e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-23550
Fentura Financial, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-2806518 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employee Identification No.) |
175 N Leroy, P.O. Box 725, Fenton, Michigan 48430
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(810) 629-2263
(Registrants telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer
and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: October 21, 2010
Class Common Stock Shares Outstanding 2,291,121
Fentura Financial Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(000s omitted except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Dec 31, |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
14,787 |
|
|
$ |
18,459 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
39,700 |
|
|
|
23,650 |
|
|
|
|
Total cash & cash equivalents |
|
|
54,487 |
|
|
|
42,109 |
|
Securities-available for sale |
|
|
54,786 |
|
|
|
43,608 |
|
Securities-held to maturity, (fair value of $4,540
at September 30, 2010 and $5,493 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
|
59,257 |
|
|
|
49,064 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
228,731 |
|
|
|
252,764 |
|
Real estate loans construction |
|
|
15,439 |
|
|
|
26,295 |
|
Real estate loans mortgage |
|
|
23,719 |
|
|
|
28,058 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
42,806 |
|
|
|
48,313 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
310,695 |
|
|
|
355,430 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(15,037 |
) |
|
|
(10,726 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
295,658 |
|
|
|
344,704 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
7,221 |
|
Bank premises and equipment |
|
|
15,254 |
|
|
|
15,914 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
9,003 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
37,919 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
449,378 |
|
|
$ |
522,079 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
68,361 |
|
|
$ |
64,530 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
340,882 |
|
|
|
376,245 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
409,243 |
|
|
|
440,775 |
|
Short term borrowings |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
35,217 |
|
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities |
|
|
3,993 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
433,306 |
|
|
|
501,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value
2,289,912 shares issued (2,248,553 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
43,002 |
|
|
|
42,913 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(27,257 |
) |
|
|
(21,657 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
16,072 |
|
|
|
20,532 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
449,378 |
|
|
$ |
522,079 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(000s omitted except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
5,030 |
|
|
$ |
5,936 |
|
|
$ |
15,536 |
|
|
$ |
18,399 |
|
Interest and dividends on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Interest on federal funds sold |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
16,774 |
|
|
|
20,031 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
4,862 |
|
|
|
7,503 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
3,972 |
|
|
|
11,314 |
|
|
|
11,699 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
11,306 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
Trust and investment services income |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other than temporary loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Loss on equity investment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,560 |
) |
Other income and fees |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
6,752 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
Loan and collection |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
Advertising and promotional |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
3,301 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
4,980 |
|
|
|
13,584 |
|
|
|
15,428 |
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
|
|
(1,468 |
) |
|
|
(6,496 |
) |
|
|
(11,590 |
) |
Federal income tax/(benefit) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,136 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,972 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,618 |
) |
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(847 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.64 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.56 |
) |
|
|
|
Income/(loss) per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.13 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash Dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
42,913 |
|
|
$ |
42,778 |
|
Issuance of shares under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director stock purchase plan &
Dividend reinvestment program (41,359 and 39,449
shares) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
43,002 |
|
|
|
42,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(21,657 |
) |
|
|
(4,677 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(5,600 |
) |
|
|
(17,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(27,257 |
) |
|
|
(22,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(1,977 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net of tax |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
16,072 |
|
|
$ |
19,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,871 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
Establishment of deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
11,306 |
|
Loans originated for sale |
|
|
(26,921 |
) |
|
|
(49,629 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of loans |
|
|
26,317 |
|
|
|
49,497 |
|
Gain on sales of loans |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
Loss on other real estate owned |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
Loss on security impairment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Loss on equity investment |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Earnings from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in interest receivable & other assets |
|
|
9,003 |
|
|
|
(3,914 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in interest payable & other liabilities |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
(3,783 |
) |
Net change in discontinued operations operating activities |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Adjustments |
|
|
18,287 |
|
|
|
10,896 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
|
|
12,687 |
|
|
|
(6,975 |
) |
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities HTM |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities AFS |
|
|
8,705 |
|
|
|
7,714 |
|
Proceeds from calls of securitiesHTM |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Proceeds from calls of securities AFS |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Proceeds from sales of securities AFS |
|
|
7,105 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Proceeds from sales of equity securities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Purchases of securities AFS |
|
|
(30,901 |
) |
|
|
(14,560 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of bank subsidiary |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net decrease in loans |
|
|
36,754 |
|
|
|
41,379 |
|
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Sales of other real estate owned |
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
Acquisition of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Net change in discontinued operations investing activities |
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
32,665 |
|
|
|
49,723 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(31,532 |
) |
|
|
(498 |
) |
Net decrease in short term borrowings |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(1,466 |
) |
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
Purchase of advances from FHLB |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
55,495 |
|
Repayments of advances from FHLB |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
(58,221 |
) |
Net proceeds from stock issuance and purchase |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Net change in discontinued operations financing activities |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
(4,275 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(32,974 |
) |
|
|
(9,860 |
) |
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,378 |
|
|
$ |
32,882 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning |
|
$ |
42,109 |
|
|
$ |
13,626 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents Ending |
|
$ |
54,487 |
|
|
$ |
46,064 |
|
Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
|
$ |
54,487 |
|
|
$ |
32,438 |
|
|
|
|
6
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
5,219 |
|
|
$ |
8,506 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,981 |
|
Non-cash Disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from loans to other real estate |
|
$ |
3,978 |
|
|
$ |
3,394 |
|
FENTURA FINANICIAL, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(847 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,871 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising
during period |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
Impairment loss recognized during period |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in income |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,851 |
) |
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
(4,549 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,682 |
) |
|
|
|
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2010 include Fentura Financial, Inc. (the Corporation) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, The
State Bank in Fenton, Michigan and West Michigan Community Bank in Hudsonville, Michigan (the
Banks), as well as West Michigan Mortgage Company, LLC, and the other subsidiaries of the Banks.
Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
On March 17, 2009, The Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its
bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. The
Corporation recorded an estimated loss on the sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 in the first
quarter of 2009. As a result of the amended sales agreement, the estimated loss of $700,000 was
reversed in the first quarter of 2010. On April 30, 2010, the sale of Davison State Bank closed and
the assets and liabilities were transferred to the investor group. As a result of the timing of
the sale, discontinued operations reflect four months of income on the income statement for the
nine month period.
Financial statements are presented with discontinued operations separately presented on the balance
sheet and income statement. The presentations have been updated for December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 to reflect the discontinued operations results.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information
7
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Reclassifications
Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current
presentation. For the nine month period end September 2009, a $700,000 impairment charge on
discontinued operations was reclassified in the prior year presentation from non-interest expense
of continuing operations to discontinued operations. This reclassification reduced the loss from
continuing operations by $700,000, net of tax, and had no impact on net income.
Securities
Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the
positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities are classified as available for
sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair
value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on
securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for
mortgage-backed securities, where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are based
on the amortized cost of the security sold.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis,
and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
In determining OTTI management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions,
and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be
required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an
other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is
based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity
intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If an entity
intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be
recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis
and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and
it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into
the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of
the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows
expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous
amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of
the investment.
8
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses,
increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management
estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of
the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values,
economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific
loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment, should be
charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the
uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
A loan is impaired when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Impairment is evaluated
in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage, consumer, and on
an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is
allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows
using the loans existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely
from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and
residential real estate loans are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are
not separately identified for impairment disclosures. Loans for which the terms have been modified
and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt
restructurings and are classified as impaired. Troubled debt restructurings are measured at the
present value of estimated future cash flows using the loans effective rate at inception.
Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets: Assets acquired through or instead of loan
foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired,
establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through
expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in
deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future
tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and
liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets
to the amount expected to be realized.
The Corporation recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax
expense.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, and the
Corporation does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase
in the next twelve months.
Dividend Restriction
Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by
the Banks to the Corporation or by the Corporation to shareholders. West Michigan Community Bank
and The State Bank have been restricted from dividend payments due to the signing of Consent Orders
with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
On October 27, 2010, management received a notice from The Federal Reserve which defined
restrictions being placed upon the Holding Company. The restrictions include the declaration or
payment of any dividends, the receipt of dividends from subsidiary Banks and the repayment of any
principal or interest on subordinated debentures or Trust Preferred securities.
9
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Stock Option Plans
The Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan provides for granting options to nonemployee directors
to purchase the Corporations common stock. The purchase price of the shares is the fair market
value at the date of the grant, and there is a three-year vesting period before options may be
exercised. Options to acquire no more than 8,131 shares of stock may be granted under the Plan in
any calendar year and options to acquire not more than 73,967 shares in the aggregate may be
outstanding at any one time. No options were granted in 2010 or 2009.
The Employee Stock Option Plan grants options to eligible employees to purchase the Corporations
common stock at or above, the fair market value of the stock at the date of the grant. Awards
granted under this plan are limited to an aggregate of 86,936 shares. The administrator of the
plan is a committee of directors. The administrator has the power to determine the number of
options to be granted, the exercise price of the options and other terms of the options, subject to
consistency with the terms of the Plan.
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average Price |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
20,297 |
|
|
$ |
29.55 |
|
Options granted 2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Options forfeited 2010 |
|
|
(3,542 |
) |
|
$ |
25.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
16,755 |
|
|
$ |
30.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Going Concern
As a result of the Corporations net losses and non-compliance with the capital requirements of the
Consent Orders, our auditors added a paragraph to their opinion on the Corporations December 31,
2009 consolidated financial statements, expressing substantial doubt about the Corporations
ability to continue as a going concern. In 2010, the Banks achieved compliance with substantially
all areas of the Consent Orders, except for the capital requirements. Strategies to improve
profitability and to meet the capital requirements of the Consent Orders, discussed in Note 10,
include shrinking the balance sheets, reducing costs, and selling subsidiary banks. The sale of
Davison State Bank, which closed on April, 30, 2010, recovered $2.8 million, of which a portion was
reinvested in The State Bank. On April 27, 2010, an agreement was signed to sell West Michigan
Community Bank. See Note 11 for details regarding the definitive agreement to sell West Michigan
Community Bank.
These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the
Corporation is unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 2 ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
New Accounting Pronouncements:
In June 2009, the FASB amended previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. This guidance must be applied as of
the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November
15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter. This guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the
effective date. Additionally, on and after the effective date, the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity is no longer relevant for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly
qualifying special-purpose entities should be evaluated for
10
NOTE 2 ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (continued)
consolidation by reporting entities on and after the effective date in accordance with the
applicable consolidation guidance. The disclosure provisions were also amended and apply to
transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date of this guidance. The effect of
adopting this new guidance was not material to the Corporation.
In June 2009, the FASB amended guidance for consolidation of variable interest entity guidance by
replacing the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if
any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on
identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. Additional disclosures
about an enterprises involvement in variable interest entities are also required. This guidance is
effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Early adoption is prohibited. The effect of
adopting this new guidance was not material to the Corporation.
Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Guidance
In July 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update, Receivables: Disclosure About the
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The objective of
this ASU is for an entity to provide disclosures that facilitate financial statement users
evaluation of the nature of credit risk inherent in the entitys portfolio of financing
receivables, how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses,
and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. An entity should
provide disclosure on a disaggregated basis on two defined levels: (1) portfolio segment; and (2)
class of financing receivable. The update makes changes to existing disclosure requirements and
includes additional disclosure requirements about financing receivables, including credit quality
indicators of financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by class of financing
receivables, the aging of past due financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by
class of financing receivables and their effect on the allowance for credit losses. The
Corporation expects the adoption on December 31, 2010 to be disclosure-related only and to have no
impact on its results of operations.
NOTE 3 SECURITIES
Securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government & federal agency |
|
$ |
11,210 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
11,244 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
8,678 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
31,926 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,288 |
|
|
$ |
931 |
|
|
$ |
(433 |
) |
|
$ |
54,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government & federal agency |
|
$ |
6,543 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
7,034 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
7,095 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,780 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
15,369 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
14,690 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,399 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
(1,449 |
) |
|
$ |
43,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
4,471 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
4,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
5,455 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
5,492 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of the securities portfolio are shown by expected maturity.
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Contractual maturities of
securities at September 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
12,108 |
|
|
$ |
12,150 |
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
8,678 |
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
31,926 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,288 |
|
|
$ |
54,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
2,792 |
|
|
$ |
2,805 |
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,471 |
|
|
$ |
4,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, there were 2 private label CMO securities, with holdings totaling
$4,079,000, which exceeded 10% of shareholders equity. At September 30, 2009, there were no
holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an
amount greater than 10% of shareholders equity.
Sales of available for sale securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Proceeds |
|
$ |
7,110 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
Gross gains |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position are as follows:
12
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
2010 |
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
5,483 |
|
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
4,584 |
|
|
$ |
(382 |
) |
|
$ |
10,067 |
|
|
$ |
(427 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
5,583 |
|
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
4,586 |
|
|
$ |
(388 |
) |
|
$ |
10,119 |
|
|
$ |
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
2009 |
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
US Govt & federal agencies |
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
State & municipal |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,872 |
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
4,872 |
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
6,540 |
|
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
$ |
10,512 |
|
|
$ |
(1,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
In evaluating OTTI, management considers the factors presented in Note 1.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations security portfolio consisted of 101 securities, 8 of
which were in an unrealized loss position. All unrealized losses are related to the Corporations
collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and equity securities, as discussed below.
Losses recognized in earnings on securities totaled $288,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009
and $307,000 of additional OTTI losses were recognized through earnings during the period ending
September 30, 2010.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs)
The Corporations unrealized losses related primarily to its investment in collateralized mortgage
obligation securities. The decline in fair value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity
and the financial crisis affecting these markets and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the
individual securities. These six investments have an amortized cost of $10,484,000 and a net
unrealized loss of $427,000. Three of these securities were issued by the U.S. government
sponsored agency Ginnie Mae and hold an AAA rating by a major rating agency.
In addition, the portfolio contains three private label securities with an amortized cost of
$5,000,000. The ratings held on the private label securities are AA, A- and CCC. The underlying
collateral of these CMOs is comprised largely of 1-4 family residences, with geographic
concentrations in California, Florida and Virginia. The higher rated securities are supported by
mortgages classified as alt-a, while the CCC rated security is supported by Prime classified
mortgages. In each of these securities, the Corporation lies in the senior tranche and receives
payments before other tranches. For private label securities, management completes an analysis to
review the recent performance of the mortgage pools underlying the instruments.
The Corporation has been closely monitoring the performance of the CMO portfolio. In 2009, there
were several CMOs that were downgraded in the market. Management continues to review historical
and projected payment streams, delinquency ratios, geographic distribution, ratings, projected
future cash
13
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
flows and general market conditions. Management uses multiple assumptions to project the expected
future cash flows of the private label CMOs, which include prepayment speeds, projected default
rates and loss severity rates. The cash flows are then discounted using the effective rate on the
securities determined at acquisition. Recent historical experience is the base for determining the
cash flow assumptions and is adjusted when appropriate after considering characteristics of the
underlying loans collateralizing the private label CMO security. As a result of its review, in the
fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation recognized a $79,000 other-than-temporary impairment as a
result of incurred credit losses which was reflected in the income statement. As part of the
September 30, 2010 analysis, managements review indicated $9,500 of additional credit related OTTI
on this security. The security with the credit loss is the Corporations sole CCC rated security
and has a remaining amortized cost of $589,000 at September 30, 2010. The remaining unrealized
loss of $84,000 on this security has been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Equity securities
The Corporation also holds investments in equity securities which gross unrealized losses of $6,000
at September 30, 2010. There are two equity securities which comprise the gross unrealized loss.
They are moderate to actively traded stocks and therefore have active market valuation data.
Management continues to watch these securities and their respective valuations. The equity
securities portfolio has an amortized cost of $1,658,000 and a fair value of $1,706,000. The
majority of the equity securities are investments in Michigan bank holding companies. On a
quarterly basis, management reviews the Corporations investment in these equity securities.
Management reviews current market prices on publicly traded equity securities and compares the
current price to the book price. Any difference is adjusted as a temporary valuation difference,
unless other resources provide other information. Equity securities that are not publicly traded
receive a multi-faceted review utilizing call report data. Management reviews such performance
indicators as earnings, ROE, ROA, non-performing assets, brokered deposits and capital ratios.
Management draws conclusions from this information, as well as any published information or trading
activity received from the individual institutions, to assist in determining if any unrealized loss
is other than temporary impairment. As a result of the September 30, 2010 review, OTTI totaling
$298,000 was recognized during the quarter on the Corporations equity securities in bank holding
companies. The impairment was recognized as a result of the length of time these securities have
been at an unrealized loss position.
The table below represents a roll forward of the credit losses recognized in earnings for the
period ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases to the amount related to the credit loss for
which other-than-temporary was previously recognized |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Major categories of loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
77,281 |
|
|
$ |
81,425 |
|
Real estate commercial |
|
|
151,450 |
|
|
|
171,339 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
15,439 |
|
|
|
26,295 |
|
Real estate mortgage |
|
|
23,719 |
|
|
|
28,058 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
42,806 |
|
|
|
48,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,695 |
|
|
|
355,430 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
15,037 |
|
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
295,658 |
|
|
$ |
344,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
The Corporation has originated primarily residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial,
construction and installment loans. The Corporation estimates that the majority of their loan
portfolio is based in Genesee, Oakland and Livingston counties within southeast Michigan; in Kent
and Ottawa counties in west Michigan, with the remainder of the portfolio distributed throughout
Michigan. The ability of the Corporations debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the
real estate and general economic conditions in these areas.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Balance, January 1, |
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
10,455 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
11,306 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(4,863 |
) |
|
|
(7,524 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
15,037 |
|
|
$ |
14,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Balance, July 1, |
|
$ |
14,227 |
|
|
$ |
13,970 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(2,216 |
) |
|
|
(1,567 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
15,037 |
|
|
$ |
14,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan impairment is measured by valuing the underlying collateral or by estimating the expected
future cash flows and discounting them at the respective effective interest rate.
The recorded investment in these loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Period end loans not requiring allocation |
|
$ |
12,998 |
|
|
$ |
15,874 |
|
Period end loans requiring allocation |
|
|
30,154 |
|
|
|
23,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,152 |
|
|
$ |
38,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated |
|
$ |
9,229 |
|
|
$ |
5,683 |
|
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
Troubled debt restructurings |
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
$ |
3,822 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
15,410 |
|
|
$ |
16,507 |
|
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified
impaired loans.
15
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair values.
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets
that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Securities
classified as available for sale are generally reported at fair value utilizing Level 2
inputs where the Corporation obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing
service which uses matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the
industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the
specific securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark
quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The fair value measurements consider observable data
that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows and the bonds terms and
conditions, among other things. The fair value of the Corporations equity securities, which
primarily consists of the common stock in other Michigan bank holding companies, is based on
the prices of recent stock trades, if available and is considered Level 2 because these
stocks are not actively traded in public markets. If there are no available recent trades
for the Corporations bank holding company equity holdings an analysis is performed which
compares trading multiples of book value of publicly traded peer banks and the Corporations
holdings are marked to a similar value based on their reported book value (Level 2 inputs).
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own assumptions
about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing and asset or liability.
The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a
mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The remaining fair values of
securities (Level 3 inputs) are based on the reporting entitys own assumptions and basic knowledge
of market conditions and individual investment performance.
Impaired Loans: The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance
for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize
a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the
income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to
adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments
are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for
determining fair value.
Other Real Estate Owned: Non-recurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential
real estate properties classified as other real estate owned are measured at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party
appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.
16
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and federal
agency |
|
$ |
11,244 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
11,244 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
31,926 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
31,926 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,786 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
54,774 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and federal agency |
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
7,095 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,095 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
13,780 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,780 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,608 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
43,590 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses
for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Corporation did not hold any Level 3
assets during 2010.
17
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance, Jan. 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized / unrealized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Loss on security impairment |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3 |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
At September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
20,925 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
20,925 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
The following represent impairment charges recognized during the period:
At September 30, 2010, impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of
the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a principal amount of $30,154,000 with a
valuation allowance of $9,229,000 resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of
$1,930,000 for the three month period, and $4,740,000 for the nine month period, ending September
30, 2010. This is compared to December 31, 2009 when the principal amount of impaired loans was
$23,059,000 with a valuation allowance of $5,683,000.
Other real estate owned which is measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs
to sell, had a net carrying amount of $9,003,000, of which $1,401,000 was at fair value at
September 30, 2010, resulting from write-downs totaling $144,000 for the three month period and
$295,000 for the nine month period. At December 31, 2009, other real estate owned had a net
carrying amount of $7,967,000, of which $1,274,000 was at fair value.
18
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments, not previously presented were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Carrying
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
54,487 |
|
|
$ |
54,487 |
|
|
$ |
42,109 |
|
|
$ |
42,109 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
5,493 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
Loans (including impaired loans) |
|
|
295,658 |
|
|
|
270,583 |
|
|
|
344,704 |
|
|
|
326,422 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
409,243 |
|
|
$ |
403,614 |
|
|
$ |
440,775 |
|
|
$ |
441,827 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
|
|
8,488 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
12,644 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
12,656 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate
their fair values.
Securities
Fair values for securities held to maturity are based on similar information previously presented
for securities available for sale.
FHLB Stock
It was not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its
transferability.
Loans held for sale
The fair values of these loans are determined in the aggregate on the basis of existing forward
commitments or fair values attributable to similar loans.
Loans
For variable rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk,
fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value for other loans is estimated using
discounted cash flow analysis. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its
fair value.
Off-balance-sheet instruments
The fair value of off-balance sheet items is not considered material.
Deposit liabilities
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition equal to the amount payable on
demand at the reporting date. The carrying amounts for variable rate, fixed term money market
accounts and
19
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed
certificates of deposit are estimated using discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest
rates currently being offered on similar certificates. The carrying amount of accrued interest
payable approximates its fair value.
Short-term borrowings
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings approximate their
fair values.
FHLB advances
Rates currently available for FHLB debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to
estimate the fair value of the existing debt.
Subordinated Debentures
The estimated fair value of the existing subordinated debentures is calculated by comparing a
current market rate for the instrument compared to the book rate. The difference between these
rates computes the fair value.
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and
information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount
that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporations entire holdings of a
particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the
Corporations financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on managements judgments
regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics and
other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could significantly affect the estimates.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely
than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. Management
has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009. The Corporations evaluation of taxable events, losses in recent years and the continuing
deterioration of the Michigan economy led management to conclude that it was more likely than not
that all or part of the benefit would not be realized. During the second quarter of 2009, the
Corporation established a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. The valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets may be reversed to income in future periods to the extent
that the related deferred income tax assets are realized or the valuation allowance is otherwise no
longer required. Management will continue to monitor our deferred tax assets quarterly for changes
affecting their realizability.
Normally, the calculation for the income tax expense (benefit) does not consider the tax effects of
changes in other categories of income such as other comprehensive income (OCI), which is a
component of shareholders equity on the balance sheet. However, an exception is warranted when
there is a pre-tax loss in continuing operations. When this is the case, pre-tax income from other
categories, such as changes in OCI and discontinued operations, are included in the calculation of
the tax expense or benefit for the current year. For the first nine months of 2010, this resulted
in an income tax benefit recorded to continuing operations.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, and the
Corporation does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase
in the next twelve months.
20
NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the computation of basic earnings per
common share and diluted earnings per common share is presented below. Earnings per common share
are presented below for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
The factors in the earnings per share computation follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(000s omitted except share and per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(847 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
2,277,406 |
|
|
|
2,210,613 |
|
|
|
2,265,472 |
|
|
|
2,198,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(847 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,871 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding for
basic earnings per common share |
|
|
2,277,406 |
|
|
|
2,210,613 |
|
|
|
2,265,472 |
|
|
|
2,198,233 |
|
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of stock Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
2,277,406 |
|
|
|
2,210,613 |
|
|
|
2,265,472 |
|
|
|
2,198,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock options for the three or nine month period ended September 30, 2010 or
September 30, 2009 that were dilutive, as a result of the net loss the period.
NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
There are various contingent liabilities that are not reflected in the financial statements
including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not
expected to have a material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial condition or results
of operations.
NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On March 17, 2009, The Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its
bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. The
Corporation recorded an estimated loss on the sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 in the first
quarter of 2009. As a result of the amended sales agreement, the estimated loss of $700,000 was
reversed in the first quarter of 2010. A condensed balance sheet of held for sale operations is
presented below for the period ended and December 31, 2009. As of April 30, 2010, Davison State
Bank was sold to an independent financial group. As a result, there is no balance sheet for
presentation at September 30, 2010.
21
NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued)
DAVISON STATE BANK
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
7,082 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
405 |
|
Loans, net of allowance ($679-2009) |
|
|
24,396 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
37,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
9,012 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
26,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
35,277 |
|
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Shareholders equity |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
37,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
DAVISON STATE BANK
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
1,556 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before federal income tax |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
|
Federal income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
(1,253 |
) |
|
|
|
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and its Bank subsidiaries are subject to various
regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet
minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Banks financial
statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and regulatory enforcement action, the Corporation
(see Note 12) and the Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative
measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items are calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also subject to
qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
22
NOTE 10 REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Banks to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as
defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as
defined) to average assets (as defined). As of December 31, 2009 notification from Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation categorized the Banks as adequately capitalized under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action.
As of December 31, 2009, The State Bank was required by regulatory authorities to maintain certain
minimum capital ratios. The State Banks required capital ratios were those required in the
Consent Order that was effective January 10, 2010 which is discussed later in this note.
In March 2009, West Michigan Community Bank entered into a Consent Order with federal and state
banking regulators that contain provisions to foster improvement in West Michigan Community Banks
earnings, reduce non performing loan levels, and increase capital. The Consent Order requires West
Michigan Community Bank to retain a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio of a minimum of 8.0%.
As of September 30, 2010, West Michigan Community Bank has a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio
of 6.7%, as compared to Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio of 6.9% at December 31, 2009. At
both September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, West Michigan Community Bank was not in compliance
with the Consent Order capital requirements.
Effective January 10, 2010, The State Bank entered into a Consent Order with federal and state
banking regulators that contain provisions to foster improvement in The State Banks earnings,
reduce nonperforming loan levels and increase capital. The Consent Order requires The State Bank to
maintain a Tier 1 capital to average asset ratio of a minimum of 8.0%. It also requires The State
Bank to maintain a total capital to risk weighted asset ratio of 12.0%. At September 30, 2010, The
State Bank had a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio of 6.2% and a total capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio of 9.4%. This is compared to ratios at December 31, 2009, of a Tier 1
capital to average assets ratio of 6.2% and a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.9%.
At September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, The State Bank was not in compliance with the
Consent Order capital requirements.
The Consent Orders restrict the Banks from issuing or renewing brokered deposits. The Consent
Orders also restrict dividend payments from The State Bank and West Michigan Community Bank to the
Corporation. The Corporation, the Boards of Directors and management continue to work on plans to
comply with the Consent Orders. While below the compliance level required by the Orders, both Banks
maintain capital levels considered adequate by regulatory standards. Non-compliance with Consent
Order requirements may cause the Banks to be subject to further enforcement actions by the FDIC.
As illustrated in the table below, at September 30, 2010, the Consolidated Corporations total
capital to risk weighted assets ratio at 7.4% was below the adequately capitalized requirement of
8.0%. At December 31, 2009, the Consolidated Corporations total capital to risk weighted assets
ratio of 7.8% was below the minimum requirement of 8.0%.
The Corporations principal source of funds for possible shareholder dividend payments is dividends
received from the Banks. Regulatory agreements limit the payment of dividends without prior
approval of regulatory agencies.
On October 27, 2010, management received a notice from The Federal Reserve which defined
restrictions being placed upon the Holding Company. The restrictions include the declaration or
payment of any dividends, the receipt of dividends from subsidiary Banks, the repayment of any
principal or interest on subordinated debentures or Trust Preferred securities, restrictions on
debt, any changes in Executive or Senior Management or change in the role of Senior Management.
The written agreement will be effective in November, 2010. In addition, the notice provided an
indication for the corporation to maintain sufficient capital levels.
23
NOTE 10REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
Agreement |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
(000s omitted) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
25,393 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
$ |
27,544 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
22,632 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
19,219 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
24,023 |
|
|
12.0% (1) |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
10,404 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
8,226 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
20,956 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
13,772 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
19,509 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
20,956 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
18,191 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
19,509 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
12,634 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
25,268 |
|
|
8.0 |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
5,462 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
10,924 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
Agreement |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
(000s omitted) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
33,661 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
$ |
34,636 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
24,334 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
21,961 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
32,810 |
|
|
12.0%(1) |
Davison State Bank |
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
11,841 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
28,164 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
17,318 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
Davison State Bank |
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
10,262 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
28,164 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
22,491 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
13,535 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
27,069 |
|
|
8.0 |
Davison State Bank |
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
8.0 |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
10,262 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
11,845 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective January 10, 2010 |
24
NOTE 11DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
On April 28, 2010, at the Annual Shareholder Meeting, a formal announcement was made regarding the
signing of a definitive agreement to sell West Michigan Community Bank. If the transaction is
consummated, the Corporation would receive $10,300,000 from the sale of West Michigan Community
Bank (an approximate 10% premium to book). As a condition of the sale, the Corporation would
acquire non-performing assets of West Michigan Community Bank. The assets will be housed in a
newly formed holding company subsidiary of the Corporation. The transaction is expected to close
during the fourth quarter of 2010. At September 30, 2010, West Michigan Community Bank is not
considered to have the status of discontinued operations due to uncertainties connected with
funding the transaction.
Regulatory approval was received after the close of the calendar quarter for the sale of West
Michigan Community Bank and for the Corporation to acquire the non-performing assets. As the
non-performing assets are converted to performing loans or liquidated, the proceeds will be
available to strengthen the capital position of The State Bank.
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Certain of the Corporations accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the
Corporations financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or
subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates
associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts
and circumstances. Facts and circumstances, which could affect these judgments, include, but
without limitation, changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the
financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include
determining the allowance for loan losses and determining the fair value of securities, carrying
value of deferred tax assets and other financial instruments.
The Corporation evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration
is given to the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than cost, the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and the ability of the
Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuers financial condition, the Corporation
may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether
downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of the reviews of the issuers
financial condition.
Results of Operations
As indicated in the income statement, the loss for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was
$2,337,000 compared to a loss of $847,000 for the same period in 2009. Net interest income in the
third quarter of 2010, was $190,000 below net interest income for the same quarter in 2009. The
third quarter 2010 provision for loan losses was up $965,000 compared to the third quarter of 2009.
Management feels the allowance for loan losses is adequate and has increased $552,000 when
comparing the period ended September 30, 2010 to the period ended September 30, 2009.
The banking industry uses standard performance indicators to help evaluate a banking institutions
performance. Return on average assets is one of these indicators. For the three months ended
September 30, 2010, the Corporations return on average
assets (annualized) was (0.51%) compared to
(0.15%) for the same period in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Corporations return on average assets (annualized) was (1.55%) compared to (4.16%) for the same
period in 2009. Net loss per share, basic and diluted, was ($1.03) in the third quarter of 2010
compared to ($0.38) net loss per share basic and diluted for the same period in 2009. Net loss per
share, basic and diluted, was ($2.47) in the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to
($8.13) net loss per share basic and diluted for the same period in 2009.
25
Net Interest Income
Net interest income and average balances and yields on major categories of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are
summarized in Table 2. Table 3 summarizes net interest income, average balances and yields on major
categories of interest-earning assets and interest-earning liabilities for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Table 1 below displays the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine month period ended September 30,
2009. The information displayed is with respect to the effects on interest income and interest
expense attributable to changes in volume and rate.
Table 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NINE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
SEPTEMBER 30, |
|
|
|
2010 COMPARED TO 2009 |
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) |
|
|
|
DUE TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
VOL |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
Taxable securities |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(280 |
) |
|
$ |
(284 |
) |
Tax-exempt securities (1) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Total loans (1) |
|
|
(3,353 |
) |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
(2,843 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
(3,564 |
) |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
(3,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
Time CDs $100,000 and over |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
Other time deposits |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(994 |
) |
Other borrowings |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
|
|
(1,497 |
) |
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
$ |
(2,189 |
) |
|
$ |
1,728 |
|
|
$ |
(461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%. |
As indicated in Table 1, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net interest income
decreased compared to the same period in 2009. Volume of loans to decreased over the past year,
along with a proportionate decrease in interest income. However the mix of this change resulted in
an improvement in loan yield. To mitigate the decrease in interest income, deposit rates and
volumes decreased year over year. The deposit interest rate reduction was achieved by reduction of
offering rates on time deposits, which assisted in encouraging high rate instruments from renewing,
with some funds exiting, thus reducing interest bearing liability costs.
As indicated in Table 2, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporations net
interest margin (with consideration of full tax equivalency) was 3.66% compared with 3.40% for the
same period
in 2009. This increase is a result of managements ability to make continuing downward repricing
steps on interest bearing liabilities. Additionally non-interest bearing deposits increased when
comparing the period ended September 30, 2010 to the period ended September 30, 2009.
Average earning assets decreased 10.5% or $49,296,000 comparing the nine months of 2010 to the same
time period in 2009. Management continues to strategically work to shrink both sides of the balance
sheet. Loans, the highest yielding component of earning assets, represented 80.3% of earning assets
in 2010 compared to 87.5% in 2009. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased
12.8% or
$55,162,000 comparing the first nine months of 2010 to the same time period in 2009. Non-interest
bearing deposits
26
amounted to 16.0% of average earning assets in the first nine months of 2010
compared with 14.3% in the same time period of 2009.
Net interest income (displayed with consideration of full tax equivalency), average balance sheet
amounts, and the corresponding yields for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are
shown in Table 3. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $3,822,000,
a decrease of $234,000, or 5.8%, from the same period in 2009. Net interest margin increased as a
result of increases in loan portfolio yields, and was assisted by a large decrease in the interest
bearing liability yield.
Management reviews economic forecasts and strategy on a monthly basis. Accordingly, the Corporation
will continue to strategically manage the balance sheet structure in an effort to create stability
in net interest income. The Corporation expects to continue to selectively seek out new loan
opportunities while continuing to maintain sound credit quality.
Management continually monitors the Corporations balance sheet in an effort to insulate net
interest income from significant swings caused by interest rate volatility. If market rates change
in 2010, corresponding changes in funding costs will be considered to avoid the potential negative
impact on net interest income. The Corporations policies in this regard are further discussed in
the section titled Interest Rate Sensitivity Management.
27
Table 2 Average Balance and Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
(000s omitted)(Annualized) |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies |
|
$ |
38,464 |
|
|
$ |
905 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
$ |
37,997 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
State and Political (1) |
|
|
9,396 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
|
|
13,902 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2,906 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
50,766 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
56,208 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
Fed Funds Sold |
|
|
31,914 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
263,621 |
|
|
|
12,266 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
320,436 |
|
|
|
14,453 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
% |
Tax Free (1) |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
% |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
25,969 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
|
35,113 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
44,949 |
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
% |
|
|
51,351 |
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
336,822 |
|
|
|
15,538 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
|
409,556 |
|
|
|
18,381 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
(12,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
324,294 |
|
|
|
15,538 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
397,665 |
|
|
|
18,381 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
420,457 |
|
|
|
16,957 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
% |
|
$ |
469,753 |
|
|
$ |
20,290 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Due from Banks |
|
|
16,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of Held for Sale Operations |
|
|
16,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Assets |
|
|
42,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
482,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
572,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing DDA |
|
$ |
83,950 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
$ |
88,275 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
% |
Savings Deposits |
|
|
72,680 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
74,373 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
% |
Time CDs $100,000 and Over |
|
|
97,636 |
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
128,744 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
% |
Other Time CDs |
|
|
100,392 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
114,512 |
|
|
|
2,677 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
354,658 |
|
|
|
4,862 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
|
405,904 |
|
|
|
7,503 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Other Borrowings |
|
|
22,217 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
26,133 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES |
|
$ |
376,875 |
|
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
$ |
432,037 |
|
|
$ |
8,332 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest bearing DDA |
|
|
67,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of Held for Sale Operations |
|
|
15,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Liabilities |
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
19,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
482,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
572,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Rate Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income /Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,497 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,958 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%. |
28
Table 3 Average Balance and Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
(000s omitted)(Annualized) |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies |
|
$ |
47,632 |
|
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
$ |
40,316 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
State and Political (1) |
|
|
5,414 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
13,429 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
% |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
55,945 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
57,550 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
% |
Fed Funds Sold |
|
|
36,561 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
6,919 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
251,224 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
305,122 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
Tax Free (1) |
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
% |
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
% |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
24,543 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
32,701 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
43,134 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
% |
|
|
50,678 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
321,103 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
|
|
391,022 |
|
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
% |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
(14,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
307,052 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
376,895 |
|
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
414,782 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
$ |
456,513 |
|
|
$ |
6,560 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Due from Banks |
|
|
16,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of held for sale operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Assets |
|
|
40,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
457,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
562,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing DDA |
|
$ |
86,129 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
$ |
88,906 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
% |
Savings Deposits |
|
|
75,472 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
77,020 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
% |
Time CDs $100,000 and Over |
|
|
87,776 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
124,411 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
% |
Other Time CDs |
|
|
94,127 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
115,117 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
343,504 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
405,454 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
% |
Other Borrowings |
|
|
22,044 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
24,244 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES |
|
$ |
365,548 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
$ |
429,698 |
|
|
$ |
2,504 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest bearing DDA |
|
|
69,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of held for sale operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Liabilities |
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
457,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
562,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Rate Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income /Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,822 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%. |
29
Allowance and Provision For Loan Losses
The Corporation maintains formal policies and procedures to control and monitor credit risk.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for probable incurred
losses in the loan portfolio. While the Corporations loan portfolio has no significant
concentrations in any one industry or any exposure in foreign loans, the loan portfolio has a
concentration connected with commercial real estate loans. Specific strategies have been deployed
to reduce the concentration levels and limit exposure to this type of lending in the future. The
Michigan economy, employment levels and other economic conditions in the Corporations local
markets may have a significant impact on the level of credit losses. Management continues to
identify and devote attention to credits that are not performing as agreed. Of course,
deterioration of economic conditions could have an impact on the Corporations credit quality,
which could impact the need for greater provision for loan losses and the level of the allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans. Non-performing loans are discussed further in the
section titled Non-Performing Assets.
The allowance for loan losses reflects managements judgment as to the level considered appropriate
to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. The Corporations methodology in determining the
adequacy of the allowance is based on ongoing quarterly assessments and relies on several key
elements, which include specific allowances for identified problem loans and a formula-based
risk-allocated allowance for the remainder of the portfolio. This includes a review of individual
loans, size, and composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, current economic
conditions, financial condition of borrowers, the level and composition of non-performing loans,
portfolio trends, estimated net charge-offs and other pertinent factors. While we consider the
allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future
adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, delinquencies,
or loss rates. Although portions of the allowance have been allocated to various portfolio
segments, the allowance is general in nature and is available for the portfolio in its entirety.
At September 30, 2010, the allowance was $15,037,000, or 4.81% of total loans compared to
$10,726,000, or 3.01%, at December 31, 2009, an increase of $4,311,000 during the first nine months
of 2010. Non performing loan levels, discussed later, decreased during the period and net
charge-offs decreased to $4,003,000 during the first nine months of 2010 compared to $7,276,000
during the first nine months of 2009. The provision for loan losses remains high as a result of
continued weaknesses in the national and local economies, elevated amounts of non-performing loans
and elevated charge-off levels over the past three years. Rolling twelve quarter periods of
historical charge off experience is considered when calculating the current required level of the
allowance for loan losses. Additionally the amount of the allowance for loan losses specifically
allocated to impaired loans increased by $1,124,000 during the quarter as a result of updated
collateral evaluations and a migration to the impaired status.
Table 4 below summarizes loan losses and recoveries for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009.
During the first nine months of 2010, the Corporation experienced net charge-offs of $4,003,000 or
1.28% of gross loans compared with net charge-offs of $7,276,000 or 1.90% of gross loans in the
first nine months of 2009. The provision for loan loss was $8,314,000 in the first nine months of
2010 and $11,306,000 for the same time period in 2009. Continuing declines in appraised values of
properties in Michigan along with additional loans migrating to watch status due to economic
conditions, have contributed to the ongoing elevated level of provision for loan losses. The
application of historical loss rates to the current portfolio has the potential to be a lagging
indicator and management evaluates whether these allocations should be adjusted. While there are
indications that asset quality is improving, such as a decrease in non-performing loans, uncertain
current economic conditions justify the use of high historical loss rates in estimating the
required level of allowance for loan losses.
30
Table 4 Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
10,455 |
|
|
|
|
Charge-Offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture |
|
|
(4,159 |
) |
|
|
(6,263 |
) |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
Installment Loans to Individuals |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Charge-Offs |
|
|
(4,863 |
) |
|
|
(7,524 |
) |
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Installment Loans to Individuals |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
Total Recoveries |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-Offs |
|
|
(4,003 |
) |
|
|
(7,276 |
) |
Provision |
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
11,306 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
$ |
15,037 |
|
|
$ |
14,485 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Net Charge-Offs to Gross Loans |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income increased during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the
same period in 2009. Overall non-interest income, of continuing operations, was $1,490,000 for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $1,480,000 for the same period in 2009. This
represents an increase of 0.7%. On a year to date basis, non-interest income at September 30, 2010
was $4,395,000 compared with $3,445,000 at September 30, 2009. This represents an increase of
27.6%.
Service charges on deposit accounts are approximately 25% of non-interest income. These fees from
continuing operations were $378,000 in the third quarter of 2010, compared to $519,000 for the same
period of 2009. This represents a decrease of 27.2% from year to year in NSF charges collected. On
a year to date basis, service charges on deposits accounts decreased 12.5% to $1,255,000 at
September 30, 2010.
Gain on the sale of mortgage loans originated by the Banks and sold into the secondary market
increased by $114,000 or 114.0% to $214,000 in the third quarter of 2010 compared to $100,000 for
the same period in 2009. Management believes for the remainder of 2010, mortgage income will remain
relatively flat as governmental purchase incentives have expired and property values remain under
stress. On a year to date basis, the gain on the sale of mortgage loans has decreased 27.8% from
the first nine months of 2009.
Trust, investment and financial planning services income decreased $82,000 or 17.9% in the third
quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease is attributable to
unfavorable changes in market value, which resulted in lower fee income. On a year to date basis,
trust and wealth management income has decreased 14.2% compared to 2009.
Other operating income increased by $119,000 or 29.5% in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the
same time period in 2009. The increases consist of increased interchange income from debit cards,
an increase in gain on sale of real estate owned, and increases in charges related to providing
support services to other banks. On a year to date basis, other operating income increased
$122,000 or 8.3%. This was due to the 2009 write down of the Arizona investment which totaled
$1,360,000. In addition, one of the Banks received proceeds from a bank owned life insurance policy
providing a benefit of $203,000, in the first quarter of 2009 and proceeds from bank owned life
insurance policies providing a benefit of $297,000 in the third quarter of 2010.
31
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense, from continued operations, decreased 6.7% to $4,647,000 in the three
months ended September 30, 2010, compared with $4,981,000 in the same period of 2009. The decrease
can be attributed to decreases in loan and collection costs of $442,000, related to other real
estate owned (ORE), and a decrease in salaries and benefits of $116,000. On a year to date basis,
non-interest expense decreased 10.8% versus last year through September 30, 2010. In addition to
the items that occurred in the quarter, as mentioned above, the year-to-date decrease was largely
attributed to items from 2009 such as a FDIC special assessment of $255,000, and an additional
$150,000 in estimated transaction costs in conjunction with an agreement to sell Davison State
Bank.
Salary and benefit costs, the Corporations largest non-interest expense category, were $2,013,000
in the third quarter of 2010, compared with $2,129,000, or a decrease of 5.4%, for the same time
period in 2009. Staff reductions in the second quarter of 2010 are a component of the decrease
along with staff attrition without replacement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
salary and benefit costs were $6,191,000 compared with $6,752,000 for the same time period in 2009.
This reduction of 8.3% or $561,000 was related to the elimination of the 401(k) match for
retirement benefits, along with the changes in staffing previously mentioned.
Occupancy expenses, at $430,000, remained relatively flat in the three months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same period in 2009 with an increase of $2,000 or 0.5%. Increases in property
insurance costs, a component of occupancy expenses, were nearly offset by decreases in occupancy
expenses as related to reductions in building repairs and maintenance. For the nine month period
ended September 30, 2010, occupancy expenses were $1,310,000, compared to $1,378,000 for the same
time period in 2009. This represents a decrease of 4.9%. For the nine month period ended
September 30, 2010, the decrease in occupancy expenses is related to reductions in building repairs
and maintenance, primarily due to lower snow removal costs earlier in 2010.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, furniture and equipment expenses were $395,000
compared to $385,000 for the same period in 2009, an increase of 2.6%. The increase was due to the
correction to the amortization of a prepaid expense. This was partially offset by decreases in
equipment rental expenses and depreciation expenses. For the nine month period ended September 30,
2010, furniture and equipment expenses were $1,152,000 compared to $1,212,000 for the same period
in 2009. This represents a decrease of 5.0% for the nine month period comparison.
Loan and collection expenses, from continuing operations, at $542,000, were down $442,000 or 44.9%
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same time period in 2009. The
decrease was related to other loan expense on other real estate owned, in the form of property
taxes and property maintenance and decreased loan and collection expenses. For the nine month
period ended September 30, 2010, loan and collection expenses totaled $1,532,000 compared to
$2,302,000 for the same period in 2009. This represents a decrease of 33.4%. The decrease during
the nine month period was also related to decreases in other real estate owned expenses.
Advertising expenses decreased $14,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
the same period in 2009. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, advertising expenses were
$25,000 compared to $39,000 for the same period in 2009. For the nine month period ended September
30, 2010, advertising expenses totaled $98,000, compared to $126,000 for the same time in 2009.
This is a decrease of 22.2%.
Other operating expenses, from continued operations, were $1,242,000 in the three months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to $1,016,000 in the same time period in 2009, an increase of $226,000
or 22.2%. Increases year over year include increases in our general insurance from third quarter
2009 totals. Partially offsetting these increases were reductions supplies expense, director fees,
ATM/Debit card expenses, business development expenses, and conferences and education. In the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, other operating expenses were $3,301,000 compared to $3,458,000 in
the same time
32
period in 2009, a decrease of $157,000 or 4.5%. The largest component of this decrease was the
2009 booking of $150,000 of anticipated expenses associated with the Davison State Bank sale
transaction.
Financial Condition
Proper management of the volume and composition of the Corporations earning assets and funding
sources is essential for ensuring strong and consistent earnings performance, maintaining adequate
liquidity and limiting exposure to risks caused by changing market conditions. The Corporations
securities portfolio is structured to provide a source of liquidity through maturities and to
generate an income stream with relatively low levels of principal risk. The Corporation does not
engage in securities trading. Loans comprise the largest component of earning assets and are the
Corporations highest yielding assets. Customer deposits are the primary source of funding for
earning assets while short-term debt and other sources of funds could be further utilized if market
conditions and liquidity needs change.
The Corporations total assets were $449,378,000 at September 30, 2010 compared to total assets of
$522,079,000 at December 31, 2009. This includes assets from discontinued operations of $37,919,000
at December 31, 2009. Loans comprised 69.6% of total assets at September 30, 2010 compared to
68.1% at December 31, 2009. Loans decreased $44,735,000 during the first nine months of 2010.
Bank premises and equipment decreased $660,000 to $15,254,000 at September 30, 2010 compared to
$15,914,000 at December 31, 2009. The decrease was a result of normal depreciation.
Other assets decreased $9,274,000 when comparing September 30, 2010 to December 31, 2009. The
decrease was mainly comprised of a $3,614,000 reduction in the outstanding balance of
non-performing loans in their redemption period. Other decreases included a decrease of $151,000
in repossessed assets, a decrease of $151,000 in bank owned life insurance policies due to the
redemption of three policies and a decrease of $1,075,000 in the banks sweeps transfer account.
Partially offsetting these decreases were increases in ORE balances totaling $1,036,000 and an
increase of $629,000 in miscellaneous assets due to VISA requirement to establish a collateral
account.
On the liability side of the balance sheet, the ratio of non-interest bearing deposits to total
deposits was 16.7% at September 30, 2010 and 14.6% at December 31, 2009. Interest bearing deposit
liabilities totaled $340,882,000 at September 30, 2010 compared to $376,245,000 at December 31,
2009. Total deposits decreased $31,532,000 with non-interest bearing demand deposits increasing
$3,831,000 and interest bearing deposits decreasing $35,363,000. Short-term borrowings decreased
$48,000 due to the decrease in treasury tax and loan payments outstanding at the end of the two
periods. FHLB advances decreased $2,000,000 comparing the two periods.
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans on which interest accruals have ceased, loans past due 90 days
or more and still accruing, loans that have been renegotiated, and real estate acquired through
foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Table 5 reflects the levels of these assets at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Non-performing assets decreased from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010. The decrease of
$4,591,000 was primarily due to decreased levels of non-accrual loans, renegotiated loans, and
REO-in-Redemption. Renegotiated loans decreased $597,000 to $3,225,000 at September 30, 2010.
Non-accrual loans decreased $1,097,000 to $15,410,000 and REO-in-redemption decreased $3,614,000 to
$1,358,000. REO-in-Redemption balance is comprised of six commercial properties and one residential
property for a total of $1,358,000 at September 30, 2010. Marketability of these properties is
dependent on the real estate market.
The level and composition of non-performing assets is affected by economic conditions in the
Corporations local markets. Non-performing assets, charge-offs, and provisions for loan losses
tend to decline in a strong economy and increase in a weak economy, potentially impacting the
Corporations
33
operating results. In addition to non-performing loans, management carefully monitors other
credits that are current in terms of principal and interest payments but, in managements opinion,
may deteriorate in quality if economic conditions change.
Table 5 Non-Performing Assets and Past Due Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due 90 Days or More & Still Accruing |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
Non-Accrual Loans |
|
|
15,410 |
|
|
|
16,507 |
|
Troubled debt restructurings |
|
|
3,225 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Loans |
|
|
18,635 |
|
|
|
20,648 |
|
|
|
|
Other Non-Performing Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Real Estate |
|
|
9,003 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
REO in Redemption |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
|
Total Other Non-Performing Assets |
|
|
10,361 |
|
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Assets |
|
$ |
28,996 |
|
|
$ |
33,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans as a % of Total Loans |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans as a % of Total Loans and Other
Real Estate |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses as a % of Non-Performing Loans |
|
|
80.69 |
% |
|
|
51.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing Assets as a % of Total Assets |
|
|
6.45 |
% |
|
|
6.43 |
% |
Certain portions of the Corporations non-performing loans included in Table 5 are considered
impaired. The Corporation measures impairment on all large balance non-accrual commercial loans.
Certain large balance accruing loans rated watch or monitor are also analyzed for possible
impairment. Impairment losses are believed to be adequately covered by the allowance for loan
losses.
The Corporation maintains policies and procedures to identify and monitor non-accrual loans. A
loan is placed on non-accrual when there is doubt regarding collection of principal or interest, or
when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. Accrued but uncollected is reversed
against income for the current quarter when a loan is placed on non-accrual. At September 30, 2010,
there were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing. Management is not aware of any
loans that have not been moved to non-accrual or not been reclassified to troubled debt
restructures at September 30, 2010. The potential, however, remains that a borrower may become
financially distressed in the future and management may place that loan into non-accrual, but this
is difficult to predict.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk Management
Asset/Liability management is designed to assure liquidity and reduce interest rate risks. The goal
in managing interest rate risk is to maintain a strong and relatively stable net interest margin.
It is the responsibility of the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO) to set policy
guidelines and to establish short-term and long-term strategies with respect to interest rate
exposure and balance sheet liquidity. The ALCO, which is comprised of key members of management,
meets regularly to review financial performance and soundness, including interest rate risk and
liquidity in relation to present and prospective markets and business conditions. Accordingly, the
committee adopts funding and balance sheet management strategies that are intended to maximize
earnings, maintain liquidity, and achieve balance sheet composition objectives.
34
Liquidity maintenance together with a solid capital base and strong earnings performance are key
objectives of the Corporation. The Corporations liquidity is derived from a strong deposit base
comprised of individual and business deposits. Deposit accounts of customers in the mature market
represent a substantial portion of deposits of individuals. The Banks deposit base plus other
funding sources (federal funds purchased, short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, repurchase
agreements, other liabilities and shareholders equity) provided primarily all funding needs in the
first nine months of 2010. While these sources of funds are expected to continue to be available to
provide funds in the future, the mix and availability of funds will depend upon future economic
conditions. The Corporation does not foresee any difficulty in meeting its funding requirements.
Primary liquidity is provided through short-term investments or borrowings (including federal funds
sold and purchased) while the securities portfolio provides secondary liquidity. The securities
portfolio has increased $10.2 million since December 31, 2009 due to purchases in the available for
sale investment portfolio. Multiple available for sale securities with elevated credit risk were
sold and the proceeds used to purchase mortgage backed instruments with lower credit risk. The
Corporation has re-invested some of the funds, from the call of these securities, back into the
securities portfolio to increase yield and manage the asset ratios on the balance sheet. The
Corporation regularly monitors liquidity to ensure adequate cash flows to cover unanticipated
reductions in the availability of funding sources.
Interest rate risk is managed by controlling and limiting the level of earnings volatility arising
from rate movements. The Corporation regularly performs reviews and analysis of those factors
impacting interest rate risk. Factors include maturity and re-pricing frequency of balance sheet
components, impact of rate changes on interest margin and prepayment speeds, market value impacts
of rate changes, and other issues. Both actual and projected performance are reviewed, analyzed,
and compared to policy and objectives to assure present and future financial viability.
The Corporation had cash used in financing activities resulting from the decrease of deposits,
short term borrowings and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. In the first nine months of 2010
deposits, from continuing operations, decreased $31,532,000, while short term borrowings decreased
$48,000 and Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $2,027,000. Cash provided by investing
activities was $32,670,000 in first nine months of 2010 compared to $49,273,000 in first nine
months of 2009. The change in investing activities was due to payoffs of loans, primarily in the
commercial loan portfolio.
Capital Resources
Management closely monitors capital levels to provide for current and future business needs and to
comply with regulatory requirements. Regulations prescribed under the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 have defined adequately capitalized institutions as those
having total risk-based ratios, tier 1 risk-based capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratios of at
least 8%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. At September 30, 2010, the Corporation and subsidiary Banks
were in excess of the minimum capital and leverage requirements as defined by federal law; however
The State Bank and West Michigan Community Bank were not in compliance with the capital
requirements prescribed by their respective Consent Orders.
Total shareholders equity decreased 21.7% to $16,072,000 at September 30, 2010 compared with
$20,532,000 at December 31, 2009. The decline was due to the net loss in the first nine months of
2010, partially offset by improvements to other comprehensive income as noted below. The
Corporations equity to asset ratio was 3.6% at September 30, 2010 and 3.9% at December 31, 2009.
As indicated on the balance sheet at December 31, 2009, the Corporation had an accumulated other
comprehensive loss of $724,000 compared to accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30,
2010 of $327,000. The decrease in the loss position is attributable to a combination of the
fluctuation of the market price of securities held in the available for sale portfolio as well as
the recognition of OTTI in the equity investment portfolio at September 30, 2010.
35
For additional information on the Corporations capital resources please refer to Note 10 to the
financial statements which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Regulatory Orders
The Corporations primary source of cash to service its subordinated debt is dividends from the
subsidiary banks. Since the subsidiary banks have suspended dividends to the holding company, the
Corporation has elected to defer interest payments for five years on $14,000,000 of subordinated
debentures. The reason for the interest deferral is to maintain liquidity at the Holding Company.
The Corporation is not in default under either of the indentures. During this five year period,
the Corporation is precluded from paying shareholder dividends on its outstanding common stock.
The Corporation subsequently may give notice that it elects to shorten the deferral period, pay
accrued interest and return to the normal course of shareholder dividend payments.
On October 27, 2010, management received a notice from The Federal Reserve which defined
restrictions being placed upon the Holding Company. The restrictions include the declaration or
payment of any dividends, the receipt of dividends from subsidiary Banks, the repayment of any
principal or interest on subordinated debentures or Trust Preferred securities, restrictions on
debt, any changes in Executive or Senior Management or change in the role of Senior Management. In
addition, the notice provided an indication for the corporation to maintain sufficient capital
levels.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
on the Corporations consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible
to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
losses, income taxes, other real estate owned, and investment securities valuation. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level we believe is adequate to absorb probable
losses identified and inherent in the loan portfolio. Our evaluation of the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, assessments of the
impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio, and historical loss
experience. The allowance for loan losses represents managements best estimate, but significant
downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality or economic conditions could result in a
requirement for an increased allowance for loan losses in the near future. Likewise, an upturn in
loan quality or improved economic conditions may result in a decline in the required allowance for
loan losses. In either instance unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on operating
earnings.
The allowance for loan losses is increased through a provision charged to operating expense.
Uncollectible loans are charged-off through the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of loans
previously charged-off are added to the allowance for loan losses. A loan is considered impaired
when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either
for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement.
Our accounting for income taxes involves the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities
primarily associated with differences in the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenses for
financial reporting and tax purposes. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is
required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such
assets will not be realized. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation
at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation
recognized a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets may be
reversed to income in future periods to the extent that the related deferred income tax assets are
realized or the valuation allowance is
36
otherwise no longer required. Management will continue to monitor our deferred tax assets
quarterly for changes affecting their realizability.
Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets are acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure.
They are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired, establishing
a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense.
Costs after acquisition are expensed.
The Corporation evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. In
determining other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) management considers many factors, including:
(1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was
affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt
security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated
recovery. The assessment of whether other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of
subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in
time.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit, and
overdraft protection, are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide
credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are
met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used.
Off-balance-sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although
material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as
are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment.
The contractual amount of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk was as follows at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Commitments to make loans (at market rates) |
|
$ |
9,450 |
|
|
$ |
2,939 |
|
Unused lines of credit and letters of credit |
|
|
48,259 |
|
|
|
53,941 |
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained on
page 61 in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, is
incorporated herein by reference.
Fentura Financial, Inc. faces market risk to the extent that both earnings and the fair value of
its financial instruments are affected by changes in interest rates. The Corporation manages this
risk with static GAP analysis and simulation modeling. For the first nine months of 2010, the
results of these measurement techniques were within the Corporations policy guidelines. The
Corporation does not believe that there has been a material change in the nature of the
Corporations primary market risk exposures, including the categories of market risk to which the
Corporation is exposed and the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss to the
Corporation, or in how those exposures have been managed in 2010 compared to 2009.
The Corporations market risk exposure is mainly comprised of its vulnerability to interest rate
risk. Prevailing interest rates and interest rate relationships in the future will be primarily
determined by market factors, which are outside of the Corporations control. All information
provided in this section consists of forward-looking statements. Reference is made to the section
captioned Forward Looking
37
Statements in this quarterly report for a discussion of the limitations on the Corporations
responsibility for such statements.
Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to maximize net interest income as a result of changing
interest rates, within prudent ranges of risk. The Corporation attempts to accomplish this
objective by structuring the balance sheet so that re-pricing opportunities exist for both assets
and liabilities in roughly equivalent amounts at approximately the same time intervals. Imbalances
in these re-pricing opportunities at any point in time constitute a banks interest rate
sensitivity. The Corporation currently does not utilize derivatives in managing interest rate risk.
An indicator of the interest rate sensitivity structure of a financial institutions balance sheet
is the difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities, and is referred to
as GAP. Table 6 sets forth the distribution of re-pricing of the Corporations earning assets and
interest bearing liabilities as of September 30, 2010, the interest rate sensitivity GAP, as
defined above, the cumulative interest rate sensitivity GAP, the interest rate sensitivity GAP
ratio (i.e. interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the
cumulative sensitivity GAP ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which earning
assets and liabilities will mature or may re-price in accordance with their contractual terms.
Table 6 GAP Analysis September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
Three |
|
|
One to |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Months to |
|
|
Five |
|
|
Five |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Months |
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Sold |
|
$ |
39,700 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
39,700 |
|
Securities |
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
|
7,633 |
|
|
|
18,025 |
|
|
|
19,130 |
|
|
|
59,257 |
|
Loans |
|
|
75,875 |
|
|
|
53,527 |
|
|
|
142,813 |
|
|
|
38,480 |
|
|
|
310,695 |
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
FHLB Stock |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
Total Earning Assets |
|
$ |
133,821 |
|
|
$ |
61,160 |
|
|
$ |
160,838 |
|
|
$ |
57,610 |
|
|
$ |
413,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Demand Deposits |
|
$ |
82,842 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
82,842 |
|
Savings Deposits |
|
|
80,451 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
80,451 |
|
Time Deposits Less than $100,000 |
|
|
20,255 |
|
|
|
32,450 |
|
|
|
37,529 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
90,327 |
|
Time Deposits Greater than $100,000 |
|
|
22,004 |
|
|
|
30,756 |
|
|
|
34,502 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
87,262 |
|
Short term borrowings |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Other Borrowings |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,030 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
$ |
219,668 |
|
|
$ |
68,236 |
|
|
$ |
72,179 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
360,952 |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP |
|
|
($85,847 |
) |
|
|
($7,076 |
) |
|
$ |
88,659 |
|
|
$ |
56,741 |
|
|
$ |
52,477 |
|
Cumulative Interest Rate
Sensitivity GAP |
|
|
($85,847 |
) |
|
|
($92,923 |
) |
|
|
($4,264 |
) |
|
$ |
52,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP |
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
66.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Interest Rate
Sensitivity GAP Ratio |
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
As indicated in Table 6, the short-term (one year and less) cumulative interest rate
sensitivity gap is negative. Accordingly, if market interest rates increase, this negative gap
position could have a short-term negative impact on interest margin. Conversely, if market rates
decline this should theoretically have a short-term positive impact. However, gap analysis is
limited and may not provide an accurate indication of the impact of general interest rate movements
on the net interest margin since the re-pricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is
subject to the Corporations needs, competitive pressures, and the needs of the Corporations
customers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as re-pricing
38
within the same period may in fact re-price at different times within such period and at different
rate indices. The Prime Rate has remained steady over the past twelve months. This steadiness
allowed management to close the gap related to interest rate sensitivity. Management was able to
reduce liquid interest bearing liability rates to extremely low rates, while maintaining relatively
similar volumes. The Banks were also able to re-price maturing time deposits, usually in a downward
fashion as longer term certificates at higher rates matured during the year. On the asset side of
the balance sheet, rates on the investment portfolios remained relatively steady and the yields on
loans increased slightly. Management worked to re-price loans favorably as they renewed and were
priced accordingly for risk, however overall loan yields decreased. This was due to increases in
non-performing loans. The Corporation expects to continue to make strides in managing interest rate
sensitivity.
Forward Looking Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements as that term is used in the securities laws. All
statements regarding our expected financial position, business and strategies are forward-looking
statements. In addition, the words anticipates, believes, estimates, seeks, expects,
plans, intends, and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. The presentation and discussion of the provision and
allowance for loan losses and statements concerning future profitability or future growth or
increases, are examples of inherently forward looking statements in that they involve judgments and
statements of belief as to the outcome of future events. Our ability to predict results or the
actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a
material adverse affect on our operations and our future prospects include, but are not limited to,
changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary
and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal
Reserve Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan
products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area and
accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered
in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such
statements. Further information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that
could materially affect our financial results, is included in our other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 4T: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporations Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporations
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, have concluded that
except for the following the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were adequate
and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation would be made
known to them by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
Form 10-Q was being prepared. |
|
|
During quarter end review procedures a formula error was uncovered in one of the Banks
allowance for loan loss calculation work sheets which resulted in the overstatement of the
allowance for loan losses. Management appropriately corrected the work sheet. Since no
preliminary financial results were disclosed, a restatement was not required. Management
has remediated this weakness and will test the effectiveness of the control prior to year
end. |
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Controls. During the period covered by this report, there have
been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting. |
39
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. - None
Item 1A. Risk Factors This item is not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None
Item 4. [Reserved]
Item 5. Other Information. None
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
40
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fentura Financial, Inc.
|
|
Dated: November 10, 2010 |
/s/ Donald L. Grill
|
|
|
Donald L. Grill |
|
|
President & CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 10, 2010 |
/s/ Douglas J. Kelley
|
|
|
Douglas J. Kelley |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
41
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant
to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
42