased 9%. |
Beverage sales increased 13% driven by volume gains. V8 V-Fusion juice sales increased
significantly due to increased advertising and promotional activity and successful new item
launches. Sales of V8 vegetable juice and V8 Splash juice drinks contributed to sales growth as
both benefitted from increased promotional activity. Sauce sales improved reflecting gains in
Prego pasta sauce and double-digit growth in Pace Mexican sauce.
In Baking and Snacking, sales at Pepperidge Farm increased primarily due to the acquisition of
Ecce Panis, Inc. in May 2009 and gains in the cookies and crackers business. In the Pepperidge
Farm cookies and crackers business, sales increased reflecting the solid growth of Goldfish snack crackers, partly offset by a decline in cookies. In Australia, sales
increased due to currency and growth in Arnotts, led by chocolate snacks, partially offset by
declines in both savory and sweet biscuit products.
22
In International Soup, Sauces and Beverages, sales increased primarily due to currency. In
Europe, sales increased primarily due to currency and higher sales in Germany, partly offset by
lower sales in France. In Asia Pacific, sales increased primarily due to currency. In Canada,
sales increased due to currency, partially offset by lower soup sales.
In North America Foodservice, sales declined primarily due to continued weakness in the food
service sector.
Gross Profit
Gross profit, defined as Net sales less Cost of products sold, increased by $58 million in
2010. As a percent of sales, gross profit increased from 40.6% in 2009 to 41.2% in 2010. The
percentage point increase was due to productivity improvements (approximately 2.1 percentage
points), higher selling prices (approximately 0.4 percentage point), and costs in the prior year
related to the initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term profitability
(approximately 0.4 percentage point), partially offset by increased promotional spending
(approximately 1.4 percentage points), a favorable adjustment on commodity hedge positions in the
prior year (approximately 0.7 percentage point), unfavorable mix (approximately 0.1 percentage
point), and the impact of cost inflation and other factors (approximately 0.1 percentage point).
Marketing and Selling Expenses
Marketing and selling expenses as a percent of sales were 14.0% in 2010 and 14.6% in 2009.
Marketing and selling expenses increased 2% in 2010 from 2009. The increase was primarily due to
the impact of currency (approximately 4 percentage points) and higher selling expenses
(approximately 2 percentage points), partially offset by lower advertising and consumer promotion
expenses (approximately 4 percentage points). The lower advertising expenses were due in part to a
reduction in media rates and a shift to trade promotion in many businesses.
Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 8.7% in 2010 and 7.7% in 2009.
Administrative expenses increased by 21% in 2010 from 2009, primarily due to an increase in
employee benefit costs, including equity-related benefit expenses and pension costs (approximately
14 percentage points), the impact of currency (approximately 4 percentage points), and higher
general administrative costs (approximately 3 percentage points).
Operating Earnings
Segment operating earnings increased 10% in 2010 from 2009.
An analysis of operating earnings by segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010(1) |
|
|
2009(2) |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating earnings for the North America Foodservice segment included
$12 million of restructuring charges. See Note 7 for additional
information on restructuring charges. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Operating earnings by segment included the effect of
restructuring-related costs of $1 million in Baking and Snacking and
$5 million in North America Foodservice, and a favorable net
adjustment on commodity hedge positions of $11 million in Corporate.
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information on restructuring charges. |
Earnings from U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages increased 10% in 2010 versus 2009 primarily due
to higher sales and an improved gross margin percentage.
23
Earnings from Baking and Snacking increased 33% in 2010 versus 2009 primarily due to the
impact of currency and margin growth in Pepperidge Farm. The prior year included $1 million in
costs related to the initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term profitability.
Earnings from International Soup, Sauces and Beverages increased 28% in 2010 versus 2009. The
increase in operating earnings was due to the impact of currency and margin growth in Europe,
partially offset by a decline in Canada.
Earnings from North America Foodservice in 2010 decreased $16 million to a loss of $3 million
from earnings of $13 million in 2009. The current year included $12 million in restructuring
charges related to the initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term profitability,
and the prior year included $5 million in costs related to the restructuring. The remaining
decrease was primarily due to lower manufacturing costs in the prior year and lower sales in the
current year.
Corporate expenses increased from $8 million in 2009 to $32 million in 2010. The prior year
included an $11 million favorable net adjustment on commodity hedge positions. The remainder of
the increase was due primarily to higher equity-related benefit costs.
Interest Expense/Income
Interest expense increased to $29 million from $26 million in the prior year, primarily due to
an increase in fixed-rate debt, partially offset by lower average short-term rates.
Taxes on Earnings
The effective tax rate for the current quarter was 36.6%. The effective rate for the year-ago
quarter was 33.1%. The increase in the effective rate was primarily due to deferred tax expense of
$10 million recognized in the current quarter as a result of the enactment of U.S. health care
legislation in March 2010. The law changed the tax treatment of subsidies to companies that
provide prescription drug benefits to retirees. The company recorded the adjustment to reduce the
value of the deferred tax asset associated with the subsidy.
NINE-MONTH DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Sales
An analysis of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
3,056 |
|
|
$ |
3,134 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,158 |
|
|
$ |
6,058 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
An analysis of percent change of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, |
|
Baking |
|
Soup, Sauces |
|
North |
|
|
|
|
Sauces and |
|
and |
|
And |
|
America |
|
|
|
|
Beverages |
|
Snacking |
|
Beverages |
|
Foodservice |
|
Total |
Volume and Mix |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Price and Sales Allowances |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Increased Promotional Spending (1) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Acquisitions/(Divestitures) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents revenue reductions from trade promotion and consumer coupon redemption programs. |
In U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages, U.S. soup sales decreased 4%, due to the following:
|
|
|
Sales of Campbells condensed soups declined 1%, as declines in eating varieties were
partially offset by gains in cooking varieties. |
|
|
|
|
Sales of ready-to-serve soups decreased 10%. |
|
|
|
|
Broth sales increased 2%. |
Beverage sales increased primarily due to higher sales of V8 V-Fusion juice, partly offset by
lower sales of V8 vegetable juice. Prego pasta sauce sales increased, while Pace Mexican sauce
sales declined slightly.
In Baking and Snacking, sales at Pepperidge Farm increased primarily due to the acquisition of
Ecce Panis, Inc. in May 2009. Within Pepperidge Farm, sales in the bakery business increased due
to the acquisition, partially offset by a decline in the base business. In the Pepperidge Farm
cookies and crackers business, sales increased reflecting the growth of Goldfish snack crackers,
partly offset by a decline in cookies. Sales declined in the Pepperidge Farm frozen business. In
Australia, sales increased due to currency and growth in Arnotts products.
In International Soup, Sauces and Beverages, sales increased primarily due to currency, partly
offset by the divestiture of the companys French sauce and mayonnaise business in September 2008.
In Europe, sales increased due to currency, partly offset by the divestiture and lower sales in
Germany. In Asia Pacific, sales increased primarily due to currency and gains in Japan. In
Canada, sales increased due to currency.
In North America Foodservice, sales declined primarily due to continued weakness in the food
service sector.
Gross Profit
Gross profit, defined as Net sales less Cost of products sold, increased by $144 million in
2010. As a percent of sales, gross profit increased from 39.5% in 2009 to 41.2% in 2010. The
percentage point increase was due to productivity improvements (approximately 2.1 percentage
points), higher selling prices (approximately 1.0 percentage point), unrealized losses on commodity
hedges in the prior year (approximately 0.2 percentage point), costs in the prior year related to
the initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term profitability (approximately 0.4
percentage point), and favorable mix (approximately 0.1 percentage point), partially offset by
increased promotional spending (approximately 1.1 percentage points), and the impact of cost
inflation and other factors (approximately 1.0 percentage point).
Marketing and Selling Expenses
Marketing and selling expenses as a percent of sales were 13.6% in 2010 and 14.3% in 2009.
Marketing and selling expenses decreased 4% in 2010 from 2009. The decrease was primarily due to
lower advertising expenses (approximately 5 percentage points), and lower other marketing expenses
(approximately 2 percentage points), partially offset by the impact of currency (approximately 2
percentage points) and higher selling expenses (approximately 1 percentage point). The lower
advertising expenses in the current year reflected a reduction in media rates and a shift to trade
promotion in many of the businesses.
25
Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 7.1% in 2010 and 6.7% in 2009.
Administrative expenses increased by 8% in 2010 from 2009, primarily due to an increase in employee
benefit costs, including equity-related benefit expenses and pension expense, (approximately
5 percentage points), and the impact of currency (approximately 3 percentage points).
Operating Earnings
Segment operating earnings increased 11% in 2010 from 2009.
An analysis of operating earnings by segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010(1) |
|
|
2009(2) |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
$ |
804 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Baking and Snacking |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
North America Foodservice |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating earnings for the North America Foodservice segment included
$12 million of restructuring charges. See Note 7 for additional
information on restructuring charges. |
|
(2) |
|
Operating earnings by segment included the effect of
restructuring-related costs of $3 million in Baking and Snacking and
$18 million in North America Foodservice, and unrealized losses on
commodity hedges of $14 million in Corporate. See Note 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on
restructuring charges. |
Earnings from U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages increased 3% in 2010 versus 2009 due to an
improvement in gross margin percentage, and lower advertising expenses, partially offset by lower
sales.
Earnings from Baking and Snacking increased 29% in 2010 versus 2009. The prior year included
$3 million in restructuring-related costs. The increase in operating earnings was due to the
impact of currency and margin growth in Pepperidge Farm and Arnotts.
Earnings from International Soup, Sauces and Beverages increased 32% in 2010 versus 2009. The
increase in operating earnings was primarily due to the impact of currency and growth in the
businesses in Europe.
Earnings from North America Foodservice increased to $40 million in 2010 from $34 million in
2009. The current year included $12 million in restructuring charges, and the prior year included
$18 million in restructuring-related costs.
Corporate expenses increased from $83 million in 2009 to $87 million in 2010. The prior
year included $14 million in unrealized losses on commodity hedges. The current year increase was
primarily due to higher equity-related benefit costs.
Interest Expense/Income
Interest expense decreased to $84 million from $85 million in the prior year, primarily due to
lower average interest rates, partially offset by higher average debt levels.
Taxes on Earnings
The effective tax rate for the current period was 32.4%. The effective rate for the year-ago
period was 30.7%. The current year included $10 million of deferred tax expense to reduce deferred
tax assets resulting from the enacted changes in U.S. health care legislation in March 2010. The
remaining increase in the effective rate was primarily due to higher state taxes in the U.S.
26
Restructuring Charges
On April 28, 2008, the company announced a series of initiatives to improve operational
efficiency and long-term profitability, including selling certain salty snack food brands and
assets in Australia, closing certain production facilities in Australia and Canada, and
streamlining the companys management structure. As a result of these initiatives, in 2008, the
company recorded a restructuring charge of $175 million ($102 million after tax or $.27 per share).
The charge consisted of a net loss of $120 million ($64 million after tax) on the sale of certain
Australian salty snack food brands and assets; $45 million ($31 million after tax) of employee
severance and benefit costs, including the estimated impact of curtailment and other pension
charges; and $10 million ($7 million after tax) of property, plant and equipment impairment
charges. In addition, approximately $7 million ($5 million after tax or $.01 per share) of costs
related to these initiatives were recorded in Cost of products sold, primarily representing
accelerated depreciation on property, plant and equipment. The aggregate after-tax impact of
restructuring charges and related costs in 2008 was $107 million, or $.28 per share.
In 2009, the company recorded approximately $22 million ($15 million after tax or $.04 per
share) of costs related to the 2008 initiatives in Cost of products sold. Approximately
$17 million ($12 million after tax) of the costs represented accelerated depreciation on property,
plant and equipment; approximately $4 million ($2 million after tax) related to other exit costs;
and approximately $1 million related to employee severance and benefit costs, including other
pension charges. Of the amount recorded in 2009, costs of $21 million ($14 million after tax or
$.04 per share) were recorded through the end of the third quarter. Approximately $17 million ($12
million after tax) of the costs represented accelerated depreciation on property, plant and
equipment, and approximately $4 million ($2 million after tax) related to other exit costs.
In the third quarter of 2010, the company recorded a restructuring charge of $12 million ($8
million after tax or $.02 per share) for pension benefit costs, which represented the final costs
associated with the 2008 initiatives.
In aggregate, the company incurred pre-tax costs of approximately $216 million in 2008 through
2010 by segment as follows: Baking and Snacking $147 million, International Soup, Sauces and
Beverages $9 million and North America Foodservice $60 million.
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The company expects that foreseeable liquidity and capital resource requirements, including
cash outflows to repurchase shares, pay dividends and fund pension plan contributions, will be met
through anticipated cash flows from operations; long-term borrowings under its shelf registration
statement; short-term borrowings, including commercial paper; and cash and cash equivalents. The
company expects that its sources of financing are adequate to meet its future liquidity and capital
resource requirements. The cost and terms of any future financing arrangements may be negatively
impacted by capital and credit market disruptions and will depend on the market conditions and the
companys financial position at the time.
The company generated cash from operations of $859 million in 2010, compared to $806 million
last year. The increase was primarily due to improvements in working capital requirements and
higher earnings, partially offset by a $260 million contribution to a U.S. pension plan.
Capital expenditures were $177 million in 2010 compared to $176 million a year ago. Capital
expenditures in 2010 included expansion and enhancements of the companys corporate headquarters
(approximately $25 million), expansion of Arnotts production capacity (approximately $15 million),
the ongoing implementation of SAP in Australia and New Zealand (approximately $12 million) and
expansion of Pepperidge Farms production capacity (approximately $9 million). Capital
expenditures are expected to total approximately $350 million in 2010.
Net cash provided by investing activities in 2009 included the proceeds from the sale of the
sauce and mayonnaise business in France, net of cash divested.
Excluding shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding requirements on
the vesting of restricted shares and for stock option exercises, the company repurchased 9 million
shares at a cost of $315 million during the nine-month period in 2010 and 13 million shares at a
cost of $409 million during the nine-month period in 2009. Approximately 5 million of the shares
repurchased in the current year and approximately 9 million of the shares repurchased in the
prior-year period were repurchased
27
pursuant to the companys June 2008 publicly announced share
repurchase program. Approximately $618 million remains available under the June 2008 repurchase
program as of May 2, 2010. In addition to the June 2008 publicly announced share repurchase
program, the company also purchased shares to offset the impact of dilution from shares issued
under the companys stock compensation plans. The company expects to continue this practice in the
future. See Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for more information.
At May 2, 2010, the company had $945 million of short-term borrowings due within one year and
$25 million of standby letters of credit issued on behalf of the company. The company has a $1.5
billion committed revolving credit facility maturing in 2011, which remained unused at May 2, 2010,
except for $25 million of standby letters of credit issued on behalf of the company. This
agreement supports the companys commercial paper programs.
In November 2008, the company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that registered an indeterminate amount of debt securities. Under the registration
statement, the company may issue debt securities, depending on market conditions. During fiscal
2010, the company entered into forward starting interest rate swap contracts with a combined
notional value of $200 million to hedge an anticipated debt offering.
The company is in compliance with the covenants contained in its revolving credit facilities
and debt securities.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The consolidated financial statements of the company are prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial
statements requires the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those
estimates and assumptions. The significant accounting policies of the company are described in Note
1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The significant accounting estimates are described in
Managements Discussion and Analysis included in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The impact of
new accounting standards is discussed in the following section. There have been no other changes in
the companys accounting policies in the current period that had a material impact on the companys
consolidated financial condition or results of operation.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In addition to the guidance related to the calculation of earnings per share described in
Basis of Presentation and in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, recent accounting
pronouncements are as follows:
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. It requires a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which was formerly known as
minority interest, to be classified as a separate component of total equity in the consolidated
financial statements. The company retrospectively adopted the new noncontrolling interest guidance
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on the financial
statements. See Note 9 for additional information.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for business combinations, which
establishes the principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes the assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date,
measured at their fair values as of that date with limited exceptions. The guidance requires
acquisition-related transaction costs to be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a
component of the business combination. The provisions as revised were effective as of the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 and will be applied to any business combinations entered into in fiscal 2010
and thereafter.
In September 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which
establishes a definition of fair value, provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands
the disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. This guidance does not require any new
fair value measurements but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
delayed by a year the effective date for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The company
adopted the provisions of the guidance for financial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The company adopted the remaining provisions in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for nonfinancial
assets and liabilities, including goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption likewise did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 13 for additional
information.
28
In January 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance related to fair value
measurements and disclosures. The guidance requires disclosure of details of significant transfers
in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. Level 1 fair value measurements are
based on unadjusted quoted market prices. Level 2 fair value measurements are based on significant
inputs, other than Level 1, that are observable for the asset/liability through corroboration with
observable market data. The guidance also clarifies the existing disclosure requirements for the
level of disaggregation of fair value measurements and the disclosures on inputs and valuation
techniques. The company adopted these provisions in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The
adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In addition, the
guidance requires a gross presentation of the activity within the Level 3 roll forward, separately
presenting information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The roll forward
information must be provided by the company for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as the provision
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim
reporting periods within those years.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to interim disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments. The company prospectively adopted the interim fair value
disclosure guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption did not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial statements. The additional disclosures are included in Note
12.
In June 2009, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) was issued to become
the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be applied by
nongovernmental entities and supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will
become nonauthoritative. The Codification was effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The company adopted the provisions in
the first quarter of 2010. The adoption did not impact the companys consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance related to employers
disclosures about the plan assets of defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The
required disclosures include a description of how investment allocation decisions are made, major
categories of plan assets, valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the
impact of measurements using significant unobservable inputs and concentrations of risk within plan
assets. The disclosures about plan assets required by this additional guidance must be provided
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, and will be effective for the company for fiscal
year-end 2010.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report contains certain statements that reflect the companys current
expectations regarding future results of operations, economic performance, financial condition and
achievements of the company. The company tries, wherever possible, to identify these
forward-looking statements by using words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect,
will and similar expressions. One can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. These statements reflect the companys current plans and
expectations and are based on information currently available to it. They rely on a number of
assumptions regarding future events and estimates which could be inaccurate and which are
inherently subject to risks and uncertainties.
The company wishes to caution the reader that the following important factors and those
important factors described in other Securities and Exchange Commission filings of the company, or
in the companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, could affect the companys actual results and
could cause such results to vary materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements
made by, or on behalf of, the company:
|
|
|
the impact of strong competitive response to the companys efforts to leverage its brand
power with product innovation, promotional programs and new advertising, and of changes in
consumer demand for the companys products; |
|
|
|
|
the risks in the marketplace associated with trade and consumer acceptance of product
improvements, shelving initiatives, new product introductions, and pricing and promotional
strategies; |
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to achieve sales and earnings guidance, which are based on
assumptions about sales volume, product mix, the development and success of new products,
the impact of marketing and pricing actions, product costs and currency; |
29
|
|
|
the companys ability to realize projected cost savings and benefits, including those
contemplated by restructuring programs and other cost-savings initiatives; |
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to manage changes to its business processes, including selling,
distribution, manufacturing, information management systems and the integration of
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
the increased significance of certain of the companys key trade customers; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of inventory management practices by the companys trade customers; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of fluctuations in the supply and inflation in energy, raw and packaging
materials cost; |
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with portfolio changes and completion of acquisitions and
divestitures; |
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties of litigation described from time to time in the companys Securities
and Exchange Commission filings; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of changes in currency exchange rates, tax rates, interest rates, debt and
equity markets, inflation rates, economic conditions and other external factors; and |
|
|
|
|
the impact of unforeseen business disruptions in one or more of the companys markets due
to political instability, civil disobedience, armed hostilities, natural disasters or other
calamities. |
This discussion of uncertainties is by no means exhaustive but is designed to highlight
important factors that may impact the companys outlook. The company disclaims any obligation or
intent to update forward-looking statements made by the company in order to reflect new
information, events or circumstances after the date they are made.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding the companys exposure to certain market risk, see Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
There have been no significant changes in the companys portfolio of financial instruments or
market risk exposures from the fiscal 2009 year-end, except that during fiscal 2010, the company
entered into four forward starting interest rate swap contracts accounted for as cash-flow hedges
to hedge interest-rate uncertainty related to an anticipated debt offering. The notional amount of
these swaps at May 2, 2010, was $200 million, and the fair value was a loss of $5 million.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the
President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Administrative Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls
and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of May 2, 2010 (the Evaluation Date).
Based on such evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation
Date, the companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
b. Changes in Internal Controls
During the quarter ended May 2, 2010, the company made the following changes to its internal
control over financial reporting that materially affected such
internal control over financial reporting:
|
|
|
As part of the previously announced SAP enterprise-resource planning system
implementation, the company implemented SAP software at its Arnotts headquarters in
Australia and its Huntingwood, New South Wales, Australia manufacturing facility. In
conjunction with this SAP implementation, the company modified the design, operation and |
30
|
|
|
documentation of its internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, the
company modified controls in the business processes impacted by the new system, such as
user access security, system reporting and authorization and reconciliation procedures. |
|
|
|
|
The company implemented a new SAP-based consolidation system for external and
management reporting, which includes new information technology infrastructure
supporting the companys consolidation processes. |
Except for the foregoing, there were no changes in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, such
internal control over financial reporting.
31
Part II
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Shares that may yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
be Purchased |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Programs |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
Per Share(2) |
|
|
Programs(3) |
|
|
($ in Millions)(3) |
|
2/1/10 2/28/10 |
|
|
883,155 |
(4) |
|
$ |
33.24 |
(4) |
|
|
449,310 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
3/1/10 3/31/10 |
|
|
1,331,359 |
(5) |
|
$ |
34.55 |
(5) |
|
|
710,670 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
4/1/10 5/2/10 |
|
|
1,015,790 |
(6) |
|
$ |
35.54 |
(6) |
|
|
715,680 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,230,304 |
|
|
$ |
34.50 |
|
|
|
1,875,660 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes (i) 1,078,440 shares repurchased in open-market transactions to offset the
dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the companys stock
compensation plans, (ii) 12,704 shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax
withholding obligations on the vesting of restricted shares and (iii) 263,500
shares purchased by the counterparty to a deferred compensation hedge entered into by
the company during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 (the Hedge Shares). The purchase
of the Hedge Shares is being disclosed because the counterparty may be an affiliated
purchaser as defined by Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Exchange Act. The company disclaims
all beneficial ownership of the Hedge Shares. Unless otherwise indicated, shares owned
and tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations were purchased at the
closing price of the companys shares on the date of vesting. |
|
(2) |
|
Average price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis and excludes commission. |
|
(3) |
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the company had one publicly announced share
repurchase program. Under this program, which was announced on June 30, 2008, the
companys Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $1.2 billion of company
stock through the end of fiscal 2011. In addition to the publicly announced share
repurchase program, the company will continue to purchase shares, under separate
authorization, as part of its practice of buying back shares sufficient to offset shares
issued under incentive compensation plans. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes (i) 431,790 shares repurchased in open-market transactions at an average price
of $33.24 to offset the dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the
companys stock compensation plans, and (ii) 2,055 shares owned and tendered by
employees at an average price per share of $32.89 to satisfy tax withholding
requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes (i) 354,330 shares repurchased in open-market transactions at an average price
of $34.33 to offset the dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the
companys stock compensation plans, (ii) 2,859 shares owned and tendered by employees at
an average price per share of $34.27 to satisfy tax withholding requirements on the
vesting of restricted shares, and (iii) the Hedge Shares at an average price
per share of $35.17. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes (i) 292,320 shares repurchased in open-market transactions at an average price
of $35.54 to offset the dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the
companys stock compensation plans, and (ii) 7,790 shares owned and tendered by
employees at an average price per share of $35.75 to satisfy tax withholding
requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. |
32
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3(i)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company By-Laws, effective March 25, 2010, were filed
with the SEC with a Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822) on March 30,
2010, and are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document* |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document* |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Label Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
* |
|
In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed furnished and not filed. |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: June 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ B. Craig Owens
|
|
|
|
B. Craig Owens |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief
Financial Officer and Chief
Administrative Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ellen Oran Kaden
|
|
|
|
Ellen Oran Kaden |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Law and
Government Affairs |
|
34
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3(i)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company By-Laws, effective March 25, 2010, were filed
with the SEC with a Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822) on March 30,
2010, and are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
Certification of B. Craig Owens pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document* |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document* |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Label Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
* |
|
In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed furnished and not filed. |